What A Day - What If Abortion Meant Prison... Or Worse?
Episode Date: June 18, 2026The 2022 Dobbs decision that reversed Roe v. Wade promised to return the issue of abortion back to the states. But for anti-abortion activists, that’s never been good enough. Some anti-abortion ac...tivists are pushing bills that could see women who get abortions imprisoned. And with the number of people who have gotten abortions only increasing over the last year, that’s a lot of punishment they want to mete out. Jessica Valenti, founder of the Substack Abortion, Every Day, has been tracking abortion rights for more than a decade. We talked about why the anti-abortion movement has gotten more extreme – and what we can do about it.And in headlines, Republicans blast Trump’s new Iran memorandum, the Supreme Court rules marijuana users can own guns, and you heard it here first: the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool is still green.Show Notes: Jessica’s Substack – https://jessica.substack.com/ Call Congress – 202-224-3121 Subscribe to the What A Day Newsletter – https://tinyurl.com/y4y2e9jy What A Day – YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/@whatadaypodcast Follow us on Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/crookedmedia/ For a transcript of this episode, please visit crooked.com/whataday
Transcript
Discussion (0)
They are really very proactively trying to shift that Overton window and get people used to the idea that it is okay to punish abortion patients.
If they can't do it with life in prison or the death penalty right away, they'll try to figure out another way to do it.
No, they are moving to the next step.
I'm Jane Koston, and this is Waddey, the show that's wondering how Vice President J. J.D. Vance really felt when his boss declared him the official scapegoat of the Iran War.
President Trump said yesterday that he was going to blame you if the talks of the round go sideways.
Are you worried that he's going to make you the fall guy?
No, not at all. I mean, I think the president was joking.
Oh, honey. Maybe ask former Vice President Mike Pence about what a hilarious guy President Donald Trump really is.
On today's show, we talk to Jessica Valenti about the next front in the abortion fight
and the scary state-level anti-abortion legislation you may not have heard about.
Before we get into all that,
Here's what we're following today, Thursday, June 18th.
So I guess I would say to anybody, any of the critics, is number one, have a little bit of faith in the President of United States.
The idea that he is going to strike a deal that's been bad for the American people, it's preposterous.
Preposterous.
Vice President J.D. Vance has the unfortunate task of spinning the new U.S. Iran Memorandum of Understanding, or, if you will, surrender random of understanding.
And spoiler alert, it's not going over well.
That's because this agreement foresees effectively pumping Iran full of money by unfreezing
hundreds of billions of dollars held in foreign banks and letting Iran sell oil right away.
It does not include a long-term resolution to the Iranian nuclear standoff, at least not on paper.
So we went from, we're going to destroy your civilization to do whatever.
After days of will he, won't he?
the president went ahead and signed the MOU during a visit to the French palace of Versailles.
That makes this the second most important document sign there,
after the treaty that famously ended World War I and paved the way for World War II.
Trump's memo of Versailles stops fighting for 60 days,
so Vance has plenty of time to scramble for a much better final deal.
And for Vance's sake, that new deal better be a big improvement,
because even Republicans think what Trump just signed is bullshit.
Fox News host, Trey Gowdy, said yesterday he thought he was being spoofed after reading the MOU
because of how it benefits Iran.
They're better off than they were before the hostilities began, and that should not be the
consequence of war.
Another Fox News host, Mark Levin, tweeted today, quote, the insanity of those defending
parts of the MOU or major matters left out of this MOU is truly stunning.
But it's not just loudmouthed Fox News personality slamming Trump's deal.
In a tweet yesterday, Louisiana Republican Senator Bill Cassidy called it the, quote,
worst foreign policy blunder in decades.
And in an interview with the Hill, Texas Republican Senator Ted Cruz suggested Trump might be getting some, quote, very poor advice on this deal.
Trump fired back today against, quote, fools who think he hasn't been tough enough on Iran,
calling them, quote, either jealous, bad people, or stupid.
As someone who opposed this war and dislikes his administration,
I'll say I'm having a great time.
It's rare that I get to say this,
but the Supreme Court today made a ruling
that was both correct and hilarious.
In a unanimous decision,
the court found that the prosecution of a Texas man
for owning a gun while also being a marijuana user
was not consistent with the Second Amendment.
In Justice Neil Gorsuch's majority opinion,
he wrote that the prosecution only made sense
if you believe that using or possessing marijuana,
a drug millions of Americans use and is legal to some degree in 40 states gave the government
the right to take away someone's Second Amendment rights.
I highly recommend reading the full opinion because Gorsuch included roughly four pages
on the drinking habits of the founding fathers.
His point, despite the fact that Thomas Jefferson drank four glasses of wine a night,
no one at the time would have attempted to restrict his right to bear arms.
And so it goes, according to the Supreme Court, with a 10-gram gum.
And speaking of green, Washington, D.C. is dealing with another kind.
Despite official claims to the contrary, the Lincoln Memorial's reflecting pool remains
emerald-colored and filled with algae. Yes, Trump promised to drain the swamp. Instead, he
put one in the reflecting pool. Earlier this morning, the Department of the Interior tweeted
they had solved this problem with, and I am not making this up. Quote,
advanced nanobbubbbler technology.
Yeah, your guess is as good as mine.
But DC correspondent Matt Berg went to look and...
Still green guys.
There you have it.
Our man in DC on the scene.
And that's the news.
Let's talk about abortion.
The 2022 Dobbs decision that reversed Roe versus Wade
promised to return the issue of abortion back to the states.
But for anti-abortion activists,
state-level bans haven't been good enough, and more and more states have introduced legislation
that would make getting an abortion a punishable crime. In Tennessee, a state with a total abortion
ban, Republican legislators tried to push through a bill that would have treated abortion like
homicide, making abortion patients eligible for the death penalty under Tennessee law.
And in North Carolina, a state where abortion is still legal,
Republican legislators recently proposed a bill that goes even further. It's clear that
anti-abortion activists want to see women who get abortions imprisoned, or worse. And with the number of
people who have gotten abortions only increasing over the last year, that's a lot of punishment they want
to meet out. Jessica Valenti writes a substack abortion every day. She has been tracking abortion rights
for more than a decade. We talked about why the anti-abortion movement has gotten more extreme and what
we can do about it. Jessica, welcome back to Wadaday. Thanks for having me.
So North Carolina has been considering a bill that would let voters amend the state constitution
to say that life starts at the moment of conception and it would equate abortion with murder.
There are a lot of layers to how bad this bill is.
Can you give us a quick explainer?
Sure. Yeah, there's a lot going on there.
It, as you said, would classify abortion as murder in the criminal code,
not just for abortion providers, but for abortion patients.
in every state that has an abortion ban,
they generally prohibit the prosecution of abortion patients.
This would allow the prosecution of abortion patients.
The way that they define abortion and life
would make it questionable on birth control
and whether certain forms of birth control like IUDs
and the morning after pill would be considered abortions
and therefore punishable with life in prison.
And then there's a really interesting is not the right word,
but a really troubling section that allows for the use of deadly force in defense of a fetus
embryo fertilized egg, meaning you could kill an abortion provider and that would be legally justified.
And the language, as if that wasn't bad enough, the language is so broad that you could also make
the argument that killing someone who is driving a person to an abortion clinic, who is lending the money,
is being done in defense of a fetus.
And so it's pretty much about as extreme as you can get.
But I would just say, unfortunately, we're seeing a real rise in bills like this, right?
Like, they're no longer anomalies.
Right.
Yeah.
I think I've seen bills like this in Tennessee and in Louisiana.
What other states have tried to pass legislation that would make an abortion the equivalent
of committing murder?
I mean, pretty much every anti-abortion state has seen a bill like this.
I think at last count, it was over a dozen.
They're called equal protection bills because the idea is that fetuses, embryos, fertilized eggs
deserve the same level of protection in the state constitution as a human being.
And they're being pushed by this really radical group, this sect of the anti-abortion movement,
called abortion abolitionists, which is just problematic for all sorts of reasons.
But they are gaining power, like culturally, politically.
They have a really unfortunately good political ground game.
They have candidates who are running for office.
They have folks who have been elected to office.
And so this is, again, it's not an unusual bit of legislation anymore.
We're seeing it every legislative session.
And every legislative session, these bills are getting more co-sponsors.
We'll get back to my conversation with Jessica Valenti in a moment with more troubling ideas that, unfortunately, we still have to talk about.
But if you like the show, make sure to subscribe, leave a five-star review on Spotify and Apple Podcasts, watch us on YouTube and share with your friends.
More to come after some ads.
What a day is brought to you by Zibiotics.
Let's face it, after a night with drinks, I don't bounce back the next day.
like I used to. I have to make a choice. I can either have a great night or a great next day,
that is, until I found pre-alcohol. Zebiotics pre-alcohol probiotic drink is the world's first
genetically engineered probiotic. It was invented by PhD scientists to tackle rough mornings
after drinking. Here's how it works. When you drink, alcohol gets converted into a toxic
byproduct in the gut. It's a buildup of this byproduct, not dehydration, that's the blame for
rough days after drinking. Pre-alcohol produces an enzyme to break this byproduct down.
Just remember to make pre-alcohol your first drink of the night, drink responsibly, and you'll
feel your best tomorrow. Every time I have pre-alcohol before drinks, I notice a difference the next day.
Even after a night out, I can confidently plan on working out without worry. Go to zbiatics.com slash
wad to learn more and get 15% off your first order when you use code Wad at checkout.
Zibiotics is backed with a 100% money-back guarantee, so if you're unsatisfied for
any reason, they'll refund your money, no questions asked. Remember to head to zbiotics.com
slash wad and use the code Wad at checkout for 15% off. Waterday is brought to you by Smalls.
Smalls fresh cat food is protein-packed recipes made with preservative-free, 100% human-grade ingredients
you'd find in your fridge, and it's delivered right to your door. A balanced diet leads to less shedding,
fewer hairballs, and more silky shine. Smalls cat food leads to high protein and improved hydration,
that equals strong bones and toned muscles.
Cats use protein as their main energy source.
More protein means more fuel and sustained energy.
After switching to Smalls,
88% of cat owners reported overall health improvements.
So stop serving your little carnivore,
a bowl of processed shortcuts.
For a limited time, because you're a what-a-day listener,
get 60% off your first order plus free shipping
and free treats for life
when you head to Smalls.com slash Wad.
That's 60% off your first.
order plus free shipping and free treats for life when you head to smalls.com slash watch.
Let's get back to my conversation with Jessica Valenti.
Now, realistically, this North Carolina bill will not pass.
I think it's interesting because you keep having these moments, again, interesting, not in a good way.
You keep having these moments where these bill is suggested.
And then the legislators clearly get yelled at just enough that they're like, oh, well, maybe it's not such a good idea.
I think my favorite example of this was a Tennessee legislator who put this forward.
His argument was, well, we don't execute that many women anyway.
So it's not really that big a concern when that bill was put forward in Tennessee.
But in a moment in which there are more than a dozen states with total bans, this tells me that the state of the anti-abortion movement is more extreme than ever.
You know, we heard for 50 years or so, oh, just send it back to the states and let states make a decision.
And then the Supreme Court did that. And it wasn't good enough for them.
Yeah. No, they are, they are moving to the next step. This is something that I've predicted
it's something other feminist and abortion rights advocates have warned about that they are really very proactively trying to shift that Overton window and get people used to the idea that it is okay to punish abortion patients if they are.
can't do it with life in prison or the death penalty right away. They'll try to figure out another
way to do it. There was a bill in South Carolina, I believe, that would punish abortion patients.
Their compromise was to move it from life in prison execution to a couple of years in prison,
like two years in prison. And for the first time, a major national anti-abortion group students
for life endorsed that legislation. Right. So we are really seeing like the so-called
mainstream anti-abortion movement get on board. I reported, I think it was a week or two ago,
the Texas Republican Party explicitly publicly praised and posted about on their social media
accounts abolish abortion Texas, an abolitionist group. They have abolitionist language in the
Republican Party platform. And so this is happening. Even if these bills don't get passed right now,
they are certainly making moves towards that eventual end.
And I think that we're moving a lot quicker than some people probably realize.
Something that I noted in coverage, local coverage from Tennessee and from North Carolina,
is that the people who are advocating for these types of legislation are generally men.
And the people you see online who are screaming at the women,
who kind of lead the anti-abortion movement, the mainstream,
it's mostly men saying,
we need to punish these women,
they are committing murder,
you punish murderers by putting them to death.
And when anti-abortion activists who are women push back,
there's basically this kind of like,
this weird, you're not going far enough,
you're just a simple, stupid woman,
you don't understand what we need to be doing.
Is that something you're seeing as well?
I mean, obviously I think misogyny
is the underpinning of so much of the anti-abortion movement itself,
But there's also a misogyny within the anti-abortion movement towards people fighting abortion.
Absolutely. Your read on it is 100% correct. These guys are misogynist, ultra-right-wing Christian
nationalists, right? Like, they have a very specific idea about what women's place is. These are the same
guys who don't want women to vote. They are certainly not interested in listening to a female leader of an
anti-abortion group. I have heard stories from women who tried to join the abolitionist movement
just to be sort of mistreated and shunned. Like, they don't think women are people. And so it's
not hard to imagine that they're not incredibly interested in working with women, having conversations,
having political conversations with women. They think that we should be home having babies.
You've written that the abortion rights movement spends a lot of time responding to
emergencies, kind of being like, oh, this is happening right now, we got to fight it. But it doesn't
plan ahead in the way that anti-abortion activists do. So if the anti-abortion movement is moving
towards abolition, where does the abortion rights movement need to go? Part of the problem is that
for way too long, you know, the mainstream abortion rights movement, mainstream democratic
legislators, they don't take these kinds of things seriously. They think that these are outliers.
They think that these are extremists. Like nothing is ever going to.
to happen with this. We need to start taking them really seriously. And as you said, really looking
ahead 10, 20, 30 years and doing political work that is thinking decades ahead, I think part of that
is really holding Republicans to account proactively and putting them on the record, you know,
like pass a bill that says we will introduce a bill in your state, in the federal government that
says we are never going to punish abortion patients. Surely we can all agree on that.
Democrats did something similar with codifying the right to contraception, right? They knew it was going to pass, but they got Republicans on the record saying that they don't want to codify the right to contraception. I think the more that we can be talking about this and holding their feet to the fire, the better. And again, taking it seriously, and I understand, I think that there's always a fear of you don't want to scare people, right? Especially when there's so much confusion and misinformation going around about.
abortion and what's legal and what's not. You never want to send the impression that,
you know, a bill is somehow a law. Like, there's a lot of confusion there for people in these
states where they think, if you make a video about one of these bills, they think, oh, my God,
can I go get an abortion or am I going to be, you know, put to death by the government? So it's
incredibly important that we're taking that into account. But this is an emergency, right? Like,
this is happening now and this is happening very, very,
quickly. They are electing these guys to office. The sooner that we can like really get on board and
make this a central piece of the movement, the better. Jessica, as always, thank you so much for
joining me. Thank you for having me. That was my conversation with Jessica Valenti, founder of
abortion every day. We'll link to her substack in the show notes. Before we go, over on the
Love It or Leave It channel this week, they're hosting a two-part pred.
special with a few of the most fabulous queer comedians in LA.
Drag race winner, Mikey Meeks, stand-up superstar Otsko Okatska, and the legend himself,
Bruce Valanche, plus many more.
Check out, love it or leave it every Wednesday and Friday on YouTube, or wherever you get your podcasts.
That's all for today.
If you like the show, make sure you subscribe, leave a review.
Congratulate former President Barack Obama and tell your friends to listen.
And if you're into reading, and not just about how the Barack Obama Presidential Center,
which features a library, park, museum, basketball court, and gardens officially open today.
Like me, Water Day is also a nightly newsletter.
Check it out and subscribe at crooked.com slash subscribe.
I'm Jane Koston.
And in a related note, CNN found today that Obama is the most popular living president.
And his popularity with independent voters is nearly twice as high as that of his successors.
I miss him.
What a day is a production of Crooked Media.
Our show was produced by Caitlin Plummer, Emily Fulter.
or Erica Morrison and Adrian Hill.
Our team includes Haley Jones, Greg Walters, Matt Berg,
Joseph Dutra, Johanna Case, and Desmond Taylor.
Our music is by Kyle Murdoch and Jordan Cantor.
We had helped today from the Associated Press.
Our production staff is proudly unionized
with the Writers Guild of America East.
