What A Day - Trump Blames Fatal Potomac Crash On Dems, DEI feat. Rep. Jamie Raskin

Episode Date: January 31, 2025

An American Airlines flight from Wichita, Kansas, and an Army helicopter on a routine training flight collided over the Potomac River late Wednesday night. While investigators spent Thursday trying to piece together what happened, President Donald Trump took the opportunity to blame the tragedy on... Democrats and D.E.I. It was the latest outrage in too many to count since Trump took office not even two weeks ago. Maryland Congressman Jamie Raskin joins us to talk about what Democrats can do to counter Trump’s onslaught of horrifying nonsense. Later in the show, Crooked Media climate correspondent Anya Zoledziowski shares some good news about Trump’s anti-climate orders.And in headlines, Tulsi Gabbard and Kash Patel got their chance to flail in front of senators during their respective confirmation hearings, Secretary of State Marco Rubio says he’s headed to Panama amid Trump’s threats to retake the Panama Canal, and a fragile ceasefire between Israel and Hamas continues to hold.Show Notes:Checkout Anya's work: Subscribe to the What A Day Newsletter – https://tinyurl.com/3kk4nyz8Support victims of the fire – votesaveamerica.com/reliefWhat A Day – YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/@whatadaypodcastFollow us on Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/crookedmedia/For a transcript of this episode, please visit crooked.com/whataday

It's Friday, January 31st. I'm Jane Coaston and this is Whatta Day, the show asking God, the universe, Beyonce, whatever might be out there to deliver us from these Trump administration confirmation hearings. On today's show, Tulsi Gabbard and Cash Patel get their chance to flail in front of senators during their respective confirmation hearings. On today's show, Tulsi Gabbard and Cash Patel get their chance to flail in front of senators during their respective confirmation hearings, and Secretary of State, little Marco, says he's headed to Panama.

But let's start with the deadly plane collision between an Army helicopter and an American Airlines flight from Wichita, Kansas late Wednesday night. The passenger plane was descending into Reagan International Airport outside Washington, D.C. when it collided with a helicopter on a routine training flight over the Potomac River. At the time of our recording Thursday night, all 67 people on the two aircraft are reportedly dead. The recovery mission in the icy Potomac is ongoing. President Donald Trump held a press conference Thursday morning to offer the obligatory thoughts

and prayer speech, but then he immediately pivoted to blame the tragedy on Democrats and diversity, equity, and inclusion programs. He doubled down when reporters pressed him on his claims. I'm trying to figure out how you can come to the conclusion right now that diversity had something to do with this crash. Because I have common sense, okay, and unfortunately a lot of people don't, we want brilliant people doing this.

This is a major chess game at the highest level. It's not common sense. He has a hammer and saw a nail. To be clear, there is not a shred of evidence that DEI had anything to do with this. Investigators do not yet know what happened. But never one to let available facts get in the way of a racist tantrum,

Trump signed an executive order later in the day demanding a review of all hiring decisions and safety protocol changes under President Biden. He was also sure to cite, quote, likely illegal decisions during the Obama and Biden administrations that minimized merit and competence in the Federal Aviation Administration. The subtext, of course, being that if anyone other than a white, straight, able-bodied man has a job these days, they surely don't deserve it. Unless maybe it's one of those black jobs or Hispanic jobs Trump talked about so much on the campaign trail.

When asked if he will visit the crash site, the president had a crass response. Do you have a plan to go visit the site? I have a plan to visit not the site because what you tell me what's the site? The water? Or to meet with the first responders down there? I don't have a plan to do that but I will be meeting with some people that were very badly hurt with their family member obviously but I'll be meeting with some of the families. Families are still grieving the loss of their loved ones. There were children on that American Airlines flight. And the president of the United States is joking about going swimming

and essentially blaming this tragedy on non-white people having jobs. A class act. It's the latest insult and too many to count since Trump took office not even two weeks ago. Democrats in Congress seem just as stunned and confused as the rest of us, especially as they confront two major problems.

First, Republicans control Congress. And second, the Democratic brand has seen better days. According to new polling from Quinnipiac University, 57% of American adults have a negative opinion of the Democratic Party. 45% have a negative opinion of the Republican Party. So to find out what Democrats are going to do next to counter this horrifying nonsense, I called up Representative Jamie Raskin, who represents the good people of Maryland's 8th congressional district. Congressman Raskin, welcome back to What a Day. I'm delighted to be with you guys.

First of all, how are you doing? Well, you're kind to ask. Today is the birthday of my son, Tommy Raskin, who we lost several years ago. So we've been thinking a lot about Tommy and remembering what a joyful, beautiful boy he was. I'm so sorry. Well, that's all right. It's tough times all over and we're also obviously mourning the deaths of all the people who were in the terrible

crash last night. Now, the president would love us to believe that former President Biden and DEI are responsible for what happened. Every president faces tragedies, but it's so clear that Trump's instinct is to just immediately politicize them and blame them on his enemies. What do you do to counter the absolute stupidity and absurdity of those kinds of statements? Well, a lot of them just kind of condemn themselves. When the president says without even any attempts to assemble any facts that DEI is responsible

for a collision between an airplane and a military helicopter. People just have to chalk it up to his basic racism or efforts to polarize and divide the population. You know, DEI has now become the all-purpose excuse for everything. I heard from one of my constituents who works for the FDA and her job is to assemble pools of patients for cancer drug trials. And one sentence in her two-page job description is to do outreach to minority communities to make sure that minorities are included in the testing of the cancer drugs. And she was fired, put into administrative leave

and set up to be riffed permanently, fired permanently because she is allegedly a DEI person. But in any event, I've been hearing a lot of my constituents who are in racial or ethnic minority groups have been reporting to me that they've been sacked even though they don't have anything to do with hiring. I want to talk actually about your constituents because you're someone who represents the great people of the 8th Congressional District in Maryland, which contains a lot of people

who work for the federal government. And I know that the White House has rescinded the memo that called for a blanket funding pause for government grants and loans and it plunged so many people into chaos. But as someone who represents a lot of those people, what have you been hearing from them? Well, my constituents have been buffeted by just dozens of executive orders and policy changes, dismissals, firings, involuntary reassignments. There's a lot going on. I have 50,000 federal

workers who live in my district, and so they all got this Godfather offer memo with the title Fork in the Road borrowed from the same memo that Elon Musk sent to the workers at Twitter when he bought that company. But basically it says, you know, take eight or nine months off, you can be paid and then you're gone. Then we're getting rid of you. Or you can stay at your own risk, but understand we're imposing new loyalty tests and we're going to be scrutinizing everybody's behavior to make sure they're loyal.

They didn't say loyal to whom, but presumably they mean Donald Trump. They don't mean to the American people or to the constitution. So there's a lot of anxiety about that. I have a lot of people living in my district who work at the department of justice, and there's been an absolute purge there of the top leadership in the natural resources and land division, the National Security Division, the Criminal Division, the head of the Office of Public Integrity.

All of the top most senior and experienced prosecutors heading up all of these divisions have been forced out of their jobs and involuntarily reassigned to a new sanctuary cities task force, which as far as I can tell doesn't exist yet. But the promise or the threat is if they decide to stick around, they're going to be spending all of their time prosecuting or bringing litigation against allegedly recalcitrant

local officials who are standing in the way of the anti-immigrant executive orders, which of course is a whole other front that is affecting people who live in my district. So it doesn't end. I mean, you know, this is undoubtedly the effectuation of Steve Bannon's vision of just flooding the zone so people are so buffeted and hammered by the news and by public policy changes that they can barely respond to it. You are a constitutional law professor. With these firings, these payout offers, the funding freeze,

do you think the administration is trying to bait lawsuits in the hopes that the Supreme Court will keep giving the office of the president, the executive branch, and therefore Donald Trump, more power? Yeah, I think there's something to that theory. The lower courts, the district courts and the appeals courts will overwhelmingly reject and repudiate all of these assaults on the rule of law, both at the constitutional level and also the statutory level because they're blatantly violating the rights of workers. When they sacked all of the inspectors general, for example, which is a way to pave the way for corruption

in all of these federal departments, they just blatantly violated the plain language of the statute, which says that the Congress has to be given 30 days notice and there has to be a specific substantive statement of explanation for why the IGs are being fired. And they just completely ignored that. They're even admitting they ignored that.

So there's some thought that, okay, they're going to lose in the district courts, they're going to lose in the appeals courts, but their ace in the hole is the US Supreme Court. When you get up to, you know, Clarence Thomas and Sam Aledo land, where there is a six to three majority tilting in Trump's direction. They are asserting the most sweeping expansion of executive powers to say that there is a unitary executive and within the executive branch, the president must be able to control everything. That's why the president has sacked the Democratic members of independent agencies and boards

already. They would like to be sued, I think, to try to get it up to the Supreme Court so they can test the proposition that the president controls everything. But in any event, we have every interest in vindicating the civil service and congressional legislation to define the administrative agencies and the boards against this monarchical kind of claim that Trump's got. Now, I know a lot of us have been stunned by all that Trump has done. Even for those of us who've been reporting on this, people have been talking about Project 2025 for two years, and yet it's wild to see it happen.

I know Trump won the popular vote, and there's a delicate needle to thread here for Democrats, but he didn't win with the kind of mandate he claims he did. So what can Democrats do to meaningfully push back and what are Democrats doing to push back? Have they've been caught flat-footed here? No, not at all. First, let's start with this. He certainly has no mandate to implement everything in 2025 because we said that was his plan and he repeatedly disavowed it, saying he didn't even know what was in Project 2025. A lot of the stuff was stupid. He didn't like it and so on. He can't run around now and say,

this is what the people voted for when he specifically disavowed and repudiated Project 2025. That's number one. What he does arguably have a mandate for is to lower grocery prices, is to lower rent, to lower the costs of living in America. And if they roll their eyes now and say, well, everybody knows that there's no way we could do that, then they're liars because they said that's what they were going to do. But they don't have a mandate, no, to go out and to destroy Head Start or Meals on Wheels. I didn't hear them ever campaign on that. In any event, when we say we're gonna stand up for what we think is the pro-choice, pro-environment,

pro-common-good majority in the country, they say, oh, you can't do that, we have a mandate. Guess what? We've got a mandate too. I got elected in the same election Donald Trump got elected in. And so did everybody who's opposing him almost every authoritarian government that has ever existed

Whether you're talking about Mussolini or Pinochet or worse started within the electoral frame and then went in and Dismantled the democratic institutions of government. It's what's going on with Putin. It's what's going on with Orban institutions of government. It's what's going on with Putin. It's what's going on with Orban. So no, we're not going to say because he was able to torture out a slender victory, not even a 50% of the vote, that we're going to bow down to his authoritarianism. Representative Raskin, thank you so much for joining me. Thanks so much for having me. Hang tough. That was my conversation with Maryland Congressman Jamie Raskin.

We'll get to more of the news in a moment, but if you like the show, make sure to subscribe, leave a five-star review on Apple Podcasts, watch us on YouTube, and share with your friends. More to come after some ads. What a Day is brought to you by Magic Spoon. Magic Spoon has turned their super popular high protein cereal into high protein treats that are light, crispy, and taste just like those crunchy cereal bars you remember from grade school. Magic Spoon's treats are so delicious and they've already become one of my favorite

on-the-go snacks. Magic Spoon is also launching a brand new high protein granola. True to the Magic Spoon promise, it's packed with protein and so crunchy and so good, perfect for breakfast or snacking, I've been having it pretty much every day. Magic Spoon's high protein treats are crispy, crunchy, and an easy way to get 12 grams of protein on the go. They come in great flavors like marshmallow, chocolate peanut butter, and dark chocolate. And Magic Spoon's brand new granola packs in 13 grams of protein and zero added sugars in amazing flavors like honey almond and peanut butter.

Get $5 off your next order at magic spoon dot com slash day or look for Magic Spoon on Amazon or in your nearest grocery store. That's magic spoon dot com slash day for $5 off. Here's what else we're following today. Headlines. Here's what else we're following today. Head of Lines. I want to warn the American people who are watching at home. You may hear lies and smears in this hearing that will challenge my loyalty to and my love for our country.

The Senate held more confirmation hearings on Trump's nominees on Thursday. Director of National Intelligence nominee Tulsi Gabbard was up first. Lawmakers had a lot of questions about the former Hawaii Congresswoman's relationship with authoritarian world leaders, like former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. I have no love for Assad or Gaddafi or any dictator. I just hate al-Qaeda.

Despite what you just heard, Gabbard has long been criticized for meeting with Assad privately when he was still in power. To this day, she has not revealed what they discussed. Not a good look for someone who wants to be in charge of the nation's secrets. Gabbard was also asked about her defense of Russian President Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine.

Democratic Senator Michael Bennet of Colorado brought up a tweet Gabbard made in 2022, on the day the war began, attacking Biden and NATO. You basically said that Putin was justified in rolling over the peaceful border of Ukraine the first time since World War Two that a free nation had been invaded by a totalitarian state and you were there at 1130 p.m. that night to say that you were with them, not us. Damn Michael Bennett, someone had his Celsius. The Senate also held a confirmation hearing for FBI Director nominee Cash Patel on Thursday.

Dems focused on whether or not Patel would use the FBI to go after Trump's political enemies if confirmed. They pointed to a list from Patel's book, a list of people he believes are part of the so-called Deep State. Democratic Senator Mazie Hirono of Hawaii asked Patel if he would investigate them if confirmed and Patel didn't exactly say no. No one that did not break the law will be investigated. Ah.

Patel was also grilled about his ties to right-wing conspiracy theorist Stu Peters. Peters is a conservative podcaster known for his Christian nationalist, neo-Nazi, and homophobic views. Patel denied knowing who he was, but senators quickly pointed out that Patel has appeared on Peters' show not once, but eight times. Roll the clip. I gotta go, Cash. Thank you so much for being here. We really appreciate it. Thanks, Stu. Up against a hard break here. Thank you so much for being here. We appreciate it. Thanks so much. Appreciate it, Stu. Cash, Patel, thank you so much for being here. We really appreciate it. Thanks, Stu. Up against a hard break here. Thank you so much for being here. We appreciate it. Thanks so much. Appreciate it, Stu.

Cash Patel, thank you so much for being here. We appreciate it. Thanks so much, Stu. Appreciate it. You've got a great show. You've got a great show, indeed. Flying under oath. Those are the kinds of qualities we're looking for to lead the FBI. And Director of Health and Human Services nominee Robert F. Kennedy Jr. sat for his second confirmation hearing Thursday. Lawmakers continued to question him about crazy things he's said in the past. At one point, Democratic Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia pointed to a tweet Kennedy made last year while running for president where he said, well, I'll let the senator say it.

You go on to say, I won't take sides as president. I won't take sides on 9-11. Wow. Wow. Panamanian president Jose Raul Molino made it clear Thursday that ownership of the Panama Canal is not up for negotiation. That's despite President Trump's fixation on taking the canal back. Molino's comments come ahead of Secretary of State Marco Rubio's diplomatic visit to the country this weekend. Trump's focus on the Panama Canal intensified in December

when he accused China of taking control of the waterway. His obsession even leaked into his inauguration speech. China is operating the Panama Canal and we didn't give it to China. We gave it to Panama and we're taking it back. For the record, China does not control the Panama Canal. The U.S. built the canal in the early 1900s. It was given to Panama by former president Jimmy Carter after the signing of two treaties in 1977. Panama took full control of the waterway in 1999. On Thursday, Molino reiterated the territory is neutral. The canal is now managed by an independent government agency, the Panama Canal Authority. Molino said he expects to meet with Rubio on Sunday.

Israel and Hamas continue to honor the conditions of their ceasefire deal on Thursday. Hamas released eight hostages from Gaza. Israel released 110 Palestinian prisoners in exchange. A key condition of the ceasefire requires Israel to make way for more humanitarian aid into the Gaza Strip. That could get complicated in the coming days. Israel's ban on the UN agency for Palestinian refugees known as UNRWA went into effect on Thursday. UNRWA has been a critical source of relief for Gazans since the start of the war in 2023. Israel passed a law last year ordering UNRWA to shut down all operations in

Jerusalem, accusing its members of taking part in the October 7th attack. Enforcing the ban could potentially violate the ceasefire deal and restart the war. The civilian death toll of Israel's war with Hamas has exceeded 47,000. Today's spacewalk includes two NASA crew members, Expedition 72 commander, who you see on the right side of your screen, NASA astronaut Sonny Williams, and Expedition 72 commander who you see on the right side of your screen NASA astronaut Suni Williams and Expedition 72 flight engineer Butch Wilmore. Remember those two NASA astronauts we talked about earlier this week? The ones Elon Musk pledged to save from the International Space Station? Well on Thursday, Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore took their first spacewalk together

after being stuck at the space station for nearly eight months. This is the 274th spacewalk in support of International Space Station's assembly, maintenance, and upgrades. Oh, and did I mention Williams performed a spacewalk with another astronaut just two weeks ago? Thursday's spacewalk was Williams' ninth. She broke a record among female astronauts, the most time spent spacewalking over a career. Sunny Williams just broke a record while completing the tasks on today's spacewalk.

Holy moly! So interesting. And that's the news. One more thing. Let's end this week with some not so bad news about Trump's executive orders. Now, if you're like me, the idea of Donald Trump's picks being in charge of climate policy makes you feel not great. And as expected, a lot of Trump's first days in office were partially occupied with efforts to overturn pretty much everything President Biden did on climate. Which was a lot of stuff.

From infrastructure to new energy initiatives, Trump has tried to reverse pretty much all of it. But it turns out that might be much harder than he thinks and for some pretty surprising reasons So to recap what Trump has done so far with climate policy. I called up crooked climate correspondent Anya Zulajewski Anya welcome to what a day. Hello. Great to be here. So Trump signed So so so many executive orders since taking office last week his administration's attacks on immigration LGBTQ plus rights, DEI, those have been the bigger headlines. But can you recap what orders the Trump administration

has made on climate and energy policy so far? You know, the TLDR version is that he really is waging war on Joe Biden's climate legacy. You know, a big headline maker was the fact that he declared the national energy emergency, which basically gives the government special powers to speed up permits for fossil fuel projects while also circumventing any sort of environmental protections. He also signed an executive order that specifically goes after wind. He's really fixated on wind. He's called it ugly. He's famously said he hates it. That order, that basically pauses leasing and

permitting for wind on federal lands and waters. He's also trying to axe efforts that support electrical vehicles and any sort of transition there. He calls for a freeze on government funds that promote a transition to clean energy. He's going after funds that are specifically in one of Joe Biden's landmark pieces of legislation, and it's the Inflation Reduction Act. And so it's actually got billions included in investments in clean energy, and it was approved by Congress. And then the final big thing that Trump did with his executive orders was mostly symbolic, removing the US from the Paris climate accord. Experts are saying that really what he effectively did

is just took the US away from the table. Like they no longer have a seat at the table when it comes to global climate action. That's like the macro view of everything he's done so far. And when it comes to those funds Trump wants to freeze, I have to ask you the same question we've been asking pretty much every day since Trump took office. Can he actually do that?

Does the executive branch have the power to freeze funds from the Inflation Reduction Act that have already been allocated by Congress? You'd certainly think he cannot. Legal experts are saying that the move is illegal. The good news is that a lot of the money has already been dispersed, and so there are no takebacksies on that one. But when it comes to anything that's still awaiting, we have seen projects paused. So time will tell, but certainly experts are saying he shouldn't be able to do it because Congress did approve the Inflation Reduction Act. And beyond the politics of it all, how seriously should we take Trump's threats to environmental policy right now? Should we be panicking hearing all of this or is this yet another case

of him just saying stuff? So far a lot of what was included in the executive orders really rings hollow. One expert called it just vibes which I thought was pretty good. For example with drill baby drill, just because he's creating room to drill doesn't mean that oil and gas companies want to just pump a ton of oil and gas into the market that actually would harm their own bottom line. And when it comes to clean energy and renewables, you know, a lot of companies that like are already committed to that transition and they don't want to hit rewind on that either. They want the US to be competitive and recent federal investments that have already gone out the door in the green economy, they

amount to more than $422 billion and have created more than 400,000 jobs, and that's mostly in red states. So that's not going away. So I want to say there's room to be optimistic while also paying attention because this will be a hard administration on climate. Anya, thank you so much for joining me. Thank you so much. It was great to be here. That was my conversation with Crooked Climate correspondent Anya Zolodzowski.

This segment was supported by our nonprofit partner, Crooked Ideas. Before we go, the next four years are going to be a challenge, but Dan Pfeiffer, co-host of Pod Save America, is here to help cut through the media noise with his message box newsletter. In the months ahead, Dan will break down the 2024 election, dive into how Democrats can rebuild their coalition, and strategize how we can take on the right-wing media machine. He'll also provide readers with guidance on where to volunteer, which campaigns matter most, and how to talk to persuadable voters about Trump's dangerous actions. Sign up now for a 30-day free trial of Messagebox at crooked.com slash yes we Dan.

That's all for today. If you liked the show, make sure you subscribe, leave a review, take a break this weekend and do some stretching and tell your friends to listen. And if you're into reading and not just about how doomscrolling is not going to do it this time, nope, like me, what a day is also a nightly newsletter. Check it out and subscribe at Crooked.com slash subscribe. I'm Jane Coaston, and go for a walk and drink some water. What A Day is a production of Crooked Media.

It's recorded and mixed by Desmond Taylor. Our associate producers are Raven Yamamoto and Emily For. Our producer is Michelle Alloy. We had production help today from Johanna Case, Joseph Dutra, Greg Walters, and Emily Four. Our producer is Michelle Alloy. We had production help today from Johanna Case, Joseph Dutra, Greg Walters, and Julia Clare. Our senior producer is Erica Morrison, and our executive producer is Adrian Hill. Our theme music is by Colin Giliard and Kashaka. Our production staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of America East.