What A Day - Trump’s Next Chat Scandal: The Coverup

Episode Date: March 27, 2025

The Atlantic published the entire Signal conversation centered on strikes on Houthi militants in Yemen between multiple administration officials and, mistakenly, Atlantic editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg. Paul Rosenzweig, the former deputy assistant secretary for policy at the Department of Homeland Security under President George W. Bush, joins us to give us some context on the scale of the Signalgate scandal and what it would mean under any other president.And in headlines: Trump announced 25% tariffs on imported cars, the Supreme Court upheld requirements to regulate ghost-guns, and a Democrat defied all odds and flipped a seat in the Pennsylvania State Senate.Show Notes:Check out Paul's story – https://tinyurl.com/3nn8zr3jSubscribe to the What A Day Newsletter – https://tinyurl.com/3kk4nyz8Support victims of the fire – votesaveamerica.com/reliefWhat A Day – YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/@whatadaypodcastFollow us on Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/crookedmedia/For a transcript of this episode, please visit crooked.com/whataday

It's Thursday, March 27th. I'm Jane Coaston. This is What a Day, the show celebrating Will Smith for getting a street named after him in West Philadelphia, where he was born and raised. You know, on the playground where he spent most of his days. Chilling out, maxing, relaxing all cool, and as I recall, shooting some b-ball outside of the school. On today's show, surprise!

President Donald Trump has gifted automakers with double-digit tariffs for cars made outside of the U.S. and the Supreme Court upholds a Biden rule on ghost guns. But let's start with Signalgate, the controversy that continues to royal Capitol Hill. On Wednesday morning, The Atlantic published the full Signal conversation centered on strikes on Houthi militants in Yemen between multiple administration officials and, mistakenly, Atlantic Editor-in-Chief Jeffrey Goldberg. Trump administration officials had emphasized on pretty much every platform there is that nothing classified was in the conversation, but I did find it interesting that when asked by The Atlantic, White House Press Secretary Caroline Levitt said in an email, quote, This was intended to be a an internal and private deliberation

amongst high level senior staff and sensitive information was discussed. She went on to object to the release of the totally not classified totally fine for signal information. Sure. The chat itself contained a ton of information. Timings about when, quote, the first bombs will definitely drop and details about intelligence gathered at attack sites. And interestingly, a real-time debate about doing the strikes in the first place,

with Vice President JD Vance voicing concerns that doing so helped Europe because quote, I just hate bailing out Europe again. And that information, particularly the specific timings, if exposed beforehand, could have put American troops at real risk, as Colorado Democratic Representative Jason Crowe attempted to explain on Fox News Wednesday. Let me explain how an SA-3 and an SA-6 works. These are the two systems that the Houthis have that they got from the Russians. If they know that aircraft are flying over a region or an area, not even a specific target, they can launch an SA-3 and an SA-6, much like they did when they

shot down the MQ-9 Reaper drone last year. So they don't need to know the exact location. In layman's terms, yeah, the Houthi rebels could have absolutely shut down American aircraft and killed American service members with this information. Now, let's be real here. This is the Trump administration. And unlike the first Trump administration, there are no adults in the room this time. Unless you count FBI Director Cash Patel and, um, you shouldn't. So I am not expecting an independent investigation

into how this happened. But I wanted to get some context on the scale of the scandal and what it would mean under pretty much any other president. So I had to talk to Paul Rosenzweig. He was a Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy at the Department of Homeland Security under President George W. Bush, and he teaches cybersecurity

at George Washington University Law School. Paul, welcome to What A Day. Thanks for having me. I think National Security Advisor Mike Wallace has been the most critical of this signal snafu thing. But what do you make of the overall line from the Trump administration and Trump himself that this is no big deal, even while many in the intelligence community and most people watching this see this as an extraordinary security breach.

You have to be exceedingly credulous and unreservedly pro-Trump to think that this is not a big deal. To be sure, nobody died, which is to say that they only included a responsible journalist who kept quiet. But we don't even need to imagine that it was a Russian on the call. It could easily have been another journalist, perhaps one with a different value set, who immediately published this information on social media, X, blue sky, wherever, at grave risk to American pilots.

So it sounds like, and I've been thinking about this, they got exceedingly lucky. So what should the White House response be? Well, without demanding people being fired, which they won't do, ban the use of signal for all high-level actors. Mandate that all future discussions of anything trenching on classified or military activity take place in the channels that are built for this. At a minimum, all the people need to be retrained. The signal, uh, app needs to be taken off their phones. Uh, and, uh, and the president needs to admonish them that if it ever happens again, they're out of work.

I mean, they should be out of work now. I mean, that's really what they should do. But I'm trying to be reasonable in answering your question in a way that might actually be responsive to what Trump should do. How would previous administrations have handled a scandal? And I'm going to call it a scandal. It is a scandal. We are calling it a scandal.

But how would they have handled something of this nature? Well, first off, I don't think that they would have happened to them. But I can tell you about what happened to me personally in this nature. I was participating in the discussion of a briefing that was to be given by the secretary I was working for to the President of the United States and it was supposed to be an unclassified briefing. So we were working on it and editing it on unclassified systems. Somebody accidentally, I mean completely inadvertently, included one slide that had classified information.

Once that was realized, all of the emails and versions of that were collected and destroyed from our unclassified system. I had to give my computer personally, the one I'd been using, to a security officer who swept it for the classified information and overwrote where that had been on my hard drive with random information. It took them two days before they gave me my computer back. And all I had done was be the inadvertent recipient.

And then all of us got a retraining lecture, if you will, on, you know, let's be careful out there. And it was completely accidental, but, you know, that's what a past administration did. And it's routine, I think. Should be routine. Is this the sort of situation where a special counsel could or should be brought in? Or short of that, what are the other legal options available to the administration in

a world in which they believed that they should face consequences. Well, if we lived in that mythical world. I mean, well, first off, before I get to the special counsel, another reason to ban the use of Signal is because Signal has the disappearing message functionality. These are, without a doubt, presidential records that ought to be subject to the Presidential Records Act and thus preserved for posterity even in a classified form until they're released in 50 years like JFK's assassination files were just released. As for special counsel, I guess I'm not really a fan of that. I don't value prosecuting people for gross negligence at a criminal level. To be fair, clearly none of this was a deliberate effort, a purposeful effort to

expose our war plans, say, to the Russians. Right, but these are cabinet officials. This is, you know, the Vice President of the United States speaking to the Secretary of Defense about war plans and then responding with flag and fist emojis. I mean, they are miserable human beings who should never have been elected. They are clowns who are not competent. But I tend to think, I mean, we've only used the gross negligence prosecution statute once before and that was with respect to Julian Assange. We usually reserve criminality for purposeful malicious intent and conduct and think deliberate

leaking. I 100% think that if we actually had say, inspectors general still, which we don't because Trump fired them all, this would be a ripe topic for inspector general investigation if we had a Congress that had a spine which we don't this would be a right subject for congressional inquiry in the intelligence committees yeah we don't have any of that so what what then? You're asking a bigger question than a signal gate, right? I mean, for four years I've been saying that the electorate has to save us and they didn't. For four years I've been saying that Congress needs to change what it's doing and they haven't.

For four years I've been saying that the courts are good but not enough and that's still true. You know, I mean the American people are getting what they voted for. They voted for a man who prizes loyalty over competence and this is a painful demonstration that they got exactly what they voted for. Is there a situation where you could imagine This is a painful demonstration that they got exactly what they voted for.

Is there a situation where you could imagine the administration would be actually compelled to really look into this? What would it take for the administration? Now, keep in mind, you and I both know who is involved in this administration. What would it take for this administration to take this seriously? If it were to recur, but the leak went to the Chinese People's Liberation Army, or if it were to recur, and American soldiers died because of the negligence.

There's very little I can imagine that would motivate Donald Trump to admit he's wrong. He never does. And I've been thinking about the ways in which the Trump administration has attempted to flatten all means by which it can be stopped, including threatening outside law firms who have worked with Democrats or for Democratic causes. If the administration is squashing dissent from within, both with its hires and with its firing, and threatening outside firms too, where does that leave us?

In a difficult place. I just published an article in the Atlantic about how law firms need to step up and how Paul Weiss is a craven, coward institution. The law firm Paul Weiss, yes. Yeah, I'm sorry, the law firm, Paul Weiss. Perhaps the adverse publicity there will embolden other law firms to step up.

I saw a couple of congressmen and representatives, Don Bacon, for example, calling for an investigation. If four Republicans are willing to vote with the Democrats to start one, maybe we can get something in the House of Representatives. But it's just very hard and very difficult to do. Paul, thank you so much for being here. Thank you for having me.

I appreciate it very much. That was my conversation with Paul Rosenzweig, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy at the Department of Homeland Security under President George W. Bush. We'll get to more of the news in a moment, but if you like the show, make sure to subscribe, leave a five-star review on Apple Podcasts, watch us on YouTube, and share with your friends. More to come after some ads. What a day is brought to you by NutriFull. You should love your hair, but that can be hard to do if you're dealing with shedding or thinning.

Luckily, NutriFull is here to help. Their whole body approach to hair health works from the inside out, so you can start loving your hair again. NutriFull is the number one dermatologist-recommended hair growth supplement brand, trusted by over 1.5 million people. You can see thicker, stronger, faster growing hair with less shedding in just 3-6 months with Neutrophil. Everyone's root causes of hair thinning are different, so a one-size-fits-all approach

to hair growth doesn't work. Neutrophil has multiple formulas that are tailored to give your hair what it needs to grow throughout different stages, such as postpartum and menopause, as well as for different lifestyles, such as plant-based diets. And while many supplements rely solely on ingredient studies, Nutrifol clinically tests final formulations to ensure their efficacy. In a clinical study, 86% of women reported improved hair growth after taking Nutrifol Women hair growth supplement for 6 months.

Physician formulated with 100% drug-free ingredients, Nutrifol supplements support visibly thicker, stronger hair from within by targeting root causes of thinning, including stress, hormones, aging, nutrition, lifestyle, and metabolism as they evolve throughout a woman's life. Start your hair growth journey with Nutrifol. For a limited time, Nutrifol is offering our listeners $10 off your first month's subscription and free shipping when you go to NutriFull.com and enter the promo code DAY. Find out why over 4,500 healthcare professionals and stylists recommend NutriFull for healthier hair. NutriFull.com spelled N-U-T-R-A-F-O-L.com promo code DAY. That's NutriFull.com promo code day. That's neutrophil.com promo code day.

Here's what else we're following today. Headlines. What we're going to be doing is a 25% tariff on all cars that are not made in the United States. If they're made in the United States, it's absolutely no tariff. Trump announced more tariffs Wednesday, this time on cars. The president signed an executive order to impose 25% tariffs on vehicles not made in the U.S. That is a huge jump from the current U.S.

tax on imported cars, which stands at 2.5%. Here's Trump speaking to reporters in the Oval Office telling them that this is the greatest thing ever and we all win. I think we're going to have a market the likes of which nobody's ever seen before, not in this country. You know, we had the best market ever in my first term. It was the strongest market ever, the best economy ever. And I think you're going to, I think this blows it away.

Experts say these new tariffs could drive the cost of cars up by as much as $10,000. Shares of automakers, including Tesla, fell on Wednesday before the tariffs were announced. Trump also said these new auto tariffs are permanent, by the way. So to recap, the U.S. now has double-digit tariffs on foreign cars, aluminum, steel, as well as imports from China, Canada, and Mexico. And more on the way. Remember those reciprocal tariffs Trump promised earlier this month? The ones that are supposed to go into effect next week? The president said that those are most definitely happening.

FUN! The Supreme Court upheld requirements aimed at regulating ghost guns, a win for gun control advocates. Ghost gun parts can be bought in kits online and assembled at home, making them really hard to trace. The regulations were issued by the Biden administration and include requirements from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, such as gun components must have serial numbers

and that buyers go through background checks. In the 72 decision Wednesday, Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote, quote, home hobbyists enjoy assembling them, but criminals also find them attractive. Gorsuch noted one of the gun kits, quote, comes with all necessary components and its intended function as instrument of combat is obvious.

Really, the kit's name says it all, buy, build, shoot. Conservative justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas both dissented. The legal challenge was brought by gun rights groups and ghost gun vendors. A Justice Department spokesperson said the administration will continue to support and defend the Second Amendment rights of all Americans. To be clear, it was not a Second Amendment ruling. And now, some good election news for once.

Honestly, very excited, obviously, and really, really happy that all the work that we put in has paid off. Democratic candidate James Malone flipped a seat in the Pennsylvania State Senate, thinning the Republican majority in the chamber. Just a reminder, there are no off years. State and local elections are happening all the time, and they have a huge impact on your community. Malone, the current mayor of East Petersburg,

beat out his Republican opponent by less than 1% of the vote. He'll go on to represent the state's 36th district in Lancaster County. The mayor's victory was shocking given that President Donald Trump won the district by 15 points in the 2024 election. The last time a Democrat held the seat was 1890. Malone spoke to a local NBC affiliate Wednesday about his victory. On the floor, the everyday voters are not liking what they're seeing in the federal level. They don't like the chaos. And, you know, we want to be sure that we as Pennsylvania are standing up for our neighbors and are standing up for our state.

The GOP majority in the state Senate now stands at 27 to 23. In a tale as old as time, Republicans in Congress are once again threatening federal funding for national public radio and public broadcasting. You know, because Elmo is a communist and Curious George has been asking too many tough questions. The heads of NPR and PBS were on Capitol Hill Wednesday to testify in front of the new House subcommittee delivering on government efficiency. Or doge.

It's chaired by Georgia Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene. So you can imagine how this went. This means that PBS is one of the founders of the trans child abuse industry, all while taking taxpayer money. Brainwashing and transing children is an issue so hated by parents across the country that it was a driving force in the landslide Republican and Trump victory in the 2024 election cycle and presidential race. She has clearly seen some episodes of Arthur that were not available in my area and missed the educational programming on what landslides are. The fight over federal funding for PBS and NPR has been going on for decades,

all the way back to when Richard Nixon was president. And for just as long, NPR and PBS have been fighting allegations of left-wing bias. In this foul year of our Lord 2025, it was president and CEO of PBS Paula Kerger's turn to call bullshit on these claims, but in the most public media way possible. There's nothing more American than PBS. As a membership organization, our local service

is at the heart of our work. Our job at PBS is to support our stations so that local stations can serve their communities. We've been proudly fulfilling our mission for nearly 60 years, using the public airwaves and other technologies to help educate, engage and inspire the American people. But this time around, the threat is a little more real. Because Republicans control all branches of government, Trump's Federal Communications Commission Chair has also opened investigations into both PBS and NPR. For context, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting gets about $535 million annually in federal funding

to help pay for NPR and PBS stations. A lot of that money helps stations in rural parts of the country stay afloat. And it is a teeny tiny fraction of the federal government's $6.8 trillion budget. I think this is where we break in for a pledge drive. And that's the news. One more thing. I'm sorry, I cannot let this story go. But if you're a normal person, or the founder of Barstool Sports, or even at least one Republican Senator, you know that SignalGate is bad. Here's Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski agreeing with me. I'm worried about everybody and how they have handled this signal controversy. Yes, I am also worried Senator, because top members of the Trump administration, all chatting about high level military escapades and unencrypted app is to me, not ideal. So it has certainly been interesting to see the many, many ways that members of this administration and its biggest supporters have been trying to spin the

scandal. The first spin as always is actually everything is awesome. Here's press secretary Caroline Levitt explaining that we should be thrilled about this. The American people should be grateful to these individuals and especially to President Trump for putting together such a competent and highly qualified team who are killing terrorists that the Biden administration allowed to run wild in the Middle East. Girl, come on. And not to be outdone in the, well, I can't use the word I'm thinking about right now, but let's go with obsequious Olympics.

Here's Fox News' Will Cain trying to make a signal group chat containing the worst guys ever into Abraham Lincoln's team of rivals. You and I have been told for years that President Trump surrounds himself by yes-men, lackeys. But now, through this leak and unadvertant transparency, you see a team not just of disruptors but of rivals with thoughtful deliberation, with authenticity, who they are privately or who they are publicly. Okay. Now, another spin effort was more specific. Very, very specific. See, the title of the original Atlantic piece on Signalgate was,

the Trump administration accidentally texted me its war plans. And when Atlantic editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg published the text you'd seen, that article was entitled, Here are the attack plans that Trump's advisors shared on Signal. Now again, you're probably a normal person, and you're thinking, there really isn't that big a difference between attack plans and war plans. But that's why you're not working for the Trump administration. Here's Defense Secretary Hegseth defending himself on Wednesday, again. Nobody's texting war plans.

Well, I noticed this morning out came something that doesn't look like war plans. And as a matter of fact, they even changed the title to attack plans because they know it's not war plans. Now, a funny thing I learned on Twitter is via our guest on yesterday's show, the Wall Street Journal's Alex Ward.

He did some reporting and found that some military officials think that attack plans, specific details about an operation, are more sensitive than war plans, the full-scale operation for something like the invasion of Ukraine. So arguably, sharing, quote, attack on a god damn texting app is worse. And seriously Trump officials, do you really want to do a semantics debate with Democrats because you will lose every time. But then again, Hegseth reverted back to spin number one. Everything is super cool.

Here he is on CNN. I know exactly what I'm doing, exactly what we're directing. In general, I have found that people who say I know exactly what I'm doing, exactly what we're directing. In general, I have found that people who say, I know exactly what I'm doing, rarely do. Now, you may have noticed that the president of the United States has been absent from the spin session. But don't worry, Trump is on top of it and definitely knows what signal is. Here he is on Newsmax. What it was, we believe, is somebody that was on the line with permission, somebody that was with Mike Waltz, worked for Mike Waltz at a lower level, had, I guess Goldberg's

number or call through the app, and somehow this guy ended up on the call. He 100% thinks this was a phone call. So in total, this was a phone call that wasn't a phone call about attack plans, not war plans. And the phone call that wasn't a phone call was awesome. And we should all be proud of it. As always, hooray for Donald Trump. Great.

Before we go on the newest episode of Assembly Required, Stacey Abrams sits down with Skye Perriman, president and CEO of Democracy Forward, to break down Trump's most brazen legal battles, from ignoring federal injunctions to unlawfully detaining immigrants. Then, Mandela Barnes joins to discuss Wisconsin's crucial Supreme Court race, an election that could reshape 2025. Tune into this important conversation now on the Assembly Required Feed or on YouTube. That's all for today. If you like the show, make sure you subscribe, leave a review. Don't use the passwords of top Trump administration security officials, even if you happen to

find them on the internet, and tell your friends to listen. And if you're into reading, and not just about how the newspaper Der Spiegel was able to find the private emails, phone numbers, and passwords of Secretary of Defense Hegseth, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, and National Security Advisor Mike Wallace just on the internet, like me, what a day is also a nightly newsletter. Check it out and subscribe at Cricut.com slash subscribe. I'm Jane Costin and I know I feel way more secure knowing that the security state can't secure its own email accounts.

What Today is a production of Cricut Media. It's recorded and mixed by Desmond Taylor. Our associate producers are Raven Yamamoto and Emily Four. Our producer is Michelle Alloy. We had production help today from Johanna Case, Joseph Dutra, Greg Walters, and Julia Clare. Our senior producer is Erica Morrison, and our executive producer is Adrian Hill.

Our theme music is by Colin Gileard and Kashaka. Our production staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of America East.