We Study Billionaires - The Investor’s Podcast Network - BTC254: Bitcoin & Macro Overview w/ Luke Gromen Q4 2025 (Bitcoin Podcast)

Starting point is 00:00:00 You're listening to TIP. Hey everyone, welcome to this Wednesday's release of the Bitcoin Fundamentals podcast. Today I'm joined by Luke Groman to break down the growing financial stress inside the U.S. system from the Treasury's heavy reliance on the short-term funding to the signals coming out of the repo market and why record tax receipts still aren't enough to cover the interest and entitlements. We also touch on the global pressure points, the dollar, and why Bitcoin remains the earliest warning sign for liquidity. This is surely an episode you won't want to miss. So without further ado,

Starting point is 00:00:33 let's jump right into the conversation. Celebrating 10 years, you are listening to Bitcoin Fundamentals by the Investors Podcast Network. Now for your host, Preston Pish. Hey, everyone, welcome to the show. I'm here with the one and only, Luke Roman. Welcome back. Thanks for having me back. It's great to see again. I'm sorry we didn't have more time to catch up down in Nashville. Oh, that's right. Yeah. Yeah. We only had a little bit to talk there. But, you know, it wasn't as exciting as it is right now. So we didn't miss out on too much. No. No, it's exciting. And I think it's going to get a lot more exciting in the next three to six months. Yeah. For the person who's not intimately familiar with all the terminology and, you know, the nuances of macroeconomics, explain it in very simple language in your opinion, what's taking place right now. Oh, boy. I guess if I had to say, we're running headlong towards a poly crisis of sorts.

Starting point is 00:01:44 There's a lot of things going on. You know, for starters, the fiscal situation, which was for all of the hubbub about tariff receipts and they were a record. So we had record tariff receipts. And we had record all-time high receipts overall. The fact is we're still at when you look at true interest expense, which is gross interest expense plus entitlement. pay goes plus Veterans Affairs benefits, you're still 96%-ish on as a percent of receipts that are all-time highs. So we're still right in that hot zone of if anything slows down, you're going to be right back over 100%. You're right back into, you know, print or default mode. And they always choose print. They have to. Furthermore, we're now seeing early signs of stress in the

Starting point is 00:02:29 overnight funding markets. There's a variety of views on that. Mine is that it is essentially, we're now 30 months into the U.S. shifting issuance to the front end because there's not enough demand at the back end. And as a result, Bessent has a red queen or Axel Rose problem, if you will. I used to do a little, but the little wouldn't do it. The little got more and more, or the red queen, I got to run faster and faster, stay in the same spot. There's more and more issuance coming, right? So, you know, 2013, we were issuing 100 bill, not issuing, excuse me, rolling. Let me be clear with my language, we were rolling about $100 billion of T bills a week per secretary of the treasury Jack Lute. Now it's $550 billion per week being rolled per my friend Andy Constan. And so that

Starting point is 00:03:18 requires having a greater level of money in the Treasury General account or TGA, which Bessent is doing, which is in turn putting overnight funding strains on overnight funding markets akin to a little bit like what we saw in 2019. So you're seeing tightening liquidity there and sort of spot applications of liquidity in terms of standing repo facility being borrowed against in a bigger way than we have seen ever before. It's back to basically nothing but two weeks ago on Halloween. It was $50 billion overnight. So you're seeing, you know, that is, that's not a problem that's going to go away.

Starting point is 00:03:54 That's going to need, you know, and they'll continue to put spot applications of liquidity. You're seeing in Japan, 10 year yields in Japan are at highest levels and, you know, a long, Long time. Yeah, sorry, long time. And yeah, we know, and the yen is weakening markedly, which is when your yields are rising and your currency is still weakening, that's like emerging market type of action, which is very important because if, you know, for the last five plus years, if you want to know where the 10-year treasury yield is going to be in anywhere from a few weeks to a month or two, just look at, you know, the direction of the travel of the 10-year JGB.

Starting point is 00:04:29 And the reason that is, is those are the two biggest carry trades funding currencies in the world going back 30 years, you know, after 89, the yen became a carry trade. And then after Bernanke in 2008, the dollar became a carry trade. And we saw in summer 2024 that anytime the yen gets too strong, the yen carry trade blows up. And anytime the yen gets too weak, dollar gets too strong, the dollar carry trade blows up. So you're sort of between, you know, Silla and Caribdis on that front with Scylla starting to get a little mouthy in terms of the the Japanese 10-year bond yields. You've got. got U.S. shale production rolling over and the EIA saying, hey, we need to drill faster just to stay

Starting point is 00:05:08 flat with oil at 5960. We've got the IEA coming out saying, I know we said two years ago that oil peak oil demand would be here by 27 or 2030. Oops, it's actually not peaking at all. Demands rising faster than we thought. So we've got U.S. shale, which has been 90% of world supply growth over the last 10, 12 years per Gering and Rosenzweig rolling over while demand. that was supposed to be rolling over, not rolling over. So that is a stress point. You've got the geopolitical where it's becoming clear and clearer. We've talked about this in the past. Russia won in Ukraine. They beat NATO. That is what it is. That has important implications for macro because, you know, I don't know how many times in my career I've been told, but it's more than one that ultimately the

Starting point is 00:05:54 U.S. military backs the dollar. If we can't credibly project power conventionally against a major peer power. That has implications for prospective rule changes to the system. You've got Bitcoin, which to me still is the best or the last functioning smoke alarm, starting to cry shrilly and issue a very shrill warning of illiquidity. And so, I mean, I could probably, I could probably, and then let's just for giggles, let's layer on AI, which has gone from funding out of obtained earnings and cash flow to they are now borrowing money. and using very creative financing mechanisms. And I had a good friend of mine point out that credit spreads on Oracle debt are starting to rise.

Starting point is 00:06:38 Credit default swaps on Oracle are starting to rise sharply. And the hyperscaler. The hyper scaler, yeah. Topping it all off, you have an issue where the market leaders, you know, the semiconductors, and in particular, Invidia, and I don't have an opinion on Nvidia one way or another. All I can say is the useful life of these chips are said to be anywhere from three to four years and you can't get an electricity hookup in some of the most attractive places in the United States for hyperscalers till 2030. I'm hearing. I got that. So the market,

Starting point is 00:07:12 I think, is at some point probably in the not-thruousin future going to ask itself what the value of a chip with a three-year life is if it can't get electricity of that chip in five to seven years. That's a pretty important question. And I don't think they're going to like the answer when they ask it. And I guess lastly, into all of this, you know, the Fed released a white paper three weeks ago, four weeks ago, noting that not only is the hedge fund basis trade in treasuries been an important buyer of treasuries, they have been the biggest marginal buyer of middle and long-term treasuries, mid-dated and long-term treasuries since 2022, they have bought 37% of net issuance of longer-term treasuries. Wow. They own $1.8 trillion, not out of the Caymans, not $465,000 or

Starting point is 00:07:57 $465 billion, as the foreign holdings report says for Treasury. And as we've talked about many times together, these hedge funds are highly levered. So if there's volatility anywhere, they have to degross. And so they will degross treasuries. And so there will be a trillion aid of treasury selling if volatility picks up anywhere. And Bitcoin's telling you volatility's coming and soon. And maybe we've already seen it started. And yeah, that's, you know, that's what I can think of right there. Oh, my God. And by the way, any of these things goes a little bit wrong, like it's sort of like smoking

Starting point is 00:08:32 in a nitro glycerin plant. You just need one of them to catch and then the lullp catch. Yeah. Just a really, in one sentence try to summarize, the fiscal issues are the math ain't math in anymore. And I mean, it hasn't for a while, but it's becoming obvious to everybody on Wall Street that the math just does not work. The liquidity issues is the driving thing.

Starting point is 00:08:54 When people were asking me, Preston, what's happening with the price of Bitcoin? I said, well, they're having liquidity issues right now. It's very obvious with the repo market. Luke, do you think that the government shut down? I saw that the TGA was building, basically the checking account for the government was building during the shutdown. And it seemed like that was just an added piece to the liquidity challenges that were already there. It just kind of enhanced it a little bit and maybe threw a little bit of extra fuel on the fire with the government being shut down. Is that how you're seeing that particular piece?

Starting point is 00:09:26 Or is that? I think it, the short answer is it clearly added to it, right? So we know it added to it, the growth in the TGA. In terms of how much of the growth in the TGA was because of the shutdown, I had thought it was more than it was most of it. We put out a report citing work by an analyst named John Kermiski, who's a Treasury Funding analyst. It has a substack.

Starting point is 00:09:50 You can find him online. We had a great interaction two weekends ago. where he pointed out to me, surprisingly, no, no, no, this wasn't shut down. This is not best playing 4D chess trying to basically squeeze funding markets into a crisis so that the Fed has to come back and do not QE or whatever. He's like, I was forecasting the TGA was going to go here because there's a formulaic. He's got to have enough in the TGA relative to, I think it's like 10 days of outlays or two weeks outlays, whatever it is.

Starting point is 00:10:18 But the formula is, it's very formulaic. And I said, so was that current deficits? He goes, no, no, no, it's not, no, it's not current deficits. It's the fact they're rolling so many bills from the past deficits. Wow. And so that to me, that really changed my mind on a couple fronts. Number one, it's not mostly shutdown related, number one. It's just 30 months of yelling and then Bessent going, oh, crap, we don't have enough

Starting point is 00:10:40 buyers for the long end of our market. So we're just going to shift it to the front end and do that enough for 30 months. And pretty soon, you know, you've got 550 billion a week. you're rolling, and that requires having a big TGA just to make sure you never have a failed auction. So along with everything else you're spending money on, you got to have the cash cushion. So that in terms of really important because if that's the case, if that's the real driver, like there's a whole bunch of people out there I'm seeing that think, okay, well, the TGA just went to a trillion because of the shutdown and now it's going back to 300 billion or 400 billion

Starting point is 00:11:12 or whatever. And great, we're going to get this big liquidity flush into the end of the year and what have you. That increasingly to me, I'm not sure that's going to happen. I mean, maybe it'll go from a trillion to $800 billion or something. Yeah. Which is still kind of helpful, but it's not, I don't think it's going, if Kamiski's right and it makes sense, because he's not the only one stand that. I've seen a number of others citing this, guys that are really good in the plumbing, saying, you know, the TJ's got to be bigger in a world where you're rolling $550 billion a week. That number is so insane. Oh, it's astonishing. Like I said, the growth rate from 2013 to $1,000, to 550 billion, that's 15% a week Kager. And that's deficit plus shifting to the front end

Starting point is 00:11:49 because you don't have the demand at the long end after central bank stopped growing holdings, right? And Luke, that is such a huge story that I don't know a lot of people are talking about. The fact that you have 30 months of the government having to issue just short duration paper because they can't go into the mid to long duration issuance, there's no buyers. And to the point that you made in your opening statement about hedge funds basically have been, What did you say? The number was 77% of the buying? It's 37, right?

Starting point is 00:12:18 So to be clear, there's buyers, right? Because bills are still only 22% of total outstanding, right? But that's probably up from 15 or 18%. Right? So you've got way bigger deficits and you've got a shift, you know, of call it 15 or 18% or whatever it was, the 22% of bills as a percent of total. And then, yeah, the kicker is, like, okay, well,

Starting point is 00:12:40 of the stuff that you have placed long end, 37% of it is with these highly levered basis trade hedge funds that can't get more levered. Well, and ironically, that fund that trade to buy the 37% at the same short end that you're crowding out with the TGA because you've placed so much at the front end. So it's literally a snake eating its own tail. And that's why I'm not encouraged that like there's going to be this giant liquidity flush out of the TGA, that this was just a shutdown related thing. Like they have to do whatever they can to keep repo down and they got to keep the repo rates calm and they got to keep the long end calm and they got to keep equities calm and they can't have vol anywhere. They'll have all everywhere. And, you know, they're using standing repo to keep vol down at the front end, which is fine. That's what it's designed for. But the more you tap that, the more there's going to be an inflationary impulse that's going to make the long end a little restless. And so then you've got to worry about that. No, by the way, if these hyperscalers do anything like untoward that. creates a problem or if private credit does, which I didn't even touch on, but which is, you know, there's smoke and now there's more smoke and now there's more smoke there.

Starting point is 00:13:50 You get equity of all to spike. You're going to get treasury vault of spike. They're going to degross on treasuries. You're going to get, you know, the 10 year yield goes down for three, four days, five days, seven days. And then it's going to start spiking, just like it did in April. And then, you know, then comes more liquidity. So it's tricky. But it's this snake eating its own tail dynamic of we had to shift to the front end because we didn't have the demand at the long end and the demand we do have the long end is actually financed at the short end that we're now crowding out because we have to have a bigger TGA for liquidity cushion because we've been financing so much at the short end. It's like, everyone's like, oh, look at all this crazy

Starting point is 00:14:24 financing schemes that, you know, Open AI and Oracle and and Invidia are doing. That's Piker's stuff compared to, it's literally, you know, Treasury's doing to the tune of 550 billion a week. A week. That's the big boy league. Yeah. Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors. All right. I want you guys to imagine spending three days in Oslo at the height of the summer. You've got long days of daylight, incredible food, floating saunas on the Oslo Fjord, and every conversation you have is with people who are actually shaping the future. That's what the Oslo Freedom Forum is. From June 1st through the 3rd, 2026, the Oslo Freedom Forum is entering its 18th year, bringing together activists, technologists, journalists, investors, and builders from all over the world. many of them operating on the front lines of history. This is where you hear firsthand stories from people using Bitcoin to survive currency collapse, using AI to expose human rights abuses, and building technology under censorship and authoritarian pressures. These aren't abstract ideas. These are tools real people are using right now. You'll be in the room with about 2,000

Starting point is 00:15:31 extraordinary individuals, dissidents, founders, philanthropists, policymakers, the kind of people you don't just listen to but end up having dinner with. Over three days, you'll experience powerful mainstage talks, hands-on workshops on freedom tech, and financial sovereignty, immersive art installations and conversations that continue long after the sessions end. And it's all happening in Oslo in June. If this sounds like your kind of room, well, you're in luck because you can attend in person. Standard and patron passes are available at Osloof Freedomforum.com with patron passes offering deep access, private events, and small group time with the speakers. The Oslo Freedom Forum isn't just a conference. It's a place where ideas meet reality and where the future is being built by people

Starting point is 00:16:18 living it. If you run a business, you've probably had the same thought lately. How do we make AI useful in the real world? Because the upside is huge, but guessing your way into it is a risky move. With NetSuite by Oracle, you can put AI to work today. NetSuite is the number one AI cloud ERP, trusted by over 43,000 businesses. It pulls your financials, inventory, commerce, HR, and CRM into one unified system. And that connected data is what makes your AI smarter. It can automate routine work, surface actionable insights, and help you cut costs while making fast AI-powered decisions with confidence. And now with the NetSuite AI connector, you can use the AI of your choice to connect directly to your real business data. This isn't some add-on,

Starting point is 00:17:06 it's AI built into the system that runs your business. And whether your company does millions or even hundreds of millions, NetSuite helps you stay ahead. If your revenues are at least in the seven figures, get their free business guide, demystifying AI at netsuite.com slash study. The guide is free to you at netsuite.com slash study. NetSuite.com slash study. When I started my own side business, it suddenly felt like I had to become 10 different people overnight wearing many different hats. Starting something from scratch can feel exciting, but also incredibly overwhelming and lonely. That's why having the right tools matters. For millions of businesses, that tool is Shopify.

Starting point is 00:17:50 Shopify is the commerce platform behind millions of businesses around the world and 10% of all e-commerce in the U.S. from brands just getting started to household names. It gives you everything you need in one place. inventory to payments to analytics. So you're not juggling a bunch of different platforms. You can build a beautiful online store with hundreds of ready-to-use templates, and Shopify is packed with helpful AI tools that write product descriptions and even enhance your product photography. Plus, if you ever get stuck, they've got award-winning 24-7 customer support. Start your business today with the industry's best business partner, Shopify, and start hearing... Sign up for your $1.00,000,

Starting point is 00:18:32 per month trial today at Shopify.com slash WSB. Go to Shopify.com slash WSB. That's Shopify.com slash WSB. All right. Back to the show. So I had an interesting conversation with a friend who's a real estate agent. And I was just asking them, hey, what's it like in the market right now? And I know this is a very localized thing, especially when you get into like retail homes

Starting point is 00:19:00 and things like that. But his comment was really fascinating to me. He says, Preston, it's really strange right now. Like way weirder than it's ever been. He's like, there's nothing moving. A lot of people were just used to their low interest rate. And they're like sitting here waiting for that environment to come back. And he said, honestly, the last Fed meeting that happened when they dropped rates,

Starting point is 00:19:24 you know, 25 basis points, he's like, everybody in my community and in my space was like, okay, here it comes. here comes the drop in interest rates. And he's like, and they went up. And he's like, everybody was just like looking around. Like, what in the world is happening? Like, what is this? They just, the Fed just dropped rates, but yet ours are staying the same or going higher.

Starting point is 00:19:45 And he said, after that meeting, he's like, everything has just been dead, completely dead. So it's, I think it's a very strange environment. It almost seems like since COVID, you know, we had the 2020, what was it, 20, what was it, 23 contraction and then the liquidity, you know, came back into the market very heavily. And it seems like this is the second go around where everybody's thinking that that old rates are going to get dropped down to 3% or whatever. I can refy my house. I can do all these things that just persisted for like 40 years straight. And it seems like people are finally coming to this recognition that something's very different. It doesn't seem to be changing. It seems to be getting worse and

Starting point is 00:20:28 stranger to all these points that you kind of laid out at the start of the show. I'm just kind of curious if you have any anecdotal stories like that or any comments on that particular real estate, you know, interest rate situation. You know, in summer of 2022, if you remember back, and I'm sure we talked then, the consensus on Wall Street was Powell's going to be Volker, right? Inflation's out of control, but he's going to be Volker. He's going to take pain. And we wrote in summer 2020, like, he ain't going to be Volker. is not even a choice for him to be Volcker because of the debt and the deficit situation. Apples and oranges compared to Volker.

Starting point is 00:21:03 He has a choice of being Benjamin Strong who led the U.S. into the Great Depression, or he can be, oh gosh, Burns. He can be Arthur Burns, who leads the U.S. into the 70s. Those are his choices. Yeah. And those are if he's lucky. Those are the good outcomes for him. And so we assumed it wasn't going to be, you know, wasn't going to be Benjamin Strong.

Starting point is 00:21:24 And so, you know, probably some version of Burns. And we're sort of seeing symptoms of that. But the point in saying that comparison was when you're in fiscal dominance, when debt the GDP is as high as is, you raise rates, you raise deficits and deficits are stimulative. If you cut rates, well, especially once inflation is a little elevated to lower deficits, to cut interest rates, to lower deficits, which is in theory lower deficits should be non-stimulative or contractionary, you're stimulating by cutting rates. So like he is, he has a choice of how he wants to inflate, how he wants to be Arthur Burns. And that's what he said at the time. And that's, it's starting to play out. And what your anecdote suggests is the real estate community doesn't understand that yet,

Starting point is 00:22:11 but they're gone to soon, which is how do they want rates to go up? They want rates to go up with inflation going up or do they want rates to go up with inflation going down? Because either way, you know, they'll go up if he raises, if he cuts rates and inflation picks up and they'll go up if he raises rates because he's raising rates. And oh, by the way, that makes the debt less sustainable and therefore higher rate on a less sustainable debt. So there are still a lot of people I don't think that appreciate that outcome. I agree with you 100%. You said something before that people finally kind of seeing, you know, the bigger picture.

Starting point is 00:22:48 The fact that everyone in their mother in the mainstream media is now talking about the debasement trade, right? You and I have been talking about this for what, five years. years, seven years. So like, you know, it's like Bruce Willis. Like, come on in. The one, you know, welcome to the party, pal. But it's not a debasement trade. It's a debasement trend. Like, this ain't going to stop. And oh, by the way, the only way you stop the rates go up with hikes or rates go up with cuts is you devalue the heck out of the currency. And you basically buy down the debt. And you know, provisionally, we've talked about this before. It's on the books. They could do it with gold. It ain't going to happen

Starting point is 00:23:23 at gold 4,000. It ain't going to have. happen with a gold 8,000, you know, gold 20,000 is probably the opening bid to have a real effect with that. So point being is like, I think not a lot of people, people are seeing the symptoms, right? Like for your friends saying, oh, rates went up when they cut rates. I don't get it. That's the girl washing up on the beach at the beginning of the movie in Jaws, right? Like, oh, it's just a boating accident. And then, you know, next comes the poor little boy, you know, and then they're going to catch a shark, right? And they're, you know, 50 year mortgages or Trump's going to tweet out the Walmart CEO thing. Well, Thanksgiving,

Starting point is 00:23:54 spending's down. And then the fact check them and they're like, well, there's six less items. There were 21 items on the menu last year. There's 15 this year and they're almost all store brands versus brand names last year. But yeah, other than that, right? That's where they catch the shark and everyone's like, hey, we got it. It's over. And they guys like, the bite radius on that animal doesn't match the bite radius on the victims. That's not your shark. Right. And then finally, we're going to see the shark. And when we finally see the shark, everyone in the real estate business is going to go, oh my God, we, if they cut rates were screwed, if they raise rates were screwed, sell your house now as fast as you can. And, you know, then what, I don't know. But people

Starting point is 00:24:33 don't appreciate that they are painted in a corner yet. That I very, they, they know they need to debate, but they don't really get like, oh. Yeah. It's funny you mentioned the 50 year mortgage thing because in my conversation with him, one of the things that I said to him, I says, dude, think about this 50-year mortgage thing, like just from a first principles standpoint. Imagine I give you tools, you know, we're 200 years in the past, and I give you some tools to go out, cut down some trees, start building your own house, right? Do you really think it would take you 50 years to build yourself a nice house? I say, no, it'd take you two years or a year or something that's like way more manageable. And I know this isn't like a perfect example, right?

Starting point is 00:25:18 But it does help a person just kind of contemplate, sit down and think, why would it take me 50 years to pay off something that I can afford, right? The whole reason they're going to a 50 year mortgage is to mask the reality of the monthly payment of what the typical person can afford to pay off 50 years later for a house. And it's totally insane how all of this is just being masked and people aren't. aren't asking like the basic questions of like, why should it take 50 years to pay? And here's the irony is if you can get a 50 year mortgage at call it five and a half, six percent or whatever the yield would be on something like that, it's actually, in my opinion, probably a screaming deal for the borrower considering where I think inflation and what the debasement is actually going to be over that same 50 year period in Fiat terms. But it's just, it's clown world. It's

Starting point is 00:26:14 totally nuts. Well, and it's particularly when you look at what the other hand of the government is doing at the same time, right? They're like, we have an affordability problem with housing. So let's get the mortgage out, right? Cut rates, take the mortgage out. Okay. But then at the other hand, our president comes out and says, you know what, we are going to let these 600,000 other students in because otherwise our college is a collapse, okay? Competition. And he literally told Laura Ingram, we can't build things in America anymore unless we have all these H-1B visa holders in. So on one hand, you're saying here, take a 50-year mortgage, you know, we'll make it more affordable, we'll cut rates. And then with the other hand, you're like,

Starting point is 00:26:55 I'm going to bring in all this labor competition to ensure, like, think about the message he just told, don't go into skilled trades. We're going to let people in to undercut you. So you're never able to afford those houses. Don't go into engineering because we're going to let all these H-1Bs is so that the companies don't have to pay a real wage. So you're literally undercutting. And oh, by the way, in the grand scheme of what we're trying to do here is we need to reshore industry so that we can compete with China so that we're not relying on the Chinese to build our weapons. So we're going to make our houses more expensive. We're going to make our labor still cheaper so that we have nobody going into these things. We're going to remain

Starting point is 00:27:31 short these things and then take it back to Nvidia and this AI thing where we can't build the grid. You've got chips that are going to expire in three to four years and you can't get an electricity hookup for five, six years, you should be like literally, hey, let's subsidize electricians to be making, you know, what short-term interest rate traders make on Wall Street. And then, you know what? You know, that hookup will happen in 2027. But that's not what we're doing. We're extending 50-year mortgages.

Starting point is 00:27:57 We're trying to cut rates. And then we're bringing in H-1Bs and we're capping or bringing more college stuff in to cap wages in this country as, oh, by the way, AI is going to deflationary crush. Oh my God. Introductary. We're not even like, we're not even talking that. That's right. So like literally the point is like from a first principle standpoint.

Starting point is 00:28:17 Yeah. Like people like, well, we're finally taking action. Don't mistake action for progress. This is like, you know, the action we're taking is we're punching ourselves in the nuts repeatedly. And mistaking that for progress. You're like, what are you doing? And what they're missing is that. But you're punching so hard, lose.

Starting point is 00:28:37 You're punching so. inflation is the fundamental market signal. It was like, we need to get back to free markets. Great. You know what a free market is? Close the border. Let inflation for skilled trades and engineers explode so that we can have an explosion of supply to those areas so we can do all of this.

Starting point is 00:28:58 But that's not what they're doing. They're like, we're going to manipulate the market the 50 or we're going to cut rates at the short end and we're going to bring in all this labor to crush labor in the U.S. Well, AI is going to do the same thing, by the way. and think that's going to work? Here's what I think is really hard for the listener. So they're hearing all of this and they're saying everything you're saying is making sense, but why is when I look at Bitcoin, it's down so hard right now.

Starting point is 00:29:21 And I know what your answer is. But I think for the listener, they might hear all of this stuff and get really frustrated and say, I don't understand why Bitcoin's not performing well in this environment with all of these things that are going wrong. So how do you respond to that? person who's thinking that right now. Bitcoin's just one of your early source. It's just the early source of liquidity, right?

Starting point is 00:29:43 And so all of these things, when you hear your friends say the market is locked up, when you hear what I just described, which is the market's going to lock up more. Like you can't extend the term and cut rates and then, you know, you are promising labor. You're going to kill them over the next five to 10 years. You're promising essentially what I just said is the Trump. administration acting to maintain the real value of the bond market and not inflating, which is what the country needs, which is if we want strategically. So ultimately, if they're going to try to act to support the bond market by capping what, that's austerity.

Starting point is 00:30:25 Right. So actually, that's not going to work. That's going to tighten liquidity and Bitcoin's going to be the first thing that warns you of it. And it's warning. By going down. Exactly. When the liquidity is tightening, which we're seeing right. now. Yep. And you call it the canary in the coal mine. Why aren't you seeing it with gold? I think you're not seeing it with gold in part because gold is being well, I think ultimately gold is being bid on the other side of this as the sovereigns are going, holy cow. That's what it is, isn't it, Luke? It's the timing thing, right? Like the sovereigns have finally, I know how this is going to end, right? If I'm managing a sovereign fund, A, I don't try to trade month

Starting point is 00:31:06 the month quarter to quarter, but B, I run a surplus. I have a choice. I can buy dollars or I can buy gold. That's it. Those are my choices. I think the sovereigns, I buy gold. I think the sovereigns understand gold. They always have understood gold as the debasement trade. And I think prior to 2020, nobody believed we could get into all of this detail and all this nuance and how all these incentives are broke and how it's a disaster, but until you started to see inflation actually manifest itself in everyday prices and see the long end of the bond yield curve start to sell off in a trend reversal kind of way, which we had never seen prior to 2020. Then since 2020, we saw the first spike, 2022, 2023, and then it didn't go away. And now the yields are still

Starting point is 00:32:00 going higher or kind of holding their own. And it looks like a trend reversal. And I think because the sovereigns understand gold, they see the trend, they see the math. And you ask anybody on Wall Street, if the governments are going to be able to, advanced governments are going to be able to get this under control. And I think every one of them would say, hell no. Right. And so where are they going? I think they're going into gold because they understand it. I think, you know, my conversations with a lot of people on Bitcoin, there's a lot to get it on Wall Street today. But I don't know that they trust it like they trust gold because it's really easy to understand. But I think when you get into Bitcoin, I think to trust it requires a lot of technical competence to dig very deep. And I think

Starting point is 00:32:47 that a lot of them that are controlling massive flow of funds are just pointing it at gold instead of the risk that's involved, the technical risk for them to wrap their head around Bitcoin. I mean, that's my two cents. I'm curious, do you kind of see it the same way? Or is there some other factors that you think are playing into this? I think it's most of the private sector, particularly in the West. They don't have the luxury of taking, you know, a 40, 50% drawdown, you know, the implied vol of Bitcoin. And gold simply really hasn't shown that kind of volatility.

Starting point is 00:33:22 I think that's part of it. And part of it's been, you know, Bitcoin in the short run has traded like a tech stock, right? And so it's technicals look like a tech stock and, you know, think about what we're talking about tech. Like, oh, like, if AI breaks, Bitcoin's probably going to break. And I don't know, I don't agree that that, I don't think they, I don't agree that Bitcoin should break with AI. I had been arguing that point up until very recently that no, they won't. They'll be a recognition. And recently, I'm like, no.

Starting point is 00:33:49 Yeah. It's totally correlated. I get shot, you know, taken out back and shot, Bitcoin's going to take him out back and shot too. And it's not the right thing to do. And it'll be an opportunity. And, you know, I don't make the rules, right? So I think that's part of it. So you're saying that the correlation in the typical investors mind is that.

Starting point is 00:34:05 And I would agree with you, Luke. I think you're right. Yeah, I think it's ultimately, yeah, guys who get paid on, you know, they have to put up numbers every month or else they get taken out of their seat every quarter or they get taken out of their seat. These aren't guys who have luxuries to, you know, say, well, the market's wrong and Bitcoin's ultimately going to be a neutral reserve ass. because they're going to have lost, you know, 12 jobs before that's ever true. Mm-hmm. And it may, I think, I think it will ultimately be true based on what I know today. But it's, it's not true now and it probably won't be true for the next six months.

Starting point is 00:34:34 And in the meantime, you know, what's going on in AI and private credit and the fiscal situation, all that is like, you know, real rates are moving up and, you know, you sell tech when real rates move up. What else do you sell? Well, sell the thing trading just like tech, Bitcoin. Yeah. In your recent report, you talked about this stable coin contradiction between Moran versus Trump, the Pentagon, the reality of all this. Explain to the listener what you're talking about here. Yeah. So put out in a recent report. I'm going to find it here real quick just to make sure I quote it properly. Miron, Stephen Myron, Fed Governor came out with a white paper, discussing what he called the opportunity to use stable coins as a basically created global

Starting point is 00:35:24 stablecoin glut, which is something we've talked about before, not in those terms, but that basically, hey, Bessent has said there could be up to three trillion in stable coins. And the thought is, you know what, foreigners would rather hold a dollar than their own currency. And so they can own an unstable coins on their phone and that'll be backed by T-bills and this will create trillions of dollars of T-bill demand. It's essentially repressible balance sheet. And what Myron's white paper talked about was this global stable coin glut is what he phrased it saying it could be like what Ben Bernanke called the global savings glut from

Starting point is 00:36:03 1996 to 2004. So by way of background, Bernanke did a white paper, you know, talking about the global savings glut. He was trying to explain why interest rates in the U.S. in particular, the West more broadly, remained persistently low despite growth, et cetera. And he reasoned out that there was this global savings glut. And so Myron's paper comes out and says, well, if we do this stable coin thing, we could get one to three trillion dollars in stable coins, and that would lower interest rates, it would pull flows out of foreign currencies into the dollar and strengthen the dollar, and it would widen our current account deficit in the same way

Starting point is 00:36:46 that the savings glut, right? So the current account deficit is basically we import more stuff and foreigners put more money in our markets, right? So the current account deficit, the stuff we bring in gets bigger, and then the capital account surplus, what the foreigners invest in our markets, get bigger. What confused the heck out of me about this report is that number one, Myron wrote a white paper very widely quoted last year called restructuring the global trading system in which he called for essentially the exact opposite on all those things. Weaker dollar, lower current account deficit, right? We make more stuff and send it to the world and then reducing foreign capital flows in here

Starting point is 00:37:25 to weaken the dollar. And now, so he puts out this white paper and highlights that. That left me very confused number one. The second thing was that the stable coin market cap, you know, for this $3 trillion number, like, I don't know where they're going to get it. Maybe they're going to do bank reserves all at once, but like it's $300 billion. And it was $260 billion when they passed the Genius Act for almost five months ago. So that's like a $10 billion a month growth rate, right?

Starting point is 00:37:53 So if Bessa wants to get the $3 trillion by 2028, like he better get going. And then if you look at it back even further to the past peak in stable coin market cap and the last call it crypto peak, it was like $190 billion in early 2022. That's like a $5 billion per month growth rate in stable coins compounded annually. So like at that rate, it would take us like 60 years to get to $3 trillion. So there's got to be some sort of like. Forced demand by U.S. banks. Is that what you're?

Starting point is 00:38:25 Maybe it's forced demand by banks. Maybe like to me, it's unclear to me how they can get to those numbers about Bitcoin being a much bigger number unless they come out and say, look, there's $3 trillion in bank reserves and we're going to convert them all into stable coins like now. That could work and that opens up some inflationary implications. Maybe that's what happens. I don't know. Broader point,

Starting point is 00:38:46 do you think that this $3 trillion number that he was thrown around was just marketing for the Genius Act? It might have been. It might have been. And it's also, it's like what we're just talking about with the mortgages, right? Which is like, we're doing what we can to help the American, right? The American consumer. We're giving them a 50 year mortgage.

Starting point is 00:39:01 We're dropping rates while we're literally kneecapping their ability for positive wage growth by bringing in H-1B and bringing in foreigners to study here. It's kind of the same thing where, like, the administration has like chapter and verse, we want to reverse trade flows. The, you know, get Chinese capital out of here. And they want people investing in factories here. Well, how are they going to do that if they're going to increase the current account deficit? They literally can't.

Starting point is 00:39:29 It's an accounting identity. It's not my opinion. It's a frigging double-entry accounting of bookkeeping. So it runs completely. completely contradiction. You know, it's strengthened the dollar. We want a weaker dollar. They've been very clear on that. So I just don't, I look at this white paper as it relates to stable coins and the goals expressed for the stable coins and they're running diametrically opposite of the goals of the administration and of out of myron himself literally 12 months ago. And I just like, I come to two possible conclusions, neither of which I hold a strong opinion on it either way. They're either throwing stuff against the wall and hoping it's sticks or they're saying one thing and they're just kind of doing what they need to do to keep the bond market happy to keep Wall Street happy. And that, oh, by the way, is 180 degrees of what they promised they would do. They are acting in Wall Street's interest, not Main Street. But

Starting point is 00:40:21 I don't know. I can't. It's one of these things where like, I don't know what it means, but I know, I know it doesn't fit. And I, you know, we'll know soon enough, right? Because there might be this sort of, I guess, my other point is they might be something really important. They're leaving out, right? Like, oh, we're going to convert three trillion of bank reserves immediately into stable coins. And be like, oh, now that makes sense. And the dollar is going to get waylaid and inflation is going to pick up and, you know, because you're basically going to be mobilizing sterilized reserves. Yeah. That would make sense. Growth would pick up. But again, then you go right back to the discussion we started with, which is if inflation picks up, then monetary

Starting point is 00:41:03 supply growth picks up, like, and it's not the amount of supply would change. It's that the velocity of those reserves rise markedly. Yeah. So the effective supply would increase. Who wants to own 10 year treasies at 4.15? Who wants to own JGBs? 10 year JGBs at 1.71? They're going to like, boom. Yeah. So I don't know. It's destabilizing. It doesn't make sense to me. It's contradictory what they said they were going to do unless there's a piece that they're kind of leaving out. You know, and meanwhile, it's just being spun, right? It's like, you know, affordable. Care Act or Operation Iraqi Freedom, right? It's like, we're going to bring back dollar dominance. Like, really? And it's almost like they just say stuff. If you repeat the lie enough,

Starting point is 00:41:43 people will believe it, right? Which is a proven tactic, but that's not my job. My job is to find the truth. So I don't know. I'm rambling. I'll stop there. It's a little confusing and frustrating to me. Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors. No, it's not your imagination. Risk and regulation are ramping up. And customers now expect proof of security just to do business. That's why VANTA is a game changer. VANTA automates your compliance process and brings compliance, risk, and customer trust together on one AI-powered platform. So whether you're prepping for a SOC 2 or running an enterprise GRC program, VANTA keeps you secure and keeps your deals moving. Instead of chasing spreadsheets and screenshots, VANTA gives you

Starting point is 00:42:27 continuous automation across more than 35 security and privacy frameworks. Companies like Ramp and writer spend 82% less time on audits with Vantta. That's not just faster compliance, it's more time for growth. If I were running a startup or scaling a team today, this is exactly the type of platform I'd want in place. Get started at Vanta.com slash billionaires. That's vanta.com slash billionaires. Ever wanted to explore the world of online trading, but haven't dared try? The futures market is more interactive now than ever before, and Plus 500 futures is the perfect place to start. Plus 500 gives you access to a wide range of instruments, the S&P 500, NASDAQ, Bitcoin, gas, and much more.

Starting point is 00:43:15 Explore equity indices, energy, metals, 4X, crypto, and beyond. With a simple and intuitive platform, you can trade from anywhere, right from your phone. Deposit with a minimum of $100 and experience the fast, accessible futures trading you've waiting for. See a trading opportunity. You'll be able to trade it in just two clicks once your account is open. Not sure if you're ready, not a problem. Plus 500 gives you an unlimited risk-free demo account with charts and analytic tools for you to practice on. With over 20 years of experience, Plus 500 is your gateway to the markets. Visit plus500.com to learn more. Trading in futures involves risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone. Not all applicants

Starting point is 00:44:01 will qualify. Plus 500, it's trading with a plus. Billion dollar investors don't typically park their cash in high-yield savings accounts. Instead, they often use one of the premier passive income strategies for institutional investors, private credit. Now, the same passive income strategy is available to investors of all sizes, thanks to the Fundrise income fund, which has more than $600 million invested in a 7.97% distribution rate. With traditional savings yields falling, it's no wonder private credit has grown to be a trillion dollar asset class in the last few years. Visit fundrise.com slash WSB to invest in the Fundrise income fund in just minutes. The fund's total return in 2025 was 8%, and the average annual total return since inception is 7.8%.

Starting point is 00:44:54 Past performance does not guarantee future results, current distribution rate as of 1231, 2025. carefully consider the investment material before investing, including objectives, risks, charges, and expenses. This and other information can be found in the income funds prospectus at fundrise.com slash income. This is a paid advertisement. All right. Back to the show.

Starting point is 00:45:16 One of the things that I like to take pride in with the show is just trying to give people tools so that when they do see a certain thing, they know how to react in the future if it plays out. So one of the most demonstrative things for me participating in markets was during the COVID 2020 liquidity insertion and just watching the markets when literally nobody was at work, everything was shut down, but because they inserted so many trillions of monetary units into the system, we watched stock indices just rip within 30 days to new all-time highs when if you were an alien and you came here and landed and said, hell, look, nobody on the entire planet is working. They're all at their houses, not buying anything.

Starting point is 00:46:03 You would suspect that you'd be seeing market lows and we saw the exact opposite. And for me, when I saw that, it was like, okay, when they add this much liquidity, this is the reaction that you get. And that doesn't mean that they're ever going to step in at the magnitude that they did during COVID because that was a very unique scenario. but when I'm looking at the current setup, I'm saying, okay, it looks like we're having liquidity issues, the dollar's getting bid relative to everything else because it's tightening. What are we going to have to see for that trend to reverse and to say, okay, I think we're

Starting point is 00:46:42 about to step into the correction of this and we're going to start to see everything risk on, start to get bid again? What does that look like? Is it tricky for us to do it if they don't really do anything in size, like the COVID example, it was so obvious the amount of trillions of units that they added into it that it's like, okay, game on, right? But in this setup or this scenario, they could be just kind of slowly trickling the liquidity in. It kind of plateaus. It runs sideways for, call it six months, because they're not taking any type of decisive liquidity action, which is my biggest, I think that's the hardest thing to navigate is when, never that's the response that you're getting as they've just kind of like slowly eased into

Starting point is 00:47:27 the expansion of the liquidity in the system. And there was nothing really that broke or that was decisively changed in the trend. So what are you on the outlook for as far as something that would maybe define a change in this tightening of the liquidity in the current setup? Yeah, for me, it's one of two things. Because right now, to your point, they're trying to ride two horses with one rear end, right? Which is we want to maintain the real value of the bond market and we don't want a lot of inflation and we, you know, they're fine with that, right? They're trying to maintain that, you know, both the bond market and the currency, right? You got to choose one eventually. I would watch, unfortunately, I thought we could do it without

Starting point is 00:48:08 a bigger crisis. I think ultimately we're going to need a huge whoosh down. Probably in the first half of next year. And then they'll do it. And especially because they'll do it because the midterms because we just got a little tiny glimpse two weeks ago. What is it? 17th. Yeah, two weeks ago. Yeah, right. Into how the midterms are going to go. And it is going to be a butt kicking. They are going to go blue, blue, blue, blue, blue, if nothing changes. If we just stay in this status quo right now, it's going to be like a blue wave like you've never seen. They don't want that because then he's a lame duck for the next two years. And then it's, you know, And that might, you know, so point being, I think we either got to get a huge whoosh down or we got to get something political, which is that it's made very apparent to the administration that they have to do something. Now, the problem is, is Paul's not out till May, right? So. Yeah, right. You know, if I'm Powell. And I've heard he can stay around on the board, too, after he's done. Is that right? Yeah. So even though you might be the fed, you know, forget the fed. I know, by the way, most of the Fed, we've seen their voting records, their donation, or not their voting records, but their donation records. But they're donation records.

Starting point is 00:49:14 right? There ain't a lot of them that are hoping that things go really well for the current administration, put it that way, based on their donation records. So what are the odds they're going to do it to be nice? Do they need the Fed? Or does Bessett at the Treasury have the capacity to juice the markets from a liquidity standpoint by himself? Well, and I think as part of the reason why we're seeing the illiquidity now, he has been. Remember, in 24, he was very vocally critical of yelling for shifting to the front end. And what did he do? Well, nothing's changed.

Starting point is 00:49:45 Yeah. Nothing's changed. He comes in. Not only does he keep up what she was doing, but he literally doubles the run rate of Treasury buybacks that she was doing. Yeah. Post May of 24 in the first half of this year. And it's very focused on replacing long end paper with short paper.

Starting point is 00:50:01 And announces a $3 trillion stable coin, which is all on the short end as well. Which is all in the short end, which by the way, I was told was a quote unquote, hail Mary to quote, prevent the collapse of the treasury market, end quote. Wow. Yeah. Oh, yeah. From a pretty reliable source or? Yes, extremely. Like literally, their word's not mine. And the context of the call was like, they reached out and they're like, look, you've been writing about this. They're trying to find a source of repressible balance sheet, which is, you know, for the audience, they need to find someone that will buy debt at zero when inflation is above zero. They need to find a sucker at the card table. And I'm saying they need to find

Starting point is 00:50:40 a source of repressable balance sheet. And yeah, what this person said is, yeah, it's... And the sucker's the same. That you think stable coins are the source of repressable balance sheet and you are right and this is why they're doing that now. Yeah. The challenge for Basscent is like, I get how you can kind of do it with the Euro dollar market in theory, right?

Starting point is 00:50:59 Hey, anything in the Euro dollar market is fully backed by the US government if it's in a stable coin and not if it's not. And that sounds like a really good plan if you have the attention span of a squirrel. Because what's going to happen is like, you're going to flood capital out of Europe. Dollar is going to skyrocket. Dollar skyrockets. That's going to trigger a crisis, number one. By the way, the Europeans own a ton of dollar assets.

Starting point is 00:51:21 Guess what they're going to sell to raise dollars because they're now short dollars. They're going to dump dollars or dump dollar stocks, dump treasury bonds. Yields are going to go. You're going to get a replay of what we saw in March and April where stocks are stocks down, bond yields up. You might get the dollar up, right? So you're literally going to have a crisis like a week later if you do it to the European. with stable coins. You know, Best incited, hey, somebody in Nigeria would rather hold up.

Starting point is 00:51:46 Yeah, but like really, how much is of the free capital in Africa right now and in sort of developing rest of the world? It's not that much money relative to what we need. So you're kind of implying that he's already kind of done what he could do. He's done what he can do. I mean, look, he could do the bank reserve thing. And I'm not the best guy to talk about that. But my understanding is that bank reserves can be used to back stable coins.

Starting point is 00:52:08 That I do know for the. for the Genius Act, then you can get into the question of, A, would they? And some of the plumbing guys say, yeah, they don't really want to do that. And I don't remember the technical reason why. But in theory, he could do that or encourage that. That's still a banking choice. In theory, he could distribute dollar stable coins, right? Once those rails are up to people direct without the Fed, without the banks, he could do that. But boy, that's a political issue, right? Like, why do we even have the Fed at that point? Yeah.

Starting point is 00:52:41 Which, so I don't know all the things he could or could not do legally. I think the reserves thing is one where, yeah, you could start to mobilize those reserves into stable coins. But then again, I'm not sure how motivated the banks would do that relative to some of their capital requirements, et cetera. I just don't know. But yes, other than that, absolutely a lot of what he has done has already, like, he's played a lot of cards already.

Starting point is 00:53:06 This is not like, oh, well, now he's going to start to do it. What is the weakest link? So you said maybe first half of next year, 2026, that, you know, something maybe breaks and then they have their excuse to step in with a lot of liquidity. But what are you seeing right now that is one of those weakest links in the economy that would be something that could break? So we've got what we've already seen with repo rates, overnight rates, straining of it. That's not an accident. That's going to keep happening. No, standing repost exists to sort of calm that down. Where before in 2019, it did not. Where before it didn't. No, exactly. Exactly.

Starting point is 00:53:45 So that one has some runway on it. So then that leads you to the conclusion in terms of the other things that could break. Number one, something in AI breaks, right? A lot of talk on that. Yeah. Right? Where just literally somebody has a problem. Sam Altman does come out and go, oops.

Starting point is 00:54:05 I am asking for a federal back. We can't make this debt payment, whatever. And I'm not saying, I don't want to like that's, I'm just a hypothetical. I bring that up because they had their whole, his CFO said maybe we'd like a backstop. Then he said, we wouldn't like a backstop. And he said, well, we actually want to access funds as it relates to whatever, you know, money that the Trump administration was handing out, whatever, to rebuild America. The numbers there, by the way, I was listening to a show and they were throwing around

Starting point is 00:54:31 some of the numbers with just open AI alone. And I mean, it was so out of touch with reality. What they were going to need from a CAPEX spend in the coming five years, the number was in the trillions, low trillions. And then you're looking at the top line of the company, which, and I might be off on these numbers, but if I remember right, it was like today is like 20 billion. And so when you're looking at the delta between these two numbers, you're in literally different universe. And this is just one of the AI. I mean, it is the biggest AI company, but still these numbers. Are crazy, Luke. These numbers are crazy. They're crazy. And I think it answers why Bitcoin's going down, right? Because think about what you just said. So if AI needs trillions of dollars, you know who else needs trillions of dollars? Got Bessent, the U.S. Treasury. So you got two different entities competing for trillions of dollars that really aren't there. But certainly that puts upward pressure on real rates. And oh, by the way, the trillions of dollars that AI is trying to fund is actively undermining the tax base.

Starting point is 00:55:34 of Scott Bessent at an exponential rate. So to the extent that AI is successful, the trillions that Bessent needs to raise who was competing against AI, those trillions are going to go up exponentially as AI takes out white collar jobs and tax receipts. So here too, we have like a snake eating its tail. So like those are the types of situations. Like it's hard to predict when it's going to, you know, what's the straw that's going to break the camel's back?

Starting point is 00:56:02 But the camel's back is going to break. It's already bowed pretty badly. But barring something like that in the funding markets, to me, I don't see something that's going to snap right away other than sort of the inflationary stuff, right? Like basically a political, you know, the political reaction. And as tense as we are, I don't see anything that explosive. Now, you can get something where, you know, maybe the markets freak out and that triggers or who knows.

Starting point is 00:56:27 But it would have to be a reaction to inflation or it's going to have to be something, you know, in the funding markets related to two giant edities trying to access trillions of dollars with one entity undercutting the others funding by accessing those funds. Oh, by the way, all, you know, biggest marginal supplier funds being, you know, a bunch of hedge funds based in the Caymans who are funding at the overnight rate, both of them are squeezing higher. This is the hardest question I got for you, Luke. So let's say markets continue to tighten liquidity-wise in the coming three to six months.

Starting point is 00:56:58 It gets pretty aggressive. of in that environment, typically nothing will outperform the dollar itself. You go back to 2008, 2009, during what was a really tight, you know, liquidity crunch that occurred. And you watched even gold itself sold off quite a bit against the dollar. The dollar just bid and beat everything. Is this the moment in this current? And I'm just assuming that tightening continues to happen. It may not.

Starting point is 00:57:25 But let's just assume that it continues to get pretty tight in the next three to six months. Does gold outperform the dollar in that environment for what I would say is like the first time in many decades? I think it does. Interesting. Yeah, I think it does because the part that a lot of people on Wall Street are leaving out about gold and the rally, because they, I can say it. I'm Cleveland. I'm not the establishment guy and whatever. They can't say it yet.

Starting point is 00:57:52 They'll say it in another two or three years. But here's what they're going to say. 22, U.S. government by sanctioning Russian FX reserves told the whole world, take your money elsewhere. Treasuries are no longer a safe haven. Then 22 to 2024, the Russians told the world at U.S. military. And in 2025, the Houthis, a little bit of the same in terms of technological change, right? And I would encourage everybody to read Eric Prince, former head of Blackwater, his speech from February on YouTube about what the Houthis and the Russians were doing then. The technology change.

Starting point is 00:58:27 The exponential changes that our friend Jeff Booth talks about came to the military. And now you got Houthis in the Red Sea, you know, making aircraft carriers have to evade so hard that F-18s are falling off the ship. Yeah. That wasn't an accident. And then you have the Chinese make it very clear that the United States can't go to war. Full stop. Yeah.

Starting point is 00:58:48 Without Chinese rare earth. Full stop. And the last people. people to admit this is true. These three things are true are Wall Street. They're the last ones to get it. This is blasphemy. A, treasuries are no longer as safe as gold after 2022 sanctions. B, the Russians outproduced NATO and the Russians beat NATO. C, technology shift has ended 400 years of Mahan doctrine, right? You control naval checkpoints. You control the world. Naval checkpoints now are death traps. Like, you had the Houthis making aircraft carriers of the United States dance

Starting point is 00:59:22 so hard that F-18s are falling off the deck. What do you think the Russians are going to do? What do you think they're underwater, unmanned, whatever the heck those things are? Do you want to be on a ship that's going through a narrow area like the Red Sea with those things out swimming? I wouldn't want to. And so checkpoints like that reverses the relative power dynamic, which again, I'm not anti-American. I am simply telling people how it is and what that implies for the macro situation, which is... You're pro-reality, Luke. You're pro-reality.

Starting point is 00:59:51 I am pro-reality. And then the final part is, is like, we can't make missiles fast enough if the Chinese send us the rare earths. And the Chinese are not sending us the rare earth. And there's like, it's a fascinating study in cognitive dissonance. You can see with our Treasury Secretary. He was this week. We think the deal is going to be done with magnets by Thanksgiving.

Starting point is 01:00:10 Wait, wait. You said the deal was done a month ago. And then it was done two months before that and done three months. before that. And there's like, I like to try to keep things simple. I know I talk a lot, but I try to keep things simple. Look at it this way. Besant and Trump, et cetera, are making the case that the Chinese are going to willingly sell us rare earths, that we are telling them we are going to use to make weapons to point at them. If your neighbor said he wanted to kill you and then also said, hey, can I borrow your shotgun? Would you give it to him? And if you did, you deserve to get

Starting point is 01:00:38 shot. You're an idiot. And the Chinese are the neighbor. So like, the rare earths aren't coming. They're not coming. Yeah. And so we're in this window of opportunity of like to tie it back to your question. I think I think gold will beat the dollar. I think the dollar will go up. But I think gold's going to go up in dollar terms and liquidity. You know, I think, you know, yeah, yeah. Yeah, I agree with that.

Starting point is 01:00:59 I think you're right. And, you know, people, I'm a hardcore bitquiner. I think in the long tail, like if you pull out five years, 10 years, I think Bitcoin just outperforms all of it. But I'm talking specifically if, you know, the dollar liquidity really dries up in the market in the coming three to six months. Because for all intents of purposes, I think Bitcoin is already demonstrating that it's selling off.

Starting point is 01:01:21 It's the, you know, if people need liquidity, they're pulling it from the Bitcoin network right now. At least that's what the price is, you know, showing us in dollar terms, where gold is not doing that. And it's been pretty obvious. So into your point that we talked about earlier in the show, it seems to be some in the minds of the market participants is somewhat correlated to risk on still, tied to tech. And I think that the large billion dollar tranches on Wall Street that are understanding this debasement trade are going to the thing that they understand. And it's pretty simple.

Starting point is 01:01:55 And so far, it appears like it's gold. So that's going to be a fun one, the track and they continue to watch for the next time we talk. I love that you have an opinion on it. So I will tell you when I don't have an opinion on something, but when I do have an opinion on something, it tends to be fairly strongly held. until facts change. If you're right, that's going to be one hell of a signal. Oh, absolutely. And it's, to me, it's just so clear, right?

Starting point is 01:02:23 Even as things as simple as, you know, look, I'm excited we're finally moving towards industrialization again. I'm excited that we realize we have a grid problem. You know, we've been talking about this for years and years. People finally understand. And I'm excited to see new technologies like small modular reactors and discussions that, you know, there might be one up and running in Ontario in 2027 or 2029. In the last 10 years, the Chinese have put up electrical capacity equal to the entire United States grid in 10 years.

Starting point is 01:02:52 So insane. And they're not standing still. And so when you look at things like that and you go, the gold go up above the dollar in the next crisis? Yeah, absolutely. It could. And this is Jensen's point from Nvidia that why he thinks China is going to win the AI race is just because they actually have the energy infrastructure to support all of the hypers to train the models. over there. Where in the U.S., we're going to be limited in our energy capacity. And by the time we get it online, it's going to be too late. This is the article and, you know, the talking point

Starting point is 01:03:23 that's been kind of going through the news in the last two weeks. So, yeah. And it's, you know, we're moving in the right direction, but it's, there's still far too much hopium and not enough reality. And what do I mean by that? Right. How many times have you heard, well, we just need to go to a wartime footing like 1940, right? We just need to, we need to do operation warp speed, right? even Scott Besson, we're going to do Operation Warp Speed. And I think in Rare Earth, we might be able to do some stuff. Maybe I'm hearing, like in the next two years, three years, maybe. But like, Operation Warp Speed for the shots, like, they started developing that stuff in the 60s and 70s. Like, they started really testing it in the 90s. They put the first one in place

Starting point is 01:04:00 in 2013. Like, and then if you want to go to wartime footing, like, okay. But again, America needs to decide, does it want to rebuild and compete or does it want to preserve the real value of its bond market. Because when we went to wartime footing in 1940, Fed's balance sheet went up 10x in three years. We capped interest rates. We put marginal tax rates on the highest earners at 95%. We rationed goods. You also didn't have the ability for people to tap into the knowledge like you do today back then. So as they're capping rates and they're putting commercials on TV to buy war bonds and people are like, hey, I'm going to do my patriotic duty to go buy the war once. You didn't have talking heads out there explaining how in real

Starting point is 01:04:45 terms they were losing X percent on an annualized basis, which is so readily available to anybody today that has an internet connection and a Twitter account or whatever. The information is so easily found nowadays. It's very different than that. It's so easily found. And I would add to that, Like, you had in 1933, the commission that Joseph Kennedy led to investigate 1929, gosh, the name of it is, but basically they ran a big review of the great crash. And the bankers came out of that as the bad guy. And there was real reform done to the system. And we had 10 years of depression, eight years of depression after that of people coming together as a society. And we had 11 to 15% unemployment. So there were ready, workers ready to go. We do not have to society that is together, we're like, oh, you know what? So we can make Elon Musk a trillionaire. We're going to buy bonds. And these tech guys can become 100 billionaires while or send a billionaires? Send a billion. Whatever. What I don't even know. Whatever. It's that big. It's that big. Like, let them buy the bonds. That's whatever. That's whatever. Like 95% of the

Starting point is 01:05:55 country is going to be like, let them by the bonds. Where were you in 08? We don't have the unity in this country that we had then where people would say, you know what? I know I'm probably going to lose, but, you know, A, they can investigate how much they're going to lose. But B, they'll be like, these people haven't helped me for 20 years. Yeah. Yeah. You know, I'm not going to help them. Yeah. Well, Luke, you and I could chat literally all day long. We could. Right. Thank you so much for always making time, always coming on the show and just, you know, sharing your deep knowledge. I do not miss a week of your newsletter. I am an avid, avid reader of your Forest from the Trees newsletter. Give people a handoff if they want to learn

Starting point is 01:06:36 more about you or anything else that you want to highlight. Oh, I appreciate that. Yeah, if they're interested in learning more about our different mass market and an institutional research product, you check out FFTT-L-L-C.com. And obviously, I've got a fairly active X-F-Feed at at Luke-G-R-O-M-E-N. Luke, as always, thank you, sir. Thanks for having me on, my friend. It's always great catching up with you. Thank you for listening to TIP. Make sure to follow Bitcoin Fundamentals on your favorite podcast app and never miss out on episodes. To access our show notes, transcripts or courses, go to theinvestorspodcast.com.

Starting point is 01:07:14 This show is for entertainment purposes only, before making any decision consult a professional. This show is copyrighted by the Investors Podcast Network. Written permission must be granted before syndication or rebroadcasting.

We Study Billionaires - The Investor’s Podcast Network - BTC254: Bitcoin & Macro Overview w/ Luke Gromen Q4 2025 (Bitcoin Podcast)

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.