We Study Billionaires - The Investor’s Podcast Network - BTC175: MicroStrategy Deep Dive w/ Jeff Walton (Bitcoin Podcast)
Episode Date: March 27, 2024Today's Bitcoin Fundamentals features Jeff Walton discussing MicroStrategy's finance strategies, including valuation and leveraging Bitcoin. We examine price actions, trading methods, and the impact o...f traditional finance on BTC futures, offering insights into the intersection of enterprise software and financial engineering. IN THIS EPISODE YOU’LL LEARN: 00:00 - Intro 01:41 - The role of MicroStrategy in modern financial strategies. 07:41 - Game theory principles applied to market structure and investor behavior. 16:18 - How Jeff Walton evaluates MicroStrategy's valuation. 16:18 - Insights into leveraging Bitcoin as collateral in finance. 16:18 - The potential of enterprise software in financial engineering. 32:58 - The differences between trading strategies and investment philosophies. 50:45 - The dynamics behind the price action of MicroStrategy's stock. 56:02 - Understanding short squeezes and their impact on valuation. Disclaimer: Slight discrepancies in the timestamps may occur due to podcast platform differences. BOOKS AND RESOURCES Jeff Walton's Twitter. Check out all the books mentioned and discussed in our podcast episodes here. Enjoy ad-free episodes when you subscribe to our Premium Feed. NEW TO THE SHOW? Follow our official social media accounts: X (Twitter) | LinkedIn | | Instagram | Facebook | TikTok. Check out our Bitcoin Fundamentals Starter Packs. Browse through all our episodes (complete with transcripts) here. Try our tool for picking stock winners and managing our portfolios: TIP Finance Tool. Enjoy exclusive perks from our favorite Apps and Services. Stay up-to-date on financial markets and investing strategies through our daily newsletter, We Study Markets. Learn how to better start, manage, and grow your business with the best business podcasts. SPONSORS Support our free podcast by supporting our sponsors: Bluehost Fintool PrizePicks Vanta Onramp SimpleMining Fundrise TurboTax Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm
Transcript
Discussion (0)
You're listening to TIP.
Hey everyone, welcome to this Wednesday's release of the Bitcoin Fundamentals podcast.
On today's show, I have Mr. Jeff Walton, who's been a thought leader on social media with
respect to covering micro strategy.
As a shareholder of micro strategy and someone that finds the financial engineering taking
place on the company to be one of the most fascinating things that can be covered in modern
finance, I brought Jeff on to talk about some of the strange and interesting developments
with respect to the price action and methods folks are using from a valuation.
standpoint. In no way are we encouraging a person to buy or sell this particular stock. But as you'll
see from our talk, we talk about our personal positions and what might be in store for us in this
very esoteric situation with respect to the company's ownership. So with that, here's my conversation
with Mr. Jeff Walton. Celebrating 10 years. You are listening to Bitcoin Fundamentals by the
Investors Podcast Network. Now for your host, Preston Pish.
Hey, everyone, welcome to the show.
I'm here with Jeff Walton.
And this one, I'll tell you what, Jeff.
I have been excited for this conversation since it just kind of percolated up out of Twitter just a few days ago.
I've been sitting here just like really kind of excited to have this because I think this is going to be a really, really engaging conversation.
So welcome to the show.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thanks for having me.
Yeah, excited to be here.
I'm excited to share some game theory, some analysis and, you know, a little bit of off-the-wall thing.
Yeah, I love that. So for people that aren't familiar with the banter on Twitter, the back
and forth and whatnot, we are, I'm a shareholder of micro strategy, you're a shareholder of
micro strategy. Everybody is talking about price targets, what they think about what Michael's
doing, this and that. But what I want to do is start off helping people, because here's the
thing about micro strategy. It's so dang volatile. You know, as a Bitcoiner for nearly a decade now,
One of the things that we hear so often is like, how do you get on the horse or how do you,
it's almost like you're trying to jump on this speedboat that's coming past the dock.
And it's so volatile, it's moving so fast that it feels like there's never a right moment
to get on it.
And I would just emphasize that I think micro strategy, and I'm sure you agree with this,
is like 2x or 3x harder to jump on than Bitcoin itself.
And so what I really, really, really want to guard against is people will see me and you
and others talking about micro strategy on Twitter.
And they're just like, all these guys seem like they know what they're talking about.
I want to buy micro strategy and own it as well and follow along.
And what I guess the way I want to start off the show is I want to just talk about my position
that I took in micro strategy, the price that I took it, not to like try to show off that I got
it at a great price.
It's more to show people where I was when I took that decision and what financial
analysis I was doing to make the decision. And then kind of like how I'm looking at my participation
in it moving forward so that we can add a whole lot of context to all these comments that I know
people are going to see on Twitter and elsewhere. And I don't like to start off shows where I'm
talking so much. This is an interview with you. But this is something that I've really wanted to do
because I know I'm talking about micro strategy a lot online. And I don't want people to have this
impression that they should go out and buy it right now because I'm not saying to buy it or not buy it.
I'm just trying to cover it.
And obviously, because I have a position, I'm very interested in it.
So all of that aside, I'm going to go really fast.
And then I want to throw it over to you because I want to hear kind of your point of view.
But real fast for the audience, my basis for my very first buy in Microstrategy, and this was
a one-time buy that I did.
This was in an IRA account for both of these positions that I'm talking about.
This was in the 21st of November, 2022.
I paid $159.63 for my basis on the first buy.
The second buy was more recently in January, the 22nd of January of 2024, when the price of
micro strategy dropped below what the Treasury value, the Bitcoin Treasury value was.
There was this really short moment.
It got down to like 460, 450, somewhere in that range.
And I was valuing the Treasury over, it was over $500 at the time when I bought a leap,
a long call option.
I just bought it at the strike of 470.
The price at the moment was at 470.
I didn't do it out of the money.
And it matures.
I did it since it's a leap.
It's long dated.
It's a 19 December 2025 call.
So there's over 600 days that remain on this.
And again, it's in an IRA account.
So I don't have the tax ramifications.
So those are my two positions.
I have not added to those positions.
I don't think that I will add to those positions.
I think I'm just going to continue to squat on those.
there's like really would appear to be really well-time positions.
And so as I continue to talk about it in probably a year from now, I'm going to probably
still be sitting on these positions and I'm not going to be selling them and I'm not going
to be adding to them.
And I think that that's really, really important context for people.
All right.
Sorry to talk so much.
I want you to go and kind of talk through the same kind of setup so people can kind of
understand where you're coming from with it.
Yeah, absolutely.
I think that's a fabulous context.
I had a similar situation where I purchased.
micro strategy for the first time in 2021, except I was at the very peak. I bought it at the very
peak. So I kind of rode the GameStop wave. I made a crazy investment decision where I liquidated
my entire portfolio. I bought GameStop shares. I rode that wave to the top, exited when sentiment
broke, and ended up having to figure out where to put that money over the next couple of weeks after
that. So part of it was in Bitcoin. I was still in that period where I was trading Bitcoin, and I didn't
really understand what it was. And, you know, there was a lot of volatility. I didn't really
know what was going on. But I was also fascinated by the fact that there was a company that moved
100% of their cash assets over to Bitcoin. I was like, wow, this is incredible. What's going on?
I've never seen anybody do this before. This is just so strange. So, Jeff, give folks real fast,
just the background on what it is that you do and what your background is. I am a reinsurance broker.
So I sell insurance to insurance companies.
And so what that effectively does is diversifies weather risk and insurance risk across the
globe.
So we take tranches of weather risk from, you know, large insurance companies and diversify those.
So we'll have anywhere from 10 to 50 reinsurers on any one individual risk tranche,
and we're outselling those to individual reinsurers across the globe.
I've got a unique perspective on how big money kind of.
it moves, really, because it's insurance for insurance companies. And the reinsurance market
is highly dependent on current rate environment, opportunity cost of capital. There's different
types of insurance and reinsurance to allocate to different locations, different regions.
And so that understanding of the insurance market and the reinsurance market and how
insurance and reinsurance market cycles work has given me a unique perspective on how the stock
market works and how all of the capital world kind of fits together. I think that's the why I might
have a different perspective or a unique perspective compared to other people, because I'm seeing
the big money moves from the top down and looking at it almost like a chessboard as opposed
to being from the bottom up looking at trying to understand what's going on. Let me ask you this,
because I think this is important context too. It seems like that you're a little bit more of a trader
or that like you would be looking at this position if it blew out to like some of these crazy
numbers that we're going to get into that you're saying that you think it could go to,
you would potentially exit that position. Whereas I am a very long-term holder. Like, from my
point of view, if I could own micro strategy and never sell it in my entire life, I would
probably do that. If I think that the fundamentals will still remain there and that they deploy
their treasury and like this whole other stuff that we're going to get into, I really just never
want to realize. And I, again, it's in an IRA account, so I don't really have this problem. But I just
have this inherent bias that I buy things very, very long and I try to never get rid of them.
And if the volatility blows out like crazy and we can talk about what the ramifications
of that might be for micro strategy, I'm more looking at it from the lens of Michael's going
to do what Michael does and he's going to do it really well better than I could do it.
And I'm just going to let him do his thing because he's a pro, right?
Yeah. I'm curious, is that correct? Is that correct frame?
Definitely not. I'm certainly not a traitor. I was a traitor for the game stop play
because that was a dynamic that I was seeing in the market that it felt like wasn't going to break.
And I felt like I was at the front end of it.
And I went through that whole process.
And I had to think through the game theory associated with the GameStop trade.
And the game theory associated with that was that there were more players in the game than just retail.
Retail was not moving the trade.
Retail compressed the trade.
But there were also large hedge funds in the trade that were burying Citadel and
Melvin Capital and knowing that there were other players in the game influenced how I made
decisions.
Talk us through this.
Talk us through the GameStop, like, if you can, give everybody an overview of how it blew
out, like, what was causing it, who some of the major players were if you do know.
The GameStop trade was incredibly interesting.
So I was following it, go from, you know, 20 to 30 to 40 to 70 in a week, purchased
put options on a Friday.
I realized I was screwed over the weekend.
I sold the put options for a profit on Monday morning and liquidated my entire portfolio.
And I bought Spot GameStop shares on Monday morning.
And then kind of rode that way from 70 bucks all the way up to, you know, 300 or whatever that happened on a Wednesday or Thursday.
Robin Hood turned the buy button off on Thursday.
And that was, I will never forget this.
I still had free capital.
I think I just got my bonus or something.
And I wanted to double down.
I was like, I'm buying today.
I'm buying more.
This phenomenon still exists.
Then I realized I couldn't buy anymore.
And I could only sell.
And at that point, sentiment had kind of, in my mind, had kind of been broken, right?
Like, it made people think, what is this company actually worth?
And you start to zoom out, right?
And you're looking at a market cap of, I don't know what it was at, but like 30 billion or something like that.
And you start to look at over the weekend, I was.
Totally ruined a vacation with my wife, which is still over one for that.
But over the weekend, I was looking at what their assets were.
I was trying to value the company, almost doing the opposite of what I've done in this
micro strategy trade.
And, you know, starting to realize that there were other players in the game, like these
large hedge funds.
I don't know who they were, but I was watching the order book and the blocks of trades
that were occurring in the order book over time were 20,000 shares.
50,000 shares, and that's not retail. Retail moves two, three, four, five shares here and there,
not 50,000 shares. One of the things that I think is really important with what you're talking about
with GME, when you're looking at it from a market cap size, like it was a P, it's really small
relative to the size of micro strategy and some of these other SMP companies. And so when you had so
much short selling taking place for major players, they're looking at this and they're saying,
all right, well, if I can apply this much capital to these short traders, they're going to become
forced buyers. I'm going to blow this thing out and I can just liquidate rug pool, get out,
and walk away. But I think a really, really important consideration in that particular trade was
the size or the market cap of GME in the face of how many people were talking about it. And that made
it a very unique scenario. And then you had the whole Wall Street bets and like the social media
aspect combined on top of that of something with such a small market cap.
Yeah, it was a small market cap.
And I think more importantly, it was a small float.
I think there were 72 million shares that were tradable at the very beginning when I looked
into this.
And I realized there were like 60 million shares short.
And that is just pretty simple math.
Like, okay, if there's, you know, if there are more people buying this than there are
shares available, then the shorts have to close this position.
and it seemed like a no-brainer.
It's like, yeah, I'm going to take a position
because I know other smart people see what I see.
And that was my ultimate strategy.
The hardest part was figuring out to exit
because there's this diamond hand.
I know I'm probably going to get crap for this,
but there's this diamond hands,
aping in and holding,
but I had to figure out what smart money was doing.
And smart money in thinking about this, right,
if they got in at $70 and they wrote it to $300,
if you've got a billion, you know, a $500 million position on this and you just turn 300% return,
you just made your entire company's returns for five years in a single trade.
And whereas retail is holding out for 10,000 percent returns because that's going to change their life.
And knowing that the smart money is happy with two or 300 percent returns and they're likely going to exit,
I had to follow what smart money was doing.
All right.
Well, let's dig into Microsoft.
No, no, no, this is good.
So let's dig in the micro strategy.
So when you're looking at it, walk us through how you think about it from evaluation
standpoint.
How I think about micro strategy.
Actually, I kind of want to get back to this trader.
Yeah, let's do it then.
The trading position.
So I think in the last four years, I've been fully orange-pilled, right?
Like I'm full Bitcoin, full steam ahead.
I've got Bitcoin on cold storage.
I think holding it on cold storage and making it on chain transaction.
is a phenomenally worthwhile exercise.
Yes.
Once you do it on chain transaction, you see the math.
You see how everything works.
And then understanding that there's a company that holds drastically more Bitcoin
than anybody else and likely there's no other company that's going to catch them,
I wanted to be on that side of the trade.
Thinking about Horizon, if you take the same perspective with Bitcoin as you do with
micro strategy agree with you 100%. This is a buy and hold forever. And if you start to see what
Michael Saylor is doing and how he's managing capital, you can do the same conceptual thing with your
micro strategy holdings. You can use your micro strategy holdings in an investment account as collateral
to take out a loan to do with it what you will. Like go buy a house or do whatever you need to do.
Alternatively, there are other ways to harvest the yield off of long-term holdings with
covered calls or covered put options.
And there are strategies where you never have to hold or you never have to sell your
micro strategy holdings in perpetuity.
And I think having that thorough and fundamental understanding and thinking a little bit
differently helps provide perspective on the micro strategy trade.
I think the really interesting part to me is that Bitcoin effectively undermines the
entire perspective of the micro strategy trade. You can't un-Bitcoin a bitconer. I've never seen
it happen. I've never seen somebody that's super pro-Bitcoin and ends up switching gears and
ends up not being a bickoiner. And those are the people that are holding micro-strategy.
I think the other thing that I did want to talk about is that I've seen a lot of these like cold
storage maxis where they're, you know, you should only buy Bitcoin in cold storage or you
should only buy Bitcoin ETF, not the, not micro strategy. There's, you know, risks associated with
it. I definitely understand and agree that there are risks associated with different forms of purchasing
Bitcoin correlated assets. And I think they both have a position in somebody's portfolio.
I think that micro strategy is effectively creating a proof of concept of how somebody that holds
Bitcoin and Cold Storage could potentially earn a yield on it. And we kind of get into that.
But yeah. Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors.
All right. I want you guys to imagine spending three days in Oslo at the height of the summer.
You've got long days of daylight, incredible food, floating saunas on the Oslo Fjord,
and every conversation you have is with people who are actually shaping the future.
That's what the Oslo Freedom Forum is.
From June 1st through the 3rd, 2026, the Oslo Freedom Forum is entering its 18th year,
bringing together activists, technologists, journalists, investors, and builders from all over the world.
many of them operating on the front lines of history.
This is where you hear firsthand stories from people using Bitcoin to survive currency collapse,
using AI to expose human rights abuses, and building technology under censorship and authoritarian pressures.
These aren't abstract ideas.
These are tools real people are using right now.
You'll be in the room with about 2,000 extraordinary individuals, dissidents, founders, philanthropists,
policymakers, the kind of people you don't just listen to but end up having to.
having dinner with. Over three days, you'll experience powerful mainstage talks, hands-on
workshops on freedom tech, and financial sovereignty, immersive art installations, and conversations
that continue long after the sessions end. And it's all happening in Oslo in June.
If this sounds like your kind of room, well, you're in luck because you can attend in person.
Standard and patron passes are available at Osloof Freedomforum.com with patron passes offering
deep access, private events, and small group time with the speakers. The Oslo Freedom Forum isn't
just a conference. It's a place where ideas meet reality and where the future is being built
by people living it. If you run a business, you've probably had the same thought lately. How do we
make AI useful in the real world? Because the upside is huge, but guessing your way into it is a
risky move. With NetSuite by Oracle, you can put AI to work today. NetSuite is the number one
AI Cloud ERP, trusted by over 43,000 businesses. It pulls your financials, inventory, commerce,
HR, and CRM into one unified system. And that connected data is what makes your AI smarter.
It can automate routine work, surface actionable insights, and help you cut costs while
making fast AI-powered decisions with confidence. And now with the NetSuite AI connector, you can
use the AI of your choice to connect directly to your real business data. This isn't some out
it's AI built into the system that runs your business.
And whether your company does millions or even hundreds of millions, NetSuite helps you stay ahead.
If your revenues are at least in the seven figures, get their free business guide
demystifying AI at netsuite.com slash study.
The guide is free to you at netsuite.com slash study.
NetSuite.com slash study.
When I started my own side business, it suddenly felt like I had to become 10 different people
overnight wearing many different hats. Starting something from scratch can feel exciting, but also
incredibly overwhelming and lonely. That's why having the right tools matters. For millions of
businesses, that tool is Shopify. Shopify is the commerce platform behind millions of businesses
around the world and 10% of all e-commerce in the U.S. from brands just getting started to household
names. It gives you everything you need in one place, from inventory to payments to analytics.
So you're not juggling a bunch of different platforms. You can build a beautiful online store
with hundreds of ready-to-use templates, and Shopify is packed with helpful AI tools that
write product descriptions and even enhance your product photography. Plus, if you ever get stuck,
they've got award-winning 24-7 customer support. Start your business today with the industry's
best business partner, Shopify, and start hearing... Sign up for your $1 per month trial today
at Shopify.com slash WSB.
Go to Shopify.com slash WSB.
That's Shopify.
com slash WSB.
All right.
Back to the show.
Well, so this is where,
so when I put on the position back in the day,
or you could just say back in 2022
or even here in January,
when I was looking at the price
and I'm saying, okay,
the price is trading below
just the treasury value alone.
This doesn't make any sense.
I think that there should be
at least a slight premium on top of it, just being very conservative in my valuation process.
And I'm looking at the underlying Bitcoin and I'm saying, I think that in this coming cycle,
I think it's totally in the realm of possible to go between 300,000 to 500,000 on the price of Bitcoin
within by the call date of December of 2025. So when I'm looking at that and I was looking at the value,
the Treasury at the time, let's just ballpark it and say it was worth $500 a share, the Bitcoin in
in each share was worth about $500.
And so I'm saying, okay, so let's just say at 10 X's from here would be a reasonable estimate.
So the Treasury values $5,000.
And I think that the shares should be in this cycle.
I'm just kind of valuing in a very short term kind of way.
I'm looking at that.
I was like, I can do these calls at $470, a strike at $470.
And I think they're worth in excess of $5,000 a share within 18 months.
So it was just kind of a no-brainer for me.
And the valuation for me was just really simple because I was completely discounting and not even trying to value the longer tail to all of this, which we can kind of talk about next.
But just, I guess as a Buffett investor and kind of looking at it as like, okay, this is just, this is just obvious.
Like this one's not even hard.
The value is there.
Like, I'd be crazy to not like lock this in right now.
I'm curious is, was for you, was it a very similar process or were you looking at this very differently?
It was a pretty similar process.
I mean, I really started with the Bitcoin holdings and where I thought Bitcoin could go as a
as a baseline.
And I was thinking, you know, okay, maybe it goes to 200,000.
What is their treasury of Bitcoin holdings at 200,000?
What is it at $500,000?
What is it at a million?
And looking at those impacts to their corporate treasury over time at these different
Bitcoin prices.
And then I tried to zoom out and look at the market as a whole.
What is a stock?
You know, what is the stock market?
What drives value in the stock market?
And this is where I really started to apply the game theory associated with the stock market.
The stock market is not a casino.
A lot of people think it's a casino, but really it's a playing field.
It's a dynamic playing field and everybody's playing the game.
And everybody's got a different strategy.
And if you understand the strategy of the different players in the game,
and some of the strategies are very basic and very static,
If you understand those strategies and you understand the dynamics of the playing board, you can develop a strong strategy to understand where capital is going to move.
There's more players to the game than just retail, just the people that are on Twitter.
In fact, just retail probably may except maybe 5% of the stock market.
That's probably way too much, actually.
Maybe it's 2%.
Really, I tried to zoom out and think about the structural design of the stock market.
and how other stocks are evaluated, right?
I looked at how is Apple evaluated?
And what I did is I created this top 20 U.S. equity comparison.
So I looked at the top 20 equities in the U.S. stock market.
And I looked at different metrics that people used to value these companies, right?
I looked at PE ratios.
I looked at liabilities to asset ratios.
I looked at multiples on net asset value.
I looked at earnings per share.
And what I found was there was no
one single homogenous way to compare any asset in the top 20 assets. I think I've heard you talk
about PE ratios, like average PE ratios. There's average PE ratios, but the PE ratios
deviate drastically, right? Like, I think Eli Lilly's PE ratios 123. And they're the eighth largest
US equity. And so when you start to think about this, like, okay, there's no homogenous way
to compare any of these statistics. What is the true.
real indicator of what a company is worth. And how far into the future do investors look at these
investments? In thinking about like zooming out even further, right, looking at Microsoft,
Apple, some of the really top ones, I've really kind of boiled it down to this, looking at net asset
value and kind of comparing some net asset values because the top companies, in my opinion,
the top companies in the stock market, they're valued purely based on sales.
sentiment and future financial strength. And future financial strength is a function of profits and
revenues in the future or the strength of their assets and how productive their assets can be.
And how long they can remain competitive? And how long they can remain competitive? Absolutely.
Absolutely. That was the perspective I took. And I was trying to think about it occurred to me that
every single one of these companies all had different types of assets. They all had fundamental
different business models and ways of generating revenue and different ways of utilizing
the financial markets, right? They all have different shares outstanding. Some are issuing shares,
some are doing share buyback, some are issuing debt. And there's an enormously creative
and large world of capital markets that can be utilized. And all these companies are doing
those types of things and doing them a little bit differently. But where those large companies
really get value is from the passive component of the market, the passive index fund component
of the market. So the S&P 500, QQQ, total stock market index, all of those index funds.
I did some math on this. There's like, I think apples, of Apple's holdings, I think about 12%
of Apple's holdings are, actually, I think six percent of Apple's holdings are S&P 500 ETFs.
Yeah. I think it makes up, I think it makes up like $360 billion.
Right. And that's a whale. That is an absolute whale. And they're not going anywhere. Any future dollars that are going to S&P 500 ETF, they have a market cap weighted allocation that's going to Apple. And so this kind of gets into the fundamental design of the stock market. I mean, who's investing in these passive ETFs? And it's pension funds, it's insurance companies, it's endowments, it's everybody with a 401k and they don't want to, they don't know what to do with it. So they're just putting it an index fund.
And I think there's a large, a very, very, very, very large pool of capital in the stock market that is just a passive zombie and not really doing anything.
If you know that there's this large chunk of capital that's a passive zombie in the market that's not doing anything, the value of a stock is actually everything else that's trading on the margin.
It's actually a very small number of shares that people are trading that are determining the value of the stock.
And if the sentiment of that small, of that small tranche of people that are trading equity
changes or shifts, that's how you would see any change in like these large or any equity,
really.
It's what's trading at the margin, not everything else.
Very, very long-winded way of thinking about the market.
That's how I think about the market.
I take this like very, very high-level view.
So then I look at micro strategy, right?
And they've got, at the time, when I was doing this, they had like 127,000 Bitcoin.
And it was more than 10x, the next closest company with Bitcoin.
And I was trying to think my way through, like, okay, who can catch them?
If this is truly the new financial ecosystem, the rails of the new financial ecosystem,
who could possibly catch them?
I think I heard Sayler say, you know, if it's good for a million, it's good for 10 million.
If it's good for 10 million, it's good for 100 million.
And if you take that concept and you start, you know, applying $10 million per Bitcoin times
$205,000 now, you start looking at those numbers, they're staggering.
And that is financial strength because they have the ability to use those assets as collateral
to generate a yield.
And I think that's something that most of the market misses is that Bitcoin is eventually
going to be used as collateral.
And it's already being teased out right now, right?
You start to see these loans where you could start to use your collateral, your Bitcoin collateral
to get a loan to go buy a house.
Micro Strategy is effectively going to be the bank in the future offering liquidity
for Bitcoin financial system at some point in the future.
They don't need to do it now, way too volatile to do it now.
But as the number of coins mined, as we get to 2034 where 99% of the coins have been mined,
the volatility is likely going to have reduced decently.
From that point of view, if I'm Michael and I'm looking at what risk premium I would need to lend
them out, like, you would literally laugh in my face if I said the number.
Because I'm looking at the return that I'm going to get just naturally through the
appreciation because of how early we are in the timeline.
And I'm saying, you'd have to pay me like, you know, well over 50% annualized for me to
assume that risk that you're going to actually pay them back.
to me. And so anybody who's not valuing them at some crazy level like that, or I guess it's
not crazy, it's very rational why you would want that type of return to lend them out, you realize
why he's not doing these fancy things with it. And there's no reason to do any fancy things
with it. And we're probably 10 years out or whatever until there's going to come a time where
you can start to do this in a way that, you know, maybe it gets down to 20%, 30%, percent.
to start lending these things out in the early days of it kind of starting to make sense.
And again, we're probably talking 10 years from now before we get to that point.
But I love your point about, you know, he's going to effectively become a bank with this treasury.
And he's also going to be looking at the economic calculation of all the other equities that exist in them now being redenominated and recapped in Bitcoin terms.
And I think we're going to see PEs down to five or whatever.
They're definitely not going to be 35.
That's for Dangshore.
And so your point that you bring up about can anybody catch up without there being massive amounts of slippage?
Because the amount that Michael would have to be paid to sell the company outright or to collect his treasury, I don't think that there could be a number for him.
Yeah, I agree with that.
I don't think there's a number.
I also agree with your loan terms, right?
I don't think this is a short term perspective.
However, it's naive to not consider it.
10, 20 years from now, the price of Bitcoin is going to be far less volatile because there's
going to be much more, it's just the way that the S curve and the adoption curve works.
Bitcoin's going to be far less volatile on a relative numbers scale and basis.
And it all comes down to like actuarial science.
If you're able to throw a volatility charge on what Bitcoin price is moving and how,
where you're generating your yield from, that it will.
will all be able to be calculated at some point in the future.
And I think if you think about the current global economy and how things are produced
and how the world kind of works, I tend to boil it down to, there are two major components
economically that allow the world to function.
And it's lending and insurance.
And because if you have a business idea and you want to go start a business because you
think you can go make disproportionate amount of money, you need to go get a loan from somebody
to run with this idea. So that's what that's one component. And then you've got the insurance component
without insurance, life would be too risky to do anything. Without insurance and without reinsurance,
life would be too risky to do anything. And having both of those components are necessary for
kind of a functioning economy. And if we're going to think about a Bitcoin denominated world,
you need to have lending and you need to have insurance.
And if you're looking at a company with more than 10x, the amount of Bitcoin of anybody else,
I think they're going to have the opportunity to get into these ventures with lending
and potentially insurance and generating a yield off of those functional business structures.
Jeff, let's get into the thing that I think you and I had a little bit of back and forth on
that maybe we see this a little bit differently with respect to capturing the spread.
I love this.
I'm kind of beating the drum and, to be quite honest with you, just kind of having fun and
tagging Michael and I know he can't respond and I don't want him to respond.
But when I'm looking at like right now today, and it's so funny because literally back in January,
February, the price of micro strategy was at parity or even above the treasury value.
Today, I would say that the treasury values around like the Bitcoin on his treasury is worth
about $800 a share.
And the post market closed today, it's sitting at $1,784 per share.
So you have basically a $1,000 premium above the treasury just since January, February.
And that is massive.
That is huge.
And so I'm looking at this.
And he's obviously been announcing all these convertible.
debt deals. Recently, he did an $800 million convertible debt deal. Then just a couple days ago,
he announced another one. I think it's $525 million that can be converted into common stock. And I think
it's at like 85 bips. It's like a pittance, the interest rate on what he's getting here because,
and this is what's so crazy for fixed income, this is probably one of the best fixed income instruments
on the planet right now to buy if you have a mandate to own fixed income. People are looking at it
There's no yield.
Like, who, what idiot is buying this?
And I'm looking at it and saying, no, you don't understand.
This is literally the best fixed income thing that you can possibly buy if you have a
mandate for it.
And just as one other point to this, people are completely missing how important and how
valuable this is for Michael's other strategy, which is to convert the common stock spread
into more Bitcoin onto his balance sheet when it's trading at a premium to his treasury.
And the reason why is because all these convertible fixed income instruments are able to provide deep liquidity into the common stock.
Okay, that's what's lost because you have all this Wall Street fast money that you kind of addressed earlier in the show that's coming in and they're hedging both sides of this.
They're trying to capture the spread.
They're not long-term holders.
They're in and out.
They're taking a short position.
And they're just trying to get a risk-free return.
But what that does is it adds absurd, absurd amount.
ounce of volume to the common stock because of these convertible debt instruments that he keeps
issuing. So it's almost like this scenario where he is able to capture this common stock
spread to the treasury by, because he has such deep liquidity, I literally saw today, he had the
same volume of trade as Amazon today, which for people that aren't like falling along is totally
nuts, nuts for the market cap size of his company to have this. So if I'm trying to put on that
trade where I'm trying to issue all this common stock, transmuted into Bitcoin, and I have deep
liquidity in the common stock, like I can do that all day long because there's so much liquidity.
I think Wall Street is totally asleep at the wheel. And now to the point where you and I were
kind of going back and forth, you were suggesting hold off because the spread's going to blow out more.
and I'm just saying, I don't want to get greedy, like, be this little piggy, thinking that I can
perfectly time that. And I'm just saying, just capture the spread. It's $1,000 right now. Just capture
the spread. So let me hear your point of view on, and I think some of this goes to your GameStop
experience. Why do you think it's going even more absurd than $1,000 per share on the spread?
I think it's going more absurd. I, you know, I've tried to think through this volume conundrum a little bit
on the micro strategy daily volume.
And I think it's a total misnomer of the actual shares trading at the margin because I think
there's a bunch of HFT, high frequency trading algos that are trying to capture risk-free
premium based on some underlying fundamental algorithm pegged to Bitcoin.
And I think that is a, it's not real volume.
Oh, really?
Okay.
So you don't, you think that even though the numbers are there that it could disappear pretty
quickly. I think the actual number of shares trading at the margin is far smaller than what the volume
indicates. And I think that's why we're seeing the premium grow at such a rapid pace.
Why is that? Why are you saying that? I'm saying that because the float is so incredibly,
like the shares outstanding is so incredibly small. You've got, you got 17 million,
whatever, people are going to argue about that. 17 million shares outstanding per se.
Saylor's got 15% of them.
You've got ETFs that have another, I don't know, 30% institutional investors have 60%.
Institutional investors are not selling this.
You've got retail that's bullying their head in here.
And so now, like, when you start to do some really rough math, of the 17 million shares
outstanding, you probably have like, I don't know, 13 or 14 million that aren't moving
at all.
And it might be more than that.
I would argue that it probably is more than that.
And so really, you may see these massive volume figures,
but I think those volume figures are a total misnomer
because what's actually trading at the margin of people that are actually buying
and people are actually selling is much, much, much, much, much smaller.
So, Jeff, but doesn't that go to my point of saying,
capture the spread now while you can get it?
Because if you sit around and wait, you're going to be too illiquid,
and you're going to get, you're playing a fool's errand of trying to time something like that
when you should just capture the spread.
Yeah, like come back to that is that more passive money is coming and people are holding.
Right.
You're saying the S&P 500 entrants.
No, no, no, not the S&P 500, right?
There are, micro strategy is already included in a handful of market cap weighted indexes.
Index funds.
So one being the Vanguard total stock market index fund.
You've got all of the Russell index funds.
They're in the Russell 2000.
You've got many index funds that they're already included in.
So passive money comes into this trade month.
probably daily. There's no great way to see when it exactly comes in. But passive money is going
to come in. And as the market cap rises and those funds rebalance and reallocate the weight
distributions of their total funds, the relative proportion of new dollars coming in is going to be a larger
proportion of the fund. Forget the S&P 500. It's a great story. And if it happens, it's even,
It's jet fuel to this thing.
But you already have passive money that's coming into the transaction.
What do we know about Bitcoin?
There's some pretty big events that are on the horizon in the next month and a half.
And we've got the halving.
And there's a lot of bowl scenarios going on here.
You've got quantitative easing, interest rates, everything that's going on.
And my argument was just be, I think you can be strategic.
and I'm sure they're calculating some relative accelerations in the price of Bitcoin
relative to the price of micro strategy in terms of rate of return.
And you could take the derivative of that curve.
And once that rate, the relative rate of change between Bitcoin and micro strategy changes,
that's the time to issue new shares to maximize the relative premium.
Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors.
No, it's not your imagination. Risk and regulation are ramping up, and customers now expect
proof of security just to do business. That's why VANTA is a game changer. VANTA automates your
compliance process and brings compliance, risk, and customer trust together on one AI-powered platform.
So whether you're prepping for a SOC 2 or running an enterprise GRC program, VANTA keeps you secure
and keeps your deals moving. Instead of chasing spreadsheets and screenshots,
VANTA gives you continuous automation across more than 35 security and privacy frameworks.
Companies like Ramp and Riders spend 82% less time on audits with Vanta.
That's not just faster compliance, it's more time for growth.
If I were running a startup or scaling a team today, this is exactly the type of platform I'd
won in place.
Get started at Vanta.com slash billionaires.
That's Vanta.com slash billionaires.
Ever wanted to explore the world of online trading, but haven't dared try?
The futures market is more active now than ever before, and Plus 500 futures is the perfect
place to start.
Plus 500 gives you access to a wide range of instruments, the S&P 500, NASDAQ, Bitcoin, gas,
and much more.
Explore equity indices, energy, metals, 4X, crypto, and beyond.
With a simple and intuitive platform, you can trade from anywhere, right from.
from your phone. Deposit with a minimum of $100 and experience the fast, accessible futures
trading you've been waiting for. See a trading opportunity, you'll be able to trade it in
just two clicks once your account is open. Not sure if you're ready, not a problem. Plus
500 gives you an unlimited, risk-free demo account with charts and analytic tools for you
to practice on. With over 20 years of experience, Plus 500 is your gateway to the markets.
Visit plus 500.com to learn more.
Trading in futures involves risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone.
Not all applicants will qualify.
Plus 500, it's trading with a plus.
Billion dollar investors don't typically park their cash in high-yield savings accounts.
Instead, they often use one of the premier passive income strategies for institutional investors,
private credit.
Now, the same passive income strategy is available to investors of all sizes
thanks to the Fundrise income fund, which has more than $600 million invested in a 7.97% distribution rate.
With traditional savings yields falling, it's no wonder private credit has grown to be a trillion dollar asset class in the last few years.
Visit fundrise.com slash WSB to invest in the Fundrise income fund in just minutes.
The fund's total return in 2025 was 8% and the average annual total return since inception
is 7.8%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, current distribution rate as of 1231,
2025. Carefully consider the investment material before investing, including objectives, risks,
charges, and expenses. This and other information can be found in the income funds prospectus at
fundrise.com slash income. This is a paid advertisement. All right. Back to the show.
Did you ever see one of these, and this is going to sound like I'm going off topic, but like I like
to use nature or physics to try to help me think through problems like the one that you're
talking about. There's this visual of this ball that like drops down and it has volatility
versus one that you start and it just like is at a 45 degree angle and goes down. And what you
often see in that clip is how the one that has more volatility is actually moving faster than the
one that's just going straight at a 45. But what you fail to see is if you run that clip long
enough and you keep watching it. The one that's at a 45 actually catches up to the one with
all the volatility and variance and then goes faster than it. So when I'm looking at what's playing
out here, I see this being a very similar dynamic as that scenario where if Michael is
stepping in and capturing the spread and he's doing it especially at a price where like when I'm
looking at this next cycle and let's say I was bearish and I think we're going to go
through another, and if I thought we were going through another cycle, which I think is a huge
if, let's say it goes to 400 or 500, where's it coming back down to? And I would say 100,000,
90,000 would be the low, call it, what would it be two years from now or two and a half,
three years from now? We would be seeing a low and maybe that it's 90,000. And if that's true,
any buys that are the transmutation of common stock to Bitcoin would be bad buys or dilutive
to the shareholders if he was doing that. If he could lock in, you know, if he was, let's just
say he was selling shares and collecting cash and then dropped it all in at 900 or 100,000 on the next
low, that's how he would ensure that he's not dilutive. So with all of that said, I'm looking at
the current price, and the current Bitcoin prices at $68,700 right now. And I'm saying you got about
another $30,000 in Bitcoin where it's a very, very high probability trade to capture the spread
because if you go through another cycle, it could be dilutive. So like to your point,
you're saying let that spread blow out because I'm with you, it might just blow out to like epic
proportions, right? Like that's really kind of your point. You're saying let that blow out,
then let's capture it.
Maybe the price of Bitcoin's, and I don't want to take words out of your mouth,
but maybe the price of Bitcoin is 120,000 when you get to that peak blowout.
And what I'm saying is you're transmuting it at a basis that is higher than where the next low could go,
which could result in you actually being somewhat dilutive to the shareholders in that scenario.
But I don't know.
I think this is one of those scenarios where all the years that I've participated in markets,
I usually get burnt the most when I try to get too cute with things.
And I try to, like, I'm not trying to be mean.
When you said it's calculus, like, I can't even tell you the red flag that like went up in my head.
It was like, that's a bad idea.
Because you're saying it's calculus, it's a bad idea.
It's too complicated.
Yeah.
It's too complicated.
Yeah.
I definitely understand.
I think one of the points I was getting at is like the velocity at that time was
rapidly changing. And if everybody, if you think about, again, this is game theory, right,
just taking a step out, look at all the players in the game, if everybody that's actually truly
holding Bitcoin is also holding micro strategy and the whole ethos of their entire trade
is they're going to hold Bitcoin forever and they're going to hold micro strategy forever.
I like this. If you know that they're not moving. We call them psychopaths. Let's just call
what it is. They're psychopaths. I'm one of them. You know it's not moving. I am not selling
micro strategy won't one forever, but why would I sell now when I know the bull market is on the
horizon? And so if you know what everybody, well, you've got institutions, they're not moving.
You've got other smart traders that know what's going on. They're not moving. Everybody knows
what's on the horizon. And then you have zombie money coming in the door to try to capture all of
the remaining tiny liquid float. That spread is going to widen. And the velocity, the acceleration,
We've seen it.
I mean, we've seen it in the last two weeks.
Yeah.
And I'm literally looking at the spread blowing out.
And you're exactly right.
It's accelerative.
The spread that's blowing out is accelerative.
And I guess when I'm looking at the fact that they had so much volume today,
and I like your argument that maybe it's not actually all there and it might be a little bit of smoke and mirrors.
But I'm also looking at Michael and I'm just like, dude, can you just like issue another like 25% of all your shares outstanding and just like capture this spread and
transmuted into Bitcoin and like, and then the price is really going to rip because he's going
to have so much more Bitcoin at such a great basis as we're getting ready to go into an
environment where I think we're going to see just absurd moves here in the coming year.
Yeah, I think that makes sense.
When I was comparing what you can do, right, you can issue shares or you can issue debt.
When I looked at the company's balance sheet, relative to the assets they hold, it's like
raising flags, go issue more debt.
And that's what they did.
They went and did this kind of convertible debt bond, which I thought was a, that's a brilliant, that's a brilliant trade.
Not to mention it helps in his taxes, like it reduces his tax burden, the interest rates are total pittance.
And the enhanced volume in the common stock is I think the really like crazy qualitative kicker that people aren't thinking about.
Yeah.
I think the one interesting question, I've been talking about this on Twitter a little bit, is,
I would love to be in the room sitting across the table at those meetings.
Can you imagine what those meetings with the executive committee at Microstratologies
like that when they're trying to go get $600 million of capital?
And who are those people, right?
Are they actual funds or are they maybe sidecars of large corporations that won't,
they know that they won't be able to get a Bitcoin purchase past their board?
So maybe they go buy convertible debt somewhere else.
AKA micro strategy.
So I would really love to know who is on the other side of those transactions, and it's super opaque.
I think the fact that you're seeing it being oversubscribed tells you everything you need to know.
We don't need to know who it is.
It's just the fact that it's oversubscribed tells you there's a massive appetite for it.
Like when you look at who the biggest shareholders are from an institutional standpoint,
it's like really smirkworthy vanguard and others that like it's just hilarious.
And let me ask you this. I'm of the firm opinion that we're watching something that is
somewhat unimaginable and that is going to absolutely go down in the history books is probably
one of the most obscene. I don't even like to call it a trade, but transitions of a company
that is going to be a global dominant player in the future. Ten years from now, everybody's
going to know what micro strategy is as if it was like Apple stock or whatever.
I absolutely 100% fundamentally agree with that statement.
I truly think that this is the biggest move, the biggest financial move in the history of
finance.
Mm-hmm.
And in the history of all of finance, I mean, this is, this is bigger than Ross Childs figuring
out how to front run in the 1600s and turning into a multi-generational wealth.
Like, this is fundamentally beyond comprehension, bigger than anything that's ever occurred
before.
Totally agree.
You heard the Coinbase announcement that they're going to.
to drop a billion into the market.
It was convertible debt, right?
I think it was also convertible debt.
Yeah.
I looked at their balance sheet,
and I don't know if they're using that billion
to refinance expiring debt.
I haven't really looked into that much.
I would doubt they're taking as big of a move financially
as micro strategy and Michael are doing.
But if it runs as well as their exchange runs,
it's going to be a very poor use of funds.
Yeah.
Absolutely.
So should we get into some valuations
and how I kind of ran and looked at this a little bit?
Yeah, go ahead.
So this is what I used as my baseline.
This is that table that I showed where I was looking at all of these homogenous risk
characteristics.
You're looking at P-Ratios, multiples, et cetera.
And I was looking at what Microstrategy was trading on it as its multiple, somewhere
around two and a half.
And then you would see all of these other companies are trading in the range from anywhere
from 1.6 to 14, 30, or 60 even in terms of their multiples.
relative to their net assets, basically their assets minus the debt.
And to me, that's a representation of their financial strength.
I looked at micro strategy, and I wanted to do a dynamic price analysis,
looking at different Bitcoin prices into the future,
and how that would potentially impact the market cap at these different Bitcoin
prices at different multiples.
And looking at what they're trading at today,
they're trading out a 2.68 multiple of their net assets.
So they're trading in a $30 billion market cap.
And then you fast forward, when you look at a couple different Bitcoin prices, and so looking
at a Bitcoin price of 125,000, if you take the same multiple that they're trading at today,
2.68, the price of Microstratology would be at a $61 billion market cap and a $3,500 price
for micro strategy. You go all the way to the furthest right on the graph. I've got 275,000
Bitcoin price, which at a 2.68 multiple results in $143 billion market.
market cap and $8,000 stock price. Now, thinking about where passive funds, how passive money flows
into this, right? You've got the potential S&P 500, which is a boon. You've got potential QQ,
which both are a boon to the amount of capital that would flow into the trade. But regardless,
you still have market cap weighted indexes that are going to passively be pushing money into the
transaction. And if people truly take this strong Bitcoin holder mentality to micro strategy,
the number of shares traded at the margins
are going to become razor thin
and price discovery to the upside
will tear people's faces off.
Lordy.
Yeah.
So I looked at multiple different trading multiples.
So back in 2021,
Microstrategia hit a six times multiple,
like when it really peaked at about $1,000 back in,
in 2021,
they were trading at six times multiple.
So I took that same multiple
and looked at different Bitcoin prices with that multiple.
At $125,000 Bitcoin price and a six times multiple,
that results in $137 billion market cap and about an $8,000 micro strategy price.
Again, as you could start to see as you go further,
if your price assumptions for Bitcoin go further out up to $275,000,
or I've obviously got many columns hidden here,
with a $275,000 Bitcoin price and a six times multiple,
you're looking at $321 billion market cap and $18,000 share price.
When GameStop had its short squeeze and there was significant pressure on the remaining
float and there was price discovery to the upside because the number of shares trading
at the margin was so incredibly small, it was trading at a 49 times net asset value.
Wow.
In looking at what a 49 times net asset value looks like at, I,
$125,000 at $125,000 Bitcoin price, trading it at 49 times multiple.
You're looking at a $1 trillion market cap.
So I love that you went here.
But I would push back to a point that I made earlier in the show as far as market cap size,
how much are you attributing like this multiple of 49, even being in the ballpark just because
of the sheer size of what micro strategy would be at that point?
Say that one more time.
Yeah. So like when we were dealing with GameStop, you're dealing with this really tiny company and, you know, just doesn't have the volume and is, you know, it's a small market cap. When you're looking at micro strategy and where this would be and call it a year and a half from now, you're kind of dealing with two different monsters. Like the one is a grown up and the other one's kind of a little kid. So can we just kind of copy and paste and say, hey, this multiple is possible? Or is it kind of a function of like how small,
GameStop was.
No, I absolutely think this is possible.
The reason being when, again, I don't like doing the direct comparison to GameStop,
but it's a good perspective on what like a short squeeze might look like where you've got
very low liquidity.
But GameStop, when that trade kind of blew up, there were 70 million shares tradable.
With Microstrategy, there's 17 million shares tradable.
So it's much, much, much, much smaller.
Yeah, right, the market cap is bigger.
But what is market cap?
What is market cap?
Market cap is synthetic.
You're very, this is such a great point because you're talking about the margins, on the margins of what are being traded.
That's what's driving the actual price.
Right.
Yeah, man, that's a great point.
So, so like market cap itself is synthetic.
This is the same comparison of Samson Mao looking at a million dollar Bitcoin, right?
Yeah.
If everybody at the same time decides that they're not going to sell their Bitcoin for a million dollars, unless it's a million dollars, and there's no liquidity.
left, the price of Bitcoin goes to a million.
Well, and so anybody that's looking at this and listening to what you're saying,
they're looking at the price of the BTC and the highest price you have here is 275K.
And you just said Samson Miles Million.
Like, what does that do to this?
Like, don't even say the number because we're getting into.
It's crazy territory.
People are going to think we're out of our minds, like some of these numbers.
Totally out of our minds.
Yeah.
So, but I think the exercise is useful.
I think the exercise of thinking about it is useful, right?
Like, I'm a reinsurance broker.
I think about tail events.
Like, what is happening like 0.001% return period.
I love that.
That's what I think about.
And you have to consider it.
Right?
Like, if you're holding an asset and you're, and like you said, if you're going to hold it forever,
wouldn't you want to think about what it might be worth?
Oh, my God.
Right.
Okay.
Then you zoom out.
Let's compare the market cap to any of these other companies.
And you go back and you look at this multiple.
assessment. And you actually realistically say, who can catch them? Who can catch
micro strategy? I don't know that anybody can at this point. Because I think if they try,
they're just going to blow out the price. I don't think that you're going to get there.
I think you've nailed it. So Berkshire has enough capital. They're probably never going to do it.
Meta Zuckerberg has 61% voting rates. If you wanted to, he could. But to your point,
like, they have enough quote unquote capital. But what if they actually would attempt to go
after it, the price is going to run so aggressively that they don't have enough capital.
Right.
Like, it appears like they do based off of, like, if everything was stationary and not dynamically
moving with the new participant that enters this.
Not to mention, we're not even talking about the qualitative side of, call it Apple or
Berkshire, whoever, is now implementing a similar strategy as Michael.
Like, what you're not accounting for is the third and fourth person that now has,
the incentive to also do it because now there's not one person doing it. There's multiple people
doing it. This is the biggest game theory situation I've ever come across. Yeah, I'm with you.
I'm with you 100%. It's filled my brain for the last 24 months. And full disclosure,
I don't think I explained it at the beginning. I made this strategy in February of 2023.
And I have more than multiple handfuls of leaps on this. And I was,
developing that strategy over time, recognizing what was kind of on the horizon and where
this could potentially go. So like this, this is my strategy since early 2023, and it's starting
to play out and it's pretty insane. I can only imagine. I can only imagine. So what are the
walks with your wife like? I'm sure I would, I'm sure I would have a different perspective than
she would. I got one other thing. Let's get out of this because you told me that you were a punner.
I quickly want to cover this because I find this type of stuff. I find elite athletes and people
that are just able to perform at just pinnacle levels. You told me the length of your longest
kick. Tell me this. This doesn't even sound believable. Yeah, yeah. So I was a punter. I had a
75-yard punt.
This was in college.
We went three and 33 in college.
So we went two years.
In the game.
In the gamer practice.
No, no.
No, no.
So in my four years in college, we won three games and we lost 33 games.
So we went defeated two years in a row.
So I got a lot of work.
You know, I was on the field quite a bit.
But yeah, had a 75-yard punt.
They called it, you know, the punt heard around the world.
I posted it on Twitter.
Wow.
Yeah.
Dude, that's great.
Out of the back of the end zone, I was like my heels on the back of the end zone and flipped
the field.
I think we downed him on like the 10 or the 15.
So did you have a massive tailwind behind you?
Like, give us the environmental setup.
What's going on?
Yeah, the environment.
It was warm.
It was Southern California.
It was on turf.
I just absolutely blasted this punt.
It definitely rolled.
Definitely rolled a little bit.
But it went over the guy's head and then just kept going.
Wow.
I think it was probably, from the line of scrimmage, it was probably 50 in the air, maybe 55.
Yeah.
And then got a material roll.
Yeah.
That is awesome.
It changed the game.
We won that game.
That was my senior year.
Wow.
That was the one game we won my senior year.
And we turned the field and scored a touchdown right after that.
Good for you, man.
That's awesome.
All right.
Hey, we're going to wrap things up.
If people want to learn more about you, tell us what you got going on.
Tell us where they can follow you.
Yeah, so we are going to be available on all streaming services here shortly. Lookup Quant Bros.
Me and my buddy Ryan are researching these types of trades and transactions, thinking about different perspectives on the market, using game theory, thinking high level, thinking really down in the nitty gritty, and, you know, hoping to talk to interesting people that think differently and think about the markets.
I love it. And I love the engagement that you guys were giving me.
on Twitter. It was really fun, the back and forth. And I, you know what, I really look forward to
continuing to interact with you and seeing your success. We have links to all this in the show notes.
So go check it out. Jeff, what a pleasure. Great analysis. That was really fun. Thanks for making
time. Yeah, absolutely. Thanks for having me, Preston. Appreciate it.
If you guys enjoyed this conversation, be sure to follow the show on whatever podcast application
you use. Just search for We Study Billionaires. The Bitcoin specific
shows come out every Wednesday, and I'd love to have you as a regular listener. If you enjoyed the show
or you learned something new or you found it valuable, if you can leave a review, we would
really appreciate that. And it's something that helps others find the interview in the search
algorithm. So anything you can do to help out with a review, we would just greatly appreciate. And with that,
thanks for listening, and I'll catch you again next week. Thank you for listening to TIP.
Make sure to follow Bitcoin Fundamentals on your favorite podcast app and never miss out on episodes.
To access our show notes, transcripts or courses, go to theinvestorspodcast.com.
This show is for entertainment purposes only, before making any decision consult a professional.
This show is copyrighted by the Investors Podcast Network.
Written permission must be granted before syndication or rebroadcasting.
