We Study Billionaires - The Investor’s Podcast Network - TIP259: What Bitcoin Solves - w/ Dr. Saifedean Ammous
Episode Date: September 7, 2019On today's show, we talk to leading Bitcoin expert, Dr. Saifedean Ammous about how Bitcoin works and what problems it attempts to solve. Dr. Ammous is the author of the Bitcoin Standard. IN THIS... EPISODE YOU’LL LEARN: Why a higher demand for Bitcoin indirectly makes the currency more secure and in turn a better store of wealth Why the adoption of a deflationary currency like Bitcoin will encourage people to think long term and invest more Why the clearance mechanisms of central banks will ensure the fiat currency system’s survival Why profitable bitcoin mining in the future won’t be using fossil fuels Why Altcoins can’t compete with Bitcoin regardless of any current or future technical properties BOOKS AND RESOURCES Join the exclusive TIP Mastermind Community to engage in meaningful stock investing discussions with Stig, Clay, and the other community members. Tweet directly to Saifedean Saifedean Ammous’ educational website NEW TO THE SHOW? Check out our We Study Billionaires Starter Packs. Browse through all our episodes (complete with transcripts) here. Try our tool for picking stock winners and managing our portfolios: TIP Finance Tool. Enjoy exclusive perks from our favorite Apps and Services. Stay up-to-date on financial markets and investing strategies through our daily newsletter, We Study Markets. Learn how to better start, manage, and grow your business with the best business podcasts. SPONSORS Support our free podcast by supporting our sponsors: River Toyota Range Rover Vacasa AT&T The Bitcoin Way USPS American Express Onramp Found SimpleMining Public Shopify HELP US OUT! Help us reach new listeners by leaving us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts! It takes less than 30 seconds, and really helps our show grow, which allows us to bring on even better guests for you all! Thank you – we really appreciate it! Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm
Transcript
Discussion (0)
You're listening to TIP.
On today's show, we have Dr. Safedina Moose, who's a leading expert in the economics of Bitcoin.
Dr. Amuse's book, The Bitcoin Standard, has been on the Amazon bestseller list since its launch in 2018.
During today's show, we talk about why Bitcoin is changing the rules for hard money,
why this transition is especially important in today's economy,
and how current monetary policy has warped the time preference of market participants.
If you're a Bitcoin skeptic or somebody who simply wants to learn more about the technology,
This is a fantastic episode to glean some insights and perspectives that might challenge some of those thoughts.
So it brings us great pleasure to bring you our discussion with Dr. Safedine Amuse.
You are listening to The Investors Podcast, where we study the financial markets and read the books that influence self-made billionaires the most.
We keep you informed and prepared for the unexpected.
Hey, everyone.
Welcome to The Investors podcast.
I'm your host, Preston Pish.
And as always, I'm accompanied by my co-host, Stig Broderson.
And man, am I excited right now because we have Safedine Amuse here with us.
The author of the Bitcoin Standard, Safedin, welcome to the show.
Thank you so much for having me.
That's a pleasure to be on.
I read your book.
I loved your book.
I've read quite a few crypto books.
And my expectation before I started reading your book was that I was going to probably get a
lot of similar content, kind of the same general.
idea that I've captured from many other, I shouldn't say crypto, I should say Bitcoin books.
And I was blown away, to be quite honest with you. I was, I was reading things in your book
that really made me take a moment and just kind of pause, because I was listening to the audio book,
I was pausing the audio book and I was just thinking. And that doesn't happen too often because
I go through so many different books, especially about finance. And your book really had me
thinking. And I am so excited to capture some of these ideas with our audience today. So, welcome to the
show. And let me go ahead and kick this off with the first question I got for you. For people not
familiar with Bitcoin, which is a majority of the population, they think that this is some kind of big
online, fake money, Ponzi scheme that all these crazy people are trading this fake digital money
that's not backed by any kind of government. So what are these people missing from your point
of you? I think the key thing that I would say they're missing is that this is a free market. This is a
product of a free market that has emerged over 10 years now. And it has grown as a neutral internet
protocol rather than as a private company or someone's private undertaking. And I think this is what
is truly unique from it. It's about it. It's an international global protocol that allows for the
transfer of value through telecommunication infrastructure essentially without having to rely on
trusted third parties. Effectively, it's it brings the form of, it's a technology for introducing
cash into the digital realm. And so it allows us to do digitally what you and I could do only
with a physical bill, which is once I pay you the physical bill, once I hand over a piece of cash
or a gold coin to you, you know, that payment is finished.
it's settled. You know, you take the coin and then you can spend it. And, you know, that's it. The fact that
you have the coin itself is the value itself and it's not in its value dependent on anybody else. It's
not like a checkbook. It's not like a credit card. It's not a liability for anybody else. It's money
that is a bearer instrument that carries value on its own. And Bitcoin essentially managed to do that
in a digital sense. And of course, that's obviously counterintuitive because, you know, when you
think of cash, you think of cash as being physical. But there's something deeply counterintuitive.
or intuitive almost about Bitcoin making digital cash. However, once you think about the implication
of that, maybe the real killer app and the comparative advantage for those for this technology
is to serve as the final settlement layer for financial transactions. If you think of it,
it's an extremely powerful technology in that I can send a digital payment across national
borders with final settlement within, say, an hour or two. That's it. You know, the payment is
finalized. You send a half a million dollars from here to China and it's finalized within a day
within a couple of hours. And that's it. You know, there's no way to reverse it. At least let's say,
you know, the level of finality that you get after a couple of hours is larger than level of
finality you would get from a financial institution transaction over several months because, you know,
there will always be clearance and settlement transactions to be done. So,
things can get reversed, but Bitcoin allows you a pretty high degree of finality within a couple of
hours. And then that just, that finality continues to get more and more certain with every passing
10 minute block. The power of being able to send that money across national borders, because
it's such a powerful tool, I think it might end up serving as a essentially as a settlement
layer for financial transactions. Bitcoin itself doesn't need to grow to handle all the world's
financial transactions, it can handle the settlement and clearance transactions at the base layer.
In other words, it's not going to replace Visa or MasterCard or Western Union. It's going to rather
replace the settlement systems amongst large financial institutions and central banks.
And if you think of it this way, it's a neutral protocol that allows us to do with code,
simply with code and technologies of cryptography and several other technologies that have emerged over
the last couple of decades. It allows us using.
code only to perform the functions that have required over the past couple of centuries,
a very sophisticated, complicated, and fragile set of political and financial institutions to run.
But all of that can effectively be eaten by code.
This might be really the final frontier of the internet.
It's replaced everything in your home, you know, from your local grocery store to your local
bookshop to pretty much everything.
but now it's knocking at the door of the central bank.
We can just have a piece of open source software
that would allow us to perform the final settlement layer of transactions,
which is traditionally the role preserved for central banks.
And that's why, you know, the subtitle of my book is Bitcoin is the decentralized alternative
to central banking.
Until the year 2008, if you wanted to send money from one country to the other,
the only technology available for you,
the only channel available for you, the only legal channel available for you,
The only legal channel available for you was the use of central banks or, you know, the institutions
that are regulated and that ones that settle their transactions through central banks.
And now we have an alternative.
We have an alternative that allows you to use a trustless technology that can perform this
function.
You can send $10 million from the U.S. to China without having to go through the central bank.
So functionally, strictly on a functional level, it is an alternative.
Currently, Bitcoin does half a million transactions per day.
it probably can scale beyond that, but you know, not by much. But still, if it does say a million
transactions a day, or even if it stays at half a million transactions a day, if you think about the
potential for how many institutions you could build around the world with that number of
transactions to be able to settle finally transactions around the world, we would have essentially
a system of many thousands of institutions that function like central banks. And so instead of having
a couple of hundred central banks that are effectively all.
central bank, the whole world really functions around the US Federal Reserve, instead of
having the Federal Reserve setting the monetary policy and dictating the policy for payment clearance
around the world and having that be a political institution, we could have neutral apolitical
code do it.
And that discussion has so much relevance when you consider where central banks are today.
And one could perhaps argue that it's not a coincidence that we arrived with the issues that we
now face.
that in mind, could you please elaborate on what is wrong with the current financial system?
So the first function of money is as a medium of exchange, and that essentially allows it to
act as the coordinating mechanism of a market system. The only way that you can have an extended
market system, you need a technology for indirect exchange that would allow people to perform
final exchange with one another when they don't have what the other person wants, you know,
when you have the problem of coincidence of once. So money is essential for a market economy.
Money is the information mechanism of the market economy. The concept that I have been strongly
influenced from Australian economics is the idea of sound money being money that emerges on the
free market emerges and its value is determined on the market freely through people interacting
with it, which then allows it to act as an accurate reflection of market conditions. So prices
reflected in the money that is determined on the market freely will be accurate prices.
You know, if you think of the manipulation of, if a government tried to manipulate the price of
apples, you're going to get mixed signals in the market for apples and you'll have shortages
and surpluses and maybe black markets and so on. And the situation is similar in the case
of money. When you manipulate the market for money, when the government can arbitrarily decide what
is money and what isn't, and then it can decide what is the supply of money.
money and it can alter the supply and alter the interest rate, then you're effectively distorting
the price signals. And that from the Austrian school is the root way of understanding
business cycles. It's the root, both the problems of unemployment and inflation. They come about
as a consequence of the manipulation of the money supply and the manipulation of the credit markets.
So that's number one. My favorite is the issue of time preference. And that flows from the
function of money as a store of value. Money being a store of value allows it to, you know,
is an enormously important technology for us as human beings because once we have the ability to store
value into the future, we can start thinking about the future. And once we start thinking about
the future, our time preference drops and we become, we initiate the process of civilization.
You know, human beings start thinking about the consequences of their actions beyond just the next
meal and you start thinking about your children and their children, you start acting from that
perspective. And this is really the fundamental driver of civilization. And that, for me, is
inextricably linked to money. And it's inextricably linked to the availability of money as a
reliable store of value. And so we can think about it in terms of the impact on culture,
on the impact on morality, the impact on family, as well as economic impact on things like
saving versus borrowing. Do you think about 19th century culture when everybody's
used to save much more versus culture today where everybody's borrowing. And I think that's also
inextricably linked to the fact that money is not a good store of value anymore. And people don't
have this technology that has been developed over thousands of years and has continued to improve.
We continue to improve the choice of the thing that we use for this, the thing that will hold on
to value the most into the future. And by the beginning of the 20th century, we'd had something
that was pretty good at it, which was gold. But then, you know, we uninvented to that. You know,
And we had one global monetary standard that saved value well and was neutral and was
used well for, was allowed for coordination of economic activity.
And we uninvented it.
And we went back to a system of partial barter of a system of hundreds of currencies around
the world.
But the inefficiency of it is quite astounding to think that in the 19th century, everyone
in the world used gold as money.
And the different currencies were just different units of gold, different measures of gold.
And today we have an absolute mess, even as the world is.
growing more and more globalized, where you just have an enormous complication with that and
totalitarianism. And I think the link between having a money that is controlled by government,
whose supply and value can be manipulated easily by government, has heavily swung the pendulum
in favor of the collective management of the individual's affairs. If you compare the era of
liberalism in the 19th century to the 20th century in terms of the restrictions that governments
placed on their citizens and the kind of economic controls that they had, I think that the
There's an enormous difference.
I don't think it's a coincidence.
So, yes, you're right.
It's not the usual Bitcoin pitch.
It's not what people usually think of when they think of Bitcoin.
Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors.
All right.
I want you guys to imagine spending three days in Oslo at the height of the summer.
You've got long days of daylight, incredible food, floating saunas on the Oslo Fjord.
In every conversation you have is with people who are actually shaping the future,
future. That's what the Oslo Freedom Forum is. From June 1st through the 3rd, 2026, the Oslo
Freedom Forum is entering its 18th year bringing together activists, technologists, journalists,
investors, and builders from all over the world, many of them operating on the front lines of
history. This is where you hear firsthand stories from people using Bitcoin to survive
currency collapse, using AI to expose human rights abuses, and building technology under censorship
and authoritarian pressures.
These aren't abstract ideas.
These are tools real people are using right now.
You'll be in the room with about 2,000 extraordinary individuals, dissidents, founders,
philanthropists, policy makers, the kind of people you don't just listen to but end up having
dinner with.
Over three days, you'll experience powerful mainstage talks, hands-on workshops on freedom
tech, and financial sovereignty, immersive art installations, and conversations that
continue long after the sessions end.
and it's all happening in Oslo in June.
If this sounds like your kind of room, well, you're in luck because you can attend in person.
Standard and patron passes are available at Osloof Freedom Forum.com, with patron passes offering
deep access, private events, and small group time with the speakers.
The Oslo Freedom Forum isn't just a conference.
It's a place where ideas meet reality and where the future is being built by people living it.
If you run a business, you've probably had the same thought lately.
How do we make AI useful in the real world? Because the upside is huge, but guessing your way into it is a risky move.
With NetSuite by Oracle, you can put AI to work today. NetSuite is the number one AI cloud ERP, trusted by over 43,000 businesses.
It pulls your financials, inventory, commerce, HR, and CRM into one unified system.
And that connected data is what makes your AI smarter. It can automate routine work, surface actionable inside,
and help you cut costs while making fast AI-powered decisions with confidence.
And now with the Netsuite AI connector, you can use the AI of your choice to connect directly
to your real business data.
This isn't some add-on, it's AI built into the system that runs your business.
And whether your company does millions or even hundreds of millions, Netsuite helps you stay
ahead.
If your revenues are at least in the seven figures, get their free business guide, demystifying
AI at net suite.com slash study. They guide is free to you at net suite.com slash study. NetSuite.
When I started my own side business, it suddenly felt like I had to become 10 different people
overnight wearing many different hats. Starting something from scratch can feel exciting,
but also incredibly overwhelming and lonely. That's why having the right tools matters. For millions
of businesses, that tool is Shopify. Shopify is the commerce platform behind millions of businesses
around the world and 10% of all e-commerce in the U.S. from brands just getting started to household
names. It gives you everything you need in one place, from inventory to payments to analytics.
So you're not juggling a bunch of different platforms. You can build a beautiful online store
with hundreds of ready-to-use templates, and Shopify is packed with helpful AI tools that
write product descriptions and even enhance your product photography.
Plus, if you ever get stuck, they've got award-winning 24-7 customer support.
Start your business today with the industry's best business partner, Shopify, and start hearing
sign up for your $1 per month trial today at Shopify.com slash WSB.
Go to Shopify.com slash WSB. That's Shopify.com slash WSB.
All right, back to the show.
So my question for you, because you've studied this just at an extreme level,
as you look at Bitcoin specifically, what is it that you find most impressive about the technology?
You only really understand something when you try and teach it or when you try and write it.
Then you have to really lay out how you think of it and then you get to understand it.
And I've come to the conclusion that maybe the magic glue that holds Bitcoin together,
the singular technical advancement that Bitcoin introduced.
Because if you think about all of the constituent pieces that make the machine work,
most of them or pretty much all of them were around before Bitcoin came about.
What Bitcoin added, the magic ingredient that was added to it was the difficulty adjustment.
And that's what I find the most interesting thing about it,
because it makes Bitcoin truly unique as a monetary asset.
For any other kind of monetary asset, for anything that gets used as money,
its supply is always increasing, and the producers are always doing their best to try and introduce
a new supply, you know, because the thing is highly valuable and it is demanded massively.
That just leads to more and more of an incentive for people to produce.
If you see it with gold, you see it with people digging for gold treasures and looking for old
sunken ships, you know, people are always trying to find a way to make more gold.
You see it with mining any metal that gets used as money.
You even see it, you know, and if you think of today's financial markets, the reason we get bubbles
in real estate and in stocks is largely because these assets are being used as money. People are
using stocks as a store of value rather than, you know, in the sense of an investment because they
don't have a store of value. You can't just put your money in, you know, in dollars and, you know,
have, say, two years expenditures stowed away in dollars safely, not for investing, not to take
in a risk and hoping that they just maintain their value over the next couple years. You can't really
do that. So you have to be investing. And so effectively, the monetary premium that goes
to making stocks or real estate or art a monetary store of value leads to the appreciation of
of the prices of those things and then results in the overproduction of those things. And so those
things end up being not very good money in the long run. But of course, you know, we don't
have any good monies now. And that's why everyone is struggling to find a way to just preserve value.
You know, we're looking for, the whole market is paying governments because their bonds are
less likely to lose value than other things. But with Bitcoin and of course with government,
money, we see that politics is just the game of printing more money and finding excuses and ways and
justifications and alliances and reasons to print more money. And so government money is always being
inflated. So there's always this mechanism that leads to an increase in the supply that makes a
money not very good. And gold, obviously, historically was the thing that could resist this the best
for chemical reasons which I discussed in my book. But Bitcoin has found a much better way of
restricting the growth in supply, which is to program it. And the,
The way that this is a pretty difficult point to get across the people, which is Bitcoin is really
stuck on a supply cap of 21 million and it's only going to be 21 million.
It's not very easy to explain why it won't change, but ultimately it has to do with the
difficulty adjustment, which makes the mining of new Bitcoins something that happens network
wide and so something that is part of the consensus parameters of the network.
So you have to agree to the mining schedule to be part of the network.
and the difficulty of the mining is also part of the parameters of the schedule.
What the difficulty adjustment does, it raises the cost of mining Bitcoin to ensure that
the output of Bitcoin stays roughly according to schedule.
Astonishingly, it has worked over the last 10 years.
If you had started, the day that Bitcoin had started, if you had actually projected
how many Bitcoins would be out there on this day, you know, 10 years and a half later on,
it would be, you know, within the 3% or 5% or so a range of the exact number of Bitcoins up until then.
So this is not exactly precisely.
It's a calibrating process.
It's not meant to be an exact estimate, but it calibrates at it pretty well.
And it basically makes mining more expensive when more people try to mine.
So with every other kind of money, when more people try and make the money, the supply inevitably increases.
With Bitcoin, when more people try and make the money to print more of it, the mine, the mine,
the mining becomes harder, which because of the way Bitcoin works, effectively makes Bitcoin more secure.
It's an astonishing rig of the way that money technology works that basically supercharges
the process of monetizing Bitcoin because as demand for Bitcoin increases, there can be no extra
supply. Instead, you get extra security, which makes Bitcoin harder to attack, which makes Bitcoin
more reliable, which makes Bitcoin start looking more attractive as a store of value,
which generates more and more demand.
Another thing that Preston and I came across in your book was the term stock to flow.
And to me, that was like, wow, I never really thought about it like that before.
And since the publication of your book, it has really caught on in the Bitcoin community to say the least.
And it seems like everyone is now studying this in detail.
So could you please explain what stock to flow is and why that is so important to understand for us as investors?
I found it to be the best way of explaining why it is gold, that is money.
You know, some people think it is because it is scarce, but that's not entirely accurate
because actually, you know, there are other metals like platinum and palladium that are
also pretty scarce, but they don't have a monetary role. They haven't been used as money
and they've not acquired a monetary role and they don't look like they're likely to acquire
a monetary role. And in fact, people try to monetize platinum in Russia in the 1820s and it
failed, even though it's rare. And I think the reason why, the best way of understanding it is because
it's not about the rarity or the scarcity, it's the stock to flow. Or effectively, it's a ratio of
the existing stockpile of all the production that is existing on the market right now that can
be sold, the ratio of that to the production that comes out of the mines every year. Gold is a prime
money in history because it is the one commodity whose stockpiles, whose existing stockpiles,
are much larger than the new supply that is being made every year from gold.
That's ultimately what it comes down to.
And that's because gold has been mined for thousands of years by people all over the world
because it does not rust or decompose or ruin in any way.
It just continues to accumulate.
And so we continue to add up more and more gold.
And so even as we continue to get much better at digging for gold,
Every one particular year is just one year's production compared to thousands of years of production.
This year is also the most advanced of all the years.
So generally, it's not one out of a thousand.
It's about one to 60.
In other words, it's always around 1.5%.
Every year, gold's supply grows at 1.5% roughly.
So the stock to flow is roughly around 60 to 1.
And that's really why gold was money.
And that's why platinum can't be money, because platinum, even though it's rare, the stockpiles of platinum that we have accumulated have only been accumulated over a couple of centuries.
And it's a couple of centuries in which platinum has had very little use in industry compared to gold's demand as money and for industry.
So therefore, the entire production of platinum that we have is pretty small.
And if somebody were to go and declare platinum as currency and start using it as money and start putting value in it, if 10% of the money,
mining and capital that goes into gold would switch towards prioritizing the mining of platinum,
then you're going to get a massive increase in the supply of platinum and the price of platinum
is going to come crashing down. Bitcoin finds another way of reaching a higher stock to flow than
gold. In a few years, Bitcoin will overtake gold in its stock to flow. Right now,
the Bitcoin supply growth rate is about 4%, or 25 to 1 stock to flow. But in a few years,
it'll drop or grow beyond golds. And then eventually it reaches infinity.
So I think this is ultimately what makes something a good money.
In other words, the size of the liquidity on the market is large enough that whatever happens
in the production of the new mines doesn't really affect the market much.
That's what makes a good monetary medium.
You know, gold was the best thing that we had, but with Bitcoin, it's going to be, I think,
even better.
Let's say that we warp ourselves into the future and Bitcoin is actually adopted and widely used.
And then I think you kind of run into a concern in the future that Bitcoin could become more
deflationary than a flat surface as far as like the coin's not expanding. But because people
losing their private keys, you could see this deflationary piece kind of taking hold.
At the same time, we talk about the existing financial structure of inflation and how time
preference is totally warped, people just wanting to spend their money as fast as they can get it.
Could we see the opposite playing out in the long run where people don't want to employ capital?
People don't want to make capital investments, which would slow down productivity throughout
the world because we're using a deflationary currency?
Yeah.
So I think the issue here is that people miss the point that investment is secondary chronologically
and logically, even conceptually in the mind of the investor.
It is necessarily secondary to the saving.
specifically, you know, the deferral of consumption, the delay of gratification has to proceed
saving, which also has to proceed investment. So I agree that, and I think for me, you know,
one of the most interesting things about Bitcoin is the issue of time preference and something
that I think has massive consequences. And I think, yes, if we move in a world in which we use
Bitcoin, you know, the fact that money appreciates over time means that any dollar that you
earn or any amount of value that you earn, you can keep into the future and expect to grow in
value. So therefore, if you're going to part with it and spend it today, you're going to want to
spend it on something that is going to better be good because, you know, it's going to be worth more
next year. You're more likely to be buying durable stuff. You're more likely to be thinking in the
long term in all of your kinds of decisions. And you're more likely to save first, you know, in terms
of saving as in delaying gratification. And then it is from saving that an individual is then able to
begin investing because investing it requires taking on risk and only after you've saved the
specific amount are you able to start taking on risks with the savings so I think the impact is that
people would save more but people would also invest more and the notion that people wouldn't invest
because the value of money appreciates I think is false I think the just like people if the money
loses 3% people are going to want to beat the 3% and still if the money gains 3%.
people still are going to want to beat the 3% that it gains.
People are always going to want to gain from investment.
And the difference is that when the value of money is depreciating, effectively it is
economical for you to make an investment, even if the investment is destructive of capital
for society overall.
You know, as long as your investment doesn't lose 3%, it's okay.
Even if you're actually destroying capital in real terms by 1% or 2% because of this,
a lot more malinvestment gets undertaken, a lot of more projects that shouldn't be undertaken
that aren't profitable get undertaken. And these are only profitable under manipulated interest rates.
And once the interest rate manipulation subsides, these projects fail. And that, of course,
is the cause of the recessions that we mentioned. The point I'll say is that with the money that
holds value and appreciates in value over time, you're going to get a lower time preference.
You're going to get more saving. And that's going to result in more.
available pools of funds for investors and that results in a lower interest rate.
You know, if you see the process under the gold standard, as the hardness of money increase,
you know, as gold became better money and harder money and we moved from silver and copper
and other forms of money, and as the capital structure became more and more developed, savings
continued to increase throughout the 19th century and capital stock continued to increase and
investment continued to increase and interest rates decline.
That can only really be understood as first, you know, people drop their time preference.
That leads to more savings being available for lending.
And that leads to a lowering in time preference and then it leads to, sorry, a lowering in the interest rate.
And it leads to an increase in investment and therefore an increase in productivity for society.
And, you know, there's more of a long-term horizon when money is harder and when money is expected to hold on to value.
And that leads to more capital accumulation and more investment.
A lot of people in finance suggest the end of the Fureen currency system.
We hear that so often, but don't really talk about how it would materialize.
Like how would we as consumers and citizens experience that in a daily life?
Where do you see the system go in the future and how would it materialize?
I mean, you know, people have spent the last 50 years predicting the death of the dollar
and the old bastard continues to survive.
I think ultimately the strength and the reason that it continues to survive is that the
clearance mechanisms around banking are just so essential that their control is so important
that whoever runs them can continue to have a lot of leeway with their inflationism because
that stuff is just so valuable. The theory that I have about Bitcoin is that Bitcoin might just
be the technological solution to the political catastrophe that is fiat debt monetary system
could become money. And I think generally most Bitcoiners will tell you the idea of the world's
going to be one big Venezuela and Bitcoin is going to be the only thing that is left standing.
And out of all of the rubble, you know, the bitcoins will build civilization.
While certainly plausible in a sense that national currencies could in fact collapse,
I don't think it's that likely because, first of all, inflation, I believe, is a money supply
phenomenon. It's not a collapse in demand. You know, the Venezuelan people didn't suddenly
drop their demand for their national currency to a billionth of.
what it was 10 years ago, leading to the currency dropping a billionth of its value. It's always
the supply. That's the issue. And so what's ignored about the rise of Bitcoin is the impact of
Bitcoin on the dollars. And that's where I think it's really the technological solution to the
problem of debt money and fiat money, because as Bitcoin grows as a hard monetary asset,
rather than a debt-based monetary asset, it is an asset that can grow without needing to
generate more debt. And it is an asset that can grow and appreciate the value without the people
who hold it getting into more debt. And therefore, people who hold Bitcoin while, you know,
in the mind of the Bitcoiners generally we think of, if you start holding Bitcoin, you're going to
want fewer dollars. And so demand for the dollar collapses and then dollar hyperinflates.
The demand isn't going to collapse that fast because, you know, people still need to pay taxes
and bills and whatever. But also, more importantly is that as those people start holding
Bitcoin and they can use it as a store of value, they no longer need to live off of debt.
You know, you no longer live in a situation where you don't have money and you spend all
of your money and you get into debt and you're constantly paying off debt until you die.
Instead, you save up capital and you spend from, you know, you pay your major expenses from
the saved up capital.
You know, you accumulate wealth and a capital over time and accumulate savings and therefore
you don't get into debt.
So now what happens if Bitcoin actually grows and people stop getting into more debt, you know,
people appreciate, people get Bitcoin and then they can start paying with their homes out of their
Bitcoin savings instead of taking out dollar loans. You know, they start paying out for,
paying for their houses. And then businesses start running on Bitcoin capital rather than running on
borrowed fiat. So what we witness is the decline in the decline in the,
creation of debt and credit and dollars, which is essentially the same thing, because the
fiat monetary system is creating dollars every time it creates debt and vice versa.
So we're effectively deflating that debt bubble slowly, or you can say, you know, the house
of cards is being undone. Bitcoin is a technology that takes out the cards two at a time,
you know, the supply and the demand of new dollars. It takes out demanders of dollars and
suppliers of dollars from the creation of loans and therefore can allow for an orderly unwinding
of this dollar catastrophe house of cards. Two cards at a time. The value of the dollar doesn't
have to collapse. The dollar economy, it's just going to be an upgrade, you know. Let's take a quick
break and hear from today's sponsors. No, it's not your imagination. Risk and regulation are ramping up
and customers now expect proof of security just to do business. That's why Vantza is a game changer.
VANTA automates your compliance process and brings compliance, risk, and customer trust together
on one AI-powered platform.
So whether you're prepping for a SOC 2 or running an enterprise GRC program, VANTA
keeps you secure and keeps your deals moving.
Instead of chasing spreadsheets and screenshots, VANTA gives you continuous automation
across more than 35 security and privacy frameworks.
Companies like Ramp and Ryder spend 82% less time on audits with Vantta.
That's not just faster compliance, it's more time for growth.
If I were running a startup or scaling a team today, this is exactly the type of platform
I'd want in place.
Get started at vanta.com slash billionaires.
That's vanta.com slash billionaires.
Ever wanted to explore the world of online trading but haven't dared try?
The futures market is more active now than ever before, and plus 500 futures is the perfect
place to start. Plus 500 gives you access to a wide range of instruments, the S&P 500, NASDAQ, Bitcoin,
gas, and much more. Explore equity indices, energy, metals, 4X, crypto, and beyond. With a simple and
intuitive platform, you can trade from anywhere, right from your phone. Deposit with a minimum of $100
and experience the fast, accessible futures trading you've been waiting for. See a trading opportunity.
you'll be able to trade it in just two clicks once your account is open.
Not sure if you're ready, not a problem.
Plus 500 gives you an unlimited risk-free demo account
with charts and analytic tools for you to practice on.
With over 20 years of experience,
Plus 500 is your gateway to the markets.
Visit plus500.com to learn more.
Trading in futures involves risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone.
Not all applicants will qualify.
Plus 500, it's trading with a plus.
Billion dollar investors don't typically park their cash in high-yield savings accounts.
Instead, they often use one of the premier passive income strategies for institutional investors,
private credit.
Now, the same passive income strategy is available to investors of all sizes, thanks to the
Fundrise income fund, which has more than $600 million invested in a 7.97% distribution rate,
With traditional savings yields falling, it's no wonder private credit has grown to be a trillion dollar asset class in the last few years.
Visit fundrise.com slash WSB to invest in the Fundrise income fund in just minutes.
The fund's total return in 2025 was 8%, and the average annual total return since inception is 7.8%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results, current distribution rate as of 1231, 2025.
carefully consider the investment material before investing, including objectives, risks, charges,
and expenses.
This and other information can be found in the income funds prospectus at fundrise.com
slash income.
This is a paid advertisement.
All right.
Back to the show.
I was listening to a conversation between yourself and Trace Mayer about the energy consumption
associated with Bitcoin.
I found this discussion just awesome.
because I believe in the coming three years, this is going to be a major, major discussion point and a political narrative that's going to come to the forefront of a lot of the discussion around Bitcoin.
Tell us what the concern is going to be that I'm kind of describing here. And then tell us your thoughts on energy consumption and mining.
Bitcoin is always going to be very harsh on Bitcoin miners.
It's sort of like with gold.
Gold mining, one guy makes a fortune, but 100 people ruin their lives digging for gold.
It's always been a story like that and it continues until today.
Generally, the reason that gold, as I was mentioning earlier, works as money, is because mining
is largely insignificant.
In the case of Bitcoin, difficulty adjustment does something similar in that as to
as soon as the rewards of mining are profitable, more people enter into the mining and then
the difficulty of mining goes up. So the difficulty adjustment increases and therefore
it becomes more expensive to mine and therefore the profitability margin starts requiring
a cheaper price of electricity. What Bitcoin mining does, what Bitcoin's difficulty adjustment
leads to, is that every few years you get a culling of miners. You get so many mining projects
that go out of business. And it gets brutal. And this was, I think the bottom in this last cycle was
in December of last year when it was, it also coincided around the time of the Bitcoin price
bottom. At that point, you know, many mining businesses. And effectively, any mining operation that
was mining, I would say above five cents for sure, probably even above three cents,
stopped being profitable at around that time. You had to have three cents per kilowatt hour or less
in order to be profitable at that time. That's an extremely cheap rate. Nobody has that commercially
anywhere. And so what ends up happening is that now as mining Bitcoin continues to grow and the
amount of electricity goes into it, the only kind of serious facilities and the serious operations
that can go into mining in any kind of meaningful sense, all the real capital that's going to be
dedicated into mining is only going to go into operations that have to pay less than
six cents per kilowatt hour or so. And that effectively excludes all kinds of hydrocarbon burning,
power generating grids. So the thing about energy generation around the world is the real
value of hydrocarbons is the fact that they're inert, relatively inert, easy to transport
and extremely cheap ways of transporting energy. You know, the reason they're so valuable is that
their cheapest way of moving energy around, as opposed to, you know, building wires and moving
electricity, which carries a lot of loss or pipelines, which also are expensive to build.
So oil is, you know, you don't need to build massive pipelines and you can move it anywhere in the
world, anywhere a car or an airplane or a helicopter can go, oil can go and you can build
a civilization around it. It's extremely valuable because of that. That's why it's always
in demand from residential and industrial and commercial applications.
So the energy sources that will end up being sustainably mining Bitcoin will be the ones that don't have to compete with civilians and commercial and industrial residential areas.
And I think this is why the kind of environmental movement and the people who already hate Bitcoin, they are the ones who bring up the issue of Bitcoin energy mining and power consumption.
But in reality, you know, there are, you know, people say Bitcoin consumes as much energy as Switzerland or Ireland.
or Denmark or something like that. And that may well be true, or if it isn't, it might be true
in a few months or years. But it's besides the point, let's put it this way, Ireland is far more
visible in its energy consumption than Bitcoin. Where are all the giant factories that are
making the bitcoins out there? And it's not easy to pinpoint any kind of large-scale Bitcoin
mining operations in any one particular location. That's why all of this anti-bitcoin energy stuff
has failed to pinpoint good pet noirs, if you want, you know, just Cape Goat. So just going to some
power plant in the States or Russia or endpoint at it. And the reason is, you don't have giant
petroleum or natural gas plants pumping out Bitcoin because I know people who work in that
business and, you know, they can sell that electricity at 10 and 15 and 20 cents, depending on
where they do it in the world. And that's just not going to compete with the Bitcoin. On the other hand,
where Bitcoin mining is going is to all of the energy sources that are isolated and stranded.
Energy sources that are practically cheap or practically free because they're away from residential
and commercial areas. And so where you have large waterfalls or hydroelectric plants,
you would have massive amounts of energy there that's extremely expensive to transport
because you don't have expensive infrastructure to send it halfway around the world.
And so Bitcoin allows for a way of developing all these resources because you don't
have to export the energy itself. You can use the energy effectively to hash Bitcoin, and you will
be exporting the energy through hashes. And so that really is where all this Bitcoin mining energy
is growing. And that's why we don't have these poster children for how horrible Bitcoin is, because
Bitcoin's massive mining capacity is mainly being built on things like hydroelectric dams, particularly
in China where, you know, the government has overinvested in so many of these dams over so many
years and now the people who operate them are using many of them for mining Bitcoin because it's
to all spare capacity. For me, the astonishing thing to think about this process five, 10 years
later is to think about how much capital infrastructure is going to go toward stranded energy
sources around the world and then imagine the kind of development that will come from that
and the kind of extra energy production and decentralization in energy production and the
reduction in reliance on national grids and just how much more decentralized and robust.
bust human societies will become when we have so many more energy sources all over the world.
Anyone anywhere in the world who can sell energy for less than four or five cents,
you know, anywhere in the world, you just need a small kind of internet connection
that doesn't even need massive bandwidth and you can turn that energy into Bitcoin.
That is very interesting and not an argument we normally here because the media
focus on absolute electricity usage and not relative.
The way the electricity works, and I'm completely looking away from Bitcoin here, is that there
will need to be a balance in the power grid. If not, the light would literally go out in your home.
And you can't predict the supply in advance. For instance, you cannot control how much the wind
is blowing for windmills to generate electricity in that second. So the excess electricity would
very often literally be sent to a hole in the ground. So keeping that in mind, it's very interesting
to hear your take on the relative energy consumption.
Another thing you have a very interesting take on is L-coins, meaning cryptocurrencies that are
not Bitcoin.
Why are you so critical about al-coins?
Could you please share your thoughts on that?
My problem is that we are going to get one shot at making something a neutral protocol,
and Bitcoin was that one thing, and Bitcoin has grown and developed as the neutral
protocol that nobody controls to a very large extent because the person who made it was interested in
it becoming a neutral protocol and that's why they made themselves anonymous and disappeared and
they may still be involved in bitcoin but it's very telling that they chose an identity that was
around for a couple of years and disappeared because i think the project itself can't work in any
other way it has to turn into something that doesn't have someone in charge of it it has to become
just code the creator of bitcoin did that because he wanted to want to
to turn it that way. And then since then, after the first year or two of it surviving, it already
had established our best chance at building that. And so since then, it's pretty clear that if you were
interested in building something that is like a neutral protocol for the transfer of value,
your best shot would be to join Bitcoin. Anybody who built any other coin since then, Bitcoin was
already there. It had the track record. It had been developed. It had many developers. It had started to
build liquidity. And yet, if you started building your own, you know, you're starting from zero
and all of those things, you have no chance of competing against Bitcoin unless you actually have
somebody in charge of your coin trying to direct its development and growth. And that's why none of the
other coins other than Bitcoin have anything close to the Bitcoin idea of true decentralization,
of just not being anybody's project. All these other coins ultimately have a small group of people that
to a very large extent control the majority of the supply, a majority of the mining power behind
them. They control the code and they review each other's code. So all of these other coins are more
like a startup or like a group of foundation or company, whereas Bitcoin is a neutral protocol.
And ultimately, if you've studied gold's monetary history and just how many alchemists and
people have tried to find ways of making gold, and if you study fiat monetary history,
you know that the temptation amongst human beings to find a reason to convince others of,
hey, look, this cheap thing that I can make in my lab at very little cost, you should definitely
be using that as a store of value. It's a pretty easy thing for you to convince yourself of.
You know, you'll just, if you find a way of making something that could pass off as a store of value
for a low price, you know, you're going to have a very strong incentive of trying to get people to
want to use it. And that's why these.
These things, the altcoins, they grew by aping Bitcoin, which is a neutral protocol.
But none of them has anything like a neutral protocol.
And nothing, none of them is a neutral protocol.
They're just a small group of people that are managing something that looks like Bitcoin.
And ultimately, if you take away that aspect of Bitcoin being neutral, being apolitical,
being not controlled by anybody, there's nothing left there.
A lot of the Bitcoin evangelists and Bitcoin fans would like to argue, you know,
Bitcoin is basically Star Trek money.
It's like with the iPhone of money.
It's going to make all of everything else look like in the 1950s phones compared to your iPhone.
It isn't.
You know, Bitcoin is not pretty.
Bitcoin is not optimized for your user experience.
It's an ugly, clodgy piece of software that does one thing, but it doesn't very well.
And that thing is resist state control.
And if it continues to grow and resist state control, you know, we can expect big things
from this crazy, ugly monster.
But, you know, your user experience and its prettiness is not one of them.
And so the entire structure and the way it works is optimized really for that thing.
And so if you take that thing away, then you're just using something extremely inefficient,
extremely slow in order to pretend to be decentralized while still, in fact, being centralized.
Safeedine, I cannot thank you enough for coming on.
Your book was amazing for people listening to this.
I'm telling you, go to Amazon, pick up Safedine's book, the Bitcoin Standard.
It is just a phenomenal read.
Safeedine, do you have a website or anything else you want to hand off?
Yes, my website, safedine.com.
I've started teaching economics classes on it and publishing my research.
I'm teaching classes on economics and on economics of Bitcoin.
All right.
Well, Safedina Moose, thank you for joining us here on the Investors podcast.
My pleasure. Thank you so much.
All right, guys.
That was all the Presta and I had for this week's episode of the Amherstas podcast.
We will see each other again next week.
Thank you for listening to TIP.
To access our show notes, courses or forums, go to theinvestorspodcast.com.
This show is for entertainment purposes only.
Before making any decisions, consult a professional.
This show is copyrighted by the Investors Podcast Network.
Written permissions must be granted before syndication or rebroadcasting.
Thank you.
