We Study Billionaires - The Investor’s Podcast Network - TIP620: The Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham
Episode Date: April 5, 2024On today’s episode, Clay shares his lessons from reading The Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham. Benjamin Graham was a renowned value investor, lecturer, financial securities researcher, and me...ntor to billionaire investor Warren Buffett. Graham is widely regarded as the father of value investing. IN THIS EPISODE YOU’LL LEARN: 00:00 - Intro 01:11 - Who Benjamin Graham was. 06:16 - How the intelligent investor seeks to capitalize on market fluctuations. 16:17 - The Intelligent Investor’s biggest advantage in the markets. 30:47 - The concept of the Margin of Safety. 34:55 - Benjamin Graham’s investment principles. 37:54 - A case study of Mr. Market’s mood swings in the 1999-2000 tech bubble. And so much more! Disclaimer: Slight discrepancies in the timestamps may occur due to podcast platform differences. BOOKS AND RESOURCES Join the exclusive TIP Mastermind Community to engage in meaningful stock investing discussions with Stig, Clay, Kyle, and the other community members. Episode Mentioned: RHW004: Intelligent Investing w/ Jason Zweig | YouTube Video. Episode Mentioned: TIP597: Darwin's Investing Lessons w/ Kyle Grieve | YouTube Video. Benjamin Graham’s book: The Intelligent Investor. Follow Clay on Twitter. Check out all the books mentioned and discussed in our podcast episodes here. Enjoy ad-free episodes when you subscribe to our Premium Feed. NEW TO THE SHOW? Follow our official social media accounts: X (Twitter) | LinkedIn | Instagram | Facebook | TikTok. Check out our We Study Billionaires Starter Packs. Browse through all our episodes (complete with transcripts) here. Try our tool for picking stock winners and managing our portfolios: TIP Finance Tool. Enjoy exclusive perks from our favorite Apps and Services. Stay up-to-date on financial markets and investing strategies through our daily newsletter, We Study Markets. Learn how to better start, manage, and grow your business with the best business podcasts. SPONSORS Support our free podcast by supporting our sponsors: Bluehost Fintool PrizePicks Vanta Onramp SimpleMining Fundrise TurboTax HELP US OUT! Help us reach new listeners by leaving us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts! It takes less than 30 seconds, and really helps our show grow, which allows us to bring on even better guests for you all! Thank you – we really appreciate it! Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm
Transcript
Discussion (0)
You're listening to TIP.
Welcome to the Investors Podcast.
I'm your host, Clay Fink, and today I'm going to be sharing what I learned from reading
The Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham.
And more specifically, the two chapters that Warren Buffett highly recommends, which are
chapters 8 and 20.
Benjamin Graham is known as the father of value investing and the number one mentor to Warren
Buffett in his own investing journey early on.
Buffett was a student of Graham's at Columbia University.
and Buffett admired Graham so much and valued his insights that he offered to work for Graham for free.
At the end of this episode, I'll also pull a couple of clips from my co-host William Green's conversation
with Jason Zweig, who wrote the commentary on the most recent edition of The Intelligent Investor.
Hope you enjoy it.
Celebrating 10 years and more than 150 million downloads.
You are listening to the Investors Podcast Network.
Since 2014, we studied the financial markets and read the books that influence self-made
billionaires the most.
We keep you informed and prepared for the unexpected.
Now, for your host, Clay Fink.
All right, so like I mentioned at the top, I picked up the Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham.
I got the revised edition with new commentary from Jason's Weig.
And the original text was published back in 1949, and this revised edition was published in
2006. So Zweig, he ended up preserving the integrity of Graham's original text and teachings,
and then he tied in some of the things that are more relevant for today's market, and then drew
parallels between Graham's examples and the headlines of when Zweig wrote the book.
My co-host William Green had Jason Zweig on the Richer Wiser Happier Podcast back on episode
four, and this was just a phenomenal conversation, so I also wanted to link a couple of clips from
that episode as well.
So Warren Buffett picked up the intelligent investor all the way back in early 1950, and back then
he believed it was the best book on investing ever written, and he still says that today.
In the preface of the book, Buffett writes, I quote,
To invest successfully over a lifetime does not require a stratospheric IQ, unusual business insights,
or inside information.
What's needed is a sound intellectual framework for making decisions and the ability to keep
emotions from corroding that framework. This book precisely and clearly prescribes to the proper framework.
You must supply the emotional discipline, end quote. And Buffett has talked about how chapters 8 and 20 alone
will make you a far better investor, which is what I'm going to discuss in detail during this episode.
Zweig has a section here on who Benjamin Graham was and why you should listen to him. He writes,
I quote, Graham was not only one of the best investors who ever lived. He was also the greatest
practical investment thinker of all time. Before Graham, money managers behaved much like a
medieval guild, guided largely by superstition, guesswork, and arcane rituals. Graham's security
analysis was the textbook that transformed this musty circle into a modern profession,
and the intelligent investor is the first book to describe for individual investors.
the emotional framework and analytical tools that are essential to financial success.
It remains the single best book on investing ever written for the general public."
Ben Graham was born in 1894 in London, and then he moved to New York when he was just one-year-old.
When Graham graduated from Columbia, he tried his hand at Wall Street.
He started out as a clerk at a bond trading firm and eventually made his way to running
his own investment partnership.
Zweig describes how Graham became a master at researching stocks in microscopic, almost molecular detail.
He would plow through reports and discover companies that traded at a market price below the cash value and the value of the high-quality bonds that the company held.
He'd buy such companies and then go on to pester the management to start increasing the dividend to help boost the share prices.
After learning some painful lessons in losing 70% of his money during the Great Depression,
his returns from 1936 through 1956 were recorded to be at least 14.7% annually versus just 12.2% for the broader market.
The intelligent investor dives into these core timeless investment principles.
These include first, a stock is not just a ticker symbol or an electronic blip.
It is an ownership in a real business that has underlying value that does not depend on the share price.
Second, the market is a pendulum that forever swings between unsustainable optimism and unjustified pessimism.
The intelligent investor is a realist who sells to the optimist and buys from the pessimist.
Third, the future value of every investment is a function of its present price.
The higher prices you pay, the lower returns you will ultimately.
receive. Fourth, no matter how careful you are, the one risk no investor can ever eliminate is the risk
of being wrong. This is why Graham incorporates a margin of safety with his purchases. A margin of
safety means that you're paying a price well below what you believe to be the underlying value
to help minimize losses in the case that you're wrong in your assessment. And finally,
fifth, the secret to your financial success is inside yourself. So Igu writes, if you become a
critical thinker who takes no Wall Street fact on faith, and you invest with patient confidence,
you can take steady advantage of even the worst bear markets. By developing your discipline and
courage, you can refuse to let other people's mood swings govern your financial destiny.
In the end, how your investments behave is much less important than how you behave, end quote.
So the book has Graham's original text, and then Zweig adds his own additional commentary after
each chapter to help illustrate how relevant Graham's principles still are today.
So like I mentioned, Buffett said that the most important chapters are Chapter 8 and Chapter 20,
so let's start there.
Chapter 8 is titled The Investor in Market Fluctuations.
So due to the involvement of humans, markets inevitably go through fluctuations.
Markets always have and always will have a series of good years and a series of bad years.
And as investors, we must be both financially and psychologically prepared for such fluctuations,
and ideally, we want to take advantage of these fluctuations in the market.
Think back to 2022.
Many people were scared because markets were falling and everyone feared a severe market crash.
Looking back, many people, including myself, were fairly pessimistic on where things were
heading.
And now with the benefit of hindsight, things were just taken too far, and the market swiftly rebound
founded in 2023. This is an example of using market drawdowns as an opportunity to capitalize
on investors thinking too short term and being too pessimistic. In an ideal world,
Graham explains how the intelligent investor is able to capitalize by buying near the lows of a
bear market and selling near the highs of a bull market. He explains that there are two ways to
profit from the mood swings of the market. The first is by the way of market timing, and the second way
is by the way of pricing. By market timing, he essentially means anticipating the price action of the
stock market, especially in the short run. In other words, buying when you believe markets are
going to go up and selling when you believe markets are going to decline. Benefitting through the
means of pricing is simply comparing the market price to what you deem the underlying business
to be worth or what Buffett would just call the intrinsic value. So comparing the price that the
market is offering you relative to what you consider to be the
intrinsic value. So when the price is trading below the intrinsic value, you buy, and when it
trades far above the intrinsic value, you sell. Graham believes that if you're an investor who
primarily relies on market timing, then he believes that you're a speculator, and you end up with
a speculator's financial results. And it's funny how closely Graham's words align with Buffett's
with regards to market forecasting. He writes, the farther one gets from Wall Street, the more
skepticism one will find, we believe, as to the pretensions of stock market forecasting or
timing, the investor can scarcely take seriously the innumerable predictions, which appear
almost daily and are his for the asking. Yet in many cases, he pays attention to them and even
acts on them. Why? Because he has been persuaded that it is important for him to form some
opinion of the future course of the stock market. And because he feels that the brokerage or service
forecast is at least more dependable than his own." So despite decades of market forecasts being
close to useless, we continue to be fooled by them. But he does admit that there are actually
a few people out there who are able to make money with forecasting, but more broadly,
he thinks that the general public will never be able to invest successfully based on predicting
where the market's short-term price movements will go. One critical difference between a
speculator and an investor is that a speculator puts a heavy emphasis on the timing. The idea of
waiting one year before his stock goes up is a foreign idea to him. The speculator wants to make
returns now, but the intelligent investor has no issue with waiting because he knows eventually
the market is a weighing machine and reflects the true underlying value of the business. While the
intelligent investor can't predict the short-term mood swings of the market, what they can't
do is take action after such swings have taken place. Graham saw that markets frequently
went through its periods of ups and downs, the bull markets, the bear markets. Bull markets were
characterized by historically high prices, high PE ratios, low dividend yields against bond yields,
and much speculation on margin, and many IPOs of poor quality. So when looking at these signs,
an investor can recognize where the market's mood is at and adjust their portfolio and strategy,
accordingly. But simply the process of buying low and selling high definitely is not easy,
because sometimes bull markets go on for much longer than one might expect, and bare markets
may be very short-lived before the next bull market comes around. So what's high can always go
higher, and what's low can always go lower. The intelligent investor also recognizes that the
day-to-day and month-to-month fluctuations in the prices of stocks he owns doesn't make him
richer or poorer. The market brings us a flurry of emotions inside of us, especially when things
are quite volatile. When stocks advance significantly, we should keep ourselves from becoming too
infected with the overconfidence and enthusiasm that the broader public falls prey to.
Graham writes, the intelligent investor is likely to need considerable willpower to keep from
following the crowd, end quote. And then he discusses one of the key central ideas of
his teachings, and that is understanding the difference between price and value. The value in owning
a common stock is that you've become a part owner of an actual business. The results as an owner
of a business are entirely dependent on the profits of the enterprise or on a change in the
underlying value of the assets that the business holds. Owning a stock is different from owning a share
of a private business because we're able to sell our shares in the company in a matter of minutes,
depending on the price the market is giving us, you know, which changes by the minute.
At times, the market price can become far removed from what a sensible person would pay
to have a part ownership of that business and a private transaction.
This is a critical insight because your typical investor today judges the performance of a
company, oftentimes based on how the stock price has moved, with making no consideration
of the underlying business's actual performance.
The stock is not the business, and the business is not.
the stock. However, over the long run, you should expect the performance of the stock to follow
the performance of the business and not the other way around. In determining the value of a business,
Graham puts a really heavy emphasis on the balance sheet and what sort of assets the business
owns. Typically, higher quality companies trade well below the company's book value, and it's more
difficult to accurately assess what the intrinsic value of such a company is, which is why during
that time, Graham focused really heavily on companies that were trading below their liquidation
value. The problem with this is that these types of investments have really become easy picking
for computer algorithms or these really smart people on Wall Street. So you typically aren't
able to find these at least as often as Graham did back when he was an investor. So Graham illustrates
the example of A&P. A&P was an American chain of grocery stores and was the largest grocery retailer in
the U.S. from 1915 through 1975. And during 1929, the stock sold for as high as $494, and by 1932,
it had declined to $104. So up from $494 at the top, all the way down to $104 in 1932.
By 1938, the share price fell down to a new low of $36. That was a 92% decline from the
1929 high. So the market price of A&P was $126 million in total, and the company had just reported
that it held $85 million in cash and had $134 million in working capital. For many years,
A&P delivered strong earnings as the largest retail enterprise in the United States, but the market
decided that it should be worth less than its current assets alone for three reasons.
The first reason was that there were threats of special taxes on chain stores.
The second reason was that net profits had fallen from the previous year.
And the third reason was that the general market was as depressed as it's ever been.
So the first reason in Graham's view was an exaggeration and eventually was based on groundless fear.
And the other two reasons were temporary.
So fast forward from 1938 to 1961, the shares had advanced from the low of $366,000,
to a high of $705 after adjusting for stock splits.
So that's nearly a 20 times increase in the stock,
as the stock went from 12 times earnings to 30 times earnings.
In 1938, the general population had been far too pessimistic
in the pricing of these quality businesses.
And by 1961, the market had become far too optimistic
on the pricing of the shares of A&P,
as it had dismal performance in the years following.
So the lofty multiple of 30 wasn't justified if you looked at the underlying business performance
and also considered that the broader market traded at 23 times earnings. In 1962,
share prices of A&P had fallen by 50%. Graham writes, I quote,
In 1938, the business was really being given away, with no takers. And in 1961,
the public was clamoring for the shares at a ridiculously high price, end quote. The
two lessons are as follows. First, the stock market often prices things far wrong, and the patient
and advantageous investor can take advantage of such mispricings. The second lesson is that
most businesses change in character and quality over the years, sometimes for the better,
and perhaps more often than not for the worse. I quote,
the investor need not watch his company's performance like a hawk, but he should give it a good,
hard look from time to time, end quote.
Graham also emphasizes that the intelligent investor is not worried about unjustified declines
in his holdings.
The advantage of the intelligent investor is that he isn't ever forced to sell his shares.
Just because other market participants want to sell down the share price far below the
underlying value doesn't mean that you should too.
Doing so turns your basic advantage into a basic disadvantage.
Graham writes, that man would be better off if his stocks had no market quotation at all.
For he would be spared the mental anguish caused him by other person's mistakes of judgment, end quote.
Buffett has often used the story of Mr. Market knocking on your door and offering to buy your home.
So if you buy your home for, say, $200,000 and you thought that was a fair price,
You wouldn't care if someone knocked on your door and offered to buy it for a $100,000.
But when it comes to stocks, this freaks people out.
He got this idea from Graham in this chapter.
I'll read those last few paragraphs directly from Graham here.
Let us close this section with something in the nature of a parable.
Imagine that in some private business, you own a small share that cost you $1,000.
One of your partners, named Mr. Market, is very very important.
Very obliging indeed. Every day, he tells you what he thinks your interest is worth in the business,
and furthermore offers either to buy you out or sell to you an additional interest on that basis.
Sometimes his idea of value appears plausible and justified based on the underlying business and the
prospects as you know them. Often, on the other hand, Mr. Market lets his enthusiasm or his fears
run away with them. And the value he proposes seems to you a little short of the business.
silly. If you are a prudent investor or a sensible businessman, will you let Mr. Markets' daily
communication determine your view of the value of the interest in the enterprise, only in case you
agree with him or in case you want to trade with him. You may be happy to sell out to him when he quotes
you a ridiculously high price, and equally happy to buy from him when the price is absurdly low.
But the rest of the time, you will be wiser to form your own ideas of the value of your holdings,
based on full reports from the company about its operations and financial position.
The true investor is in that very position when he owns a listed common stock.
He can take advantage of the daily market price or leave it alone as dictated by his own judgment
and inclination.
He must take cognizant of important price movements, for otherwise his judgment will have
nothing to work on.
Conceivably, they may give him a warning signal, which he will do well to heed.
This in plain English means that he is to sell his shares because the price has gone down for boating worse things to come.
In our view, such signals are misleading, at least as often as they are helpful.
Basically, price fluctuations have only one significant meaning for the true investor.
They provide him with the opportunity to buy wisely when prices fall sharply and to sell wisely when they advance a great deal.
At other times, he will do better if he forgets about the stock market.
and pays attention to his dividend returns and to the operating results of his companies."
Then in the ending commentary, Zweig explains that most of the time, the market is fairly accurate
in the pricing of stocks.
But sometimes the market gets things very wrong, which makes Graham's metaphor of Mr. Market
incredibly useful.
When stocks go up, people are naturally prone to want to buy them, and when stocks fall,
are naturally prone to want to sell them. Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors.
All right. I want you guys to imagine spending three days in Oslo at the height of the summer.
You've got long days of daylight, incredible food, floating saunas on the Oslo Fjord, and every
conversation you have is with people who are actually shaping the future. That's what the Oslo
Freedom Forum is. From June 1st through the 3rd, 2026, the Oslo Freedom Forum is entering its 18th year,
bringing together activists, technologists, journalists, investors, and builders from all over the world,
many of them operating on the front lines of history. This is where you hear firsthand stories from people
using Bitcoin to survive currency collapse, using AI to expose human rights abuses, and building
technology under censorship and authoritarian pressures. These aren't abstract ideas. These are tools
real people are using right now. You'll be in the room with about 2,000 extraordinary individuals,
dissidents, founders, philanthropists, policymakers, the kind of people you don't just listen to but end up having dinner with.
Over three days, you'll experience powerful mainstage talks, hands-on workshops on freedom tech and financial sovereignty,
immersive art installations and conversations that continue long after the sessions end.
And it's all happening in Oslo in June.
If this sounds like your kind of room, well, you're in luck because you can attend in person.
Standard and patron passes are available at Osloof Freedom Forum.com with patron passes offering
deep access, private events, and small group time with the speakers.
The Oslo Freedom Forum isn't just a conference, it's a place where ideas meet reality
and where the future is being built by people living it.
If you run a business, you've probably had the same thought lately.
How do we make AI useful in the real world?
Because the upside is huge, but guessing your way into it is a risky move.
With NetSuite by Oracle, you can put AI to work today.
NetSuite is the number one AI Cloud ERP, trusted by over 43,000 businesses.
It pulls your financials, inventory, commerce, HR, and CRM into one unified system.
And that connected data is what makes your AI smarter.
It can automate routine work, surface actionable insights, and help you cut costs while making
fast AI-powered decisions with confidence.
And now with the Netsuite AI connector, you can use the AI of your choice to connect directly to your real business data.
This isn't some add-on, it's AI built into the system that runs your business.
And whether your company does millions or even hundreds of millions, Netsuite helps you stay ahead.
If your revenues are at least in the seven figures, get their free business guide, demystifying AI at Nessuite.com slash study.
The guide is free to you at Nessuite.com slash study.
NetSuite.com slash study.
When I started my own side business, it suddenly felt like I had to become 10 different people
overnight wearing many different hats.
Starting something from scratch can feel exciting, but also incredibly overwhelming and lonely.
That's why having the right tools matters.
For millions of businesses, that tool is Shopify.
Shopify is the commerce platform behind millions of businesses around the world, and 10% of all
e-commerce in the U.S., from brands just getting started to household names.
It gives you everything you need in one place, from inventory to payments to analytics.
So you're not juggling a bunch of different platforms.
You can build a beautiful online store with hundreds of ready-to-use templates,
and Shopify is packed with helpful AI tools that write product descriptions and even enhance
your product photography.
Plus, if you ever get stuck, they've got award-winning 24-7 customer support.
Start your business today with the industry's best business partner, Shopify, and start hearing
Sign up for your $1 per month trial today at Shopify.com slash WSB.
Go to Shopify.com slash WSB.
That's Shopify.com slash WSB.
All right.
Back to the show.
Dwight illustrates the example of Ink Tomi during the tech bubble.
Inc. tome was the fast-growing tech company whose stock had risen by 1,900% from June of 1998 through
March of 2000. In just a few weeks leading up to March 17th of 2000, the stock had tripled.
Investors saw that Ink Toomey was an internet company, and in the last quarter of 1999,
they had $36 million in revenue, which was more than they had done in revenue all of the previous year.
But Mr. Market was overlooking a very critical aspect of their business.
They were not only losing money, but losing lots of money.
Despite losing $24 million in the trailing 12 months, the market put a value on this business
on March 17, 2000, at $25 billion.
That's with the B.
The stock at the time was trading at $231, and if we fast forward two and a half years later,
Inc. tome stock, from that previous high of $231, it closed at 25 cents, bringing the total
market value from its high of $25 billion down to less than $40 million. So while the
business was still generating $113 million in revenues, Mr. Markets' mood on the stock had changed
substantially. The funny thing is that this stock traded on both extremes of extreme optimism
and extreme pessimism. Later in 2002, Yahoo would buy Ink Tomi for $1.65 per share. This was seven times
the stock price of what had been a few months earlier. With the benefit of hindsight, we would find
that Yahoo actually got a bargain on that purchase as well. This is why critical thinking and the
ability to think for yourself is just so, so important. If you can think for yourself,
you can find these sort of obvious situations where the market is just incredibly irrational
and the odds are heavily stacked in our favor.
So in this case of Ink-Tomi, all these tech companies were bid up to extreme levels.
And really the entire sector was just multiples of where they were months earlier.
And then on the opposite end, when a stock or an industry like this is witnessing these
force-sellings by institutions, that's the times where investors should probably start getting
interested, I'm brought to mind of what happened in March 2020, where just everything was getting
crushed and there was a lot of forced selling at play. Zweig explains how he views we should
utilize Mr. Marcus' offerings to us, I quote. The intelligent investor shouldn't ignore Mr.
Market entirely. Instead, you should do business with him, but only to the extent that it serves
your interests. Mr. Marcus's job is to provide you with prices. Your job is to decide whether it is
your advantage to act on them. You do not have to trade with him just because he constantly begs you to.
By refusing to let Mr. Market be your master, you transform him into your servant, end quote.
So Graham talked about how those who get persuaded by Mr. Market have transformed their basic
advantage into a basic disadvantage. Zweig explains what he believes Graham meant by this.
The intelligent investor has the full freedom to choose whether or not to find.
follow Mr. Market. You have the luxury of being able to think for yourself. Many investment
professionals really don't have this luxury. Many of them manage billions of dollars and they're
forced to hold really big companies. Many investors pour into these funds during the good years and take
their money out during the bad years. This means that professionals aren't able to take full advantage
of market drops. Many portfolio managers get bonuses for beating the market. So instead of optimizing for
long term, they may try and optimize for the next three or the next six months and not stray
too far from the index. Zweig argues that because many institutional investors can't truly
think for themselves and have a full level of independence, then there's no reason for us individual
investors to think we can't do as well as the pros. The intelligent investor focuses their
attention on things they can control. You can look at your costs or fees, using realistic
expectations in your forecasts, deciding your level of risk through portfolio concentration,
when you sell and incur taxes, and most important of all is your behavior.
Zweig also explains that we shouldn't judge our financial success by how other people are doing.
He writes, you're not one penny poorer if someone in Dallas or Denver beats the S&P 500 and
you don't. No one's gravestone reads, he beat the market, end quote. More important,
important than beating the market is achieving your financial goals and having enough money to cover
the things that are most important to you. There's always going to be someone out there who achieves
higher returns than you. And that shouldn't sway you to do irrational things like ignoring the
price of the investments you're paying for or forgetting about your core investment principles.
What is amazing is that we're all susceptible to falling prey to Mr. Market. Zweig explains that we're
actually hardwired to get into investing trouble because humans are pattern-seeking animals.
Even if you were to tell people that numbers shown on a screen are entirely random,
people will still insist on trying to guess what's going to come next.
If you believe a stock will go up and your prediction is correct, your brain releases dopamine.
That's the feel-good hormone.
And this is what we always want more of.
Dopamine can make us addicted to our own predictions in the midst of all this randomness.
On the flip side, when a stock drops, our brain processes fear and anxiety.
And this generates a fight or flight response within us.
It's totally natural to feel fearful when stocks are falling because we're literally
hardwired for it, just as if we're hardwired to avoid a rattlesnake or have a rising
heart rate when a fire alarm goes off.
The other irony is that falling stock prices for long-term investors is actually good news,
not bad.
Falling stock prices means better bargains are available, and the lower prices fall, the higher
your expected returns are.
If you're a long-term investor and you won't need to sell any stocks in the near term,
then you should be welcoming falling stock prices.
So that concludes Chapter 8.
Let's jump to Chapter 20 here.
Chapter 20 is titled, Margin of Safety, as the central concept of.
investment. Graham argues that a margin of safety is essential for sound investments in bonds and
stocks. Now the way Graham argues the definition of a margin of safety is by comparing the
yield you get on stocks relative to that of bonds. During the Benjamin Graham era of investing,
your typical stock was selling at around 11 times earnings. So your earnings yield on that
just dividing 1 divided by 11 was 9%. And then the typical rate on bonds was around 4%
so it didn't seem too difficult to get a better earnings yield on stocks relative to bonds.
A more relevant definition of the margin of safety is a favorable difference between the price you pay
and the intrinsic value of the underlying asset.
So the difficulty in stock picking is forecasting the future because the future has been
and always will be fundamentally uncertain.
When you purchase with a large margin of safety, you help remove the need to know how the future is going to play out.
Buffett's number one rule is not to lose money. In utilizing a margin of safety approach not only
limits your downside risk, but it also gives you more upside opportunity as you're buying at more
opportune prices. Graham writes, I quote, if such a margin is present in each of a diversified list of
20 more stocks, the probability of a favorable result under fairly normal conditions becomes
very large. That is why the policy of investing in representative common stocks does not require high,
qualities of insight and foresight to work out successfully. The danger to investors lies in concentrating
their purchases in the upper levels of the market, or in buying non-representative common stocks that
carry more than average risk of diminished earnings power." Graham is, of course, well known for
diving into the land of cigar butts and looking for these opportunities, and part of the reason
he found it so attractive is because cigar butts are the companies in which the market has no real
enthusiasm about the company's prospects. If the sentiment is so bad that no investor wants to touch
that stock no matter the price, this is what gets him interested because the company is priced
at such a level that even very conservative forecasts will lead to highly satisfactory returns.
Plus, if you buy with an appropriate margin of safety and the company ends up underperforming
your expectations, the margin of safety may still prevent you from losing money or earning an
unsatisfactory return. In this case,
the margin of safety would have served its purpose. Graham also touches on the topic of investing
versus speculation. Because of the world is fundamentally uncertain, and we don't know the true
probabilities of what's going to happen, it makes it pretty difficult at times to distinguish
between an investment and a speculation. One man's investment may be another man's speculation.
Graham proposes that the margin of safety concept can be used as a tool to distinguish between
the two. In investing, we want to stack the odds of earning a satisfactory return in our favor. Using
arithmetic reasoning and practical investment experience, in a true investment, there must be present
a true margin of safety. And he concludes, I quote, a true margin of safety is one that can be
demonstrated by figures, by persuasive reasoning, and by reference to a body of actual experience,
end quote. Graham also believes that there's no such thing as a good stock or a bad stock,
only cheap stocks and expensive stocks. The best companies can be poor investments if you're paying a
price too high, and the worst companies can be great investments if the price is too low.
Then Graham has a section at the end of the chapter that starts with the quote that I really
like, investment is most intelligent when it's most business-like. This is why value investors
repeatedly say that buying the stock is the same as taking ownership in a real business.
And this is also why we should view ourselves as business analysts and not stock analysts.
And then he concludes with four principles that we can use to invest in such a manner.
The first principle he lists is to know what you're doing and to know your business.
Second, do not let anyone else run your business unless you can supervise his performance
with adequate care and comprehension, or you have an unusually strong.
reasons for placing implicit confidence in his integrity and ability.
Third, do not enter upon an operation unless a reliable calculation shows that it has a fair
chance to yield a reasonable profit.
In other words, avoid opportunities that present little to gain, but much to lose.
And fourth, I quote, have the courage of your knowledge and experience.
If you have formed a conclusion from the facts, and if you know your judgment is sound,
act on it, even though others may hesitate or differ. He writes, you are neither right nor wrong
because the crowd disagrees with you. You are right because your data and reasoning are right.
This takes us to the commentary on Zweig for this chapter. He proposes the question, what is risk?
Well, in 1999, risk was making less money than your friends or less money than your coworkers
during the tech boom. In 2003, risk had come to mean that the stock market wouldn't
quit falling and the remainder of your wealth would evaporate. Dwight shares the wise words,
the people who take the biggest gambles and make the biggest gains in a bull market are almost
always the ones who get hurt the worst in the bear market. Being quote-unquote right makes speculators
even more eager to take extra risk, as their confidence catches fire, end quote. He then explains
that losing some money is an inevitable part of investing, and there's nothing you can do to prevent
But to be an intelligent investor, you must take responsibility for ensuring that you never
lose most or all of your money.
Survival is everything.
The margin of safety concept ensures that you don't pay too much for an investment and you
minimize the chances that your wealth will be destroyed.
I'm also reminded of the lessons that Poulac Prasad shared in his book, what I learned about
investing from Darwin.
He shared six types of companies that he tends to avoid as a permanent owner.
of high-quality businesses to help eliminate the risk of ruin. These include one, avoiding
companies that are run by criminals, crooks, and cheats. Two, avoiding turnaround
situations because turn-around seldom turn. Three, only invest in companies with little to no debt,
as companies with too much debt are the most likely ones to go bankrupt during a downturn.
4. Stay away from what he calls M&A junkies, as most acquisitions are not value-accretive to shareholders.
Five, stay away from fast-changing in hot industries, as they are highly disruptive and unpredictable.
And finally, six, only invests with companies whose managers are well aligned with their shareholder base.
My co-host, Kyle Greve, did an entire review of this book on Episode 597, which I highly recommend.
If you want to find the most extreme examples of what it looks like to overpay, look no further than the 1999 tech bubble.
Over one year, JDS Uniface Corp generated $673 million in sales.
It lost $313 million and it had tangible assets totaling $1.5 billion.
On March 7th of 2000, Mr. Market quoted a market value of $143 billion for the.
entire business. The peak of the hype, shares traded at $153 per share, and it ended up cratering
to $2.47 cents at the end of 2002. Just to get back to the $153 price level, you would need
43 years of 10% compounding just to get back to even. So if the stock price increased by a very
high percentage, say 20% a year, then you'd still need to wait 22 years. The lesson is that overpaying
is painful because to break even after losing a substantial amount of your capital is very hard
to do. Zweig also explains that much of the risk in investing can actually lie within ourselves.
Many people are naturally overconfident in their ability to select stocks and how you will react
when your analysis turns out to be wrong. He shares a quote from Paul Slavic, I quote,
risk is brewed from an equal dose of two ingredients, probabilities and consequences, end quote.
Before we invest, we have to realistically assess the probability of being right and how we will react
to the consequences of being wrong. There's also a great quote from Peter Bernstein that is just
absolutely wonderful. In making decisions under conditions of uncertainty, the consequences
must dominate the probabilities.
We never know the future.
I'll repeat that for you.
In making decisions under conditions of uncertainty,
the consequences must dominate the probabilities.
We never know the future.
Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors.
No, it's not your imagination.
Risk and regulation are ramping up
and customers now expect proof of security just to do business.
That's why VANTA is a game changer. VANTA automates your compliance process and brings compliance,
risk, and customer trust together on one AI-powered platform. So whether you're prepping for
a SOC 2 or running an enterprise GRC program, VANTA keeps you secure and keeps your deals moving.
Instead of chasing spreadsheets and screenshots, VANTA gives you continuous automation across more
than 35 security and privacy frameworks. Companies like Ramp and Ryder spend 82%
less time on audits with Vantta.
That's not just faster compliance, it's more time for growth.
If I were running a startup or scaling a team today, this is exactly the type of platform
I'd won in place.
Get started at Vanta.com slash billionaires.
That's Vanta.com slash billionaires.
Ever wanted to explore the world of online trading, but haven't dared try?
The futures market is more active now than ever before, and plus 500 futures,
is the perfect place to start.
Plus 500 gives you access to a wide range of instruments, the S&P 500, NASDAQ, Bitcoin, gas, and much more.
Explore equity indices, energy, metals, 4x, crypto, and beyond.
With a simple and intuitive platform, you can trade from anywhere, right from your phone.
Deposit with a minimum of $100 and experience the fast, accessible futures trading you've
been waiting for.
See a trading opportunity.
You'll be able to trade it in just two clicks once your account is open.
Not sure if you're ready, not a problem.
Plus 500 gives you an unlimited, risk-free demo account with charts and analytic tools for
you to practice on.
With over 20 years of experience, Plus 500 is your gateway to the markets.
Visit plus500.com to learn more.
Trading in futures involves risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone.
Not all applicants will qualify.
Plus 500, it's trading with a plus.
Billion dollar investors don't typically park their cash in high-yield savings accounts.
Instead, they often use one of the premier passive income strategies for institutional investors,
private credit.
Now, the same passive income strategy is available to investors of all sizes, thanks to the
Fundrise income fund, which has more than $600 million invested in a 7.97% distribution rate,
With traditional savings yields falling, it's no wonder private credit has grown to be a trillion-dollar
asset class in the last few years. Visit fundrise.com slash WSB to invest in the Fundrise
Income Fund in just minutes. The fund's total return in 2025 was 8%, and the average annual
total return since inception is 7.8%. Past performance does not guarantee future results,
current distribution rate as of 1231, 2025.
Carefully consider the investment material before investing, including objectives, risks,
charges, and expenses.
This and other information can be found in the income funds prospectus at fundrise.com
slash income.
This is a paid advertisement.
All right.
Back to the show.
The point is that we shouldn't only focus on getting our analysis right, but also consider
the consequences of being wrong.
It's almost certain that about every.
single stock picker or active investor is going to have at least one mistake during his investing
career. That's a near certainty. And we don't have control over that. What we do have control
over is the consequences when we are wrong. There was a survey that was done that showed that
10% out of 1,300 investors surveyed had put at least 85% of their money in tech stocks in 1999.
Based on that statistic, 10% of investors ignored the potential consequences of being wrong
and ignored the margin of safety concept.
So they did nothing to protect themselves against the serious consequences of being wrong.
Zweig writes, simply by keeping your holdings permanently diversified and refusing to fling
money at Mr. Market's latest, craziest fashions, you can ensure that the consequences
of your mistakes will never be catastrophic.
No matter what Mr. Market throws at you, you will always be able to say with a quiet confidence, this two shall pass away, end quote.
Next, I wanted a turn to play a couple of clips from William Green's interview with Jason's Wig.
That was released on the Richer Wiser Happier Podcast back in April of 2022.
That was episode four, which you can find on our website or on the feed you're listening to now.
And I'll be sure to get that linked in the show notes as well.
The first clip is Jason's Wyck talking about Graham's emphasis on survival, and adhering
so strongly to the principle of the margin of safety.
Some people could argue that he is too pessimistic in his view of the world, so I thought
it would be an interesting one to play here in this context.
Here's the clip of William and Jason discussing why he was shaped to view the world in this
way.
There are other fascinating things about Graham that I wanted to run by you.
One of them, I wrote about Graham and Richard Wieser, a happier about.
about his early life, which is kind of fascinating, like that he came from this prosperous
family that I think imported porcelain from Europe.
And then his father died at the age of about 35, and the mother was widowed and left with
three kids to bring up.
And the business collapsed, and she ends up turning their home into a boarding house, which
failed.
Then she borrows money, gets wiped out in the panic of 1907.
And then Graham grows up, instead of growing up with a cook and a maid and a governess,
which he'd always had when they were this prosperous family, when his dad was alive, sees the family
actually forced to sell its possessions in a public auction and never really recovered from that kind
of public disgrace. And then lives through World War I, the Great Depression, the crash of
29, where I think from 1929 to 32, he lost like 70% of his money and then lives through
World War II. And he's from a Jewish family. He was born Benjamin Grossman, as you know, and had
come from Poland, same sort of area that you're from
family of mine had come from as you can't use.
And what's fascinating to me is that his entire investment credo is built on this idea
of the margin of safety.
And here's a guy whose youth is in a sense the epitome of chaos.
That even as a Jewish guy coming from Poland, he's seen, I mean, I think his, if I remember
rightly, I think his grandfather may have been the chief rabbi of Warsaw.
And so this is kind of fascinating to me because my background is similar.
your background is similar, right? My family came from Russia, Poland, and Ukraine.
Yours, I think, came from Ukraine. I remember your grandfather was from Ukraine.
And I'm wondering if you could talk about that connection, the link between this kind of personal
chaos and his sense that you have to find a way of investing that protects you against chaos.
Yeah, that's a, that's such a good observation, William.
You know, the anecdote that stands out for me from Graham's life story is when he was a very small child, this was after his dad had died.
His mother had to cash a check at the bank.
And I think she asked Graham to take it to the bank.
And was it that she had to cash a check?
No, she had to, I forget whether to cash a check or make a withdrawal.
But in any case, Graham had to go to the teller.
And the teller said out loud, sort of to the bank floor, is Mrs. Graham good for this amount?
And it just stuck with him. It was maybe $5 or something like that, which, of course, in those days was a lot more than it is today, but it still wasn't much.
And I think he was, Graham was traumatized by loss. And, you know, in several of his books and articles, he has this expression. He says the future is,
something to be guarded against. And I think this is the, you know, this is the biggest knock on Graham.
It's the criticism so many people make of him today and have been making for 20 years. And I think it's
valid. Charlie Munger makes the same point. The first, you know, one of the first times I interviewed
Munger, he said to me, Graham was afraid that the depression would repeat. And he always saw
another depression around the corner. And all he cared about was surviving that.
And in the intelligent investor, he talks about the difference between protection and projection.
And effectively, growth stocks, growth investors are in the projection business.
They're trying to extrapolate a, you know, a fabulous line of growth into the future.
They're projecting it.
And Graham cares about protecting.
He's worried about the downside.
And that's because he really suffered it.
And he really felt it.
And, you know, both Buffett and Munger went through the Great Depression, but they were much younger than Graham.
And they saw the country come roaring back.
To Graham, you know, he had been through many more severe cycles.
And of course, he, you know, he was only, you know, he was a young adult when the Federal Reserve was created.
So he had lived through the panic of 1907 when there was no longer.
lender of last resort. And it wasn't clear if the financial system would survive. So he was obsessed
with the downside and protecting against it. And, you know, if I were revising the book today,
that would be the main issue that I would be struggling with, which is how do we reconcile the need
for protection with the importance of projection? I mean, we're not investing for today. We're
investing for tomorrow. And if you don't project, if all you do is protect, then how will you
prosper tomorrow? And I think that's the, that's a valid criticism of Graham's approach.
It's a profound conundrum. I remember having a revelation at one point when Howard Marks,
who's great at articulating these conundrums, said at a certain point, risk avoidance
becomes return avoidance. And I have that kind of fearfulness and anxiety about
the future that I suspect to some degree is an inherited thing from our families having gone
through the trauma of having fled from Russia and Poland and the Holocaust and the like. And I don't,
I remember talking to Chuck Akrae about this at one point saying that I'm kind of a pessimist and
he's like, good luck with that. You know, he was like, look, as an investor in stocks, you need
to be an optimist. Yeah. Do you think that's true that there is a, I mean, I see you
conflicted about this as well, right? Because you've written, I think, that uncertainty is the
the most fundamental fact about human life and economic activity. So I think you temperamentally
in some ways are on my side and Ben Graham's side more than on Chuck Akre's side temperamentally.
Yeah, I mean, sure, I'm a worrier. But, you know, I also am an optimist. I mean,
I've seen too many good things happen in my own life and frankly in the world's life to be a pessimist.
I mean, I think it was, I forget who it was.
An Israeli prime minister, naturally, said to be a realist, you have to believe in miracles.
I think it might have been Ben-Gurion.
Yeah, either Van Gereon or Golda Mayer, one of those two.
Yeah.
And it's kind of true.
I mean, you think back a decade ago, you know, who would have expected, well, a little more than a decade, but who would have expected, you know, cloud computing and fracking?
the U.S. is energy independent.
That seemed impossible 15 years ago.
And, you know, progress doesn't stop as negative and horrible as a lot of the headlines are.
And as worried as I am, as I think any thinking person has to be about the polarization
in our society and the rising resentment and distrust of expertise.
and the anger across the political spectrum at the other side.
I don't know how you can really be a pessimist.
Yeah, I tend to feel, having talked to a lot of great investors who are smarter about this stuff than I am,
that it's a kind of general upward trajectory that's interrupted by these periods of tremendous disruption.
But I think that that was Ray Dalio's view when I interviewed him recently.
That if you look at the very long-term picture of productivity, longevity,
you know, human lifespan, quality of life. It's hard not to be optimistic, but there are these
periods of disruption. And so it seems to me that part of the key to investing well is to set
yourself up for survival. And I remember you having a great interview with Peter Bernstein,
where he talked about just this recognition of just how badly things can get wrong when you
asked him about the biggest mistake that you can make investing.
So when Jason tells the story of Graham being at the bank and
the teller asking if they are good for the $5.
I really can't help but compare that to my own life experiences.
I grew up in a family where we were generally pretty well off.
And whenever I needed the basic necessities, they were always provided to me.
I had a stable family.
My parents had great jobs and I had a good support system around me.
And I can clearly see that partially because of that,
I have an optimistic view of the world and that things tend to remain stable or tend to
continually get better over time. I haven't lived through a Great Depression-type scenario, and
whenever financial markets go sort of haywire, the Fed tends to swoop in, support markets,
support asset prices, and the environment for businesses is largely accommodative. And I think this is a
reminder that we shouldn't rely on things always being so good. Having some protection against
calamity can be very wise, whether that means having more cash in an emergency fund than I
I probably otherwise would, or maybe having some physical gold as a safe haven, or buying more
safe blue chip companies or index funds.
I'm not one to say what that additional cushion might be for the listener, but those are
just some ideas that I can come up with for myself.
I think we can still have an optimistic view of the economy and an optimistic view of the
world, but still know that bad and unexpected things are bound to happen at some point in
our lives that we can just never see coming. Morgan Housel wisely said that the biggest risk
over the next 10 years is one that we can't foresee coming. And we really can't even fathom.
I love how they also mentioned that the conundrum of needing to balance survival with capital
appreciation. If you focus solely on capital appreciation, you're going to find out the hard way
that you need to balance it with some of these survival characteristics, such as not growing
too fast, having a strong, healthy balance sheet, growing thoughtfully and strategically,
thinking long term, etc. And if you focus too much on capital preservation, then you may come
to find that your returns aren't enough to reach your financial goals. So you need to find
that healthy balance between the two that suits your temperament and suit your skill set.
Next, I wanted to share one more clip here on Jason's Weig's thoughts on diversification
versus concentration. This is an area where Graham actually
differed from Buffen Munger. For example, Charlie Munger, he feels that when he's nearly certain
on a bet, he's more than willing to put 30% of his portfolio in that bet. Graham liked to be
much, much more diversified. So here's the next clip from Jason and William.
And you've said that I think the phrase you used at one point was that a diversified portfolio
is the closest thing to a sure thing in all of finance. That ultimately the best insurance policy
other than not investing, which doesn't lead to a great outcome either with inflation and the like.
The best insurance policy is to diversify.
Is that also one of the one of just the most simple and basic but timeless lessons that we get from
someone like Graham, who was probably much more diversified than Buffett chose to?
Yeah.
Yeah, correct.
I mean, it's kind of interesting.
This is another area where Buffett and Munger really diverged from Graham.
Graham invested in categories of securities.
You know, if railroad stocks were cheap, he would just buy every railroad stock that was cheap.
He wouldn't buy one.
He would buy dozens.
Maybe he thought utilities were cheap.
He would buy every utility he could find that was cheap.
Graham was a huge believer in diversification.
And Buffett and Munger are not.
And, you know, I think the right way to think about it is that diversification, you know,
The justification is inverse to the likelihood that you have superior knowledge and you're actually right.
So the more sure you are that you know what you're doing, that you're doing something that not everybody else is, and that there's an asymmetry between the downside and the upside, the more you should put in that asset.
And, you know, great investors will tend to be under-diversified, great active investors, because they feel or their experience tells them that they should concentrate.
The problem with that is that people aren't very good at assessing how valid their signals of confidence are.
And, you know, it's part of normal human behavior to be overconfident.
And if you're overconfident about the things you're over concentrating in,
the result is not likely to be very accretive in the long run.
Yeah, I remember once saying to Bill Miller when he was, I think he had bought 15% of Amazon.
This is back in 2000, 2001.
And everything was going to hell in the market after 9-11.
And he was, I was with him while he was investing hundreds of millions of dollars.
And I said to him at one point, God, you've got to have so much balls to do what you do.
He said, yeah, I've also got to be right.
And it was one of those moments where you were like, oh, yeah, it's like so many of the,
the truths that you hear in investing are so simple.
You know, there's this emphasis on survival, this emphasis on diversification, this emphasis on being right.
Like this emphasis on being long term patient.
They're all so platitudinous that our eyes kind of glaze over and we don't take them seriously.
But it's like, yeah, if you're going to, if you're going to, if you're going to,
If you're going to concentrate really heavily in a few positions, you better be really smart and right.
Yeah. And William, and it's worth emphasizing for people the sequel, right?
Because Bill was almost looking forward in a way. He was almost looking ahead because he did the same thing seven or eight years later with financials.
And he wasn't right.
And then the sequel to the sequel, which is then he did the same thing with Bitcoin and Amazon.
And he was right.
And was right.
So I think to some extent when I look at these great investors,
I was thinking about this recently with Bill Ackman as well,
where I was reading in the journal the other day
about how he just made $4 billion during the financial crisis.
Sorry, during the COVID meltdown and then the recovery.
I was just thinking one of the keys is just to be true to themselves.
Like you have to kind of embrace your own form of craziness to some extent
to be extraordinary at anything.
You have to play the game in a way that suits your particular form of brilliance and craziness.
Does that resonate for you?
Yeah, it does.
And I think, you know, I think the challenge all great professionals face is this push and pull between the sense you have that you are exerting actual skill and the need for humility.
I mean, whenever I hear anyone talk about being humble, I just, I mean, I want to throw up.
I mean, it's like if you're talking about your own humility, then you don't have any.
I literally, Jason, had a conversation a few years ago where I was talking with a guy I was friends with who I was helping with a memoir that hasn't been published, who's multi-billionaire art collector.
And I was talking about, you know, someone had said something about humility and vanity and the like.
And he said, no one is more humble than I am.
And I sort of burst out watching and I thought he was joking.
And then I realized, no, no, he's totally serious.
Here is this multi-billionaire saying nobody is more humble than I am.
Right.
Mostly that is the reality.
It's wonderful.
I'm the best at being humble.
Look at me.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I mean, it's a, I think the key is that combination of you can't be good at something if you don't think you're good at it.
And if you've been a professional investor for years and you have a successful track record,
it's sort of inconceivable that you would, you don't come into the office each day and
saying, oh, God, what am I going to screw up next?
You come in, you have a sense of exerting your skill and demonstrating your power and your
facility and your knowledge.
And without that, you'd be lost.
On the other hand, you can't let it go to your head.
And, you know, there's ultimately, I think, humility, the only way to resolve it is with paradox, right?
I mean, there's a wonderful expression, I think it's somewhere in the Talmud, actually,
that says, the truly healthy man has a soul without knowing it.
And it's something like that.
It's that you want to be humble and you seek to be humble, but you don't really expect
to achieve it because if you did, if you did expect it,
you would end up sounding like the person you were just describing.
So as William said to Bill Miller,
you've got to have a lot of guts to concentrate so heavily.
And he also made the point that you really need to be right
when you concentrate.
Remember what I said earlier that you need to consider
the consequences of when you're wrong
and the consequences cut really heavily
when you're wrong after you concentrate like that.
So concentration in a way is,
like leverage in that it's a knife that cuts both ways. When you're right, it can be tremendously
profitable, but when you're wrong, it can definitely work against you really strongly.
So that wraps up today's episode on The Intelligent Investor. I really hope you enjoyed it.
If you'd like to check out that full interview with Jason Zweig and William Green,
Jason did the commentary on the most recent edition of The Intelligent Investor. I'll be sure to
get that episode linked in the show notes and I'll get the book linked as well. So thanks a lot for
tune and in and I hope to see you again next time. Thank you for listening to TIP.
Make sure to follow We Study Billionaires on your favorite podcast app and never miss out on episodes.
To access our show notes, transcripts or courses, go to theinvestorspodcast.com.
This show is for entertainment purposes only, before making any decision consult a professional.
This show is copyrighted by the Investors Podcast Network. Written permission must be granted before
syndication or rebroadcasting.
