We Study Billionaires - The Investor’s Podcast Network - BTC229: Trump Tariffs, Market Chaos, Bitcoin Impact w/ James Lavish

Starting point is 00:00:00 You're listening to TIP. Hey everyone, welcome to this Wednesday's release of the Bitcoin Fundamentals podcast. On today's show, I bring on Wall Street veteran and macro expert James Lavish. During the show, we have a candid back and forth about the Trump tariffs and what the impact in game theory looks like moving forward. We talk about how it's impacting fixed income, equities, and Bitcoin. We also get into how the U.S. might navigate things from here and what's expected ahead. This is a discussion you will not want to miss.

Starting point is 00:00:28 So with that, let's jump right into it. Celebrating 10 years. You are listening to Bitcoin Fundamentals by the Investors Podcast Network. Now for your host, Preston Pish. Hey, everyone. Welcome back to the show. I'm here with the one and only good friend James Lavish. Welcome back to the show, James.

Starting point is 00:00:59 Thank you for having me, Preston. Good to be here. As always. Dude, we got to talk this tariff stuff. So. my gosh, this is wild. I think everybody was expecting Trump to have like this cat and mouse. It just can kind of like continue on.

Starting point is 00:01:19 A lot of talk. Maybe he puts something on one country and then he haggles over that for a bit. And the market was pricing this and you'd see a bunch of volatility in the market, but just somewhat normal. And then last week it was like it almost came out of nowhere, or at least that's what it felt like to me, it was like, no, every single country on the planet, this is your new tariff rate and go. And I think the market was just like completely caught off guard. Blind type, but not just that. Preston.

Starting point is 00:01:49 He held up that chart and it showed, wasn't showing the reciprocal tariffs. It was showing the net export import of each country. And he's like, well, we're your biggest customer. Yeah. We're such a great customer. You're gouging us. And so it took the market by surprise. And as you and I talked about many, many times before, markets don't like surprises.

Starting point is 00:02:11 They don't like uncertainty. And it's interesting when you hear Scott Besson talk about the treasury and the challenges they have and the dollar and the need for U.S. treasuries to come down in the curve and the long end of the curve. And this is all kind of you would expect that this is some sort of big game of 3D or 4D chess that they're doing. But it almost seems like off the cuff like you just said. It's just like we're going to come out with a big sword. Then we're going to start swinging. Yeah.

Starting point is 00:02:41 And if you're in the way, you're going to get hit. And the market acted violently and obviously. And so for good reason. And this is not like a one-time event where you have lockdowns and then you come out of lockdowns and things are transitory. Just put money putting aside. Just pretend. And then or if you have some sort of event that is,

Starting point is 00:03:03 kind of catastrophic to the market, like a long-term capital manager or something. If you have things like that, they're one-time things and they get cleaned up and you move on. But this is a changing of financial global order. And that's what's giving investors pause and they're worried. There's so much uncertainty about just how the tariffs are going to be levied, who they're going to be levied on, what goods are going to be on, the size of the tariffs, what kind of retaliatory tariffs are going to come our way. There's just so much uncertainty from it. It's incredible.

Starting point is 00:03:37 In the market, it's taken it on the chin for it. So I was just like doing a little bit of research there to see what portion of the U.S. population doesn't own any part of the stock market. And it's saying about 39% of U.S. adults do not own any stocks. And this is a 2023 figure out of Gallup that it gave me the source. And I'm not trying to substantiate any of this. I'm just trying to like wrap my head around the incentives that's driving some of the rationale for what they're doing.

Starting point is 00:04:07 And this Scott Bessett quote just keeps coming back to me the day after this was announced, which was, this isn't a MAG 7 issue. Messing up the question. This is a MAG7 issue. This is not a MAGA issue was the quote from the Treasury Secretary the day after. And I don't know. I think that's a really powerful quote. And he's basically saying like, hey, this is, if you own a lot of assets in the U.S.

Starting point is 00:04:33 and you're a high net worth person, you're heavily exposed to the stock market. It seems like it's a you problem. But for our voter base, it's not. Yeah, they're basically saying that fairly they're enacting policy that they feel is going to be good from Main Street. And they're not worried about Wall Street. They keep saying that over and over again. Yeah. And that's the issue.

Starting point is 00:04:51 And it has gotten investors absolutely freaked out. And that's what the market is trying to gauge. Okay. How much of this is gamesmanship? How much of it is? They're talking down. That's the question. Yeah. And how much pain are they willing to take in the interim? And the question is, on that is, look, Besson keeps talking about, he needs the 10-year treasury yields down.

Starting point is 00:05:16 He needs along the curve to come down. Well, that means that he needs rates lower. Why does he need rates lower? He needs rates lower to finance and refinance of debt. You've got $9 trillion of debt that's coming due this year, an over $10 trillion in a year. He's got a lot of debt that he's got to deal with. And the problem is that as Luke Grumman keeps talking about, the debt to GDP is just, it's through the roof. Yeah.

Starting point is 00:05:39 And so how do you manage this? Well, you've got the Doge commission out there trying to cut costs, but how much can they really cut? Can they cut $500 billion out of the expenses? Maybe a trillion? I don't think so. I mean, that's a massive amount of fraud. I mean, what are you going to cut out? Do you basically have to cut all of the discretionary expenses to get to a trillion dollars?

Starting point is 00:06:02 I mean, I just don't see how they're going to be able to do that. Or you cut back some of the entitlements that would be kind of political suicide. If we get the midterms there, right? So that's not going to happen. Or you could expand the tax base. Well, he's not going to raise taxes. He needs nominal GDP to go up to do that basically, right? Because he's talked about lowering taxes.

Starting point is 00:06:23 Or he can create a consumption tax through tariffs. And that's what we're talking about here, right? So that's another way to do it. It's a lot of consumption. tax. The problem is that we are so financialized that you and I have discussed this before. We are so financialized that it would be wreckage in the markets and it would spill over to the economy because you've got so much of the economy is tied into the financial markets now. Okay. So, but how much pain are they willing to take if they are driving the market down,

Starting point is 00:06:57 forcing the Fed's hands to lower rates and come in and come in. and maybe with QE or whatever, to flood the market with liquidity, to drive up that nominal GDP, how much pain are they willing to take on the asset deflation side in order to bring down mainstream prices, bring manufacturing back into the United States? And that takes a long time. The thought of the regulations you have to go through, sourcing the land or the spot you're going to build a factory, hiring workers, building out the factory. I mean, like, there's just so much.

Starting point is 00:07:32 It's so much time. It's not going to happen. Yeah. It's not going to happen before me the terms. Okay. So the question here is, I think Trump and percent and I think they, these guys, they have their eye on the big prize. He wants to be on Mount Rushmore.

Starting point is 00:07:48 He wants to be the president who changed the world order, got the United States back into a surplus, solved a dead issue, maybe put us on. a Bitcoin Reserve that is tied to bonds. We've saved the whole United States. We're the leader in the crypto. We're leader in AI. We have manufacturing facilities here. We've solved the problem bringing all of those workers and getting workers' jobs here and solving that. The GDP is a lot of it's driven by export import. We're net importers solving that problem because we export so much. I mean, we import so much. So how much pain are they willing to take? And here's a story. So I was telling you this morning, but there's a legend that goes around Fort Worth, that there was a conversation

Starting point is 00:08:35 that Sid Bass had with Richard Rainwater, the biggest hedge fund manager out. He used to be one of the head investment managers for the Bass family, their assets, right, their money. Well, anyways, they're buying up land and buying up buildings in downtown Fort Worth, apparently, and they were kind of letting them just go into disrepair. This is decades and decades ago, right? And there's just the year after year, not putting any money into him. And Richard looked at, I believe it was said. He goes, you're just, you're ruining your investments here. Like, what are you doing?

Starting point is 00:09:09 Like, you're just buying these things and just letting him sit there and letting him rot. He's like, Richard, you know what your problem is? Your problem is you don't know how to be really rich. And so for the people that are listening, the vast family is the wealthiest family in all worth, they're worth tens of billions of dollars. And basically his plan was to let all of those values, the building values, the land values around downtown Fort Worth just brought. And then they bought it all up. And they did.

Starting point is 00:09:37 And so they created something called Sundance Square. It's a beautiful area. It's downtown Fort Worth. And it's all owned by the Bass family. They have their own police force there. And so does Trump dissent? Do these guys have that kind of patient? And I just don't know that they have that timeline to do that.

Starting point is 00:09:55 politically, yeah. Exactly, we talked about. I mean, politically, you don't have that time to do that stuff. Yeah. So you're talking about here trying to flip a switch and change the world order and dying and they just don't see that happening, which gets us to now. What's the negotiation tactic here? What are they doing?

Starting point is 00:10:13 Because that's what it has to be, right? It has to be a negotiation tactic. It's almost like they're taking a playbook that works at the small town or even New York city level real estate or something that happens at like a private business kind of standpoint. And they think that you just like plug that in like applying that same mentality to this. Yeah. So how is that going to work here in 17 months? We're going to have, I mean, embroiled the midterms, right?

Starting point is 00:10:44 Yeah. To this point. So to really kind of look at first principles, how did we get here? Right. I just look at since early 80s and you look at, well, why do we have such a massive trade deficit with every single country on the planet? And like when you go far enough upstream to that question, what you realize is dollar dominance and the rest of the world arbitraging the dollar's value with their own local

Starting point is 00:11:10 currency, like how this played out was the gutting of making anything and everything inside to the U.S. and having everybody else in the world make these physical things that are then imported into our country. And what did we do as a country for decades is we stuffed paper promises down their throat for these physical things that were delivered to us? Literally exporting inflation. Yes. So when you look at how long this persisted and how it incentivized this dollar network effect, which was our Luke says this all the time, our number one export was U.S. Treasuries, right? And that gets to this idea that we were shoving these paper promises down the throats of everybody in the world in exchange for all their physical things. But if we think we're going to, in like you said, 17 months, turn the tide of this water wheel that's been spinning at a breakneck pace for 40 years, I think we're kidding ourselves.

Starting point is 00:12:06 I think they're in this weird spot where they thought they could really kind of all those promises that you said that I think Trump sees himself on the Mount Rushmore and like. Like, all the ego that goes with basically wanting to be that historical figure was completely, like, out of touch with reality in how quickly something like this could take place in a single administration. And that right there is, okay. So now, are they really out of touch, though? He is not a dumb man. No. A lot of people out there would think that Trump is just, he's just wild and crazy and he's just a big risk taker. I've heard over and over again that he does his research.

Starting point is 00:12:46 He does not just throw these things out offhand or half-heartedly. He does float things to see what the reaction is, I'm sure. And he does do that sometimes just to get a certain reaction. Well, this may be that exactly that kind of tactic where he turns around. He's floating this idea. And it's not really an idea. So now he's like, the hammer's come on down. Everybody's going to get a 10% tax across the board.

Starting point is 00:13:09 That should bring a lot of countries to the table to negotiate. And if it doesn't, then this tactic has failed. But I think that it brings countries to the table to negotiate. And they know that they're not going to be able to negotiate these things in nine days, eight days, seven days. Like, this is going to take time. And so one thing that I was reading this weekend, too, is Bill Ackman said, oh, it makes sense for them to just postpone the deadline and saying that,

Starting point is 00:13:39 are you bringing up that tweet right now? No, no, no, no, go ahead. I'm laughing about something else. I'll say what it is after you're done. Okay. But what I was going to say is that it would make sense that they would save face and say, hey, we got 50 countries that we want to come to the table. We're going to give them a chance to negotiate and we're going to get something out of it.

Starting point is 00:13:59 The reality is that what they want to do is they want to win. They want to put the United States in a better position than we are now on these terrorists and our trade imbalances. How do you do that? Well, you've got to bring manufacturing home. and you can drive that with incentives to companies to do that. You can also force it with tariffs, and you can do it with a little bit of both. So it's going to be interesting to see who comes to the table how quickly.

Starting point is 00:14:23 I think I saw earlier that Europe is already saying, hey, look, we'll have a net net zero tariff policy with you. Let's figure it out. So I would expect more of that rather than all of these countries waging tariff war on our, well, we're the ones who are waging it. pushing reciprocal tariffs for their interests and potentially losing. And of course, the biggest sturop in the room is China. Yeah, all right. That's the one that really matters. Yeah.

Starting point is 00:14:51 That's the prize, right? That's the golden prize right there. Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors. All right. I want you guys to imagine spending three days in Oslo at the height of the summer. You've got long days of daylight, incredible food, floating saunas on the Oslo Fjord. And every conversation you have is with people who are actually. shaping the future. That's what the Oslo Freedom Forum is. From June 1st through the 3rd,

Starting point is 00:15:16 2026, the Oslo Freedom Forum is entering its 18th year, bringing together activists, technologists, journalists, investors, and builders from all over the world, many of them operating on the front lines of history. This is where you hear firsthand stories from people using Bitcoin to survive currency collapse, using AI to expose human rights abuses, and building technology under censorship and authoritarian pressures. These aren't abstract ideas. These are tools real people are using right now. You'll be in the room with about 2,000 extraordinary individuals, dissidents, founders, philanthropists,

Starting point is 00:15:52 policymakers, the kind of people you don't just listen to but end up having dinner with. Over three days, you'll experience powerful mainstage talks, hands-on workshops on freedom tech, and financial sovereignty, immersive art installations, and conversations that continue long after the sessions end. And it's all happening in Oslo in June. If this sounds like your kind of room, well, you're in luck because you can attend in person. Standard and patron passes are available at Osloof Freedom Forum.com with patron passes offering deep access, private events, and small group time with the speakers. The Oslo Freedom Forum isn't just a conference. It's a place where ideas meet reality and where the future is being built by people living it. If you run a business, you've

Starting point is 00:16:38 probably had the same thought lately. How do we make AI useful in the real world? Because the upside is huge, but guessing your way into it is a risky move. With NetSuite by Oracle, you can put AI to work today. NetSuite is the number one AI cloud ERP, trusted by over 43,000 businesses. It pulls your financials, inventory, commerce, HR, and CRM into one unified system. And that connected data is what makes your AI smarter. It can automate routine work, surface actionable insights and help you cut costs while making fast AI-powered decisions with confidence. And now with the NetSuite AI connector, you can use the AI of your choice to connect directly to your real business data. This isn't some add-on, it's AI built into the system that runs

Starting point is 00:17:25 your business. And whether your company does millions or even hundreds of millions, NetSuite helps you stay ahead. If your revenues are at least in the seven figures, get their free business guide demystifying AI at netsuite.com slash study. The guide is free to you at net suite.com slash study. NetSuite.com slash study. When I started my own side business, it suddenly felt like I had to become 10 different people overnight wearing many different hats. Starting something from scratch can feel exciting, but also incredibly overwhelming and

Starting point is 00:17:59 lonely. That's why having the right tools matters. For millions of businesses, that tool is Shopify. Shopify is the commerce platform behind millions of businesses around the world and 10% of all e-commerce in the U.S. from brands just getting started to household names. It gives you everything you need in one place, from inventory to payments to analytics. So you're not juggling a bunch of different platforms. You can build a beautiful online store with hundreds of ready-to-use templates, and Shopify is packed with helpful AI tools that write product descriptions and even enhance your product photography.

Starting point is 00:18:35 Plus, if you ever get stuck, they've got award-winning 24-7 customer support. Start your business today with the industry's best business partner, Shopify, and start hearing... Sign up for your $1 per month trial today at Shopify.com slash WSB. Go to Shopify.com slash WSB. That's Shopify.com slash WSB. All right, back to the show. Just for the numbers sake, so people understand, I just had AI kind of run the numbers on a 10% flat tax on any import coming into the U.S. that's physical in nature, not service-based.

Starting point is 00:19:15 This would produce about $230 billion in additional revenue for tax purposes, which in the grand scheme of things really isn't a whole lot relative to the amount that's currently being collected through the existing internal sources. The reason I was laughing when you brought up Bill Ackman, I just, there was a tweet that somebody had put out there that the market's not going to recover until Bill Ackman goes on CNBC and starts crying. Well, it might be true. He's already out there. He is. But, yeah, I mean, I think he's speaking the Wall Street narrative of like, hey, somebody's got to plug that. Like, somebody's got to step in right now. Or, and this is something Luke had said to me, he's like, it's seven.

Starting point is 00:20:01 to nine trillion right now that they got to refinance in the coming year. But if they let this thing continue to sell off, it might be more like 11 to 13 trillion that they've got to finance in the coming year because you're going to have issues with tax receipts and whatnot because of the recession that's going to be underway. So, yeah, it's a 2025 tax receipts, the ones they receive in 2026. Yeah. They're going to be lower as of now. But he's got a long time to recover here. He did this in the beginning of the year. So he's got a long time to recover this. Yeah. wild times. So Ray Dalio just published a article that was actually pretty good. This was called Don't Make the Mistake of Thinking that what's happening is mostly about tariffs. And the core thesis of

Starting point is 00:20:45 the article is tariffs are a symptom, not the cause. And what his basically what he's saying is globalism is over. And because it's over and because everybody is taking on the stance of our country first and everybody else second, that the tariffs are a shadow or a reflection of these new policies that globalism is over. I'm curious what your thoughts are on that idea. That's interesting. Yeah, I mean, and that's the point is that changing the world order, meaning that the globalism, Trump wants to separate the United States from all of the European issues and how their energy issues, their issues with NATO and all that. Like, you just want to wants to separate from all of that.

Starting point is 00:21:30 And he's made that abundantly clear. And the United States has, and this, I think it all just goes back to China. And it's where I think Ray is, he's not wrong, but maybe he's understating. That imbalance with China, and you can bring it up and see what that number is. It is so large. And China's manipulating the wand for so long that that's what, Trump wants to fix because in reality, that's a two-horse race here. And who else is going to be out there? It's not going to be Japan. They have their own demographic and financial issues that you and I

Starting point is 00:22:09 actually talked about two years ago ad nauseum that have only gotten worse. And who else is out there that's going to be a threat to the United States being the largest financial and the largest consumer of the world? Like, who's going to be a threat to that? This is, if I was going to describe it really simply for anybody hearing about, and I agree with you, I think China is the big bogey for him to really kind of pin down. But if I was going to really oversimplify this, let's just imagine that I'm producing food and I'm delivering it to your house and you're the U.S. and you're paying me in monopoly money in exchange for this food that I bring over to your house every single day. We have this agreement. We keep doing this for, call it, 40 years, where I make the

Starting point is 00:22:54 food, I come over to your house, I drop it off, you consume it, and you give me the paper promises. This relationship works. As long as that money that you're giving me, I can go out and spend at what I think it was worth as I'm receiving it. In fact, if it's getting more valuable, which would be the sovereign bonds over this 40 years, which is what was happening, it was getting more valuable in the overall market of all these other people I could go spend it. But then all of a sudden, if I'm bringing this food to your house and what you're paying me is getting wrecked relative to other physical things that I want to go by with these paper promises you're giving me, all of a sudden, who holds, this is the core question is, who holds

Starting point is 00:23:31 the power in this negotiation when I'm the one that's been producing all this food and I have cattle and I have the fields and I have all this stuff and you just have a keyboard to plaque on the keys and give me some more paper promises. Like, I don't think that you hold in this relationship, I think I hold all the cards, right? And I think that's the problem for the U.S. is like if I was going to argue. We outsource all of our everything, not all of, but so much of our manufacturing production. On a net basis, it's crazy.

Starting point is 00:24:05 Like some of these trade deficits with these countries are like 90 to 10. It's crazy. Right? It's insane. Yeah. And so in that, yeah, that's the challenge. But if I was going to argue with myself, I think maybe he does have some leverage if he goes in like one z and two z with these different countries, but doesn't try to do it all at

Starting point is 00:24:24 once. Because I think when he tries to do it all at once, like they just did, the rest of the world can kind of collectively get together and be like, well, what are they going to do? Like, what are they going to do if we don't comply? But if you do it to one of the countries and you kind of like pin down China, are they going to, are iPhone suddenly going to be $5,000? Yeah. So it's almost because of the components. It just seems like maybe the better approach would have been to just like really go after one country specifically and like get the terms and conditions like lined up and then go to the next one and then go to the next one. But by doing it, take the scenario with like the food and the paper promises between us. And let's say that

Starting point is 00:25:02 it was like five other people on the one side. You're just basically printing a bunch of paper and you're consuming from everybody else. If you go to everybody and start hitting them on the head and say, no, I want this adjustment. Like everybody else is going to look at each other and say, they have nothing, right? You haven't even gotten to the other side of it yet. I'm sure you're going there, but the other problem is we need them to need dollars desperately. Yeah, right? We need them to need dollars desperately because we have a fiscal issue.

Starting point is 00:25:32 Our deficits are large enough, meaning that we overspend every year so much that we need other countries to buy our paper. We need them to buy our treasuries and to keep the whole thing going. We need them to trust us. And so we need them to trust us. We can't go and willy-nilly turn off the swift access and seize treasuries from a country because we don't like what they're dealing. We still need those countries to buy our treasuries. And so it's almost like, and Luke, I think, has been talking about this.

Starting point is 00:26:06 You have to solve that debt to GDP problem first. Ray Dahlia has been talking about it. I'm not prominent like Ray talking on all the shows and everything, but you and I have been talking about it. A lot of Bitcoiners talk about it because they understand the problems of sound money. Man, the dollar is not sound. And here's the crazy thing. I caught just pieces, bits and pieces of the best interview with Tucker. And he was talking about gold. And he was like, oh, but did you hear all this? I know that, yeah, I saw some clips, but I didn't watch the full interview. Yeah. He's talking about gold. And he's talking about how, look, people want gold because

Starting point is 00:26:41 it's sound money. It's sound. They can't be printed like the dollar. Dude, is that a warning shot to, is that a warning shot to Congress to get their act together? For the listeners, Besson's job is to make sure that he's to enable Congress. He's to spend, right? His job is to manage that spending as the banker to the country. That's the Treasury. The Treasury is the banker to the country. And then if we have to borrow to do that, then we'll borrow to do that.

Starting point is 00:27:13 He's kind of like that manager who's saying, you remember what was that show on HBO entourage? Yeah. The main character. What's his name? Adrian, something or other. Yeah. I think that's the actor. Oh, I don't know the actor.

Starting point is 00:27:30 I think that's, isn't that as anyway. What was it? He does. Right. The main guy is like spending. He's buying a house. He's buying cars. His agents like, dude, you've kind of stopped spending.

Starting point is 00:27:40 Yeah. You don't have a movie in production. Like, you got to. You are. in serious deficit, and you got to stop spending. That's literally what Besson is to Congress, and he's got those going. He's not telling Elon and Trump they've got to stop spending. He knows that we have an issue, and he's got to re-up all this debt, and then they're

Starting point is 00:27:58 trying this hard as again to get that deficit down. But again, that goes back to, well, I don't see that happening this year. I don't know if you see it happening in this first term of getting to surplus. That's a long put. I just don't see us getting to surplus without some sort of predictive miracle that is not so deflationary that we don't have the tax base anymore. But something that is that brings up GDP, nominal GDP, to a high enough level that we don't have to raise taxes around it.

Starting point is 00:28:31 But it's still, we're $2 trillion deficit. Doge has cut out $250 billion. We're not there. No. We're not going to get there with those. So I love it. I'm happy that we're cutting out fraud and waste. Even by doing that, they still have to add more monetary units into the system.

Starting point is 00:28:48 That's just how this works. That's how fractures are banking. We're on a debt-based system. And so the problem is you've got to get that down before you, how do you, and I think they don't see the 10% number you quoted to get a half a billion dollars. Half a trillion dollars. I think a half a trillion dollars of external revenue service to add to the internal revenue service. it still doesn't get us there.

Starting point is 00:29:13 Not even close. So not even close. So maybe they see something that we don't see. The numbers that were on the chart from last week, like if they follow through with those numbers, obviously we'll have more than a quarter trillion, but we'll also have prices on goods and services here. I can't even imagine because you made this comment that we exported inflation for those 40 years. By slapping these tariffs on the products that are still coming in that we're still consuming like crazy, I think what it does. does as it brings back all that exported inflation for decades, like very swiftly. And it's a consumption tax.

Starting point is 00:29:48 Yeah. It's a consumption tax for us. Yeah. Because they're just going to tax. So, right? And I think that's the ultimate argument is that, hey, if you said we're going to, we're going to raise taxes on income for America, I think Americans would be pretty upset. But if you said, we're just going to have a consumption tax.

Starting point is 00:30:06 If you consume more, you're going to be taxed more. You're a billionaire and you're spending $100 million in a year. Well, you're going to be taxed on that $100 million. Yeah. That's going to be spending $100. You're going to be spending $150 million instead of $100. Yeah. And I think that general America would be fine with that.

Starting point is 00:30:25 They'd be like, fine. I'm okay with that. Yeah. It's a consumption tax. But I know people who in the Las Vegas area who are struggling. They're struggling in this economy. They cannot keep up with the inflation. I know that people are, oh, but inflation's come down.

Starting point is 00:30:39 The goods prices have not come down and their wages have not kept up. They're still high prices. They're looking at oil. They still have sticker shock on everything. Yeah. I think you might see the price of oil come down. That's the thing that everybody's going around talking about. But the price of everything else, even though that's the number one input to the production

Starting point is 00:30:57 of anything is energy, I don't see the prices of all this finished goods coming back. They're not coming back. Like, that's crazy talk. It's over. That's where they are now. They reach a new level. And so if you go out to a nice steak restaurant, instead of being $42 for the filet, it's $78. Or in Vegas, it's $112.

Starting point is 00:31:17 It's mind-blowing. Yeah. And, of course, you don't need that, but talk about things you do need. You do need certain goods and services. You do need to pay for insurance for your car. Insurance rates are absolutely gone up astronomically. You do need food, and you're replacing it. If you're a lower income consumer, you're replacing your food with cheaper food.

Starting point is 00:31:44 And so you're just doing the best you can. Or what we're now seeing is that you're seeing people charge things. The consumer credit is going through the roof. And the levels of savings are super low. People, they spent all the checks they got, the stimulus checks long, long ago. They're not putting away money because the lower income demographic has been hit harder by inflation. This is what angers mean. When you hear economists get on these shows, they're like, but you know, inflation hurts everybody. No. How do you not understand that? Of course, they do

Starting point is 00:32:17 understand it. If you own assets, if you own stocks and bonds up to the big last couple days, and you own gold, you own Bitcoin, and you own a house or you own houses, and your assets have ever been value number one. That's just number one. The other thing is, if you're a higher demographic, your income so far out surpasses your needs that, yeah, so eggs are six bucks instead of three bucks. What do you care? You don't care if you spend $300 on groceries or $400 on groceries instead of $150. You don't even notice it. Whereas if you're a lower income demographic, that $150 goes to $300.

Starting point is 00:32:58 Well, now you actually can't even make your rent and do that and pay for gas to your car. Do you need the gas to come down? You need the rent to come down. And those will come down. And they know this inherently. Those will come down with the price of oil will come down. Gas will come down. Interest rates come down.

Starting point is 00:33:17 That's just reality. And they know this. And so that's what the prize is. Win it for Main Street. But it's going to be painful. And then the ultimate prize is to get those manufacturing jobs back into America. Get these facilities up and running, give incentives these companies to start building in America.

Starting point is 00:33:32 That's the ultimate prize, I think. But how do they get there without the pain? I don't see that path. I do not see that. Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors. No, it's not your imagination. Risk and regulation are ramping up, and customers now expect proof of security just to do business.

Starting point is 00:33:52 That's why VANTA is a game changer. Vanta automates your compliance process and brings compliance, risk, and customer trust together on one AI-powered platform. So whether you're prepping for a SOC 2 or running an enterprise GRC program, VANTA keeps you secure and keeps your deals moving. Instead of chasing spreadsheets and screenshots, VANTA gives you continuous automation across more than 35 security and privacy frameworks. Companies like Ramp and Ryder spend 82% less time on audits with Vantta.

Starting point is 00:34:24 That's not just faster compliance, it's more time for growth. If I were running a startup or scaling a team today, this is exactly the type of of platform I'd want in place. Get started at vanta.com slash billionaires. That's vanta.com slash billionaires. Ever wanted to explore the world of online trading but haven't dared try? The futures market is more active now than ever before and plus 500 futures is the perfect place to start. Plus 500 gives you access to a wide range of instruments, the S&B 500, NASDAQ, Bitcoin, gas, and much more. Explore equity indices, energy, metals, 4x, crypto, and beyond.

Starting point is 00:35:07 With a simple and intuitive platform, you can trade from anywhere, right from your phone. Deposit with a minimum of $100 and experience the fast, accessible futures trading you've been waiting for. See a trading opportunity. You'll be able to trade it in just two clicks once your account is open. Not sure if you're ready, not a problem. Plus 500 gives you an unlimited risk-free demo account with charts and analytic tools for you to practice on. With over 20 years of experience, Plus 500 is your gateway to the markets.

Starting point is 00:35:39 Visit plus500.com to learn more. Trading in futures involves risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone. Not all applicants will qualify. Plus 500, it's trading with a plus. Billion dollar investors don't typically park their cash in high-yield savings account. Instead, they often use one of the premier passive income strategies for institutional investors, private credit. Now, the same passive income strategy is available to investors of all sizes thanks to the Fundrise

Starting point is 00:36:10 Income Fund, which has more than $600 million invested in a 7.97% distribution rate. With traditional savings yields falling, it's no wonder private credit has grown to be a trillion dollar asset class in the last few years. Visit fundrise.com slash WSB to invest in the Fundrise Income Fund in just minutes. The fund's total return in 2025 was 8%, and the average annual total return since inception is 7.8%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, current distribution rate as of 1231, 2025. Carefully consider the investment material before investing, including objectives, risks, charges, and expenses. This and other information can be found in the income fund's

Starting point is 00:36:55 at Fundrise.com slash income. This is a paid advertisement. All right. Back to the show. I mean, if I was in the seat and I'm trying to conjure up something to give relief to people, I don't know that there's an easy solution here outside of our Bitcoin maxi like talking points, which I'm not even going to go down because everybody that listens to the show knows what they are.

Starting point is 00:37:22 We're talking about bit bonds and all these types. of things that I think is really, and I don't know that that's going to give you interim or short-term relief, even going down some of these paths. I think that when you delay pain for this long and you kick the can for this many decades, and you're saying, well, how do we not pay the bill for this? I think as a fool's errand type question. Yeah. The cure might kill the patient.

Starting point is 00:37:49 Yeah, right. And that's the situation we're in because we're in, we have so much debt. We are so overwhelmed with it. Debt to GDP, 120%. This was also mentioned in Ray's article. And one of the core reasons why he's saying that the tariffs are a symptom and not the cause is because he's saying we're just too indebted as a nation and we consume everything outside of our country.

Starting point is 00:38:13 I wanted to talk this. This is really interesting that this happened this morning. This was posted like four hours ago, Trump, if China does not withdraw its 34% increase above of their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow, April 8th, 2025, the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50% effective April 9th. An hour later, Zero Hedge posts this 10-year Treasury yield chart that shows that the yields are back up to where they were at when the tariffs were originally announced with the headline this is Zero Hedges take.

Starting point is 00:38:51 They said China responds by selling 50 billion in treasuries. Oh, by the way, the yields on the 10-year are now almost on change from Liberation Day. And that's the problem. That's the problem is their response isn't words. It's actions of, hey, all these paper promises have you been shoving down our throat. We're just going to sell those and we're going to basically. We don't want them anyways. We know that they're a real negative yield.

Starting point is 00:39:15 We know that because you guys print so much money. Yeah. Crazy. This is wild. Is this like a 1980? 87, like, kind of moment in markets, in your opinion? Well, and I don't mean that from like a percent sell-off. I mean it more from like a shifting global policy standpoint or like something that people

Starting point is 00:39:36 will continue to talk about decades from now. Yeah, I think it's different than a market shock of just you walk in one day and the market's down 9%, 10%. But the difference here is, impressive, we have these circuit breakers. So we don't know where the market would have. have gone without circuit breakers. They can pretty quickly. And I don't know, did we hit the circuit barriers this morning?

Starting point is 00:39:58 They're close. Traders know that. I know that they hit them in Japan at the open last night. I don't remember. And maybe there was some in Europe, but here in the U.S. I didn't see them today. But the volatility is what's so crazy. Oh, yeah.

Starting point is 00:40:12 And what's so different this time around Preston is that the back in the day, if Trump said something, it would take hours. and sometimes days to filter through to everybody. Now, if you said something, it's on a tweet, and it's retreated, and it's spread around the world like that. You see the markets react, like, what just happened? And then this morning was you see that the market started rallying, like violent, rally, violent cover, right? And meaning, it was coming back. And it rallied the positive from being down almost 5%.

Starting point is 00:40:47 And it was like, in mere minutes, there was like, what is going? on. And then you saw that headline, which was White House officials says that they're going to put a pause on the terrorists for 90 days or something like that to give countries a chance to negotiate, which is what I think they're ultimately going to do. But I don't know if it'd be 90 days, but then the market just took that headline and rallied. And then you've got the White House issue statement that that's nonsense. There's no such thing coming. We didn't say any that thing and the market just dumps against. You can see the S&P just, by the way, wild swing. From a liquidity standpoint, these violent moves up, down, back and forth just is like a sponge

Starting point is 00:41:31 just literally sucking liquidity straight out of the market. Yes. To the point where now it's just getting harder tomorrow for everybody else to manage expectations. Let's talk about that for the listeners so they understand that liquidity is, what you're talking about is in the equity markets, liquidity is taken up because of the margin calls. So why did Bitcoin sell off so heavily on Sunday before Monday? Well, they've got hedge funds who probably were unwinding and covering Bitcoin on Friday, which kept it up, right? That might have helped that decoupling. So unwinding trades where they were short Bitcoin and Bitcoin ETFs. And then, On Saturday, Sunday, you start getting this chatter and you've got Besson on that podcast.

Starting point is 00:42:20 You just like, people start worrying about a Black Monday. They're like, well, if I'm going to get a margin call, I get to get my book in order. So I don't have to sell positions that I don't want to sell. I'm going to sell what I can today. And what can you today? It's Sunday afternoon, Sunday afternoon. You can sell Bitcoin. Yeah.

Starting point is 00:42:39 You can sell Bitcoin. So that, I think that was like hedge funds getting ahead of the drop. the market and making sure they didn't get margin calls or maybe helping their liquidity of their book. Okay. So that's one thing. Margin call that takes out liquidity. The second thing is when you have volatility in these markets like this, what happens is that margin that is required on your investments goes up, which means that you can't use that for people trying to like envision this. If you have $100 a stock, then it's Apple and your prime broker is giving you margin on that. It's not like reg T. You're not getting 50-50

Starting point is 00:43:19 margin like you do in your brokerage account. Like you could get 90, 95% margin on these names because they're blue chip made. But when the market is violent like this, which we saw in 2020, this is called portfolio margining. And what happens is you'll start getting falls from your prime broker saying, hey, your haircut is going to go up to 15%, 20%, 30%, on names that you have, you have, had 5% hairphen-on. What does that mean? That means that you were able to borrow 95% against your $100, and now you're only allowed to borrow six or 70%.

Starting point is 00:43:56 That's liquidity coming out. You've got to sell positions to bring that cash back in. Yeah. And so exactly what you're saying, that's one side of it. The second side of it is the collateral on the bonds. And when you have bond volatility, where you can margin these things to the Hilt, normally, they're U.S. Treasuries.

Starting point is 00:44:14 But when you have volatility like we're seeing here, I mean, this is just, I'm looking at the 10 year, the 10 year here. This is pressing. It's up four and a half. The yields are up four and a half percent. That is mental for these things to be whipping around like this. This is not normal. This is a very abnormal period.

Starting point is 00:44:33 So what happens? Four and a half percent change on the day. I think it's important for people. On the day. Of the yield. Of the day. Of the, on the day. the yield. We're not saying the yield is obviously for people that are listening.

Starting point is 00:44:45 I'm saying, yeah, exactly. That the 10 years yield has moved four and a half percent today. That is a violent move in the treasury. Violent for the 10 year. This is the benchmark treasury of the world and it is doing this today. That is just, it's mind blowing. What does that mean for margin though? It means that it is not as strong collateral. for barring against volatility is up. That means that you have to leave more of your cash in against that on a repo or whatever you're using it for. And that means that there's less liquidity out there.

Starting point is 00:45:25 So that's when you're the listener, when Preston's talking about this volatility is taking the liquidity out of the markets. It's just draining it. It's like a sponge is soaking it back in. That's what you're talking about. James, to close this out, I want to pull up a chart. We'll have a little fun here with this chart. Let me get this.

Starting point is 00:45:44 So when I got here is all the global stock indices over the last decade and a half. And what I find so fascinating about this chart, and people might not know the tickers here, but I'll call them out. So if you're looking at the chart, the top one there is, I think this is the Russell. So this is the U.S. stock market at the top. And you can see it's up 350 percent since what is this? It's the end October of 2009. It's up 350%. What I find fascinating is look at the HSI, the GXC, and the Cospi, which is the Cospi is the

Starting point is 00:46:22 Korean market and the other two are China and Hong Kong. Look how flat and down. Hong Kong is down 10% since 2009. China's up 3%. Mind blowing. 3% since 2009. Mind blowing. So like when we look around the world, and I'll just, I'll just call out a couple others here.

Starting point is 00:46:45 Japan is up 87% and India is up 153% since 2009 on this chart. I think this is kind of mind-blowing when you just kind of look at it. Now, of course, since we have a lot of Bitcoiners that listen to the show, I'm going to put the Bitcoin chart. And of course, it's crazy. Let's zoom in here and let's look at since COVID, since 2020, let's look at what happened. And what I'm going to do is go to the bottom in the market before they flooded the global economy with all this printing. This is what the story that's being told. So we're at the bottom in 2020, March.

Starting point is 00:47:20 We still have China down almost 14%, negative 14%. Same thing with Hong Kong. Korea up 26%. Japan up 41% since that bottom in 2020. Europe up 65%. Canada up 94%. US up 102% and India up 145% since the bottom of COVID. Okay.

Starting point is 00:47:45 The reason that you're using the Russell 3000 is to encompass more of the companies, not just the mag 7 of the S&P. Correct. I'm trying to get a better site picture of just business at large. It was why I was using some of these indices. I'm going to put Bitcoin in here. This is again the bottom of the COVID sell-off. and Bitcoin is up 669% against all those other percentages that I just told you.

Starting point is 00:48:12 Now, this is the thing that I find really fascinating, James. Let's take the previous high in Bitcoin, okay, from the last cycle that peaked in November of 2021. So when we come here and we reset that as the new benchmark against all these other indices, Bitcoin is still in front of everything else. Bitcoin at 19% performance since the top of the 2021 cycle. The next highest is India again at 10%. The U.S. is at 2.5%. Europe at negative 7.

Starting point is 00:48:47 Canada at negative 7. Japan at negative 19. We have Hong Kong at negative 21%. China at negative 36% since the bottom of COVID. It's down negative 30. And Korea down negative 37% since the bottom. bottom of COVID. This is wild, huh? That's wild. What is it from the bottom of Bitcoin in 23? Okay. Here, we'll go there. So right around here is the bottom of the market.

Starting point is 00:49:16 Yeah, right? If you can grab a bottom tick and hashin Bitcoin on these cycles. So these troughs. Well, it's not just the bottom of Bitcoin. It was the bottom of the equity markets too. Like they both bought it at the same time. So it let it down. It did. But, right? Let me zoom out here. So if we were going to take the bottom of equities, I would say we're like right around in this mark. You're right. It led it by a couple months.

Starting point is 00:49:43 But let's take the bottom of equities right there. Yeah. Right in here. And just I'm going to quickly go through this so people have a mark. So if you go to the bottom of the equity market in 23, Bitcoin is up 248%. India is up 28%. The U.S. is up 23%. Canada up 5%.

Starting point is 00:50:01 Europe, up 5%, Japan, 2%, Hong Kong, negative 2, China, negative 12, Korea, negative 15. Really fascinating, right? Fascinating. So at the end of the day, the volatility in the short term, in the short term, the volatility is brutal as a bitcoiner when it's going down. But the performance, if you can get any type of site picture beyond a year or two, the performance against pretty much everything else you can own is spectacular. And that's the thing is that trying to pick tops and bottoms in Bitcoin, which is why I was laughing about that.

Starting point is 00:50:37 It's so difficult. But you do know, you do feel when there's market capitulation, this is the asset you want to be owning for sure. And the easiest thing, the easiest thing to do is just to hold on to it through the cycles. This is something that I've thought a lot about more recently is the volatility. If your dollar cost averaging through this volatility, it is massive. Like, we're just showing if you were like plucking the tops of like some of the worst moments in time or the best moments in time, this is what the performance is. Right. But if you could dollar cost average and then show the performance against these other assets, I think it would melt your brain as to how much the outperformance is.

Starting point is 00:51:17 Because think of it like this. Let's say Bitcoin was at 1,000. It went down to 200 and it went back to 1,000. And you were dollar cost averaging all of that. Your performance isn't flat. It's not zero. Your performance is actually really, really good because there was so much volatility and it got back to its starting point. And that goes for any asset.

Starting point is 00:51:38 I mean, your average should be somewhere around 600. That's right. Although your dollar could, yeah. So your average should be somewhere around 600. And so you've got probably a 66% return performance. Even though instead of flat. That's right. And so I don't know.

Starting point is 00:51:55 I think it's, I think the more I'm watching this violence unfold of Bitcoin relative, and this is important, it's relative to anything else you could possibly own. Right. And so like the, what has been the best performing stuff in the last decade? It's been equities. If you're not looking at Bitcoin, right? It's equities. Yeah. So when I'm looking at Bitcoin's performance, and I guess what took me down this path, I'm a little frustrated because I'm used to the the 2017 bull run or like I'm looking at Bitcoin's past performance and I'm saying this current bull run is somewhat disappointing from a percentage performance return to what I've seen in other bull cycles. But then I'm saying, okay, Preston, relative to what? Relative to Bitcoin's

Starting point is 00:52:39 previous performance or relative to what else you could own. And when I look at what else I could, when I look at what else I could own over this past or since the bottom of 20, which was what we just showed. The results are like astounding how much better Bitcoin's performances versus these other assets. I just made this. So let me see if I can share this because I did this just the other day at BitBlock boom here. Yeah, go ahead.

Starting point is 00:53:08 This is what you're talking about here, Preston. And for people listening, this is Bitcoin over U.S. treasuries. Instead of just over the dollar, he's putting it over the U.S. treasuries, which then account for the performance of U.S. So it's gone from being valued at just a fraction of it to 25 times. Same thing with Bitcoin versus gold, a fraction of an ounce of gold to 27 times. You can do the math today. Just divide 78, divided by the 3,000.

Starting point is 00:53:39 That gold is trading at what? It's trading at 2974, so you can do the math. But that's what you're looking at there is Bitcoin versus the SMP. Here's what you're talking about. That's the Mag 7. Yeah. It's still outperforming the Mag 7. Yeah.

Starting point is 00:53:54 Still outperforming the Mag 7 in the last 10 years. I mean, that's what we're talking about, though. Yeah. And so this is what's so mind-blowing to people and institutional investors to what you're saying is that, wait, what? Is that right? But it's been so volatile. I thought it was at a whole time high.

Starting point is 00:54:11 It's just now getting back there, right? Yeah. And that doesn't include the dollar cost average that you're talking about, which you would have been done monumental. better. That's the performance difference that I would love to see. Hey, if you dollar cost averaged into the S&P 500 every day for the last four years, what is your performance profile versus Bitcoin? Because just taking that snapshot in time does not do it any kind of justice, I suspect, right? No, it doesn't. And here's the other thing. And so this is the other thing I want to

Starting point is 00:54:42 point out that listening to these guys talk, Trump, we want the United States to be the crypto capital of the world and we know that his family is mostly focused on Bitcoin. Lutnik, he understands Bitcoin and these guys get it. And Bissent, he understands Bitcoin. He said it to Tucker. He said, I think that money's going to flow into golden Bitcoin because those are, that's hard money. I mean, they can close my mind and even said it. That's like when the Treasury put that chart out that's an unsustainable fiscal path and like a shot over the ballot to Congress, kind of doing the same thing, but he did mention Bitcoin. They know that this is decentralized asset that it cannot be diluted.

Starting point is 00:55:27 It can't be debased. And they understand that. And so that's the interesting part that they get it. And so all of these tail wins, and now you're talking about a structural change, it may be painful, but over the long haul, what do you want to own? Oh, yeah. What do you want to own? Nothing's changed with respect to that thesis at all for the Bitcoin.

Starting point is 00:55:48 Right? Like the Bitcoin thesis. That's right. I'm not one of those guys who wants to see the world implode. No, of course. I'm one of those guys. And I don't. I don't want the world to implode and Bitcoin to sure to incredible values at the expense of everything else. That's not what I want. But I want to protect my own hard-earned money. And that's why I do exactly what you're saying. I don't think it's just that. I think it's you also want to usher in a world that is fair. Yes. With respect to the energy exchange between all participants, all governments, everybody that if you want to go to war, well, you need to pay for it today. You need to suffer through the consequences of what that means for reelection.

Starting point is 00:56:34 If you're making that decision now, like all of these things, I don't know. I think it just rewires the natural incentives that are so perverted with fiat. So, yeah, I don't know, man. I this is from a financial media standpoint. This is like a dang feeding frenzy of interesting things to talk about. That's for sure. That's really awesome. Yeah.

Starting point is 00:56:55 Dude, thank you so much for making time. This was an awesome conversation. I learned so much for me every time we chat and just consider you a good friend and just really appreciate you making time, James. Likewise, my friend will, we'll do it again soon. Give people a handoff where they can find there or anything else that you can highlight. Yeah, of course. I'm at James Lavish on Twitter.

Starting point is 00:57:16 I have a substack called The Informationist. It's a newsletter that I put out weekly that just simplifies some of these topics for you every single week. And there's a free version too. That's, again, a free one every month. And then the co-managing partner of the Bitcoin Opportunity Fund. And so, and we are actually raising our second fund right now. It's just like the first fund. If it sounds an interest to you, you can just go to Bitcoin Opportunity.

Starting point is 00:57:40 fund gives your info and we can we continue some information and get in touch of you. Amazing. We'll have links to all of that in the show notes. James, thank you, sir. Thank you. Thank you for listening to TIP. Make sure to follow Bitcoin Fundamentals on your favorite podcast app and never miss out on episodes. To access our show notes, transcripts or courses, go to The Investorspodcast.com. This show is for entertainment purposes only before making any decision consultant professional. This show is copyrighted by the Investors Podcast Network. Written permission must be granted before syndication or rebroadcasting.

We Study Billionaires - The Investor’s Podcast Network - BTC229: Trump Tariffs, Market Chaos, Bitcoin Impact w/ James Lavish

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.