We Study Billionaires - The Investor’s Podcast Network - BTC209: Bitcoin Lightning Balancing MoE and SoV w/ Roy Sheinfeld (Bitcoin Podcast)
Episode Date: November 20, 2024Exploring Bitcoin's Future as Both Store of Value and Medium of Exchange with Roy Sheinfeld, CEO of Breez, a leader in Bitcoin's Lightning Network. IN THIS EPISODE YOU’LL LEARN: 00:00 - Intro 0...2:22 - How Breez uses the Lightning Network to enable seamless Bitcoin transactions. 04:50 - Challenges and solutions to improving Bitcoin’s user experience for mainstream adoption. 08:47 - Why Roy Sheinfeld believes Bitcoin must function as both a store of value and a medium of exchange. 18:54 - The long-term vision for Breez as a driver of global financial freedom. 27:17 - Roy's perspectives on Bitcoin’s evolution and its competition with fiat currencies. 31:25 - Practical advice for developers aiming to build on Bitcoin. 39:11 - The ways Breez’s SDK empowers developers and businesses to integrate Bitcoin functionality. 43:49 - How Breez’s nodeless design simplifies access to Bitcoin for both developers and users. 50:22 - Insights from Breez’s partnership with Yopaki in Mexico, showcasing Bitcoin’s impact in underserved regions. Disclaimer: Slight discrepancies in the timestamps may occur due to podcast platform differences. BOOKS AND RESOURCES Roy Steinfield’s X (Twitter) Account. Breez Website. Check out all the books mentioned and discussed in our podcast episodes here. Enjoy ad-free episodes when you subscribe to our Premium Feed. NEW TO THE SHOW? Join the exclusive TIP Mastermind Community to engage in meaningful stock investing discussions with Stig, Clay, Kyle, and the other community members. Follow our official social media accounts: X (Twitter) | LinkedIn | Instagram | Facebook | TikTok. Check out our Bitcoin Fundamentals Starter Packs. Browse through all our episodes (complete with transcripts) here. Try our tool for picking stock winners and managing our portfolios: TIP Finance Tool. Enjoy exclusive perks from our favorite Apps and Services. Stay up-to-date on financial markets and investing strategies through our daily newsletter, We Study Markets. Learn how to better start, manage, and grow your business with the best business podcasts. SPONSORS Support our free podcast by supporting our sponsors: Hardblock Found DeleteMe Fundrise CFI Education Vanta Shopify Onramp TurboTax Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm
Transcript
Discussion (0)
You're listening to TIP.
Hey everyone, welcome to this Wednesday's release of the Bitcoin Fundamentals podcast.
On today's show, I have one of the most talented developers in the Bitcoin space with
Mr. Roy Scheinfeld.
Roy is the CEO and founder of Breeze, which is the premier business enabling the interface
of the Bitcoin Lightning Economy.
During our show today, we talk about Roy's point of view that in order for Bitcoin
to remain truly decentralized and open, it not only needs to deliver on its store
value properties, but it also needs to be used as day-to-day money. This is an important conversation
and one that helps the listener truly understand the importance of the Lightning Network
sitting at the center of gravity for the Bitcoin Network. So without further delay, here's my chat
with Roy. Celebrating 10 years, you are listening to Bitcoin Fundamentals by the Investors Podcast Network.
Now for your host, Preston Pish.
Hey everyone, welcome to the show. I'm here with the one and the only Roy Scheinfeld. Welcome
to the Investors podcast and Bitcoin Fundamentals.
Thank you for having me, Preston.
Roy, so, you know, if people don't know you, I'm just going to, I'm going to shoot them
straight here.
In my opinion, I think you're one of the best developers in the entire space.
I've had numerous opportunities to talk with you in person, and every time I just kind of walk
away with just how clear your thinking is, there's a couple developers out there, engineers
that aren't just talented devs, but are great at explaining things and kind of seeing a vision
of where a lot of this stuff is moving in the future. So where I want to start off, you have a company
called Breeze, and it's on the Lightning Network. You're doing payment processing. But the thing that I want
you to kind of start off talking to the audience about is really your vision. Like, where is this all going?
We talk about the Lightning Network all the time on the show. But from a payments processing
standpoint, how are vendors going to interact with this? There's been a lot of comments and debates
as to the, how robust and reliable the Lightning Network is.
So somebody that's building in this space, where do you see this kind of moving and evolving
in the coming five to 10 years with respect to the Lightning Network?
And then you as, you know, an entrepreneur and builder with Breeze, talk a little bit
about the mission of Breeze.
Okay.
Easy question to start me off.
There's a lot to unpack.
So let's take a step back and kind of try to understand what is that.
is trying to achieve. And it's really about evolving Bitcoin to be a global currency. That's
basically our mission. If we talk about in this time spans that you're talking about, like 10,
even 20, 30 years, let's talk about 100 years. What will happen in 100 years? We think there are
two options, basically. We think the world will have a global currency, but there are two options
on the global currency that will be used in the world. One option is CBDC.
One global currency that is controlled by an entity.
We don't know which exactly is going to be the ruling entity,
but there will be an entity that govern this currency.
And the second option is decentralized currency.
We think Bitcoin has the best chance of being this decentralized currency.
So when you talk about vision, the breeze mission,
is basically to help Bitcoin evolve to be in a place that it will be able
to perform the task of a global currency.
And that's where we headed.
And everything that we do in Brits is to make sure Bitcoin is capable in performing
the task of being a global currency.
And it's not easy because Bitcoin is based on the blockchain.
The Bitcoin technology is based on the blockchain.
And blockchains in general don't scale.
So how can you evolve Bitcoin to a place that it will be able to perform the task
of money?
we tend to call medium of exchange.
And there's a lot of time people kind of confuse medium of exchange with a merchant adoption.
Like I think already Bitcoin is a tremendous medium of exchange.
But in order to get to a point where it's widely accepted by merchant, we need to scale Bitcoin
in order for Bitcoin to be used by at least two order of magnitudes that it's being used right now.
We started the breeze six years ago with the lightening network with the emergence of the lighting
network because we think the best way to scale Bitcoin is by using Bitcoin, meaning
Lightning Network is an extension of Bitcoin.
It uses Bitcoin as a very asset.
And it provides a level of scalability that can be achieved on the Bitcoin mainnet, on the Bitcoin
chain.
And it works.
There are challenges, as you've mentioned, and there are inherent problems to the
Lightning Network that hinder the user experience, mainly.
what we call the inbound liquidity problem.
We can talk about that if you want to expand on that later.
But another point of friction is also the fact that it does interact with the chain from time to time,
meaning in order to onboard to the Lightning Network, you need an on-chain transaction to happen.
And sometimes channels get closed, and when channels go closed, you need to interact with a chain.
And every time users interact with the main chain, it's a cause of friction because
the chains are slow and the chain are costly.
So if fees are high, it means that there's a cost to be paid.
I think we've done a lot, specifically at Brees, but generally also in the lightning ecosystem
in the past six years.
I don't know if people remember how lightning looked like six years ago, but I remember
myself like in the Bitcoin conference in Berlin trying to pay for a beer using lightning.
and it took, on average, it took us 30 times to get a payment.
30 tries.
30 tries, yeah.
Yeah.
To get the beer spilling in this hacky Bitcoin conference.
And today you don't see that.
No, we're not in a place where we have 99% reliability.
We have around 90 to 95% payment reliability, which by no means is good enough.
but it's widely used by millions of people.
The largest exchanges in the world already support lightning.
We'll talk about Coinbase and Binance and Krakken.
All the major exchanges supports lightning.
I think Coinbase even released some statistics a few months ago
that 6.8% from all the Bitcoin deposits are done using lightning.
Oh, wow.
And it's Coinbase.
Yeah, that's pretty high.
So we're talking about definitely a significant number.
There are other statistics, I think,
OKX are reporting 70k of active lightning users on their exchange.
So, yes, lighting didn't took the wall, but I think one of the mistakes that some people
have done years ago is to set the wrong expectations of what lightning is.
I think nevertheless, we did achieve the next level in the foundation.
Like, we've built lightning as a foundation, which is remarkable.
And millions of people are using lightning.
and I think we're ready to use Lightning as a way to scale Bitcoin and bring to the next level.
And the way I see now, and I think I have a different vision than the vision that I started.
I think Lightning is going to be the common language between end users, enterprises, and subnetworks,
meaning we're starting to see subnetworks evolve that brings Bitcoin to end users,
what we call the last mile solution.
So we see solutions like Feddy and we are seeing solutions like e-cash-based solution like cash use.
And we're starting to see ARC evolve and we're starting to see many Bitcoin layer two.
I think all of the sub-networks are going to speak lightning.
Lightning is going to be the interoperable language between all the sub-networks.
So lightning is here to stay.
Yeah, I really like that last point.
And I think that last point is sometimes lost on people because they see e-cash.
or they see FETI or any of these other ones that you're talking about.
And they might not understand that those other networks are dependent on Lightning being
the second layer.
If you want to call those third layers or whatever, I don't know what the correct terminology
would be, but they're really dependent on Lightning being that middle ground between
where they're at acting in a very high frequency kind of way, but requiring more trust.
And Bitcoin Layer 1, which is store of value, settles every 10 minutes, a lot more robust
security setup required and all those things. So I think that that's such a key point. Before we go
any further, you have this amazing article that you recently wrote. This went out on Bitcoin
magazine. The name of this article was Bitcoin's false dichotomy between store value and medium
of exchange. You were using a term, I want to clear up some terminology for people that are listening
to this. You were saying the term currency. And when I think currency, I typically equate it with
paper money or something that's happening at a very high frequency. Like the money that you would
have in your wallet is a currency. It's, you know, we can get into the backing, which is it gets really
mutilated in the difference between currency and money, because these are the two terms that I think
are really important for people to wrap their head around. And when we're talking about money,
typically we're talking about something that has some type of proof of work or some type of backing
to it, call it gold. Like, I think nobody would disagree that gold is money. Whether it's actually
saleable and you can use it as a form of currency and you wrote a little bit about this in the
article, it gets a lot harder because in order to make it more saleable, you really need to kind
of ride a paper currency on top of it because it's just so scarce.
Not portable.
Yeah, it's not portable.
That's a better way to put it.
But these two terms, currency, which is high frequency representation of money, and then you
have money itself, which is this proof of work back.
with Bitcoin, we have something that has the potential and is, both of these things simultaneously
with respect to being able to spend it at a very high frequency way.
But we get into the technical challenges of doing it, which I find really interesting because
it's a representation of what we've seen throughout human history that...
History.
Right?
And even though we've moved completely into the digital realm, these things that existed in
the physical realm of, you know, it's...
It's really hard to make gold saleable.
It's really hard to do.
And it's just mind-blowing to me that Bitcoin has the exact same challenges, even though
at the base layer it's still digital.
So 100%.
Talk us through.
So like people are hearing that and they're saying, well, how is that even possible?
Like what are you talking about?
Okay.
So how do we explain this and you do this in your article and you do a lot more in the article
too.
But let's start there to explain like, why is it still so hard to make it saleable in a secure
way and like all that nuance?
Okay, again, a lot to unpack here. I think comparing to gold, for example, gold didn't
become gold as a sellable asset until people started minting gold coins. Now, the question is,
in my mind, has Bitcoin reached the point where we meet Bitcoin as a coin, meaning, is it easy
enough, convenient enough to exchange Bitcoin in a portable, divisible, fungible way?
So let's take a step back and talk about store of value and medium of exchange because
basically these are the properties we're talking about when we talk about money.
That question that you proposed, I think needs just a touch more to it, which is can you do that
on your own without some type of custodian or assistance from somebody else, right?
Can you transact in a way that it's just you doing it?
Or are you reliant on some other person to provide a service for you to do it?
So when I talk about Bitcoin, when I talk about Bitcoin, I talk about self-custodial Bitcoin.
Everything, all the work that we do at the breeze is self-custodial Bitcoin,
meaning you own the keys, you own the Bitcoin.
You're not relying on the third party or an intermediate to do the exchange for you.
When I say Bitcoin, I inherently and implicitly say self-custodial Bitcoin.
And I know maybe that's not the way people are using the term Bitcoin and people are
the term Bitcoin with self-custodial.
But when I say Bitcoin, I mean self-custodial Bitcoin, because that encapsulate the value
proposition of Bitcoin, which is basically two, there are two pillars to the value proposition
of Bitcoin.
One is the scarcity of Bitcoin, the fact that we only will have 21 million coins.
And secondly, the fact that you can do an exchange without relying on a third party or
another entity or individual to perform the task for it.
the exchange of value.
And I'm just a pleb.
I'm not an historian and I'm not an economic scholar.
I'm just a flip.
But when I say store of value and when people say story value,
the word value exists in the sentence, store of value,
meaning people want two things when they use something as a store of value.
They want something that is durable and they want to use something that will retain value.
But the word value means a future exchange.
You don't want to store something for nothing.
You want to store something because you know you're going to sell the asset later on.
It can be years, it can be decades.
You might not even sell it, but it means that you have the ability to sell something in the future.
Again, there are different theories of value.
There's the labor theory of value that value reflects the work that you put into something.
That's kind of the Marxist theory of value.
And there's frequently used the term intrinsic value.
There's like inherent value or something.
Very Warren Buffett like.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I don't think there's something.
I don't think like I think people use it without understanding.
There's no value without context, meaning a barrel of water in the desert worth like all the
gold in the world in a very specific context.
So all value is contextual.
Once you understand that all value is contextual, you understand there's nothing like the intrinsic value doesn't really exist.
You don't use gold because you have the ability to make it to a jewelry.
Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors.
All right.
I want you guys to imagine spending three days in Oslo at the height of the summer.
You've got long days of daylight, incredible food, floating saunas on the Oslo Fjord.
And every conversation you have is with people who are actually shaping the future.
That's what the Oslo Freedom Forum is. From June 1st through the 3rd, 2026, the Oslo Freedom Forum is entering its 18th year bringing together activists, technologists, journalists, investors, and builders from all over the world, many of them operating on the front lines of history.
This is where you hear firsthand stories from people using Bitcoin to survive currency collapse, using AI to expose human rights abuses, and building technology under censorship and authoritarian pressures.
These aren't abstract ideas.
These are tools real people are using right now.
You'll be in the room with about 2,000 extraordinary individuals, dissidents, founders, philanthropists, policy makers, the kind of people you don't just listen to but end up having dinner with.
Over three days, you'll experience powerful mainstage talks, hands-on workshops on freedom tech, and financial sovereignty, immersive art installations, and conversations that continue long after the sessions end.
and it's all happening in Oslo in June.
If this sounds like your kind of room, well, you're in luck because you can attend in person.
Standard and patron passes are available at Osloof Freedom Forum.com with patron passes offering
deep access, private events, and small group time with the speakers.
The Oslo Freedom Forum isn't just a conference.
It's a place where ideas meet reality and where the future is being built by people living it.
If you run a business, you've probably had the same thought lately.
How do we make AI useful in the real world?
Because the upside is huge, but guessing your way into it is a risky move.
With NetSuite by Oracle, you can put AI to work today.
NetSuite is the number one AI cloud ERP, trusted by over 43,000 businesses.
It pulls your financials, inventory, commerce, HR, and CRM into one unified system.
And that connected data is what makes your AI smarter.
It can automate routine work, surface actionable insights,
and help you cut costs while making fast AI-powered decisions with confidence.
And now with the NetSuite AI connector, you can use the AI of your choice to connect directly
to your real business data.
This isn't some add-on, it's AI built into the system that runs your business.
And whether your company does millions or even hundreds of millions, NetSuite helps you stay ahead.
If your revenues are at least in the seven figures, get their free business guide,
demystifying AI at NetSuite.com slash study.
The guide is free to you at netsuite.com slash study.
NetSuite.com slash study.
When I started my own side business, it suddenly felt like I had to become 10 different
people overnight wearing many different hats.
Starting something from scratch can feel exciting, but also incredibly overwhelming and
lonely.
That's why having the right tools matters.
For millions of businesses, that tool is Shopify.
Shopify is the commerce platform behind millions of businesses.
around the world and 10% of all e-commerce in the U.S. from brands just getting started to household
names. It gives you everything you need in one place, from inventory to payments to analytics.
So you're not juggling a bunch of different platforms. You can build a beautiful online store with
hundreds of ready-to-use templates, and Shopify is packed with helpful AI tools that write product
descriptions and even enhance your product photography. Plus, if you ever get stuck, they've got award-winning
24-7 customer support. Start your business today with the industry's best business partner, Shopify,
and start hearing sign up for your $1 per month trial today at Shopify.com slash WSB.
Go to Shopify.com slash WSB. That's Shopify.com slash WSB.
All right. Back to the show. There's another, there's an idea that's often discussed called the
coincidence of once, meaning if you're in a desert and you're, you know, like, ready to die and
you need water to survive and I have that water and I can somehow get it to you, like the value is,
it's dependent on the situations. So some people, some people want an apple. The other person wants
an orange. And if you have a bunch of apples and I have a bunch of oranges and we, you know,
the value proposition, even though if you're looking at the energy that was required for you to
harvest that and for me to harvest, it was maybe the same amount of energy, because of where we sit and
because of the circumstances of our environment, the value changes dynamically for each one of us.
And this is this idea of coincidence at once.
Exactly.
Exactly.
If all value is contextual, the only way to determine value is to exchange the asset for something else.
Yeah.
Price discovery is inherent to a store value.
Because if you have value and the value is contextual and you want to trade it someday in the
future, you need an exchange to happen in order to discover the price of your store value.
And we see that with Bitcoin right now, by the way, like all the time.
Bitcoin is being exchanged for fiat value.
And we know the price of Bitcoin as a store value because of its exchange with other
fiat currencies.
And if you flip the coin to the medium of exchange side, you understand there's no
medium of exchange without some portion of being able to retain value. If you have a good medium
of exchange is an asset that you can exchange for goods and services. But if it doesn't retain
value, it's a bad medium of exchange. You wouldn't use, I don't know, like the boulevard.
Well, from the first, I love this idea. So from a first principle standpoint, going back to what
we were talking about with the apple and an orange, right? If I exchange, let's say I have the
apple and I give it to you, as soon as it passes out of my hand and it hits your hand, let's just
imagine that it immediately becomes rotten and you can't eat it or use it for anything.
Immediately, it's upon arrival. Because it didn't have some type of store of value properties,
it then becomes worthless immediately. Exactly. Exactly. And in our cases, like the way,
where it happens.
For example, in the article,
I give it an example of cigarettes in prisons.
It's something that is very, it's not durable.
Like, it lasts, like they perish after one or two weeks.
But they use as a medium of exchange all the time in prison
in a very specific context.
Of course, it doesn't extend outside of the prison walls
because it's a very, very poor store value.
So if you do kind of in your head, you do the Venn diagram of a medium of exchange on one hand and store value on the other end, you see most of the assets that we use are actually both.
Are both store value and there are medium of exchange and Bitcoin.
I got tired of the discourse.
I got sick of hearing a sailor talk about Bitcoin as capital and people trying kind of to push the ETF narratives and their own stocks in order for you to buy Bitcoin.
via a proxy.
And they use kind of the store of value medium of exchange narrative in order to say,
listen, Bitcoin isn't a medium of exchange.
You don't need a direct access to Bitcoin.
So if it's a store of value, you can buy it via proxy because you're not going to
sell it anytime soon.
Maybe, but it doesn't mean Bitcoin isn't a medium of exchange.
Bitcoin is a very good medium of exchange.
Bitcoin is being traded in the trillions, tens of trillions of dollars every year.
And if you compare it to the market cap of Bitcoin, it's one or two of the magnitude.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I wanted to say my piece and be done with it.
And if people don't get it, okay, I'll let them continue with this narrative.
But Bitcoin is a great store value and Bitcoin is a great medium of exchange.
Yeah.
Now let's go back to your original question.
If I'm claiming it's such a great medium of exchange, why it's not being wide.
adapted by all the merchants and why aren't we transacting Bitcoin in our day-to-day lives.
And that's basically why I started the breeze.
And that's why we have a lot of work to do because I don't think Bitcoin had this gold coin moment
where we kind of transform gold from something that is used in ceremonies and in rituals
to something that can be easily exchanged and transferred.
The Lightning Network is one piece of the puzzle.
We definitely made a lot of progress in that regard, but there are still hurdles.
Some of the hurdles are technical hurdles.
Some of the hurdles are kind of macro related to the wider acceptance of Bitcoin as a currency
and the fight that we're still having with regulatory entities to accept Bitcoin as a currency.
From a U.X standpoint, I think we'll be there soon.
You asked me about the five to ten years' vision.
I think we'll gather sooner than that.
I think it would become very, very easy to transact in Bitcoin,
even without the pain points of lightning,
which is the interaction with the main chain
and the fees that in core is a result of interacting with the chain.
So we'll get there very soon.
You can already see solutions like Feddi and solutions like cashiers
and solutions like ARC and solutions like what we are doing with Liquid.
we're basically using
other blockchains in order to scale
the Bitcoin blockchain.
So I think you'll see a proliferation of solutions
that are kind of targeting
in solving the last mile issues
and we're very, very close.
Which the one that you're...
I just want for the audience to understand
the context of that last comment.
So Blockstream has the liquid network,
which is a federated,
just like we were talking about Feddy earlier,
This is another federation that you can peg in, peg out.
It comes with its own security challenges or whatever, like any federated system does.
It's a different trust profile.
I think when you're talking about scaling Bitcoin, you're basically talking about
compromising in the trust profile.
And then once you accept another trust profile, and even Lightning kind of has some
constraint that you need to subscribe to, not in the terms of kind of the consensus, but in terms
of, you need to be online in order to validate to check your channels and to make sure that
you're not being fraudulent. It's a different trust profile than using the main chain. And in Fed,
you accept the guardians, you need to trust the guardians and you need to trust the guardians,
won't collude to take your money.
With Liquid, we're talking about currently,
it's a federation of 15 organizations,
and you need 11 out of 15 functionaries
to sign in order for them to steal your money.
Next year, we're going to scale the federation
to in another order of magnitude.
So the trust for profile is going to improve.
With solutions like Ashu,
you're talking about the Minter.
You need to trust the Minter,
not to steal your funds.
Yeah.
In ARC, you're talking about an ASP, like the ARC node.
You need to trust the ARC node in some regards.
So every last mile solution, including, by the way, other Bitcoin layer two's.
I'm using layer two in a very, very free form right now because it's a very controversial
term, what is a layer two.
But I'm including for the sake of simplicity, I'm including all the layer twos here,
even layer twos that don't have unilateral.
exit from the chain, you basically trust another federation, another consensus algorithm that
is different from the Bitcoin main chain. Once you do that, we solve the last-mile solution
in a different way that is solved using the Lightning Network. Let me just talk about my own
personal experience of running my own node, opening a bunch of channels, taking a self-custody
wallet and linking it to my node and where I had all this liquidity that I created. And then going out
and conducting transactions on layer two lightning Bitcoin. And you had talked about earlier about the
reliability being like 90 to 95 percent of the transactions going through on layer two today
based off of just global metrics. And what I found personally was that it was a little slow.
It was slow relative to just trying to find a pathway, right? When I was doing literally all
the technical side. And by the way, this was no task that I would ever want my mother to do or my father
to do it. It doesn't scale. It doesn't scale. Like, could I do it? Yep. Did it take a whole lot of effort?
It didn't take a terrible amount of effort, but I feel like I'm somewhat technically inclined.
And so I was able to do it. The reliability wasn't great. Was I able to conduct transit?
Of course, it would like I had a pretty good success rate. But then I go out there and then other
people were providing this service on my behalf, call it a wallet of Satoshi.
or I download the primal app and there's a native wallet in there that I, you know,
is using strike back end and like all these other things that just really make it easy to do.
And I'm like, ah, I'll just load $100 worth of sats onto this, you know, wallet that somebody
else is holding.
Where was I at?
I was in Mexico last week.
And I was buying something.
And the person literally had, you know, we accept Bitcoin here.
And I went and I scanned it.
I downloaded the primal app or I had the primal app already in my phone.
I scanned it.
Went straight through.
No issue.
and probably the transaction settled in a second or less first try.
So I think from a user's standpoint, having gone through everything that I had done before
to then seeing that, you can see how a bunch of people just want to basically outsource this.
I'm not too concerned if I'd lose $100.
You know, there's $100 on the wallet.
If I ran out of money, I could just load it up with another $100 worth of Bitcoin and just
kind of use it in this manner.
Is this a concern that this is the way that this is going to go?
What are your thoughts on this being how medium of exchange kind of, you know, maybe the natural
market forces are pushing us in this way? Talk us through the thoughts around all of this.
First, I don't argue with the market. The market does what the market does and it's a good thing.
Again, a lot to unpack. But what we've done with Brise is to create this notion of an LSD,
a Latin service provider. Meaning when you download the self-custodial wallet of Brise,
you are connected to a professional node that is very professionally maintained and very tuned
to make sure that your payments are going through.
One of the reasons that a lightning matured and became more and more reliable is because
we no longer had this command that you ran your own node, probably on your umbrella or whatever.
But you were part of the reason that the network was flaky.
So the less obvious we have as nose runners, the more professional the network become.
And part of the reason that the lightning payment success rate increased in the past couple of years
is because we went through this phase of going from hobbyists to professionals.
And it's a good thing.
Like I see it as a positive evolution in the evolution of liking, the more professionals,
the more money they have, the more liquidity they have,
the likelihood of the payment to go through is increases by a lot.
So that's one thing.
I think the network needs to become more professionals.
I think LSP is a notion that we brought to market and it's now widely adopted when you use a Phoenix, when you use a breeze, when you use, there are other zoos or other self-custodial wallet.
You're immediately connected to a professional LSP, which helps you in the success rate of the payments and solves the inbound liquidity problem, etc.
You were talking about custodial, meaning when you use FRIMEL, you said it correctly, you're using strike at the back end, when you use Blink, when you use, I don't know, Bitnob in Africa or pouch in the Philippines, you're basically using a custodial service.
My concern about custodial services is twofold.
One, they can't scale globally, meaning it's a Bitcoin bank.
And a Bitcoin bank won't operate globally because all of their regulatory hurdles and there's no way.
way to use this solution globally. There's no Fiat payment that works globally. And if we want to
provide the service to all of the people in the world, we can't rely on a custodial service because
that won't happen. We have a 26,000 Fiat payment networks. There's no single Fiat network
that works globally. So the only way for Bitcoin to be widely and globally accepted is maintaining
its peer-to-peer characteristics.
That's one thing.
Secondly, I think that if we'll continue in building Bitcoin banks,
which again, like you said, it's a natural evolution in the acceptance of Bitcoin,
the acceptance of Bitcoin in the market,
I think that's positive in that regard,
but we'll get into the same Fiat problems that we're getting,
that we have with Fiat today.
AML, KYC, bans.
I don't know, I saw a post yesterday of someone who was banned
from Wise, it happened to me, like I tried to use Wise and suddenly the day after they banned
me, you'll get to the same problems if you're being reliant on Bitcoin Bank. The fact that
primal works right now doesn't mean it will work tomorrow if they will continue using a Bitcoin
bank at the backhanded. Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors. No, it's not
your imagination. Risk and regulation are ramping up and customers now expect proof of security
just to do business. That's why.
Vantta is a game changer. Vanta automates your compliance process and brings compliance, risk,
and customer trust together on one AI-powered platform. So whether you're prepping for a SOC
or running an enterprise GRC program, VANTA keeps you secure and keeps your deals moving. Instead
of chasing spreadsheets and screenshots, VANTA gives you continuous automation across more than
35 security and privacy frameworks. Companies like Ramp and Ryder spend 82% less time on
audits with Vanta. That's not just faster compliance, it's more time for growth. If I were running a
startup or scaling a team today, this is exactly the type of platform I'd want in place. Get started
at Vanta.com slash billionaires. That's Vanta.com slash billionaires. Ever wanted to explore the world of
online trading, but haven't dared try? The futures market is more active now than ever before,
and plus 500 futures is the perfect place to start.
Plus 500 gives you access to a wide range of instruments, the S&B 500, NASDAQ, Bitcoin, gas, and much more.
Explore equity indices, energy, metals, 4X, crypto, and beyond.
With a simple and intuitive platform, you can trade from anywhere, right from your phone.
Deposit with a minimum of $100 and experience the fast, accessible futures trading you've been waiting for.
See a trading opportunity. You'll be able to trade it in just two clicks once your account is open.
Not sure if you're ready, not a problem. Plus 500 gives you an unlimited, risk-free demo account
with charts and analytic tools for you to practice on. With over 20 years of experience,
Plus 500 is your gateway to the markets. Visit Plus500.com to learn more.
Trading in futures involves risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone. Not all applicants will call
Plus 500, it's trading with a plus.
Billion dollar investors don't typically park their cash in high-yield savings accounts.
Instead, they often use one of the premier passive income strategies for institutional
investors, private credit.
Now, the same passive income strategy is available to investors of all sizes thanks to the
Fundrise income fund, which has more than $600 million invested in a 7.97% distribution rate,
traditional savings yields falling, it's no wonder private credit has grown to be a trillion
dollar asset class in the last few years. Visit fundrise.com slash WSB to invest in the Fundrise
Income Fund in just minutes. The fund's total return in 2025 was 8%, and the average annual
total return since inception is 7.8%. Past performance does not guarantee future results,
current distribution rate as of 1231, 2025. Carefully consider the investment material,
before investing, including objectives, risks, charges, and expenses.
This and other information can be found in the income funds prospectus at fundrise.com
slash income.
This is a paid advertisement.
All right.
Back to the show.
Roy, I think this is a really important topic because what you're really, what you're
effectively saying is there's a potential to bifurcate the lightning network into a KYC'd network
and a non-KYCed network.
Am I stating this correctly?
as far as a concern.
Yes.
Yeah.
Lacking Network is just an implementation detail of Bitcoin.
Bitcoin in general can be very, like you can have white and black Bitcoin in the future.
You already have that, which analysis and other products are kind of using to differentiate
between different types of Bitcoins.
But definitely it can happen.
By the way, it's already happening.
If in the early days of Lightning, every node was able to connect to another node in the
network, you can't do that right now. If you're trying to connect to the Cash app node, for example,
you can't. Only regulated entities in the US can connect to the Cash app as an example.
Do you think that this is policy driving, is the past administration that we're moving away
from one of the reasons why Cash App was very hesitant to just allow anybody to connect with them?
And do you see that changing potentially if we get more friendly policies?
Or do you think that this is hanging around?
I think CashUp is part of Block, which is a public company.
You can take the risks that a company like Brist can take.
Definitely being in the U.S., you need to be concerned about the risk and the regulatory landscape,
as we saw with the Samurai trial and in other occasions.
So, yes, I definitely think that a more open administration can lead to,
to be less risk adverse.
Nevertheless, I think we all need to keep in mind that you can't avoid the inherent issue here.
If you let someone else take care of your money, that entity is going to be heavily regulated.
And that regulation is going to have implication.
It's going to have user experience implications, meaning as a user, you will have to K.
K. YC and AML every time you make a transaction. And there's risks in them preventing you access to the
network in the future. It happens in Fiat. It's happening in Bitcoin as well. It's going to only get worse
in the future. The only way to circumvent that, again, we start this conversation by taking
kind of the 100 years vision of one single CBDC versus a peer to peer. The only way to
circumvent that is by everyone owning their own money and executing peer-to-peer transaction.
That's why we're so focused on the peer-to-peer aspects of Bitcoin and the technology
improving. I'm a technology. You start by saying that I'm a developer. Yeah, I believe in
technology. I believe in the ability of us to evolve and improve a technology. I think we'll get
to a point where peer-to-per transactions are super easy and not just for us, the Bitcoiners,
but for every mainstream users.
And if everyone of us will be able to make peer-to-preach transaction,
there's no reason that peer-to-peer won't be an alternative to banks.
Yeah.
One of the interesting things that you get when you start talking about federated systems
or like cash-you is you get way more privacy with the movement of the coins
because of the way that federations work.
Do you think that this technology, and I know we called it layer three earlier,
would you agree that it's called a layer three?
or what would be the correct terminology for these types of technologies?
I think Cashew isn't really a layer three because it's not built on Bitcoin at all.
I don't like to add another layer.
I think layer two is enough.
It's complicated enough.
Let's end the discussion on what's a layer two and then move to a layer of three.
I don't think at this point we need to add another.
So the reason I bring this up is because it almost seems like this technology that people
are just starting to build on here in the last year and a half is going to be.
instrumental in almost being a tailwind to non-KYC'd lightning and allowing these properties to
allow it to continue to propagate where not everything has to be KYC. And when we look at that five,
10, 15-year horizon, is this the thing that maybe actually allows and enables Bitcoin to remain
the freedom tech that we all, you know, see it being? Because at grassroots and instrumental level
of just like a $1 payment or a cup of coffee type payment that you can do it with call it
cashew or a fetament or something that are these like tokens that have an enormous amount of
privacy to them because once you get down and I also find this interesting and I'm sorry to meander
all over the place that layer one bitcoin where it's really being used as store of value has a ton
of issues with respect to privacy but as you go further and further away from it in the really
high frequency, low value per transaction size, that you get way more privacy once you push down
on that part of the spectrum. And I find that really fascinating, right? That that's kind of how
it's naturally put it out. One easy way to explain it is that as the chain keeps track,
it's a global ledger and it keeps tracks on all of the transaction. And once you start building
on layers, you no longer have to persist a global state. And if you don't need to persist,
a global state, then inherently you gain more privacy. You have that in lightning, by the way,
as well, because there's no global state. The state is persisted in the node. And if you are
executing transaction, basically the date is persist in the channel, which means it needs to
persist by two parties. But there's no global state in lightning as well. Only if you open the channel
or close the channel, then the state kind of resurface in the chain.
So there's no ledger, there's no public ledger of the lightning transaction.
I always laugh when people give me statistics about the adoption of lightning,
because the only thing that they can see is how much public liquidity is locked in lightning.
They don't see the private liquidity that is locked in lightning,
and they don't see the velocity of the payment, the frequency of the payment.
And so you can have a solution like Allen markets.
And if you take a look for an outsider view, you take a look at their node.
I don't know like how big is the node, that 30, 40 Bitcoin, something like that.
But I think people will be shocked when they realize how, like what's the velocity,
how many payments, Ellen markets are actually processing and what's the throughput of these
payments.
And I say that because this information is not encapsulated in the chain.
Like you don't know.
You have no way to retrieve this information, only if you go and inspect the specific node,
which, of course, naturally you don't have access to very specific nodes.
This is an interesting difference from physical reality to the digital realm of money,
where I think of it in terms of like electrical engineering.
When you open these channels and you're running frequency through the line,
you need the wire to be really large if you're putting a lot of current through the line
or there's a lot of alternating current going through the line.
the line would heat up and it would melt down.
With this, that's not necessarily the case.
You could have a massive channel and you can be using it very seldomly.
It'll still carry the communication of the money transfer.
And the line could actually be really small because I think the frequency is unlimited
because you're in the digital realm.
It just doesn't matter.
And so this is really fascinating that you're right.
Like I guess all we can look at are the sizes of the lines connecting the network.
that doesn't necessarily tell you how much the network is being utilized or what the frequency
of that exchange is.
Yeah, very fascinating, right?
Just taking a step back, I guess I'm just like, as an engineer, I'm looking at certain
things that just like make me say, wow, like, how is this happening in the digital realm?
And it's so in parallel to the physical.
And then some other aspects that are just, you know, slightly different.
But yeah, anyway.
It's like you saying you have a one gigabyte connection at your home, so you can't watch
movies that are larger than that.
That's not the case.
Like you're downloading gigabytes or maybe
terabytes of data on a very small
channel. Yeah, right. Yeah, exactly.
And the same happens in the like network.
It's actually counterintuitive, but
you have a more efficient lighting node
if you get the ratio right between
locked liquidity to frequency.
Meaning you need to be very efficient with your liquidity
and the more you can route using less
liquidity, the more money, and that's the incentives of the lighting network. The ratio between
the velocity and the throughput of the channels divided by the channel size, that is the calculation
for the profitability of the channel and the node. So the less liquidity you lock, but you're still
able to process the payment that's going through your node, the more efficient, the more
economical, the more money
you make as a Latin node.
And many node operators
are making the very
beginners, like Noob's mistake
of putting a lot of liquidity
early on. Yeah.
And that's, they don't need to
their channels are just going to get exhausted.
Well, their channels will just get exhausted
to the edge node of where all
the buying is taking place, right?
Even if they're going to
be used at all.
That's a, yeah.
Yeah. Exhaustion means there's frequency. There's payments coming through. It's a good sign. If your channel is exhausted, again, it depends on the time span. But if your channel has been exhausted, it means that you were able to successfully route payments, which is a good thing. There's a lot of nodes if you look at kind of the Latin terminal or Ambrose or other Latinxfer. You immediately identify the nodes that allocate tons of liquidity. There's something. Be cautious about these notes. Because it's,
They want to artificially capture traffic or they simply don't know what they're doing.
Yeah, which in my case was exactly what it was when I was running my own note.
You're still running your note?
I still run my no, but the channel capacity and all that.
I've just, you know, it was just too much effort and too much hassle.
But I learned a ton by doing it.
Like, I learned an absolute ton.
And according to you, now the network can run a little bit more efficiently because amateur
Preston isn't there clogging things up.
Let's talk about your software development kit.
So Breeze has an SDK.
That's what that stands for.
It's very popular amongst developers that are building on Lightning.
Explain to the audience what this is, why it's important, what value it really provides
to vendors or people that are building businesses on Lightning.
Yeah.
Allow me to take a step back again.
And because we talked a lot about Bitcoin and Bitcoin as a global currency, the part
that we want to play in that regard is that we're going to.
We want to bring lightning to every application, basically.
Bitcoin, I don't think merchant adoption.
There's a lot of this course about merchant adoption.
I don't think Bitcoin right now provides enough value for people to use it in the context
of buying physical goods or even digital goods.
I don't think that's kind of the play where we're going to see Bitcoin adoption.
So what we want to do, we want to bring Bitcoin to every application and service out there.
In this kind of concept of creating Bitcoin or setting Bitcoin as a global currency.
So imagine you're using TikTok and you want kind of to tip a TikToker or as a TikToker you want to earn money.
We want Bitcoin to be the currency that you do that.
We want Bitcoin to facilitate these digital interactions.
But the barrier of entry for developers today to embed Bitcoin payments into their solutions is super high.
In order to, before the BRISDK, if you wanted to add Lightning Payments to your solution or your application,
you had to have dedicated Lightning team working on this project for two or three years.
And basically what we do with the Lightning SDK, with the BRISDK, is lowering the barrier of entry,
and we're continuing to lower it every day.
For you, as a developer to integrate Bitcoin payment into your application or solution,
It takes days and we haven't had developers integrating lighting hours.
So we're continuing to kind of lower the barrier of entry of embedding Bitcoin payments into apps and services.
And basically that's our role.
Our role is to provide the best developer experience out there for embedding bid contaminants in applications and solutions.
We have two flavors of our SDK.
We have a native, a native implementation, which is built on top of Greenlight by Bidon.
block stream. We learned a lot from the breeze wallet and the work that we've done on lightning over
the years. And we've managed to simplify everything, for example, by running nodes in the cloud
using the green light infrastructure, providing automated lightning liquidity services,
providing automated on-chain interoperability services. And everything is encapsulated in the SDK
in a very simple API. You have one API to send the payment, one API to receive a payment,
And all the heavy lifting is done on the backend.
And we recently added a very popular took off much faster than I expected.
We created a nodeless implementation.
And in the nodeless implementation of our SDK, users don't even need to run lightning nodes
because the underlying technology is liquid.
So people hold their funds in liquid, but the interface is still a lighting interface.
We talked about lightning as the common language.
basically the SDK exposes a lighting interface, but it uses a different side chain in order
to preserve funds and people.
In that scenario, sorry to interrupt you.
So you're outsourcing somebody else running the node, which means there's private keys
associated with that node that's interacting with layer one Bitcoin.
Is that correct?
So in the Nodeless architecture, you still hold your funds and you hold the keys, but
you hold it in a liquid wallet.
And when you want to do a lightning transaction, you basically do an atomic swap, a submarine swap
between liquid to lightning.
So you're always in custody over your fund.
And there's no way for an intermediary or third party to steal your fund, even in that
implementation, in the Nodis implementation.
But there's no need for an LSP.
And there's no need for on-chain fees to occur because you're not interfacing with lightning
using lightning channels.
You're interfacing with lightning using atomic swaps.
Got it.
So while you'd be holding funds in liquid,
that's where you're trusting the federation.
The liquid federation.
Yeah, the liquid federation.
Okay, thank you.
So if you compare the native SDK implementation to the Nodeless SDK implementation,
the trust profile is different.
Because in the native implementation, you just trust the chain.
Yeah.
In the Nodless implementation, you trust the liquid federation.
But it comes with the benefit of not running your own node and doing all the technical
swoopy things that I talked about earlier being so challenging.
Well, in the native implementation, you don't do that as well because everything is covered
by the LSP.
Basically, the LSP, open channels, the LSP managed the liquidity, the LSP, writes the payment.
The difference is that you don't have channel management fees.
Yeah.
Basically, you don't need to pay an on-chain fee in order to onboard to Lightning.
And there's no friction when it comes to closing channels or anything like that.
Because one of the functions of the LSP is to allocate liquidity, to reallocate liquidity.
So it means that if you don't use the channel, the LSP needs to take your liquidity and use it for other users.
And that means that they effectively will either close your channels or decrease your inbound liquidity.
And that creates friction because next time you want to receive a payment, then another on-shin fee will occur.
You don't have that with the notice implementation.
So from a developer experience, it's much easier to integrate the notice implementation because you don't,
you're not dealing with anything other than you're not dealing with opening or closing channels and fees.
But yes, you need to kind of subscribe to the liquid trust profile.
When I look at all these technical solutions and I see how robust all of it is,
I'm starting to like up until now, I think if we went back four years ago,
you were talking about how poor the reliability was, you know,
when you were at the conference in Atlanta or wherever you were at.
And today I think that we're really, we're quickly moving away from that.
Where the barriers or the challenges for a vendor to start being onboarding and paying in Bitcoin,
I don't think it's originating necessarily from technical challenges anymore.
What it seems to me is if I'm a vendor and all of my bills are denominated in dollars
and I'm receiving payments coming through the door, and let's say my top line is $100,
and my expenses are $90 and they're denominated in dollars.
That means I have free cash flows of $10, which I can then sweep into Bitcoin
if I want to preserve that buying power and put it into something that's going to continue to grow.
And I think this is how everybody is functioning today.
This is how I'm operating as a business today and many others that I know.
Micro Strategies may be a little bit fancier with how they're implementing this.
But at the end of the day, as long as that $90 of expense structure exists.
And I mean, this could be a mom, pa, just store gas station for all we could be talking about, right?
As long as those bills are all denominated in dollars, a lot of them don't want to be accepting Bitcoin payments because then they effectively
if I get $1 worth of Bitcoin as a payment, I almost have to immediately take 90% of that,
based on the math I was just describing, immediately turn it into dollars and then I can keep the other
10% still in Bitcoin because my bills at the end of the month are in dollars and I need to remove
that variance of the price action versus between Bitcoin and dollars. And you go to developing nations,
let's say we're going somewhere where the inflation rate somewhere else is 50% annualized.
They're having to deal with this volatility in their underlying currency and their expenses
still being denominated in dollars or that underlying currency.
And it just creates massive challenges for them to really want to accept this as a form
of payment.
Do you think that that's the number one thing?
Number one thing holding us up or is there something?
Yeah.
I think capital gain tax is definitely a huge barrier.
And volatility, yes.
Although I think that volatility can also be a feature.
not a bug, meaning if you're a Bitcoin error and you understand the Bitcoin trajectory and you
understand that the number goes up, you want volatility, basically because the volatility is going
your end. If you can kind of retain the funds and not use it for instance. So let's take a company
like Atom, for example, like the shoe company that accepts Bitcoin. Yes, not all the customers
of Atom use Bitcoin Err to purchase shoes, but let's say you have 10, 20% that do you use.
in order to purchase shoes.
And they put it immediately into their treasury.
It's the same math.
It's the same math.
It's the same.
Exactly.
So volatility goes both ways.
Yes, of course, if you're in a survival mode and you're dependent on every penny that goes into the business,
you understand that you need to pay expenses or vice groceries with the, well, it doesn't feed the model.
But another thing I think it's very important to understand.
the more Bitcoin is used as a medium of exchange, meaning the more price discovery happens
for Bitcoin, the less volatile Bitcoin will be.
Yeah, especially compared to physical, real things, not necessarily Fiat currencies,
but like real physical things, exactly.
But like the Nigerian Naira is, like you can't really trust it, right?
No.
fluctuated 40% day after day.
So I think crazy things happen in Fiat, less crazy things happen in Bitcoin.
And I think the trajectory is very clear where Bitcoin is added.
So I think, of course, the innovators and the early adopters already accept Bitcoin as a mean of benefit.
I think people will be surprised to understand and to know how many merchants already accept Bitcoin as a.
There's a reason all the luxury brands except Bitcoin.
Like you can buy Louis Vuitton bags and you can buy Ferrari.
Ferrari can buy Palisaga.
It can buy everything in Bitcoin.
And of course, yes, it's luxury brand.
Still not the $5 coffee.
but in the 10, 15 years, a time spent that we're talking about, I think you'll be able to buy
everything in Bitcoin.
That's so fascinating.
And I'll tell you what, Roy, from a strategic standpoint, just kind of understanding where
so much of this is going, you have always been just so helpful for me personally.
I've just cherished the conversations we've had in Nashville and other locations where
we've had an opportunity to just kind of talk in person.
And this is like all of those other conversations.
So I thank you so much for your time and coming on.
Is there anything else that you want to highlight to the audience or throw out there that you guys are working on?
I did want to say this with respect to the SDK that we were talking about earlier.
I know you have this Yopaki case study that happened in Mexico recently.
I don't know if you want to talk about that or anything else that you want to highlight to the audience.
Yeah, sure.
The note is another.
We have two live implementations of our Nodeless integration that just came out a month ago.
We have Stash Pay by Tanker that is creating an app for freelancers to be able to accept
Bitcoin and Yupaki is the second implementation.
It's a Mexican neobank.
It's a fascinating app, by the way.
It shows you, Yopaki is a good example to show you how much the things are and applications
are not rational.
Like everything is so emotional, meaning you need to, there's no one size fits all when
it comes to money.
You need to speak in the language of your users.
And your Paki is a great example for that because something like Fault and I love
I love Google and I love Fault, but something like Fault won't work in Mexico because there's no culture affiliation to fall in Nio, for example.
They have a feature called Lotaria. Lotoria is something that is very common in Mexico, like a Mexican raffle.
And they brought the same feature to their app and they're speaking the language of their users.
And that's one of the things I like to see with the Brise's DK.
one of the reasons I was always kind of pushing to build something like the resist decay
is because there's no one-size-fits-all.
And we need to have hundreds, thousands, and tens of thousands of applications
fulfilling different requirements, speaking different languages, addressing different use cases.
So we're starting to see like the first non-less integration coming to market.
I think you'll be surprised next year to see how many existing applications, not new
applications, existing applications adopting lightning using the Breezes decay and even tens of millions
of users using traditional fintech product. We already see that with cash up, but you're going to
see other fintech solutions like Robin Hood and others supporting lightning. So exciting times.
Amazing. Where can people learn more about Breeze? I'm everywhere and Breeze is everywhere.
I think our medium is a good entry point, medium.com slash eBriz technology, and our Twitter X, whatever I'm on linking, I'm easy to find.
Awesome. We'll have links to all of that in the show notes. Roy, thank you so much for making time and coming on the show today.
Thank you, Preston. Thank you so much. Thank you for listening to TIP.
Make sure to follow Bitcoin Fundamentals on your favorite podcast app and never miss out on episodes.
our show notes, transcripts or courses, go to theinvestorspodcast.com. This show is for entertainment
purposes only, before making any decision consult a professional. This show is copyrighted by
The Investors Podcast Network. Written permission must be granted before syndication or rebroadcasting.
