We Study Billionaires - The Investor’s Podcast Network - TIP377: The Antisocial Network w/ Ben Mezrich
Episode Date: September 10, 2021On today’s episode, Trey Lockerbie sits down with bestselling author, Ben Mezrich to discuss his new book The Antisocial Network, which covers the sage of Gamestop, Robinhood, Reddit and Retail trad...ers. It’s a tale of irony, humor, high stakes, billionaires, and Ben is the perfect guest to cover such an entertaining story. IN THIS EPISODE, YOU'LL LEARN (01:11) Ben’s framework for approaching a new book. (18:43) The power of mindset. (41:19) The ramifications of meme stocks for Wall Street and a whole lot more. *Disclaimer: Slight timestamp discrepancies may occur due to podcast platform differences. BOOKS AND RESOURCES Join the exclusive TIP Mastermind Community to engage in meaningful stock investing discussions with Stig, Clay, and the other community members. Ben Mezrich’s new book The Antisocial Network. Ben Mezrich’s book Bitcoin Billionaires. Ben Mezrich’s book The Accidental Billionaires. Trey Lockerbie Twitter. NEW TO THE SHOW? Check out our We Study Billionaires Starter Packs. Browse through all our episodes (complete with transcripts) here. Try our tool for picking stock winners and managing our portfolios: TIP Finance Tool. Enjoy exclusive perks from our favorite Apps and Services. Stay up-to-date on financial markets and investing strategies through our daily newsletter, We Study Markets. Learn how to better start, manage, and grow your business with the best business podcasts. SPONSORS Support our free podcast by supporting our sponsors: Hardblock AnchorWatch Cape Intuit Shopify Vanta reMarkable Abundant Mines HELP US OUT! Help us reach new listeners by leaving us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts! It takes less than 30 seconds, and really helps our show grow, which allows us to bring on even better guests for you all! Thank you – we really appreciate it! Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm
Transcript
Discussion (0)
You're listening to TIP.
On today's episode, I sit down with bestselling author Ben Mesrick to discuss his new book,
The Anti-Social Network, which covers the saga of GameStop, Robin Hood, Reddit, and retail
traders.
It's a tale of irony, humor, high stakes, billionaires, and Ben is the perfect guest that
covers such an entertaining story.
We also cover Ben's framework to approaching a new book, the power of mindset, the ramifications
of meme stocks for Wall Street, and a whole lot more.
I'm a big fan of Ben and his books, and this conversation didn't disappoint.
So without further ado, please enjoy The Tale of GameStop with Ben Mesrick.
You are listening to The Investors Podcast, where we study the financial markets and read the books that influence self-made billionaires the most.
We keep you informed and prepared for the unexpected.
Welcome to The Investors podcast.
I'm your host, Trey Lockerbie, and today we have on the show, Ben, Mesrick.
Ben, welcome to the show.
Thank you very much for having me.
This is great.
I am so excited to get into today's conversation around the whole GameStop saga.
And it's something that we really haven't covered on the show because when I noticed that you were going to write this book about it and you kind of announced it a few months ago, I said, you know what, this is going to be the time to cover this story in depth.
Before we dig into the book, I want to go over your framework a little bit.
But you seem to always be at this cutting edge of topics for your books, always consistently
at this intersection of tech and society.
And it's always fairly prescient.
You're always a little bit ahead of the game.
What is your framework for approaching a new book?
Yeah.
For me, it's almost over and over again.
My career has gone from story to story almost by accident.
It's very hard to know what the next big thing is going to be.
It's almost impossible to try and predict what's going to be big.
So for me, I'm often pitched stories or people send me stories or I see something in the
the news and it just intrigues me enough to dive in and see where it leads. And so I've kind of gone
from story to story. The first one that was successful was the story of the MIT Blackjack team,
which was a book called Bringing Down the House I wrote, which became movie 21. And so I was playing
with a team of blackjack players going to Vegas every weekend, just living this crazy life and
turned it into a book. And so I fell into a true story that happened to be really, really cool.
and that guided the rest of my career.
And from there came the social network to in the morning email from a guy who had co-founded Facebook, right?
And he just wanted to tell his story.
So suddenly I was into that story.
So for me, it's more about finding something that really intrigues me.
And I'm really turned on by themes about people taking on the system.
Young people who are smart, who kind of don't like authority, who find a way to win against the things that we all kind of struggle against, whether it's a casino or Wall Street,
or Facebook, it's always someone against the establishment is what I'm always most intrigued by.
So that's kind of the thing I'm always looking for.
Money, exciting locale, something juicy is always important to keep the story going.
But the themes for me are always kind of this sort of Robin Hood, I guess, in a way,
that the way of sort of taking on trying to do something, not necessarily the right thing or
because it's good, but trying to beat a system in some way or another.
Those are the themes I really look for.
Quickly on that, we got a question on Twitter about this, but I'm curious as well, covering
Facebook and then covering Bitcoin billionaires, you had the WinkleVi twins kind of overlapping
on these two stories.
What was it like working with them on that research, you know, having gone through
portraying them in one book and then another?
Yeah, so Winklewurst twins to me are really amazing, people and amazing characters.
And when I did the book, Backsonable Villainters became the Social Network, I never thought
I would be writing about the Winklevoss twins again.
Honestly, they were the bad guys in the story.
They were the big guys dressed in skeleton costume chasing the karate kid around in the gym,
the archetypal 80s bad guys from every movie I had seen growing up.
And I thought that's who they were going to be.
They were the guys who took on Zuckerberg.
They believed they came up with Facebook and Mark stole it from them.
And they received a huge settlement.
And I thought, that's it.
You'll never hear or receive from them again.
But the reality was something very different.
And Bitcoin billionaires came about because I saw a headline in the New York Times, which
said, Weikovost twins are Bitcoin billionaires. And suddenly they'd gone from the bad guys in one
movie to being worth billions. And so I called them up. And amazingly, they were not angry at me.
You know, they didn't like their portrayal in the movie so much. It was a one-note portrayal.
But at the same time, they're smart guys. They understood how Hollywood works. They understood
how they were viewed their caricatures. It's hard not to view them that way because they're
gigantic, really good-looking Olympic athletes. But the reality is something much more. And
after I spent a year hanging out with them and learning about crypto and Bitcoin, really from the ground up.
I didn't know anything about crypto when I started hanging out with them.
I learned that they were much more than they had been in that movie.
There was much more to them.
And so I think they really liked the process and really ended up liking the book, Bitcoin billionaires.
And so, yeah, so overall, I don't think they were particularly angry at me or anything like that after the fact.
So it all worked out.
Well, while they may or may not have found at Facebook, it all worked out for them.
in the end. So much like your other books, when I was reading this new book, it really felt
like I was watching a movie. I mean, the visuals you display in the book, the writing itself,
it just flows just like I'm watching a movie. And the first few chapters shine a light on some
of the players in the story, many of them discovering Wall Street bets for the first time.
So walk us through the players you chose to feature in this story. And let's kind of set the stage
for our listeners. So there's the story that everyone's kind of heard of. You know, the one that was in the
news was this Keith Gill guy, this guy from Brockton, Mass, which is kind of a working-class
neighborhood outside of Boston. He's the guy who fell in love with GameStop when it was a
nothing stock that nobody really should be buying, you know, it was a few dollars a share of this
kind of dying brick-and-mortar company. And so we all know about Keith Gill and called himself
Roaring Kitty on YouTube and DFV. I don't know what we're allowed to say on your podcast
on Reddit. And he just kept posting about GameStop. I love GameStop. These are the shares I bought.
He bought $53,000 worth of shares when it was trading at a few dollars a share.
And then you have the other side.
You have Wall Street.
You have Gabe Plotkin and Melvin Capital, which is this hedge fund, very stayed, very smart,
who was shorting GameStop because it made sense.
You know, GameStop's going to go to zero.
Why wouldn't you short that company?
And then you have Citadel and you have Ken Griffin, which is kind of at the center of the
American economy.
They're the market makers for Robin Hood.
And that's the other main character, Vlad, who we've all seen again and again.
on different interviews, which has placed the tools of Wall Street in the hands of every American.
That's what they've done. So that's kind of the A story. What I wanted to do was find some of these
people on Reddit who either made a fortune or didn't make a fortune who got caught up in GameStop.
And so my main characters are a college kid who in the book I called Jeremy, who put a few thousand
dollars into GameStop and ended up making a quarter million dollars as he rode the stock up
with everyone else. Another character I have is a registered nurse named Kim Campbell,
who's a wonderful woman, single mother of two, who's struggled.
You know, she hasn't had the easiest life.
And she's this rabid Trump supporter really believes that, you know, she's been screwed over
by everybody and that Trump was going to be a savior, and that didn't pan out.
And she gets into GameStop because she wants to pay for her kids' braces.
And then there's another character who's a young woman who 2020 was going to be her year,
who's going to get married, she was pregnant.
And of course, the pandemic hits.
And ruins everything.
She doesn't get her dream wedding.
She has to end up sweeping hair in a beauty salon as her job. Things didn't pan out. And she sees GameStop as this
sort of way of fighting back or having something for herself. And so that's kind of thematically to me,
the story here is much, much bigger than this ridiculous company that is suddenly worth as much as
Apple or whatever. The real story is that all of our lives were thrown into mayhem over the last
two years. And we are all stuck on our couches, either in quarantine or isolation or social or we lost
our jobs or whatever. And what do we do? We suddenly have tools of Wall Street in our hand,
and we have a stimulus check or whatever, a few dollars, and we all dive into game stuff. And that's
the story. And there's this anger underneath, this sort of Wall Street is just full of people who've
made these massive fortunes. And even though the world has come to crap, they're making even more money.
Wall Street people have been doing great during the pandemic. And the stock market actually was
flying during the pandemic. And so there's this bubbling up anger that I think came through on Reddit
and on Discord and on Twitter and we see it every day and via Trump as well. There's this
internal anger towards the establishment that's screwing everybody. And I think that that's what
powers this story along. So I've chosen these characters and I set them up and they're all real
people, by the way. This is all real. We just sort of exemplify the story I'm trying to tell.
Well, that's what I love so much about the story is that it touched everybody. It's seemingly just
everyone seemed to get involved from everyone from the nurse practitioner to even Elon Musk,
Mark Cuban, Chamath, they were all throwing in voiceover. And you do squeeze in a chapter on
Elon in the middle of the book that I just loved because he comes across like this bond
super villain. And it's actually hard to gauge what amount, if any, of that chapter is fictitious.
Can't wait until Elon reads this and I'm really curious what he's going to think of it.
Well, here's my view about Elon Musk. We all know who Elon Musk is, okay? You don't need to read a
biography to have in your head an image of Elon. We've all seen it. He's out there on Twitter every day.
And so I want to take him and place him where we all already know him, but go a lot farther than that.
And so a lot of that chapter is real, but a lot of it obviously goes a lot farther than the
reality. But what is definitely real is his feeling that he hates the shortseller. He feels like
short selling is just wrong. It's something that almost destroyed Tesla. He takes it personally,
because in a lot of ways it is personal.
When you're betting on a company to fail,
you're betting on the people who run that company to lose and go bankrupt and maybe lose everything.
When you're betting against Tesla or shorting Tesla,
you're hoping Elon Musk is a massive failure and disappears, right?
And so I can see why someone like him would take it very personally.
And when he saw what was going on with GameStop,
he immediately identifies with the Reddit people,
with the people who are fighting Wall Street because he's seeing the same sort of shorts
aligned against GameStop that were aligned against Tesla.
And so that chapter, I think, resonates for that reason. But yeah, I mean, he's larger than life characters.
I'm always interested in pushing farther because I feel like the boring story is the one we all could look at
Wikipedia for, right? You know, we all know who Elon Musk is and what he's done. We all know what
Tesla is. But what we don't really know about is what's going on under the streets of L.A. in the
boring tunnels, right? And with his AI stuff and the simulation stuff and the Mars stuff, like that's the
fun stuff. And so I want to take it a little bit farther because that's what I do anyway.
You know, when you pick up one of my books, it's not the same as picking up Walter Iison's book or someone else.
It's going to be a slightly different experience and hopefully people expect that going in.
I'm glad you touched on short selling or short squeeze because this is crucial to understanding this story.
So I want to just quickly cover what short selling is and also what a short squeeze is because for those who don't know, it's imperative to understand.
Yeah.
So short selling is a way of betting that a company is going to go down.
We all know what long is a company is going to go up. You buy the stock. The stock goes up in value.
You can sell it. You make a profit. The way you bet against a company is you do something called
short selling, which is you borrow a share. Let's say a stock is trading at $10 a share.
You borrow a share and you sell it on the market for that $10. And you promise to return that
stock to that person at some point in the future. So if the stock goes down, as you believe it is,
to $5, you then re-buy the share for $5, you give it back to the person you borrowed it from,
and you pocket the difference, which would be $5.
But the problem with short selling is that your losses are not capped at anything.
They're actually unlimited, because if you buy it at $10 and the stock just starts going up,
you still have to return that share.
So if you have to buy it back at $20, you've lost $10.
If you have to buy it back at $100, you've lost $90.
And it can go on theoretically forever.
So if you buy a ton of shares, you know, if you sell a ton of shares shorts, that means
you borrowed a ton of shares.
And at some point, you have to return those shares.
And what happens with a short squeeze is, let's say you short sell, meaning you borrow a
bunch of shares, you sell them on the market.
And let's say for whatever reason, because good news comes out about the company, or suddenly
for whatever reason, everyone on Reddit wants to buy that company's stock, the stock starts
to go up, you're in a tough position because you need to buy shares, which also pushes the
stock price. And so if there's a bunch of short sellers, suddenly they're squeezed as they try
to reach the exit. They all dive in at the same time trying to rebuy those shares. The price
keeps going up. They keep trying to rebuy and it just gets worse and worse and worse. So that's
essentially a short squeeze. And it's happened a number of times in history. And it can be very,
very dramatic because it happens very quickly. If something happens to make a stock start to skyrocket,
all of the short sellers have to dive into the market at the same time to get out, or else they
could lose everything. I mean, you don't just lose $100, you could lose a billion dollars if the
stock goes up shares. And that's essentially what happened here. And what's really interesting about
this story with GameStop is the people on the other side were attempting to make a short squeeze
happen. They weren't buying the stock, most of them, because they believed GameStop should be worth
$1,000 a share. They were buying the stock because they saw that Wall Street had this huge
short position. And they knew if they bought it, they could force a short squeeze. At one point in time,
140% of the shares of this company were short, which means that more shares were short than
exist, which means that what happened with people borrowed it, sold it, and then borrowed it again and sold it
multiple times. And so that's a very dangerous position for people on the short side. And a lot of the
hedge funders I talked to who were not on the short side, couldn't believe that people were still
shorting a stock with that much of a short because, you know, it's crazy. I mean, you're going to get
killed at some point. It's very easy for something bad to happen. That's what happened. And so there's a lot
of reasons behind why hedge funds continue to short a stock. The basic reason was is that GameStop
as a company looked like it was in a lot of trouble. This is a company that brick and mortar in malls
selling video game consoles in a world that's gone digital, right?
In a world that doesn't go to malls anymore, especially during a pandemic.
So you would look on paper and say, okay, GameStop's in a lot of trouble.
This company is probably going to go the way of Blockbuster or, you know,
you can name a dozen companies that have gone out of business and think,
this is just the next one going out of business.
But the thing that I think wasn't taking into account beyond the whole Reddit mob was that GameStop did have some outs.
one of them being the video game market is actually boom and GameStop has a community of people
that love video games. So just separate from the fact that it's this brick and mortar store,
it also has this millions and millions of people who nostalgically love GameStop and buy and sell
video games. And so their pivot to the digital world is actually not that hard for them to do
if they could just figure it out. That's where the value proposition comes into this. But the reality
is what happened was it turned into a massive short squeeze. It turned into a,
this massive, let's take down Wall Street. Let's stay strong and stay apes together strong
is with the thing that would go off on Reddit. Let's look at this that way. Let's all stay together
on this and the short sellers are going to get killed. Let's take a quick break and hear from today's
sponsors. All right. I want you guys to imagine spending three days in Oslo at the height of the
summer. You've got long days of daylight, incredible food, floating saunas on the Oslo Fjord.
in every conversation you have is with people who are actually shaping the future.
That's what the Oslo Freedom Forum is.
From June 1st through the 3rd, 2026, the Oslo Freedom Forum is entering its 18th year, bringing
together activists, technologists, journalists, investors, and builders from all over the
world, many of them operating on the front lines of history.
This is where you hear firsthand stories from people using Bitcoin to survive, currency
collapse, using AI to expose human rights abuses.
and building technology under censorship and authoritarian pressures.
These aren't abstract ideas.
These are tools real people are using right now.
You'll be in the room with about 2,000 extraordinary individuals, dissidents, founders, philanthropists, policymakers,
the kind of people you don't just listen to but end up having dinner with.
Over three days, you'll experience powerful mainstage talks, hands-on workshops on freedom tech,
and financial sovereignty, immersive art installations, and conversational.
conversations that continue long after the sessions end. And it's all happening in Oslo in June.
If this sounds like your kind of room, well, you're in luck because you can attend in person.
Standard and patron passes are available at Osloof Freedom Forum.com with patron passes offering
deep access, private events, and small group time with the speakers. The Oslo Freedom Forum isn't
just a conference. It's a place where ideas meet reality and where the future is being built by people living it.
If you run a business, you've probably had the same thought lately.
How do we make AI useful in the real world?
Because the upside is huge, but guessing your way into it is a risky move.
With NetSuite by Oracle, you can put AI to work today.
NetSuite is the number one AI cloud ERP, trusted by over 43,000 businesses.
It pulls your financials, inventory, commerce, HR, and CRM into one unified system.
And that connected data is what makes your AI.
smarter. It can automate routine work, surface actionable insights, and help you cut costs while
making fast AI-powered decisions with confidence. And now with the NetSuite AI connector,
you can use the AI of your choice to connect directly to your real business data. This isn't some add-on,
it's AI built into the system that runs your business. And whether your company does millions
or even hundreds of millions, NetSuite helps you stay ahead. If your revenues are at least in the
seven figures, get their free business guide demystifying AI at netsuite.com slash study.
The guide is free to you at net suite.com slash study. NetSuite.com slash study.
When I started my own side business, it suddenly felt like I had to become 10 different people
overnight wearing many different hats. Starting something from scratch can feel exciting,
but also incredibly overwhelming and lonely. That's why having the right tools matters.
For millions of businesses, that tool is Shopify.
Shopify is the commerce platform behind millions of businesses around the world and 10% of all
e-commerce in the U.S. from brands just getting started to household names.
It gives you everything you need in one place, from inventory to payments to analytics.
So you're not juggling a bunch of different platforms.
You can build a beautiful online store with hundreds of ready-to-use templates,
and Shopify is packed with helpful AI tools that write product descriptions,
and even enhance your product photography.
Plus, if you ever get stuck, they've got award-winning 24-7 customer support.
Start your business today with the industry's best business partner, Shopify, and start hearing
sign up for your $1 per month trial today at Shopify.com slash WSB.
Go to Shopify.com slash WSB.
That's Shopify.com slash WSB.
All right.
Back to the show.
And most of this activity, this cohort of folks who wanted to, quote unquote, they want to stick it to the man by running up the price was happening on Reddit on Wall Street Betts.
So I'm assuming that you spend a good amount of time on Reddit and Wall Street Betts researching for this book.
So I'm kind of curious what were some of the most surprising things you discovered on the site?
Yeah.
So first of all, on its surface, when you just look at it.
And the reason I call the book, the anti-social network is it's just a dirty free-for-all.
I mean, the language is horrific.
There are some people who are just trolls.
I mean, Reddit as a whole is a world full of people who are just having fun and taking the piss out of everyone else and just sort of trollish.
But as you look deeper into Wall Street bets specifically, what I found was number one, there's a lot of really smart people on there, like people who know much more about investing than I do.
They might be amateur investors, but some of these people really understand this stuff and do some really good research.
The other thing I noticed was that it was a very diverse group of people.
It wasn't the view you have of white, trollish guys sitting on the internet.
There's lots of all sorts of people on Reddit and on multiple people.
By the end, it had swell to nine million people.
And you have to weed between the bots and the people who work for hedge funds and the people
who are just out crazy and a lot of college kids and things like that.
But as you dug deeper, you definitely saw a lot of interesting analysis.
But what I also loved is the way people would put up pictures of their accounts,
their wins and their losses.
And people are almost more excited to put up losses than wins.
I mean, there are people putting up things where they lost $100,000 in two days.
And everyone makes fun of them.
But at the same time, it's this camaraderie.
It's this like, you know, that I think was very unique to Wall Street bets,
is people putting up their losses more than their win.
And I think when DFV, when Keith Gill started out, he was being ridiculed because he had put
so much money into GameStop and he lost, he was losing, it was falling apart,
and people were making fun of him.
And then when he starts to make money and suddenly he puts up this screenshot, which shows
$47 million in profits, it's this kind of incredible moment where it's almost like, let's rally
together.
This is actually possible.
And so, yeah, I don't know.
I had a lot of fun on it.
I spent a lot of time on it.
I'm on Twitter a lot already.
And I'd always kind of looked at Reddit and stuff like that.
But this was the first time I really saw the power of a community is pretty impressive.
So when people get together, it's incredible what power they have.
I think that's something Wall Street is still trying to.
to deal with to try to figure out how you work around the idea that these loosely affiliated
groups can be more powerful than a Wall Street bank.
You've got nine million people who each have a $2,000 stimulus check or whatever.
That's as big as any Wall Street bank right there.
And so it's intriguing.
It's an intriguing thought.
I think there's something there that we could all learn from actually.
There's a book I love called Mindset, and it sort of touches on this like flipping an issue
on its head, celebrating your losses.
And, you know, I found this in my own business with trying to raise venture capital.
You can get 100 noes before you get a yes.
And it can really wear you down.
Or if you're an actor and you go out for an audition, you get told no all the time.
And it's this idea of like celebrating those nose, like flipping this on his head.
And because really at the end of the day, persistence is all that matters, right?
And so this idea of celebrating losses is intriguing to me.
Oh, I agree entirely.
Like, you know, as a writer, obviously, your life is until you make it, it's so much rejection.
When I was a struggling writer, I got about 190 rejection slips before I sold my first book.
And I would tape them to the walls.
So I had just walls covered in rejection slips because it was like it powers you forward.
It's like you live in that misery.
And it's kind of romantic.
It's an interesting point.
I'm sure actors, it's even worse because it's to your face.
You know, you go in and she's living in front of someone and they reject you.
That's a hard thing to get used to.
But I do think the more you revel in it, the stronger you.
I think that was going on for sure on this board.
is, you know, people who were willing to take risk because even if they lost, they still had something to post.
You could post your massive loss and get some level of feeling of camaraderie out of that.
And so people were willing to take risks that on paper made no sense at all.
I mean, the whole YOLO investing comes out of this, the whole idea that, and I explained it in the book for like a college kid who's got a couple thousand dollars.
The idea of making 5% of that is pointless.
Why take a safe investment that you might make a little bit on rather than just bet it all?
on something that you could get a 10x on. Any college kid agrees with that. Always go for the 10x. Never go
for the safe bet because it doesn't change your life. But a YOLO bet does change your life. And it makes
sense to me that's somebody who's been involved in gambling my whole life and going to Vegas.
And like the idea of just doubling your money is not that exciting. When I used to go to Vegas
all the time, you would see people sit down at a blackjack table with $1,000. And when they hit $2,000,
you'd say, oh, you should leave. You just doubled your money. But that's not exciting, right?
Nobody leaves doubling their money. Nobody. And Vegas knows this and they count on it and that's how they make all their money. No one will leave doubling their money. People need to make 10 times their money before they stand up on a table because doubling your money just doesn't feel like a win. And I think Wall Street doesn't necessarily understand that's what's going on here. They think people made 10, 20 percent. Now we can short it because they can go back down. But that's not how the people on Reddit think. 20 percent is meaningless to them. They want to make 2,000 percent before they would walk away. And I think that's something that someone has to figure out.
now is how do you analyze when people are crazy. When people are not thinking straight, they're
thinking, I want 10x. I certainly agree with the idea of having a concentrated portfolio of
sorts to grow wealth. And then once you have wealth, then you can diversify and, you know,
see, now you're being rational. When you've got nothing, you have nothing to lose, right? So if all
you've got is $1,000, you're not trying to make $100 on that $1,000. Because this
meaningless doesn't change your life in any way. And so even though the rational thing, of course,
if you only have $1,000 is to be careful, the reality is you go buy a thousand scratch ticket
because the one scratch ticket can change your life, but $100 isn't going to do anything.
And so I think that's something that people don't understand.
And when you look at people who just have a little, they're the biggest risk teams.
The people who have a lot are usually not the big risk takers because 10% is fine for them.
They've already got a lot of it.
But if you've got no money, you'll risk everything.
And that's what we saw happening.
The story also had a lot of irony in it.
So we need to talk about Robin Hood.
A lot of these players, as you mentioned, we're discovering Robin Hood even for the first time.
Part of the appeal of Robin Hood is that is commission free trading.
And I love this quote in your book where when the product is free, you are the product.
So walk us through how Robin Hood manages to make money off of commission free trading in the first place.
Yeah.
And it gets a little complicated.
But the reality is, so Robin Hood has this incredible app, which I love, with anybody who picks it up loves.
Because it's like a video game.
And it hands everyone the ability to trade like they're a Wall Street banker.
There's no fees.
You can put whatever a little amount you want in there.
And you can instantly and almost immediately start buying stocks and options and all sorts of things at the push of the button.
And when you buy something, you know, confetti goes off.
It's like it's fun.
It turns it into a video game.
And the way they're able to offer it free to everybody essentially is the way they actually make their money is they take all of these aggregate buys and sells.
and they sell them essentially to the market makers, the people who actually put these trades through.
And so the majority of their trades, or at least a good percentage of it, goes through Citadel,
which is the giant sort of market maker, which is at the center of retail stock trading in the United States,
pretty much the world.
And so that's what happens.
When you buy and sell stocks, those trades go through this other company, and Robin Hood takes a little piece off that.
So they don't have to charge you anything.
So the reality is even though you're not paying anything, you're actually the product.
They're making money off of you.
And so it comes to a head in this story because what ended up happening was people were buying GameStop on Robinner.
Because every retail guy sitting in their house, that's the platform they all use.
It's the easy smartphone platform.
And there's something called clearing.
And this is where it gets a little complicated.
But when you buy a stock, there's this process that takes place between the moment you buy it and it actually becomes your stock.
which is something called clearing.
And it takes two days, actually.
It's not instant, even though you buy the socket and it seems to appear immediately
into your hand.
And the reality is there's this two-day clearing period.
During which point, Robin Hood has to put up a certain amount of money as collateral
against all of the trades that go through it.
That number, it turns out, can get very, very large.
And it's separate from the amount of money they take in.
So if I buy a stock for $5, they have to find a different $5.
or more to be as collateral to that $5 trade.
And it turns out the more volatile the stock is, the larger that collateral number becomes.
What happened was on around January 26 to 28, people were going crazy buying game stop.
The short sellers are going crazy trying to cover.
And it became the most volatile, the most traded stock on Wall Street.
And suddenly, Robin Hood got a collateral call for $3.7 billion, which they did not have.
They needed to show $3.7 billion or else they could just get shut down right.
And so that's why they had to freeze trading on GameStop.
They stopped everyone from being able to buy GameStop on their app.
You could still sell it, but you couldn't buy it.
And that moment destroyed the rally, basically.
It sent GameStop dropping, as you would expect.
Everyone got very, very upset.
And then it started to look fishy because we all discover that all of their trades go through Citadel
and Citadel happened to then invest in the Wall Street fund, Melvin, that was shorting on the other side.
Right.
I mean, they lost, not just on GameStop, but a number of stocks that were all short that Reddit attacked, basically.
They lost, went from a $12.5 billion fund to like a six.
It's still unclear what the exact numbers are, but they lost somewhere in the order of $5 billion, almost overnight, a matter of date.
So it all got murky and scary and dark, but Robin is at the center of all this, because on the one hand, they're built.
around the idea that they're democratizing finance. They're giving everyone the ability to be a
Wall Street trader. They're leveling the playing field. You're all part of this giant market. But on the
other hand, when things got hairy, they immediately shut out the retail buyer. So suddenly,
are they Robin Hood or are they in the other side? Who do they actually work for? Now, from their
point of view, they had no choice. They couldn't operate unless they came up with this scheme
to lower the collateral they had to put down.
But from the outside, it just looked like they just said,
screw you to their entire user base.
And so it's a tough kind of moment.
Afterwards, by the way, Robin Hood has done fine.
All of that anger towards Robin Hood seems to have gone away to some extent
because the tool is great.
It's kind of like Facebook in that way,
is that every time Facebook does something that pisses everyone off,
Facebook actually grows.
Everyone gets pissed off and says,
I'm never going to use Facebook again.
And then the next day, everyone's on Facebook.
And the same thing kind of happening, Robin Hood.
Because the tool is very good.
The app is very good.
If you're going to buy and sell stocks, Robin Hood is great.
It's right in your pocket.
You have the ability to buy and sell stocks.
But yes, so that is at the center of it all.
And I have a lot of fun with Robin Hood in the book.
I think Blod is an incredible character.
If you've ever watched him on any kind of video or had him on it, if you had him on,
but he's, you know, Prince Valiant haircut and he's very almost got the puppy dog eyes.
And he's trying to do the right thing.
I think he's got the archetypal Silicon Valley Unicorn, who are a guy who really believes
in this democracy of finance and the idea.
that what they're doing is a good thing.
I think he really and truly believes that.
And in reality, he does hand everyone the ability to do it, but it also is game of fun.
Although Wall Street already is a big game.
It's a big casino anyways.
He's just made it very obvious that what we're doing is playing a video game.
Yeah, I remember this story, in my opinion, it culminated almost on Clubhouse because
there was a period there or there was a night where in the heat of this discussion,
Vlad and Elon Musk and Mark and Dris, all these people were on Clubhouse, hashing this out.
And there was actually an interesting point there where Elon took to interviewing Flab and turns out Elon's a great interviewer, which makes sense at his level.
But that was surprising a little bit.
It was funny because even at the time, it was hard to believe him.
It was hard to believe that, oh, we just had this bill we had to pay.
Even though at the end of the day, it seems like it was such a logical reason, I feel like there's still a bit of skepticism around it.
You know, here's the thing.
They had options.
The other option, they could have frozen the buy and the cell, right?
they could have not forced only to be able to sell it. Now, their point of view is people would have been more upset if they were stuck in a stock and it started to drop and were not unable to sell it. So that's an issue. Number two, they could have had more money in hand. Could you predict such an enormous collateral call? Probably not, right? But on the other hand, the volumes and the craziness started the week before, the volumes and the day to day, so the way they argue it, and I think this is an interesting argument, the week before their collateral call was in the $125 million.
And on that day, it suddenly jumped to $3.7 billion.
So you look at a week of $125 million, $150 million, $125 billion, $3.7 billion, and you think,
oh, how could they cover it?
But at the same time, if you were looking back at that week and you saw what was going on
with GameStop, and they were clearly seeing what was going on at GameStop, you might say
to yourself, uh-oh, there might be some massive collateral call coming at some point in the next week.
The other thing, and this is a point I'm making the book that I don't think anyone else has
made yet, is that although Citadel says they had nothing to do, they didn't tell Robin Hood
that they had to stop people from buying, they said that we did nothing like that. And that's what
they say, and that's probably true. They should have been able to figure out what the collateral
call would be, because all of the trades were going through them. So when you think about a company
like that that's built on analyzing information and forward-looking on information, wouldn't they
know that Robin Hood was about to get a massive call like that? And
wouldn't be able to cover it because they know everything about Robert and because they're running,
all the money is running through them.
Wouldn't they be able to know this ahead of time?
And what would they be able to do with that information?
And so that's kind of one of the points I make in the book, which maybe I'm sure they
will disagree with.
And from their point of view, they would say absolutely not.
We didn't know anything.
How could they not know?
Maybe you couldn't predict Elon Musk tweeting GameSong, right?
But you definitely could predict that something incredibly volatile is going on here.
So you could wonder why aren't they better, why wasn't Robert had better capitalized for
this moment? Or why weren't they able to immediately draw a large amount of capital to cover trades
that were coming through with no problem? There was no fear that the trades weren't happening.
The collateral money would go back to them. So why couldn't they raise an amount of money on a
guaranteed return? Those are questions that I would ask. I understand at that moment, five in the
morning you get a call that says, you have to come up with $3.7 billion and you say, well,
what if I stop people from buying the stock and then you don't have to come up with it? I get that
that's a solution. But the question becomes, why couldn't you make a different call to someone
who has $10 million and say, I just need this for the day? And that person could have been
someone like Ken Griffin. Yes, that's why it looks a little fishy. It's like, was it really
the only thing you could do? It's a hard question. And so I don't know. But on the other hand,
I like Robin Hood. I'm not one of the people who thinks that we should not use Robin Hood. I use
Robin Hood. I think it's a great app. It really is. I love simple, well-designed beautiful apps.
and I don't see them as evil in any way.
I think that's a very useful, positive thing.
So yes, but it was a very interesting day.
I agree.
Elon was great interviewing and really took it to him, which I think was the best part about
being someone like Elon is you don't have to give a crap about what anyone thinks.
And he clearly doesn't.
And so I think that was awesome.
Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors.
No, it's not your imagination.
Risk and regulation are ramping up.
And customers now expect proof of security just to do business.
That's why VANTA is a game changer. VANTA automates your compliance process and brings compliance,
risk, and customer trust together on one AI-powered platform. So whether you're prepping for
a SOC 2 or running an enterprise GRC program, VANTA keeps you secure and keeps your deals moving.
Instead of chasing spreadsheets and screenshots, VANTA gives you continuous automation across more
than 35 security and privacy frameworks. Companies like Ramp and Ryder spend 82%
less time on audits with Vantta.
That's not just faster compliance, it's more time for growth.
If I were running a startup or scaling a team today, this is exactly the type of platform
I'd want in place.
Get started at Vanta.com slash billionaires.
That's Vanta.com slash billionaires.
Ever wanted to explore the world of online trading, but haven't dared try?
The futures market is more active now than ever before, and plus 500 futures,
is the perfect place to start.
Plus 500 gives you access to a wide range of instruments, the S&P 500, NASDAQ, Bitcoin, gas, and much more.
Explore equity indices, energy, metals, 4X, crypto, and beyond.
With a simple and intuitive platform, you can trade from anywhere, right from your phone.
Deposit with a minimum of $100 and experience the fast, accessible futures trading you've
been waiting for.
See a trading opportunity.
You'll be able to trade it in just two clicks once your account is open.
Not sure if you're ready, not a problem.
Plus 500 gives you an unlimited, risk-free demo account with charts and analytic tools for
you to practice on.
With over 20 years of experience, Plus 500 is your gateway to the markets.
Visit plus500.com to learn more.
Trading in futures involves risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone.
Not all applicants will qualify.
Plus 500, it's trading with a plus.
Billion dollar investors don't typically park their cash in high-yield savings accounts.
Instead, they often use one of the premier passive income strategies for institutional investors,
private credit.
Now, the same passive income strategy is available to investors of all sizes, thanks to the
Fundrise income fund, which has more than $600 million invested in a 7.97% distribution rate,
With traditional savings yields falling, it's no wonder private credit has grown to be a trillion-dollar
asset class in the last few years. Visit fundrise.com slash WSB to invest in the Fundrise
Income Fund in just minutes. The fund's total return in 2025 was 8%, and the average annual
total return since inception is 7.8%. Past performance does not guarantee future results,
current distribution rate as of 1231, 2025.
Carefully consider the investment material before investing, including objectives, risks,
charges, and expenses.
This and other information can be found in the income funds prospectus at fundrise.com
slash income.
This is a paid advertisement.
All right.
Back to the show.
Well, it was very tempting to kind of certainly point fingers and try and figure out
who the bad guy is really in this story.
And it seems like it's still a little hazy because everyone,
seems to have a very good out, a very good reason behind it. But if anyone were the villain in
this story from your book, in my opinion, it seems to be Ken Griffin of Citadel. And his chapter
especially is just hilarious. I mean, he is sitting on a game out of skulls and bones of his
people he's killed. But yes, so let me just put this out where I don't know Ken personally.
We went to the same college at the same time, but I don't think I ever crossed baths with him.
He's a genius. He's built an incredible company, but his reputation is very intense. And
people you talk to who work with him or work know him or have been fired by him,
all sort of things.
They have a lot of really dark things to say about him.
So I think there is definitely a feel that he is kind of, if this were Lord of the Rings,
he would be sitting under the giant eye with his orc army ready to destroy middle earth.
So I do think there's a feel in that respect.
And we'll see what Hollywood does with the movie here.
But yeah, when I write books like this, I really try and dramatize it and make it a lot of fun.
I don't really pick, okay, this guy's the villain.
You see what he is in this story and what he's done in this story.
And I think you can make your own, come to your own conclusion of who the bad guy
really is in this story.
But everyone, I think, has its own likability factor to it.
I go back to the Facebook story.
I mean, Zuckerberg, you know, is he the villain in the story?
I mean, sure.
But at the same time, you don't necessarily hate Mark Zuckerberg during the social.
You might hate him now.
But during the social network, he was kind of the bad guy, but he was also kind of likable
bad guy.
And I think there's some level of that in all of these characters.
Well, and also you go out of your way to highlight the fact that he almost lost everything during the global financial crisis.
Even these guys who are somewhat villains, you empathize with them because you're like, these are people who have persevered through a lot of hardship.
Even though this guy is a multi-billionaire and really well off, you don't get there just by happenstance.
And I have a ton of respect for people.
I'm different than a lot of people, writers or whatever, in that I love Billy.
I love people who have succeeded because I know a lot of my.
my friends went to Wall Street. I could have ended up on Wall Street. It's hard, man. The work that
people put in to build these careers and a lot of luck has to happen along the way, but they're
geniuses and they all almost lost it all. I mean, almost anybody you see at an incredible
high level of power almost lost it all at some point. And that's usually what drives him to the
next thing. And Ken is an example of that where he nearly lost everything in 2008, 2009, and even
had CNBC parked outside his office ready to interview him when he went bankrupt. And so the
These guys are under at certain points in their careers, I think is something you really should take into account and how they got to where they are, I think is fascinating.
And listen, Gabe Plotkin is another character who I really deeply like. I actually think Gabe is a really smart, good person.
And on Reddit, he's the bad guy. On Reddit, he's attacked mercilessly. I mean, the people went after him in horrible ways, you know, anti-Semitism and all this kind of stuff.
But the reality is, this is the guy who wins a lot, and he's won a lot over his career. And so you dislike that.
him because he wins so much, but he wins so much because he's smart and he works really hard,
and he applied himself in an area where if you win, you win huge, right? And so I respect that.
And I like Gabe. And I think he was caught completely by surprise by what happened with GameStop.
He could never have guessed that the most simple short in the world, shorting a company like GameStop,
would turn into something that nearly destroys his career.
Yeah, and I think the animosity compounded there because you had people,
like Gabe shorting the stock very innocently. Yeah, the fundamentals don't look good. It's an obvious
trade. But then when Wall Street bets started driving the price up, now you say, well, this is
even better short. And there's a little bit of hubris that it gets involved where these short sellers
come in even bigger and better and doubling down on the short. I talked to hedge funders who
weren't short and they were like, we could not understand what Gabe was doing here. Because the
stock was obviously not tied to the fundamentals anymore. It was skyrocketing and he doubled down
on his short position. And the only reason to do that is because you need to win here. It's no longer
based on logic anymore. This company's price, maybe it'll turn around at some point and go back
to where it should be, but obviously some other forces are working here, and he probably should
have gotten out earlier than he did. I mean, he did get out before Elon Musk's tweet, according to him
on CBC, and said he was out on the 26. He was already all out. But couldn't you have seen this
happening a week before, two weeks before when the stock price was at 90 rather than 500? Obviously,
this company should not be at $90 a share. Although things have changed since then. Let me say
this for the people who love GameStop. Ryan Cohen being involved now, the pivot that GameStop is
trying to make, I get why it's in the 160s now. I'm talking about last January, should it have been
160? Probably not. But, you know, anyways, yes, you do wonder, why do you keep doubling down
on a short like that? And I try to get into it in the book. And this is a guy whose sports have been a
big part of his life. You know, he worked with Michael Jordan. You know, he's a team owner. And I think
you look at someone like Michael Jordan and you think these are guys who need to win.
These are guys who are being taken on by a bunch of dudes on their couches.
They're not going to back down.
And I think that plays into it.
Well, to use a poker term, right, it's like he went on tilt a little bit, right?
He kind of, and maybe the lesson here for everybody to take away is that you don't always have to win the same way you lost.
He was doubling down on that trade.
Maybe you could have made that money back somewhere else.
Yeah.
I mean, I definitely think the lesson is, if you don't really understand what's happening,
you get out because there are market forces going on that you just can't, after the fact,
you might be able to go back and analyze what was going on there.
But in the heat of that moment, there were a lot of warning signs that this is not normal
and something really crazy is going on.
And Robin Hood should have seen the warning signs and Gabe should have seen the warning
signs.
A lot of people could have seen what was going on.
So part of the story is reminiscent to the global financial crisis to some degree
because there were bad actors involved and no one seemed to go to prison at the end of the day.
Do you feel like there should have been more ramifications or anywhere around?
Or you feel like it was almost circumstantial?
Great question.
So there's a lot of civil suits going on that I know about.
I don't know how everything is going to pan out.
I know there are multiple investigations still and there are suits going on.
I know Keith Gill has completely clamped up.
It's impossible to talk to him.
So I'm guessing there's some sort of actions going on because he made a fortune
and you could wonder, well, he did have a series six license.
he was on the internet promoting a stock.
How does this all pan out?
And then Melvin Capital is, I don't want to get anywhere near what's going on
legally because I have no idea what's going on over there.
So there might be more ramifications down the line.
The question becomes, could Congress, could the SEC, could they do something to protect
both sides here?
Is there something that should be done about short selling in certain situations?
Is there something that should be done about people conglomerating together to buy a stock?
That I don't think so.
I don't see anything wrong with a million people on Reddit going after a stock because they like the stock.
I think that's fine.
That's no different than a Wall Street guy walking into a club somewhere and telling his friends how much he likes a stock.
It's not really trading on inside information.
It's just rallying behind something.
It's a community.
So I don't see a problem with that.
So yeah, I think Robin Hood obviously has to be well regulated and there has to be a lot of caretaken in terms of.
I see a lot more advertising towards younger and younger people in finance.
There's like accounts now for your high school kid.
I don't know if this is a good angle here.
I think this is a, you know, as someone who comes from the world of gambling a little bit,
there definitely is a point where people are not as rational as they should be.
And I fear the gamification of Wall Street to younger and younger people.
Because the way people sports fed in college, now they day trade in college, right?
And that's not a bad.
Look, I love it.
If I were in college right now, I'd be doing it too.
But I can see how quickly you can get in a lot of trouble.
To that point, you highlight in the book that a lot of these players on Wall Street, they don't
have to do much to win.
They're almost like the house in the casino.
So while these retail traders are out there very actively trading, it seems like a lot of
these Wall Street firms don't have to do much.
They can sit back on and know that in a matter of time they will ultimately come out
on top.
Right.
I mean, and that's the scary thing is that, you know, if you're a college kid with $4,000
in the bank and you go on Robin Hood and bet that $4,000, you can lose everything.
And you could be left with nothing.
But if you're a Wall Street banker who has a position on GameStop, the reality is it's not a big deal.
And you could lose at that or you could just hold it longer.
There's a lot of things you could do to get out of that situation that's not going to ruin your life.
And so I do think that the risk factors are so much higher for the retail people, the regular Main Street people, there has to be some protection over them.
The idea that Robin Hood can just democratize and say, you now have the power of a Wall Street bank, but you also have the risk.
10 times what a Wall Street banker had. And so there has to be some level of control over that
and whether it's limits or things like that. I mean, people don't like the idea of things like
that, but there does have to be some level of protection for the average person because they can
get screwed very easily. Like you look at GameStop, which runs all the way up to 500 and then
drops all the way back down. And a lot of people, if you're a Wall Street banker, you could
hold through all that. But if you're a regular person and you just lost everything you were going
to pay your rent with, what are you going to do? You can't just hold that loss, right? And so it's a
Different level of risk, I think.
So this started populating in other stocks as well.
AMC seemed to be one and a few other meme stocks, as they're called.
But it's kind of seemed to die down a little bit.
Maybe it's just the stimulus checks have kind of run out or...
There will be meme stops, and I do think there are fundamental changes that have happened here.
And I think you're going to see it in crypto, you're going to see it in those you see
it, the idea that the value of something is no longer linked to fundamentals and doesn't need
to be in any way.
Every stock or whatever in a lot of ways is like a social network.
If people love it, it's going to go up and nothing else really matters.
It doesn't have to make anything.
I think that's what Doge is showing us is that it doesn't do anything and there's an unlimited
supply and it will still go up if people like it.
And so GameStop, any stock could be that.
So that has to be taken to account.
But I do agree that this book, and I couch it in that, is that this was a moment in time
in some respects.
How do we not all be sitting on our couches had life not been normal and you couldn't
just leave and go do something. I mean, that's why I chose like a college kid and someone
who works in health care and someone who works, you know, someone who's just starting out in life
because those are the people I feel like exemplify all of us over this two-year period now,
is that if you were going to college during the pandemic, it was not a normal college
experience. And that was a moment where day trading and using Robert had really took off because
everyone's sitting at home dreaming about a better life than they're living right now. I think we all
kind of identify with that. And so, yeah, yeah, it is a story of the moment.
moment in some respects. But yeah, and at the same time, the whole meme thing, it's died down to
some respect, but I also think it's carrying forward in a lot of different ways. I don't think
people analyze stocks the same way anymore. And I don't think you should. I don't think you
can look at a stock and say, well, the fundamentals are great and this and that. That means it's
going to go up. I don't think those are connected anymore. Another big component of it is do people
on Reddit like it? Do people on internet like it? Do regular people, are they in love with this?
Is there a nostalgia factor? Is there a reason why this could go up? That has a
nothing to do with fundamentals. And I think that that's where it gets really intriguing.
Yeah, I'm curious about if there are any other ramifications from all of this. One might be that,
you know, in my opinion, hedge funds might be a little bit hesitant to go 140% short interest
on anything anymore. And maybe they're hiring full-time Reddit analysts nowadays.
Yeah, both of those things are happening for sure. And there are a bunch of shorts those who are
getting out of the short business, simply because it's just too dangerous. There will always be
shorts, and it does have a place. If a company is being poorly run or is scamming people, or
there are reasons why a company should have short pressure against it, and people should bet
against it. But I do think people are more cognizant of what they're shorting and also being
public about it. I think this will make people more secretive. One of the problems that Plotkin and Melvin
had is they bought public options. They had to actually release information in the SEC. So that caught
the attention of people on Reddit. You could have shorted a stock without people knowing if you hadn't
bought these particular options.
So that's where it gets interesting.
You want to keep, if you're shorting something, you don't want to be too public about it necessarily
because you don't want to catch, get that bull's eye on you.
And yes, people are absolutely all the funds they're hiring people to scour Reddit and Twitter
and make sure they're not missing something on social media going.
I'm curious about Keith Gill because, you know, he's such an interesting character
and a great underdog for this story.
In that testimony, he says, I like the stock.
And you kind of highlighted here that at 160 bucks a share, you get it.
I mean, they did turn cash flow positive after a brutal 2020.
They've got Ryan Cohen.
So I got to ask you, Ben, do you like the stock?
You know what?
First of all, I love GameStop, the company.
I say it in my beginning, acknowledgement somewhere that I have little kids, and they are like
nothing better than to go to GameStop.
I walked by there.
There was one in Boston.
There's one on Boylston Street.
I was in there every weekend.
And what I love about GameStop is on one shelf, you'll have like, you know, stuffed
little toys and then there's like a chainsaw dripping blood. It's like the oddest
galomeration of stuff. It's just a fun store. So nostalgia-wise, I love video games. I love
GameStop. And the idea that they have a community is worth way more than anything else.
Their main problem, I think, has been leadership. But if they can get a hold of that and Ryan Cohen
is very smart, I do like this stuff. But what does the price really work? What is the value of it?
I'm not a guy who could tell you that number. When it was running to 500, towards
a thousand, obviously that was crazy. And without a short situation going on, that made no sense
at all. But should it go bankrupt? No, I don't think this is a company that should go bankrupt.
But then again, listen, I love Blockbuster too. It's spent a lot of time in Blockbuster. So I don't
know. To me, because I'm old, I'm not 22. There's something about GameStop that, to me,
would be sad if that company ever went on there. Do you see any chance for a sequel to this book,
given the activity on the stock market nowadays? I mean, yeah, there's a lot of
possibilities of the sequel. You know, we're making the movie. So MGM bought the rights and the
MGM, the people who did the social network, and Mike DeLuca's, you know, running it,
and Aaron Ryder who produced a rival and Memento is a genius and the screenplay is in. So I believe
we'll get a movie underway pretty soon. There's so many ways you could go with this story.
I do think it's a possibility. And I guess we'll see how well the book does. I'm always
happy to write sequels. It's just a question of whether the audience is there for them.
But yeah, I'm fascinated. You know, I wrote Bitcoin Billionaires. So the whole crypto thing is always
interesting to me. NFTs, I think, is a really cool field. And, you know, I don't know what the story is
there yet, but I'm dabbling in it. I'm looking into sort of how I can get involved in NFTs because I'm a
big fan of that. I think the idea of sort of digital collectibles of a whole economy around that,
it's brilliant. And that's the world we're moving into. You know, I look at my kids and they're
more interested in buying clothes, you know, for their character on Fortnite than they would be buying
real clothes, right? It's more real to them than real things are. And that's the direction we're all
moving. And so I do think that there's a lot going to happen in the next five to 10 years.
Well, we can agree on this. The future will not be boring. And I'm really looking forward to the
pandemic being over so that, you know, I can actually get out and start signing books for people
and doing this all face to face. I think I do have one of the few careers where being locked up
for a year is good for your career. But in general, I think it's just, it's good to hopefully see a light
end of this tunnel. We'll see how it goes. Yeah.
Well, Ben, congratulations on the new book. It's incredible.
Congratulations. I can't wait to see the movie that comes out. This is just another winner.
And for those who are listening, it's called the Anti-Social Network. This was a lot of fun.
Thanks so much. I appreciate it from you too. And this was awesome. So I look forward to
seeing it.
All right, folks, that's all we had for you this week. If you're loving the show, don't forget
to follow us on your favorite podcast app so you get the episodes automatically every week.
Feel free to say hello on Twitter at Trey Lockerby. And if you're curious about
if GameStop is a buy right now, you might want to check out TIP Finance and see what the tool
has to say. So go ahead and Google TIP Finance and it should pop right up. And with that,
we'll see you again next time. Thank you for listening to TIP. Make sure to subscribe to
millennial investing by the Investors Podcast Network and learn how to achieve financial independence.
To access our show notes, transcripts or courses, go to theinvestorspodcast.com. This show is for
entertainment purposes only, before making any decision consult a professional.
This show is copyrighted by the Investors Podcast Network.
Written permission must be granted before syndication or rebroadcasting.
