We Study Billionaires - The Investor’s Podcast Network - TIP517: Mohnish Pabrai's Dhandho Investment Framework
Episode Date: January 22, 2023On today’s episode, Clay reviews Mohnish Pabrai’s book, The Dhandho Investor. Mohnish is one of our very favorite investors to study here at TIP as we’ve interviewed him for the podcast multiple... times in the past. Since its inception in 2000, Mohnish’s flagship fund has achieved a return of 781% to his investors net of fees versus 378% for the S&P 500. IN THIS EPISODE YOU’LL LEARN: 00:00 - Intro 05:19 -The story of the Patels, who went from owning nothing in the US, to owning over 50% of the motel industry. 11:33 - The 9 Dhandho investment principles. 14:24 - How Dhandho investors are able to earn outsized returns with minimal risk. 25:09 - How to identify bargains in the market. 32:17 - The relationship between investing and gambling. 39:17 - Clay’s analysis on Mohnish’s largest US equity holding today. 49:46 - Mohnish’s investing checklist he uses prior to purchasing a company. Disclaimer: Slight discrepancies in the timestamps may occur due to podcast platform differences. BOOKS AND RESOURCES Join the exclusive TIP Mastermind Community to engage in meaningful stock investing discussions with Stig, Clay, and the other community members. Tune into the recent We Study Billionaires' episode covering The Little Book of Valuation by Aswath Damodaran or watch the video. Listen to the episode on Warren Buffett's Money Mind or watch the video. Related Episode: Listen to Investing in Stocks w/ Mohnish Pabrai - TIP442, or watch the video. Related Episode: Listen to Berkshire's Purchase of TSM & Meta "Doomsday" Analysis - TIP508, or watch the video. Mohnish Pabrai’s book: The Dhandho Investor. Follow Clay on Twitter. NEW TO THE SHOW? Check out our We Study Billionaires Starter Packs. Browse through all our episodes (complete with transcripts) here. Try our tool for picking stock winners and managing our portfolios: TIP Finance Tool. Enjoy exclusive perks from our favorite Apps and Services. Stay up-to-date on financial markets and investing strategies through our daily newsletter, We Study Markets. Learn how to better start, manage, and grow your business with the best business podcasts. SPONSORS Support our free podcast by supporting our sponsors: River Toyota Sun Life The Bitcoin Way Range Rover Sound Advisory BAM Capital Fidelity SimpleMining Briggs & Riley Public Shopify HELP US OUT! Help us reach new listeners by leaving us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts! It takes less than 30 seconds, and really helps our show grow, which allows us to bring on even better guests for you all! Thank you – we really appreciate it! Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm
Transcript
Discussion (0)
You're listening to TIP.
Hey, everyone, welcome to The Investors Podcast.
I'm your host, Clay Fink.
I'm very excited for today's episode because I'm going to be covering the investing strategy
of Monish Pabri.
Monish is one of our very favorite investors to learn from here at the Investors Podcast
Network, as he's been a guest on our show a number of times over the years for
Preston, Stig, and William.
Since inception in 2000, Monich's flagship fund returned 781,000.
percent to his investors net of fees relative to only 378% for the S&P 500.
For much of this episode, I'll be covering my biggest takeaways from reading his book,
The Dondo Investor, which was published back in 2007.
During this episode, you'll learn the nine Dondo investment principles, why Dondo investors are
able to earn outsized returns with minimal risk, how to find bargains in the market,
The story of the Patels, who went from owning nothing in the U.S. to managing 50% of the motel
industry in just 35 years? Why Dondo's love arbitrage opportunities? How investing relates
to gambling, Monash's seven criteria he goes through before purchasing a company, and so much more.
At the end of the episode, I'll be discussing Monisha's holdings in his portfolio today, most notably
Micron. With that, I hope you enjoyed today's episode covering Investing Great, Monash Pabri.
You are listening to The Investors Podcast, where we study the financial markets and read the books
that influence self-made billionaires the most. We keep you informed and prepared for the unexpected.
Warren Buffett has famously said that he is a better investor because he is a businessman,
and a better businessman because he is an investor.
Monash states that the Dondo investor is the expansion of that one sentence into a book
diving into that idea.
So up until just recently, I had no idea what a Dondo investor was.
I had first learned about it through reading TIP's investment newsletter called We Study Markets
and knew I had to give this book a read given that it was written by Monash.
If by chance you aren't yet subscribed to TIP's newsletter We Study Markets, you can do so
by simply going to Theinvestorspodcast.com slash newsletter.
If you're interested in staying up to date with markets and just personal development as an investor,
I highly recommend you go subscribe at theinvestorspodcast.com slash newsletter.
All right.
So now the Dondo investor is simply an approach to business that has minimal risk,
but maximum reward, meaning that if you win, you win big.
And if you lose, you may only lose a little bit.
Said another way, the Dondo style of investing in business is taking asymmetric bets that
give you disproportionate upside relative to the downside.
An important part of this is minimizing the downside because Buffett says that the number
one rule to invest is to not lose money.
And rule number two is obviously to not forget rule number one.
We've all been taught that in order to increase returns, you must take greater risk.
But when you study the investors that take this Dondo approach, they feel that you know.
flip this idea totally on its head. Dondo investors have a way of taking on business endeavors
that create wealth while taking virtually no risk. Monash tells a number of stories of business
people who took this Dondo approach, the first of which was a group of people referred to as
the Patels. 35 years before this book was published, there were practically no Patels in the
United States. And at the time the book was published, the Patels owned more than $40 billion worth of
motels, paying $725 million in taxes, and employed over 1 million people.
Over half of the motel industry was owned by the Patels in the United States, despite
only being 0.2% of the population.
Now, the Patels were from a specific area of India near where Gandhi was born.
The Patels had their wealth seized, and they were driven out of Uganda at some point,
and they were forced to go elsewhere.
The United States ended up accepting a few.
thousand of these families, and this group eventually entered the motel industry. When you study
immigrants that come to the United States, you oftentimes find that certain ethnic groups
tend to stick to a certain profession or certain business. This is because the role models in
our life play a big role in the path we end up choosing to follow. If we see someone who did quite well
who had a similar upbringing, attended a similar school, had a similar lifestyle, then it's
natural for us to take a similar path as well. It's what we're most familiar and most comfortable
with, which really makes sense from that perspective. Now, why did the Patels enter the motel business
specifically? Well, after World War II, there was a huge buildout of suburban life and interstate
highway systems as the automobile became a staple of American life. By 1973, the U.S. had
entered a recession, and the motel industry had taken a downturn. And one of these Patel families
saw a huge opportunity after losing practically everything they had in Uganda, and now they were
just immigrants to the U.S. The father of the family was working a minimum wage job, and he figured
out that he could purchase this motel largely with debt. And they would have minimal transportation
and living expenses because they could live at the motel and not have to commute for work.
So they buy this 20-room motel for $5,000 down, and rather than keeping the employees that
worked there, they let them all go, and the family of five would handle all the operations
of the business.
The competitive advantage that this Patel family created was to be the lowest-cost operator
and have the same or higher levels of profitability per room than their competitors.
Since they were the lowest-cost motel, their occupancy rates ended up being much higher
than their counterparts.
This Patel family's expenses were abysmally low.
They spent practically all of their time working and didn't have time to spend money on recreational
activities.
They didn't have a mortgage payment.
They weren't commuting anywhere.
When you're working all the time, it's kind of hard to have a lot of expenses,
assuming that you're not spending a ton of money on the business itself.
To add to that, they were vegetarians and just lived a really simple life and they just
spend a lot of their time just working. The distress price for the motel ended up being $50,000
initially, and after the $5,000 down payment, the motel would bring in $15,000 in annual profit
and an additional $5,000 in principal paid on the loan, netting the Patels of 400% return
on their original investment. Turning back to this Dondo approach, when looking at the motel
deal, there was obviously some sort of chance that it would end up failing.
If the economy entered a severe recession and enough business never came in to cover the expenses,
then the motel would get foreclosed on.
In that sort of situation, the Patels would have lost their $5,000 initial investment.
If the economy does recover, though, then the bet pays off tremendously.
Say the family netted $20,000 per year for 10 years, and the business is sold for the
price it was originally bought.
That would mean this investment would end up being a $20,000.
one bagger on their initial purchase price. This summarizes the Dondo approach, minimal downside with
very high asymmetric upside. Let's say that there was a 10% chance that this deal wouldn't
work out, and the Patel's lost all of their $5,000 that they initially invested. Well, that means
if he made this bet twice, then there would be a 1% chance that this sort of arrangement doesn't
work out both times. So if the family was willing to take two shots at this and go all in, then there
was a 99% chance that it would pay off big in the end. After the first failure, of course, they would
of course need to go back and work some sort of minimum wage job to save up the money again, to invest
it for the second one. And of course, since the first motel ended up being a success for them,
the family was eventually flushed with cash and they were able to go out and purchase a bigger
deal that was 50 rooms instead of 20. And the snowball effect started to come into play, which
led to the Patels from this specific part of India to own 50% of the motel market in the U.S.
in just 35 years. Before diving into more of the details on the Dondo framework, Monash also
tells his own story of his own Dondo experience. Monash founded a business called TransTech Inc.
And when he started the business, he had $30,000 saved up in his 401k.
And he had $70,000 available in credit card limits.
He did some research and discovered that if the business ended up not working out,
he could file for bankruptcy and simply wipe out his debts.
And to make the jump slightly more comforting,
his previous employer, he just quit at,
told him that they'd love to have him back if his business ended up not working out.
So in Monisha's eyes, he didn't see much downside in starting a business
while he was young, being only 25 years old,
and he had this opportunity in front of him that he just really had to seize.
He started TransTech part-time in early 1990 while working his full-time job.
And then when he quit his full-time job, he had already signed his first client and had
$200,000 in the annual revenue.
He actually regarded staying at his full-time job, the risky path in life.
As when he was in his 20s, it would be the only shot at life that he had at starting a business.
as in the later years, he would have a family of his own, and starting a business would be
much more difficult and likely more risky since his expenses would be much higher too.
So if the business didn't work out, he would say loses $30,000 that was in his 401k.
And if it did work out well, then it would likely net him millions of dollars at the very
least.
And once he started getting the business established and he had a few customers and clients
on board, he knew the business was then very low risk and was really a no-brainer in his mind.
The business model was actually very simple that Monash implemented. It was an arbitrage-based
business model where he leveraged India's deep expertise and knowledge in client server computing
to satisfy the deep shortage of talent in the Midwest in the U.S. By 1996, his business was
recognized in the Inc. 500, which represented the 500 fastest growing businesses in the U.S.
Over the first 10 years, the business went from nothing to over $20 million in revenue,
and Monash never had to take in outside capital. Monash says that he ended up selling the
business in 2000 for several million dollars. His initial $30,000, he quote-unquote, put at risk,
had turned into a 150 bagger over 10 years, which he stated.
is an annualized return of 65% per year. When he quit his job, he had a salary of $45,000,
and in a few years, he was consistently making over $300,000 per year. In Monich's words,
the magic is Dondo, huge upside with virtually no downside. It was a classic, heads-eye win,
tails I don't lose much kind of bet. Monich then dives into the Dondo framework, which consists of
nine core principles. The first principle is to focus on buying an existing business. The stories
that Monish told at the beginning of the book didn't include crazy startups, you know, where it's
something like Elon Must starting Tesla, Jeff Bezos starting Amazon out of his garage, or Steve Jobs,
creating a new form of computing. They were businesses that already existed and these businesses
have been around for a really long time. This is a much less risk.
business venture than operating a startup. The second principle is to buy simple businesses
in industries with an ultra-slow rate of change. Warren Buffett once said,
we see change as the enemy of investments. So we look for the absence of change. We don't like to
lose money, and capitalism is pretty brutal. We look for mundane products that everyone
needs. The third principle is to buy distressed businesses in distressed industries. You're going to
get the best deals when business isn't as good, and the general sentiment is really, really bad.
The Patel's first got into the motel business during a recession. In the business environment
for the industry was really pretty poor because people overall are traveling and they're spending
less because they don't have as much discretionary income. As we all know, Buffett likes to be greedy
when others are fearful and fearful when others are greedy. Monish states that Dondo investors
intrinsically understand that the very best time to buy a business is when its near-term future
prospects are murky and the business is hated and unloved. In such circumstances, the odds are high
that an investor can pick up cheap assets at steep discounts to their underlying value. The fourth
principle is to buy businesses with a durable, competitive advantage or moat. For the Patels
and the motel business, this was the ability to charge much less than all of their
competitors and still maintain healthy margins. Other examples of a competitive advantage is
access to resources your competitors don't have, having a highly skilled labor force, or having
a strong brand awareness. The fifth principle is to bet heavily when the odds are in your favor.
Again, this ties into the asymmetric upside we mentioned earlier where if you win, you win big,
and if you lose, you only lose a relatively small amount. Charlie Munger relates this to
horse betting as he says, we look for the horse with one chance and two of winning, which pays you
three to one. You're looking for a mispriced gamble. That's what investing is. And you have to
know enough to know whether the gamble is mispriced. That's value investing. This reminds me of how
Warren Buffett almost always has ample amounts of cash, partly because he had his insurance
business and has to have cash available to pay out claims, but also partially to give him that
optionality. During the great financial crisis, because he had a ton of cash and a ton of other people
needed cash, he was able to invest in deals with great terms that earned him outsized returns.
The sixth principle is to focus on arbitrage. Arbitrage is simply profiting by exploiting
price differences in two different markets. Buffett is actually currently in an arbitrage deal
as he purchased a stake in Activision. Microsoft is in the works of purchasing Activision and
Buffett stated that he plans on exiting the deal, and the goal with the investment is to make a
profit when the deal closes, which is a strategy known as merger arbitrage.
In a typical arbitrage play, you just can't lose.
But in this merger arbitrage for Buffett, there is, of course, the chance that regulators
don't approve of the deal, and Buffett is stuck holding his shares in Activision, which he
very well may be okay with.
Arbitrages can be applied to businesses as well.
In a way, Monish applied this arbitrage concept when he was meeting a need in the marketplace.
He found labor in India and the demand for labor in the Midwest, and he connected the two,
making the decision a no-brainer for both parties.
If the arbitrage is so successful and so profitable, then eventually competition will flow
in and close the gap on the mispricing in the market.
Arbitrages can be found when entrepreneurs deliver a product or service to a market
that isn't yet being serviced and has a desire to fill in for that demand.
Principle number seven is to buy businesses with big discounts to intrinsic value.
As we've talked about in all of our episodes covering Warren Buffett, you want to purchase a business
with a margin of safety to help minimize those chances of you losing money.
In Buffett's number one rule of investing, as I mentioned, is to not lose money.
Principle number eight is to look for low-risk, high-uncertainty businesses. The Patel's Motel's
Motel's motel business did not have much risk to it. However, it did have a lot of uncertainty
because of the looming recession and how bad the recession would end up actually turning out.
The low risk is an obvious sign to look out for if you've listened this far into this episode,
but the reason why high uncertainty is actually desirable is because that is what's going
to give you the depressed prices. The market really doesn't like uncertainty. Let's take a quick break
and hear from today's sponsors.
All right.
I want you guys to imagine spending three days in Oslo at the height of the summer.
You've got long days of daylight, incredible food, floating saunas on the Oslo Fjord,
and every conversation you have is with people who are actually shaping the future.
That's what the Oslo Freedom Forum is.
From June 1st through the 3rd, 2026, the Oslo Freedom Forum is entering its 18th year,
bringing together activists, technologists, journalists, investors, and builders from all
over the world, many of them operating on the front lines of history.
This is where you hear firsthand stories from people using Bitcoin to survive currency collapse,
using AI to expose human rights abuses, and building technology under censorship and authoritarian
pressures.
These aren't abstract ideas.
These are tools real people are using right now.
You'll be in the room with about 2,000 extraordinary individuals, dissidents, founders,
philanthropists, policymakers, the kind of people you don't just listen to.
but end up having dinner with.
Over three days, you'll experience powerful mainstage talks,
hands-on workshops on freedom tech, and financial sovereignty,
immersive art installations,
and conversations that continue long after the sessions end.
And it's all happening in Oslo in June.
If this sounds like your kind of room,
well, you're in luck because you can attend in person.
Standard and patron passes are available at Osloof Freedom Forum.com,
with patron passes offering deep access,
private events, and small group time with the speakers. The Oslo Freedom Forum isn't just a conference.
It's a place where ideas meet reality and where the future is being built by people living it.
If you run a business, you've probably had the same thought lately. How do we make AI useful in the real world?
Because the upside is huge, but guessing your way into it is a risky move. With NetSuite by Oracle,
you can put AI to work today. NetSuite is the number one AI Cloud ERP,
trusted by over 43,000 businesses. It pulls your financials, inventory, commerce, HR, and CRM into
one unified system. And that connected data is what makes your AI smarter. It can automate
routine work, surface actionable insights, and help you cut costs while making fast AI-powered decisions
with confidence. And now with the Netsuite AI connector, you can use the AI of your choice
to connect directly to your real business data. This isn't some add-on, it's AI built and
into the system that runs your business.
And whether your company does millions or even hundreds of millions,
NetSuite helps you stay ahead.
If your revenues are at least in the seven figures,
get their free business guide,
domesticifying AI at netsuite.com slash study.
The guide is free to you at netsuite.com slash study.
NetSuite.com slash study.
When I started my own side business,
it suddenly felt like I had to become 10 different people
overnight wearing many different hats. Starting something from scratch can feel exciting, but also
incredibly overwhelming and lonely. That's why having the right tools matters. For millions of
businesses, that tool is Shopify. Shopify is the commerce platform behind millions of businesses
around the world and 10% of all e-commerce in the U.S. from brands just getting started to household
names. It gives you everything you need in one place, from inventory to payments to analytics. So you're not
juggling a bunch of different platforms. You can build a beautiful online store with hundreds of
ready-to-use templates, and Shopify is packed with helpful AI tools that write product descriptions
and even enhance your product photography. Plus, if you ever get stuck, they've got award-winning
24-7 customer support. Start your business today with the industry's best business partner, Shopify,
and start hearing... Sign up for your $1 per month trial today at Shopify.com.
slash WSB.
Go to Shopify.com slash WSB.
That's Shopify.com slash WSB.
All right.
Back to the show.
Monish has talked about meta stock before and how he believes the company is undervalued.
The reason meta stock is so depressed is because there is a lot of uncertainty going forward
and the market really does not like uncertainty.
Nobody really knows how much meta will end up spending on the Metaverse and how that
will end up playing out for them whether they'll actually make money or if it will be a huge
success. Principle number nine is that it's better to be a copycat than an innovator.
The first few Patel's in the US paved the way for the remainder to head to the US and enter
that business. Innovation can be a crapshoot and it's better to copy what works than to create
something new. Monash is actually quite well known for cloning and shamelessly taking the best ideas
from the great investors such as Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger.
It's pretty foolish to believe that you need to invent or create something new when you can
just simply clone the best ideas that already exist.
Not a lot of people listening to the show might want to go out and buy or start a business
like the Patels did or Monash did in the 90s.
And this is where the stock market comes into play.
Ever since the creation of the stock market in 1790, many people have viewed.
it as a piece of paper whose prices continually race up and race down, Monish highlights that a far
better way to view the stock market is how Benjamin Graham views them, and that's the ownership
of a real business. The stock market allows anyone to own a publicly traded company and benefit
from the cash that business creates, just like how the Patel has benefited from the cash that
was created by their motel business. Monash then highlights six big advantages that the stock
market offers versus buying and selling an entire business. The first advantage is the headache
saved. When you purchase an entire business, it takes a tremendous amount of energy and dedication
in order to make it successful. When you buy a stock, all you need to do is do your research
up front and you don't need to go out and find managers to take care of the business of the stock
you're buying. You can buy as little or you can buy as much as you want. You can sell out whenever
you'd like with just a few clicks on your computer. The Patels didn't have this advantage of being
able to buy and sell whenever they wanted to. Plus, they had to spend so much time and so much
headaches dealing with the business they had, which also gave them a lot more potential
upside and sweat equity as well. Another advantage is that when a wholly owned business is sold,
both parties in that transaction tend to have a pretty good sense of what the asset is worth.
and they come to a rational price during the sale.
And oftentimes, the seller will only want to sell at a time that is to their benefit.
I would also argue that many times the seller of a wholly owned business knows more about
that business and the buyer does, so they're able to make a sale that is more beneficial
to them.
Instead of stocks being a conversation between the buyer and the seller, it's more like
an auction system of buyers and sellers constantly placing orders and occasionally
Finally, you'll find a wide divergence between the value of the business and the price that's quoted
by the market.
Other advantages include the ability to get started with a very small amount of money, having
the opportunity to buy into over 100,000 businesses that are all over the world, as well
as very little transaction costs.
Monash is a big believer that having an ownership stake in a few businesses is the best
path to building wealth.
And since there is no heavy lifting required and the opportunity to buy bargains, among other
benefits, it makes buying stakes in publicly traded existing businesses a no-brainer for the Dondo
investor. Monash then goes on to explain that he wants to own a simple business and to keep
the intrinsic value calculation simple as well. He did an intrinsic value analysis in his book
on Bed Bath and Beyond based on the numbers back in 2005, and he came to the conclusion that
the company was trading around its intrinsic value and offered a potential return of roughly 10%.
After projecting out modest, conservative growth and discovering that the stock wasn't trading
well below its intrinsic value, the stock was an easy pass for him because it didn't offer
much upside, as well as a decent chance of delivering returns that were less than 10% per year.
Simplicity is key when buying stocks, as he mentions that even Warren Buffett's style of investing
is simple. The key to fighting the psychological warfare, he calls it, which I'll be discussing
later, is to buy a simple business with a simple thesis for why you're likely to make a great
amount of money and unlikely to lose very much. If it takes more than a short paragraph,
then there's a fundamental problem, and if it requires a complex model, then that's probably
a red flag. Chapter 8 in this book covers investing in distressed businesses in distressed industries.
He outlines his opinion on the efficiency of markets, noting that he believes that markets are
largely efficient for most businesses.
And the reason they aren't fully efficient is because humans are in control of the auction-driven
pricing mechanism.
When humans as a group are extremely fearful, the pricing of the assets they are fearful
of are likely to fall below their intrinsic value.
And then on the opposite end of the spectrum, extreme greed can lead to very optimistic prices.
In the stock market, when someone is extremely fearful about a company, they can log onto their
brokerage and sell their position in just a matter of minutes.
Monish then lists a number of ways you can find distressed businesses.
The first of which is to simply look at the news headlines, as they tend to cover the
negative news about a certain business or certain industry.
Meta is a great example of this, as it's a company many people are talking about nowadays.
Second is Value Line, which is a research service which also includes a weekly summary of the
stocks that have lost the most value in the last 13 weeks.
I'm sure there are other sources as well with the internet nowadays showing stocks that are
at either quarterly or 52-week lows or stocks with the lowest P.E. ratios, widest discount
to book value, highest dividend yield, and so on.
Third is he also recommends checking out what other super investors are purchasing, which
is what you can find on Datarama, online on the activity tab, where it shows the recent
buys and sells made by top investors.
These investors won't necessarily be focused on the most distressed businesses, but they will
be looking for good value investments.
Be sure to stick around until the end of the episode because I will be touching on Monisha's
holdings in his portfolio, which for the most part only consists of two companies that are in
the U.S., and the remainder of his portfolio is international.
Lastly, he also recommends in the book to check out Joel Greenblatt's website called Value Investors
Club, which is a membership site to present and receive ideas.
Then Monish also recommends Greenblatt's book, The Little Book, The Little Book, that beats the market.
As we talk about numerous times on the show, you want to invest in businesses with a durable
moat or competitive advantage.
Capitalism is brutal, and people are always out there trying to find a way to earn more
money or steal profits from a business that is earning a lot of money.
A moat is what keeps competitors from stealing your lunch.
Emote doesn't make it impossible to steal a share of a company's profits, but it makes it
very difficult.
You can try and make a better Google search, but Google is already free to users, and
building a better Google search may cost you billions of dollars, which may not even
attract current users of Google anyways.
Outside of the qualitative aspects of a business, such as the location Starbucks puts in their
stores and how addictive their products are, another way to identify a quality moat is to look
at the company's return on invested capital. Consistently high returns on capital are a good
indicator of a strong moat. Monash gives an example that if it costs 700 grand to open a Chipotle
and the average store generates 250 grand in free cash flow, then that's a really really
really good business. This reminds me of how Dollar General, who is still building out stores,
will only build a store if they can hit a return on investment of 20% or more for a location.
It's also important to understand that history tells us that eventually even the greatest
businesses eventually enter the phase of decline. Charlie Munger points out that out of the 50
largest companies on the New York Stock Exchange in 1911, only one remains today, and that's
General Electric.
Over the very long term, the odds of any business surviving the forces of competitive
destruction are very, very small.
Because even the most durable modes don't last forever.
It's probably best to limit your discounted cash flow calculations to 10 years or less
to avoid being too optimistic about the future.
When you do find a company you're ready to wager on, Monice describes how the Dondo investor bets big.
Monish, of course, prefers to have a highly concentrated portfolio with a handful of bets.
He mentioned a Charlie Munger quote with regards to this,
The Wise Ones bet heavily when the world offers them that opportunity.
They bet big when they have the odds.
And the rest of the time, they don't.
It's just that simple.
Here's a clip of Monish talking about position.
during his conversation with Stig on episode TIP 442.
If anyone were to invest today with me in my funds, even though we limit ourselves to 10%
beds, the top three positions for, I think all my funds are 50 to 60% of assets because
they've run up, right?
So we bought Micron a few years back and it's doubled and so on.
If you had invested in me when I was starting out, then yeah, we would not have the same
degree of concentration because things haven't run up. But typically when investors have joined me,
they've always come into a fund that probably the top three positions are 40 to 60% type
concentration. And then by the time you get to the sixth or seventh position, you're looking at
90% of assets or something like that. I don't think I need to start a fund and say, I'm going to
only have three picks. I could do that, but I think that the nature of investing is such,
that it would get there anyway.
And one of the things to keep in mind
is there is this very high error rate, right?
We've talked about 40, 50% error rates.
And so if you have 40, 50% error rate,
and you have three pays,
you could be wrong in two out of three of them.
Right.
And if you're wrong has a range of outcomes, right?
Wrong means something could flatline,
just doesn't go anywhere,
or something is a 20% loss.
Or wrong could also be permanent.
wipeout, zero on that.
All of those are mistakes.
Three bets could work as long as you don't have the wipeouts, right?
I think you could have two of the three bets go sideways or be very modest winners
and one could carry you.
That's possible.
But I don't think you need to be that way.
But I would say this, you know, sometimes we do get a chance to make investments
where the odds are just so heavily stacked in your favor and the economics are so compelling
that you would want to try to do more.
It takes an incredible amount of conviction to invest so concentrated as he does, but he
acknowledges that he's going to have some sort of error rate of, say, 40 to 50%, which is why
us as individual retail investors should be careful not to bet too much on one stock.
Now, this is one of my favorite chapters of the book as Monash describes the Kelly formula.
The Kelly formula calculates the optimal fraction of your money that should be invested into a
favorable bet.
The more favorable the odds, the more one should bet.
If you're interested in learning the exact formula for this, you can Google it and figure it out
exactly.
In general terms, the Kelly formula is your edge divided by your odds.
To use an example, if there was a coin flip where you're going to be a credit.
it was, if it landed heads, you went $2, and if it was tails, you'd lose $1. The Kelly formula
suggests that you should bet 25% of your money each time you're given that opportunity. Monash
then tells us the story of Ed Thorpe, who wrote the book, Beat the Dealer, where Thorpe described
how he was able to gain an edge in Blackjack, and he used the Kelly formula to determine
his bet sizes when he had an edge over the house. In the 1960s, there were tables with
single-deck Blackjack, and Thorpe just made a killing off of it. They didn't know exactly how
he was doing it, but he eventually got kicked out for consistently winning in these casinos.
After Thorpe wrote his book on How to Win at Blackjack, the casinos, of course, read it,
and then they wizened up by changing the game and adding more decks. Thorpe knew that the best
betting environment would be one where there were no table limits, the odds were vastly better,
and the house was civil about taking losses, as well as the mob wasn't running the casino,
and they weren't going to hurt him.
And Thorpe found exactly what he was looking for, and it was the New York Stock Exchange
and the options markets.
He would master the options market simply by buying underpriced options and selling the
overpriced ones and making up to $6 million per year while taking what he considered
to be minimal risk.
Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors.
No, it's not your imagination, risk and regulation are ramping up, and customers now expect
proof of security just to do business.
That's why VANTA is a game changer.
VANTA automates your compliance process and brings compliance, risk, and customer trust
together on one AI-powered platform.
So whether you're prepping for a SOC 2 or running an enterprise GRC program, VANTA keeps you
secure and keeps your deals moving.
of chasing spreadsheets and screenshots, VANTA gives you continuous automation across more than
35 security and privacy frameworks. Companies like Ramp and Ryder spend 82% less time on audits
with Vantta. That's not just faster compliance, it's more time for growth. If I were running
a startup or scaling a team today, this is exactly the type of platform I'd want in place.
Get started at Vanta.com slash billionaires. That's Vanta.com slash billionaires. That's Vanta.com
Billionaires.
Ever wanted to explore the world of online trading, but haven't dared try?
The futures market is more active now than ever before, and Plus 500 futures is the perfect
place to start.
Plus 500 gives you access to a wide range of instruments, the S&P 500, NASDAQ, Bitcoin,
gas, and much more.
Explore equity indices, energy, metals, 4X, crypto, and beyond.
With a simple and intuitive platform, you can trade from anywhere.
right from your phone. Deposit with a minimum of $100 and experience the fast, accessible futures
trading you've been waiting for. See a trading opportunity. You'll be able to trade it in just
two clicks once your account is open. Not sure if you're ready, not a problem. Plus 500 gives you
an unlimited, risk-free demo account with charts and analytic tools for you to practice on.
With over 20 years of experience, Plus 500 is your gateway to the markets. Visit Plus
500.com to learn more. Trading in futures involves risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone.
Not all applicants will qualify. Plus 500, it's trading with a plus. Billion dollar investors
don't typically park their cash in high-yield savings accounts. Instead, they often use one of the
premier passive income strategies for institutional investors, private credit. Now, the same
passive income strategy is available to investors of all sizes, thanks to the
Fundrise Income Fund, which has more than $600 million invested in a 7.97% distribution rate.
With traditional savings yields falling, it's no wonder private credit has grown to be a
trillion dollar asset class in the last few years. Visit fundrise.com slash WSB to invest in the
Fundrise income fund in just minutes. The fund's total return in 2025 was 8%, and the average annual
total return since inception is 7.8%. Past performance does not guarantee future results,
current distribution rate as of 1231, 2025. Carefully consider the investment material before
investing, including objectives, risks, charges, and expenses. This and other information can be found
in the income fund fundrise.com slash income. This is a paid advertisement.
All right. Back to the show. One Buffett example of capitalizing on opportunities when the odds
overwhelmingly in your favor was when Buffett invested 40% of his partnerships assets into American
Express in November of 1963. At the time, American Express had a massive loss from a scandal
and the stock was instantly cut in half. Buffett figured out that as long as customers stuck
around with American Express, then the company was significantly undervalued. And from his
perspective, there was practically no chance that the business was going anywhere. So in his eyes,
there was practically no downside. Buffett rarely applied this level of concentration because
these types of opportunities were so rare for him. So we can see that Buffett in his own way
applied the Kelly formula of betting more when the odds were more heavily tilted in his favor.
This stock earned him a 3x return over the next three years that followed when he placed that bet.
Pabri rounds out this chapter by stating, investing is just like gambling.
It's all about the odds.
Looking for mispriced betting opportunities and betting heavily when the odds are overwhelmingly
in your favor is the ticket to wealth.
It's all about letting the Kelly formula dictate the upper bounds of these large bets.
Further, because of multiple favorable betting opportunities available in equity markets,
the volatility surrounding the Kelly formula can be naturally tamed while still still
running a very concentrated portfolio.
In Chapter 12, Monash covered the concept of always having a margin of safety in your investments.
Warren Buffett is asked about book recommendations.
He often talks about what is considered to be the Bible of value investing, which is the
intelligent investor.
The three biggest ideas Buffett picked up from this book was first, the Mr. Market
analogy of making the stock market serve you rather than you being a servant to the market.
Mr. Market offers you a price every day that you can either take or leave, and there's no called
strikes in this game.
Second is that a stock is a piece of a business, and to never forget that you are buying a business
which has underlying value based on how much cash goes in and goes out of the business.
Third is the concept of the margin of safety, which is to make sure that you are buying a business
for way less than you think it's conservatively worth.
When you focus on buying an asset for substantially less than its worth, we've reduced our downside
risk.
In the bigger the discount to intrinsic value, the lower the risk and the higher the returns.
Most of the time, companies trade near or above their fair value.
And value investors like Monish are waiting for times of extreme distress and extreme pessimism
as this is when rationality goes out the window and prices of certain assets go well below
their intrinsic value. The March 2020 liquidity crisis is a perfect example of this as many market
participants were forced to sell their stocks to get dollars for whatever obligations they had,
or maybe sometimes it was even because of fear. And many of these people were getting margin
called and being forced to sell, which further exacerbates the selling, making the discounts
to intrinsic value even greater. In Chapter 15, Monish covered the art of selling a stock.
Up to this point, he mostly covered how to find a great investment.
Before you decide to purchase the stock using the method he's describing, he lists seven criteria
we should meet before purchasing.
First, you need to understand the business well, and for the business to be in your circle
of competence.
Second, you need to know the intrinsic value of the business and understand how likely it is
for the value of the business to change in the next few years.
Third, the business needs to be priced at a 50% discount to intrinsic value.
Fourth, you need to consider if you'd be willing to put a large percentage of your net worth
into the business.
Fifth, the downside needs to be minimal.
Six, the business needs to have a moat.
And seven, the business needs to be run by able and honest managers.
The difficulty with deciding to sell a company or not lies in the inability to predict
the future.
Sometimes we buy a stock and forces outside of our control lead our forecasts to differ
from what actually occurs in the business.
A rule that Monish sets for himself is that you should only sell a stock within the first
two or three years of owning it if you have a high level of certainty that the current
intrinsic value is less than the market price.
To use an example, say you buy a stock for $100, thinking that it's worth $200.
And then the stock declines and it goes down from $100 down to $75.
Maybe the thesis doesn't play out as you'd expect.
the earnings drop for whatever reason, and you're certain that you misjudge the business when
making your original purchase. Maybe now, instead of your intrinsic value being $200, you determine
it's actually around $50. Then you may want to consider selling because the company is trading
at a price higher than your intrinsic value calculation, even though you'd be selling at a loss
at that time. So it's all about understanding the business and having that high level of
certainty about the company's intrinsic value when making the decision to both buy and sell.
In the book, he also talks about what he calls a three-year rule. He wants to give a company
three years to potentially converge towards its intrinsic value. In the first year, the stock
in the business might turn against you, but you may still be right that the company is overvalued.
In giving yourself that three years to invest in a business is a lot of times enough to allow
the market to realize the true value of that company. If it doesn't converge and the stock hasn't
moved very much during that time, then you may decide that you were wrong on your thesis and
you're going to sell out and allocate to a better idea because there's always that opportunity
cost. You can only put a certain dollar in one place at a time without leverage, so you want to
allocate your capital wisely and maybe reconsider the businesses that aren't performing as well as you
anticipated. In reading through Monish's work and learning more about his approach in general,
it's pretty clear that this guy takes more of the buy something cheap rather than buy something
quality approach. Like I've talked about in recent episodes, Buffett a lot of times is looking
for a quality business that will be able to grow their earnings for a really long time,
while Monash is the type of investor who will buy something that is obviously really cheap to him.
This is how Buffett invested in his early days and likely trading out of that position in a few
years when the price reaches its intrinsic value.
Another thing I've learned from Monash is that you should find a few metrics that allow you
to say no to a company really quickly.
In order to find the types of picks that Monash is finding, you need to be able to sift
through a lot of different companies.
If a company has a PE of 50, then that is probably a really good sign it's not
even worth looking at for Monash. Whereas if a company has a PE of three and is training well below
its liquidation value, then that is something that would get them interested and want to dig deeper.
Again, you have to select metrics that work for your own approach, but I find it valuable
to have an idea of the first things you want to look at when you're screening for companies.
Next, I wanted to transition to talk a little bit about Monash's portfolio today. As of his most
recent 13F, his fund Pabri investments owns two stocks with a sizable position in the U.S.
His 13F excludes any of his international holdings and he only holds two sizable positions
in the U.S. The first is Micron, which is 92% of his U.S. holdings in his 13F.
And then there's Brookfield corporations, which consist of most of that remainder.
In an interview in the first half of 2022, Monish stated that,
Micron was his largest stock holding. Micron is very popular amongst the prominent value investors,
as Monish, Lee Liu, Guy Speer, Seth Claremont, among others, all have a position in it.
Monish, in his interview with William Green, said that he collaborated with Lee Liu on
Micron, and Lee Lou believes that it will perform very well as an investment.
Most of these investors purchased this company around the $30 to $40 per share range,
prior to 2021, but interestingly, the stock has pulled back like much of the market recently.
Here at the end of 2022, the stock trades at just under $50 per share after dropping from its
52-week high of $98. Micron is a semiconductor company and a memory chip designer and
manufacturer based in the U.S. They produce two of the main memory chip technologies,
which includes what is called the DRAM and the NAND. I'm not sure if I'm saying,
those correctly, but it's DRAM and N-A-N-D. I'm definitely no expert on these semiconductor chips.
At the end of 2021, they are the fourth largest semiconductor manufacturer company in the world.
Like I talked about in my episode covering Buffett's purchase of TSM in episode TIP 508,
the semiconductor industry is very cyclical, so it's got these boom bus cycles, and you can
clearly see that when you look at Micron's price chart on a longer time horizon over the last, say,
30 years. Cyclical businesses are difficult businesses to be in because when you're in the down
part of the cycle, you have these manufacturers with excess supply met with a market that is low
demand. This leads manufacturers to investing less in building out new manufacturing. Thus,
when that increased demand comes back, you see the opposite dynamic where you have excess
demand and not enough supply. So like a commodity business, the semiconductor industry can be quite cyclical.
When you look at Micron's revenue relative to their cost of goods sold over time, their costs of
goods sold is actually quite stable, but their revenues are very volatile due to the shifts in
consumer demand and the average selling price of their products. Just looking at their gross margins,
you can clearly see that they go through these waves of up and down cycles.
In 2010, gross margins are around 32%.
These dropped to 11% in 2012, back up to the mid-30% range in 2014, and went way up in 2018,
and now it appears to be more on the downtrend as gross margins sit around 41%
in their most recent quarter.
And these figures are all based on the trailing 12-month numbers.
Another difficulty with the semiconductor industry is the high capital expenditures that are required
in this business, as the manufacturers need to continually invest and innovate to produce better
and better products. It is very capital-intensive to build out the property, the plant,
the equipment needed to manufacture these chips. Mycon alone spent $11 billion on capital expenditures
in fiscal year 2022, while the company generated $30 billion.
in revenues that same year. So quite a bit of investment relative to the money they're bringing in.
Now, the bull case for Micron is that over a long enough period of time, the demand for these
chips are going to be higher, say, five plus years from now. Yes, we may see lower demand
from year to year, say in 2023, but looking out at least five years, it's pretty likely that
the demand for these chips is going to be much higher, which hopefully in turn will lead to
much higher profits for a company like Micron. That's the bull case. Another item that these prominent
investors have mentioned with regards to Micron is that this specific memory chip industry,
because of the ruthless nature of the players in the industry, it's turned into what's called
an oligopoly with three main players. There's Samsung, Hyneks, and Micron. Because you have this
oligopoly dynamic, it's expected that the companies in this industry won't,
try and undercut each other as companies have done in the past. Thus, we may see a much less
cyclical business in the future because with a market that's an oligopoly, it's in each
company's best interest to not undercut each other. You can think about the soda market with
Coca-Cola and Pepsi dominating. They naturally charge higher prices and they don't try and
undercut each other because if they did, neither of them would end up making a decent profit margin.
Another thing to consider with Micron is that the physical limitations of Moore's law are beginning
to become reached, meaning that the primary driver of innovation within the semiconductor industry
is coming to a halt, and the capacity of these chips won't be doubling every two years
as they have for decades.
This lower speed of innovation may lead to their inventory lasting longer, which will
then stabilize average selling prices, and then eventually lead to lower capitalization.
expenditures that will be needed to continue to innovate on these chips.
Again, as I mentioned in the episode covering Taiwan Semiconductor, this technology is critical
to the technological age and where the world is moving.
Monich mentioned in an interview that if Amazon were going to spend, say, $100 or $200 million
on a data center, about 30% of that investment in the data center is going to be going
to the memory chip industry, which is just massive.
I do like this pick from the perspective that you don't have to bet on a specific AI company
or a specific electric vehicle manufacturer.
I think that owning Micron allows you to be long human innovation and be long continued
development of various technologies and benefit really wherever the world moves towards.
Additionally, I do like to see that the company does earn good returns on capital.
It's typically been in the mid-teens, but of course can vary quite a bit from the very much.
from year to year as their profitability rises and falls. Because of the cyclicality, when times
are good, the stock can look really cheap because the earnings are quite high relative to the
price of the stock, but the market knows that it's a cyclical business, and you can't rely
on those high earnings year after year. The market essentially expects these earnings to
eventually turn. I think the other stock in his 13F filing is also worth mentioning, which
is Brookfield Corporation, ticker BN. Q3 of 2022 was the first time he purchased this company,
and this is quite an interesting one because it's a special situation-type play.
Brookfield Asset Management previously operated under the ticker BAM, and what makes this
somewhat confusing is that the legacy business is transitioning to be under a new ticker of
BN. B.N. Brookfield Asset Management is a Canadian asset manager with a business.
over $700 billion in assets under management, investing in various things such as gas pipelines,
toll roads, data centers, solar farms, hydroelectric dams, and sky scrapers across five continents.
This is a massive company that makes money three different ways, the first of which is investing
their own capital in various projects, then they have their asset management business in which
they invest other people's money in exchange for management fee. Then the third business is their
stakes in publicly held companies that they founded and hold controlling stakes in. Brookfield has been a
strong outperformer over the years, as they've had the tailwind of more and more capital wanting to
invest in alternative assets, which they really specialize in. Over the past 20 years, the stock's
analyzed return has been 19% per year versus 10% for the S&P 500. Now, what the company announced
they're doing is they're spinning off 25% of their asset management business into Brookfield
Corporation because they believe that the asset management business deserves a higher multiple.
Brookfield still owns the remaining 75% under the original company.
The spinoff will be going under the ticker BAM and the legacy business is transitioning
to BN.
So Monish took a position in the legacy business, BN.
Now, it looked to me that Brookfield has a lot of tailwinds at its back.
This has been a company whose assets under management over the past 20 years or so has just
absolutely exploded.
And the company foresees that growth to continue for the foreseeable future as they project
their distributable earnings to grow by over 20% over the next five years, from $3.7 billion
to $9.3 billion, which is really quite incredible.
The reason they expect continued growth is because they're filling in the gap and filling
that demand for alternative asset investing in new investments in infrastructure.
They have a really strong competitive advantage because they invests globally, meaning that
they can send these investments to whichever country they believe will get the highest rate
of return.
I was digging into the company's 2021 annual report, and it's just insane how big this company
is.
And I suspect a lot of the TIP listeners haven't.
even heard of this company or researched them. According to their annual report, they have roughly
180,000 employees globally. And since 2017, their distributable earnings have grown by 29% per year,
while their assets under management have grown at 25% per year. I would think that low interest
rates would be a big tailwind for them as investors are searching for yield. So it'll be interesting
to see how their assets under management continue to grow now that we have higher levels of
interest rates now in 2022 going into 2023. I'd expect Brookfield to be a great company to own
in terms of a longer-term compounder. As we see continued investments in growth in the asset
management business, management expects they will be able to grow in the high teens over at least
the next five years. The stock recently is selling off because I think there's a lot of confusion
around the company and what this spinoff really means for investors.
When I look at Micron and I look at Brookfield, and I compare it to the Dondo checklist,
I can see that Monish still applies the principles he laid out in his book years ago.
And I see companies with wide moats, a potentially large margin of safety.
In the case of Micron, he's betting over $91 million, so he's really betting heavily
when he believes the odds are in his favor.
Also, looking back to Monich's buys and sells.
of different stocks over the years. He added Alibaba in the first half of 2021 and ended up completely
exiting that position in the second half of 2021 as the stock trended down for pretty much the whole year.
So that's another interesting move as we've seen many investors bet on shares in Alibaba.
All right, so that wraps up today's episode. If you don't already, be sure to click follow on the
podcast app you're on so you can get notified of all of our future episodes coming out.
And if you're interested in learning more about Monash Pabar, I can't recommend his book,
The Dondo Investor Enough.
With that, thank you so much for tuning in to today's episode.
And I hope to see you again next week.
Thank you for listening to TIP.
Make sure to subscribe to Millennial Investing by the Investors Podcast Network and learn how to
achieve financial independence.
To access our show notes, transcripts, or courses, go to theinvestorspodcast.com.
show is for entertainment purposes only. Before making any decision consult a professional,
this show is copyrighted by the Investors Podcast Network. Written permission must be granted
before syndication or rebroadcasting.
