We Study Billionaires - The Investor’s Podcast Network - TIP280: A History of 5 US Market Crashes w/ Scott Nations (Business Podcast)
Episode Date: February 2, 2020On today's show, we talk to financial history expert, Scott Nations, about the United States's five most impactful crashes. IN THIS EPISODE, YOU'LL LEARN: An in-depth analysis of the stock marke...t crashes in 1907, 1929, 1987, 2008, and 2010. The similarities between the FED’s monetary policy in 1929 and today. How the stock market could decline by 22.6% in a single day in 1987. How the incentives for homeowners and investment bankers in 2008 destroyed the stock market. Why the next crash is going to look more like the flash crash in 2010 than any of the earlier crashes. Ask The Investors: How should I invest in sector ETFs? BOOKS AND RESOURCES Join the exclusive TIP Mastermind Community to engage in meaningful stock investing discussions with Stig, Clay, and the other community members. Subscribe to Real Estate Investing by The Investor’s Podcast. Listen to the first episode of Real Estate Investing by The Investor’s Podcast, with Chad Carson . Scott Nation’s book, A History of The United States in Five Crashes – Read reviews of his book. Scott Nation’s Amazon author page. Scott Nation’s website. NEW TO THE SHOW? Check out our We Study Billionaires Starter Packs. Browse through all our episodes (complete with transcripts) here. Try our tool for picking stock winners and managing our portfolios: TIP Finance Tool. Enjoy exclusive perks from our favorite Apps and Services. Stay up-to-date on financial markets and investing strategies through our daily newsletter, We Study Markets. Learn how to better start, manage, and grow your business with the best business podcasts. SPONSORS Support our free podcast by supporting our sponsors: Hardblock AnchorWatch Cape Intuit Shopify Vanta reMarkable Abundant Mines HELP US OUT! Help us reach new listeners by leaving us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts! It takes less than 30 seconds, and really helps our show grow, which allows us to bring on even better guests for you all! Thank you – we really appreciate it! Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm
Transcript
Discussion (0)
You're listening to TIP.
On today's show, we're really excited to have author Scott Nations with us.
Scott is the author of the book, The History of the United States, in Five Crashes.
And during our show, we talked to Scott about five of the most famous financial meltdowns
that defined our country throughout the last century.
If you're a financial history buff, you're going to love this discussion.
Scott is a regular guest on CNBC and comes with decades of experience in the financial
derivatives market.
So without further delay, here's our chat with the very thoughtful Scott Nations.
You are listening to The Investors Podcast, where we study the financial markets and read the books that influence self-made billionaires the most.
We keep you informed and prepared for the unexpected.
Hey guys, welcome to The Investors Podcast.
I'm your host, Jake Brodison, and as always, I'm here with my co-host, Preston Pish.
Today we hear with best-selling author Scott Nations to talk about his book, A History of United States in Five Crashes.
Scott, welcome to the show.
Thanks so much.
It's great to be with you.
So, Scott, in this episode, we're going to be talking about the crashes of 1907, 1929, 1987, 2008, and the flash crash of 2010.
I'm sure some, if not all of those years are very familiar for a lot of people in our audience.
but let's start all the way back to 1907.
And for people not familiar with this crash, J.P. Morgan was a key character in this crash.
So talk to us a little bit about him and talk to us about the characteristics of the 1907 crash.
J.P. Morgan was a fascinating man. He was a fascinating man. He was a man of privilege.
He was born into privilege. His father was Junis Morgan, who was, well, essentially made the family even more wealthy by selling Civil War bonds.
London during the American Civil War. J.P. Morgan was educated, as you would expect somebody
of his wealth. He had a parapetetic education. He was obviously educated in the United States,
but also in Switzerland and in Germany. As a young man, in Germany, he developed an appreciation
for art, actually a love for art, which informed his private life. But J.P. Morgan was really
raised be a banker. In the early part of the 20th century, he was by far the wealthiest man on Wall
Street. Well, maybe not the wealthiest, but certainly the most powerful. He was absolutely the most
powerful man on Wall Street. He was called the Zeus of Wall Street. And he really was involved
in every aspect of finance in the United States in the first part of the 20th century.
Now, if we go back to October 1907, the market crashed almost 50% from the previous year's peak.
The panic might have been even worse if it hadn't been for JP Morgan, and he pledged
to huge some of his money and convinced others to do the same.
Perhaps you could tell us some of the factors about what caused the crash, but also the story
about Morgan's intervention in the market.
It's a very fascinating story.
Before 1907, the United States was really beginning to understand that it was going to be the American century.
It was powerful.
It was probably at that point the most powerful country on the globe.
And so, frankly, the United States got carried away with itself.
And we'll talk about some of the specifics of some of these crashes and how these shared some similarities in a bit.
But you asked specifically about Morgan's intervention in the market.
This was before the U.S. Federal Reserve existed.
In fact, the panic of 1907 was the cause the Federal Reserve was created.
But if you were worried about the market, you were worried about the panic of 1907,
the person you went to see was J.P. Morgan because, again, he was so powerful.
And one example occurred in the midst of the panic on Thursday, the 24th of October.
of 1907, when the president of the New York Stock Exchange went to J.P. Morgan at the time his office
was directly across the street from the New York Stock Exchange. Very simply, Mr. Morgan,
we will have to close the exchange early. There's simply too much selling. And J.P. Morgan
understood what that meant. His question was, how in the world do you ever reopen a stock market
that you've been forced to close because there's too much selling? And so, J.P. Morgan,
JP Morgan asked, when do you normally close? Well, sir, we normally close at three o'clock, but we can't get there. There's too much sign. He said, then you will not close one minute early. And his confidence was, it was not naked. He rounded up bankers in the Wall Street area, got them all into his office. It was a time when if JP Morgan called, you came running. And he told the assembled bankers, you have 15 minutes to raise
$25 million to save the stock market.
$25 million back then was a colossal amount of money.
But J.P. Morgan essentially said you have 15 minutes to raise this money or the stock market
is going to close and who knows when it will ever reopen.
And that's just one specific story of his involvement.
That's not the first time he did something like that.
Probably the most immediate.
But within 15 minutes, they had raised actually more than $25 million.
The officials were able to go on the floor and say, we have $25 million to lend to investors
who are in trouble.
People were so desperate to get this money that the clerk who was responsible for recording
borrowers and amounts had his suit coat ripped off of him in the turmoil.
So J.P. Morgan was really the man, the single man, who managed to save the stock market
in 1907.
So, Scott, you briefly mentioned that the panic in 1907 was the reason.
for the creation of the Federal Reserve. Talk to us a little bit more about that idea.
It became obvious to everybody after things had settled down after the panic of 1907. The
United States government needed a way to inject liquidity into the system and didn't have it.
And that there needed to be a lender of last resort, if you will, for the financial market.
And that didn't exist before 1907. And so the Federal Reserve was created in 1913 because
everybody realized, if nothing else, J.P. Morgan's not going to live forever. And we can't
rely on one man, one person, to essentially bail out the stock market in times of stress.
Let's turn to the next crash, the crisis in 1929. And to really understand what happened,
we also have to understand how crazy the market behaved in 1927 and 1928. And I think you
do a fantastic job of that in your book, explaining everything leads up to the crash. In
28, the Dow closed in 300, which probably to the listers out there seems outrageously cheap,
but it was definitely not the case. And this was at the end of the second biggest two-year run
ever. It was actually more than 90%. So, Scott, what drove the all-time highs leading up to the crash
in 1929? In the late 1920s, actually much of the entire decade,
particularly in the last half of the 1920s, there were simply a euphoria at work in the United States
that was not just financial. It had to do with the United States place in the world and from a
military point of view, also from an industrial point of view. So as you pointed out, in 1927 and
1928, the stock market gained more than 90%. We had come out of World War I. We felt great about
our place in the world. But there were also some other things that work. For example, in a situation
like that, with an economy roaring like that, a stock market booming like that, you would expect
the Federal Reserve, which it was new at the time, you would expect them to raise rates.
One Federal Reserve officer at one time described it as taking away the punch bowl when the party
really got going. And the Federal Reserve did not do that. In fact, they kept rates low. They kept rates
too low, largely because they wanted to help England return to the gold standard after World War
1. That was a tragic mistake, keeping rates that low. There was also a roster of new technologies
that were unleashed following World War I. Radio would probably be the biggest, but also the automobile
industry really got going, really came into its own. And then America just felt good about itself.
And so all of those things spawned this euphoria that eventually made its way into the stock market.
And the stock market got carried away with itself.
It's very interesting, and you mentioned that before here with the Federal Reserve.
Could you talk more about which actions did they take?
You already, again, briefly touched upon that.
But if you should outline and put some years on like before, during and then, especially after the crash,
It was very interesting the type of monetary policy that the Federal Reserve decided to carry out.
The Federal Reserve really started making errors in policy in 1924 when they were essentially begged by the British government to help them get back on the gold standard by lowering interest rates here in the United States.
And they did that.
And they continued that sort of policy.
And eventually the Federal Reserve simply lost control of the monetary situation in the United States.
there was so much money being made by industry and individuals that they were happy to loan that money
to stock market speculators. And that's sometimes called the call money market. All money is money
that's available to investors to speculate with. And for a long time, that money had been provided by
banks. And now outside investors were providing it. And they did it in droves because interest rates
were so low otherwise. And the bubble was undeniable. In the late 1920s, American brokerage firms
paid $100,000 to put a brokerage office on a single transatlantic liner, the Berengaria,
$100,000 just open the opportunity to open a brokerage office. Another brokerage firm opened a tent
at the U.S. amateur golf open in Pebble Beach, the stock market was such a phenomenon and the
rally was such a phenomenon that people didn't want to get away from it.
Scott, do you see any parallels between what's happening today and what was happening back
in the 1920s?
I think that's a great question.
I think that given our stock market, the American stock market, is at all time highs
and that our economy is doing pretty well, not great, but pretty well.
I think it's easy to say that interest rates here in the United States as guided by the Federal Reserve are too low.
The Federal Reserve, I believe, is responsible for the crash in 1929 by keeping rates too low in the late 1920s.
And I think they did the same thing in the decade of the 2000s, just before the crash in 2008 and 2009.
They kept rates too low for too long.
So I think there's real concern.
Before we turn to the next crash, Scott, I just have a quick follow-up question.
What happened in 1929 was just so, so many interesting things happened.
And we still talk about it today.
We still talk about the Great Depression.
Now, what is the one thing?
If you can just name one thing that all listeners should learn from that interesting period,
as stock investors.
What is that thing that they can learn from?
I think that the thing to take away from all the crashes actually is that they are all hauntingly similar.
Crashes are all hauntingly similar.
And that's really the reason I wrote the book.
But they're also extremely rare.
Crashes are extremely rare.
It was more than 20 years from the first to the second that I write about.
And then more than 50 years from the second to the third and then again 20 years from the third to the fourth.
I think that those are the two things that I would leave investors with.
Unfortunately, they're also inevitable.
Crashes are inevitable.
Why is that?
It's because our greed runs away with us and we lose sight of fear.
And every investor should have a reliable balance of those two things.
So it's unfortunate that we do have crashes because they do inflict a monetary and a psychic cost.
But over time, the stock market is a great place.
to provide for educations or retirements.
So I guess the lesson is don't get caught up in the hype.
And if you think that there's hype going on right now, well, don't get caught up in it.
So Scott, let's talk about the really famous 1987 crash.
But before we get into the meat of all the information surrounding it,
I think it's important for people to understand that this decade was full of activism.
call it the Carl Icon style of corporate governance raiders.
Talk to our audience a little bit about this and what was going on back during this decade.
Certainly.
Before the 1980s, businessmen were seen as gentlemen.
J.P. Morgan would have thought, first and foremost, that he was a gentleman.
And they did not believe in essentially rocking the boat.
When they did business, they wanted to do business together.
They wanted everybody to agree.
The 1980s, things changed.
And we ended up with what we'd end up calling corporate raiders.
People who were happy to rock the boat, who realized that corporations were holding
this hidden value and that only somebody was willing to rock the boat could unleash that value.
And the example, one of the first examples from the 1980s is an example from T-Boon Pickens.
Key Boom Pickens ran a small, small-ish petroleum firm, Mesa Petroleum, essentially drilling for either crude oil or natural gas.
And obviously he paid attention to the bigger firms in the business.
And one of the firms that he saw was a company called Cities Services, which had been around for a long time.
And Key Boone Pickens did a little math and realized that the price at which City Services stock was trading,
meant that all of the crude oil reserves that they had were selling for about $5 a barrel.
So if he could have bought the whole company at the current stock price,
he would have bought a whole bunch of proven oil reserves of crude oil for about $5 a peril.
Well, T-Boon Pickens also knew that the industry finding cost,
that is the cost to go out and do the geology, drill a test well and the like,
was $15, $1, $5.
and that crude oil was actually trading on the commodity markets for $30.
So crude oil, as reserves for city services, were trading at a huge discount to what the crude oil was really worth.
And so T-Bone Pickens realized the best place to find crude oil was on Wall Street.
And he drilled for it by trying to buy city services because he realized that as an activist,
that the value of the company was grossly understated by the stock market.
Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors.
All right. I want you guys to imagine spending three days in Oslo at the height of the summer.
You've got long days of daylight, incredible food, floating saunas on the Oslo Fjord,
and every conversation you have is with people who are actually shaping the future.
That's what the Oslo Freedom Forum is.
From June 1st through the 3rd, 2026, the Oslo Freedom,
Form is entering its 18th year bringing together activists, technologists, journalists, investors,
and builders from all over the world, many of them operating on the front lines of history.
This is where you hear firsthand stories from people using Bitcoin to survive currency collapse,
using AI to expose human rights abuses, and building technology under censorship and authoritarian
pressures. These aren't abstract ideas. These are tools real people are using right now.
You'll be in the room with about 2,000 extraordinary individuals, dissidents, founders, philanthropists,
policymakers, the kind of people you don't just listen to but end up having dinner with.
Over three days, you'll experience powerful mainstage talks, hands-on workshops on freedom,
tech, and financial sovereignty, immersive art installations, and conversations that continue
long after the sessions end. And it's all happening in Oslo in June.
If this sounds like your kind of room, well, you're in luck because you can have.
attend in person. Standard and patron passes are available at Osloof Freedom Forum.com with patron passes
offering deep access, private events, and small group time with the speakers. The Oslo
Freedom Forum isn't just a conference. It's a place where ideas meet reality and where the future
is being built by people living it. If you run a business, you've probably had the same thought
lately. How do we make AI useful in the real world? Because the upside is huge, but guessing your way
into it is a risky move. With NetSuite by Oracle, you can put AI to work today. NetSuite is the number
one AI cloud ERP, trusted by over 43,000 businesses. It pulls your financials, inventory, commerce,
HR, and CRM into one unified system. And that connected data is what makes your AI smarter.
It can automate routine work, surface actionable insights, and help you cut costs while
making fast AI-powered decisions with confidence. And now with the
NetSuite AI connector, you can use the AI of your choice to connect directly to your real business
data. This isn't some add-on, it's AI built into the system that runs your business. And whether
your company does millions or even hundreds of millions, NetSuite helps you stay ahead. If your
revenues are at least in the seven figures, get their free business guide, demystifying AI at
netsuite.com slash study. The guide is free to you at netsuite.com slash study. NetSuite.com
When I started my own side business, it suddenly felt like I had to become 10 different people
overnight wearing many different hats. Starting something from scratch can feel exciting,
but also incredibly overwhelming and lonely. That's why having the right tools matters.
For millions of businesses, that tool is Shopify. Shopify is the commerce platform behind
millions of businesses around the world and 10% of all e-commerce in the U.S. from brands just getting
started to household names. It gives you everything you need in one place, from inventory to payments
to analytics. So you're not juggling a bunch of different platforms. You can build a beautiful
online store with hundreds of ready-to-use templates, and Shopify is packed with helpful AI
tools that write product descriptions and even enhance your product photography. Plus, if you ever
get stuck, they've got award-winning 24-7 customer support. Start your business today with the industry's
best business partner, Shopify, and start hearing.
Sign up for your $1 per month trial today at Shopify.com slash WSB.
Go to Shopify.com slash WSB.
That's Shopify.com slash WSB.
All right, back to the show.
Before we go on, I just would like to give a quick handoff talking about cheaper pigings.
We did a thorough review of his book, The First Billion is the hottest, and I'll make
short to link to that in the show notes. Now, very interesting, Scott, the way that you
explained activism and the role in terms of driving up the prices. Now, a new concept I would like
to introduce to the audience here today together with you is the technique of portfolio insurance.
And there was something that was pioneered by Hayne Leland and Mark Rubinstein back in 1979.
Now, this is a hedging strategy developed to limit the losses an investor might face from a declining basket of stocks without having to sell the stocks themselves.
Now, all of that being said, because it sounds like a great product, like, why wouldn't we have that?
But keeping that in mind, could you please talk to us how this seemingly risk-reducing product led to a 22.6% decline.
The biggest one day percentage loss in history, that crucial day in 1987.
I had actually just started my career when the crash of 1987 happened, and it was certainly
something to live through.
I talked about every crash having some sort of financial contraption, and portfolio
insurance was certainly the financial contraption for 1987.
So portfolio insurance was certainly the contraption for 1987.
What is portfolio insurance?
Because it sounds like a wonderful idea.
Sounds like a wonderful concept.
The map of options on stocks can get pretty rigorous.
But some academics realize that if you were to trade a portfolio of stocks in small
slices and in a very particular way that you could replicate the performance of an insured portfolio,
hence portfolio insurance.
And these academics realized that if they used this,
really rigorous math, that theoretically they could limit the risk on a portfolio.
And again, that sounds like a wonderful thing.
They used stock index futures to do this eventually.
The problem is that portfolio insurance and the math at the heart of it rely on some
assumptions about our market, which just are not valid.
It assumes that there's essentially an unlimited amount of liquidity.
And we know that in times of stress, liquidity dries up.
So portfolio insurance called for selling tiny slivers of a portfolio in the form of stock index futures as the market fell and continuing to sell small slivers as the market continues to fall.
And eventually, if it falls enough, you have to sell more slivers and larger slivers.
So that's what happened in October of 1987.
Investors were entranced by this concept of portfolio insurance, and so they used it to a huge degree.
They also invested more money in the stock market because of portfolio insurance that they would have otherwise.
They felt confident that this insurance would save the day, essentially.
And so what happened is that there was just this cascade of selling from portfolio insurance
as more and more and more had to be sold, liquidity dries up in an environment like this.
And that's what happened.
The market was essentially trying to sell billions of dollars worth of stock, and there were simply no buyers.
So, Scott, you were just starting out during this period of time.
So what was that like to live through?
I had just started as a clerk on the floor of the Chicago Board of Trade in the financial futures markets.
I was a young guy, so I had the benefit of not having a lot of responsibilities.
I didn't know if I would have a job the next day.
I worked for a wonderful man who was a legendary trader, and he was able to navigate it very easily.
But you never know what else is going to happen.
Is the market simply going to close down, or am I going to have a job?
Fortunately, it worked out well.
It certainly didn't work out well for investors.
Again, there was a lot of psychic and financial damage.
But it was something interesting to live through because it explained it shows in sharp focus
that markets often behave irrationally, that the market can fall farther than you believe
it can, and that the worst time to try and right-size your portfolio is during a panic.
How did it change your investment approach if it changed your investment approach if it changed
investment approach to experience something like that so early in your career?
That's a great question. It really drives home the idea that markets can fall farther than we
believe and that some of these, again, financial contraptions have problems. And I didn't
really understand the idea of the financial contraption across stock market crashes at the time.
But I came to realize that some of these great ideas that people have.
have are flawed at their very core. And so you have to be a little bit, we'll call it dubious,
you have to be a little bit dubious about some of these great ideas.
So talk to us about the rebound, Scott. How long did it take? What was the sentiment through
that period of time? The interesting thing to take away is now that our equity market has
what we would call circuit breakers. So it would simply not be possible for our stock market
to drop by 22, almost 23% in a single day. The market would close down before that would happen.
And because these are engineered in such way that everybody knows what they are, these secret
circuit breakers, what they do is they tell everybody, let's just stop and think about what we're doing
and let's just not sell because we're in the middle of a panic. So that's sort of a loss for a
single day is simply not possible anymore. And that's important for an investor to realize.
Doesn't mean it couldn't happen over the course of a month or two, which would be pretty ugly.
But things are a little bit different.
I think we also have an understanding now about the interaction of some of our markets,
and we didn't understand how some of our markets interacted back in 1987.
So we're certainly a lot smarter about some of those issues than we used to be.
Now, Scott, we can definitely talk, I mean, almost an entire episode, if not more,
about ease of these crashes. But let's jump to the next crash here in 2008. Now, that is the story
of new financial products that changed the financial markets. What I really like in your book,
you talked about Bistro that was first introduced in 1997. And it's not as, it's not as delicious
as it sounds. It was the predecessor of the synthetic collateralized debt products that just grew
in popularity and was contributing to causing this major, major crisis. Now,
Now, Scott, could you please explain the relationship between the various debt products and
the financial crisis?
A few decades ago, a mortgage on a home was a very different sort of thing.
For example, the mortgage that my parents had on the home I grew up in, they got from
a local savings in loan, it was down the street, that's where they dropped off their check
every month, the savings and loan kept that mortgage, they kept that loan, it was an asset
for that savings and loan.
My parents knew some of the people who worked there.
They probably knew the banker who made them the mortgage.
That relationship changed fundamentally over the last, say, 20 or 30 years.
Instead of a mortgage being an asset that a savings and loan would keep on their books,
bankers realize it's really an asset that can be sold off.
And once it's sold off, it can be combined with a bunch of other mortgages.
And that makes sense.
There's no reason that an investor, let's say an institutional investor, might not want to own a big portfolio of, say, 10,000 mortgages.
They're going to take the risk, but they're also going to reap the interest rate rewards.
So that is an interesting concept.
Unfortunately, we got to the point where we wanted to divide up that portfolio of mortgages in different ways to satisfy different needs.
and we lost sight of the risk.
But really what happened was that there was this enormous appetite for mortgages from financial,
essentially from investment banks, to put into these mortgage-backed securities,
which could then be diced up and sold to investors.
And the problem with that is that this appetite for mortgages means that everybody lets their guard down a little bit.
The homeowner is able to get a bigger mortgage than they might,
otherwise. The mortgage broker gets paid for writing the mortgage. The bank that
originally makes the mortgage gets paid when they sell it. Everybody gets paid except the end
investor. And so again, some financial engineering got a little ahead of itself. And we ended up
with these products that destroyed the link between the end investor and the person who was
actually borrowing the money for a mortgage. And I think it's that destruction of that
link that really caused the problems in 2008, 2009.
So let's talk a little bit more about the mortgage-backed securities and all the key players
that had their hands in this crash and how they were incentivized.
What were the key motivations and catalysts?
It seemed that everybody had the incentive to get paid.
And it seemed like everybody was going to get paid.
The homeowner was going to get a big mortgage.
The rating agencies were going to get paid by the banks, who paid them?
to rate these deals. The investment bankers got paid when they bought these mortgages,
put them into mortgage-backed securities, and then sold them to investors. And policymakers got
paid to the degree that they were able to have satisfied their personal opinions about
how involved government should be in these sorts of things. The best way to express that everybody
was getting paid and that the link of trust had been broken is one of the phrases that
some of the mortgage brokers used and that some of the investment bankers used. And it was very,
very simply put, I'll be gone, you'll be gone. And what they meant was that we're going to get
paid for these deals now. We're going to get paid for writing mortgages or buying mortgages or
packaging mortgages and selling them. We're going to get paid now. And when the problems rise
because people aren't able to pay their mortgage, you and I will be gone. We will have. We will
cash the check, we'll be wealthy, maybe it will be retired, but we'll get paid and I'll be gone
and you'll be gone.
Very interesting the way that you phrase that, you can probably still make the argument
that a lot of people want to put blame of everything that happened back then.
Is that the right lens to look back at all the events back there saying, these people are
to blame?
How do you look at that?
They all got paid.
that means that they were all greedy.
To the degree that we're greedy for more money or more love or more free time,
it seems that everybody wants more of something.
Those people wanted more money.
So to look back and say that we're going to try and regulate greed
or legislate against greed, I think, is a mistake.
There were lots of problems that were made.
There were lots of mistakes that were made.
problems were generated.
But to a certain degree, they're human.
I mean, Warren Buffett is the first one to talk about fear versus greed.
And those are purely human emotions.
So, Scott, is it even possible to regulate greed or is there something else that can be done?
No, you simply can't.
I talk about every crash being abetted by some new sort of contraption.
The contraptions just changed.
The contraptions change.
They get much more sophisticated as time goes on.
The contraption for the very first crash, 1907, was a savings trust.
It was called a savings trust.
And what could sound better than that?
Two wonderful words put together to mean something entirely different.
It was really intended to be a savings in loan or a bank.
Ultimately, it became essentially a savings and loan that was grafted onto a hedge fund.
So the worst sort of thing.
But the point is that these contraptions, they all,
they evolve. They become much more sophisticated. They feed people's greed because people
are getting paid or believe that it reduces risk. And there's simply no way to legislate against
that. Let's turn out attention to the Crescent 2010. And this was a time where it seemed like
everyone suddenly started to talk about the Greek economy, which they never really seemed to have been
doing before, and perhaps that is a little surprising because it's such a small economy, only
around 3% of the total EU economy.
How would you best describe the Greek economy leading up to 2010, and why was the Greek economy
all of a sudden a problem for the entire financial system?
That's a great question.
And let me preface this by saying that people often ask, why did I write about the flash crash
in 2010?
because it happened very, very quickly.
And it was over almost as soon as it started.
It's certainly not as familiar to everybody as 2008, 1987, 1929,
and probably more people have heard of the panic of 1907 than remember the flash crash of 2010.
But I write about the flash crash of 2010.
I write about that because the next crash we have,
and I don't know if it's going to be a week from now or two decades from now,
but the next crash we have is going to look much more like the flash crash than it's
going to look like anything else.
It's certainly going to look more like the flash crash and it's going to look like
1929.
So that's why I write about the flash crash.
Now specifically Greece and the Eurozone economy, the best way to describe the Greek economy
in a period from say 2000 to 2010.
was a lie which was built on a disaster.
And what do I mean by that?
Well, the Greek economy was a disaster.
It was absolutely a disaster.
It was underperforming.
There were a few jobs.
Tax avoidance was not just something that was a problem.
It was essentially an avocation for every Greek citizen.
They felt like they almost, it seemed that they almost felt like it was their job to avoid taxes.
And it was tough to find.
fund an economy or a government that way. And even though they didn't have revenue coming in,
the Greek national government spent money like it was going out of style. One example in the book,
the Greek National Railroad one year had revenues of 100 million euros. The total money
that they pulled in was 100 million euros. But their expenses were seven times that. Their
expenses were 700 million euros. And the Greek finance minister calculated at one point that it would be
cheaper for the government to simply shut down the Greek National Railroad and pay for every passenger to take a taxi cab.
So that was the Greek government.
But they obviously couldn't shut down the railroad for political considerations.
But when it came time for them to try and get into the Eurozone, that is, the community of countries that uses the common currency, the common Euro currency, the Greek government was desperate to do so because of the benefits that they thought,
which would ensue, but they weren't even close to being able to meet the objective standards for inclusion, standard like the size of the government deficit, the amount of government debt.
So they simply started lying about these things to their European brothers.
And so eventually Europe let them into the Eurozone.
When the problem, the size of the problem in Greece became obvious, that's when everybody sat up in
took notice because there's no provision for divorce in the Eurozone. There's no provision for
somebody for an economy to leave the Eurozone. And so now the question becomes, is the entire
experiment going to collapse? And if it does, what does that do to France? What does it do to Germany?
What does it do to other Eurozone economies? And what does it do in the United States? And so that
is the uncertainty that caused the flash crash on May 6th of 2010. Let's take a quick break and hear
from today's sponsors.
No, it's not your imagination.
Risk and regulation are ramping up,
and customers now expect proof of security
just to do business.
That's why VANTA is a game changer.
VANTA automates your compliance process
and brings compliance, risk,
and customer trust together on one AI-powered platform.
So whether you're prepping for a SOC 2
or running an enterprise GRC program,
VANTA keeps you secure and keeps your deals moving.
Instead of chasing spreadsheets and screenshots, Vanta gives you continuous automation across more than 35
security and privacy frameworks. Companies like Ramp and Riter spend 82% less time on audits with Vanta.
That's not just faster compliance, it's more time for growth. If I were running a startup or scaling a team today,
this is exactly the type of platform I'd won in place. Get started at vanta.com slash billionaires.
That's vanta.com slash billionaires.
Ever wanted to explore the world of online trading but haven't dared try?
The futures market is more active now than ever before and plus 500 futures is the perfect
place to start.
Plus 500 gives you access to a wide range of instruments, the S&P 500, NASDAQ, Bitcoin, gas,
and much more.
Explore equity indices, energy, metals, 4X, crypto, and beyond.
With a simple and intuitive platform, you can trade from anywhere, right from your phone.
Deposit with a minimum of $100 and experience the fast, accessible futures trading you've been waiting for.
See a trading opportunity.
You'll be able to trade it in just two clicks once your account is open.
Not sure if you're ready, not a problem.
Plus 500 gives you an unlimited, risk-free demo account with charts and analytic tools for you to practice on.
With over 20 years of experience, Plus 500 is your gateway to the markets.
Visit Plus500.com to learn more.
Trading in futures involves risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone.
Not all applicants will qualify.
Plus 500, it's trading with a plus.
Billion dollar investors don't typically park their cash in high-yield savings accounts.
Instead, they often use one of the premier passive income strategies for institutional investors.
Private Credit.
Now, the same passive income strategy is available to investors of all sizes thanks to the
Fundrise income fund, which has more than $600 million invested in a 7.97% distribution rate.
With traditional savings yields falling, it's no wonder private credit has grown to be a
trillion dollar asset class in the last few years.
Visit fundrise.com slash WSB to invest in the Fundrise income fund in just minutes.
The fund's total return in 2025 was 8%, and the average annual total return since inception
is 7.8%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, current distribution rate as of 1231,
2025. Carefully consider the investment material before investing, including objectives, risks, charges,
and expenses. This and other information can be found in the income funds prospectus at
fundrise.com slash income. This is a paid advertisement.
All right. Back to the show.
Scott, let's talk more about this flash crash that happened on May 6, 2010.
In your book, you talk about how the algorithms misunderstood the liquidity in the market,
and this was really fascinating stuff.
So describe this to our audience.
Yeah, it's a great question because, again, the next crash is going to look like the flash crash.
There were certainly reasons to be worried about our stock market in early May of 2010.
And there was one institutional investor in particular who was worried.
And so they wanted to reduce their exposure for their investors.
They wanted to do so by selling stock index futures, which now trade almost exclusively
electronically.
In 1987, it was a bunch of guys and bright red jackets jumping around in a pit.
And in 2010, it was almost exclusively electronic.
And so this investor wanted to sell electronically.
They wanted to sell a bunch of futures contracts, which was perfect.
reasonable way to hedge. But they wanted to do so in size. That is, they wanted to sell a lot of contracts,
but that means that they also wanted to sell in a way which would not drive the price down via their own
selling. So they turned to an algorithm. Actually, they turned to three different algorithms.
Eventually, they said that we're going to sell a certain number of contracts every minute equal to
the volume of the market in the previous minute. And the problem with that is,
is that their own selling ballooned the volume.
They had overconfidence in the liquidity that's provided via electronic trading.
And they essentially tricked themselves into believing that the market could sustain a bunch
more selling than it actually could.
And so within the span of just a few minutes, their lack of understanding of real liquidity
in the market led them to sell so many futures contracts, overwhelmed the liquidity in the
market and drive the Dow Jones Industrial average down by 10% again in just a matter of minutes.
That's an absolutely amazing story. And keep in mind that you just, as you mentioned before,
that crashes would probably look different than have historically look more like 2010.
How should investors position themselves knowing that?
That's a question I get a lot. What should I do? What should I do to protect myself? Well,
many of vehicles that exist are pretty expensive. I spent my time on the trading floors of Chicago as
professional option trader, and you think that options are insurance, I can buy insurance
and protect myself. The problem is that insurance ends up being very expensive. So what can you do?
What you can do is not get carried away. So right now the stock market is doing very well.
This may be a time to be more fearful than greedy.
In early 2009, the market looked horrible.
When it looks horrible, it's probably a time to be more greedy than fearful.
In addition, there are certain good old-fashioned ways of approaching the stock market.
Have your money spread around.
That's called diversification.
Have a little bit of money in the stock market.
Have a little bit of money in fixed income.
We know that diversification is the only free lunch in investing in that it can increase
your risk-adjusted returns.
So unfortunately, there's no silver bullet.
There are great vehicles that didn't exist 20 years ago, like exchange-traded funds,
which are much cheaper for the average investor to use than an old-fashioned mutual fund.
Take advantage of those.
But also realize that liquidity dries up during a panic.
So if you think that when panic hits, I'm simply going to sell, well, you're going to be really unhappy with your results.
It's important to realize that stocks have been a great way to build wealth for millions of people.
But one of the reasons that stocks do so well is that sometimes you are just along for the right.
That is, you're not going to be able to get out during a panic.
So how would people position themselves?
kind of old-fashioned, logical, fear versus greed, diversification is really the best way to do it.
So one of the key takeaways, or I guess two of the key takeaways I took from your book,
was how much more financial markets are now becoming integrated and how fast everything is today.
This is not like the old days where you can do arbitrage between London and New York by calling in by telephone.
believe it or not, that actually did happen once. But what does the increase in financial integration
mean for us as investors? That's a wonderful question, because you're right, there was a time
when you could call from Chicago or New York to London, and that was considered essentially
instantaneous. Now, as an example, we are traders, high-frequency traders, are bumping up
literally against the speed of light.
That is now the problem that they have.
That's the hurdle that they have when it comes to executing trades.
For example, most orders that are sent between New York and Chicago or Chicago and New York
are done via microwave.
They're not done by fiber optic cable because fiber optic is too slow.
So it's done via microwave.
and those firms can tell you what the weather is like between Chicago and New York,
because their trades will be slowed down by a few nanoseconds if the weather is bad,
if it's raining between Chicago and New York.
That will give you an indication of how speed is now critical.
But speed cuts both ways.
And it's necessary for a high-frequency trader,
but it doesn't really take anything away from the long-term investment.
So when you read about these things or you hear about these things, as a long-term investor, you should be interested, but it doesn't put you at a disadvantage.
The best advantage you have is, again, the right sort of diversification, a strategy that makes sense for you, discipline, and using products that are lower costs for the investor.
That's what people should be doing, and that's how they can make the stock market work for them.
Scott, do you have a broader concerns for our financial markets today?
That's a great question because as a young person as an investor, I came up in a time when
there were people who were required to provide liquidity.
For example, in the New York Stock Exchange, there were specialists who had a really
lucrative franchise to trade stocks.
Here in the United States now, there is no person, no body, no trader, no.
no investor who was required to provide liquidity.
And I think that that is probably the biggest weakness that our stock market,
our financial markets in general, have right now.
And we've seen that.
We saw that during the flash crash.
We saw that some high-frequency traders not understanding what was going on,
simply refuse to participate.
And they're not required to provide liquidity,
despite the fact that they have access to some of these markets that other investors
don't. I think that would be the larger concern that I would have.
This has been absolutely amazing, Scott. The name of the book is A History of the United States
in Five Crashes, and I highly recommend everyone here in the audience to pick it up. Now, Scott,
where can the audience learn more about you, your company, and your book?
Well, Stegg, as you know, I'm a contributor to CNBC so they can see me on CNBC. They can also
go to the author website. Author website is scottnations.com. And I also have a presence on Amazon
author page. Scott, this has really been fantastic. I have thoroughly enjoyed this conversation.
And we'll be sure to provide links to all those resources in the show notes. Thank you so much
for taking time out of your busy day to talk with us. Wonderful to be here. Thanks so much for
bringing this story to investors around the world. All right, guys. So this point in time in the show,
we'll play a question from the audience.
And this question comes from Hermann.
Hello, Preston Stig.
This is Hermann from Argentina.
And I wanted to thank you for your amazing show.
I listen every week.
My question is specifically on sector ETFs.
I found some areas in some sectors there,
they have some value.
And I was researching some stocks.
But then I thought, why not invest in the sector,
which has all the best stocks already into the ETF.
My question specifically is, would be better to invest in stock,
in value stocks, or in sectors, ETF of the same sector.
I hope that question makes sense.
And I thank you again for your amazing show.
Thank you.
So, Hermann, this is a very interesting question you bring up.
Let's talk about an example that is relevant today.
Whenever I'm looking in my screen here on TP Finance, I see a lot of financial companies
that are relatively undervalued.
So one approach surely is to buy a sector ETF just with financial companies.
Now, what you said was that the sector had the best stocks.
The way that sector ETF's work is that they are typically market weighted, meaning that
bigger banks like Bank of America and Wells Fargo would take up a larger part of the ETF than
smaller banks. Jim Greenblan, who you might know, have shown that equal-weighted sector
ETFs perform better than a market cap index because the stocks that are temporarily out
of favor would go up in price and stocks that are overvalued would go down in price,
which would be under and overrepresented in a market capitalized index respectively.
So if you want to go the sector ETF route, you might consider doing an equal weighted index.
But generally, I don't think that sector ETAFs is a bad idea if you choose the most undervalued
sector, which right now would be financials and energy.
But let me give you another suggestion.
If you would buy Vanguard's value ETF, you can get it for as cheap as 0.0.04% in expense ratio.
and you would already have it all representation of financial stocks.
For instance, you would have 23.6% compared to 15% in the S&P 500,
and you would have the added benefit of not having to rebalance.
Because when you rebalance or outright permanently sell your SECTF,
you would have to pay taxes.
So if you stay within a solid value ETF, you would save the taxes.
Of course, the drawback is that you won't be as concentrated in that sector.
but if you do plan to hold a few sectors, which it sounds like on your question that you are,
you really have to be good at picking those sectors and sell them at just the right time
to outweigh the extra cost and taxes.
The reason is that if the value ETF is selected probably,
it would automatically overrepresent the most undervalued stocks and therefore rebalance for you.
Hernan, Stig knocked this one out of the ballpark.
I don't have anything else valuable to.
say on top of what he's already put out there. But for asking such a great question, we're going
to give you free access to our intrinsic value course for anyone wanting to check out the course.
Go to tipintrinsicvalue.com. That's tip intrinsic value.com. The course also comes with
access to our TIP finance tool, which helps you find and filter undervalued stock picks.
If anyone else wants to get a question played on the show, go to AsktheInvesters.com and you can
record your question there. If it gets played on the show, you get a bunch of
of free and valuable stuff.
All right, guys.
As you may have noticed, we've set up quite a few shows lately,
Millennial Investing, Silicon Valley, and most recently, The Good Life.
Today, I'm proud to say that we're launching a brand new show,
which is the last show we plan to set up for the time being,
and the reason is that this show is very special.
Because of all the non-stock investing questions, Preston and I are getting,
By far, by far, what our listeners are most interest in is real estate.
Therefore, I'm also excited to announce that earlier this week, we launched a brand new show
called Real Estate Investing by the Investor's podcast network.
And the host of the new show is an experienced real estate enmaster himself.
And it's our very own Robert Leonard from millennial investing.
Robert, welcome back on the Amherstas podcast.
Stig, thanks so much for having me.
It still feels a bit surreal to be here on We Study Billionaires and part of the TIP team.
As you know, We Study Billionaires has been my favorite podcast for four to five years now,
and it was really the first podcast I ever listened to.
It really got me interested in podcasts, so needless to say, I'm super excited to be here.
Thank you for your kind words.
And Robert, listeners of Millennium Investing are already familiar with your extensive knowledge
in real estate investing, but for those who are a little bit of life.
listeners who do not know you're too well why I're setting up a real estate podcast.
The millennial investing show has been going great so far and we'll continue to cover great
topics like stock investing, investing in side hustles, startups, entrepreneurship, and personal
finance. But I'm also super passionate about real estate. So I wanted to launch a real estate
show to really dive deep into all kinds of real estate strategies and really be a resource to
new investors to help them get started. And if we talked about all the things I want to talk about
related to real estate on the millennial investing show, it'd just become a real estate show itself.
So we decided to launch a second show, focusing specifically on that real estate.
And Robert, you have such a great personal story. How and why did you start to invest in real estate?
So I actually got started in real estate by accident. I kind of fell into what we now know as a
strategy of house hack. So it all started back when I was just entering college, my parents told me that
when I graduated college and started to work my first career and started to bring in a salary,
that I was going to be required to pay them rent to live in their home, which completely made
sense, but I didn't want to have to do that. And so I made a pretty big goal to purchase a house
as soon as I graduated college. That way, I could buy my own asset, pay for my own mortgage,
rather than paying rent to my parents.
And so what I did was I worked nearly full-time my entire time throughout college,
and I was fortunate enough to be able to save up my money
and purchase a small condo before I even walked at my college graduation.
And so when I graduated college, I moved into the condo,
and I realized that there was a bedroom in this house that I never went into.
I'd walk by it every day, and I don't think I opened the door one time
in the first two or three months that I lived there.
And so I realized I should probably do something with that room.
And so I ended up renting that room out and it covered almost all of my mortgage.
And so I was able to live for very cheap.
And at the time, I didn't know that this was a strategy known as house hacking,
but I would come to find out that it was.
And I realized that I was actually a real estate investor.
And what was interesting about that was I never thought that I could become a real estate investor.
I always was a stock investor and I never thought real estate investing was within my reach.
I always thought it was an asset class or a strategy that only wealthy investors could access.
And so I started to study real estate a lot more. I started to read a lot of books and listen to podcasts.
And then I found out that a lot of people doing this were just like me. And I realized that I could do it too.
And so ever since then, I've continued to invest in real estate and continued to scale my portfolio.
Fast forward to today, I'm still working on my real estate goals. I'm not where I want to be yet.
I've done a few real estate deals and I've read a ton of books and listened to a lot of podcasts
about real estate, but I'm really still on my journey too. So I want to take the listeners on
my journey through real estate in hopes that that will help them reach their goals as well.
And we can all learn the best strategies and tips from successful real estate investors that
we have on the show.
Robert, let's talk more about your goals and your journey.
People have a lot of different reasons to start investing in real estate.
You mentioned house hacking, which you did, which is basically a way to lower your mortgage
significantly or perhaps even live there at no cost at all.
Others are more ambitious and they want to invest to accumulate properties and perhaps
even become financial independent.
I guess you could say you have everything in between.
What is your goal with your real estate portfolio?
My ultimate goal is, like you mentioned, financial independence.
And so my goal with the real estate portfolio is to build a portfolio of buy and hold rental
properties that will provide passive income that will ultimately allow me to spend more time
with the ones I love, doing the things I love.
Like I said, I'm not there yet, but I'm working on it.
And once I get there, I'll reassess my goals and decide where I really want to go from there.
A very value investing mindset to real estate investing.
And Robert, we have talked back and forth about you creating various resources for real estate
to help beginners and intermediate real estate investors, just like we're doing for
TIP Academy when it comes to stock investing.
And we're very excited to go that route later this year.
But right now, all your focus is on your brand new show.
Please talk to us more about it.
What can we expect?
I certainly do try to take a value investing approach to real estate, and you'll hear on the first
episode of the real estate show with Chad Carson that he also takes a value investing mindset
into real estate. He's also a big fan of Warren Buffett like I am and you Stig and probably
everybody listening to The We Study Billionaire show. So I think it's a great segue from this show
into real estate. And so on the show, I'll be talking with successful investors using various
different real estate investing strategies to help educate both the listeners and me on a real
estate investing journey, whether they're just getting started or they're looking to grow their
business. And I truly believe that one of the most important things about real estate is just
doing that first deal. A lot of successful real estate investors I've talked to have told me,
and I've even seen this myself, that real estate investors almost never do just one deal.
They've either done no deals or multiple deals.
And usually those people that have done multiple deals have done many deals.
So for new investors, my goal is to give them all of the resources and information needed to get their first deal.
If I can help investors get their first deal by listening to this podcast, I'd consider that a huge success because I know the rest will take care of itself.
Once you get that first deal, it really does continue to snowball.
And for investors who have already done a deal or even a few deals, my goal is to help you
scale your portfolio or really hit whatever real estate goals you may have.
So, guys, if you like our show, The Amassas Podcast, you are 100% going to love Robert's
new show.
The name of the show is Real Estate Investing by The Amherstas podcast.
And to subscribe to the show, please go to your podcast app on your iPhone, Android, or whatever
you listen to our podcast.
and make sure to search for the Amherstors Podcast Network
to find our new real estate podcast.
That is the Amherstors Podcast Network.
You can also find a direct link in our show notes
with more information on how to subscribe.
But guys, that was all the Preston, Robert and I had
for this week's episode of The Amherstead's podcast.
We see you till I again next week.
Thank you for listening to TIP.
To access our show notes, courses or forums,
go to the investorspodcast.com.
This show is for entertainment purposes only.
Before making any decisions, consult a professional.
This show is copyrighted by the Investors Podcast Network.
Written permissions must be granted before syndication or rebroadcasting.
