What A Day - The Real House Speaker of D.C.
Episode Date: October 26, 2023Rep. Mike Johnson of Louisiana is the new Speaker of the House of Representatives, ending a 22-days of GOP in-fighting since Rep. Kevin McCarthy’s ouster. While he managed to earn the support of bot...h “moderate” and far-right Republicans, Johnson has a history of voting against abortion access and LGBTQ rights.The war between Israel and Hamas rages on, and people living on both sides of the Israel-Lebanon border are on edge over skirmishes between the IDF and the militant group Hezbollah. We check in with Washington Post correspondent Sarah Dadouch from Beirut about fears that the conflict could spill over.Show Notes:PRRI: Threats to American Democracy Ahead of an Unprecedented Presidential Election – https://www.prri.org/research/threats-to-american-democracy-ahead-of-an-unprecedented-presidential-election/What A Day – YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/@whatadaypodcastCrooked Coffee is officially here. Our first blend, What A Morning, is available in medium and dark roasts. Wake up with your own bag at crooked.com/coffeeFollow us on Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/crookedmedia/For a transcript of this episode, please visit crooked.com/whataday
Transcript
Discussion (0)
it's thursday october 26th i'm priyanka arabindi and i'm juanita toliver and this is what a day
on today's show donald trump was hit with another fine for violating the gag order in his civil
fraud trial plus a new survey has found that nearly one in four americans support political
violence i know exactly who we're side-eyeing
and placing a lot of the blame on right now.
Yep, it's not good.
But first, after 22 days of chaos
since giving Kevin McCarthy the boot,
Republicans unanimously elected
Louisiana Representative Mike Johnson,
Speaker of the House,
and the final vote was 220 to 209.
Now, while a lot of folks are saying how nice of a guy Johnson is, his voting record and legislative agenda say otherwise.
Here's how minority leader Hakeem Jeffries described him during a conversation with MSNBC host Ari Melber.
Well, Mike Johnson has a very pleasant demeanor, but his voting record is as extreme as the most extreme members of
their conference.
Someone who, like Kevin McCarthy, like Steve Scalise, like Jim Jordan, voted to overturn
the 2020 presidential election.
Track record of trying to undermine Social Security and Medicare, probably more so than
almost any other member of the House Republican Conference,
wants to criminalize abortion care and impose a nationwide ban.
Like, not a single lie detected. And on top of what Representative Jeffries mentioned,
Speaker Johnson has also supported the criminalization of same-sex relationships.
He co-sponsored a bill to criminalize gender-affirming care for people 18 years old and under.
And when it comes to abortion, Johnson once argued that abortion access prevents women
from giving birth to, quote, able-bodied workers.
This man is truly sickening.
And now he's running the House, and he's the third most powerful person in our government.
Great.
I mean, like, what is there to say to all of this?
I feel like the Trump years,
the gift that really keeps on giving is just that the absolute worst, least qualified, most
disgusting, despicable human beings are elevated to positions of power that they have no business
being anywhere near, not even with a 10 foot pole. And the fact that the entire Republican
conference backed him up on it. So don't tell me y'all are an extremist when that's what it is.
Right. So what did it take, speaking of all that, for Mike Johnson to get this unanimous vote from these House Republicans?
Well, in addition to Johnson's extremist bona fides, the top two factors in my mind are the general fatigue and shame that Republicans were feeling and the fact that Donald Trump signed off on Representative Johnson. After the uno reverse on Representative Emmer, Republicans
were exasperated with each other. And honestly, they were just over it. So they turned to Johnson,
who fulfills the extremist MAGA Republican checklist that Marjorie Taylor Greene was
looking for. But unlike failed speaker candidate Representative Jim Jordan, Johnson doesn't have as many haters within the Republican conference because he advances his hateful anti-abortion, anti-LGBTQ, anti-democracy agenda with a smile.
That, plus Trump's support, which was likely rooted in Johnson's efforts to overturn the 2020 elections, is what put him over the edge here.
So how is the White House reacting to this newly minted Speaker
Johnson? President Biden called the speaker after the vote and expressed his interest in working
together and, you know, finding common ground. The president also released a statement calling
on Congress to move swiftly on pressing issues, including funding the government, which Johnson
actually voted against a few weeks ago. Conversely, Biden's 2024 presidential campaign actually went in.
Thank you.
I know, right?
The campaign declared that the election of Johnson as speaker, quote,
cements the extreme MAGA takeover of the House Republican Conference.
A campaign spokesperson added that Johnson would seek, quote,
to ban abortion nationwide, lead efforts to deny free and fair election results, gut Social Security and Medicare. And there is the 2024 messaging.
And it does look identical to the 2022 midterms messaging where Democrats saw history defying
outcomes. Yeah, I mean, I can't say I'm mad from that perspective, but I do think that, you know,
this being the party platform of one
of the two major parties of our country is really not good for anyone who cares about our country.
So are we in the clear now that we have House Speaker Johnson? Are we in the clear in the
house now? Can we stop talking about this for a minute? I mean, not quite. So you remember that
rule where a single person can trigger a motion to vacate? Oh, yes, I do. Yeah, that's still in place for now, at least.
Republican Representative Dan Crenshaw has said that he plans to propose a rules change
on that to raise the threshold from one member to 25 members and to ensure that the chair is
not vacated until a new speaker is elected. So let's not get comfortable just yet,
you know, like that rule is still on the book. So until that changes, I wouldn't lighten up at all.
Sure. That makes sense. Thank you so much for walking us through all of this chaos of the past
22 days. You are a hero for that. We really appreciate it. Now we will switch back to the
latest from the war between Israel and
Hamas. Concerns about the ability to deliver aid and warnings over the deteriorating situation in
Gaza continue to come. Yesterday, the World Health Organization said that 12 out of the 35 hospitals
in Gaza are no longer functioning. And the UN warned that it is on the verge of running out
of fuel in the Gaza Strip, which would force aid workers to slow down their relief efforts.
As of the time of our recording, only eight aid trucks were able to cross into Gaza from Egypt.
Rather than the 20 that had been originally scheduled, Israel was still inspecting the other 12.
The Hamas-controlled health ministry in Gaza has raised the death toll to more than
6,500 people in Gaza. Those figures, as we've noted, are not possible to independently verify
at this time. President Biden expressed that he was not confident in those figures, but many experts
do actually consider figures that the health ministry provides to be accurate based on the accuracy of the information
that they have provided in the past. So a little divide there, not able to independently verify
at this time, but it remains very clear that the situation is dire and people need help.
Right. And speaking of President Biden, what is the administration calling for at this time?
Yes. So the Biden administration has been vocal about wanting more aid to reach the civilians
of Gaza.
They are now pushing for a humanitarian pause in Israel's military action in order to get
that aid into Gaza and to get civilians who want to leave out of Gaza.
That is a definite shift in message from where they have been in days and weeks past.
Though President Biden throughout all of this
has repeatedly affirmed that the U.S. recognizes
and will continue to support Israel's right to defend itself.
The Wall Street Journal reported yesterday
that Israel has agreed to delay its ground invasion
at the request of the U.S.
so that the Pentagon will have time to position air defenses
in the region to protect U.S. troops. That is,
according to this one report, hasn't been verified by other outlets at this time. Israeli Prime
Minister Bibi Netanyahu did say yesterday that the Israeli military was still preparing for a
ground invasion in Gaza, but he refused to provide any further details on timing. Speaking at the
White House earlier, Biden reaffirmed support for Israel and
also added that he was alarmed by Israeli settlers who are attacking Palestinians in the West Bank.
That is something we have seen happening more frequently in recent weeks. He said that they
were pouring gasoline on the fire. Yeah. Speaking of that, we have mentioned the potential for this
war to spread within the region. It's a concern of many of these groups and leaders.
Do we have any new information on that front?
Yes.
So yesterday, the leader of Hezbollah, which is a militant group based in Lebanon, met
in Beirut with senior leaders of Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, which is another
militant group in Gaza.
Afterwards, they released a statement saying that their shared goal is to achieve a, quote,
real victory for resistance in Gaza and Palestine and to stop Israel's aggression against the people in Gaza and in the West Bank.
We spoke earlier about the situation in Lebanon with Sarah Daddush.
She is a Middle East correspondent with The Washington Post who has been covering the broader conflict from Beirut, we started by asking her how people
in Lebanon are feeling as the border clashes continue to flare up between Hezbollah fighters
and Israeli troops. There's a lot of fear in Lebanon right now. The Lebanese are very used
to this idea that Israel and Lebanon will go to war at some point. It's been present in their
minds ever since 2006. Every summer, the joke goes,
the Lebanese say there's going to be war when the weather is at its best. But there still seems to be
this kind of astonished sense that this time it's actually happening. There's panic everywhere. The
streets are completely empty. The shops are empty. A lot of them are closing early out of fear that
something's going to happen. Because of the evacuation in the south, there's a lot of them are closing early out of fear that something's going to happen. Because of the evacuation in the south, you know, there's a lot of places that have been completely filled up.
Rent has tripled in some areas, especially north of Beirut in Christian-dominated areas,
because those areas are less likely to be hit.
This assumption is based off of the blueprint of where Israel bombed in 2006.
There's been about 30% of an increase of people leaving and about 30%
of a decrease of people coming in. Middle East Airlines, the flagship carrier for Lebanon,
has brought down its number of flights from 22 to 8, and it's parked a bunch of their aircrafts
in Turkey for insurance reasons. So it's a very tense situation here.
And I said, wow, a couple of times as you were speaking, Dush, then because of the economic premium placed on safety right now, you mentioned the planes in Turkey because of insurance purposes.
You mentioned rent being increased three times in Christian parts of the country.
Like that's sickening to hear that still there's this mentality of different ways of profiting off of people's
fear. The worrying part about this also is that on top of the fact that, you know, just like any
other war, people will profit from this. Lebanon is not doing well. It's been in a massive economic
meltdown since 2019 when protesters took to the streets to kind of call for the end of this
corrupt system that's been in place. But no one
is doing well economically. In 2006, when people were leaving in droves and when Lebanon, like a
lot of other Middle Eastern countries, is very community based. So if you were in the south,
you had people usually along the coast or somewhere else in Lebanon and you could go stay with them.
There is no guarantee for that this time. You know, I went to the south and spoke to some people who
have been displaced to schools.
And there was one father whose wife had left him right after she had their two-month daughter.
And so it was just him and her.
And he had some married daughters elsewhere.
And I said, well, can't you go stay with them?
And he said, it's such a hard time on everyone.
They told me to come.
I just, they're living in one room.
And a lot of the people who come from poorer backgrounds
or he's an electrician in the South, you know,
he doesn't have houses somewhere else.
He can only rely so much on his family.
He luckily, the second he saw stuff in Gaza pop off,
he packed all of his seven bags and packed them on his motorcycle
with diapers and milk and everything that his daughter needs
and a thermometer and medicine.
He had it all lined up in the school, and he kept talking about going north
because he doesn't even trust that the school won't get bombed.
So we're talking a very different economic situation for the Lebanese themselves.
And the difference also between the last conflict and this one is that in 2006,
there were large numbers of people who were able to drive into Syria,
and Syria, at the time, a functioning country, was able to take in these
numbers. So Syria can't do that anymore. That Syria is in no condition to take in anyone.
It's told the foreign minister that the road is clear, he told me yesterday, but they are not
really able to provide anything really more than a route to people who can then maybe cross into
Jordan. So that's also a big calculation for Lebanon is
the government and the people cannot handle a war. And speaking of the government, one frame that has
been prevalent in the media is that Hezbollah is the entity essentially dragging Lebanon into
this conflict and that the Lebanese government has no real say in the cross-border clashes that
are occurring. Is that an accurate portrayal of the power dynamic on the ground?
And if so, how is the Lebanese government responding in this moment?
Right now, Hezbollah and its allies control the largest number of seats in parliament.
There were elections last year, and they had the majority in parliament before.
They lost that majority, but they still have the largest number of seats.
So we have ministers who are pro-Hizballah,
and we have ministers who aren't, who are from the other side. So we're getting a very mixed
bag basically from the government. But the government itself has said, the minister of
information has come out and said, the official Lebanon does not want a war. But we are very aware
of things that are happening at the border. The foreign minister was saying, we have been asked
to restrain Hezbollah by the Americans and by the French
and by other Western countries. And our messaging back to them is just like you can't restrain
Israel, we can't restrain Hezbollah within Lebanon. And they've said, instead of trying
to place pressure on us to pass on that pressure to Hezbollah to not engage with Israel, you need
to pass on the pressure in the other side to Israel and make sure that they
impose a ceasefire and make sure that they don't do a ground invasion in Gaza because that's what's
going to probably provoke Hezbollah to carry on into Israel or strike Israel or engage with Israel
in the south. So if this situation with Hezbollah escalates, is it possible to say, you know,
how it would be different from the group's previous clashes with Israel up until this point? I think this escalation is very different in that it's not a Hezbollah-Israel war.
If Hezbollah properly enters the fight, because it already has entered,
we're not going to just be seeing that from Hezbollah.
We're going to be seeing that probably from Inayat al-Khbaik, Kata'ib Hezbollah,
which is another group that is not affiliated, not related to Hezbollah. It just has the same, a similar name. We're going to see that in Syria, where a lot of
Palestinian factions are based. We're going to see a reaction from Iran, most likely. The Houthis in
Yemen have already said that they're going to attack, and I think they already have claimed a
strike. One big difference is that this won't be an isolated fight for the group. They also know
that in 2006, there was massive support for Hezbollah. This is not as guaranteed now locally
in Lebanon because of the really dire economic conditions. But militarily, Hezbollah has been
prepping for this for a very long time. They have not kept this a secret. They've said Nasrallah, the leader of the group, has repeatedly said that we have all of our weapons and arms in place.
Hezbollah is very patient. It thinks very long term. It's been prepping for this,
so it's ready for the long haul. Is there anything, just as we wrap up our conversation,
that we haven't touched on that you think might be valuable for people
to understand as we continue to watch this conflict unfold? It's important to remember,
we have been unfortunately desensitized to photos and images and stories of Palestinian
children being killed. And what happened to Israeli civilians was a tragedy. What is continuing
to happen on a daily basis in Gaza is also a very, very big tragedy. And this is not something that's
recent. This is one of the biggest spates of such kind of attack, but this is not an isolated event.
What happened in Israel was one of the worst things that has happened to Israel since 1948.
But what's happening in Gaza has been happening for a very long time.
It was already under a blockade, and now it's under a full blockade.
It wasn't doing well to begin with.
And a big, big, big percentage of the ones being killed are children.
So I think that distinction between Palestinian and Israeli lives
is something that we need to reconsider and think
about. That was our conversation with Sarah Doudouche from The Washington Post. We will be
sure to bring you more updates as this conflict continues to unfold. But that is the latest for
now. We'll be back after some ads. Let's wrap up with some headlines.
Headlines.
If you are dealing with any drama in your personal life right now, consider this.
At least you are not hanging around one Donald J. Trump.
Wow, the bar is really low for that.
The bar is so low.
The bar has never been lower.
The former president was slapped with a $10,000 fine yesterday
for violating the gag order in his civil fraud trial in New York.
We have mentioned before that the judge in this case
imposed the order to stop him from going after court staffers,
in particular, one of Judge Arthur Engeron's clerks,
who Trump essentially doxed on social media earlier this month.
It all went down yesterday after Trump was abruptly called up to the stand to explain these comments that he made to reporters. perhaps even much more partisan than he is. So we are doing very well.
The facts are speaking very loud.
He's a totally discredited witness.
And if you haven't seen anything yet,
this goes on for a long time.
He's a totally discredited witness.
What a terrible situation to be this man's lawyer,
to know that he will say whatever the fuck he wants.
He has no regard for your legal advice.
100%.
Whether or not it's good.
Trump was in the hot seat for about three minutes
and claimed he was talking about his former fixer,
Michael Cohen.
What a blast from the past.
Who actually took the stand against him earlier that day.
Judge Angeron, of course, did not buy it.
Shortly after that,
Trump's defense team asked to dismiss the case entirely.
When Judge Angeron shot that down,
Trump reportedly stood up and stormed out of the courtroom
without any warning or notice.
I'm sure his fists were balled
as he pounded his feet against the floor like a toddler.
What a weirdo.
Like, truly does not accept any accountability
and so doesn't know how to behave when he receives it.
It's toddler behavior.
It is wild.
This is the second time that Trump has been fined for running his mouth in his civil fraud trial.
He now has 30 days to pay up. Will he do it? Place your bets.
All communications in Acapulco, Mexico, were knocked out after Hurricane Otis slammed into the resort city early yesterday morning.
Otis initially crept up as a tropical storm, but quickly strengthened to a Category 5
hurricane just hours before it made landfall. Forecasters called the storm a quote-unquote
nightmare scenario as it was unfolding, and at one point clocked in sustained winds of 165 miles per
hour. The ferocious storm also dumped sheets of rain on the region, triggering landslides and flooding roads.
As of our record time Wednesday evening, there were no immediate reports of any fatalities,
but Mexican authorities say communications with emergency responders are also down.
It's unusual for a storm to intensify so quickly.
Scientists have warned that as human-driven climate change accelerates,
such fast-moving and unpredictable storms are becoming more common.
The United Auto Workers Union said last night that it has reached a tentative deal with Ford.
Many of the details of the agreement weren't released by the time we sat down to record this
show, but there are reports that it would include pay increases for workers of up to 25%
over the course of the four and a
half year contract. The deal will first need to be ratified by the 57,000 UAW members at Ford
before it goes into effect. In the meantime, it definitely puts pressure on GM and Stellantis to
come to an agreement with the union as well. UAW members went on strike against the big three
automakers six weeks ago and have since
walked off the job at assembly plants in multiple states. This is a really exciting development for
these striking workers who have really been in solidarity, walking off the job, doing their part
to get what they deserve. And now Stellantis and GM, let's make it happen. Let's bring this home, please.
Yeah, you literally have the blueprint from Ford. Step up. Let's lock it up.
And finally, a new survey has found that more Americans support political violence because they believe it's justified.
The report released by the Public Religion Research Institute and the Brookings Institution found that nearly a quarter of Americans agree with the following
statement, quote, because things have gotten so far off track, true American patriots may have
to resort to violence in order to save our country. That sounds ridiculous and crazy.
Yeah. That number is up from 15 percent who agreed with that sentiment in 2021.
What's more, a third of Republican surveyed said they support resorting
to violence to, quote, save the country compared to 22% of independents and just 13% of Democrats.
And digging further into those numbers, the survey also found that Republicans who support
former President Donald Trump are nearly three times as likely to support political violence
than Republicans who don't like him. Look, we saw January 6th. I feel like this is yet another opportunity to confirm what we already
know. Thank you for this data and be wary of anybody who calls himself a patriot. Yikes.
Seriously. But there were some areas where most Americans see eye to eye. Three quarters of survey
respondents agreed that the future of democracy is at risk ahead of next year's
presidential election.
There's a lot more to unpack
from the survey,
including an increase in support
for conspiracy theories.
So we'll link to it in our show notes
if you want to learn more.
And when we say we're worried about
the general public and the electorate
and how that relates to our democracy,
this is what we're talking about.
Totally. It's scary.'re talking about. Totally.
It's scary.
It's sad.
And it plays out in how our society has become more extreme, more divided.
And as we're seeing here with increasing tendencies toward violence.
Yeah.
And those are the headlines. in today's digital age comedy usually boils down to three things short meme oriented and
readily available on your phones just ask dark brandon on this week's episode of offline host
john favreau sits down with vulture senior editor, Jesse David Fox, to figure out how we got here and how this new era of comedy is making its mark on politics. Be sure to subscribe to Offline
wherever you get your podcasts. That is all for today. If you like the show, make sure you
subscribe, leave a review, and tell your friends to listen. What a Day is also a nightly newsletter.
Check it out and subscribe at crooked.com slash subscribe. I'm Juanita Tolliver. And I'm Priyanka Arabindi.
What a Day is a production of Cricut Media. It's recorded and mixed by Bill Lance.
Our show's producer is Itzy Quintanilla.
Raven Yamamoto and Natalie Bettendorf are our associate producers.
And our senior producer is Lita Martinez.
Our theme music is by Colin Gilliard and Kashaka.