We Study Billionaires - The Investor’s Podcast Network - BTC126: Redeeming GBTC w/ David Bailey (Bitcoin Podcast)
Episode Date: April 19, 2023David Bailey and Preston Pysh get into an in-depth conversation about the GBTC Bitcoin Trust and all of the issues it's had over the past year and a half. IN THIS EPISODE, YOU’LL LEARN: 00:00 - Int...ro 01:29 - What backs Bitcoin? 10:27 - CBDCs and what happens next. 13:14 - FedNow and what happens after it's launch. 18:43 - The actual impact of picking winners and losers for decades on end. 20:14 - The Skull of Satoshi. 29:43 - What it's like building a Bitcoin media company as an entrepreneur. 29:43 - Growing the Bitcoin Conference. 45:32 - GBTC and the campaign for shareholders to redeem the Bitcoin in the trust. Disclaimer: Slight discrepancies in the timestamps may occur due to podcast platform differences. BOOKS AND RESOURCES Join the exclusive TIP Mastermind Community to engage in meaningful stock investing discussions with Stig, Clay, and the other community members. Redeem GBTC Website. David Bailey's Twitter. The Bitcoin Miami Conference. NEW TO THE SHOW? Check out our We Study Billionaires Starter Packs. Browse through all our episodes (complete with transcripts) here. Try our tool for picking stock winners and managing our portfolios: TIP Finance Tool. Enjoy exclusive perks from our favorite Apps and Services. Stay up-to-date on financial markets and investing strategies through our daily newsletter, We Study Markets. Learn how to better start, manage, and grow your business with the best business podcasts. SPONSORS Support our free podcast by supporting our sponsors: River Toyota Range Rover Daloopa The Bitcoin Way American Express Found Vacasa Onramp Facet SimpleMining Public Fundrise USPS AT&T Shopify Fundrise Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm
Transcript
Discussion (0)
You're listening to TIP.
Hey everyone, welcome to this Wednesday's release of the Bitcoin Fundamentals podcast.
On today's show, I have Bitcoin OG, CEO, and owner of Bitcoin magazine, Mr. David Bailey.
During the show, we cover a lot of ground, and in the middle of the discussion, David and I get into an in-depth conversation about the GBT Bitcoin Trust and all of the issues it's had over the past year and a half.
David understands it better than anyone I've ever interviewed, so if you're interested in the internet,
in understanding everything that's gone wrong, you won't want to miss that part of the interview.
We also talk about how David grew this massive Bitcoin conference from small to huge,
bringing in tens of thousands of people and household names.
And in general, this was just a really fun conversation.
And I learned a ton because David is extremely smart and very articulate in the way he describes things.
So with that, sit back and enjoy this chat with the very thoughtful Mr. David Bailey.
You're listening to Bitcoin Fundamentals by the Investors Podcast Network.
Now for your host, Preston Pish.
Hey everyone, welcome to the show.
I'm very excited about this.
This is long overdue.
I'm here with David Bailey.
David, thanks for making time to come on the show.
Preston, thanks for having me on.
I just want to start with a tweet that you recently put out there because I really like this
and I think it's pertinent, and the Bitcoin politics piece where everybody's got an opinion
and some are really misinformed.
You posted, you said, what backs Bitcoin?
Trust in this idea of capitalism.
You said, what backs Fiat?
Trust in politicians.
Which one are you betting on?
And I love this.
Go ahead and explain what you're getting at.
Yeah, well, it was actually, I was retweeting someone else where they asked what backs TCIP.
and, you know, the underlying message of that is like the value of TCPIP is really the value of the network of people that you're able to communicate, interact with, etc.
And it's really in the same way that's what makes Bitcoin valuable.
Bitcoin's value comes from the 50 million plus economic actors that use it to engage in commerce and trade and economic activity.
And that's what backs it.
And if you take a long-term perspective on why is this something, you know, that I should buy in on is because what governs it,
value and what governs its how it works is free market individual actors acting of their own
volition in a truly capitalistic sense. That's how currency and money should work. But money as it
exists today has been bastardized to such a degree that money is really about control. And it's really
about rather than trusting the free market, you're trusting that a set of politicians or a set of
academics selected by politicians are going to make decisions that are better than the free market
is going to make them. And I feel like when you boil it all down, that's just in essence,
like are you long free markets or are you long essentially controlled economies? And I feel like
that's a debate that's already been resolved. So, uh, yeah, I'm betting on capitalism. What about you?
Absolutely. 100%. My frustration with like this past event,
with the Silicon Valley Bank and just everything that the Fed stepped in and did, it just dupes people
from actually digging in and actually having a consequence to the actions of these fractional
reserve systems. So, like, there was, I couldn't even imagine the amount of money that should
have been burned up in all of these collapses. And I don't want to see people be harmed,
but at the same time, they're masking the reality of how fragile and how broke this fractional
Reserve system is by coming in and backstopping things and then you're manipulating the cost
of capital. So, like, how do you see it manifesting that people will actually ask those
questions of like why they should trust this system that doesn't have any counterparty risk
versus the legacy system that always just gets bailed out and they, and people that are using
that legacy system don't even know how fragile it is or how manipulated it is because they
keep backstopping it. Yeah, I mean, I totally agree with you that it's sad.
when bad things happen to people.
But, you know, there is no action that the government can do that is in any way saving people.
It's just distributing the cost of what happened to other people.
They're choosing who bears the cost and who doesn't.
And so, you know, in the case of Silicon Valley Bank, it should have been the depositors
of the bank that bore the cost, which sucks for the depositors.
But instead, it's going to be socialized across all Americans that are going to bear the cost.
And then, you know, the Silicon Valley Bank deposits, they're going to get some benefit put on them
that they get their deposits out.
In terms of, you know, how does this like kind of come to fruition?
I think what happens is one system thrives and one system decays.
And over time, the difference between the thriving system and the decaying system
becomes overwhelmingly obvious to anyone who can pay attention at all.
And right, it's already obvious to some people.
But like as the difference, the divergence grows stronger, it becomes even more obvious.
And so a good maybe example of this is like,
the United States versus the Soviet Union.
And the United States, not that the United States was some shining, you know,
a city on the hill of capitalism,
but relative to what was the essentially controlled currency that the USSR used,
much more free market.
And you saw one society decay and you saw one society relatively thrived.
And, you know, I feel like if the USSR had ruled the world,
it would have lasted a lot longer because there wouldn't have been that alternative.
like I guess the Tina, the Tina effect.
Like there has to be an alternative to compare your reality against.
And so Bitcoin is just going to keep moving along, growing over time.
The people who are a part of the Bitcoin economy are going to be insulated from different bank runs that happen, financial calamities that happen,
that will constantly require more and more reaction from regulators, which will require more and more socialization of cost across all the users of that system.
and the Bitcoin system will see the good actors thrive and grow and benefit greatly from being a part of Bitcoin.
The people who hold Bitcoin will thrive.
Their net worth will grow.
Their purchasing power will grow.
And people will look at the two options.
They'll say, okay, well, you know, the U.S. dollar may still be around, but I'm going to choose into this better system where I see people thriving.
And I think that that's a long process and then a sudden process.
And I don't know where we are exactly in the time horizon of that adoption.
but, you know, it's kind of like these bank runs.
It's like the banks bleed deposits slowly.
People start seeing the writing on the wall of what's happening.
You know, I don't know if you saw the news report that like the month or two before Silicon Valley Bank failed.
There was like a massive amount of insider loans that were approved.
I did see.
Yes.
Yeah.
So, you know, it's like people, the writing was on the wall.
And then everything accelerates as there becomes this social awareness that the writing
on the wall. And, you know, and I think in large part, like, and this was already kind of
implicit, but I think Silicon Valley Bank and signature credit have made it semi-explicit.
All deposits of all banks in the United States are guaranteed. And so ultimately, all deposits
of all banks in the world are guaranteed, because if you, if you can have international
banks fail, those international banks can bring down your domestic banks. So, you know, since
they're all tied together, okay, now, like implicitly, that all the banks,
you know, are too big to fail. And once you're at that point, it's like, okay, now we've
nationalized the global banking system. Okay, well, what is a rational actor doing in that
scenario? They seek out risk. Like, okay, my downside is protected. Like, I benefit from
taking on excessive risk, having excessive returns. And if things go sideways, you know,
passing the butt on to the rest of society, banks will over time trend towards making
riskier and riskier decisions under that pretext.
and the problems and the costs that society is going to have to bear is just going to grow proportionately.
And that doesn't even include the dislocations to what would be a fully functioning free market that we would have in the world,
an economy that if capital was deployed as the free market actually needed it,
would flow much differently in a way that would maybe create more growth and more value for society.
We're not going to see that.
So that's the opportunity cost side of it.
But then the behavior that we're going to incentivize is risk-taking on a,
grander and grander level to such a point in that eventually there will come a calamity
that it won't be possible to fail your way out of.
And I mean, I feel like that's really when you have a run on the reserve currency,
when you have a run on trust, the trust in the system itself, rather than just the trust
in a bank, but truly the trust in the dollar, trust in the United States government,
like that's impossible to recover from.
Like you may be able to use an army to force people to, you know, begrudgingly comply with
something, but, you know, trust is something that takes a long time to earn and is quickly,
you know, it's quickly lost.
It seems like when, as they've been using QE for the past decade plus, that your typical
common person doesn't even understand that they're grossly manipulating markets through
that type of tool.
When we went through COVID 2020 and they started writing checks to everybody and people
could spend it however, whenever, as long as they wanted to because it's money,
or it's currency that doesn't have a coupon, like, term limit to it. I think you'll probably
know where I'm going with this question, by the way that I'm phrasing that. As all these people
got those checks, they were able to go out and spend willy-nilly on whatever they wanted,
and we saw the prices of everything start to really shoot up because of the tool that they
were using, which was a form of UBI. As we go through the next crisis, whatever it is, however
it manifests itself, a lot of people were saying that it's going to be commercial real estate,
combined with like regional banks, they're going to have to do more UBI-like activities in order
to stimulate the money that doesn't trickle down through QE or yield curve control or whatever,
which is the tool of choice for them because people don't understand it. So I guess when we're
talking about acceleration is the CBDC, the thing that really starts to accelerate people's
understanding of the power of Bitcoin that's been pretty much lost on them for all these years
because they really just don't understand how the markets are being manipulated because
with the CBDC, they're actually able to control the duration of money. And I think that that's
going to be important for them to kind of try to control the order of all of this.
You know, I have a hard time predicting what's going to happen with CBDCs because I'm still
of the mindset that I think they're going to struggle to ever get them deployed into the market
and get people to actually use them. I don't really think that there's a use case for CBDC
from the perspective of the end user. And, you know, I think that a lot of the excitement
that central banks have, well, okay, of course there's the totalitarian excitement of like, hey,
we can have monetary policy tools that we currently don't have. But it's like,
they look at stable coins and they think that that's somehow like a validation of the idea that
people want some stable digital currency. But in reality, the use case for stable coins is actually
regulatory arbitrage. Like, stable coins are just a wrapper on a bank account. And so, you know,
they pay no interest. They have no FDIC insurance. So they're really an inferior bank account.
So why would anyone ever hold a stable coin? Well, they hold a stable coin because they can't
touch a bank account for whatever reason. Maybe there's currency controls. Maybe there is,
they don't want to have the tax authorities tipped off. Maybe they want to buy unrestricted securities overseas.
there's a whole list of reasons.
But none of them come down to, oh, wow, the technology is just so great on stable coins
that I'm willing to give up what my bank can do in order to hold this IOU.
That's just money sitting in a bank account somewhere else.
So I think, you know, at the end of the day, those are all use cases that I don't see any
CBDC being like, unless they're saying, hey, we're going to waive the restrictions that we applied
and put on bank accounts in the first place, which we can just do.
like who's getting, why is someone going to be using CBDCs?
You know, they would really need to keep you from using a bank account to force the adoption of it.
And you've seen so many nations now, like people still think these CBDCs are just like purely
in beta mode. But, you know, this stuff has been around for a while. I mean, China started
working on CBDCs in like 2017, 2016, Nigeria's, I mean, there's lots of nations that have
rolled them out. Like, you can't find one where they've been successful at all. Like, it typically
ends in them trying to ban Bitcoin and trying to force people to use CBDC that it still doesn't
work. So I don't know. It's hard for me to predict what is a practical policy outcome,
a monetary policy for CBDCs if they can never solve the problem of how do they get the
end user to have trust in the system. Yeah. And it almost seems, especially here in the US,
like they just can't find a contractor or somebody to actually stand it up in a technical way
that is trustworthy.
They just seem to be so far behind the power curve and the execution of it.
You know, they're launching like Fed now.
Yeah, yeah.
Like, let's see what happens with Fed now.
I think they'll find that they're going to suffer from all the same problems that,
you know, every API-based banks suffers from.
I think like there's a reason why this problem hasn't already been solved and just
centralizing it at the Federal Reserve, which I don't know how many people work at the
Federal Reserve. But I think that that's just like doom for failure.
Kalin's done a good job of talking about the need for higher capital requirements at the banks
whenever they speed up the settlement and have APIs that can settle over the weekend.
Like all of a sudden, if you were a bank that was sitting on $10 billion, you might need $30 billion
now in order to have enough capital to handle the speed at which the settlement will happen
under this new system. It just seems like it's a fed wire that's just faster and it's just going to
require them to hold more more cash on hand, which I don't think helps them control. Does that help
them control the amount of money supply or make it, make it harder, right? I feel like actually
the slowness of the payment system we have is a feature, not a bug. Yeah. From their perspective.
So it's like, yeah, I don't, I'm just kind of a wait and see on how that plays out.
I do agree with your opinion on in terms of like where financial calamity is coming from.
Like, you know, that there's a fairly straightforward cause and effect of like, okay, the,
the government injected a lot of liquidity into the banks and certain people's bank accounts.
Okay, you can go through the list of people that benefited disproportionately during that time period.
So you mentioned UBI for individuals, which was the unemployment checks.
There was the PPP program, which pumped a ton of money into small businesses,
medium-sized businesses, there was massive underwriting of junk bonds, of corporate debt that was done
as well during that time. And when they dropped the interest rates to zero, junk bonds, like just the
trash of trash companies were able to finance their debt, lock in multi-year debt offerings at
extremely low rates. And, you know, when everyone that was flushed with cash in their bank account,
Everyone wanted to buy real estate.
So you had a massive pump in crypto, tech, real estate.
Those were the things that most outperformed, let's say, of all assets.
Okay, so what banks are under stress right now?
The banks that banked tech companies.
Okay, the banks that banked crypto companies, the banks that banked real estate companies,
I'm willing to bet you that where we see the next banks that are distressed are going to be
merchant banks, that bank, the companies are having to refinance.
they're done. You're going to have, I mean, you just basically have to see where the cash came in.
Then the banks had to do something with the cash. So they had to deploy it into, you know,
held to maturity securities. They had to loan it out. They had to do something. So like I'm
Silicon Valley Bank. My customers are tech companies. Now they're flooded with venture investment.
They're flooded with cash from, you know, going public or whatever. And now I'm holding their
cash. I'm having deployed in some way. And then now like I'm on the front lines of the change
an interest rate policy of those investments that we made as a bank going underwater,
as well as my customers that were flushed with cash when I made these investments,
now burning cash,
and now I'm having to pay out those customers.
So, like, I think you can just, like, basically map out 2020 of who did well.
And you can, you can correlate that to 2023, who's going to do poorly.
And the sequence of who's going to do poorly.
And this is a multi-year process that's playing out.
Like, I mean, there's some pretty good graphs out there in terms of just like,
what is the net interest margin for these financial institutions?
Like, fundamentally, they have deposits that can leave at any time.
I mean, that's the point of a deposit.
And, you know, they have assets on their balance sheet that, you know,
have some sort of maturity timeline to them.
So until they can get the interest that they're earning on their balance sheet in aggregate
it to match what they need to pay out to their depositors,
which is variable in real time,
to whatever the Fed does,
they're going to be losing deposits if they can't make the interest rate the same,
or they're going to be burning money paying the depositors more money than they have.
So they have to basically choose one of two outcomes.
And like the amount of time it's going to take for their assets
that earn an average interest rate that matches the current Fed funds rate is like four years from now.
So they're just going to be bleeding deposits month over month over month,
for years. And, you know, we're only one and a half years into this process already, and they're
already bank failures. So there's just, the math, like, kind of speaks for itself. There's no way to
balance these two, these two issues. And you're going to have not just bank failures at the
regional banks, you're going to have bank failures at the, at the big banks, too. I mean, this is
really, it's, the fundamental issue is deposit it, to higher earning treasuries or money market accounts,
et cetera.
Yes.
And until there's equalization in the rates, it's not about the bank runs.
The bank runs are just a byproduct of the underlying depositor flight that had been
going on for months and months and months and months.
They want higher rates, but they don't want people to withdraw and put them into
those types of vehicles.
So it's like you can't have it both ways.
It's crazy.
Yeah.
And that gets back to the crux of the issue of like, okay, they're having to take winners
and losers.
Yeah.
But they want everyone to be a winner and no one to be a loser.
Well, it doesn't work like that.
If I give you a money printer machine and then you're having to pick winners and losers,
but you decide to bail out all the participants in the system.
Okay, well, like, someone has to bear the cost of the day.
So, yeah, I don't know how they fix it.
And if they cut rates really quickly, they have another issue on their hands because now
there's all these banks that in order to survive have switched their loan portfolio from
fixed rate in securities that they're holding to variable rate securities.
so they could improve their net interest margin position.
So, like, great, variable rate.
That makes sense when the rates are rising.
But if you cut rates really quickly,
they should have actually been buying fixed rate at that time.
So now they got, like, the basically inverse problem.
And so it's now like which banks benefit and which banks get hurt.
And it's really like the pace at which they're making the changes,
which is unpredictable and difficult for banks to plan for.
So it's like the banks are caught in a hard place.
It's a tough situation.
I honestly don't.
It's difficult to see what the third and fourth order effects of all these changes are because it starts cascading really quickly into the more broad economy, into multiple different sectors.
It's much bigger than just tech and crypto.
Oh, yeah. Yeah. Amazing rundown, David. And I completely agree with your point. Your point about them having to switch over from fixed to variable at the most inopportune time is a really important.
important point and very smart comment. I want to talk to you about the skull of Satoshi.
I love the response that you have on this. And hey, you know what? Come on down to the conference
in Miami here in May. And let's have a real conversation and not some propaganda, you know,
pictures and whatnot. So tell us about what this thing is for people that don't even know what it is.
tell them what it is and then tell them what your response was.
So Skull of Satoshi is an art piece that was commissioned by Greenpeace,
which is an environmentalist group that took a massive bribe, Chris Larson of Ripple.
And so they got a very talented artist to make something that they thought was going to be like,
I guess, a dig at the Bitcoin community.
And all things are good for Bitcoin.
So the community embraced it, loves it, and wants to co-opt it.
did co-opt it. And yeah, so we try to get the school to come to the conference. We've been in talks
with the artist, a cool guy. He's been, he's starting his orange pool process now. He's gone to
Greenpeace to try to get Greenpeace to agree to come and do a debate, bring the school. You know,
Greenpeace overall, so some inside baseball, Greenpeace overall was pretty thrilled with the result
because Greenpeace as like the larger environmental organization,
they only care about like the environment.
Like that's their macro goal.
Yeah.
You know, Chris Larson's just a donor that they're like shilling for that like specific
change the code, you know, thing to get $5 million.
But like at the end of the day, that does not matter to them.
And so when they saw this thing going viral, they're like, you know,
raised awareness about Greenpeace massively on social.
This is the biggest thing we've done on social in a long time.
So they were actually like kind of excited about the response.
But we have been unable and the artist has been unable to get them to engage with us directly about coming to the debate.
So what we thought would be kind of cool would be like we do a debate.
We have some truly impartial judges.
And we also throw up like two QR codes like for both debates.
Oh, that'd be awesome.
Like whichever QR code raises the most funds.
Yeah.
Like, that's the people's choice of who won.
And, you know, if they win, all the funds go to the charity of their choice.
And if we win, all the funds go to the charity of our choice.
And then it's like, okay, like, there's some skin in the game.
There's some economic value.
Oh, my Lord.
To rig the vote.
You can go on there and put $5 million at the vote.
But anyway, so we'll see what happens.
We'll see what happens.
Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors.
All right.
I want you guys to imagine spending three days in Oslo at the height of the summer.
You've got long days of daylight, incredible food, floating saunas on the Oslo Fjord, and every
conversation you have is with people who are actually shaping the future.
That's what the Oslo Freedom Forum is.
From June 1st through the 3rd, 2026, the Oslo Freedom Forum is entering its 18th year,
bringing together activists, technologists, journalists, investors, and builders from all over
the world, many of them operating on the front lines of history.
This is where you hear firsthand stories from people using Bicketts,
Bitcoin to survive currency collapse, using AI to expose human rights abuses, and building technology
under censorship and authoritarian pressures.
These aren't abstract ideas.
These are tools real people are using right now.
You'll be in the room with about 2,000 extraordinary individuals, dissidents, founders,
philanthropists, policymakers, the kind of people you don't just listen to but end up having
dinner with.
Over three days, you'll experience powerful mainstage talks, hands-on workshops, on
freedom tech and financial sovereignty, immersive art installations, and conversations that continue
long after the sessions end. And it's all happening in Oslo in June. If this sounds like your kind
of room, well, you're in luck because you can attend in person. Standard and patron passes are
available at Osloof Freedom Forum.com with patron passes offering deep access, private events,
and small group time with the speakers. The Oslo Freedom Forum isn't just a conference. It's a place where
ideas meet reality and where the future is being built by people living it.
If you run a business, you've probably had the same thought lately.
How do we make AI useful in the real world?
Because the upside is huge, but guessing your way into it is a risky move.
With NetSuite by Oracle, you can put AI to work today.
NetSuite is the number one AI Cloud ERP, trusted by over 43,000 businesses.
It pulls your financials, inventory, commerce, HR, and CRM.
into one unified system.
And that connected data is what makes your AI smarter.
It can automate routine work, surface actionable insights, and help you cut costs while making
fast AI-powered decisions with confidence.
And now with the NetSuite AI connector, you can use the AI of your choice to connect directly
to your real business data.
This isn't some add-on, it's AI built into the system that runs your business.
And whether your company does millions or even hundreds of millions, NetSuite helps you stay ahead.
If your revenues are at least in the seven figures, get their free business guide, demystifying
AI at netsuite.com slash study. The guide is free to you at netsuite.com slash study. NetSuite.com
slash study. When I started my own side business, it suddenly felt like I had to become
10 different people overnight wearing many different hats. Starting something from scratch
can feel exciting, but also incredibly overwhelming and lonely. That's why having to have
the right tools matters. For millions of businesses, that tool is Shopify. Shopify is the
commerce platform behind millions of businesses around the world and 10% of all e-commerce in the U.S.
from brands just getting started to household names. It gives you everything you need in one place,
from inventory to payments to analytics. So you're not juggling a bunch of different platforms.
You can build a beautiful online store with hundreds of ready-to-use templates and Shopify is
packed with helpful AI tools that write product descriptions and even enhance your product
photography.
Plus, if you ever get stuck, they've got award-winning 24-7 customer support.
Start your business today with the industry's best business partner, Shopify, and start hearing
sign up for your $1 per month trial today at Shopify.com slash WSB.
Go to Shopify.com slash WSB.
That's Shopify.
slash WSB.
All right.
Back to the show.
I absolutely love this.
This is,
well,
no,
because I mean,
it really forces,
hey,
we want to engage,
we want to have a
conversation.
Let's sit down
and let's talk about
the facts around the matter.
Let's throw out some stats
and like,
hey,
let's do this.
And when it comes to that moment,
they cower and hide in the darkness,
right?
Maybe there's a chance.
They'd be decimated.
Yeah.
They would get,
be honest. I mean, they would get that amazing.
Asking the community, like, who would be our chosen champions?
Like, we had so many people reach out. And it's like, we could put together like the Avengers
Bitcoiners that like each have a specialty at a different silo of like, you know,
Bitcoin's energy consumption and how it works and why it's good for the environment.
It would be like an NFL team, you know, playing against like a peewee, you know,
flag football team. But anyway, we want to see it happen. And yeah, that's,
The point of the conference is like, how do we create a shilling point for the entire industry
where we can like focus our attention to get the real world to engage with us?
So get the real world to see Bitcoin's about, to get the real world to see what Bitcoin culture is about,
to create a platform for companies that companies, countries that like want to,
let's say there's a marketing benefit or a PR benefit to them.
about engaging Bitcoin.
We want to give them a platform and be like,
okay, this is why you need to make the leap.
It's not just the technology you're benefiting from.
It's also the story you get to tell the world.
And, you know, it's hard to get that kind of buy-in
unless you can create a platform big enough
that the juice is worth to squeeze for them.
So that's where we want to turn it.
We want it to be, you know,
where the biggest announcements,
the biggest developments in the Bitcoin world
are announced and showcased and debated and challenged.
and that those kind of conversations drive the energy over the course of the year.
That's our goal.
That's our vision.
You know, David, I took my wife with me last year to the conference.
We had an absolute blast.
It was the first conference she had ever gone to with me.
I've always just kind of gone by my.
She's like, you go do your thing.
I'm staying at the house.
I was like, come down, it's in South Beach.
It's a blast.
We can go out and, you know, go to some awesome restaurants and just have a good time together.
And so she came and she was just like, this is massive.
This is unreal.
And I don't, I think the numbers were like 30,000 last year, right?
26,000.
46, my God.
26.
26.
Okay, okay, 26,000.
So, David, I guess where I'm going with the talking about the conferences, for me as an entrepreneur, I look at this.
I'm just saying when you grow something from the ground up and then you see how massive this is, I mean, you got shell coming in, you got 20.
26,000 people coming to this conference.
I want to say Serena Williams was at the one last year.
Some of these, like, unbelievable athletes.
Like, this is insane.
And you grew it literally from nothing to this.
Walk us, walk us through this process as an entrepreneur.
Like, what are some of your thoughts on?
This is crazy.
Yeah.
Well, so I will say, you know, every mistake you can make in your entrepreneurial journey I've made.
sadly I've made some many of them multiple times so like it has been a decade plus long journey
to to build the requisite worldview and experiences to kind of get us to launching the Bitcoin
conference but we made the decision in 2018 that we were going to go Bitcoin only and like
you know when we got into Bitcoin there was only Bitcoin and then came blockchain and
crypto and all this stuff and so it was just kind of a natural progressive progression of our
space, like, these things are all children of Bitcoin. And then before you know it, you're doing
more stuff that's not Bitcoin related than you're doing Bitcoin. And so that was, that was, you know,
I would say, very perspective shaping part of our journey as a company. But in 2018, we decided
to go Bitcoin only, divest everything we had that wasn't Bitcoin. And, you know, our, our kind of
belief was like, okay, Bitcoin is the only legit thing here. And it's humanity's best chance
at escaping the invisible prison that we've been placed in.
And so we need to give it everything we have to have victory with Bitcoin.
It deserves that.
And so, you know, that means like, okay, Bitcoin needs to have a conference.
It needs to have a dedicated media publication.
Somebody needs to be covering news about it.
Like, there are things that the ecosystem, the community, the industry,
users need to help accelerate adoption, interconnectivity,
new companies getting started.
None of these things existed at the time.
The Bitcoin community was fractured.
They had just gone through the block wars.
People hated each other.
And so we decided we needed to make a Bitcoin-only conference.
And what Bitcoin only meant to us was Nakamoto consensus.
So no hard forks.
You know, it's just like, but we're not going to be like relitigating the past.
People were too obsessed with scaling, scaling, scaling, scaling, scaling.
It's like, okay, scaling wars are over.
It's been determined.
Nakamoto consists of what went out.
BTC is Bitcoin.
Let's just go.
And people thought it was an insane idea.
Thought it wouldn't work.
Thought no one would back it.
Thought crypto was the future.
Thought it was economic suicide for us to do this.
But we just, we forged ahead.
And the first conference was in 2019.
We had 2,000 people.
And it was an amazing event.
And a lot of great companies came together at that event.
I think Swan got started at that conference.
Zabidi got started at that conference.
A lot of new people joined core from that conference.
It was people had not been to a Bitcoin conference before.
And, you know, our vision for that event was like Bitcoin 2013,
which was kind of what got me really sucked deep down the rabbit hole of the Bitcoin conference
and it hadn't happened since.
So 2020 comes along.
We were going to have like a 4,000 person event,
but we had to cancel it because of COVID.
And immediately our focus was like, okay, we have to do this conference.
when's the earliest we can do it.
So there was a whole trial and tribulation we had to go through to actually put on a conference in 2021.
And we were the first conference back from COVID in the world to happen.
Like, people don't know that.
But like our event was the first.
And the only reason we were able to do it was because the Bitcoin community is fearless.
And we were able to say stuff like, if you're afraid of dying, don't come to the conference.
like, you know, if the American Revolution wasn't canceled over yellow fever,
we're not canceling the conference over, over, you know, COVID.
And you were in Florida.
Well, we had to move to Florida to do.
Oh, oh, okay.
Oh, okay.
We negotiated with, we went to basically start going to cities and saying,
who's willing to partner with us so we can do this event.
And Mayor Suarez and DeSantis forged the path for us to be, to do it.
And people like, no one's going to come to this.
You're insane.
You're killing people.
I mean, we had so many people try to stop us. It was like insane. And we're like,
nothing is going to stop us. This conference must happen. And it was insane. I mean,
it was 13,000 people. Yeah. I was there. It was amazing. It was amazing. And so it was just more
validation that having a mission of driving a business and having that be the driving purpose for
your team, the driving purpose for what you do, like that authenticity gets rewarded by who
your true community is. And it doesn't matter what the media says. It doesn't matter what a politician
says. A movement is authentic to the movement. So we did that. That was an awesome event. And then
we did 2022 again in Miami. And that was 26,000 people. So we went from four years in effectively
three unique events, a 2,000 person conference to a 26,000 person event that was the biggest
finance conference in the world. Not just Bitcoin or crypto, but all finance. And I mean,
it was an insane roller coaster of growing our team, figuring it out. We got scammed by so many
things. I mean, it's been just a roller coaster. So this year, 2023, this is going to be like our
first bear market conference. Yeah. Since the cycle started. So like, you know, there's,
there's pressure on us from that perspective. We're expecting, like, we planned on a 50% reduction in attendees.
So, like, I think that's basically where we're going to be.
That would be like 13,000 people.
But the attention, the attendees, it's a derivative of the price.
Like, the price definitely dampers all of these things.
So I also think that when you're focused on like the bull market side,
there's so much glam.
There's so much speed, speed, speed, speed, speed, speed, that the things are the most
valuable things don't get enough attention.
And the things that are less valuable, but more fun, get too much attention.
So this is a bare market conference.
It's a conference for builders.
So like, you know, instead of lobster, we're eating like mayonnaise sandwiches.
Like, instead of staying other words, Carlton or sleeping in the tent city.
But it is going to be a fantastic conference.
And it's focused on the most interesting things happening in Bitcoin, the most
interesting projects being built in Bitcoin.
We have really a souped up open source stage that we've given a lot of passes to the open
source developers to get them engaged and involved and give them a platform.
we have an entire part of the conference that's focused on what has happened over the past 24 months as an industry
and what changes need to happen to our industry going forward as a reflection upon a lot of mistakes that were made,
a lot of things that were allowed to happen that shouldn't have been allowed to happen.
What's going to happen with the GBTC trust?
You know, what's going to happen with the restructuring of the dozen bankruptcy estates that are out there representing millions of people?
some of the kind of issues of our day, let's say,
and try to stress out what the future looks like
and what needs to happen.
And then we have our main stage
where we're bringing in a lot of awesome announcements.
We have some really big ones planned.
We have some big ones in the works that we're hoping materialized.
Like the best, juiciest stuff, it comes in in like the last, you know, 50 days or so.
But we have a couple presidents that are going to be there.
So, like, it's dope.
I mean, it's...
Wow.
It's very cool to get to see, like, what happens behind the scenes because the public only gets to see like 10%.
It's like an iceberg.
So like for everything that gets announced on stage, there's nine other deals that were being worked.
We're trying to make it happen.
And nobles happened, but it didn't get quite there.
And so, yeah, I mean, there's just so much exciting stuff going on with Bitcoin.
And it's interesting to see, like, those who have the stomach to go through the price decline.
Yeah.
And those that don't, which I understand the people that don't.
Like, that's part of the journey of building conviction is like watching the volatility from afar and realizing, oh, I can survive that too.
But it definitely, you know, there's definitely a lot of bodies along the way.
So I'm very appreciative of our corporate sponsors that are, you know, sticking up to the maybe some plaque that they're getting from different parts of the mainstream world and participating.
I'm very bullish on energy companies in general, getting involved in Bitcoin.
I think that's going to be a very big trend of the next cycle is household names having
divisions focused on that in the same way that Intel has a division now focused on A6.
And yeah, I'm excited to see some of the more controversial discussions too.
I mean, we have Casey Rotamor just giving a keynote on ordinals and we're going to have a debate
around ordinals.
Are they technology?
Are they graffiti?
but we as like an event, we try to be a platform for people to unite under common ideas.
And, you know, people have many different worldviews, Bitcoiners, but there are things that unite us.
And so we try to be a platform for as many ideas as possible and let people share their perspective,
battle it out, let the good ideas thrive, let the bad ideas die.
And we try not to be editor-in-chief of what is and isn't Bitcoin.
Our editorial standard is like if it happens on Bitcoin, if it touches Bitcoin mainnet, it's Bitcoin.
Okay.
Whether something is valuable or should be done or whatever, that's for the community to
suss out for themselves.
Yes.
But like, you know, if it's on Bitcoin, it's, it's relevant, it's topical, and it can be a part
of the conference.
If you're a company that has a Bitcoin product and you're there to only talk about
your Bitcoin product, you can be a part of the conference.
If you don't have a Bitcoin product, you can't be a part of the conference.
So that's an objective standard.
We make mistakes, but it's like, that's the,
The point of the event is how do we accelerate hyperbiquinization?
How do we bring people together?
So I think we're doing our best to stay aligned to that North Star.
Love it.
And I'm really looking forward to the conference here in May.
Your wife got spoiled for last year's event.
So I don't know.
Maybe like, hey, wait until, you know, the halving conference to come by.
I don't want her to like be like, oh, there was a huge rock concert here last year.
Where's that?
It's like, ah.
No, you know what she loves?
she just loved being there in South Beach, just trying out the different foods and just
running into various people that I've talked about in the house that she's never like met in
real life. And so it was just, it was fun to be able to, like I hung out with Jeff Booth a lot.
She got to meet Jeff's wife and in person. And so, you know, stuff like that is just what,
what it's all about and really just to kind of enjoy the company while you're down there.
Yeah.
Hey, you've been talking.
Hey, it's about meeting your next founder.
It's about co-founder.
It's about meeting your next investor.
It's about coming up with the next idea to improve Bitcoin.
It's about learning how Bitcoin works so that you can evangelize it to others.
It's really a unique pilgrimage for Bitcoiners.
That's a good word for it.
It's just getting started.
I mean, our vision for this event is something where 100 years from now, it will be Christmas
Mass.
It will be, you know, a journey to Mecca.
And we're going to bring it to every comment.
And, you know, we're going to orange kill the world.
I mean, that's the...
I love it.
I love it.
Hey, you've been very outspoken on the GBTC, Barry, DCG.
I think the comments you're making are so important to kind of cover here.
Walk us through GBTC, just so people understand.
I think most people listening to the show understand it.
But then talk to us about, like, some of your gripes and concerns.
I know you've got a campaign redeemed GBTC campaign that you've started.
So talk to us a little bit about this.
Okay.
So there's a lot to this.
So I'm going to like, and I was describing it from the start to someone the other day.
And it was like, wow, this takes a really long time to walk through.
So we're going to go with like the most consolidated version.
But basically, GBTC is a trust that you can buy in your retirement account that holds
Bitcoin in it.
And it's run by a company called Grayscale, which is owned by a company called DCG, which is
run by a guy named Barry Silver.
And they operate other trust, too, for Ethereum and other cryptos, but the Bitcoin one
is the biggest.
In fact, the trust is the biggest single holdings of Bitcoin in the world.
So it has about 620, 630,000 Bitcoins in it, which represents about 3.something percent,
3.3% of the world's Bitcoin supply.
So that's like what it is.
What's going on with it is that this vehicle that is a trust, that the, that the
the bitcoins are parked in has shares of the trust that you can buy and sell in your retirement
account, you can trade to other users, just like a stock and a company. And they marketed and sold
this product. The reason you want to buy it is because the shares should reflect the value of the
Bitcoin sitting in the trust. And so that way, it's like a proxy for Bitcoin that you can
get in your retirement account. Well, great. Long list of reasons. We can get into the most important
ones, the value of those shares relative to the amount of Bitcoin sitting in the trust has not
performed well. In fact, as recently as a month ago, it was trading at a 45% discount to the actual
value of the Bitcoin in the trust. So you bought this thing thinking, hey, I'm buying one Bitcoin
and I'm buying one Bitcoin worth of Bitcoin in my retirement account. And then you check back
in a year later. And now you're, you only have half of Bitcoin.
in your retirement account. What happened? And so that's the, that's the current situation.
There's about a million people that own this trust. Across all the trust, it's even more.
And collectively, they're down about, well, because the price of Bitcoin's gone up,
I don't know the exact number, but let's just call roughly $12 billion in value.
So in terms of the scale of losses that have been realized, those losses are greater than
than FTX and Alameda.
And the number of users affected is on a similar scale.
But actually,
the collateral damage is much worse
because what also went down with gray scale was Genesis,
the lending desk of Barry.
And Genesis took in deposits from users.
It's basically a bank.
And it had,
let's call it, another million users
that deposited its money there.
And it went bankrupted during this process as well
and lost all of those users, their deposits.
So really the collateral damage is more like
maybe 2 million people.
And the reason that these two things are tied together is because Genesis took in deposits
from all these users promising a fixed rate of return.
There's some parallels to maybe some things happening in life here, but a fixed rate of
return, hey, we're super safe.
Come give us your Bitcoin or your USD and we're going to pay you 8% completely safe.
These are completely collateralized loans that we're making.
You know, trust us.
People said, okay, they take the money that they're deposit.
gave them, they give the money to effectively Ponzi schemes. So Alameda, Three Arrows, Voyager, Babel, Celsius,
Lockfi, every company you've heard of that's gone bankrupt in 2022, they were giving massive loans
to on the condition that they use those loans to deposit, to basically buy Bitcoin from them,
to deposit into the Grayscale Trust.
So they used depositors money at Genesis to subsidize
sketchy-ass Ponzi-Sheem institutions that they didn't really do any,
you know, risk controls on or credit quality checks, obviously,
so that those institutions would then put money in a different vehicle that Barry owned
Grayscale.
And once the Bitcoin goes into the trust,
the way they've structured the trust is such that the Bitcoin can never leave.
So at the end of the day, Genesis depositors money ended up in Grayscale's trust.
Genesis is bankrupt and those users aren't getting paid back.
And Grayscale is trading at a massive discount to value because they pumped so much,
so many shares out to these institutions that dumped them,
thinking that they'd be able to dump them on a retail for a profit.
And now we're in a bad situation where a lot of people are hurt,
but Barry still has control of 630,000 Bitcoins
that he's sucking 2% out of per year
and putting in his pocket.
When, you know, in reality, what he did was criminal
and he needs to go to jail.
And the Bitcoin that is in the trust
needs to be returned to the shareholders
so that they can realize the value of the investment
that they were sold.
That's really the only equitable way to go forward.
And they're claiming that they're going to turn the trust
into an ETF.
You know, first off, I'm very skeptical that that happens, given all the other circumstances
around this case.
Second off, I've been told that even if they did get SEC approval for an ETF, they would
not convert to an ETF intentionally for several years.
Because if they convert into an ETF and people were able to remove their money, their
AUM would drop massively.
And the fees that they would have to charge would drop massively.
And so they might lose 80.
75% of their fee income that they're generating from the trust if they actually became an
ETF. So Barry needs that money because that's the only way he's going to keep DCG, his parent
company, from going bankrupt. So this whole SEC lawsuit is just, it's just a cover story
so they can delay making any changes to the trust, allowing anyone to take their Bitcoin out
or reducing the fees while he sucks the money out from the trust and puts it into the DCG's
pocket.
Ultimately, like, he's not going to be successful in doing this.
There are a lot of people trying to stop this.
And like, let me shill real quick.
RedeemGBTc.com.
If you are a shareholder of Grayscale, please go to redeemgbtc.com, sign up for updates.
Let us know how many shares you own.
But there are a dozen plus organizations, companies, institutions,
that are driving forward a campaign to get the trust redeemed.
the fees reduced. And there are many different tactics and strategies that are being
deployed. You know, our campaign redeemed GPTC has now well over 3,000 shareholders
that have signed up representing over 30% of all the shares of Grayscale, which is at $8 billion
bucks or whatever right now. And our role is coordinating all these different efforts
with the relevant shareholders that are needed to be included. And we're going to have some news on
this front soon. I was hoping we'd be able to go into detail on it today. There are some class
action lawsuits that are coming that we're going to need to have people sign on to in order to
hit certain thresholds that are required. I can't share more detail about it yet, but I highly recommend
people sign up for redeem gbtc.com if they would like to redeem their shares at some point in time
in the future and see the discount go away. And if I'm a creditor at Genesis and I have a restructuring
plan that I'm looking at that's been presented by DCG about what Genesis should look like in the
future, I highly recommend that you reject that restructuring plan. You put forward a new restructuring
plan in which you put DCG into bankruptcy and you take control of DCG. That's how you're going to
maximize the value that you get returned. There are three parties involved in the situation.
Genesis, gray scale, DCG. Okay. There's only one thing of value at the whole, the whole
situation of real value, gray scale. Okay, there's a deal to be had to redeem gray scale and distribute
part of the cash during that redemption to the other parties involved, Genesis and DCG.
If they don't reject Barry's restructuring plan, the money from that transaction, that settlement
that's going to occur at some point in time in the future is going to flow to Barry. And so maybe
Barry collect a billion and a half dollars and he turns around and pays out the Genesis creditors,
500 million of it so he can make good on his debt coming up in a few weeks.
But he shouldn't get to keep the other billion.
So, you know, I'm of the mindset that Genesis creditors and Grayscale shareholders should
be working together. We should be sending Barry Silverton into bankruptcy.
And we should be working on a deal between these two parties so that any value that can
be captured through a redemption process of the Grayscale trust can go to the victims of Genesis,
not to the perpetrator of the crimes.
So that's a concise version of what went out.
I can go in a lot more detail about some of the things that were done,
crimes that were committed,
unethical behavior, tactics, people's legal approaches that they're taking to bust the trust.
Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors.
No, it's not your imagination.
Risk and regulation are ramping up,
and customers now expect proof of security just to do business.
That's why Vantza is a game change.
VANTA automates your compliance process and brings compliance, risk, and customer trust together
on one AI-powered platform.
So whether you're prepping for a SOC 2 or running an enterprise GRC program, VANTA keeps you secure
and keeps your deals moving.
Instead of chasing spreadsheets and screenshots, VANTA gives you continuous automation across
more than 35 security and privacy frameworks.
Companies like Ramp and Ryder spend 82% less time on audits with Vantza.
That's not just faster compliance, it's more time for growth.
If I were running a startup or scaling a team today, this is exactly the type of platform
I'd want in place.
Get started at vanta.com slash billionaires.
That's vanta.com slash billionaires.
Ever wanted to explore the world of online trading, but haven't dared try?
The futures market is more active now than ever before, and plus 500 futures is the perfect
place to start.
Plus 500 gives you access to a wide range of instruments, the S&P 500, NASDAQ, Bitcoin, gas, and much more.
Explore equity indices, energy, metals, 4X, crypto, and beyond.
With a simple and intuitive platform, you can trade from anywhere, right from your phone.
Deposit with a minimum of $100 and experience the fast, accessible futures trading you've been waiting for.
See a trading opportunity.
You'll be able to trade it in just two clicks once you're accounting.
is open. Not sure if you're ready, not a problem. Plus 500 gives you an unlimited, risk-free
demo account with charts and analytic tools for you to practice on. With over 20 years of
experience, Plus 500 is your gateway to the markets. Visit plus 500.com to learn more. Trading in
futures involves risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone. Not all applicants will qualify.
Plus 500, it's trading with a plus.
Billion dollar investors don't typically park their cash in high yield savings accounts. Instead,
they often use one of the premier passive income strategies for institutional investors, private credit.
Now, the same passive income strategy is available to investors of all sizes thanks to the
Fundrise income fund, which has more than $600 million invested in a 7.97% distribution rate.
With traditional savings yields falling, it's no wonder private credit,
has grown to be a trillion dollar asset class in the last few years.
Visit fundrise.com slash WSB to invest in the Fundrise income fund in just minutes.
The fund's total return in 2025 was 8%, and the average annual total return since inception is
7.8%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results, current distribution rate as of 1231, 2025.
Carefully consider the investment material before investing, including objectives,
risks, charges, and expenses.
This and other information can be found in the income funds prospectus at fundrise.com
slash income.
This is a paid advertisement.
All right.
Back to the show.
I've read about it on the fringes.
I've seen the posts.
I've seen your posts.
And I mean, the whole thing just smells like rotten fish, like when I'm looking at it.
But I could never piece together how it all fits together in such a.
simple way that you just described it.
I want to footstomp the redeem GBT link.
We're going to have this in the show notes.
If you're listening to this and you hold GBT,
it's probably in your best interest to click on to open the show notes right now,
click on the link, go there, have it open in your web browser.
If you don't have time to fill it out right now,
open it up in your web browser so that you can go back to it.
But we're going to have a link in the show notes for what David just talked about.
It's 10 seconds to sign up.
Yes.
And, you know, there is a great.
lawsuit. You can find it on the Redeemed GPDC site, just recently filed by Alameda, the bankruptcy
estate of Alameda against Grayscale, where they go into detail on violations of the trust documents,
breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, very well articulated case by arguably the best law firm
in the country. And, you know, there's some stunning, some stunning items in there. But one of the
actions that they're taking is they want to claw back ill-gotten fees from Grayscale, which
you know, Grayscale has charged the trust almost $2 billion in fees over the past several years.
And so if we're able to claw back those fees, which by the language black and white in the trust documents are excessive and bad faith,
that's a direct tangible benefit that could pay out to all of the shareholders beyond just their ability to get redemption.
And so it really behooves you to sign up on the website to get to stay up to date on this.
you can see just from the clawback of ill-gotten fees,
you know, several percent benefit on your GBT position.
And that's just that piece.
And then you have the redemption piece,
which is the discount.
Like,
if we're able to make redemptions happen,
you can close that discount entirely.
So please, please, please sign up.
You have nothing to lose.
You have a lot to gain.
And, you know, frankly, Barry Silbert is a,
and the Michael Shana sign are bad actors that are criminals.
And that a lot of the pain that's been felt in our industry over the past several years,
they are at the source of.
The Alameda, Celsius, you name it, would not have been able to happen without the loans
given by Genesis using depositors' money so that Barry could enrich himself at gray scale.
The guy's got to go.
He's an anchor around our industry.
The neck, he funds that are out there.
He puts them in trust and he sells them to retirees.
The guy's got to go.
When I look at what's happened in the last year and a half, the amount of selling pressure
and fierce volatility through all that selling pressure, I kind of feel like we've produced
the super hoddler through that painful process.
You're a Bitcoin OG.
You are around during Mount Gox.
Is this akin to Mount Gox?
Is the hoddler pressure that's happened over the last year and a half stronger than
Mount Gox or like how would you equate this to previous periods?
So I would say like, okay, Mount Gox is what's known from that period.
But in 2013 and 2014, exchanges went down like like, I mean, almost every exchange.
Yeah, almost every exchange got hacked, exits, gam, whatever.
So, you know, while maybe like this go around only, you know,
if you say there's 50 million or people that own Bitcoin,
you know,
maybe 20% of those users have been affected.
Like in the early days,
I really don't know anyone who has ever avoided getting hit
on at least one exchange that went under and they lost all their Bitcoin under.
Like not your keys,
not your coin.
That came from a very rough period of Bitcoin's history.
So I think like in terms of the percentage of people affected,
it's probably lower now than it is then.
What makes this one more brutal is that at least for the OGs, there's a lot of OGs that felt like they had learned that lesson.
And kept that lesson very, you know, was very well ingrained.
And then got allured by the power of borrowing against their Bitcoin, which is a, you know, if you're a hardcore Bitcoiner, you know, and you have tens or hundreds of millions of dollars in Bitcoin.
Like, you don't want to sell your Bitcoin, but you got all this value.
You want to be able to make investments or run a company or buy a house, whatever.
And so a lot of OGs borrowed against their Bitcoin thinking that, hey, these are fully
collateralized position and I don't really have counterparty risk.
You know, I'm working, especially with Genesis as an example, it's the adult in the room.
It's the best institution in our space.
And so a lot of OGs got decimated in this cycle.
and I mean, people with huge Bitcoin holdings got decimated.
And it's, it's been brutal to watch.
I mean, I will say, like, I've talked like, you know,
the good thing about Bitcoin is that it gives you a good ability to,
what's it called, um, recuperate from your losses because you have, you know,
promise about the future and you think, okay, I've made it before I can make it again.
But dude, some of the best OGs that have just lost their entire stack in a way that I've
never seen before in a way that was much worse than, you know,
2014, 2013.
So that's been sad to watch and a good, a good reminder that it doesn't matter how long
you've been around in Bitcoin.
There's always a new flavors to scams and, you know, not your keys, not your coins.
Yeah.
That's just the bottom line.
Very well said.
Yeah, we covered on this show, we had Zach Prince on from BlockFi.
And like the one question that I just could never wrap my head around was you have,
you have retail investors that are over collateralized, which means they're.
shouldn't be any risk. But you also have institutional investors with sizable positions that are not
over-collateralized. And you're commingling the two within your company veil. And so, like,
how do you protect the retailers that are over collateralized if these other ones run into
issues with their counterparty risk? And they touch the legacy system in a major way. And I talked about
the idea with Jason Williams once. And then I also talked about.
about it at the end of one of the podcasts I did with Zach Prince.
And it's one of the main reasons why I didn't have any money on any of these things.
Because it was just like, if I can't quantify these people that are under collateralized,
how do I know the whole thing?
It was almost like a CDO.
I guess that's how I viewed it as they were doing this.
It's like in the 2008 crisis, the consolidated debt obligations is like you just don't know what's in that basket.
And if you can't audit it, like, you know, if you're putting funds in here,
it better be a small amount.
It's only as good as their weakest counterparty.
Yeah.
And, you know, it's like, oh, our portfolio is 95% solid.
We just got a couple liabilities that are not good.
It's like, okay, well, those are liabilities that implode the whole thing.
So, yeah, and some of the behavior, like, unchained capital has product where you can borrow against your Bitcoin.
But each loan is segregated.
And like the counterparty risk is unique to your specific loan.
over collateralized. They haven't had
on any of them. So like, there's a, there's
an idea there that has substance.
Um, and I hate to like throw the baby out with the bathwater when talking
about this. But when you are blending the risk, as you were describing, where you
have some parties that are that are over collateralized and you have other parties
that are much bigger size that are under collateralized dramatically, um,
that, or when you have a collateral that you say makes them over collateralized,
but the quality of that collateral is not good.
you know it's not good.
Yeah.
Like that,
that's an issue.
And that is the footnote detail that brought down every one of these businesses
and turned out to be the only detail that mattered.
And at the end of the day,
no matter how clean your business was,
your yield came from a Ponzi scheme somewhere else.
And it was a daisy chain of firms that had,
quote,
different credit qualities.
But at the end of the day,
the yield all derived from the Ponzi.
And when that one blew up,
It just cascaded to the slightly not as bad Ponzi.
The Ponzi slightly not as bad as the one before that.
The one slightly not as bad as the one before that.
And so we get all the way to the source of the Ponzi, which is DCG,
which is the last one to go down and of the biggest scale.
And yeah, it's going to leave an impression and imprint on our industry forever.
Like just like how Mount Gox is something that still has talked about today.
and is not forgotten.
This will not be forgotten 10 years from now.
It'll take new flavors where we'll get taught the same lesson.
But never again will the lending markets in Bitcoin look and act like they did in this cycle
for the better.
And that's the power of the free market.
And that's the power to go back to the very beginning of our conversation about the
cost and who bears the cost and how our cost, who's the winner and who's the loser.
Yes.
And, you know, fundamentally, the losers.
here are the people who made the wrong decision to trust institutions that lied to them
and they didn't do their diligence on. And in the future, they're not going to make the same mistake,
at least in the same way again. And that's the behavior that we need ingrained from this.
It can't be imagine how catastrophic it would be if there was an entity that came riding in
to save the day at Alameda and bailed out FTX and Alameda's Ponzi scheme and bailed out Barry
Silbert's Ponzi scheme and allowed them to keep running the show and they didn't have to bear any of the
consequences of the fraud that they ran. That would be you just enable them to run the fraud
bigger and bigger and bigger. Amen, David. That's it. And that is the Fiat system that we just
described. That's the Fiat system. Yeah. Yeah, exactly. Oh, we got to end it. I have more questions.
I can talk to you all day, man. Let's wrap it up. You can't end it on a better note.
than that. That is the Fiat system. We're not bailing anybody out if you make poor decisions. The
Bitcoin falls out of your hands. No matter how bad you want to keep holding them, it's going to
leave and it's going to find smarter, more risk-adverse people who are making sound decisions,
right? That's just what it does. And when you talk about which system do you trust,
when Bitcoin recovers from what just went down and we went through our own OA financial crisis
and we handled it in a year and a half time.
And only the people who took the risk paid the consequence.
And we've built back stronger.
Yes.
What an indictment of the Fiat system,
where it's bailout after bailout and perpetual crisis
that can never be cured.
And here we are, the illegitimate currency,
and we're able to restructure ourselves and build back
like a free market should.
Yes.
Yes.
All right.
Preston, thank you for having me on.
Thank you so much.
Let's do it again.
Dude, thank you so much for making time.
We'll have a link in the show notes to the Redeemed GBTC campaign.
We're going to have a link to the Miami conference, which I hope to meet.
I'm going to be there.
David, you'll be there.
Hopefully we can meet some of the people listening to the show if they decide to come on down.
Is there anything else you want to highlight?
I know you're active on Twitter.
Anything else?
Yeah, redeem gbtc.com.
We got to bust the trust.
We have no choice.
And you can include that in the title of this podcast, that domain.
but thank you for having me on
and I hope your listeners
got some value from the conversation
and hold your bitcoins.
This journey is just beginning.
We got a lot more painful lessons
to learn in the future.
Thank you.
Thank you, sir.
Appreciate that.
Cool.
All right.
Preston.
Thank you, chow.
See you.
If you guys enjoyed this conversation,
be sure to follow the show
on whatever podcast application you use.
Just search for We Study Billionaires.
The Bitcoin specific shows
come out every Wednesday,
and I'd love to have you as a regular listener. If you enjoyed the show or you learned something new
or you found it valuable, if you can leave a review, we would really appreciate that. And it's something
that helps others find the interview in the search algorithm. So anything you can do to help out
with a review, we would just greatly appreciate. And with that, thanks for listening and I'll catch
you again next week. Thank you for listening to TIP. To access our show notes, courses, or forums,
go to the investors podcast.com.
This show is for entertainment purposes only.
Before making any decisions, consult a professional.
This show is copyrighted by the Investors Podcast Network.
Written permissions must be granted before syndication or re-broadcasting.
