What A Day - Trump’s Dept. of Just Us

Episode Date: February 17, 2025

The Justice Department is in turmoil after more than half a dozen federal prosecutors resigned rather than sign their names to a motion to dismiss corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. It's the latest indication that the Trump administration plans to use the DOJ, now led by Attorney General Pam Bondi, as an extension of the president's political agenda above all else. Ken White, a former federal prosecutor and current criminal defense attorney who writes the 'Popehat' newsletter, talks about what the crisis at the DOJ means for the agency charged with enforcing federal laws.And in headlines: The U.S. seems ready to sideline Zelensky and Europe in favor of starting peace talks with Russia to end the war in Ukraine, thousands of federal workers at the CDC and NIH lose their jobs, and phase two of the ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas is in doubt.Show Notes:Check out Ken's newsletter – https://www.popehat.com/Subscribe to the What A Day Newsletter – https://tinyurl.com/3kk4nyz8Support victims of the fire – votesaveamerica.com/reliefWhat A Day – YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/@whatadaypodcastFollow us on Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/crookedmedia/For a transcript of this episode, please visit crooked.com/whataday

It's Monday, February 17th. I'm Jane Coaston, and this is What a Day. Happy President's Day to all who celebrate. And since I'm not super into this particular president, I'm thinking about a president I like more. Like President James Garfield, who seems fine, but died in 1881 not because he was shot by Charles Gouteau, but because a doctor named Doctor, yes, a doctor named Doctor, didn't wash its hands before messing around with the wound. So Doctor Doctor Willard Bliss killed a president.

There's a fun fact for you. On today's show, thousands more federal workers are fired by the Trump administration. And phase two of the ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas is in doubt. But let's start with the Department of Justice, because right now the DOJ is in a real and very serious crisis. Last week, the Justice Department ordered attorneys to drop corruption charges against

New York City Mayor Eric Adams. Emile Beauvais, the acting U.S. Deputy Attorney General, issued a memo last Monday saying that the charges were getting in the way of Adams' ability to fight illegal immigration and violent crime. In case you may have forgotten, those charges stemmed from allegedly improper gifts and illegal campaign contributions Adams got from various entities going back a decade. When federal prosecutors announced those charges in September, they made it clear that they believed those gifts were being made in exchange for preferential treatment from Adams. But according to the Trump administration, that's all good now. No worries on taking those steeply discounted flights on

Turkish Airlines. What really matters is whether or not Eric Adams can do what the Trump administration wants him to do. That's the argument Danielle Sassoon, the former acting US attorney for the Southern District of New York and a Trump appointee, made in her resignation letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi. She said that Adams' attorneys wanted a clear quid pro quo. Drop the charges and Adams will do what Trump wants. According to anonymous sources who spoke with multiple media outlets, when Bove referred the case to the DOJ's public integrity section,

those attorneys resigned too. In fact, it took until Friday afternoon when Bove demanded someone put their name on the dismissal documents or be forced out for one attorney to do so. As folks on the left and right have pointed out, this is the weaponization of law enforcement, or as the conservative magazine National Review put it, the politicization of law enforcement. Because as the Wall Street Journal pointed out, the DOJ could still prosecute him after the 2025 mayoral elections, making it clear that if Eric Adams wants to stay out of jail, he has to do what the DOJ and the Trump

administration want. The Justice Department now seems to operate on a policy in which friends of Trump or people who want to be can get special perks with big downsides. Here's border czar, Tom Homan with Adams on Fox and Friends on Friday. If he doesn't come through, I'll be back in New York City and we won't be sitting on the couch, I'll be in his office, up his butt saying, where the hell is the agreement we came to? That seems like a political hostage situation to me. If the DOJ now works on a friends and family discount policy where all you have

to do is just do what Trump wants and your charges magically go away, that's bad. That's bad for the department. That's bad for its prosecutors. That's bad for the rule of law. And that's just bad for us as Americans. Period. So to explain more about the situation and what it means, I had to talk to Ken White. He's a former federal prosecutor and current criminal defense attorney who writes the PO-PAT newsletter. Ken, welcome back to What A Day. Ken White It's good to be back here, even under these circumstances.

Lauren Henry Yeah, speaking of that, more than half a dozen federal prosecutors resigned rather than sign their name to a motion to dismiss corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. As a former federal prosecutor, can you explain what a big deal that is? Sure. That sort of thing just doesn't happen very often at all. It's very reminiscent, of course, of the Saturday Night Massacre during the Nixon administration, only far, far stupider. The heart of this here was that the Trump administration had decided to dismiss the charges against New York Mayor Eric Adams,

and its reasons for doing so were rather transparently bogus. Some of these federal prosecutors, none of them woke liberals, were not good with this. They did not feel comfortable putting their names to documents that made what they felt were misrepresentations to the court about the reasons that the case was being dismissed. One after the other, they refused. Some of them refused in pretty extreme public terms that the current heads of the Justice Department did not take well at all. So stupider than the Saturday Night Massacre, how? Because obviously this is still a very big deal. And the whole thing seems to be, again, it's like extremely obvious quid pro quo. But can

you explain that comparison a little? Well, with the Saturday Night Massacre for all those young whelps in the audience who went around then was when Nixon ordered the various people acting as attorney general to fire the special prosecutor. Two of them refused and resigned. That was over a matter of principle of whether or not the president could fire

the special prosecutor, whether he had the power to do so, particularly because the reason was that he was getting close to Nixon. This, though, is about whether or not prosecutors will sign their name to a transparently bogus explanation for why they are dismissing the criminal case against Eric Adams. The narrative that the Justice Department has decided upon was that this was retaliation for Eric Adams' anti-immigration stance and that being prosecuted made it too difficult for him

to serve as mayor and be an anti-immigration mayor. For this, they wanted to dismiss the case without prejudice with the understanding that would allow him to do his job as the Trump administration saw it. You hear a lot the word unprecedented, but I am aware of no other instance in American history where the federal government has held possible charges over the head of an elected state or local official saying if you don't do things our way, we come back and continue this federal prosecution of you run related conduct. It's pretty much astounding and I think that's also largely a loyalty test in other words it's a it's a test of your capacity to pretend that the emperor has clothes.

It's a test of whether or not you will say, oh, yes, there's no quid pro quo. This is a good reason to dismiss, when in fact it's transparently clear that there is no good reason to dismiss and that this is purely political. Now, should I just start getting flowers together for Attorney General Pan Bondi so that I am not prosecuted?

Because this seems to say something about how the Justice Department under Trump will be run, which is, for my friends, everything, for my enemies, the law. What do you think it says? I think it says that and also it just says, this is part of the the Trump administration emphasis on the Supreme Executive. Pan Bondi immediately, she came in as AG, issued a memorandum that talked about prosecutors who wanted to make good faith objections to things they were asked to do. What she said is there is no such thing.

You're here to do the president's agenda and if you don't, you'll be fired. The thing is, the history of the Justice Department, the history of Assistant U.S. Attorneys is that they are supposed to serve the Constitution of the United States and America, the American people. They are not the President's lawyers. They are not supposed to carry out a presidential agenda unless it's like emphasis on different areas of what crime should be emphasized to be prosecuted. But to basically say, no, you cannot object that what you're being asked to do is unethical and your agenda is the president's agenda, your purpose is to serve the president, is a dramatic departure from history for the Justice Department. DC's interim US attorney, Edward Martin Jr., also sent Elon Musk a letter earlier this

month saying he would chase people who acted unethically to the ends of the earth. Can you unpack that for us specifically the part about acting unethically? So this was a letter in response to some reports that people were more or less saying mean things about the juvenile sociopaths that Elon Musk has wandering around trying to dismantle parts of the government. The new US attorney for the District of Columbia, Ed Martin, sent this truly nauseating letter, fawning over Elon Musk and one of his lieutenants, calling him Elon, saying, thank you so much for referring this to me. And yes, anyone who commits a crime or does something unethical will pursue them to the ends of the earth.

A couple of things about that. First of all, the US attorney doesn't fawn over political figures like that in a normal world. That is gross. And the US attorney does not pursue people for unethical things. They pursue them for federal crimes. Now, Congress can investigate unethical things. They pursue them for federal crimes. Congress can investigate unethical things. Offices of Inspector General can do that if there are any left, but the

U.S. Attorney doesn't investigate lack of ethics. This is pretty clearly just a saber-rattling threat by this new U.S. Attorney to say, we're on your side, we're here to do anything you want. And it's done just in such a nauseatingly obsequious way that every current or former assistant US attorney I knew was just, it turned our stomach. It's terrible. We've also seen top Justice Department officials demand a list of employees who worked on the January 6th cases. There are fears that this could lead to the firing of as many as 5,000 people. A few dozen DOJ prosecutors have already been dismissed for their work on January 6th cases.

What would that kind of mass firing do to the functioning of the Justice Department as a whole? Because I think people don't quite understand how big DOJ is. Department of Justice is huge, and it's got thousands of lawyers and many more thousands of other employees. Yes, this could dramatically impair its ability to function, which may be a feature rather than a bug. We've had before pretty big sort of shifts in the priorities of the Justice Department.

Notably, when I was a young lawyer, after 9-11, the Justice Department dramatically changed its priorities from white collar type stuff to more meat and potatoes, violent crime, drugs, immigration, that type of thing. So part of that is this change in agenda, but part of it is also just this pure for the king everything decision to retaliate against and expel people perceived to be as potentially disloyal because they worked on cases against Trump or against the January 6 rioters. To the extent they carry that further than they already have with the firing of dozens of people, then yes, it's going to blow a big hole in the ability of the Justice Department

to do the things it normally does. But again, with the Justice Department that has decided it is not going to go after corruption, it is not going to go after civil rights, it's not going to go after environmental crime, it's not going to go after police abuse, maybe they don't need all those attorneys if what they're going to do is just go after the people they don't like. I think a couple of DOJ officials have basically said that people who were just carrying out duties and following orders from superiors faced no risk of being fired. But do we know how they'd be determining that? What's the mood inside the agency, do you think? Oh, it's terrible. And the mood

inside the US Attorney's offices is very glum, very grim. These are offices that generally people don't become an assistant US attorney because they're super progressive. It often goes more conservative, but it's not Trumpist. Generally they believe in the rule of law. They believe that you have to follow the law, that type of thing. Otherwise they wouldn't be there. This sort of turn to the king can do anything he wants is very grim to them. Same with the FBI.

The FBI has always had its own issues, but it too is very invested in the concept of the rule of law. When you throw it out the window, it upsets them. It makes them feel they don't know what they're doing. All these people, with the exception of the appointed US attorney for each district, all these people have civil service protections. The administration is just ignoring those and basically saying, sue us, we don't care. And so that's what's going to start happening. A lot of lawsuits with this administration, I suspect, arguing

that all these civil service protections are unconstitutional to the extent they limit the executive's unrestrained right to do whatever he wants. We are not even a month into Trump's second term, and already we're using terms like constitutional crisis and referencing the Saturday Night Massacre. Going forward, what are your big fears for the DOJ if it continues to be run this way? Well, we're getting there awfully fast. We're speed running this as we go through it. My concerns are when they start weaponizing DOJ against opponents.

So they've done that in the sense of firing people. They have not yet started to do it in terms of prosecuting and investigating people at least in a way that's public. But there are signs that that could happen. We've already started to see glimmerings of that with the FCC, with the FCC under its new director going after CBS, going after a local station that broadcasts news about local ICE activities, things like that. So that would be one really big concern. And of course, violence and the response to it is also a big concern. This weekend, the president said, where's the effect if the president – if it's done to save the country, it's not against the law, which is a very sort of fascist sentiment.

And so the concern is that that's not just a statement of what he's going to do, but a signal to people who might use violence in support of the administration that they're free to do so and they will not be restrained. Those are some of my biggest concerns. But are they not already kind of using the agency against their opponents? Bondi filed a lawsuit against New York, the governor, the attorney general, and yes, they said it's over their immigration policies. But it doesn't seem like a coincidence that AG Letitia James also won a big civil case against Trump and his businesses.

It's not, but that one was an example of the way I hope it goes. A lot of bluster without much substance. In that case, Bondi came out and said, we've just filed charges against Letitia James and all these people. Now, what she actually meant is that they had filed a civil lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of a New York statute. Now, that's actually the way it should work. If the federal government thinks a state statute is unconstitutional, then they should challenge

it in court. That's the rule of law. That's the way we want it to work. And the court will sort it out. And that's what we want to happen. Ken, as always, thank you so much for being here. Thank you. It's always a pleasure. That was my conversation with Ken White. He's a former federal prosecutor and current criminal defense attorney who writes the Popat Newsletter. We'll get to more of the news in a moment.

But if you like the show, make sure to subscribe, leave a five-star review on Apple Podcasts, watch us on YouTube, and share with your friends. More to come after some ads. What a Day is brought to you by Magic Spoon. Magic Spoon has turned their super popular high protein cereal into high protein treats that are light, crispy, and taste just like those crunchy cereal bars you remember from being a kid. Magic Spoon's treats are so delicious and have already become my favorite on-the-go gym snack.

Magic Spoon is also launching a brand new high protein granola. True to the Magic Spoon promise, it's packed with protein and so crunchy and sweet, perfect for breakfast or snacking. I've been having them pretty much every morning to fuel my workouts. Magic Spoon's high protein treats are crispy, crunchy, airy, and an easy way to get 12 grams of protein on the go. They come in mouth-watering flavors like marshmallow, chocolate peanut butter, and dark chocolate, perfect for after a workout. And Magic Spoon's brand new granola packs in 13 grams of protein and zero added sugars,

becoming delicious flavors like honey almond and peanut butter. Get $5 off your next order at magic spoon.com slash day, or look for Magic Spoon on Amazon or in your nearest grocery store. That's magic spoon.com slash day for $5 off. Here's what else we're following today. Headlines. Here's what else we're following today. I really believe that time has come.

The armed forces of Europe must be created. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Saturday called on the European Union to establish its own military to defend itself against Russia. Zelensky made the remarks during a speech at the Munich Security Conference. The war on Ukraine was top of mind for European leaders ahead of the three year anniversary of Russia's invasion. But the Trump administration seems not super interested in what Ukraine has to say about ending Russia's invasion of...

Ukraine. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and a team of U.S. diplomats are set to meet with Russian officials to start peace talks in Saudi Arabia this week. Zalensky said that Ukraine has not been invited to any upcoming negotiations with Russia and the U.S. He talked about it in an interview with NBC that aired Sunday. I will never accept any decisions between the United States and Russia about Ukraine.

Never. Rubio told CBS that Ukraine will eventually join the conversation. Ukraine will have to be involved because they're the one that were invaded. Oh, really? Huh. But back to the Munich Security Conference. Vice President JD Vance also addressed European leaders on Friday, and it was weird. Instead of focusing on the war in Ukraine like literally everyone else, Vance downplayed

Russia's invasion. And he lectured officials about how they should be more concerned with immigration and restrictions on free speech. The threat that I worry the most about vis-a-vis Europe is not Russia, it's not China, it's not any other external actor. And what I worry about is the threat from within. Officials did not take kindly to Vance's remarks. German Chancellor Olaf Schulz tweeted on Friday that he, quote,

expressly rejects the vice president's speech. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu held a joint press conference with Secretary of State Rubio on Sunday. Netanyahu called President Donald Trump's plan to remove Palestinians from Gaza, quote, the only viable plan to enable a different future. The conference in Jerusalem came just a day after Israel and Hamas finished their sixth trade of Israeli hostages and Palestinian prisoners.

Three Israeli hostages and nearly 400 Palestinian prisoners were released. Two weeks remain in the first phase of the ceasefire. Netanyahu said Sunday he's working closely with Trump and that the dozens of hostages still held by Hamas will be released, even if it takes the use of force. And we can't always share the details of this strategy with the public, including when the gates of hell will be opened, as they surely will if all our hostages are not released until the last one of them.

President Trump said Sunday on the tarmac after attending the Daytona 500 that he's given Netanyahu the green light to bring the remaining hostages back by any means necessary. I told Bibi you do whatever you want because you know my statement was they gotta come back now. A finalized deal for the second phase of the ceasefire still hasn't materialized. The next phase broadly calls for the release of the remaining Israeli hostages in exchange for more Palestinian prisoners and the withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza. But the ceasefire remains fragile.

Marco Rubio said Sunday Hamas quote, must be eradicated, throwing the longevity of the deal into doubt. President Trump on Sunday asked the Supreme Court to let him fire the head of an agency that protects whistleblowers. The filing seeks to overturn a temporary restraining order that protects the U.S. Office of Special Counsel from Trump's recent firings, because there's been a lot of them. Trump fired as many as 17 inspectors general just days after taking office, attributing their termination to, quote, changing priorities. These are people who investigate and audit federal agencies to prevent fraud, waste,

and abuse. Federal law is supposed to protect them from being fired for partisan reasons. A group of eight inspectors general filed a lawsuit last week claiming their firings were politically motivated and therefore illegal. reasons. A group of eight inspectors general filed a lawsuit last week claiming their firings were politically motivated and therefore illegal. One of the fired inspectors, Robert Storch, who used to work for the Defense Department, told CNN recently the firings are concerning. Yeah, it's very troubling and particularly doing it in the widespread way they did and without giving Congress and through Congress, the American public any rationale.

But a Biden appointed federal judge ruled against the inspectors general on Friday. The lawsuit was thrown out primarily for procedural reasons, but their suit might still proceed on a slower timeline. The Trump administration laid off thousands of employees at the Centers for Disease Control and the National Institutes of Health over the weekend. CDC staffers were notified on Friday that the agency is cutting 1,300 jobs, about 10% of its workforce. The NIH laid off 1,500 employees that same day.

The layoffs targeted probationary employees at both agencies. These are typically new hires or existing employees who have recently been promoted. A federal official told the Associated Press that workers who were laid off will get a month of paid administrative leave. The verbal announcement came directly from the Department of Health and Human Services during a meeting with CDC leaders. The department said in a written statement on Friday

that the job cuts were part of the Trump administration's bigger mission to downsize the federal workforce, and that the job cuts would, quote, ensure that HHS better serves the American people at the highest and most efficient standard. Because firing thousands of highly educated people who have devoted their lives to studying human disease and preventing disease outbreaks is

absolutely what this country needs right now. And that's the news. Before we go, this month Vote Save America is making donations as part of their Anxiety Relief Program to Black-led organizations and candidates of color helping us gain ground at the state and local level. Like Power to the Polls and the Black Male Initiative, which are working to change the way we organize Black, Brown, and working-class communities to drive voter turnout. Like Kimberly Pope Adams,

who's running for a Virginia state house seat this year, a prime opportunity to expand the Democrats' one-seat majority. Set up a recurring donation at any amount that feels right for you, and Vote Save America will use it to build progressive power in 2025 and beyond. Go to vote save America dot com slash donate to donate now. This message is paid for by Vote Save America, vote save America dot com. Not authorized by any candidate or candidates committee. That's all for today. If you like the show, make sure you subscribe, leave a review. Remember that if you're going to mass fire people, perhaps don't mass fire the people in charge of the nukes,

then tell your friends to listen. And if you're into reading and not just about how yes, roughly 300 staff at the National Nuclear Security Administration were fired on Thursday, and then someone was like, wait, they handle our nuclear weapons stockpile, and currently the administration is trying to unfire them, like me? What A Day is also a nightly newsletter. Check it out and subscribe at crooked.com slash subscribe. I'm Jane Coaston, and this moment would almost be kind of funny if it weren't so fucking stupid and bad.

What A Day is a production of Crooked Media. It's recorded and mixed by Desmond Taylor. Our associate producers are Raven Yamamoto and Emily Four. Our producer is Michelle Eloy. We had production help today from Tyler Hill, Johanna Case, Joseph Dutra, Greg Walters, and Julia Clare. Our senior producer is Erica Morrison,

and our executive producer is Adrian Hill. Our theme music is by Colin, Gileard and Kshaka. Our production staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of America East.