We Study Billionaires - The Investor’s Podcast Network - TIP735: Compounding with Character w/ Guy Spier

Episode Date: July 6, 2025

In this episode, Stig Brodersen speaks with Guy Spier who has outperformed the S&P 500 since 1997, with a 9.6% vs. 8.8% CAGR. They explore why Guy invested in The Economist, and how friendships, service, and living by an inner scorecard guide his life and investment philosophy. IN THIS EPISODE YOU’LL LEARN: 00:00 - Intro 02:27 - Why Guy Spier decided to invest in The Economist. 13:16 - How Guy is living by his inner scorecard. 55:16 - Why friendships are there for a reason, a season, or a lifetime. 55:16 - How does Guy invest in friendships? 01:09:03 - How to facilitate thoughtful conversations with friends. 01:22:03 - How do you seek wisdom? 01:44:04 - How do you identify how to best be of service? 01:57:43 - What money can and can’t buy you. Disclaimer: Slight discrepancies in the timestamps may occur due to podcast platform differences. BOOKS AND RESOURCES Join Clay and a select group of passionate value investors for a retreat in Big Sky, Montana. Learn more ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠here⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. Join the exclusive ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠TIP Mastermind Community⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ to engage in meaningful stock investing discussions with Stig, Clay, Kyle, and the other community members. Stig’s interview with Guy Spier about his track record and risk. Stig’s interview with Guy Spier about investing and life. Stig and Preston’s interview with Guy Spier on his book, The Education of a Value Investor. Stig and Preston’s interview with Guy Spier about his lunch with Warren Buffett.  Guy Spier’s book, The Education of a Value Investor – Read reviews of the book. Subscribe to Guy Spier’s Free Newsletter. Guy Spier’s podcast and website. Check out all the books mentioned and discussed in our podcast episodes ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠here⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. Enjoy ad-free episodes when you subscribe to our ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Premium Feed⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. NEW TO THE SHOW? Get smarter about valuing businesses in just a few minutes each week through our newsletter, ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Intrinsic Value Newsletter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. Check out our ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠We Study Billionaires Starter Packs⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. Follow our official social media accounts: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠X (Twitter)⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ | ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠LinkedIn⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ | ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ | ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Facebook⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ | ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠TikTok⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. Browse through all our episodes (complete with transcripts) ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠here⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. Try our tool for picking stock winners and managing our portfolios: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠TIP Finance Tool⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. Enjoy exclusive perks from our ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠favorite Apps and Services⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. Learn how to better start, manage, and grow your business with the ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠best business podcasts⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. SPONSORS Support our free podcast by supporting our ⁠⁠sponsors⁠⁠: SimpleMining Hardblock AnchorWatch Human Rights Foundation Cape Unchained Vanta Shopify Onramp Abundant Mines HELP US OUT! Help us reach new listeners by leaving us a ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠rating and review⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Spotify⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠! It takes less than 30 seconds, and really helps our show grow, which allows us to bring on even better guests for you all! Thank you – we really appreciate it! Support our show by becoming a premium member! ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm⁠⁠ Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm

You're listening to TIP. Guy Speer is more than an investor. He's a teacher, a philosopher and student of life. Since founding the Acriman Fund in 1997, he outperformed the SNP 500 by investing not just with his head, but with his heart. In this wide-ranging episode, you'll learn why Guy Speer invest in the economist, how Guy builds meaningful relationships, and how he navigates a world where money has limits and character has none.

This was one of the most thoughtful and enriching conversations. ever had on the show, and I hope you'll enjoy the exploration as much as I did. Since 2014 and through more than 180 million downloads, we've studied the financial markets and read the books that influence self-made billionaires the most. We keep you informed and prepared for the unexpected. Now for your host, Dick Broderson. You're listening to The Investors Podcast. I'm your host Dick Broderson, and I am here today with one of the most revered investors in the value investing community. Guy Speer. Guy, how are you today? I'm alive, as I say now these days. I'm glad to be alive. I'm glad to be on a podcast with you.

As you know, Stig, I'm in a relatively remote location and I was super frustrated about the internet connection. I want everybody to know that Stig has the patience of an elephant. So we both side aside the afternoon for this because I can tell you Stig, I enjoy talking to you as much as I think you enjoy talking to me. So we had no time commitment, a time barrier, hard stop on the other side. But it is literally an hour and 20 minutes where we're supposed to start the interview.

So thank you, Stake, for your extreme patience in this case, really. You're very kind, Guy, and I'm just happy to have a chance to catch up with you and hear how everything is. So no worries at all. As you know, you have a very, very successful podcast and rightfully so a huge number of people listen to you.

So I always feel privileged that you want to invite me back. And I'm waiting for the day when you decide internally that you've had enough of geysphere. And I'm a little surprised that you haven't had enough of geispeer yet. But I feel honored and I feel imposter syndrome to be here in a certain way. I don't think I can ever get enough of speaking with you. and we're going to talk more about meaningful conversations and meaningful relationships later in this episode. And I couldn't think of a better person to talk about that than with you, Guy.

But before we do, I want to talk about Charlie Amonger's favorite adult magazine, as he's been quoted to call it. We're talking about The Economist. And you invested recently in the Economist group. And I was kind of curious if you could elaborate a bit more on how did the transaction come about, does it mean that you now have shares in a private company because it is a private company or is it an investment indirectly through Xer? I'm kind of curious what's going on. Yeah, I mean, obviously I have known about the economist ever since I started studying

economics around age 18. It's a very, very old publication. It started in the, suddenly in the 1800s, how early in the 1800s, I can't remember. It was actually part of the Enlightenment in a way. They were trying to get people to think in a rational way about the allocation of scarce resources. So it was a must read in the UK at the time of the Industrial Revolution and onwards. And so I was aware of it. But then I also became more aware of it when I came across two business school cases, Harvard Business School cases. One case is actually on the Harvard Business School itself and analyzes the Harvard Business School as a business. You know, Bill Ackman recently did that about Harvard University.

This is just Harvard Business School. And one part of the case study, if I'm not mistaken, focused on a publication called the Harvard Business Review. And then another study, another Harvard Business School case study on the Economist. And, you know, this was around the time of the reorganize of publishing post-internet. And both the Harvard Business Review and the Economist were kind of high. violated as sort of publications that somehow had managed to survive and maybe even thrive through the great kind of tumult of the internet. And so that got my attention, though I didn't do anything about it. But then when I was studying Exor, which is in my portfolio, and I go to a

bi-annual meeting that takes place in Turin for people who are interested in Exor. And it's a very small gathering of people and I met the most incredible woman, Susan Haywood, who herself, you know, if you could get her on the podcast, it'd be great, but she's written a couple of books and she's now for various positions within Exor, but she's kind of a key operational figure for John Elkan in Exor. And I had a conversation with her about the economist because John Elcan controls about, or Exor controls about 40% by value of the economist's chairs. And I said, you know, it would be a dream for me to own shares of the economists. And she said, oh, let me introduce you to the CFO or the CEO. And I visited them in London. So that's how it happened.

It's happened through the connection from Exor and John Alkin. And the company is private, but there's a very clear price that's established for the shares, because shares do change hands privately. So even though it's private, you could have argued there's an over-the-counter market for the shares, something like that. And in the past, in the beginning of the fund, I bought shares of Noytsurche Zeitung, the number one newspaper in Switzerland. I paid like around four times earnings for that. I paid a little bit more. I mean, it's, I think I said something like it's not cheap, but it's not expensive, something like that. I bought into it at a fair price. But just to add one thing extra to that, which is just an interesting way in which life works, the opportunities unevenly spread in the world,

And opportunities tend to collect to certain points. If you make it your business to attend the Berkshire meeting, or if you make it your business to attend the Exxor meeting, you're more likely to hear about and pick up on those opportunities. I mean, the connection to John Elkan and Exxor arose from the Berkshire Hathaway meeting, and I can tell you about that if you like. So now the connection to the economist arose from the attendance of the Exxor meeting. You know, I've been reading that magazine for I don't know how long, and it's such high quality.

And so I looked into like multiple times, like, we experienced life. And whenever we see something that's really valuable, you're sort of like, you look up, or at least I do, and probably a lot of listeners are looking up, can I invest in that company? Looking X or a few times, it's always been one of those, how much of that exposure do you really get and what is that I want. Like, whenever you look something like economists that raised prices quite rapidly over the past few years, I'm not saying that in any kind of negative way, but you also, you really experienced the pricing power firsthand. And I found it to be a very interesting investment. I found it to be a very guy type investment, which I do mean as a compliment whenever I say

that. So because of the longevity, to your point, and you also invested in LVMAs, and I'm not here to give you any kind of confirmation bias or anything like that. the reason why I found LVMA to be interesting. And of course, the business isn't that old, but a lot of the brands are very, very old. And it really comes from this idea of, to your point about the economists, so that's sort of like when I'm trying to connect the dots of there are so many things in the world that are changing. What is not going to change and perhaps what's even going to outlive us? And whenever I think about that and that anti-fragility, I think about you and I think about your portfolio and reading about that.

investment, reading about the economy, so it's like, oh, I was just about to say great minds, it's thing alike. It could also be not so great minds or in the same echo chamber, but then I'm sort of like pulling you down on my level, so I probably shouldn't have said a not great mind. So my apologies for that bad joke guy. We're in the same level, Stig, we're both students, we're both students of life and business and investing and building a better life for ourselves, despite our own forebills and weaknesses. I did an interview with this guy, ValueEx participant, David Duranco. He's a mathematician, and so he knows what a power law means way better than me.

But it's not like the best businesses in the world are twice or three times as good as the worst businesses. The best businesses of the world are 100, 10,000, 100,000 times better. I don't know how you measure that quality. And so you really give up a lot by trying to find cheap businesses. that you think are going to outperform or are going to be a better value than the best businesses on the planet. And in this case, even if it's not the best, we can't make the argument that the economist, I don't think we can make the argument, the economist is the best business on the planet, but the quality of the people that it attracts and the quality of the way, the

organization, and the fact that they attract the world's greatest minds to both either to read it or to publish in it, whether anonymously or non-anonymously, and it aspires to be the mixing ground of the most important economic ideas of the day, that kind of like at that apex, that once you're at the top of that mountain, it's very hard to dislod you. And in a way, and the economist is there, I mean, they share the space with a few other people. I mean, I think that people would argue that the Financial Times sits there in that space as well, and maybe the Wall Street Journal, but there's not 100. There's maybe two or three.

And what's fascinating about the economist is that you and I and probably about a quarter million people in the world, actually by subscriber numbers, it's higher than that, decide even if we don't read every single issue that we want to have it. So like, minds meet at the top or the world narrows at the top. And so, I mean, every back page of the economist is most of the time it's Rolex. And it's not Rolex, it's Selv-M-H. It's probably an LVM-H brand. And that is very coveted real estate.

And it's more coveted even than, for example, National Geographic. And Rolex is all over National Geographic. And Rolex becomes a kind of conduit because it's not Rolex. Rolex is there, but it's showing Roger Federer or it's showing. the director of an opera or an opera singer, and the people who want to enter into the culture at the very kind of peak and at the elite of what they're doing, whether they're golfers, tennis players, opera singers, opera directors, they find their way into these pages, you know. So yeah, and something else that happens, which really shouldn't be the case.

You know, I could own shares of just for argument sake T.J. Max, and it might make a really good investment, and a really good compounder. But there's something that I get a personal benefit out of being associated with the economists and talking about it. An image that I have in my mind is you're furnishing your home. And yes, there are some very important pieces of furniture

like the couch and the settee maybe, which you should not pay a ridiculously high price for and is an important part of the home. And then you get this jewel, which is not going to be an important part of the home, but somehow it enhances it in ways that make it more livable space for you. And I think the Warren Buffett has made investments like that. You know, early on, companies like Borsheims were like that. But even more recently, I think, I mean, for various reasons, I'm just reminded by somebody who said,

you know, they had to buy fruit of the loom because it was the only way they get into women's underwear. It was kind of a special brand and they wanted it in the portfolio, even though it's just apparel, you know, and it was never going to make a huge contribution to Berkshire's earnings, but it was kind of a jewel. So I think that the economist is like that for me. Interesting enough, I brought in a cocktail party, I had the opportunity to talk Ted Wexler, and I brought up my economist investment. And I actually said, you know, forgive me, because I don't want to presume to know or understand what you're dealing with in capital allocation, Berkshire. and I realize that it's tiny, but isn't, that's a beautiful brand to own inside Berkshire Hathaway?

And the response I got was just like, it doesn't move the needle. It certainly doesn't move the needle for Berkshire Hathaway, but anyway, so I brought it up to Berkshire Hathaway, the Museum of Modern Business, as he says. But I'm glad you liked it. I very much liked it. And I think it's a good transition into my other questions here, Guy. now that you mentioned your conversation and whether it should move the needle or not. No, I was speaking with an asset manager here some time ago.

And I asked about what he did, like how he spent his days. And I might be oversimplifying things here, but he made it sound like everything he did in life made him a better investor. So first of all, he talked about how many hours he spent on, you know, conventional investing tasks, like reading 10K, 10 Q's and whatnot. And then he said, you know, he did a lot of philanthropy, which was, of course, wonderful. He talked about how that made him a better investor, and then he went to the gym, and then that made him a better investor. And he didn't really do anything that didn't make him a better investor. And even something that seemingly didn't make him a better

investor, he sort of like had a theory of why that made him a better investor. And I've heard different variation, perhaps not to the same extent, but I heard different variation in that story many times you're over the years and, you know, many, I see, many just talk about that the work all the time and it's sort of like makes sense, part because a lot of people in that field, you know, they do what they loves and why wouldn't they spend a lot of time on that? But there's perhaps there's also an element that you sort of have to say that to justify your fees, like, and who wouldn't want to invest with this person with a great track record that spends all his time on figuring out what to invest in,

and even whenever he's doing something that seemingly doesn't make any sense, he still makes him a better investor. Now, I wanted to turn this question into something about you, because, guy, I know you have, I know you have many hobbies. And I would argue that hobbies give you a higher quality of life. And I would probably also argue that I'm probably just wide differently than this investor I'm talking about, but I do a lot of things that doesn't make me a better investor. I just really enjoy doing them. And that's the reason why I do it. So how do you think about

managing money for other people, but also living the best possible life? I mean, in a way, it's shocking what taking fees can do to the way you manage your life. And it's not easy and it's not fun to be in front of people that you've taken fees from and you've having a period of bad performance and they're not very happy about that. So I empathize, I guess, to the guy that you were talking to. But I think that you and I both agree that there's something disingenuous about it. And there's something where if you want to live a more honest life, he needs to be more curious about his motivations.

We both sense that he's seeking to justify it. The only person that I've met who meets the description that I think that he's trying to describe himself as is Warren Buffett, where he's best life. And I remember it's about two-thirds to three-quarters of the way through the Lancho, the penny finally dropped. He actually doesn't like all those things. It's not just that he doesn't like them. He's generally not interested.

He doesn't even notice them. And, you know, one vignettes of that is that Monish, you know, jibes me and says, oh, Warren, you know, Guy spent some money on expensive car. We were driving around New York City last night in the 9-10. 11, we'd got a great tour of in the, a Porsche 9-11, a Cabri-Lay 9-11. And, you know, I don't know if Warren didn't know what a Porsche 9-11 was, or he just didn't care. But that guy is, his best life is reading any reports all day.

And I think that that's not the case for me. It's not the case for you. And before I go into, I can talk about some of the hobbies. I mean, I kind of did the confession. So two conversations that come up for me. One is with a guy called Ori Ayal. This is like 20 years ago and we're in Pasadena and we've just attended the Westco annual meeting, that great gathering of investors around Charlie Munger and then Whitney Tilson and John Schwartz have their value investors Congress. And I know that Ori's question to me was, but don't you want to be a really,

really good investor. And it was then that the penny started slowly dropping on me that I didn't want to be the world's greatest investor. I wanted to be the best version of Geist Beer that I can be and let the cards fall where they may, if you like. So, I mean, you've heard about this idea has been well expressed by me and others many time. I can go into it. And then it happened again, more recently. The realization that is, I have a finite time. on this earth and there's a diminishing return to the amount of money I have, let's say, or the amount of money that I manage. So what actually am I trying to do? What am I trying to optimize? And if, going back to the story about Warren Buffett, if I'm Warren Buffett,

Warren Buffett could have this conversation with me, he says, yeah, I'm not freaking interested in getting on a bicycle. I'm not interested. And I could try in a thousand of ways to say, but Warren, it's so wonderful. Is this, that will the other, or, He's not interested. I am interested. And at some point, you have to say, I actually care more about, I guess I'm coming just full circle to what you said about the quality of my life, not the amount of money that I have in the bank or the success of my fund or all of those things. So if given the choice between authenticity to myself and trying to be the best possible manager of a fund, And it's a clear winner.

Of course, you have to be authentic to yourself. That's the only thing you have to be. Maybe this is a way to swing it back to you that person that you're talking about, I think that if I was his psychotherapist, and I have no understanding of what psychotherapists do, but I've been in many psychotherapists session as a client. But what I want to ask him is, how can you be so sure that being the best investor is the best use of your time. And how can you be so sure that you're not being the truly authentic version of yourself? Because that would be a shame if you didn't do that, wouldn't it? That's time

lost, if you like. So I know that we're both circling the same idea, but I'm not actually putting my finger on the kind of the hot button to kind of solve it, if you like. But I think that maybe this helps. So first of all, I learned this really from my courage, courage to tell the truth to oneself. And I'm not saying that I'm the best at it, but I'm on a journey and I think I'm improving. I think that I learned more from my wife than anybody else because I've seen her, I've seen Laurie in multiple circumstances, not be fearful of telling the truth to herself or to others and let the cars fall where they may. And if you set yourself up as an investor, investment manager, you've taken other people's money, it's a very, very scary thing to

stand in front of them and say what you just said to me. There's some things that you do, Sting, that it's very tenuous for anybody to believe that it makes you better investor. It's a leap into the unknown because you don't know how the world will react. And so it's, I think that you both, both you and I need to forgive people who do it. They do it for none of us to standable reason. But the people who don't do it, the people who take the leap of faith and say, you know what, I'm just going to be honest. I care more about being honest than achieving what I

perceive to be success. Those people are the people who live real adventures. And just coming back to me, it can go in a negative way as well. I mean, hobbies is one thing. You know, we touched on it. You know that my letter I talked about an operation that I had later last year. And it required me to kind of re-evaluate what my life is about. And I didn't want the life where I had to write to my investors and say I had an operation last year. I think everything's going to be fine, but it is a risk factor and I need to tell you about it. But, you know, it's like if you confront that and you actually say, well, that is a fact. It's there and I'm not going to hide from the truth and I'm not going to try and massage the truth for my investors. You know, maybe maybe God or destiny has a better and more

valuable investor venture in store for you. You just have to take that step and find out. And the person who doesn't take that step, who shies away from being brutally honest with themselves, it lives a diminished life, lives a less full life than they could lead. You know, it's not about the outward success. It's about knowing that it's really your life that you're leading and the treasures that you're discovering are your own and only your own? The best footballers in the world, they obviously don't continue playing because they need the money. They love to win. That's why they do it. And they do things they don't like to do. Perhaps it could be speaking with the press and that state, I'm pretty sure they don't want

to speak with more journalists. If they can avoid it, it could also be, you know, dieting, whatever it could be. There is something, you know, traveling to away games, whatever. I can guarantee you for all of us and even for the best footballers, they do things they don't want to do because it is in that bucket, which is to continue to win, to continue to get, to win those championships, you have to feel an element of pain for the light of better words. And I'm curious to hear about how you think about that guy, not necessarily talking about football, but what do you do that you don't like doing to continue to win? in whatever kind of way you want to define winning.

I mean, I find the football analogy very, very interesting. I'm not a close football fan, but I've been close enough to football fans. Before I go there, you know, a friend of mine was a tennis dad, so his son was a very competitive tennis player, and he turns to me, you know, and he says, we're just in a cafe having coffee or something, and he says, you know, Guy, do you know what's more important than winning at tennis? and I say, you know, and I'm thinking of all these other things. And I say, well, I don't know.

And he says, nothing, nothing is more important than winning. So that's about your point with soccer maybe. But I think that if I was talking to a great soccer player, and you know, it's funny because, you know, I spend more time on TikTok than I care to admit to. And I just love watching these videos. I don't know if you do as well of Renaldeino or, or Maradona and Maradona and Ronaldino are so interesting to me because they don't have

particularly aesthetic-looking bodies. When you look at the guy and you say he's an athlete, you know, Maradona is not very tall guy, he's kind of short and stocky. But what he does with the ball is utterly, utterly genius. I mean, who could imagine that somebody could do that? But I think that if I was talking to Ronaldinho or MS or anybody else, I'd say, look, every, you know, you've been very good at winning in soccer and you've been, you know, and soccer's an amazing sport because it's a combination of individual and team skills. It's an amazing combination of team skills. Some sports are all an individual like golf maybe and some sports like rowing.

It's all the team. And then there are sports like soccer, which is an amazing balance. but you know, you talk about winning, and soccer, if you look at the books on infinite and infinite games, soccer is described like chess as being a very clearly well-deliminated finite game. And what I'd want to say to the soccer player is, you know, as you grow older, you'll inevitably not be a part of a soccer team anymore. You know, if you're lucky, you'll be a star and you'll be remembered for the great skills on the pitch. But you need to transition. from playing a finite game where it's all about winning to playing an infinite game.

And I would seek to prepare the soccer player for the ways in which he might do that. I think I see a parallel in my own life that when I was younger, I used to get great pleasure out of setting my sight on a target, whether it's getting a good grade in a particular exam or learning a language or getting into a certain school and then achieving that target. I didn't achieve all the targets, but that was like seeing the game, the game is getting into Harvard Business School, the game is going to Oxford, the game is getting a job for a consulting firm, the game is getting a deal at an investment bank, and then winning at that game. But that becomes very, very empty and hollow after a while, and there has to be more to it than that. And I think that that's even true of people who've won at the game of making vast amounts of money.

and the people who just continue to play the game of making the vast amount of money, I mean, I didn't know too much about him, but I understand this guy, Sumner Redstone, who he built a media conglomerate called Viacom. You know, he was the kind of guy that Warren Buffett said of people like that, that so many people came to the funeral just to remember, just to make sure that they were actually dead. You know, or there was a story of a media. empire in Germany, I'll certainly not remember their names, where it was actually built up by a guy who was actually blind, if I'm not, if I'm not mistaken. And again, he was a genius of what he did.

And he played the game to the nth degree, but he was hated by such a vast proportion of the people that he dealt with. And so at some point, the money is meaningless. And if you're playing it for the sake of the money, if you're playing it for the sake of winning in that narrow sense of like winning a soccer match, then you've kind of like missed something really, really, really important. And I think that that's why, I mean, maybe maybe this is helpful as we think through this. Warren Buffett talked about some guy that he knew that discovered value investing, made a couple of hundred million dollars. He was a guy who was on the beach when Warren Buffett met him, and now he owns the beach. But he's happy on the beach. And so, and Warren Buffett, again,

is very unusual because his artwork is Berkshire Hathaway. The actual highest and best purpose in life is to build a company like Berkshire Hathaway. I think that many people just want, you know, the highest and best purpose is to be a good husband and to be a good father. I was sitting at the Berkshire Hathaway meeting and Chris Davis went past me as a director of Berkshire Hathaway. And I think that I don't know him that well, but I think that he really cares about being a great dad. And he is a really, really phenomenal dad. And that actually, so, you know, the rich man died, how much money did he leave all of it? And interesting enough, the change in perspective of me going through a major operation, being on the other side of it, what regrets that do I have about my life

lived to date? Not that many, but one of them is that I always used to come home at like sort of seven o'clock, which was when dinner time was. Because I spent that extra hour and a half in the office doing everything I could to. And I wish in that last 20 years, I'd just have come home at 5.30. I'd skip that extra hour and a half in the office. And that wouldn't have necessarily made me a better dad, but it would have given me more space to become a better dad than I could have been because I would have been just that little bit more present with our children. So I think that just going back, winning the game, but you need to update your understanding of what the game is. And the game is, if you have a well-defined set of rules for what the game is, like making a lot

of money or winning a chess, then you probably need to broaden your perspective. And then there are people who play the game of life in ways, and they're sorry, I'm just broading it out to sort of think of, you know, great people. You know, so three people who were murdered or his lives were taken away, but I don't think they would have lived their lives any differently. One is Alexei Navalny. Another one is Mahatma Gandhi. A third one is Cicero.

And I think that for those people, they, I mean, Alexei Navalny, there's a great Netflix program on him. And I haven't read the book yet. a biography of his, he lived in a world where he cared more about the opportunity to change the course of Russian history than he did about his own life, you know? And I think that even though he died in natural death, that's true of Nelson Mandela, those people would look at me. So I look at the guy who says, I'm about making the most money possible. And I say, that's not a good game to play. I don't think that that's the most meaningful way to live one's life. I don't want to

be Sumner Redstone the moment before I pass on. But I think that people like Alexei Navalny would look at me and say, he cares about the highest values of human civilization and making sure they continue. I guess what I'm trying to say to you, Stey, is that there's a part of me that says, so rather than look down on that guy that you talk to who maybe has the wrong values and is trying to win a relatively finite game of who dies with the most. money. But my values actually are extremely bourgeois, I think, is what the word would be. I care to have my children educated at good schools and I want to be in nice places and I want to

travel business class and stay in nice hotels and have nice things around. And I think that there's a very valid criticism that people like Alexei Navalny and many others, human rights activists could level at me and say, you're abusing your wealth and your position in society just to live a comfortable life and you need to do more than that. That's an interesting thing. And I apologize to all of them because I think they're probably right. Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors. All right. I want you guys to imagine spending three days in Oslo at the height of the summer. You've got long days of daylight, incredible food, floating saunas on the Oslo Fjord, and every conversation you have is with people who are actually shaping the future. That's what the

Oslo Freedom Forum is. From June 1st through the 3rd, 2026, the Oslo Freedom Forum is entering its 18th year, bringing together activists, technologists, journalists, investors, and builders from all over the world, many of them operating on the front lines of history. This is where you hear firsthand stories from people using Bitcoin to survive currency collapse, using AI to expose human rights abuses, and building technology under censorship and authoritarian pressures. These aren't abstract ideas. These are tools real people are using right now. You'll be in the room with about 2,000 extraordinary individuals, dissidents, founders, philanthropists, policymakers, the kind of people you don't just listen to, but end up having dinner with. Over three days, you'll experience powerful mainstage talks,

hands-on workshops on freedom tech, and financial sovereignty, immersive art installations, and conversations that continue long after the sessions end. And it's all happening in Oslo in June. If this sounds like your kind of room, well, you're in luck because you can attend in person. Standard and patron passes are available at Osloof Freedom Forum.com with patron passes offering deep access, private events, and small group time with the speakers. The Oslo Freedom Forum isn't just a conference. It's a place where ideas meet reality and where the future is being built by people living it. If you run a business, you've probably had the same thought lately.

How do we make AI useful in the real world? Because the upside is huge, but guessing your way into it is a risky move. With NetSuite by Oracle, you can put AI to work today. NetSuite is the number one AI Cloud ERP, trusted by over 43,000 businesses. It pulls your financials, inventory, commerce, HR, and CRM into one unified system. And that connected data is what makes your AI smarter. can automate routine work, surface actionable insights, and help you cut costs while making fast AI-powered decisions with confidence. And now with the NetSuite AI connector, you can use the

AI of your choice to connect directly to your real business data. This isn't some add-on, it's AI built into the system that runs your business. And whether your company does millions or even hundreds of millions, NetSuite helps you stay ahead. If your revenues are at least in the seven figures, get their free business guide, Dymistifying AI, at net suite.com slash study. The guide is free to you at net suite.com slash study. NetSuite.com slash study. When I started my own side business, it suddenly felt like I had to become 10 different people overnight wearing many different hats. Starting something from scratch can feel exciting, but also incredibly overwhelming and lonely. That's why having the right tools matters.

For millions of businesses, that tool is Shopify. Shopify is the commerce platform behind millions of businesses around the world and 10% of all e-commerce in the U.S. from brands just getting started to household names. It gives you everything you need in one place, from inventory to payments to analytics. So you're not juggling a bunch of different platforms. You can build a beautiful online store with hundreds of ready-to-use templates, and Shopify is packed with helpful AI tools that write product descriptions and even enhance your product photography.

Plus, if you ever get stuck, they've got award-winning 24-7 customer support. Start your business today with the industry's best business partner, Shopify, and start hearing sign up for your $1 per month trial today at Shopify.com slash WSB. Go to Shopify.com slash WSB. That's Shopify.com slash WSB. All right, back to the show. It's really important that we live by our values. You mentioned a number of different individuals, very unique, and we would probably say,

and they would probably say they live very aligned with their values. Whenever I have gotten to know you all the past decade and has been absolutely wonderful, I also think that you're on a journey, both figuring out what your values are and also aligning yourself with those values. And also knowing that sometimes life changes and you change. I don't necessarily, like, I was talking about this as a manager before, and I just want to clarify that, not that you necessarily exinuated that, guys, please don't keep me wrong. I don't look down on him for feeling that way in case he did.

I think it's a question of some people, perhaps he lived very much aligned with his values. Perhaps that was his finest mission in life. I don't know him that well. Perhaps it was not to be the richest man in the world. perhaps it was to, you know, provide the best returns for investors. And that's, that is his legacy. That is how he wants to be remembered. And who am I to say? That's not noble for him. I think it's easy for us. And I kind of feel, you know, I'm as guilty as Chad. So if you want to call me a hypocrite, that's, that's perfectly fine. But it's very, it's very easy for us to say, oh, you know, this person

isn't enlightened or isn't spiritual or whatever that might be. And that's only because, you know, that person hasn't achieved X, Y, C, like I have. But then we're back to this idea of, like, who are defining which game we were playing? And to your point before, about Buffett, you know, a lot of people would probably say he's not very enlightened. But I think he's very aligned with his values. He's probably living by his inner scorecard. It's not about the money for him. It's about the game and the game he wants to play.

And I think that's all right. I guess that's what I'm trying to say. Two points that come up for me that I think are valid and relevant. So, you know, one of my worst performance performing investments is a company called Saratage. And at some point, Warren had a 5% stake in the company. And then he arranged he actually had Berkshire Hathaway take over a slug of debt that the Serritsch had. Berkshire Hathaway could have easily, if they'd have wanted to bankrupt to the company,

It would have been better for the Berkshire shareholders, that's for sure. They would have made more money, but that's not the game that Warren Buffett wanted to play. And I think that he's got a sufficiently high reputation that it wouldn't have damaged his reputation too badly or the reputation of Berkshire. And in a way, it was kind of a legitimate thing for the lender to the company to do. This was in the vulture world, it wouldn't have been the worst vulture move that anybody had ever made. It's worth saying that Warren Buffett, I think, plays the game far less aggressively than he could play and probably did play when he was younger when he was doing, for example, merger arbitrage and various other moves that enhanced Berkshire returns, but maybe didn't make him most popular with some people.

So that's one perspective. And then there was another perspective that, yes, if you've not seen it and you probably have, But if a listener hasn't seen it, you ought to go and listen to the podcast with Nikolai Tangan and Chris Hahn, who is a phenomenal investor, one of the smartest guys that I've ever met, who was a classmate of mine at business school. And I think that if Chris was on this call talking to you and me, he would just say, without any apologies, say, listen, I was an immigrant to the UK. and my father was a car mechanic. And I went into huge amounts of debt to go to business school. And the most important thing that I needed to do was get myself economically self-sufficient

and get myself on a path to the solid middle classes, which is not where I came from. And so, well, you guys who had an easier ride have these moral arguments about you know, whether somebody's playing the right kind of game that is suited to his personality. I was just trying to make ends meet. By the time I'd paid off my student debt, and by the time I'd kind of lifted my eyes and realized that I could think about other things, I realized I was really good at this, and I really, really liked to do it. And yeah, I continue to do it.

And it's no more complicated than that. And actually, perhaps, I wouldn't say you're over-complicating it, but perhaps I'm over-complicating it a lot. Well, Guy, you know, many, many investors present this image of having everything figure it out. And you clearly openly shared your struggles in investing and also personal and showing a great deal of vulnerability. Where are you mentally, if I can put it like that? And I don't know if now I'm complicated things. But where are you mentally, whenever you speak about these challenges publicly. Is it, is it something that you already processed? Is it something that you are going through while you're talking about and that's a part of your process to deal with

different problems? Yeah, let me throw a bag over to you, Guy. It's a really interesting question. It's funny because I'm at the house where I come back to it, Jordan Peterson was said, if you want an adventure in life, tell the truth. So I was in a single bedroom in my parents' house not far away from where I am right now, and I'm writing the Betty of the Beast chapter. But I didn't even, you know, that's at the point in my book where I'm just, you know, writing down whatever comes to my mind, doing brain dumps of various different things to create the material that I can then raid for my book. Much of the material didn't make it in the book.

But I'm writing this kind of chapter in D.H. Blair, and I realize at the end of it, I'm doing a brain dump, not a chapter. I'm just doing a brain dump at that point, but the subject matter is my big career mistake and my two year and a half at this bucket shot in New York City. And at the end of it, I realized that I want to put that into my book and that it will probably be the best, the strongest and beginning chapter. And that's the point at which I made a commitment to myself to tell the truth publicly. And that was a beginning of a big adventure for me. And I think that you take a huge risk for doing. doing it, but the rewards are just enormous and you get huge rewards from doing it.

And yes, I've continued to do that. And I remember myself asking your question of Warren Buffett, not about telling the truth about doing the right thing, but it comes to the same thing. And I said, does it become any easier? And he said a little. I think that by telling the truth about my, that career mistake, I strengthened a muscle inside of me that made it easy to tell the truth about other things as I went along. And so that their muscle sort of like is slowly and gradually strengthened such that I can, I remember the first time and it was subsequent to writing the book. And somebody said, how do you know when to sell? And it came up for me that I wanted to, you know, the first answer I wanted to give is some uber rational sort of, you know,

we do a fine analysis of fair value. And when the company comes for me, you know, we do a fine analysis of fair value. And when the company comes within fair value, and I looked at the person and I cast that answer aside and I said a more honest truth, which was, it's really hard. I really don't know. Yes, I would like to say to you that I come up with this careful analysis of intrinsic value and I, and you know, the fact of the matter is a lot of the time I don't fully understand how to go about it and I'm doing the best I can. And, you know, and why? Is there something that happened? to you, that has happened to me a number of times when I've done things like that, which is the only way I can describe it is God smiles at me, meaning that it's not like

it gets showered with love or something like that or get showered with riches, but somehow, and in the terms of the book, Power versus Force by David Hawkins, if things go strong around me and I realize I've stepped into a different reality. But I think that something that it comes up for me is that each time I've done that, it's been difficult for me. And I've had to break through a whole bunch of resistance inside myself. I've had to break through fears. It's kind of like it's stepping into the unknown every time that I've done it. And when I've done it, I feel like, well, now I'm done. That's the last test. I don't have to do that anymore. Now I can sit back and relax and enjoy my life. And a pattern that I'm learning now,

And I wish it wasn't the case, is that life keeps on throwing these challenges at you, unfortunately. Because I can't say that every time I've done that, I mean, just like Warren Buffett said, it becomes a little easier, maybe. The muscle's a little stronger, but not a lot. And it's never fun to do. So when I've broken through that, the incentive is, you know, don't come out with the full truth, hide a little bit of yourself. You don't know how they will react. They don't deserve to know that this is your private life, all of those things. And those things, those forces and voices around me of both inside and outside tell me, you know, for example, talking about my health, you know, various, powerful voices that said, you don't have to talk about this. This is your own private

stuff. And I said, no, I do have to talk about it because they deserve to know and I'm applying the simple rule. So taking that jump every time has been difficult and every time on the other side, there's been a reward that is not kind of instant and obvious, but there has been a reward for doing it. I don't know. So for what it's worth, I'm also helped greatly that I have, I really believe, and I can give you specific examples if you want me to, that I've been greatly strengthened in this by my wife, Laurie,

and her relationship to the truth. And underneath her beautiful soul, and outward beauty, an amazing mother and all sorts of other things, I find her to be an extraordinarily brave and courageous woman who is not afraid of the truth and not afraid to say the truth in all sorts of circumstances that I can share with you. So the fact that she is that way makes it far easier for me to be that way, if you like.

I've also seen that in my children. I have multiple times in my life thought, well, now I've been honest with this and I've seen the rewards. I won't be tested again, you know? And it seems to me, I mean, some of the ways that I've been tested, you know, my career decision to go to D.H. Blair, investment mistakes, or I've had to come clean with my investors. And the reason why I was bringing up Lorry so much, my wife, is that she was, we got married and we went through all sorts of difficulties in our marriage. We don't know if those are the same or greater or not as great as the marriages that other people go through, but Laurie was fine and I'm fine for us to talk about them in the open.

In fact, we think that it's important for people to know. I think that I have more than a successful marriage. I could ask for better, but if people think that that happens easily, it doesn't. It happens through an enormous amount of work. And both Laurie and I, I think, are very proud of our marriage, but we're proud of the work that we've done to make it that marriage. It didn't happen just because we wanted it to. And now there's kind of new challenges related to, you know,

the state of my health, for example, that requires me to get come clean with investors in the world in a way that I didn't expect. and it has its rewards. It has its huge rewards. So my consciousness has expanded. I think I can say that. But it's expanded not because I wanted it to expand, but because I had no choice.

I tried every other option, and every other option didn't work as well, basically. I think it's an interesting idea. The things I'm really proud of that I've done in life, like, you know, succeeded in my marriage, despite, I think, of great difficulties or succeeded in writing a book despite being, you know, for all sorts of reasons why I don't think I was ideally, ideal person to write a book. None of those things felt easy and none of those things felt like they were voluntary. In a way, I felt like I was pushed into it and pushed in,

not by an individual, but by life's circumstances got me into a place where suddenly I was cornered and yes, maybe I took a more courageous way out, but I didn't take that more courageous way out because I woke up and was brave or courageous. I tried every other option first because I really didn't want to be courageous. I didn't want to tell the truth. I didn't want to stand there face up to what I was facing up to, but I realized that that was the only option. And I did that option reluctantly. I think that my point to you and anybody who's still listening at this point is that at least in my case, and all what I'm doing is acting as a witness to my own experience, it doesn't come easily for me and I don't do it

gladly. I do it very, very reluctantly, if you like. And I think that that is probably true of many people who are courageous, who take difficult decisions, or maybe it's just me, and I'm the least vested it. But I think that that should encourage people. If you think, if you faced with a difficult situation, an investment that's gone bad, an investor who's not happy with you, a situation where you feel ashamed, then, you know, I hope that I can be helpful by being a witness to my experience in those circumstances. If you feel like you want to be six feet out of underground and you don't want to be anywhere near what's just happened, I felt that as well. And I've tried every single way to get out of that situation without facing up to the reality.

And I realized that every other single way was to run away, which didn't solve the problem. In my experience, Stig, I hope this is helpful and I'm not rambling. So, you know, we live in Switzerland and there are plenty of beautiful mountains to climb, and there are things called, in Italian it's called a Viaferata. And in German, it's called a Klethechde. I don't know what it is in English, but. It's extremely safe. You have a version of a harness

which allows you to clip yourselves in to these metal guides, which it's impossible to have an accident if you follow some very simple rules about clipping yourself in. But at the end of the day, you're in a place where if you look down, you could fall 500 meters or more.

I mean, you'd fall to your death if you weren't securely clipped in. I've never ever, I mean, I don't know, there are people who say that they love those things, and they get an endorphin high and they get super excited to do it. I've hated it every time I've done it. I never enjoyed doing it. When I'm finished with it, I say I'm glad it's over.

I'm glad I got through. I'm glad I did that high line wire thing. And no, I didn't enjoy it. And so that's the same for me with this kind of truth telling, if you like. But I still think it's a better lie. Nobody has to go on the high line. Nobody has to climb ridiculous places on a Kletstijg. But it seems to me that all of us will be faced with very difficult situations in our lives where we're better off showing up, even though it's not pleasant to show up, you know?

I mean, sorry, because it's higher on my mind. There are phone falls or opportunities to show up. Somebody's had a terrible diagnosis. Somebody's loved one has died, their mother has died. You know, it's not an easy call to make. nobody wants to make that call, but you're so much better if you do make that call. And that seems to me that that's just a part of life. And, you know, somebody that I was at university with, he says to me, well, I just want to be happy. You know, I'm going to do what it takes to minimize pain and to

maximize joy. And it just, that's a really lovely idea. And I hope that most of us get to experience vast spans of our lives when that is true. But it, it, it, It just seems to me that for an individual, it's just universally true. At some point, we're all, it's part of the human condition that will be faced with something, whether there are choices to run away or to do what's meaningful. And you can run away, but then you're leaving a far diminished version of what your life is, or you can do what's meaningful. And that, and my point to you, and I'm sorry if I've belaboring this point,

doing what meaningful is meaningful is not, don't have in your image you, the listener of some courageous hero who finds it easy. I don't think anybody finds it easier. Maybe afterwards people say, oh yeah, that was a cinch. I don't believe it because I've not experienced that in my life, you know?

When Warren Buffett says, he shows up at Simon Brothers, and he says something like, my mother has sewn my name into my underwear, So it's all going to be okay. I mean, he was actually being extraordinarily courageous, and he can say what he likes. He was scared.

His reputation was on the line. His Salibin brother's moment, showing up in Congress and deciding that he wasn't going to pretend about what happened, he was going to tell the truth as it was. It seems so easy in hindsight. But actually, I think that if we could get him talking about it, I don't know, he's a different personality to me.

You know, he's a different generation. Our generation are full of psychotherapists and feelings and examining your feelings. And probably you couldn't get him to say more than, yeah. My mother had sewn my name into my underwear, so it was going to be okay. Come on, Warren, you were scared. And probably he'd just say, he'd just brush it over. But I'm sure that he had the same feeling of butterflies of his stomach. I'm convinced of it.

But we'll probably never find out. No, we probably never well. And I also like that you brought up this point here about Buffett. I think a lot of us, myself included, as you'd say, are looking at different parts of his life and saying, oh, like, how can you do this? How can he say that? And I think it goes back to our previous conversation about, yeah, he made mistakes. And he talked about this here at the Q&A at the last year. He was meeting where there are different things.

He wasn't specific about some of the mistakes he made. but he certainly said that he made mistakes, but also that's the way it is. And I think, you know, we are evaluating a man who's born in 1930 based on 2025 standards and the upbringing that we have and the thing we have experienced and the values that we have. And so it's like they're not the same. It's not a one-on-one thing to say that's not been a successful life. And this is not my way of saying that that is success. It goes back to this point about what is successful for that person. and whether they're aligned with their values. And it sort of like takes me to another thing I wanted to talk to you about Guy,

because I've talked to you in the past about, you know, this idea of being wealthy or not being wealthy in seconds. And as we grow older, we start to think differently about, well, everything, I guess. To the point you had before about it's a little bit easier to do the right thing as you grow older. There's probably an element of experience and perhaps even wisdom in that. Also, that you at a certain age, you just don't know what the right thing is. You haven't had a good feedback loop. And you start to think about time differently as you grow older.

You think about minimizing regrets or at least some type of regrets. But also being very frank about what is right to do at one age isn't necessarily the right to do in another age, even though you don't need to regret what you did whenever you're 25 because life was just different whenever you were 25. But, you know, one of the things that I've increasingly starting to think about as similar to you, perhaps, Guy, you know, having friends on many different continents, traveling and making decisions is going to sound very transactional, that's not my intention. But there are friendships where you want to cross the ocean to see that person.

And then there are probably good people who would show up at your doorstep, but where you're like, no, because I also have to do other things. And so that leads me to this question and your reflections of, how do you think about which friendships to invest in, and how do you invest in those friendships? Yeah, it's a good question, obviously, and in a way it hits hard for me, because I don't think that I've been,

maybe none of us are conscious about it. and it kind of, so it kind of hits me in the gut because I don't think I've been very optimal about it either. You know, and so you've got me kind of in a way trying to think it through on the fly, if you like. So one of the things that comes up from me as you say that is that I find it interesting that there are friendships that I've had at different parts of my life that were deep and very meaningful, but they have a natural lifespan to them. And so not every friendship has to have the same intensity, the same depth of exchange, all at all points in one's life. So that's one thing to be said. I think that I have friends from my time at school and my time at university where we don't have as much as common in common now as I would like.

But I hold them dear to my heart because they are people. who shared a certain part of my life with me and who knew what I was at the time. And so they knew what I was like then. And so even if that's not something I want to invest a lot of time in, I hold them dear. And it's interesting for me that I think that Warren has many people like that in his life. And he continues to invite them to Berkshire and finds them very, it finds that he's really happy when they show up, even though he doesn't necessarily meet with them and doesn't have a lot of time for them. And I know about that because I've been a regular at Debbie Bessani's events, and I think that many, there are a number of people at

at Debbie Bersatix events, which have been very meaningful for Warren Buffett at certain points in his life, but he doesn't have time for them today. So I think that one of the first things that comes up for me is to honor that. I also think of another cut kind of friend, And I'm thinking specifically of somebody, a couple that I met in Toronto. Sorry, I met them in Oxford. They now live in Toronto where our interactions are intermittent and are not regular at all. But somehow when we talk, we pick off from where we left off. And he is a lawyer.

They're both lawyers, actually. They have three wonderful children. and I've been like a child in their household, and I could sort of like try and analyze and go through with you why it is that that friendship exists, but they're not family in a family, in a biological sense, but they feel like family to me in so many ways. And I feel no obligation to,

and they don't feel any obligation to kind of hang out on a regular basis. I'm seeing all these categories of friendships. I also see that friendships can change over time or change life circumstances reveal something about a friendship that you didn't see before. And I can say that when you go through life change yourself, some people who I didn't know would turn out to be such good friends. And some people that I thought were very good friends

were maybe less good friends. So there's a new light that's shone on it. I think the bottom line is that clearly friendship is one of the most important things in life. It's a complex phenomenon. There are many things that go on in a friendship. And I maybe think of the different friendships in my life as a bit of a garden. And there's some very strong oak trees. There are forgotten flowers.

There's various different species in the garden. And every now and then I realized I didn't fully understand what was in the garden. that's just a very long way of saying nothing perhaps. I don't have any definitive answers, if you like. I think that there's a poem that somebody wrote about love, which comes out in the same way, where the poet or the character in the poem just says, don't talk to me about love.

It's like, it's a complex thing. It's too complex for any individual to analyze, and everybody sees it differently. It's interesting because this poem, I wish you can bring it up. I'll have to ask CHAPT or similar, is that in the poem, the character becomes quite angry about being asked the question, you know, and maybe I'll come up with, they'll send it to you if I find it.

I don't know if I, have I enlightened you in any way, shape or form sting? No, I love the way that you think about this guy and that, and to your point, I don't think everyone solved it, or at least I haven't seen anyone solve it. And it's one of those things where as you grow older, you learn that the only thing that's constant, is change. And one of the things that my wife and I talk a lot about with the relationships we have in life is that very often those relationships are there for a reason, a season, or a lifetime. And most things are not there for a lifetime. And that's okay, too. And it's not, I think probably because I'm sentimental as a default, it sometimes makes me

sad that some of my relationships are not there anymore. But I think I'm more at peace with that than I used to because there were a reason why we're close to some point in time. And there's a reason why we're not anymore. And that's not because there's a falling out or, you know, anyone is mad. It's like we were, you know, some of the friends that I had in Beck University, there was, you know, mainly because we like watching the same football and drinking the same beer and party together, you know, and that was, that, it's not like, I don't expect to lie on my deathbed and be like, oh, that was a deep regret. I didn't, you know, kept in touch with them. But I also don't think I'm going to lie in my deathbed and be like, oh, you shouldn't have done that. You should

have, you should have started reading one piece much younger. I probably should have, but we had fun those nights, you know, and there was a reason for that. And that's wonderful. And then you have some relationships that are sort of like eps and flows. And that's wonderful too. Sometimes there are, again, reason for why those were eps and flows. And sometimes you experience different things. It might because you have kids or perhaps there's a parent that's passing at the same. Whatever, it might be a ton of different reasons why at some point in time that there are

different things sort of like ties you together. And then sometimes it's just location, you know, like I know you talk here with me, even on the show, I think it was on value X and, you know, that started because you moved to Zurich and there was a different, different phase in your life and you wanted to say yes to different things. In New York City at a certain point, I'd met a guy who, I don't know exactly why we became friends, but he helped me to explore the dark underbelly of New York Nightlife. And so he had an apartment on Madison and 67th Street, which is just like just north of Midtown, really incredible place to have an apartment with some really beautiful restaurants around.

And I, for a period of, I don't know, maybe it was a six months to a year, was a regular. And at restaurants that he would go to parties at his place, inevitably at like 11, 30, 12 at night would end up. being taken by some lima zine to some nightclub that I never even heard of, but there were some of the most beautiful, gorgeous people around. And I, within a very short period of time, had a most incredible set of friends. I mean, this was the most colorful set of friends I had in New York. And then at some point, I don't know what changed, but I was like, I didn't want to be in that New York nightlife. And all of those friends disappeared. Like, there were people who I only saw at the nightclubs at night and I only saw at the restaurants. And I don't know if they, I don't know if

they were ghosts. I don't know if they actually existed outside of that little world. And so that's an example. And I loved those people. I adored them and I had a great time with them and they showed me things I never would have seen before and it just disappeared. And I think that's fine, you know? So I don't know if that is helpful to you. I can, I can just one other. This is more of less of an anecdote and more of a kind of a wisdom bump that I've had recently is that, I mean, my health experience, I didn't know, for some reason, I was able to see far more clearly the motivations of some people, why they were in my life. And one thing that I, so one thing I noticed was people who are narcissists, suddenly I became far more clear about what the

narcissistic personality type is and how toxic it can be for you. And that doesn't mean you shouldn't have a narcissist in your life or multiple narcissists, but I learned that it can be toxic either for you or the people around you. And I think I see that now and have a better handle on perhaps how to deal with it. I also realized how many people were envious of me and envious of what I had. And it became starkly clear to me how negative in the motion is envy can be and how necessary it is to not have envious people in your life. And what the envious people don't realize is that you may see somebody who you envy, but you don't know what else is going on in their life. You don't know what disease they have. You don't know how happy their marriages. You don't remember what difficulties they had

to get to that point or what difficulties they have later in your life. And so, I've been grown particularly sensitive to the people that I've know had envy of me, and I don't want to... That doesn't mean that I have to delete them, but I just want to not have them in the Mercury orbit if I'm the Sun or the Venus orbit. I want them to be in the Jupiter or Saturn or Uranus orbit. They can be there, but not so close. And another thing that I've really noticed is,

first of all, you should want the people in your life to be living them, most joyful life, so long as they're not harming other people. So the corollary of not being envious and not having envious people in your life is you should wish, certainly for your friends, but any human, any life being on the planet, the most joy that they can possibly have, because you don't know how that's going to change. And I think that I'm, I've been thinking a lot about this king croesus who asked if, one of his subjects, if he was happy, if he lived a happy life and his subject says, well, we don't know that yet because we haven't gone to the day of your death.

So I don't know if that's helpful to bring you to the question that you're about to ask or have I led you further astray down the garden path. Can I say both, guys? No, there was wonderful. Thank you for telling those anecdotes. You know, I sort of feel like I am imposing a bit on you here what I value and then assume that you value the same, which shouldn't be the case. One thing I absolutely love is to have thoughtful conversations. I don't necessarily think I'm thoughtful, but I can then speak with people

who are more thoughtful than me. And so I find that, you know, we talked here before about this idea of, you know, crossing the ocean to meet friends. And, you know, some of the best conversation that I have, I should probably preface to say, except not whenever it comes to you, guy, but sometimes conversations that are, you know, you go from two to three and it's on Zoom and then it's on to the next meeting, like those meetings are often not the best meetings. That could be an operational reason why you have that and then that's all good and well. And, you know, really the best conversations I have is whenever I can spend consecutive days with a really good friend, and we can just pick up where we left. Even it might be a year or two ago

since we last met. So you have those conversations that might on and off last 50 hours, if you're lucky. Most often because we're all busy, those compartments would be shorter. It might be 10 hours. It might be 20 hours. But you have those ongoing discussions about everything in life. Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors. No, it's not your imagination. are ramping up, and customers now expect proof of security just to do business. That's why VANTA is a game changer. VANTA automates your compliance process and brings compliance, risk, and customer trust together on one AI-powered platform. So whether you're prepping for a SOC 2 or running an enterprise GRC program, VANTA keeps you secure and keeps your deals moving.

Instead of chasing spreadsheets and screenshots, VANTA gives you continuous automation across more than 35 security and privacy frameworks. Companies like Ramp and Ryder spend 82% less time on audits with Vantta. That's not just faster compliance, it's more time for growth. If I were running a startup or scaling a team today, this is exactly the type of platform I'd want in place. Get started at vanta.com slash billionaires. That's vanta.com slash billionaires. Ever wanted to explore the world of online trading, but haven't dared try? The futures market is more active now than ever before, and Plus 500 futures is the perfect place to start. Plus 500 gives you access to a wide range of instruments, the S&B 500, NASDAQ, Bitcoin, gas, and much more.

Explore equity indices, energy, metals, 4X, crypto, and beyond. With a simple and intuitive platform, you can trade from anywhere, right from. from your phone. Deposit with a minimum of $100 and experience the fast, accessible futures trading you've been waiting for. See a trading opportunity. You'll be able to trade it in just two clicks once your account is open. Not sure if you're ready, not a problem. Plus 500 gives you an unlimited, risk-free demo account with charts and analytic tools for you to practice on. With over 20 years of experience, Plus 500 is your gateway to the markets. Visit Plus to learn more. Trading in futures involves risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone. Not all

applicants will qualify. Plus 500, it's trading with a plus. Billion dollar investors don't typically park their cash in high-yield savings accounts. Instead, they often use one of the premier passive income strategies for institutional investors, private credit. Now, the same passive income strategy is available to investors of all sizes thanks to the Fundrise income fund, which has more than $600 million invested in a 7.97% distribution rate. With traditional savings yields falling, it's no wonder private credit has grown to be a trillion dollar asset class in the last few years. Visit fundrise.com slash WSB to invest in the Fundrise income fund in just minutes. The fund's total return in 2025 was 8%, and the average annual total return since inception is 7.8%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results, current distribution rate as of 1231, 2025. Carefully consider the investment material before investing, including objectives, risks, charges, and expenses. This and other information can be found in the income fund fund's prospectus at fundrise.com slash income. This is a paid advertisement. All right. Back to the show. And so my question, and again, I'm sort of like feel like I'm imposing this on you guys, how do you facilitate the most thoughtful conversations and which conversations do you

most enjoy having? Yeah, again, it's such interesting questions. And why is it an interesting question? Because to answer that question is to live one's life better. And I've not asked that question of myself. I've never heard that question asked of me in that way, and so I really appreciate the question. And the listener and what you're doing, Stig, is a beautiful conversation. That's a natural curiosity for you.

You know, you're asking that question of yourself. And now you get me to ask that question of myself, and I never formulated in that way. But I do have ideas. One of the reasons why, I mean, I've really, someday I'll get even more clarity on the way my relationship with my wife, my wife works because she's not into those kinds of things. She's like, you know, I need to go and make dinner for the children. So I'll leave you, you know, if she was in this room, she'd say, you know what, Gyn Stig, you continue to explore the nature of reality. I'm going to make dinner for the

children, see you in a couple of hours, you know. When we have dinner parties with Jeffersonian dinners, She enjoys it tremendously, and at some point she's had enough, and she's like she gets something and goes to the kitchen. And I say, can we help? And she says, no, I really want to leave you at the table doing what you're doing. By contrast, my wife can dance the night away, you know? And so, you know, different people have different capacities for different things. And I want to put to you, I see it in our three children, the personality that wants to explore questions of the existence and reality in the universe and is one personality type, but it's not the only personality type.

And if you're not that personality type, I have plenty of people in my family are like that, and they have a very important contribution to make. It's like we don't want to live just in a world of the one. I would not have three healthy, successful children if I didn't have the yin and the yang of me who wants to explore everything, in an intellectual way, and my wife who has, you know, she has far less patience for it. She doesn't have no patience for it, but she wants to see a practical outcome at the end of

the day, which I think is very, very valuable. I think that there are another place where I would go is that some people, they don't realize they have it, but they, their landmines of one kind or another inside their mental landscape that they are defending against. And they don't perhaps realize that they're defending against. But you discover them pretty quick, because when they go there, when you go there, they get argumentative and they get difficult or they get defensive or they don't want to bring up that particular topic. And it's not fun being around people like that. Because if you're, because it's fun to explore, it's not fun to come up against somebody's defenses. I don't particularly like dinner parties where there's a group of people

there is say don't bring up politics, religion, or those are the only things to talk about in a way. And I think that what I'm trying to say to you is an answer to your question is, unless they're your parents or family members or friends from a part of your life that you treasure and hold dear, and you want to help them explore those defenses and they have some openness to exploring those defenses that's kind of like, they're not going to make good conversation partners, if you like. And I find myself disappointed. I've been disappointed in some very, very smart interlocutors when I realize that there are places where they just won't go. And I don't have the right to tell them to go there. But if they're not going to go there, so if I have somebody,

I'd like to believe, I think that my views on Israel are very, very clear, I'd like to believe that there's somebody who's very, very different viewpoints to mine, but so long as we're both willing to explore in our assumptions and question each other's assumptions without insisting that the conversation gets to a certain conclusion where I'm right and there wrong or the other way around, I could have even interesting conversations about that. But now I'm really kind of floating around the ether in the stratosphere and I need to bring this down to earth for your listeners and for myself, I guess. And so here are some basic rules that I think contribute to valuable conversations. One is to examine another person's or to when another person

reveals an attitude, an opinion, a thought, to ask the question, that's really, rather engage with the thought, the attitude, the opinion, you engage with the process by which they came to that attitude, thought of opinion. And this is I'm picking straight up from a book by David Bricks called, I think, to know a person. And so the extremely productive question, shall ask, that's really interesting. How did you come to that viewpoint? How did you come to think that ABCD, whether you agree with it or disagree with it? I think a few other sort of like navigational rules are I try to treat what the other person tells me is confidential, unless I get permission to share that engages them in ability to want to share. I try to never to tell people

what to do. I think that when people get told what to do, they become defensive, even subconsciously defensive. So if they know they're in the presence of somebody who is never going to do that, then that makes it easy for them to go to that kind of sharing place where they can reveal their vulnerabilities, if you like. And, you know, there's simply, you know, rather than telling them what to do, and say, wow, I think that if I was in your circumstances, here's what I would do. You can do that. We don't say, oh, my advice to you is ABC, because that's very egotistical on the one in my case in that example to even think to know what they would do in those circumstances.

And it puts them on the defensive. The last thing I would say is that there are certain formats that work extremely well. So obviously, you need time. but I've, and I can talk about it a little bit, I've just fallen in love with the Jeffersonian dinner format that I try to have as many of them as possible wherever I can because it's just so much fun. I conduct my meetings with investors when I have an investor dinner. I conduct those dinners in a modified Jeffersonian format because I like it so much. So those are some of the things that I do. But I think that I go back to the first question, which is, is this person really,

a growth mindset person who's open to explore whatever comes up with courage and to examine it with me, or am I going to run into minefields and defenses, which is going to make the landscape difficult for that kind of exploratory and open conversation? To me, you are a very wise person, and I'm kind of curious to hear how you achieve wisdom, how much of that is reading, how much of that is interacting with other people, and how do you achieve wisdom through meaningful conversations. This is very kind of you to call me wise. Even if it's true, which part of me wants to doubt,

even though I'm flattered by you saying that, I'd rather be, you know, so in the Wagner opera, it's the third opera is called Siegfried. You've got the young and powerful idiot. The guy is, Siegfried is very, very strong. He fashions his sword, his own sword, and he follows the bird song to his call to adventure. But he's got no life experience. And the tragedy in the Wagner-Ropr-Sigfried is that he dies because he doesn't figure out.

He doesn't get wise fast enough, if you like. But my point to you is that I'd rather be young and unwise than old and wise, because if you're young and unwise, you have your whole life ahead of you. you, whereas if you're old and wise, you have more of your life behind you in a way that's part of how you gain wisdom. So I don't think that, you know, this friend who lives in Toronto, I guess there's no problem mentioning his name. His name's Arthur Fish. His wife is called Bonnie. They're wonderful people. A long time ago, he said to me, he just said, the unexamined life is not worth living. And I think that's a quote from Socrates. So I think that the beginning of wisdom is to be

willing to examine your life. And I don't think I've been particularly good at it. I think that if I'd have been good at it, I'd have been an essayist like George Orwell or William Hazlett or E.B. White. And I really envy those people because I think that those people have far greater opportunities for growing their wisdom. Montaigne is one of the first essayists or bacon in the English language. So, but you've got to, you've got to certainly examine your life. You've got to examine, you know, look inside and examine what's going on and courageously examine what's going on. I think that maybe is the beginning of wisdom and, you know, and if you want to do that, then you're not, you've not, what's so tragic and so difficult about watching the Seafried opera is that,

and I don't remember, I have the first act clear in my mind. He fashions the thought of the sword and he's a, he's a, he's a, he's a, an orphan being brought up by a stranger and he breaks free of that limited environment. If I remember correctly, he just basically walks into a hornet's nest and dies. And by the way, the music of Secreux funeral in the Wagner Opera Stig is, I don't know if you like music, but it's one of the most phenomenal pieces of music you've ever heard. And it sort of like it emphasizes the tragedy. And you don't want to be a fool like Siegfried. Do you want to start getting learning and getting smart about what the games are being played around you and understand what it is?

I was talking to my mother last night and I was expressing to how I regret over when I was at business school, I didn't take it seriously and I didn't take myself seriously. And I just wish if I could have my life that time back, I didn't have the wisdom. I was like a young Sinkfried, if somebody could have come to me and said, not only you're not taking your life seriously, you're not taking yourself seriously, and that's a great waste and a shame, and you should do better for yourself. That would have been very, very nice. I think that this idea of curiosity about how the world really works, and so it's not reading for the sake of reading. It's reading for the sake of, I'm trying to understand how the world really works. And realizing, having the honesty to realize I actually don't have a good understanding of how the world really works. How am I going to find out more? So it's reading with purpose, if you like, not with not just like reading for the sake of reading. I think that I would say that I think that in many ways my learning has accelerated with the advent of AI because I now can have these great conversations with artificial intelligence.

and I can say, you know, like I've wrote up, Hazlitt. So one of the prompts that I use on chat GPD is I will run the posts that I want to put on X through chat GPT. And I say, please look at this post and correct it for grammar and for spelling and for clarity. And then I say, please append suggestions for improvement, specifically make the post sound a little bit more like George Orwell. you know, because I'm very, who would not be impressed with how George Orwell wrote? And then today, earlier today, so I don't know if this is too much detail, but Chantal tells me at like 1130 that I've got the podcast with you,

and the only window I have to go and do my workout is, sort of like from 12 to 2, which is why I arrived slightly late to this. But I was asking, having done a post on Twitter, and having asked chat GPT to give me synonyms for words and like better ways of saying and a way that was, so my language starts off with too many words. And actually I can prune a lot of words. I'm a big fan of Ernest Hemingway who also wanted to write in short, clear sentences. And so then I asked chat GPT, who can I learn from to write better?

And it came up with some great, great examples. And so why is this relevant to the acquisition of wisdom? Because I think, you know, saying to chat GPT, hey, I really don't want to be an idiot like Siegfried was. And I want to read works of literature that helped me to understand people's true motivations that are often hidden. What can you give me to read? You know, and it would come up, I imagine.

one of the works it would come up with, not just because I've talked about it, is war and peace, but it would come up with other works. So here's the point. We thought that privacy was phone companies not hearing our phone conversations. But actually, it turns out that privacy is about a lot more than that. It's about all this metadata.

When did you make the phone call? From where did you make the phone call? How many times did you call the person? You know, that has got no content in it. But those patterns are an extremely valuable for understanding what somebody is doing and when. I just read the other day or I heard somebody say that if a teenage girl deletes a bunch of photographs from any social media that can detect it, that's a great time. She's clearly not happy with her image. And that's a good time to advertise some beauty products to her.

So that's kind of the idea of metadata. What's my point? The reading and the exposition of wisdom is greatly enhanced by not just reading, you know, Francis Bacon's essays or Leil Tolstoy or George Orwell. It's about having somebody say, here's why you want to read George Orwell, here's why you want to read Leal Tolstoy, here's what you're going to learn. Well, here's the kind of, if you're curious about this, read War and Peace. If you're curious about that. So, you're curious about that. So you're kind of primed in a certain way and something that I, different paths in life, I don't exist in a university environment, but one of the things I think you gain in a university environment

is that meta-knowledge, how to go about acquiring the knowledge. And so I think that my ability to acquire wisdom is actually accelerated in the last year because I'm using multiple conversations with these LLMs, where if I'm reading a book, I then, you know, you know, But while I'm reading the book, I go and have a conversation with the LLM about what I'm reading. You know, I read the Canterbury Tales, like the Knight's Tale, who are these characters? How did, why did Chaucer choose those characters? So that's already fascinating. I leave you with one last thought.

So I decided I need to read one novel in Spanish. And I haven't read any novels in Spanish yet. I've read bits and pieces. You know, as you know, Stig, my wife has grew up in Mexico. Spanish is a language I hear a lot in my family. Because I had this operation, actually, my capacity to pronounce foreign languages has atrophied a little bit. And so I've decided that one of the ways to get it back is to read in that language.

So I had to select a book. And of course, the great work of literature and Spanish literature is Don Quixote de la Mancha. And so I'm reading the introduction to the English version by Harold Bloom. and he names Chervantes, who wrote Don Quixote, is an equal to Shakespeare in his literary output, and there's been no equal sense. Shakespeare and Chivanties are the two greatest creators of fictional works. He's written about Shakespeare and the creation of the human.

We would not be the people we are today if Shakespeare's work didn't exist. I can get into that if he want to dive into it. Anyway, I'm reading Don Quixote, which is an enormously satirical work, but I'm finding so many aspects of people that I know in this Don Quixote character, which is, it's so beautiful because, and I'm providing the listener with meta knowledge about Don Quixote right now, because it might make them want to read it. The guy clearly loves the character. Chivant has loved us the character that he's created, while at the same time making fun of the character that he's created, if that's that. make sense. He's lovingly making fun of him. And lovingly making fun of him, he's actually holding up a mirror to so much of what we see in the world, which is just, he spends a whole week in the very beginning of the book, and I'm only at the very beginning. Don Quixote spends a whole week trying to figure out the right name for his horse, Rosinante.

You know, and I was thinking, how many times do people spend a lot of time deciding on the name of something or on something which kind of involves their ego and they, you know, think it's important. Anyway, so I was able to start reading Don Quixote and start having a real relationship to the text because I'm constantly in conversation with the large language models that basically instantly bring up stuff that's relevant to the thoughts that I'm having. So that is a very long and discursive answer, a lot of sound and fury signifying nothing. But directed curiosity. So you require wisdom, not by being curious, for the sake of being curious, not by reading for the sake of reading, not for having conversations

for the sake of having conversations, but directed curiosity trying to answer questions that are in your mind and trying to find a path to them, if that makes sense. That totally makes sense, Guy. And I wanted to talk a bit more about what you alluded to here earlier about facilitating conversations and meeting people with different opinion. You know, some of the best, but perhaps also some of the worst conversations that you have is with people who see the world different than you. So we're having this conversation. There are a few things that I would say I probably see a little bit different than you.

That makes me excited. It makes me curious. It makes me want to explore more things together with you. and not in a way of I'm right, you're wrong type way, but just like, oh, like, understanding where you are coming from and what kind of experiences that has led you to having that opinion. And I think that's a wonderful journey. Now, some of the other discussions you have leaves you not curious, but basically leaves you cold.

And that person also has a different opinion than you, but some people leave you with that positive energy and then other people leave you without that positive energy. positive energy, even though perhaps they've said the same thing. Are you consciously looking for people to challenge your worldview? And if you do, how do you engage with them to win together for the lack of better words? So like studying and enhancing this Jeffersonian format for conversation, I ran across the parliamentary rules of order. It is just a fascinating area of knowledge. So there's an American work called, I think it's called Roberts Rules of Order. And actually in the English version, and I don't remember the name,

it's actually written into the parliamentary rules and procedures. And so, and the question becomes, how does an assembly, and you know, you can start with two, but you can go as large as 600 people, conduct its business. How do you go about achieving something where you've got, plenty of voices in the room and different opinions in the room, obviously. And before I go there, just, so this is something that goes deep into the roots of Western civilization going back at least a couple of thousands of years, if not more.

So how do we achieve things as a group? And we know what an authoritarian system looks like. In authoritarian, there's a leader, there's a general, there's somebody, and basically, we need to follow their orders and they can engage in some degree of consultation or not, but ultimately they decide

and we follow. And then a deliberative assembly is very, very different to that. Deliberative assembly comes to a problem that needs to be solved without some kind of pre-conclusion

as to how it's going to show up. So deliberative assemblies have rules about how they do that. So just say, here are some basic rules, which is just fascinating. So one is every person has the right to speak. So, you know, in my Jeffersonian meals, if somebody's not speaking, I will ask them to

speak because the person who feels like they have the least to contribute often has the most to contribute. So first of all, you know, don't filibuster is what it comes down to in a conversation between two people. filibuster is when you continue to speak despite the other person have something they want to say. A conversation happens when

in podcasts I resort to the idea of saying I'm about to hand the mic over to you even though this is not a physical mind that I'm holding over but there's got to be balance in the ways in which two people are speaking to each other and online now on YouTube you can see plenty of debates where one person is filibustering another person

They're not allowing the other person to speak to say what they want to say. And there are various ways of doing it. And that is unparliamentary behavior. That doesn't facilitate conversation. And if you're around somebody who filibusters, it's a pain and it's a drag and it's a nightmare. Another basic role, and it's surprising to me how many people don't understand this, is you completely refrain from ad homonym attacks, meaning that you never, never attack. the integrity of the person, you always attack the integrity of their ideas. So you separate the

individual from the ideas. And, you know, in the British Parliament, they have various forms to help that to happen. So you never referred to somebody who's spoken into a debate. You never refer to them by name. You refer to them by referring to their constituency. So you can say the right honorable member from XYZ constituency. Or you can just say my right honorable friend, but you don't see, I disagree with my right honorable friend. You don't say I disagree with Guy Speer over there with a beard. So you're trying to create a situation where the ideas are attacked and not the individual. And that goes even further. Parliamentary conduct requires somebody to not accuse somebody of lying, even though that's what they think they're what they're doing.

You say, I can't remember the formula, but there's formulas for doing, where you don't say the right honorable member from Richmond is lying. You say, you know, he may have inadvertently misspoken, you say. Those are all ways of saying, I respect you as an individual, even though I disagree fundamentally with your ideas. So all of that facilitates an abstraction away from the the personalities and into what you really want to agree or disagree with. I think that if you get those things going in a conversation, it becomes easier and easier for me to talk to you, Stig, about something that come from the opposite sides of the spectrum and constantly reassure the person.

We're in the same room. I respect you as a human being. I respect the right to your own opinion. I respect your right to speak your own opinion. but I just agree vehemently with your ideas. Another very important point when you look at this sort of careful management of the environment in which ideas get discussed. If an individual feels like either their ideas or their personhood or their integrity

is being put under attack in some way, then there's the right of reply. So the worst thing that you can do in a deliberative discussion, which can just be between two people. You know, if I say, for example, I love your ideas, but they suffer from the misfortune of being wrong, you know, everybody in the room needs to understand that when you do that,

Stig has the right of reply. You can't go on for too long without giving Sting the right to correct the records. And if you have a conversation with somebody feels like they have not been given the right to correct the records, to reframe what they've said, to say it more accurately, it becomes unfair, if you like, and people don't like unfair. And I think that it's possible to have discussions. And I would say that it goes to the very, very

core of our Western civilization, the reason why we've succeeded so well for the last 500 years in the West is we've found the way to bring people with very different opinions into a room and to have them talk it out, basically. And this started happening in the 12th century. You had disputations on various different topics where they would, the king or the count or the leading power and the was curious to get the answer to the question and they would get two experts.

But there would be rules as to how that disputation would go. So those are some of the things that are really, very, very basic. And actually, I really appreciate you giving me the opportunity. to talk about it here because I think that it's a subject to be taught at school, actually. We should all graduate school with knowing these things. And it's an implicit in our civilization, but in increasingly, we kind of lose touch with it. And when we lose touch with it, we lose the capacity to access the kind of debate that we want to have. And it would be nice to have it back. I mean, you know, something happened on the subjects, and I don't know if you're going to the subjects,

I vehement in my opinions about Israel and who's right or wrong there, as you may have noticed in my Twitter account, and we can talk about it if you like, but there was a conversation recently between this famous, sort of like TV hosts, Pierce Morgan and a lawyer called Natasha Hausdorff, and Pierce Morgan, even though he was the host of the show, I feel filibustered. Natasha, didn't allow her to answer the questions that he posed to her. And the way, you know, a lot of people cried out Pierce Morgan's an anti-Semite. And what I would have said is, you don't need to go there. He was just not gentlemanly. He was not, he did not conduct himself in the interview according to the rules of parliamentary behavior. He made assertions of Natasha

Hausdorff in that case. And he didn't allow her the right of reply. And when he's you inadvertently make an ad hominid attack, if you inadvertently accuse somebody of being misrepresenting the truth or lying, then you need to give them the right of reply. And so if you follow those rules, it should be possible to have somebody in the room who fundamentally, you disagree in fundamental issues in the most profound way, but you still accept them in the same room. That's actually what a parliament's about. It's a flat organization. You're all equals. You all have an equal right to be here, there, you all have the right to say your peace, you all have the right to be heard, uninterrupted, and every time somebody speaks in a room like that, and even if's just two

people or more people, opinions slowly and gradually shift, and we get progress. And, you know, the hive mind, in many cases, that's what gives the solution. So, I don't know, I've rambled a little bit, but it's something that's dear to my heart, actually. I don't know if I'm answering directly your question. No, I definitely think that you, that you are. And to your point, Guy, about we need time. Like, that's one of the things I love with the podcast format that you do have the time to talk about, like, there are so many important things in the world that doesn't, you just can't put in 160 characters, to put it mildly. And understanding where that person is coming from, I think if it's done well, it's empowering for both parties. But also to your point,

you need to agree on those rules beforehand. So otherwise, they, obviously, they don't work. It's like playing football. And then one team, you know, has 11 players and the other one's like, no, we're just going to put in as many players as we want. Because we make the rules. And that's, that's obviously not what you want to have happened. I wanted to talk to you about another related topic guy. And it's, I should probably say where I'm coming from as I'm talking about this. I come from this place of, of admiring your willingness to help others. I think in that sense, you're very much a role model for us in the value investing community. And I can't help but to digress a bit here. And I'm talking about you and I'm talking about everyone else whenever I'm,

I'm digressing a bit here. But one of the interesting things that I found coming from, a normal, I don't know, you shouldn't say normal. That's kind of like a loaded word. But I come from a very typical middle class Danish family. And so I didn't know wealthy people growing up. It was not before I went to business school. I had like met people would have what probably other people would call rich, or I would call rich for that matter. But anyways, I think one of the, one of the interesting things I've realized from being around wealthier people. And here I'm not necessarily talking about wealthy people in business school because in that age of our life, we were just all trying to figure out life and who we are. And so, but once we grow up and we're adults,

one of the things I found interesting about being around wealthy people is that they show you who they are because money tends to magnify who you are. And if you're a jerk, then you're going to be a jerk with money. And then you're going to do different things because now you're a jerk. If you're a wonderful person and now you have a bit of money, you do wonderful things for other people because you can. And that's because that's who you are. So I think that's sort of like my premise going to this here.

But, you know, I know you guy that whenever you meet people, you always come from this wonderful place and wanting to help that individual, no matter, you know, what the circumstances are. You're there to help, you're there to provide service. And I'm curious to hear how you think about this next part, because you might attend a conference or a gathering of wealthy, very wealthy individuals. Let's say a young guy who wants to set up his own fund. I would imagine that over the years, quite a few young budding managers have been, as managers

have been approaching you to help them set up a fund or whatever it might be. and the person might not have a high net worth right now on paper, but you also know the human capital is probably 50 million euros easily. But you can also help them to get to 50 million or 100 million faster if you really do whatever you can to help them. But then you could also spend that time of energy on helping other people with zero in net worth, but a different type of net worth, perhaps with the human capital, that's 10,000 euros, whatever it might be. This is not my way of saying we shouldn't help

young asset managers who have a lot of human capital ahead of them, even though they might have a very low net worth on paper. We should then instead buy food and for the poorest globally. I'm not coming from a place of guilt, as I'm saying this. I'm more coming from a place of thinking about opportunity cost. And I'm inclined to say, who's the most deserving of your help. I think, I think that's probably come, that sounds very negative whenever I say deserving, but how do you, how do you figure out how you can best be of service? Yeah, I mean, I don't think that I'm very, monish has said to me personally a number of times, you're just not good enough at saying no. So maybe that's part of it. But I know what it's like.

It doesn't feel long ago to me that I was a guy walking down, you know, the streets of London, and trying to get into somebody's office so I could get an internship and not knowing how to do it. And so I identify with that a lot. I think that, you know, I personally don't have a strategic approach to it. Maybe I should be more strategic, and that is something that we could explore,

or I could try and think about. But I think that I'm reacting to what shows up in front of me, and I know that I do, If I do more of the helping stuff, then good things will happen to me. So, first of all, it's worth saying that in a way, it's motivated by, I mean, Warren Buffett has called it long-term greedy. It's not altruism or it's more a case of, I want to live the best possible life, and I live the best possible life by helping others.

And, you know, one example of that is 25 years ago, so the first addition of the manual of ideas lands on my desk. And I was truly impressed with what John Miljavik had put together. And, you know, I had an office in Carnegie Holtar, and I write to him an email and I say, this is one of the best research publications of what we've seen. Would you like to come to the office and say, hi? And yeah, I definitely want to subscribe with the right price. So I think that I was the first person that from the kind of like, it looked like I was a big fancy hedge fund manager. I was in Carnegie Givold Tower. So that would have been impressive to him,

even though that was a bad real estate decision for me. So he came to my office, and I remember saying to him, you're clearly a very small guy, and I just want to be clear here, I want to help you right now, because one day you'll be very successful, and then it would be very nice if you remember me now. And then that's literally what I remember saying,

and that's what I meant. The fact of the matter is 25 years later, the many of ideas is still an extremely successful, both publication and community of investors. He has a number of investor meetings, the Zurich Project in Zurich. He has a meeting in Sun Moritz in the wintertime, and he walks and me there. So that was an investment that I made. So when you help people only in their lives, the investment can pay off in such a significant ways because it's very meaningful to them at that moment.

nobody's paying attention to them. And I know how that felt for me you're in a way very vulnerable. So I remember that. And I'm doing it because it's a smart move to do it. And in a way, I want to make that move as often as I can because I don't know, it's long-term greedy. I want the move to pay off.

I'm not just doing for altruistic reasons. But so when I can, I do. And something came out recently that I'm going to give a backhanded compliment to a guy called Rittervan. Ritavann's an Indian guy. I grew up in originally from Pondicherry in the south of India, now lives in Munich, studied in the Ecole Normale Superio in Paris. It's an interesting story. And you wrote a book that I've got here, but I don't have one on my desk, and, you know, how traditional businesses can use data to their advantage.

And I was just like, you know, is it the best produced book? And that's the backhanded compliment part. No, it's not the best produced book. but he sent me a personal copy and it with a note on top. So I wrote him a note back saying, congratulations on writing this book. It clearly has a lot of very good ideas in it. Can't wait to read it all.

I flipped through and you're a very smart guy, something like that. But the most important thing that I wanted to do, this was not Isaac and Walter Isaacson biography of Elon Musk. It wasn't Robert Moses by Caro. It wasn't that kind of book. But it was a book that he'd produced. But that personal note, he was so excited.

He wrote back to me and said, wow, I'm so excited by this note. Would you mind if I posted it on LinkedIn? I was like, of course you can post it on LinkedIn. Not a problem. What's my point? He posts on LinkedIn. We ended up having a podcast together. And in a way, I feel like I think he deserves to be far more successful in the years.

He's on his path to that. But I became a part of his story. and that's hugely kind of like that makes my life more meaningful in another case, the same thing happened with Luca Delana is that I'm sure you know he's written a book about Agudicity

and about playing long-time games and he was at my Value X event this year or he talked about, you know, why you need to pay attention to near misses. And I looked at this guy's book arrived on my desk and I said, my God, this is an amazing book, it deserves, and nobody's paying attention to him.

Everybody's paying attention to Ray Dalio, they're queuing up to interviewing him. They're queuing up for all sorts of things. And he's at the end of his career. But look at Alana's at the beginning of his career. And so I get a, I can say that I get an endorphin kick. I get an endorphin high about from making, really from my perspective, minor interventions that will make a significant difference for them. I mean, you know, what game are you playing?

You know, if you want to end up at the end of your life for the most money in the bank, congratulations, you know, maybe you'll do well and maybe you're smart enough to do that. And maybe that's a game worth playing. You know, what I am, I guess now I'm talking about it, maybe it'll become more conscious. I'm trying to maximize goodwill. I'm trying to maximize the number of people who are grateful that I exist on the planet, the number of people who are grateful that I took an action that made a difference in their lives. And that for me is extremely meaningful and it gives me great joy.

Many of the actions that I take don't pay off in any specific way to me, but you only need a few for it to pay off. And, you know, again, it's kind of frustrating for me because one of these days, if Warren Buffett, if you ever listened to this, it's okay if you don't. I want to learn something that you haven't learned. So far, everything that I've learned, I realize Warren Buffett's learned. If you come to my office in Zurich, you'll see that Warren Buffett has sent me on the course of the last 10 years, maybe, I don't know, seven or eight pieces of mail personalized directly to me. And, you know, I mean, I remember the first letter I received from him.

He'd read my own report and he had some nice words to say about minor report. You know, you could have peeled me off the floor. I mean, you know, and it's air-framed and everything. And so if Warren Buffett's doing that for me, why wouldn't I do it? do that for other people. And too many people have the perspective and it's so wonderful because they're trying to appeal to the Ray Delios, the Ken Griffin's, the Warren Buffett's, the people who have no time at all. And they're going to have a very, very hard time making a difference for them. Where there's all these people who are doing, maybe they're not as great as Warren Buffett,

but they still deserve a spotlight on them and they deserve to have more attention on them. And even at a more fundamental level, everybody wants to be. be seen. Everybody wants to know that their life has meaning and what they're doing is meaningful. And I think it's a great gift to the world to say, you are being seen by me. I see you. I'm another human and I see you. I remember the first time I got that feeling, I was a very self-centered individual, but I'm having coffee in Harvard Square or not far away from Harvard Square. I can still see the rest of the cafe in my mind. And I saw a blind person who was about to cross the road. And I dropped everything and rushed out. And I came up next and said, I see you about to cross

the road. Can I help you? And in this case, many blind people don't like the hell. They say, no, that's fine. I'm fine on my own. Thank you so much for asking. But they said, yeah, this firm and said, yeah, sure, I'd love to, for your company crossing. It's like, I crossed the road with her. She was happy. I went back into the restaurant. They offered me a free coffee, you know, the restaurant because they'd seen what had happened. And I got that feeling of being seen. The waitress and the manager of the restaurant had seen me do a sort of simple good deed. And it felt great. So Warren Buffett said it's not money that makes the world go around. It's allowed. If you can give that, if you can give that feeling of being seen to an individual,

why the hell wouldn't you do that? If Rittervan writes a book and sends it, takes the trouble to send it to me, why would I not make him be seen? And it gives me great joy in doing so. So, so what's my point to you, it's kind of like bring this down to earth and give you back to Mike, is that in a way, I'm doing it for purely selfish reasons. I'm doing it because it's long-term greedy. It's great business. It's a great way to live your life. But it's also gives me great joy to do it. You know, it's just fun to do. I mean, it's an enormous amount of fun. It's wonderful how you want to use your platform to do such good things for the value investing community and the community at large.

There are a lot of people out there and I'm thinking about entrepreneurs here and they get asked, so why did they start a certain company? And then they had some kind of mission that they wanted to help other people. And I wish I could say it was the same for me whenever I started TAPE that I just wanted to help other people. I did it because I had a good friend, have a good friend, Preston, and we wanted to talk about Buffett, and we sort of felt we needed a reason to do that, so we made it public. And then, you know, as it got a bit of traction, it was like kind of like to the Chris Hahn,

not necessarily because my dad was a car mechanic and I need to make ends meet, but there was certainly an element of, oh, can I make a living of doing my hobby? But, you know, as TEP has become a bit more successful, there is a lot of. There's this urge to want it to use the platform to do something, to do good. And I've been approached by different people who want me to be political, for example, which I don't want to do. And I think that's, you know, we've talked a bit about that. But, you know, I generally don't want to use the platform to be political.

But, you know, that is one way to do it. The other ways to do it. And one of sort of like, and I don't know if it's going to sound cliche, but one of the ways I want to use the TAPE platform. to make a small slice of the world, perhaps the value investing community a little better, is to speak with you, Guy, and other thoughtful people who come from a place I wanted to help. And we started out talking a lot about investing on the show. And we still have hosts on the show that talk a lot about investing, whereas I can almost feel like to an increasing

extent I've started to have conversations like, I have with you today, Guy, about crossing oceans for friendships and have the right discourse with the right people. and it's different. But I'm going to do a very long segue here into my question at the end, but perhaps something that might be a bit of views and not sound as self-serving as what just went through, but something that might be a bit of views to the audience and something I know you figured out a long time ago guy and certainly Buffett has because he always thought about things.

Even whenever you're like, oh, I just came up with this and then you study his work and then he probably said something 30 years ago about it, found the value investing community because I wanted to make a lot of money. That was sort of like my very brief introduction in my 20s into all of this. Like, no, we need to figure out how to make money. Buffett made a lot of money. Let's study Buffett. And of course, whenever you start doing that, you realize that there is so much more to it and you sort of like stick around for all the life lessons and the values and all that good stuff. And I can't help but sort of like segue then to my

long winter question about all the past 12 months, guy, I'm putting you a bit on the spot. When have you found that money has bought you happiness? I think to a large extent, especially in my 20s, I thought that money would buy me happiness. But also, when has it not all the past 12 months? No, I mean, clearly money does not buy happiness. I mean, that's just, we can say that. I think I even don't think you'd be controversial, actually.

But money buys you comfort. Put it that way. It buys you headroom. It buys you. and the ability to abstract away from the problems that can be solved with money. And I realized that from my perspective for me to say that money doesn't buy happiness probably will sound very, very, not very down to wealth for a lot of people. I remember, and again, I think I'm okay to mention him, a guy called Abel Help and a classmate

of mine from business school, who said, you just have the freedom. by having money to worry about the things that really count in life. And the rest of us who don't have enough money, in addition to getting to worry about the things that really count in life, have to worry about a whole bunch of other things like how to rent an apartment, how to get to work tomorrow, how to put food on the table for our wife and children, all of those things. But I think that I would still make, and I understand that I'm kind of abstracting away from those everyday things that the vast majority of people on the planet, you know, in Hebrew, you'd say the word pal-nasa, which means to make a living. And that is a

fundamental problem that everybody needs to overcome at some way. We all need a way to make a living to pay the rent, to buy the food, to do what we do. That's a part of what you were saying, what you've got, you're interested in value investing, and then you realize, well, maybe I can do it also to make a living and then I can have a hobby making a living. But when you go beyond that and you see you're more than making a living, can it buy your happiness? No, it doesn't buy you happiness. Period. End of story. What buys you happiness? There's all the other stuff that we've been talking about, this investing in goodwill, pursuing one's interests, having hobbies and the right to have a hobby and the freedom to have a

hobby or an interest that is an interest purely because it interests you and not because it gets you to somewhere or gets you to some position. It's not an ulterior motive. Yeah, I mean, that just seems to me to be obviously true. Again, I'm repeating myself because so you're going to say easy for you to say because you have enough money, but I think that even if you feel like you don't have enough money and you still, a huge part of your life is directed towards those basic daily needs, you should create the space for the other stuff if you possibly can or be aware that once you've

reached those daily needs, extra money is not going to solve anything, if you like. I spent a good five years thinking that actually, you know, I proudly would say I'm an immigrant. Immigrants go after the money and they don't question anymore because that's what immigrants do. And I spend a lot of time in that mindset. And I think that I'm coming out of that mindset now where I'm saying that's not, very smart, in fact, assassinine. I've only gone anywhere close to answering your question. Yes, and Guy, I think you bring up a good point. Whenever you say, it's easy for you to say, because you have enough money. But on the other hand, it also sounds different if a person is

struggling to make a living and then also says money doesn't buy happiness. So I think you, please don't beat yourself up. I think your perspective does have that impact because you are in in that well-deserving privilege position. Guy, this has been a wonderful conversation. Thank you for being so generous with your time. Do you have any concluding remarks here before I, before let you go? Yeah, there was something that came up for me. It's, you know, these thoughts that kind of come up and then they disappear before you

had the chance to. So something like that, but I'm not going to remember right now. I just say that for the audience, that, and for you, I don't give this much time to most people who want to call me up and talk to me, but I really value your conversations. I think my conversations with you, I think that I learned a lot from being on this show with you, on this conversation with you. I know I've said it before. I really ought to make the time to come visit you and spend a few days with you in Aris. I think it would be a lot of fun. And we would have multiple conversations like this. But next best is to have it like, it is, it is, it, it is,

is to have it on a podcast and a distance. And that's why I allocated the whole afternoon to it because I knew that I wanted to go for as long as it went for. And we can re-take this up. There's so many issues that we can take it up whenever we get the chance to when the time is right. I would like to believe that we've discovered something with the people who gathered around the Berkshire Hathaway

meeting so many years ago. We're onto something. And as humanity figures out that that is the right way to be a capitalist, perhaps we'll make the world into a slightly better place, meaning I think we're on the right track and we invite other members of humanity to come on board with us. There's plenty of space and this is not something kind of exclusive club. You know, Warren Buffett, I said this in some essay or some posts that I made

and it didn't get much play, but I believe that Warren Buffett can be seen. seem to be a philosopher of capitalism. And there are different versions of capitalism that was the kind of capitalism that was practiced post-industrial, in the Industrial Revolution, in the United Kingdom, which involved slavery and involved people working long hours and factories. There's the kind of capitalism that was practiced in Russia after the fall of the Soviet Union. And then there's a version of capitalism that Warren Buffett kind of identified and iterated upon, which is just a beautiful way to be. And we've kind of discovered that and we love it.

And it's not just about making money. It's about all these other things we've been discussing. And my word to anybody who's just tuning in, there's plenty of space for everybody. In fact, it's one of these beautiful things that the more people have that outlook, the better the world becomes for all of us. So maybe that's the thought to leave us with. And that's kind of the journey that you and I are on stick.

We're continuing to explore the implications of what we've learned at the feet of Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger. And the implications are very broad. What better way to end the episode than on that note, Guy. Thank you. Yeah, thank you. Thank you for having me on and wishing you a great rest of the day. Thank you for listening to TIP. Make sure to follow We Study Billionaires on your favorite podcast app and never miss out on episodes. To access our show notes, transcripts or courses, go to theinvestorspodcast.com. This show is for entertainment purposes only, before making any decision consult a professional.

This show is copyrighted by the Investors Podcast Network. Written permission must be granted before syndication or rebroadcasting.