We Study Billionaires - The Investor’s Podcast Network - BTC060: Bitcoin Tech w/ Stephan Livera (Bitcoin Podcast)

Starting point is 00:00:00 You're listening to TIP. Hey, everyone. Welcome to this Wednesday's release of the podcast where we're talking about Bitcoin. On today's show, I have a good friend in the Bitcoin space, and that's Stefan Levera. Stefan's been a Bitcoiner since 2013, and as a fellow podcaster has talked to some of the brightest minds in the space like Jack Dorsey. On today's show, Stefan talks about some of the things happening from a technological standpoint.

Starting point is 00:00:21 We talk about Bitcoin risks and where new innovations may be taking us. So without further delay, here's my interview with the thoughtful Stefan Lever. Vera. You're listening to Bitcoin Fundamentals by the Investors Podcast Network. Now for your host, Preston Pish. All right. So like I said in the introduction, I'm here with Stefan. Stefan, first time on the show. I know I was over on your show and I'm excited to bring you over here because, dude, you are a wealth of knowledge, especially in the technical front. So I'm thrilled to have you here. Thank you, Preston. It's always a pleasure to chat with you. I guess this is the first question I got for you. What was the aha moment for you with Bitcoin?

Starting point is 00:01:14 Like what kind of set it all off? Like most people, the first time I heard about Bitcoin, I thought of it like some foolish thing or it was just like some game currency, whatever, you know, like Fortnite V-Bucks or World of Warcraft Gold or whatever, right? What did it for me was actually an Eric Voorhe's article and I was reading it in December 2012. So that's when I came across it. And so I, being a libertarian and into Austrian economics, anti-central banking, anti-fiat money, this was the article for me that just made it click. And so from then on, I just couldn't stop thinking about Bitcoin and talking about Bitcoin. And nowadays, I eat, live and breathe Bitcoin. And so that was my moment. And so what I would say, in terms

Starting point is 00:01:59 of that article, I think it was that up until then, no one had explained it to me in a way that made sense that, oh, wow, this is actually a challenger to central banking. And of course, I love all different aspects of Bitcoin. I like talking about the economics of it, the technology of it, as you mentioned. And so for me, it was the economics of it that really got me interested. It's just that I was, I'm not a developer, but I'm just like a relatively tech savvy person. And so that's what sort of enabled me to, I think, get a reasonable understanding of it relative to the average person on the street. Now, you came with a background. on an accounting, correct?

Starting point is 00:02:36 Yes, that's right. I was working as an internal auditor and chartered accountant back in Australia. So I used to work at Deloitte and then later I was working at some of the big banks. What made you such an Austrian economics person? What caused that? What triggered it? Right. So that's another whole rabbit hole.

Starting point is 00:02:53 So that for me was actually even earlier. I was probably about 14 or 15 years old around there. And I was on IRC. So for the young ones, that's internet relay chat. that's like an old school chat system. And so I would hang out on IRC channels and I found this Australian politics channel. And this guy kept linking to Meese's daily articles. At the time, I just thought, what the hell?

Starting point is 00:03:15 This is all crazy stuff. That's not going to work. But then the logic of it started to dawn on me as I read those articles. And then it just made so much more sense to me than what I was being taught in terms of the Keynesian and monetarist ideas. I was being fed at school and at university. And so for me, I went down that Austrian rabbit hole in terms of reading Mises and Rothbard, Hansem and Hopper, Gito Halsman, Joseph Salerno, and the modern day, well-known practitioners, people like Tom Woods and Bob Murphy. I was reading a lot of their work, listening to their lectures or podcasts.

Starting point is 00:03:48 And that was what gave me that awareness and understanding from an Austro-libertarian perspective. And that's, I think, also what helped, what you might say, primed me for being open to the idea of Bitcoin, this anti-state money. anti-fayat money. This is not what you're typical. What age did you say you were? 14? I was about 14 or 15 when I started learning a little bit about Austrian economics. And I would say it took some while for it to take, right? Maybe a couple of years later, I would have said, yeah, I'm a libertarian. I'm interested in Austrian economics. But it sort of took time. And obviously, when you're younger, your patience for reading these long books is not as much. I started out reading articles and shorter books. And then by the time I got to about university age, then I was reading more

Starting point is 00:04:31 of the longer Austrian books and considering myself at least a student of Austrian economics. It seems like you had an interest in finance and just money from a very young age. What do you think triggered that? So for me, I think it's a few things, but I loved that idea of when you're young, you think of this idea of, I guess it's kind of like passive income, but although that can be overplayed nowadays, but I mean, this idea that, hey, if I save this money and I earn, you know, back in those days, you could actually earn interest in the bank, right? Because you would actually earn an interest. And so it was like this idea, this fascination of, oh, hey, what if I save? And then I can actually earn money off of the interest or earn money

Starting point is 00:05:11 out of the income. And so that was a very appealing idea to me. And I would say from a young age, I was more of a saver. Like, I was already a kind of a saving kind of person. And so even for my first job, I was relatively good about saving. And I'd enjoy. reading about personal finance and accounting and find like some of these different ideas. So I think all of those things sort of contributed to the, I guess, the personality and the person I am now. Fascinating. On your show that you do, you cover a lot of the technical aspects on Bitcoin. I find myself tuning into your show all the time to just make myself smarter. And I mean, I come with an engineering background, but your ability to explain it and just kind of get the

Starting point is 00:05:52 questions out of your guests that have this superior technical knowledge. I mean, they're, they're literally the ones clacking on the keys making these things happen. And you're able to ask such amazing questions to them. I guess my question to you is when you're looking at it holistically over all the guests that you've interviewed through the years, what would you say are like the top three technical things that you think most participants in the space don't even understand, get, or just you can tell that people just overlook it or just really don't care about it. Did you find really valuable? Right. I think part of that is just that awareness that you need to really play around with things to learn because I think a lot of

Starting point is 00:06:33 people might, they might have heard someone talk about this idea, but never have actually used it. And I think that's an important thing. So it's important to try to get as close to bare metal as you can where you can, right, whether that is learning how to take your coins off the exchange, whether that is learning how to run a Bitcoin node, whether that's learning how to use hardware wallets, whether that's playing around with multi-signature. So, these are a few examples. Like, I guess the lesson is really actually try to use this stuff. And so that's something even for me, it's not always possible, but when I can, if I'm interviewing someone, I try to actually use their product or their software or their hardware if possible. It's not always feasible,

Starting point is 00:07:09 but the better you can, then you're giving more of a real, you're giving a more well-informed perspective on that. Other concepts that I think a lot of people struggle with, just like, when you're backing up your Bitcoin as an example, right? You know how most people might, if you set up a Bitcoin wallet or a hardware wallet, you might have seen how we write down the 12 or 24 words. What a lot of new people might struggle with is that understanding that that is your backup, not just for the coins that you have received up until now, it's the backup for the coins you'll receive in the future on that wallet. And that's a really kind of crazy idea, right? Because you're coming back from a non-Bitcoin perspective, you might think,

Starting point is 00:07:45 oh, I'm writing in my word document and I hit Control S or hit save, and that saves my progress up to now. It doesn't save my future progress, but these 24 words you write down actually is for your future. And then the other aspect, I think a lot of people wouldn't understand is just that idea of trying to retain cold storage security. So as an example, when we're thinking in the world of Bitcoin security, people might take things without understanding, they might go into those 12 words or 24 words into an online connected computer or phone. And then all of a sudden, they're taking what was previously a cold setup and now putting it into a hot wallet setup, which is now a completely less secure method of storing your coins.

Starting point is 00:08:24 And find that might be reasonable for, let's say, a smaller amount you keep in your lightning wallet or maybe a privacy coin join wallet or just a day-to-day spending. But it should not be what you're doing if you're holding a significant amount. So these are little things around the security aspects of it. But of course, I think maybe to the spirit of your question is also around aspects around where is Bitcoin going in terms of lightning and scalability and other aspects. So it might be that as an example, we as a community often say, not your keys, not your coins. However, it's going to get more and more difficult over time because over time, there's only so many

Starting point is 00:09:01 people who can actually hold a UTXO. What's a UTXO? Unspent transaction output. And so over time, the network and the community and the movement, the project, whatever you want to call this, is going to have to figure out ways to help deal with that. And there are various ways. Obviously, lightning is an important part of that. It's only one part of the strategy. In the future, we may be operating on things like a channel

Starting point is 00:09:24 factory. It's been colloquially called or more professionally, it might be termed multi-party channels. So that's one example. Or another example might be the usage of federated mints. That's another example. As an example, if you look at what's going on in Bitcoin Beach down in El Salvador, in El-Zonte, where Galloy created, Gelloy Money, the company created the Bitcoin Beach wallet. And it's like this idea of like, okay, it's custodial lightning wallet and it is also a multi-sig community held wallet. And so I think we're going to see advanced ideas around that. I think another interesting aspect is just around being private in Bitcoin. I think it is possible to be private with Bitcoin. It just takes additional steps. And so as an example, people need to learn how to,

Starting point is 00:10:07 for example, run their own Bitcoin full node and then ideally use some kind of privacy preserving wallet. Examples might be Samurai wallet on Android or Sparrow wallet on the desktop. And these wallets allow you to connect to your own Bitcoin node, ideally, although they can be used in default setup with somebody else's node. Of course, it's best if it's with your own. And then they can use different techniques like the Whirlpool coin join as an example. And then when they're going to spend, they are using post-mix spend techniques like Stonewall. So that's an example where it makes a transaction that even looks like a coin join, even if it's not a coin join. So that's just a few examples.

Starting point is 00:10:48 I think there's all these different technical realms within Bitcoin. And it's very difficult for one person to sort of be an expert in all of them. So really, I think it's sort of like I think of myself as I do as much as possible to try to be able to be a good interviewer on the topic that I'm interviewing, whether it's Bitcoin mining or it's privacy or it's lightning or it's something else or it's, you know, the financial aspects of Bitcoin, the regulation, the economics. There's all these different nuances to it. So I just try to do my best to get as knowledgeable as I can to be able to ask a skillful or an intelligent question of the guess. I want to follow up on two of the points you made there. The first one

Starting point is 00:11:26 on the UTXO comment, I'm not sure that I follow what you meant by people won't be able to hold their own Bitcoin or their own key. What did you mean by that? So think of it like this. When we spin up a Bitcoin node, we're downloading the entire blockchain of transactions. Now remember, that's the history of all the transactions. And I think today that's probably 430 gigs around that and rising over time. But that is distinct from the UTXO set. And so think of it like this. The entire blockchain is the history of every transaction.

Starting point is 00:11:58 And so your Bitcoin node, it downloads all those transactions. And then some Bitcoin nodes run in what's called pruned modes, which is like a cut down version of that, maybe five gigs, let's say, just as an example. But that is distinct from the what's called the UTXO set, which is the set of unspent coins. So think of it like this. Now, in a superficial sense, people think, oh, I just send Bitcoin to this address and it lives in this address. But that's not really precise. It's more like UTXOs or Bitcoin coins live inside a UTXO.

Starting point is 00:12:29 You can have multiple UTXO that were sent to the same address, if that makes sense. And so what's actually going on in the background is your wallet is having to select which UTXO it's using when it's spending and so on. But to the point I was saying, that UTXO set has a scaling limitation. And it's just literally not going to be feasible for everyone on earth. Let's say there's 8 billion of us. It's just not, it's nowhere near feasible for everyone to actually hold their own coin in that UTXO sense. Then that brings the question, well, okay, what can we do about this? What can we do to make it possible? And so some of the ideas, as I was saying, are relating to multiple people holding or holding a piece of a coin,

Starting point is 00:13:11 let's say, of a UTXO. And so that's where, let's say, we have, let's say we have it, we're living in the advanced world where maybe we got any prep out and we have the L2 Lightning Network. And then let's say, instead of having a lightning channel between you and me, Preston, it might be like a lightning channel between you, me and 20 other people. And we're all sharing that UTXO. So that's how the idea could scale and allow for more and more people to still have some level of self-sovereignty, although, of course, it is a spectrum. I also want to hit on the coin join part that you brought up because I don't, I mean, my audience, I'm sure a lot of the people in the audience know what coin join is, but for those that don't,

Starting point is 00:13:49 explain what it is and then explain what your point was there earlier. A coin join, we can think of it like, let's say we got down at a table and everyone was blindfolded. Let's say we each had a $10 note. And what we're doing is somehow, if you could of make it so that you could all shuffle around those $10 notes and then pick out. And we knew atomically, you knew for certain that they weren't going to run off with their $10. You would put in $10 and get back a different $10 node. You can sort of think of it a bit like that. And so the way coin join operates is it's there to try to break the deterministic links

Starting point is 00:14:24 between how we spent our coins. And so what that does is it makes it more difficult for somebody who's an outside observer trying to surveil what's going on on the chain, as it were. And so that's one way that people can give themselves a little bit more privacy in terms of when they are spending coins so that people don't necessarily know how much you've got in your overall stack. Because let's say, I mean, hypothetically, let's say someone was like a whale, you know, let's say you're Michael sale or you're someone with like, you know, massive number of coins. You don't necessarily want to spend directly out of that coin because they might then know,

Starting point is 00:15:03 how many coins you've got because they could look on the blockchain and see, oh, look, look at the change output. There's 10,000 Bitcoin going back to that guy. He must be rich. Okay, then that could create a personal security issue for you. The way I think of it is you might want to be wary about that and carve off a small amount into your coin join wallet as an example, like samurai wallet or sparrow wallet. And you could then, or join market as another example, and you could run coin join and

Starting point is 00:15:30 then spend out of that coin joined balance. to which an outside reserve, if they try to look at that on the chain, they weren't necessarily be able to trace that back. Now, maybe I could explain that just a little bit better. One aspect of how are they able to trace it back? Well, it's because when you spend Bitcoin, your wallet has to select from those UTXOs in its pool, if you will, or in its wallet. And what people can do if you are a chain surveillance firm, such as chain analysis, elliptic, cipher trace, some of these others, they are applying these kinds of probabilistic techniques to try to say, ah, look, these coins were spent together, therefore they must be controlled by the same person.

Starting point is 00:16:10 Or we have figured out that this is, let's say, the cold storage of this exchange A, and that's cold storage of exchange B. But look, we saw it come out to there and go to this person, and then this person later paid me, and I can see, okay, now I can trace back and see that person's financial history. For some people, it's not a concern. They're not really thinking as deeply about it, but in the future, it could present more of a privacy and it could actually represent a security risk as well if they were to know. You talked a little bit about the centralization on some of these lightning wallets and people basically outsourcing their full node to somebody else and the consolidation of that.

Starting point is 00:16:49 Do you see that this is a concern or issue moving forward or you think that it's the optionality of everybody still being able to run their own full node and run their own Lightning Wallet is good enough. Is what matters. Yeah, look, I'm with you there on the optionality thing, point, right? The point is that anyone could. Not everybody will. And I think we have to be realistic about that because, look, it would be like the equivalent of all of us being email server nerds back in the day and then being annoyed that everyone just uses Gmail instead of running their own email server, right? Maybe in the future that's, but of course, we want to make it as easy as possible

Starting point is 00:17:26 for people so that that way in some sense the system is more robust. It's less amenable or less prone to capture because the coins and everything is just kind of all distributed so much so that no one person, company, government, whatever could compromise the system and sort of capture it in a way that would hurt the qualities of Bitcoin that we really like, like this idea of permissionlessness, this idea of inflation resistance, and these related, uh, related, uh, ideas. Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors. All right. I want you guys to imagine spending three days in Oslo at the height of the summer. You've got long days of daylight, incredible food, floating saunas on the Oslo Fjord, and every conversation you have is with people who are

Starting point is 00:18:13 actually shaping the future. That's what the Oslo Freedom Forum is. From June 1st through the 3rd, 2006, the Oslo Freedom Forum is entering its 18th year, bringing together activists, technologists, journalists, investors, and builders from all over the world, many of them operating on the front lines of history. This is where you hear firsthand stories from people using Bitcoin to survive currency collapse, using AI to expose human rights abuses, and building technology under censorship and authoritarian pressures. These aren't abstract ideas. These are tools real people are using right now. You'll be in the room with about 2,000 extraordinary individuals, dissidents, founders, philanthropists, policymakers, the kind of people you don't just listen to but end up having dinner with.

Starting point is 00:19:00 Over three days, you'll experience powerful mainstage talks, hands-on workshops on freedom, tech, and financial sovereignty, immersive art installations, and conversations that continue long after the sessions end. And it's all happening in Oslo in June. If this sounds like your kind of room, well, you're in luck because you can attend in person. Standard and patron passes are available at Osloof Freedom Forum.com, with patron passes offering deep access, private events, and small group time with the speakers. The Oslo Freedom Forum isn't just a conference. It's a place where ideas meet reality and where the future is being built by people living it.

Starting point is 00:19:39 If you run a business, you've probably had the same thought lately. How do we make AI useful in the real world? because the upside is huge, but guessing your way into it is a risky move. With NetSuite by Oracle, you can put AI to work today. NetSuite is the number one AI cloud ERP, trusted by over 43,000 businesses. It pulls your financials, inventory, commerce, HR, and CRM into one unified system. And that connected data is what makes your AI smarter. It can automate routine work, surface actionable insights, and help you cut costs while

Starting point is 00:20:14 making fast AI-powered decisions with confidence. And now with the NetSuite AI connector, you can use the AI of your choice to connect directly to your real business data. This isn't some add-on, it's AI built into the system that runs your business. And whether your company does millions or even hundreds of millions, NetSuite helps you stay ahead. If your revenues are at least in the seven figures, get their free business guide, demystifying AI at netsuite.com slash study. The guide is free to you at netsuite.com slash study. NetSuite.com slash study. When I started my own side business, it suddenly felt like I had to become 10 different people

Starting point is 00:20:55 overnight wearing many different hats. Starting something from scratch can feel exciting, but also incredibly overwhelming and lonely. That's why having the right tools matters. For millions of businesses, that tool is Shopify. Shopify is the commerce platform behind millions of businesses of businesses of around the world and 10% of all e-commerce in the U.S. from brands just getting started to household names. It gives you everything you need in one place, from inventory to payments to analytics. So you're not juggling a bunch of different platforms. You can build a beautiful online store

Starting point is 00:21:28 with hundreds of ready-to-use templates, and Shopify is packed with helpful AI tools that write product descriptions and even enhance your product photography. Plus, if you ever get stuck, they've got award-winning 24-7 customer support. Start your business today with the industry's best business partner, Shopify, and start hearing sign up for your $1 per month trial today at Shopify.com slash WSB. Go to Shopify.com slash WSB. That's Shopify.com slash WSB. All right.

Starting point is 00:22:06 Back to the show. I have a little bit of a technical question here for you. So, you know, I got my own full node. I got my own lightning wallet that that's coming off of my own full nodes. And when I make a lightning purchase, it's being routed through my node. I could set up family members. I could set you up with a lightning wallet that runs through my node. So let's say you accumulate $10,000 worth of Bitcoin on that lightning wallet and then I just turn my node off. What happens to your wallet in that kind of situation? I think the impetus for, and I think the impetus for the intent of the question is, so you got wallet of Satoshi, you got these companies that are

Starting point is 00:22:45 basically providing these types of services for Lightning Wallets, Blue Wallet. People aren't setting it up and configuring it back to their full node. They're just using their full node. So what if that company goes under? What happens to like all of those addresses? Let's say the company just disappears for whatever reason, you know, just from a from a risk standpoint for all those people that are using that solution, but aren't configuring it to their full. node. I see. Yes. So essentially, you are running the risk then that you lose that money, essentially. I mean, it's possible that they try to find people and give them, make them whole, but do you really want to take that chance, right? Although in fairness, I can also understand,

Starting point is 00:23:27 like, I'm trying to steal man here. The steel man would be, well, for some people, it's easy to onboard them this way, and then later they can then go and advance up the stack and learn to become non-custodial, right? That would be some of the argument here. So essentially, Yeah, that's kind of the main point. But if that node went, like, they would need to find a way to ultimately, at the end of the day, you are still using custodial coins, right? So you are reliant. Right.

Starting point is 00:23:53 If I keep my coins on your node, well, I'm custodial in that case. I'm custodial to you. You're the one actually holding my coins. So generally, though, we would probably say, like for most people, lightning should be seen more like their day-to-day spending and not necessarily keeping their savings. But certainly it might be a caution for people out there to think about how much and think of through more carefully. Because what can happen in practice, right?

Starting point is 00:24:19 Like, I think for people who are really involved and really engaged, they're well aware of what they've got and where it is. But for somebody who, let's say they're more of a casual person or maybe there's somebody who got sent $10 four years ago and they've just sort of left it and forgotten it about it. That could be an example in this case where maybe, and now that $10 four years ago, it might be worth $100. Who knows? And so it's one of those examples where maybe a casual user might lose out and lose some

Starting point is 00:24:47 money there. But it is definitely a challenge around the whole trying to improve non-custodial adoption of Bitcoin because there are always trade-offs with these things. So as an example, if you are trying to do everything yourself, well, then that means you might be having to run your own channels. You might have to be doing your own management of that lightning note to make sure what is the uptime of that. What's the, you know, do you know how to back?

Starting point is 00:25:10 it up. If something went wrong, could you recover it? All of these questions are, you know, they are important. And so I can understand why if people just use those more custodial or maybe even like a hybrid option, there are some that work in that way as well, where you might still hold the keys to the coins. So an example might be Phoenix wallet, where you still hold the keys to those coins. You still wrote down the 12 words, but your ability to spend and receive is dependent on that provider. And maybe that's a better trade-off balance for some people. So in that case, if every everything else went away, you still have your 12 words and you could recover those coins using the likes of a wallet like Electrum or others where you can just recover the coins.

Starting point is 00:25:49 So it's a spectrum and the idea is we're trying to get people further and further down that funnel such that we can maximally retain the qualities of the system we know and love. I'm trying to understand the business case for a company like Wallet of Satoshi that's providing this service because when you look at the amount of fees that they're able to collect on Lightning today. I mean, it's just, there's not much juice to squeeze there. Now, I suspect in the future, especially as Lightning adoption picks up, that that, that might drastically change, and you might see the amount of velocity. I know people hate this term, velocity of money. The velocity of money that's going through the rails would, I think,

Starting point is 00:26:31 pick up in a dramatic fashion from where it is today. And I think that even keeping the fees as low as they are, if that would even persist, I just think the sheer speed of all the transaction that would be going through the channels would increase the amount that's being made significantly. So is it a long-term play? Walk us through what you think the business case is there. So in some cases, it might be ideological. They want to support this network and they want to make Bitcoin becomes sound money. So they're kind of ideologically committed to it. But I think You're right to also point out that as this maturity, as the network matures, we will start to see professionalized routing node operators. And so in the case of the big node operators like

Starting point is 00:27:17 wallet of Satoshi, I mean, they could be charging. I mean, for all we know, the charge to send Bitcoin in a non-custodial permissionless way might actually even charge a premium of what we pay today for credit card payments. And if credit card payments are, I don't know, half percent, 1 percent, if you account for the fraud and so on, then it might well be that even paying 0.2 to 0.4 percent, let's say, on the Lightning Network is a reasonable tradeoff. And the users are comfortable with that and that aggregated across enough users, the likes of Wollett of Satoshi or others, can make money even on that. And maybe that's one aspect of what they're doing. Maybe that's one aspect that they are, let's say, a Lightning service provider

Starting point is 00:27:56 for their customers who are using Wallet of Satoshi or others, other liquidity providers. And so maybe that's part of what they're doing and maybe what they're doing is peering or partnering with some merchants and sort of doing a deal where let's say, you know, maybe they have bit refill vouchers right in the app and they're able to get a percentage there. So maybe that's kind of part of the idea is that it's a convenience layer and lots of average users will happily pay for convenience. And so maybe that's where the profit comes from for them. But it is yet to be seen, let's say. You know, it seemed like the El Salvador announcement and then them using it as legal tender along with the dollar down there in their country really led to a significant

Starting point is 00:28:41 amount of adoption on the Lightning Network. Do you think that that was maybe the impetus for why we saw such explosive growth in 21? And if so, what does that mean for you moving forward? Right. I think you're right to say that and to point that out. I think, I don't know the exact numbers, but it's probably something like 1,500 coins that were on the network at roughly the start of 2021 towards the end where it's probably 4,000 coins were in lightning channels, something like that. And that's in public channels, not even counting the private or unannounced channels that we know exist between some of the large exchanges. So that's just an example.

Starting point is 00:29:15 And we've seen probably last I saw, I think it's over 15,000, over 20,000 lightning nodes are out there now. Whereas I recall in October of 2019 at the Lightning Conference, around in those days, it was maybe 6,000 lightning nodes were in existence at that point. And so we have to say we have seen a big explosion in the growth of lightning nodes. I think part of that is community involvement, enthusiasm. We've seen a lot of Pleb node runners who just want to support the network and they're interested and it's part of their own learning journey that they want to run a Bitcoin node. And then, of course, we're seeing the professionalized operators as well. And also we are seeing

Starting point is 00:29:52 some services like, for example, Zion, this attempt to create a more decentralized social media and as part of becoming joining on that network, you're running a lightning node. These aren't necessarily even what we would, you know, you and I would term hardcore Bitcoin people. These are people who just want to use the service. And as part of that, they're actually without really knowing too much about it, they're running a Bitcoin node in the background. Now, admittedly, these are more like VPS nodes, virtual private server nodes as opposed to like, you know, the umbrella or the my node or the Raspberry Blitz sort of physical box. But nevertheless, it is a Lightning Node and it's all part of the journey. So I think certainly the El Salvador story

Starting point is 00:30:31 and news around Legal Tender helped drive more professional interest in Bitcoin and Lightning Node management, whether you are Open Node or whether you are Chevo wallet, whether you are EBEX, Mercado or some other company looking to sell services and using the Lightning Network in El Salvador. So I think that is also another aspect of a stress test that we are going to see that we have been seeing and we are continuing to see. Hey, so when you think through the risks moving forward, I think this is the question that I think my audience likes to hear the response to the most. What do you think are some of the risks moving forward? We used to talk about the 51% attack. I think after the China migration of all their

Starting point is 00:31:19 hardware, a lot of that concern really, I don't hear people asking me personally about that. too much anymore. I'm with you. I don't get that question either. I would say that is a little bit more of a new coin a question, right? It's a common one. They're thinking, oh, 51% attack. That's probably not the one that most people are thinking of in their might. Like, once people have been sort of further down the rabbit hole, I think they turn their attention more to other questions, like, will the system get captured? That might actually be more of a risk like that if everything was to be captured and let's say potentially if as there are certain supply overhang

Starting point is 00:31:58 arguments that I spoke about actually recently with BJ Boy Party as well, that potentially if there was to be a gox supply, you know, back from 2013 supply overhang of all these new people who receive these coins and if they decide to sell them, could that slow down the growth of the Bitcoin network? Maybe another idea would be, and kind of related to the capture idea, is that if not enough people actually take their sovereignty seriously enough to actually hold their own keys and that if all the coins end up being held in certain large custodians, that then become equivalent to the Fort Knox or to the other well-known gold vaults that can be captured.

Starting point is 00:32:37 And could that impact or impinge on the qualities of the system? I think those are a few examples that come to my mind. But, I mean, for me, to be honest, I still think of these scenarios as very, very, very unlikely. And they're all just slowing adoption down. It doesn't, I mean, that's not stopping adoption. That's not breaking the protocol. That's just, I mean, it's just slowing those down. Almost like you would have a ban in a major country.

Starting point is 00:33:02 It would be a setback. The price would get punished, most likely. I mean, I have no idea, but I would suspect that. But then it's just going to keep going, right? Like, there's others that aren't banning. I could think of maybe, I mean, look, even though I'm extremely bullish on Bitcoin, I think it's going literally $10 to $20 million per coin in today's terms, right? It's something in that range eventually.

Starting point is 00:33:23 Like, I don't know when. But it is a risk for people to think it's inevitable. You know, like we can't just say, oh, it's all, it is important just to not get complacent. Because there have been bugs in Bitcoin's past, right? There was the famous buffer overflow. I think 84 billion Bitcoins are created in 2010. Now, of course, that's an early example. There was another inflation bug that not, that did not get exploited in 2018.

Starting point is 00:33:46 And so that's another example where, you know, that could really injure the confidence or the perception of Bitcoin. In those scenarios, there can be a patch. It can be full node operators can step in and adopt the patch. Walk us through that. What would that look like? And obviously it would cause enormous amounts of damage in the short term. But is it recoverable? Is it something that the network can come out of after enough time?

Starting point is 00:34:16 and garner confidence and trust again, even though something like that would happen. Yeah, that's an interesting question. And I think you could argue from one point of view, you could say, well, what if the people couldn't agree on what was the correct chain to go back to? And what would the right checkpoint be? Like, if, let's say, it wasn't something that everyone agreed straight away, oh, that was wrong. It was actually something that got discovered later on. And, you know, then people, it would then be like, oh, wait a minute, we'd have to like go back and figure out what's the right point to go back to and what if people are transacted in that time? Are they just, well, too bad. Sorry, too bad. So sad, right? But yeah, look,

Starting point is 00:34:53 broadly, I think the reason you and I and many other people are into Bitcoin is because, well, very chiefly is the 21 million cap. And we would never ever want that to be changed. I mean, the truth of the matter is the actual amount is a bit less than that because there are some cases where obviously coins got lost and some coins were never claimed when they should have been. There were some examples where there were bugs and, you know, coins weren't claim, but, you know, assuming just, you know, for simplicity of, say, 21 million, you know, I think essentially there would be a bunch of developers who come out with a patch or some kind of code and they would then essentially have to be able to convince enough people to be able

Starting point is 00:35:27 to roll to that, roll their node back to that. And you would be relying on, let's say, the node implementation software people to also help make it easy because not everyone's technical, right? So the likes of Umbril and Ronan Dojo and Rathwa Blitz and My Node and Star 9 and someone would have to make their stuff work for that too. What else? You'd have to make sure, you'd have to try to get all the exchanges and the miners on board. That said, I believe the miners would follow where the quote-unquote economic majority went. So, of course, they would follow the incentive there, right? But it would still be a pretty tough coordination problem, right? Because, again, there's no king, there's no person in charge. Okay, let's say Adam Beck comes out and says, look, guys, I think this is

Starting point is 00:36:07 the right way? Well, I don't know. Is that even, but look, I do think that for better or worse, people would not let that kind of thing happen. And there, of course, is a lot of effort around Bitcoin development. That said, oftentimes the bottleneck is actually around review time, right, having skilled contributors. And I think if you would ask this question maybe a couple years ago, or if we had been considering this question a couple years ago, we might have been thinking, well, okay, we need some more funding to Bitcoin Review, like Bitcoin Core Review. And I think now it's actually that there is funding. It's the bottleneck might actually be more like getting enough people who are, are skilled enough and want to work on Bitcoin because there can be challenges to it too,

Starting point is 00:36:48 right? Some Bitcoin developers are getting sued by Craig Wright and others. And that can, and it can be a bit, there can be some pressures for the developers and contributors in Bitcoin core and Bitcoin in general. So it seems like there can be like flame wars and things going on online. And that's always been the way. but it's not necessarily the most attractive thing from that point of view. But at the same time, now the flip side argument would be, no, actually, this is going

Starting point is 00:37:18 to be the future of the world's money. Having a chance to work on that and contribute to that is incredible and would represent working on just like this incredible pinnacle of what an incredible project, what an incredible civilizational infrastructure Bitcoin is for mankind. And so working on that should be seen as like a very prestigious thing. And maybe that's part of where things go in five, 10 years time. You know, it's interesting when you were talking through the scenario of a fork and trying to convince nodes to adopt whatever software version and then the miners and all that,

Starting point is 00:37:56 I wrote this down. I wrote down decentralization equals you have to have a slow methodical process with minor updates to the protocol. if you're truly decentralized. Because if you get yourself in that situation, it could just be completely disastrous if you have this kind of 50-50 split as to what people think the software baseline is.

Starting point is 00:38:18 Now, if you have a centralized protocol, and we could probably talk about a whole bunch of examples of this in the space of centralization, it's not as big of a problem for them. Because if they control a majority of the nodes and they can steer the ship because it's centralized, they can make a mistake and roll to whatever software update they want and control the adoption on the full node. So it's a lot easier if you're centralized in order to do that. So Bitcoin's strength

Starting point is 00:38:51 is its decentralization, but it also comes with this really important quality of being extremely conservative, like extraordinarily conservative in software updates, in testing and I think we see that in the community. I think the culture in the community is exactly that. And I think it needs to stay that, especially because we are decentralized. It's not like we can convince a host of 10,000 full node operators to just do this one thing. I mean, each person is thinking in their own terms and their own critical thinking as to what they think it is or isn't. Correct.

Starting point is 00:39:28 And I think that's an important distinction because you see so often hacks happen in the alt-coin world and then they just say, oh, look, we're just going to pause the network. We couldn't pause the Bitcoin network. We couldn't say, hey, guys, stop trading or hey guys, stop transacting. You can't stop them. So how do we coordinate these things? Well, it takes work. It takes individuals who put their hand up and try to coordinate things. I mean, even if I'm thinking back to the Taproot Soft Fork, which is now activated in Bitcoin, but it took work. It took work from hundreds of reviewers of Taproot code. It took work from the likes of, For example, Alejandro Dillatorre from, so he used to be at Pullin and now he's got his own consulting operation going.

Starting point is 00:40:09 And he went around trying to find, ask all the miners, hey, are you interested to run Taproot and try to help build support? And so fundamentally, anyone trying to change Bitcoin has to do that. And I think Taproot was a great example of a decentralized effort because you had, you know, people like that. And you had people like, I believe, Hampus Schoberg, who set up the Taproot. Watch website and all these other people who are contributing in their own little way, whether that was reviewing or helping explaining, this was or trying to write code and trying to help the miners get on board as well. People trying to pressure the exchanges saying, hey, CZ and Binance, please support TapRood. We want TapRoot. And so I think that is probably a good example. I mean, there was arguments internally about

Starting point is 00:40:50 how to do it, right? About how to activate it. He stopped following me after I did that. He used to follow my account and then he stopped following me after I pinged him on Taproot. Hey, from a regulatory standpoint, how do you see 2022 playing out? Ginsler, and I'm talking mostly from a U.S. perspective, and I know you're looking at it from a global perspective, but here in the U.S., Gensler has just been beating the drum, that there's basically Bitcoin and then there's everything else. And how do you see him making a play at this? Is he going to make a play at this? Because, I mean, he's been in charge at the SEC for quite a while now, and it doesn't seem like anything has really been done. So is he going to get something done in this administration,

Starting point is 00:41:37 assuming that he's there for only four years total? Is he going to be able to get anything done? What does that even look like if he gets something done? What are your thoughts? When it comes to the SEC, the big question everyone seems to ask is what about the spot ETF, right? And so there's different concerns. I've seen people share some share concerns about re-hypropocation or using paper coin to suppress the price of Bitcoin in the physical, or in the physical in the spot markets. I think, broadly speaking, it seems like a lot of the regulatory attention and pressure is coming more around stable coins.

Starting point is 00:42:11 It's not really coming around, right? It's not really coming around Bitcoin. It seems like, you know, for better or worse, it seems like they sort of see it like, oh, Bitcoin, that's just your little store of value coin. You guys can do whatever you want with that. But stable coins, okay, we're regulating that. And obviously, securities, we're regulating that. That's, again, that's as I, as a relative outsider in that sense, I'm not an American myself.

Starting point is 00:42:33 There obviously as a Bitcoin podcast of myself, I try to stay up on the space and what's going on. So it seems to me like if there were actions coming from that side, it might be more against alt coins and maybe regulation on stable coins is probably the most likely aspect that I can see. Now, in the future, it could well be that Bitcoin becomes a political football, just like lots of other things. and there might be arguments about proof of work energy usage. There might be arguments about inequality. There might be arguments about all sorts of aspects. Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors.

Starting point is 00:43:09 No, it's not your imagination. Risk and regulation are ramping up and customers now expect proof of security just to do business. That's why VANTA is a game changer. VANTA automates your compliance process and brings compliance, risk, and customer trust together on one AI-powered platform. So whether you're prepping for a SOC 2 or running an enterprise GRC program, VANTA

Starting point is 00:43:32 keeps you secure and keeps your deals moving. Instead of chasing spreadsheets and screenshots, VANTA gives you continuous automation across more than 35 security and privacy frameworks. Companies like Ramp and Ryder spend 82% less time on audits with Vantta. That's not just faster compliance, it's more time for growth. If I were running a startup or scaling a team today, this is exactly the type of platform I'd want in place. Get started at vanta.com slash billionaires.

Starting point is 00:44:03 That's vanta.com slash billionaires. Ever wanted to explore the world of online trading, but haven't dared try? The futures market is more active now than ever before, and plus 500 futures is the perfect place to start. Plus 500 gives you access to a wide range of instruments, the S&P 500, NASDAQ, Bitcoin, gas, and much more. Explore equity indices, energy, metals, 4X, crypto, and beyond. With a simple and intuitive platform, you can trade from anywhere, right from your phone. Deposit with a minimum of $100 and experience the fast, accessible futures trading you've been waiting for.

Starting point is 00:44:44 See a trading opportunity. You'll be able to trade it in just two clicks once your account. is open. Not sure if you're ready, not a problem. Plus 500 gives you an unlimited, risk-free demo account with charts and analytic tools for you to practice on. With over 20 years of experience, Plus 500 is your gateway to the markets. Visit plus 500.com to learn more. Trading in futures involves risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone. Not all applicants will qualify. Plus 500, it's trading with a plus. investors don't typically park their cash in high-yield savings accounts. Instead, they often use

Starting point is 00:45:25 one of the premier passive income strategies for institutional investors, private credit. Now, the same passive income strategy is available to investors of all sizes thanks to the Fundrise income fund, which has more than $600 million invested in a 7.97% distribution rate. With traditional savings yields falling, it's no wonder private credit has grown to be a trillion asset class in the last few years. Visit fundrise.com slash WSB to invest in the Fundrise income fund in just minutes. The fund's total return in 2025 was 8%, and the average annual total return since inception is 7.8%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, current distribution rate as of

Starting point is 00:46:10 1231, 2025. Carefully consider the investment material before investing, including objectives, risks, charges, and expenses. This and other information can be found in the income funds prospectus at fundrise.com slash income. This is a paid advertisement. All right. Back to the show. And it makes sense why they're going after stable coins from a government standpoint,

Starting point is 00:46:33 not as a individual, right? But what it really does, if I'm going to simplify it for the audience, is just the Fed, the central banks have enormous control over these units, these Fiat units, the system. And if they don't like a transaction, they can just completely stop it. They can go into your account at that bank. They can claw all those units out of your account at will. And a stable coin effectively bypasses that control. They're not able to do that with a stable coin if you got it in your account. So I think the growth rate is scaring the hell out of them. Do you know the market cap of the USDC and some of these stable coins? I know it's over 100 billion. But

Starting point is 00:47:16 billion, right? Oh, yeah, it's grown a lot. I don't have the number off the top of my head, but yeah, definitely it's absolutely true. They've grown massively over the last year or two. I think the demand for them isn't just in our Bitcoin and crypto world. It's actually people even just in other countries who just want US dollar exposure. And they found it easier, for whatever reason, to hold USD stable coins than to try to get physical cash, or maybe they just found it more convenient because they could transact. To your point, the regulation aspect of it is that typically with these stable coins, it's only KYC, know your customer, AML, anti-money laundering. A lot of those requirements seem to only come at the beginning at the end of the process there

Starting point is 00:47:59 and where people who are just kind of interacting inside that closed loop, there's not as much control being leveraged there by the government into regulatory controls around who spends what to wear and sells and whatever. So it remains to be seeing what happens there. If the US government does try to clamp down further on the stable coins and say no, even for every each intermediary step, we need KIC or we need some kind of identification that potentially, we don't know what direction they come down there. But I also think we are going to see more technological development around synthetic US dollar. And so there are ideas around this being done like what some people have termed stable channels or also arguably called D.

Starting point is 00:48:41 ELC stablecoins, right? So it's like this idea of a discrete logarithmic contract stablecoin. And so, which is essentially like the idea that you might have a lightning channel with somebody and it would be actually a contract for difference in the background. And so we might load some stats and then, you know, try to true up based on the price of the real USD price. So that, that might be an interesting technological direction. And of course, I'm sure you're aware, but just for listeners, HRF and Strike recently put up a bounty for, I think it's a one Bitcoin bounty, a kind of I can't recall, but essentially they are looking for somebody to create that. Essentially, there are a lot of people, and I recently came, I was in, I was down in El Salvador.

Starting point is 00:49:19 So I was there for adopting Bitcoin and Love Bitcoin. And talking to people there, I definitely got the sense, a lot of people really like the use of stable coins there. Now, I don't, I'm not a stable coin guy myself. I'm just Bitcoin only. But I see stable coins as kind of like a crypto fiat, right? Like they're just kind of, they're just looking for a way to get some US dollar exposure. And for better or worse, that seems to be what a lot of people there want.

Starting point is 00:49:40 So then it seems like, well, the market now has stable coins, right? There's the likes of Tether and USDC and others that they are able to use, whether that's for loans or to try to, if they're trading around. Of course, my preferred answer would just be everyone just go straight to Bitcoin. You know, that's not realistic. I think there will be people who just use it like a bridging step. And so whether that's people trying to use it for payments for services, they're using stable coins.

Starting point is 00:50:07 But then that also brings the question of, well, Could there be technological approaches? And not necessarily like the kind of algorithmic stable coin in the sense, let's say from 2017 era, what we're talking about here is more like technology that allows people to replicate the value of, say, one USD or 100 USD in Bitcoin. So this might be something that comes in the future using this DLC technology. Although it does require some updates and changes to the Bitcoin protocol. So this is an area where I'm sort of, I'm getting to the edge of what I could explain.

Starting point is 00:50:40 accurately. But essentially, the idea is that you might load in a certain number of stats based on what that price is. And you might have to load in a bit more than that because obviously there's price movement. And then the other person, the other side of that trade is the one who's, well, one side is like offering the offer. The other side is the one who wants the stability. And so then they would have to true up at the end. And just like now in a lightning channel, like if I have a lightning channel open with you and I send some to you and then we close that Lightning Channel, well, your true balance is what goes back to you on chain. So in a similar kind of way, I think that's kind of the idea of like a lightning stable coin, although it might not be exactly

Starting point is 00:51:20 the same as Lightning Today because it might not have like multi-hop. Like, for example, in the Lightning Network today, it can route through multiple parties, whereas in this case, it would be more like a one-to-one aspect. But I think it might be a couple of years before we really get that coming to fruition and actually being available. There are other efforts being done. One, I like when I was in El Salvador for LaBitCon, some of the money on chain guys were talking to me, and that's basically like a stable coin that they're doing using RSK. Now, being honest, I haven't looked into in-depth in how that works, but that's another idea that people are exploring.

Starting point is 00:51:57 Wow. And so if I was going to try to summarize what I think I heard, through discrete log contracts, which is happening all on Bitcoin, you're effectively able to create a synthetic stable coin. So if a person wants to hold dollars, and we all understand why stable coins work for so many people, they work because most people don't have a lot of disposable income, and all of their bills are denominated in dollars, and they want to make sure that they can meet those obligations at the end of every month after their paycheck. So that's why people want to hold dollars, and that's why stable coins are going to be around.

Starting point is 00:52:32 I suspect they're going to be around for a very long time. And when I think about the government response here, they might not understand. I'd say most people in the community don't even understand what's going on here from a technical standpoint is this can all be synthetically created like you just described on the Bitcoin protocol that if you want to hold dollars, you can make a Bitcoin deposit and somebody else is going to take the other side of the trade trying to participate in the volatility direction that they think it's going. And you get a stable, denominated relative to whatever fiat they're trying to compare it to.

Starting point is 00:53:07 that's unstoppable. Like, you're not stopping that. You're not able to control that. I don't care who you are from a technical standpoint. Good luck. Yeah. So I think that's the goal of what I think there are people working on this kind of idea. That said.

Starting point is 00:53:23 You said strike was offering a one Bitcoin bounty for somebody that does this? Right. So Strike and HRF have put up, I believe it was a one Bitcoin bounty for somebody who's able to create. Now, I don't know the details. it, but essentially it was an interesting idea came across my feed. Now, I think there are others who, let's say, Shortbits, right? So they're a team working on DLC and Chris Stewart from Short Bits and Nadav Cohen are definitely good ones to speak to on this kind of thing because they could speak to it at a level that I'm kind of only able to give a very high level explanation.

Starting point is 00:53:59 Someone like Chris Stewart or Nadav Cohen could probably go in more depth there. But yeah, that's That's essentially the idea and it represents an interesting thing because when you think about it like, what are regulators going to be able to stop then? If this ends up being built into Bitcoin, let's say it comes in two or three years time, well maybe people use stable coins for the here and now, right? The tethers and USDCs of the world and others. And then in a few years time, if this idea is there, well then they might choose to use that. Now of course, everything has tradeoffs and we don't know there could be some other security

Starting point is 00:54:32 tradeoff or some other availability, something, you know, it could be something there. But I think that's definitely an interesting aspect. Now, we're also seeing other approaches. So, for example, John Carvalia with synthetics, I believe it's called, his new startup is kind of having a Bitcoin world that does Bitcoin and Lightning and I believe Tether, because it's kind of like there's an ownership relationship there with, I believe, with Bitfinex or Tether, either or. But that's like another way of having everything all in one app, right? You've got Bitcoin, the Lightning and Tether all on the one app. that's another possibility. And so that might be an interesting angle also. So there's this video floating around of Vitalik quoting that 85 terabytes per year is totally fine.

Starting point is 00:55:16 I mean, this is crazy talk. This is like, and I don't want to bash, I'm not here to bash other projects. I really want everybody to be able to work on whatever they think is value added, right? We're obviously Bitcoiners. We think that there's value in keeping the block size small and like the long-term growth. And I think when you're talking about decentralization, it's so important to not talk about today where it's at, but where is it going to be in 10 or 20 years from now? And when I look at all these other protocols, that's the thing for me, from an engineering standpoint, I'm just saying the growth rate is far exceeding the growth rate of storage

Starting point is 00:55:51 capacity and hardware in a super meaningful kind of way. So what are your thoughts on this quote, 85 terabytes per year is totally fine as far as the amount of storage that's needed. That's in today's terms. I couldn't imagine what 10 years the terms would be. And maybe what are your thoughts on some of these other protocols that are trying to do all of these things on layer one? I'm not aware of the full context of what Vitalik was saying, but I mean, generally it sounds pretty crazy to me. I believe in the idea that the average person should be able to run a Bitcoin node. Now, my hope is that it's able to be sustained and that people can do this. And there might be other tricks and things that are

Starting point is 00:56:34 employed to be able to keep it that way, whether that is assume UTXO by James OB, or maybe Tadj, Driger's work on U3XO, Tadj and some others as well. So those might be interesting ideas. But essentially the point being, if you don't make it easy for average people to be able to run a Bitcoin node or to be able to run a node, then the system will tend to centralize. And when the system tends to centralize, then you have to be thinking about the capture and political risks associated. Because if the system becomes overly centralized, what are you really creating? Are you just recreating a new system? But with yourselves at the top, I think most of us here in Bitcoin see this like, we're trying to create something different. We're trying to

Starting point is 00:57:21 create something that's not corrupted in the same way that the Fiat system has become. And so for me, it just seems very, it's counter to the point. I just don't see why there's a long term there. Now, I understand that now for some people, maybe, no, I'm not a trader. I'm a stacker and a hodler, but maybe there are some people out there who think I can just play this for the short term and I'm going to try to time it in and out and whatever. I wouldn't recommend it. I think most people will fail trying that.

Starting point is 00:57:46 I think there's tons of them too, Stefan. Yeah. There's tons of them. Yeah. And I just wouldn't, you know, I wouldn't want to try to time that. I don't know that episode you and I did about the final cycle, right? We don't want to try to time this. You want to just be accumulating regularly because you never know when it is the final cycle.

Starting point is 00:58:03 It could happen, right? This is gradually then suddenly. And in the meantime, you've been doing 100% compound annual growth rate. So, I mean, there's no rush. Exactly. If anything, you want it to kind of stay, you know, at a slower growth rate so you can stack more of it. Exactly right. And I think that's ultimately, it's about patience.

Starting point is 00:58:23 And so we're living in an age when very few people have patients and very few people. and very few people are really thinking about the long term. But I think that is the essence of Bitcoin ethos is really thinking about and building for the long term, whether that is you're having a family and having children to pass on a legacy or whether you're building a protocol and you want this protocol to last. Many, many, many years after you and I are gone, that we want something there that creates a certain level of discipline that was not there and available in the, Fiat world. I think it's fair to say that there are cultural impacts of Fiat money. And so this

Starting point is 00:59:02 is something I've been talking about for years. I've written about this. People like Safety and the OG G Gita Hilsman, Austrian economist, has written extensively about this. I think there are cultural impacts of Fiat money. It causes us to make more high-type preference or impatient decisions when really the important decisions we make are those long-term decisions about what am I doing over the next 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 years. And so that is really, I think, a significant difference in the mindset of the typical bitcoins versus what many altcoin enthusiasts are thinking about. So I really just think it comes down to having enough people who have that vision and have

Starting point is 00:59:44 that belief that, yeah, we really can make the world a better place. And part of that starts with fixing the money, as Marty Vance says, right? fix the money, fix the world. I got two more questions for you. The one here that I'm really curious to hear your answer to, what was the biggest takeaway for you or the biggest surprise in 2021 that you just didn't see coming?

Starting point is 01:00:04 It's got to be the El Salvador legal tender law, right? Just to think that an entire country would just go there and just say, yeah, you've got to think about it from this point of view, right? A lot of countries are not thinking very forward. They're not thinking, they might see something as like, hey, this is a cash cow.

Starting point is 01:00:21 I'm just going to make money out of it. And look, I can get capital gains. But to actually go the other way and realize and arguably see that there's a long-term vision, now, of course, I think there are certain aspects of criticism around Buckela and what's going on in El Salvador. But I also think it's fair to say he's giving empowerment to the people and giving and taking away a very important intervention that the government has, which is capital gains tax. If you take that away, you are massively opening up the market.

Starting point is 01:00:51 I think. And I'm really interested to see what happens with the Bitcoin city, right? This whole idea of basically it was zero income tax, but a 10% sales tax. And maybe it'll be more like a user pays model. Who knows? So I think that's probably the biggest surprise. I think probably number two on that would be the China Bans Bitcoin, right? Because up until then it was, it was a meme. It was like, yeah, whatever. I did not see that. Every Tuesday. Right. And then actually, a lot of the network did move out. Now, in fairness, there's still a reasonable chunk of miners there in China, but still, we're probably talking in something like hundreds of thousands of miners, mining equipment, of those basics, were shifted out of China into USA, Kazakhstan, Canada, and other

Starting point is 01:01:34 places around the world. And so that was probably the other big surprise for 2021 for me. So Joggy posted a comment. He wanted you to expand on the idea of growth deflation. I was curious what this is. This is one of my hobby horse issues. I love talking about growth deflation because I see it as Bitcoin is this massive, positive sum technology for the world, right? Because we are going to be living in a world where your money rises in purchasing power because a lot of people think about deflation the wrong way.

Starting point is 01:02:07 And so I've done various episodes on my show talking about this and it's like a hobby horse issue for me. A lot of people think deflation is bad. But actually what we need to do is distinguish between the types of deflation because there is the credit collapse sort of deflate or bank credit deflation, which is like the economy is collapsing because of the prior overinflation or the malinvestments created are now being wiped away because the market is sort of realizing effectively that those investments were not profitable or the entrepreneurs realized they do not have the resources to complete that.

Starting point is 01:02:39 That's one aspect of the quote unquote bad deflation. But there's also the good deflation, which is growth deflation. And so growth deflation just refers to the beneficial rise in purchasing power that we would experience under a hard money world, whether that's a gold standard or a Bitcoin standard. I obviously believe it's going to be a Bitcoin standard. So just by merely holding Bitcoin, we will become richer over time. And so I think it'll be really different to think about because we are used to, and we've, for all in our lives, we've grown up in a world where you lose purchasing power over time.

Starting point is 01:03:16 if you hold it in dollars. And so I just think it's such a phenomenal and incredible concept to me. And I think it's so poorly understood as well because I think people just conflate everything together. They're not able to distinguish and decompose those into their component parts and say, oh, hey, this growth deflation. And to understand living in a Bitcoin, living under a Bitcoin standard, living in the Bitcoinized world, the hyper-bitonized world, is going to be a growth deflationary world. So the future is bright. I really think that is the white pill for all of us is that, look, there are times now where we might not be as free as we want to be, but I really do believe the future is going to be bright so long

Starting point is 01:03:57 as we make it there, that a Bitcoin standard will genuinely improve the way society operates in so many ways. And I think we're going to basically massively remove or reduce global poverty. We're going to massively give people much more of an opportunity to really engage in what they want to do and work on things that are in their passion and things that they really believe in for the long term. So that's my message on growth deflation. So if I was going to summarize this, for Stefan Lavera, the price of meat in 2021 went down. That's correct. That is excellent. Yes, that's right. Okay, I lied. There's one more question. You're a favorite book or maybe And if you have a book that's not about Bitcoin or finance, and then maybe a Bitcoin or finance book.

Starting point is 01:04:51 An interesting one that hit me was by Cal Newport, Deep Work. I think that was an interesting one because essentially the message and the moral of that story was that people are getting distracted by the likes of social media when actually we are living in a time where the rewards go to the people who are the best in their field. And so the people who are the best in their field are often the ones who are able to spend that time doing deep work. And so that for me was an interesting one. Yeah, I would say that's probably the non-Bitcoin book. And then the Bitcoin book, probably one of my favorites is, well, the ethics of money production by Gita Hilsman. So that for me was probably like a really, I just have such a strong recollection of reading that book. I was away on a work trip. I was

Starting point is 01:05:36 still in my, in a Fiat job at that time. And this is maybe 2013. or 14. And so obviously, I was really into Bitcoin at that point. And I was reading this book. And obviously, there's not one mention of Bitcoin in the book. I think the book came out in 2008, funnily enough. You're just reading that book and you're just thinking, wow. It's just confirming so many things that we thought about our Bitcoin thesis. And so I remember reading that in 2013 and 14. And it just really, it was such a strongly influential book on my own thought. And so that's why the ethics of money production is probably one of my favorites there. And I had the pleasure of interviewing Gido Hulsman, the author, as well.

Starting point is 01:06:14 We're going to have a link in the show notes to Stefan's interview with the author. And obviously you have an amazing, amazing podcast. I listen to your podcast all the time, Stefan. It's such an honor to have you on the show. Is there anything else you want to highlight or point the audience to? So, yeah, so Stefanlavera.com is the place to find my podcast. And of course, I work at Swan Bitcoin as well. So that's Swan.com.

Starting point is 01:06:37 That's where people can learn about Bitcoin and start accumulating Bitcoin as well. And Preston, it's been a pleasure. I'm a big fan of your work also. I think you do a great job at really skillfully asking good questions. So that's why I'm a big fan of your work also. Yeah, once again, thank you for inviting me. Awesome having you, Stefan. If you guys enjoyed this conversation, be sure to follow the show on whatever podcast application

Starting point is 01:06:59 you use. Just search for We Study Billionaires. The Bitcoin-specific shows come out every Wednesday, and I'd love to have you as a listener. If you enjoyed the show or you learned something new or you found it valuable, if you can leave a review, we would really appreciate that. And it's something that helps others find the interview in the search algorithm. So anything you can do to help out with a review, we would just greatly appreciate. And with that, thanks for listening. And I'll catch you again next week. Thank you for listening to TIP. To access our show notes, courses or forums, go to the

Starting point is 01:07:33 The Investorspodcast.com. This show is for entertainment. purposes only. Before making any decisions, consult a professional. This show is copyrighted by the Investors Podcast Network. Written permissions must be granted before syndication or rebroadcasting.

We Study Billionaires - The Investor’s Podcast Network - BTC060: Bitcoin Tech w/ Stephan Livera (Bitcoin Podcast)

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.