We Study Billionaires - The Investor’s Podcast Network - TIP752: Financial Statements Explained Simply w/ Brian Feroldi

Starting point is 00:00:00 You're listening to TIP. On today's episode, I welcome back longtime guest, Brian Feraldi, to educate our listeners on how to analyze financial statements. Brian Feraldi is the founder of long-term mindset, which creates educational content that can help anyone better understand how the stock market works. His newsletter has over 100,000 readers, and he's one of the best at making investing as simple as possible to understand. We cover a lot during this conversation.

Starting point is 00:00:28 We give an overview of the three financial statements. What gap accounting is and why the U.S. is a good environment for investors from a regulatory perspective. Why Brian prefers that companies pay employees in cash rather than through stock-based compensation. The role of financial statements in estimating a company's intrinsic value. Why the PE ratio is a useless valuation metric for most growth businesses. Why Brian prioritizes optionality in his investment process. Red flags to look out for in the financial statements. Why good investing is all about marrying the right side of your brain with the left side of your and so much more. It's always a treat to bring Brian on the show, so with that, I really hope

Starting point is 00:01:04 you enjoy our conversation. Since 2014 and through more than 180 million downloads, we've studied the financial markets and read the books that influence self-made billionaires the most. We keep you informed and prepared for the unexpected. Now for your host, Clay Fink. Welcome to The Investors Podcast. I'm your host, Clay Fink, and today we welcome back Long time guest, Brian Feraldi. Brian, so great to have you back. Clay, awesome to be back. Thank you for the invite. I've long wanted to do an episode touching on accounting and financial statements, but as you know, it can be so difficult to do just in a podcast format. So I thought

Starting point is 00:01:55 there's no better person to bring onto the show to explain these concepts as simply as possible. So to kick us off, how about we just start with talking about the role that analyzing financial statements plays in your investing process? To me, it's a critical component. I like to think of financial statements as a company's report card to judge how well the business is executing against the story or the promise that the business inherently has. So if you don't know how to read financial statements, I liken that to calling yourself a musician, but not knowing how to read music, it is that important and that fundamental. So for me, I would never make any investment into any stock without analyzing its financial statements deeply. So I think the next place to go here is to talk

Starting point is 00:02:45 about the master accounting equation. I love the name of that. I'm not sure if you came up with it or not. What is the master accounting equation and why is that important? The master accounting equation is assets equals liabilities plus shareholders equity. Now, that is the accounting way. of saying, what is a company's net worth? Clay, if I asked you, what's your net worth, you'd do a very simple math equation in your head. You'd say, what do I own, minus, what do I owe equals my net worth. That is the master accounting equation, except for it's in accounting speak. So what you own is a company's assets.

Starting point is 00:03:23 What you owe to others is a company's liabilities, and a company's net worth is just called shareholders equity or owner's equity. But that is the master accounting equation and it rules the company's financial statements. And that naturally brings us to the three financial statements. Talk to us about, you know, each of these statements and how all of these tie together as well. The three most important financial statements to know are the balance sheet, the income statement, and the cash flow statement. Let's take them one at a time.

Starting point is 00:03:57 The balance sheet is a snapshot picture of. a company's net worth on paper at a point in time. And the balance sheet follows the master accounting equation. So on one side of the balance sheet is the company's assets. On the other side are the company's liabilities and shareholders' equity. Now, the balance sheet is called the balance sheet because those two numbers, assets and liabilities plus owner's equity, must always exactly equal each other or balance, hence the term balance sheet. Now that is the company's balance sheet. Then there's the company's income statement. And the income statement tracks a company's revenue and expenses over a set period of time. Now, the period of time is typically a quarter

Starting point is 00:04:40 or a year. And think of a income statement, kind of like a movie. So there's a start to it, and there's an end to it. And the income statement records all revenue and expenses incurred during that period of time. And the income statement is used to tell whether a company is profitable or unprofitable, at least on paper. The third financial statement is called the cash flow statement. And this financial statement's purpose is to just track cash movement in and out of a business. So think of this kind of like your personal checking account. It just measures, did cash come in or did cash come out? Having all three of these statements is incredibly important because they each give you a different window into a company's financial situation. And it's by analyzing all three

Starting point is 00:05:31 of them together that you can get a true picture of a company's financials. So going back to my accounting 101 days, one of the things that always sort of trip me up and sort of confused me, what's this concept of double entry bookkeeping, right? So for every debit, there's a credit. So, you know, a company raises money. They get cash on the balance sheet. You know, it's offset. by some sort of liability, whether they raise that money through debt, whether they raise it through equity and whatnot. So how about you talk more about this concept of double entry bookkeeping of how for every transaction, there's a credit and a debit?

Starting point is 00:06:07 Yeah, this is recorded on the balance sheet, and it is the method that keeps the balance sheet in balance. To your point, every time there is a transaction that affects something on the balance sheet, by definition, it also has to affect another ledger to ensure that the balance sheet. to ensure that the balance sheet remains in perfect balance with each other. For example, if a company goes out to the market or goes out to the private markets and raises capital from investors, that's when an investor injects cash into a business in order to fund operations. That would have two transactions that appear on the balance sheet. First,

Starting point is 00:06:44 the company is receiving cash from investors. So therefore, the company's cash balance would go up. Now, cash is an asset, so that affects the left side of the balance sheet. And because the left side of the balance sheet is going up, there must be something on the right side of the balance sheet that also increases in order to make sure that the balance sheet is perfectly imbalanced. Now, in the case of a company selling stock to other investors, that would affect the shareholders equity portion of the income statement, and particularly two numbers. One is common stock, and the second is called additional paid in capital.

Starting point is 00:07:20 So if a company raises a million dollars from selling to investors, cash balance would go up by a million dollars, and then common stock and additional payment capital would combine go up by $1 million as well. That would ensure that the balance sheet remains in balance. And this is true for every single transaction that can possibly occur in a company. So when revenue comes in, when sales come in, those would increase the company's retained earnings and it would increase the company's cash balance when an expense is paid. So like employees' salaries are paid or rent is paid. If that was paid in cash, that would decrease

Starting point is 00:07:58 the company's cash balance, simultaneously decreasing a company's retained earnings. So it's an incredibly important concept, the concept of double-entry accounting to ensure that the master account equation is always perfectly in balance. As you know, I recently interviewed David Gardner in our episode, we'll be going out next week. And one of the things we discussed during that conversation was just how so many of a company's assets you won't even find on the balance sheet. For example, Amazon, their most important asset over the years was having Jeff Bezos as a CEO for such a long time.

Starting point is 00:08:32 So, you know, many successful companies today are making these investments into intangible assets, which is becoming more and more prominent with all these technology names rising up. Intangible assets, you can think of things like brand, patents, proprietary, technology or human capital, whereas decades ago, oftentimes companies were investing in these tangible assets such as a plant property equipment and inventory. So how about you talk about the differences and how these intangible versus tangible investments flow through the financial statements? Sure, great question. That simple concept is worth exploring more, tangible versus

Starting point is 00:09:08 intangible. To me, the word tangible, the easiest way to think about it is tangible means something you can physically touch, intangible means something that you can't physically touch. So a tangible asset would be a store, a retail store that a business operates out of. You can go down and touch a Home Depot. Home Depot stores are a tangible asset. But if I was to say, touch the brand name or the copyright for Home Depot, that's something that exists in a ledger somewhere. So you can't physically touch the brand name, a Home Depot. So that would be an example of an intangible asset. Companies derive value from both sources and both are really important to know. But the tricky thing about intangible assets is they're often incredibly, incredibly

Starting point is 00:09:51 difficult to value. If I said to you, what's the value, the dollar value of the word Coca-Cola? What would you say? And how could you possibly come up with a figure? You could go anywhere on the planet and talk to almost any human. And if you said the word Coca-Cola, they would understand what you're talking about and know exactly what you mean, even if they didn't speak English. So what is the dollar value that we should assign to that name? It's really hard to do, and accountants do attempt to put a dollar value behind it, and they do often to make sure the financial statements work. But it's very challenging to do. So much easier to say, what's the dollar value of the manufacturing building where we create the Coca-Cola? You can go in

Starting point is 00:10:33 and say, well, how much did it cost to make it? How much is the equipment a cost, and what are the operating? expenses of it and how can we depreciate that over time? That is a much easier thing to come up with. But David Gardner, I have learned so much from him, and he has taught me the value of intangible assets. One that you didn't touch on is just something called mine share. Do your customers know and think of your product? And if I said to you, Clay, name a store that you would go to to get groceries. What would you say? Closest to down the street would be Target and Costco. There you go. So two brand names. So I said you need something and you immediately thought of Target and Costco. Is there value in that? Are there millions of people just like you who named

Starting point is 00:11:12 to say a toothpaste or name a computer or name a phone company, they would instantly have something in mind? I would argue that there's tremendous value to that, to having your name implanted in the customer's mind. But how can you express that on a financial statement? It's really hard to do. This is why marrying both the details of accounting with the soft art of analyzing companies at a high level is so important. I mean, to pull the thread on that a little bit, a company like Coca-Cola is investing in marketing each year. So on the one side, I could see where these marketing expenses are flowing through the income statement and they're just like expenses or the cost of doing business. But then there's

Starting point is 00:11:52 also the case of, you know, maybe part of this spend should be flowing through to the brand value in these intangible assets. So how does this end up manifesting in the accounting statements for something like a marketing budget? Yeah. So that is one way of doing it. You can say how much dollars have we put behind advertising campaigns, or in the case of creating intellectual property or materials, like think about Disney. Disney made the movie Snow White, like what, 80, 90 years ago or something like that, but we still know the name Snow White. And think of all the ways that Disney has monetized the movie Snow White over the last 100 years. The monetization that they've got out of that movie is enormous when compared to the resources that they put into

Starting point is 00:12:33 of creating that. So to your point, one way that you can account for for the value of a company's brand is to look at the spend that the company has put into sales and marketing over that brand's a lifetime. And that is one way of valuing an intangible asset. It's an imprecise way, but it's kind of the best that accountants have at any given time. This is why one trick that I know that David Gardner uses when he's looking at financial statements is he looks at a company's intangible value, and then he asks himself, is the actual value that the company derives from the intangible that has far higher than what's recorded on the on the financial statements. That's one way that you can look for a mismatch between what a company

Starting point is 00:13:11 is worth in reality and what it's worth on paper. I guess we'll jump here to gap accounting. So financial statements for companies that are listed here in the U.S. are constructed based on gap accounting. How about you just talk a little bit about what gap accounting is and why it's used here in the U.S.? When it comes to creating financial statements, it's important that there are a set of rules and procedures that all companies follow to make sure that the reports that they're issuing to investors are accurate. In the United States, the accounting procedures that we use are called GAP, or generally accepted accounting principles, GAAP, and all companies that are publicly traded in the

Starting point is 00:13:52 United States are required by law to report their financial statements using GAAP accounting. Now for some businesses, because of the black and white nature of GAAP accounting, and the role that a gap accounting uses when valuing things like intangible assets, sometimes the rules that companies have to follow are too rigid and too black and white. So some companies, especially modern day tech companies, choose to report in addition to GAAP accounting, non-GAP accounting, which is the financials that do not comply with GAAP accounting because they give the company more wiggle room to report information that they think is more valid.

Starting point is 00:14:31 Here's a simple way to think about GAAP versus non-GAP accounting. I play golf with my son. My son and I played golf the other night, and I took a drive and duffed it, and I said, I'm going to take a mulligan, and I hit a second shot. And then I duffed my third shot out of the sand. It took me two tries, and I got up onto the green. And then I putted, and I was within like, you know, six feet. And I said, it's a gimmie. Well, according to Gap accounting, that's like a nine in the golf scorecott. But if you use non-gap accounting, I would say, that's a five. I'm going to forget all those things that don't account. So gap accounting, rigid following of rules and they're standardized and all companies might report them.

Starting point is 00:15:08 Non-gap accounting is massaging the rules and often leaving out certain items to make your financial statements look better. Yeah, I mean, that's such an important point because you see so many companies, you know, report these non-gap measures. You know, I can imagine in some cases it makes a lot of sense, but then, you know, I can't help but think there's going to be some bad actors out there that try and make the company look better than it actually is, which can lead people to investing in the company and, you know, they can finance their operations through issuing equity and whatnot and get some investors into

Starting point is 00:15:44 trouble. So how reliable do you think the non-gap measures are? Like, how do we know if we can really, you know, trust them and trust, you know, what management's trying to tell us with these numbers? Well, it's important to that whenever a company reports non-gap numbers, it tells you precisely the adjustments that it's making to the gap figures in order to come up with them. The most common adjustment that we see that most investors have a problem in, or there's a big debate about, is the treatment of stock-based compensation. Stock-based compensation is a non-cash expense that according to Gap accounting must be accounted for on the company's financial statements.

Starting point is 00:16:20 So if a company pays hundreds of millions of dollars in stock-based compensation, that reduces their gap earnings by hundreds of millions of dollars. even though it did not have a cash cost to the business. This is why many companies that pay huge amounts of stock-based compensation also report non-gap numbers and say, well, if we exclude stock-based compensation from a reporting, here's how much of a profit we would have recorded. That is probably the most common thing that is adjusted for with non-gap accounting, but there's lots of other things that are adjusted for.

Starting point is 00:16:54 Some companies choose to exclude one-time events or one-time events. anomalies from their financial statements. For example, if they closed down a factory and they had big severance payments, in theory, that is a one-time expense, one-time thing that they have to do. Now, with GAAP accounting, they have to record that one-time expense in their financial statements. But from an operating perspective, it does make sense for a company to say, here's what it is with that expense excluded, and here's what the numbers would be without that expense included. This is why some companies find it helpful to report both GAP and Non-GAP numbers. Now, it's up to the individual investor that's analyzing the financial statements to look at the adjustments and see if they agree with the adjustments that are being made.

Starting point is 00:17:38 When I'm looking at a financial statements, if I find a company that touts its adjusted EBITDA, a very non-gap number, I automatically deduct points in my head for that company's management team because I think they're focused on the wrong metric. But if a company is touting its gap earnings per share, or that's the number that they report to the markets, I immediately give that management team points and credit because that's a much harder number to manipulate. So the onus, like always, is always on the individual investor or the investor that's analyzing a financial statement. Do the work to see, is this management team trustworthy?

Starting point is 00:18:11 Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors. All right. I want you guys to imagine spending three days in Oslo at the height of the summer. You've got long days of daylight, incredible food, floating saunas on the Oslo Fjord, and every conversation you have is with people who are actually shaping the future. That's what the Oslo Freedom Forum is. From June 1st through the 3rd, 2026, the Oslo Freedom Forum is entering its 18th year bringing together activists, technologists, journalists, investors, and builders from all over the world, many of them operating on the front lines of history. This is where you hear firsthand stories

Starting point is 00:18:48 from people using Bitcoin to survive currency collapse, using AI to expose human rights abuses, and building technology under censorship and authoritarian pressures. These aren't abstract ideas. These are tools real people are using right now. You'll be in the room with about 2,000 extraordinary individuals, dissidents, founders, philanthropists, policymakers, the kind of people you don't just listen to but end up having dinner with. Over three days, you'll experience powerful mainstage talks, hands-on, on workshops on freedom tech and financial sovereignty, immersive art installations, and conversations

Starting point is 00:19:24 that continue long after the sessions end. And it's all happening in Oslo in June. If this sounds like your kind of room, well, you're in luck because you can attend in person. Standard and patron passes are available at Osloof Freedom Forum.com with patron passes offering deep access, private events, and small group time with the speakers. The Oslo Freedom Forum isn't just a conference. It's a place where ideas meet reality and where the future is being built by people living it. If you run a business, you've probably had the same thought lately. How do we make AI useful in the real world? Because the upside is huge, but guessing your way into it is a risky move.

Starting point is 00:20:04 With NetSuite by Oracle, you can put AI to work today. NetSuite is the number one AI Cloud ERP, trusted by over 43,000 businesses. It pulls your financials, inventory, commerce, HR, and CRR. into one unified system. And that connected data is what makes your AI smarter. It can automate routine work, surface actionable insights, and help you cut costs while making fast AI-powered decisions with confidence. And now with the NetSuite AI connector, you can use the AI of your choice to connect directly to your real business data. This isn't some add-on, it's AI built into the system that runs your business. And whether your company does millions or even hundreds of millions,

Starting point is 00:20:46 NetSuite helps you stay ahead. If your revenues are at least in the seven figures, get their free business guide demystifying AI at netsuite.com slash study. The guide is free to you at net suite.com slash study. NetSuite.com slash study. When I started my own side business, it suddenly felt like I had to become 10 different people overnight wearing many different hats. Starting something from scratch can feel exciting, but also incredibly overwhelmed.

Starting point is 00:21:16 and lonely. That's why having the right tools matters. For millions of businesses, that tool is Shopify. Shopify is the commerce platform behind millions of businesses around the world and 10% of all e-commerce in the U.S. from brands just getting started to household names. It gives you everything you need in one place, from inventory to payments to analytics. So you're not juggling a bunch of different platforms. You can build a beautiful online store with hundreds of ready-to-use templates and Shopify is packed with helpful AI tools that write product descriptions and even enhance your product photography. Plus, if you ever get stuck, they've got award-winning 24-7 customer support.

Starting point is 00:21:57 Start your business today with the industry's best business partner, Shopify, and start hearing sign up for your $1 per month trial today at Shopify.com slash WSB. Go to Shopify.com slash WSB. That's Shopify.com slash WSB. All right, back to the show. I'm happy you mentioned stock-based compensation there because I feel like Warren Buffett has almost trained a lot of us to dislike this metric. And it's something that's been used more and more here in the U.S., especially within technology

Starting point is 00:22:36 companies. On the one hand, you know, stock-based compensation, many people view as a real expense. You know, there's no free lunch, as they say. But one thing I do appreciate about stock-based compensation is, you know, based on my understanding, employees that work at the company, part of their benefit is receiving stock as a part of their total compensation. I can appreciate this because it can really give, create this culture of ownership, right? Where the employees actually own shares in the company and now they're vested in that company's

Starting point is 00:23:07 success, especially as, you know, employees work there over a long period of time, but then a substantial portion of their net worth might be in those shares, especially if the shares appreciate. I don't know if you have any follow-ups to that on. Of course, stock-based compensation is a real expense, but there could be some benefit for some companies that have that ownership culture. Yeah, I see both sides of it. And stock-based compensation makes a ton of sense for startup and early-stage businesses. Oftentimes, they do not have the cash resources to go out and pay executives their market rate. So if an executive, they want to pay them $500,000 per year, and company might not have that operating income to support that kind of executive payment. So it makes

Starting point is 00:23:49 a lot of sense for them to say, we're going to pay you $100,000 in cash and $400,000 in stock, which might be attractive to the executive if they think that the company could be worth far more into the future. But while I do see both sides of the stock-based compensation perspective, I am firmly, I've become firmly in the camp of Warren Buffett that I would vastly prefer bonuses to be paid for with cash because I think that cash is actually a better motivation tool for the employee than I do stock-based compensation. The reason I now think that is if you are anything other than the CEO, you do not have full control over what the company does. Imagine that you're a mid-level executive in the sales department. You have control over the sales

Starting point is 00:24:33 and the actions in your specific region, but you have no control over the research and development department or the manufacturing department or the legal department or acquisitions that are made, yet those other actions will directly impact the stock price. So therefore, by owning just stock in the company, you have no control over what the company does, only the CEO does. So I think that every executive, except for the CEO, should not have stock-based compensation in their package. I would prefer them to be paid for with cash. Now, the CEO, who does have control over all operation should absolutely be paid in stock-based compensation because they actually have the control over what happens at the company level. But I've become much less of a fan of it at any other

Starting point is 00:25:14 level of the organization. So some of the investors I've talked to here on the show, I've mentioned that the U.S. is an attractive place to invest for several reasons, one of which is related to the regulatory environment and how much information public companies are required to publish for investors. I've never purchased a stock in China or India, but I've heard that investing in stocks in those countries can be tricky because you know, you tend to find a number of fraudulent names there. And that isn't to say that all companies in the U.S. are perfect by any means at all. But I think that it just gets to the point that oftentimes you can trust the numbers, at least a little bit more. So how about you talk a little bit about some of the protections

Starting point is 00:25:53 that are in place here in the U.S. that seem to hold public companies that are listed here to a higher standard. The United States is blessed with a few hundred year operating history of public markets. And because of that, the U.S. is a highly regulated market. And thanks to the actions of like the SEC, there are far more investor protections in place today than there have been historically. And oftentimes, it's often a tragedy or a big high-flang disaster that causes regulations to be put into place.

Starting point is 00:26:22 As an example, I think most listeners are familiar with the name Enron and the Enron scandal that happened in the late 1990s, early 2000s, where companies like Enron and Arthur Anderson and WorldCom were essentially cooking their books. They were making their financial statements look much better than the underlying performance of the company was. Well, thanks to the outfall of the Enron debacle, companies are now required to include a cash flow statement. They are required to report a cash flow statement when they filed with the SEC. Prior to Enron, they were not required to issue a cash flow statement, which made it really really. hard for investors to track the true earnings performance that a company has. In addition, executives

Starting point is 00:27:03 are also now required to sign their name on all of their financial statements, putting themselves personally liable for the reliability and the accuracy of those financial statements. I'm not an expert in international markets by any means, but I don't think that those same regulations are in place that would give investors protection. So one reason why it makes a lot of sense to me to invest mostly in the United States is that companies are required to follow GAP accounting, which is the accounting that I know best, and there are some basic shareholder protections in place. Not to say that there aren't fabulous companies and great exchanges elsewhere, but for my money, I am perfectly comfortable and happy to invest in the U.S.

Starting point is 00:27:41 And one of the funny things about accounting and financial statements is that people tend to think of accountants as very rational, very logical thinkers that follow a very strict set of rules. So once people pull up a financial statement, they tend to, you know, just take the numbers for what they're worth, right? I think it's important to mention that there's actually some subjectivity when it comes to creating financial statements. So to use just a simple example, I think everyone can understand, let's say a manufacturing company buys machines for its plants and the life of those machines is expected to be 10 years. Well, you know, if the company depreciates those machines over 20 years, then they're likely to be overstating earnings.

Starting point is 00:28:22 So if an investor takes those earnings at face value, then they might not necessarily make the right investment decision based on what's happening in reality. And here at TIP, I'm reminded that we have an advertising segment of our business and I could come up with a handful of ways that we could recognize revenue, for example. We could recognize revenue when a deal signed, when the ad starts running, when the advertiser actually pays us if they do pay us and whatnot. So there's all this nuance that can go into it. And all of these methods can pay to much.

Starting point is 00:28:52 much different financial picture when you're looking at the statements. So, you know, I just illustrate this to just show how subjective accounting can be at times. It's not always that the economic earnings actually reflect economic reality. And we might find ourselves in a case where, you know, the analysis was spot on, but our investment decision was incorrect based on, you know, our analysis of the numbers that the company showed us. So, you know, this is also one reason I like to prioritize management in my analysis of a company. If I know I'm working with a highly ethical manager that I can trust, then it could be the case that they tend to understate earnings because they care about investors and protecting investors. So I think in these cases,

Starting point is 00:29:36 it could be a situation where they tend to surprise to the upside over the long term rather than disappointing investors. Yeah, to your point, you just laid out a great example of how creative accountants can be when it comes to creating their financial statements. Revenue recognition is a huge area that CFOs or management teams have control over. And to your point, when is revenue recorded? Is it when the item is actually shipped and leaves the factory? Is it when you receive the cash from the customer? Those can be months apart. And when a company is publicly traded, there is huge financial pressure on the management team to report numbers that exceed or beat Wall Street's estimates. That controls their bonuses, that controls the stock price, that controls whether or not

Starting point is 00:30:20 they get to keep their job. So there are huge incentives in place for management teams to fudge the numbers or do everything that they can to present the best story that they can at making time to Wall Street. So to your point, if you find a company that is very conservative with the accounting, that speaks volumes about the integrity of the management team. And if you find the inverse, you should probably just stay away from that business. Yeah, that is an excellent point that so many companies just want to hit their quarterly EPS. And in the short term, that might be a great thing. But over the long term, it could end up hurting investors that aren't investing in companies

Starting point is 00:30:55 that use more conservative accounting. Another point I'd like to mention is this concept of fungibility. So intuitively, as humans, we tend to think of money as fungible. So, Brian, if you and I walk into a Starbucks, we each go and buy an overpriced expensive latte, we're each going to pay $6 for that latte and essentially get the exact same product. So your $6 had the exact same utility as my $6. And I think carrying this line of thinking can sometimes actually hurt us in investing who treat each dollar the same.

Starting point is 00:31:26 So for example, a dollar's worth of earnings at a company like Costco might actually be worth considerably more than a dollar's worth of earnings at another retailer that might be in decline or might have volatile earnings from year to year. So how about you talk about this concept of understanding this, that there's more to just looking at the numbers? You hit on a really important point when it comes to analyzing business. And this really confused me when I first started investing because the thing that you read in investing books and value investing books is low PE ratios mean a company is cheap, high

Starting point is 00:31:59 P.E ratios mean that a company is expensive. So if you were looking at say an auto maker like Ford, you might see that it's trading at eight times earnings, six or eight times earnings. And your natural thing to say would be, well, that number is cheap. Ford and stock is cheap. Conversely, you might find a company like Costco or Visa or MasterCard trading at 30 times earnings, and your natural inclination might be those stocks are expensive. Look how high their PE ratios are in comparison to the market or in comparison to Ford.

Starting point is 00:32:28 But you hit on an incredibly important point that not all profits and not all revenue is created equally. A dollar in sales at one business should be worth completely different than a dollar in sales at another business because not all revenue and not all profits are created equally. High quality revenue, really high quality revenue has some key characteristics. Revenue that is recession proof that happens in good times and bad is far more valuable than revenue that is cyclical in nature and that a lot of it happens in good times and it disappears in bad times. Revenue that becomes cash is far more valuable than revenue that becomes accounts receivable. Revenue that is recurring in nature or where a customer makes continual payments, say, for a software, a license or a utility, is far more valuable than revenue that is related to a one-off purchase or a one-off transaction that happens every five to ten years. Revenue that is very high margin, has a gross margin of 80% is far more valuable than revenue that has a very low. gross margin of, say, 10% or something. So to your point, if you were analyzing a dollar worth of sales at Ford, the market only

Starting point is 00:33:40 might assign a six or eight multiple to that because the market believes that Ford's profits are not highly valuable profits. Those profits might disappear completely when the economy goes through a downturn. Ford also issues credit, so it becomes an accounts receivable for the business. You compare that to Costco. People shop at Costco in good times and in bad. You could even argue that people shop at Costco more when the economy goes down. So therefore, you can have a lot of confidence in the continual earnings power of a company

Starting point is 00:34:12 like Costco when compared to a company like Ford. This is why, when you're looking at companies that trade at wildly different PE ratios, that's the market's way of saying this profit is highly valuable and this profit is not nearly as valuable. I also wanted to touch on the options a company has when they generate cash, what they can do with that cash. So generally, they can do six different things when a company generates cash. It can keep that cash on the balance sheet, pay down debt, distribute dividends, repurchase its own shares, make an acquisition, or reinvest back into the business. I would say

Starting point is 00:34:46 that those first five tend to be relatively easier to follow in the financial statements, but I think that the reinvestment piece can be a bit more elusive. What are some of the line items that we should look out for to better understand to what extent a business is reinvesting back into its own operations. Yeah, you can determine that when looking at the company's income statement and what its operating expenses are doing as well as looking at its cash flow statement. If a company, for example, is making, is reinvesting into the business through capital expenditures, it's building new factories, it's building new stores, it's making new equipment. That would be reflected in the capital expenditures or perpetrators of property plant equipment line of the cash flow

Starting point is 00:35:25 statement, and you would also see a corresponding increase in a company's operating expenses on the income statement. But you just hit on a really important point. What you just described is something called capital allocation, and Warren Buffett has called a CEO's most important job capital allocation. There are six levers that a management team can pull at any time with the cash that it has available to them, and the order and the magnitude of which those levels are pulled can have tremendous, tremendous outputs on the returns that shareholders receive. When a company is in the early stages of its development, when it's a startup or when it's in the hypergrowth mode or it's really starting to get growing, a company often does not

Starting point is 00:36:04 have excess capital. All capital that's generated in the business goes right back into the company and is reinvested. This is when a company is hiring engineers in research and development, hiring salespeople, opening up new geographies, creating new products and launching those to market. When a company is in that stage of the business growth cycle, all capital should be really reinvested back into the core business to drive future growth. That's unquestionable. Once a company runs out of internally generated projects in order to continue growing itself, that's when those other five options become available to the business. And so many management teams screw this part up. They have some excess capital to them, and they don't have the

Starting point is 00:36:46 training or discipline that they need to make the right choices, application choices, to maximize shareholder value. For example, some companies buy back their stock, because they think that's a good way to return capital of shareholders with no regard to the valuation or the market price that they're paying for that stock. And buying back a stock when it's overvalued is a horrible use of capital. Buying back that stock when it's dramatically undervalued can be a great use of capital. The same can go for issuing and paying off debt. Paying off debt that's at a high rate can be a great use of capital. Paying off debt that's at a very low rate can be a poor use of capital.

Starting point is 00:37:21 The same can be true of making acquisitions or even paying dividends or just. just building the company's cash position. So capital allocation is something that investors should really pay attention to, and they can tell you a lot about the decision-making of the management team. Financial statements also play a big role in how many investors are viewing the company's valuation. So David Gardner, he was talking about how he's actually attracted to companies that financial commentators and analysts are saying are overvalued. Yet, I think the irony with many great businesses is that they oftentimes appear more expensive than they really are when you're looking at these financial statements. So one example I thought of was looking at Netflix, for example,

Starting point is 00:38:05 they've been investing in new content to try and boost their subscriber numbers over time. In theory, they could stop investing in new content and generate a ton of cash, a substantial amount of profit. And the stock might actually look cheap, but this would actually be detrimental to their business in the long term. So there's this aspect of looking at the numbers and understanding them, but not getting too bogged down in the numbers today, maybe focusing more on, you know, if it's a growth company like Netflix, focusing more on their management's ability to execute on their strategy and how successful they are in painting that vision for where they want to be. Yeah, you just highlighted probably one of the most confusing aspects of investing in valuation,

Starting point is 00:38:50 especially if you're a new investor. And when I first started, I thought that the way that you valued a business was by looking at its PE ratio, its price to earnings ratio. When I first understood what the PE ratio was, I would look at great companies like Apple, Netflix, Amazon, Intuitive Surgical, all of which had PE ratios that were 50, 80, 100, or even 1,000, and my immediate next thought was too expensive. Can't buy that stock. It is just not for me. The problem is the PE ratio is a highly useful tool, but you have to use it at the right time. The price to earnings ratio is only a meaningful number when a company is fully optimized for generating profits. When a company is in growth mode, it is often not optimized for generating profits. It's optimized for growth.

Starting point is 00:39:42 Companies like Netflix or Amazon, when they were in buildout mode, were investing heavily in content in the case of Netflix, or investing heavily in distribution in the case of Amazon, in order to increase their capacity in the anticipation of future growth that would come from future customers. Those proved to be very smart, savvy investments. But as a byproduct of that, it meant that their expenses were inflated when compared to the current size of the business. And since the expenses were inflated or overstated, that meant that the company's profits, true profits were understated. And when profits are understated, that means the price to earnings ratio is inflated.

Starting point is 00:40:23 And that's why we saw companies like Amazon have a P.E. ratio four or five hundred, and they were actually tremendous buys back then, even though they optically look extremely expensive. So a key thing I want listeners to do, when you're analyzing a company's price to earnings ratio, ask yourself, is this company optimized for profits today? If the answer is no, don't use the PE ratio. I'd also like to mention another item that you won't find on a balance sheet, which is optionality.

Starting point is 00:40:54 So, you know, when you look at Netflix in 2015, they had zero advertising business. And today, Netflix has an advertising aspect to their business, which, as we know, is extremely profitable for many of these big tech platforms. And this is same with Amazon. You know, they might have had very little to no advertising 10, 20 years ago. And now advertising is a major. segment of their business. So that's why I also mentioned just how well is management executing on what they say they're trying to do and what their strategy is and gaining market share

Starting point is 00:41:25 and whatnot because that optionality piece is something that you need to consider if you're going to hold a stock for five, ten plus years. Totally. And this is one of the most difficult things that comes to analyzing a business. So let me give you my definition of optionality. I define optionality as the company's ability to launch new products and new services to its customers that generate needle-moving revenue and profits in the future. The best classic example that everyone can think of is Amazon. When Amazon first was a company, it sold books.

Starting point is 00:41:59 That was the business. It was selling books. What does Amazon sell today? Everything? Like everything that you can possibly think of. So Amazon, by starting in books, was developing a customer list and getting the operations in place to deliver books, but then it added on CDs and movies and electronics. And now I think you can go as far as buying kayaks delivered straight to your home directly

Starting point is 00:42:22 on Amazon. So Amazon is a tremendous example of a company that was able to launch new products and new services that opened up needle moving revenue. When I look back at some of the best investments that I've ever made, many of them, the The reason for the upside that I have achieved is because of optionality. As an example, Axon, which is formally called Taser, they made 100% of their revenue from tasers that police use, the police stun guns. If you look at the company today, that is still a major revenue driver for the company,

Starting point is 00:42:52 but it also has Axon body cameras, as well as a software solution that it developed internally that ties all of its hardware components together. So if you were buying Axon stock 10 or 20 years ago, you were buying future optionality and these future products that you could not see at the time. And that is one reason why companies like Amazon, like companies like Apple, why companies like Mercado Libre have been such extreme outperformers over the last 10 and 20 years is because 10 and 20 years ago, there was hidden value in the company from future optionality. I know that's something that David Gardner, when he's investing, looks for very closely.

Starting point is 00:43:32 He asks, can this company launch new products and new services that open up new revenue opportunities? And if the answer is yes, the company might just be undervalued. Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors. No, it's not your imagination. Risk and regulation are ramping up. And customers now expect proof of security just to do business. That's why VANTA is a game changer. VANTA automates your compliance process and brings compliance, risk, and customer trust together on one AI-powered platform.

Starting point is 00:44:03 So whether you're prepping for a SOC 2 or running an enterprise GRC program, VANTA keeps you secure and keeps your deals moving. Instead of chasing spreadsheets and screenshots, VANTA gives you continuous automation across more than 35 security and privacy frameworks. Companies like Ramp and Riders spend 82% less time on audits with Vantta. That's not just faster compliance, it's more time for growth. If I were running a startup or scaling a team today, this is exactly the type of platform I'd want in place. Get started at vanta.com slash billionaires. That's vanta.com slash billionaires.

Starting point is 00:44:43 Ever wanted to explore the world of online trading, but haven't dared try? The futures market is more active now than ever before, and plus 500 futures is the perfect place to start. Plus 500 gives you access to a wide range of instruments, the S&P 500, Nasdaq, Bitcoin, gas, and much more. Explore equity indices, energy, metals, 4X, crypto, and beyond. With a simple and intuitive platform, you can trade from anywhere, right from your phone. Deposit with a minimum of $100 and experience the fast, accessible futures trading you've been waiting for. See a trading opportunity, you'll be able to trade it in just two clicks once your account is open. Not sure if you're ready, not a problem. Plus 500 gives you an unlimited, risk-free demo account

Starting point is 00:45:32 with charts and analytic tools for you to practice on. With over 20 years of experience, Plus 500 is your gateway to the markets. Visit Plus500.com to learn more. Trading in futures involves risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone. Not all applicants will qualify. Plus 500, it's trading with a plus. Billion dollar investors don't typically park their cash in high-yield savings accounts. Instead, they often use one of the premier passive income strategies for institutional investors, private credit. Now, the same passive income strategy is available to investors of all sizes, thanks to the

Starting point is 00:46:11 Fundrise income fund, which has more than $600 million invested in a 7.97% distribution rate, With traditional savings yields falling, it's no wonder private credit has grown to be a trillion-dollar asset class in the last few years. Visit fundrise.com slash WSB to invest in the Fundrise income fund in just minutes. The fund's total return in 2025 was 8%, and the average annual total return since inception is 7.8%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, current distribution rate as of 1231, 2025. Carefully consider the investment material before investing, including objectives, risks, charges, and expenses.

Starting point is 00:46:54 This and other information can be found in the income funds prospectus at fundrise.com slash income. This is a paid advertisement. All right. Back to the show. Let's talk about red flags. So, although accounting is the language of business, sometimes we can make the wrong interpretation of a company based on the numbers, either because management is intentionally

Starting point is 00:47:14 trying to show us what we want to see as investors or we aren't looking in the right places within the financial statements. How about we'll start with the income statement. What are somebody red flags that you look out for on the income statement? Yeah, there's a couple of them. I define these more as yellow flags, to be perfectly honest. When I think the word red flag, I think that means stop, do not go any further, do not invest. So I call these the flags that we're about to go over, yellow flagged because when I see them tripped, it just to me means investigate further. You need more information about this. So in the income statement in particular, I like to look at the revenue growth rate, and I judge the revenue growth rate from year to year. And if you see a sudden

Starting point is 00:47:53 change in a company's revenue growth rate, that is a signal to Wall Street that the thesis may be running out. And oftentimes, that can trigger a severe decline in the company's stock. So revenue growth rate from year to year is something that I do track. And if a company has a history of growing its revenue 30% per year, and then suddenly it comes out with a report where revenue is growing 10% per year, that is a significant change in the company's revenue growth rate. And when that happens, it's often associated with a meaningful decline in the company's stock price. Another number that I track closely on the income statement is something called gross margin. Gross margin is a company's gross profit divided by its revenue, and it tells you how profitable

Starting point is 00:48:37 a product or services on a unit basis. When the company's gross margin is declining over time, that to me is a big yellow flag that needs to be investigated because it either means the company is being forced to discount its product to consumers in order to drive a nice sales, or its suppliers are increasing prices and the supplies, and the company can't successfully pass those along to consumers, both of which are big yellow flags to me. The final one that I will look at is a company's shares outstanding or how many shares of stock exist. If this number is rapidly increasing over time, more than 3% per year, that to me is a yellow flag because it means the company doesn't respect their equity and is likely diluting shareholders through the issuing

Starting point is 00:49:23 of too much stock-based compensation. So those are three big yellow flags that I look for, a growth rate, gross margin, and the dilution rate. Yeah, I think dilution is definitely an important one to highlight because, you know, using that term I used earlier, it can be a bit more elusive where if you see the stock price falling and management still needs to issue shares just to finance their business, it's a bit in desperation mode, if we can call it that. How about we jump to the balance sheet? What are the red or yellow flags on the balance sheet? First thing I look at when I'm analyzing a balance sheet is the company's cash versus the company's debt. Cash is king in a business. There's only one true sin and that is running out of cash. So I like to compare

Starting point is 00:50:05 how much cash or marketable securities, which is essentially the same thing as cash, a company has, and I compare that to its debt load, both short-term debt and long-term debt. Best case scenario is a company has millions or billions of dollars in cash and zero debt, although that's pretty darn rare. So I at least like to check out the relationship between a company's cash balance and debt balance. And as a general statement, it's okay that a company has debt, but I also want to see plenty of cash to be able to finance and support that debt into the future. So that's the first thing that I checked. Another number that I look for on the balance sheet is something called Goodwill. Goodwill is the premium that companies have paid in the past

Starting point is 00:50:44 to make acquisitions. And it shows how much management teams overspent on the acquired company's assets in order to make the transaction happen. Now, goodwill by itself is not necessarily a bad thing. There's no liquidity to the asset. You can't turn Goodwill back into cash unless you sell the company that you acquired. So I like to make sure that a company's goodwill is less than 10% of the company's total assets. Company can get into trouble if Goodwill becomes the company's largest asset. So if I see Goodwill over 50%, or even 60%, that's when I raise, that to me, is a red flag. And the final thing that I look at are some current assets that are called accounts receivable and inventory. These are assets that the company has that will be converted into cash in the future,

Starting point is 00:51:34 but you don't want too much of a company's liquidity to be tied up in accounts receivable or inventory because the company might have trouble collecting on the accounts receivable that it has or the company might have trouble selling inventory that has and converting it into cash. So if a company has too much working capital or too much accounts receivable or inventory, and that number dwarfs, it's cash balance. To me, that's another red flag. Yeah, I love in one of your videos, you highlighted Goodwill right down by Teledoc. So in 2021, they had $14 billion in Goodwill. And in 2022, that was written down to $1 billion. So just a classic example of a company massively overpaying in an acquisition and, you know, paying for it in the end. That made me feel good as

Starting point is 00:52:21 an investor because I've certainly bought lots of bad stocks that have cost me money, but I've never bought a company that cost $13 billion. So management teams make plenty of mistakes too. Yeah. How about red flags for the cash flow statement finally? Yeah, the cash flow statement is my favorite statement to analyze because it shows you whether or not a company is producing or consuming cash. So one of the first things that I look at on the cash flow statement is the company's net income, and I compare that directly to a company's free cash flow. Now, free cash flow is not a number that's reported on most cash flow but it's easy to calculate. You take operating cash flow and you subtract out capital expenditures.

Starting point is 00:53:01 These numbers are right next to each other on the cash flow statement. What you want to do as an investor is you compare net income to a company's free cash flow. In the best case scenario, a company is producing more free cash flow than it is net income. That would be a positive thing. And the downside, or the worst case scenario, is a company is reporting lots of net income, but its free cash flow is a negative number, which means that the company is quote-unquote profitable on paper, but the company is not actually generating cash from operations. And there's a couple of big reasons why that could happen. They could be related to stock-based compensation expenses.

Starting point is 00:53:40 They could be to big changes in working capital. They could be to just huge capital expenditures to get the business off the ground. So that's not necessarily a red flag, but it definitely is worth a deeper dive as an investor. Another thing that I look at is stock-based compensation. I compare how much stock-based compensation is being issued and compare that to a company's net income. As a general broad statement, I like it when less than 10% of a company's net income is issued as stock-based compensation. That's not always possible with high-growth companies that are in the tech sector, but if a company is issuing stock-based compensation, I want to make sure it's a relatively

Starting point is 00:54:18 small figure. I wanted to jump to one of the items you include in your investing checklist. So one item you look for that would make a stock uninvestable is what you refer to as accounting irregularities. I don't know if I've had anyone discuss this in depth, so I'd love for you to explain this for our listeners. When a company says has to issue a press release saying, we have some accounting irregularities, what they're telling you in plain English is, our financial statements that we have issued in the past are not accurate. They are wrong, and they could be wrong for a bunch of reasons, and they could be wrong in one direction in the other. As a general statement, when a company

Starting point is 00:54:58 does that, that means that they overstated their previous revenue or their profits, and the orders of their companies found significant problems with the way the company reports financial statements. To me, that is the only true red flag that exists. When I'm making an investment, an inherent promise of that investment is that the numbers that I'm using to make a decision about the company and the valuation are accurate. If all of a sudden, I have to question the validity of the numbers that I use to make that decision, I just immediately sell that stock and write that company off as dead to me forever. There are thousands of companies out there that do not have to restate their financial statements. I don't think investors should bother

Starting point is 00:55:42 at all with companies that accounting is a problem. Are there any examples in the past of this happening? Maybe you've owned a company that has published this announcement? Yeah, there's lots of that that happen. They don't always happen to big name companies, but the one that comes to mind immediately was Luckin Coffee, the Chinese high-growth coffee company that in a matter of like three years or something like that had as many locations as Starbucks did and it's like 50-year history as a company. So when I saw that, I was kind of scratching my head like, hmm, that's interesting to see a company that in just a couple of years has matched Starbucks distribution scale. And after being public for a couple of months, they did have to come out and say that we are

Starting point is 00:56:21 restating our financial positions or we found some accounting irregularities. When that happened, the stock dropped like 60% or something like that. And I think peak the trough, the stock went down like 90-ish percent. I believe in the case of Luckin Coffee, the company has since cleaned up its financial act and is back to being in the good graces of Wall Street. And I think the stock has appreciated meaningfully from when it declined. But for me, the investor, I still would have zero faith in the accuracy of Luckin Coffee's financial statements at this point in time.

Starting point is 00:56:50 And to me, I would never include that company in my portfolio. Is it the SEC that's sort of tapping him on the shoulder to confirm that these numbers are correct? And, you know, they find that they're not. Is it the SEC that does it? Is it shareholder pushback or what leads to these irregularities? It's a combination of the SEC and the auditors of the business. So companies that are publicly traded do have to get an outside auditing firm to go in and confirm that the numbers are correct.

Starting point is 00:57:15 This is where the big four auditors come fine. And it's one reason why if an investor does not see one of the big four auditors on the company's financial statements, they oftentimes will have big questions in the place and saying, why are you bothering with this outside auditor? We don't trust them. We do trust the big four auditors in the U.S. But typically, it's a combination of the management team, the auditors, the board of directors, and the regulators that identify whether a company has financial problems or not. Excellent. We've already mentioned David Gardner a couple of times during this conversation, and I mentioned I had just interviewed him and that episode will go live a week after this one. And I

Starting point is 00:57:52 I must say that it's one of my favorite conversations to date. And you worked at The Motley Fool for a number of years, and I know that Gardner was highly influential for you and your investment strategy and whatnot. As I was reading through the book, I know that I see plenty of parallels between how both of you think about the world of investing. And I'll also mention that Gardner, amazingly, I read in his book, that his portfolio has seven 100 baggers and Amazon's more than a 1,000 bagger in his portfolio. So really excited for that episode to go out next week. But But before I give you the final handoff, I was curious if you could just talk a little bit about the impact that David Gardner has had either on you as an investor or as a person.

Starting point is 00:58:32 David is a tremendous human being on so many fronts. And one thing that I really like about studying David's investing style is it's so backwards and so differs so greatly from what you hear from the investing rates like Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger and Seth Klarman, who emphasized valuation first and everything that they do. David is, I view as almost a venture capitalist investor who just so happens to fish in public markets. And he has his six signs of a rule breaker have been instrumental in helping me as an investor. In particular, the thing that he has changed my mind about the boast is valuation and how

Starting point is 00:59:09 to think about companies that are valued. I am a natural value investor. When I first started investing, I looked for big dividend yields and low PE ratios, and And those were the stocks that I wanted to own. So when I heard him say things like, it's okay to pay 100 plus PE ratios for businesses. And when I saw him recommending Amazon and Netflix early on in their growth phase, I thought he was nuts. I just thought he was absolutely backwards and he was violating so many of the sound investing

Starting point is 00:59:39 principles. But when I look back at my biggest winners of all time, the things that have the biggest network impact on my personal net worth, they are almost exclusively companies that David Gardner picked out. Companies like Netflix, Amazon, intuitive, a surgical, axon. These are companies that I never would have put into my portfolio if he hadn't recommended them and convinced me to. And in many cases, I was holding my nose about the valuation and buying and looking back, they were some of the best purchases I ever made. So he's had a tremendous impact on my financial life. Are there any ways in which you feel that your approach differs from his, certain things you

Starting point is 01:00:16 look for that he might not or certain things you emphasize? Yeah, if you look at my checklist and compare it to his, I have more components on my checklist, but I am more of a quality investor at this time. I am okay with giving up the upside potential of a business. I tend to invest at later stages than he does because I want to see more that the thesis has been proven out. One thing that I like about his style is despite picking stock publicly for like 20 plus years, he is perfectly okay with striking out on an investment, going up and being the champion for a company like Peloton early on and saying, yes, I like this company that stock went on fall like 70 plus percent, and he is willing to shake it off, step up to the plate, and still pick another stock that

Starting point is 01:00:59 he thinks has his upside potential. And what he showed me is that it is perfectly okay to lose and it's perfectly okay to have a portfolio filled with losers. You just need to get one Amazon or one Nvidia or one Apple into your portfolio, and the gains that you get from that mega winner will pay for all of your losers combined. Since valuation is such an important piece of looking at the financial statements, you mentioned initially you got attracted to juicy dividend yields to low PE ratios. And I remember very vividly back in college, I saw AT&T at a dividend deal to 5, 6%, and I was like, man, why am I not just putting a bunch of money into this?

Starting point is 01:01:41 these, what I viewed as sort of guaranteed dividends. You know, of course, they probably cut the dividend since then and highly indebted company and whatnot. I don't know if you have anything else that you feel is really important for your journey as an investor. And, you know, looking at the numbers and understanding the numbers, but also understanding how they fit into the bigger picture of understanding, you know, companies value, where that might value might be in the future and just, yeah, viewing that from an investor standpoint. Good investing is all about marrying the left side of your brain with the right side of your brain. And I've learned that good investing is part art and part science.

Starting point is 01:02:18 And you need both working in tandem with each other in order to do well. You need to have the financial knowledge to be able to analyze the company's financial statements and ask, what's happening with revenue, what's happening with margins? Can the company's balance sheet allow it to survive or will it have to raise capital and dilute investors into oblivion? That's a very important skill that you need to know and to look at. Equally important is to be able to see the company where it is today and have the vision in your mind to say, what can happen if this company does what it says it can do?

Starting point is 01:02:48 Or is the future of this company even brighter than the most bullish analyst that's covering this stock today believes? It's oftentimes those companies, the one that's outperform even the most wildly optimistic expectations that are out there that truly go on to deliver life-changing returns for their investors. This is one of the most important things that everybody listening this needs to know. What kind of investor are you? Where on the risk-reward spectrum do you lie?

Starting point is 01:03:15 Are you going after a hundred-bagger stocks? If so, you need to really emphasize the story of the business and really de-emphasize the current financials of the business. If you're a value investor or a dividend investor or a quality investor, you need to really emphasize the financials of a business and de-emphasize the story of the business. But it's really important to know yourself and to know what you're looking for

Starting point is 01:03:37 so you can make the right investing decisions for you. And lastly, how much emphasis do you put on, you know, building a DCF, building a model to determine whether you're going to invest in a stock or not? Personally, I put zero emphasis on DCF models. I don't use DCF models. I know many valuation guros say that they're the only way to value business.

Starting point is 01:03:58 I don't agree with that at all. I think the most useful DCF model is called the reverse DCF model, where you solve for the company's implied growth rate by using the current stock price. That makes a lot of sense to me because you're not making estimates about what the company is going to do. You're seeing what does the market estimate that this company is going to do, and do I think the company can outperform or underperform that. Valuation is one of the most tricky things to do, but I think the simpler you can keep it with valuation, the better you would do as an investor. So when I'm valuing companies, I'm looking at typically reverse discounted cash flow analysis or simple multiples to

Starting point is 01:04:33 determine valuation. I think, while that is a very broad stroke, I think that's all you need to do well as an investor. Well, Brian, this is fantastic. A great conversation for many in our audience to become more familiar with financial statements and understanding how this all fits together and how understanding financial statements can help us as investors. I'd like to give you the final handoff here.

Starting point is 01:04:55 Please let the audience know where they can get in touch with you and maybe even learn more about these concepts. Yeah, so financial statements are a really hard thing to express over a podcast. So if anybody follows me on social media, I create a lot of visuals that kind of explain the nuance of accounting. So if your listeners go to financial statements. Dot school, financial statements. Dot school.

Starting point is 01:05:17 There I have an ebook that has 10 of my most popular accounting infographics, and you can download them, and then they'll make a lot of the concepts we talked about on today's episode make a whole lot more sense. Excellent. Well, Brian, I really can't thank you enough and look forward to our next conversation in the future. Thank you for the invite, Clay. It's a pleasure to be here. Thank you for listening to TIP. Make sure to follow We Study Billionaires on your favorite podcast app and never miss out on episodes. To access our show notes, transcripts or courses, go to theinvestorspodcast.com. This show is for entertainment purposes only before making any decision consult a professional.

Starting point is 01:05:56 This show is copyrighted by the Investors Podcast Network. Written permission must be granted before syndication or rebroadcasting.

We Study Billionaires - The Investor’s Podcast Network - TIP752: Financial Statements Explained Simply w/ Brian Feroldi

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.