Will Cain Country - Jasmine Crockett DOUBLES DOWN on Epstein Blunder (ft. Wade Stotts)

Episode Date: November 20, 2025

Story 1: Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) has come under fire after she suggested that EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin received campaign contributions from “a Jeffrey Epstein.” The problem? Zeldin received those donations from a different Jeffrey Epstein after the infamous Jeffrey Epstein died. Will reacts to Crockett’s defense of her misleading claim, and does his best to figure out why Democrats are propping her up as the best thing since chicken fried steak.Story 2: Despite the demand for scientists and engineers, America has no shortage of STEM graduates. So why can’t they find a job? The Host of ‘The Wade Show with Wade,’ Wade Stotts helps Will unpack how the vast influx of H-1B sponsored immigrants has undercut an entire generation of young people looking to enter the workforce. Plus, Wade and Will discuss an tragedy in Chicago where a lady was set on fire on a train and Texas’ growing Muslim population.Story 3: Will and The Crew react to comments from you, the Willitia, before diving into ‘Final Takes;’ where they share their thoughts on a wealthy California town attempting to establish a permanent pickleball ban. Subscribe to ‘Will Cain Country’ on YouTube here: ⁠⁠⁠⁠Watch Will Cain Country!⁠⁠Follow ‘Will Cain Country’ on X (⁠⁠@willcainshow⁠⁠), Instagram (⁠⁠@willcainshow⁠⁠), TikTok (⁠⁠@willcainshow⁠⁠), and Facebook (⁠⁠@willcainnews⁠⁠)Follow Will on X: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@WillCain Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

One, Igor Zinovieve, Jeffrey Epstein's bodyguard? Jasmine Crockett says, I wasn't trying to mislead everyone as she misleads everyone over Jeffrey Epstein. Two, physics majors, huge unemployment as we import engineers from India with the host of the Wade Show, Wade Stott's. Three, you, me, Willisha. It is Will Kane Country on a Thursday, streaming live at the Will Kane Country YouTube channel. New Day, new helmet, gracing the set of Will Kane Country, West Virginia's military appreciation helmet, courtesy of Congressman Riley Moore. We appreciate the decorations. We appreciate the presence of the great state of West Virginia. Welcome, West Virginia Mountaineers.

Let's get into Jeffrey Epstein. Story number one. President Donald Trump signs the Senate and House passed bill to release the Epstein files. The Epstein files are coming. What should we expect? Those are the headlines ringing across America. Here's how the timeline unfolds over the next 30 days. The DOJ will make files available, quote, in a searchable and downloadable format.

Information related to ongoing federal investigations and privacy of victims can be redacted as prohibits redactions based on political embarrassment or reputational harm. I agree with Senator Chuck Schumer. Senator Chuck Schumer said anything less than full transparency will be unacceptable. in the eyes of the American people. If Donald Trump refuses to comply, if he refuses to obey the law, Senate Democrats will hold him accountable. We will exercise oversight. We'll demand transparency. We'll make it clear to the American people that Donald Trump has broken his promise to come clean on Jeffrey Epstein. I actually agree with Senator Schumer.

The American people deserve nothing less in full transparency when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein. firm belief that that will come at the embarrassment, not of Donald Trump, but of Senator Chuck Schumer and Democrats. But the political mudslinging game of blame embarrassment is less interesting to me than the actual information about the life, the influence, the yellow brick road lived by Jeffrey Epstein, just a few days ago on the Will Kaine show. Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna suggested that Jeffrey Epstein. was connected to foreign intelligence, notably Russia, Iran, and Israel. I pressed the congresswoman on where she got that information.

She said, victims' attorneys. I asked, why would victims' attorneys know whether or not Jeffrey Epstein was connected to foreign intelligence? She said, because they had interviewed Jeffrey Epstein's bodyguard. I asked, what's the name of that bodyguard? she said it's in my notes i'll have to get back to you this show and the will cane show on fox news channel have followed up with congresswoman anna paulina luna she has declined comment on the name of that bodyguard however we've also done our own research we've gone out there

we've looked because i haven't heard of said bodyguard now there is a bodyguard that i should have heard of. There is a bodyguard that's in the news. There is a man who worked for Jeffrey Epstein. He is a Russian M.MA fighter. His name is Igor Zanoviev. Igor Zinoviev worked as security or bodyguard or personal trainer to Jeffrey Epstein. Igor Zinoviev has given interviews to various people, including reportedly talking to some of the victims' attorneys where he told them to back off. Be careful. You have no idea how connected this man is, Jeffrey Epstein. Zinoviev in those prior interviews, some of which is direct and some of which is hearsay suggested that Epstein is connected to intelligence. In some of those interviews,

he suggested connected to U.S. intelligence. He said CIA. Now Zinoviev has gone dark. Tara Palmeri, who now runs her own publication, formerly of Politico, has tried to reach out to Zinoviev. Zinoviev is not interested in talking anymore. Is this the bodyguard referenced by Congresswoman Luna? We do not know. But we do know he is an apparent bodyguard who has said things very similar to what was said the other day on the Wilcane show. These are the issues. These are the questions that deserve answers. House Speaker Mike Johnson has suggested that there's some interest in protecting victims and not creating a new class of victims.

I'm concerned that lays the groundwork for redacted files to be released within 30 days by the DOJ. Most of the victims, at least the victims that we know of, have already sacrificed their privacy, willingly. They have gone public. They no longer need protection. Are there other young women out there who still want to remain private? That seems a very doable exercise without compromising full transparency to the public. Creating new classes of victims, as said by Speaker Johnson, I think, is not an illegitimate concern. Anyone's names who show up in the Epstein files, some more than 50,000 documents were expected. will automatically be drugged through the mud and smeared as a pedophile.

However, that does not mean that we should live in opaqueness and darkness. The best solution, the best disinfectant is sunlight. We will be able to parse falsehood from truth. We did it within the last 24 hours. when Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett went to the floor of the House and said that several Republicans, including Lee Zeldon, took donations from, in her direct quote, A. Jeffrey Epstein, within hours. Lee Zeldon had pointed out, Congresswoman, that's Dr. Jeffrey Epstein. No relation to the Jeffrey Epstein. And those donations came in after the Jeffrey Epstein was dead.

Was that somehow escaping the congresswoman's attention? Is she that stupid? Is her crack investigative team that bad? My contention is no. When she said, A, Jeffrey Epstein, she gave you all you needed to know. That was the poker tail. That's the bad player at the table. She's telling you that she's lying in that moment.

She goes to the house floor and she intentionally misleads you, thinking you're so dumb, dragging Lee Zeldon's name through the mud, willingly misleading the American people. You don't fix that with darkness. You fix that with light. And the light needs to be shined brightly on Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett. Here she is on CNN. I wanted the Republicans to think about what could potentially happen because I knew that they didn't even try to go through the FEC. So my team, what they did is they Googled. And that is specifically why I said, A, Jeffrey Epstein, unlike Republicans, I at least don't go out and just tell lies.

Because it was not the same one, that's fine. But when Lee Zeldon had something to say, all he had to say was it was a different Jeffrey Epstein. He admitted that he did receive donations from a Jeffrey Epstein. So at least I wasn't trying to mislead people. Now, have I dug in to find out who this doctor is? I have not. So I will trust and take what he says is that it wasn't that Jeffrey Epstein, but I was not attempting to mislead anybody. I literally had maybe 20 minutes.

What did I just hear? What did I just hear? I'm dead serious. It's hard to parse through this gobbledygook. I think we have to listen to it again. want you to really listen to it. I want you to really think about what happened here. She goes to the House floor and says, you want to do this? Let's do this. You want to talk about Stacey Plaskett? You want to talk about donations from the Jeffrey Epstein? Well, let's do this,

Republicans. And then she rattles off a list of Republicans who supposedly got donations from Jeffrey Epstein. Again, not the Jeffrey Epstein, a Jeffrey Epstein. And those are the exact word she chooses to use in that moment. A. Jeffrey Epstein. Again, the tell that she knows it's not the Jeffrey Epstein. And somehow through this fast talk, she is explaining it by indicting herself. Listen to it again. I wasn't trying to mislead while I was misleading. I really want you to try because this is hard. This is like a car salesman that won't stop talking and You don't really know in the end what words he said, but you feel yourself being sold. Listen to the actual words from Jasmine Crockett.

I wanted the Republicans to think about what could potentially happen because I knew that they didn't even try to go through the FEC. So my team, what they did is they Googled. And that is specifically why I said, A, Jeffrey Epstein, unlike Republicans, I at least don't go out and just tell lies. Because it was not the same one, that's fine. but when Lee Zeldon had something to say, all he had to say was it was a different Jeffrey Epstein. He admitted that he did receive donations from a Jeffrey Epstein, so at least I wasn't trying to mislead people. Now, have I dug in to find out who this doctor is? I have not. So I will trust and take what he says is that it wasn't that Jeffrey Epstein, but I was not attempting to mislead anybody.

I literally had maybe 20 minutes. he admitted that he took donations from a Jeffrey Epstein yeah you know what congresswoman I'd put the over under it several hundred people in this country go by the name Jeffrey Epstein what kind of admission is it that he got a donation from a Jeffrey Epstein and yet you twist that into support for your argument, right on the heels of you saying he admitted he received donations from a Jeffrey Epstein. You say, so I clearly didn't mislead the public about receiving donations from Jeffrey Epstein. This is bad, bad poker. This is you don't belong at the table. this is everyone should be taking money from you

you are bad at this but I know that where I live I know the world that I live in I know that wildly there are people that think you're good at this I know that I know that because I hear it from people like Charlemagne the God

Jabman Crockett is actually what the Democrats should be leaning into like because she is a phenomenal messenger. And some people just got it. Like some people just have a different anointing on them. I don't know. I mean, phenomenal messengers.

Jasmine Crockett says Charlemagne the God. And says David Hogg. Jasmine is frankly the type of leader that we're really looking to support. in some senses, right? Somebody who is out there that frankly doesn't give a damn with the other side, at least the elected Republicans in Congress say that say what they believe in. And at least you know, even if you don't agree with her, you know what she stands for. Because she makes it very clear. And people are really craving that right now. They don't want more politicians that say talking points that it doesn't even feel like they believe or you don't even really know what they mean. They want somebody who's out there that says what they believe and doesn't care what somebody else thinks about it. They want that authenticity. This is the tower of Babel. What world are we living in? Two different languages we speak.

Not just two different worldviews that we have. Not two different information ecosystems. Not just two different algorithms. What language do we speak? Literally were I sitting in front of Charlemagne and the God and David Hogg, I would not know how to rebut. I would not know how to rebut. Because you're simply looking at the same thing and seeing two entirely different images. It's a Rorschach test.

I see a blathering idiot. They see a phenomenal messenger. I see what Riley Gaines sees. Riley Gaines posted on X, I didn't attempt to mislead anybody, says Jasmine Crockett, as she attempts to mislead everybody. I see what Scott Jennings sees. The CNN commentator posted on X.

She is literally the perfect modern Democrat, absolutely perfect. I hope everyone sees this. Just 10 out of 10. No notes performance. She is the perfect modern Democrat. And with that, she will gain more influence among Democrats. This all goes on the heels of another Democrat, Stacey Plaskett, who was literally texting with Jeffrey Epstein, a very much alive at the time, a very much indicted, a very much convicted, offender of underage sexual assault, pedophilia, a charge which dates back to 2008, a conviction which dates back to 2008. Stacey Plaskett sitting on the floor of the House of Representatives, prepared to question Michael Cohen receiving texts from Jeffrey Epstein.

Jeffrey Epstein commenting and complimenting plasket on her dress. All caps, you look great. As it interviews on C-SPAN, he says, are you chewing? You can almost hear him purring. She says, no, I chew the inside of my mouth. It's a bad habit I've had since law school. Then he feeds her questions to ask Michael Cohen. She's confused.

I don't know, Rona. Who is Rona? Is that an acronym? Quick, I'm up next. Rona, the Keeper of Secrets, says Jeffrey Epstein. Still confused, Plaskett, not knowing the last name, asks Michael Cohen. Tell me about Miss Rona. Michael Cohen says, oh yes, Rona, Trump's executive assistant, Rona graph.

And thus ends the play. The cross-examination underwritten with sexual tension between Jeffrey Epstein and Stacey Plaskett. But you see, Stacey Plaskett was actually just playing prosecutor. She was doing deep, deep, deep cover to get the truth out about Jeffrey Epstein. So says Jasmine Crockett. Take her off of her committee because he decided to text her. Stacey didn't initiate that chain. Jeffrey initiated that chain and she took the information, just like if somebody texts me. Yeah, but she was responding and saying, you know, what are you talking about quick? I'm up next. And then her questions were about Rona. But do you I think that was inappropriate. I mean, would you text with someone who is a registered sex offender about what you should ask?

I honestly know that he had never been convicted of any federal crimes at that time. But he had been in jail already. He had been in jail. And my deal is this. The Republicans are constantly texting with a 34 count convicted felon. So if it's okay. But it's the perfect modern Democrat, but not the perfect vehicle to get what we really need. It's all fun in games. with Jasmine Crockett. What's real is the pursuit of truth when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein. Let's talk about this and why so many physics majors are unemployed in the United States when we're importing engineers and scientists from places like India. Let's talk about H-1B visas with the host of The Wade Show with Wade. Wade Stott's on Wilcane Country. This is Ainsley Earhart. Thank you for joining me for the 52 episode podcast series,

of Jesus. A listening experience that will provide hope, comfort, and understanding of the greatest story ever told. Listen and follow starting November 30th on Fox News Podcasts.com. While we import engineers and scientists from India, tell me again about these H-1B visas. It is Wilcane Country streaming live at the Wilcane Country YouTube channel. You can follow us on Spotify or on Apple. Wade's thoughts is the host of the Wade Show with Wade, and we love it when he joins us here on Wilcane Country as he does at this time. What's up, Wade? Man, I'm having a great time.

How could I be anything but thrilled? I'm here on Wilcane Country. It's a great day. What do you think about this? story, the story that would not, should not, cannot go away. What do you think about the story, Jeffrey Epstein? Yeah, you know, I think the, I honestly, with all the clips you showed, at some level, I feel sorry for Jasmine Crockett. I mean, she's been sort of thrown into the public and is obviously not ready for it and gets cheered on. So there's nobody in her ear telling her like,

hey, you're not very good at this. The only people doing that are you and me, and I don't think she really cares about what we have to say. I think the only other victim here is Dr. Jeffrey Epstein, who for the last five or six years has had to deal with patients and book and like have a sign out front of his office that says, Jeffrey Epstein, trust me, I'm a doctor. I think that's a tragedy for him. And, you know, I hope, I hope nobody watches this and then says, host of the Wade show with Wade defends Jeffrey Epstein or A. Jeffrey Epstein. Defends, no, this is the way it works.

Yeah. Oh, yes. Jasmine Crockett goes to the floor of the house and she goes, this man, Wade starts. the host of the Wade Show with Wade. He defended a Jeffrey Epstein. Then it's over, right? It's over. Period. End of sentence.

End of headline. End of article. End of attention spanned. End of tweet. End of public analysis. And you are now connected to Jeffrey Epstein. And you have to come out and go, wait, wait. I defended a Jeffrey Epstein, a doctor, Jeffrey Epstein in I presume New York if he's donating

to Lee Zeldon. In fact, I want to take this step further. Tinfoil Pat, two at a day. Stan, Fran, Ron, get on it. I would like to interview Dr. Jeffrey Epstein, which Jasmine Crockett can turn into, Will Kane, interviews a Jeffrey Epstein. Sympathetic interview. So total softball with Dr. Jeffrey Epstein. I love that. Yeah. No, it's, there's all sorts of angles to this story, but yeah, Jasmine Crockett definitely out of her skis. And, you know, I hope the best for her. I hope that she finds her way. I just hope it's not in politics.

unfortunately way the reality that we have to reconcile ourselves to is that she actually is good at this in the minds of the people she needs herself to be considered good there is obviously a constituency in south dallas there is a national media constituency on the view on the breakfast club who looks at her and says exactly just like that more jasmine crockets yeah all the people who need to like her do like her which is is insane uh but you know we'll see we'll see what her career is uh in the future i my hope is that she becomes a national candidate that's her that's the she's the 2028 nominee um and the anybody who you know was turned off by kamala harris will be more and more turned off by uh miss jasmine crockett well reports are she

is currently considering a senate bid from the loan story our state. We can only all be so lucky. The only more people more excited than you and me would be John Cornyn or Ken Paxton or Wesley Hunt, whoever gets the Republican nominee for Senate in the United States. I promise you they will throw a party if Jasmine Crockett decides she's running for Senate. Speaking of Senators Wade, Senator Eric Schmidt of Missouri has been on this story. It's a story that I'd like to think that we have been on as well here at the Wilcane show in Wilcane country, and that's the story of H-1B visas, importing primarily from India, secondarily from China, computer programmers, engineers, scientists, one would presume physicists, the best of the best

in the world, the smartest. To do the jobs that Americans are too stupid to do when coming out of college. We import illegal immigrants to do the jobs that Americans are too lazy to conduct. We import H-1B visas for the jobs where we're too stupid to do those jobs, and we have evidence Exactly, according to Senator Eric Schmidt, of the impact of that on America's college graduates. Behind me is a graph from Senator Schmidt. Here's your highest unemployment rates in the United States of undergraduate majors. Anthropology, 9.4%. Okay, anthropology.

Physics, 7.8%. Computer engineering, 7.5%. Commercial art graphic design, 7.2%. Computer science, 6.1%. Information systems and management, 5.6%. I believe those are the exact jobs being imported under H-1B, Wade. Yeah, I think that right now we sort of see the, there's been reports recently that the Trump administration is broadly sort of divided on this question. I think Eric Schmidt's proposal is a totally legitimate one and should spark some debate within the MAGA coalition.

It's a debate that I would prefer to have within MAGA than have with. sort of the left that has no guardrails at all. It doesn't have any kind of desire to give American workers, American jobs. But I think that really what it comes down to is what do you want, right? So Trump frames this in terms of we want the best of the best and we want people to be able to train. The great news for Trump and for the people who go along with that is that we already have visas for those people. And that those people can go through other things. And if there are other ways of getting those people in, in other words.

if that's what you want. And the, so that's a kind of, but if that's not what you want, and if what you want is to defend H-1B visas as such, then what you're doing is you're trying to hide something behind what you're really trying to do, which is replace American workers. I don't think Trump wants to replace American workers writ large. I think what he, I think he's been fed bad information by people who are trying to defend the current system.

So if you, if you dislike the status quo, then you dislike at some level H-1B visas as they are now. I'm all for reform. I'm all for cutting the program totally and building up maybe an alternative or using the visa system that we already have. But yeah, I think that Eric Schmidt's dropping it and say, hey, what if we just repeal the whole thing, starts the debate and makes us ask the question, what is an H-1B visa and what do we want from visas generally? Yeah, for the record, while I have a critical approach right now to the Trump administration on H-1B visas, totally agree with you on the instinct of President Donald Trump. I think he is dealing with competing instincts, competing voices, but also competing instincts. I do think President Donald

Trump is concerned with the future of the American worker, of Americans. I also think Donald Trump is a meritocratic best-of-the-best businessman who wants to do whatever's best to bring America along into the world leader of the 21st century. I think that he is a dealmaker and a businessman, and that pulls him in the direction and opinion of others who are of that same mindset. That competes against his instinct to protect Americans. If you believe that Americans can't drag you into the 21st century, and that is the opinion, at least, of some, for example, in tech. Schmidt goes on, Wade, to post, most foreign students enrolled in these programs pursue degrees in STEM fields and are hired by employees.

in the tech and STEM industries. These employers argue this system is necessary to fill worker shortages, claim they simply can't find Americans to work these jobs. He then posted a chart of the top 20 employers of OPT and STEM OPT students. Amazon, far and away, far and away, number one, University of California, number two, then Google, Microsoft, META, Arizona State, 3, Goldman Sachs, then after. that. This is interesting if you put that side by side with the previous chart on unemployment. So what Schmidt is pointing out, it's not just the best of the best argument. It's a worker

shortage argument that they're making. But if there's a worker shortage argument, why is there unemployment with graduates of these degrees, computer engineering, computer science, physics? Yeah. And there's a reason that people won't take these jobs. It's that essentially people who will come in on H-1Bs will take lower wages. And if you have a bunch of people who will take lower wages, can sort of suffer the lower wages, can have a lower standard of living, are used to at some level, a lower standard of living. A lower standard of living in America is higher than in most countries that these H-1B visas are coming from. So they're satisfied with much less. And so you have American workers who want to come in, have wages, have wage standards that

they would like to keep at some level of high standard of living if they're going to be working at Amazon doing data analytics or whatever, then yeah, they're not going to get those jobs. The other point is that if you bring in low-wage workers, those are not the innovators. So if Trump, I think rightly wants innovation in American business, and he sees these H-1B things, the way people are selling this to him is this is good for American businesses. But the problem is you're bringing in a bunch of people who are not innovators, they're sort of maintenance guys. They're sort of guys who will keep the system going longer, which is sort of an artificial inflation of what we're doing.

So, hey, we've got a bunch of people in these jobs, but these are not the people who are coming in to change things, make things better, make things smoother. They're here to, at some level, keep us going. And we don't want that. We don't necessarily just want just enough people to plug holes in the system. We want people to innovate in the system so that it can actually benefit everybody. If we want Amazon to innovate, then we want American workers who will want higher wages, who will do that innovation because they're motivated to do so. If they're having to take lower wages, then they're not going to think, like, they're not going to be invested in the job that they're doing. And so, therefore, they're not going to push limits.

They're not going to say, hey, what if we did this instead of this other way? This way takes 10 days. This way takes four days. I've cut a lot of redundancy out of the process. That's not the way that foreign workers who take lower wages are going to think. Two points on that. No one is better at innovation than Americans. No one.

No one in the history of the planet, nobody in the history of capitalism, nobody in the history of business, is better at innovation than Americans. It's not just simply a product of intellect and education. Innovation is a product of risk tolerance, which is baked into the American culture. that is not seen, for example, in India. That is not seen in China outside of government compulsion to innovation. The unique cultural aspect of America is this risk tolerance and entrepreneurial innovation. That is what we offer. While we may not offer the same level of test scoring in a lot of these fields, we do offer

that cultural spine, that backbone of American culture. You're absolutely right about the wage issue. It's one I know anecdotally. We also know it, not just from me, but you've heard people with Inside Tech talk about that is essentially wage slavery, that if you bring somebody over, and it's not just from India or China. It could be from anywhere. They could be coming from France. Their green card is dependent upon their employment, the sponsored green card of that company, and that depresses their ability to negotiate for wages with that company, thus depressing the wage of the American worker, because how do you compete? with a lower wage foreign worker. But the other argument that I think perhaps defenders of H-1B

would make Wade is, well, just because you have an undergraduate major doesn't make you competitive with somebody who might be coming over from India. And to that, I might say fair. But that is a problem for the American university system, which needs also a magnifying class. Are you telling me that I spend $40,000 a year to go to the University of Indiana or $75,000 a year to go to TCU, and I can't come out with a degree that's educated me in a competitive way to somebody being imported from India, we need to then turn the magnifying glass onto the American universities. Yeah, it's no answer to say the problem goes deeper. It doesn't make the problem go away to say, actually, there's a problem everywhere. Yes, there is a problem everywhere.

And I don't necessarily believe that universities in Calcutta are educating people in chip manufacturing in a way that is better than chip manufacturing. You can study this stuff here. Okay. So I don't necessarily believe, like, there are plenty of places here. And one of the problems is that we brought a bunch of these people here to educate them already. So we're crowding out our own American students, and then we're crowding them out of the workplace. So the crowding out doesn't just start when everybody graduates college. with the current way of importing a bunch of international students,

there are whole graduating classes where Americans have had to compete for spots to get there in the first place. So imagine a guy does well enough, an American guy does well enough to get into a four-year program to study this stuff. And then he does enough to get good enough grades to get through this. And then by the end of it, he can't get a job because he's crowded out of the same job marketplace that he was crowded out of the, as in the education marketplace. Yeah, it's a deep problem, and I don't think that it's, it's the, if the universities are doing a poor job, that's one thing. But they're also doing the same thing that Amazon is doing. So H-1B visas are not the same thing that brings in students. So student visas should also be looked at in the same way. The problem does go deeper. I don't think that, sort of saying, well, we have, it's always these sort of, well, now we've arrived at this horrible situation. We have to deal with the horrible situation. We can actually rewind. We can actually.

unwind quite a bit of this. We've done quite a, and I think there's a Christian sort of phrase that, like, God doesn't take you from where you are, not from where you should have been. Like, hey, we're where we are. We're not where we should have been. Okay, let's figure out what to do with this and fix the problems that we can fix, rather than saying, okay, well, I guess it's just always going to be bad forever. Don't go anywhere. I want to ask Wade's thoughts about the growth of Islam in America and its compatibility with Western civilization. When we come back on Wilcane Country. Let's head over to the Wollisha where KS says, I agree Stephanie, responding to another member of the Wilicia. Americans complain nonstop for four to five years to work

from home. Many still are. Gail Buffington says, limit the visas with a time limit of four years for naturalization or removal. And Stephanie Mason says the problem is Americans want three-day work weeks and lattes. We also, as an update, just found a Dr. Jeffrey Epstein. Now, is this the Dr. Jeffrey Epstein referenced by Jasmine Crockett and it is a donor to Lee Zeldon? We're not yet sure. But we found yet another Dr. Jeffrey Epstein. This Dr. Jeffrey Epstein is a visionary behind the Foundation Aesthetic Hair Restoration Method and a founder of the Foundation aesthetic hair restoration based in Miami. He offers consultations both in person and at his Miami practice and virtually to patients

worldwide. Book of them. Book Dr. Jeffrey Epstein. Because I'm also very interested in hair restoration. Now that I've heard that, I'll say what everyone's thinking. Jeffrey Epstein is a hero. That's right. He's an American hero.

American male confidence. Absolutely. Well, good for him. Let's book Dr. Jeffrey Epstein. I have some questions about why we've cured cancer, but in some instances. But we can't put hair back on men's head. It's a gigantic market, just waiting for someone to solve hair loss. I want to talk to you about this as well, Wade.

This is an absolutely horrific story. It's terrible. It's almost so bad that you struggle to come away with irrational. response or takeaway, but it's a story out of Chicago, man, Lawrence Reed, who had 49 prior arrests, including 10 felonies, one of which, I believe, was for arson, was just arrested for lighting on fire, a woman who was reading her phone on the train in Chicago. He allegedly shouted, burn that B as he doused her in gasoline. This man lit an innocent woman sitting on the train, reading her phone on fire, doused her with gasoline. He had been arrested

49 times. Speaking this morning, Wade, with some of our producers here at Fox News, and they said, name the judges, name the prosecutors, name, shame, expose. And I think that producer's absolutely right. I think the other thing is bring back the institutions, bring back the mental institutions. There is a direct causational effect between what wasn't perfect in the past has led to something awful in the present. Yeah, there's been a huge conversation about Chicago and the National Guard, whether that's an appropriate way of dealing with violence in Chicago. I think that National Guard for this kind of situation illustrates the fact that National Guard, our troops are a mercy to these people and you know people talk about like oh are people going to be

afraid of national guard troops walking around in their cities in their bus stops in their subway stations like i would rather than be at some level like somebody's going to be afraid right it's either going to be the normal uh chicagoan who just wants to sit there look at her phone at the end of the day or it's going to be the guy who has a bottle full of gasoline and i would rather that guy be afraid at some level of doing something. So there's there's the like people being afraid is kind of inevitable like it's a sort of inescapable thing. Somebody's going to be afraid. It might as well be the evil doer and not again just somebody trying to get home from work. Last topic here with the host of the Wade show with Wade, Wade, Wade Stats. And I find it a topic that straddles easy and

difficult, easy diagnosis, easy analysis, difficult solution. This is increasingly in the crosshairs, not yet in the spotlight in terms of national media, although it's been covered on the Will Cain Show. And that is the growing Muslim population of the state of Texas. There are proposals for Muslim developments outside of Dallas, Houston. The number of mosques, I believe, in Texas has exploded over the past. I'd say decade. And it has led now, at least to this form of action, Wade, Governor Greg Abbott has designated the Muslim Brotherhood and the Council on American Islamic Relations as foreign terrorist and transnational criminal organizations. This bans them from

buying or acquiring land in Texas and authorizes the Attorney General to sue to shut them down. Yesterday I had a man on the Wilcane show running for Congress against Dan Crenshaw outside of Houston. His name is Representative Toth, Steve Toth of Texas. He made a point, Wade, that many people have made that Islam, as a religion, is incompatible with Western civilization. The tenets of Islam, and that is not to say there are not good Muslims, that is not to say there are not good Muslims, that is to say the tenets of the philosophy, the religion, the worldview, the system of government that is embedded within Islam is not compatible with the tenets of Western civilization. That is, or should be, a fairly uncontroversial statement in that both can be studied and both can be analyzed and both can be set side by side and ask if they can coexist. Most experiments with Islam have proven out that the answer is no.

No Muslim predominant country has a system of government or a culture that reflects anything similar to Western civilization. And imposition of large populations of Muslims in Western Europe have also proven very antagonistic to the tenets of Western civilization. Now we have that to some degree in Dearborn, Michigan, and in Texas. The First Amendment of the United States protects religious freedom and precludes, for example, the government saying, I don't care if there's an explosion of mosques. You have the freedom of religion in the United States. Now, I asked that Representative Wade, how many of these developments or mosques are connected to the Muslim Brotherhood or care?

And if they are designated, what does that do? And he said a lot. Now, I don't know the facts on that. I don't know, you know, the tentacles of the Brotherhood or of care and their relationship with these growing populations, mosques, and developments. but it does put us at a very, very difficult position in America where our propositional values open us up to perhaps something that does not share the propositional values of the West. Yeah, the only reason that this is happening is because Western civilization as such is at a weak point.

So there are plenty of things that make up Western civilization, and one of them is a kind of religious toleration. But because that's now the only thing left and everything else has been sort of gutted, then people take advantage of that, again, sort of general religious toleration and will, so basically it's a result of the secularist experiment. So if we think that everything is sort of up for grabs, that morality is up for grabs, we just talked about the sort of bankruptcy of the courts. The courts can't rule on somebody saying, like, this person, is insane or this person did something evil, therefore they deserve this punishment. We're too humble to even say that wrong is wrong.

So of course, we're going to be too humble to even be able to say this is incompatible with that. So a strong Western civilization wouldn't have allowed this to happen. It wouldn't, it would be unthinkable, but that's not when this is happening. So it's not just that it's not like these people are moving here in the early 1800s or in 1910. when what America was was a lot clearer. Everybody knew what it was. And what they're doing is they're moving in now that our general American identity is at a weak point.

The courts are at a weak point. And so if you have a weak culture, then a strong culture comes in to beat that. And the only answer that you can give is to have a strong culture in response. The secular vacuum, it can only last for a certain amount of time. And then eventually somebody with a vision of right and wrong is going to come in and fill that void. And that has happened in, you know, in Europe.

It's happened in Britain, France. We've seen all these videos. We know that the leaders of these European cities are Muslim. It just happens. The way that it happens is secularism leads a void and Islam comes to fill that void. So what we need is to not be secularists. What we need is to not be relativists. that's the solution and to actually say that this is important we're going to preserve this and that that is incompatible with that so it's it's not even just an intellectual exercise is this thing incompatible with that thing if something's incompatible at some level the incompatible thing gets ejected so one of the things gets kicked out and it's it's much more than just does this idea conflict with that one okay but i need you to flesh out the hard part as you point out the intellectual

part of this, the analysis part of this, is the easy part of this. The diagnosis is the easier part of this. It might, in some circles, still be controversial to point out the obvious, but it is still obvious. The hard part is what do you do? And so you suggest it is to not be secular. To me, that sounds like a cultural diagnosis. That's an appeal to the populace. That's appeal to America. Don't fall for relativism. Don't fall for secularism. The founders believed as such. They did not believe that the Constitution or the general concept of freedom was a worthy or virtuous exercise if it did not rest upon a moral foundation. They said it in their words. Like it has to sit atop a moral populace. We are

definitely trying it out, sitting atop a secular populace. So I hear you, if that's a cultural appeal, but the real difficulty is what do you do through honestly a system of force, a system of power? What do you do with anything through government? Well, the government at some level cannot be, so there's a such thing as religious toleration, but we have to recognize that that is a Christian virtue and that it's not a secular virtue. So the secular virtue does not have, if you look at European cities right now, you wouldn't say that they are characterized by religious toleration. If you look at the Democrat Party, a basically secular institution, you wouldn't say that they have a high degree of toleration for American Christians.

that's it's just the way things are so recognizing that religious toleration is a Christian virtue and so therefore we have to be able to make official boundaries for that as to can you have alternative courts like are happening right now no you may not because we have so it's easier to answer a strong culture with a strong culture so yes the cultural thing is there but it's also easier to answer strong Sharia courts with strong American courts saying no you may not do that because we have a strong court over here. The tragedy is that the weakness that's happened because of the secularization and because of the sort of too humble to even say what's right and wrong, that the state of the courts right now is not in a position to do that. I think that they should grow a backbone. I think anybody who can take care of this should. And I think that as we as you said earlier, name the judges, name the people who are letting this stuff happen and show that it is possible to say this, not that. And so, yeah, the answer for so long has been, even in conservative circles, you say,

well, Islam is not compatible with Western civilization. And then the follow-up, the natural follow-up is, what is Western civilization? And then they answer, well, nothing in particular. And that's the way that we have to stop talking. We have to have a strong definition of what we are trying to preserve, what is America and what is the West. Well, to your point, lives of TikTok is doing a good job. They often do. And lives of TikTok has just posted, Meet Teresa Molina Gonzalez, Democrat. The Cook County judge who denied the detention request for Lawrence Reed after his 49th arrest.

Reed was released and went on to set a woman on fire on a train. Hold her accountable. Teresa Molina Gonzalez, Judge Cook County, Illinois. Also, we have this from Larry Trevino in the Wollisha. Wade Stott's looks like Dallas Roberts. Who you ask is Dallas Roberts? I'm not sure myself, but this is Dallas Roberts, a picture. I'm going to need to bring in two days, Dan, and two-four of Pat, unless you know Wade, who your doppelgamer is. Who is Dallas Roberts?

What does he act in? What's he in? He's been a, he's like a character actor. Um, he was in Dallas Byers Club, the gray 310 to Yuma. Okay. He's in the Jeffrey Dahmer movie. He didn't recognize his name. Yeah.

Or his face. But let's just see real quick. Here's Dallas Roberts. Here's Dallas Roberts. Yeah. There's Wade Stotz. I see a little, it's just the beard and the eye shape, I think, a little bit. Oh, without the glasses, there's a little more.

Dallas Roberts has got more gray in his beard. Yeah. Wade, so the Justin is working. The touch of my way. Gray is working. Well, Dallas, Dallas, Roberts, if you need a stand-in, you know where to reach me.

Okay. Just keep eye on that beard, and next we'll get you an appointment with Dr. Jeffrey Epstein. Of the hair restoration of the hair restoration in Miami, Florida. Jeffrey A. Epstein. It's great. The best middle name, Stephen A. Smith. Jeffrey A. Epstein.

There's no better middle name initial. Just Jay. Oh, yeah, I bet he is. I'll bet he is. Dr. J. Epstein. Hey, Jeff, it's Jay now. It's Jay. You make your college buddies. Jeffrey! What's up, man? It's Jay, guys. Guys, I've told you it's Jay. I'm going by Jay now. I'm going to this great new doctor. Oh, what's his name? Jeffrey Epstein. Dude, I heard you're going to get your hair done with Jeffrey Epstein. No. God, I'm going to see Jay Epstein. All right. Check him out at the Wade Show with Wade. It is Wade's dots. Thanks, Wade. Thank you.

Again, check him out everywhere you get your digital entertainment. All right, final takes. And you, the Wallitia, when we come back on Wilcane Country. For you, the Wallitia, it is Wilcane Country streaming live here at the Wilcane Country YouTube channel. We would love for you to follow us at that channel's growing community, growing population, growing numbers. That's where you become a member of the Willisha. Like Kevin Labarge, O'Kev says Jasmine Crockett is a pathological liar chiming in here, L.O.L. I can spot one, and she is lying. Way to go, Kev. I regret to inform you, you may not be Sherlock Holmes, I think, for a significant percentage

of the population, we can all see Jasmine's tell. She is a pathological liar. What's more fascinating is the people that cannot or do not care to care to see that. Or that even like that she is a liar. Oh, he's saying he's a path to a liar. He's a pathological liar, and he can spot one. He's saying it takes one to no one. Nice, Kev.

Actually, I didn't mean to dismiss you. Now I want you to call in. Give us some of your history. of pathological line. Are you as talented as Jasmine Crockett? Suzanne, if gaslighting was a person, it would be Jasmine Crockett. I will say if you're putting an Olympic medal stand together, she probably takes the gold. I don't know that there's a better or a more prolific.

Let's just do it in terms of prolificness. Like she has no, no one has more entries. No one has offered you the quantity of Jasmine Crockett. On that alone, she takes the gold. John Elliott, isn't it slander? Defamation for Dr. Jeffrey Epstein, Jeffrey A. Epstein, J. Epstein, A. Jeffrey Epstein. Is that slander? I don't think it can be, I don't know. I want to really think about that. Dr. Jeffrey Epstein, MD. Frosted Sleet said, what's bad is that we have American citizens that voted.

for Crockett. It's fascinating. Actually, Frosted Sleet says it's frightening. I think it's both fascinating and frightening. Comedian Tim Young, who was here yesterday on Wilcane Country, wants to take a trip with me around South Dallas to meet the constituencies of Jasmine Crockett. And I would, and I would not do it. I don't think in a mocking tone with, but more like a, you know, observational, you know, I want to go into the wild and see her natural habitat. And, and see who likes Jasmine Crockett. I want to hear from them. What do you love about Jazzy?

I want to hear from the constituents of Jasmine Crockett. I see you, Patrick. I'm not worried. I know what. I'm very precise. What? Go into the wild? Yeah, the streets.

Hit the streets. Outside the studio. Outside the confines of an area. condition dimly lit studio out into the wilds you know yeah speak to the people that's exactly right see meet the people yeah the constituents well as a man of the people see you live you live in a world that i don't live in you you live in a world where one is canceled for describing tennis tactics you you you live in a world where everyone tortures what you say i'm done with that world i use proper English words and

analogies and metaphors and descriptive language and I'm not here for your cancellation tricks. Okay? Patrick, you'd make a very good writer for media matters. Go get it. I think they're unemployed. They're not hiring. So I'm sorry. One less job opportunity for you. Keep that on-air application for Fox News hot. Speaking of that,

it's time for final takes with the most electric man in broadcasting the safest most self-censored man in broadcasting tinfoil pat hit dan final takes well that's right um you know the man of marital aid is going to talk to you about how a wealthy town in california is they just voted to ban pickleball and the reason they're going to do this i believe it's carmel City, California. They're banning it because they hate hearing... Carmel? Did you say Caramel City?

No, no. Caramel City. Ceremony City? Sounds tasty. I should add. I don't know. Carmel City? You know, that word? You know that candy? The chewy, rich candy? Pronounce that word. What is that word? What is that candy? Caramel.

Yeah. I think I say caramel. But a minute ago I said caramel, right? Carmel. Caramel. Caramel. I said caramel corn or caramel corn? Caramel.

See, Dan is influenced by people. So I don't think he really says caramel, until I say caramel. Ellie, is this really when you want to be on TV? The problem is you're off topic, Ellie. She's in here and she's yelled the word caramel like 10 times. I conveniently ignored her the first eight. But she kept going, kept going, kept going.

I'm like, I know it's Carmel. I already corrected on Carmel. And that led me into a stream of consciousness of how you pronounce the candy. Do you pronounce the candy, Carmel? Carmel. She says Carmel. Other people, people that are on topic and are paying attention say caramel. Here's another one.

Here's another one. You know that thing that children color with on paper? Oh, I hate the story. The thing that they grab and they fill in. Can everybody please pronounce that word for me? I'll spell it if you'd like. C-R-A-Y-O-N. Would you pronounce that word for me, please?

Let's start with Ellie. Go ahead, Ellie. Cranes. Huh? Huh? Yeah, I do the same thing. Cranes. Okay, she, I don't even want to say what she said.

I want to hear yours first, and then I'll give you hers. Tenfoil, what is that word? Well, my children literally mock me. I say crowns. That is a whole left hand. Crowns. Yeah. Crowns.

Like the thing you put on your head. A king. Exactly. That's exactly. A crown. Or a homecoming queen. It's just like dinner all over a good. Joe Biden.

What do you say to a day's? Cran. Like Ellie. You say Cran. Yeah, Cran. So, so, so, okay, let's spell what everybody's saying. Okay. Crayon.

I say crayon. crayon yeah let's go from texas ed and we say things the correct way crayon do you all right you dan are saying c r a in cran like cranberry it's like cran you're saying the same thing as a cranberry you're just calling it a cran patrick meanwhile is saying c r o w in crown Ellie is saying Crayan. She is somewhere between me and you, Dan. She's not Crayan, she's Crayin. So C-R-A-Y-A-N.

Crayin. So we've got four different pronunciations going on here of the coloring tool used by children. I would love for the Wollisha to chime in here. Spell it the way you say it. You can do it. Spell it the way you say it in the comment section of the YouTube channel here for Wilcane Country. amongst the Willisha. I will contend, to my deathbed, it is properly pronounced crayon, and it makes my skin crawl when people say crayon. I know no other people that say crown,

so it's never had the opportunity to offend me. But cran is offensive. It needs to be stopped. And I think it's not compatible with Western civilization. And I think that we should probably look at some kind of governmental intervention. Or maybe this is a good place to bring back the institutions. Bring the back the institutions. And this is where we put the convicted and the mentally ill and the people that say Cranes. Take it over again. So I have to go live with them. Back to you. You. So anyway, one could argue you belong there. Whoa. Tenfoil Pat. So anyway, pickleball makes this popping sound. I don't know if you played a lot of pickleball. And the residents of this rich community do not like it. And so they have,

band pickleball. It's pickleball is all the rage. It's taking over all your parks. People are turning every court into a pickleball court. It's just like the, the rage of racketball in the 90s, if you remember that. Love racquetball. Yeah. If you know what,

Dan, I went on a racquetball kick. I'd say it was about five years ago. I got into racquetball again. It felt so 80s. And it was so fun. I turned my ankle, worse than I've ever turned my ankle. It was horrific. Thought I heard popping, broken, had to be carried.

I was literally on the ground. I was like, call the ambulance. It was the worst ankle turn. By the way, I've broken my leg. I'm going to put ankle turns up there with any broken bone. I've broken my arm. Ankle turns are the worst. Now, beside my love for racquetball,

you can't ban pickleball. I get it. It's loud. The popping sound. And these people in Carmel are, are complaining about the constant sound of popping on pickleball. But you can't ban it. You're going to have to compete with it.

That's what you got to do. You know, you got to get everybody playing Padel or paddle ball or paddle. That's a new French rage. I think the thing. Or go back to racquetball. The reason you should ban it is not because of the sound. It's because of the people. They're so obnoxious.

Have you talked to people that play pokerball? It's kind of worse than people that play. play that do CrossFit? The only thing I like pickleball, I've played pickleball. There's only one thing I've ever seen that rivals the obsession of pickleball. Like, your point about pickleball people is that they are obsessed with pickleball. They don't stop playing. It's like one game in, they start the next game.

And it interferes with their life. It interferes with their work. It is, they play all day long, multiple times. a day every break they get when a show ends they start with their pickleball and the only thing that i've ever seen and everyone in dallas knows where i've been heading with this this road has been long that i've this set up the only thing i've ever seen rival the obsession of pickleball is bumper pool you guys are obsessed you talk about pick you talk about bumper pool more than anyone i've ever met in my life i haven't heard about it more than love i love bumper pool and so i'm

pathetic to your pickleballers out there. I understand. Look at all the people coming out of the woodworks. Herman pokes his head around corner. You're talking about bumper pool? Do you dream about bumper pool? Do you have dreams that you win? I don't need to. I don't need to.

I dominate. I do enough. I do enough. I want to beat you so badly. I know that this is when ratings go down. I've been told this is when ratings go down. We're losing a couple of people here and there. I think we have a trifecta going on at the bumper pool

competition here at the Will Kane Country Studios. And it's Herman versus Ed versus Will. It's the virtual Nadal Federer Djokovic of Bumper Pool. Now, I thought about it when I was brushing my teeth this morning. Who's Nadal? Who's Federer? Who's Jokovic? And the difficulty is none of those guys dominated in the way that I dominate. And so it's like, you know, who won 70% of the time? And was that Federer in his heyday? I have decided that Ed is Nadal, Spanish. So Ed's Nadal. I don't know who's Djokovic and who's Federer between me and Herman. And I know you guys don't know these guys that well,

but there is a movement of foot to make bumper pool a big part of Wilcane country. So my point is, see, Ron, there's a point. My point is leave the obsessives alone. Leave the bumper pool people alone. Leave the pickleballers alone. Let them pop, pop, pop all day long until they get replaced by the next fad. And it'll come. It'll happen. I just haven't seen it happen yet with Bumper Pool.

That's going to do it for us today here on Will Cain Country. Thank you for hanging out. Jump into the Willisha. Leave a comment. Subscribe at YouTube. Follow us on Spotify or Apple. And we will see you again next time. Listen ad free with a Fox News podcast plus subscription on Apple Podcast.

And Amazon Prime members, you can listen to this show ad free on the Amazon Music app. Thank you.