What A Day - How It's Joe-ing Six Months In
Episode Date: July 20, 2021Today marks six months since President Biden entered the White House. We talked with Crooked Media’s editor-in-chief and the host of "Rubicon," Brian Beutler, about Biden’s progress on the $600 bi...llion infrastructure bill, the $3.5 trillion Democrat-led budget bill, the COVID response, voting rights, climate change, and more.And in headlines: the first sentencing for a Capitol rioter, Canada opens its borders to vaccinated Americans, and Ben and Jerry’s stops commercial activities in Israeli-occupied Palestinian territories.For a transcript of this episode, please visit crooked.com/whataday
Transcript
Discussion (0)
It's Tuesday, July 20th.
I'm Elyse Hu in for Akilah Hughes.
And I'm Gideon Resnick, and this is What A Day,
the only podcast that is featured in the background of Space Jam 2.
Yeah, all the Warner Media characters make cameos,
and when you see Dorothy from The Wizard of Oz back there,
she's listening to WOD.
You can tell because her eyes are glazed over from all the learning.
On today's show, a federal court upholds a vaccine mandate at Indiana University,
plus a documentary, quote unquote, deep fakes the voice of the late Anthony Bourdain.
But first, we do another check in on President Biden's progress in office.
Today marks six months since he entered the White House.
Yeah, and yesterday he pushed Congress to pass two key pieces of his economic agenda.
First, there's the nearly $600 billion infrastructure bill,
and then also the $3.5 trillion with a T budget that was crafted by Democrats,
which is set to go through reconciliation.
What we can't do is go back to the same old
trickle-down theories that gave us nearly $2 trillion in deficit finance corporate tax giveaways.
It did nothing to make our economy more productive and resilient.
But you know, this speech for big spending items comes at a tricky time when it seems like the
economy still hasn't fully recovered. And although it's not the
ultimate sign of the country's economic health, and we know this, just yesterday, Wall Street had
a terrible day with the Dow suffering its biggest drop of the year. Yeah, and so part of that drop
was because of all this uncertainty about the pandemic and its trajectory. The Delta variant
has been running rampant across the world, and it has also been driving up cases in the U.S.,
mostly among the many millions who are still unvaccinated. And investors were worried that the variant might threaten the
country's overall recovery in the future. So there's the economy and the virus,
but also on Biden's plate are things like voting rights, you know, democracy,
and climate change, kind of a big deal, and international cybersecurity, too.
Yesterday, the White House formally accused China of hacking Microsoft. That follows sanctions the U.S. placed on Russia back in April for the hacking of the company
SolarWinds. Yeah. So to find out where Biden is at six months in office, we have Crooked Media's
editor-in-chief and the host of Rubicon, Brian Boitler. We talked with him 100 days into the
Biden administration. So, Brian, welcome back to WOD for another check-in. It's always good to be
back.
So let's kick things off first with the pandemic.
Last time you were with us, we were talking about how Biden kind of under-promised and then over-delivered when he first set a goal of 100 million vaccine shots given out in
his first 100 days.
That, of course, happened.
But then he fell short of the next goal that he set for himself, 70% of adults, with at
least one shot by July 4th.
So why do you think that is? And what
could actually be done here to change that? My sense is that they underestimated how much
vaccine hesitancy there would be in the population, in part because they underestimated the extent to
which Republican Party actors would discourage vaccine uptake, both by spreading lies and also just basically
saying that not getting vaccinated is a way to hurt Biden and his administration. After all this
time, it seems like maybe you should anticipate that level of malice. At the same time, you kind
of can kind of understand why somebody might not anticipate that they would discourage their own
supporters from getting a lifesaving vaccine in order just to cause political pain to the other party.
And so far, America, we should be clear, America hasn't hit it yet.
We still haven't hit 70 percent of adults with at least one shot.
Right. Yeah. They were somewhere in the mid 60 percent range at the turn of the month.
And now it's a couple of weeks later and they're still not there.
So things have slowed down dramatically.
And then the Delta variant is raging. So, Brian, what about the antidote to this malice?
Has the administration been sending the right messages about how Americans should be dealing
with the variant and what sort of implications could a possible resurgence have?
Part of it might take care of itself as we see case numbers go up. The Biden administration
has leaned really heavily on local doctors and clergy, people who trust Trump, won't trust them,
but might trust their doctor, right? And I think that that's wise, but I also think that we've seen
both in the U.S. and abroad that inducements work.
To offer them free beer.
Yeah, free beer, money, prizes.
And, you know, we've seen that even in Republican-controlled parts of the country, those things have an impact. seen no evidence that they're interested in trying, would be to impose or encourage the
imposition of vaccine requirements in order to get into public places. They did it in France,
and there was an immediate and dramatic uptick in appointments for vaccination when they did it.
On the other side of this, right, like I guess the side that Republicans
think that they care about here is the economic stuff. There was this big
stock sell off yesterday driven by fears over Delta. Plus, there are these concerns about
seeing spikes in inflation. That comes as the unemployment rate is at 5.9%. That's down from
nearly 15% in April 2020. And a number of polls are giving Biden about a 50% approval rating on
his handling of the economy. So how critical are the next six months or so on this front to Biden's overall success? Always important, right? I mean, I think political
scientists will break down when exactly it's optimal politically for an incumbent to see
economic growth. And it's like in the quarter or two before the election. It's a little complicated
because he wants to pass an infrastructure agenda.
It's a lot of money, but those bills will be paid for and thus shouldn't contribute to inflation.
His real lever for making sure that inflation doesn't get out of control is who he appoints
to the Federal Reserve. Nobody's really thinking about that as being a centerpiece of Biden's
political program. Like, is he attending to that institution right?
But I do think that, you know, if things were to go wrong,
then come election time, we would end up looking back
at what he could or could not have done on that front.
And Brian, you mentioned the infrastructure bill,
which is, I think, looking shakier
after the growing Republican resistance
to the IRS tax enforcement part of it.
So bring us up to speed. Where do things stand with what was supposed to be bipartisan infrastructure reform?
And where do you see it going?
What I saw happen was this.
I saw Biden join a group of Democratic and Republican senators and saying they cut a deal on a framework that would turn into a bill,
talking about how proud they were of this accomplishment. And then Republicans were like, actually, we're going to take one of the key financing mechanisms out of it. And Democrats,
I suppose, because they want to log this accomplishment, this bipartisan accomplishment,
just decided to reopen the deal and let that piece of it fall out. Now the challenge is like holding
Republicans who said that they'd support the framework to their word and not let them use the
fact that Democrats are interested in the deal to allow them to like drag this process out forever.
So I think that if it starts to happen, what will happen is that bill just won't pass and then
Democrats will move on to put as much of it as they can into the partisan bill that they want to pass and act alone. Okay. We've got to talk about climate.
There's this $3.5 trillion separate Democratic package that has some provisions to deal with
climate change. And we've seen in recent days, record floods, fires, and more just across the
planet, right, because of climate change. So
point blank, if Biden doesn't get through any kind of climate legislation at all,
then does the rest of what he does even really matter? Will we still be here?
In an existential sense? Yeah, maybe not. But in a truly existential sense, in the long run,
we're all dead, so why try to do anything? True.
No, that's the Mitch McConnell view. agenda out of that bill and try to get them into subsequent legislation in the appropriations
process or anytime an opportunity arose to try to get more of that stuff out the door,
they would take it. And I imagine that that's the way they'd go. But but the you know, it would be
very hard for them to get something along the lines of a clean, clean electricity standard
into law if this big bill somehow sinks.
Yeah. And on another topic of things that make us feel doomed often, voting rights,
at least 17 states have enacted various laws that make it harder for people to vote.
Congress, of course, is still trying to pass federal legislation to protect voting rights.
Has Biden been forceful enough to try and compel lawmakers to take action? Is the
problem here coming from the amount of will that he's putting towards it? I personally don't think
so. There is a school of thought among a lot of progressives that he should have made voting
rights and democracy protection his top priority and then leaned into it more heavily and more
publicly the way he has on infrastructure. This is a sign of their priorities, right? They want to get that
passed. There is a logic to it. I know that a lot of progressives were disappointed when in his
speech on voting rights last week, Biden didn't mention the filibuster. But I don't take that to
mean that they're not actually trying to figure out a way to get around a filibuster on voting rights.
I took that to mean that putting Biden out there to say that the filibuster has to go so that they have to do this charges that issue so heavily that it might ultimately be counterproductive.
And that the way to get to people like Manchin and Sinema is back channels and to use surrogates.
If Joe Biden comes out there and says, I want the Senate to change its rules to pass my bill,
you might end up actually setting back your own cause.
OK, let's go to the international front, because yesterday the Biden administration accused China of hacking Microsoft.
This comes after sanctions were imposed on Russia for the
separate SolarWinds attack. How would you assess how the Biden administration is dealing with
cybersecurity while navigating these international relationships? Oh, geez, I don't know.
This is a smorgasbord. Yeah, an easy one. I can't say sitting here that I know what the right level of sanctions confrontation would be.
We're coming off of such a low baseline from the Trump years in how foreign relations between the United States and these authoritarian governments was conducted that it's good to see professionalism restored to that process by people who are
basically there. You can trust that they're applying real judgment to these questions.
I would say, though, that you've seen the restoration of real process to questions along
the lines of what's the right balance between carrot and stick to use with somebody like
Vladimir Putin? I'll just say that it's good to have some sense
that like there's a real process here for doing these things. To wrap things up here. So we've
alluded to this, but you know, the midterm elections are coming up relatively soon.
Democrats control the Senate because of an even split for now. So given what we've said about
Biden's first six months, what do you think is going to be the most crucial thing for him to
accomplish before those elections? Oh, making sure that nobody in the Senate passes away.
Yeah, easy.
That's real.
That's real.
I think that, you know, I don't know what to say about what more Biden could do to get it done.
But really, honestly, issues around democracy protection, adding states, Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico, if Puerto Rico
wants it, other territories, make them states, give them two senators apiece, pass the provisions
of the For the People Act pertaining to gerrymandering. You can have a great economy
and you can win some court cases on these voter suppression tactics.
And you're still dealing with needing to win a landslide just to break even. In my personal opinion, more important than the, than the infrastructure agenda, um, is just making sure
that, uh, that our elections are secure and that they take place on an even playing field so that
whoever gets the most votes wins. Right. Okay. Um, well, Brian, thank you so much again for
joining us. We really appreciate
it. I guess we'll check in at 150 days, 200 days, whatever you think. We can just pick other days.
Yeah. I mean, every 31st day of a month. Perfect. We'll see you then. Yeah,
Brian, we'll be back very the man who blew the lid off
confidential stuff in kitchens, the late, great Anthony Bourdain, who is the star of
a new documentary called Roadrunner.
Roadrunner focuses on Bourdain's ascendant career as a chef, author, and TV star up through
his tragic suicide in 2018.
And one 45-second chunk of the film
has attracted some serious debate.
It's a section where the filmmakers used artificial intelligence
and troves of recorded audio
to make Bourdain say something out loud
that he had only written in an email.
This is essentially a deepfake,
and some people are opposed to its use in the documentary.
One filmmaker said it might make viewers skeptical of everything else they see in the doc, while an ex-wife of Bourdain suggested
on Twitter that he would have disapproved. Others say that it's harmless given the clip uses Bourdain's
exact words and the filmmakers claim to have gotten permission from Bourdain's estate.
Anyway, as a host of this podcast, I have recorded countless hours of audio saying
just about every word that exists, so I'm just grateful that our company would never do anything like this to me.
Yeah, totally.
Never.
Hello, me again.
I'm the real Gideon Resnick.
And I just want to say Crooked Media can make me into a robot puppet that says whatever
you want.
End of the story.
Hmm.
Truly frightening.
Don't love it.
That sounded like a clip of me saying Crooked could use recordings of my voice to turn me into a quote unquote robot puppet,
which definitely not something I recall saying.
Can we play that again just to make sure?
Hello, me again. I'm the real Gideon Resnick.
And I just want to say Crooked Media can make me into a robot puppet.
That says whatever you want. End of the story.
Huh. That sounded real real i guess you did
say that yeah i mean you're right i i don't really see any other explanation um yeah i i take back
what i said earlier i look forward to getting deep faked by my employer you know honestly
anybody else we'll be back after some ads let's wrap up with some headlines. Headlines. A Florida man became the first person to be sentenced for
participating in the January 6th Capitol riots. 38 year old Paul Hodgkins was pictured in the
Senate chambers carrying a Trump flag and wearing a Trump T-shirt, which is the uniform that most
of the other rioters chose that day as well. Weird. He pleaded guilty last month to the felony
charge of obstructing the counting of electoral votes and now faces an eight-month federal prison
sentence. The Justice Department first requested a year and a half sentence, but the judge overseeing
the case gave Hodgkins some leniency for pleading guilty and not being outright violent. This
sentence will likely be a model. It's going to influence the way hundreds of other January 6th
rioters face punishment as their cases move forward.
We're all one step closer to ripping off our masks and drinking maple syrup out of a tree.
Canada will be opening its doors on August 9th to U.S. citizens who are fully vaccinated.
Americans will be getting special early access before Canada opens its doors to vaccinated people from the rest of the world on September 7th.
Officials have also gotten rid of the 14-day quarantine previously required for people
traveling into the country. Since March of last year, Canada banned all non-essential
travel into the country to mitigate the spread of the virus. Now, authorities,
including Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, are feeling good about the rising percentage of
the population that has been fully vaccinated, which has surpassed the U.S.'s number over the
weekend. Trudeau has been facing more and more pressure to ease border restrictions
as he's expected to call a federal election next month.
Canada, eh?
Eh.
Eh.
Okay, I'm going to stay with COVID news.
A federal judge on Monday ruled that Indiana University could require its faculty,
staff, and students to get the coronavirus vaccine,
which is likely to set a precedent for universities across the country.
Eight students brought this case, arguing that the vaccine requirement was a violation of their right to bodily integrity and autonomy.
It was paid for by America's frontline doctors, a sneakily named conservative anti-vax organization.
Judge Lechte of the U.S. District Court for Northern Indiana said Indiana University's vaccine requirement was in the legitimate interest of public health.
He also noted exemptions for religion, allergies and online class attendance.
Currently, about 400 university campuses have mandated vaccines.
But with such widespread controversy, we can expect more cases to be filed and possibly reach the Supreme Court.
Where I'm sure the decision would be a responsible one. The preferred food
of politicians who want to seem normal, ice cream, has entered the political fray yet again.
Left-leaning dairy product Ben & Jerry's announced yesterday that it will stop selling its ice cream
in Israeli-occupied Palestinian territories, citing their values as a company. Additionally,
Ben & Jerry's will not renew its license with the one Israeli manufacturer it currently contracts
with. The announcement was met with quick backlash in Israel, with the foreign minister Yair Lapid
describing it as a, quote, disgraceful capitulation to anti-Semitism.
Okay.
All right, sir.
Others in the Israeli government went visual with their criticisms, posting videos of themselves
throwing Ben and Jerry's ice cream in the trash can.
That's just a personal own.
Ben and Jerry's is typically outspoken about social justice issues,
but they said nothing during violence in Gaza and East Jerusalem earlier this year.
For those that believe, as Human Rights Watch does,
that Israel's actions towards Palestinians are crimes against humanity,
this action by Ben and Jerry's fits with the company's other progressive positions.
And those are the headlines. What a Day is also a nightly newsletter. Check it out and subscribe at crooked.com slash subscribe.
I am Elise Hu.
I'm Gideon Resnick.
And enjoy your maple syrup.
Yeah, I mean, it's probably appreciated in age, right?
Nobody's accessed it in like a year.
There's probably a lot in those trees.
Oh, Canada.
What a Day is a production of Crooked Media.
It's recorded and mixed by Charlotte Landis.
Sonia Tun and Jazzy Marine are our associate producers.
Our head writer is John Milstein,
and our executive producers are Leo Duran,
Akilah Hughes, and me.
Our theme music is by Colin Gilliard and Kashaka.