We Study Billionaires - The Investor’s Podcast Network - TIP766: Intelligent Fanatics: How Great Business Leaders Win w/ Clay Finck
Episode Date: November 7, 2025In this episode, Clay explores the concept of Intelligent Fanatics. Intelligent Fanatics are visionary leaders who build enduring, high-performance businesses through culture, focus, and integrity. ...Drawing from Ian Cassel and Sean Iddings’ book Intelligent Fanatics, Clay highlights how exceptional leaders like Herb Kelleher, Les Schwab, and Chester Cadieux created companies that thrived for decades by empowering employees, thinking unconventionally, and maintaining a long-term focus. IN THIS EPISODE YOU’LL LEARN: 00:00:00 - Intro 00:02:12 - What defines an Intelligent Fanatic and how they build lasting business moats 00:26:10 - The role of incentives in motivating teams and compounding performance 00:43:32 - How exceptional leaders create cultures that empower employees and drive long-term success 00:47:09 - Why culture is the strongest and hardest-to-replicate competitive advantage 00:50:56 - How frugality, integrity, and focus shape world-class organizations 01:01:35 - How Intelligent Fanatics sustain greatness through experimentation and productive paranoia Disclaimer: Slight discrepancies in the timestamps may occur due to podcast platform differences. BOOKS AND RESOURCES Join the exclusive TIP Mastermind Community to engage in meaningful stock investing discussions with Stig, Clay, Kyle, and the other community members. Ian Cassel’s firm: Intelligent Fanatics Capital Management Related Episode TIP734: My Investment Philosophy w/ Clay Finck. Related Episode TIP656: Mastering Stock Selection with an Investment Checklist w/ Clay Finck. Follow Clay on X and LinkedIn. Related books mentioned in the podcast. Ad-free episodes on our Premium Feed. NEW TO THE SHOW? Get smarter about valuing businesses in just a few minutes each week through our newsletter, The Intrinsic Value Newsletter. Check out our We Study Billionaires Starter Packs. Follow our official social media accounts: X (Twitter) | LinkedIn | Instagram | Facebook | TikTok. Browse through all our episodes (complete with transcripts) here. Try our tool for picking stock winners and managing our portfolios: TIP Finance Tool. Enjoy exclusive perks from our favorite Apps and Services. Learn how to better start, manage, and grow your business with the best business podcasts. SPONSORS Support our free podcast by supporting our sponsors: HardBlock Human Rights Foundation Masterworks Linkedin Talent Solutions Simple Mining Plus500 Netsuite Fundrise Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm
Transcript
Discussion (0)
You're listening to TIP.
The concept of intelligent fanatics has interested me for years.
Intelligent Fanatics are individuals who are obsessed with building a resilient business
that's able to grow and create tremendous shareholder value for multiple decades.
The term was first coined by Charlie Munger and later explored in-depth by Ian Castle and Sean
Idings in their book, Intelligent Fanatics.
The author studied leaders across industries and eras who achieves remarkable
success, not through luck or industry tailwinds, but through strong cultures, unconventional thinking,
and long-term vision. In this episode, we'll explore what makes intelligent fanatics so unique,
how their values and leadership styles allowed them to outperform for decades, and what lessons
we as investors can draw from them when evaluating management teams today. We'll dive into real-world
examples to see how these individuals built in during modes rooted in people, culture, and mission.
So with that, I hope you enjoyed today's episode on Intelligent Fanatics by Ian Castle and Sean
idings.
Since 2014 and through more than 180 million downloads, we've studied the financial markets
and read the books that influence self-made billionaires the most.
We keep you informed and prepared for the unexpected.
Now for your host, Playfink.
Welcome to the Investors podcast.
I'm your host, Clay Fink.
and today we're going to be chatting about Intelligent Fanatics.
I recently picked up this book titled Intelligent Fanatics, written by Ian Castle and Sean
Idings, which was written back in 2016 and is actually now out of print.
Many of our listeners are going to be familiar with Ian as he's been a guest on the show
several times.
Ian's a full-time MicroCap investor and the chief investment officer of Intelligent Fanatics
Capital Management.
He's also the founder of MicroCapClub.com, which he started back in 2011.
Intelligent Fanatics is certainly an interesting topic to cover here on the show.
Companies that sustainably grow profits for decades do so with a strong moat that creates
a barrier to competition stealing market share.
And moats don't just come about by accident.
Oftentimes, they're built by intelligent fanatics who lead the organization to success.
In the book, the authors share the stories of eight intelligent fanatics who would, on average,
deliver a 24% average annualized return over more than 30 years.
These fanatics operated in a wide array of industries during different time periods
and different geographies and against different economic backdrops,
but their leadership styles, strategies, corporate cultures, and values turned out to be quite similar.
The term intelligent fanatic is believed to have originated from Charlie Munger.
We can define it as a business leader with the following attributes.
It's a founder, CEO, or management team with unconventional ideas and a fanatical drive to build a
high-performance organization.
These managers are learning machines that can quickly adapt to change and are able to create
a trust-based culture that aligns everyone to think like owners.
They focus on acquiring, training, and motivating the best talent, and they think in 10-year
time horizons and invest in their business accordingly.
Lastly, they're able to create an impenetrable moat that competitors initially cannot understand
and eventually fear, regardless of the industry they're in.
A big part of investing is understanding the moat, in the direction with which the moat is heading,
and oftentimes what underpins that moat is the managers running the business.
Managers who can grow and increase the strength of a moat over decades are hard to come by.
But in today's episode, we'll walk through a few of the case studies outlined.
in this book. Charlie Munger described intelligent fanatics as a world-class business builder.
Without studying what a world-class business builder is, how can you expect to identify one when you
come across them? One of the things I've picked up about intelligent fanatics is that these
types of personalities are simply wired much differently than your typical manager. For intelligent
fanatics, their business is their life's work. They live and breathe their business. When they leave work,
they're thinking about their business, not necessarily because they have to, but because they want to.
Reed Hastings, the founder of Netflix, once said,
When some idea is shaking you so hard, you're willing to go into poverty to make it a reality.
That's when you become an entrepreneur, end quote.
Let's take someone like Jensen Wong, for example, as well.
Jensen is worth over $150 billion.
If you or myself ever became worth even a billion dollars, we would probably take our foot off
the gas, you know, take an extra vacation or two and enjoy life more. But Jensen is simply not wired
that way. He stated that he works from the moment he wakes up to the moment he goes to bed,
seven days a week. Even during his downtime, like watching a movie, he is mentally occupied with
NVIDIA and his work. If I were operating in the chip industry, I would be terrified to go
head to head against someone like that. One of the other interesting things about intelligent
fanatics is how they're able to sustain greatness and dominate their industry for multiple
decades. It's one thing to grow your business over, say, three or five years, but it's another
thing to dominate for 30 years or more. Those are the investments that we'd prefer to find, since
they've built something that is more durable and proven, and they tend to generate the best long-term
returns for shareholders. Charlie Munger studied a countless number of intelligent fanatics,
But one that everyone will be familiar with is Sam Walton. Munger talked about how interesting
it is that Sam Walton started with Walmart as a single store in Bentonville, Arkansas,
and was competing against massive retailers with a brand name, reputation, and billions
of dollars of capital at their disposal. But over time, Walmart blew right by all of them
within Sam Walton's lifetime. Walton invented practically nothing in the retail industry,
But he played the retail game harder and better than anyone else. One of the ways in which
Walmart got off the ground was that they started out in small towns and went up against weak
competition. He was essentially picking fights that he knew he could win. This gave Walmart
the experience and the momentum to eventually start boxing against the heavy weights.
For most entrepreneurs, the odds are stacked against them, yet they push forward anyway.
First-time entrepreneurs have a success rate of just 18 percent, and a failure to
failed first-time entrepreneur that goes for a second venture has a 20% chance of success.
There's no doubt that success as an entrepreneur is difficult to achieve. And what's even more
difficult is sustaining that success. Imagine if you were to invest in Walmart in the 1960s when
it just had a few stores. You wouldn't be investing in the concept of Walmart. You were really
investing in Sam Walton. This idea helps illustrate how important it is to know the management
a team you're investing alongside, in what they're setting out to build, especially if you're
investing in smaller companies.
We've covered many well-known intelligent fanatics here on the podcast, including names like
Jeff Bezos, Warren Buffett, Mark Leonard, Howard Schultz, Bernard Arnaud, and Jensen Wong to share
a few examples.
But this book covered some of the lesser-known examples throughout history.
The three intelligent fanatics we'll be covering today are Erb Kelleher from Southwest Airlines,
Les Schwab from Les Schwab Tire Centers, and Chester Kajou, for
from Quick Trip. Let's start here with Herb Kelleher, the co-founder of Southwest Airlines.
The game of business is already difficult. And if you want to dial the lever to extreme
difficulty, then I would recommend starting an airline company. The airline industry is notoriously
brutal because it combines high fixed costs with razor-thin profit margins, leaving little
room for error. Demand for flights ebbs and flows with the economy. You're at the whims of fuel
price changes daily, an intense price competition makes it hard for most airlines to stay consistently
profitable. Airlines also face labor disputes, weather disruptions, and heavy regulations,
an intense number of headwinds to go up against no matter how good of a business person
you are. Since the aviation industry deregulated in 1978, 198 airline companies have declared
bankruptcy, and the U.S. airline industry has lost $60 billion. No industry can match
such staggering statistics. But Southwest Airlines bucked the trend of operating in such a brutal
industry. After being founded in 1966, Southwest Airlines had 15 months of startup losses,
and every single year since then, they've turned a profit, with the exception of COVID in 2020.
Given such a track record, luck could not be the only factor. There were several intelligent
fanatics in the Southwest story. The main one we'll cover here is Erb Kelleher.
Southwest Airlines is who I personally most commonly fly with as they're a leader in offering
basic economy flights.
In my experience, they tend to offer the best prices, a good overall experience, and they
have friendly staff.
I don't know too many people that love flying, but I feel that Southwest makes the overall
experience feel a bit more alive than your typical flight experience.
However, Southwest doesn't always have the best options in terms of flight times and layovers,
which leads me to occasionally use another airline.
I also liked that Southwest has an open seating policy instead of assigned seats,
meaning that you just grab whatever seats available when you get on the plane.
And they're actually getting rid of the open seating assignments in 2026, so some people
are a bit annoyed by that.
And with them also dropping their longstanding two free checked bags policy, for many customers
starting this year, I think they're letting go of some of the things that made them unique
in a highly commoditized and competitive industry.
So turning back to Southwest here and Kelleher,
Kelleher was born in New Jersey in 1931,
and his mother taught him that every person in every job
is worth as much as any other person or any other job.
This value would live on and permeate in the culture at Southwest Airlines,
which he co-founded when he was 35 years old in 1966.
While he was a lawyer, one of his clients was running an airline in California,
which exposed them to the business and the industry, and the two partnered up in launching Southwest Airlines
in Texas to provide flights between Houston, San Antonio, and Dallas. After raising a half a million
dollars, it would take them around five years of working with regulators before they were able to
send their first flight. Incumbents in the industry benefited from a regulated monopoly,
established by the government, and competitors weren't too happy about Southwest wanting to
enter the market as a discount airline. So they did everything in their power.
to prevent Southwest from getting off the ground.
Since it took them longer than expected to start bringing in revenue,
Kelleher offered to provide legal services for free
to work through the trials with the incumbents that were making life difficult for them.
Luckily, Kelleher was able to work through the trials
and allow Southwest to send planes into the sky.
In the recent recession,
also left a lot of talent available for them to pick up and take advantage of and bring on board.
Southwest needed additional capital to continue to fend off the incumbent,
so they filed for an IPO to give them greater access to the capital markets, and shares began
trading publicly in June of 1971 as they raised $7 million. Southwest only had three airplanes
in their early 1970s and was able to run a profitable organization. In the years leading up to
1973, they were facing some issues with filling their planes with paying customers, so to help
stimulate more demand, Lamar Mews, then the CEO of Southwest, and Erb Kelleherd, they developed a
strategy to lower the price of their flight from San Antonio to Dallas from $26 to $13 with
with no restrictions on the discount.
The tactic worked to their favor, but unfortunately, one of the big competitors, Braniff,
they were one of the largest airline operators in Texas.
They decided that they didn't want a new player in town stealing market share.
So they also lowered the price of some of their flights to $13 as well.
This move meant little from a financial perspective to Braniff, but it was a very important.
a huge deal to Southwest, as it could have bankrupted them. Rather than fold, Mews and
Kelleherd quickly developed a marketing strategy that not only allowed them to win, but also
led Braniff to exit their route to Dallas two years later. So what Southwest did was they put
a two-page advertisement in the Houston and Dallas newspapers with the caption,
Nobody's going to shoot Southwest Airlines out of the sky for a lousy $13. Then the ad described
how Southwest was giving customers a choice. They could pay the reduced.
fare of $13, or they could pay the nominal fare of $26 and receive a complimentary whiskey or
vodka beverage, and non-drinkers would receive a complimentary leather bucket, which was a classy
bar accessory popular in the 1970s.
When they ran this promotion, over three-fourths of passengers chose the normal fare price
of $26 plus the gift.
In Southwest, was the largest liquor distributor in Texas for a few months.
As you can imagine, business travelers absolutely loved the deal and they would charge the expense
on their business card.
And it's a classic example of an intelligent fanatic outsmarting an established competitor
and getting creative with the solution to a problem.
The next problem they tackled was decreasing the turnaround time for the planes between when
they landed in the airport and when they took off.
This includes pulling the plane up to the gate, unloading the passengers, loading the new passengers,
and pushing back from the gate.
Airlines had a turnaround time around 45 minutes to an hour, but Southwest's ground operations
guru, Bill Franklin, he believed that a Boeing 737 could be turned around in just 10 minutes
or less.
And the workers at Southwest were too new to the industry and too inexperienced enough to not really
know any different when they were told that they were going to turn around much quicker
than their competitors.
Southwest was actually able to pull this off, and it became one of the hallmarks of the company.
Southwest management team was determined to bring air travel to the masses.
Prior to 1971, air travel was restricted to the elite who could afford the high prices
regulated by the government.
In light of the deregulation that was to take place, Southwest wanted to capitalize on the
demand that was coming in the decades ahead.
In the company's early days, they hired Lamar Mews as a CEO who did a great job at growing
the business before going off and starting his own airline.
Kelleher would become the new CEO in 1981 and would stay in that role until 2001.
He led Southwest from $270 million in revenue to $5.7 billion and was profitable every
year.
No other airline has been able to match that kind of record in the United States.
The key to Kelleher's success was unconventional thinking.
In Southwest's early days, he was told that the company wouldn't be able to survive without
the six best practices that were used by other kids.
carriers. In an unconventional fashion, Kelleher would follow none of them. Kelleher wanted to
provide lower fares and enable a greater number of Americans to fly. So really, Southwest would not
be actually competing with many of the other airlines, but with other forms of transportation.
To bring down the cost of air travel, Southwest did four things. First, they focused on the less
costly and less congested airports such as Dallas's Love Field and Hobby Airport in Houston.
Direct flights between these small airports allowed the company to utilize its aircraft most
efficiently and get passengers directly to where they needed to go.
And these airports tend to be situated closer to downtown locations, making them more
attractive to customers who are time-sensitive, such as businessmen.
I frequently fly out of Omaha, which would be right up Southwest's Alley for their
target customer base they described here.
Omaha doesn't have an international airport, so it's quite small in comparison to an airport
like O'Hare and Chicago. And Omaha's airport is just a six-minute drive from downtown. If you look
at many international airports, they tend to be not near as close to the downtown areas of the city.
So second, Southwest focused on operating only one type of aircraft, the Boeing 737. This gave
them bargaining power and new airplane purchases and the power to make suggestions and how these
planes are designed. This also reduced the time needed to train pilots, mechanics, and other workers.
Third, Southwest understood that planes are only driving revenue if they're in the air.
So they reduced the amount of times that planes were on the ground by 90%, just a 10-minute turnaround
times.
This allowed them to get more out of their planes and more out of their employees relative to their
competitors.
And finally, Southwest took good care of their employees.
They're able to retain highly qualified, hardworking employees by providing an atmosphere
that reinforces individual responsibility and offers a good care of their employees.
opportunities for advancement. As a result, employee turnover is well below the industry average.
Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors. All right, I want you guys to imagine
spending three days in Oslo at the height of the summer. You've got long days of daylight,
incredible food, floating saunas on the Oslo Fjord, and every conversation you have is with people
who are actually shaping the future. That's what the Oslo Freedom Forum is. From June 1st through
the third, 2026, the Oslo Freedom Forum is entering its 18th year bringing together activists,
technologists, journalists, investors, and builders from all over the world, many of them
operating on the front lines of history. This is where you hear firsthand stories from people
using Bitcoin to survive currency collapse, using AI to expose human rights abuses, and building
technology under censorship and authoritarian pressures. These aren't abstract ideas. These are
tools real people are using right now. You'll be in the room with about 2,000 extraordinary individuals,
dissidents, founders, philanthropists, policymakers, the kind of people you don't just listen to,
but end up having dinner with. Over three days, you'll experience powerful mainstage talks,
hands-on workshops on freedom tech, and financial sovereignty, immersive art installations,
and conversations that continue long after the sessions end. And it's all happening in Oslo in June.
If this sounds like your kind of room, well, you're in luck because you can attend in person.
Standard and patron passes are available at Osloof Freedom Forum.com with patron passes offering
deep access, private events, and small group time with the speakers.
The Oslo Freedom Forum isn't just a conference. It's a place where ideas meet reality
and where the future is being built by people living it.
If you run a business, you've probably had the same thought lately. How do we make AI useful
in the real world, because the upside is huge, but guessing your way into it is a risky move.
With NetSuite by Oracle, you can put AI to work today.
NetSuite is the number one AI cloud ERP, trusted by over 43,000 businesses.
It pulls your financials, inventory, commerce, HR, and CRM into one unified system.
And that connected data is what makes your AI smarter.
It can automate routine work, surface actionable insights, and help you cut costs while making
fast, AI-powered decisions with confidence. And now with the Netsuite AI connector, you can use the
AI of your choice to connect directly to your real business data. This isn't some add-on,
it's AI built into the system that runs your business. And whether your company does millions
or even hundreds of millions, Netsuite helps you stay ahead. If your revenues are at least in the
seven figures, get their free business guide, demystifying AI at Netsuite.com slash study. The guide is free to
at netsuite.com slash study.
NetSuite.com slash study.
When I started my own side business,
it suddenly felt like I had to become 10 different people
overnight wearing many different hats.
Starting something from scratch can feel exciting,
but also incredibly overwhelming and lonely.
That's why having the right tools matters.
For millions of businesses, that tool is Shopify.
Shopify is the commerce platform
behind millions of businesses around the world
and 10% of all e-commerce in the U.S. from brands just getting started to household names.
It gives you everything you need in one place, from inventory to payments to analytics.
So you're not juggling a bunch of different platforms.
You can build a beautiful online store with hundreds of ready-to-use templates,
and Shopify is packed with helpful AI tools that write product descriptions and even enhance
for product photography.
Plus, if you ever get stuck, they've got award-winning 24-7 customer support.
Start your business today with the industry's best business partner, Shopify, and start hearing
sign up for your $1 per month trial today at Shopify.com slash WSB.
Go to Shopify.com slash WSB.
That's Shopify.com slash WSB.
All right.
Back to the show.
Each employee at Southwest was treated the same.
And Kelleher created a culture of employees who think in
to act like owners. Each employee had the opportunity to participate in a profit-sharing program,
and the company offered a hefty employer match in 401k retirement plans. Because Southwest had a culture
of people who thought like owners, they weren't stuck in the corporate bureaucracy and red tape
that held other airlines back. For example, in 1990, word got around that Midway Airlines was out
of cash and would be closing its doors in Chicago, providing the opportunity for another airline
to step in to take their place.
Before Midway had even made the announcement, Southwest already had a team of lawyers negotiating
with city officials and letting them know that they would invest $20 million into the airport
and make use of the open gates.
You know, it's one thing to say that you take care of your employees, and it's another
thing for employees themselves to actually feel that way.
And one thing that's important when it comes to making employees feel valued and cared for is
job security.
Southwest Airlines is the only airline in one of the few corporations in any industry that
has been able to run for decades without ever imposing a furlough.
When necessary, they find cost reductions elsewhere, and that has promoted healthy employee
morale within the organization.
And one thing that some bigger, more bureaucratic companies get wrong is how they think about risk.
At bigger companies, taking risks typically isn't encouraged, and thus, innovation is stifled.
Kelleher recognized that taking calculated risks is essential to improving the business.
And with any risk comes failure.
However, Southwest never took big financial risks.
They grew conservatively and only expanded outside of Texas when it made financial sense
to do so.
Expansion was financed internally, whereas other airlines would likely take on debt to grow
market share rather than profits. They recognized the hidden dangers that were awaiting as an airline
operator. For example, in 1990, Iraq invaded Kuwait, which led to a surge in jet fuel in an economic
recession, which led to two major U.S. carriers filing for bankruptcy. Most carriers weren't prepared
for such a downturn, but Southwest was, and they remained profitable both in 1990 and in 1991.
One of the common themes that Sean and Ian found in the Intelligent Fanatic studied was simple
and effective communication, both internally and externally.
They shared a letter in the book that was a note that they'd sent internally in 1995 that
discussed how important every single customer is on the plane.
It outlined how the finance department found that on average, they needed at least 75
customers on their flight for that single flight to become profitable.
From an organizational standpoint, if you took the profit for the year and divided that by the total
flights flown, Southwest had an average profit per flight of $287 in 1994.
If you take that $287 of profit per flight and divided by the average fare, that gave you the number
of customers per flight that accounted for the profit generated for the year.
It turned out that it was just five customers per flight accounted for all.
all of the profits that Southwest generated. In other words, just 7% of their customers accounted
for the difference between profit and loss. When the management team framed the business in this
manner, it was clearly communicated just how valuable every customer is to Southwest and to the employees.
It also helped them understand that each employee did make a real difference in such an
organization with over 15,000 employees at the time. And this data is quite interesting to learn if you were
working at the company. Intelligent fanatics care about their business and the well-being of their
employees, so they feel an obligation to serve as a teacher to every shareholder.
Kelleher's efforts at Southwest certainly paid off for shareholders as well. Investing in Southwest
Airlines at the IPO in June of 1971 and holding shares until Kelleher stepped down in 2001
would have generated a 25% compounded annual growth rate relative to this S&P 500's return of
8.5% over that same time period. A true sign of an intelligent fanatic-led organization
is that the business continues to outperform even after the intelligent fanatic has fully exited
the business. Shares of South-Uice Airlines did quite well from 2001 until this book was
released in the 2015-2016 timeframe, and the stock performance has been quite lacklester since then
as they've struggled with increased costs of labor and fuel, which is part of the reason
that margins have fallen drastically.
Another intelligent fanatic that Munger spoke highly of is Lesh Schwab, the founder of Lesh Schwab Tire
Centers.
Schwab was born in 1917 in Bend, Oregon, and had a rough upbringing as both of his parents
passed away in his teens.
Schwab worked his tail off for as long as he could remember and fought in World War II
for his country and received his education and business in the newspaper industry.
It was in the newspaper business where he started testing out different incentive programs,
with employees. The book writes here, the success of vitting business is directly correlated to
its ability to motivate its people through clever systems and incentives. Lesh Schwab understood
this like no other and was constantly tinkering through trial and error to get the most out of his
people, end quote. One hugely successful system Schwab created was the Honor Carrier Program,
which helped increase the newspaper circulation significantly. The program incentivized newspaper
carriers to acquire new customers, provide impeccable service, and collect and keep financial
records about their routes.
There were three levels that each carrier could achieve, and the reward was both intrinsic and
extrinsic.
Top newspaper carriers would get their picture and story in the paper and receive a $25 bond.
The beauty of this incentive structure was that the cost of the incentive to the newspaper
was small, but it provided a large return on investment, and the carriers were challenged
and pleased that their hard work actually would pay off. I feel pretty lucky to work for a company
that takes a similar approach to compensating employees. I'm incentivized to increase the topline
revenue for the company I work for without significantly increasing the level of costs,
and I earn a financial reward just one month after that revenue is generated. It's nice that I don't
have to wait a year or even multiple years to see the fruit of my labor. I've worked at jobs
in the past where they throw out these vague ideas like profit sharing and the potential
for a promotion without giving the employees anything concrete or giving them an idea of what the
potential payoffs or rewards will be down the line. So there was just much less transparency around
it, which I believe led to employees that were less motivated. The other thing I appreciate
about my current incentive structure is how concrete it is. I don't have to necessarily guess
what my compensation will be or will I have to negotiate after the fact when it's all said and done.
And lastly, just like the owners, I share in both the upside and the downside of the business.
Too often, incentive structures benefit someone on the upside, but they don't share in the
downside risk if things go wrong.
For example, if I were incentivized to double revenue of the business, but didn't share
any of the risk if revenue ended up going down, then I might do some risky things that
simply aren't sustainable or have the potential to actually decrease revenue.
It would be like a baseball player trying to hit a home run every time he steps up to the plate,
even when the odds of his team winning would be much better if he just stepped up and instead
tried to go for a single or double each at bat.
In starting Les Schwab Tire Center, Schwab was working to unlock the superpower of incentives
and generate success both for his business and his employees.
Schwab's first employees, Bill Welch and Frank Kennedy, originally were part of an informal
profit-sharing agreement when the business started in the 1950s.
Profits were split 50-50 with the employees, which was an unusual and unconventional arrangement
for any company during that time.
But quality incentives are only worthwhile if the growth opportunity for the company is present
and significant.
If I put myself in the shoes of the employees, there really isn't much to be excited about
if I get half the profits of a company that isn't addressing a sizable need in the market.
Schwab used less Schwab Tire Center as an avenue to empower young, ambitious,
men who wanted to become successful. So he opened up a chain of stores for others to manage. He would
take half the profits and use that capital to open new stores where he felt there was good opportunities
to grow. As the conglomerate and the stores themselves grew, the incentive structure needed to adapt,
and Schwab recognized that. So he asked his managers to appoint their best worker to assistant manager
and to give them 10% of the store's profits. With both Schwab and the manager giving up 5%. Some managers
weren't too keen on giving up equity, and Schwab was blunt in sharing that if there's a hardworking
employee who has done well for the company and shown loyalty, then it's selfish not to give him
the opportunity to advance further in his career. Due to the pushback from some, he even went
as far as incentivizing managers to change. A new rule was put in place stating that if managers
did not have an assistant manager by the end of the year, Schwab would end up taking 55%
of the profits and leave the manager with only 45%. In the book, they shared a great quote from Schwab,
he said, Problems create opportunity. The solution to a problem is common sense, open communication,
complete honesty, and the desire to help your fellow man become a successful person, end quote.
And Schwab was a master at helping others succeed. He always encouraged his managers to treat their
employees well because he believed that the way a company treated their employees would
directly affect how employees would treat the customer. Schwab also believed that the more he shared
with the employees, the more the business would succeed, and the more resources that would eventually
be available to give others opportunities to also become successful. Once employees were in these
programs, it would be hard for them and the company as a whole not to become successful, because the
incentives were just so powerful. Schwab also wanted to offer incentives to the employees who
had worked with the business the longest, which increased employee loyalty.
The entire playbook was laid out for employees, and they were told in simple terms all of the details of the profit-sharing agreement.
Talking about incentives sounds great on paper, but in many cases, it can be difficult to effectively align the incentives.
For example, if I were an assistant manager at a tire shop, it would be much easier for me to eventually replace the manager at my store who's nearing retirement than to apply to open a new store my own.
This was one of the many puzzles that Les was able to crack.
He ensured that the new managers at top stores would be reserved for applicants who either
had pioneered a new store themselves or turned around a poor performing store.
This ensured that managers truly had to earn their keep and weren't simply looking for profit
sharing handouts.
After the new system was in place, quality managers were eager to turn around some of the
poorer performing stores or take over new stores in their quest to get the top spot.
at a top store. Another problem that Schwab faced was the rising cost of opening new stores. In the
1950s and 60s, the cost to open stores was minimal relative to the 70s, which made it difficult
for a new store to reach profitability. Since rent was paid on the value of the building, the older,
larger stores were paying a smaller percentage of their sales and rent, so new stores were paying a
much higher percentage of sales relative to the older stores. So to solve this problem, Schwab required
every store to pay the same amount of rent as a percentage of sales. This allowed new stores to pay
a much lower amount in the earlier years when they were just started and getting off the ground,
and the older stores were on board with this because it aligned with the company's mission and
their values of giving the newcomers opportunities to succeed. As opening up a new store became
more and more difficult, Schwab put programs in place to support these new owners and give
them a path to profitability in their first year of business. Like other intelligent finance,
Schwab clearly had an unconventional business acumen. Conventional wisdom was to give corporate
executives large pay packages and pay the grunt workers much lower wages. At Leshawab Tire
Centers, the highest overall pay packages were not to Les Schwab or to these executives,
but to the people who really mattered, which were the store managers. As profits are being distributed
around the company, people can be tempted to try and negotiate their way to get a greater share
of the pie. Schwab had a falling out.
with a couple of employees who wanted larger equity stakes, contrary to their original agreement,
and Schwab wasn't interested in working with greedy people who don't keep their word. Like many
intelligent fanatics that we've covered here on the show, Schwab ran his business in a decentralized
fashion and preferred that the people running the tire shop had the autonomy to run the business
as if it was their own. The author's right here, authority and autonomy promote a feeling
of control and self-worth that is intrinsically valuable to employees.
To operate with such a model is difficult without the right amount of communication among
separate businesses, the hiring of quality individuals, or clear corporate values for employees
to abide by."
When Lesh Schwab acquired Tire Stores in Idaho in 1966, this was what he told the new store
managers he expected of them.
The big thing that's going to hit you right between the eyes is that we expect you to run
the store.
You're on your own and you will sink or swim according to your abilities.
It takes quite a man to be a store manager."
Schwab believed that decision-making is best executed at the lowest level.
Store employees are oftentimes the individuals with perfect information and knowledge of the
situation at hand, and once manuals are created, these manuals tend to only grow.
And soon enough, your company is just another big corporation.
To Schwab, the main job of the head office was to provide motivation to create programs
that make it possible for employees to be successful, and to track and communicate how well stores
are doing.
He also implemented an open book policy, so employees could get practically any information they wanted
about the business, including company profits, employee salaries, and so forth.
He even put together a report that showed the net profit of each store and distributed it to employees.
Leswap Tire Centers has been a private company during its entire corporate existence,
So there are few records on the profitability and revenue of the company, but regardless of the lack of data,
we do know that they grew from one store to hundreds of stores in operations today,
and billions of dollars in revenue, generating tremendous value for shareholders.
The third intelligent fanatic I wanted to be sure to cover on the show today is Chester Cajot,
who's the founder of QuickTrip.
For those in the audience who aren't familiar, QuickTrip is a chain of convenience stores and gas stations known for its clean facilities,
friendly service, and made to order food and drinks. From 1962 to 2015, QuickTrip grew its revenue
base from $1 million to $11 billion. Whenever my friends and I would drive down to Kansas City,
one of the highlights of our trip was always swinging by a quick trip to grab a steak and cheese
tequito or one of their other convenience snacks that they have hot and ready to eat.
Buckies is actually probably my favorite convenience store here in the U.S., but unfortunately
there aren't really any in my general area, so QuickTrip would have to take the crown as the top
convenience store that I'm able to visit. Warren Buffett once tried his hand at the convenience
store business. In 1951, him and his friend from the National Guard, they purchased a
Sinclair service station. In those days, a service station consisted of a few pumps out front,
an on-site repair garage and limited offerings, if any, inside. Buffett was only 21 years old
at the time, and there was a Texaco station right across the street.
And that taught him the hard way, the importance of having a competitive advantage in business.
It was seven years later in 1958 that Chester Cajot was looking to get into the gas retail business
himself and like Buffett, he had no clue what he was getting himself into.
But unlike Buffett, he was eventually able to go head to head and really compete with the
other players instead of exiting the industry like Buffett did.
In the 1960s and 70s, there was little competition in the convenience industry.
Since these businesses provided longer hours of operation than supermarkets, customers were willing
to pay higher prices.
In the beginning, QuickTrip did about everything wrong.
They opened their first store in Tulsa, Oklahoma, but paid little attention to where the
most attractive location would be, and the merchandise was poorly chosen.
After the first three years, the company was on the verge of bankruptcy, but they managed to scrape
by with a few lucky breaks.
Kajot's success was highly influenced by his long-term mindset, his ability to be able to be
ability to adapt and his willingness to continuously learn. For example, QuickTrip started installing
gas pumps in 1972, once self-service became legal in two states and had built up financial
and intellectual capital to prepare for such a move. Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors.
No, it's not your imagination. Risk and regulation are ramping up and customers now expect
proof of security just to do business. That's why Vanta is a game changer. Vanta
automates your compliance process and brings compliance, risk, and customer trust together on
one AI-powered platform. So whether you're prepping for a stock two or running an enterprise
GRC program, VANTA keeps you secure and keeps your deals moving. Instead of chasing spreadsheets
and screenshots, VANTA gives you continuous automation across more than 35 security and privacy
frameworks. Companies like Ramp and Riter spend 82% less time on audits with Vantta. That's not just
faster compliance, it's more time for growth. If I were running a startup or scaling a team today,
this is exactly the type of platform I'd want in place. Get started at vanta.com slash billionaires.
That's vanta.com slash billionaires. Ever wanted to explore the world of online trading,
but haven't dared try? The futures market is more active now than ever before, and plus 500 futures
is the perfect place to start.
Plus 500 gives you access to a wide range of instruments,
the S&P 500, NASDAQ, Bitcoin, gas, and much more.
Explore equity indices, energy, metals, 4X, crypto, and beyond.
With a simple and intuitive platform, you can trade from anywhere, right from your phone.
Deposit with a minimum of $100 and experience the fast, accessible futures trading
you've been waiting for.
See a trading opportunity.
you'll be able to trade it in just two clicks once your account is open. Not sure if you're ready,
not a problem. Plus 500 gives you an unlimited risk-free demo account with charts and analytic
tools for you to practice on. With over 20 years of experience, Plus 500 is your gateway to the markets.
Visit plus500.com to learn more. Trading in futures involves risk of loss and is not suitable for
everyone. Not all applicants will qualify.
Plus 500, it's trading with a plus.
Billion dollar investors don't typically park their cash in high-yield savings accounts.
Instead, they often use one of the premier passive income strategies for institutional investors,
private credit.
Now, the same passive income strategy is available to investors of all sizes, thanks to the
Fundrise income fund, which has more than $600 million invested in a 7.97% distribution rate,
With traditional savings yields falling, it's no wonder private credit has grown to be a trillion-dollar asset class in the last few years.
Visit fundrise.com slash WSB to invest in the Fundrise income fund in just minutes.
The fund's total return in 2025 was 8%, and the average annual total return since inception is 7.8%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results, current distribution rate as of 1231, 2025.
carefully consider the investment material before investing, including objectives, risks, charges,
and expenses. This and other information can be found in the income funds prospectus at
Fundrise.com slash income. This is a paid advertisement. All right, back to the show.
Cajot's competitive advantage over his larger rivals was his focus on employees in innovation.
He would spend a large part of his time, roughly two months out of the year, and direct
communication with QuickTrip employees. He had stated, without fail, each year we learn something
important from a question or comment voiced by a single employee. Cajot believed in treating
employees well and incentivizing them properly. And employees then provide exceptional service
to the customers, so very similar to what Lesh Schwab was talking about. Amazing customer service
will lead to customer loyalty, which is difficult to replicate, especially by competitors
who don't value their employees.
The authors write here, exceptional employees and a quality corporate culture have allowed
a quick trip to stay ahead of the competition from convenience stores, gas retailers,
quick service restaurants, cafes, and hypermarkets, end quote.
Similar to Schwab, Kjo's main objective was always about employees in giving them opportunities
to grow and succeed.
On leadership, Kajos stated, leaders are not necessarily born with the highest IQs or the
most drive to succeed, or the greatest people skills. Instead, the best leaders are adaptive.
They understand the necessity of pulling bright, energetic people into their world and tapping
their determination and drive. True leaders never feel comfortable staying in the same course for too
long or following conventional wisdom. They inherently understand the importance of constantly
breaking out routines in order to recognize the changing needs of their customers and employees,
end quote. I think many people view leaders as someone with these naturally born talents or
personality traits, but I like how Cajot, he really prioritizes more of these soft traits,
like adaptability and the desire for continuous learning. At QuickTrip, this mindset translated
into a culture where employees were really encouraged to take the initiative, learn from experiences,
and grow into leadership roles over time. Cajot understood that by investing in people and giving
them room to develop, he was not just building stronger employees, but future leaders who would
carry the company's values forward and showcase loyalty to the company.
Kujo preferred to pay new entry-level employees higher wages relative to the competitors.
This led to a higher number of applicants for positions, which allowed QuickTrip to be highly
selective in who would be able to join the organization.
QuickTrip was in the privileged position of interviewing roughly three out of every 100 applicants
they received. And due to their culture of excellence, the applicants that made it through the hiring
process were also self-selective as only 70% of new hires would make it out of training. And around
50% would last in the job for six months. But for employees who stuck around for that long,
they tended to stick around for a very long time. According to the book here, Quicktrip's
turnover rate was roughly 13% compared to the industry average of 59%. Quicktrip was also a pime.
and paying employees a bonus based on their stores operating profit and allowing employees
to own a large stake in QuickTrip through the company's employee stock ownership program.
Cajot's main motivation wasn't to make the most money for himself, but to develop the best
people and to provide the best service to customers.
He once said, it just so happens that by making our employees successful, we made our shareholders
successful and we make our customers happy.
So it's clear that these intelligent fanatics were able to build colds.
cultures that really empowered their people at every level of the organization.
Kjo's approach at QuickTrip mirrors the same core principles seen in other great companies,
where adaptability, a strong culture, and investment in people become the foundation for long-term
success.
These qualities form the essence of what's described as the intelligent fanatic model, a framework
for how exceptional leaders turn human potential into a lasting competitive advantage.
In the 2010 Berkshire-Hathaway shareholder letter, Buffett stated,
Our final advantage is the hard-to-duplicate culture that permeates Berkshire.
And in businesses, culture counts, end quote.
Companies that can harness the full potential of human capital can build nimble,
sustainable organizations that are hard to replicate.
In covering many types of companies here on the show,
it's clear that a strong and adaptable culture is a key theme that separates in
industry's top performers from their peers.
Traits of a strong culture include the quality of the leadership, the maintenance of an entrepreneurial
environment, prudent risk-taking, innovation, flexibility, and open communication through the organization
from top to bottom. Top-performing companies maintain a small company feel and have long time
horizons. The Intelligent Fanatics outlined here displayed all of these traits, and their businesses
put together exceptional performance for multiple decades. At the end of the day, intelligent fanatics
are effective leaders. The authors right here, leadership is one of the most important aspects of a
successful organization. A corporation is comprised of people who, whether consciously or unconsciously,
are essentially working for primarily selfish reasons. Great leaders can attract and most importantly,
retain high-quality individuals by convincing them to work hard for the good of the company.
Intelligent fanatics create a higher cause that all employees have the chance to become invested in,
and they provide an environment in which it's natural for employees to become heavily invested
in the company's mission, end quote.
This is really such a critical insight.
Intelligent fanatics have a knack for getting people bought into the company's mission.
I'm reminded of my days playing high school basketball and football.
I had an amazing coach that actually coached both sports, and he knew that some people were
on the team for very selfish reasons.
But if you're going to win the state championship of a team sport like basketball, you need
everyone bought into the mission of the team.
And that's to win.
Not to have the big highlight reel or getting the attention from college coaches or making
your parents proud or whatever selfish reason players have in playing.
I recently did an episode on Tesla whose mission is to accelerate the world's transition to
sustainable energy.
There are plenty of cases of engineers choosing to work with Tesla for less money because they
believe in Tesla's mission, and they wanted to be a part of something bigger than themselves.
Southwest Airlines' mission was about connecting people through friendly, reliable, and low-cost
travel. Employees take pride in creating joyful travel experiences and are treated as the key
to the company's success, and they've been successful in getting employees to buy into that
mission and vision. Leadership is critical when it comes to developing a culture because senior
leaders will create these systems and structures and everyone looks to the leader's behavior
for guidance on how to behave themselves.
In a lot of companies, managers will say one thing and do another thing, which creates this
misalignment.
But someone like Herb-Kelleher was the perfect role model for those values.
He expressed sincere appreciation for employees and remembered their names.
Colleen Barrett, Vice President of Southwest, said, Erb is Southwest Airlines.
exemplifies everything the company stands for. So I've personally worked at both types of companies
myself, those that prioritize the importance of culture and those that don't. All companies likely
talk about culture in some form or fashion. One company I worked for in the past really had
a culture as a box that they sort of needed to check for formality purposes. They'd have the year-end
holiday parties that felt a bit inauthentic and they talked about work-life balance without
actually living it, and it made the company to employ your relationship much more transactional.
Instead of each party asking, what can I give in this relationship, they're prioritizing
what can I get out of it. A good culture is really difficult to fake. I really think of culture
almost as a company's second product. Each company has the product they sell to customers,
and then they also have the product that they sell to employees, which is the culture.
For a company to succeed long term, it really needs a culture that attracts the right employees
and is able to promote loyalty.
Another interesting angle when looking at Intelligent Fanatics is their views on frugality and
expense control.
This is an aspect of the business where both employees and leaders have 100% control,
and frugality is another important value for a performance-driven culture.
Intelligent Fanatics often demonstrate their values of thrift by setting a good example.
example. When Sam Walton, the founder of Walmart, became the richest man in the world,
he still drove an old, beat-up, 1979 Ford F-150. Jeff Bezos was living in a small apartment
and driving a Honda when Amazon went public, and of course Warren Buffett still lives in
the house he purchased in 1958 for $31,000. The authors right here, offices of intelligent fanatics
are rarely fancy due to their belief in conserving money for things that matter, end quote.
Fugality sends a powerful message.
It shows that leaders care more about substance than appearances, and by avoiding the excess,
these leaders reinforce a culture where every dollar is valued highly and is directed towards
creating long-term shareholder value.
And this mindset builds trust among employees and shareholders because people see that
leadership isn't asking others to make sacrifices that they themselves wouldn't make.
Intelligent fanatics have integrity and always do the right thing, even when it's hard to do so.
To them, uncompromising integrity of character is invaluable.
Integrity isn't something that can be taught, so great companies look to hire individuals
who already have it.
To help determine what the right decision is, one filter you can use is Buffett's newspaper
test.
The Warren Buffett newspaper test is a simple ethical guideline that prompts decision makers
to consider how they would feel if their actions were reported in the local newspaper
by a smart but unfriendly reporter.
If you would be uncomfortable with your friends, family, and neighbors reading about the decision,
then it's a bad decision.
The test is designed to evaluate decisions not just for legality, but for long-term reputation
and integrity, as it highlights the potential for reputational damage and consequences beyond
immediate profits.
One of the other common themes with the intelligent fatatics studied was their style of unconventional
thinking and how they were able to take on an established industry from a different vantage point.
are full of unwritten truths and established ways of thinking, and industry veterans often get accustomed
to a certain way of doing or thinking about things and have trouble approaching problems from a different
viewpoint. This is the commitment and consistency bias at play, as popularized in the Charlie Munger speech,
the psychology of human misjudgment. All of the intelligent fanatics covered in the book were either
absolute beginners with no industry experience or they had minimal experience. Their inexperience
allowed them to be open to trying something new and to challenge the old guard.
These new ways of operating led to business models that the established companies simply couldn't
compete with.
Erb Kelleher was told that his business model would be impossible to operate profitably.
But being new to the industry, he wasn't afraid to attack a problem from a different angle.
Intelligent fanatics not only led by example, but they're also excellent teachers.
John Patterson from National Cash Register, who was outlined in Chapter 1, said the following.
Business is only a form of teaching. You teach people to desire your product. That is selling. You
teach workmen to make the right product. That is manufacturing. You teach others to cooperate
with you. That is organization. To succeed in business, it is necessary to make the other man
see things as you see them. I say as you see them, which means that you yourself must first
see and believe before you can tell another." Saul Price, who was Costco founder Jim Senegal's
Protégé stated, if you're not spending 90% of your time teaching, you're not doing your job.
So focusing on teaching not only helps develop talent, but it's also the best way to reinforce
your knowledge on the subject. And of course, the intelligent fanatics also owned a meaningful
piece of the businesses they led. Their ownership position combined with execution,
gave them ultimate control over the long-term direction of the company. The only way to succeed
in dominating a market for decades is to have that long-term focus. They built the infrastructure
to support a larger business, which normally takes significant upfront investment that will
lower profitability in the short term. As New Corps' Ken Iverson stated, every decision we make as
managers is rooted in long-term perspective. In QuickTrips, Chester Cajos stated, most everything
we spend money on in any given day is important 10, 15, 20 years from now. A good majority of convenience
stores in the U.S. tend to be old, run down, and not well taken care of. QuickTrip, on the other hand,
continues to reinvest and renovate their stores every few years to keep them in pristine shape.
It's one example that can be difficult to justify in a spreadsheet, given how capital-intensive
the business model is, but sometimes intelligent fanatics simply go with their gut instinct.
The bottom line is that the stronger company's culture, the more likely they can stand the test
of time. The book also gets into the power of focus. Over the year,
is working on different business pursuits. This is a takeaway I've learned from my own personal
experience as well. Whenever my attention gets too spread out on too many things, meaningful progress
in any of these things is difficult. When you want to get ahead in life and succeed,
it can be tempting to say yes to a lot of things. It reminds me of something I learned from
Steve Jobs. Joni Ive, who was the chief design officer at Apple, said that Steve was the most
remarkably focused person he had ever met in his life. While Steve was maniacally focused on the task
at hand or on his vision, he would ask people he worked with, how many things have he said no to?
This is a powerful question because every time you say yes to one thing, we're saying no to
a thousand other things. So I think intelligent fanatics are really good at understanding what they can do
well, what sort of advantage they have in a fiercely competitive marketplace and stick with those one, two,
or three thanks. In business, it can be tempting to chase the next shiny object while underestimating
the power of focusing on one or two things for a decade or more. The podcast you're listening to
right now, I think is a good example of that. We study billionaires was started all the way back
in 2014, and I frequently bump into listeners who have tuned into our show for five, six,
seven, eight years or more. That sort of loyalty is hard for other podcasts to replicate. While we're
by no means perfect, by any means in terms of focusing on just one or two things, we've consistently
published content week after week to continue to build that sort of loyalty with our listeners
over time. Costco's another great example of this kind of discipline. They've built their
entire business around doing just a few things exceptionally well, selling a limited selection of high
quality goods at unbeatable prices, treating employees well, and running stores with efficiency.
Instead of chasing every retail trend, they've stuck to their core model for decades, proving that
long-term focus and simplicity can outperform complexity and constant reinvention.
The bottom line is that in most cases, to be very successful at something, you need to be highly
focused on that one thing.
Saul Price was maniacally focused on selling things as cheaply as he could.
Les Schwab told his managers, sell tires, give service, keep expenses low, communicate with
employees, and you'll come out all right.
Intelligent fanatics often run their businesses without an extensive and detailed business plan.
Anyone can make great projections, but few can develop a simple yet effective and unconventional
business model and work very hard to put it in motion.
We already talked quite a bit about incentives, but it's hard to overestimate their importance.
A good incentive system includes both intrinsic and extrinsic factors.
So it's not only just about the financial incentive.
Extrinsic factors include things like money or status, and intrinsic factors include things like
personal growth, purpose, and meaning, having the opportunity to overcome a challenge, helping people,
or simply just making the world a better place. A talented individual who's going to work with both
powerful, intrinsic and extrinsic forces at play is likely going to beat the talented individual
with the best financial incentives in place. Lesh Schwab wasn't just about enriching himself.
he created his company to provide opportunities for young people to succeed. Similarly, Chester
Kajou stated, if we've hired the right people with consistent aligned values and then you go
and try and make them successful, or at least give them an opportunity to become successful,
you are going to become a successful organization. While many publicly traded companies have a
shareholder-first mentality, intelligent fanatics seem to have an employee-first mentality that created
positive feedback loops. When employees are treated well,
they treat customers well. Customers tell their friends and their friends might become customers too.
And this is to the benefit of shareholders. This is in contrast to a shareholder-first mentality
of most corporations. Focusing purely on shareholders with little regard for employees or
customers leads to companies to try to cater to the whims of the market. Intelligent fanatics had a way
of getting their employees to think and act like owners. This was done with financial incentives
that aligned their financial interests with that of the actual owners.
And employees received intrinsic motivation to think like owners.
The other aspect of an employee first culture is hiring great people.
If you're a manager with a shareholder first mentality,
then it's likely tempting to offer lower wages for your employees
or perhaps a subpar benefits package.
That can work wonders from a financial perspective in the short term,
but that can be detrimental in the long term.
On the other hand, paying high salaries will do the opposite.
It can attract a large pool of applicants free to select from, and with the right incentives,
you can empower these people to create tremendous long-term value for their organization.
And if you have a great culture, then these employees will stick with you for a long time.
As Richard Branson stated, train people well enough so they can leave, treat them well enough
so they don't want to, end quote.
I think that employee turnover can be an important metric to consider when analyzing the
quality of an organization's culture. So you look at Costco, employee turnover at Costco is just
6% while retail overall has turnover of 60 to 70% and Chick-fil-A is another really good example.
They have some of the lowest employee turnover in the fast food industry. The last two concepts
I wanted to touch on as it relates to intelligent fanatics are experimentation and productive
paranoia. Experimentation and innovation are unnecessary for a company to keep up with the ever-changing
environment, and as a business grows, it becomes more and more difficult for them to compete with
smaller, more nimble competitors. Jeff Bezos and Amazon understood the exponential payoffs that
well-thought-out experiments provide, and he knew that not every idea will work out as planned.
Bezos stated, a few big successes compensate for dozens and dozens of things that did not work,
end quote. This approach to business led them, of course, to launching AWS, while many companies
punished failure, Bezos found it to be necessary for innovation. For these experiments to be
successful, employees need to be encouraged to take calculated risks, and the company has to be
supportive with that. If employees risk being fired for taking a calculated risk, then they really
have no incentive to do so. We always hear about the success stories and those that made it to the top,
but we don't know about many of the failures or the personal sacrifices that intelligent fanatics
had to make. Almost all successful people went through incredible hardship, obstacles, and challenges.
So if you look at Charlie Munger, for example, you know, when he was around age 30 or 31, he went
through a divorce, he had to financially start from zero, he lost his nine-year-old son due to leukemia,
and he became blind in one eye as a result of a failed cataract surgery. Or take Erb Kelleher,
who had to fight four years of legal battles to get the first Southwest Airlines flight
off the ground. Intelligent fanatics persevere through adversity, for they see courage the way
Winston Churchill did, who stated, courage is going from failure to failure with enthusiasm.
Lastly, let's talk about productive paranoia. Jim Collins describes successful leaders as being
paranoid, neurotic freaks. Intelligent fanatics recognize the competitive nature of capitalism
and how someone is always out there trying to figure out how to eat their lunch. It's no wonder
all retailers feared Jeff Bezos, as he stated, your margin is my opportunity.
Productive paranoia isn't just about worrying about the competition, but actually doing something
about it. Intelligent fanatics are always looking for ways to make their businesses better.
They want to disrupt themselves before somebody else disrupts them. Sam Walton, for example,
was never satisfied and content with his business. He'd say that the lines were too long at the
cash registers and his people weren't being helpful enough. But if you ask some CEO,
of other retailers, they would possibly brag to you and tell you about how great their businesses.
The world truly belongs to the discontent. There's no doubt that the Intelligent Fanatics
covered today shared many traits, and they provide a high-level blueprint for building a
dominant, sustainable business. If you're an investor looking to invest early in these great
companies that are led by Intelligent Fanatics, then seeking out these types of characteristics
will be useful to you. To conclude the book, the authors discuss how the only truly sustainable
competitive advantage is the company's human capital. Eventually, companies can and will copy products,
but it's extremely difficult to copy a strong culture. All the capital in the world cannot buy
and transform a poor culture into a great one. Deeply rooted cultures are built up over years,
one higher at a time, and leadership and culture are as strong as their weakest link. And intelligent
fanatics inevitably will need to leave their companies at some point, and for that reason,
they build their companies to thrive long after they're gone. They take care of their employees
and in turn, the employees take care of them and their companies. All companies run into some
sort of problems, and when employees feel like partners, the success of the organization is very
important to them. Sean and Ian close out the book with the following line. Whether you're an
investor or an entrepreneur, invest in the best human capital you can find, end quote. That wraps up
today's episode on Intelligent Fanatics, I'd like to extend a special thank you to Ian Castle
and Sean Idings for allowing me to chat about this book today, since it is out of print.
I think it's a very important subject that's definitely worth studying, and I appreciate
Ian and Sean sharing the common findings they found in studying these exceptional managers
for us to use as a blueprint in assessing management teams ourselves. So with that,
thank you so much for tuning in to today's episode, and I hope to see you again next week.
for listening to TIP.
Make sure to follow We Study Billionaires on your favorite podcast app and never miss out on episodes.
To access our show notes, transcripts or courses, go to theinvestorspodcast.com.
This show is for entertainment purposes only, before making any decision consult a professional.
This show is copyrighted by the Investors Podcast Network.
Written permission must be granted before syndication or rebroadcasting.
