We Study Billionaires - The Investor’s Podcast Network - TIP796: Die with Zero & Linde Stock Analysis w/ Clay Finck
Episode Date: March 6, 2026Clay explores Bill Perkins’ book Die with Zero, which challenges the traditional mindset of accumulating wealth at all costs and instead encourages readers to think more intentionally about how and ...when they spend their money. In the second segment, Clay shifts gears to analyze Linde PLC, the global industrial gas powerhouse. He explains why Linde may represent an attractive opportunity in today’s market. IN THIS EPISODE YOU’LL LEARN: 00:00:00 - Intro 00:02:40 - Why optimizing for life experiences may matter more than maximizing net worth 00:23:56 - Why you should consider giving money to your kids earlier in life rather than later 00:27:28 - The tradeoff between compounding money and compounding memories 00:31:26 - The concept of time-bucketing your life to maximize fulfillment 00:35:42 - An overview of Linde PLC’s business and its strong competitive position 00:46:56 - Why Linde is an attractive opportunity to consider with AI disrupting so many different industries Disclaimer: Slight discrepancies in the timestamps may occur due to podcast platform differences. BOOKS AND RESOURCES Join the exclusive TIP Mastermind Community to engage in meaningful stock investing discussions with Stig, Clay, Kyle, and the other community members. Learn how to join us in Omaha for the Berkshire meeting here. Bill Perkins’ book: Die with Zero. Follow Clay on X and LinkedIn. Related books mentioned in the podcast. Ad-free episodes on our Premium Feed. NEW TO THE SHOW? Get smarter about valuing businesses in just a few minutes each week through our newsletter, The Intrinsic Value Newsletter. Check out our We Study Billionaires Starter Packs. Follow our official social media accounts: X | LinkedIn | Facebook. Browse through all our episodes here. Try our tool for picking stock winners and managing our portfolios: TIP Finance Tool. Enjoy exclusive perks from our favorite Apps and Services. Learn how to better start, manage, and grow your business with the best business podcasts. SPONSORS Support our free podcast by supporting our sponsors: HardBlock Human Rights Foundation Simple Mining Unchained Plus500 Netsuite Vanta Shopify Fundrise References to any third-party products, services, or advertisers do not constitute endorsements, and The Investor’s Podcast Network is not responsible for any claims made by them. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm
Transcript
Discussion (0)
You're listening to TIP.
Today's episode will be broken up into two segments.
During the first segment, I'll be discussing the book Die with Zero by Bill Perkins.
It's a book that challenges some of the core assumptions that we have related to money
and living a good life.
As investors, we spend a lot of time thinking about compounding, delayed gratification,
in long-term wealth creation.
But Perkins flips the script and asks a different question.
What's the point of accumulating wealth if you don't use it to create meaningful experiences
along the way?
Perkins' core idea is simple.
Money should be a tool for maximizing life experiences, not a scorecard you optimize until
the very end.
He encourages readers to think carefully about the timing of our spending and the reality
that our ability to enjoy experiences declines as we age.
During the second segment, we'll shift gears to talk about a boring but stable compound
in the stock market, Lindy PLC. From 1993 to year-end 2024, Lindy's stock has compounded at
12% per annum versus the S&P 500 returning 8% over that same time period. Lindy is the world's
largest industrial gas company supplying essential products like oxygen, nitrogen, nitrogen,
and it touches so many parts of our modern-day economy. We'll explore its business model,
competitive advantages, capital allocation, and whatsoever of returns, share.
shareholders can expect from here going forward. So with that, I hope you enjoy today's episode.
Since 2014 and through more than 190 million downloads, we break down the principles of value
investing and sit down with some of the world's best asset managers. We uncover potential
opportunities in the market and explore the intersection between money, happiness, and the art
of living a good life. This show is not investment advice. It's intended for informational
and entertainment purposes only. All opinions expressed by hosts and guests are solely their own,
and they may have investments in the securities discussed. Now for your host, Clay Fink.
Hey everybody, welcome back to The Investors Podcast. I'm your host, Clay Fink, and during this first
segment, I'll be sharing what I learned from reading the book Die with Zero by Bill Perkins.
I initially came across this book after my best friend told me that it was a must read. I thought this
would be an interesting book to cover on the show because I found that many value investors
think about more than just wealth accumulation. Living a good life is also about how we choose
to spend our time, who we choose to spend our time with, and how we spend our money. Many people
who enjoy accumulating wealth use money as their scorecard for success. And the main takeaway
that Perkins wanted readers to walk away with was to realize that money should be used as a tool
for creating memorable experiences, not just a scorecard to maximize until death.
Perhaps controversially, he encourages readers to spend and give money during years
when they're able to actually enjoy it instead of dying with a substantial amount of unused
wealth.
My friend David Fagan from our mastermind community, he recently shared this idea on a call
he hosted with the group, where he essentially said that much of life is a paradox.
On the one hand, we're told to push our limits, be the best that we can be, and let nothing
stop us from achieving success.
But on the other hand, we're also told to slow down, take it easy, and not take life so seriously.
Much of life is about finding the right balance, and I feel that this book can help balance
our perspective, especially for those of you who have been quite successful professionally
and potentially need to rethink the other aspects of your life.
So Perkins' book is for those who really want to live life to the fullest.
Perkins opens up the book with a story about a young couple in their 30s named Aaron and John.
They were both successful lawyers and had three young children together.
They received the devastating news that John had been diagnosed with the rare and rapidly growing cancer,
which was unheard of for a healthy 35-year-old.
With John now very sick, the burden of taking care of the family physically and financially fell on Aaron.
Perkins then told Aaron that she should stop work and spend as much time with the family
as she can, and that he would help her financially if they needed it.
In between cancer treatments, the couple enjoyed each other's company.
They'd go to the park together, watch movies, and pick up their kids from school together.
John ended up passing away in January of 2009, just three months after his diagnosis.
Looking back at that period, Aaron recalls trauma and devastation, but she's glad she quit
job to be at home with John. Most people would have done the same thing that Aaron did in these
circumstances. Death, you know, it tends to wake people up and the closer it gets, the more awake
and aware we become of it. When the end is near, we suddenly start thinking, what am I doing? Why did I
wait this long? But until then, most of us go through life as if we had all the time in the world.
As I mentioned earlier, this is a balance of strike. Many people in our audience likely have no
issues with mapping out their five-year or 10-year plan and enjoy delaying gratification.
But Perkins argues that far too many delay gratification far too long or even delay it indefinitely.
They put off what they want to do until it's too late, saving money for experiences that they'll
never enjoy and living life as if it were infinite. Although the case with Aaron and John is an
extreme example, we all face the challenge that everyone's health generally declines with time.
and sooner or later, we all die. So the question we all must answer is how to make the most of
our finite time on Earth. Perkins is a big advocate for living life to the fullest by maximizing
your positive life experiences. Enjoyable experiences will vary from person to person. Some people
are active and adventurous, while others prefer to stay close to home. Some get great satisfaction
from splurging on themselves and their families and their friends, while others prefer to spend their
time and money on those less fortunate than themselves.
He's not one to tell others how they should live their lives, but instead encourages us to
choose our life experiences deliberately and purposefully rather than living life on autopilot
as many people do. But when it comes to experiences, timing also matters. There is not much
value of going on a cruise for a newborn and playing golf probably isn't too much fun when you're
90 years old. This idea was clear to Perkins after he had a life-changing conversation with his
boss on Wall Street. Perkins went to college at the University of Iowa, majoring in electrical engineering.
He figured out that there was no way he would pursue the typical career path working for a company
like IBM, and he smelled opportunity on Wall Street. So he took a job on the floor of the New York
Mercantile Exchange, making just $18,000 a year in the early 1990s. Living in New York, he had very
little disposable income, and he started driving his boss's limo at night to earn extra cash.
Perkins was proud of his thriftiness, and he managed to save $1,000 on such a small income.
He was so proud that he even told his boss, thinking that he would also be proud.
He ended up receiving the opposite response from what he expected.
His boss essentially called him an idiot for saving that $1,000, considering that he would be
earning a substantial income on Wall Street down the road if he stayed on the path that he was on.
He was on his way to making millions on Wall Street, so why worry about saving such a small amount
early on in his career? This interaction helped Perkins reshape his thoughts around how to balance
your earnings with your spending. In finance, this idea can be referred to as consumption
smoothing. Our incomes might vary from one month or one year to another, but that doesn't mean our
spending should reflect these variations. We might be better off if we evened out these variations,
and to do that, this means transferring money from the years of abundance into the leaner years.
Perkins didn't know for certain that he would make it big on Wall Street like he did,
but he was fairly certain that in a few years, he would be making much more than he was when he was
just starting out. He couldn't predict the magnitude of it, but he was right to be confident
in the direction of his earnings over time.
Perkins' thinking was also impacted by the book,
Your Money or Your Life,
which talks about the intersection between how we spend our lives and our money,
and it aims to help people live their lives more intentionally.
The authors urge us not to sacrifice our lives just for the sake of money.
Instead, Perkins is a big believer in the value of experiences.
Experiences don't have to cost us a lot of money,
and they can even be free,
But worthwhile experiences do usually come at some sort of cost.
The unforgettable trip, the concert tickets, the pursuit of an entrepreneurial dream or a new hobby.
All of these costs money.
To Perkins, this money is well worth spending.
Many psychological studies have shown that spending money on experiences makes us happier than spending money on things.
Unlike material possessions, which seem exciting at the beginning, but then often depreciate quickly,
while experiences actually gain value over time.
They pay what he calls a memory dividend.
Carson from the movie Downtown Abbey stated,
The Business of Life is the acquisition of memories.
In the end, that's all there is.
Towards the end of Perkins' father's life,
he was at the point where his physical ability had diminished,
and he wasn't able to travel.
So instead, Perkins gifted him a shamelessly sentimental gift,
an iPad full of memories.
As a college student, he had played football for several seasons at the University of Iowa, so Perkins
took a highlight reel from that glorious season, had it digitized, and he put it on the iPad.
We're always reliving our life through memories, and putting them in this format would make
them more vivid and easier to relive. As his father was too old to acquire significant new experiences,
he could still derive great enjoyment from the highlight video. He thought that it was the best gift
he had ever received. When one is too frail to do much of anything else, you can still look back
on your life that you've lived and experience immense pride, joy, and the bittersweet feeling
of nostalgia. When it comes to spending money, many people who put a lot of emphasis on
saving and little emphasis on actually enjoying the money, they probably think a lot about return
on their investment. Stocks often pay a dividend and appreciate over time, and real estate generates
rental income. Experiences can also be seen as investments, which would probably shock some,
but the payoff from an investment, it doesn't have to be financial. When you spend time or spend
money on experiences, they are not only enjoyable in the moment, they also pay an ongoing dividend.
Perkin then gets into why he believes one should die with zero dollars in their bank account.
In the book, he talks a lot about how people live on autopilot. They go to the same job,
have the same routines, automatically save and invests, and possibly aren't living life as deliberately
as they should. Perkins had a young friend named John Arnold, who would eventually become a billionaire.
Arnold started a successful hedge fund called Centurus. On one difficult day, he turned to Perkins
and told him, once I make $15 million, if I'm still trading, punch me in the face.
Arnold was a brilliant trader, and he would definitely surpass the $15 million mark.
The goalposts then moved to $25 million, then moved to $100 million.
When you're on a winning streak that big, it's hard to stop, even when your rational mind tells
you that you should.
He understood perfectly well that at a certain point, it makes a lot more sense to spend money
doing the things you love instead of simply earning more money.
But his numerical target continued to shift, and as his wealth grew, his leisure time
continue to diminish. Arnold ended up running Centuris until 2012 when he was 38 years old,
and he built a personal fortune of $4 billion. Now, the vast majority of people can only dream
of retiring at 38, but Perkins argues that he retired too late for two reasons. First, he'll never
get back those years that he spent just focusing on making money. He'll never be 30 again,
and his children will never be babies again. Second, he made so much money that he's not. He's
faces the issue of likely never being able to spend it all. Arnold didn't particularly enjoy
running his company, so part of the reason why he continued to do so was just simply out of
habit. And that habit can be difficult to break. Earning money is society's way of recognizing
a job well done. And once you're in the habit of working for money to live, the thrill of
making money exceeds the thrill of actually living. The example of John Arnold is, again, an extreme
example, but it highlights the same psychological forces at play for many people. Many people feel like
they can never get enough, and as their net worth grows, their goalposts just continue to shift.
Perkins then explains that if you spend your life earning money and then die without spending all
that money, then you've needlessly wasted too many precious hours of your life. Now, I feel like this
point goes a little bit too far for me, but I definitely do resonate with it to some extent.
I do think it's right for us to pass things down to charitable organizations and down to
our family when we eventually pass away. And it's nearly impossible to actually die with zero
because none of us know when our last day on Earth will be. But I think the key takeaway for me
is that for those of us who are those natural savers, it can be very easy for us to save far too much,
working far too long and not enjoying our money nearly as much as we probably should.
Perkins looked at how much U.S. households saved over time, so the median net worth for the
U.S. household between the ages of 45 and 54,000 is $124,000. So half of households have more
than that saved and half have less. What's more interesting, though, is how the amount saved
how that trends over time. We see a clear pattern that the median household's net worth only
increases over time. This is a result of people's incomes rising with age and continuing to save
what they don't spend. This leads Perkins to the conclusion that most people save well past
the point that is optimal, similar to the example outlined earlier with John Arnold. Perkins
then looked at the spending habits of retirees once they were finished working. After looking
at the data, he came to the following conclusions. As a whole, people are very slow to spend
down their assets in retirement. Across ages, from 160s to their 90s, the ratio of household
spending to household income hovers around one to one. This means that retirees tend to spend
whatever it is that they earn, so retirees generally are not drawing on the capital that they've
accumulated over their life. Meeting retirees who had $500,000 or more right before retirement
had spent down just 12% of that money 20 years later, or by the time that they died. So if someone
retired with $500,000, they would have had $440,000 by the age of 85. One third of all retirees
actually increased their assets after retirement. Now, Perkins doesn't talk about inflation here,
as that's of course an important consideration when thinking about things like health care costs.
My first job out of school was in the world of health insurance, and it was a pretty common
practice to assume that medical costs would increase by anywhere from 5 to 8% per year.
For illustration purposes, if someone had $500,000 at the age of 65 when they retired,
by the time that person was 85, $500,000 would be essentially worth the equivalent of $305,000,
after adjusting for inflation, assuming a 2.5% inflation rate. The good news, though, is that retirees
tend to have much of their assets invested in stocks and bonds, which helps mitigate the impact
of inflation over time. Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors.
All right. I want you guys to imagine spending three days in Oslo at the height of the summer.
You've got long days of daylight, incredible food, floating saunas on the Oslo Fjord,
and every conversation you have is with people who are actually shaping the future.
That's what the Oslo Freedom Forum is.
From June 1st through the 3rd, 2026, the Oslo Freedom Forum is entering its 18th year, bringing together activists, technologists, journalists, investors, and builders from all over the world, many of them operating on the front lines of history.
This is where you hear firsthand stories from people using Bitcoin to survive currency collapse, using AI to expose human rights abuses.
and building technology under censorship and authoritarian pressures.
These aren't abstract ideas.
These are tools real people are using right now.
You'll be in the room with about 2,000 extraordinary individuals, dissidents, founders, philanthropists, policymakers,
the kind of people you don't just listen to but end up having dinner with.
Over three days, you'll experience powerful mainstage talks, hands-on workshops on freedom tech,
and financial sovereignty, immersive art installations, and conversations, and conversational.
conversations that continue long after the sessions end. And it's all happening in Oslo in June.
If this sounds like your kind of room, well, you're in luck because you can attend in person.
Standard and patron passes are available at Osloof Freedom Forum.com with patron passes offering
deep access, private events, and small group time with the speakers. The Oslo Freedom Forum isn't just a conference.
It's a place where ideas meet reality and where the future is being built by people living it.
a business, you've probably had the same thought lately. How do we make AI useful in the real
world? Because the upside is huge, but guessing your way into it is a risky move. With NetSuite
by Oracle, you can put AI to work today. NetSuite is the number one AI cloud ERP, trusted by over
43,000 businesses. It pulls your financials, inventory, commerce, HR, and CRM into one
unified system. And that connected data is what makes your AI smarter. It can automate
automate routine work, surface actionable insights, and help you cut costs while making fast,
AI-powered decisions with confidence.
And now with the NetSuite AI connector, you can use the AI of your choice to connect directly
to your real business data.
This isn't some add-on, it's AI built into the system that runs your business.
And whether your company does millions or even hundreds of millions, NetSuite helps you stay
ahead.
If your revenues are at least in the seven figures, get their free business guide, domesticifying
AI at net suite.com slash study. The guide is free to you at netsuite.com slash study. NetSuite.com
slash study. When I started my own side business, it suddenly felt like I had to become 10 different
people overnight wearing many different hats. Starting something from scratch can feel exciting,
but also incredibly overwhelming and lonely. That's why having the right tools matters. For millions
of businesses, that tool is Shopify. Shopify is the commerce platform behind millions of businesses
around the world and 10% of all e-commerce in the U.S. from brands just getting started to household
names. It gives you everything you need in one place, from inventory to payments to analytics.
So you're not juggling a bunch of different platforms. You can build a beautiful online store
with hundreds of ready-to-use templates, and Shopify is packed with helpful AI tools that write
product descriptions and even enhance your product photography.
Plus, if you ever get stuck, they've got award-winning 24-7 customer support.
Start your business today with the industry's best business partner, Shopify, and start hearing
sign up for your $1 per month trial today at Shopify.com slash WSB.
Go to Shopify.com slash WSB.
That's Shopify.
All right, back to the show.
So after analyzing retirees spending habits, it's clear that most people do not aim to die with zero.
And there are a couple of reasons as to why that is.
The first is that we're saving all this money until we retire at, say, the age of 65, only to not
have the energy in our 70s and 80s that we had in our earlier years.
For example, no matter how much money you have, if you don't have the drive and the energy
to travel in your 70s, or it becomes the energy.
comes a major headache to travel, you know, you're just not going to enjoy that money like you
would have earlier in your life. Perkins saw this in his grandmother, who was in her late 70s
when he was in his late 20s on the up and up in Wall Street. He wanted to share the wealth he had
with those closest to him. So he gave his grandmother a $10,000 check, which he now realizes
was actually a big mistake, as she wasn't really spending any of the money that she had. It's not
that she was poor or that she needed the cash to pay bills, it's just that her go-go years
were largely over. There's another story from the book about his grandmother that illustrates
how some people can indefinitely delay gratification, largely for no reason. She would keep her
couch, Lovesy, and Easy Chair covered in plastic to protect it from general wear and tear. But
this plastic also made the furniture uncomfortable to sit on and unattractive. For one special occasion,
she had taken the plastic off in Perkins, he loved the furniture. But other than that,
that plastic would always be on the furniture and it would stay on for the rest of her life.
I think the takeaway from this is, why have a nice couch and a nice love seat if you're not
going to actually enjoy it? There are certainly times in your life to be thrifty and delay gratification,
and there are times in your life to actually spend your money and enjoy the fruits of your labor.
Some people get stuck in either one mode or the other for much of their life and have trouble
flipping that switch when it makes a lot of sense to do so.
The other reason that people have a hard time spending their money in their older years
is to be prepared for unforeseen expenses in their older ages, especially medical expenses.
Medical expenses are, of course, difficult to predict, but that's exactly what health insurance
is for.
It helps protect against large, unforeseen medical expenses.
However, insurers are not always going to foot the bill if for some reason they decide to deny coverage.
So given this uncertainty of their spending needs in the future, many retirees still play it
on the very safe side.
Given that Perkins' mantra outlined in the book is to maximize the amount of enjoyment that we get
out of life, then saving all this money to never get to enjoy it just doesn't seem ideal.
So the question then becomes, how do we go about spending our money?
Perkins recognizes that with declining health, it will naturally lead to diminishing interest
in things that you could theoretically spend your money on.
So he's in the camp that you should expect to spend much less in your 80s than you would
in your 50s.
One of my favorite chapters from the book is Chapter 5 titled What About the Kids?
Every time Perkins talks about dying with zero, he typically will get some version of the
question, what about the kids?
meaning why would you want to pass away without having anything left to give your children,
which logically makes sense to ask? It feels a bit selfish if one makes all this money throughout
their life, only to pass away and leave their kids without any sort of gift or inheritance.
Perkins, who has two children himself, he recommends giving to your children earlier in life
rather than just when you pass away. Federal Reserve data shows that the typical inheritance
is passed down to children around the age of 60.
That's a natural result as the most common lifespan is 80,
and the most common age gap between parents and children is around 20 years.
In most of the money that children end up receiving from their parents
ends up being through an inheritance instead of through a gift earlier in their life.
The utility and value of money changes as we age and accumulate wealth.
So a monetary gift at the age of 30 is actually much more meaningful.
than at age 60, because when we're younger, you're at the stage of your life where you're
getting your footing, you're buying a house, and ensuring that you live in a good neighborhood,
and starting a family. Likewise, when you're 60, your kids have moved out. You may have paid off
your house by then. Your retirement assets have potentially grown to a level where you're very
comfortable, and getting an extra gift from your parents might make little to no difference in your
life. Through this lens, one could argue that a $25,000 gift at age 30 is more valuable or makes
more of an impact than a $250,000 gift at age 60. Furthermore, a 30-year-old can also arguably
enjoy the money more than a 60-year-old can. As one ages, the utility of money declines
considerably. Either you would get a lot less enjoyment out of that same dollar, or you would
need more money to obtain the same amount of enjoyment as you would when you're younger.
As a result, Perkins reasons that as your adult children age, every dollar you give them
goes less far over time. And at some point, that money might become almost useless to them.
To use an extreme example to help illustrate the value of passing down wealth earlier,
which do you think appreciates the gift more? A 21-year-old that has zero dollars to his name
and receives $10,000, or a 61-year-old that is $5,000?
$5 million to his name and receives $100,000. I think the clear answer is the former.
If you're trying to maximize the impact of the money you give, instead of just the total
dollar amount, then it's important to also recognize that timing matters. Of course,
this does not apply to everybody, but I think you follow the point he's making here.
The other issue with passing down wealth when you die is that you're probably assuming
that all of your children will outlive you, which oftentimes is not the case.
Around 17% of Americans pass away prior to age 60, and around 30% of Americans pass away prior to
age 70. I've been fortunate that both my grandmothers are around at 90 years old, and they've
both seen one of their children, unfortunately, pass away prior to themselves. Being born and
raised here in Nebraska, one of the things that I appreciate about the culture here is
how family-oriented it is. So when I read about Perkins's lens of maximizing your life
experiences and closely considering the timing of life experiences, I think one of the things that a lot
of people around me get right is taking their families on vacations. So growing up, I would
go boating at the Lake of the Ozarks each summer and we still have that tradition to this day.
Is it the cheapest trip? Absolutely not. But it's also about having those experiences together
as a family because one day, mom and dad will not have the energy to drive to the lake and those
memories will carry with their children and their grandchildren for a lifetime. Now today, my parents
are in their 60s, so now they get to share those experiences with their grandchildren, which are my
three nephews. These types of investments pay dividends that may not be as obvious on the surface.
Researchers have found that young adults who, as young children, received more affection from
their parents, come to enjoy better personal relationships, experience better health outcomes,
and also have lower rates of substance abuse and depression.
Perkins' overall thinking on spending money,
it sort of goes against what I feel myself
and probably how many people in our audience feel.
We're often told to start saving money early in life
to take full advantage of the benefits of compounding
and to not fall prey to the hedonic treadmill,
which explains for as one incomes rise,
their spending tends to rise in tandem.
Well, this is exactly what Perkins believes is the right thing to do.
But I think we generally all still view spending money in a similar light.
We need to strike that balance between spending on the present on things you value and saving
intelligently for the future.
If we think of making the most of life as simply maximizing our life experiences, then traveling
is one thing that many people would like to take advantage of.
But traveling has its difficulties as it requires time, money, and health.
When you're old, your health is in decline.
and when you're young, you might not have the time and or the money.
This is why Perkins encourages readers to travel as soon as they can, preferably in their early
20s. Even if you don't have a lot of money, you should travel because it's the one time
in your life where you have the time and the health. By the time you're in your 30s, you might
have kids, then you likely won't have the opportunities to travel abroad for an extended
period of time. A similar line of thinking can be applied to sports. If you enjoy playing sports,
you should do so when you're young, because the older you get, the more difficult it is to play
sports and the harder it is to enjoy. In my spare time, I enjoy lifting weights, playing basketball,
playing pickleball, all of which are activities I thoroughly enjoy and they help keep me in shape.
I also play golf from time to time, but it depends on the day whether I truly enjoy it or not.
Furthermore, the rate at which you decline physically is partially up to you.
The better you maintain your health, the less steep your decline is expected to be.
Nothing has a greater effect on your ability to enjoy experiences at any age than your health.
I think some people are fed the narrative of looking forward to retirement because of all the
free time you're going to have.
You know, you're going to be able to enjoy the money, you've saved up all those years,
but the real golden years of enjoying the fruits of your labor come before the traditional
retirement age of 65.
So it's all about finding the right balance between time, money, and your health.
At different points in your life, each of those is going to look different.
When one is middle-aged, say in their 40s, still in good health and is in a great financial
position, the biggest constraint is likely having time.
So this is a period of your life where it can make sense to exchange your money for more
time when that allows.
That might mean hiring out tasks that take up your free time like house cleaning, yard work,
home maintenance and repairs, or even cooking or grocery shopping.
Sometimes it's easy for me personally to outsource some of these things, but there's still
those tasks that are just difficult to outsource to somebody else.
Something like house cleaning is something I just don't really hesitate to outsource as
that time can either be used to earn more money or just do something that I enjoy.
In Chapter 7, Perkins discusses time-bucketing your life.
When Perkins's daughters were little, he would often watch kids' movies with them.
But then one day his younger daughter was 10, and she just wasn't as interested in watching movies
anymore.
All of a sudden, she was too old for it.
If someone had told him that at this specific date, at this specific time, his kid would
stop wanting to do this activity with him, then he would probably have done it more and made
the most of it.
But unfortunately, in real life, we do not receive this luxury.
We sort of assume that some things will last forever, but of course they don't.
But recognizing that they don't last forever, that everything fades and dies can make you appreciate
everything more in the here and now.
Die with Zero is predicated on the hard, cold truth that we all die and as we age, our health will
gradually decline.
But there's another less obvious truth about dying that has important implications for how
you should live your life.
We all die a multitude of deaths throughout our lives.
There will also be a last time that Perkins goes wave running, a last time playing in a poker
tournament, and a last time to board a plane to fly somewhere exotic.
It's kind of sad to think that eventually the teenager in you dies, the college student
in you dies, the parent of young children in you dies, etc.
Once each of these many deaths occur, there's no going back.
Maybe, quote, dies is a bit harsh in this context, but you get the idea.
We all keep progressing from one stage of life to the next.
The die-with-zero philosophy recognizes this fact and seeks to make the most of each window
of opportunity before it closes forever.
Perkins discusses the work of Brony Ware, who had conversations with patients on their deathbed
about the lives they had lived and the regrets they had.
There were five common regrets they shared among them.
The first was wishing they'd had the courage to live a life true to themselves as opposed
to the life that others.
expected of them. It's a regret about not pursuing your dreams and therefore having those dreams
unfulfilled. If you ignore what you truly value in life and instead pursue a path that society
pushes on you, you risk having real regret at the end of your life. In our American culture,
society can push values such as hard work and earning more money and de-emphasize things like
leisure, adventure, and quality relationships. The second regret, which was actually the top regret for
male patients was this. I wish I hadn't worked so hard. Now, that's not to say that you should
immediately start working less, but instead recognize that our time here is limited, and we should
try to make the most of what we're given. To help do this, Perkins introduces the concept of
time buckets. Time buckets are a simple tool for discovering what you want your life to look like
in broad strokes. You simply map out the rest of your life in five to ten year increments for
each bucket, and then consider the key experiences, activities, or events that you definitely
want to happen during that period of your life. If experiences are some of the best parts of your life,
then it's probably good to actually write down some of those experiences that we'd like to have
in our lifetime. Some examples can include having a child, running a marathon, hiking the
Himalayas, building a house, starting a business, go skiing a certain number of times,
and so on. This can help us actually consider some of the really important things that we
want to do in our lives. For example, I'd like to spend a couple of weeks in Europe, but I haven't been
able to find the time to actually do it. It's easy to live our lives as if we'll be able to make
time later, but then life only gets busier, and it becomes even more difficult to make that trip.
Mapping out your life in some fashion can help us be more intentional with the things we would
like to do throughout the different stages of our lives. In the book, Perkins gave readers an impossible
task, to die with zero. But the real aim was to ensure that we live a life intentionally
instead of on autopilot and maximize the use of our wealth to live our best lives possible.
That's why dying with zero, at least to Perkins, is a worthy goal. As someone who's a natural
saver and oftentimes enjoys delaying gratification, this book really got me thinking a bit differently
about how to approach saving and spending my money and living out my life. So during my last episode,
which was published a couple of weeks ago, I discussed the drawdown in Constellation software,
which primarily occurred due to AI fears.
This made me consider what type of company might have near zero risk from AI specifically.
Software companies are going to be some of the first targets for disruption, but what
companies have practically no chance of being disrupted by new technologies like AI?
One of the first companies that came to mind for me was a company that a member of our
Mastermind Community pitch to the group, that company is Lindy PLC. So I'd like to give our listeners
a bit of an overview of the company and some of the things that I learned from that presentation.
Our member who's an equity analyst at a multi-billion dollar wealth management firm, he posed the
question to the group, if you had to invest all of your net worth in one company over the next
10 years and you cannot sell it, what would you own? For him, the clear answer was Lindy PLC.
Before getting to Lindy specifically, when we think about what type of company we would want to put
our entire net worth in for 10 years, the company probably needs a few characteristics, at least in
my mind.
So the first would be, I would need to be highly certain of the future state of that business.
Second, I would need to be highly certain that the future state of that business will be positive.
So it would need to be able to grow earnings at an adequate rate in essentially any market
environment. And finally, third, the company needs to be trading at a reasonable starting valuation.
So let's see exactly how Lindy may or may not fit into that framework.
Let's take a quick break and hear from today's sponsors.
No, it's not your imagination. Risk and regulation are ramping up and customers now expect
proof of security just to do business. That's why VANTA is a game changer. Vanta automates
your compliance process and brings compliance, risk, and
customer trust together on one AI-powered platform. So whether you're prepping for a SOC to
or running an enterprise GRC program, VANTA keeps you secure and keeps your deals moving.
Instead of chasing spreadsheets and screenshots, VANTA gives you continuous automation
across more than 35 security and privacy frameworks. Companies like Ramp and Riter spend 82%
less time on audits with VANTA. That's not just faster compliance, it's more time for
growth. If I were running a startup or scaling a team today, this is exactly the type of platform
I'd won in place. Get started at vanta.com slash billionaires. That's vanta.com
slash billionaires. Ever wanted to explore the world of online trading, but haven't dared try?
The futures market is more active now than ever before, and plus 500 futures is the perfect
place to start. Plus 500 gives you access to a wide range of instruments, the S&P 500, Nasdaq, Bitcoin,
gas, and much more. Explore equity indices, energy, metals, 4X, crypto, and beyond. With a simple and intuitive
platform, you can trade from anywhere, right from your phone. Deposit with a minimum of $100 and experience
the fast, accessible futures trading you've been waiting for. See a trading opportunity.
you'll be able to trade it in just two clicks once your account is open.
Not sure if you're ready, not a problem.
Plus 500 gives you an unlimited, risk-free demo account with charts and analytic tools for you to practice on.
With over 20 years of experience, Plus 500 is your gateway to the markets.
Visit plus500.com to learn more.
Trading in futures involves risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone.
Not all applicants will qualify.
Plus 500, it's trading with a plus.
Billion dollar investors don't typically park their cash in high-yield savings accounts.
Instead, they often use one of the premier passive income strategies for institutional investors,
private credit.
Now, the same passive income strategy is available to investors of all sizes, thanks to the
Fundrise income fund, which has more than $600 million invested in a 7.97% distribution rate,
With traditional savings yields falling, it's no wonder private credit has grown to be a trillion-dollar
asset class in the last few years. Visit fundrise.com slash WSB to invest in the Fundrise
Income Fund in just minutes. The fund's total return in 2025 was 8%, and the average annual
total return since inception is 7.8%. Past performance does not guarantee future results,
current distribution rate as of 1231, 2025.
Carefully consider the investment material before investing, including objectives, risks,
charges, and expenses.
This and other information can be found in the income funds prospectus at fundrise.com
slash income.
This is a paid advertisement.
All right.
Back to the show.
Lindy is the largest global provider of industrial gases with $34 billion in revenue
and $220 billion in market cap.
When I say industrial gases, think of things like oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen, carbon dioxide, etc.
The company also designs and builds equipment that produces industrial gases and offers customers
a wide range of gas production and processing services. Lindi is a global business as they have
around 65% of sales outside of the U.S. The business was started in 1879, so there's a very
long history here, and the company merged with Praxair in 2018, which is an American industrial
gases company. Lindy is domiciled in the UK, but with the merger of Praxair, you can really
think of this as an American company, since their corporate headquarters is in Connecticut.
Over the past few decades, the business has performed very well from a financial standpoint.
For the 30 years or so leading up to 2024, sales have compounded at 9% and earnings per share
is compounded at 12%. The industrial gas segment has 30% ebit margins, and overall return on
invested capital is over 20% after backing out goodwill and intangibles. From 1993 to year-end
2024, Lindy's stock has compounded at 12% versus the S&P 500's 8% over that same time
period. In their investor presentation, they also showcase how they've compounded sales,
earnings per share, operating cash flow, and their dividend at a much faster rate they and their
competitors. So how does Lindy make money? Lindy supplies industrial gases, which are these
critical resources for various parts of the economy. Industrial gases are essential inputs in most
manufacturing processes, but they only make up a low single-digit percentage of most cost
structures. So being able to source these resources from a reliable producer is absolutely essential.
A few examples might include Coke and Pepsi using carbon dioxide for carbonation, hospitals using
oxygen for respiratory therapy, TSM and Samsung using nitrogen and hydrogen for chipmaking,
and steelmakers using oxygen and argon for steel processing. The important thing for me, at least,
from a business perspective, is that these are critical components to a well-functioning economy.
Hospitals cannot operate without oxygen, and Coca-Cola needs a partner like Lindy to produce
carbonation. Lindy's end markets are fairly well diversified, with some being,
more cyclical than others. They're more resilient in markets are healthcare, food and beverage,
and electronics, and their more cyclical in markets are chemicals and energy, manufacturing, and metals
and mining. Lindi distributes its products three different ways. First is on-site. This is their biggest
long-term contracts. These customers require the largest volumes of product, which is typically
oxygen, nitrogen, and they have a relatively consistent demand pattern. So Lindi will make these
huge capital investments to construct these plants on or adjacent to these customer sites and supply
the product directly to customers by pipeline. These contracts tend to range anywhere from 10 to 20
years and they contain minimum purchase requirements and price escalation provisions.
So Lindy ensures that they're going to get their required return since they're putting this huge
upfront investment to construct these plants. Today, on-site distribution comprises of around
25% of Lindy's business. The second form of distribution is merchant distribution. These deliveries
generally are made from Lindy's plants by tanker trucks to storage containers at their customer's
sites, which are usually owned and maintained by Lindy and leased to the customer. Merchant distribution
tends to be contracts around three to seven years. Through these merchant contracts,
Lindy is able to leverage their existing infrastructure to deliver industrial gases to nearby
customers. Since these contracts aren't as capital intensive, they're able to target a higher
return on invested capital on these contracts. Today, around one-third of Lendie's business comes
from merchant distribution. The third form of distribution is packaged gas, which you can think
of as smaller volume packages that are supplied in metal containers. Cylenders may be delivered
to the customer site or picked up by the customer at a packaging facility or retail store.
Packaged gases are generally sold under one to three-year supply contracts and through purchase orders.
This segment makes up more than one-third of the overall business.
All three of these distribution methods, on-site, merchant, and packaged,
they're all sourced from the same air separation unit.
The other beautiful part of the on-site contracts that Lindy has in place is that even though
these contracts might range from 10 to 20 years, they're almost always renewed.
So Lindy is able to take these major contracts that they put in place, and then they leverage these
contracts to find opportunities to deliver the product to different customers that are in close
proximity.
This creates an industry where there are several local monopolies because it's uneconomic to transport
these gases more than 100 miles.
You tend to only see one or two of these major industrial gas companies in each region, holding that
local monopoly or duopoly.
So there's several attributes of this that are really attractive from an investor's perspective.
So Lindy has all of these local monopolies or duoplies.
Their products and services are mission critical.
The products are a low overall percentage of the customer's overall spend, think around 1, 2%,
and they have a high cost of failure.
This is a formula that leads to a very sticky customer base and strong pricing power.
Furthermore, Lindy typically includes costs pass-through in their long-term contracts.
so they should be able to pass along inflation in any of their raw inputs onto the customer.
Overall, the industrial gases industry has seen consolidation. Over the past 25 years,
the market share for the top three players has gone from around 40% to over 60%. And return on capital
in the industry has improved as the industry has consolidated. In 2000, the return on capital
employed was around 10% for the industry. Today, it's around 16%. This consolidation also highlighted,
highlights the network density required to operate profitably, which helps prevent new entrants
from entering the space.
Network density refers to Lindy's ability to serve many customers within a concentrated geographic
footprint, using shared infrastructure like pipelines, production plants, and distribution routes.
This density creates a major cost advantage because the more customers Lindi serves in a region,
the more efficiently it can spread fixed costs across higher volumes.
It also raises the barrier to entry, since a new entrant would need to build massive,
capital-intensive infrastructure without having enough local demand to operate economically.
Over time, this dense network reinforces Lindy's local monopoly position and makes it extremely
difficult for anyone to replicate their scale and reliability.
Other aspects of their remote involve trust, reliability, and their engineering expertise.
So since they're the standard in the industry and they've built up the scale.
there is little incentive for a new entrant to enter because the value proposition cannot be
significantly improved upon. So even if someone does invest all of this capital and offers, say,
a 10% discount on price, most manufacturers just aren't going to be interested because there's
the risk that it doesn't work, and the industrial gases are a low percentage of overall
spend anyway. So you might as well go with the proven players. And since gases are so critical
to the manufacturing processes that Lindy supports, choosing a reliable supplier is oftentimes
a top consideration. Since Lindy has a very dense network, they tend to be one of the most reliable
sources. The other two big players in the industry are Air Lequide and Air Products. Air Lechide is headquartered
in France, and Air Products is headquartered in Pennsylvania. Lundy has around one-third of the market
today, and the top three players add up to more than 70% of the overall market. Historically,
Lindi has been the more disciplined player of the three. They're laser focused on cost discipline
and return on invested capital. And of the three players, Lindi has the best return on capital.
And one of the main reasons for that is how they're able to leverage their on-site distribution
systems to supply products to these customers. As a result, Lindi has historically generated
much better returns for shareholders than their competitors as earnings per share over the past
decade have grown at around 12% per annum. Management takes a balanced approach to capital allocation.
Just over one-third of cash flow gets deployed into share repurchases, one-third of cash flow goes to
CAPEX, and the remainder is distributed as a dividend. The management team is incentivized
based on organic sales, net income, cash flow, return on capital, relative total shareholder return,
and absolute stock appreciation. There are also thousands of managers on the ground operating
these business segments globally that are also incentivized on many of the same metrics.
What really stands out from listening to management on earnings calls is just their discipline.
They're very clear that they will only pursue projects that meet strict return thresholds
and are backed by long-term contracts, even if that means walking away from growth opportunities
that don't meet that criteria.
They repeatedly emphasize not all growth is good, and their $10 billion project backlog is designed
to generate attractive returns and drive high-quality earnings per-share growth. Above all, management
consistently frames decisions through a long-term lens, focusing on return on capital, durable,
competitive positioning, and compounding shareholder value over multiple years rather than chasing
short-term volume or headline revenue revenue growth. Management has noted that around two-thirds
of their backlog supports contracted clean energy projects, which aligns with the global push for decarbonization.
Rather than speculating on commodity prices, Lendi focuses on building out infrastructure
that enables customers to reduce emissions through hydrogen, carbon capture, and other low-carbon
solutions.
Many of these projects strengthen Lundy's existing network density, creating additional
opportunities to serve nearby customers and improve returns over time.
Importantly, management remains disciplined, only pursuing clean energy investments
that meet these strict return thresholds and are supported by a high-rength,
high-quality counterparties. In that way, this global energy transition, it becomes less of a risky
bet for Lindy and more of a long-term play. At a high level, I think Lindy is a business that
one should expect to grow alongside the broader growth of the economy, increasing volumes at around
2% to 4% per year. And part of the magic of this business has been their ability to capture
these high-return projects that improve margins and boosts earnings per share. And this is despite
not increasing their volume significantly. So with 2 to 4% growth in volumes, you also have
2 to 3% growth in price, so those alone will generate 6 to 8% in earnings growth. And then they
receive an additional boost to 10 to 12% earnings growth due to cost efficiencies and share
repurchases. But it's also important to keep in mind that Lindy's been operating through a somewhat
lacklester manufacturing environment ever since 2021. So in 2021, volumes grew by 8%, but in the
Four years after that, volume growth over any calendar year has not exceeded 1%.
However, management has been pushing prices to try and drive more of that revenue growth.
So jumping back to Lindy and the Praxair merger, the merger closed in October of 2018.
This merger has really worked out well for Lindy because the industry benefits from consolidation
and operating at scale.
Higher network density leads to lower per unit costs, improve service, and stronger pricing
power. Just as importantly, the merger brought together Lindy's world-class German engineering,
with Praxair's reputation for operational rigor and cost discipline. After the deal,
the combined company streamlined overhead, optimized plan efficiency, and gained significant
procurement and logistics advantages from its larger footprint. Prax Air's tighter approach
to pricing and capital allocation also became more central, helping expand margins and strengthen
and free cash flow. Altogether, the merger turned Lindy into a more efficient shareholder-friendly
industrial gas powerhouse, even in a slower volume growth environment. So the question then becomes
how much more can Lindy continue to improve margins? Upon the merger with Praxair, Lindi started to
identify areas where there were opportunities to improve margins. If a plant in Mexico was at 40%
margin and another plant in Canada was half of that, management would be on their team to do what
they need to do to get them to the margin level they needed to be at, whether that be hiking the
price or adding necessary tools to improve the efficiency. Alongside pricing, Lundy's management
team consistently frames productivity improvements as one driver of long-term earnings growth.
Even in weak demand environments, they emphasize that productivity is how they keep expanding
margins. The business operates in a decentralized manner where they constantly have thousands of operational
improvement projects happening, and they share these best practices for sites that have margin levels
that need improvement. Increasingly, Lindy is leaning on technology, digital tools, and even
AI to accelerate these productivity gains, helping them optimize pricing, managed costs, and run plants
more efficiently. Over time, these innovations give them another lever to keep expanding margins,
even when volumes or the broader industrial economy is sluggish.
I think it's reasonable to assume that margins will continue to expand over the next five years or so,
but probably not at the rate that they've expanded since the merger with Praxair,
since they've already identified a lot of the lower-hanging fruits.
Taking a look at the valuation, Lindy trades at a premium to the overall market
due to the business's durability and low terminal value risk.
I think it's pretty fair to say that in 30 years,
Lindi will still be providing industrial gases globally to industries that are, you know, a cornerstone
of our daily lives, things like health care, chips, soft drinks, etc. The forward PE tends to trade in the
mid-20s or a 30 to 40% to the S&B 500. The marketplace is a premium on Lindy's earnings because
of the certainty with which they'll be able to continue to grow going forward. Pretty much
no matter what happens over the next decade, the world is going to still need industrial.
What I think is also important to consider is that volume growth has been quite modest in
recent years, with the exception of 2021.
So if we believe that the economy is cyclical and things eventually pick back up, then we
could see a bit of a tailwind from economic growth, whether that be Europe's economy
gaining traction or the AI and data centers in the U.S. providing a bit of a tailwind.
Another key support for Lindy's long-term growth is its $10 billion project backlog.
With roughly two-thirds of that tied to contracted clean energy investments, giving the company
high visibility into future earnings.
So as hydrogen, decarbonization, and advanced electronics, infrastructure continue to scale globally,
Lendie's positioned as an essential supplier to many of these projects.
In the company's most recent earnings call, they guided for 6% to 9% growth in earnings per share
and 0% base volume growth.
Over the long term, management expects to grow earnings per share in the 10 to 12% range,
which comes from a combination of raising prices, increasing efficiencies, buying back shares,
and reinvesting in future growth.
Even in a stagnant manufacturing environment, Lindy seems pretty well positioned to continue
to grow earnings per share at 10% plus, and if the manufacturing environment manages to
pick up globally, then we could see Lindy benefit due to higher volumes, higher price increases,
and increase operating leverage. As people continue to talk about the potential of a recession in the
near future, management has even gone as far to say that they've been going through an industrial
recession for more than two years. While they're seeing massive investments in AI and digital
infrastructure, traditional industrial markets like manufacturing, metals, chemicals, and mining,
they've been facing continued retrenchment. In Lindy's recent performance showcases their ability
to continue to be prepared for the worst and ready to capitalize on any upside opportunities that
exist. So Lindy grew earnings per share by 8% in 2024 and 7% in 2025, and that's honestly
pretty remarkable given the macro backdrop that they've been facing. So I wouldn't be surprised
to see a business like this to have some upside if the manufacturing base picks back up overall.
So to wrap things up and summarize the Lindy thesis, Lindy operates in an attractive
industry with rational players and offers products and services that are mission-critical.
They have an unrivaled network density, which enables them to offer competitive prices and generate
industry-leading returns on capital. They're well-positioned to continue growing with the global
transition to clean energy. They have world-class operators with the business owner mindset.
From top to bottom, they prioritize increasing efficiencies in achieving higher margins over time.
And lastly, the business features best-in-class financial performance.
performance with unwavering capital discipline, which positions them to continue to deliver
solid returns for shareholders from here. That wraps up all I have to share on Lundy today.
I hope you found it useful or interesting in some way. So with that, thanks a lot for tuning
in to today's episode. I hope to see you again next time.
Thanks for listening to TIP. Follow We Study Billionaires on your favorite podcast app and
visit The Investorspodcast.com for show notes and educational resources.
This podcast is for informational and entertainment purposes only and does not provide financial, investment, tax or legal advice.
The content is impersonal and does not consider your objectives, financial situation or needs.
Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principle and past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
Listeners should do their own research and consult a qualified professional before making any financial decisions.
Nothing on this show is a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any security or other financial product.
Hosts, guests, and the Investors' Podcast Network may hold position.
and securities discussed and may change those positions at any time without notice. References
to any third-party products, services or advertisers do not constitute endorsements and the Investors'
Podcast Network is not responsible for any claims made by them. Copyright by the Investors' Podcast Network,
all rights reserved.
