WSJ What’s News - Crypto’s Long, Hard Fall This Winter

Episode Date: February 5, 2026

P.M. Edition for Feb. 5. Even as stocks have been on a tear in recent months, the price of bitcoin has fallen, today closing below $64,000, its lowest level in more than a year. Journal reporter Vicky Ge Huang talks about why investors seem to have soured on bitcoin and crypto. Plus, the latest batch of Epstein files has led to political pressure on U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer and led Brad Karp, leader of the law firm Paul Weiss, to step down as chair of the firm. We hear from WSJ national legal affairs reporter Erin Mulvaney about what his resignation means for Paul Weiss. And the government’s January jobs report may be delayed because of the government shutdown, but other sources of data indicate it probably wasn’t a great month for the labor market. Alex Ossola hosts. Sign up for the WSJ's free What's News newsletter. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Local news is in decline across Canada, and this is bad news for all of us. With less local news, noise, rumors, and misinformation fill the void, and it gets harder to separate truth from fiction. That's why CBC News is putting more journalists in more places across Canada, reporting on the ground from where you live, telling the stories that matter to all of us, because local news is big news. Choose news, not noise.

CBC News. Bitcoin hits its lowest price in more than a year. What's driving its fall? That's the narrative that it's supposed to be this digital gold, that it would perform better than gold. But the reality is that it just has not acted like a hedge against inflation and has underperformed gold. Plus, big tech companies like Google and meta

plan to spend billions on AI this year. Investors are having mixed feelings. And the latest batch of Epstein files shakes up UK politics and an elite U.S. law firm. It's Thursday, February 5th. I'm Alex Oslov for the Wall Street Journal. This is the PM edition of What's News, the top headlines and business stories that move the world today.

Big tech companies are announcing big AI spending plans. Meta said last week that it would spend up to $135 billion on capital expenditures this year. And yesterday, Google Parent Alphabet, said it was planning to spend as much as $185 billion, about double last year. Investors have their doubts. WSJ heard on the street columnist Dan Gallagher joins me now with more. Dan, I just laid out these eye-popping numbers for KAPX spending this year. Is it all going to the building out of AI? Well, most of it is, yes.

Especially with Google and what they said on their earnings call is like, yeah, the bulk of it goes to essentially the AI infrastructure. And a lot of it goes to specifically the chips and the servers to power that. Why do these companies feel the need to do this? What is the competitive pressure here? They're in a race to build up AI services, get as much market share, getting users really accustomed to their AI platforms. So for Google, you know, they have Gemini. Gemini competes with ChatGBT and Claude and these other kind of AI models.

Google wants as many users as it can. using Gemini. So they're going to build and invest in that because you need the AI infrastructure to power that and to grow the services. So how are investors responding to the announcements of all this spending? I mean, obviously there's been some investor concern about AI spending overall over the past few months. But as you said, it could be critical to some of these companies' central functions. So what's the verdict there? Honestly, it's mixed because it depends on the day you asked that question. We saw last week when Metaer announced, they put out this really big Kappex number, this projection, but they also had really strong results.

And it was pretty clear AI was helping that business go up. And so you saw the stock go up. With Google, with Alphabet, you're seeing kind of the opposite. The business is still strong. It's like they showed a similar acceleration in their business. And they put out a big KappX number. But in the market reaction afterwards, everyone's kind of more keen on the KappX number. The other difference between the two is meta stock was way down before their earnings

report because there was some other concerns about them. And Google's has been up a lot. And then you've had this week kind of this general overall worry about AI disruption, what AI could do to all these traditional tech companies. And that feeds into it as well. That was WSJ Heard on the street columnist, Dan Gallagher. Thanks so much, Dan. Thank you for having me. Reporting after the bell, Amazon said its sales rose in the most recent quarter. And the company said it expected capital expenditures of $200 billion in 2026 because, like its rivals, it's also picking up its spending on AI.

For more on Amazon's earnings, visit WSJ.com. The government shutdown delayed the release of the Labor Department's official January jobs report, so it'll be out next week rather than tomorrow. But a bunch of other reports are signaling that the labor market got off to a rough start this year. Some of those are other government reports, like the Labor Department won on job openings. Those fell in December to their lowest level since 2020. Other indicators are gloomy, too. An estimate out today from Ravellio Labs, a workforce data company, said the U.S. lost more than 13,000 jobs in January.

And Challenger Gray and Christmas, which tracks layoffs, said companies announced more than 108,000 job cuts last month, the highest level for January in more than a decade. Those concerns about the health of the U.S. labor market, as well as worries about the tech sector, again weighed on stocks today. The three major indexes each fell more than 1 percent, with the NASDAQ posting the biggest loss and close. closing down 1.6%, extending its worst route since April's tariff crash. And today, Bitcoin fell below $64,000, trading at its lowest levels since October 2024. That might come as a surprise to some who thought there would be a golden age for crypto under a friendly Trump administration. Bitcoin hit a record high above $126,000 in October. But in the months since, traders seem to have lost their appetite for crypto. For more on what's driving the decline, I'm joined now by Journal

quarter, Vicky Gohwang. Vicky, in recent months, stocks have hit records and so have safe haven assets like gold and silver, but Bitcoin has been on the decline. What's going on there? Yeah, so Bitcoin has actually been a bare market since late last year. The crypto market has been experiencing same liquidity, where there just hasn't been as much demand, whether from individual investors or institutional investors for digital assets. And then coming into the new year, investors have been rotating out of tech stocks and in tandem with that investors are rotating out of Bitcoin. So it has been under further pressure in recent days because of that rotation and macroeconomic and geopolitical uncertainties.

So on a sort of strategic level, how do investors think about Bitcoin? Like, do they think of it like golden silver, like a safe haven investment or do they treat it more like a tech stock? Historically, Bitcoin has acted like a sort of highly leveraged tech stock. It's being trading like a speculative asset where it's super volatile. The industry has pitched it as a safe haven, a store of value, a hedge against inflation. That's the narrative that it's supposed to be this digital gold, that it would perform better than gold. But the reality is that it just has not acted like a hedge against inflation and it has underperformed gold.

Crypto has been on the down swing here. What would it take to turn things around? So a lot of crypto investors are saying that this is kind of the strangest crypto bear market in the entire history of the industry. Because in the past crypto winters, what happened was that there would be a big scandal, a big hack into an exchange or the collapse of the, a prominent industry company that would usher in this collapse in prices. However, this time, it seems like a lot of Wall Street institutions are still adopting crypto or integrating crypto into their systems, such as Fidelity, introducing their own stable coin or Wall Street firms are continuing to launch new crypto or digital assets funds for investors to invest in them.

So it seems like some investors believe that as long as this Wall Street adoption, Eventually, the market might bounce back slowly, but it would probably take a year or two years for that to happen. That was Wall Street Journal reporter, Vicki Gougham. Thanks, Vicki. Thank you, Alex. And a merger between Rio Tinto and Glencore is off after the mining company's abandoned talks. The deal would have formed the world's largest mining company with a market value of more than $200 billion. coming up how the latest round of Jeffrey Epstein emails took down the leader of one of the most prominent law firms in the U.S.

That's after the break. The scorebed app here with trusted stats in real-time sports news. Yeah, hey, who should I take in the Boston game? Well, statistically speaking. Nah, no more statistically speaking. I want hot takes. I want knee-jerk reactions. That's not really. what I do. Is that because you don't have any news? Or? The scoreback. Trusted sports content, seamless sports betting. Download today.

19 plus, Ontario only. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or the gambling of someone close to you, please go to conicsonterio.ca. Last week, the Justice Department began releasing what it says is the final batch of files related to its investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. And some of the people who appear to have ties to the disgraced financier are feeling the effects. One of those people is Brad Karp, who for the past 18 years, has been the leader of Paul Weiss, one of the country's biggest law firms. Yesterday, Karp resigned as the firm's chair, after new revelations about his association with Epstein.

For more on Karp and the impact of his resignation, I'm joined now by WSJ National Legal Affairs reporter, Aaron Mulvaney. Aaron, Brad Karp, is a huge figure in the legal world. What is he known for? So his reputation is one of a very charismatic, dynamic leader. He's really transformed during his time as leader, Paul Weiss, from largely known as a litigation shop with very important high profile litigation to one of the major players in the mergers and acquisitions space. And it's just one of the most elite law firms in the world. And he's been at the helm of it for 18 years.

And the client work he does has risen his profile, made him a very important member of the industry for years. So what happened inside the firm after the revelations in the Epstein emails came out? The recent badge of Epstein emails showed that he had corresponded with him months before his death, talking about some plea agreements. And previously, he had attended dinners with him and asked for his son to have a job on a Woody Allen set. There were just things that stood out that I think drew a lot of media attention that the partners felt like they couldn't really ignore. And there was a meeting among a small group that came to. to the consensus that it was best that CARP stepped down as chair. And so yesterday they said, Brad,

you're going to need to step down. And the understanding was, I think it was a hard decision. He apparently, according to our reporting, was taken aback, but wanted to do what was best for the firm. Paul Weiss says CARP plans to stay on as a partner. But what does his resignation as chair mean for the firm and its dealings with Wall Street? It's worth saying who is replacing him. Scott Bar-Shea, He basically had Zelda corporate dealings at Paul Weiss. So my understanding is he has a very different personality than Brad, but he also is responsible for a lot of the change as well. They had one of their best years ever last year.

They remain a very elite firm. Harp is still remaining on and maintaining his clients as far as we know. It remains to be seen what the shift will mean. That was WSJ reporter, Aaron Mulvaney. Thanks, Erin Mulvaney. Thank you so much. In response to the Epstein emails, Paul Weiss had said that Karp never witnessed or participated in any misconduct. And in a statement yesterday, Karp said that, quote, recent reporting has created a distraction and placed a focus on him that wasn't in the firm's best interests. And across the Atlantic, revelations from the Epstein files are threatening Prime Minister Kier Starmers' hold on power.

UK lawmakers are questioning why he appointed Peter Mandelson to be Britain's ambassador to Washington. Starmar fired Mandelson last year after emails between Mandelson and Epstein indicated that the two were good friends. Now, newly released files appear to show that Mandelson, while a government official, said Epstein information that could have allowed him to trade on inside information. British police have said they're investigating whether the emails broke the law. Mandelson hasn't publicly commented on the emails but has apologized to Epstein's victims. And President Trump said today that he wants the U.S. to negotiate a new strategic arms treaty with Russia. As we reported on this morning show, the previous one has expired. Many lawmakers have argued that new arms control agreements must include China, which is building up its own nuclear forces.

So far, though, China has refused to participate in strategic arms talks. Trump didn't mention China today. And that's what's news for this Thursday afternoon. Today's show is produced by Pierre Biennamee and Alexis Sassiz. more with Supervising Producer Tali Arbel. I'm Alex O'Selef for The Wall Street Journal. We'll be back with a new show tomorrow morning. Thanks for listening.