What A Day - The Gentrification Of Intersectionality

Episode Date: May 11, 2026

Over the last year and a half, the Trump Administration has made a big effort to limit which words are used in federal documents. Across government memos and wide-ranging agency material, hundreds of terms and ideas have been explicitly or implicitly forbidden from use. These terms include words like “accessible” or “activism.” Another example? Intersectionality. It’s been nearly 40 years since Kimberlé Crenshaw coined the term “intersectionality.” And in that time, the word has been twisted into something barely recognizable. We spoke with Crenshaw about her work, her new book, and how her past has given her the strength to keep talking back.And in headlines, Iran responds to the latest U.S. ceasefire proposal, Democrats respond to the Virginia Supreme Court ruling on redistricting, and the cruise ship roiled by hantavirus anchors in the Canary Islands.Show Notes: Check out Kimberlé's book – https://tinyurl.com/4ndwy3rx Call Congress – 202-224-3121 Subscribe to the What A Day Newsletter – https://tinyurl.com/y4y2e9jy What A Day – YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/@whatadaypodcast Follow us on Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/crookedmedia/ For a transcript of this episode, please visit crooked.com/whataday

It's Monday, May 11th. I'm Jane Koston, and this is what a day. The show congratulating President Donald Trump on the 22-foot-tall golden statue of himself at Trump National Doral Golf Club in Florida. The statue was dedicated by televangelist and Trump ally Pastor Mark Burns, who posted an important clarification on Twitter. Quote, let me be clear, this is not a golden calf. You know, like pastors normally say about golden. and statues of presidents they're dedicating at golf courses. On today's show, Virginia Democrats are mulling over a plan that would replace all of the judges on its state Supreme Court. And President Trump finds Iran's response to a ceasefire proposal, quote, totally unacceptable.

But let's start with words. Over the last year and a half, the Trump administration has made a big effort to limit which words are used in federal documents. In government memos and official and unofficial agency guidance, hundreds of terms of terms of, and ideas have been explicitly or implicitly forbidden from use, or at best, heavily discouraged. These terms include words like accessible, activism, anti-racist, inclusive, and injustice. Another example, intersectionality. But unlike many of the words on the government's list, the term intersectionality has an origin story and an originator, Columbia University professor Kimberly Crenshaw. It's been nearly 40 years since Crenshaw coined the term

intersectionality. And in that time, she's seen it grow into popular culture, turn into a divisive idea, and become a target of the federal government. Now she's put it all into a book, Backtalker, an American memoir. I spoke to Crenshaw about her new book, her work, and how her past has given her the strength to keep talking back. Kimberly, welcome to Wadda. So happy to join me. Great to see you again. It's wonderful to see you again. And we'll talk about how it's been a couple of years since we've spoken, but actually, it's been now more than 30 years since you first coined the term intersectionality. What does that word mean? The word simply means that patterns of discrimination sometimes are not singular.

You're not discriminated events just because you're a person of color or just because you're a woman or you may be queer. But often discrimination is compounded. It happens to you because of more than one thing. And as a consequence of that compounding of discrimination or exclusion, some of the interventions that imagine discrimination just to be singular based on one thing or another don't actually work for people who are looking at compounded forms of exclusion. That really is all it is. It's a metaphor for the idea that power can be overlapping, not singular. Right. It's interesting. It's a very simple concept. but for the last decade and a half or so,

it's become a part of a larger political zeitgeist conversation. In that time, has the meaning changed for you? No, I mean, the basic observation that discrimination and exclusion can be compounded is not a new thing. It wasn't even new when I articulated it. I was articulating it to help judges interpret and understand claims that were made. by black women, for example, that they were discriminated against not just as women and not just as black people, but as black women. What has changed is the extent to which the idea has been used by multiple other communities and constituencies and in places and spaces outside of courtrooms. So that part has grown.

It's sort of skipped out of law into other disciplines and then into the popular culture and, frankly, internationally in human rights. spaces and other contexts. But what has happened that is somewhat new is the use of the term to advance myths, to advance a defamatory way of framing social justice as woke. It's basically become kind of the poster child of identity politics on steroids. So it's been misinterpreted, I use the word sometimes gentrified. You know, it's space that we created for ourselves to be able to express and communicate about some of the conditions of our lives. Now it's been utilized by people who are not supportive of the overall agenda to create greater forms of equity and inclusion. Right.

And I want to talk about that backlash in just a little bit. but we first spoke in 2019. And it was in the midst of this giant burst of conversation around the word intersectionality, where it did skip out of the courtroom. What was your reaction when you first started seeing intersectionality be at the center of political debate? Well, you know, at first I wasn't shocked by it. There were ways that I was gratified by it because some of the issues that have happened since intersectionality was framed did not have have the benefit of that kind of framing, and that has caused disasters. You think about

Clarence Thomas and Anita Hill, when the whole world, it seemed, was watching a story unfold that was about sexual harassment between two African Americans. I call that an intersectional failure. So when intersectionality started to be more readily utilized to talk about issues, I thought, okay, that's a good thing, because intersectionality. is not just a legal concept. It's the way that people's lives are actually being structured. But, you know, what became a moment of deep distress is when intersectionality was framed as one of those ideas

that didn't have a meaning that could be firmly identified and agreed upon. And instead, it was being used to generate resentment, confusion, expressions of, you know, replacement anxieties. A lot of people talk about intersectionality is basically trying to create

a new pariah class out of straight white men. That's a quote. So it is the misappropriation and the intentional distortion around intersectionality is problematic. I just got a report two weeks ago from some obscure foundation saying that intersectionality was a dangerous ideology that needed to be, you know, contained and

destroyed. That's kind of distressing. Yeah, that is distressing. But I'm actually, I'm really glad that you brought up the Clarence Thomas case because in the, you talk about it in your memoir, which is excellent, by the way. In the book, you write about another incident a little earlier, is you endured serious domestic violence. And a friend told you to drop the charges against this person to avoid, quote, letting the systems lock our brothers up. And that struck me as an intersectional failure. You mentioned that in the context of wanting to back talk to the people you love most. Was that a part of why you decided to write this memoir and share these stories, to backtalk even to the people who agreed with you in the midst of an intersectional failure? Well, that's clearly why I use the term backtalking, right? It's not just speaking truth to power,

which is real, but backtalking also implies that you are having contested conversations within spaces in which respect and, you know, quietude are often expected. So backtalking against, you know, external parties that have always oppressed you, that, that's not that hard of a concept, but backtalking at home, back talking, you know, to fellow members of your community, of your political party, or, you know, in your church and in spaces that are meant to be home to you, but in other ways are not treating you like you fully belong. That's the kind of back talking that is often the most difficult, the most consequential to your connection to those places and spaces. You mentioned the ways in which you've seen intersectionality be used as a cudgel,

someone talking about how it's a dangerous ideology. We're in this moment where we're seeing the erasure, the purposeful erasure, in my view, of a lot of progress that has been made for women, for people of color, for queer people, for people who are even queer women of color. It can be done. They'll let you do it now. And the Trump administration has even removed terms like intersectionality from school curriculums, from government websites. What do we lose when these concepts, these words, disappear from public conversation? Yeah, you know, this has been the bane of my existence for the last several years.

It's not just that we have to contend with the Trump administration that has identified these ideas, the histories associated with these ideas, the artifacts in museums that prove the realities that these ideas represent. You know, this has been officially called improper ideology, which of course begs the question what's improper about it and what is proper ideology. And I would just, you know, submit that we know all we need to know about that when we look at which books have been purged, for example, from the Navy. Military Academy, they've taken out Maya Angelou. I know why the Caged Bird sings or how racism

takes place. What do they leave on the show? Adolf Hitler, Mind Comp, Charles Murray, you know, the bell curve. So we know that what's improper is things that challenge the existing status quo, things that give us the history for why we have to pay attention to equity and inclusion. We know what they consider to be proper are the things that say everything is the way it needs to be. So we know the endgame. I think what was most frustrating for me is how difficult it's been to persuade some of our allies, some of our social justice groups, some of the civil rights groups, that this was in the process of happening way back when the first thing they came after was intersectionality or critical race theory or the 1619 project, there was too much of a sense that

give them that, we can still do what we're going to do. We know what justice is. We know what's required. And my sense was that this is just the opening salvo. They're not just going after some words or some letters. They're going after the entire civil rights infrastructure, all the concepts framing that is necessary to establish it. And now we're in a period of time where we can see that, in fact, that was always what they were going after. Yeah. And I think that that goes with how we've seen some voices in the Democratic Party saying that concepts like intersectionality are the problem, because that means Democrats can't get elected because they're too focused on wokeness. And I wanted to be very clear. I am using air quotes. So even as the Trump administration

is trying to erase your work, do you think that the Democratic Party is trying to like distract away from your work? Or do you think that Democrats are doing a good job of defending its importance? It's hard to say, you know, with some kind of totality. But I would say that there is, let's say, asymmetry in modern politics. And here's how I would explain it. What's left of the Republican Party is completely aligned with the idea that their fortunes turn on being able to suppress and repress as much as possible the constituencies, the language, the history that has contributed to greater levels of representation around people of color, women, queer people, I would say on the Democrat side, there is not alignment.

There is not consistency. There's not even the effort to continue to protect the contributions of the constituencies that allow the Democratic Party to actually compete for political power. So for this to be such an important part of the Democratic Party and for the messaging around the importance to be so muddled, so skewed. for them not to turn up at every point along this pathway that they should have turned up in order to say, no, we're not going to permit the erasure of these ideas, the disempowerment of these communities, the irrelevance of this history,

for them not to have done that until this moment, one has to look at that failure as a condition of this moment's possibility. So, you know, pivoting away from a fight when people are trying to destroy you, that's not the best way to go about actually, you know, engaging in serious conflict about the future of the party and the future of the democracy. Kimberly, thank you so much for joining me. It is such a pleasure to be in conversation with you again. Thanks. That was my conversation with Kimberly Crenshaw. She's a pioneering legal scholar, executive director of the African American Policy Forum, and the author of Backtalker, an American Memoir.

We'll link to it in the show notes. Here at What Today, there are no forbidden terms, except for moist, because that word is just gross. If you're on the same page, make sure to subscribe, leave a five-star review on Spotify or Apple Podcasts, watch us on YouTube, and share with your friends. More to come after some ads. What Today is brought to you by Upwork. Hiring help shouldn't be a headache or a drain on your budget. Upwork makes it easy to hire specialized freelancers quickly, so you can get the expertise you need now, without weeks of recruiting or a full-time hire. Upwork is a one-stop platform to find, hire, and pay expert freelancers across web and software development, data and analytics, marketing, business operations, and more. You can browse profiles, review past work, and get help scoping the role, so you can hire with confidence and get started quickly.

With Business Plus, you can access the top 1% of talent on Upwork, and with AI-powered shortlisting, you'll get matched to the right freelancer in under six hours. No endless searching required. Thousands of growing businesses already trust Upwork to hire flexible, high-quality freelance talent. for everything from one-off projects to ongoing support. It's free to sign up and posting a job is easy. Visit upwork.com right now and post your job for free. That is upwork.com to connect with top talent ready to help your business grow. That's UP-W-O-R-K.com.

Thanks to homeserv for sponsoring this episode. Owning a home is great until a pipe burst or your water heater stops heating water. Repairs don't care about timing and they definitely don't care about your budget. Regular homeowners insurance usually doesn't cover a lot of the day-to-day wear and tear. Plumbing failures, H-FAC breakdowns, electrical issues, you're often on your own for those. That's where HomeServe comes in. It's like a subscription for your home. For as little as $4.99 a month, they've got your back. Repairs hit fast and hard. You could be searching for a contractor and a panic. Or you could already be on the phone with HomeServe's 24-7 hotline scheduling a repair.

It's super simple. Choose a plan for your needs and budget, and when something on your plan goes wrong, just call their 24-7 hotline to start the repair process. If I owned a home, HomeServe would be an absolute game changer for me. I know how expensive home repairs can be, from broken light switches to a septic line disaster. HomeServe is there to help. Help protect your home systems and your wallet with HomeServe against covered repairs.

Plans start at just $4.99 a month. Go to homeserve.com to find the plan that's right for you. That's homeserv.com. Not available everywhere. Most plans range between $499 to $11.99 a month your first year. Terms apply on covered repairs. Hey, Crooked listeners. If you haven't become a friend of the pod yet,

You are missing out on exclusive bonus content that drops every single week. If you do join, you're helping us, you know, grow crooked media, which is one of the few independent, proudly pro-democracy media companies left in Trump's America. If you join, you also get ad-free episodes of all your favorite pods. Add-free episodes of Pod Save America. Love it or leave it. Offline. Pod Save the World.

You also get bonus content like our new extra episode of Pod Save America. America called POTSave America Only Friends, Dan Pfeiffer's Polar Coaster. You also get access to all of our excellent substack newsletters like Potsave America OpenTabs and tons more great content. So stop what you're doing right now and go ahead and subscribe at cricket.com slash friends. Check it out. Here's what else we're following today. Head Alime.

Would the United States ever agree to a deal with Iran that does not address its nuclear program, even if it's a short-term deal. Oh, I mean, I don't know about interim deals or whatever, but we know where the end point is going to be. The endpoint is going to be free flow of traffic through the international waters that are the Straits of Hormuz and an end to the Iranian nuclear program. That's where we're going to end. I seem to remember the Strait of Hormuz was open before you closed it. Energy Secretary Chris Wright repeated Trump administration talking points about the Iran war during an interview with host Christian Welker on NBC's Meet the Press Sunday.

Meanwhile, Iran sent its response to the latest U.S. ceasefire proposal via Pakistani mediators. President Trump quickly rejected it, writing in a post-S. Sunday afternoon, quote, totally unacceptable! This is just another setback to efforts to resolve the standoff that has throttled shipping and sent energy prices soaring. Later on Meet the Press, Wright and Welker discussed a plan to lighten the bird not Americans, as gas prices have risen as much as 50 percent since the Iran war, We are working every day to offset this rise in prices because of a critical conflict in Iran

to drive prices down and we're open to all such ideas. This is significant what you're saying. You're saying that you that President Trump would be open to suspending the federal gas tax? We're open to all ideas. Everything has tradeoffs, all ideas to lower prices for American consumers and American businesses. I hope he cleared that ringing endorsement with Trump first. Virginia Democrats are reportedly discussing lowering the state Supreme Court's mandatory retirement age to 54, removing all sitting justices from the court.

Why? Well, the Virginia Supreme Court struck down a voter-approved congressional map that could have handed them four more seats in the midterps. Friday's 4-3 ruling upended the state's election plans and left some candidates without districts to run in. Virginia Democratic Representative Jennifer McClellan joined the Hill Sunday to discuss the fallout. At the end of the day, that means we need to fight to pick up these seats. And we can definitely pick up two, probably three, maybe even four, because Virginia voters are furious. And particularly when we see what's happening across the Jim Crow South, our black voters here are particularly furious. And they're ready to come out and vote and turn that fury into action on Election Day.

Virginia Democrats are also planning to appeal the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, according to a court filing. As Virginia Democrats try to figure out what's next, other states are barreling forward with their own plans to redistrict. Republicans in South Carolina, Alabama, and Louisiana are laying the groundwork for new maps that could hand them extra seats in the House. Of course, there's no guarantee as to how new districts would vote. South Carolina Democratic Representative Jim Clyburn told CNN's State of the Union Sunday that he thinks efforts to redraw his own state's map could end up backfiring on Republicans. All I'm going to say to that is be very careful what you pray for, because what I do believe is that when they finish with the redistricting, there will be the possibilities of LH3 Democrats getting elected here in South Carolina to the United States Congress.

One can only hope, Representative Clyburn. By now, you've probably heard about the cruise ship that was hit by Haunted Virus. On Sunday, the ship anchored in the Canary Islands and passengers started flying home aboard military and government planes. Three people have died since the outbreak began, and five passengers who left the ship earlier are also infected with the rodent-borne illness. At a press conference, World Health Organization Director General Tedros Adenam Gabriasis tried to calm fears. This is not another COVID, and the risk to the public is low. So they shouldn't be scared and they shouldn't panic. The WHO's top epidemiologist said it's recommending that passengers' home countries, quote,

have active monitoring and follow-up, which means daily health checks either at home or in a specialized facility. And that's the news. That's all for today. If you like the show, make sure you subscribe, leave a review. Contemplate how all the babies are named Olivia or Liam and tell your friends to listen. And if you're into reading, and not just about how for the seventh year in a row, Olivia and Liam have topped the list of the most popular baby names in America, like me, Whataday is also a nightly newsletter. Check it out and subscribe at crooked.com slash subscribe.

I'm Jane Koston, and here's my question. When I was a kid, everyone was named Jessica or Ashley. But where are all the adult Jessica's and Ashley's? Please comment if you're an adult named Jessica or Ashley. What a Day is a production of Crooked Media. Our show is produced by Caitlin Plummer, Emily 4, Erica Morrison and Adrian Hill. Our team includes Haley Jones, Greg Walters, Matt Berg, Joseph Dutra, Johanna Case, and Desmond Taylor. Our music is by Kyle Murdoch and Jordan Cantor. We had helped today from the Associated Press. Our production staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of America East.

Hey, Cricket listeners, if you haven't become a friend of the pod yet, you are missing out on exclusive bonus content that drops every single week. If you do join, you're helping us, you know, grow crooked media, which is one of the, few independent, proudly pro-democracy media companies left in Trump's America. If you join, you also get ad-free episodes of all your favorite pods. Add-free episodes of Pod Save America. Love it or leave it. Offline. Pod Save the World.

You also get bonus content like our new extra episode of Pod Save America called Pod Save America Only Friends, Dan Fifer's Polar Coaster. You also get access to all of our excellent substack newsletters like Pod Save America Open tabs and tons more great. content. So stop what you're doing right now and go ahead and subscribe at cricket.com slash friends. Check it out.