We Study Billionaires - The Investor’s Podcast Network - TIP306: Frontier Investing w/ Kiyan Zandiyeh (Business Podcast)
Episode Date: July 19, 2020Kiyan Zandiyeh is the Chief Investment Officer for Sturgeon Capital. He has extensive experience with early-stage business and pioneer investing. Throughout the show, we talk about different countries... and how to assess equities inside of those countries. IN THIS EPISODE, YOU’LL LEARN: How to invest in frontier markets from A-Z. Why frontier market investing should have a place in any well-diversified portfolio. How to assess the political and currency risk of a country. How to do boots-on-the-ground-research and understanding lollapalooza effects. Why Uzbekistan is the most interesting frontier market right now. BOOKS AND RESOURCES Join the exclusive TIP Mastermind Community to engage in meaningful stock investing discussions with Stig, Clay, and the other community members. Sturgeon Capital’s website. Learn more about Sturgeon Capital’s Uzbekistan Growth Equity Fund. Tweet directly to Sturgeon Capital. NEW TO THE SHOW? Check out our We Study Billionaires Starter Packs. Browse through all our episodes (complete with transcripts) here. Try our tool for picking stock winners and managing our portfolios: TIP Finance Tool. Enjoy exclusive perks from our favorite Apps and Services. Stay up-to-date on financial markets and investing strategies through our daily newsletter, We Study Markets. Learn how to better start, manage, and grow your business with the best business podcasts. SPONSORS Support our free podcast by supporting our sponsors: Bluehost Fintool PrizePicks Vanta Onramp SimpleMining Fundrise TurboTax Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm
Transcript
Discussion (0)
You're listening to TIP.
Hey, everyone, welcome to the Investors podcast.
On today's show, we have an awesome guest that's going to talk to us about frontier investing.
His name is Kian Zandiyah, and he's the chief investment officer for Sturgeon Capital.
Kian has extensive experience with early stage business and pioneer investing.
Throughout the show, we talk about different countries and how to assess equities inside of those countries.
And then in the second half of the show, we specifically focus on the way he's investing in Uzbekistan.
This is a fascinating discussion.
and I have no doubt you guys are going to really enjoy learning about this style of investing as much as I did.
So with that, let's go ahead and dive in.
You are listening to The Investors Podcast, where we study the financial markets and read the books that influence self-made billionaires the most.
We keep you informed and prepared for the unexpected.
Welcome to The Investors Podcast. I'm your host, Dick Bruterson, and as always, I'm accompanied by my co-host, Preston Pish.
Today's guest is Kian Zandiyya.
Kian, welcome to our show.
Thank you very much.
Pleasure with you.
Today's topic is investing in frontier markets.
And that is not to be confused with investing in emerging markets.
Kian, perhaps you could provide an overview of the difference between the two and what
it really means to be investing in frontier markets.
So it's an important question, actually.
and I guess to take a first step is there's no universal definition of frontier emerging or even
develop for that matter. And if you take the indices as they stand and you invert the current
indexes, let's say, by the country constituents, what do you quickly find or infer is that there is no
unifying theme that exists. And the difficulty of that is, let's say, for public market investors,
is that for active investors on a relative basis, their performance is judged by the indexes.
and passive investors are getting exposure to what would arguably not be frontier.
And the issue of the indices, I think, is that the lens of which they're put together is
capital market sophistication.
That is, to what extent have the capital markets of these countries allow for international
investors to access to?
And what that implicitly means is that you have a whole host of countries that have simply
skipped or missed than investors are not getting access to.
And so our focus is really on the private market where we're not beholden by these
traditional definitions, and we can act as we see fit. And so what we've tried to do is create a
simple definition of what we consider frontier and emerging. And the way we look at it is a frontier
country is effectively one that has substantially below average levels of private sector participation,
and by virtue of that has very low levels of foreign investment. And emerging are countries that we
see developing in the sense that either the government or some sort of catalyst has taken place
to allow for private sector participation and foreign investment to increase.
And what we like to define what we do is investing in countries that are frontier, by the
definition I just provided, but are emerging in a sense that they are allowing for the private
sector to play a larger role in the economy and by virtue of that foreign investors to also
participate. What that effectively means is that because there has been a lack of, let's say,
true private capital, which is more incentivized to capitalize on opportunities in, let's say,
government capital, that opportunities can be exploited or capitalized that the rest of the
world has already seen, but that these countries haven't yet experienced. And in terms of
frontier markets specifically, I think what has changed in the landscape over the past five to
10 years has been that traditionally, the only way to really express a view, especially on the
private side, was to invest in, let's say traditional businesses. Let's say,
a bottling factory or some sort of industrial business. And the difficulty with that is, what you're
effectively doing is you're optimizing what has already been in the country rather than creating
or optimizing for what is best practice or best business models. And the revenue side of that
is implicitly linked with GDP. Now, what you have in these countries is that GDP is structurally
higher but more volatile. And so your revenues and even from an FX perspective, there's more volatility.
And what a lot of people focus on is, let's say, cost optimization.
And let's say you have a business that has 20% operating margins, but peak margins in an industry
of 30%.
There's not really that much room for you to optimize.
And so, again, you fall back to revenue growth.
And revenue growth in a scenario where you have to make large, tangible investments is
difficult.
But what has happened is the beauty of, let's say, development markets is because of a base-level
technological infrastructure improvement, the speed of which companies can grow has been
extremely accelerated. To an extent that base level of, let's say, digital infrastructure is there
as well. So you have, let's say, 70% to 80% internet penetration. You have 50% to 60% smartphone
penetration. But none of these business models that we know have, let's say, positive economic
dynamics, positive unity economics that are scalable, have been implemented. And so our focus really
is on this area where we believe it's a secular trend that is decorrelated. It's not too linked
of the economy, but you're taking advantage of all the benefits of what frontier markets typically
present that haven't been previously available to investors looking at this.
So, Kian, when we hear about growth rates in frontier markets, we often hear about
generous double-digit returns. However, the highest returns are often denominated in local
currencies for that specific country. How do I, as an investor, assess the currency risk
when I convert back into USD or euros or any other major established currency?
Let's say on a macro basis, I would say country by country is different, but there are tell-tale
signs of the structural dynamics of an economy that could lead to FX vulnerability.
It could be current account deficit, it could be budget deficit, could be high levels
of external debt.
And these are stuff that are easily available for an investor to observe and to choose
whether to participate in the economy or in the markets or not.
What we're trying to do is obviously stay away from those sort of economy.
economies, what we like our economies that have natural current account surpluses, have very low levels
of external debt.
And so from a, let's say, foundational perspective, you're protected.
Then there's the portfolio or investment micro basis where on a company by company basis,
you can build in, let's say, implicit hedges.
So what you want to avoid are, let's say, companies where you're importing your input factor,
that is, your costs are FX based, but your revenues are local currency base.
that will always leave the business vulnerable to FX shocks.
The flip side of that is you have companies that may export a product or a service
whereby they're getting hard currency revenues, but their costs are local currency.
And in a scenario where the currency weakens, your margins actually expand.
What we also care a lot about is companies to have pricing power.
So what you normally have is, let's say, a weakening in currency, but then inflation coming.
What we want to be able to see is that a company has demonstrative power of pricing,
whatever inflation may be. So that what will happen is in the short term, yes, you'll feel a nominal
pain from the currency weakening, but over the mid to long term, really that pricing power comes to
fruition and provides a hedge to that currency. And on a separate basis, what we try and do when we're
looking at investments is really stress tests against worse possible FX scenarios. And if we find
that we're not comfortable with what the business will look like in that scenario, then we simply
pass. I mean, we like to think that we want inbuilt resiliency within the business models from
various different perspectives, but especially on the FX side of thing.
Frontier markets is such an interesting type of investment. And typically, people don't want to be
100% exposed into something like that, but perhaps they might take a small part of that
portfolio and allocate into something that's different. Could you please talk about the correlation
and risk premium between specific frontier markets and a portfolio?
of global market-weighted equities?
If we'd take a look at, let's say, public markets where more data is available, let's say,
MSCI frontier, what you've actually found over the past 10 years is that they are pretty
decarrelated. So I think you have a correlation with developed markets about 0.3.
And only 3% of individual returns in countries can be explained by other frontier markets.
So you take the box from a decarrelation perspective.
From a risk premium perspective, frontier markets basically failed to invest.
So if we take MSCI Frontier over the past 10 years, it's annualized about 4% in dollars.
What I think explains both the correlation dynamic and the risk premium dynamic in public markets
has been drain of liquidity that you've seen from these markets over the past 10 years.
And for us, it's a structural flaw of public market investing in frontier markets,
in that you may be right on your investment thesis,
but for the validation of that investment thesis to be liquidity coming into the market,
especially foreign liquidity in the absence of local sophisticated capital markets, you're basically
investing with a huge variable you have no control over. So maybe you're right in five years,
maybe you're right in seven years. But as an investor where your career is in it, is the funds that
you manage, it's very difficult. Similarly, in private equity, I would argue that the risk premium
side of things have failed as well. So if you look at realized returns over the past 10 years from
frontier market private equity funds, we talk on 9.87%. Now, if we put that on the spectrum of
emerging and develop, emerging mean, let's say, realize it's been around 15%. Developed markets have
been 19%, upper quarter of was 29%. So frontier from a risk premium perspective, and the private
market has really been the opposite end of the spectrum that one would normally want. And again,
going back to my previous answer, I really think that has been an issue of allocation as opposed to the
fundamental benefits of Frontier, in that again, if you're investing in traditional businesses,
it's very difficult to unlock value. If you're investing in previously owned state companies because
they're nominally cheap, it's very difficult to unlock value. And the way we think about it is,
well, what is a return that investors should expect from Frontier? And if we're focusing on the
private side of things, if you take a look at developed market returns, as I said,
let's take the upper quartile of 29% of the past 10 years. It would be rational.
to assume that investors would want a premium. And if we take, let's a GMO forecast of kind of what
premium should be, it's roughly 10%. So our target return is 40% annualized, which means roughly just above
5x in five years on capital. Now, that may seem somewhat of an ambitious target, but our view
is that if we cannot achieve it, there's simply no reason for us to exist as a firm. And the way we
think about it is when we're appraising or looking at investments, 40% is simply our discount.
down rate. And if it does pass that, then our whole job is making sure that the assumptions
that go into how that return is achieved is validated and that we have conviction.
So, Kian, most investors like the certainty that there won't be any major unexpected changes
to the investment climate. That's different in frontier markets. So how do you assess the
political risk in a frontier market? I don't think there's anywhere in the world at the moment where there
is in political risk. And I would argue that political risk in more developed countries is higher. Why? Because
you have democratic political cycles that are every four years. And within that, there are dynamics that
unfold that drive markets. So if we take the U.S. as an example, for a tweet, Trump can move the market.
The narrative of 2019 was the China trade deal. You've had examples of, let's say, Switzerland in
2015 when they abandoned the current FX floor investors lost money. There are a lot of things
that are happening around the world, but especially in developed markets, that present investors
some form of political risk. With frontier markets is somewhat different. So what you have is
there's less democratic structures and what you normally have is one political system that
leads or operates for an extended period of time. Now, that doesn't necessarily mean that that
political system is positive or negative, but at least you're comfortable of the lay of the land.
And what you normally happen are momentous shifts every, let's say, 10, 15, 20 years,
where the leadership structure of a country changes.
And what we want to be is on the right side of that.
If a country has just gone through a change to observe that that change is positive,
that there is stability to that change, and then we start to invest.
So that's on a macro level.
On a micro level, what you have from political risk is, let's say if you're involved
in an industry where all of a sudden the regulation changes, the law changes,
that could affect the pricing of the product or service at the last.
selling. And what you normally find is, especially if you're involved in investments that are
somewhat involved in the ecosystem of the government from a strategic asset perspective,
there are potential risks that. So let's say a country is one of the biggest assets is,
let's say oil and gas. If you're somewhere in the value chain of that, you potentially fall
of political risks. And so what we want to do is the way we think about it is we don't want
to be involved in investments where we're taking from the ecosystem, but we're adding to it.
So, let's say if a lot of people like the concept of investing in privatizations, they've
seen success stories in other countries.
But what you normally find in these companies that they have bloated workforces and that the rational
first thing to do would be to basically make redundant up to 50% of the workforce.
Now, as a first step in an economy which you're going, that doesn't win you any favors.
But if I flip it and say, well, let's say we're investing in e-commerce, what are you doing that?
What you're saying to local logistic providers, which aren't really making money, is, look, by working with us, your revenue will increase.
You employ the youth population.
Again, you're tackling a problem of youth unemployment.
You're making it easy for people to access products which they otherwise wouldn't be able to access to and at a lower cost.
So you're adding value to the ecosystem.
And the final point to kind of I would say that we really focus on is building intangible value as opposed to tangible value.
tangible value is much easier to be expropriated.
It's much easier to criticize.
But intangible value is something that is difficult to build and is very difficult for
someone to say, oh, well, we don't like this business.
We're taking away to CEO and putting a new one because there isn't anyone that could run
that business the same way that the incumbent is already doing.
Whereas with a gold mine, you can easily take away the CEO and put in someone else to run it.
Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors.
All right.
I want you guys to imagine spending three days in Oslo at the height of the somber.
You've got long days of daylight, incredible food, floating saunas on the Oslo Fjord, and every
conversation you have is with people who are actually shaping the future.
That's what the Oslo Freedom Forum is.
From June 1st through the 3rd, 2026, the Oslo Freedom Forum is entering its 18th year,
bringing together activists, technologists, journalists, investors, and builders from all over the
world, many of them operating on the front lines of history.
This is where you hear firsthand stories from people using business.
Bitcoin to survive currency collapse, using AI to expose human rights abuses, and building technology
under censorship and authoritarian pressures.
These aren't abstract ideas.
These are tools real people are using right now.
You'll be in the room with about 2,000 extraordinary individuals, dissidents, founders,
philanthropists, policymakers, the kind of people you don't just listen to but end up having
dinner with.
Over three days, you'll experience powerful mainstage talks, hands-on workshops,
freedom tech and financial sovereignty, immersive art installations, and conversations that continue
long after the sessions end. And it's all happening in Oslo in June. If this sounds like your kind of
room, well, you're in luck because you can attend in person. Standard and patron passes are available
at Osloof Freedom Forum.com with patron passes offering deep access, private events, and small
group time with the speakers. The Oslo Freedom Forum isn't just a conference. It's a place where ideas,
meet reality and where the future is being built by people living it.
If you run a business, you've probably had the same thought lately.
How do we make AI useful in the real world? Because the upside is huge, but guessing your way
into it is a risky move. With NetSuite by Oracle, you can put AI to work today. NetSuite is the
number one AI Cloud ERP, trusted by over 43,000 businesses. It pulls your financials, inventory,
commerce, HR, and CRM into one unified system. And that connected data is what makes your AI smarter.
It can automate routine work, surface actionable insights, and help you cut costs while making
fast AI-powered decisions with confidence. And now with the Netsuite AI connector, you can use
the AI of your choice to connect directly to your real business data. This isn't some add-on,
it's AI built into the system that runs your business. And whether your company does millions
or even hundreds of millions, NetSuite helps you stay ahead.
If your revenues are at least in the seven figures, get their free business guide,
Dymistifying AI at netsuite.com slash study.
The guide is free to you at netsuite.com slash study.
NetSuite.com slash study.
When I started my own side business, it suddenly felt like I had to become 10 different
people overnight wearing many different hats.
Starting something from scratch can feel exciting,
but also incredibly overwhelming and lonely. That's why having the right tools matters. For millions
of businesses, that tool is Shopify. Shopify is the commerce platform behind millions of businesses
around the world and 10% of all e-commerce in the U.S. from brands just getting started to household
names. It gives you everything you need in one place, from inventory to payments to analytics.
So you're not juggling a bunch of different platforms. You can build a beautiful online store with
hundreds of ready-to-use templates, and Shopify is packed with helpful AI tools that write
product descriptions and even enhance her product photography. Plus, if you ever get stuck,
they've got award-winning 24-7 customer support. Start your business today with the industry's
best business partner, Shopify, and start hearing... Sign up for your $1 per month trial today
at Shopify.com slash WSB. Go to Shopify.com.com slash...
WSB.
That's Shopify.com slash WSB.
All right.
Back to the show.
So I guess I would like to preface my next question and say that this might come from
someone who hasn't been invested ever in frontier markets and only starting to invest in
emerging markets recently, again knowing that there's no official definition between
the two.
One thing that I as an investor always concerned about, the information that I get,
How do I validate if that's true? And some of the data might even be hard to collect. So I guess
that's my way of saying, okay, so you have a research process, but how do you validate the data
you collect? The benefit of investing, let's say in the U.S. is by law, by regulation, the quality
and the quantity of information that's provided to investors allows for an appropriate judgment
to be made as to an investment. Now, what that means is that that information has effectively
been commoditized. The beauty of frontier markets is that it hasn't. And so as an investor,
if you have an edge in collecting valuable information, then that can really be valuable.
So what we do is in any country that we invest in, for us, it's important to build a local
team on the ground. And one of the reasons that's important is that they have an understanding
of the level of information that's needed for us to make an investment appraisal. And what they
actively do with the companies that we're looking at, and I'm focusing on the private market,
here is they effectively handhold and actively work with the management to dig out the information
that's necessary for us to appraise. The other thing that's important in these countries is that
what you don't want to be in a situation is where there's a huge asymmetry of information.
So you could go into a management meeting and the guy could be extremely charming, that could
be charismatic. What we want to do is effectively flip that asymmetry. So when we're looking
in a business, what we initially do is identify the variables to say what are the important
variables that are driving this business. What are the data points that we can match to that?
And what we request or what we insist on is that company having the data infrastructure
within the business for us to be able to see it on basically a live basis. So on a weekly
basis, biweekly basis, we're getting data inputs as to what factually is happening with
the business and then for us to drive the discussion and narrative of management off of that.
So we believe that's important from, let's say, practical investment perspective.
The other factor is, let's say, governance aspect in that, again, when you're a discussion,
when it comes to develop markets, you're reasonably confident that the laws and regulations
provide for a base level of governance infrastructure that can make you comfortable.
What we effectively do is what we create what we call a stakeholder map.
So that really is a map of all the factors that are driving the business.
So you want to know if the guy is, if he's buying supplies, if he's buying a data center,
if he's buying an office, is there any related parties in that transaction?
If so, what is the incentive driving that?
And that really basically brings to life any bottlenecks, any potential risks that we can address
even through the term sheets, even through direct discussions of management, all the way we
structured the investment.
So, Kian, I know that you're doing this.
And top authorities in the frontier market investing always talk about why you need to be
having boots on the ground to conduct research.
What are frontier market investors like you looking for when you travel to frontier markets
like Albania, Bangladesh, Botswana, or any other kind of frontier market for that matter?
Well, the first question you want to answer is, why does an opportunity exist in that country?
Normally, the answer is pretty simple. It comes back to my first point of saying, well,
there just hasn't been private capital. Make sure that the institutions, that is the laws and
regulations, will allow you to operate in a reasonably easy manner. The ultimate question I would
say that we want to answer is what variant perception or, let's say, what edge
do we have in the country that not only foreign investors don't have, but the locals don't have.
And one kind of hack that I think is a good way to go about it is when you go to a country,
meet with leading brokers, meet with the local version of investment banks, and ask them
to simply show you the best deals that they have. The idea is not specifically to look for
actionable investment ideas, but is to see what are the locals thinking about, how are they
thinking about what the best opportunities are and why they think that. And then around that,
you can see, well, what are they missing? Now, the aim there is not necessarily to look for
actionable investment opportunities off of that, but it gives you the framework of how the locals
are thinking about it. What you ultimately want to do is define what your edge is within that
country, whatever it may be. What is also important is that whatever that edge is, is to make sure
that the institutions in the country, that is the legal system, the regulation, allows for you to
execute on whatever that particular focus may be. And so one example that I can give is to
what we've learned through this as to avoid. What you normally find in frontier countries
that investors, they say, well, let's go and invest in the leading entrepreneur in the country.
Why? Because, well, obviously, he would probably be able to capitalize on the country opening up
and expand his business. But if you think about the dynamics of that as a trade,
it's an asymmetrical trade in the sense that whoever that individual is, a man or woman that's
been successful, they already have access to capital. They already have a profitable business.
So what you're saying to them or what you're effectively doing is forcing capital to them.
They're saying, take my capital, please, because I want you to have it.
And that capital may be in the form of saying, well, okay, if you're producing 100 tons of
glass for bottling this year, increases to 150 tons.
Now, again, if you're sat in the entrepreneur's perspective, what are you saying is, well,
this is a great trade.
If it works out, it works out.
If it doesn't, I still have my core business, which is profitable.
And what most likely will happen is that me as an investor, I have a liquidity window.
I have to get out at some point, that they buy me out at a discount.
What also happens is that because everyone follows this narrative or this analogy, the price
or the valuation of that company gets bid up to such a point that from a risk perspective,
you're not really getting returns commensurate with the risk that you'll take.
Let's transition into the second segment of the show.
After talking about Frontier Market's as an investment class, I would like to be a bit more specific.
Right now, sturgeon capital is focusing on.
on Uzbekistan specifically. I can't help but wondering of all the frontier markets you could
invest in why Uzbekistan and why not any of the other frontier markets? It's worth a little bit
of history on the firm. So again, I defined what we do as looking at countries that are
frontier but emerging. And what that has naturally led us to is focusing on Central Asia.
So you had Georgia in the first instance, which had went through a tremendous reform path.
Kazakhstan, which didn't, weren't as aggressive as reforms, but really allowed the private sector
to take shape. And the elephant in the room for us over the years has been Uzbekistan,
because relative to this region, it has the largest population, about 33 million people,
great demographics, kind of 65% under the age of 35. Unlike a lot of other countries,
it has a really diversified economy. So whilst they have natural resources, the natural resource
to an extent countercyclical, so the largest export is gold, they have uranium. But for all intents and
purposes, it was very difficult to allocate meaningful capital there under the previous administration.
And the previous administration was there for about 25 years. You could argue it was kind of,
let's say, a closed-off socialist state. And so no one was really paying attention to it.
Now, having said that, we were actually involved in a country for about eight years on a small,
non-long level because we believed it important to have a pulse of what's actually going on.
So what happened? Two and a half years ago, effectively, the previous president passed away.
And ironically, his prime minister became president.
And so the general consensus at the time, even amongst locals, was that, well, it would
be a continuation of the previous policies.
And then unbeknownst to everyone, what he effectively did was embark on a very ambitious
and aggressive reform path.
And what we define as, let's say, the fall of the Berlin Wall moment was really lifting
the currency control.
So they had two different currency exchange rates.
One was a subsidized rate.
One was a free market rate.
And overnight, they unified that.
that they took a 50% hit on the currency. But as before, where it was difficult or nearly
impossible to get money in and out, that changed overnight. What then followed was that the roster
of, let's say, previous ministers were fired and replaced with, let's say, young, Western-educated
Uzbek technocrats and then a series of other policies reforms took place. So they're now
privatizing nearly every state assets. There's 1,200 companies on the privatization list.
They engage in serious tax reform. So they had a large part of the economy estimates are up to 50%
that were in a black economy that was not paying taxes. Why? Because the tax system was complex
and probably arbitrarily high. What they did is they reduced, let's say, the corporate tax rate
by 50%. And the irony is that tax revenues went up 70% year on year. So that's a reflection of the
black economy moving towards a formal economy moving. Now, if I put the GDP per capita of the country
in context view, we're talking about a country of 33 million people that has $1,500 GDP per capita.
Now, comparing that, let's say a country like Georgia, which has one-fifth of the population,
no natural resources, they're at about four and a half, five thousand.
Kazakhstan has a half the population, but more natural resources is about 8,000 to 9,000.
And you're coming from such a low base that if you want to add a value tilt to it,
you're investing with a margin of safety or with the wind behind your back.
The second aspect that is important from an economic structural perspective is that
the country basically has very little debt, both across the sovereign,
corporate and private sector. So total debt to GDP is under 30 percent, and they reserves the GDP
of 60 percent. And that bulk of those reserves are of gold. And so what you will see, I think,
is a one-off leveraging. But the important point to that, unlike developed markets, is that
leverage really is going into productive capacity, in that you have a lot of the economy,
which is already producing undercapacity. And so what that capital is going into is really
the high return on investment projects. The final aspect that is positive and someone underlooked by,
let's say the Western world is the Belt and Road from China. And the way we think about that
is that it's the Marshall Plan on steroids. It's a one trillion investment plan. And effectively
what it's doing for the country is reducing the cost of doing business by building out base
level infrastructure and making it easier for the country to do business with the world.
And I mean, Charlie Munga talks about these kind of lulipalooza effects happening when you have
a confluence of positive factors taking place. We believe you have a number of positive factors
that are coming to fruition at a single point in time.
And that, frankly, from our investment career perspective,
there hasn't been a country which has such a high conviction over in the past 15 years.
So, Kian, let's assume that three of us go on a trip to Uzbekistan.
What would it be like when we hit the ground and what might we expect to see from an investing standpoint?
A good way to think about it is, so you have a pre-Soviet infrastructure or order.
That is, you have these wide roads, the roads are clean,
Everything's quiet.
And you have pre-Soviet Union human capital, right?
In that the majority of the education levels are very high, and then the majority of the
people are educated in the hard sciences, which is normally what you want as opposed to
the software that are social sciences.
But you have post-Soviet GDP dynamics.
So, let's say the normal amenities, which you probably expect in a lot of countries,
are not there, although they're really coming to place now.
In terms of opportunities, I think we're effectively at the moment the only international firm
providing private capital to the country. And I hope I like to think that that's built up
somewhat a lot of goodwill. And when you meet local entrepreneurs, they're very proud and they like
the fact that you're there and they're more than open to have a discussion of you. And so what we find
fascinating and I think what investors that come with us to the country find fascinating is simply
the breadth of people that you can meet. So you can meet the leading entrepreneur and the retail space.
You can meet the leading real estate developer. You can meet the leading tech entrepreneur.
Similarly, on the public side, you can meet with ministers to really understand how are they
thinking about the policies that they're setting, what yardsticks they're setting for themselves.
And so they're saying the space of three to four days, you can leave the country to having
experience and met with people that you would otherwise never be able to meet in any other
country and really probably get a good feel of what the reality of the ground is as opposed
to perception, where in most cases there is simply no perception because it's a country that
most people haven't really come across in their lifetime.
So it's very interesting that you would say, like, you're the only foreign company providing capital.
What kind of advantages and disadvantages does that entail?
One disadvantage, I think, is, and it's something that can be managed on a personal level or a firm level,
is that simply if you travel there, you can be awed by the scale of opportunity, which you would see.
And one anecdotal evidence I would give you is a given example of the real estate sector.
What will normally happen is that, yes, demand is likely to go up because you have urbanization,
GDP is growing up, but one factor that probably will more determine economic returns is a supply side.
And on the real estate, it's not too difficult to expand supply, right?
So an equilibrium will quickly be formed, which is what you want to stay away from.
Really, where our focus is, as I mentioned earlier, is to try and capture these decorrelating
dynamics by investing in secular trends.
Now, the biggest secular trend that we see amongst frontier markets is the technological leapfrogging.
Now, what do I mean by that?
Let's take the banking sector.
And let's take fintech as an example.
So if you look at the UK or in the U.S. to an extent, there are very difficult pureplay
fintech winners to see that are profitable at scale.
Why?
Because you have a legacy infrastructure in place.
That is, the majority of people hold their main deposit account at incumbent bank.
and they use fintech companies for additional services, whether it would be payments, etc., etc.
In frontier countries, it's a complete different dynamic.
So you already have a large part of the population that simply does not have a bank account,
and there is no legacy infrastructure.
So when you're going in there with a fintech product, you have the ecosystem to allow you to build that business,
but what you find is that the people will move directly towards the most optimal solution.
And so you are the captive deposit account for that customer as opposed to just being an added functionality.
to. And so our focus really is on looking at business models that we know work. What I mean by
work is that they have positive unity economics. They build the most as time goes by and that they're
scalable. What we look to do is build or invest in businesses similar to that in these countries.
I'm happy to go into a few examples if you would like. That would be fantastic because you already
made a few positions in your space than already. I would be very curious to hear if you can take
is through like a step-by-step process from whenever one of or multiple of these companies came
on your radar until today? Yes, I think something that we're kind of proud of is that all the
investments that we've made have been, let's say, organically sourced in the sense that either
it's been the entrepreneur that has contacted us esoteric ways. It may be a message for LinkedIn,
it may be an email, it may be someone indirectly reaching out, or they have been sourced from
us actively reaching out to entrepreneurs. We try not to rely on, let's say, outside of
advisors where incentives can be flawed. But if I give a few examples, let's say one investment
that represents a significant portion of portfolio today is a business that today is called Zudmore.
And today is arguably the largest cross-order e-commerce marketplace in Central Asia.
Now, what do I mean by e-commerce marketplace? Think of the same business model as Alibaba or Alibaba
Express. That is, you don't hold product inventory. You're not Amazon. You simply provide a
platform for products to be placed, people buy it, and you take a commission. Now, if we think about
what is needed for that business to be successful, effectively is three main things. One is a
logistical solution, right? That is if you're sending products from China to, let's say,
Uzbekistan or from Europe or anywhere in the world, you need to have a logistical solution.
And what this company has done is they partner up with every national post company and local
postal companies to the point where in every country operates in, it has a last mile delivery,
something that just did not exist.
And it provides that delivery at a cost lower than AliExpress and faster than AliExpress.
Why?
Because for Ali Express, these countries on an individual basis are not large enough for them to want to do the heavy lifting needed to integrate it into their core platform.
The second aspect they need to solve for is payment solutions.
So in Uzbekistan, less than 10% of the population have Visa or MasterCard, which basically shuts them off from any international commerce.
And what this business has done is they've integrated local payment solutions of international.
ones. They've added cash on delivery, which today represents 80% of their orders. But they've also
added installment solutions and buy now, pay later. What buy now pay later is, is effectively saying
you buy a product today, you pay it in 60 days with zero interest. And the supplier takes
the hit on the interest. And for the supplier, they will do it. Why? Because here you have a
population of combined 400 million people, which no one from an e-commerce perspective is tackling.
The final aspect is you actually have to have products on the platform that people can buy.
And so with that infrastructure that they have, they basically signed with JD.com and China,
which is, I think, number three e-commerce.
You have Hepsi Barad and Turkey, which is number one e-commerce, and a range of other service providers.
The other kind of less direct positive is that all these countries have VAT and customs duty
exemptions for cross-border e-commerce, which basically means that all the products that would
be available offline are cheaper for the platform.
So if we summarize the totality of the value proposition is that you have the convenient
of last mile delivery, you're opening up people to buy products from around the world
through integrating payment solutions. You have a range of products that are implicitly cheaper
than if they were available offline, and you have products that are simply not available offline
in those countries. And so what the business did effectively launched them in November 2018,
and I should say this is a management team that we've known for about five years.
The core management team has been together for about 20 years. They previously had two successful exits.
And since November 2018, effectively, the businesses developed such that today in every country
it operates in it's the most downloaded shopping app, has about 3.5 million downloads of the
app. Up until Corona was growing at about 38% a month, GMV-wise, that is, value of transactions
on the platform. And the way we see it is, as time goes on, the barriers to entry go up,
the most of the business increases. And what you're seeing is that, for example, over the past
two months, they've basically been given the exclusive online distribution for Samsung, Huawei
phones, and even Apple products through this region, which is a huge win. But why is because
they have that infrastructure, which is just kind of adding to that month. And the way we see it in
terms of returns is if you mathematically compound GMV from where it is today, let's say at 4%
a month, you get to about half a billion in value of transactions in about 4 to 5 years.
Bear in mind that the company is growing at about 30% a month at the moment. And if you look at
exit multiples of these businesses over the past five to 10 years, let's say from one and a half
to three times GMV, let's take the bottom threshold. This in our mind can be a plus billion
business and at the moment we're invested in the business at a valuation of 40 million.
Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors. No, it's not your imagination.
Risk and regulation are ramping up and customers now expect proof of security just to do business.
That's why Vantta is a game changer. Vanta automates your compliance process.
and brings compliance, risk, and customer trust together on one AI-powered platform.
So whether you're prepping for a SOC 2 or running an enterprise GRC program, VANTA
keeps you secure and keeps your deals moving.
Instead of chasing spreadsheets and screenshots, VANTA gives you continuous automation
across more than 35 security and privacy frameworks.
Companies like Ramp and Ryder spend 82% less time on audits with VANTA.
That's not just faster compliance.
it's more time for growth. If I were running a startup or scaling a team today, this is exactly the
type of platform I'd want in place. Get started at vanta.com slash billionaires. That's vanta.com
slash billionaires. Ever wanted to explore the world of online trading, but haven't dared try?
The futures market is more active now than ever before, and plus 500 futures is the perfect place to start.
Plus 500 gives you access to a wide range of instruments, the S&P 500, NASDAQ, Bitcoin, gas, and much more.
Explore equity indices, energy, metals, 4X, crypto, and beyond.
With a simple and intuitive platform, you can trade from anywhere, right from your phone.
Deposit with a minimum of $100 and experience the fast, accessible futures trading you've been waiting for.
See a trading opportunity, you'll be able to trade it in just two clicks once your account.
is open. Not sure if you're ready, not a problem. Plus 500 gives you an unlimited,
risk-free demo account with charts and analytic tools for you to practice on. With over 20
years of experience, Plus 500 is your gateway to the markets. Visit plus 500.com to learn more.
Trading in futures involves risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone. Not all applicants
will qualify. Plus 500, it's trading with a plus.
investors don't typically park their cash in high-yield savings accounts. Instead, they often use
one of the premier passive income strategies for institutional investors, private credit.
Now, the same passive income strategy is available to investors of all sizes thanks to the Fundrise
Income Fund, which has more than $600 million invested in a 7.97% distribution rate.
With traditional savings yields falling, it's no wonder private credit has grown to be a trillion
dollar asset class in the last few years.
Visit fundrise.com slash WSB to invest in the Fundrise income fund in just minutes.
The fund's total return in 2025 was 8%, and the average annual total return since inception
is 7.8%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results, current distribution rate as of 1231, 2025.
Carefully consider the investment material before investing, including objectives,
risks, charges, and expenses. This and other information can be found in the income funds prospectus
at fundrise.com slash income. This is a paid advertisement. All right, back to the show.
So here in the U.S., when a company talks about an exit plan, it often involves an initial
public offering, an IPO, or if you're really small, maybe you're trying to sell to a private equity
firm. Are the rules any different in the frontier investing space? That's a very good question.
I guess it's kind of reverting back to the public markets.
Again, one of the reasons that I think it's difficult to consistently make money there is
if we isolate the local capital market, you don't have that intensity of capital or the true
free market capitalism mentality that you have in the US, whereby if something is cheap,
either through private equity or through M&A, that value is unlocked.
And so you're really relying on foreign liquidity, again, which is very difficult to predict.
What we want to be on the side of where we effectively are involved in a situation,
whereby the value or the strength of the business creates its own liquidity ultimately.
And that can come in a few forms.
One is if we take Uzbek as something, we're investing at a time where the public markets
really are in their infancy, but there's aggressive reforms and there is ambitious plans
to develop that local capital market.
And so there is a scenario where I would probably rank all the perspective, we'll put
it at the bottom that you could exit for the local capital markets and by virtue of being
invested in a company where none of the existing or incumbent constituents of the market represent
that sort of dynamic that is a technology company that is relatively fast growing, it would
relatively be easier to, let's say, IP on a local basis.
On an international basis, I can point to at least a half a dozen examples of leading frontier
businesses that have managed to IPO on international markets. If you take Georgia, you have two of the
leading banks that are trading in the London Stock Exchange, kind of plus billion market caps and
and trading on valuations at peers with, let's say, Western multiples.
If you take Russia, you have businesses like Yandex, you have businesses like Tinkoff
that are trading on a NASDAQ.
In Africa, you have businesses like Jumea, which, again, is an e-commerce marketplace
that had a pretty successful IP on the U.S. market.
And finally, again, what you're ultimately doing in these countries is, if you think
of it through the lens of international players, whether it be multinationals or, let's say
companies like 10-cent or Alibaba, is that what you're saying is, I've solved the issue
of these countries, I've solved the difficulty of all.
operating these countries for you. So if we look at Tencent or Alibaba, a third of their income line
is investment income. That investment incomes comes from acquisitions. If you look at the number of
acquisitions that Alibaba or Tencent have made combined, I think it reaches nearly a thousand over the
past 10 years. Why? Because they have a cash cow in their core business and they have FOMO that they
don't want to miss out on the next big thing, whether it be e-commerce, whether it be gaming,
whatever it may be. And so they have the capital to acquire. And China already has this basically
I Silk Road, which is the digital Silk Road project that they have, what we're doing
falls directly within to that. So you also have the optionality of leaning towards the East.
So talking a bit more about comparison for something like Uzbekistan and to the West,
which perhaps resonate a bit more with most of our listeners. You know, you mentioned a pricing
power before. That's also something we talked about here on the show, Warren Buffett one-on-one.
How are the quote-unquote rules different, if ever, of a good company in the, let's call it the developed world?
Like, you're looking for something not just with a good pricing power.
You might also be looking at a company that needs to have lower capic, whatever kind of things that we've been taught about all the businesses.
Is that different in any way whenever you try to identify that in a country like Uzbekistan?
Yes and no.
I mean, the question that I guess we're ultimately trying to answer is twofold.
One is, what is the value proposition of the business's core product or service to the underlying user?
That is what utility is it providing it?
And sometimes that utility is very high.
And the ideal situation is that there's high utility,
but the economic structure of that business or the sector also allows for economic gains to be made from that utility.
And that's basically margins are indicative of that.
So you have some businesses where there's high utility to the customer, but the underlying
dynamics, maybe there's a competitive factor, whatever it may be, doesn't allow for you as an investor
to capture economic benefits.
And so what we really care about is investing in business models that have high customer
utility, but also have high economic benefits to you as an investor.
And another example I could give of that is, let's say a business we've invested in
Uzbekistan called Bills, which is the leading enterprise software of SaaS business.
And I think probably you and the listeners are familiar with that business model, which in our mind is the most elegant, beautiful business model.
You have kind of plus 50% operating margins.
You have kind of high cash flow, high recurring revenue.
And what you can argue is in a developed world, this is quite a now saturated investment landscape in that everyone is investing in SaaS.
Now, if you flip that in the frontier market space, and specifically in Uzbekistan, this is a business that is targeting the small to midsize businesses, where their alternative, let's say we're focusing on account management and inventory.
management is either paper or Excel.
And the beauty is that the government is effectively mandated that that has to be digitalized,
that businesses have to digitalize their account management and inventory management process,
not only for transparency but for efficiency.
And the beauty of this business is also that not only are you providing a service that
is implicitly profitable, but by virtue of providing that service, you're collecting
unique data which no one has in the country.
Now, what data is that?
It's working capital cycle, cash cycle data, on a range of,
of SME businesses which no one has. And that comes into the financial services angle and that
no one is really, you're talking about a country that is really at this infancy of financial services.
So you have 50% of the population that do not have a bank account, which by law now they have
to. Now, one of the issues there is credit quality in that at the moment credit scoring is binary.
Either you are good credit in which you get a loan or your bad credit in which you don't get
a loan or the rate at which you get it is astronomically high. And so what is really important
to have an edge is to have good credit data. Why? Because it means that you can apprise your
risk that is price loans at a more appropriate rate, but also allows you to speed up the speed
of which you can distribute that loan. And going back to the SaaS business, what you're effectively
doing is you have a range of businesses where you have all the working capital cycle, you've all
the cash cycle data, and the business can either, through their own balance sheet start to lend
out or act as a platform to the banks to basically say, well, we act as a loan distribution
for you and we take a introduce a fee. The latter is a more capital-light model.
The former is you have more control over it.
But either way, it's still, you're adding value and there's economic rent to be taken from that.
So, Keanu, what are the main red flags you look out for in Uzbekistan, where if they materialized, you would close down your Uzbekistan growth fund?
As a firm, what we've seen over the past 15 years by being in front end markets is a wide range of risks, be it coming from government, be it kind of micro investment risks.
And what I hope or I like to think that we've built up is an investment framework off our own
mistakes, off seeing other investors' mistakes, that really focuses on this concept of resiliency
and that we're investing in business models and investing in a manner and constructing
a portfolio that is inherently resilient or the aim of being resilient.
And one other anecdotal example I can give of a country that we're not involved in at all
anymore, but purely observe out of interest, is Iran.
So let's look what happened there.
2016 sanctions lifted.
There's this whole rush for investors to get into the country,
whoever it be multinational financial investors.
2018, Trump comes in.
The widest ranging sanctions that any country has ever experienced
gets reinstated on the country.
The currency devalues by 80%.
The country goes into recession.
What has happened over the past two years?
2019, the stock market goes up roughly 80% in dollars.
This year, it's up 120% in dollars.
In the similar period, you've had the local version of Uber B development.
where to the point it has two and a half million rights today,
which basically makes it a third of fourth largest ride-hailing out in the world.
That is, if it was a country that was normally on,
this would be a plus three billion company.
So the point is that there are reflives that I would say we have a responsibility
and it's incumbent upon us to be cautious of and to build a framework around of.
Kian, this was a fantastic interview.
I cannot believe it would take us six years into the Ammasters podcast
to have the very first episode.
about frontier markets.
I'm sure the audience would like to learn more.
Where can I learn more about Jew and Sturton Capital?
I think the easiest way is just to reach out to us.
We believe we're operating in markets and countries
which are implicitly more unknown to the bulk of the investor population.
And we have a responsibility.
And again, it's incumbent upon us to be actively communicating the opportunity set
and what we do.
So I would really encourage anyone that wants to reach out to us directly.
You can find us on our website.
it. And I hope what's COVID goes away that we can encourage you and a potential investor is to
come out of us to Uzbekistan. There's no other way to go about it and really get a feel for
what's going on on the ground. I can speak as much as I want, but it's better always to get
your own, let's say, first principles.
Kehan, we really appreciate that kind invite, and we really appreciate you coming on the show
today. I know I learned a ton. I'm sure the audience captured a ton of value out of this.
And thanks for making time for us.
It's a pleasure. Thank you again for the time.
All right, guys.
That was all the press down I had for this week's episode of The Ambassadors Podcast.
We'll see each other again next week.
Thank you for listening to TIP.
To access our show notes, courses or forums, go to theinvestorspodcast.com.
This show is for entertainment purposes only.
Before making any decisions, consult a professional.
This show is copyrighted by the Investors Podcast Network.
Written permissions must be granted before syndication or re-broadcast.
Staying.
