We Fixed It, You're Welcome - Is Outer Space for Everyone?
Episode Date: March 31, 2026Space exploration used to be reserved for governments and elite astronauts only. Today, commercial launches, private space stations, and civilian missions are raising questions about opening up space ...travel and making access more widely available. In this episode, global space policy executive Christopher Hearsey joins the conversation to explore the future of commercial spaceflight, the role of private companies, and whether humanity is entering a new era where space truly becomes accessible to everyone. From billionaire tourism headlines to satellite infrastructure that powers everyday life on Earth, this discussion separates myth from reality and explains what space tourism and space commercialization actually means for society. What You’ll Learn in This Episode Why space is no longer just for astronauts and governments How private companies like SpaceX and Blue Origin are accelerating the push for space travel The legal reality behind the Outer Space Treaty and ownership in space The economics of space tourism and why costs are still high How satellites already power GPS, banking, communications, and security systems Whether governments or private companies should lead the next phase of exploration About Christopher Hearsey Christopher Hearsey is a global space executive and founder of OSA Consulting, specializing in commercial space policy and regulatory strategy. He previously worked at the U.S. State Department and helped support implementation of the National Space Policy. He also co-founded the Space Court Foundation, which promotes global education around space law and governance. Learn more: https://www.linkedin.com/in/hearsey/ Our Panel Aaron Wolpoff – Host and Marketing panelist Melissa Eaton – Operations and C/X panelist Chino Nnadi – People, Talent and Culture panelist Christopher Hearsey - Guest and global space executive Subscribe for more deep dives where we fix big business problems with fresh perspectives. • Website – www.wefixeditpod.com • Follow us on: Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/wefixeditpod LinkedIn – https://www.linkedin.com/company/wefixeditpod YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/@WeFixedItPod If you liked this episode, don’t forget to subscribe, leave a review, and share it with your friends! Keep listening to find out how we fix companies and put them back better than we found them. Disclaimer A quick disclaimer. We are going into this somewhat cold and nothing we say should be construed as legal advice, financial advice or anything that would get us in trouble. These are our views and opinions. We're here to ask the kinds of questions everyone's thinking, have an engaging conversation and maybe come to some conclusions that we feel are worth exploring. By the end, if we fixed it, you're welcome. All trademarks, IP and brand elements discussed are property of their respective owners. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome to We Fixed It. You're welcome.
The show where we take over companies, you come along for the ride, and we try to put them back better than we found them.
Today we're talking about something that used to be science fiction and now feels like a checkmark on a billionaire's bucket list.
Space travel. It's not just for astronauts and cosmonauts anymore.
These days it seems anyone who can write a big check can take a joyride into the unknown.
If you've seen the resulting photos and videos, a space voyage looks like summer camp.
for the Uber wealthy, the ultimate experience. And what do you get for the price of admission?
Right now, we're talking about three to five minutes in zero gravity and then back to the mansion.
But this is just getting started. The push to commercialize space travel is escalating.
And an increasing number of for-profit companies want to go to space for their own purposes.
It's not too far-fetched to think about private space stations, moon bases,
maybe even luxury hotels and cities somewhere other than Earth. These are real conversations.
that are happening, and plans are in the works. We're going to figure this all out and ask the
question, who does space belong to? Is it governments? Corporations that can outspend governments?
Should we all go full speed ahead into space for the sake of progress? Or are we collectively
pushing the limits of something we don't truly understand yet? Well, Chino, Melissa, I don't claim to
be an expert on any of this. Today we're joined by Christopher Hirsey. Christopher is a global space
executive and the founder and CEO of OSA Consulting, where he focuses on expanding access to the
space sector for entrepreneurs, startups, and organizations around the world. He spent his career
at the intersection of space policy and business, advising aerospace companies, working in
regulatory and government affairs, and helping shape how commercial space evolves, both in the U.S.
and globally. Christopher, please tell us more about yourself and also tell us by your nonprofit.
Yeah, well, thank you. It was wonderful to be here, Aaron.
joined by Chino and Melissa to talk about space.
My career, I've been in it for almost 20 years,
and I've worked in a variety of different roles.
I've worked at the State Department during the Obama administration,
and it was part of an interagency team running the national space policy.
I've worked as both corporate council and a director for a company called Bigelah Aerospace,
which sent the first expandable commercial habitation module to the International Space Station in 2015.
But also, as you mentioned, I co-founded a global nonprofit called the Space Court Foundation.
There's a little bit of an irony because there is no courts in space.
So we create a foundation ahead of time so that people understand that the rule of law applies to space.
And what we do is we promote space law education and the rule of law.
We have a global internship program.
We take about 30 students a year.
We do original research.
And you can check us out on our website at www.
and at spacecourtfoundation.org and at SpaceCourt Foundation on YouTube,
where we have some content directed at getting the general public to understand what actually
is space law and regulation and how that works in your daily life.
And our flagship pilot that we have there is called Stelladocysis.
We're invited three notable professionals in space law to adjudicate a fake space law case
that we presented by actual two space lawyers who were actually husband and wife.
both of them are very good friends of mine, but one of them was my roommate in law school.
So one thing about the space community is, well, it may seem it's filled with billionaires and multimillionaires.
It's filled a lot of average people who just have a passion for space and want to see space developed in an economical and safe and inclusive way.
Well, thanks Christopher. I'm really glad to have you here with us.
And I think space lawyer is probably the coolest business card there could ever be.
You know this stuff more than any of us.
I'm going to try to get the rest of us up to speed in about a minute.
So modern space exploration really begins with Sputnik in 1957 and the space race with the Soviet Union.
Within 12 years, we were walking on the moon, one small step for man.
Yay!
The U.S. and Soviet space initiatives were each backed by different governments, but they were both government-funded projects.
So, in fact, for most of modern history, space exploration has been the result of efforts by one government or another.
In over six decades, roughly only 360 NASA-assadded.
astronauts have gone to space. That's a small group of people. If you went to space,
it was because you were a trained astronaut selected by NASA or another national program.
But now, here comes private companies like Blue Origin and SpaceX with a focus on passengers
who are civilians. Rich civilians, important researchers, pop stars, you've seen the headlines.
Since 2021, Blue Origin alone has taken over 80 individuals into space on short suborbital missions.
That may not sound like a lot, and the flights are short, but compared to the elite class of astronauts in the past, it's clear things are changing.
The door is cracking open.
And it gets more interesting, NASA plans to retire the International Space Station after 2030.
Instead of replacing it with another government-owned station, NASA is encouraging private companies to build the next generation of space stations as commercial destinations.
And since space is governed by agreements like the Outer Space Treaty, which says no nation can claim.
ownership of the moon or other celestial bodies, we're entering a complicated situation.
No one country can own space, but companies can build, operate, and profit there under national
laws. So here's what we're going to fix. Since it's already happening, should we all get on
board with space tourism? Our private companies are equipped to take the lead on space exploration
and development, and just because all of this is possible doesn't mean it should be happening
at the speed it's happening. That's our conversation. Chris, where you want to kick us up,
off? Sure. I mean, my position is we've got to get the office planet. You know, in my career,
we or I have and working with different colleagues work to send people and things to space.
You know, I've worked with companies like SpaceX and others, Virgin Galactic. I'm mostly on the
human spaceflight side in my career, but we're also moving to sailout operations and you see a lot of
robust changes there. I think what the average person needs to understand is that most of which you
understand the state-of-the-art technology here on Earth has not actually moved into space.
We've not tested a lot of things. So you probably hear about things like putting data centers.
Well, when you start hearing about all these different things you can do in space, it raises a lot
of questions. So you mentioned the Outer Space Treaty. The Outer Space Treaty in Article 1 actually
says that outer space is the common regime of humanity. I'm paraphrasing. There's a different word
for that, but it's a little controversial and I want to go down that rabbit hole. But the whole point
is, is that everyone is supposed to have access to space. Over the last, I would say, 20, 25 years,
there's been a huge uptick in the number of companies that have both successfully gone to space and
also unsuccessfully gone to space. I think that's a good thing. We have to try out how we do things
and we have to see what works. Now, that's not to say that there aren't serious policy issues associated
with that. And for me, you know, my career has been trying to get larger commercialization efforts
so that anyone, whether it's Aaron, Chino, Melissa, or your kids, your grandkids, your great-grandchildren,
anyone you know, will they want to go to space? They can't go to space. And I think that's a,
there's a, there is a fundamental, at least philosophical reason for me, which was I don't think that
as a species, we're in a suicide pact with each other to stay on this planet. Now, how we go about
that is the central question. And lots of people have different ideas about settling the moon or going to
Mars. And that's all great. But what you have to keep in mind is the slow role of this technology
into space and utilized by space is what keeps this podcast actually to be recorded, to be distributed.
It allows you to move money around through bank accounts. It allows you to make your phone calls
wherever you are on this earth. And it also helps you figure out where the
you are and you don't have a Thomas guide anymore and you have to rely on GPS.
So our society has evolved to the point where we depend on space technology for everyday life.
And if it all went away tomorrow, we'd all have to go back to the way the things used to be in
the 70s and 80s and rely on paper things, on institutional knowledge.
I mean, how many people even remember phone numbers anymore?
So, you know, it's part of our society now and how we adapt to it, I think, is really the important
bit and you first start with who has access to going to space. I think it's interesting when you talk
about the democratization because it's not just I have a right to live in a time or something
exciting like this is happening and I'm watching the progress happen and the technology catch up.
But I have a right to participate. Yeah, I understand theoretically what you're saying, Chris,
that yes, it's open to us, but in reality it's not. I would just say that it's still an exclusive
opportunity. You know, it's costly. Like, you know, all of the people you've mentioned who've
gone to space have had to pay a great deal. And the average citizen of the world doesn't have that
kind of money to be able to pay to go up to space. So I think, you know, to focus the conversation,
and I don't know how we want to do that, Chris or Aaron, but like, I do think that there are
multitudes of components before we get to the point where we can really,
say space is an opportunity that all of us have a right to that we can actually participate in
because I get it theoretically we've already got the space station where we've already done
some of these things we've had SpaceX we've had Blue Origin go up but again it's a very
limited population group that's getting that opportunity and so the thought is really
understanding what is the client value proposition so the person who
who chooses to pay to go up, right?
And also, what is the business value proposition?
So to your point, Chris, like we're looking to expand into space and have the opportunities.
So it's about business.
It's about like what are we going to be doing and how are we going to be building structures
and processes and operations and, you know, the research missions and all the things that are
currently up there, you know, and, you know, do we really even want to duplicate what's on
earth to some places? Probably don't. I don't know. Well, it's interesting because you think of these
open marketplaces like eBay or YouTube or Etsy where it starts off with everyone's invited
and everyone's, it's diplomatic and you can come on and have a representation there. But then it
builds into this, well, some know how to do it better than others and some are more structured and
some sell better. And then those rise to the top and that everyone egalitarian model kind of
falls away. And yeah, you can still be there, but you don't really have much of a presence or
much of a voice and you don't do as well as others that are now suddenly at the top.
I got to jump in. I got to jump in. This is so, Chris, I'm so excited to have you here.
I've actually worked with the Planetary Society before. And their mission is all about
empowering the world citizens to advance space science and exploration, which I have.
a thousand percent stand beside. I believe deeply that we need to be doing more in terms of
space research. I agree with your first statement too, Chris, about, you know, we need to get the
hell out of here. We figure out a different way. And as you were talking to about like how it
impacts human physically to go into space, that's all science. And what I wanted kind of
fragment this conversation, because there's two aspects to this. There's the like, utilitarian
need to figure something better because as humans, we've not been that great with our planet,
right?
There's a finite time.
It's a long time, but it's finite.
What other ways to explore?
But to do that, it's all based on science, right?
For me personally, when I'm looking at these multi-billion dollar companies who've invested
into space travel, my challenge here, like similar to the Titanic exploration, you're
having people do this for their own ego. And I don't want this to be, excuse my French,
a dick measuring contest to see who's there first. And yes, I appreciate Tom Cruise going there
and Russia coming into doing a scene. We as humans need to figure out and have the science there
to back it. I want to touch on the planetary side a little bit because they had a day of action
last year to help. They went to Congress to negotiate and hopefully rebut their claim to want to
cut down their funding 50% right last year they were able to take that it there's going to be
another day of action April 19th to the 20th of this year and go on their website to check out how
you can be a part of that but I think that yes there needs to be space lawyer but we need to
make sure that this is grounded on bringing back information in science versus just sending
celebrities up and it becoming your next holiday vacation spot because there is a need to do to
explore seasons to bring that science back um and i think again when we talked about and you mentioned
chris you know right now it's no one's you know one's owning anything right as a nation um i'm not
american i'm canadian right so canadian here um when we talk
talk about threat actors and, you know, with the current political climate of going on,
sometimes you got to ask, yes, obviously there's certain things, but who's controlling that
radar? Because a threat actor to you and me can look differently depending on what that is.
And I'm sure I would have loved to sit in the room when the, you know, the husband in Hawaii
space lawyers are going back and forth on that. But that is something we need to be able to
tackle. I do think we need space exploration. I would love to see.
that backed by billionaires Elon, give NASA some more money.
I know that you wanted to help TSA.
You just put out a statement on X saying that you would help the TSA, you know,
providing income for the people that are losing their income while there is the strike.
Can we add your billion dollars, more than a couple billion dollars to NASA and other
aspects so that the everyday person who is excited and who wants to be about it,
who understands the need for space exploration to become their own scientists, to help bring back
something. If we're going to do space exploration and tours, there should be something that we're
bringing back from a research perspective outside of just how this impacts the human body.
And I think that's where I'm finding the miss here as an everyday citizen, where it's just
another luxury for the billionaires, where I'm not seeing it as how are we trying to help
the human race essentially to explore space.
And so Chris, I'm curious because I know a lot of people have the same sentiment.
I am not intimately in this world.
I completely back the planetary society.
I love what they stand for as well.
And I know that your non-for-profit and what you do is exactly this.
But how would you tell our listeners who say that this is just for billionaires?
And what would be the win to do that?
Yeah, yeah, I'd start with the floor and a ceiling.
So the floor is for $5 to $10,000, you can go to Southampton, Pennsylvania right now
and figure out if you're medically cleared to go to space.
And you could get cleared to go work with SpaceX or Blue or Virgin or whomever else comes online for human spaceflight.
They train for all that.
That is no different than doing anything that would be an extreme environment.
So you want to climb to the top of Mount Everest.
You want to go to the bottom of the ocean.
The difference is that when it comes to spaceflight, human spaceflight,
like this stuff is taken very seriously.
Everyone involved takes safety very seriously.
What you have to understand is that all human spaceflight activities
is designated legally as ultra-hazardous.
And the same thing that you do, like if you want to do paragliding or parachuting
or whatever it is, stunt flying, it's all the same legal.
regime. Now, the ceiling on this is, and the sort of the pushback on the billionaires taking
vacations, that's actually not accurate. It is a reflection because Bezos and Richard Branson
had to demonstrate for themselves and their constituencies that their spacecraft works.
The person that's not on that list, Elon has never flown to space.
Elon's never been on a dragon, and he is never going to get on a vehicle unless he's,
is ready to go die on Mars.
Like that's, you said that publicly.
But that's not taking a vacation.
That's a one-way trip for him.
You don't hear the same rhetoric out of Richard Branson or Bezos or very few others.
So that's an exception.
But having done this for clients who tried to get A-listers to space, I can tell you it's not that simple.
And the perfect example actually is Bezos.
So think of any celebrity that you'd like to see in space.
Okay?
and I'll put just one asterist on Tom Cruz because he's the exception in all of Hollywood,
all of the A-listers, because he can self-fund.
If you are an A-lister or extremely high-wealth individual like Jeff Bezos, if you want to go to
space, all of your lawyers and all of your insurers will say, sure, but you need to do
X, Y, and Z things to do that.
What did Bezos have to do?
He had to cancel all his insurance for a day, and he had to resign from a bunch of boards,
all his boards are on because the risk if he dies means everything goes into probate or whatever,
you know, trust that he's got set up. And you don't want to deal with that. But if you're an actor,
you can't take two years off of not making movies. I mean, look at some of the A-list actors,
Timothy Shalamea, whatever, right? They're doing two, three, four movies in a two, three-year period.
So it's an opportunity cost. Do I go and make $120 million and maybe win an Academy Award?
or do I just hang out with a bunch of people for two years and train for space?
Now, the training time for space is significantly been diminished,
but it depends on what you want to do there and how long you want to be there.
For example, Jared Isaacman, the current NASA administrator,
he's still the only real, let's say, wealthy person that's gone to SpaceX to be their guinea pig.
And one of the consequences of him being their guinea pig is that he demonstrated an EVA
an exosurricular activity.
So that's basically putting on a pressurized space suit,
depressurizing the capsule with all your friends inside,
walking outside, doing an EVA for a certain period of time,
usually like 30 seconds and coming back in.
But I could easily see Tom Cruise wanting not to have any tether
and have some sort of propulsion system with the satellites as cameras
showing him do some Mission Impossible 15 stunt, right?
I mean, so it's interesting
and who actually can go to space
and what we would expect to go to space.
So all of these things are opening up.
Yeah, Chris, you were talking about first.
And you know, you were talking about it too.
And there's like a pissing match going on.
And there's a premium.
You know, whoever's going to be first to do anything
in this sector is going to pay multiples.
Like the first VCR is to market.
Back in the day, we're $1,200 or $1,500.
when they hit economies of scale and product adoption, that dropped quite a bit.
So first one in the door is going to pay that $60 million or whatever it is.
Second, third, 28th, you know, as the line goes longer, yeah, they're booked out for the next
five, ten years and maybe no end in sight.
And the more that they can command a premium for for these elite experiences, more power
to them.
But at some point, if you really want to turn this into a viable,
enterprise beyond just the ultra elite that get bankrolled or can write the check, you got to figure
out how do you make it accessible to more, more players and let the doors open?
And I think just on that note too, because I, again, agree, I do think people should be
going up. I think we should be exploring space. We need to for humanity. But when we look at it from
like a people in culture lens of like, what does this mean, right? Again,
being first is great but I do think if you're a business that says I want to do it like again with the um you know for poor kate not poor katie perry very rich katie perry and gail king and Lauren sanchus who went up on the blue origin flight right for women international women's day I think that was last year which is insane to think about but when they came back it was an insane blowback it didn't read well Katie Perry kind of had to you know
go underground a little bit, dating my former prime minister, but it just wasn't, it didn't read well.
And so if you're a brand who's saying, okay, great, I want to bring Katie Perry, I want to bring Gil King, I want to bring Aaron and Melissa and Chris to space.
There needs to be a messaging there too, because I think at the end of the day, this all goes back to like, what is the greater good?
I believe, like, you're right, Chris.
If you, you know, something happened to all the people who have made their careers in space exploration, who've worked at NASA.
There's not that many, there's not that many pool, but are there a thousand and millions of people who are interested looking at the Planetary Society's membership?
I know that that's a fact.
And I think it's going to cost millions.
But what I don't want to happen is it just become a ego trip to go up there.
I would love to see that money being donated back.
We have in-kind donations to NASA or other private sectors, Chris, that you work with.
You're not-per-profit that actually will help bring more people into the space community because it should be accessible.
Right now, the barrier to entry is money.
And if you're a billionaire that has no problem doing these little ego trips, I would really hope that you would add something to and give back as part.
of your trip to a optically it looks good on you but b you're allowing for more of the space
exploration and the science because it can't just be a trip you know that 10 minute concert is cool for
who not me not you it's not doing anything like what are you if you're going to go up there
what are the what's the data you're gathering outside of just what the effects are on humans we have
a larger data set on that you talked about um the
degree of, you know, safety that we do know. And like, there's opportunities to train. So that's
great. Obviously, more data is important. But what else? What else is out there that we're not
touching on because we're so focused on being the first versus looking at it from a space
exploration. I think as a business, you can't do A without that critical piece without looking
like an asshole, to be frank. And I think that if you're going to do that as a business, that's,
they need to go together. Almost. If we put
companies in charge instead of governments and make companies the gatekeepers? Does that solve anything?
Does that make it better to start to open things up and have companies be the decision makers of
other companies that get to play along? As opposed to governments, does that help to democratize a
situation or is just out complexity? I think it adds complexity, but I also think that what you're
saying is a proven thing. So when different companies are involved,
in operations and scaling or transforming, innovating, growing a business, it's really important
that they learn from their past. And so I think, Chris, you've talked about this a little bit
about, you know, what do we want out there in space and what are the types of industries
that are going to be relevant, are going to continue to, you know, bring resources in there,
are going to bring travel there, are going to be part of a critical mission, Gino, that's both
culturally and scientifically and, you know, life-changingly important. And so that's one of the things
that I was asking around value proposition, because I think the value proposition for, I'm going to
call them space explorers or space travelers, which would be more the citizen type of person or, you
know, or the worker going up to space is different than what the value proposition would be for a
business, right? And so when you're seeing that perspective, I would hope that business leaders
are, you're getting the most innovative minds, Chris, like yourself, to help to kind of create that
roadmap. You know, whenever you think about startups, whenever you think about corporations as they
scale and grow, they look to the data to inform them of how to do that effectively. You know,
space is still, you know, the unknown frontier, so to speak, in a lot of ways. And even though,
you know, I know you were aligning it, Chris, with, you know, airlines or trains, we've all
used different modes of transportation to get where we need to go. There's still a sense of, like,
do I trust that this is a safe thing for myself to do, right?
And it's the same manner is, do I trust as these operations grow out in space? And do I understand? Is there
opakness or is it transparent what their mission is, what their critical mission is? And how can I
best understand that and align myself with that? Because I do think it is the answer. We know we need to look further than our small planet.
And I do believe, Aaron, to your point, you know, that we need to be very thoughtful and intentional
about how we build that out. And I know that there are plenty of smarter people doing that right now.
But again, I don't see that transparency that will help me as an individual say, okay, I'm willing
to put my money where my mouth is. I want to do this. I want to be part of it.
I'm kind of sitting back and saying,
I'd like to see who actually ends up there
and what businesses end up there
because in relation to, you know,
and again, I know that we're talking about it,
you know, in a different way.
But it really, again, to me,
it doesn't make sense that, you know,
you're not going to have a sociologist go up there right now.
Like that doesn't have the means,
in sponsorship and backing and then has that personal mission to understand what their purpose is to do so.
So I think all of that needs to be clearly defined. And I, you know, and again, I'm not aware of
all the different things that are going on. I know there's, there's a multitude of countries,
there's a multitude of corporations, there's a multitude of societies that are trying to push this
to the forefront. But I do feel like it needs to have.
a common thread between
to ensure that we are building
with intention as we go to space.
It seems like the companies that are there
have first mover advantage.
So, you know, if I,
let's say I wanted to start a cell phone company
and I had to apply through the government
and work through the bureaucracy
and raise all the funding.
Like, that's a lot of work
and there's a clear path to it.
If I wanted to start a cell phone company
and I was late to the game
and I had to apply to Verizon and T-Mobile,
they're going to have competing
incentives of whether or not they let me in and let me play.
So are we creating this barrier already of whoever's been,
you know, been proven, past some safety regulations
and they're already, you know, locked and loaded.
They're building the space stations.
They're getting the funding and all the money and, you know,
like marketplaces that I mentioned like Etsy and those,
are they locking out others that want in and just can't play along
because they're too far behind?
I think those companies are limiting themselves, to be honest.
So what I mean by that, Aaron, is everyone has that same opportunity to what Chris was saying.
You know, it's the democratization of space.
Who's going to prioritize that?
So like if we're just talking, you know, satellites or cell phones, whatever, all of those companies have the same opportunity to prioritize that that's what they want to invest in that may be only a.
small one will actually do it. And then to your point, Aaron, they're the first ones there.
Do you see what I'm saying? I feel like I think part of it is people not really putting, you know, or companies, not people, companies may be not prioritizing that because they don't have a Chris on their board to help them understand what that vast opportunity looks like.
Yeah. Yeah, Chris, should it be an open marketplace?
to whatever companies can survive and thrive, just let them at it?
Well, here's the thing.
Like, you're talking about exactly what I've been fighting in my entire career to do.
You know, before 2000, everything was just, are you Boeing?
Are you Lockheed?
Are you Northrop Grumman?
Are you a defense prime contractor doing X, Y, and Z and a cost plus contract?
Because that's what all of my shareholders are demanding that I charge the government.
In the last five, six, seven years, we've had an explosion of companies where you had all kinds of investment dollars from all over the place, from private equity to venture capitalists and everything in between mom and pops, starting some of these great space companies. Some of them get bought up. Some of them fail. Some of them succeed. But everyone is trying to take their space in the vertical where they're still looking around. They're only other couple of competitors or other.
are their partners. And the thing is, when it comes to space, it's all integrated. You can't have
a rocket without a payload, and you can't have a payload without a rocket. You can't have humans going
to space without a payload and a rocket. And if you can't come back, you never fly at all.
That's where all these other secondary and tertiary economies are important, because once you
establish these platforms, you can get into recycling, you can get into smelting. You can now take
all this crap, put in a bin, melt it, turn it into an excruiter element, and now you can
3D print and space, and you don't have to bring up any material from Earth.
And that's the biggest economic driver.
And so trying to create these closed-loop economic systems is what experts like myself and
others have been trying and working in our career at so that you can not only have an
economic justification, but you're going to have, you know, as you said, the public policy
rationale.
What are you getting out of it?
Right.
And so for some people, it's being able to drive to work.
For other people, it's to be able to move money to my bank account and pay someone
through my Venmo and for other people it's to prevent a nuclear thermonuclear war.
Yeah, well, we're not trying to start any wars here. We only want to do good.
Which means we've got to fix what we set out to fix. And, you know, it's hard to wrap up in a
bullet point, but we'll just say that commercial space travel that we've all seen the celebrities
and the billionaires equates in the public's imagination. That's the tip of it. That's the
very public piece of it, but there's a lot more to it. And there's a lot more room for companies
and even small companies and even startup companies that aren't as well funded to play along.
And what we would just hope is everyone who's there and there to play along is doing it
for the right reasons. So let's drill it down to two points in our fix. Let's just say space
tourism. Are we for it? Are we for expanding it? Should we be doing it? And then
that's number one. And number two, who leads the charge when it's tourism and exploration and
commercialization governments or private companies or a mix of both? So tourism, yay or nay,
and then who's in charge? Governments, private sector, some of each. Melissa, what do you think?
Well, definitely I am for the tourism. I think that's an exciting and, you know, it's the wave of the
future. That's what we're headed towards. But I do think there are some caveats to that, and that includes,
you know, building clear safety regulatory frameworks so that I feel safe. Then there's transparency
and understanding the data, you know, standardizing. And I think this has already been said. Chris has
done a really good job of explaining the customer consent, you know, the client consent, the screening,
the training, and all of that that goes into being able to participate.
in spaceflight.
I also would love to see, you know, in my mind, from an operational perspective,
that we're really focusing on strategically positioning ourselves in this post-international
space station world.
And what that would mean is, Chris, you just mentioned, there's so many people that
are in the space, but they need to partner together to understand.
how they can make sure that everything that they're focused on and their mission is really
fundamentally being supported by all the different aspects and actors. I mean, it's very interesting.
I loved how you said, like, you could get up there, but then where are you?
Like, do you have a place to stay? Do you have, you know, how, what if you, you know, is there
health, you know, what happens if there's a medical emergency, you know, like those are all the
ancillary areas of support that need to happen when you think about space travel.
Thanks, Melissa.
So, you know, space tourism thumbs up, thumbs down, and who do we trust to take the charge
government or companies?
I hope our listeners walk away from this conversation, understanding that space literally is
for everybody.
It is interconnected.
We can bring a socialist up to space one day because as Chris and Melissa and Aaron and
we've shared in this conversation,
it's interconnected. You need to be able to learn from each other. So yes, to space exploration is what I would
call it. I think with that exploration, it needs to be tied, as Melissa shared, to an intention,
an intention for good. And I would love to see every single company, regardless of what country
you're coming from, has a pledge to do good, whether do good for space and for earth.
So whether that is helping others who, again, that barrier for entry is money, if you can put some dollars down so that we can allow space to be for everybody.
Because eventually you're going to need some psychologists up there and, you know, someone to help cook and all of this too.
Like that's what we want to get to.
But space is R&D.
It's the same way you look at it for any business.
You need to invest in it so that you can go out there.
You need to work with the Chris of the world so that we can get to that point.
We need this. We've established that. Does it need to be run by the government? I don't think so, but I think the government can definitely help bring wider accessibility outside of it just being within a company. So there's a need for both government and for private sectors. And I think, yes, there's always going to be a first for someone. But if that's your main position is just being the first without any of that intention behind it, I think you'll fall flat.
as a business looking to do that.
So just keep that in mind as you're, you know,
exploring what that can look like.
Thank you, Chino.
Chris, take us homes.
Space tourism and exploration.
Just keep it going, yeah?
Yeah, I think it'll evolve.
I think space tourism will continue to evolve.
I think what's exciting about the future of space tourism,
as I mentioned, is that we could be getting more movies.
You could get, you know, you could probably do an episode of this podcast.
on an Axiom station in the future.
So, you know, the cost is slowly coming down.
I mean, it may not see it when you're still talking tens of millions of dollars,
but from where it started, oh, that is, that is, that's actually kind of cheap.
You know, dreams do come true, and a lot of it is, it's just you have to ask.
Don't expect people to give it to you.
If you want to be part of the space community, go and do it.
You want to be a sociologist?
There's tons of, I can, can I do tons of sociologists and stuff?
space. They all do analog missions. They go up to Canada. They go to the badlands of South Dakota.
They go to Antarctica. There's so much activity going on. And if there's a way that we can put it
together, I know it's going to start from this podcast. Okay. We're up for it. So between Chris and
marketing and operations and talent, we'll get you to space. That's our promise to you. That's
going to close out our episode. Our mission is over. But before we go, I'd like to
give another thanks to Christopher Hiercy for spending the time with us. Chris, how can everyone
keep up with OSA consulting and then your nonprofit? Yeah, with OSA consulting, probably the best
way to contact me is on LinkedIn. I do have a website, but I mostly just do everything through
LinkedIn. But I really would direct your audience to the YouTube channel that we have for
SpaceCorp Foundation and our website. Everything's there. We've got a pilot podcast called
the space bar show. We've got a pilot animated series, MootCorp series called Stelocysis. We've got
fake space commercials, but we also have actual hard research. We have our big books of national
space law, which is a compendium of all the country's space laws and regulations. And we have
the online database where you can search that. We've got partnerships. We've got internships.
So if you're an undergrad or a law student or a graduate student, master's PhD, you can go to
our website, spacecourt foundation.org, found application. And we are an interdisciplinary,
multidisciplinary group. Not everyone's a lawyer. Everyone has different parts of this. This is
what's so great about space is it's so broad and inclusive. You can't just silo engineers and
the lawyers off. And so this is what we do. We promote spatial education, the rule of law,
and the rule of law bid is the most important bid here, because none of these activities will be
sustainable if we don't agree on the rules moving forward. And, you know, you want to limit conflict
in space. And that's what I spend a lot of my time talking with people about is how do we not
fight and get in a war, you know, let alone get arrested by the space cops. So these are all
things that students today can think about and check out. There's tons of stuff you can Google.
And finally, I guess I'll just end them and say thank you. Aaron, Sheena and Melissa, it's been great
being a part of this conversation today and I hope we can have more in the future.
Thank you, Chris.
And thank you, Melissa and Chino.
And for all of you listening, thank you.
Mark my words, there will be hotels on the moon.
So if you've been everywhere else, start saving up now.
If you want to underwrite us as the first podcast taping in space, we're up for it.
We'll do it.
Until then, stay grounded and we will see you next time.
We hope you enjoyed this episode of We Fixed It.
You're welcome.
We go into every episode somewhat cold.
and nothing we say should be construed as legal advice, financial advice, or anything that would get us in trouble.
All trademarks, IP, and brand elements remain property of their respective owners.
