What Bitcoin Did - The Epstein Files: What They Reveal About Bitcoin & The Dollar System | Mark Goodwin

Episode Date: February 13, 2026

Mark Goodwin is a journalist and author at Unlimited Hangout. In this episode, he breaks down what the Epstein files reveal about Bitcoin's origins and the connections between the Epstein network, the PayPal mafia, and the creation of Tether. We get into whether Bitcoin has been co-opted, the role of stablecoins in extending dollar hegemony, and why the Bitcoin community needs to refocus on building peer-to-peer freedom tools. THANKS TO OUR SPONSORS: ANCHORWATCH BLOCKWARE LEDN BITKEY SWAN CAPE CLUB ORANGE FOLLOW: Danny Knowles: https://x.com/\_DannyKnowles or https://primal.net/danny Mark Goodwin: https://x.com/markgoodw_in

Don't lose focus. Where is Bitcoin going? Who is it going to benefit? Is this actually going to unlock this freedom, the greatest change of the global order, maybe ever, and maybe the final one? Or will it sort of unlock and enable the same networks that were running the dollar system to have a really neat way to get out of their debt problem and, you know, kick the can down the road? It was designed to kind of have this disinflationary asymptotic approach to zero issuance. That has not been co-opted. that will not be co-opted. And because of that, Bitcoin will win, but it might not win carrying along the carriage behind it of peer-to-peer on censorable cash. If there was something that was co-opted, it's the Bitcoin culture, it's the people, it's the community, it's the discourse. If we're not ready to onboard billions of people onto Bitcoin and give them sovereignty, a permissionless network like it was when we found it years ago, if we can't give that to our kids, then we failed, even though we're going to be multimillionaires. Let's go.

Mark Goodwin, what a terrible time to be a conspiracy theory denier. Holy shit. Yeah, the only one who's down more... How much of the victory luck if you wanted to go on the last week? Yeah, the only people that are down more than the Bitcoin holders right now are the conspiracy short sellers. So, yeah, it's been interesting. It's been fun.

Twitter's on fire and it's just, we're in the fog of war, the eye of the storm, whatever. crappy metaphor you want to use. But yeah, files are, some of them are out. There's some people that are now having to accept reality that they've denied for years. And, you know, here we are. And Bitcoin gets wrapped all up in it, you know? So very, very fun for, you know, for folks like me who have been sort of yelling for a while about this stuff. And, you know, obviously many times spoken on this show with you, with Peter, about a lot of this stuff.

So yeah, wakey, wakey, welcome. I hope you had a nice nap. Welcome back. I mean, I feel like you're an apology from some people over this. Like you said, you've been banging this drum for so long. I do want to get into the Bitcoin and Epstein stuff a little bit later. But can we start on just the Epstein files, like more broadly? Because I know you'll have been paying a lot of attention to this.

It's been impossible to not see this on Twitter for the last couple weeks. But I don't even know where to start because there's just so much. in this? Like, where do you think we should start with this? Well, I think just, you know, zooming out quite a bit and just looking at, you know, what is the real Epstein story? You know, for starters, anybody that says they know the whole Epstein story is full of it because there's just so much we don't know. And from what we do know, there's so many tangential connections and the web of it is just very insane. No pun intended, of course with Whitney Webb's wonderful book that sort of broke down, you know, all of this years ago about as thoroughly as one could. So I highly recommend checking out her work both online and One Nation Under Blackmail for the real story. I'm not an Epstein expert. I just work with one who's like the premiere. So I get a lot of, you know, osmosis, you know, thinking about Epstein. But I think the main thing for me that I think people miss with the Epstein story is, yeah, there was sex.

blackmail and illegal, you know, trafficking and prostitution and a whole bunch of disgusting stuff with real victims and real people. And it's, it's so sensational that it's hard sometimes to remember that there were real people involved, not just the bad people, but the people that, you know, were hurt. And it's a really sensational story. And I think by design, the story has always sort of focused on the sensationalism of it. You know, he's got this crazy, and they're doing occult rituals and using code words and eating jerky and pizza and and all this insanity. And I think there's a ton of truth to that stuff and it's really disturbing.

But to me, I think the story and maybe it's just because of where my interests lie, but, you know, the technology angle, the science angle and the financial angle of the Epstein case are just severely under-investigated, especially the financial. angle. So that's where, you know, if I have any right to speak on this topic, you know, surely where the Bitcoin and the cryptocurrency networks, you know, combined with the Epstein network and why someone like Epstein would be interested in, you know, a technology like Bitcoin, you know, he's the money man of, you know, that network, of that, you know, power nexus that obviously

has pretty significant control, if not influence, over American politics. And it seems to be a lot more than just that, but sort of this worldwide, you know, power structure that influences world governments. And, you know, you look into some of these emails, there's some really telling things and, you know, that relate to that. Like Larry Summers, the former Treasury Secretary referring to Epstein as Mr. Munn. You know, I mean, this is a guy that was running, you know, the, you know, the Treasury at the most important financial powerhouse in the world, sending an email to this, you know, guy with, you know, very few credentials in the, you know, academic sense. And he's emailing him, asking him questions and calling him Mr. Money, you know. I mean, it's like this guy was the money man for this currency speculation network. That sort of, you know, grew out of the mega group. Robert Maxwell, Galane Maxwell's dad, Jimmy Goldsmith, and then of course Leslie Wexner, who is, you know, kind of the main financial beneficiary, benefactor for Epstein was one of the main ways that he got the majority of his money. And Epstein was sort of the money guy for these people. These people have billions of dollars, if not hundreds of millions of dollars. And, you know, they have to figure out a way to deal with the tax code. You, you know, laundering. successfully to figure out how to hide illegal money, to wash illegal money, to put it in

legitimate ventures. And Epstein was the guy. I mean, he was the guy for this network that understood the tax code better than everyone else, which is interesting as it relates to him talking about Bitcoin. A lot of his Bitcoin discussion was talking about tax code. And no, you can't say that. Try not to use coin when doing ICO stuff because, you know, it brings up a bunch of legal gray areas and and yada, yada. But this guy, he was, he was the money man for, for the people behind the control nexus. And, you know, he was heavily involved in what developed in 2008 and 2007 with the financial crisis at Bear Stearns.

And he had this, this firm, I believe it was called Liquid Holdings that was, that got liquidated. But they were one of the first people that was really working on these collaborations. collateralized debt obligations and doing these synthetic mortgage plays that obviously developed and spiraled out of control, which led to the huge crash, which of course, again, Larry Summers was one of the main guys behind the deregulation in the Glass-Degel era that led to, you know, this stuff being able to be legal, that people could split up these mortgages and play with them and take these huge risks and this, you know, this new way, this new kind of evolution of the junk bond

that Mike Milken kind of created, you know, a decade prior, two decades prior. The modern iteration in the 2000s, you know, a lot of it was, let's play with mortgages, let's cut them up, let's create synthetic versions of these mortgages and speculate all over them and just blow it out into this big bubble. And then it popped. And, you know, these people, in the in the network of epstein were you know pretty pretty responsible for a lot of what went down at the great financial crisis and you know for the listeners if you've listened to me on the show before you know i've talked a lot about how it is absolutely not an accident that bitcoin came you know right when the u.s you know monetary system needed a relief valve for the economic stimulus

that came downstream of these these great financial crisis um you know obviously Obviously, it's very convenient at the start of 2009 that, you know, this white paper comes out of nowhere and here we go. And then, of course, what happened in COVID in 2020, you know, Bitcoin was ready right before the happening that brings it down to its relative issuance below the rate of gold, below the target inflation rate of the dollar. That would be in May in 2020. So right before that, we see, you know, the going direct reset with Black Rock. and Donald Trump kind of putting together this plan of how do we deal with this stimulus, how do we get it into the right hands? And they created this whole plan, you know, months before there was any whisper of a virus. Again, very convenient place for Bitcoin to be ready, waiting

to take on that, you know, be the debt sink, basically, for that massive monetary stimulus. So Epstein, you know, prior to 2020, obviously he's not around by then. But in 2008, he's right there. He was right in the smack of, you know, really everything that was going down in 2008. And very interestingly, you know, what these emails have shown is that he was speaking in 2009 to John Brockman, who was the co-founder of the, you know, the Mind Shift Conference and the Edge Foundation, which were these kind of like gatherings of scientific minds, you know, kind of the best of the best. you know, Epstein kind of collected smart people, whether they were, you know, doctors or scientists or, you know, money people themselves, like Summers or like a Brock Pierce. And in 2009, he, you know, obviously after the network had launched, but I believe it was in August of 2009, he sent an email to John Brockman saying, you know, it's time for a new financial, you know, system.

It's time for a new alternative currency. this is what PayPal set out to do initially. You know, this was what they set out to do a new world currency, which of course, again, listeners that listened in, that was kind of the finishing blow of the chain series. That was, you know, hey, maybe Bitcoin and stable coins are the final culmination of PayPal's quest to create a new world currency. And he was talking about it right then, you know, in 2009.

Now, again, let's just, we have to be very clear when we're talking about this stuff. He never specifically says he's talking about Bitcoin. You know, these are unencrypted emails. They're just, you know, he's probably shooting it off from his Blackberry at the side of the pool, you know, doing sketchy shit. And, you know, you can look at the way he types and, you know, they're very casual emails. But the implications are very, very big. And so to me, like, that was kind of the one that blew my brain open where I was like,

aha, like, you just. connected all of these tropes that I've been trying to connect, and I'd say I did for the most part, but trying to connect, you know, how does the Epstein network combine with the PayPal network and culminating all together at the same time as the Bitcoin network is launching off? Who really had the power, the technical chops, the economic chops, and the influence, the political influence, and the banking influence. to pull something like this off. And it's that network, to me.

I don't think there's any other network that could if we want to sort of, you know, let's moonlight the idea that it was just the shadowy coder in his basement, you know, just a single guy who did the Bitcoin white paper and the coding. You know, if we ignore that possibility, which is, of course, an absolutely valid possibility. again, if anyone's talking at absolutes here, they're full of shit.

I mean, we just, we don't know. There's no evidence that the Bitcoin network came out of PayPal or the Epstein network, just like there's actually no evidence that it came out of a single solitary guy writing code in a UK basement or a California basement or whatever. There's a lot of speculation, lots of good research that's been done trying to pin it down. but there just isn't and there never will be. And to me, you know, the fact that there never will be is also very telling. You know, we know the state that we're in, the surveillance state that we exist in and operate in. And if Bitcoin was this grand, you know, threat to this group's power that it was, I think we would know who Satoshi is, or certainly they would know who Satoshi is.

And Bitcoin would have been dealt with in a way that never would have. have allowed it to become a trillion dollar asset and be, you know, borderline too big to fail as it relates to, like, American consumers and, you know, the American citizenry. And certainly the institutions that profit off of them. With Fiat money constantly debasing, wealth preservation isn't optional. That's why I recommend Swan Bitcoin, a team of dedicated Bitcoiners who work with families and businesses to build and secure generational wealth with Bitcoin. strong relationships with clients are at the center of everything Swan does.

A dedicated Swan private wealth representative, which is a real person that you can text and call, will help you build a Bitcoin wealth strategy using Swan's comprehensive platform of Bitcoin services, including tax advantage retirement accounts, advanced Bitcoin cold storage using collaborative self-custody, inheritance planning with both trust and entity accounts, tax loss harvesting, asset back loans and more. Swan have helped over 100,000 clients since 2020, and if you're serious about, acquiring and securing Bitcoin, I recommend Swam. Meet the team at swan.com forward slash WBD, which is swan.com forward slash WBD. If you already self-custody of Bitcoin, you know the deal with hardware wallets.

Complex setups, clumsy interfaces and a seed phrase that can be lost, stolen or forgotten. Well, BitKee fixes that. BitKee's a multi-sig hardware wallet built by the team behind Square and Cash app. It packs a cryptographic recovery system and built-in inheritance feature into an intuitive, easy-to-use wallet with no seed phrase to sweat over. It's simple, secure self-custody without the stress, and time named Bitkey one of the best inventions of 2024. Get 20% off at bitkey.world when you use the code WBD. That's B-I-T-K-E-Y.org and use the code WBD. If you haven't tried out Club Orange yet, then now is the time. It's my go-to place to find Bitcoiners whenever I'm

traveling. Club Orange is a social app built for Bitcoiners where you can find local meetups and events in your area and find merchants that are accepting Bitcoin. There are over 19,000 Bitcoiners on there, and whether you're at home or traveling is a great place to keep in touch with Bitcoiners from all over the world. I've been using Club Orange since it was Orange Pill app, and it really is awesome. So if you're on there, drop me a DM and say hi. And if you want to find out more and download the app, just search for Club Orange on your app store or go to cluborange.org. What if you could lower your tax bill and stack Bitcoin at the same time? Well, by mining Bitcoin with Blockware, you can.

New tax guidelines from the Big Beautiful Bill allow American miners to write off 100% of the cost of their mining hardware in a single tax year. That's right, 100% write off. So if you have $100,000 in capital gains or income, you can purchase $100,000 of miners and offset it entirely. Blockware's mining as a service enables you to start mining Bitcoin right now without lifting a finger. Blockware handles everything from securing the miners to sourcing low-cost power to configuring the pool, they do it all. You get to stack Bitcoin at a discount every single day while also saving big come tax season. Get started today by going to mining.blockware solutions.com forward slash WBD. Of course, none of this is tax advice, speak to your accountant or tax advisor to understand how

these rules apply to you, and then head over to mining.com.com slash wbd, and you'll get one week of free hosting and electricity with each hosted miner purchased. When you say, like, who could have pulled this off? Are you saying you think this came out of the PayPal mafia people, the CIA? Do you think it was like an intelligence group that actually built Bitcoin? Or do you think really this was like Epstein realizing there needed to be an alternative and looking for something and finding Bitcoin? I mean, that's a great question that I don't think we'll ever get an answer to. I think these emails give us kind of the closest, you know, glimpse into that. But like, we'll, we'll

never know. I mean, it's, we will never know where Bitcoin came from. Obviously, what is infinitely more important is where it's going. And that's always been the case. And, you know, we have a lot to talk about here today, but I think that's like the main point of why I was excited to come on. Well, also, it's just always great to talk to you, Danny. But, you know, the main thing I was really excited about to talk about now is just like, don't lose focus. You know, where is Bitcoin going? where is it being pushed to? Who is it going to benefit? Is this actually going to unlock this freedom, you know, kind of utopia because we have sound money that can be used on the Internet?

Or will it sort of unlock and enable, you know, the same networks that were running the dollar system to have a really neat way to get out of their debt problem and, you know, kick the can down the road 10 to 15 years, maybe 40 years. at a very important time when technology is really hitting this kind of parabolic breakthrough with autonomy, with AI, with, you know, robotics, just drone satellites, just internet, you know, architecture kind of breaking in the world of bits breaking into the world of atoms as it's sort of happening. You know, let's focus on that. Where is it going? So the question of, was it Epstein?

Was Satoshi Epstein? I think it's kind of a ridiculous question like on its face. because he very clearly wasn't a coder. Very clearly was, you know, in the emails buying books in 2018, you know, that, you know, was like Bitcoin for Dummies and this. And I think a bit of that is sort of him being a curious guy and, you know, wanting to see what was, well, what is the Bitcoin for dummies? What is the, you know, how do we reduce this for dummies? Let me check it out.

But obviously, he knew very much about it. I mean, he was, he was reaching out to Gavin Andresen in 2011 to, like, ask about what was going on with Bitcoin at the time. You know, again, that email to John Brockman saying, it's time for a viable alternative currency, his connections with Amir and Adam Back, Amir Taki, and Adam back, you know, he claimed multiple times in multiple emails that he met with the founders of Bitcoin.

And, you know, there are these kind of crazy guys that are willing to go to jail for it, and I'm not. And, you know, so it's very clear pretty early on in the network cycle, he was hip to Bitcoin and had a pretty good understanding of it. You know, there's some pretty, pretty interesting emails in there where he talks about this. So the idea that he was there at the very, very, very beginning is unknown. I don't think he has the technical chops to have created it, but I do think he knew the people that did have the technical chops to create it.

And, you know, the chain series sort of concludes with this idea that, you know, the most likely people that would benefit from it and have the chain series. the ability to create it would be the PayPal guys, would be Peter Thiel and Max Lefchin specifically, and we know how close they were with Epstein, specifically Teal. And there's even emails with Peter Teal talking to Epstein about, you know, the coming anti-Bitcoin pressure in 2014, which I think, again, everybody read it wrong. Everybody read that email being like, look, Epstein and Teal are here to take down Bitcoin. Like, they're talking about the coming pressure. It's like, No, they're sitting on their tower looking at, like, oh, there's a new front developing in the Bitcoin space.

And here comes the legislators that don't know that it is this, you know, that it's designed to beat the system and become the new reserve currency, a reserve asset, really. I think they're sort of like, we're expecting it and waiting for it. And then they saw it and they're sharing it with each other. And Teal's like, oh, is this the start of what we thought was going to happen, which is like, actually the incumbent system pushing back on Bitcoin. That's how I read it. I don't see how you could read it any other way. I mean, I don't think the Epstein Network or Teal, I mean, PayPal was playing around with Bitcoin by then publicly. Teal owned it. A lot of those guys owned it. You know, Bellagie and Co. were working on their mining, you know, their A6. And a lot of the people in the

Bitcoin network, you know, had intense connections to the PayPal network. Max Levechin was an investor in that Balaji, you know, ASIC project. So, no, I don't think he's Satoshi. I don't. Yeah, no, I, Epstein's clearly not Satoshi. But I do think we should dispel some fud here because I think there's a few things that are in the emails, like one saying he met the creators of Bitcoin. I think that could really be easily, be explained by maybe he met like Amiraki, Gavin

Andresen or spokes Gavin Andreessen and chalked them up as the creator of Bitcoin, which they clearly weren't, just like developers in the space early. I think in 2009, 2010, that's kind of an understandable take. But like the really interesting thing here is that there's becoming this connection, like especially on Twitter, maybe people who are new to Bitcoin, who think that this is kind of an issue that Epstein was in Bitcoin very early, maybe like had something to do with the developers back then. But really that doesn't matter. Do you want to like explain why? Well, it doesn't matter. And it does matter.

It does matter in the sense that it is very clear that this network was in on Bitcoin in the first epoch, which is the epoch that 50% of all Bitcoin were issued. And that's something that the chain looked at as well. You look at Charles Cascarilla of Paxos. He talks about running a mining operation out of a failed bank in Manhattan where he got free electricity and he had enough GPUs and early A6s where he was. he was actually running, you know, he had over 25% of the hash rate of the network during the first epoch, right? You know, you look at Wences Casares, who was incredibly involved in the, in the PayPal network and, you know, formed Zappo. He has a hot wallet that's linked to his name that he published online that had a million Bitcoin flow through it, right? So these guys were

there at the beginning. This idea that Bitcoin was this complete immaculate conception and there were not bankers or intelligence or scummy people at the beginning is ridiculous. They were. They were there. The difference, though, is that it was designed so that the issuance was not controlled by any of these people, specifically, unlike, you know, an Ethereum or something like that where there's a pre-mine and this stuff is distributed. you know, there's at least the idea, the concept that this was distributed fairly. And that's important, I think, for it to kind of get the treatment from the market as it does as being kind of a commodity versus, you know, XRP that printed 100 billion tokens in the Genesis block, if it even is a Genesis block. But you know what I mean?

It's like they just printed it, distribute it. Yes, they locked half away, but, you know, they were all created at the beginning. Bitcoin isn't like that. It's infinitely more like a commodity and you have to kind of put in work to get the bitcoins out. But it is important that this network was there at the beginning because they probably hold a shit ton of Bitcoin. But they can't do anything with that Bitcoin. They can't change the rules because they have a load of Bitcoin. Well, right. But also it shows that if this is going to become the new reserve asset of the world, they might have 25% of the supply that we don't know about. And what if it's like, you know, we're seeing consolidation within that network. It's not like, these networks are perfect and there's not infighting within them, you know, who knows where all that Bitcoin went? Who knows who has control of Satoshi's wallets? You know, all we have is these little data points, these little emails, these little things, the little bit of architecture that people have kind of designed to look at the blockchain

and try to make guesses. But, like, we don't really know. And if this is going to be something that, you know, is a true social post away from becoming a $10 trillion market cap, well, you know, some of the worst people in the world might hold 10%, 5% of the supply and we would have no idea. So to say that that doesn't matter is ludicrous in the sense that, well, we just made these guys some of the richest people in the world. And if this is going to pan out the way that we, as Bitcoiners think it will, Bitcoin will continue to appreciate immensely. And of course, have boom bust like we're seeing now.

what Bitcoin looks absolutely terrible right now. But, you know, like, these guys have a lot of power. I mean, if this becomes the next reserve asset of the world, of course it's important. But does that mean that they control consensus moving forward? Like, not at the protocol level. I mean, it's not a proof of stake system. Holding a bunch of Bitcoin does not mean you can censor the next person or restrict a transaction from going through or, you know, my favorite FUD, I guess, is, you know, this idea that they'll make more than $21 million. It's like, why would someone that controls that much of the asset want there to be more? I mean, it makes absolutely no sense.

And so, but, but, but yeah, I mean, it, it of course matters. You know, if, if gold had a, had a fair launch like that, but had a limited supply and there was someone that held, you know, let's say even 2%, 5% of the supply, you know, it's a big deal. I mean, they can find ways to paperize it and not have to sell it. They can find ways to financialize it and make, you know, make that work for them without actually moving the asset at all, which is one of the big things that worries me about where Bitcoin is going as this like treasury asset. By the way, love your interview with Sailor.

I thought it was great. I really enjoyed it. That was a fun role. But, and I'm not, you know, I don't really care what happens to strategy. But I think the idea of like, okay, so this network has. X amount of the next reserve asset and it is going to continue to inflate like crazy and it's not going to be distributed necessarily. It does matter who is there at the beginning.

And now we have proof that this network was there at the beginning. It just was. Maybe not before the white paper came out. Maybe they weren't there. I think that's a good point that maybe they came in and saw it and went. We were experimenting already with alternative currencies. You know, that's something that's really important with this nexus that, again, I talked about quite a bit in the chain is the Steve Bannon, Brock Pierce, IGE company that, you know, Goldman took a big share of that Brock Pierce started after he left the digital entertainment network. It blew up in flames because of a sexual assault pedophilia scandal. And he was really into World of Warcraft. And they developed a virtual goods system where they were, you know, finding value in these, multi, you know, massive multiplayer online games like World of Warcraft and literally mining gold

in the game with these, you know, paying people minimum wage to, or way less, you know, but paying people to farm gold, virtual gold in the game, and then consolidating it and selling it on eBay for tons of money. And then eBay started to shut them down. PayPal said you can't, you know, process your, you know, we're not letting you process this money. And they had to look for an alternative currency to sell the alternative currency, you know, but these, but this, this network, you know, it's not an accident, you know, Pierce talks about this, as, which is noted in the chain, that they were working with economists to try out things in, in online games because the, you know, the outcome was, was a game. So it, what didn't have real world effects, if they inflated the

supply of a rare item, if they only created one of a rare item, and then that, And they basically ran experiments on the players and the users of the world to figure out, you know, okay, how do we not piss everybody off but create scarcity? How do we, you know, do X, Y, Z within the digital space? And that network was very interested in that. I mean, they understood that the world was digitizing and that, you know, that there was an exceptionally good chance that the world economy would run on Internet rails, whether that's the dollar or some other alternative currency.

And again, that email from Epstein in 2009 to John Brockman was like, now's the time. This was PayPal's original vision. The technology is there. We can actually do this. And there's actually a super telling email. It's probably my favorite in the whole bunch. It was released actually in November.

But it's an email from Jeffrey to Steve Bannon. in 2018, talking about, you know, should we get rid of Powell or get rid of Mnuchin, you know, kind of talking about the Trump administration, you know, right before the going direct happens, right before COVID, you know, it was December 2018, like the end of the year. And Bannon asked them, you know, should we get rid of Powell or Mnuchin, which is very strange that Bannon, who was, you know, a political advisor to Trump, you know, very early on, was a big part of the campaign, but he kind of, at least publicly sort of looked like he had kind of taken a step back from the administration. But, you know, there were reports, as this email

notes, you know, like the Hill was reporting that Trump was discussing firing Powell because of interest rate hikes. And Epstein says, no, Mnuchin is okay. It's simple. Fifteen years ago, the geriatrics understood that the internet was like telephones, connections only. Then my nerds taught them that cyber is a weapon. Same with the Fed. It's a weapon to be used with sophistication. Inflation is a concept from the 50s before the internet sent instantaneous info around the world. So dumb. Great Epstein, you know, banter there. I mean, it's pretty funny, but I think it really sets up this idea. Again, this is 2018. He's had extensive connections with, you know, the Bitcoin space. By then, really had its big pop in 2017, where it really became kind of indisputable that it was going to be

around for a bit. That was really the, you know, to me, I mean, I got into it in 2017, but it seemed like that was kind of the, okay, we're crossing 10,000, you know, we're going to be here for a bit. And I think he understood. He was a technologist and interested in technology and a money man, and he knew that inflation is an outdated concept. And we have technology and algorithms and instantaneous information that can collude and create a monetary network with zero inflation. Interesting. You know, these were his people. So he's being asked by, you know, a close advisor to Trump, you know, do we need to get

rid of some of the most important bankers in the world? And he's like, nah, no, cyber is the weapon. And this is how we're going to do it. And again, he doesn't specifically say, we're going to use tether and Bitcoin, and we're going to create the Bitcoin dollar and this guy Mark Goodwin's going to write a book about it. No, he doesn't say any of that shit, obviously. But what the fuck else is he talking about? I mean, it's very obvious that the, you know, the fight for the future of the financial system and the global economy was was through digital rails. It wasn't through these analog connections

like early telephones. It's through packets. It's through creating a monetary ledger and an asset that lives on it. And he understood that. And he understood it early and early enough to probably help guide it along. I mean, he's advising Treasury secretaries. He's advising, you know, the people at the digital currency initiative at MIT that were helping, you know, take over the void left when the Bitcoin Foundation exploded, you know, helping developers get money. I mean, he really did understand where this was going. and I think he helped connect the people

that needed to be connected to do it. He connected Larry Summers and Brock Pierce at the Mind Shift Conference, like really early on, 2011, I think. He was obviously in the Bannon sphere and talking with Bannon. He was talking with the MIT guys. He was talking with Amir. He was talking apparently with Adam back.

Gavin and Dresen, at least it seems, in the emails said, know, which is very interesting, so hats off to him. But, you know, he was all over this space. And his connections with Teal are pretty immense. And he was quite literally putting his money where his mouth was. He wasn't just coming up with these ideas or connecting people. I mean, he was investing in these in these companies. There's tons of portfolios and things strewn throughout. I mean, I almost kind of feel bad for some of the people that whose names are just in the files technically, because it's like, you know, here's all the cryptocurrency partners, like the early version of blockchain capital, Brock Pearson and the Stevens brothers, you know, really the first VC firm that, you know, it was kind of behind all the early Bitcoin companies, you know, they have all of these investor decks just like all over the, you know, the files because they emailed them with Jeffrey, because they were, you know, investing with him. And Jeffrey invested in, you know, in Coinbase. and was divested from it, you know, pretty quickly on.

A slight tangent here, it is kind of funny, actually. You look at the Blockstream emails. You know, he was conversing a lot with Austin Hill of Blockstream. And there's actually a, you know, so he was working with Reed Hoffman, who was another PayPal Mafia guy, the founder of LinkedIn, who is, you know, we know was one of the seed investors of Blockstream. And they were really good buddies. Epstein and Reed Hoffman.

But it's funny, there's this email with Austin Hill where he talks about, like, hey, I see that you guys are putting money in, like, stellar and ripple. And, like, there are competitors, and we don't want, like, what they're doing is very bad for our ecosystem. Like, we don't want this competition and basically ask them to divest because they were investing in competitors. So, like, that's another angle to this that's very interesting. To me, it seems very obvious Bitcoin is created to be the commodity that it is.

But like, it wasn't always a sure bet. It's pretty sure now that it has the, you know, mostly has the regulatory clarity of the only jurisdiction that really matters that it's a commodity. But like that wasn't true back then. It really was, you know, a fight to see who would win and who would, who would, you know, stand the test of time and actually have a chance at becoming an alternative currency. And so it was a bit more of a battle then between Bitcoin and these alternative ideas that even some of the most important people in the space at the time were like, you can't put money into our competitors. Like, what if we lose? It's so funny to think of that. But yeah, I mean, Epstein was all over this space, all over with Brock Pierce, who, you know, 10, you know, 10. Heather is the most important, maybe the most important company in the world, like in many ways. Like, yeah, okay, they're not creating AI that's going to take over so much of, you know, jobs and how people interact with each other and interface with companies.

Okay, but they are investing in it. They're not creating the chips that are going to run all the computers that run all this stuff. Like, sure, maybe Nvidia's up there, obviously Apple and Microsoft. You know, there's these software and hardware companies that are stalwarts that are exceptionally important. But, like, what's more important than the digital Federal Reserve? I mean, like the company that prints dollars and gets four and a half percent or whatever, three percent to issue dollar tokens. I mean, it's incredible what the way that Tether has squeaked through where they're Bagman now, who's all over the, the files as well, Howie Lutnik is like running commerce, you know, for years and years, right?

It's been BitFinext and a lot of these truthers who are like 99% correct about everything about Tether, except the most important thing to me, which is that it's not a fraud in the typical sense where it's not this Ponzi scheme that's going to blow up because it's too important. It is way, way, way too important for dollar hegemonic advances for the U.S. government to let Tether die. And so, I don't know, maybe I'll eat my words. Maybe it will. Maybe it finally will. This will be the cycle.

And I'm totally wrong about all this. And Tether blows up. But it's like Tether resembles so much more of an intelligence operation than it does a fraud. And I think the Tether Truthers for years and years have really done the research about how nefarious a lot of these people are and how they are working at the behest of the government in so many ways, freezing funds and this and that. But now they're like the largest private holder of gold in the world. They have 100,000 Bitcoin. They can, they have a money printer. They're, they've basically gotten the okay from at least the current administration.

We'll see if that stays. And they have a big enough head start in the stable coin space that, you know, I don't see the market cap being challenged imminently. Yeah, they're one of the most important companies in the world. Which is wild. Which is crazy. Obviously, some of us knew that that was coming a little earlier on than others. But, I mean, the gold thing is, I know I've been ranting a ton, but the gold thing is crazy. I don't know if you have any thoughts on it, but it's like, they're the gold thing.

the large like what's going on here this is an interesting development i remember ansel uh who you know i used to work with a bit at bitcoin magazine he's he runs some pretty good financial market stuff and um you know he had a tweet about you know pretty pretty early on in the gold bull run that was like what if the gold story is actually kind of accidentally a bitcoin coin story and it's really about tether buying up tons of gold to get ready for the expansion of the tokenized gold system You know, wouldn't that be kind of funny? And everybody was like ripping them apart and be like, you're so crazy. They're not buying enough.

You know, this is a central bank and this is a huge, this is China. And sure, it is. But also, no, he was right. Like, this is tethered. They bought a fucking shit ton of gold. And they're getting ready. I mean, they are the prime company set up for, you know, if this financial system, you know, goes into place, which like, I don't know what other choice the U.S. government has. why would Trump let himself go into the midterms, you know, with a collapsed economy when there's like an alternative where he could theoretically sort of do the things we've discussed for years and use Bitcoin as this debt sink and print a bunch of money at zero rates to the stablecoin issuers and have the new buyers a debt issue stable coins who hold a lot of Bitcoin and pump Bitcoin. I mean, to me, it's sort of a no-brainer versus like, let's lose all the midterms, get everything all fucked up, have the economy.

crash, have the world take over U.S. dollar hedge mund, and we lose it to gold-backed stable coins from China. I don't think they're going to let that happen. They're definitely not going to let that happen. And so Tether has emerged as too big to fail again. This episode is brought to you by Anchor Watch. The thing that keeps me up at night is the idea of a critical error with my Bitcoin cold storage. And this is where Anchor Watch comes in. With Anchor Watch, your Bitcoin is insured with your own A-plus rated Lloyds of London insurance policy, and all Bitcoin is held in their time-locked multi-sig volts. So you have the peace of mind known your Bitcoin is insured while not giving up custody.

So whether you're worried about inheritance planning, wrench attacks, natural disasters, or just your own silly mistakes, you're protected by Anchor Watch. Rates for fully insured custody start as low as 0.55% and are available for individual and commercial customers located in the US. Speak to Anchorwatch for a quote and for more details about your security options and coverage. Visit anchorwatch.com today. That is anchorwatch.com. Privacy was never a priority for mobile networks. For companies like AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon, data collection and monetization is the default.

But Cape is changing that. Cape is a premium U.S. mobile carrier with nationwide coverage designed from the ground up with privacy and security at the core. When you sign up, Cape collects the absolute minimum data required, stores it for the shortest time possible and never sells it. They also make you significantly harder to track at the network level and protect against sim swap attacks, which are becoming one of the biggest security risks out there, especially for Bitcoins. Cape SimSwap protection is fundamentally different. Instead of usernames and passwords, your account is secured by a 24-word passphrase, similar to how Bitcoin wallet works. No one can initiate a sim swap or take control of your phone number except you.

This isn't a burner phone or a workaround, it's a normal mobile service built properly. If you care about privacy and security, there is no better mobile carrier. To learn more and get 33% off your first six months, head to cape.co slash WBD and use code WBD at checkout. That's cape.com slash WBD. Do you wish you could access cash without selling your Bitcoin? Well, Leeder makes that possible. They're the global leader in Bitcoin-backed lending and since 2018 they've issued over $9 billion in loans with a perfect record of protecting client assets. With Leiden, you get full-costly loans with no credit checks or monthly repayments, just easy access to dollars without selling a single sat. As of July 1st, Leiden is Bitcoin only, meaning they exclusively offer Bitcoin

back loans with all collateral held by Leiden directly or their funding partners. Your Bitcoin is never lent out to generate interest. I recently took out a loan with Leiden. The whole process was super easy. The application took me less than 15 minutes and in a few hours I had the dollars in my account. It was really smooth. So if you need cash but you don't want to Bitcoin, head over to leaden.io, forward slash WBD, and you'll get 0.25% off your first loan. That's ledden.io, forward slash WBD. The interesting thing is, like, we've been calling Tether's sort of a de facto central bank for such a long time. And so I didn't guess they were going to buy a massive amount of

gold, be the largest private holder of gold in the world. But they're just behaving like a central bank. Like, it all makes sense. Like, they are just doing what all the other central banks are doing at this point. And I think the tokenization of gold is, you know, is really true. I don't really know what their hand game is there. Can we go back a little bit? Because that was an insane rant. You're awesome. Yeah, sorry. But I do want to ask a question about the PayPal Mafia still, because there's tons of people that got into Bitcoin in 2010, 2009, like super, super early that are going to get rich that I might not like. And there's nothing I can do about that, nothing I should do about that. But like, do you think there's a non-nefarious answer

to why the PayPal guys got into Bitcoin so early, in the sense that they were trying to build a monetary system for the world. They were obviously going to be paying attention to anything like Bitcoin that did come out. Is there no explanation where they just spotted it early and thought this is interesting, I should buy some while it's really cheap? Well, I think the answer sort of lies in the words of Teal, which is interesting because, you know, he says a lot of things that are obviously not true. Like, I'm a libertarian and blah, blah, And it's like, no, you work with the state. Like, you're on the Bilderberg steering committee.

Like, what are you talking about? But, you know, he talks about how competition is for losers. And that is how you lose profits is entering an environment with competition. You know, find something that no one else does. Create it, build it, offer it, and dominate it. Become the monopoly of the thing that you offer that no one else does. And that is what PayPal did. I mean, you have to tip your hat.

These guys are the ultra spooks of the modern world, but you have to kind of tip your hat sometimes and be like, okay, PayPal did it. You know, Levchen studied distributed systems and cryptography, and he meets up with teal. And, you know, they have a breakfast one morning, and he tells him, I want to, you know, build a cryptography for, you know, sending money,

you know, using Palm Pilots. That was the initial idea. And he jumped on it and they were like, that's an amazing idea. I'm a currency speculator. That's what Teal did. His first fund was a hedge fund that dealt with, you know, forex currency, you know, markets. And they knew right away that, hey, actually, we can blow this out.

I shouldn't say right away, actually. It actually came when Reed Hoffman joined and when David Sachs, who's now running crypto and for Trump when they both joined, you know, they weren't they weren't founders. It was, you know, mostly Lev Chin and Teal. But they decided like, hey, you know, we are the, we're in Silicon Valley. This is where all the PayPal or sorry, all the Palm Pilot users of the world are. If we build this thing as a Palm Pilot native thing, like great, our like target audience is like 40 bros that live in Silicon Valley. Whereas if we use email, everyone has email. And literally the PayPal

idea of emails was just the backup. Like that was just the way to access if your Palm Pilot got lost. Like they had a backup system that used email where you could send money if your Palm Pilot infrared, you know, do-hickie wasn't working. It was literally just like, you know, the backup. And then they were like, let's focus on that and let's grow it out like that. And they were correct. And what people never understand about PayPal is they were the first people to

dollarize the Internet. They made the dollar via PayPal and eBay, who later bought them. You know, the native currency of the Internet was the dollar. That's extremely important. I mean, as it relates to, you know, these, again, these are decade-long plans. The dollar system new technology is coming. A lot of this, you know, communication technology will lead to new ways to spend and transact financially. PayPal understood that.

They dominated it. they took over and they not only dominated it within the U.S., but throughout the world, they made the U.S. dollar the de facto currency of the Internet. So there's the rant there. How does that relate to your question? They're already saying that they're not going to let competitors into the space. You find the space, you dominate the space, and you kill the competitors. Why would this group of people that understood that there was a viable alternative currency

that was being born that was now starting to get a little bit of a market cap and get a little bit of a network. Bitcoin was a lot more fragile than it is now. And rather than embracing it, they could have done things to try to displace it in line with this idea of let's not have competitors. And they didn't do that. I mean, PayPal flirted with doing Bitcoin stuff in 2014. Like, there are, there's, like, deleted, like, commercials that they made that reference

Bitcoin payments that they ended up taking that out and not delivering that option. And there's a lot of interesting interviews with like David Marcus, who's at Lightspark now, who was at PayPal then, talking about, you know, how they were interested in, you know, using Bitcoin early on. And Teal and Epstein are emailing about Bitcoin in 2014. He bought it then. That whole network is all over it. They would not let it blossom. They wouldn't invest their money into it. They wouldn't be pushing it as this altruistic good or this

potential commodity replacement if they thought it was a real threat to their model rather than something that could extend their dominance. And so I do think it's very possible that they weren't behind it and they saw it and they went, actually, we can use this better than everybody else by

tweaking a couple things. And actually there's an interesting email there. Let me just find it here. Where he's talking about, he's talking to Bill Gross, who is the guy that founded Idea Labs. And Idea Labs is this like Southern California incubator that was the first investor,

the first institutional investor in PayPal. and PayPal was initially funded with a million dollar fund from Teal himself from his from his hedge fund that he gave basically to him and Levchen to start the company but the first real investor was this incubator idea labs and Bill Gross one of the co-founders with him was Bill Elkis who was the guy that led the investment into PayPal

he was the signee on that also turns out He was the co-signee of the Jay Epstein Foundation and was very close to Epstein. They had known each other, known each other since 85. And there's this exchange between Epstein and Bill Gross, where he talks to Jeff, and they get connected in 2013. And he says, I'd love to talk to you about my new currency idea. And they talk about Bill Elkiss and they have this little bit of an exchange. And, you know, they literally bring up, you know, are you thinking of doing this with Brock Pierce?

And Bill Gross says, I don't know Brock Pierce. It's very interesting that he says that because Brock Pierce at the time was actually running a fund with Bill Elkis under his Clearstone Ventures, which was a spin-off from Ideal Labs. and Pierce was running this fund with William Quigley that was the Clearstone Ventures Gaming Fund and that was sort of a spin-off for when he got replaced by Steve Bannon at IGE when they were doing the World of Warcraft stuff he got sucked into this world

and he started this online gaming fund and so Bill Gross is reaching out to Epstein is like, hey, I have this new idea for a currency he brings up, Epstein says, you should talk to Brock Pierce and Bill Gross says, I don't know Brock Pierce. Obviously, it's very close in his network that he could get to know Pierce very well because he's working with one of his best friends, Bill Elkis.

And in this email, after he says, you should talk to Brock Pierce, Epstein writes to Bill Gross, it just randomly turns and starts talking about Bitcoin. And so in 2013, after discussing, I have this new idea for a currency, you should talk to Brock Pierce, and then it just randomly cuts to discussing Bitcoin. And Epstein says this. He says, so this is May 30th, 2013, Epstein to Bill Gross. The good is that Bitcoin uses an algorithm to limit supply, unlike the variable of gold or other commodities. However, two main issues. One, the government doesn't like it. Money laundering, money transmitting, aiding and abetting all types of crime, etc. Two, all transactions are arguably taxable and therefore extra tricky. The

Bitcoin guys came to see me early in the process and made it clear they were all willing to go to jail for their ideas. I'm not, but there is a way to do it, but it turns the Bitcoin model on its head. Talk to you soon. So that's 2013. They were talking about, hey, how can we flip this model on its head? I have this idea. You got to talk to Brock Pierce, who's buddies with Bill Elkis, who we're both buddies with. And Tether gets formed the next year.

founded by Brock Pierce and, you know, and Reeves and Sellers. But then the kind of fourth guy that joins on, he technically, I've been corrected by Craig Sellers personally, that William Quigley was actually not a co-founder of Tether, but he came on, you know, pretty promptly after. Him and Brock Pierce worked on that fund together under Elkis at Clearstone. And he comes on and William Quigley considers himself one of the founders of Tether, but apparently the, other Tether Boys do not. But then they go on and they create Tether, which kind of flips the Bitcoin model on its head and sort of this new idea of a currency that Bill Gross had.

Bill Gross is like an incredibly important guy in the tech space who was kind of an uncle figure for a lot of these pretty important companies early on. PayPal absolutely included. And he went on to then form near intelligence, which became one of the long. largest data brokers and trackers of human and data in the world. It's this huge, you know, kind of think like a primordial pound tier. But these guys are, I mean, they're just discussing

very openly in these emails. Like, how do we flip the Bitcoin thing on its head? How do we create a new currency? Hey, you should talk to Brock Pierce. Oh, you know, Bill Elkis. And it's like, they're the PayPal guys. They were the money behind PayPal. They were the incubators behind PayPal. you know, these guys are all there. They could see, you know, to your point of, okay, maybe they didn't start it, but did they try to co-opt it? You know, to me, the tether model doesn't work unless there is extreme belief that Bitcoin will monetize excessively because it's sort of this play that the dollar

will continue to depreciate relative to Bitcoin. So we have this huge Bitcoin holdings and we can use tether to not artificially necessarily, but by creating more dollars of these digital tokens, what else you're using them for other than trading and going in and out of Bitcoin? So it becomes this way to generate more liquidity in dollars in the Bitcoin space and quite literally tether the Bitcoin price

to the US dollar price. To me, that's not a necessarily like a mutilistic bad relationship with Bitcoin. You could argue that it does, and a lot of people do. A lot of the hijacking Bitcoin people talk accessible. about how tether is this big fraud and it's, you know, well, you know, really only started doing this in 2017 when it picked the winner of the block size war. It was tether that did it. But to me,

I think the story is a lot deeper than that. And these guys understood that there was going to be economic debasement that would threaten the U.S. dollar system because of just the math of, of X trillion dollars of debt. It's obviously gone up exceptionally since these systems were even put in place. But to me, it doesn't seem like Tether or PayPal has any. interest in killing Bitcoin because it actually helps them a lot because they own a shit ton of it. And so why would they hurt this system? How can we try to monetize it and create a profit model around something that doesn't have a profit model other than just hold and watch the asset appreciate? You know, you have to sell, you have to distribute, you have to, you know, find

income, right? And so PayPal and Tether and this group that is immensely connected at its origins understood how they could build a system that kind of flipped the Bitcoin thing on its head. When you look at what Tether is today, it has, I mean, it's an important part of like the Bitcoin story that is now has like regulatory clarity in the US at least. But like go back to 2016, 2017, it didn't at all. It was under massive scrutiny. Yeah. Do you think, um, what was it sort of, well, that's, that was going to be my question. Do you think the kind of Epstein, PayPal, Mafia connection is what allowed it to kind of get through that period where, like, who was it, the New York Fed were trying to sue, not the New York Fed, sorry, the New York

DA sued. Yeah, the SDNY. Yeah. Yeah. I think it's theater. I think a lot of this stuff is theater. I think the other big story that was going on at that time was Facebook's Libra, and they were going to create this basket of currencies, then it turned into a stable

coin, a U.S. dollar stable coin. And, you know, immediately upon Facebook, which, again, we know so much about their intelligence connections at their origin as well. This idea that the U.S. government wouldn't want the most active website with the most active monthly users to create a U.S. dollar, you know, asset that is totally surveillable and seizable and freezable and used by the world. Like the fact that the Senate called them in like immediately upon the announcement of it and did this whole, you're threatening the U.S. dollar system. and doing all this bullshit. It's like, why the hell wouldn't they want that? You know, why wouldn't they want that?

It doesn't threaten the power structures of the Fed at all. Well, was that not when they were trying to do it with like a basket of different things? They were wanting to have like gold in there, different currencies. Well, yeah, it was going to be, you know, the euro and the pound. And, you know, I think there was a bunch of different discussions. And the hard part about talking about Libra is it literally like changed names and changed ideas and changed lead developers. And it just moved around so much. it's hard to say specifically. But initially, like when that first happened, the first white paper and

getting called to Congress, it was a basket of currencies. And it's hilarious to me that the U.S. government would pretend that they didn't want that. Now, I get other central banks not wanting it, which is also true. I mean, there was a lot of talk. I think Mark Carney, who's now the president of Canada, was like running the Bank of England at the time. And he talked about, you know, how this is a threat to, you know, if it gets put in this basket, and then we create extreme monetary velocity because it's a digital asset, and then they have 200 million active users,

and, you know, this could become a threat to like our financial, you know, sovereignty, basically. And I understand everyone else being involved in the Libra Project, the basket of currencies, pissing their pants. But the U.S. government, it's like, you guys obviously created Facebook, and why wouldn't you want this?

To me, it was just a lot of theater about, like, okay, well, if there's going to be centralization. We've got to go back. You say so many things that I've got questions on. You say the U.S. government obviously created Facebook. Is that true? Yeah, I mean, the lifelog story of kind of this idea that, you know, the day the lifelog project was shuttered, which was this DARPA project that basically

was to create a database and ID pictures, a life log, you know, of, of every, every person of every citizen in the United States. The day that was shuttered was the day that Facebook was launched. And there's an amazing article by Whitney Webb about the military origins of Facebook. And it is a crazy, it's a lot to, like, accept, of course, this idea that, like, is intelligence really in the private sector like this? like doing social networks and like is the remnants of DARPA and the CIA like, you know, actually the company that Mark Zuckerberg is running. And there's a lot of like suspension of disbelief to sort of accept the premise that maybe it's

true. But when you read about it, I mean, definitely I urge everyone to read it and make the decision for themselves. It's like pretty undeniable, I think. And, you know, again, does it matter who creates? Facebook, just like who doesn't matter who created Bitcoin. Like, no, it doesn't really. But at the end of the day, where is it going and what is it doing and what is it enable?

And it created the first, it created consent for, you know, the digital ID. It created the first kind of web of interconnectivity between all these people, these spokes of people on the internet. I mean, it's absolutely proven that they have IDs for people that don't even have, you know, accounts on Facebook. Like they were able to just sort of map everybody. that's interacted with each other and create, you know, through our consent, right?

I mean, I was all over Facebook when I was like a child and in high school and it came out. And tagging yourself in photos. Tagging myself and putting like, like squares over my face and being like, this is me and like, this is my grandma and this is my best friend and I'm on my camp and I'm this. And just the web of connections that that whole network created plays a huge role in, you know, like this.

Bitcoin is pseudo-inonymous, but if you have all of this just crap laying around that you were kind of careless about all over the Internet, it becomes a lot easier to sort of analyze and do heuristic analysis to figure out what everybody's doing on the Internet. The Internet's really hard to be private, not because there aren't technologies to be private on the Internet, but there's so much lossiness in the process of trying to be private. and when you've created so much evidence and breadcrumbs through social networks, um, that you consented to giving your information to and didn't really think about why that would be a bad idea. Um, yeah. And so, so anyways, I, I think it's, I think it's pretty, pretty proven that, that there was a military origin to the background of Facebook. And there's more to it. Um, I, I, I haven't read the article in a little bit, and I don't exactly remember, but there's a lot more to it than just the day that it shuttered was the day that it opened, that shared some advisors and some people left from DARPA to then go and work directly at Facebook.

But regardless, right, like the U.S. government understands the importance of Facebook being basically the face of the internet for like billions of people. I mean, at least a billion people. Like a lot of places in the world, like that's how you, it's kind of the American online port. Like that's how you get on the internet. It's like you use Facebook. It's a lot of times it's free. You can't access the internet, but you can access Facebook like with the phone.

And so like why wouldn't the US government want there to create a US dollar asset that runs around on its rails that users in Africa can send to each other for free with their smartphones? Like why wouldn't they want to extend dollar hedge money in that way? Of course they would. But to me, I looked at it as this sort of like, well, this is how we create consent for what we really want. what we really want to do. And we have to create the regulatory environment

and use the government as the enabling environment to create the system that we really want. So we'll huff and puff and make a big stink about, oh, no, like, Facebook is becoming too powerful and it's too centralized. And so it basically creates this perfect opportunity for what we're seeing now, which is the proliferation of privately issued stable coins

that, you know, because of the Genius Act, that was really the evolution of the Gillis or the Lummis Gillibrand bill that had so much to do and talk so much about the Terraluna implosion. We can't have algorithmic back stable coins. They need to be backed with U.S. treasuries. You know, we need to be very careful because it's very dangerous. And they just created all of this consent and for the perfect, you know, opportunity for them to just enshrine. U.S. debt has to back stable coins. These are the people that can issue them. We don't really care who issues them as long as they're backed with our debt and they uphold to these K. Y.C. and AML and all these things. And they really just set, you know, the perfect gumbo for the U.S. dollar to just spread all over the world and just infiltrate like a virus every other national sovereign central bank. Why would you keep your money in a local currency if you can, just use your cell phone and get a U.S. dollar token.

And, you know, it's a total domination. The U.S. is in perfect place. You know, the dollar's over levered against itself, but every other currency looks like shit, too. And the U.S. dollar is having a technological breakthrough, whereas really nothing else in the world is having that technological breakthrough by any means. And these rails are there to create enough liquidity

for the whole world to use dollars. I mean, stable coins are the big. You know, they are the big cahuna of what's happening, whether it's gold-backed or U.S. dollar back, like, that's the fight. And it's really interesting to me that Tether now is the largest private holder of gold. Yeah, it's going to win the fight. Yeah, Tether's going to win. Yeah, it's a showdown between U.S. back, U.S. dollar-backed stable coins and gold-backed stable coins. And the winner is already determined.

It's Tether. Thanks for playing. Have a good time. So I don't know where we started there, but I think there was a question and I probably didn't answer it. Well, I don't remember either, but I have another question anyway. So last time we spoke, we talked a little bit about, well, we talked a lot about the idea of Bitcoin being co-opted and whether Tether, what role Tether plays in that. I've also since then, I did an interview of Brent Johnson where we talked about his dollar milkshake theory, which Tether only accelerates to like a crazy degree. Oh, yeah.

Like that is the way that the world dollar rises. Do you think that Bitcoin is co-opted at this point? No, I don't, actually, which I think is probably surprising to a lot of my independent media friends because I think they would just assume that I think that because I've talked so much about the Epstein Network and Bitcoin and the PayPal Mafia and Tether is, you know, a lot of these things being ultimately bad for sovereignty and privacy and human freedom. But I don't think Bitcoin was co-opted because I think it is doing exactly what it was designed to do. I don't know if it's better that it's not co-opted or that it, like, I don't know if it's like a

worse thing that it was created under these perfect altruistic scenarios and then got co-opted by the baddies. Does that feel better? Is it better for us to think that way? I don't know. I don't know what's better or what's not. But Bitcoin was designed to do exactly what it's doing right now, maybe not. literally this month, but with, you know, with the down. But, I mean, it's just very clearly

proven itself to be a very strategically important asset at a time where the economic debasement of the U.S. dollar is about to create, you know, the debasement trade when the world currency, world reserve currency begins to debase. You just want to get rid of it all of your dollars and throw it into assets. And that has not happened yet. I mean, despite gold going gangbusters and silver having that that crazy blow off top there. And I'm very happy for my silver and gold bugs, friends. I own some and great. And I do think it will appreciate immensely eventually when it gets its shit back together. But no, I don't think, I think Bitcoin was designed to do exactly what it needs to do to win. I don't think it was really designed to fight. It was

designed to win and be the most mathematically astute investment you can make during the debasement trade. And I think it's very clear that it is being embraced by the very administration at the very time that it needs to be embraced to allow to get the regulatory clarity and have the inbound action, you know, have enough ability for people to get their money in, more so the institutions maybe than retail. And that's kind of already happened. I think if the U.S. government really didn't want Bitcoin to win, they wouldn't let micro strategy do what they're doing, which is obviously a speculative attack on the dollar. It just, there is no other way to put it. And if Bitcoin was truly co-opted, it wouldn't have gotten this far. It would have died

a few years ago. It wouldn't have had the COVID expansion that it saw. COVID was the perfect opportunity to kill something like Bitcoin when we saw it crash down to 3,000. If the powers that B wanted Bitcoin to die, they would have killed it then. And they didn't. And they didn't because it is very useful to them. And that does not mean that it was co-opted useful. It means that it is what it is. And it is the only digital commodity that can and will ever exist. it will never happen again. This idea that you can just carbon copy and create another one or increase the 21 million. I mean, these are things that will not happen.

They can technically happen, but they will not happen economically or socially. I can create a fork right now. I can increase the supply of Bitcoin on my node. Neither of those things matter at all. Bitcoin was designed to be a liquidity sink and be a reserve asset at the time when economic debasement goes gangbusters. And it is mostly centralized within the United States power system, within the Western power system. It is mostly, even within that power structure, it's mostly centralized within Silicon Valley from a technology standpoint. And now from an

institutional standpoint, there's enough held in private companies, or rather public companies, that the U.S. government doesn't actually need to buy Bitcoin at all. They can basically just use reserve capital requirements and tell these publicly traded companies that hold millions of dollars of Bitcoin, or millions of Bitcoin. You have to have a dollar for every dollar of Bitcoin value you have on your balance sheet.

Here, we'll link you up with a stable coin issuer that will lend you a stable coin so you can hold for every dollar of Bitcoin and we'll charge you a little fee. and Bitcoin goes up to be a $10 million market cap. We generate $10 million, $10 trillion of dollar demand. Bitcoin goes to $50 trillion. We create $40 trillion more dollars of dollar demand.

Like there's so many ways that the system can use Bitcoin that are just innately baked into what Bitcoin is, that the idea that this was hijacked by Roger Vair or sorry, by the Epstein group and Roger Vare was right. and he totally wasn't wrong about anything. And I think this bifurcation that's occurred within the Bitcoin space is also part of the design of the Bitcoin project, which was to keep us all sort of on the reservation

and infighting between the ideologues and the technologists and not really paying attention to what's going on outside of that. And instead of focusing on scaling tools and privacy tools and barter and, you know, local economies and getting, you know, people that can actually, you know, really benefit from the monetization of Bitcoin, getting Bitcoin. We're instead cheering on an administration that is incredibly corrupt and has been proven in these emails to be incredibly corrupt and is trying, whether it's Lutnik or Trump. And, you know, trying to basically get the U.S. government to pump this shit out of

of our bags, rather than focusing on all the things that we as people can use. Like, Bitcoin is an amazing idea. It will never happen again. Why do we want to let it be centralized entirely into some of the worst people in the world holding the majority of Bitcoin? If we could keep this message going and everyone just keeps bike shedding on who won the block size war, should it be two megabyte blocks, should it be four? Was BSV the right choice?

Maybe Ripples the right choice. Was it XRP? Was it, Ethereum? You know, all of these things that were just in this little box, and they're just shaking it and laughing at us, and we're just infighting instead of actually building something that will create, you know, freedom and success and what have you at the local level.

It's become zoomed out, and it's this big, you know, it's ridiculous, I think, the amount of time we've wasted. whether you believe Roger Vair's book is the Bible or, you know, the block size war is the Bible. I think you miss the bigger picture that like Bitcoin was actually probably designed by an intelligence group early on to create this exact environment and be there when monetary debasement happens and sort of push us along into the new financial system. And Bitcoin is the only digital commodity. and we're fighting all of this time, wasting all of this amazing human capital and human energy on infighting. And I'm not saying that we should reach out this big olive branch to Craig Wright or whatever, or even Roger.

Like, I think these guys have done some pretty dumb things that don't deserve forgiveness. I mean, you look at like, whose cost more people more Bitcoin in the world. Like Roger Ver is right up there with Mount Cox and B-cash. I mean, it's just unfortunate. It's true. But a lot of the people that went over there thinking this guy was correct because he said a lot of nice things, like aren't necessarily bad people. And they haven't done necessarily bad things on B-Cash development. Like, it's not a terrible idea.

Increasing the block size was something that most people in Bitcoin agreed with. We don't need it yet because no one's fucking using Bitcoin to transact. We're just holding it and hoping we become billionaires. And I think the real freedom that humans could find out of it is uncensurable, pure-to-pure cash. Like, that is the ultimate goal, not because the white paper says it, not because Roger Baer said it, but because that is actually what it would be helpful, that I could have an uncensurable monetary good. I think that's the greatest. But to be fair, Bitcoin economically, you know, it was designed to kind of have this disinflationary asymptotic approach to zero issuance.

And that is what it is. That's what it was designed to do. That has not been co-opted. That will not be co-opted. And because of that, Bitcoin will win on that metric of being the reserve asset. It will win mathematically, but it might not win carrying along the carriage behind it of peer-to-peer on censorable cash. And so can we create an environment where we understand, okay, it's going to win. It's going to monetize. That's going to happen. The government's there. Black Rock's there. All the worst people in the world are there. The Epstein's there. teal's there, you know, okay, like they're not going to just blow this up. I don't think it's a giant Ponzi scheme. I think it's something a lot more important. Can we come together and understand that we do

have human power and human capital that we can lever against these institutions that hold all the Bitcoin, but can we create tools, create a way to spend Bitcoin privately, create, you know, education and marketing and ways to get people into Bitcoin? understanding all of the faults of it, and that maybe this dream of peer-to-peer uncentruable cash may fail, but the monetary side will definitely win. Can we fight that battle, knowing that it probably almost definitely was designed to win the reserve asset battle?

And if we can kind of get our shit together and stop infighting and wasting more time on did Epstein hijack Bitcoin, what size should block, and just focus on like, what the fuck do we want? because so many of us made it. I mean, so many Bitcoiners made it. And we have all day to sit on pods and sit on spaces and talk about fucking JPEGs and talk about bullshit.

And nothing is happening. There is no push towards scaling solutions. There's very little work on privacy stuff. We're not developing cool alternative ways to like, you know, create dollar denominated value and send it, you know, we're just recreating old shitty systems on top of Bitcoin over and over and over again that are centralized and shitty, and that we're doomed to fail on the peer-to-peer cash element for 8 billion people if we keep bike shedding and fighting the block size war every three years when there's a bear market. It's fucking stupid,

and it's probably by design. If there was something that was co-opted, I'll leave it at this. It's the Bitcoin culture. It's the people. It's the community. It's the discourse. And it has been co-opted by people that have alternative motives. that are not expressed, and they censor, and they promote, and they tweak, and they tweak the discourse towards specific ways so that we're all wasting our time talking about bullshit and not fighting the giant elephants in the room. And the block size war is not the elephant in the room. It's not important. It happened. Here we are. Move on. Like, figure it out. I can't send Bitcoin to you privately easily. Can we solve for that? Can we get people to open a million lightning

channels in a single transaction? Can we onboard 8 billion people onto Bitcoin? No. Does that mean we need bigger blocks? Maybe. But there's probably a bunch of other ways that we can do it too. And if we just continually to get baited by fucking spooks in the Bitcoin space that have terrible motives and are probably taking money from certain entities to push certain narratives, to push certain books, you know, we're not going to get anywhere. And so Bitcoin culture, in my opinion, has been co-opted. And, you know, I can hear people already thinking, like, there is no Bitcoin culture. You're just projecting because you weren't to Bitcoin magazine. You're talking about Mr. Hoddle here.

Yeah. How the fuck did you know? I'm exactly thinking about Mr. Hoddle. And I disagree. I think there obviously very clearly is like a multi-million dollar Bitcoin culture industry, but that is also not necessarily representative of what Bitcoin culture could be. And like eventually it's just going to be money. We're all going to be running around with shirts on that just say money on it and it's not going to be cool or interesting that's already kind of started to happen. But if we're not ready from a technological and ideological standpoint to deal with the transition, which has not happened yet, the economic to basement trade has not happened yet. If we're not ready to onboard billions of people onto Bitcoin and give them sovereignty and give them a permissionless network like it was when we found it years ago,

if we can't give that to our kids, then we failed even though we're going to be multimillionaires. Like, that sucks. I don't want that world. I want people to be able to use this technology and have access to this monetary policy in a self-sovereign way holding their own UTXOs, rather than having to go through some paperized Bitcoin bullshit where there's third-party trust, there's custodial risk, there's all of these issues, surveillance, censorship, freezability. I don't want that to be how everyone interacts with Bitcoin, knowing that it's probably, almost definitely designed to win the economic debasement trade.

How do we make it a useful technology for everyone else that doesn't hold it? Because frankly, not a lot of people own Bitcoin. They just don't. You know? Damn, you got me fired up, Mark. We need to do better. This has been awesome. Is there anything else that you want to talk about when it comes to Epstein and Bitcoin?

I have one more question about Epstein, but it's got nothing to do with Bitcoin. I don't know. I talked about a good amount of stuff. I think the tether stuff is super interesting. There was, yes, there is one more thing I want to talk about. It will be quick, though, I know, because we've been ripping for a bit. Hey, you don't have to be quick. We've got all the time in the world.

Right on, brother. Well, in 2014 August, Epstein emailed a group of people or at least one person. It's redacted. A lot of people speculate it's Austin Hill from Blockstream, but I don't know. It's hard to see there is a redaction there. But he messages in August, August 14th, 2014, I'm going to Treasury to talk Bitcoin questions, which A, that to me is, extremely interesting that well after he was arrested the first time, you know, Epstein is going to Treasury to discuss financial things. You know, Mr. Money is strutting into Treasury. That obviously should be a huge red flag about our government, and by our government, I mean the United States government, that financial decisions and counsel is being had with, you know, convicted sexual abusers. So that's A, very interesting, but also the fact that he is being brought into Treasury

to discuss Bitcoin. You could argue, is he doing it to discuss how do we stop it or how do we embrace it or just, hey, did you make this thing? Like, I don't know. No one has any ideas. But the response is very interesting to me. And I think it really sums up kind of everything

that I've sort of speculated regarding stable coins and Bitcoin. And the response is, I'm more interested in planting some seeds of thought. Ecuador is working on a nationally approved cryptocurrency. Looks like we will have a pilot in the works with India to do a digital rupee to phase out graft and grift and corruption. Canada is also looking at doing a digital Canadian dollar. I'm more interested in what Treasury thinks about doing a Fed- Reserve-backed digital U.S.D, especially if they felt like they could embed AML and KYC policy into the coin.

It's one of the few legitimate approaches they have to change the adoption use cases of Bitcoin. A digital USD wouldn't suffer the volatility of Bitcoin and could gain wider adoption and allow them to have a seat at the table as opposed to regulating Bitcoin and driving innovation overseas and criminals underground. Any insights on this will be great. That to me is sums up so much about what we've discussed about, you know, sort of the perception of stable coins. And that, interestingly, I think you could make an argument based on that, that, okay, maybe this is a co-option play and the stable coins are part of this co-option play of how do we coax, you know, the treasury into playing ball. and here's how they can co-opt in and do it.

But to me, it seems like a really clever plan, especially if this did come from Austin Hill, that it is them saying, here's how we trick Treasury and the U.S. government into thinking they have a seat at the table and they get a seat at the table to ensure, you know, U.S. dollar hedgeman lasts. But in reality, us Bitcoiners are actually really playing them

and playing the uninitiated into the Bitcoin scheme, and we're tricking them into thinking, yeah, if you use stable coins, you don't got to worry about Bitcoin at all. But in reality, we obviously know that that's not true, and there's this incredible symbiotic relationship between stable. Now, let's talk about it. In 2014, I mean, there was no stable coin industry.

Tether was founded then. I mean, we're talking, you know, at most when it was MasterCoin on Omnilayer. I mean, you know, we're talking millions of dollars, well under a billion dollars. I mean, it was just this tiny little, this little thing. But this seed being planted, like, as this email says, like, this is how we get treasury, which, again, is bringing in Epstein for counsel to talk about Bitcoin. This is how we get them to be comfortable with the growth of Bitcoin, which, of course, we saw a massive growth of Bitcoin in that era.

You know, this is how we get them comfortable as we tell them this, and they think they're playing this game. when in reality we're playing this game, which is the Bitcoin game. And that to me, I think, is like such a perfect summation of a lot of the questions I have about, like, which came first, the stable coin or the Bitcoin, like the chicken and the egg thing. Like, was it just to trick the government? Was it created as a ploy? Was Bitcoin created as a ploy to extend the dollar? Was it actually created by a bunch of insiders to make a breakaway financial system? that mathematically will win as, as like we see the economic debasement. Like, who knows?

But I think the reality of that situation that Epstein is going into Treasury to talk Bitcoin and he's coming in with this idea in his head after he just discussed in emails previously a year ago with Bill Gross about how he had this idea to flip Bitcoin on its head and you should talk to Brock Pierce and found this new, you know, alternative currency, which very likely became Tether. And then he's going into Treasury. And then this guy is saying, trick them with this. Tell them this.

You know, we don't want to force innovation to go overseas. Like you hear so many of those talking points in senators today talking about stable coins. We can't drive innovation overseas. That was in an email from this guy to Epstein on his way, probably looking at his Blackberry, walking into the fucking treasury to talk about Bitcoin in 2014. And he's getting fed this. Yeah, that's a pretty good idea. I actually might have just helped create.

tether and you know, that's a pretty good idea. It's just so crazy that, you know, we think of we think of these technologies as like inhuman and sort of, you know, especially Bitcoin as like, you know, not having been created or pushed along by humans. It's like a very like, you know, the philosophers of Bitcoin about how Bitcoin was, wasn't invented, it was discovered and the fires of math and the proof of work and just like absolute slop. ridiculousness, although I did, sometimes I do think it's fun and I get it, but like, no, it was obviously invented. Bitcoin was fucking invented, grow up, it wasn't discovered. There are elements of math that, of course, will always exist, but like, yeah, it was invented. It was invented by people.

They coded it. They released it. They created pseudonyms. They did, like, Satoshi was a human being. He might have been multiple human beings, but he was a human being, or they were a human being or whatever. And it was, this, this is a plan that was done. It was done very carefully. It was done at the specific time. It was done to do exactly what it is doing now. It was not co-opted. Tether didn't co-op Bitcoin. The big blockers didn't lose. It isn't some, whatever conspiracy you think it is, it's like the conspiracy is actually simpler in that it was a group of people came together and went, let's do this and let's do that, and let's tell them this, and we'll release it here, and we'll do that, and we'll sit back and we'll make billions and billions of dollars,

and we'll have a whole new alternative currency network where we can launder, and we can pay for nefarious things, and do a whole bunch of crazy shit and take over the world global economy. And the fact that at the very beginning, these discussions were being had with the EPSC network deserves a think. It deserves a thought to think about what does that mean? Does that change my relationship with Bitcoin? Am I selling all my Bitcoin because I think that there were bad things, bad people involved at the beginning or it might be this big trick? Like, I'm not. And I know people probably don't get that. Like, how could you? You know, I've been called crazy things on Twitter because people sort of assumed I was someone other than I was by saying that there's a lot of issues with Bitcoin

and a lot of bad people and blah, blah, blah. But, like, it was designed to do what it's going to do, and I want to be there for it when it does it, so I can use that my asymmetric information advantage of being early to Bitcoin to go do cool things with my family and help people and hopefully build things because ultimately the final play of the Bitcoin dollar, stable coin hoopla, blah, blah,

is not a decentralization of monetary policy. It's a centralization of the U.S. dollar policy over the world, And then that versus gold and versus Bitcoin, and that trifecta will play out. And if I had to choose between Bitcoin, gold, or U.S. dollars to hold long term to be able to give something to my kids, I would certainly put some in gold, but I would put the vast majority of it in Bitcoin, which is what I'm doing, which is what I'm living. I'm not lying to you. I'm going down with the ship with all of you if this goes to zero to, you know, like that's

just the reality and it will be painful, but it is what it is. But if I had to pick between those three things, I'm picking Bitcoin for the long term, for the most appreciation and in the most sovereignty. And I hope that the Bitcoin space can stop arguing and fighting like Don Quixote style, the windmills of the block size war over and over again. And we can come together and be like, okay, maybe we were fooled. Maybe we were bamboozled. Who gives a shit? It is what it is. Let's fight.

What do we do? How do we build? how do we put this money towards Bitcoiners like suck at supporting stuff as it relates to development. Like there's a lot of cool stuff going on. But like in general, other spaces because it's a much less hard money, you know, there's so much more money in Ethereum and in these shit coins to slosh around to buy influencers to do this stuff. Bitcoiners need to sort of to use sailor talking to you like not eat their own and and support their own. because there are a bunch of true Bitcoiners that don't give a shit about state power

and want the U.S. dollar to not necessarily go up in flames, but like, do a controlled demolition of the power structures that are upheld because of dollar hedgemon. And I think Bitcoiners can do it. And I hope they do. But either way, I mean, I'm pretty sure Bitcoin

is going to succeed because it was designed to succeed. and how that success is distributed is up to us. And I think there's a lot of demoralization in hearing about all these bad things. Like, oh, my God, Epstein wasn't talking about Bitcoin and maybe 2009, like, this is so bad. Like, it's not the money of pedophiles.

Like, sorry, that's the U.S. dollar, maybe the pound. I don't know. But it's not Bitcoin. And certainly we can get rid of that, moniker and get rid of that stickiness of these bad people by using it as a tool that empowers local trade and economic freedom that doesn't touch status government bags. So yeah, long story short, that's that's about it. Okay, last question on Edstein. Did this document drop unearth anything about who he exactly was and who he was working for, where he kind of fit in the power structure?

Yeah, I mean, nothing that I think wasn't already pretty, you know, expressed by a lot of great Epstein researchers, but obviously Whitney Webb has done excessive amounts of work and research on this. But, no, I mean, he talks about how he basically is a representative, you know, a representative of the Rothschild banking dynasty. which is also very interesting because Trump himself was bailed out by Wilbur Ross, who later worked in his first administration when he was a banker at Rothschild Inc. You know, when he got into a bunch of gambling debt, you know, so he was very likely an asset of Rothschild banking dynasty as well. Obviously, Rothschild, like when you talk about them, it like devolves really quickly into, you know, like, I don't know, like Luciferian, anti-eastern, anti-eastern.

Semitic crazy. I mean, it's just you can't like say Rothschild without going into that place, which I think is probably by design where you like can't actually talk about them because if you do, you're like this crazy guy and you're like you hate Jews or whatever. And it's just like, no, that has nothing to do with that. It's like this is a banking dynasty that has controlled, you know, humongous like areas of the world global financial system for for centuries. And it's interesting that, you know, I think a lot of people, when they think about these banker families, they think of, you know, gold, silver, like, Napoleonic era, which is true. That's where they were there as well. But like these banking dynasties, these infrastructure dynasties, the Rockefellas, these, you know, they don't, they don't just disappear. They didn't lose all of their money. They got guys like Epstein to hide it. And that's what Epstein was. doing. I mean, he was, he was the best at finding these offshore banking communities, using Cayman, you know, fronts and, and washing, you know, billions and billions of dollars for the

wealthiest people in the world. And he so much as says that in the, in the docs that he is a representative of them. He obviously isn't only a representative of them. I mean, he obviously has humongous ties to Leslie Waxner and, you know, a lot of other people and obviously had his hands in, you know, he was distributing money for Bill Gates, you know, who also invested in MIT on behalf of him. He was obviously all over the PayPal Mafia through Peter Thiel and Reid Hoffman and, you know, was investing money in Teal's valor, you know, his fund there. Like, I don't think there is one answer of who he worked for. I think he was the best at, you know, brokering power and blackmailing was a. a part of it. But I think it was mostly a money manager and finding ways, you know, working with

the Bronfman's, finding ways to hide humongous amounts of money for these families that had so much money. And he was better at it than anyone because he understood the math. He understood foreign exchange, you know, and currency plays and the tax code. And he was just so good at what he did that, you know, we get, we get treasury secretaries calling him Mr. Money, you know. But I don't think there's one single answer. I don't think we'll ever have a single answer. We'll never know why he died or if he died or how he died or, you know, why he got into this network in the first place, although there's a lot of speculation about his

connections going overseas and meeting up with Jimmy Goldsmith, who formed the mega group. And there's a lot of interesting conversations. there, especially with the Dalton School and William Barr and his connections with the Trump administration. Like, looking at the life of Epstein, I mean, this guy is everywhere, everywhere you want and don't want to be. And there is not one handler. He had multiple projects where he was working on specific people. He had multiple people that were working with him. I think he was taking directions from multiple intelligence agencies, from multiple countries. I think the answer to like who runs the world is it's not necessarily a fun answer because it doesn't really answer anything, but it's a trans fraternal, transnational, transgenerational group of people. So it doesn't really nower it down.

You can't just say, oh, it's the city of London. Oh, it's Israel. Oh, it's the U.S. Oh, it's all of those things. It's so much more simpler and more complicated at the same time. And again, I'm not an expert on Epstein. I just work with one, and I've read the books and, you know, I've done a lot of reading myself.

But, you know, like, we'll never know the true answer. Even the things that we got, the Epstein files, like, how can you possibly trust this administration at this time? Why are they dropping it now? What is the point? you know, I'm seeing people say that it's a big sting operation and Q is real and Trump's going to, there's a thing and he actually blew the whistle on him. And it's like, I just, I think they're going to do some sort of play like that where they'll try to make Trump the hero. I think it will probably work on a lot of people. It won't work on me. I don't, I don't trust this guy. I never liked Trump. I mean, I think he's hilarious. Like early on, Trump was very funny. And I living in a super. liberal area. I thought it was very funny when he won watching, you know, the Californians just lose their minds. It was fun. I enjoyed that. But I also knew what was coming was was very serious

that if they're going to put in this sort of very compromised chaos agent to run the most important government in the world, that like very intense, dramatic things were going to change and were going to happen. I mean, you look at that election. It's like Hillary was obviously made more sense as like a insider and the continuation of the status quo of the Obama years and bringing back a little bit of neocan hawkishness there and a little bit more Bush era than Obama. But, you know, let's continue on this path. And then Trump comes in and he's a wrecking ball by design. And he set up everything that we're seeing now, legislation-wise, all of these things that we were talking about of like, how do we set up the Bitcoin dollar system? Like he set all that up in his first

term, created this scenario to print tons of money, worked with Fink and created the going directory set, leaves for four years, and it's just we have this, you know, a cadaver as president, and it just doesn't even make any sense. The Biden era is like a dream. It's like it didn't even happen. And then they run Kamala and Walts, which is the most obvious, just poison pill. They know they're not going to win candidacy ever, and Trump comes in, you know, number 47, and he's here, and now it's just absolute insanity.

by design, tariffs, gold, silver explosions. You know, Bitcoin, at least at first, did break all-time highs and went to 126. I mean, that was only October. The stable coin market exploded. There's way more stable coins now.

The tokenized gold market has exploded. Tethers now the largest private gold holder. Like all of these things are, you know, are being done basically under the guise of a chaos agent of chaos, But in reality, I think it's a lot more controlled than that. And this trans fraternal, transgenerational, transnational group that is very possibly behind all of the, you know, the most important players in the Trump government, you know, Trump himself, Besson is this longtime Soros guy. Lutnik is an Epstein affiliate and is the bad guy for Tether. We're having Kevin Warsh come in as the, you know, most likely coming in.

He's been picked anyway to be the new. Fed Chair. He was an advisor to Anchorage Digital up until a week ago until they took his name off of it. I mean, alongside Max Levchen of PayPal, alongside Stanley Drunken Miller, another Soros guy. And, you know, Anchorage Digital was the bank that the Trump administration gave the first bank charter to as Brian Brooks, who was like a founding, not founding, but very early PayPal VP, or sorry, Coinbase VP, he was like their head legal guy that set up all the legal environments there to let Coinbase become the publicly traded, you know, company that it is. And on his last days in office, when Trump's leaving, he sends them a bank charter. Kevin Warsh, you know, Bill the Berg

Steering Committee member worked with, worked with Teal there. And he's advisor to like the one bank that the Trump administration gave the bank charter to up until a week ago. And now he's going to go run the Fed and is going to come in to theoretically cut rates to zero and let the real economic debasement begin. Again, I don't think that's an accident. I don't think that's chaos. That to me sounds very deliberate. It doesn't seem like an accident.

And when you look at how it doesn't seem like an accident. I don't believe in coincidences. They do happen. But I think what we're going to see is Warsh come in and cut rates and we're going to see tokenize gold explode and we're going to see Bitcoin. explode and we're going to see the debasement trade begin. Stocks are going to go crazy because why would you hold anything in dollars? Real estate probably will go crazy.

And then we'll see these crazy boomboss all throughout the system at the same time. And what will be the outcome? I think it will be the U.S. finds a way to basically force demand for dollars and pay off their debt. They'll still be way in debt, but they'll find buyers to service the old debt that they have. And, you know, basically things will turn on for another 10 to 40 years. And then we'll see what drone warfare, AI, all the crazy scientific sci-fi future, how that affects power structures. Do we live in a multipolar world?

Or is it already one world government already? And it's just a bunch of theater. We'll find all that out in our lifetime, which is exciting. But, you know, it's going to be insane because they don't want us to feel like it's by design. They want us to feel like it's chaos. So they will generate social chaos. And if you are engaged all the time and you're online and you're getting the stream of slop and you're looking at YouTube shorts

and you're on Twitter and you're doing the thing, it's going to be this very gradual thing. And then you're suddenly, oh, wow, every commercial at the Super Bowl was about AI. Ring doorbell was using AI to find dogs and they can track everything that they see and all the neighborhoods in the world. I mean, it's like, it's insane where we're going. And if you are involved in looking at the screen, like, it'll be so gradual you won't notice.

But if you're not looking and then you check back in every once in a while, like, it's so crazy and so insane how fast everything is moving. And they keep you on the edge of your seat. I mean, it's like, what's going on in El Paso, Texas? Oh, they close the border. They close the airport for 10 days, because are we going to war with Mexico? Oh, no, it was a balloon.

And they shot it down and they already opened. Like, that story happened and ended like this morning for me, you know? The chaos of that is like they're just, they're creating, you know, they're wagging the keys and you're looking. And then you miss that Brian Brooks handed Anchorage Digital, a bank charter on the final days of the administration, because you're still wondering how the fuck Biden won. You know, it's like you look away because the keys are so shiny and dangly and jingly. and then it's like, oh, holy shit, we're in a new financial system. And so, like, enjoy the ride, have fun.

Be safe. Don't fucking lever up. Like, you're going to get fucked. Like, Bitcoin could go to 40, 35. Who the fuck knows? It could. It could absolutely go down another 50% for, like, a second, and then shoot the fuck back up. It could go to zero.

But I think long term, if you hold spot and you chill, buy some metals, buy land, get yourself so that you're not dependent on anything. I don't want anyone listening to this to be a stable coin slave or surf. I want to see you have assets and have land and live a nice life. And, uh, you know, at least you'll be able to write a cool memoir because you saw the, the greatest change of the global order, um, you know, maybe ever and maybe the final one. Damn, Mark. What a way to end the show. Um, you're fucking awesome. Where do people go to find all writing, where do you want to send people? Yeah, thanks, brother.

I think you're the man too, man. I really appreciate these conversations. It's very fun. It really means a lot that there are places where we can have these conversations and, and, you know, who the fuck knows what's going to happen. But the only thing that I care about is people are informed enough to then go inform themselves. So there's a lot of things we've sprinkled out there. Go look them up.

I'll send the email links so you can post them if people want to look at those emails and everything I talked about. But you can find me on Twitter. Mark Good W underscore IN. I try not to be there as much, but then when something like this happens, I have to go look at what everyone's finding and spend a couple days being in the slop with everyone else.

But I've been writing for Unlimited Hangout for a couple years now, and we actually just started a new publication called Papercut Publishing House, Whitney, myself, and my dear friend, A.B., very excited about that. Our first book is out. It's just shipping now. called the Technocratic Dark State by Ian Davis, who's the man, who, you know, has been writing for U.H for a long time too.

So find me an unlimited hangout. We got a whole bunch of new stuff coming, website redesign, maybe some video content, a whole bunch of shit. We want to thank everybody for taking care of us for a while, and we got a bunch of cool shit coming, a magazine, all this good stuff. So it's been a little bit of a dormancy period for me

because I've been dealing with a bunch of health issues, but feeling so much better and alive and excited to make a bunch of more articles for you. And so that's all coming. So yeah, find me on Twitter and on Live and Hangout. Well, let's go. Thank you, Mark. This was really cool. Hopefully I'll see you in person again at some point soon, but I appreciate you, man.

Cheers, brother.