We Study Billionaires - The Investor’s Podcast Network - TIP145: Bitcoin and Ethereum w/ Tuur Demeester (Business Podcast)
Episode Date: July 1, 2017IN THIS EPISODE, YOU’LL LEARN: What the fundamental value of Bitcoin is. Why Bitcoin might continue to be the dominant cryptocurrency. Why Bitcoin is expected to split into multiple currencies. ...The main differences between Bitcoin and Ethereum. BOOKS AND RESOURCES Join the exclusive TIP Mastermind Community to engage in meaningful stock investing discussions with Stig, Clay, and the other community members. Preston’s and Stig’s episode about Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. NEW TO THE SHOW? Check out our We Study Billionaires Starter Packs. Browse through all our episodes (complete with transcripts) here. Try our tool for picking stock winners and managing our portfolios: TIP Finance Tool. Enjoy exclusive perks from our favorite Apps and Services. Stay up-to-date on financial markets and investing strategies through our daily newsletter, We Study Markets. Learn how to better start, manage, and grow your business with the best business podcasts. SPONSORS Support our free podcast by supporting our sponsors: Hardblock AnchorWatch Cape Intuit Shopify Vanta reMarkable Abundant Mines Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Listening to TIP.
Hey, how's it going out there?
So since the last time the investors' podcast covered cryptocurrencies in 2015, the price of Bitcoin
has increased by over 1,000 percent.
And within the last five years, numerous billionaires have suggested that digital currencies
are going to be the next big thing.
For example, we have Bill Gates, Google's Eric Schmidt, Peter Thiel, Richard Branson,
Patrick Byrne from Overstock.com.
As a side note, in our show notes, we're going to have videos.
of all of those people talking about cryptocurrencies and their potential impact moving into the future.
So here's what you're going to get in this episode.
First, we're going to provide the audience with a little bit of a background on digital currencies,
blockchain technology, Bitcoin, all that kind of stuff from the research that we did about
two years ago after reading the book, The Age of Cryptocurrency.
After that quick recap of what Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are, we have a brand new
interview that we did with crypto expert Tur Demaster.
During our interview with Turr, we asked some of the hardest questions that we can think of
from the potential of a Bitcoin fork to why Ethereum is better or worse than Bitcoin.
And we talk about the advantages of even being able to launch your own company and IPO with
blockchain technology on Ethereum.
If this is a field of finance that you don't understand or that you haven't heard too
much about, get ready to hear some crazy and amazing things.
You are listening to The Investors Podcast, where we study the financial markets and read
the books that influence self-made buildings.
millionaires the most. We keep you informed and prepared for the unexpected.
So as we said then, the intro will kick this episode off playing just short of 15 minutes of
episode 30, where we talked about the concept of money, cryptocurrency, and Bitcoin, and really
give you the foundation to fully understand the conversation that we have with Tour de Mistor.
So here we go. Today, we've got a really fun one for you, because this one's not what we
typically talk about. And we're going to be talking about cryptocurrencies.
that have emerged on the market in the last three to four years.
And I think for a lot of people, they have no idea what this is.
I know I didn't.
In fact, I heard Bitcoin being mentioned in the news, and I just completely ignored it.
It had no interest in it at all.
I didn't know what they were really talking about.
I just thought it was probably like some type of internet scam that was going on and pretty much ignored it.
Then recently, I don't really remember how I came across this, but I started doing some reading.
I think it was because I was researching ways to prevent inflation on currencies, and I kind of came across an article on Bitcoin, and it gave a general idea of what it was.
And so it kind of piqued my interest.
And I started talking to Stig about it, and he was about as skeptical as anybody else on the street.
Isn't that right, Stig?
Probably a lot worse, to be quite honest.
So I told Stig, I said, well, let's stop reading these Internet articles, and we have no idea who wrote these things.
and what this is about.
I said, and let's go find a really good book that is written by somebody that has some credibility,
and let's do some research on this, and just read some more and learn about it.
So we felt like it'd be kind of a fun topic to talk about on the podcast.
So that's why we went out and got this book.
And the book that we used for our discussion and to learn about this, it's called The Age of Cryptocurrency,
how Bitcoin and Digital Money are challenging the global economic order.
This was written by two Wall Street Journal, journalists, Paul Vigna and Michael Casey, having read the book, it's a pretty large book. What was it like 350 pages, Stig? Something like that, 400 pages maybe?
Yeah, something like that.
It was big. It was good.
They were very thorough. That's what I liked.
And I thought that their arguments were pretty balanced.
I think that they were definitely buying into the fact that cryptocurrencies are going to be the future.
But I think that their discussion on Bitcoin and some of the other cryptocurrencies that are out there was pretty balanced.
And they gave a really good discussion.
So without further delay, Stig and I are just going to kind of jump into this and talk about cryptocurrencies in general.
We're going to be pulling some pieces from the book and some.
other pieces with just general discussion. So our outline for today, we're going to first start
off by talking about what is money. In general, money is nothing more than an accounting mechanism.
So with that idea, that's where we want to start with cryptocurrencies because it's really hard.
I think it's really far-fetched for a lot of people to think that there's just bits of data
that are going to be used as money in the future. And I'll tell you, after reading the book and
after seeing the technology that exists for this, I really do think that, and I think you already
kind of see this, but it's just kind of a mirage for a lot of people that whenever I send money
to Stig in Denmark, you know, it's not an actual dollar bills being sent anymore. And I think
that a lot of people have, they're actually experiencing a form of cryptocurrency in a way,
but they really don't necessarily recognize it for what it is yet. And I think it's only
going to get more dramatic as time goes on based on some of the stuff that we were reading in this
book. So what's the purpose? Why did Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies emerge in the last five years,
call it? And there's really two main reasons. And the first one I'm going to talk about. The next
one, Stigl will talk about. But the first one is that governments cannot increase the supply of this
cryptocurrency. And so that might sound like a really far-fetched idea for people because it's,
you know, bits of data. But how they're actually doing this is they have an open source, and we'll talk
about this more later on, but there's open source program algorithm. And it's open source,
meaning that there's a group of people that work on it. It's just not one person. And what they've
done is they've programmed the algorithm so that it cannot produce more units or coins, if you
will, of that system. And so there's, let's just say there's a hundred coins. Okay. And let's use
an example of myself, Stig, Hari, and Colin, the four of us.
And if there's a hundred coins and we divide up those hundred coins, each person has
25 of those coins.
And the computer algorithm will not let us use any more than 100.
You can see how we can keep track of each other's in that little micro economy.
If Stig performs some work for me and I give Stig five of my coins, my account is now
at 20.
His is now at 30.
and Colin and Hari would then still be at 25.
And the way that Bitcoin works, and we're getting into a little bit of the technical,
but we'll talk about that now while we use that example.
So the way Bitcoin works is I would have a piece of paper.
Imagine I'd have like a digital piece of paper, and each one of us would have a digital
piece of paper.
So Stig would have one.
Harry would have one and Colin would have one.
And so whenever that transaction between Stig and I would take place where I would
give him five of my coins, I would update my digital piece of paper so that it says that I have
20 coins and Stig has 30. Stig would also update his digital piece of paper. So it says that he has
30 and I have 20. And so would Hari and Colin, even though they weren't involved in the transaction.
So basically everybody updates that ledger. And that's what it's referred to in cryptocurrency
is the ledger is updated. And so although there was no money, there was nothing physically
exchanged as far as the currency goes, the fact that everybody has,
an updated ledger of where the accounting took place, that's how Bitcoin or any of these
cryptocurrencies work.
And I find that really fascinating.
They talk about the different forms of money and how the best type of money to use.
And so when you go back into, you know, hundreds of years ago, the type of money that they
would always try to use was something that was very durable, something that could hold up
over time.
Something else that they wanted to use was something that couldn't be replicated or just
produced on a whim like paper. And so that kind of talks to the reason why cryptocurrency has really
emerged is because you can't increase the supply of the money. So that's what they're trying to
get around here is all these governments, they're printing money through the nose. They're just
printing as much money as they can because then that drop the value of their currency,
increases their exports out of the country, which produces their GDP to go up. And so what you have
is this race around the world for people to devalue their currency by printing more. And so,
And so this cryptocurrency solves that problem by stopping that by having a fine amount, a limit, a cap, if you will, on the amount of currency that's in the system.
The other thing that's nice is that it's completely durable, meaning that you can't break it or, well, you could potentially hack it, which we'll talk about later, but it will last.
It's not like it's going to wear out.
The other thing that's nice is it's very small.
It's it doesn't, you know, it's not something you even put in your pocket.
It'd be something you'd use over your smartphone.
So those are the advantages.
So it's really kind of interesting to see how this developed and what they're trying to
solve here by fixing the inflation, the currency inflation issue.
But there's another reason that Bitcoin has emerged and that's what Stig's going to talk about.
Yeah.
And that's really all about cutting out the middleman.
So right now we're using banks.
And as you're probably all aware of, it's really expensive using banks.
I know this from my own experience.
Whenever Preston, I were doing transactions, that is extremely expensive.
Not only because I would have to convert that in my own currency, but also because the bank
would charge me just for receiving that money.
And then when I'm doing my accounting, then my accountant will also charge me for using
another currency.
So when you have different currencies or actually just sending money to each other, even though it's the same currency, you have some sort of transaction cost.
And since banks as a whole really have a monopoly or close to a monopoly on that, things tends to get very expensive.
So whenever I heard about this cryptocurrency and whenever I start reading a book, this was really where I grabbed my attention.
Because I was thinking, well, how can I avoid paying all of those fees?
So one of the lead program developers for Bitcoin, I was watching a video of him talk about Bitcoin.
And he said, the best way I can describe this is it's like having a bank in your pocket.
Every single person is their own bank.
So if I want to send money to stick through Bitcoin, there is no transaction fee.
It's just, you know, I can just straight send him the money.
There's really no delay at all for him to receive those funds.
He might want to wait a little bit for the encryption to work itself out so that he can see that
It was actually a valid transaction and that there wasn't double spending that occurred.
So that's what's really, I think, exciting for a lot of people that would potentially be using this.
If the currency could actually have a pretty solid and steady rate at which it can be exchanged into other currencies,
I think that you would really see this start taking off.
But because it's kind of all over the place, you're seeing a lot of hesitation for people to start adopting this.
All right, so that concludes our replay of the very first part of episode 30 than Preston
I did more than two years ago.
We really hope that you have a good understanding of the fundamentals of Bitcoin and
cryptocurrencies.
So now let's transition into a very recent discussion with your Demester.
All right, so we are so excited to have Tor with us today, and this is Tor Demaster.
And Tor, as we said in the introduction of the show, just comes with this extreme level
of understanding of this stuff way far better than Stiggin I could ever imagine.
And so we are really excited to be talking to you today because I know there's a lot of
people in our audience that are interested about cryptocurrencies and to be able to have access
to somebody like yourself.
We're just really, really appreciative for you to take time out of your busy day to talk with us.
So thanks so much for joining us today, Tour.
Hey, Stig and Preston.
Yeah, happy to be here.
All right.
So whenever I was talking to various people on Twitter and some of our forums as to what
questions we should ask you, the one that came.
up more than anything else, was this concern about a potential fork with Bitcoin because of
this bottleneck that's happening? So could you talk to us about what this bottleneck is,
kind of put it in layman's terms so we can all understand what is potentially going to happen?
And then I think the thing people really want to hear is what do you think the fallout would be
if something like that would actually happen? I think first of all, it's important to understand
the bigger picture, which is that if you're going to scale network, digital technology,
you're always going to have bottlenecks.
It's not like we're facing something like the French Revolution or something.
Like five years from now, we can have a conversation and there'll be another scaling bottleneck in Bitcoin.
Like, it's just going to happen.
But then in this particular case, we have sort of two camps as far as how Bitcoin should scale.
And just to be clear, it is already scaling, right?
The capacity now on chain, which is, you know, when you talk about the Bitcoin blockchain,
it grows by one megabyte every 10 minutes.
that's 300,000 transactions a day.
There is scaling happening off-chain
because we have these Bitcoin exchanges,
we have Bitcoin gambling websites
who basically perform millions of off-chain transactions a day
and then later settle them on the main blockchain.
But the question is now there's this exciting notion
that maybe we can scale Bitcoin in a decentralized way, right?
We can keep this decentralized story going
and make it bigger and have like millions of transactions a second
and all in a decentralized way.
That's like the big, hairy goal.
And so the question is, how do we get there?
There's one notion that says,
all right, let's view pragmatic.
Bitcoin is a highway.
It has three lanes now.
Let's just widen the highway and make it 12 lanes, right?
That means bigger blocks.
That means faster growth of the blockchain,
but also an immediate increase in transaction throughput.
That's the one camp.
And then roughly speaking, of course,
there's also people who are focused on improving efficiency.
so that you can put more transactions in that very same block.
So that's one camp.
The other camp says, well, let's look at how digital technology has scaled in the past,
which is, you know, the Internet protocols and so on.
What you see there often is that these protocols are very inert.
They don't change a lot.
People eventually accept them as is.
And then they decide to build modules on top, really a modular way of scaling.
So as far as Bitcoin goes, you're talking that about segregated witness,
which enables lightning, basically payment channel technology,
which is you take the transactions elsewhere and then you settle on the blockchain.
Same with side chains is also a way to scale.
Take the transactions to another chain and then finally you come back to the main Bitcoin chain.
You settle there.
And so these two camps basically have two different bitcoins in mind,
do different futures, a bigger block Bitcoin or same block kind of Bitcoin and then modular scaling.
And so it's possible that we'll get a fork, right?
that people will start using versions of the Bitcoin client
that is not compatible with the current version
and that there will be enough of an economic force behind that
so that we have two coins that trade against each other.
And there are some concerns that maybe one chain
might attack the other one.
In general, I'm not that worried.
I think the market is just incredible
in how it figures these things out.
We already have a precedent with Ethereum,
which is way more grave because there,
it was a very hasty hard fork and it happened to basically fix a huge bug whereas Bitcoin
we're in this luxury situation whereas the network is spinning like never before.
There's no errors, no DDoS attacks, no failure at all.
It's just like how are we going to scale?
And so if it comes to the point where some people feel very confident enough that they're
wanting to fork off and they're hopeful that everybody's going to join them, I'm totally
okay with that because the coins that I have, which then will be legacy bitcoins, I will have coins on
both chains if there is a hard fork. And so I can just, you know, go for the ride, see what happens.
And then eventually, you know, if I feel more confident in one chain, sell the coins on the other
chain and have more coins on that first chain. So explain that just a little bit more for us so everyone
understands. It's almost like a splitting of stocks. Is that a way that you could describe it where
if you had a thousand coins on the legacy, it goes to a hard fork.
You still have that thousand coins on the legacy and you also have a thousand on whatever
the new coin would be called.
Yeah, it could be like, you know, what if eBay was split into PayPal plus eBay, right?
I would still have the same stake in the same economic entity only.
It would be more granular and I could sell my eBay stock for more PayPal or vice versa.
You know, that's not 100% in that analogy, but roughly speaking, because, you know, this
blockchain, you can do two things if you fork.
There's two understandings of hard forks.
For example, you're talking about a Linux operating system.
If I have a different vision for what Linux should be, I can tweak the code and launch
my own fork.
And then, you know, anybody can run that.
And so it's the same thing with Bitcoin.
You can tweak the code and create a new blockchain and have a new Genesis block,
which is then you create an alt coin.
You start from scratch.
Block one, there's no history.
And then just people start mining, which is, you know, we already have five, six, six,
700 of those coins out there. But the hard for that people talk about here is that you choose
to retain the ledger as is, and you just tweak the client a little bit so that it starts
creating its own divergent chain. So, Tor, if I have a coin base account, which is what I think
most people that would be listening to the show, if they do own Bitcoin, they probably have a
coin base account. And let's say I have that account and this fork occurs. How am I able to see
the two different coins, walk us through this so that we can really understand it from just the
regular user who's sitting on 10 bitcoins at their house. Yeah, so we have a little bit of precedent
here because Ethereum has had a fork as well. There's now Ethereum backed by the Ethereum
Foundation and Ethereum Classic, which is actually the legacy chain that never changed. And then
there is the other chain that is the chain that had the Dowel, Beala. But that's a different story.
But I mean, at least we can look back and see what happened there. And that was very sudden that
that happened. And so initially, people like Coinbase, they said, like, um, you know,
we are focused on where Ethereum Foundation is taking this. We're not really interested in this
new, you know, this new version of Ethereum, so to speak. But what they saw it's very quickly
is that it became a tradable asset. Poloniac started listing the asset, Ethereum Classic. It started
getting a market value. And then people were upset that even though the chain is split and that if
they had the ether in their own charge, they would have two tokens, right? And then Coinbase only
listed and acknowledged one. And so very quickly, Coinbase turned around and said, all right, don't
worry, guys, we are going to also give you the Ether classic, right? We're not going to list it
right away. We're not going to trade it, but you can withdraw it from us. So I think that's kind
of what you can probably expect. I think it's extremely likely if we have a contentious hard fork,
which is a controversial hard fork. And I do think if we get a hardfoot, at least in the next
12 months. If we get a Bitcoin hard for it, I believe it will be contentious, and that means there
will be an economic value for both chains. Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors.
All right. I want you guys to imagine spending three days in Oslo at the height of the summer.
You've got long days of daylight, incredible food, floating saunas on the Oslo Fjord, and every
conversation you have is with people who are actually shaping the future. That's what the Oslo
Freedom Forum is. From June 1st, through the 3rd,
Third, 2026, the Oslo Freedom Forum is entering its 18th year, bringing together activists,
technologists, journalists, investors, and builders from all over the world, many of them
operating on the front lines of history. This is where you hear firsthand stories from people
using Bitcoin to survive currency collapse, using AI to expose human rights abuses, and building
technology under censorship and authoritarian pressures. These aren't abstract ideas. These are
tools real people are using right now. You'll be in the room with about 2,000 extraordinary individuals,
dissidents, founders, philanthropists, policymakers, the kind of people you don't just listen to but
end up having dinner with. Over three days, you'll experience powerful mainstage talks,
hands-on workshops on freedom tech, and financial sovereignty, immersive art installations,
and conversations that continue long after the sessions end. And it's all happening in Oslo in June.
If this sounds like your kind of room, well, you're in luck because you can attend in person.
Standard and patron passes are available at Osloof Freedom Forum.com with patron passes offering
deep access, private events, and small group time with the speakers.
The Oslo Freedom Forum isn't just a conference.
It's a place where ideas meet reality and where the future is being built by people living it.
If you run a business, you've probably had the same thought lately.
How do we make AI useful in the real?
world, because the upside is huge, but guessing your way into it is a risky move.
With NetSuite by Oracle, you can put AI to work today.
NetSuite is the number one AI Cloud ERP, trusted by over 43,000 businesses.
It pulls your financials, inventory, commerce, HR, and CRM into one unified system.
And that connected data is what makes your AI smarter.
It can automate routine work, surface actionable insights, and help you cut costs while
making fast AI-powered decisions with confidence. And now with the Netsuite AI connector, you can use
the AI of your choice to connect directly to your real business data. This isn't some add-on,
it's AI built into the system that runs your business. And whether your company does millions or
even hundreds of millions, Netsuite helps you stay ahead. If your revenues are at least in the seven
figures, get their free business guide, demystifying AI at Netsuite.com slash study. The guide is free
to you at netsuite.com slash study. NetSuite.com slash study. When I started my own side business,
it suddenly felt like I had to become 10 different people overnight wearing many different hats.
Starting something from scratch can feel exciting, but also incredibly overwhelming and lonely.
That's why having the right tools matters. For millions of businesses, that tool is Shopify.
Shopify is the commerce platform behind millions of businesses around the world.
and 10% of all e-commerce in the U.S., from brands just getting started to household names.
It gives you everything you need in one place, from inventory to payments to analytics.
So you're not juggling a bunch of different platforms.
You can build a beautiful online store with hundreds of ready-to-use templates,
and Shopify is packed with helpful AI tools that write product descriptions
and even enhance your product photography.
Plus, if you ever get stuck, they've got award-winning 24-7 customer support.
Start your business today with the industry's best business partner, Shopify, and start hearing
sign up for your $1 per month trial today at Shopify.com slash WSB.
Go to Shopify.com slash WSB.
That's Shopify.
com slash WSB.
All right.
Back to the show.
So Tor, I wanted to ask you some more questions about the fork because from the stuff
that I'm reading, it seems to me like there's going to be a high probability of a fork
happening this year. But I'm curious what you think that probability is. Do you see this as a 50%
kind of thing or you see it much higher than that? And then after you respond to that, I really think
that the Ethereum fork would represent a really good representation of what the potential value
drop would be in Bitcoin. I don't know what that was. Before the fork in Ethereum, what the
market cap was and what it went to after the fork. But I would imagine that whatever we saw there
would be something that we might see similarly play out in Bitcoin in the short term, I'm saying.
And then I know today that the classic Ethereum coin is worth about 10% of what the forked value is.
I would guess that we'd see something similar happen in Bitcoin, but I'm curious to hear your
thoughts on all of that. Yeah. So it's really hard, at least to me it is. It's really hard to estimate
the probability of the heart for because there's so much,
this is like a game theorist's playground, right?
There's so much you can do with just trying to manipulate public opinion,
you can bluff, you can agree on something and then not do it.
And then there's also the viral effect.
Information flows very freely in Bitcoin.
And so whenever something new is brought to the market and the market picks up on it,
adoption can happen very quickly.
And so, for example, Segwit, which is the,
key to lightning and then lightning in turn is how you get millions of transactions a day
in cryptocurrency. So Segwit, that's kind of, you know, one of the contentious pieces that's
on the table, that upgrade. Segway was adopted in Lightcoin. And the way that went was that
light coin is a way smaller. So of course, things happen faster. Users started advocating for
what's called a user activated softbook. This is something that has been used one time in Bitcoin.
The way upgrades usually happen is through the miners, but users themselves can actually choose to
run a different type of software, and so force the miners to also then transition.
And if users change the protocol, they can basically make the mining revenue is almost obsolete.
They can really endanger the economic edge of the miners.
And so in that sense, it's kind of like a nuclear option that you can threaten with.
Like, hey, if you guys don't do what we want with a minor activated software, we will do it and you will
lose revenue. You can even threaten with a proof of work change, right? The way Bitcoin mining
software is designed is specifically around the shot 256 algorithm. You can change that. Users can
just, you know, decide to change. And then entire mining farms become obsolete and they have to
design new chips to try and make it work again. So I'm just trying to describe. Like there's so many
elements to this table, things that even traditional political theory, you can't really apply. And, you know,
like when you try to assess, like, is this political agreement going to happen or not?
Because usually it's corporate, political, they come together.
There's maybe like a rival political clique that then, you know, starts.
But we all of a sudden users have huge power in cryptocurrency that is just not comparable
to anything in real world politics.
And so I don't know.
I don't know.
The only thing I try to focus on is, you know, what kind of potential damage could there be to afford.
That's kind of what I'm trying to see.
And then if I'm no worried about that, I don't really care if the hard four happens sooner or later.
I think long term, there will be some kind of fork.
I'm pretty convinced.
So with short term, what would happen if we get a contentious hard fork in Bitcoin?
I think it's fair to look at Ethereum and see what happened there.
Although the situation is quite different.
With Ethereum, the developers, most of the core developers backed the new version of Ethereum, right?
they backed the Ethereum Foundation's Ethereum, which means the bailout of the Dow.
Whereas now with Bitcoin, most of the core developers are more likely to support the legacy
chain that will then have, you know, segwit implemented.
When you look at the price, you have to take into account as well that after the Dow bailout
happened and the split, a period after that, there was a series of attacks on Ethereum,
DDoS attacks that had nothing to do with the split.
And so that lowered the price.
That was my thesis that I presented.
It's why I'm short Ethereum is because I thought there were a bunch of vulnerabilities
that the market was not discounting the price for.
And that, you know, it dropped 70%.
But short term, there was not really a price decline.
So the pie of value, you know, the market cap of Ethereum prior to the split and
Ethereum post split, those two together stayed roughly the same.
And so I think that that is most likely to happen.
That, you know, maybe depending on where we are and they change.
general price cycle, it's actually not going to affect the value that much.
So I guess I'm speaking more from a person who doesn't understand this stuff nearly at the
level that you do. If I read something that says, you know, Bitcoin forked, in my mind,
because I know so little about this stuff, I'm scared, especially if you've made, you know,
let's say you've doubled your money since you were in it, I'm immediately exiting that
position because I just don't understand what's happening. And I'd be curious.
curious to know how many people in the community that have a position in Bitcoin think very
similarly to the way I'm describing it versus, hey, I really understand how these protocol
networks work and, you know, it's split, but these are all the reasons why that's not a big
deal. I'd be willing to bet 10% or 20% of the people think like that versus 80% to probably
think the same way that I do and are just going to cut their gains and step aside for a little bit
to see what shakes out and then maybe reenter at a different point. So that's why I think
that regardless of whether the fork is good, bad, or in between, I think you're going to see
a pullback just because of the general understanding of the people that are actually involved
in the market.
I think that's fair.
I think it's fair.
I think it's likely we'll see some kind of shakeout.
But then, you know, most of the question I think is like how long would that last?
A shakeout is basically when, you know, we can sell and strong hands have an opportunity to buy
and accumulate.
Hedge funds are not exposed to Bitcoin.
You know, there are some estimates out there that are very credible, I think.
That say only half a percent of all the hedge fund in the world have some kind of exposure to Bitcoin.
That's Minut school.
A lot of money is looking to get some exposure to the space.
And so a shakeout would be a fantastic opportunity to pick up some coins.
Family offices, a little more exposure, some angel investors, a little more exposure in tech.
Although I do think that there's some tech people that don't necessarily have a hard money background
that are a little bit misguided on where the actual value is,
the value proposition is.
And then, of course, I mean, there's just lots of money.
Banks have no exposure to Bitcoin.
You know, they're focused on these private blockchains,
which may turn out to be the intranet's story of, you know, the internet, right?
There was a lot of buzz around that in the 90s of, like, private networks between corporations,
was that that was the big story.
I think it's a possibility that we would get a shakeout.
I still think that the prevailing.
trend would define where the price would go.
If we are already,
technically the price is already
somewhat breaking down and then the hard flow happens,
people would say, oh, the price went down
because of the hard flow. If the
price is still going up strong,
the market possibly won't
flinch. It can just
keep going because the narrative
is then that there's a split,
but Segwit is adopted now
and we can have lightning and all, you know,
so it can be spun in two different ways
and I'm convinced that CNBC
or whoever, they're just going to go with a narrative that fits the price rather than really
understanding why fundamentally Bitcoin is going up or down.
I would really like to relate that to discussion about trust because it's really, really
hard to put up any kind of monetary system if there's not trust.
And I think the system you have today where you have central banks, they basically just
print money.
I mean, that requires trust more than anything.
But for people to transition into Bitcoin or another.
kind of cryptocurrency. Are you concerned that a fork, no matter how it plays out,
will alien some people and really wrote that trust with people because now it starts to get
more confusing. You're already talking about, called 500 and 600 different cryptocurrencies,
but you always have the big one, the Bitcoin. And the second base of lithium, it's already
split. So is that a concern that you have in terms of trust? Yeah, I think that's a great question,
actually. I think short term, yes, there will be commotion. There will be
confusion about the brand of Bitcoin, especially if both sides, both camps are more or less
equal in terms of economic terms.
You know, if the legacy Bitcoin has 10 times more value in terms of the Bitcoin price
versus the new version only 10%.
I think then it won't be a big deal.
But if it's a close race, yeah, I think things will be confusing.
But I do think that this is a very different debate than what you had with Ethereum
because the ether split came in like, in this.
Initially, the mantra, the whole value system of Ethereum was immutable transactions, trustless code, code is law, all these things that were said and promised.
And then all of a sudden, somebody took advantage of basically the small print and this smart contract and was able to acquire a huge amount of coins by executing the code that was embedded in the blockchain.
and then The Human Foundation decided to bail out people who had been investing in this smart contract.
So I think it's more likely that in that environment you can talk about a breach of trust.
Whereas with Bitcoin, I don't think necessarily that Bitcoin is less of a digital goal because
there is a difference in visions where, you know, how big the block should be.
Like it doesn't mean that transactions are being reversed or anything.
Well, I think it's a good point that you bring up.
And I think especially for someone who is an expert in the field, an authority in the field,
it makes a lot of sense to separate this.
And also because you know the story about the various splits that you've seen.
But if you were looking into cryptocurrencies for the first time,
and you are thinking that, yes, it does make sense you have some kind of digital currency.
And then you'll see all these different currencies and you see how volatile they are as well.
Do you think it would be perceived better if you just had one cryptocurrency,
even though it might have some minor flaws,
what people could basically equate, this is cryptocurrencies, yes, and that's called Bitcoin,
or whatever it's called, and that would be the exchange rate you will look up.
You wouldn't look up, ripple, you wouldn't look up Bitcoin.
You would just look up what is the exchange rate to call the US dollars for cryptocurrencies,
even though it's such a wide area to cover.
Yeah, yeah.
Yeah, again, great question.
I think it's actually healthier and better.
If you have a long-term vision, it's way better than we have 600 different cryptocurrencies
that are all competing with each other because what we're seeing is the advent of private money,
right? And the essence of the fact that something is private is that it happens in the market.
There is zero barrier to entry. There's competition. There's features that are being developed in
certain coins that are not existing in other coins. And then those features, all the code is open source,
they can be merged into other coins, right? And so everybody is kept on their toes and you get way
faster development. Of course, you have a lot more, you could say, maybe scabs and deceit and things
that are, you know, people telling you stories and people investing in things that will become
total duds and things that will go to zero that are now maybe worth $500 million or a billion
dollars. And it was the same way in the advent of the internet, the same way with the railway boom.
There were lots and lots of scabs during all those times. I think it's just, you know,
whenever there's a disruptive evolution, disruptive technology, you get a lot of hot air
and you get some really valuable stuff that is happening. And it's a challenge to discern those two.
And you get booms and busts very violently. And during the booms, some of the investments stick.
And they are the infrastructure of what later will become mass adopted. So it's the same with the internet.
You had protocol wars, if you look it up, right? The internet protocol wars, which was literally huge
disagreements about what the basic protocols of the internet should become. Now we all know it's
TCPIP, but back then there were way different visions about what that should be. So I think it's just,
you know, it's just clear. All this to me is evidence that we're talking about massively
disruptive technology. Yeah, it's interesting when you get into the protocol piece of what Bitcoin is,
because for people that don't understand it real well, that's what we're really talking about is a new
protocol for exchange and which one's going to emerge as the winner. And as of today, it looks
like it's going to be Bitcoin, but there's no guarantee that that's how it's going to eventually
shake out 10 years from now. And I think that that's the risk that people've got to be aware of
when they're thinking through if I'm going to invest in this, how do I navigate that sea of
change most advantageously? So we're curious how you would answer that because I've read some of your
your white papers online tour and they're absolutely incredible. We're going to have those in the show
notes for people to read. The thing that I find really interesting that you've talked about is the
difference between Bitcoin and Ethereum and why you were a bear on Ethereum and I've seen your
opinion of that kind of evolve through some of your writing. I still know that you're much of a
Bitcoin enthusiast and you kind of place your bet on Bitcoin kind of moving forward. But you
started to talk about this difference between Bitcoin and Ethereum, and I would really like to hear
more about that. Yeah, so briefly, I want to comment first about, you know, how do you find your
way through this maze? One of the things that helped me or that I use to get clarity or to
stay sane, because that's hard enough, is just to focus on what technologies do we have that
actually have consumer use cases, right? What real world adoption beyond speculation are we safe?
So that's something that I try to keep in mind because you have lofty white papers and lofty business plans.
You saw lots of those during the dot-com bubble.
It doesn't mean that it's really anything of substance.
Whereas Amazon, for example, they could show like, you know, their sales numbers went up and up and up, all that kind of thing.
So when you're talking about Bitcoin and Ethereum in particular, Bitcoin was conceived of as digital cash and digital gold, which actually is very similar because cash is, you know,
Another way to say, to talk about cash is like a bearer bond.
It's, you know, like something that you have readily accessible.
And that may actually imply scarcity and imply some of the characteristics that we know of in gold.
And so what happens when you design a cryptocurrency with that as an end goal in mind is that you start focusing on security very, very much.
And that's how you end up with these blocks that are just one megabyte, right?
I mean, what is one megabyte in these times?
You know, the entire Bitcoin blockchain, I think, is now like 30.
13 gigabytes. So that's not a lot of money. But, you know, keeping it small like that allows
the network to be truly decentralized. It allows the future to be insured. It allows transactions
to be censorship resistant in an approvable way. So that's Bitcoin. Ethereum, what they wanted to
do was to create a decentralized internet. What if we do away with these up codes and say,
you can publish anything you want on that blockchain? Any code will execute.
This is the cloud-based computer.
And so then they call that code smart contracts.
And so, you know, we can have a rental contract
or anything you can imagine,
you can execute on that blockchain.
And so to get there again,
their approach is to building way more flexibility.
That's something I've talked about in the past.
The trade-off is that you have a lot more security concerns.
Because what if somebody uploads a so-called smart contract
that's actually designed to crash your nodes?
And all of a sudden,
None of your nodes are working.
They're all, it's like a DDoS attack, and you have to then rush in to fix that little bug and then, you know, continue on.
And so security experts, they kind of, it's kind of a nightmare for them because Ethereum has an attack surface that cannot be clearly defined.
Whereas with Bitcoin, you can say, all right, here are the exact risks of how the history of Bitcoin could be reversed or of how nodes could crash.
It's very, very well defined.
Ethereum has none of that.
And so it's kind of like it works as long as it works.
And so that's one of my concerns.
Obviously, maybe I'm biased because my background is that I want a savings instrument
that has high liquidity and extremely high security and almost no kind of party risk.
That's my focus.
And so Ethereum is never something that I wanted or I aspire to.
But even objectively, I still think you can ask the question, what real world use cases
are there today of Ethereum smart contracts that cannot be done in a better way by just using a MySQL database?
So for me to just kind of summarize so that you can say, yes, you understood that or you didn't.
That's basically why I'm restating this.
When it comes to Bitcoin, you see that as a good store of value and something that could be used as global money, global currency.
When it comes to the Ethereum, it's a great platform for exercising smart contracts.
So like let's say I sold you my car and we wanted to set up a loan payment over five years.
If for whatever reason, let's say my car is smart enough that I could code it that if you failed to make a payment,
it would automatically stop the digital key that you can't drive it anymore and I can repossess the car because you didn't
make that payment.
We could do something like that on Ethereum.
But with Bitcoin, that'd be very difficult to do something like that or to program something
that would operate on the Bitcoin protocol doing something like that.
Is that a correct way to look at it?
I agree with most of what you said.
I would disagree with great.
You said it's a great way, a great platform to do smart contracts.
And the reason why I took issue with that is that it's still unproven.
It's also not the case that you cannot do that with Bitcoin.
The fact is that with Bitcoin, you would have to wait a bit longer until we have these
second or third layer protocols built on top of it and then executed in those layers
and then just use the main layer to maybe settle the transaction or something like that.
So it's not that Ethereum is doing something that's impossible in Bitcoin.
The thing is that the worry that I have with Ethereum is that, well, if we accept that
Ethereum is a less or an inferior store of value platform, well, how can it then really be
the base layer for all these smart contracts that, you know, in the future would hold billions
of dollars of value?
Why would I trust my real estate transaction with that Ethereum blockchain if maybe in a
year for now, it's going to hard fork and they're going to reverse some transactions or my
existing smart contract stops working with this because they change something.
That's something I really worry about is that if you stuff too much in one protocol layer,
things can get really messy and confusing.
I would really like to talk about what you said before at the digital gold.
Prest and I have covered gold multiple times here on the podcast.
And we always talked about how the scarcity of gold is very valuable in a monster system.
which is also why we had that until 1971.
Now, I listened to this podcast with you
whenever I was doing research for the interview,
and what you did in that interview was that you compared the market cap of Bitcoin
with the market cap of gold.
And one of the things you said was,
what if Bitcoin is just 1% of gold?
And back then, it was very little.
It was back in October 2016.
And you said, well, if it was just 1%,
Bitcoin would be priced at around $3,000.
That's what you said.
So could you take us through that process in terms of why you think that Bitcoin is perhaps
the digital gold and the good properties of that?
Bitcoin was conceived as digital gold.
This is something that goes back even 20 years before the code was launched in 2009.
People were talking about digital gold and how to do that.
And then there's initiatives like e-gold and all those kind of things.
There's definitely a long history there.
Toshi himself, which is the inventor of Bitcoin, mentioned.
Bitcoin that's digital gold compares it to gold six times, even though he was only active for a period of one year.
So how is Bitcoin digital gold?
Well, first of all, it solves a problem of it's called double spending.
The idea is that if I create a digital currency, nothing will stop me from spending the same token or the same coin twice,
thereby increasing the money supply and actually robbing value of everybody else,
which is what happens in the traditional financial system, when banks or central banks is
create money out of thin air. And so the way they solved that was to introduce this idea of a
shared legend, right? We just have a fixed amount of tokens and then we shift them around among
the owners, but we keep very precise track of where the money is so that no coin is ever
duplicated. So Bitcoin solves that in a masterful way and proof of work is a very important part
of that, which is that miners have to do work to acquire a certain voting power to decide
what is the final version of the ledger?
Because there's new transactions added all the time to the ledger
so that every time you have to decide,
like, are we going to go left or right
where the ledger is going?
So finite supply is solved.
There will only ever be 21 million bitcoins that is embedded in the Bitcoin protocol.
There's no way to change that except to fork,
which is fine.
You can do that.
A light coin, for example, has four times the amount of coins as Bitcoin.
And it was based off the same code,
But those nodes, if you run the software, don't talk to each other.
They speak a different language, so they will never interfere.
So, finance supply, the fact that the transportation is virtually without cost, right?
If I can send you an email, I can send you Bitcoins.
I would argue that storage of Bitcoins actually can be done more securely than storage of gold,
because with Bitcoin, there's something that's called a multi-signature transaction.
And so I can have a wallet of Bitcoins that can pull.
only be spent if, for example, three out of five signatures are provided. And then those
keys, those signatures, I can store on five different continents. And so if some entity wants
to rob me, they would have to break into vaults on three different continents to be able to
spend those bitcoins. That's different with gold. You cannot store gold the same ounce of gold
in different locations. So there are several properties like that that make Bitcoin, I think,
extremely powerful as a digital cash, a savings instrument, digital gold.
Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors.
No, it's not your imagination.
Risk and regulation are ramping up,
and customers now expect proof of security just to do business.
That's why VANTA is a game changer.
VANTA automates your compliance process
and brings compliance, risk, and customer trust together on one AI-powered platform.
So whether you're prepping for a SOC 2 or running an enterprise GRC program, VANTA keeps you secure
and keeps your deals moving.
Instead of chasing spreadsheets and screenshots, VANTA gives you continuous automation across
more than 35 security and privacy frameworks.
Companies like Ramp and Ryder spend 82% less time on audits with Vantza.
That's not just faster compliance, it's more time for growth.
If I were running a startup or scaling a team today, this is exactly the type of
of platform I'd want in place. Get started at vanta.com slash billionaires. That's vanta.com
slash billionaires. Ever wanted to explore the world of online trading but haven't dared try?
The futures market is more active now than ever before and plus 500 futures is the perfect
place to start. Plus 500 gives you access to a wide range of instruments, the S&P 500, NASDAQ,
Bitcoin, gas, and much more.
Explore equity indices, energy, metals,
4x, crypto, and beyond.
With a simple and intuitive platform,
you can trade from anywhere, right from your phone.
Deposit with a minimum of $100
and experience the fast,
accessible futures trading you've been waiting for.
See a trading opportunity.
You'll be able to trade it in just two clicks
once your account is open.
Not sure if you're ready, not a problem.
Plus 500 gives you an unlimited risk-free
demo account with charts and analytic tools for you to practice on. With over 20 years of experience,
Plus 500 is your gateway to the markets. Visit Plus500.com to learn more. Trading in futures involves
risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone. Not all applicants will qualify. Plus 500,
it's trading with a plus. Billion dollar investors don't typically park their cash in high-yield
savings accounts. Instead, they often use one of the premier passive income strategies for institutional
investors, private credit. Now, the same passive income strategy is available to investors of all sizes
thanks to the Fundrise income fund, which has more than $600 million invested in a 7.97%
distribution rate. With traditional savings yields falling, it's no wonder private credit has
grown to be a trillion dollar asset class in the last few years.
at fundrise.com slash WSB to invest in the Fundrise income fund in just minutes. The fund's total
return in 2025 was 8%, and the average annual total return since inception is 7.8%. Past performance
does not guarantee future results, current distribution rate as of 1231, 2025. Carefully consider
the investment material before investing, including objectives, risks, charges, and expenses.
This and other information can be found in the income funds prospectus at fundrise.com
slash income.
This is a paid advertisement.
All right.
Back to the show.
Yeah.
And I think it's really interesting part again that you bring up because whenever we're
talking about the price of Bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency, I mean, what is it that
we really need to compare it to?
And if you look up like the current price of Bitcoin, say it's around $2,000, and you'll be
like, hmm, why is it worth $2,000 today, why it was only worth, call it $200 a few years ago?
And, you know, it goes into this very weird discussion of how do you actually find an appropriate
price? So whenever I started it, there are some people that saying, well, you should kind of
look at the value of Bitcoin as what is the processing fees you would use for Visa and MasterCat,
for instance, if that is really the problem it's solving. And then you will have other people
saying, well, you know, perhaps you should compare it to the price of gold because that's
another problem that's solving, you know, it's a finite supply, you're storing a value.
So let me ask this broad question.
How do you come up with a fundamental value of Bitcoin?
So to me, the main problem that Bitcoin solves is how do I store wealth?
That's the main problem it solves.
And so comparing the Bitcoin market cap, currently $40 billion, to the gold.
you know, above ground physical gold, which is about $5 trillion, makes sense to me, right?
Right now we're at about 1%.
And I think we can totally go to 10%.
But it doesn't stop there, in my opinion, because, you know, there are stores of wealth that
are vastly bigger than gold, right?
We have government bonds.
We have, you know, Forex markets are huge.
I think roughly speaking, we can talk about $100 trillion, a pool of $100 trillion worth of
value that is considered to be liquid and relatively stable that Bitcoin basically competes
with.
So when you talk about future valuations, I think it's not outrageous to talk about a Bitcoin
price of $100,000 or a million dollars.
When you look at the qualities of Bitcoin, and especially when you take into account
the amount of scaling that's going to happen, I think it's hard to argue that it's not
actually better than gold in several respects or better than, you know, a 10-year government
bond or better than if you take US dollar, for example.
So I would like to just take one step back and not so much talk about only the fork,
whether or not that would happen called in a year or two, whenever it would happen or perhaps
not happen, but really in the grand scheme of things.
And I would like to do that by talking about creative destruction.
And creative destruction is actually something that we talked a lot about here on the podcast,
even though we typically don't use that fancy term.
but it basically means that everything will always improve and become more efficient.
And the example that we typically use and the Warren Buffing Chalamanga uses is that they're saying
we used to ride on horses, now we have cars, and soon we will have driverless cars.
So it's not really not a question about if it will happen, because it will happen.
We just don't know when and in which form.
And we can see the same thing with different monetary systems.
I mean, we have seen this with the bothering system,
Winston, ancient Rome,
whatever that system has been,
we always come up with someone that's been more efficient.
And I think there's a lot of good arguments for saying that
cryptocurrencies, one way or the other,
if the digital age is a more efficient monter system.
Having said all that,
I also think there's a lot of reasons why you could argue the opposite,
why it won't go that way.
So I'm curious to hear your thoughts on it.
that. Will we see cryptocurrency as something eventually replacing the Fiat monetary system,
whether it happens in 10 years, 100 years from now, or will always be like a way of storing value
digitally? Yeah, great question. If you look at finance, obviously there's some changes that
have happened over the years and different financial products that have been designed. And we have
come off the gold standard. Like for 6,000 years, the way to save was to have gold. And then that
transition gradually became, went from like a gold backed standard to then fully digitized just,
you know, fiat tokens, what we have now. I think that Bitcoin is really, it's a monumental
proposition for creative destruction, like really like, it really fundamentally challenges. And
you can go back to 2012 and look at this ECB paper that was put out talking about virtual
currencies is what they called it. But I think Bitcoin was mentioned 150 times. And
in the paper. And basically, the ECB was talking about how their senior edge revenues were being
threatened by these private digital currencies. Saniorich is from a central bank point of view.
What we call inflation is actually part of their revenue stream. That's how they make money for
themselves so that their revenue stream was actually threatened by these competitive technologies.
I think that what is most likely to happen is that we get some.
kind of a crisis in the financial system, right?
For a Bitcoin will grow on its own, but then when there is a big crisis where we have
a currency that used to be considered a store of value that all of a sudden goes into
stackflation, high inflation, hyperinflation, I think that could be a sea change moment
where people realize that there's actually this backup financial system that's already operational
and they can just make the switch.
And that's when you will see governments accepting taxes expressed in Bitcoin, for example.
That's when you'll see Bitcoin being used as a reserve instrument, those kind of things.
So I do think that we can see a significant, you know, like almost unimaginable adoption of Bitcoin.
Or, you know, maybe I'm wrong and maybe it's another cryptocurrency happen in the future.
Yeah.
And back to what you said about that might be a safe haven if we see a crisis.
I mean, traditionally, a lot of people were saying, oh, we need to go into gold because that was storing value if something happens.
And just like, just as a comment to that also like to stress that whenever we're talking about the value of Bitcoin or the value of gold for that matter, it's always priced in another currency.
So that doesn't necessarily mean that the value of Bitcoin or gold has gone up.
It could also be that they say the value of the dollar has gone down, which is another interesting.
Which is why I'm less hesitant to say Bitcoin is going to go to a million dollars because what is that million dollar going to buy? Is it going to be a car, a house? Is it going to be a bicycle? It all depends on the inflation. That's a great point. And what I've been a bit confused about whenever I've been reading up on the price development of different commodities, whenever I looked up on price development, for instance, on gold, is that I don't see a closer correlation with Bitcoin and gold. And I don't know if it's because there is a lot of
And Bitcoin, obviously there's a lot of speculation in gold as well. Or it's simply a question of having a somewhat similar supply side. The demand side is very, very different from Bitcoin, but all these people flowing in right now. And I'm curious to hear about your thoughts on that and really explain the volatility.
So it is true that the correlation with Bitcoin and gold is very weak. Actually, the correlation with Bitcoin and virtually anything, any financial asset is at least, it's true.
extremely weak. There is, there is some, the best case you could make is a negative correlation
between, you know, Bitcoin dollar and Chinese Yuan dollar, which is basically indicating that
if there is a downtick in the Yuan, if there's some fears of devaluation, then people go to Bitcoin.
And there is a very active trading community in China. So that is interesting in itself. And why is it
not higher? Because it, you know, it would be logical to say, I think, I think the main reason is that
Bitcoin is just tiny, super tiny, and that the forces of adoption play a much bigger role.
So you have these, you know, if you look back on the Bitcoin price, you have these waves,
these cycles.
You know, Bitcoin went from $1 to $30 and then down to $2 and then up to, I think it was
$160 and then down to $85 and then up to $1,200 and then down to $150.
So like, and I'm talking about between these price points, we saw sometimes six months or a year
path. So like really big price waves. So I think that is really adoption. That's technological
adoption. That is basically all the time this dynamic between weak hands and strong hands,
strong hands buying at the bottom and then weak hands jumping on board as the price accelerates.
And then as the price declines, the weak hands panic and they sell and new strong hands come in.
I think that is an important part of, you know, understanding the Bitcoin price.
A lot of people that got involved in Bitcoin had a technology background. They
weren't necessarily looking to, you know, make a lot of money or they didn't have an
understanding of investing necessarily of value investing or anything like that. And sometimes
people just misunderstand Bitcoin as well. Sometimes they buy it because they think it's going to
be the next visa competitor. And then they see the fees on the Bitcoin network all of a sudden
go to one, two, maybe $3 and they panic. It's like, oh my God, like my whole narrative is
destroyed. I should sell. So it's not necessarily that these people lack the will, but sometimes
there's some different interpretation of what Bitcoin is.
So I think that plays a big role.
There's also the fact that Bitcoin miners all the time are exposed to the Bitcoin price.
So every 10 minutes, a block is mined.
Some miners somewhere wins that block.
So they get all the transaction fees in the block plus block reward fee.
Currently 12 and a half Bitcoin.
Not too bad, right?
That's $24,000.
And so if the Bitcoin is rising, they can either sell it right away or they can hoard it.
can decide to keep it and sell it at a higher price.
That's very tempting, especially if you have a one-year bull market, a lot of miners,
they start thinking that maybe I'm not just, you know, in blue-collar, minor, and I'm a technology
guy, I'm not necessarily a speculator.
You know, they sometimes change their mind and decide to hoard coins.
And then supply gets constricted, right?
Instead of 380,000 bitcoins a year, maybe you get only 100,000 that new bitcoins on the
market and all the rest is hoarded, which is, you know, great until the price starts declining
again. Then the miners might not only offload the bitcoins that they have already
hoarded, but because the price declines, maybe their profit margins are getting understress.
Maybe they overstretched. Maybe they have some debt that they incurred. Maybe there's new competitors
on the market that have made mining more expensive. And so maybe they will start selling a higher
percentage of the new coins as well. That's thing is really important to understand.
Because this made me underestimate the length of the Bitcoin winter in 2014 and 15, I think,
is that not only were miners hoarding on the way up, but they took a long time to start offloading,
offloading and offloading these coins.
So there's more dynamics, but these are some of the things that I think sometimes people miss.
So one of the things that I find really fascinating about blockchain technology is all the other
things that you can do.
And we talked about a little bit when we got into the Ethereum discussion.
But let me just throw out a scenario here for people that might not understand this aspect of blockchain.
So say Stig and I wanted to start a new company and we wanted to do an offering of equity of the business.
Say we wanted to sell off 10% of our business to raise money early on.
We can now do this through blockchain technology without having to go through some big bank that's going to suck a ton of fees out of area.
You're basically able to do your own IPO through blockchain technology.
So I've read this in books that you can do this, but I've never really talked to anybody that's done at an application.
So my question for you is, can you do this today?
And if you can, where would you go about doing it?
Yeah, you can do it today.
I think it's like Ethereum.org slash crowdsend.
I think there is actually a page and they will just walk you through it, how to do it.
And it will be a smart contract and it'll be published on the Ethereum blockchain.
And you can start raising funds.
And, you know, I don't know the exact number, but hundreds of millions of dollars have been raised this way.
And I think that long term, there is something there.
I think there is really something there that's going to stick around where this obvious evolution from, you know,
Wall Street based capital raising to then, you know, venture capital to then crowd sales with like Kickstarter and things like that.
to then, you know, actually offering equity to the market.
I don't, as far as I know, because, of course, I mean, equity offerings have happened in the past,
like straight to the public.
It has happened during the railway boom.
It happened during the, in the 20s.
So it happened many times in the past, and usually during a bubble, a lot of people get scammed.
And this is in part why securities laws have been, you know, brought into creation.
So it's really interesting, a couple different points that I've,
thinking about as you said all this, is first of all the fact that it would have to be done on
Ethereum and not the Bitcoin blockchain. I find that to be really interesting. And I think about it
more from the dynamic that if IPOs are just one thing you can do on Ethereum that you're not
today able to do on Bitcoin, that gives a lot of momentum to that as a currency. Because if now,
if you got that application and another person builds the next Airbnb that you don't have
to pay Airbnb a fee to, it's just, you know, customer to.
transaction because you don't need that overhead there. That creates a lot of momentum in that
currency. The other part that I have a question for you on is, let's say Stig and I do this IPO
on Ethereum. And the coins that people are able to basically secure that say that they own
some of this equity are Ethereum, it's ether? Is that what it is? Or is it some other
spin-off coin that would be called Stiggin-Preston's coin that makes it separate from ether?
I don't understand that part of it.
Can you explain that to us?
Yeah, I think most ICOs create.
In your case, it might be like S&P coin or something like that.
And the cool thing about it is that all of a sudden,
you might have a phone call with a few of the exchanges,
and then one of them might bite.
Maybe you'll offer them some money even.
There's exchanges that will take some money
and then they will publish your pair, your token.
All of a sudden it gets traded.
And because you are the company,
you obviously have allocated a lot of tokens to yourself.
And so then as it gets traded, it gets a value.
And you can basically offload some of those tokens to liquidate them and make some money.
And obviously, if you had malicious intent, you could do a pump-and-dump, right?
You can, you know, invest $200,000 in marketing and, you know, make sure that there's an enticing story.
The price pumps.
And you can then offload and you can make $500,000 based on, you know, the buzz.
But yeah, I think the attractiveness is if you have a token that is specific and it trades,
then all of a sudden the market is going to value your company at a certain amount.
All right. So, Tor, we can't thank you enough for taking time out of your day to chat with us.
I could literally talk to you for probably the rest of the entire day.
And it's the morning over here.
So I've got a lot of questions for you.
This stuff is fascinating.
My opinion is if people don't get smart on this stuff and start to really understand it,
they're going to be left in the dust with a massive opportunity,
whether it's Bitcoin or Ethereum or whatever, there's just so much to learn.
And you are definitely one of those sources out there that I really trust.
I know anything you write is now on my reading list because, man, I've learned so much
from reading your blog and talking to you today.
So we can't thank you enough for that.
If you could give a handoff to people listening to this where they can learn more about
you, your Twitter handle, stuff like that, I'm sure they would love to know what that is.
Yeah, I would recommend just Google my name.
The first result is my Twitter handle.
I'm on Twitter every day.
So that's where I do most of my stuff.
And then I have my articles.
I usually post on Medium.
Medium.com.
So if you go there, it's pretty easy to find more articles.
I have some reports that I've written over time, but I publish those links occasionally.
Because I don't like to promote reports that are maybe a bit outdated.
So I talk about those as they come out.
And then what I'm doing in general is that I'm moving to the hedge fund space.
It's kind of my passion is to, I think the time is ripe for institutional investors to come into Bitcoin.
There's a lot more interest now.
And so that's where I'm looking to specialize.
All right.
That was all the Preston and I had for this week's episode of The Investors Podcast.
We see each other again next week.
Thanks for listening to TIP.
To access the show notes, courses or forums, go to the investorspodcast.com.
To get your questions played on the show, go to Asktheinvestors.com and win a free subscription to any of our courses on TIP Academy.
This show is for entertainment purposes only.
Before making investment decisions, consult a professional.
This show is copyrighted by the TIP network.
Written permission must be granted before syndication or rebroadcasting.
