What A Day - The Trump Putin Breakup Explained

Episode Date: July 16, 2025

On the 2024 campaign trail, then-candidate Donald Trump repeatedly claimed he could end Russia’s war in Ukraine ‘on day one.’ Roughly 180 days into his second presidential term, the war has only escalated. What has changed is Trump’s attitude toward Russian President Vladimir Putin. This week, Trump announced a new deal to send U.S. weapons to Ukraine, after weeks of complaining about Putin’s increasingly destructive attacks. Ben Rhodes, former Deputy National Security Advisor to President Barack Obama and co-host of Pod Save the World, discusses the significance of Trump’s pivot. He also weighs in on the latest fault lines in the ongoing ceasefire talks between Hamas and Israel, mass layoffs at the State Department, and looming cuts to foreign aid.And in headlines: The House joined in on the Jeffrey Epstein discourse, the Supreme Court greenlights mass layoffs at the Department of Education, and former National Security Adviser Mike Waltz testifies at his Senate confirmation hearing to be US ambassador to the United Nations.Show Notes:Check out Pod Save The World – https://tinyurl.com/mrapf4a4Call Congress – 202-224-3121Subscribe to the What A Day Newsletter – https://tinyurl.com/3kk4nyz8What A Day – YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/@whatadaypodcastFollow us on Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/crookedmedia/For a transcript of this episode, please visit crooked.com/whataday

It's Wednesday, July 16th. I'm Jane Coaston, and this is What Today, the show saluting former University of Kentucky wide receiver Scott Mitchell, who ran down and attempted arsonist in Runyon Canyon in West Hollywood and prevented what could have been a truly devastating fire. That is, in my view, some truly heroic shit. On today's show, the House joins in on the Jeffrey Epstein discourse. And former National Security Advisor Mike Waltz testifies at a Senate confirmation hearing to be U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, because we got rid of accountability a long time ago. But let's start with foreign policy. Because we love good things.

And sadly, no good things are happening. Take Russia's war against Ukraine. You know, the one President Donald Trump said he would end on day one and then some 180 days later. Still hasn't. The reason the war is still ongoing couldn't possibly have anything to do with Trump's decision to spend months trying to cozy up to Russian President Vladimir Putin, a dictator who's had no issue sending hundreds of thousands of his own citizens to die in the meat grinder of war, a war

he started to achieve his vision of making the Soviet Union great again. Nope, Trump spent Tuesday insisting this was all still former President Joe Biden's fault. I think really the question should be asked, why did Biden get us into that ridiculous war? Why did Biden bring us there? That should never ever have happened, that war. This is Biden's war. I'm just trying to end it because we're saving a lot of lives. While it's not all that surprising that Trump keeps blaming Biden for everything he doesn't like, what is surprising is the total about face he's taken on dealing with Putin.

Here's Trump in May talking to reporters. I'll give you an update. I'm not happy with what Putin's doing. He's killing a lot of people and I don't know what the hell happened to Putin. I've known him a long time, always gotten along with him, but he's sending rockets into cities and killing people and I don't like it at all. Okay? And here he is like it at all. Okay. And here he is Monday in the Oval Office, just as he announced a new deal to send more weapons to Ukraine.

At one point, Trump seemed to almost grasp that his Slovenian wife might have a better understanding of how Putin operates in the world than he does. I go home, I tell the first lady, and I spoke with Vladimir today. We had a wonderful conversation. She said, Oh really? tell the First Lady, and I spoke with Vladimir today, we had a wonderful conversation. She said, oh really? Another city was just hit. So it's like, yeah.

The First Lady is not wrong. Despite all of those wonderful phone calls Trump has had with Putin, Russia has launched its most devastating aerial bombardments of the entire three-year war over the last few weeks. It fired hundreds of drones and missiles into southwestern Ukraine on Saturday alone. And speaking of places where Trump claimed during the election he could bring peace, the latest round of ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas still show no signs of progress in Gaza, even after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's visit to Washington last week.

Good thing the Trump administration is gutting the State Department, while Congress weighs a White House request to cut billions in foreign aid. Definitely a winning strategy. So for more on the wars in Ukraine and Gaza, and how the Trump administration is wreaking havoc on American diplomatic efforts here at home, I spoke to Ben Rhodes. He served as the Deputy National Security Advisor to President Barack Obama, and is now co-host of Pod Save the World.

Ben, welcome back to Whatta Day. I love being here. Let's start with Ukraine, which I cannot figure this out because Trump has done a 180 degree turn from the way he's talked about Ukraine and Russia, not just since the war began, but basically for the last 10 years. He's on the outs now with Russian president, Vladimir Putin. Is this a good thing?

Was this inevitable to some degree? Yeah, I think it was inevitable. I mean, Trump is the only person in the world who seems to have been surprised by the fact that Vladimir Putin lied to him, right? Well, of course he did. Yeah, that's kind of part of his whole thing. Yeah, his whole thing is to lie about

what he's doing in Ukraine. And Trump wasted months, you know, pursuing this completely futile effort to end the war. It's good that he's now going to provide Ukraine with some support, including, really importantly, they've been under heavy missile bombardment. But to be clear, there's nothing new about this. Right. Even the stuff he's announcing, this is actually already stuff in the pipeline that, you pipeline that the Biden

administration had approved. So Trump is just letting stuff happen that was going to happen anyway. So he's talking now like tough on Putin, but he's not doing anything materially different or new. And frankly, I don't think it really makes much difference because there's no strategy attached to it. Yeah. And part of the fallout between Trump and Putin is because Russia has been

amping up its attacks while Trump has been talking about an alleged cease fire and being so nice. And as you said, Russia's missile attack in the last couple of months has been the worst of the war. So why is Russia doing this now? Because the Ukrainians are uniquely vulnerable because of Donald Trump, right? So if you're Putin, you're carrying out this war of attrition, then Trump comes in, he humiliates Zelensky in the Oval

Office, he says he's not going to give him a blank check of support, the Ukrainians are on their back foot, they're feeling vulnerable. What do you do? You press your advantage. Then the U.S. under Trump conceded in these negotiations that we believe that Russia should be able to annex all these regions that they occupy. Well, Putin's not the kind of guy who says, that's great, I'm done. He's the kind of guy who says, great, I'll pocket that. I want more.

So it's not at all a surprise that he would escalate things when the Ukrainians are being humiliated and isolated by Trump in this manner. Now, Trump finally, I guess, figured that out, but the Ukrainians are in a much worse position today than they were six months ago when Trump said he was going to end this war on day one. Yeah, it turns out appeasement doesn't seem to work that well. Doesn't seem to work with dictators, no.

Weird. So Trump is, as we mentioned, sending Ukraine a new wave of weapons by way of NATO. You've pointed out that that was in the pipeline to start with. But he's also giving Russia 50 days, the two weeks of foreign policy to reach a ceasefire deal before he imposes more economic pressures on Russia. I want to ask two questions here. One, what economic pressure can the United States possibly actually put on Russia given that we actually don't do that much trade with Russia.

So tariffs seem to me to be an ineffective policy. I mean, they're ineffective in a lot of different ways, but they're ineffective, especially here. Also, what kind of window could those 50 days give Putin to potentially escalate things in Ukraine even more? You're exactly right. Frankly, I think sanctions, tariffs, the Russians have figured out how to live under US sanctions. In part because they have a lot of oil and gas and they can sell it to a lot

of people who want to buy it. And the more Trump pisses off other countries, the less likely they are to go along with US sanctions and pressure on Russia. So there's a cost to Trump pissing everybody off with tariffs. Look, and on the 50 days, I think what Putin could do is just like continue the level and scale of bombardment to show he doesn't care about what Trump's saying. So more tax on civilians in Ukraine, more tax on infrastructure that civilians rely on like energy infrastructure, right?

Putin wants to demonstrate that he's not going to be lectured into making peace by an American president. And so things could get worse for the Ukrainians. There's no reason to believe that Putin is so concerned about what Donald Trump thinks, that he's gonna have to change his war strategy in the next 50 days. In other ceasefire news, because that's apparently,

you know, ceasefires that don't actually happen seem to be what's happening. Talks over ending the war in Gaza are reportedly once again on the brink of collapse. What appears to be the latest hangup? The same hangup that's been the case since the beginning, which is essentially Hamas, their position has been there needs to be an end to the war. The US and Israeli position has been essentially there'll be a ceasefire,

you release the hostages, and then we're going to resume the war, and we're going to resume the war and we're going to ethnically cleanse Gaza. And so, I hate Hamas. They're a horrific organization that should not be governing Gaza in the future. But of course, you're not going to agree to that. And the added complication has been that the Israeli defense minister went out and said, essentially, we're going to build a camp in the former city of Rafa

that was been utterly destroyed by Israel, and we're going to move all the remaining people who are still alive in Gaza into this camp before we decide where to relocate them. That's not conducive to an idea of ending the war. More broadly, Trump seemed so confident that this was something a businessman could end. Both of these conflicts were something that he could wrap up because you just needed somebody, an outsider, to come in and solve this.

Anyone who knows anything about these two conflicts knew that that was an absurd claim. But does that failure say anything about faults in the White House's strategy? Or are these both just two intractable wars being waged by groups with long histories of conflict? No, it does. Because look, any other president came in and promised I'm going to end the war in Ukraine on day one, and I got to ceasefire in Gaza, and I'm investing all of my prestige in it. And you had this level of failure, like six months later, it would be a much bigger deal than nothing seems to stick to Trump in the same way it would stick to somebody else.

Look, in the case of Ukraine, if you came in and said, here's a real strategy, right? On the one hand, if you continue this war of Vladimir Putin, there's this massive package of support we're gonna provide to Ukraine, there are these security guarantees, they're gonna get closer to NATO, here's the pressure that we're gonna use to try to Ukraine. There are these security guarantees. They're going to get closer to NATO. Here's the pressure that we're going

to use to try to get you in the negotiating table. And then there we might negotiate some concessions on Ukraine. There was a case for a diplomatic plan. That's not what happened. He came in and he said, Ukraine must make all the concessions. So that incentivized Putin to continue the war. And similarly on Gaza, I don't even

like the term ceasefire, to tell you the truth. Because right now, what's happening is Israel is just bombing some remaining places that are not yet destroyed in Gaza and killing some additional people. Now what a US president who actually wanted to end the war would do is say to Israel, like if you don't stop what you're doing in Gaza, I'm going to cut off all military assistance to you. By the way, I thought Joe Biden should have done that, so I'm not singing that at Trump. If Trump wanted to end the war, he could that way, but instead he's just, you know, the

pipeline's flowing into the Israeli military. So what incentive does Netanyahu have to actually end the war? Talking domestically, we just saw massive cuts to the US State Department, more than a thousand people let go. The administration claims this is just a big reorganization, but how could those losses hobble US diplomatic efforts, especially right now? Well, you know, first of all what they basically did is they eliminated any bureau that has any values proposition attached to it, right? So the democracy and human rights bureau the global women's issues bureau You know all the you can see why Trump type people wouldn't like this

But the reality is if you take the destruction of USAID together with the elimination of any bureau in the State Department that has anything to do with values-based propositions, together with, by the way, just giving the State Department a huge haircut, guess who's not doing that? China's not doing that. Right? China has like a very coherent methodical strategy for being more present around the world, for building relationships in places like Africa

and Southeast Asia that are precisely the places that we are retrenching from in the Trump budget. On the one hand, they talk about the need to compete with China, the need to get critical minerals around the world, all these things that Trump talks about. He is literally disempowering the capacity of the United States government to do those things.

Speaking of values-based propositions, the Senate is also about to take up a rescissions package that the president wants passed. It calls for cutting about $8 billion in foreign aid. But in a rare bit of maybe good news, it seems that former President George W. Bush's signature program to combat the spread of HIV abroad, PEPFAR, will be spared. This program used to have overwhelming bipartisan support. I used to work for an organization that focused on prevention of mother-to-child transmission

of HIV that relied and still relies on PEPFAR. And we had support across the board. Why have Republicans turned against it? It's baffling to me because it's originated in a Republican administration. Genuinely the best thing George W. Bush ever did. No question, it has saved tens of millions of lives at a relatively cost-effective price tag.

And to me, the withdrawal of Republican support from PEPFAR tells you everything you need to know about the way in which the Republican Party has kind of walked away from any values-based proposition because there's kind of two reasons for it, or maybe three. One is just like, Trump, America first, we don't want to fund anything. Another is that there's some interaction in the right wing fever dream mind between PEPFAR and kind of reproductive health assistance. Mainly in part because you don't want to, there's funding to avoid transmission from mother to child

like you worked on. Oh my God, that sounds like abortion. You know, even though it doesn't, but like. 100% not, but yeah, no, you see that. There's this kind of weird correlation that they draw. And so that's the second part of it. And then the other is just they're starving the government through tax cuts,

that they have to find cuts elsewhere. And let's find it. Anything that helps people, I guess, we cut, whether it's in this country and Medicaid or whether it's PEPFAR around the world. We're still talking about $8 billion in cuts to foreign aid, though. Do you think that there are enough Republicans to block this rescissions package?

Because we just did the allegedly big, beautiful bill where you had a bunch of Senate Republicans complaining about it, House Republicans complaining about it after they finally read it, and then they all ultimately voted for it. Yeah. I assume there's maybe enough legacy support for PEPFAR that there's some like kind of small rump of it that survives, but I'm not optimistic about it. And I think Americans need to know like,

cause we have such short attention spans, like, oh, they cut USAID and their projections of like millions of people are going to die because of those cuts. And many of them already have. If you take away drugs that are keeping people alive, if you take away food that is keeping people alive, if you take away PEPFAR funding, like people will die. You may not want to think about that,

but it's the reality here, right? And those fact cases don't seem to be enough to swing those Republicans if Trump actually leans on them at the end of the day. It's always interesting to me because the argument is always that, well, we need to focus on veterans and the homeless here, and then we absolutely are not going to do that. Then we cut funding for them, yeah.

We're not going to do any of that. Ben, as always, thanks so much for joining me. Yeah, great talking to you. That was my conversation with Ben Rhodes, former Deputy National Security Advisor to President Barack Obama and co-host of Pod Save the World. We'll get to more of the news in a moment, but if you like the show, make sure to subscribe, leave a five-star review on Apple Podcasts, watch us on YouTube, and share with your friends. More to come after some ads. What a Day is brought to you by Zbiotics pre-alcohol. Let's face it, after a night with drinks, I don't bounce back the next day like I did 10, 15 years ago. I have to make a choice. I can either have a great night or a great next day like I did 10-15 years ago. I have to make a choice.

I can either have a great night or a great next day. That is, until I found pre-alcohol. Zebiotic's pre-alcohol probiotic drink is the world's first genetically engineered probiotic. It was invented by PhD scientists to tackle rough mornings after drinking. Here's how it works. When you drink, alcohol gets converted into a toxic byproduct in the gut. It's a buildup of this byproduct, not dehydration,

that's to blame for rough days after drinking. Pre-alcohol produces an enzyme to break this byproduct down. Just remember to make pre-alcohol your first drink of the night, drink responsibly, and you'll feel your best tomorrow. Every time I have pre-alcohol before I have drinks, I notice a difference the next day. Even after a night out,

I can confidently plan on working out without worry. Summer is here, which means there are so many more opportunities to celebrate the warm weather. Before that backyard barbecue brew, glass of Pino watching the sunset at the beach, or cocktail by the campfire, don't forget your Zeba Addicts pre-alcohol. Drink one before drinking and wake up feeling great and ready to take on the next day and all that summer has to offer. Go to zbiotics.com slash wad to learn more and get 15% off your first order when you use code wad at checkout. Zbiotics is backed with a 100% money back guarantee, so if you're unsatisfied for any reason, they'll refund your money, no questions asked. Remember

to head to zbiotics.com slash wad and use the code wad at checkout for 15% off. Here's what else we're following today. Headlines. They voted to protect rich and powerful men who were abusing, assaulting, and abandoning young women. That's what this vote is about. But enough about the 2024 election. The Epstein debate has landed in the House. California Democratic Representative Ro Khanna tore into his Republican

colleagues on the House floor after they voted against forcing the Justice Department to release files on disgraced financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Weird. Kana had been trying to amend the Genius Act, a cryptocurrency bill, to require the publication of the Epstein documents. The bill would regulate stable coins, whatever those are. There is something rotten in Washington. And this is a question of whose side are you on? Are you on the side of the

people? Are you on the side of America's children? Or are you on the side of the rich and powerful who've had their thumb on the scales and shafted Americans for decades? The MAGA infighting over the Trump administration's flip-flopping on the files continues. House Speaker Mike Johnson told right-wing podcaster Benny Johnson he wants the files released. South Carolina Republican Representative Ralph Norman voted with Democrats to include Kana's amendment in the cryptocurrency bill. He said, quote, I think there are files.

All of a sudden not to have files is a little strange. We'll see how it plays out. I think the president will do the right thing. I'm sure he will, Ralph. He always does. The Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to move forward with its plan to dismantle the Department of Education on Monday. For now. Shortly after, the White House said it would terminate around 1,300 workers. President Trump talked to reporters about the decision before heading to Pittsburgh

on Tuesday. We had a big win with the Supreme Court on the Department of Education. And we went, as you know, we want to bring education back to the states, take the federal government out of it. A little tiny bit of supervision, but very little, almost nothing, like to make sure they speak English. That's about all we need. Who is they?

What is he talking about? The legality of the potential layoffs is still being deliberated in lower courts. Also on Monday, several thousand people at the Health and Human Services Department got an email telling them that they were being fired. The layoffs come as part of a still ongoing legal battle that began when the administration

tried to lay off 10,000 HHS employees in late March. The reorganization affected workers at the Food and Drug Administration, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the National Institutes of Health, among others. Some of those workers got their jobs back and are still protected for now. But the Supreme Court's decision to side with Trump means the odds are stacked against them as legal challenges to the mass layoffs continue to play out in the lower courts. Federal immigration authorities are trying to get landlords to turn over information about their tenants, according to a subpoena obtained by the Associated Press. The subpoena

was shared with the AP by an Atlanta real estate attorney, who said it was sent to several of his clients. The document asks for leases, forwarding addresses, ID cards, and rental applications, among other things. Landlords in Boston and Los Angeles have also received requests. The subpoena also asks for information about people who have lived with tenants.

It's unclear how many subpoenas were sent out and where. Whether the documents are legally binding is up for debate since they're not signed by a judge. At the same time, the Trump administration is reportedly trying to keep undocumented immigrants from getting bond hearings during their deportation proceedings, according to The Washington Post. That would allow immigration authorities to keep them in custody indefinitely. I'm confident under this president's leadership, we can continue to spread peace and prosperity

and I'm confident we can make the UN great again. Mike Waltz, President Trump's second nominee for US Ambassador to the United Nations, testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Tuesday. Some Republicans critiqued the UN and condemned it for so-called politicization and anti-Semitism during the Senate confirmation hearing. Waltz committed to vetoing, quote, one-sided anti-Israel resolutions and agreed the UN needs reform, but suggested it has room for improvement. We should have one place in the world where everyone can talk, where China, Russia, Europe, the developing world can come together and resolve conflicts. But after 80 years, it's drifted from its core mission of peacemaking. Though Walz is auditioning for a new role in the administration, there was a time not too long ago when he served as

Trump's national security adviser. Remember that? If you don't, let me jog your memory with one word. Signalgate. That was the March scandal involving Defense Secretary Pete Hicks at texting war plans they say weren't war plans, but definitely were war plans to a Signal Group chat that accidentally included the editor-in-chief of the Atlantic. Waltz was at the center of the controversy because he was the one who allegedly added the journalist

to the chat by mistake. Delaware Democratic Senator Chris Coons asked Waltz during the hearing if disciplinary action was taken by the White House investigation for the fuck-up. Waltz said, nope, nada, and insisted the use of signal is not only authorized but highly recommended. He is notably no longer the national security advisor for reasons. So, in summary, if you mistakenly add a journalist to a small group cabinet meeting on a platform you're definitely not supposed to be using to talk about not-war plan war plans, you get a new job.

Great. And that's the news. Before we go, if you enjoyed listening to Ben Rhodes, check out his show, Pod Save the World. Each week, he and Tommy Vitor break down the biggest international stories, from diplomacy to conflict, and explain how US foreign policy shapes what's happening around the globe. This week they're covering State Department layoffs, meetings with African leaders, and the latest on Russia, Ukraine, and Israel-Gaza. Watch Pod Save the World on YouTube or listen wherever you get your podcasts. That's all for today. If you like the show, make sure you subscribe,

leave a review, thank a cat named Pepper, who has discovered a rare virus for the second time, and tell your friends to listen. And if you're into reading, and not just about how Pepper the cat, who belongs to a virologist at the University of Florida, discovered a rare virus on a rodent he caught that might be connected to cases of encephalitis in humans like me. Water Day is also a nightly newsletter. Check it out and subscribe at Crooked.com slash subscribe. I'm Jane Coaston, and Pepper discovered a rare microbe back in 2021. I have never discovered any rare diseases, so two points for Pepper. What a day is a production of Crooked Media.

It's recorded and mixed by Desmond Taylor. Our associate producer is Emily Foer. Our producer is Michelle Alloy. Our video editor is Joseph Dutra. Our video producer is Johanna Case. We had production help today from Greg Walters, Matt Berg, Sean Ali, Tyler Hill, and Laura Newcomb. Our senior producer is Erica Morrison, and our senior vice president of news and politics

is Adrian Hill. Our theme music is by Colin Gilyard and Kashaka. Our production staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of America East.