What A Day - Get Your Bans Off My Books with George M. Johnson

Episode Date: February 1, 2022

As we celebrate the beginning of Black History Month, conservatives are actively and aggressively silencing educators’ ability to talk honestly about history. Book bans are gaining steam with school...s banning everything from "The 1619 Project," to Toni Morrison’s "Beloved," to Art Spiegelman’s "Maus." Journalist and activist George M. Johnson joins us to discuss the issue from an author’s perspective after their book, "All Boys Aren’t Blue," was targeted for removal in at least 14 states.And in headlines: A Georgia judge rejected plea agreements in the federal hate crime trial of Gregory and Travis McMichael, the FDA granted full approval of Moderna’s coronavirus vaccine, and The New York Times announced it had acquired Wordle.Show Notes:NYT: "Book Ban Efforts Spread Across the U.S." - https://nyti.ms/3uah9wKOrder "All Boys Aren't Blue" by George M. Johnson - https://bit.ly/34qKfNCFollow us on Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/whatadayFor a transcript of this episode, please visit crooked.com/whataday

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 It's Tuesday, February 1st. I'm Gideon Resnick. And I'm Josie Duffy Rice. And this is What A Day, the podcast that has no problem with beautiful, famous people announcing they're having a baby together. Yeah, unlike Drake, we're even happy for A$AP Rocky and Rihanna. From Fenty Beauty to Fenty Baby. Baby.
Starting point is 00:00:22 That's the autobiography right there of the child. On today's show, the FDA fully authorizes the Moderna vaccine, plus an update on the federal hate crime trial of the men who killed Ahmaud Arbery. But first, today marks the beginning of Black History Month, my favorite month of the year. So we wanted to focus on the recent attempts to erase part of that history. Yeah, so across the country, conservatives have been actively and aggressively silencing educators' ability to talk honestly about history. Recently, a number of states have passed laws functionally outlawing the discussion of race and white supremacy in schools across the country. These laws, which attempt to prevent the honest discussion of
Starting point is 00:01:05 history, contribute to the erasure of marginalized people and their stories. In particular, book bans, which never really went away, are gaining steam. Schools are banning everything from the 1619 Project to Toni Morrison's Beloved to, most recently, Mouse, Art Spiegelman's graphic novel about his parents' survival of the Holocaust. In fact, hundreds of books are slowly disappearing from school libraries across the country. Recently, efforts have expanded well outside the confines of just school board meetings. Now members of law enforcement and state legislatures are being mobilized in some cases too. As a recent feature in the New York
Starting point is 00:01:38 Times noted, organizations are targeting a wide range of books that parents see listed in various places online, subsequently demanding their removal as part of a broader argument that parents should dictate what is taught to not only their children, but all children. The American Library Association reported that it received 330 reports of book challenges last fall, which it described as a quote, unprecedented amount. Yeah, and authors of marginalized backgrounds are seeing their work specifically targeted, especially books that tackle issues of race, gender, and sexuality. We wanted to talk to one of those authors, so today we have with us journalist and activist George M. Johnson. They are the author of the book All Boys Aren't Blue, a memoir that has been targeted for removal in at least 14 states, perhaps more by the time this airs, after conservatives deemed it inappropriate for children. In one instance, a school board member in Florida filed a complaint with
Starting point is 00:02:28 the sheriff's department about it. George, welcome to What A Day. Thank you for having me today. So your book, All Boys Aren't Blue, it recounts your lived experience growing up as a queer Black person. What was your reaction to finding out that such a personal piece of yours had been banned in several schools? When I found out about the first ban, which was in like Kansas City, I laughed because I thought it was funny because the book had already been out for 17 months. And so it was like, you know, if you were going to attack it, I would have thought it would have got attacked at the height
Starting point is 00:02:56 of when the book was out and had all the press. But within about four to six weeks, it had got up to eight states. And that's when I finally said something publicly about it. And then that following week was when the first criminal complaint was filed against me and the book in Florida. It's just actually been a pretty wild journey to witness this happening. You know, we've dealt with censorship and things, but I don't think we've ever seen this type of authoritarianism come into play around literature in such a fervent and vicious way. Yeah. And what other details were provided about this criminal complaint? Were you given any notice or rationale here of like why this was? I've never heard of that before. Yeah. I mean, between myself, my attorneys, we didn't know that you could file a criminal
Starting point is 00:03:42 complaint against a book. But that's pretty much how we found out that there was some form of legislation that they were trying to use. Fortunately, every single time they have tried to file the criminal complaints, they've been thrown out. But yeah, apparently there are obscenity laws and they are trying to sweep our books into being seen as obscene titles that teens should not be allowed to read. Crazy. Unbelievable. So conservatives have been targeting LGBTQ plus books specifically in recent months, but they're also pushing to control what students are taught in the classroom about queerness, right?
Starting point is 00:04:15 So for example, in Florida, a house committee just passed a law that would prohibit students and teachers from discussing gender identity and sexual orientation in schools. What do you think is the ultimate goal of these measures to prevent students from engaging with the idea of queerness in schools? We just have to look at what the founding principles in many ways of what the United States has been. And it's always been cis, male, heterosexual, and patriarchal. So when we get to a place now where we have a population shift happening,
Starting point is 00:04:43 where white folks thought they had until 2050 before they would become the minority and are realizing that that 2050 line is starting to creep back into the 2030s. And Gen Z is the most diverse population we have ever had in terms of when you look at children demographically across the country who fall into that category. There is a real fear that they are going to lose not just the majority, you know, within the country when it comes to voting, which is why we see they're attacking voting, not just the majority when it comes to the population, which is why they're attacking Roe v. Wade, but also the majority when it comes to how information historically has been
Starting point is 00:05:21 fed to us as children that have conditioned us to see white people as authoritative figures who we should see as our savior rather than our oppressor. That is really what the nexus of all of this is, is that they are trying to now block Gen Z specifically from becoming the next future leaders who will actually know that there are people who exist outside of them that are not white. You know, that's a real fear for them because they got to grow up not having to think about us because all the books looked white, all the teachings were white, their children are not growing up in that same generation. And so that is really what the fear is. It's one of like a purity principle, trying to keep like a purity innocence to white
Starting point is 00:06:04 children. Right. And a lot of authors like yourself have been censored, but you've been really vocal about fighting back on all of this. So what does it actually look like in the past few months? And have you made any discernible progress here? I am blessed that I grew up with a grandmother who didn't take any mess. I would have cursed, but I'm not sure what kind of podcast. So when something like this occurs, for me, I just go back to what I would have cursed, but I'm not sure what kind of podcast. So when something like this occurs for me, I just go back to what I've always known, which is I've always been an activist for myself. Anytime something happened to me, I spoke up about it. A lot of other authors don't necessarily operate through their world with an activist lens. I always did. I was a journalist
Starting point is 00:06:37 first. For me, this was part of the plan. This was part of my purpose. We've won several of the suits. We've been able to retain the books in several of the libraries. Like this was part of my purpose. We've won several of the suits. We've been able to retain the books in several of the libraries. We've lost some, but we've won some too. I've learned that librarians are some of the baddest, dopest people in the country because they are very, very adamant about what you will not do to their libraries and the books. And teachers who, again, are always the heroes of most generations. I think it's a beautiful coalition being built around the censorship and I'm watching it unfold in real time. And that's really, really dope. Yeah. Well, speaking of that coalition,
Starting point is 00:07:13 right, there are conservative voices who have been complaining about cancel culture for months, years, right? This has been kind of a refrain on the right. I've noticed, and you may have noticed, that a lot of them are silent about this particular issue, censorship of books like this, laws like the one in Florida, this, you know, critical race theory laws. Are you finding any kind of support on the right on principle here? And if not, what do you think about that? As much as this is a conservative issue, which clearly it is, I also do take issue with the silence of those who are supposed to be the advocates. Right. So it's like you would expect at least that some liberals and progressives would be just as vocal.
Starting point is 00:07:59 You would expect that historic organizations like NAACP, whether it's HBCUs, whether it's the Divine Nine, because I'm Greek, too. I'm not hearing much from them and their thoughts about it either. Right. And sometimes your silence speaks to what you feel, too. We have one group who's saying the quiet part out loud and another group who may sadly believe the part that they're saying out loud, but just not getting involved. You know, I will say, though, clearly there's been more support from liberals and moderates and progressives than there has been from conservatives to help with the pushback. But I think it could be stronger. There are probably a lot of listeners hearing this thinking, first of all, what the hell is going on? And second of all, maybe thinking they want to support you and other authors who have been faced with these censorship situations. So what can they actually do to make sure that these stories are not getting lost or not getting taken off of library shelves?
Starting point is 00:08:50 There are a couple things that you can do. One, if you are noticing that your school board is one of those school boards that is challenging the book, to say something, to send emails, to call with your concerns about them doing this type of censorship. Two, it is important that you actually check because a lot of them are doing this silently simply because the press has not been able to pick up on it. A third thing, there are a lot of free libraries. I think the ultimate goal of this is when they take away one access point, we need to create 10 more. So like free libraries, making sure that you're donating the books that are being banned to LGBTQ centers and other types of resource centers and groups in places where we know students have the ability to freely frequent.
Starting point is 00:09:31 And the fourth thing is buy the books. When they see sales increase of these books, what happens is big retailers then catch on and say, we can make some money here. Before we let you go, we just wanted to ask about the loss here. What do students in schools lose when they ban books by Black and queer authors like yourself and authors of marginalized backgrounds as a whole, right? How does erasing history, especially these histories, really allow the expansion of the conservative project, but also just allow the expansion of the American project of erasure, which is part and parcel of the history. We lose the truth. The unfounded truth of this country has been told and sold for nearly 500 plus years now.
Starting point is 00:10:12 And now we have reached a point where Black storytelling, queer storytelling gets to unravel all those truths and give the other side of that. The second thing we lose is being seen. I grew up and went through high school and was not. I didn't read about myself in books. I read about little white boys like Colden Haulfield or Holden Cofield, whatever that other thing was. And I read about indigenous people being called savages and having a white teacher explain why that made sense. So we now have a generation of kids
Starting point is 00:10:42 who get to open a book, not even just open a book, look at a book cover and see a person, a color on it, see a black face on it, see a black queer face on it, right? So what we lose is the empowering of kids who, like myself, had to go through a second adolescence because in many ways my first was taken from me. When we give these books to them, they have an adolescence now because they know they have precedent. They know that they have legacy. They know that they have ancestors. They know that their story exists. And they get to see people who have the same identifiers as them succeed in this world. Yeah, a lot to think about. Thank you so much for all of your time. We really appreciate you
Starting point is 00:11:17 joining today. Thank you. Thank you for having me. We'll be following George's efforts, but that is the latest for now. We'll be back after some ads. Let's wrap up with some headlines. Headlines. A judge in Georgia rejected plea agreements in the federal hate crime trial of Gregory and Travis McMichael yesterday. The father and son were already convicted in state court and sentenced to life in prison for murdering Ahmaud Arbery. He was a 25-year-old black man who was jogging when the McMichaels and another white man shot and killed him in February of 2020. The plea deal had been negotiated between the McMichaels and the U.S. Department of Justice. In exchange for pleading guilty and admitting that their murder of Arbery was racially motivated,
Starting point is 00:12:15 they were set to avert their trial on federal hate crime charges and go to federal prison for 30 years instead of state prison. Arbery's family felt angry and betrayed by this arrangement, though, and it was their objection during a hearing yesterday that motivated the judge to reject the deal. Arbery's mom, Wanda Cooper-Jones, told the judge, quote, granting these men their preferred conditions of confinement would defeat me. It gives them one last chance to spit in my face after murdering my son. The judge gave the McMichaels until Friday to decide whether they want to go to trial, which is scheduled for Monday, or to stick with their guilty pleas, which would no longer guarantee them the lighter sentence. If you've had some Moderna swimming around you for the past several months,
Starting point is 00:12:50 join me in a hip-hip her FDA. No. You love it. On Monday, the Food and Drug Administration granted full approval of Moderna's coronavirus vaccine. Hundreds of millions of people have already received the shot under an emergency authorization by the FDA. But now Moderna joins Pfizer-BioNTech's vaccine and being fully licensed for use in the U.S. FDA approval for Pfizer shots still remains a few steps ahead of Moderna.
Starting point is 00:13:18 Pending approval of Pfizer shots for children from six months to five years old could be available as soon as the end of the month, which would make it the first vaccine available for that age group. But Moderna has been busy making notable strides in other crucial areas. Last week, Moderna announced the launch of early-stage clinical trials of an HIV mRNA vaccine, employing the same technology used in the company's groundbreaking COVID shot. Moderna is working with the nonprofit International AIDS Vaccine Initiative in developing the vaccine, and the first people participating in the trial have already received their first shots. I was waiting for full approval, and now I will think about getting vaccinated, Josie. Oh, man. Let's make sure that people understand
Starting point is 00:13:55 that that is not true. That is a joke and a bad one. Please get your vaccine. Okay. Bad news for birds who love to cough. The Biden administration announced that it will ramp up regulation of coal burning power plants yesterday. It'll do it by bringing back an Obama era rule that allows it to restrict emissions of mercury, which is a dangerous neurotoxin. The rule comes down from Biden's EPA. It proposes returning to an old method of calculating the benefits of reducing mercury pollution, which allows for a more generous estimate. Under Trump, this Obama era approach was which allows for a more generous estimate. Under Trump, this Obama-era approach was scrapped and a more narrow way of estimating benefits was used, allowing the administration to conclude that enforcing limits on mercury polluters didn't make sense financially, because that's the best metric for making that decision.
Starting point is 00:14:39 The EPA is expected to start enforcing the renewed rule later this year. It is one small step towards delivering on Biden's clean energy agenda, key elements of which are going nowhere, thanks to Senator Joe Manchin's objections to their inclusion in the Build Back Better bill. While we wait on the clean kind of energy, Biden's making sure that no one runs out of the dirty kind. Yesterday, he met with the Emir of Qatar in attempts to ensure that our European allies could import some of that country's natural gas in case a war in Ukraine makes Russian natural gas off limits. After that meeting, Biden said that he would designate Qatar a, quote, major non-NATO ally. The New York Times will soon be in charge of all the five-letter words
Starting point is 00:15:21 that are fit to print. On Monday, the newspaper announced that it acquired Wordle, the free daily word puzzle created by software engineer Josh Wordle. The acquisition isn't wholly surprising for anyone who's seen the browser-based game gain popularity over the past few months, going from 90 users on November 1st of last year to millions of players a day. While it's unclear if Wordle will retain some of its more charming features, notably its no-frills, ad-free layout, the New York Times announcement made clear that the game would remain free, for now at least.
Starting point is 00:15:49 The paywalled New York Times game section has grown over recent years, home to the digital crossword as well as newer games like The Spelling Bee, and it's unclear whether the Times will eventually put Wordle behind the paywall as well. But it wouldn't be surprising. Wardle, who initially made the game for his girlfriend to pass time during quarantine, reportedly sold the game for a number in, quote, the low seven figures. While you can't blame the guy for passing the game on to bigger, brighter things, today maybe start your Wardle game with price.
Starting point is 00:16:16 Because it turns out everybody's got one, even the nice puzzle guy. We love you, Josh. Come on the show. Come on the show. Yeah, that would be a lot of fun. It's going to be interesting when all of the words are like do that and Stevens and other various times authors of note. That's not actually going to happen because those are proper names and that wouldn't make any sense for the game that Josh created, which we all think is quite fun. It's true. And those are the headlines. One more thing before we go. This week on America Dissected,
Starting point is 00:16:47 Dr. Abdul El-Sayed talks to NYU law professor and host of the podcast, Strict Scrutiny, Melissa Murray, about a recent ruling against workplace vaccine mandates and how that might affect the Supreme Court and the Justice Breyer retirement. New episodes of America Dissected drop every Tuesday. You can listen wherever you get your podcasts. That is all for today.
Starting point is 00:17:08 If you like the show, make sure you subscribe, leave a review, do a free wordle and tell your friends to listen. And if you are into reading and not just the coolest band books like me, what it is also a nightly newsletter, check it out and subscribe at cricket.com slash subscribe. I'm Josie Duffy Rice.
Starting point is 00:17:20 I'm Gideon Resnick. And happy Lunar New Year. You have the tiger, baby. That's right. We know what that means. Lunar New Year. You have the tiger, baby. That's right. We know what that means. It means the Bengals. Okay.
Starting point is 00:17:29 Oh my God. That's kind of cool. What a Day is a production of Crooked Media. It's recorded and mixed by Bill Lance. Jazzy Marine and Raven Yamamoto are our associate producers. Our head writer is John Milstein with writing support from Jossie Kaufman. And our executive producers are Leo Duran and me, Gideon Resnick.
Starting point is 00:17:49 Our theme music is by Colin Gilliard and Kashaka.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.