What A Day - How NOT To Run The FBI

Episode Date: September 18, 2025

The investigation into the assassination of Charlie Kirk has raised a lot of questions – not just about the alleged shooter, but about the investigation itself. And especially about the person at the head of the bureau tasked with helping to find and capture suspects in acts of violence not just in the Kirk case, but across the country: FBI Director Kash Patel. His performance thus far has been, well, questionable. And he's tussling with Democrats who call him on it. To learn more about the FBI, Kash Patel, and how the Bureau is supposed to work, I spoke to Andrew McCabe, the FBI's former deputy director.And in headlines, the Federal Reserve cut interest rates amid some less-than-stellar employment and inflation numbers, the former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention testified to the Senate about her firing by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.,  and the U.K. rolls out the red carpet for President Trump.Show Notes:Call Congress – 202-224-3121Subscribe to the What A Day Newsletter – https://tinyurl.com/3kk4nyz8What A Day – YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/@whatadaypodcastFollow us on Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/crookedmedia/For a transcript of this episode, please visit crooked.com/whataday Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

It's Thursday, September 18th. I'm Jane Koston, and this is what a day. The show celebrating yet another moment of free speech greatness under the Trump administration. In this example, here's FCC chair Brendan Carr telling right-wing podcaster Benny Johnson that he could pressure television networks to stop showing the ABC late-night talk show Jimmy Kimmel Live because it made President Donald Trump mad. It's really sort of past time that a lot of these licensed broadcasters themselves push back on Comcast and Disney and say, listen, we are going to preempt.

We're not going to run Kimmel anymore until you straighten this out because we, we licensed broadcaster, are running the possibility of fines or licensed revocation from the FCC. And just as we were set to record the show around 4 p.m. Pacific Wednesday, ABC announced that it had pulled Jimmy Kimmel live, quote, indefinitely. The move comes after comments Kimmel made during his opening monologue Monday about Trump's reaction to the shooting death of conservative activists. Charlie Kirk went viral. Interesting timing. We'll be revisiting this.

On today's show, Trump meets with British Prime Minister Kyr Stammer after a lavish visit with King Charles III, and the Federal Reserve finally cuts its key interest rate. But let's start with the FBI. The investigation into the assassination of Charlie Kirk has raised a lot of questions, not just about the alleged shooter, but about the investigation into Kirk's death. and especially about the person at the head of the Bureau tasked with helping to find and capture suspects in acts of violence, not just in the curt case, but across the country. FBI director Cash Patel. As I mentioned on the show yesterday, Cash Patel was clearly not nominated to the position

of FBI director because of his deep grasp on the many issues facing federal law enforcement. For example, here he is speaking Wednesday before the House Judiciary Committee about a horrifying act of violence that shocked America in 2015. when Patel was working as a federal prosecutor within the National Security Division of the Department of Justice. So Dylan Roof, who followed white supremacist propaganda, murdered

nine black parishioners in Charleston in 2015. Do you deny this? I'm sorry. Dylan Ruth? Roof? Roof. Can you give me some more information? Head of the FBI, you probably know this.

If you don't know, that's fine. If you can give me a reminder, I've got a lot in front of me. Bullshit. But that's what we've come to expect from FBI Director Patel, a man tasked with running a law enforcement agency that employs nearly 40,000 people, one of the most powerful such agencies on earth.

And that's terrifying. Because it's not just about the Kirk investigation, though Patel has gotten a ton of criticism, even from the MAGO right, for his actions in that case. But Patel has had a real and, to me, very bad impact on the day-to-day operations of the FBI. For example, NBC News reported Tuesday that, according to data from the Cato Institute, the FBI under Patel has redirected roughly 20% of its agents to focus on immigration enforcement.

That percentage represents a larger shift in priorities in manpower than what took place after the September 11th attacks. And many of those agents had been tasked with stopping domestic terrorism, including from nihilistic violent extremists, like we talked about on the show yesterday. So to talk more about the FBI, Cash Patel, and how the the Bureau is supposed to work and isn't. I spoke to former FBI deputy director, Andrew McCabe. Andrew McCabe, welcome back to what today.

Thank you. It's so nice to be here. You helped investigate the Boston Marathon bombings. What's your take on how things have been going so far in the investigation into the assassination of Charlie Kirk? Yeah, it's a great question. It's, and as you would expect, it's a bit more complicated than it looks. I mean, provisionally, like, top line, they did a first. fine job because they found the guy that did it. And it's fairly small period of time. So

good result, and at the end of the day, that's what matters. But it was a little bumpy getting there. I think, you know, the things that I would point out that were probably less than ideal, I really don't have anything to do with the men and women working the case on the ground. It was leadership issues that were not great. As far as the tactics of the investigation, I think if there's one, if I were still at the FBI and I was kind of looking at this after the fact and trying to figure out what could we do a little bit better next time, I think they could have leaned a little further into releasing actually good photographs early. We now know that they had the photographs that they released on the second day. They had those pretty early on. And had they put those out very quickly, they might have actually even had him identified faster. But the idea of crowdsourcing, the identification, of a subject in a manhunt is really something that we kind of stumbled into

in the Boston Marathon investigation, as you probably know. And so to hear the leadership, and particularly the director, talk now about having made this monumental decision by himself to release these photographs, which no one else has ever done before. That's just, you know, not true. A gross exaggeration and really kind of,

I think, unfairly putting himself in the spotlight and taking all the credit for a victory that was really, of course, as always, won by the people on the ground in partnership with their colleagues in state and local law enforcement. What is the relationship between an FBI investigation into a crime and the ultimate prosecution of a suspect? Like, does the FBI have a role in figuring out a motive, even though I don't think that that's essential in terms of prosecution or why a crime is committed in the first place? Or is it just basically like, here's the evidence we have, here's a suspect, go nuts. Yes, kind of like that. So we're there to help them do all these things. And in the course of that work, you start to develop a sense of what happened.

So very clearly, we have a state murder case here, right? Everybody knows that from the beginning. And it turns out now that it's not only a murder case, it's a capital murder case. We go into it with the ability to preserve evidence for that state case. just to help them out. But while we're there, we're also looking to see if there's a federal violation. I'm sure that federal prosecutors are reviewing all the evidence we collect in the Charlie Kirk assassination case, and they are reviewing to see whether or not they should also bring federal charges. And this is something a lot of people don't understand. You can be charged

for the same activity at the state level and at the federal level, because they are considered to be separate sovereigns, that is not an instance of double jeopardy. So you could get convicted of murder at the state level, and you could get convicted of some sort of corollary federal offense for essentially the same activity, and you would be sentenced to, you could be sentenced to prison time in both systems, either concurrently or consecutively. I do want to talk about FBI director Cash Patel. He has made a lot of people very mad. And it's been interesting also, because something that he's been doing throughout this investigation is tweeting nonstop. And that included the night that Kirk was assassinated, he tweeted that a subject was in custody.

Now, most people would read that and take that as implying that the person who committed this act is in custody, but that's not what subject means. And then about an hour and a half later, he's like, you know, that person has been released and, you know, after interrogation. Now, Patel has defended basically live tweeting this investigation, saying that he just wants to keep the public informed and that he's all about transparency. What's your take on that argument? I mean, I think he's rationalizing what he wants to do. He's a guy who tweets and posts things on social media all the time. I would guess that he considers that important to his brand, his personal, you know, that's what he was. Before he became the FBI director, he was some sort of a.

kind of a social media personality, I guess. And he has brought that habit, that custom into the office. That is dangerous and not productive. And here's why. FBI directors are typically, no matter which president appointed them, or what party they came from or whatever, have always been very reticent to go out and start talking about ongoing investigations.

There is a policy in the Justice Department. You don't talk about an ongoing investigation. Of course, you would never talk about class. information, but even in a criminal investigation like this where nothing is classified, it's ongoing, it is sensitive, a lot of the material that you have, you may have collected, for instance, with the help of a grand jury subpoena, so that information is all protected by grand jury secrecy. You just don't do it. For broader reasons, you don't want to do it because what if you're wrong, case in point Cash Patel, you've now misled the public, you've elevated

people's expectations, you know, that tweet that he put out, he may be, you know, slicing it semantically now. But the fact is, the way it was read reasonably by most people who saw it was it was a bit of a chest pounding, look how great we are, moment. Like, we did this. And also, like, I just kept thinking about, you know, I used to live in Utah. The community where this happened is quite small. That's right. And I can imagine people seeing that and thinking, oh my gosh, I feel so much safer. I can go to the store. I can go outside because they've caught this guy. Right. And then 90 minutes later, nope, he's been interrogated and it's not him. Bad idea. Bad idea for all those reasons. And then, you know, also you don't push, constantly push

sensitive case information out into the public during an investigation, especially one like this where somebody's going to be prosecuted because you now run the risk of prejudicing the jury pool. You run the risk of negatively impacting if you're going to charge someone, that person constitutional rights, you are creating issues for that person's defense team to attack the indictment or the charge. It's just bad business. And I can't think of a single FBI director other than Mr. Patel who would have engaged in that sort of behavior. To your point, Patel was on Capitol Hill for the second day in a row, clashing with Democrats, who seemed to just mock him to his face. There's one example from Congressman Jamie Raskin.

Well, most other new FBI directors drew on their experience as FBI agents. You didn't have that. But you did write a picture book trilogy for children ages five and up based on your experience clashing with President Trump's political enemies. Now, you were mentioning that, you know, FBI directors, regardless of party, we've never had a Democratic or Democratic-registered FBI director. And yet this, I've never seen anything like the interactions between FBI director Patel and Democrats. It's been, it's extraordinarily partisan in a way that I feel as if previous FBI directors have not been. Do these interactions to you raise questions about his ability to lead that he is very easily baited by members of Congress? Yeah, yes, short answer, yes. There's a lot to unpack there. He is an intensely partisan person. We know this. This is not debatable. We know this from what he was doing before he became the FBI director. And he's brought that partisanship into his role as director, which I think is very bad for the FBI and bad for the American public's perception of the FBI. That partisan nature, I think, is what you saw on display yesterday.

yesterday during his testimony. Now, I will say, I've no FBI director that I've ever known, and I've known quite a few, likes having to go to Congress and testify about anything. It's a tough experience. He's been a lot of time preparing. You try to be as a laser accurate as you can. You try not to, like, compromise cases and classified material in your testimony. It's very, very hard. And some members will really kind of get in your face about the issues that are important to them. that said i've never ever seen anyone be as aggressive um as disrespectful as impertinent as cash patel as when he appears on the hill it's i think it's a disgrace and when your job is to run the organization part of that is complying with oversight that's your job when you're up there

not to get into screaming matches with cori booker or anything else people are given and the respect that they earn up there. And I think that's what you saw yesterday. He hasn't ever presented himself in a clearly articulated, respectful, accurate way on the Hill, in my view, in my opinion. And so this is what they expect when he comes up and they give it right back to him. And it really devolves into a display that's not helpful for anyone. In my view, Patel was not nominated to run the FBI effectively. He was nominated because he shares the same grievances against federal law enforcement, against the Department of Justice, against the FBI that Donald Trump has. But the FBI remains an essential law enforcement organization tasked with doing real work. And we've talked about this before.

Given what's been taking place over the last week or so, what are your concerns more broadly about how the agency is being run? because I want to highlight you've been mentioning, you know, the men and women who are working as agents in this case in Utah or on the cases that Patel did mention yesterday, talking about the thousands of domestic terrorism investigations, the looking into nihilistic violent extremism. Like, there's a lot to be done. And I'm just curious as to your thoughts about, you know, the work that Patel has been doing and just kind of the direction of the Bureau thus far, given that. that there seems to be this big divide between the person running the organization and the people doing the work. I think there is, and I think you're really onto something there in the way that you perceive why he was put in the job. We know that part of what he's done since he's been in the job has been basically executing on what you can imagine was a very clear order given to him by someone in the administration to rid the FBI of anyone who had anything to do with any cases

affecting Donald Trump. And that is a blatantly political strategy. And it is the one that he's engaged in. As you see, there's a million examples. He fired all the EADs in his first week. He got rid of the two guys that he had brought in to run the organization while his confirmation was pending. Two of them have now, or three of them have now turned around and sued him over their unlawful termination. He has submitted FBI leaders to loyalty tests and polygraph examinations and support of those loyalty tests. These are all things that have never happened in the FBI before. They're not necessary now.

They've never been necessary, and they negatively affect the Bureau's ability to protect the country. Those decisions will drop an axe into the center of this organization. I will carve a gulf in the FBI between the people who are hired under those new rules and everyone else. It is the sort of corrosive divisive, of thing that an organization will take decades to recover from.

Andrew McCabe, thank you so much for joining me again. It's always a pleasure. Thanks so much for having me. That was my conversation with former FBI deputy director, Andrew McCabe. We'll get to more of the news in a moment. But if you like the show, make sure to subscribe, leave a five-star review on Apple Podcasts, watch us on YouTube, and share with your friends. More to come after some ads. This episode is sponsored by BetterHelp. Who do you go to to solve your life's problems?

The group chat? Oversharing with strangers? Posting on TikTok? That's not therapy. Therapists are clinically trained and licensed. And BetterHelp has been helping people find their therapy match for over 10 years and has a 4.9 rating out of 1.7 million client session reviews. BetterHelp therapists work according to a

strict code of conduct and are fully licensed in the US. And BetterHelp does the initial matching work for you so you can focus in your therapy goals. A short questionnaire helps identify your needs and preferences and our 10 years of experience and industry leading match fulfillment rate means we typically get it right the first time. If you aren't happy with your match, switch to a different therapist at any time from our tailored recommendations. It's convenient, too. You can join a session with a therapist at the click of a button, helping you fit therapy into your busy life. Plus, at any time. As the largest online therapy provider in the world, BetterHelp can provide access to mental health professionals with a diverse variety of

expertise. Find the one with BetterHelp. Our listeners get 10% off their first month at betterhelp.com slash Wad. That's BetterHelp, H-E-L-P.com slash Wad. Here's what else we're following today. In support of our goals and in light of the shift in the balance of risk, Today, the Oaks Federal Open Market Committee decided to lower our policy interest rate by a quarter percentage point. We also decided to continue to reduce our securities holdings. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell announced some changes Wednesday in response to employment and inflation numbers that are pretty bleak. This is the first time the Fed has cut its benchmark interest rate in nine months.

Since the last cut, progress on inflation has slowed as the labor market has cooled, meaning that Americans are dealing with both high prices and a challenging job market. Not a great combo. It's a difficult position for the Fed to be in, according to economists. The rate shift could affect what people pay for credit cards, auto loans, mortgages, and other financial products. But if you're a prospective homebuyer, don't get too excited, because the cuts right now are unlikely to make a noticeable difference from most consumers, according to a financial analyst who spoke to the Associated Press. Meanwhile, Black unemployment is searching at the fastest rate since 2020. It's shot up by 1.5 percentage points over the last three months, which, according to Bloomberg, is rare outside of recessions.

The unemployment rate for black people is currently twice the rate that it is for white people. Why? Experts say a slowdown in the broader labor market is hurting black workers, who tend to be the first ones to lose their jobs. And black workers are actually overrepresented in the federal workforce, which Trump has been slashing since he returns the Oval Office. He directed me to commit in advance to approving every ACIP recommendation, regardless of the scientific evidence. He also directed me to dismiss career officials responsible for vaccine policy without cause. He said if I was unwilling to do both, I should resign.

That's Dr. Susan Menares, who, was director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, until her boss, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., fired her after just 29 days in the job. She testified before a Senate panel on Wednesday, explaining how she was told to resign if she did not sign off on new vaccine recommendations, which are expected to be announced this week by the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP. Fun fact! In June, Kennedy fired everyone on that committee and replaced them with his own people, including a bunch of anti-vaxxers.

Wednesday's testimony was the first time Menares gave a detailed account of the events that led to her firing, and she dropped a few other bombshells. I believe preventable diseases will return, and I believe that we will have our children harmed for things that we know that you not need to be harmed by, polio, measles, diphtheria, whooping cough. Menares went on to say that she worries about the effect this will have not only on children and their families, but also on the school systems and medical institutions that will have to care for them. Not a great vision for our future.

Another stunner came during questioning from Virginia Democratic Senator Tim Cain, when Menares confirmed that Secretary Kennedy had asked her not to speak directly to senators. Understandably, Senator Cain found that pretty damning. Is my memory right? Isn't Secretary Kennedy say he's about radical transparency? That is one of the areas he has prioritized. Yeah. Well, putting a gag order on a CDC director.

and directing her not to speak to those who have confirmed her and to whom she is responsible for oversight is a very serious matter. For his part, Secretary Kennedy has denied Menares's accusation that he asked her to pre-approved vaccine requirements. Staying with our nation's health, several West Coast states are now trying to get ahead of the health emergency in Menares was warning about.

On Wednesday, the West Coast Health Alliance, which includes California, Oregon, Washington, and Hawaii, issued its own recommendations for who should get three common seasonal vaccines. It's a direct response to the anti-vax agenda that Health Secretary RFK Jr. is apparently, as we just heard, trying to implement at a national level. Among its recommendations, the Four State Alliance advises that everyone six months and older get the flu vaccine and that high-risk groups like pregnant women and children between six months and two years old get the updated COVID-19 vaccine.

The guidance mirrors clinical recommendations from groups like the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American Academy of Pediatrics. In other words, actual doctors. But it's in contrast with the CDC guidance, which, under Kennedy, no longer recommends the COVID vaccine for healthy pregnant women and says children should not get it without a doctor's consent. This all comes as the federal ACIP is set to review

and possibly change several vaccine recommendations later this week, including those for hepatitis B, COVID, and measles. And as we mentioned just moments ago, that committee now includes a bunch of well-known anti-vaxxers. whereas the health officials making decisions in these Western states are all again, actual doctors. Because now we live in a world where having doctors and medical experts make decisions about health care is an act of resistance. Great.

Together we must defend the exceptional heritage that makes us who we are, and we must continue to stand for the values and the people of the English-speaking world, and we do indeed stand for that. On behalf of all Americans, I offer a toast to one of the great friendships, to two great countries, and to his majesty, King Charles, the third, a very, very special man and also a very, very special queen. What? In case you missed it, the President and First Lady Melania Trump are in the United Kingdom

for a lavish state visit full of wide-brimmed hats and tiaras. Windsor Castle must have been prepping for quite a while for our. all the pomp and circumstance. I think it's obvious by now how to get on Trump's good side. And don't worry, there were also plenty of Brits protesting his visit. On Wednesday, Trump reveled in hours of pageantry with the monarch while still making time for a quiet tribute at Queen Elizabeth II's tomb. The grandeur-loving president soaked it all up, from the largest guard of honor in living memory, to carriage rides, to an air show, to a Windsor Castle dinner. And during that dinner, Trump said things. A fifth of all, with humanity speak.

writes, thanks, and praise in the language born on these aisles and perfected in the pages of Shakespeare and Dickens and Tolkien, Lewis, Orwell, Kipling. Incredible people, unbelievable people like we have rarely seen before, probably won't see again. I must know if Trump has read the Fellowship of the Ring. Did he also get stuck in all the Elf song? And King Charles also said, Things. I have cherished the close ties between the British and American people.

In fact, had the media succeeded in the 1970s in their own attempt to deepening a special relationship, I myself might have been married off within the Nixon family. I've watched multiple seasons of the Crown, and I have many questions. But it can't be all play in no work. Trump and British Prime Minister Kier Starmar are set to meet today. I'm sure Trump is so pumped for that. And that's the news. Before we go, from record-breaking wins to headline-grabbing fashion,

the 77th Emmys gave Keep It hosts plenty to talk about. This week, Lewis Vertel is joined by Ghost Writer Akila Green to break down the award ceremony. Plus, Charlie Sheen's new documentary and more moments in pop culture. Then Djibuki Young White stops by to talk about his new film, The Threesome. Tune into this episode of Keep It Now, wherever you get your podcasts. That's all for today. If you like the show, make sure you subscribe, leave a review, contemplate a man who allegedly stole nearly $20,000 from a Disney World restaurant and escaped

by scuba diving away and tell your friends to listen. And if you're into reading, and not just about how the suspect walked into paddlefish, a restaurant on Disney World property, took the money, and is believed to have changed into scuba gear to get away via a man-made lake nearby, like me. What a day is also a nightly newsletter. Check it out and subscribe at cricket.com slash subscribe. I'm Jane Koston. And am I alone in saying that's just too much work for crime?

What a day is a production of Crooked Media. It's recorded and mixed by Desmond Taylor. Our associate producer is Emily Four. Our video editor is Joseph Dutra. Our video producer is Johanna Case. We have production help today from Greg Walters, Matt Berg, Megan Larson, Gina Pollock, and Jonah Eatman. Our senior producer is Erica Morrison, and our senior vice president of news and politics is Adrian We had helped today from the Associated Press.

Our theme music is by Colin Gilliard and Kashaka. Our production staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of America East. Thank you.