We Study Billionaires - The Investor’s Podcast Network - TIP524: Four Wide Moat Stocks for 2023
Episode Date: February 14, 2023On today’s episode, Clay breaks down four wide moat stocks to be considered for 2023. If you’ve been following along with the show for quite some time, you know that Warren Buffett loves companies... with wide moats. These are the companies that are most equipped to handle the constant disruption occurring in the capitalistic marketplace. However, even some of the widest moat and highest quality companies can be a poor investment if you pay too high of a price, so I also brought that into consideration when selecting these four companies. If you enjoy learning about individual stocks and what makes a great company, you won’t want to miss this great episode. IN THIS EPISODE YOU’LL LEARN: 00:00 - Intro 02:58 - What it means for a company to have a wide economic moat. 03:53 - Why a wide moat is critical to assess and succeed as an investor. 05:03 - Why technology companies offer some of the most attractive opportunities for value investors. 09:42 - Why Clay believes that Alphabet and Amazon offer good value in today’s market. 26:54 - Why Amazon is a “forever hold” for legendary investors like Nick Sleep and Bill Miller. 38:58 - What super investors have taken positions in Alphabet and Amazon. 43:20 - What makes S&P Global and Sherwin Williams both companies with very strong moats. Disclaimer: Slight discrepancies in the timestamps may occur due to podcast platform differences. BOOKS AND RESOURCES Join the exclusive TIP Mastermind Community to engage in meaningful stock investing discussions with Stig, Clay, and the other community members. Adam Seessel’s book: Where the Money Is. Listen to John Huber chatting about Amazon on Millennial Investing, or watch the video. Security Analysis Newsletter. Check out our takeaways from Warren Buffett's Shareholder Letters. Watch the video here. Don’t miss Clay’s review of The Education of a Value Investor by Guy Spier. Watch the video here. Follow Clay on Twitter. NEW TO THE SHOW? Check out our We Study Billionaires Starter Packs. Browse through all our episodes (complete with transcripts) here. Try our tool for picking stock winners and managing our portfolios: TIP Finance Tool. Enjoy exclusive perks from our favorite Apps and Services. Stay up-to-date on financial markets and investing strategies through our daily newsletter, We Study Markets. Learn how to better start, manage, and grow your business with the best business podcasts. SPONSORS Support our free podcast by supporting our sponsors: River Toyota Sun Life The Bitcoin Way Range Rover Sound Advisory BAM Capital Fidelity SimpleMining Briggs & Riley Public Shopify HELP US OUT! Help us reach new listeners by leaving us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts! It takes less than 30 seconds, and really helps our show grow, which allows us to bring on even better guests for you all! Thank you – we really appreciate it! Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm
Transcript
Discussion (0)
You're listening to TIP.
Welcome to the Investors podcast.
I'm your host, Clay Fink.
On today's episode, I wanted to cover four wide moat companies I think are worth
a consideration for stock investors in 2023.
Given we're in a bare market and teetering on a recession, the prices of the majority of
stocks are down giving us the opportunity to potentially add to wonderful companies at discounted
prices.
If you've been following along with the show for quite some of the time,
time, you know that Warren Buffett loves companies with wide moats. These are the companies that are
most equipped to handle the constant disruption occurring in the capitalistic marketplace. However,
even some of the widest moat and highest quality companies can be a poor investment if you pay
too high of a price. So I also brought price into consideration when selecting these four companies.
With that, let's dive right in. You are listening to The Investors Podcast, where we study the
financial markets and read the books that influence self-made billionaires the most.
We keep you informed and prepared for the unexpected.
Before we get into the companies I'll be covering today, let's make it clear what it really
means for a company to have a wide moat and why it's important for a company to have it.
As long-term investors, it is critical that the companies we invest in have a strong economic
moat, which is simply a distinct competitive advantage that a company has.
has over its competitors. We want to be certain that if you're going to own a company for the next
10 or 20 years, we're fairly certain that the company's products or services will still be desired
because if a company ends up getting disrupted, then it's likely that the sock won't end up
being a good investment. Warren Buffett says that a good business is like a strong castle with a deep
moat around it. I want sharks in the moat. I want it to be untouchable. There are a number of different
types of moats that can exist in the marketplace. One of the most well-known types of
modes is a network effect, which is the phenomenon where the value of the network becomes more
valuable as more people join the network, which is the case with many social media companies
because these companies become more valuable with each new user that joins the social media
network. Another common type of moat or competitive advantage is simply the brand. If I'm overseas
in Europe or another country, and I want to go grab a can of pop.
Odds are I'm going to be more likely to grab something like a Coca-Cola rather than another
brand I've never seen in my life.
Another example is I enjoy working out, and whenever I go and get new workout shoes, I
oftentimes pick Nike.
Even though I could probably get some other brand for a little bit cheaper, that's a similar
quality.
I just know what I'm going to get with Nike and they have that brand power and brand awareness
with millions of people worldwide.
Other types of moats include being the low-cost provider, having high switching costs,
having economies of scale, or a company being essentially like a toll booth that collects
a fee for being the sole provider of one particular product or service.
Much of what constitutes a moat can be very qualitative, but these qualitative factors can be
validated using quantitative factors.
If a company is consistently able to produce high returns on invested capital,
while consistently pricing their products higher than their competitors, then that is probably
a good sign that the company has a strong and durable moat because a lot of times when companies
are able to achieve high returns on capital, competition comes in and makes it no longer possible
to achieve those high returns. Looking at a company's revenue, their earnings per share,
and the return on invested capital are all good places to check and see if a company has a durable
and longstanding moat to date. In addition to a company having a strong-standing mode to date, in addition to a company
having a strong moat, I also want to ensure that the company has a growth runway ahead of it,
continuing to grow their earnings, and the company is trading out what I believe to be a reasonable
price, they have a solid management team, high returns on invested capital, and also I want to be
in companies that aren't too cyclical. Looking for companies with these characteristics are ingredients
for what I call a steady compounder, which I would consider to be a company that is almost certain
to continue to grow and continually just steadily march their earnings per share higher and hopefully
the stock price as well. Because of the high quality of these types of businesses, the market
oftentimes won't hand you these companies for super cheap, so they aren't going to make you rich
overnight. One of my very favorite value investing books is a book called Where the Money is by
Adam Ziesel. TIP had Adam on our podcast on our millennial investing show and the we study
billionaire show in the past. His book talks about how value investors need to transition to a world
that is vastly dominated by technology. And value investors should not shy away from technology
companies because of how much stronger some of these companies have become in the tremendous
moats and network effects that technology has enabled. In his book, Adam states that
Peter Lynch wrote in one up on Wall Street that in the end, superior companies will succeed
and mediocre companies will fail, and investors in each will be rewarded accordingly.
Lynch's words remain as true as ever, but the problem is that over the last generation,
technological change has altered the economy so much that the nature and character of what
constitutes a superior business has also dramatically changed. The internet, the cell phone,
and social media didn't exist when Lynch wrote this. Many of the everyday examples that he used
to illustrate superior businesses are now laughably out of date. That's no knock on Peter Lynch,
the world changes, but we must acknowledge that the same common sense that led him to those
stocks now tells us to go nowhere near them. The internal combustion automobile today faces threats
from both driverless and electric cars, and as for Toys R, S, squeeze between the giant
princers of Walmart and e-commerce, it filed for bankruptcy protection in 2017.
Powered by continued improvements in computing power and related technologies, digital companies
have transformed our daily lives, the world economy, and most importantly for the purposes
of this book, The Stock Market.
Roughly half of the U.S. markets' gains since 2011 have come from the information technology
and related sectors. Since 2016, roughly two-thirds of the market's appreciation has come
from these sectors. A decade ago, only two of the world's top 10 most valuable publicly traded
companies, not controlled by the government, were digital enterprises. Today, as the chart below
shows, eight of the top 10 are. The only two companies that aren't technology base are Berkshire
Hathaway and an oil company out of the Middle East. As the graphics suggests, the digital age
has come upon us so quickly that we haven't had time to step back and parse what it means.
While it's obvious to everyone that something dramatic and lasting has occurred, most investors
seem befuddled by it. As a result, most haven't learned the language and the dynamics of a sector
whose principal output consists of zeros and ones. To say that this is unfortunate would be an
understatement. Companies built on a digital foundation, Tech, in the shorthand of Wall Street,
are creating most of the incremental wealth in the world today. Tech dominates our daily lives so thoroughly
that it's natural to think the digital revolution is largely complete, but that's not true.
In many ways, it's just beginning.
Even after a generation of growth, Amazon's annual retail sales volume only now matches Walmarts.
Cloud computing, which today accounts for roughly 10 to 15% of all spending on information technology,
which one day will likely account for more than two-thirds.
Into it, the world's leading provider of small business accounting software reaches only one
to 2% of its ultimate addressable market. The list goes on and on, and as computing power compounds,
the list gets longer every year. As tech creates new industries and new wealth, it is simultaneously
hollowing out large parts of the legacy economy. Tech's dramatic rise has been accompanied by an
astonishing fall of the old economy's market values. Big Tech gets most of the headlines,
but hundreds of smaller, lesser-known tech companies have also continued to appreciate.
Then a few pages later, he describes how one of the reasons that tech is taking over is because
the returns on capital employed are just so much higher. As he says that, if Ford wants to grow their
business, they need to invest $10 to achieve $1 an additional profit. For Coca-Cola, they need to invest $6 for $1 in
profit. And for so many of these big tech companies, they only need to invest, you know, two or
three dollars to generate the same level of profits as these legacy businesses. So because of
these reasons, many technology companies are just better businesses and they have wider
most than these other businesses. I want to ensure that I at least consider these types of
companies when I'm picking and choosing individual stocks for my own portfolio. The first two
companies I'm going to cover today are well-known big tech companies.
as these are just some of the strongest moats the world has ever seen, and I like the prices
they're trading at. And then the other two companies I'll cover are companies outside of big tech.
The first company I wanted to discuss today was Alphabet. Buffett and Munger aren't considered
the geniuses or masterminds of technology, but they've both commented on the strength of the moat of
Alphabet. Munger has stated that he's never seen a company with as wide of a moat as Googles. Although
Although it appears that Alphabet's Mote may be in question with the rise of AI and technologies
like Chat GPT, Alphabet today is one of the most dominant and profitable companies in the world.
As in the trailing 12 months, they posted a net income just shy of $67 billion.
The primary source of Alphabet's Mote is the competitive advantages built in Google Search
through their network effect.
Once Google established itself as a leader in search, more and more people started to use
using Google for their search queries.
And the more people that started using Google Search, the more data they were able to collect,
which not only improved Google Search, but it also improved their targeted ads.
For how valuable of a product Google Search is for its users, it's pretty incredible that
is just totally free, which is the beauty of technology and the power that it brings to people.
Alphabet is a trillion-dollar company built primarily on the back of a product that is free
for its users, and one could also include YouTube in that discussion as well. Because of this dynamic
and network effect, the search market has essentially turned into a winner take-all industry,
as Google Search currently holds 84% of the search market according to Statista, which essentially
hasn't really budged at all over the past decade. This also reminds me of Guy Spear and what he
looks for in businesses to invest in, and Nick's sleep as well, to add to that discussion. This is win-win
scenarios. All parties win using Alphabet's platform, whether that be the users or the advertisers,
everyone wins in working with Alphabet and Google Search. And when I pull up Datorama to see what
Superinvestors own Alphabet, I see Guy Speer owns a little bit in his portfolio, and then also
Bill Miller, Bill Nygren, Lee Liu, Francois Rochon, Tom Gaynor, and a long list of others all own
Alphabet in their funds portfolios as well. Google Search also has a
really powerful brand and people associate Google with the internet itself. So in a way, it's almost
a toll road on the internet where so many people are using Google in their everyday life. So their
brand name also has substantial value for the company. However, their brand alone isn't as powerful
as a company like Apple, for example. And I think YouTube has a lot of many of the same characteristics
as Google Search. I've recently tuned into the podcast episode of Mr. Beast and Lex Friedman.
And Mr. Beast just makes me so bullish on YouTube, given the huge staying power that YouTube
has where it's kind of the toll road for videos. And it's just provided so much value for creators,
for advertisers, and for users. And I see YouTube in many ways in the same light as Google Search.
And I'm very bullish on both long term. Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors.
All right. I want you guys to imagine spending three days in Oslo at the height of the summer.
You've got long days of daylight, incredible food, floating saunas on the Oslo Fjord, and every
conversation you have is with people who are actually shaping the future.
That's what the Oslo Freedom Forum is.
From June 1st through the 3rd, 2026, the Oslo Freedom Forum is entering its 18th year,
bringing together activists, technologists, journalists, investors, and builders from all over
the world, many of them operating on the front lines of history.
This is where you hear firsthand stories from people using.
Bitcoin to survive currency collapse, using AI to expose human rights abuses, and building technology
under censorship and authoritarian pressures. These aren't abstract ideas. These are tools real people
are using right now. You'll be in the room with about 2,000 extraordinary individuals,
dissidents, founders, philanthropists, policymakers, the kind of people you don't just listen to,
but end up having dinner with. Over three days, you'll experience powerful mainstage talks,
hands-on workshops on freedom tech and financial sovereignty, immersive art installations,
and conversations that continue long after the sessions end. And it's all happening in Oslo in June.
If this sounds like your kind of room, well, you're in luck because you can attend in person.
Standard and patron passes are available at Osloof Freedom Forum.com with patron passes offering
deep access, private events, and small group time with the speakers. The Oslo Freedom Forum isn't
just a conference, it's a place where ideas meet reality and where the future is being built by
people living it.
If you run a business, you've probably had the same thought lately.
How do we make AI useful in the real world?
Because the upside is huge, but guessing your way into it is a risky move.
With NetSuite by Oracle, you can put AI to work today.
NetSuite is the number one AI cloud ERP, trusted by over 43,000 businesses.
It pulls your financials, inventory, commerce, and,
HR, and CRM into one unified system. And that connected data is what makes your AI smarter. It can automate
routine work, surface actionable insights, and help you cut costs while making fast AI-powered decisions
with confidence. And now with the Netsuite AI connector, you can use the AI of your choice to connect
directly to your real business data. This isn't some add-on, it's AI built into the system
that runs your business. And whether your company does millions or even hundreds of millions,
NetSuite helps you stay ahead.
If your revenues are at least in the seven figures, get their free business guide,
Dymistifying AI at netsuite.com slash study.
The guide is free to you at netsuite.com slash study.
NetSuite.com slash study.
When I started my own side business, it suddenly felt like I had to become 10 different
people overnight wearing many different hats.
Starting something from scratch can feel exciting, but also incredibly overwhelming
and lonely. That's why having the right tools matters. For millions of businesses, that tool
is Shopify. Shopify is the commerce platform behind millions of businesses around the world and 10%
of all e-commerce in the U.S. from brands just getting started to household names. It gives you
everything you need in one place, from inventory to payments to analytics. So you're not juggling a
bunch of different platforms. You can build a beautiful online store with hundreds of ready-to-use templates,
and Shopify is packed with helpful AI tools that write product descriptions and even enhance
your product photography.
Plus, if you ever get stuck, they've got award-winning 24-7 customer support.
Start your business today with the industry's best business partner, Shopify, and start hearing
sign up for your $1 per month trial today at Shopify.com slash WSB.
Go to Shopify.
Shopify.com slash WSB.
That's Shopify.com slash WSB.
All right.
Back to the show.
So Google Search, I obviously believe, is a great business, but Alphabet also has two
other fast-growing businesses within the company.
I already mentioned YouTube, and then Google Cloud is another fast-growing business that
they have.
YouTube produced nearly $30 billion in revenue in the trailing 12 months, and Google Cloud
produce revenues of over 24 billion, which are both growing very rapidly. YouTube remarkably is
still growing its user base and has 2.6 billion users globally. I am a shareholder in Alphabet,
but one of my main concerns with the company is how well their advertising revenue will hold
up during a recession. During a recession and difficult economic times, companies are forced
to cut back on spending to remain profitable, and oftentimes the very first place they're going to cut
spending is in their advertising budget. During the great financial crisis, advertising revenue fell
sharply but quickly rebounded once economic conditions improved for Alphabet. Alphabet's advertising
revenue has held up remarkably well in recent months, which is really good to see. As of Q3 of
2022, Google searches revenue was up 4% year over year, and their overall revenue was up 6%. If you take
the free cash flow and subtract out roughly $19 billion in assumed stock-based compensation,
I'm getting a free cash flow yield of roughly 4% for a company I expect to continue to grow
for many years to come. And this is after subtracting out the net cash from the market cap for those
following along with those numbers. I'm not trying to make it sound like I'm pumping the stock,
but at a free cash flow yield of 4% for a company of this high quality, I will gladly purchase
this stock around $90, $100.
Of course, it could go lower and receive a lot of pressure with the recession, but I will
gladly hold right onto it.
Now, most people are probably concerned about chat GPT and the disruption that may be coming
from them.
There was recent news that came out from Microsoft.
They reportedly planned to invest $10 billion into the company OpenAI who developed
this software.
This investment would value OpenAI at $29.
billion dollars. Even Bezos, one of the most ambitious entrepreneurs on the planet has stated that
you should treat Google like a mountain. You can climb it, but you can't move it. And Microsoft has long
been wanting to get into the search business, as over the years they've spent over $15 billion
on Bing, only to fail to tap into Google's market share of the search industry. I got this stat from
Adam Ziesel's book where the money is. Here's what Adam had to say about Google in his book that was
written just last year. Microsoft and Amazon wanted a piece of Google's action so badly because
search is likely the internet's mightiest and most profitable toll bridge. Search is quite literally
the gateway to the information superhighway. Amazon may control e-commerce, but physical goods
account for only 25 to 30% of economic output. Services accounts for the other 70 to 75%, and services
is where Google excels.
Anyone in the world who wants a divorce lawyer, a mortgage broker, or information on a Caribbean
vacation, Googles it, which means that every divorce lawyer, every mortgage broker,
and every Caribbean-related travel business must advertise on Google.
The best part is that advertisers don't mind paying Google, because advertising on its site
is both cheaper and more effective than advertising on traditional media.
When a travel agent or a divorce lawyer advertises on TV or in the local newspaper, they're unsure
their message will reach its intended audience. On Google, advertisements are tied to keywords,
so advertisers can measure whether their spending is effective or not, end quote.
I discussed Google with Adam Ziesel during my conversation with him on millennial investing,
and he was describing to me how despite Alphabet being highly profitable today,
they aren't as optimized for profits as a company like Apple, for example.
They are still very much making large investments for the future,
which really leads me to believe that the free cash flow amounts that we're seeing today
are largely understated at least to some degree.
To round out the discussion on Alphabet,
I wanted to end it with a clip from Bill Nygren,
where he digs into this idea further on the Millennial Investing Show.
Here it is.
Yeah, it's funny.
I think a lot of times people get,
the idea that value investors are stuck investing in below average businesses, what Warren Buffett or
Benjamin Graham called the cigar bet companies. But to us, value just means that you're getting a lot
more than you're paying for. And through some of these accounting issues where a company is making
a lot of investments for the future that aren't creating current earnings, it's creating the
misperception that the company's expensive. You look at a company like Alphabet, and they're investing a
tremendous amount in autonomous vehicles, in healthcare, in Google Cloud, none of which really is
earning any money today. In fact, it's losing significant money. We think about it, like, if they made
those investments with a venture capital firm instead, the accounting would be very different. It would be a
big asset that goes on their balance sheet and the losses that are going through those venture
companies don't go through the income statement. So we add them back. So but we look piece by piece
at the values. We separate out the cash. We look at the venture cap investments that aren't
earning money. We look at the under monetized investments like YouTube at Alphabet that's still
through either subscriptions or advertising is monetizing at a fraction of what other
streaming services are. And we do a piece by piece valuation. And when we sum up the parks,
we subtract that from the stock price and say, we're really getting the search business at
less their market multiple. And as we move to more and more of a business world that's based
on intangible assets, intellectual property, venture capital like investing, R&D, we think there
are more and more of these opportunities where really good businesses look like they're selling
at an expensive PE rate show. But by the time you do the work and dig into it, there's a
core piece of the business that everybody agrees is a great business. And we think we're buying
them at less than their market multiple. So to us, this is still just as much value investing as
buying GM at six times earnings was. It's just a little more complicated to get there.
To add to what Bill is saying with the earnings on Alphabet, I also wanted to pull in one more
line from Adam Ziesel's book. Tech companies could report dramatically higher current earnings
if they wanted to. It's just not in their best interest to do so. Early in their life cycles,
and with only a fraction of their markets conquered, digital businesses are in growth rather than
harvest mode. They are wisely spending dollars today that will be worth more dollars in the future.
Such spending makes the E and the PE ratio look small and the multiple of current earnings
to look large.
But that is a misleading and deceptive snapshot of reality.
It's especially misleading when we are comparing tech companies which are reinvesting heavily
in the future to legacy companies, most of which are not.
To compare Amazon's or Alphabet's current profits to Wells Fargo is like comparing an apple
orchard in the springtime to an apple orchard in the fall. The latter is ready for harvest,
while the former is just beginning to grow, end quote. All right, now the second company I wanted to
talk about today is Amazon. Amazon is another widely held company amongst super investors,
and I believe that's for good reasons. Investors, including Bill Miller, Bill Nygren, Tom Gainer,
and even Warren Buffett, all have exposure to Amazon stock. When Bill Miller was asked what
the best investment decision he's ever made, he said it's buying the Amazon IPO. And then when
he's asked what the worst financial decision he's ever made, it was ever selling a share of Amazon.
I tuned in to a recent interview Bill Miller did with WealthTrack at the end of 2021. He stated
that his estimate of what Amazon AWS is worth is around $1.5 trillion if it were valued similar
to other SaaS companies. But Amazon's total valuation is worth is around $1.5 trillion dollars if it were valued similar to other SaaS companies.
But Amazon's total valuation today, here at the start of 2023, is around $1 trillion.
So the total value of the company is valued at $1 trillion, while Bill Miller's estimate of
AWS alone is $1.5 trillion.
Here's a clip of Warren Buffett talking about Berkshire's investment in Amazon when he was
questioned whether it falls within a value investor's framework back during the 2019
annual meeting.
This question is from Ken Scarbeck in Indianapolis. He says, with the full understanding that Warren had no input on the Amazon purchase and that relative to Berkshire, it's likely a small stake, the investment still caught me off guard. I'm wondering if I should begin to think differently about Berkshire looking out, say, 20 years. Might we be seeing a shift in investment philosophy away from value investing principles that the current management has practiced for 70 years? Amazon is a great.
great company, yet it would seem its heady shares 10 years into a bull market appeared to
conflict with being fearful when others are greedy. Considering this and other recent investments like
Stoneco, should we be preparing for a change in the price versus value decisions that built
Berkshire? It's interesting that the term value investing came up, because I can assure you that
both managers who and one of them bought some Amazon stock in the last quarter, which will get
reported another week or 10 days.
He is a value investor.
The idea that value is somehow connected to book value
or low price earnings ratios or anything,
as Charlie has said,
all investing is value investing.
I mean, you're putting out some money now
to get more later on
and you're making a calculation
as to the probabilities of getting that money
and when you'll get it
and what interest rates will be in between
and all the same calculation
goes into it whether you're buying some bank
at 70% of book value
or you're buying Amazon
had some very high mobile pull of reported earnings.
The people making the decision on Amazon
are absolutely much value investors
as I was when I was looking around
for all these things selling below working capital years ago.
So that has not changed.
The two people that, one of whom made the investment in Amazon,
they are looking at many hundreds of securities
and they can look at more than I can
because they're managing less money in their universe,
possible universe is a greater, but they are looking for things that they feel they understand
what will be developed by that business between now and Judgment Day and cash. And it's not
it. Sales, current sales can make some difference. Current profit margins can make some
difference. Tangible assets, excess cash, excess debt, all of those things go into making a
calculation as to whether they should buy A versus B versus C.
And they are got, they are absolutely following value principles.
They don't necessarily agree with each other or agree with me, but they are very smart.
They are totally committed to Berkshire.
And they're, they're very good in human beings on top of it.
So shortly, Warren and I are a little older than some people.
Yeah, I'm near everybody.
Yeah.
And we're not the most flexible, probably in the whole world.
And, of course, if something as extreme as Internet development happens,
and you don't catch it, why other people are going to blow by you.
And I don't mind not having caught Amazon early.
The guy is kind of a miracle worker.
It's very peculiar.
I give myself a pass on that.
But I feel like ours is asked for not identifying Google,
better. I think Warren feels the same way.
Yeah. We screwed up. He's saying we blew it. And we did have some insights into that
because we were using them at GEICO and we were seeing the results produced and we saw
that we were paying $10 or click or whatever it might have been for something that had a
marginal cost of them of exactly zero. And we saw it was working for us. So we can see in our own
operations. Oh, well that Google advertising was working. And we just sat there sucking our thumbs.
So we're ashamed. We atone. We're trying to atone. When he says sucking her thumbs, I'm just glad he didn't use some other example.
Now, from a high level, Amazon was a really big beneficiary of the COVID pandemic as the trend to
e-commerce and online shopping really accelerated. And despite that, the stock has been getting hammered
in recent months.
At the time of this recording, it sits at around $97, which is nearly 50% below its all-time high,
and it's just slightly above the March 2020 low.
Let's talk about the moat this company has, starting with their e-commerce business.
Without a doubt, this company has one of the strongest moats to ever exist in my mind.
In 2014, Amazon did $39 billion in e-commerce sales, and in 2022, e-commerce sales,
Two, e-commerce sales are estimated to be around $142 billion.
I think of Amazon as similar to Google Search and that it's a toll road on the internet.
It established that early lead, and now when anyone wants to purchase something online,
oftentimes the first place they're going to go is to Amazon.
And to help lock in their customers and keep them coming back time and time again,
they implemented Amazon Prime with their two-day shipping.
Currently, Amazon Prime costs $15 a month or $139 on an annual basis in the U.S.
I'd imagine that many American households can't really imagine living without their Amazon Prime
membership and all the benefits that it offers.
Just from 2019 through 2021, the number of Prime members increased from $150 million to $200 million.
So this company is definitely still in growth mode,
despite being just such a large business today.
I see quite a bit of optionality with Amazon's e-commerce business.
First is the potential to profit off of every single sale that occurs on their platform.
Since this is a business built on the internet,
they are easily able to tweak the pricing of their products that they sell on Amazon
or tweak the fees that they charge for others that sell on Amazon.
This is also referenced as their third-party seller service.
So they have the revenue they're collecting from the sales.
selling themselves, they have revenue from the third-party seller services, and then they have revenue
from Amazon Prime, and last but not least, they have their revenue from their advertising business.
Their advertising business unit is extremely valuable because when someone searches for an item on
Amazon, they enter that search query with the intention of buying a product. This leads to massive
amount of dollars spent on advertising to try and catch these users' attention. I was chatting with
John Huber on Millennial Investing back on episode 165, and during that episode, he talked a lot
about how good of a business the digital ad segment is, and how much more valuable those ads
are, given that the customers seeing those ads entered the search query with the intent
of making a purchase. A lot of people talk about the e-commerce space and the AWS, but the digital
ads business may also be a really big driver for Amazon stock performance over the coming
decade. I'd encourage the audience to check out that episode with John Huber if they'd like to learn more
about why John made Amazon his largest stock position in his fund. Let's take a quick break and hear
from today's sponsors. No, it's not your imagination. Risk and regulation are ramping up,
and customers now expect proof of security just to do business. That's why VANTA is a game changer.
VANTA automates your compliance process and brings compliance, risk, and customer trust together.
on one AI-powered platform.
So whether you're prepping for a SOC 2 or running an enterprise GRC program, VANTA keeps you secure
and keeps your deals moving.
Instead of chasing spreadsheets and screenshots, VANTA gives you continuous automation
across more than 35 security and privacy frameworks.
Companies like Ramp and Ryder spend 82% less time on audits with VANTA.
That's not just faster compliance, it's more time for growth.
If I were running a startup or scaling a team today, this is exactly the type of platform
I'd want in place. Get started at vanta.com slash billionaires. That's vanta.com slash billionaires.
Ever wanted to explore the world of online trading, but haven't dared try? The futures market
is more active now than ever before, and plus 500 futures is the perfect place to start.
Plus 500 gives you access to a wide range of instruments, the S&P 500, NASDAQ, Bitcoin, gas, and much more.
Explore equity indices, energy, metals, 4X, crypto, and beyond.
With a simple and intuitive platform, you can trade from anywhere, right from your phone.
Deposit with a minimum of $100 and experience the fast, accessible futures trading you've been waiting for.
See a trading opportunity, you'll be able to trade it in just two clicks once your account.
is open. Not sure if you're ready, not a problem. Plus 500 gives you an unlimited,
risk-free demo account with charts and analytic tools for you to practice on. With over 20
years of experience, Plus 500 is your gateway to the markets. Visit plus 500.com to learn more.
Trading in futures involves risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone. Not all applicants
will qualify. Plus 500, it's trading with a plus.
investors don't typically park their cash in high-yield savings accounts. Instead, they often use
one of the premier passive income strategies for institutional investors, private credit.
Now, the same passive income strategy is available to investors of all sizes thanks to the Fundrise
Income Fund, which has more than $600 million invested in a 7.97% distribution rate.
With traditional savings yields falling, it's no wonder private credit has grown to be a trillion
dollar asset class in the last few years. Visit fundrise.com slash WSB to invest in the Fundrise
Income Fund in just minutes. The fund's total return in 2025 was 8%, and the average annual
total return since inception is 7.8%. Past performance does not guarantee future results,
current distribution rate as of 1231, 2025. Carefully consider the investment material before
investing, including objectives, risks, charges, and expenses. This and
other information can be found in the income funds prospectus at fundrise.com slash income.
This is a paid advertisement.
All right.
Back to the show.
Amazon's advertising business grew by 25% in the most recent quarter, and in the
trailing 12 months, their ad business generated over $35 billion in revenue.
And then last but not least, Amazon's cash cow is their AWS business.
This business in the trailing 12 months generated $76 billion.
in revenue, with revenues in Q3 of 2022, increasing by 27%. Their AWS business is not only a very
large and very fast-growing business, it's also very high margins, as EBIT margins are 30% and give
Amazon the cash needed to help fund the ever-growing retail business and other necessary investments
they're making in their continued future growth. In relation to Amazon's mo, let's not forget that
Nick Sleep, who's an investor that puts so much emphasis on quality, still to this day, as far as
we know, has owned Amazon stock for the last 20 years. When Sleep was researching the best
companies to own, he discovered the incredible power of companies with what he calls
scaled economies shared, meaning that as the companies grow, they're able to continue to
offer lower and lower prices, which in turn only attracts more and more customers. It's
the ultimate win-win situation.
So Sleep identified Amazon, Costco, and Berkshire Hathaway back in the early 2000s, and put his
entire net worth practically in these three stocks.
That's not to say that we should invest in whatever companies these super investors buy,
but I believe that Amazon has a very large moat around its business.
Amazon, over the many years, continues to ensure that they're providing low prices to customers,
especially since many of them are signing up for their annual prime membership.
In order to provide that fast and easy two-day shipping, Amazon had to spend so much money
to build out that fulfillment network.
Because of the amount of capital that took to build all that out, this is just another
factor that plays into their moat because they have all these fulfillment centers and it
becomes extremely difficult for other companies to compete in achieve profitable margins.
In addition to all the capital they've had to invest, they also have immense network effects,
especially with Amazon Prime, essentially locking customers in, giving these customers massive
incentives to continue to shop on Amazon. The network effects also tie into the scaled economy share
that Nick's sleep describes as they're able to continually have a cost advantage over the long term
as the company continues to grow year in and you're out. I did a bit of research into Amazon's
market share and how that's trending as well. I'm seeing varying statistics from different sources,
but multiple more conservative sources stated that in 2021, Amazon accounted for 40% of all
e-commerce sales. Walmart, of course, is also making a push for e-commerce and is growing as well,
but today they only account for around 6% of e-commerce sales. Amazon also has the largest cloud
business in the world with AWS, and with the continued increase in spend and commitments on
AWS, more and more companies are getting locked into that AWS ecosystem, and there's high
switching costs if they ever wanted to switch to another cloud provider.
Recently, Amazon's free cash flows have dipped into the negative territory, dragging the stock
down with it, but I personally believe that these headwinds from a free cash flow perspective
are temporary.
When I look at the company's top line for each of their important business segments, I see strong
and consistent growth.
And when I look at the big picture and the secular trends of e-commerce and the cloud industries,
Amazon is a massive beneficiary for these trends.
I believe that if Amazon really wanted to produce a ton of free cash flow in the near term,
they could definitely do that, but instead they're opting to continue to reinvest back into
the growth of the company and reinvest and create that customer goodwill by continually offering
those low prices.
I don't know when the situation will improve in terms of Amazon's financials, but when the stock
price of a great company drops by 50%, and is trading below what I believe the value to be,
then I think when the financials improve and the economy eventually recovers, these lower share
prices will prove to have been potentially great buying opportunities.
I think this will also be a really big test for Andy Jassy, as he's facing a lot of pressure
in terms of the overall economy and inflation.
But I think there's a lot of options for him in levers he can pull,
such as the trimming the employee count or increasing their prices a little bit,
or just tweaking some of their business segments.
I think there's so much optionality and so many levers that management can pull
to achieve that long-term profitability.
Lastly, regarding Alphabet and Amazon,
I wouldn't be surprised at all if either of these two companies have really depressed
earnings in 2023, and it pushes their stock prices even lower. The emphasis for me is on the really
long term and the secular trends that will benefit these companies. When looking at Alphabet,
for example, in what looks like a relatively low PE today, we need to consider that those earnings
in the future may decline. We may see lower earnings in 2023, so the stock might look cheap today. So I guess
that's my way of saying to be prepared for a potentially bumpy ride with these two companies, as
the market is a voting machine in the short run and a weighing machine in the long run.
Transitioning to the third company I wanted to talk about in today's episode, this is a new one
I haven't done into prior to researching for this episode. It's a company called S&P Global,
ticker SPGI. Value Stock Geek, which is one of my very favorite blogs for company Deepdives,
did a pretty detailed article on this company. So shout out to him for his great write-up on his
blog called Security Analysis. Plus, my colleague, Sean O'Malley, who's our newsletter writer at
TIP, used to work at this company, so I was able to get some interesting insights from him as
well. Sean is doing great work on TIP's daily newsletter called We Study Markets. If you're not
yet subscribed for that, you can do so by going to The Investorspodcast.com slash we study markets.
Now, S&P Global describes themselves as the leading provider of transparent and independent ratings,
benchmarks, analytics, and data to the capital and commodity markets worldwide.
Their claim to fame is their creation of the S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average Indexes,
and they're also one of the three major corporate credit rating agencies, along with Moody's and Fitch.
So they operate in an oligopoly in this market, which,
provides them with one of the most powerful moats in the world. Many of our listeners may be aware
that Buffett has roughly a $6 billion position in Moody's and has owned the company since the year 2000.
Any corporation that wants to issue debt, which is practically every company, they're going to
need to get a credit rating in order to do so. SPGI is also a data company, as in 2020,
they acquired a company called IHS Market. IHS market has various products that provide things
such as economic forecasting data, financial data for securities and derivatives, data and
analytics for the energy market, and various other niche data. So from a high level,
SPGI has four major business segments. First is their ratings business. This is the supplier
of credit ratings on corporations and sovereign governments. The blog posts from Secure,
analysis states that the data collected from this segment supplies the market intelligence business.
Ratings are the most cyclical segment of the company as it depends on new deals and debt issuance,
which will pick up when the economy is hot. Ratings represent nearly 57% of operating profits.
The second segment is their indices business as they're the index provider for indexes like
the S&P 500. When a company like I-Shares, Van Goghawk, or BlackRock once,
to create a product based on the S&P Index, they have to pay SPGI a fee. This segment represents
17% of operating profits. Third is their market intelligence segment that represents subscription
software that supplies data to investment professionals, government agencies, corporations,
and universities. So this brings that recurring revenue in for providing an essential product
for financial professionals. This is 15% of operating profits. And fourth is what's called their
Platt segment. This is a data provider of information and benchmark prices for commodity and energy
markets. So what S&P is to the equity markets, Plats is to the commodity markets. This is 11% of
operating profits. Thirty-nine percent of the company's revenues are subscription-based and they're very
sticky due to the nature of their agreements and their high switching costs as well. The index business
is also a very sticky business because of a company like BlackRock creates an S&P 500 index.
It's not like they can easily shut that down and stop paying SPGI their fees.
And this helps provide entrenchment in the company's moat.
SPGI is priced as if it's a great company.
Their PE ratio is around 30 and their EV to EBIT is around 24, which is a metric that got
as low as six during the great financial crisis, which was quite an extreme event for
company like many other companies. They've outperformed the market over the past 10 years as shares
have averaged 22% annual growth over the past decade versus just 12% for the S&P 500. Even since the
mid-1980s, it's been a really strong outperformer as they've continued to deliver strong
growth in their EPS and their free cash flow per share. The company went through some structural
changes back in 2016. And ever since, they've seen considerable improvements in their operating
operating margins. Prior to 2016, operating margins were around 30%, and now operating margins
are around 50%. Their returns on capital are also outstanding, averaging north of 20%.
And the company also has a really good management team. They recently acquired Market,
which helped expand their mo and they rebranded the company over the previous decade from
McGraw Hill to S&P Global. The fundamentals have improved substantially over the past few years,
as revenues that have grown by over 50% since 2019, and operating income has increased by 64%.
I think that if we see poor economic conditions in 2023, then the somewhat cyclicality of
SPGI's business will likely come to haunt them like it did during the great financial crisis,
but the business itself won't be going anywhere.
So we could see some great buying opportunities in this company if we do end up seeing a rough recession
To be honest, I don't love the valuation at these prices, but it's definitely one of the strongest
modes for a large-cap public company I could really find.
Their returns on capital are really, really good, but if you see their earnings multiple
mean revert, you could see a 30 to 50% markdown in the shares to the $180 to $260 range
at their current level of earnings.
So this company is more so one to add to my watch list to keep an eye on if we do end up
seeing a recession and a sharp drawdown in the stock price. Other than the price, it really
checks all the boxes for me from a value investor's perspective. All right, so transitioning to
the fourth and final wide moe company I wanted to discuss during this episode, it was somewhat
hard to just pick one company. There are a number of companies I've talked about in the past that
would probably be what I call honorable mentions, such as Dollar General, Home Depot, Adobe,
or there are companies that are frankly pretty expensive on a multiple basis like Costco,
MasterCard and some of the other big tech companies like Apple and Microsoft. But that's the trouble
with these great companies is that for a lot of the company's lifetime, they're going to be
trading at what looks to be pretty expensive prices. Now, let's talk about a company that is likely
impossible to be disrupted by technology, and that is Sherwin Williams. Another special shout
out to my friend Adam Ziesel for touching on Sherwin Williams in his book, and it really piqued
my interest in the company. Sherwin Williams started all the way back in 1866, and it's widely
known for manufacturing paint and paint products. Today, they have about 4,800 locations in the
U.S., Canada, Latin America, and the Caribbean. Their business is primarily driven by three
main segments, consumer brands, the Americas, and performance coatings. The Consumer Brands
is what is sold to retail stores like Lowe's. The Americas is what is sold, and the
their own Sherwin-Williams locations, which drives over 50% of their revenue, and then the
performance coatings are their industrial customers, such as automotive companies and floor manufacturers.
The company is somewhat tied to the housing market as people do home improvements. They may be
redoing their paint job and their home, of course. Looking back at their history, revenues did
decline in 2009, but quickly rebounded in the years that followed. The company continued to
produce positive net income throughout the great financial crisis as well.
Over the past 10 years, this boring, stable business has produced average annual returns
of 16% annually, not including the small dividend that they've been paying out, which right
now is about a 1% yield. Sherwin Williams has a pretty strong moat for a number of reasons,
I think. For the foreseeable future, we're going to always need paint. New houses are always
being built, people are always doing updates on their houses. I think that their consistent operating
margins show that they're able to continually increase prices over time without being disrupted
by competitors. They've built out these really strong relationships with contractors, and they're
able to either deliver products to them in a timely manner or have them pick up the products
at somewhere like a Lowe's or in their own Sherwin-Williams stores. Because a lot of these contractors
value speed in getting the job done quickly, Sherwin-Williams.
is able to deliver fast delivery to customers better than anyone else because they have the largest
distribution network of stores in the U.S. Similar to SBGI, Sherwin-Williams is a quality company
trading at a premium price. The EV to EBITs is around 27, which got all the way up to 36
at the end of 2021, and it's now trading more in line with where it was in 2017. Prior to the end,
it could be purchased at a multiple in the low teen, so I'd say that the market has definitely
recognize the quality of this company. Sherwin Williams has three things I really like to see in a
company. On top of their return on investing capital being in the mid-teens, they're continually
growing their earnings year after year, they're repurchasing shares at around 1 to 3% per year,
and they're steadily increasing their dividend, which is a really strong indication that the
management team is looking out for the best interest of their shareholders. I think that investors
will do just fine buying at this price, but more cautious investors may put it on their watch
list and see if the multiple drops from the mid-20s to below the 20s to the mid-teens, which is
where it's been for a good amount of its history. It's more so what Buffett would call
a wonderful company at a fair price than something that happens to be trading at a wonderful
price as well. Let's remember that alphabet, which I talked about earlier, is trading at a
multiple of 14 to 15 before factoring in any stock-based compensation. Also, for Sherwin-Williams,
I wanted to read another excerpt from Adam Diesel's book because I just really enjoyed this book and
he has so many good pieces in it. All my non-tech companies are largely tech-proof, but none
is more so than Sherwin Williams. You just can't render paint digitally, at least not yet.
Meanwhile, there's something deep within human beings that drives them to coat their walls.
either for decoration or to protect against the weather. In 1866, Henry Sherwin and Edward Williams
founded the company that would introduce the world's first guaranteed ready-to-use paint. As the
industrial age progressed, paint became coatings and was used to finish anything that needed
protection from the elements such as automobiles, ships, and airplanes. Sherwin Williams
developed many of these modern finishes and patented them, then kept investing
money into research and development to deepen its product moat. To make the Sherwin-Williams brand instantly
recognizable, it also kept spending on marketing. Today, Sherwin-Williams has competitive advantages that
stem from 150 years of innovation and brand loyalty. But what really distinguishes the company
is its incredible retail presence. Sherwin-Williams operates a network of nearly 5,000 company-owned stores
and its nearest competitor, PPG, operates roughly 1,000 stores.
Why does this network of owned stores give Sherwin an edge?
Because only Sherwin Williams has a store base extensive enough to touch American painters every day.
Like many great businesses, Sherwin Williams created its moat by asking,
What does my customer care about and them working backwards?
Until computers learn about how to coat buildings,
the economics of house painting will remain simple.
80% of a painter's expenses are labor, and 20% is paint. Time is therefore money to a painter,
and Sherman Williams focused on that fact like a laser beam. Given these unit economics,
wouldn't painters reward the company that saved them time? If so, why not roll out so many stores
that most would drive by them every day on the way to their job? That's what Sherwin Williams
has done. They even offer free curbside pickup so the painters don't.
have to get out of their trucks and free donuts as well. The company supplements this network
with the fleet of 3,000 trucks, whose drivers make constant runs to job sites to replenish low
supplies. PPG owns their stores, but roughly one-fifth the number of Sherwin-Williams. PPG
doesn't have the density required to make the network ubiquitous. Benjamin Moore has more
contact points because only Sherwin-Williams can handle national accounts, and only Sherwin-Williams can handle national accounts,
and only Sherwin Williams can roll out a new and improved finish in a consistent nationwide brand campaign.
Only Sherwin Williams has a mobile app that allows a painter to order 10 gallons of eggshell white in the evening,
then show up at his local store the next morning and find it ready for him.
Sherwin's store network gives it an edge, and this edge is continuing to grow.
Every year, Sherwin adds nearly 100 new company-owned stores.
PPG's annual new store count barely reaches double digits.
Little wonder that Sherwin Williams is growing its North American paint sales at 6% to 7% per year,
twice the rate of the competition.
Meanwhile, Sherwin Williams has a low share of a large and growing market.
The worldwide painting and coding sector remains fragmented, and Sherwin only has about 10% of it.
At nearly 150 billion in annual sales, the market is huge and growing up.
growing slightly more than the worldwide economy.
Management is also excellent.
Unlike Bezos at Amazon or Murphy at Cap Cities, there is no single-star executive.
There is, however, a culture at Sherwin Williams that inculsates in every employee.
From the lowest store trainee to the CEO, the discipline of thinking like an owner.
Unlike many companies, Sherwin doesn't just leave it to the CFO to understand principles
like return on capital and capital allocation. You can tell this is not only from how executives talk,
but how they act. Sherwin Williams rarely buys companies, but when they do, they do it brilliantly.
In 2017, they bought ValSpar, a leading industrial coatings company using 100% debt financing.
Like Tom Murphy at Cap Cities, they reasoned that they didn't need to use stock. Instead,
they could use Sherwin Williams' ample cash flow to pay down the debt over $7,000.
several years, then enjoy the acquisition forever without any dilution to shareholders.
Unlike other, less disciplined businesses, Sherwin Williams articulates clear priorities for
its cash flow and then sticks to them. It reinvest money in its store network, in product
development, and in the Sherwin brand. Anything left over goes back to shareholders, either as
dividends or share repurchases. So as you can tell, Ziesel has so much respect for Sherwin
Williams as a brand and their business fundamentals. And I also discovered back in 2018, Lowe's
announced that they would be the only nationwide home center outside of Sherwin Williams' own
stores. Now, Lowe's and Home Depot are in a race to partner with the very best brands.
And this partnership Lowe's established with Sherwin Williams not only shows how strong of a brand
Sherwin Williams has, but also helps widen their moat. As anyone who shops at Lowe's and wants to
purchase paint, they have no other choice than to buy from Sherwin Williams. If that's not a mo,
I don't know what is. A Lowe's executive stated that we do a tremendous amount of research
related to customer preferences, and through that analysis, we draw insights, which has led us
to some of the most important brands in Sherwin William being one of those. Although the partnership
with Lowe's is great news, the company earns 75% of its profit from the America's group, which is
essentially its own stores, and they completely dominate the U.S. with 50% market share.
Their competitive advantage in this division is their vertical integration within their operations
and their stores being so close to their customers. So again, Sherwin-Williams, it's a great
company, likely trading at a fairly high multiple, but it's come back a little bit in 2022 and
2023 here. So I think it's one for considering if you're really looking for companies with
really, really strong moats.
All right, that wraps up today's episode.
I hope you enjoyed this episode covering four wide moat companies to consider for
2023.
If you don't already, be sure to click follow on the podcast app you're on so you can get
notified of all of our future episodes coming out in the future.
Also, if you enjoyed this episode, I would really, really appreciate it if you shared it
with just one person you think would also enjoy it, or maybe even you decide to share it on
your favorite social media platform that you use day to day. This will really help us out as we
continue to provide these episodes to you for free. TIP is my full-time job. And if you're
enjoying the show, we would really appreciate it if you shared the episode to help support the team.
And if you don't yet subscribe to our daily newsletter, We Study Markets. Be sure to get signed up
at Theinvestorspodcast.com slash we study markets. And with that, thank you so much for
tuning into today's episode, and I hope to see you again next time.
Thank you for listening to TIP.
Make sure to subscribe to millennial investing by the Investors Podcast Network
and learn how to achieve financial independence.
To access our show notes, transcripts or courses, go to theinvestorspodcast.com.
This show is for entertainment purposes only.
Before making any decision consult a professional, this show is copyrighted by the
Investors Podcast Network.
Written permission must be granted before syndication or rebroadcasting.
