What A Day - Inside the Deal to End the Shutdown

Episode Date: November 10, 2025

On Sunday evening, senators from both parties reached a deal that could bring an end to the government shutdown, which has lasted well over a month. The deal would include a new stopgap measure that would fund the government through January, plus three different spending measures. Democrats are also negotiating the rehiring of the more than 4,000 federal employees who were laid off during the shutdown. But Democrats aren’t getting the primary thing they’ve wanted. For weeks, Democrats insisted that Republicans extend the Affordable Care Act’s insurance subsidies. As of now, Republicans have only agreed to hold a vote on the issue next month, but have not guaranteed any support. For more on how the deal came together, we spoke with Stephen Neukam, a Congressional reporter for Axios. And in headlines, the fight to fund the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program continues, the Treasury Secretary struggles to explain President Donald Trump’s promise that profits from tariffs will be paid out to the public, and two top executives at the BBC resigned following criticism over how the broadcaster edited a speech given by President Trump. Show Notes:Check out Stephen's reporting – axios.com/authors/sneukamCall Congress – 202-224-3121Subscribe to the What A Day Newsletter – https://tinyurl.com/3kk4nyz8What A Day – YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/@whatadaypodcastFollow us on Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/crookedmedia/For a transcript of this episode, please visit crooked.com/whataday Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

It's Monday, November 10th. I'm Josie Duffy Rice, and for Jane Koston, and this is What a Day. The show that wonders where Donald Trump was racing to in his limousine this weekend. If you guessed that he was headed to the Capitol to resolve the longest government shutdown in American history, you would be wrong. He was, in fact, racing to his golf course in West Palm Beach. You know, if only golf courses were federal agencies, the shutdown on would have lasted, like 14 seconds, tops. On today's show, the fight to fund the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program continues, and Trump promises, quote, a dividend of at least $2,000 a person from tariffs

to most American citizens, before his Treasury Secretary immediately tries to clean that up. But let's start with the longest government shut down in American history. which might be coming to an end soon. As of our recording time on Sunday evening, senators from both parties reached a deal that could bring an end to the shutdown, which has lasted well over a month.

The deal would include a new stopgap measure that would fund the government through January, plus three different spending measures. One of them, the 2006 military construction and Veterans Affairs funding bill would allocate $153 billion to fund the Department of Veterans Affairs and infrastructure programs at the Pentagon

for a full year. In a win for Democrats, these three bills do not include most of the brutal spending cuts that Trump proposed in his budget a few months ago. No longer would the government accountability office's funding be cut in half. Democrats are also negotiating the rehiring of more than 4,000 federal employees who were laid off during the shutdown. But Democrats are not getting the primary thing that they've wanted. For weeks, Democrats insisted that Republicans agree to extend the Affordable Care Act's insurance subsidies. But now that demand has been reduced. As of now, Republicans have only agreed to hold a vote on the issue next month, but have not guaranteed any support.

I spoke with Stephen Newcomb, a congressional reporter for Axios, on Sunday afternoon, as the details of an agreement were still being hammered out. Stephen, welcome to what a day. Thanks for having me. So you reported on Sunday about a group of Senate Democrats who are willing to advance a package of bills to end the shutdown. How much do we know about what's in this package? We know a decent about what is in the package. It's sort of formed around a short-term stopgap spending bill that would go through the end of this year, between either January 30th or January 31st, and also packaged with three full legislative funding bills, Milcon, VA. So that will fund a number of things across the government, which is a big handout or a big victory for Democrats who want to see some of the agencies fully funded through the end of the year. year. And then on top of that, to get the Democratic votes, the moderates that they've been

able to extract, Republicans have given Democrats a promise of a vote in December on extending, expiring Obamacare tax credits on top of some language. We're not exactly sure what the language looks like yet, but some protections for rehiring federal workers who were fired under the shutdown. What led to this thaw in negotiations? Like, how did we get here? after so many weeks of it feeling like a total impasse. Yeah, it did feel like a total impasse. And I think if you go back to the beginning of the middle of last week and the end of last week, there was actually a decent amount of momentum moving toward a deal that kind of looked similarly to this.

And then what happened was Democrats go out and sort of route Republicans in elections across the country. They win the Virginia governor's race. They win the New Jersey's governor's race. They win state houses. They flip a lot of red seats. And there's a lot of Democrats up here on Capitol Hill in the Senate who read that as voters sort of rewarding them for holding out and fighting the Trump administration on government funding and on health care.

So we sort of got that little law there for a few days where folks were trying to understand what the effect of the election was, what the polls were going to say. Senate Democrats earlier this week brought forward their own proposal, which was a one-year clean extension of these ACA tax credits that are expiring and attaching it to a government funding bill. And Republicans rejected that. So I think that once we got to that spot at the end of this week, there's a lot of moderate Democrats who were already kind of willing to enter into this type of agreement. And once we saw that there was no path forward for the Democratic solution to the shutdown, they were willing to negotiate with Republicans. But I would just

say, sort of timing-wise, in terms of getting the government open, we're talking right now, you know, Sunday afternoon, Senate Democrats are about to meet. The way that the Senate works procedurally is they need something called unanimous consent to sort of go through procedural hurdles. If they were to sort of run the procedure all the way through, this wouldn't get done until, you know, Thursday or Friday of next week. That's just sort of the way that the Senate works. And, like, they're going to come out of this meeting, and I can guarantee you, there's going to be some progressives, Bernie Sanders, Chris Murphy, who we're going to be upset with this deal. And something to watch is if they give what is called consent to sort of let this process move more quickly along to get the shutdown done quicker. Because if the moderates say that they're willing to vote for the bill, there's nothing that the left can do to stop this bill from passing.

So you mentioned that as part of this deal, there's a promise vote on extent. extending ACA subsidies, but it wouldn't be until December. So why is that compromise, like, not satisfying to some Democrats? Well, the reason it's not satisfying to some Democrats is because it's not a guarantee that it will be passed. The way that the Senate works, you need 60 votes to be able to pass anything to break a filibuster. So they have a promised vote in December, a 60 vote threshold on extending these ACA tax credits. Is there enough Republican support in the Senate to get to 60 votes to pass that extension? Maybe. But the reality is even if it gets through the Senate, it has to get back through the House where, you know, the thing just stands essentially

no shot. House Speaker Mike Johnson has already said that, you know, this is not something he's willing to put on the floor. There's other ideas that are going around about how do you do that. But really, the reality is that there's just no path forward for this extension, even if it were to pass the Senate against all odds in December. And Republicans are starting to talk more about alternatives to these subsidies. Can you tell a little bit about the proposal that Louisiana Republican Senator Bill Cassidy is suggesting? Yeah, not just the Cassidy one, but to sort of give you like the spectrum of ideas here on health care that have been thrown around. Yeah, you have Cassidy and some Republicans who have talked about the idea of income caps on the ACA tax credits.

You've seen the president say that the ACA structure is not a good one, that they don't. want to continue to go down that path. So Republicans have sort of developed their counterproposal. The reality, you know, at this point is that the bill that's going to be voted on in December is the Democratic version of a one-year extension of ACA tax credits. And that's the reason why I say it's it's just unlikely that it gets through the Senate in December. And even if it did, it would die in the House. And then you have folks on the left like Bernie Sanders who have said that, okay, well, If we're worried about the influence of insurance companies, if we're worried about the making the wealthier, richer through these types of programs, well, then they should all get behind Medicare for all, which is obviously sort of a really popular proposal on the left, something that's been led by Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, others in the past. So this sort of debate has sparked a debate about health care across the entire political spectrum recently.

So there's a Supreme Court element to this, too, right? Because on Friday, Justice Katanji Brown Jackson paused a lower court order. to fully fund SNAP benefits during the shutdown. Then over the weekend, the Department of Agriculture demanded that states undo any SNAP payments that have already gone out this month. So what's the latest on this back and forth? Do we have a sense of that? Well, as of right now, the Supreme Court has allowed the Trump administration to sort of let that pause go on

in terms of not paying the federal benefits as it gets worked out in the lower court system. I think the most important piece or the most important point to make on SNAP benefits is this. Like, when you talk about stat benefits, it's not like federal workers who have been furloughed or working without pay, especially working without pay, who will get back pay when they are, you know, the government's back open and things are functioning the way it is. Those SNAP payments, you don't, those aren't accrued. You don't get them from, you know, the missed payments that you didn't get. You just, you know, you just don't have the money to buy food. So I think that that snap sort of issue is really a driving issue, especially with some of the moderates who are willing to make a deal in the Democratic Party right now because they understand that they're not going to get those benefits back. And the quicker that they can open the government up, the quicker those benefits can get to folks who really need that type of support.

Okay. I just have one more question for you, Stephen. So if and when the shutdown ends, hopefully when, what will you be watching for other than? this potential vote on the ACA subsidies. What else should we be aware of? Yeah, you've got to look at the fallout for Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, who, you know, faced a lot of criticism in March when he decided to vote to fund the government, found himself in a similar position, obviously did not do it, do that in October, the end of September. That's why we've had a shutdown for, for a month and, you know, a week.

But he could face some pretty serious criticism from his left, just, in terms of the structure of the deal that seems to be coming together. Like you said, there, our Democrats are going to be upset that this will not be enough, that a promised vote does not mean that it will become law. That does not mean that the president will sign an end the law, even if it passed Congress. So I would be looking for the political fallout in terms of the criticism of Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer. Thank you so much, Stephen, Stephen, for joining us. Yeah, thanks for having me.

That was my conversation with Stephen Newcomb, Congressional Reporter for Axios. We will get to more of the news in a moment, but if you like the show, make sure to subscribe, leave a five-star review on Apple Podcasts, watch us on YouTube, and share with your friends. More to come after some ads. What a day is brought to you by Zbiotics pre-alcohol. Between bowl games, cold beers by the bonfire, and whiskey with the family after Thanksgiving dinner, this time of year is past. hacked with festivities. Here's how I stay productive the next day. Zbiotics pre-alcohol probiotic drink is the world's first genetically engineered probiotic. It was invented by PhD scientists to tackle rough mornings after drinking. Here's how it works. When you drink, alcohol gets

converted into a toxic byproduct in the gut. It's a buildup of this byproduct, not dehydration, that's to blame for rough days after drinking. Pre-alcohol produces an enzyme to break this byproduct down. Just remember to make pre-alcohol your first drink of the night, drink responsibly, and you'll feel your best tomorrow. Every time I have pre-alcohol before drinks, I notice a difference the next day. Even after a night out, I can confidently plan on working out the next day without worry.

Make the most of every toast, tailgate, and touch down this holiday season. Just don't forget to bring pre-alcohol along for the ride. Go to zbiotics.com slash wad to learn more and get 15% off your first order when you use code Wad at checkout. Zbiotics is backed with a 100% money-back guarantee, so if you're unsatisfied for any reason,

they'll refund your money, no questions asked. Remember to heads at zbiotics.com slash wad and use the code want to checkout for 15% off. Here's what else we're following today. Headalines. We've now received guidance saying the states are going to be punished for fronting the money. There is a chaos and it is an intentional chaos that we are seeing from this administration. Maryland Democratic Governor Wes Moore spoke with Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan on CBS on Sunday about how the federal government is failing to feed Americans during a shutdown.

The Trump administration is demanding states, quote-unquote, undo the federal supplemental nutrition assistance program benefits that have already been paid out to recipients. The directive comes after a federal judge ordered the White House to fully fund SNAP benefits for the month of November. The administration immediately appealed. And the Supreme Court issued a temporary pause on the program on Friday in order to give the appeals court time to weigh in. In light of that decision, the Department of Agriculture warned state SNAP directors over the weekend

that it now considers payments under the prior orders, quote, unauthorized. It's just the latest swing in a back-and-forth legal battle over the food aid program used by 42 million Americans, but Governor Moore said he's taking matters into his own hands. And I have also authorized $62 million to go towards SNAP to make sure that SNAP is not going to be interrupted for the people of Maryland for as long as long as, as we can, despite the fact that we are waiting for the president of the United States to finally do his job. And Moore isn't the only one pushing back. Massachusetts Governor Maura Healy said in a statement Sunday that recipients, quote,

with funds on their cards, should continue to spend it on food. And Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers didn't mince any words. In response to the administration's demand that states return food assistance payments to the government, Ever said, quote, no. President Trump touted his tariff policies on truth social on Sunday, bragging about how rich the country is now, and writing, quote, a dividend of at least $2,000, a person, not including high-income people,

will be paid to everyone. That sounds great, right? Well, Treasury Secretary Scott Besson immediately tried to reel in that promise when speaking with ABC's George Stephanopoulos the very same day. Do you have a proposal, a former proposal, to give a $2,000 dividend to every American? I haven't spoken to the president about this yet, but it could, the $2,000 dividend could come in lots of forms, in lots of ways, George.

You know, it could be just the tax decreases that we are seeing on the president's agenda, you know, no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, no tax on Social Security, deductibility of auto loans. So, you know, those are substantial deductions that, you know, are being financed in. in the tax bill. I love this response. He sounds terrified. Just say no. We're not going to get that money, Scott. You know it.

We know it. Just to be honest. Trump made other claims in his post on Sunday. That Stephanopoulos also pressed Bassanon. The president is also posting about tariffs this morning. He's saying people that are against tariffs are fools. We're taking in trillions of dollars. Is that true?

We have taken over the course of the next few years, we could take in trillions of dollars, George. But the real goal of the tariffs is to rebalance trade and make it more fair. We could take in trillions of dollars over the next few years. Again, just say no, Scott. Admit it, we have not taken in trillions. Just, you know, shoot straight, man. Trump's comments come as the Supreme Court weighs the legality of his tariffs on U.S. trading partners.

A majority of the justices last week seemed skeptical about Trump's ability to unilaterally impose them. Israel on Sunday confirmed that he received the remains of Hadar Golden, a soldier killed in the Gaza Strip, in 2014. The 23-year-old was killed two hours after a ceasefire took effect in that year's war between Israel and Hamas. Golden's family waged a public campaign for 11 years to bring home his remains. The return of Golden's remains were a result of the U.S. brokered truce, which has faltered, to say the least, Israeli forces have killed over 200 people in Gaza since the ceasefire was reached. Israel has blamed Hamas for the slow return of the bodies of hostages. Gaza health officials say 300 Palestinian bodies have now been handed back, with 89 of those identified.

Jared Kushner, President Trump's son-in-law and a key architect of Washington's 20-point ceasefire plan, has quietly returned to Israel to help push negotiations forward, a person familiar with a visit, told the Associated Press. The BBC's Director General and its top news executive both resigned. following criticism over how the broadcaster edited a speech given by President Trump. Pressure on the broadcaster's top executives has been growing since the right-leaning telegraph newspaper published parts of a dossier last week, compiled by a former employee hired to advise the BBC on standards and guidelines. The report criticized the outlet's editing of Trump's January 6, 2021 speech

used in a BBC documentary last year. The BBC cut out a section where Trump said he wanted supporters to demonstrate peacefully. Telegraph Associate editor Gordon Rainer detailed the dossier's findings in a video posted by the outlet. In it, they played the following clip. We're going to walk down to the Capitol

and I'll be there with you. And we fight. We fight like hell. But Trump didn't in fact say this at all. The BBC spliced together two clips that took place 54 minutes apart. So let's go through it again. Rainer then plays the unedited excerpt of the speech.

We're going to walk down to the Capitol. And we're going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women. It's different. BBC Director General Tim Davies said in his resignation letter on Sunday that quitting the job was entirely his decision. New CEO, Deborah Turner, said in her own letter that the controversy about the Trump documentary, quote, has reached a stage where it is causing damage to the BBC, an institution that I love.

As the CEO of BBC News and Current Affairs, the buck stops with me. And that's the news. That's all for today. If you like the show, make sure you subscribe, leave a review, prepare yourself for Trump's DC Arena, and tell your friends to listen. And if you are into reading, and not just about how the White House said Saturday, it would be, quote, beautiful to name the new stadium for the Washington Commanders after President Donald Trump, like me, what a day is also a nightly newsletter, so check it out and

subscribe at cricket.com slash subscribe. I'm Josie Duffy Rice. And Trump actually attended the Washington Commanders game on Sunday. And if the crowd's reaction to him on the Jumbotron is any indication of their enthusiasm for a name change. Well. What Today is a production of Crooked Media. It's recorded and mixed by Desmond Taylor. Our associate producer is Emily Ford. Our video editor is Joseph Dutra. Our video producer is Johanna Case.

We had production help today from Greg Walters, Matt Berg, Megan Larson, Gina Pollock, and Jonah Eatman. Our senior producer is Erica Morrison, and our senior vice president of news and politics is Adrian Hill. We had helped today from the Associated Press. Our theme music is by Colin Gilliard and Kashaka. Our production staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of America East.