WSJ What’s News - Are Higher Oil Prices the New Normal?

Episode Date: March 24, 2026

A.M. Edition for Mar. 24. U.S. allies in the Persian Gulf are tightening the screws on Tehran in response to persistent attacks. Rystad Energy’s Jorge León explains how Iran’s continued strikes on the region and ability to exert control over the Strait of Hormuz mean oil is likely to remain expensive for longer. Plus, the EU and Australia ink a free-trade deal as the world’s “middle powers” link up. And Estée Lauder is in talks to acquire Puig Brands in a deal that would create a global beauty giant and add cult brands Charlotte Tilbury and Byredo to its sprawling portfolio. Luke Vargas hosts. Sign up for the WSJ’s free What’s News newsletter. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Okay, when I sell my business, I want the best tax and investment advice. I want to help my kids, and I want to give back to the community. Ooh, then it's the vacation of a lifetime. I wonder if my head of office has a forever setting. An IG Private Wealth advisor creates the clarity you need with plans that harmonize your business, your family, and your dreams. Get financial advice that puts you at the center. Find your advisor at IG Private Wealth.com.

Signs of progress in the Senate as lawmakers pushed to fund the TSA. Plus oil rebounds as traders assess potential long-term hits to global energy supplies. Before the conflict, refinery runs in the Middle East where around 26 million barrels per day. Right now, we think the refiner rounds is close to 16 million barrels per day. And the EU and Australia Inc. A free trade deal has the world's middle powers link up. It's Tuesday, March 24th. I'm Luke Vargas for the Wall Street Journal, and here is the AM edition of What's News, the top headlines and business stories moving your world today. Senators say they are closing in on a deal to fund most of the Department of Homeland

Security, including the TSA, as security lines continue to grow at airports nationwide. Carved out of the potential agreement, according to Democratic senators, would be funding for an ICE division that carries out immigrant arrests and deportations. Delaware Democrat Chris Coons said the deal would broadly require ICE to wear body cameras and display identification, though it's not clear if it would address other core Democratic demands, including a ban on agents wearing masks. Meanwhile, the Senate has approved President Trump's choice to succeed Christy Noem at DHS in a largely party-line vote. The eyes are 54, the nays are 45.

The nomination of Mark Wade-Mullen of Oklahoma to be Secretary of Homeland Security is confirmed. Mullen will face the task of pushing for a deal to reopen his agency and balancing the president's desire to deport large numbers of immigrants with a shift to a more low-profile enforcement style. Mullen's swearing in is scheduled for this afternoon. The Pentagon is once again limiting press access, including rehousing credentialed reporters outside of the building and requiring that they have escorts when inside. The restrictions come after a federal judge on Friday ruled that prior limits on reporters' access. to the Pentagon were unconstitutional, including forcing reporters to sign a document restricting their communication with military sources. The Defense Department has said it plans to appeal that ruling. Meanwhile, the DOD is set to meet face-to-face with Anthropic in court today in a dispute

over the military's labeling of the company as a supply chain risk. The spat between the sides spilled out in public last month after Anthropic drew red lines around the use of its AI tools in mass surveillance and autonomous weapons, leading President's Trump to call it a radical left woke company and direct every federal agency to immediately stop the use of its technology. Journal Tech reporter Heather Somerville told us about the court fight to come. We are expecting to hear Anthropic talk about how the Pentagon has retaliated against it first free speech and its speech should be protected under the First Amendment. It's going to talk about how the Pentagon's behavior and actions have already detrimentally impacted its business. And it's

its ability to raise money from investors has been negatively impacted. What the U.S. government has said in its response is that it is well within its right. It has the discretion to declare anthropic a supply chain risk and that the government's actions are not retaliatory. They have nothing to do with free speech, but they have to do with this building mistrust of anthropic and a fear that anthropic, if it has access to the Pentagon's wartime infrastructure, can meddle with The AI models can put limitations on its technology, can create changes to the AI that's been deployed that will negatively affect U.S. national security. Israel, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Saudi Arabia have been hit by a barrage of missiles this morning

as Iran launched fresh attacks. That comes after President Trump said the U.S. military would stop strikes on Iranian power plants for five days following what he called productive talks with Tehran. Iran has denied the talks were taking place, according to state media, but acknowledged that countries in the region were trying to get diplomacy going. At the same time, Journal Middle East editor Andrew Dowell says that Gulf countries are weighing whether to get more involved in the fighting. The Gulf's a little bit of two minds here. They've obviously been hurt very badly by the war, and they don't want it to continue. By the same token, they don't want it to end where Iran is in, for lack of a better phrase, a position of power, certainly where Iran has more influence over. the crucial strait of Hormuz waterway than it had coming into the war. So in the background,

the Gulf is pressing the U.S. very hard to keep going and finish the job so that Iran doesn't come out of this, still able to pose a threat. On the other hand, they are participating in the process with talks to make sure that they head in the right direction and also just because they do eventually want an end to the war. And obviously diplomacy will have to be a part of that. President Trump promised earlier this month that once Iran's nuclear threat was taken out, prices would drop rapidly. But how likely is that now, as banks raise their medium-term oil price forecast, and energy producers warn that it could take years to rebuild following Iranian attacks?

Jorge Leon is the head of geopolitical analysis at Rysstad Energy. Jorge, it's a new week, but here we are once again, focusing on Iran. holding up traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, despite the country now having been hit thousands of times by the U.S. and Israel. Obviously, we saw how markets were very quick to price in a short-term disruption of Hormuz traffic. But did anyone really factor in that Iran might possess an enduring asymmetric advantage here? I think indeed. I think no one was really anticipated that this was going to be a longer conflict. It's Iranians' only cart on the table to close the Strait of Hormuz.

At the end of the day, it all goes back to the leverage, to Iranian leverage. They hold the trade of Hormuz and also putting pressure on the U.S. And a way of doing that is through attacks in energy infrastructure that would hurt the U.S. economy through a high oil price. So I think that everybody in the market was anticipating that this was going to be part of the problem. But everybody in the market, I think, anticipated that this was going to be top priority for the U.S. and governments around the world to try to try to be.

reopen as fast as possible. Now, in reality, what we have seen is that it's not that simple to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. I wonder, are we starting to look at a situation now where even if it is reopened, that supply could remain disrupted for quite some time? I think that the markets can reopen faster than supply chain. I think that is key. Yes, if the Strait of Ramos reopens tomorrow, we shouldn't expect that supply will come back to the market very rapidly. For a few reasons, the first one is that there has been supply. production shut-ins and it takes time for that production to go back to the market. You've actually taken out the pressure from the wells and pressure in the reservoir is fundamental

to determine how much oil you can get. So it does take quite a bit of time. Then you also have the fact that you have massive logistical backlog in the straight-upormuz. So even if it reopens tomorrow, just clearing up all those vessels that are waiting there will take quite a bit of time. And then finally, the fact that energy infrastructure has been hit. We've seen refineries being hit. We've seen pipelines being hit.

We've also seen oil storage capacity being taken offline. So to give you a sense, before the conflict, refinery runs in the Middle East were around 26 million barrels per day. Right now, we think the refinery rounds is close to 16 million barrels per day. So that means that roughly 10 million barrels per day of refinery rounds have been hit because of the damage to infrastructure. So that's, it really shows how important those attacks have been. Kind of an insult to injury in all of this is that the big oil companies had spent recent years sort of doubling down on the Middle East and in existing partnerships and investments they had there, as opposed to pursuing new ventures elsewhere.

All of that sort of suggesting that if there is going to be a push now to hedge against the Middle East, that's going to take a while and be pretty costly. Is that fair? I think that's very fair. I mean, yes, we can get a little bit more barrels from Venezuela, maybe 200,000 barrels per day more towards the end of the year. yes, shale producers in the U.S. could ramp up a little bit production, let's say 300,000 barrels per day and a little bit here and there. But we're talking about a supply disruption of 10 million barrels per day. So you could get probably half a million barrels per day of extra supply by the end of the year. That's going to increase the pressure on the White House on Europe to ease up on

sanctions on Russian oil. Is it not if this continues? For sure, for sure. We've seen that the waivers were given to India to continue buying Russian crude at sea. We've seen that now waivers have been given for buying Iranian oil at sea. So I think that governments around the world are trying to find different levers to try to, you know, limit the upside price pressure and protect consumers around the world. We've seen some measures from certain governments, particularly in Asia, to try to protect final consumers, new policies such as remote working, car sharing, public transport and so on. But those are measures that I would anticipate that if this conflict continues in the next few weeks, that governments will continue to put into place. If they do, you'll hear about it here.

Jorge Leon is the head of geopolitical analysis at Rysstad Energy. Jorge, thanks as always. Appreciate you. Thanks. Coming up, the day's markets news, including a new EU-Australia trade deal and a potential beauty tie-up. That's after the break. Where are my gloves? Come on, heat.

Any day now? Winter is hard, but your groceries don't have to be. This winter, stay warm. Tap the banner to order your groceries online at voila.ca. Enjoy in-store prices without leaving your home. You'll find the same regular prices online as in-store. Many promotions are available both in-store and online, though some may vary. The European Union and Australia have

inked a new free trade deal and security partnership. Journal reporter James Glenn is in Sydney. The agreement comes after an arduous eight-year process that stalled a number of times, and it feels as if it was sped up in the end by the extreme level of uncertainty that most countries are facing at the moment with the on and off again tariffs of the White House. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen was very explicit in what was. motivating her to get this done and it really goes to the requirement for greater certainty around security agreements and curing things like critical metals which Australia is a big exporter of. For Australia it means an extra $8 to $10 billion in trade which is not insignificant but

I think the agreement really should be viewed as part of the middle powers to larger powers reaching out to each other at a time of great uncertainty. The deal is the EU's latest as it diversifies economic relations away from the U.S., following agreements with India, Indonesia, and four South American countries over the last year. Elsewhere in markets news today, Estee Lauder is in talks to buy Spanish beauty group Pooch brands, a deal which both said could still fall apart, would create a global beauty giant and expand Estée Laudder's already sprawling portfolio to include cult brands such as Charlotte Tilbury and Bayrado.

Tesla has notched its first monthly sales increase in Europe in more than a year as double-digit growth in the continent's battery EV market boosted a number of carmakers. And Europe's most valuable fintech company, Revolut, has posted a 46% jump in revenue with its customer base growing by around a third over the past year. The London-based company, whose app lets users make payments, trade assets, and hold money, got regulatory approval to operate as a full-fledged bank in the UK this month. month and recently applied for a national bank charter in the U.S. And that's it for what's news for this Tuesday morning. Today's show was produced by Daniel Bach and Hattie Moyer. Our supervising producer is Sandra Kilhoff, and I'm Luke Vargas for the Wall Street Journal. We'll be back tonight with the news show.

And until then, thanks for listening.