Will Cain Country - China’s "Manchurian Generation": The Hidden Plan to Undermine the U.S. (ft. Peter Schweizer)

Episode Date: January 29, 2026

Mass migration didn’t just happen, it was engineered. Author of ‘The Invisible Coup: How American Elites and Foreign Powers Use Immigration as a Weapon Peter Schweizer joins Will to expose how Democratic operatives, elite-funded NGOs, and foreign powers weaponized illegal immigration to reshape U.S. politics. The most shocking example? China’s use of “birth tourism” to secure long-term influence inside America.Plus, Will and The Crew break down Gov. Tim Walz (D-MN) walking the line between reckless leadership and insurrectionist rhetoric, and react to Rep. Ilhan Omar  (D-MN) being sprayed with apple cider vinegar at a rally. Subscribe to ‘Will Cain Country’ on YouTube here: ⁠⁠⁠⁠Watch Will Cain Country!⁠⁠Follow ‘Will Cain Country’ on X (⁠⁠@willcainshow⁠⁠), Instagram (⁠⁠@willcainshow⁠⁠), TikTok (⁠⁠@willcainshow⁠⁠), and Facebook (⁠⁠@willcainnews⁠⁠)Follow Will on X: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@WillCain Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The Manchurian generation, how birthright citizenship and birth tourism from Mexico and China are changing the demographics of America with the author of a brand new book, The Invisible Coup, Peter Schweitzer. It is Wilcane Country streaming live at the Wilcane Country YouTube channel. Always available for you here at Spotify or on. Apple. We're settling back in after snowpocalypse, culling up with our dogs, back into our home studios, one full night's rest, and yet somehow more tired. But we're getting back to it because the adrenaline has worn off. The black rifle coffer energy drinks will not prop us up. We're going to move forward with our own natural intellect and locomotion. Let's do that because today we have an incredible guest. He is the author of The Invisible Coup, How American Elites and Foreign

Powers Use Immigration as a weapon. He is the president of the Government Accountability Institute. It is Peter Schweitzer. What's up, Peter? How are you doing, man? I hope you're keeping warm. Thank you. It's warming up. It's thawing out. Everything is melting. That's enough. That's enough for me. you know, living in Texas, once a year, a little white on the ground is all we need, and then we can move forward and start getting back to spring and warmth. The rest of the country and your bomb cyclone that's happening in the Northeast, we wish you luck with that, have some more snow. We're done here.

Peter, what is the Manchurian generation? Yeah, this is how China, on an industrial scale, has weaponized birthright citizenship. Birthright citizenship, of course, that's related to the 14th Amendment. Some people say that it means anybody born in the United States, even if you're here for two days, if you're born here, that child is a U.S. citizen. And the Supreme Court is going to take up that case and debate what that actually means. And I think a lot of people assume that, you know, this is people slipping across the border. This is a student who happens to be here and gives birth. China has created up a massive way of manufacturing U.S. citizens.

So what do I mean? Yeah, birth tourism in China, whereby a couple, the mother will come to the United States. She'll give birth. The child will be given you a citizenship because they were born here. They will travel back to China, and the child will be raised in Chinese Communist Party schools, you know, in that ecosystem. And when they turn 18, that child will have the rights of every other U.S. They're going to be able to vote in elections, donate to political campaigns, apply for U.S. government jobs. And the question's been, what is the scale here?

Now, our federal government has no idea, Will, because we don't track that information on a birth certificate. It does not list the nationality of the parents. But the Chinese government has looked at this, and the Chinese government has encouraged this beginning in 2011. They were running articles in the People's Daily telling members of the CCP elite, hey, you should do this. your child can get U.S. citizenship. And, of course, you wonder why they would encourage this behavior. But what is the scale we're talking about? The Chinese government, a couple of research firms in China have looked at this.

And they say that over the last 13 years, every year, roughly 100,000 Chinese babies have been born in the United States. Come on. Yeah. 100,000. That's their number. A hundred thousand annually of Chinese people coming over to the United States to have a their kids on American soil so that they have birthright citizenship, move back to China, raised in China, turn 18, can vote, can live, can do whatever they want in America.

That is, would you say 13 years? 1.3 million? That's your Manchurian generation? Yeah, that's the Manchurian generation. It's going to start cresting in 28. That's the first year that this big wave really happened. So it's a huge national security problem. You think about that, you know, you've got a million.

voters, U.S. citizens that are voters in China, the 2016 election was settled by 72,000 votes. So there's enormous political influence here. There's another component to this will, and that's the rise of surrogacy. So in this particular case, a guy in China will hire an American woman to carry his child. He'll pay her 50 to 60 grand to carry the child. Same thing. The child is born. The child will be a U.S. citizen because they were born here. Also their mother, their biological mother is American. They will then be picked up oftentimes by a third party, not even by the dad, picked up by a third party and sent back to China. We have no idea of the numbers on this. The Chinese government hasn't even estimated, but let me just give you two

data points. Number one, the Wall Street Journal had an article about five weeks ago, a front page story about a single billionaire in China who's close to the CCP. He alone has 100 children that were born in the United States by this technique that are now being raised in China. This is the Wall Street Journal. And there are other instances of guys that are, you know, like in the middle double digits. But to look at the scale of this, just in Southern California, we found 107 Chinese-owned owned surrogacy companies that are offering these services in China to members of the elite.

So this is a huge, huge, huge problem. I had read that story in the Wall Street Journal. That's the only reason I'm not reacting with is quite as much shock at that story. It is incredibly shocking that a billionaire in China has had over 100 kids in the United States via surrogacy. Obviously, obviously, there is no paternal instincts driving you to 100 kids via surrogacy. There is a political instinct that is a payoff, or at the very least, a financial instinct that is a payoff for the dynasty that you are building in China. The number that you say there that shocks me, Peter, is the businesses, 100 in Southern California facilitating the surrogacy.

Back to the 100,000 a year, where is that coming from? I know you said it's hard to measure scale. How confident are you in that number that 100,000 of year are doing this birthright tourism? having kids on U.S. soil? Well, what I'm doing is I'm reporting what the Chinese government estimate is, and they gave that figure of roughly 100,000. They gave kind of a range, but 100,000 is the middle of that. There's also a research company in China that's looked at this,

and they say that they calculated for individual years. They said, I think it was in 2018. They believe in just 2018 there were 150,000 in just that year. So these are estimates, but these are not estimates by people who have a reason to fearmonger or anything like that. I think these are efforts to get at the bottom of these numbers. And Will, the other thing to point out is there's lots of anecdotal evidence. I mean, there are people, I quote them in the book, who say, you know, they are on flights going from Los Angeles to Beijing or to Shanghai. And they said literally

the entire front of the plane is occupied by individuals and babies. And they're shocked. They said you fly on, you go through a business class. Every space is taken by an individual with a child that they are bringing back to China, a newborn infant. So it's a big problem. And the thing that's weird about this, Will, you've talked about California and the problems with California. California regulates a lot of things, right? They don't regulate this.

So California is the ground zero for this. You can't engage in widespread surrogacy in a lot of other states. Birth tourism is limited in a lot of other states. It's ground zero is in California. And so you're going to have to have a California government try to squelch this. I'm not sure they're going to do it. So that's the dilemma we're in. Let me dig into intention.

Intention is always hard. I had almost a throwaway statement a moment ago, Peter, when I said, you don't have this out of paternal instinct. talking about the surrogacy case of the billionaire having 100 kids in the United States. But let's talk about all of this, the surrogacy and the birthright tourism angle. I threw out, almost dismissively, you don't have that as a paternal instinct. You have that as a political instinct or at the very least a financial instinct. I actually want to dig into what I threw away. Should I leap immediately to?

This is some CCP-directed program to exert some measure of influence over American political future, or is it individuals in China liberated to make financial decisions that are advantageous for their family? There is probably nothing more valuable than American citizenship on the world stage, and they're getting this for their kids. So are they doing it out of the age old explanation and intention and motivation for most self-interest? Are they doing it for Mother China? It's a great question, and you're right, it's very hard to get it in intentions. But here are a couple things we know. We know that China did this on a smaller scale or tried to do this in Hong Kong in the early 2000s. And the Hong Kong government at that time shut it down. They got rid of birthright

citizenship for Chinese nationals because they believed that it was an orchestrated effort to basically take over China through this technique. The second thing that I would say about intention is you can go online. I list some of the web pages in the chapter of these companies that offer birth tourism and they will list who their clientele is. Okay. They're not political dissidents. They're not guys that are, you know, managing a department store. They are military officers, intelligence officers, senior officials with the Ministry of Propaganda,

senior officials within the CCP political apparatus. These are the clients that are listed by these firms. And then you have individual cases. We know of a senior military officer in the People's Liberation Army who has three children who are U.S. citizens. He brought his wife here three times to get U.S. citizenship. So are there cases of some of these people wanting a escape hatch, right? Things go bad in China. We can try to get to the United States.

There's probably some of that. But the fact is the Chinese Communist Party encouraged this. They ran articles about it and pushed it. beginning like 15 years ago. And the other thing that we know is that these birth tourism companies operate openly in China. They advertise. They have high-level clients. If the Chinese government did not want this to happen, they would not have publicized it and pushed it.

And they certainly would shut down this industry in a minute. It would not be difficult for them to do that. But they haven't done that. So I think that's what is most important to understand about their intentions. Let's take a quick break, but continue this conversation with Peter Schweitzer, whose new book is The Invisible Coup, how American elites and foreign powers use immigration as a weapon on Wilcane Country. This is Ainsley Earhart. Thank you for joining me for the 52 episode podcast series, The Life of Jesus. A listening experience that will provide hope, comfort, and understanding of the greatest story ever told. Listen and follow now at Fox News Podcasts.com or wherever you listen to podcasts.

Welcome back to Will Cain Country. We're still hanging out with Peter Schweitzer, the author of a new book. look, the invisible coup, how American elites and foreign powers use immigration as a weapon. So really quickly back to the timeline. You said this really began about 13 years ago. So you said it will crest, and if I'm doing my math correctly, in about five years, that's when you'll get the first wave of this birthright tourism generation, capable of moving to the United States at the age of 18, voting, and doing whatever they want here as an American citizen. Yeah, and here's the thing.

When they turn 18, a lot of states, you don't have to vote. You don't have to establish residency more than a couple of days before an election day. And your proof of residency, because you can get absentee ballots, right? People that live with American citizens overseas can get absentee ballots. All you need to do is establish is that you have a physical address in a congressional district or in a state or wherever. And there have already been reports of, you know, condos or apartments that have 15 or 16 foreign nationals registered to that apartment. These are foreign nationals that have dual citizenship. And they're not even living in the United States, but they're voting in, say, an Arizona election because they, along with 15 others, have listed this apartment.

You know, somebody's paying the rent. And they are listing this apartment as their place of residence. because local voter checks, you've talked about this on your program, others have as well. There's really not tight security when it comes to dealing with voter fraud. There's this emphasis on accessibility. The problem is it makes it accessible for people overseas to do this at scale, which is what's going to start happening in 2030. Let's take a minute as a diversion to take a step backwards really quickly. And let's talk about birthright citizenship because it's the backbone of this entire story.

Peter, you may know, and I've done this, and I just can't recall off the top of my head, I might, I might be recalling it accurately. Are we the only country that really does this that has birthright citizenship? I don't think European countries honor birthright citizenship. I don't know who else does this. Is this uniquely American? Very, very few countries. Canada does in New Zealand, and there are a couple of other, you know, small third world countries that I'm not sure people would want to get citizenship there. But it's important to point out like New Zealand has it, but New Zealand rigorously looks at people coming into the United States.

So if you are pregnant and you show up in New Zealand, they cannot admit you into the country because they deem that you are there to get birthright citizenship. You're there for a medical procedure. In the United States, particularly in the Obama administration, they fast-track this. The directive went out in the Obama administration when this really took off. that Customs and Border Patrol were not allowed to ask people that were coming to the United States on a tourism visa for two weeks. If they were pregnant, they were not allowed to ask them, are you here to give birth to a child? And then in the case of China, you actually have the Obama administration put in place 10-year visas. And I quote an Australian professor who said, you know, for a fertile woman in China, she could have five or six children in the United States.

and this 10-year visa means she will be unhindered. She shows up, she shows up a Customs Border Patrol, she shows them the 10-year visa, and she slides right in. So if you have birthright citizenship and you do not have rigorous, tight enforcement of your borders, meaning you're pregnant, sorry, we're not going to admit you in the country because we think you're here for birthright citizenship. You are going to have this problem. Which it sounds honestly that rigor in policing, again,

which you're actually policing is intentions is incredibly difficult, which takes me back to the idea of birthright citizenship itself being somewhat absurd and unique on the global scale. So the problem now that we're going to arrive at, Peter, and I know a fair amount about the constitutionality and the law on this, as I'm sure you know more, is it should go back and you look at the 14th Amendment's drafting. You look at the language that the framers used at the time, and it's hard to draw, and by the way, also the legislative record behind the drafting of the 14th Amendment, meaning that's what the congressmen and senators wrote when they were drafting this, in essence, giving us their intentions of what they meant. It's hard to come away with the idea that they meant for it to be the way that it has played out over the past, what has it been, roughly 150 years of birthright citizenship. But yet, the Supreme Court has interpreted to mean exactly as we think of it here today.

And so what we have is a century of precedent. We have a century of Supreme Court decisions that have accepted it means born here, citizen here. And I know that, as you mentioned, they are reviewing this as we speak because the Trump administration has looked to revoke birthright citizenship. I would not suggest that anyone should retain any sense of optimism on that. I cannot imagine John Roberts overturning 100 years of precedent. Even going back to original intentions of the drafting of the 14th Amendment, I cannot imagine even Neil Gorsuch doing so. I'm not trying to name check or run through my memorization of Supreme Court justice,

but I think I'm pretty accurate. Maybe Samuel Alito would do so. We've long lost Scalia, who certainly would be interested in original intentions. Maybe Thomas would do the right thing as well. my mind the right thing. My point is, I don't think they're going to overturn birthright citizenship. Yeah, I will leave that court watching to you because you're a lot more, you know, you've looked at that a lot more detail than I have. What I would say is this. And again, I'm not an attorney. I'm not a constitutional scholar or anything of the sort. But I do think a critical point here is,

if you're talking about birthright citizenship where somebody snuck across the border 20 years ago, and they've lived here for 20 years and they gave birth 15 years ago, maybe you can make the argument that birthright citizenship applies because there is that phrase under the jurisdiction thereof. The question is, and I don't know the answer will, maybe you have an opinion on this, I don't know you can argue that somebody, a baby that is born in the United States and when they are ready to fly home, flies home and is raised in China,

never lives here. And then 18 is a citizen, were they really ever under the jurisdiction of the United States? So my argument would be, I don't know if we're going to have the complete upending of birthright citizenship, but it would be interesting to see if the court says, you know what, this birth tourism thing is garbage, because this is not an attempt to become part of the United States. You're not interested in being part of the United States. You're not subject to the jurisdiction of. This is a convenient act that you took in the modern era to capture U.S. citizenship. Ergo, we think there needs to be limits on, on, you know, how birthright citizenship is applied. And possibly part of a greater scheme by a foreign power to exert influence over the

future of American elections. You also write about in this book, The Invisible Coup, you also talk about Mexico and Mexico's footprint now in the United States. Yeah, this was really interesting to me because I kind of had the view. I'm sure it's probably unfair that the Mexican government is largely, you know, corrupt and hapless. But it was very interesting to me. I ran across literally dozens of senior officials making claims about how they view mass migration. And it's very different from ours. If I would, let me just read a couple of them to you. This is from a December 2024 report written by when a president Shyamom's top a government report. quote, we already know that the Mexican population in the United States reaches 39.9 million. We Mexicans are reclaiming our territory. Or this quote from a powerful Mexican senator, Morena Party, the ruling party. He sits on the National Defense Committee. Quote, Mexicans are in our territories, California, Nevada, Texas, Utah, New Mexico, Arizona,

Kansas, Oklahoma, Colorado, and Wyoming. We're going to take back the territory that was stolen from us. and, you know, I could read you dozens more. And, you know, so I thought, okay, is this just kind of bravado, right? These guys are just kind of like puffing themselves up. And what you realize is, no, that there actually is a sizable portion of the political leadership who've used mass migration as an opportunity to extend Mexico's sovereignty into the United States.

And it begins at a couple levels. Number one, the involvement of the consulates. Great Britain and China. have six and seven consulates in the United States, respectively. Mexico has 53. And as I lay out in the book, they're involved in partisan political activities here, which diplomats are not supposed to be doing. They are also involved in organizing some of these anti-ice protests.

But in addition to that network, Will, you have this, what I would say is a clear intrusion on our sovereignty. They have this network of senior Mexican politicians who live in the United States. These are migrant senators and migrant deputies in their chamber of deputies, their Congress. They live here, and their job is to represent Mexicans in the United States before the government of Mexico. And some of them, there's a senator from Arizona, Ruiz, who sits in the Mexican Senate, who supports legislation to turn California into a state of Mexico. I'm not saying that's going to happen, but that's their intention.

and these guys are heavily involved in social disruption in our country. One of them, a guy named Alejandro Robles. Mexican politicians, Mexican politicians that serve in the Mexican government live in the United States and represent the interests of what? Mexican citizens in America or Mexican Americans? Who's votes for them? Who's interest do they serve, these politicians? Yeah, any Mexican can go to a consulate, register to vote. And when they have national elections in Mexico, you can vote for the president.

You can vote for your representative. In the case of those living in the United States, you can be an American citizen. And if you're a Mexican ancestry, you can register and vote. And the job of these migrant representatives is to represent the interests in the Mexican. government. It's a complete invasion of our sovereignty. And it relates to this view they have of mass migration as a strategic tool for Mexico to advance their interests and advance their political causes within the United States. And they're actively doing that. Good Lord. Good Lord. Peter, I mean, it's a political cliche that might be the only

cliche that matters in politics. Demographics is destiny. Whether or not we're talking about the Manchurian generation of what's happening with this Chinese birth tourism, whether or not we're talking about this issue with sovereignty in Mexico, or we talk about the Somali refugee population sending money back to Somalia. We have a real problem with demographics and sovereignty. We do. And what I would add, Will, is that what people don't recognize is the Mexican government, certainly the Chinese government, and the Muslim Brotherhood, when it relates to Muslims in the United States, aggressively go after those in their communities who embrace the American dream, who Americanize, who assimilate. So, for example, as it relates to Mexico, this surprises a lot of people, but it's absolutely true.

and there's numerous examples. With regards to Mexico, there's a guy named Alejandro Robles. So he sits in the Mexican Chamber of Deputies, their Congress, but he lives in Ontario, California, outside of Los Angeles. And he has gone around the country, in his words, quote, organizing the militancy against the Trump administration and has declared that migrants are, quote, at the forefront of civil resistance in the United States.

And he goes after those that come to America and embrace the American dream. And his words, Americanize. He calls them traders to Mexico. And he says that Shinebaum, he's from Scheinbaum's political party, that Shinebaum agrees with him, that Mexicans that come to the United States embrace our values, you know, learn the language, learn the culture, are traders to Mexico. And in fact, President Scheinbaum had a song commission called The Migrant Hym that she plays at all these events, which is this jingoistic song about Mexicans in the United States better stay loyal to Mexico and they should not become like the gringoes. So they aggressively, it's not just demographics, as you correctly point out, it's their concerted effort to prevent assimilation.

Because if assimilation takes place, they lose their political power. Is that not sedition? The behaviors you just described of Robles, he has to have some status here in the United States to be living in the United States. Does that not fit the definition of sedition? I certainly think it does, yes. I think if you are fomenting and whipping up opposition, he met with, there's a group called the People's Forum in New York, which is a hotbed of Antifa activism. He met with those guys. He's met with other people. you have another a migrant you know there seemed to be a lot in california you have another migrant deputy um who when the los angeles riots uh broke out last year you remember those um he was saying that you know we are part of the permanent resistance and he was putting up videos of and he seemed to be participating in this of um people harassing Hispanic cops in los angeles calling them traders this is the kind of stuff that these guys are doing again these are these are

government officials in Mexico who are living inside the United States. As far as I'm concerned, if you're making your choice to side with the Mexican government, we should kick you out of the country. It's just not a legitimate role. Let's take quick break, but continue this conversation with Peter Schweitzer, whose new book is The Invisible Coup, how American elites and foreign powers use immigration as a weapon on Will Cain Country. Welcome back to Will Cain Country. We're still hanging out with Peter Schweitzer, the author of a new book. The invisible coup, how American elites and foreign powers use immigration as a weapon. But this is not something that's just happening to us, right?

This is not just happening to us from China, not just happening to us from Mexico. This is something that, at the very least, through the facilitation of NGOs funded by American tax dollars, we are also doing to ourselves and politicians who are not sitting here protecting America, but facilitating and and encouraging this from foreign powers. Yeah, yeah. Yeah, no, you're exactly right. And that's why in the book, you know, it's about, you know, elites in the United States working with these foreign powers.

And you see it in a couple of ways as it relates to NGOs. A lot of the NGOs that work with refugees or work on immigration, when you look through their own literature will, what they say is they like immigration because of its transformative power on the United States. In other words, it's going to change America. America needs to be changed, and immigration is a tool to do that. And you see that manifested in all kinds of ways. When it comes to the political side...

Wait, that's written? Yes. That's written, you're saying, in the doctrine and manifesto of NGOs? Yes. There are several NGOs that I mentioned in the book that are funded by Bill Gates, George Horace and others, that said... one of the important things. The NGOs should use immigration as a tool to change America.

I just want to be clear. That's what they're saying. Who are these NGOs? The NGOs, I'm trying to remember the names right now. They're in the book. But they explicitly say in their mission statement is that they favor mass migration because of its transformative power on American society. I thought, wait, I thought that was a conspiracy that didn't exist. I thought that was the racist Great Replacement Theory.

That very, very exact language was, has been dismissed as a racist, xenophobic fiction of the paranoid mind of the conservative. I thought that's the great replacement theory. Yeah, yeah. Well, this is what the NGOs themselves are saying. And what's happening on the political level is the Democratic Party realized beginning in the 1990s under Bill Clinton that mass migration was a political winner. They found that in the 1990s newly minted citizens that come to the United States that get citizenship in their first couple of elections vote 85% Democrat. The Democrats did a study and they determined this. And so they realized in the 1996 re-election for Bill Clinton,

we need to mint a lot of new voters voters to ensure our victory. And so, and I look, I quote from the White House emails that were going back and forth on this topic. So what they did was, and this has been replicated by Barack Obama, and it was replicated by Joe Biden, is they completely gutted the citizenship process. They cast aside hundreds of thousands of criminal background checks. They got rid of the literacy requirements. they got rid of the language requirements because they wanted to ram through as many new citizens as possible, regardless of whether they even met the criteria. And that's why in the modern American history, the three biggest years for new naturalizations were 1996,

Bill Clinton's reelection, 2012, Barack Obama's reelection, and 2024 when Joe Biden tried to win re-election. So they see this as a political winner. that is why the Democratic Party is fighting so hard to avoid deportations. Well, that's exactly, Peter, by the way, what I laid out yesterday at the 4 o'clock hour on the Fox News Channel. Why? That's the question that's got to exist in the background of every person in America right now, those that can get beyond, you know, a viral video of a tragedy, of a man being killed. Why? Why are so many people fighting so hard to stop the deportation in this case of simply criminal illegal aliens? And my contention yesterday, Peter, was, well, have you seen the new census?

The anticipation of the 2030 census is a projection. But because of the way Americans are moving, literally, you know, to Texas, to Florida, to the south, you're going to see the electoral map, the electoral college map, and the congressional seat map favor Republicans incredibly, starting in 2030. Texas is going to gain. Florida's going to gain. New York's going to lose. And if that map had existed in 24, Donald Trump would have won the presidency. He would have smoked Kamala Harris and wouldn't have needed the quote-unquote blue wall. Wouldn't have needed Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, wouldn't need the traditional swing states.

They won't matter anymore because Texas and Florida and the southern states will carry so much weight. And so Democrats see this, and they're going to have to figure out a way. And we can set aside for now whether or not illegals vote. Just being on the census rolls change your congressional app, changes the electoral college map. And the census counts everybody, legal or illegal. And so they see this. They see this. And they're fighting tooth and nail because it's political death down the line for them.

Yeah, you nailed it, Will. That's exactly right. And just look at the math. California has four more congressional seats totally because of illegals that are in that state, because of the way that the census is conducted as you laid out. Now, you think four congressmen, what does that mean? That's actually a larger congressional delegation than 13 American states. Illegals in California have a larger representation in Congress than 13 different states in our country. So it's hugely important.

The other dynamic is progressive. recognize and see that not only does it help them electorally, but progressives see that it moves the Democratic Party to the left. Because, again, there's been a lot of research and study done on this. A lot of the radical movements, a lot of the more radical unskilled labor unions. I'm not talking about the auto workers and teamsters. I'm talking about, you know, the SCIUs of the world. Those unions are largely led by immigrants that have come to the United States.

in the last 20 to 25 years. And what labor scholars who are sympathetic to the cause will say is they have moved the labor movement far to the left because many of these people were involved in radical movements in their home countries, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Mexico. They came here and they essentially brought the revolution here. In fact, there's a professor from UCLA who's sympathetic to the cause who says exactly that. They brought the revolution here. So it helps the Democratic Party, and it also moves the Democratic Party further to the left by virtue of they are capturing these institutions like labor unions that used to be a lot more centrist.

But I want to take this a little bit bigger for just one moment, Peter, because it's easy and I don't think inaccurate to make this a partisan issue, to talk about how this plays in terms of Republican and Democrat and to understand this through the dynamic. of power. However, this is also a global phenomenon, Peter. Like, this is not just the story of America. This is a story of Europe. This is a story of Sweden, as I laid out yesterday again on the Will Cane show. In 2015, Sweden threw open its doors. Now, a little more background. These are just facts. Sweden is one of the most has been, historically, one of the most homogenous, meaning monolithic, racially countries in the world. You know what a Swede looks like. They all looked like that. By the way, same thing with Norway, same thing with Denmark, so forth. For what it's worth, I'm just giving you the facts. I'm not passing judgment. They also always came in like

numbers one, two, three, four, and five on the happiness index, whatever that is. It's a thing they actually do. Now, I don't know how you measure happiness, but they did. And they always came in really high. They also had some of the highest social safety nets. Now, I've read a lot about why that is and this is not a good or bad thing. It's just a sober analysis. People have an easier time supporting people they can identify with. That's not good. That's not bad. That just is. Okay. So a bunch of Swedes want to cast a big social safety NF for another bunch of Swedes. This is what's going on. In 2015, they open their doors and they invite in the world's refugees. And they do it through the same language of Jacob Frye, Minneapolis mayor.

Love, compassion. And the people flood in from Iraq, from the Middle East, from everywhere. In Germany, it's Turkey. It's everywhere. Every European country seems to have a different story connected to a different part of the globe. In France, it's Africa. And so much so that 20% of the Swedish population is now foreign-born or born to foreign-born parents. What happens?

Crime goes up. Trust goes down. Unemployment goes up. economy suffered. All these terrible things happen. The Swedes have totally reversed course. Totally. They've shut their doors, shut down asylum claims, and they're trying to deport, not the same way we are in Minneapolis, but they're offering people almost 40 grand to leave. If you leave, we will give you 40 grand. They want them gone. Honestly, that's what they want. They want their society back. The point is, that's all a true story. I think I've described it 100%

factually and accurately, without a value judgment attached to any of it, just the way that it is. What I'm getting at, Peter, is this isn't just happening in America. So what's going on? It's not just a Republican Democrat thing. It's bigger. Yeah, no. And by the way, I think you described Sweden perfectly, and I can say that because my mother was from Sweden, and I still have cousins that live in Sweden.

So I track events there very closely, and I think you accurately explained what's going on. Look, what's happening is a war, a clash of civilizations. And this is a war on Western civilization. And it's not me saying that. If you look at what the Chinese theoreticians are saying in the CCP, they view the key to them thriving. It's not just achieving military superiority over the United States or a sphere of influence. That's important to them. It's the destruction of the Judeo-Christian Western civilization.

and its emphasis on individual rights and freedoms. They say that. If you look at Mexico's leaders, particularly the Marina Party, this radical left movement, they reject Western culture. Now, that seems radical to say because they're Spanish, but what's happened under Amlo and under Shinebaum is this embrace of indigenous cultures. So they will say, you know, Mexico was great until the Spanish arrived. When the Spanish arrived, that's when we got war.

That's when we got greed. that's when we got slavery. It's total bunk, by the way. The Aztecs were not nice people, but that is the embrace that they have given ideologically, and they view this is a battle between their indigenous populations and the sort of Anglo-Saxon, which is, of course, doesn't fully describe the United States, but as this Anglo-Saxon Western culture. Same thing with the Muslim Brotherhood. And so they speak openly about this, and that is what they're goal is and the problem that people are they in who's the day peter because i i i'm okay but who is the they on that because the migrant themselves they're not motivated by what you just said they may be

once they arrived like i want to hang on to my culture i want to hang on to who i am i want to hang on to my values and i don't begrudge uh individuals that you know if iraqis want to live a certain way they don't have to live the same way as americans this isn't about someone dictating to another how they live their life. It is about how they live their life if they choose to do so in America. Correct. Or let the Germans decide what it is to be German or the German way of life. And the same thing with the Swedes.

But the point is the migrants are seeking, quite honestly, a better economic life for themselves and probably a better security life for themselves. Yes. They're fleeing threat of death and they're running toward a better. better economic future. So who's the they that's actually trying to pit this battle of civilizations? These are, these are some of the NGOs. These are political leaders in the United States, who I name in the book, and these are these foreign organizations which want to reject and prevent these migrants from assimilating. And they're told that. They're told by NGOs. I mean,

I quote officials, government officials in Massachusetts and other states who specifically tell migrants don't assimilate. Stick with your language, stick with your culture, don't feel like you have to kow to American civilization and American society. So, you know, the pressure in the Mexican community, I hear this from people all the time who, a gentleman I know who's married to a Mexican American who she gets pressured when she, quote unquote, Americanizes. There are people in the community that say, why are you doing that? Why are you becoming a gringo? So there are these social pressures that are brought to bear that somehow it's bad to assimilate. That's particularly strong in places like Europe where there are language barriers. There are, you know, different cultural

barriers that the United States is more fluid society, I would argue, than France is. The same thing occurs there. So you have, you know, the migration of 50 or 100 years ago was you go to France, you go to the United States, you learn the language, you blend in. Of course you celebrate the holidays. of course you, you know, eat the meals and you remember the homeland, but you become part of the country that you are in. They are being told by multiple very loud voices. You don't need to do that anymore. That's what I think is the weaponization of immigration. It's not just immigration itself.

It's how it's become weaponized by these foreign and domestic actors. And the asymmetry of it all is so fascinating, Peter, because, of course, the conversation you and I are, having will someone might be dismissed as I don't know like xenophobic or culturally superior. And by the way, I don't run from that. I don't think all cultures are equal. Excuse me, Peter. I don't think all cultures are equal.

And I don't think you have to pretend that they are. But that being said, that's not the point of this conversation. The point of what I think is fascinating is the asymmetry of it all. We already talked about the asymmetry of birthright citizenship. We do it. Others don't. And the fact that we won't move the way the rest of the world does, well, that makes it xenophobic or racist. But if I move to Mexico, there will be a cultural expectation for me to behave and live as a Mexican. I know. The New York Times just wrote an article on this about people that move to Mexico City and continue to live like Americans and eat like Americans and they are ruining Mexico City.

The New York Times just wrote that, right? And if you move to Iraq, you know, they're not going to be real happy with you trying to live the life of American in Baghdad. They're going to want you, if they allow you to live there, to live like a Baghdaddy. You know, and so the asymmetry of this of like, no, no, no, you move here. We want you to be like us. But if we move there, we want you to make sure you don't assimilate to be an American. Yeah, you said earlier, Will, that. that there's this migration in the United States, people from California, going to Texas and going to

Florida. That's happening on a global scale. And, you know, the revolutionary Vladimir Lenin said people vote with their feet. And that's happening on a global scale. So I have no problem in saying that Western civilization is superior because this is where everybody wants to live, right? People aren't in, you know, in mass trying to go to these other countries. There's some migration, but this is where people want to be because of the institutions. and the values that have created peace, stability, unity, and the rule of law, which are incredibly rare on the planet. So Western civilization is superior, and I don't say that out of arrogance.

It's not something I did. I'm fortunate to have been here, but we need to embrace that and adopt that. And the problem is, as long as we allow the weaponization of immigration to continue, we're not going to be able to have a real conversation. about immigration in general. In other words, I'm the product of immigration. My parents came here from Europe. I believe in immigration.

But we can have a conversation about what should be the level of legal immigration so long as this weaponization is taking place. Because as long as that's happening, it's going to distort the debate and it's going to have all of these horrible repercussions for American society. Well, Peter's written it very well, laid out the case, which you've heard. here today. In his new book, The Invisible Coup, How American Elites and Foreign Powers use immigration as a weapon. It's out this month. What a fascinating conversation, Peter, and a fascinating study. Thank you so much for hanging out with us today on Will Kane Country. I enjoyed it, Will. Thanks a lot. Appreciate it. All right, take care. There he goes. Peter Schweitzer. Make sure you check out his book. Okay, let's do this. Two of Days, Dan is out today, by the way. We've got

tin foil pat. Let's take a quick break. Come back. Let's break it down with a few of your comments, your thoughts, what you just listened to, The Willisha, when we come back on Wilcane Country. The Willisha, you here on Wilcane Country. Streaming live at the Wilcane Country YouTube channel, Wilcane Facebook page, always here at Spotify or on Apple. If you're watching on the Fox News Facebook page, we hope you will head over to the Wilcane Facebook page. Go ahead and bookmark it, follow it, whatever, all the little dings and whistles that you hit. That way you'll get the notification that we're up. We're live.

come join us come hang out every day tin full pat is here today with us two a days dan is out um being disappointed i want to read you this quick headline pat this is fascinating i just want to this is it's all over i never trust my algorithm anymore because just because i'm seeing it 10 times and all of a sudden it makes me feel like everybody's talking about it it doesn't mean anything it might not be in your algorithm but my algorithm is all over uh governor tim waltz governor tim waltz governor tim Waltz of Minnesota, who has already said his situation in Minnesota is akin to Anne Frank in the Holocaust, who has called Trump's ICE the Gestapo, who has said this could be Gettysburg, has a new one out. He's now asking, is this a Fort Sumter? Fort Sumter, of course, was the first battle of the United

States Civil War. I know you want to laugh. I see you laughing because it's literally the dumbest thing a politician might have ever said. But Walt is in this situation where he's in a rhetorical death spiral. He has to outdo himself. And I think he has now hit the bottom. He's called Trump Hitler. He's in everything. Where else? Where's there to go from here? Fort Sumter, Civil War, World War II, Holocaust, Hitler. Satan? Is that the only thing left for him to? do? Like, he is to call Donald Trump the manifestation of the Antichrist? That's all this left I can think of. Like, there's no, there's no, no, there's no, there's no, there's no, there's no, there's no, there's no, there's no, there's no, there's no, there's no, there's no, there's no,

I think, Satan's just above him. But also, where, where is walls, like, what side is he on? Like, in this, like, civil war kind of thing, isn't he the South? In this situation? Yes. Yes. Yes. This is insurrection. This is insurrection.

Right? I mean, this is really, really close. And I'm only couching this and saying it's close in that I actually want to dive in and see what the laws are. To making yourself eligible to be arrested. You know, this is not politics. This is insurrection. You have fomented an insurrection in Minnesota. So that's why I say you can laugh, but at some point here, like, this is deadly, and I mean deadly, serious, what he's doing in Minnesota.

It's also absurdly stupid and laughable. How do you take care of it? But, hey, he's got Giacalo Esposito. from Breaking Bad. Remember he played Gus? He's got Molly Ringwald. He's got Ethan Hawk. He's got Eva Longoria.

He's got Victor Wimbunyama. He's got Steve Kerr. He's got Greg Popovich. He's got the entirety of the American pop culture experience on his side. And 15 years ago, what's interesting to think about is that would have been, ooh, the celebrities are all saying something. Now, I don't know. I don't know.

I literally think no one gives a rat's ass what they say, the celebrities. I think, I think they've lost all cultural relevance. I think. Or has half of the American population bought into this is Fort Sumter? I just saw one. You're missing one. I just saw one. I believe it was Lady Gaga who's in Japan.

Fomending this kind of thing. and it's just kind of ironic because Japan is way, way worse on immigration reform. Worse or better? Worse or better? Right, right. For her, way worse, but for, you know, yeah, it's a... Japan does not give a F. No.

Japan is like, no, no. We're not participating in your fluid, cultural. relative moralism, you know, cultural multiculturalism. You don't just get to come here. You don't get to live in Japan. You certainly don't get to be Japanese. They're like, no, we don't care. Keep it.

We're good, bro. We're sticking with Japan. That's what they've decided. And they don't bend. Yeah. And so she's saying this from the shores of whatever. What's the big island in Japan? You know, I know there's Okinawa.

What's the island that Tokyo? What do they call that island? I don't even know. Isn't it just Japan? Japan? Do they call that island Japan? It's like Hawaii. You know, the big island is Hawaii

and the whole thing is Hawaii, both. It always throws people off, especially with the capital is in Oahu, Honolulu. Did you not know that? I had no idea. No. Would you have guessed, had I told you that,

the capital would also then be on the island of Hawaii? I would have assumed that was the case. But I'm not as bad as my sister on geography who literally, she would see the map of America. And you know how like they keep apart Alaska and Hawaii in the little corner? She thought that that was where they were located just in that little corner over there. Like there's what? A time warp? That little line in the map.

Yeah, she didn't realize that was a lot. Hawaii's like 100 miles off the coast of California. And Alaska is like, you know, just a, you know, a five iron off the northwestern coast of Washington. Pretty much. No, she thinks it's out past the California because it's over in the corner. She doesn't realize it's all the way up here. She's up in the top left corner. Yeah, it's the top left corner.

Usually Alaska's in the top left corner up by Washington. and Hawaii's over here in the bottom left corner. On our maps, we had both in the left corner. So she just thought they were down here, both of them. Well, aren't you a map conspiracy theorist? I would think that you are, like, that the maps are totally false, that the world is flat. There's an ice wall. I got trouble last time.

A lot of viewers didn't like me mocking the idea of the ice wall that's holding the oceans in. And that beyond that is the White Walkers and the Wildeastern. outlings, and then the world drops after that. And I do have this great book. They do say our maps are completely deceiving, by the way, right? Geographically? Have you ever seen that, that our maps are completely deceiving on size, on what's big and what's not so big?

Yeah. They claim it's like it works out like the, I guess the stuff in the middle gets shrunken and the stuff outside gets expanded. for the most part. So like Greenland is way bigger than it should be. Africa is way small than it should be. That's the alleged conspiracy. Map conspiracies.

Love it, tinfoil. All right, I don't know if you have anything. I don't know if you're capable of doing two a day's job today of bringing the audience in to what I thought was an absolutely no. Fascinating. No, we do have the video. I can't do it. I think, Justin, do we have the video?

Are you guys talking about Elon Omar video? Yeah, yeah. Have you switched topics on me? Oh, oh, sorry. I thought we were supposed to stop. Hold on, Justin. All right. That's what happens when you give you this.

It's what happens when you give Patrick the steering wheel. You never know. Careful. There's a ditch right there. Whoop. Hit a patch of black ice. Does anybody else get a little cringe? You know, we've got the snowstorm going on.

It's starting to melt. And then it freezes again overnight. And everybody's like, be careful. for black ice and you're like, why has it got to be black ice? Why is white ice better than black ice? Is everybody racist? Like, what are we doing here? Why is black ice got to be the most dangerous and scary? You know, every time you go careful for that black ice, you're like, but I'm not racist. You know, I'm not making a thing, which I told myself this morning, dude, when you drive to school, I know it's warmer, but it wasn't last night. Today's the day. Be careful for black ice. And then you're like, looking over both shoulders.

Be careful. Black ice will get you. Be careful. It's true. There's nothing more dangerous than the black ice, which is out right now. But I gave Patrick the steering wheel, and he jerked it right into the ditch, and switched topics on us because I thought we'd get the Willisha in on Peter Schweitzer. But we're prepared. We're prepared to talk about Ilan Omar.

Now, what's going on with Ilan Omar? Well, the government's looking into how she got rich so quick, okay? Real quick. larger through her husband. There's some weird stuff going on with a winery that is being investigated and looked into. But in the midst of all that, Ilan Omar takes to the stage the last couple of days, and she was attacked. A dude runs up and squirt something on her. Now, for everyone watching and listening, I will tell you, I've not seen the video, okay?

which we've decided I'll see it for the first time with you right now. So all I know about this is she was attacked. I'm like, that's terrible. That's terrible. And somebody threw a liquid on her. And I'm like, that's horrible. You've heard these horrible stories, often out of somewhere, you know, some Muslim country, honestly, where they throw acid on young girls' faces and stuff like that.

And your brain goes there. I'm like, oh, man, this is awful, right? Well, then some details start coming out. I think, and I'll find out. We'll watch in a second, but here's what I've heard. I want to let you know what I've heard because I want to judge it with you in real time. He squirted it on her torso, her chest, I think, where she had clothes on. Weird aim of attack.

And everybody yells, ooh, that stinks. That's terrible. That makes you go, huh, what would that be? Maybe, you know, some of the protesters stuff, we've heard about them throwing like water balloons. full of urine on people and that kind. Maybe it was that kind of thing, right? And then I hear, and I haven't heard seen it again, that's what I hear. Did you see what Omar did? I'm like, no. She went after the dude. I'm like, what? Dude squirts something on her. She doesn't recoil. She goes after the dude, which I'm like, wow, that's, that's rare, and I guess heroic, you know,

like how many people? I would say 99 out of 100. Your dude charges you, squirts liquid at you, Your natural reaction is to recoil, but not Elon Omar. So, last detail, which we learned this morning, turns out the reporting is what he squirted at her was apple cider vinegar. Okay, with all of that information, let's roll the tape. I'll watch it with you for the first time. Take it away, Justin. And DHS Secretary Christine Nome must resign or face impeachment. I don't know.

Oh, my God. He's sprayed something on her. I need a napkin to know nothing. Okay. All right. That's interesting. Powered through. Okay, so he.

Foreign substance. She powered through. Yes. So, okay, dude's got like a syringe. He's a weird choice of dispensary mechanism. He's got like a syringe. that he like hits the plunger on as he runs up. Not to stick her.

He didn't try to stick her. He just kind of squirts it out at her. And I will say, I don't know if he was aiming, right? The whole torso versus face thing. I don't know. It looked like it could have got her in the neck. Like, I'm talking about bare skin. What matters is bare skin, you would think, right?

So, hmm, I don't know. And she does kind of, she's not a, She's not afraid of it. How about that? She's not afraid of it. That's a fair characterization. She's like, goes towards him. And her reaction is, I don't know.

I don't know. To whatever it is. Everybody's going, oh, my God, what is that? He's scored something on you. What is it? I don't know. I don't know. I don't know, Patrick.

It turns out it's apple cider vinegar. I think that the appropriate analysis of this right now is, huh, hmm. I think that's the appropriate analysis. Like, oh, I mean, it's, it's bad. This dude definitely did something bad, and he should have, he should be fully investigated and charged. But that's kind of different, the whole thing. We were breaking news. Oh.

He's being federally charged. He should be. Yeah. So if this was, you know, if this was any, whatever situation certain people are talking about on the internet, you know, federal charges now. So there's no, you know, he's held accountable for his actions. All right. Investing. Get to the bottom of it. Charge him. I totally agree. Do it. Make sure we get everything. And as the story sits right now, bravo to Omar and the way she handled that. Channeled just right because it all it turned out to be was apple cider vinegar.

But take that and don't mess with Ilan Omar. She's not going to recoil from mystery substances. Shot at her. Bravo. Get this dude. All right. We'll wait for further details on the investigation in the charges into that attack on Ilan Omar. Okay.

That's going to do it for us today here on Wilkang Country. My thanks to Peter Schweitzer, check out his book, The Invisible Coup. Make sure you follow us on Spotify or on Apple, and we will see you again next time. Listen to ad free with a Fox News podcast plus subscribe. on Apple Podcasts and Amazon Prime members. You can listen to this show ad free on the Amazon music app.