What A Day - What Did Trump’s DC Police Takeover Accomplish?

Episode Date: September 16, 2025

Memphis, Tennessee, is the latest city in President Donald Trump's Crime Takeover-A-Go-Go. On Monday, Trump signed a presidential memorandum establishing a "Memphis Safe Task Force" and announced that he would send the National Guard to the city.During a press conference detailing the decision, Trump said that he wanted to accomplish in Memphis – and everywhere else – what federal authorities did in Washington, D.C. But the question is…what exactly did the administration accomplish in D.C.? We asked Emma Uber, a reporter covering crime and criminal justice for the Washington Post.And in headlines, the suspect in Charlie Kirk's killing reportedly confessed to the murder in a Discord group chat, according to the Washington Post, Secretary of State Marco Rubio heads to Qatar, and a longtime federal prosecutor — who happens to be James Comey's daughter — sues the Trump administration over her firing.Show Notes:Check out Emma's reporting – https://tinyurl.com/49wzspyfCall Congress – 202-224-3121Subscribe to the What A Day Newsletter – https://tinyurl.com/3kk4nyz8What A Day – YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/@whatadaypodcastFollow us on Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/crookedmedia/For a transcript of this episode, please visit crooked.com/whataday Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

It's Tuesday, September 16th. I'm Jane Koston, and this is Waday. The show reminding you as it learns of the discovery of the F.J. King, a ship that sank in Lake Michigan nearly 140 years ago, leave ghost ships alone. They are full of the disembodied spirits of the watery damned. We all know this. On today's show, the suspect in Charlie Kirk's assassination reportedly confessed to the murder in a discord group chat, according to the Washington Post. And Secretary of State Marco Rubio is in Qatar on the heels of a visit with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. But let's start with Memphis, Tennessee. The latest city in President Donald Trump's crime takeover a go-go. On Monday, Trump signed a presidential memorandum establishing a Memphis Safe Task Force and announced that he would be sending the National Guard to the city. He sure does love taking over state's national guard. During a press conference detailing the decision, Trump said that he wanted to accomplish in Memphis

and everywhere else what federal authorities had in Washington, D.C., because he had solved all crime? The crime has almost disappeared, maybe completely disappeared. I mean, Washington, they don't even know how to record it because it's down so much. You know, they've never heard, I heard 87% is down. I said, really, who are the 13%? Because it's more than that. It's actually more hard to believe, right?

But the question is, what exactly did the Trump administration accomplish in D.C.? Because, well, yeah, Trump believes that he basically eliminated all crime in the city and everything's perfect. If you're anything like me, especially if you know a lot of people who live in D.C., and even more especially if you live there, that's probably not how you experienced Trump's incursion in the nation's capital. The Washington Post looked into more than a thousand arrests that took place during the first four weeks of Trump's supposed D.C. crackdown, including nearly 500 that involved federal officers. And what they found was both surprising and, to me, concerning. So to discuss the Post reporting and what journalists learned about the federalization of D.C.'s

Metropolitan Police, I spoke to Emma Euber. She's a reporter covering crime and criminal justice for the Washington Post. Emma Euber, welcome to what today. Thanks. Thanks for having me. So just to give us some context, where are we with the federalization of the police in D.C. right now? Like, what's going on with that? Well, that's a good question. I mean, as you know, the 30-day emergency that President Donald Trump declared on August 11th has ended, though he did fire off a late-night truth social post threatening to potentially extend it even further because he's not happy that Mayor Bowser and D.C. police are seeking an end to immigration enforcement by city police. But there's still lots of law enforcement, federal law enforcement out on the streets in D.C. just today when I got off the metro to come to work, I saw some members of the National Guard standing alongside some members of the D.C. police force. So even though the crime emergency has ended, there is a lot of federal law enforcement still in the district. So I'm going to ask you two questions back to back because I was so interested in your reporting because I think that this is really important. So first, what has the Trump administration claimed it accomplished by federalizing the D.C. police sending in federal officers and deploying National Guard troops?

Yeah. So the term administration has claimed that they have essentially eliminated crime in the district. And that is not true. There are still crimes. However, there has been a significant reduction of crime and violent crime in the district. So I believe. Yeah. I'm curious as to what you found in your reporting as to what actually happened. Can we break out crime and violent crime? Like, what are we looking at? Did any types of crime go up? Like, what are we seeing? Yeah, crime in general is down. We didn't see much crime go up. And so crime across homicides, carjackings, and also minor crimes are down. But we did see that a lot of the arrests made by federal law enforcement officers were more what you would characterize as minor crime. They're not really participating as much in the investigation of homicides or things of that nature. So some of our findings were that, you know, about one in seven of the cases that specifically mentioned federal law enforcement as being involved in the arrests, dealt with open containers of alcohol in cars or parks or curbside. Now, some of those escalated and those people ended up being charged with bigger crimes. Some of them stayed just minor open container.

Yeah, you mentioned that about a third of the arrests you examined involved federal law enforcement. And you mentioned that in the piece. Yes. How did their activities differ from run-of-the-mill policing before the administration sent in federal law enforcement? So that's something that we actually set out to kind of examine. And what we learned is that it's not very different. Chief of police, Pamela Smith and Mayor Bowser have said that they've kind of been using federal law enforcement as just kind of force multipliers for D.C. police. We weren't sure if that was true. But a lot of this policing is stuff that MPD.

was already doing. Many of the arrest affidavits even note if they're written by a federal police officer that the reason they were in that area was because D.C. police had told them that that area was a place that it would be useful for them to monitor. So there's that piece of it. A lot of the stops have been for really minor infractions. And so if there was a difference, I would say federal officers are maybe stopping people a bit more frequently for minor things. But they're in a lot of the same places, making a lot of the same stops that D.C. police would be doing if they had more officers. I mean, let's talk about where these arrests took place. I mean, we'd seen pictures of the National Guard at Union Station in D.C. and on the National Mall, very high visibility

places. And I was struck by how there was some reporting from folks living in Anacostia or other neighborhoods east of the river or in Trinidad or Noma that they weren't seeing anything. They were not seeing National Guard. They weren't seeing anybody doing anything. So what did your reporting show about where these arrests were taking place? Yeah. We did not find that to be true. That is also a claim that we had heard echoed. And I think anecdotally, that's what a lot of people were saying, is that these people were not going where the crime is. We found that the most arrests by federal law enforcement officers are being made in the highest crime areas of D.C. Even in our piece, we have a map overlaid, with the arrests that happened prior to the federal law enforcement,

and they look really similar. So there was a strong federal law enforcement presence in high crime areas in D.C. And that was a finding that we thought was significant to include, because to your point, that's not what much of the conversation has been surrounding federal law enforcement thus far. And your team noted during this time frame officers arrested many young black men. How did the arrest demographics for D.C. during this time frame compare to long-term averages? They look very similar. We noticed, you know, when going through our reporting that these are overwhelmingly young black men. Our numbers do not include juvenile arrests. So we're not sure how many juveniles were included, but overwhelmingly young black men. But then we kind of zoomed out. And that seems to be looking at last year's data from D.C. police. It was also overwhelmingly young black men.

Let's talk about how the day-to-day workings of the criminal justice system changed while the feds were most active. You mentioned seeing a lot of so-called pretext stops. What is a pre-text stop, and why does it matter that D.C. saw more of them? A pre-text stop is when a law enforcement officer makes a stop for something minor. One example would be like tinted windows or an expired license plate on a car. But they use that minor stop as an excuse to search for something more serious. So we saw a lot of stops for minor infractions that then resulted in seizures of. of guns or drugs. And that matters because it's a very controversial policing practice. It is legal.

The Supreme Court has upheld that it is a legal thing to do. But it leaves a lot of discretion on the officers' behalf. And a lot of studies have found that pre-tech stops can allow racial profiling or officers to kind of search people that they don't have a great reason to search. They just find them kind of off or fishy. Right. And so that was a big conversation. and we talked to retired police officers and academics, some of which really disavowed them because of the potential or racial profiling and others who defended them as one of the strongest tools the officers can use to get guns, drugs, and other illegal substances off the streets before they're investigating more serious crime. There's been a ton of reporting talking about how the DC criminal justice system has been in trouble for a bunch of different reasons, like a lack of judges, the fact that you don't have a forensics facility. that was certified until, I think, very recently. So what impact do you think that all of this is going to have

on D.C.'s criminal justice system moving forward? Yeah. It's hard to say because this is pretty unprecedented, but the justice system right now certainly feels a little overburdened. One impact that's already happening is that courtroom C-10, where all the arraignments happen, they've been going well, well past 5 p.m. every day. I know that's something that we're monitoring. So it'll be interesting to see how it plays out.

out, but the criminal justice system in D.C. is quite busy right now. And we're also looking at some overhaul of the D.C. criminal justice system from Congress based on some of the bills being heard this week. So it's difficult to say exactly how it's going to play out, but we're certainly at what I think is a pivotal moment for D.C. criminal justice. Emma Euber, thank you so much again for joining me. Thank you for having me. It was a pleasure. That was my conversation with Emma Uber, a crime and criminal justice reporter for the Washington Post. We'll link to her work in the show notes. We'll get to more of the news in a moment, but if you like the show, make sure to subscribe, leave a five-star review on Apple Podcasts, watch us on YouTube, and share with your friends.

More to come after some ads. What Today is brought to you by Bookshop.org. Where you shop for books matters. When you purchase from bookshop.org, you're supporting more than 2,400 local independent bookstores across the country, ensuring they'll continue to foster culture, curiosity, and a love of reading for generations to come. And, big news. Bookshop.org has an e-book app.

Now you can support local independent bookstores even when you read digitally. Use code WOD to get 10% off your next order at bookshop.org. That's code Wad at bookshop.org. Here's what else we're following today. Headlines. By the way, when I say that, that's my opinion, I think he was radicalized online based on what they're saying. Helpful.

President Trump addressed reporters in the Oval Office on Monday following a new report from the Washington Post that the 22-year-old suspect in Charlie Kirk's killing made an apparent confession in a group chat on Discord. Quote, it was me. According to the Post, the message was allegedly sent just two hours before the suspected shooter was taken into custody. And this conversation reportedly happened after the suspect had joked about his doppelganger being the shooter in a different discord chat, as reported by the New York Times. The new developments come as political tensions are reaching a fever pitch in the aftermath of Kirk's killing.

And with everything going on in the country right now, political violence, economic uncertainty, social division, it's comforting to know that Vice President J.D. Vance is focused on what's important, stepping in to host Charlie Kirk's podcast. We have to talk about this incredibly destructive movement of left-wing extremism that has grown up over the last few years, and I believe as part of the reason why Charlie was killed by an assassin's bullet. It's worth noting. We know very, very little about the suspect's motive or ideology. But that didn't stop Vance from pouring gasoline on the fire during his two-hour stint,

guest hosting Kirk's podcast at the White House. He was joined by a who's who of administration officials and MAGA World A-listers, including Stephen Miller, Caroline Levitt, Susie Wiles, Tucker Carlson, and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. And in this spirit, Miller, who is famously level-headed and well-adjusted, had this to say about so-called left-wing extremism. The organized docksing campaigns, the organized riots, the organized street violence, the organized campaigns of dehumanization, vilification, posting people's addresses, combining that with messaging

this is designed to trigger inside violence and the actual organized selves that carry out and facilitate the violence, it is a vast domestic terror movement. Again, we know very, very little about what motivated the suspect. But I can't help but wonder if Miller feels as strongly about those

in the right doxing people for allegedly celebrating Kirk's murder or just quoting him. Does that also amount to domestic terrorism? Your presence here in Israel, today is a clear message that America stands with Israel. You stand with us on the face of terror, in the face of the incredible, I would almost say, middle-age lies, middle-ages lies that are directed against us.

Israeli Prime Minister and Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, showed a unified front during a press conference in Jerusalem Monday. Unified, despite the fact that Israel has been condemned by many countries for attacking Hamas leaders in Kutcher, a U.S. ally. And by the way, Trump said he wasn't thrilled about the strike either. Reminder, Kutcher has been mediating talks to end the Israel-Humas war. Netanyahu said Israel's decision to strike Hamas leaders was, quote, wholly independent. Rubio added he's focused on what happens now. What role can Qatar play possibly in reaching an outcome here that leads not just to the end of this hostilities, not just to the release of all of the

hostages, both living and deceased, not just the disarmament and elimination of Hamas, but also a better future for the people of Gaza, which isn't possible as long as Hamas exists. The State Department says Rubio will pay a quick visit to Qatar today. Rubio will then fly to London to join his dear leader, President Trump, on a state visit to Britain. Maureen Comey, a longtime prosecutor in the Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office, and the daughter of a certain former FBI director who you may have heard of, is hitting back of the Trump administration firing her. She filed a lawsuit on Monday saying she was let go without warning or explanation.

Comey worked at the prosecutor's office for 10 years and commanded respect among colleagues. She led the trial of Sean Diddy Combs, and she handled the prosecutions of Jeffrey Epstein and Galane Maxwell, and as one of the few people left at DOJ with deep knowledge of those cases. And the timing is, well, interesting, since Trump's orbit is lighting itself on fire over his administration's handling of the Epstein files. So why give her the boot? Well, apparently nothing on her resume matters as much as who her father is, James Comey, a Trump foe of nearly a decade.

Her lawsuit hits this hard, claiming, quote, defendants fired Ms. Comey solely or substantially because her father is former FBI director James B. Comey, or because of her perceived political affiliation and beliefs, or both. The suit also notes that Marine had a target on her back from none other than Internet troll and Trump whisperer, Laura Lumer. And she says that even her boss, Jay Clayton, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, couldn't come up with a solid reason for her termination. According to the lawsuit, Clayton said, quote, all I can say is it came from Washington. I can't tell you anything else. We have a framework for a TikTok deal.

The two leaders, President Trump and party chair, she will speak on Friday to complete. the deal, but we do have a framework for a deal with TikTok. That was Treasury Secretary Scott Besant, a man who could not be more vague about the details of the agreement made just days before another deadline that could have banned the app in the U.S. Besant spoke from Madrid on Monday, where he met with a Chinese delegation to discuss ongoing trade tensions. When asked about the sticking point of who would control TikTok's algorithm moving forward, Besant said he wouldn't talk about terms because it was between, quote, two private parties? Which parties? Surprise! He wouldn't say. Also, didn't we ban TikTok already? I mean,

in 2024, a rarely United Congress agreed the app was a security threat. Lawmakers wanted it banished from the U.S., that is, unless it was sold to a non-Chinese buyer. The Supreme Court upheld that ban, but apparently it's not being enforced. And we're old enough to remember when Trump himself wanted to get rid of TikTok back in 2020. Could it be that Trump did a 180 on the app when Jeffrey Yass, a major stakeholder in TikTok's parent company, BiteDance, donated millions and millions of dollars to the GOP in 2024 and to Trump's MAGA Inc. Superpack in 2025? Or could it be when Trump realized that MAGA influencers, like Charlie Kirk, use TikTok to help and win re-election? He addressed one of those things on Monday.

I used TikTok. I mean, I have to admit it in the election and look how I did with you. No Republicans come close. I blew everyone away. You know, if you look back, Back, not so long ago Romney, he got like 7% of the youth. I got like eight times that amount. I got tremendous numbers of youth. By the way, I want to say, Charlie helped me. And Charlie was the one, get on TikTok. He used to say to me, get on TikTok.

Making the subtext text. That's our president. And that's the news. Before we head out, we need your help. We're doing something wild, radical even. We're asking you, loyal listener, what you want out of Crooked's friend of the pod subscription. Do you want more exclusive content, better merch, fewer emails, more ad-free shows? This is your chance to tell us everything, what you love, what you hate, what you're

pretend to love, but secretly don't. Take the survey now at cricket.com slash survey. That's all for today. If you like the show, make sure you subscribe, leave a review, contemplate the sheer hutspe of famous filmmaker and, um, person of controversy, Woody Allen, deciding that what the world needs now were his thoughts on how Jeffrey Epstein, quote, couldn't have been nicer, and tell your friends to listen. And if you're into reading, and not just about how Alan told the Sunday times that he met Epstein just after the convicted sex offender was released from jail after serving a sentence for soliciting a minor for prostitution and thought, he was just a nice guy, like me.

Wooda Day is also a nightly newsletter. Check it out and subscribe at crooked.com slash subscribe. I'm Jane Koston, and honestly, this is pretty much exactly what I think Woody Allen would say about Jeffrey Epstein. What Today is a production of Crooked Media. It's recorded and mixed by Desmond Taylor. Our associate producer is Emily Four. Our video editor is Joseph Tutra. Our video producer is Johanna Case.

We had production help today from Greg Walters, Matt Berg, Megan Larson, Gina Pollock, and Jonah Eatman. Our senior producer is Erica Morrison, and our senior vice president of news and politics is Adrian Hill. We had helped today from the Associated Press. Our theme music is by Colin Gilliard and Kashaka. Our production staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of America East. I don't know. I don't know.