What A Day - Trump And Musk's Messy Break-Up
Episode Date: June 6, 2025While President Trump demands his administration investigate the former president's pardons and executive orders, we're left thinking about President Joe Biden again…and where it all went wrong. Ale...x Thompson, national political correspondent for Axios and co-author of the new book, "Original Sin," joins us to talk about Biden's decline in office and how the people around him covered it up.And in headlines, President Trump and Elon Musk trade attacks on social media over the Big Beautiful Bill, Trump bans citizens of 12 countries from traveling to the US, and a Massachusetts teen detained by ICE is released on bond.Show Notes:Check out Alex's book – https://sites.prh.com/originalsin/Subscribe to the What A Day Newsletter – https://tinyurl.com/3kk4nyz8What A Day – YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/@whatadaypodcastFollow us on Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/crookedmedia/For a transcript of this episode, please visit crooked.com/whataday
Transcript
Discussion (0)
It's Friday, June 6. I'm Jane Coaston and this is What a Day, the show that did see
that anti-vaxxer and extremely elderly quarterback Aaron Rodgers is joining the Pittsburgh Steelers,
an announcement that came in the midst of a giant internet fight between two other famous
people who spend too much time complaining on podcasts. On today's show, President Donald Trump and Elon Musk trade barbs on social media for
hours.
And a Massachusetts teen detained by ICE is released on bond.
But let's start with former President Joe Biden and whether his administration may have
helped to keep his alleged infirmity under wraps.
Now, I know what you're probably thinking.
It feels extremely strange to talk about the former president being not all there mentally
when our current president says things like this pretty much every day.
No, but I've uncovered, you know, the human mind.
I was in a debate with the human mind and I didn't think he knew.
That's President Donald Trump with the new chancellor of Germany,
who's probably like many world leaders thinking, what the hell is going on?
And that's the same President Donald Trump who is now demanding his administration
investigate the former president's pardons and executive orders.
Because of, among additional reasons, the former president's use of an auto pen to
sign documents.
A few notes.
Trump has also used an auto pen.
You can't undo a pardon.
And let's recall that a lot of this is because Trump still believes he won the 2020 election,
which he didn't.
I get it.
Donald Trump is a generationally weird and bad person who has gotten even more
adult than I thought possible. But if we as Democrats, as liberals, as
progressives, as people who oppose all this shit, want to understand why Donald
Trump is president again, we need to understand what went wrong at the end of
Biden's term in office. Why didn't he stump for the Inflation Reduction Act
in a cross-country tour and brag on television every day
about his achievements in the fight against climate change
or his many, many efforts to support LGBTQ rights
or his support for unions because he was, again,
the most pro-union president in American history?
Was it because he couldn't do that?
We don't know.
And I'm guessing that the efforts of the GOP to investigate Joe Biden's actions
by bringing his former aides and doctor before Congress is going to be political
theater, the likes of which only Donald Trump, who loves musicals, could enjoy.
But there is a version of history in which we don't have Donald Trump 2.0.
And I think it's worth understanding why, in part, that didn't happen.
So Alex Thompson stopped by the studio.
He's national political correspondent for Axios and the co-author of Original Sin with
CNN anchor Jake Tapper.
Alex, welcome back to Whatta Day and congrats on the book.
Thank you so much.
You were one of the first mainstream reporters to really draw attention or try to to Biden's age
and you were attacked by the Biden administration and Democrats for doing so. But as you were
reporting out this book, what surprised even you, someone who'd been following this, about the extent
to which officials within the administration and on the campaign had been covering up Biden's
decline as the title of your book says? I guess I'd say it this way. The Joe Biden we saw on the debate stage
against Donald Trump in June of 2024,
the number of times that other people within the White House
and within the broader Democratic Party
had seen Joe Biden act like that and didn't say anything
and just basically like held on and said,
I hope this works.
Right.
I think that was sort of shocking the amount of people that knew.
This is something we, I think, interpreted, but Biden had implied during the 2020 campaign that he would be a bridge candidate to a new generation of Democrats.
So what changed? Like, when did it switch from, I'm a bridge candidate to I'm running again?
When did it switch from, I'm a bridge candidate to I'm running again? I don't think anything changed.
I think he said the bridge candidate part in the middle of a presidential primary when
he knew that there were concerns about his age in order to get over the line of getting
the nomination.
One person close to Biden had told us he is nothing if not for this.
The people that are closest to Joe Biden have told me, have told us, that like every president
runs for two terms.
Every president gets eight years and that desire by him was then reinforced by the family
for a variety of different reasons.
So he was lying?
Well he never explicitly, he would say he never explicitly promised to be a one-term
president, but he definitely made people believe it, even though I don't think he ever meant
it.
You and your co-author, Jake Tapper, write about this mentality you refer to as, quote,
the Biden-ness, this deep belief among Biden's closest allies in his ability to overcome
adversity and prove people wrong.
And you say it played a big role in justifying his reelection run.
And while I think a lot of us
know about the ways that Biden has overcome unimaginable tragedies, the death of his first
wife and daughter, the death of his son, Bo, two brain aneurysms, I was really surprised to hear
how something far more petty was part of that Biden mentality. And that was resentment over
how former president Barack Obama and others
in his camp had discouraged Biden from running in 2016.
People in democratic circles, in liberal circles in 2015-2016, they wanted him to run and were
very encouraging of that happening.
Can you talk about that a little bit and why those feelings were still festering after
he did win in 2020? Well, from the Biden perspective, Obama never truly appreciated Biden's gifts.
Obama was a bit of a snob.
Obama was a bit of like an intellect, part of sort of the intellectual elite that
Joe Biden had always resented and felt never took him seriously.
I think the fact that Obama clearly preferred Hillary over Biden to be his successor,
I think really wounded Biden
because what bigger slap in the face is there to say,
I think she'd be a better president than you.
And Biden never got over it.
And it wasn't just Biden,
it was the entire core team around him
had a deep resentment of a lot of people
from Obama world and Obama
which honestly is part of the reason why despite some of like the insinuations
that Obama was the puppeteer like trying to get Joe Biden out of the race, Obama
knew that actually he had to play it very conservative because he knew if he
did anything Biden would get his back up even more. Right and I think that that
goes to one of the big tensions within the administration that comes
through in your book, which is between staffers whose allegiance was primarily to the United
States government and its proper functioning and doing stuff, and the staffers whose primary
allegiance was to the Biden family specifically.
How did that tension divide the White House in 2024 or in the lead up to 2024?
Every single White House, there's always a tug of war between are you more loyal to your
boss or are you more loyal to the larger cause that you're part of.
As you insinuate the Biden theology of he'll always come back, they eventually lost sight
of the party, the White House, the country, and they saw service to Biden as being the same thing
as those other things.
As a result, the Biden White House operated in a way
that anyone that even didn't seem completely 110% on board
with Joe Biden was slowly but surely pushed out of the circle,
was not given as much access, was not seen,
was essentially like...
So he was even more insulated
than as this keeps going.
Yes, absolutely.
And there was this protective shell
increasingly built around him.
Cabinet members couldn't see him,
senior White House officials couldn't see him.
In the end, he regularly only had interaction,
honestly, usually with like five to 10 people,
and they were all hyper-loyalists.
In the reception to your book and to talking about this,
there's a real temptation to focus on this
as being just a family story,
but it is also not just a politics story,
but a policy story,
because there was a lot that the Biden White House
wanted to do and a lot that it did do. How did Biden's infirmity impact the Biden White House's policy
proposals? The withdrawal from Afghanistan or immigration reform or the Inflation Reduction
Act?
I would say there were members of the administration, members of the cabinet, senior Democrats in the Senate and in the House that believed that his age played a significant role in a few different
things.
First and foremost, the fact that Joe Biden, who had supported a constitutional amendment
for a balanced budget amendment in 1984, had signed the crime bill, was like a hawk on
immigration.
If you look at Joe Biden's entire career
and you look at how he governed the first two years,
you would sort of be shocked,
like from an objective perspective,
because like Joe Biden was like center left,
middle of the road Democrat.
And there was a feeling among some members of the cabinet,
some members of the administration,
that if he had been 20 years younger,
he would not have governed as to the left as he did. And they felt that because he had limited energy, limited time of the
day, that as a result, more power flowed down to staff levels. And in particular, Ron Klain
those first two years, his chief of staff, and Ron Klain was to the left of Joe Biden and steered that way. I'd also say people felt that
Biden's sort of, you know, age in which he really oriented himself and geared himself towards issues
where he felt more comfortable. In particular, like NATO, Ukraine, made it so he didn't pay as much attention
to thornier issues like immigration and the border.
And Senator Michael Bennett,
we have an actor in the book,
where a Democrat of Colorado
goes to an immigration event in June, 2024.
And he comes out of that event
believing that Biden's age is leaving him unable
to handle the actual portfolio of this thorny issue.
But it is difficult to tell. I will say also this, there's a lot of Biden people that will
acknowledge that, yes, his schedule was limited. Yes, he didn't have as much energy.
Yes, his communication abilities degenerated.
But then we'll still insist that his decision-making was as good and as sharp as ever, behind closed doors.
I realize to some extent, this is a lot of Monday morning quarterbacking.
We are looking back and yelling at each other about it. But it also seems like some signs of Biden's decline were painfully clear
to a lot of people and then became even more so to everyone at that debate. You write how Biden
needed note cards and teleprompters even during cabinet meetings. You even spoke to four of the
president's own cabinet secretaries for this book. So how did they rationalize Biden's decline or did they?
I would say the main rationalization
that all these people had was,
Joe Biden beat Donald Trump before,
Joe Biden is probably in their own minds,
probably best decision to beat him again.
And Donald Trump is the next central threat to democracy and
If you believe those things then you can really rationalize anything, right?
I'd also say just on a crude pragmatic level given how small and insular the circle was a lot of senior administration
officials basically felt
I'm not going to change his mind.
There's only like three or four people in the world that could change his mind.
If I go public, it's only going to hurt him and help Donald Trump.
Now you could argue like that's still sort of like, you know, a cowardly way out,
but I do think for some of them, it was sincere.
We'll be back for more from Alex Thompson.
But if you liked the show, make sure to subscribe,
leave a five-star review on Apple Podcasts, watch us on YouTube, and share with your friends.
More to come after some ads.
What A Day is brought to you by Zbiotics Pre-Alcohol.
Let's face it, after a night with drinks, I don't bounce back the next day like I used
to.
I have to make a choice.
I can either have a great night or a great next day.
That is until I found pre-alcohol.
Zbiotics Pre-Alcohol Probiotic Drink is the world's first genetically engineered probiotic.
It was invented by PhD scientists to tackle rough mornings after drinking.
Here's how it works.
When you drink, alcohol gets converted
into a toxic byproduct in the gut.
It's a buildup of this byproduct, not dehydration,
that's to blame for rough days after drinking.
Pre-alcohol produces an enzyme to break this byproduct down.
Just remember to make pre-alcohol
your first drink of the night, drink responsibly,
and you'll feel your best tomorrow. Every time I have pre-alcohol before drinks drink of the night, drink responsibly, and you'll feel your best tomorrow.
Every time I have pre-alcohol before drinks, I do notice a difference the next day.
Even after a night out, I can still confidently plan on getting in my workout or my long run without worry.
Summer is here, which means more opportunities to celebrate the warm weather.
Before that, backyard barbecue brew, glass of P&O watching the sunset at the beach, or a cocktail by the campfire,
don't forget your Zebra Addicts pre-alcohol.
Drink one before drinking and wake up feeling great and ready to take on the next day and
all that summer has to offer.
Go to zebiaddicts.com slash wad to learn more and get 15% off your first order when you
use code wad at checkout.
Zebi Addicts is backed with a 100% money back guarantee, so if you're unsatisfied for any
reason, they'll refund your money, no questions asked.
Remember to head to zbiadix.com slash wad
and use the code wad at checkout for 15% off.
Here's more from my conversation with Alex Thompson.
So we know how the story ends for Biden,
but I think one of the big questions
a lot of Democrats are still asking themselves,
and it feels like the book couldn't quite answer,
is to what extent was this a concerted effort by a few people to deceive
the American public about the limits of a man they knew was no longer fit to hold office
versus an inability or an unwillingness to deal with the fact that the Joe Biden that
they knew or were around in 2011 was not the same person they were dealing with in 2021, 2022.
And they could not and did not want to accept the reality that Biden's best days in politics
were already behind him.
After reporting out this book, where do you fall?
It's hard to say definitive.
I mean, I think there are people in both camps, but even the people in the latter camp, which
were basically people that were just in denial,
if you look at their actions,
they knew that he was struggling.
So the best example is Jill Biden.
I think if you were to ask her,
per her even on truth serum,
she would say, Joe Biden is fine.
There's not been decline.
She said so on The View recently.
But if you look at how she acted behind the scenes
and in front of cameras, increasingly interjecting
in conversations when he was sort of stalling out,
increasingly saying, hey, you remember so-and-so,
basically guiding him at events. Even if she would not
admit it to herself, her actions, I think, speak to the fact that she knew that he was not as able
as he once was. And there were a lot of people, even if they were in, like, you know, denial
rationally by their actions, they knew that he was not like the Biden he once was.
Yeah. And I think that, I mean, that's the part that actually for a lot of people might be kind
of familiar because you might have, you know, parents for whom one parent's like, you know,
my spouse is fine. And yet they're having to do so much more.
Yes.
Republicans, because of course they are,
are planning to launch their own probe into Biden's health.
Senators are planning a hearing this month.
Some have even called for a DOJ investigation.
How explosive could those be with the proviso again
that this is something, you know,
Republicans have been basically saying
that Joe Biden had dementia in like 2018.
Whether or not these hearings make a difference, I mean, as you know, like so many hearings
are just like show trials.
Just because some Republicans are operating in bad faith and just trying to like obscure
attention from other things still does not make it less newsworthy and interesting to
probe this further.
I would say, like for one instance, me and my colleague at Axios, Mark Caputo, were the
first to publish the tapes of the Robert Herr interview for the special counsel Robert Herr,
who investigated Joe Biden on classified documents and took a lot of heat when he basically said
that he couldn't prosecute Biden because he had memory issues and was a well-meaning old man.
When the transcript of that came out, a lot of reporters and a lot of Democrats sort of
bought the spin that Robert Herr was acting in bad faith.
If you listen to those tapes, I think it has shifted the conversation.
And those tapes only came out like a month ago. I think there are going to be more examples of not just the political consequences, but
the potential policy consequences of having a man at that age in that position.
I think what was striking for me is that I think I thought that, you know, we're not
in the era of Woodrow Wilson having a stroke and Edith Wilson running the White House.
We're not in the era of FDR being in a wheelchair and the entire press corps being like,
we just won't ever show you in a wheelchair. This is a time in which presidents are,
rightfully so, more examined, more analyzed, more observed than at any time in human history.
you know, observed than at any time in human history. What takeaways did you have from your reporting that you think could be useful going forward for future
presidents? You know, whether it is about ensuring that we know more about the
health of presidents, whether it is about, you know, something else. I'm just curious
as to, you know, as you've been talking about this book and reporting on for this book, what do you think could change that
this might not happen again, where you couldn't have essentially as you know, the Politburo
protect the president from himself?
You're right to mention both like Wilson and FDR, JFK, like lied about having Addison's, was taking lots of drugs.
George Washington also was not transparent about his health.
Nobody is transparent about their health.
Reagan.
Yes, exactly.
And I bring all those examples
and to show that like Joe Biden is not unique
and he won't be unique again
unless there is some sort of forcing mechanism.
It would take Congress,
it would take another branch of government
to force a president to actually disclose,
like have a full disclosure of health
under like penalty of perjury,
you could have the White House position submit documents.
President Trump's health summary, first of all,
he almost disclosed nothing when he was president
and his recent health summary,
it is more than he gave during the campaign, but there's, it still begs many questions, including the fact that like, do we
believe he's like six, three, two 15?
I mean, maybe, uh, I'm just saying, I don't think he has the same BMI as
like Jalen hurts.
I mean, forget Trump for a second.
Biden is not the first.
He will not be the last unless there is like some deeper conversation going on about presidential
health, especially in the nuclear era, where a president, you know, Woodrow Wilson, had
the ability to blow up the entire world, neither did FDR.
Right.
But Joe Biden did.
And we had no and Donald Trump does right now.
On that reassuring note, Alex, thank you so much for joining me.
Always a pleasure.
That was my conversation with Alex Thompson.
He is the coauthor of Original Sin with CNN anchor Jake Tapper.
Here's what else we're following today.
Headlines.
This is the day anniversary when the Americans once ended a war in Europe.
And I think this is in your hand in specific in ours.
That was not a pleasant day for you?
No, that was not a pleasant.
Well, in the long run, Mr.
President, this was the liberation of
my country from Nazi dictatorship.
This is German Chancellor Friedrich
Mertz attempting to school President
Trump at the White House Thursday.
They were supposed to talk about trade
in the Ukraine war ahead of the
anniversary of D-Day.
But Trump sidetracked the conversation to rant about his once-but-now-ex best friend,
Elon Musk.
The tech billionaire spent this week crapping on the president's so-called Big Beautiful
Bill, calling it a quote, disgusting abomination.
You know the bill, the one with the massive tax cuts that would also cut hundreds of billions
of dollars in Medicaid funding, which Elon is fine with.
In fact, what he wants are more cuts.
Trump admits he and Musk are having issues.
Look, Elon and I had a great relationship.
I don't know if we're well anymore.
I was surprised because you were here.
Everybody in this room practically was here as we had a wonderful sendoff.
He said wonderful things about me.
You couldn't have nicer said the best things.
He's worn the hat.
Trump was right about everything.
And I am right about the great, big, beautiful bill.
We go to great, big, beautiful bill because that's what it is.
Trump also said he thinks Musk just misses him after leaving the White House last week. People leave my administration and they love us.
And then at some point they miss it so badly and some of them embrace it and some of them actually become hostile.
I don't know what it is. It's sort of Trump derangement syndrome, I guess they call it.
The spat continued Thursday.
At one point, Musk tweeted, quote,
Time to drop the really big bomb.
At real, Donald Trump is in the Epstein files.
That is the real reason they have not been made public.
Have a nice day, DJT.
And he also agreed with a tweet that argued Trump should be impeached.
You've heard of enemies to lovers, but what about lovers to enemies?
A messy breakup during Pride? Groundbreaking. And I have to mention here that House Speaker Mike Johnson
is still trying to get Elon on the phone.
He's ghosted you, girl.
I'm sorry.
We will not allow people to enter our country who
wish to do us harm.
And nothing will stop us from keeping America safe.
President Trump is once again banning whole swaths of people from traveling to the U.S.
That's according to a proclamation he issued Wednesday along with a video.
He said the ban starts Monday and would apply to citizens from 12 countries.
Brace yourself, here they are.
Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea,
Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. The policy also imposes travel
restrictions on nationals from seven other countries. Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra
Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. Those nationals can't immigrate to the
US but can still apply for some temporary visas.
And if you, like me, just said, Burundi?
Laos?
What?
Yeah, you're not alone.
Trump said the list is subject to change.
And if you think you're having deja vu, you are.
Trump signed a sweeping travel ban during his first term.
It was coined a quote, Muslim ban by critics because it applied to a group of predominantly
Muslim countries. It was repealed by former President Biden.
While Steve Bannon was arguing that Elon Musk should be deported and the weirdest
MAGA fans on the internet were melting down, the Supreme Court made news on
Thursday too. Here are three highlights. Decision number one. The court ruled that
a Catholic charity in Wisconsin was indeed entitled to a tax exemption that the state court had shot down. The
Wisconsin Supreme Court had said the charity serves and employs people of all
faiths and its activities were quote, primarily charitable and secular. But the
US High Court said Wisconsin violated the charity's First Amendment rights.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote quote, a law that differentiates between religions along theological lines is
textbook denominational discrimination. In decision number two,
the court sided with a woman who claimed she was subjected to reverse
discrimination in the workplace because she's straight. Last,
but certainly not least,
the justices also blocked a lawsuit filed by Mexico.
The Mexican government alleged top American firearm manufacturers were responsible for
the marketing and distribution of guns to cartels.
The court said, nah, saying you usually can't sue gun makers for crimes committed with guns.
My name is Marcelo Gomez de Silva.
I don't want to cry. But I want to say that that place, it's not good.
It's not good.
That is a Massachusetts high school student and that not good place, the
immigration custody center that he'd been in.
Immigration and customs enforcement agents seized Marcelo Gomez de Silva
last weekend when he was on his way to volleyball practice.
He spoke to reporters after his release on Bonds Thursday.
Ever since I got here, they had me in handcuffs.
They put me downstairs and I was in a room with a bunch of 35 year old men and those
rooms were small compared to the size of like how many men were there.
There was like 40 men in there.
We would barely get any attention from the people there.
It'd be really hard.
I haven't showered in six days, I haven't done anything.
The only thing I could do is thank God every day
because that's all I would do.
I would pray there, I would talk about the Bible to them.
Authorities said they were originally looking
for Gomez de Silva's father and they had spotted his car.
They picked up the son who had been driving that car.
Gomez de Silva's lawyer, Robin Nice, spoke to reporters outside the courthouse Thursday.
She said her client had no criminal record.
This is all a waste.
We disrupted a kid's life.
We disrupted a community's life.
These kids should be celebrating graduation and prom, I assume.
They should be doing kid stuff and it is a travesty and a waste
of our judicial process to have to go through this. Nice says Gomez de Silva first entered the US on a
visitor visa and was later issued a student visa that has since lapsed. And that's the news. Before we go, it's Pride Month and the Crooked Store is stocked with everything you need,
whether you're marking this month with joy, wrath, or a delightful combination of both.
Wear a join or die Pride tee to speak to this moment, or add some fun to your month by picking
up a Pride bundle for $10 or $20.
Just choose your t-shirt size and the Crooked Store will send you a surprise selection of
Pride tees and accessories.
It's like playing the lottery, except you always win.
Head to crooked.com slash store for all your Pride Month merch.
That's all for today. If you like the show, make sure you subscribe, leave a
review, contemplate how the two most powerful people in America spent all day
Thursday fighting on the internet, and tell your friends to listen. And if
you're into reading, and not just about how seriously, the two most powerful
people in America took it to the timelines like they were about to get
dragged into a Real Housewives reunion with Andy Cohen,
like me.
What A Day is also a nightly newsletter.
Check it out and subscribe at crooked.com slash subscribe.
I'm Jane Costin and it would be funnier if it weren't weird
but it's also still extremely funny.
What A Day is a production of Crooked Media.
It's recorded and mixed by Desmond Taylor.
Our associate producers are Raven Yamamoto and Emily Four.
Our producer is Michelle Eloy.
We had production help today from Johanna Case,
Joseph Dutra, Greg Walters, and Julia Clare.
Our senior producer is Erica Morrison,
and our executive producer is Adrian Hill.
Our theme music is by Colin Gileard and Kashaka.
Our production staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of America East.