WSJ What’s News - How The AI Race is Driving an Energy Wild West
Episode Date: October 16, 2025A.M. Edition for Oct. 16. President Trump has authorized CIA covert operations in Venezuela, with the president saying land strikes in the country are also possible. Plus, Trump touts Indian Prime Min...ister Narendra Modi's pledge to pause Russian oil purchases, but WSJ's Tripti Lahiri says that might not be so straightforward. And as tech companies try to race ahead in the AI arms race, WSJ’s Jennifer Hiller details how an archaic U.S. power grid is leading companies to build their own power plants to fuel data centers. Caitlin McCabe hosts. Sign up for the WSJ’s free What’s News newsletter. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Crude prices gain as President Trump says India plans to pause buying Russian oil.
Plus, the Trump administration moves to weaponize the IRS in its campaign against left-leaning groups.
And tech companies pushing for AI dominance are desperate for power. Lots of it.
We're seeing a lot of different creative solutions out there.
But what some tech companies and data center developers are doing is a center.
building their own power on site and providing their own power plants.
It's Thursday, October 16th.
I'm Caitlin McKay for the Wall Street Journal, and here's the AM edition of What's News.
The top headlines and business stories moving your world today.
President Trump has authorized covert CIA operations in Venezuela while floating the idea
of land strikes inside the country, as the U.S. broadens its campaign.
against alleged drug trafficking.
An administration official said the authorization allows the CIA to potentially take action
against Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, his government, and drug traffickers.
Asked by a reporter if the CIA would have the power to remove Maduro,
Trump said it was a, quote, ridiculous question.
A CIA spokesman declined to comment.
In a televised speech yesterday, Maduro appealed for,
for peace, while lashing out at the CIA's involvement in past conflicts in Latin America.
No war, just spit on the people in the United States. Please. Please, please, please, please.
The announcement comes amid the biggest U.S. military buildup in the Caribbean in decades,
including fighter jets, Reaper drones, and guided missile destroyers. The Trump administration is preparing
sweeping changes at the Internal Revenue Service. The Journal Underviewed.
stands that would allow the agency to pursue criminal inquiries of left-leaning groups more easily.
Gary Shappley, a senior IRS official and advisor to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent,
is drawing up a list of potential targets that includes major Democratic donors.
It couldn't be determined on what grounds Shappley would seek to begin such an investigation.
The effort coincides with a larger administration effort to probe left-leaning groups
for helping finance organizations that the president says are stirring up political violence.
Democrats say the effort is politically motivated and not based on real evidence.
Shapley and the Treasury Department didn't answer questions about changes to the IRS criminal unit or desired targets.
And the Supreme Court has signaled an openness to scaling back protections against racial discrimination in redistricting,
potentially making it more difficult for minorities to elect candidates of their choice.
The case stems from Louisiana's move to redraw the state's congressional map after the 2020 census.
The justices heard arguments to re-examine when, if ever, it is permissible to take race into account in drawing electoral lines.
Several conservative justices suggested that creating race-based congressional districts to ensure the election of minority-backed lawmakers might no longer be justified under the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
If the Supreme Court now weakens or strikes down Section 2 of that act, states would not be bound by any limits and how they draw electoral districts.
Oil prices are heading higher this morning, reversing a recent stretch of declines after President Trump said Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi told him he plans to pause purchases of Russian oil.
Our South Asia Bureau Chief Tripti Lahiri says the announcement could resolve trade tensions between
Washington and New Delhi, which crescendoed in August when Trump imposed 50 percent tariffs on
Indian goods, including an extra 25 percent levy to penalize the country's large Russian oil
purchases. I think that the latest tweets and the phone calls between Modi and Trump show that
things are improving, and certainly if India could buy more U.S. oil, that would help a lot.
Modi and Trump have spoken twice in about the last three weeks. One of those occasions was when
Modi called Trump to congratulate him for the Gaza deal. So things are improving and oil may be
the way that they improve further. But Trump's statement yesterday may not be so straightforward.
Tripti says India's foreign ministry issued a carefully worded statement following Trump's announcement.
They began by saying that, you know, first and foremost, India thinks about its energy purchases
from the point of view of what is good for the Indian consumer. And that has been a stated rationale for
why India started buying so much Russian oil when the war broke out and Russian oil became very
cheap for India. Russia is the top provider of oil to India right now from almost nothing before
the war. And so this has become a big bone of contention with the U.S. But the stance that India is
taking that it is going to put the Indian consumer first, that doesn't actually totally contradict
the idea that it could also start reducing the Russian oil purchases and maybe substitute that for
U.S. oil. So I think this carefully worded statement gives India the wiggle room.
to cover a lot of different actions. And that could be continuing to buy some Russian oil,
but starting to buy more U.S. oil and buy less Russian oil.
Tripti said it's unlikely India would act in a way that would cast aside its relationship with Russia.
But she added, the country is also eager to reach a trade deal with the U.S.
and wants to be on good terms with Trump.
Federal officials have found no evidence of appliance makers cheating on tariffs,
despite Whirlpool's accusations last month that its overseas competitors were undervaluing imported
appliances in order to pay lower duties. Some customs brokers said the plunging values were
likely due to data entry errors, not tariff dodging, which U.S. Customs and Border Protection
agreed with after a review. Some import data has been revised since Whirlpool raised the issue.
GE appliances, which last month said Whirlpool's allegations were inaccurate, issued a fresh rebuke,
saying Whirlpool weaponized the data for competitive advantage.
Canada has threatened Stalantis with legal action after the company said it plans to make mid-sized jeeps in Illinois instead of Ontario.
In a letter to Stalantis and viewed by the journal, Canadian industry minister Melanie Jolie said the carmaker is in danger of defaulting on agreements it made to maintain its factory footprint in southern Ontario in exchange for billions of dollars in subsidies.
Earlier this week, the company said it was moving Jeep production to Illinois as part of a plan to invest $13 billion in the U.S.
and add 5,000 jobs in the Midwest to protect the company from President Trump's tariffs.
Speaking to the Canadian press, Jolie called the move unacceptable.
We've been engaging with the company for months now, knowing that the Brampton facility was going to be retooled.
We've invested millions of dollars in that facility based on the commitment.
that they would be investing in a new model.
And so that's why, if they don't do so, we'll hold them to account.
A. Stalantis spokeswoman said that Canada remains important to the company
and that they would share plans with Ottawa to offset the Jeep move.
Coming up, as AI data centers grow increasingly desperate for electricity,
tech companies are creating an energy wild west by bypassing the grid.
More on that story after the break.
Tech companies competing in the AI race need power, and lots of it.
But there's one big problem.
The U.S. isn't building power plants or transmission lines fast enough to meet demand.
Supply chain snarls and permitting challenges are among the issues complicating the effort,
all while electricity demand continues to grow.
By 2028, data centers are projected to use as much as 12% of U.S. electricity up from less than 2% before 2020.
Journal reporter Jennifer Hiller covers the energy transition.
She says an energy Wild West is now unfolding as Tech Titans race to bridge the gap themselves.
Jennifer, walk us through what's happening right now.
How much power is needed to fuel this AI boom and how far behind is the U.S.?
Well, we need definitely a lot of new power and a lot of new power infrastructure to be able to
accommodate all of the AI growth.
Analysts estimate that the U.S. should be building about 80 gigawatts of power a year.
That's about 15 gigawatts more than we're building because you're retiring older plants and
you need new stuff coming online to replace those and to accommodate new growth.
And we still have by far more data centers than other parts of the world.
But it is a struggle to keep up because the supply chain is just really bogged down in this industry.
It's very hard to get equipment like transformers.
It can be hard to get large gas turbines for big natural gas fired power plants, building transmission lines.
It's a very slow process.
in the U.S., there's a lot of permitting or legal challenges that pop up. And so people are trying
to build faster and accommodate all of this. But it's just slow going and there's not really
easy and quick fixes. Jennifer, you have this really interesting story out where you mentioned this
energy wild west that's happening, meaning tech companies are taking the power issue into their
own hands. How are we seeing that manifest? Well, we're seeing a lot of different creative solutions out
there, but what some tech companies and data center developers are doing is essentially building
their own power on site and just providing their own power plants. Most of them are doing this
as what they call a bridge until the grid can catch up. And others are talking about maybe being
off grid forever. So we see different examples of this, kind of emerging in different places.
Stargate out in West Texas, which is the big open AI project, is using some on-site power
and got started with that and is going to be using kind of a mix of grid and on-site power.
And you've seen the Elon Musk projects in Memphis start off-grid as well and then maybe
later connect.
A lot of these data centers, they all traditionally have 100% backup power on site.
So to some extent, they can maybe beef up and do some different planning to be able to perhaps use that in the beginning of a project.
And if they need to maybe move that equipment to the next project later on, once the grid catches up or transition something to being backup or emergency power, you know, they're in the same difficult supply chain as everybody else, too.
Will we get to a point where supply can meet demand, or will this always just be a pervasive issue, especially as AI becomes more dominant in all of our lives?
Yeah, I think at some point, supply does catch up with demand. People are really seeing this as a big crunch maybe in the next five years or so, and that things may start to ease up after that.
the risk on the other end is that things go to an oversupply later on. But for right now,
there is a little bit of this crunch going on and this race for power wherever people can find
it. And they are still trying to connect to the grid wherever they can all over the country and
looking for those spots where there is some excess capacity. You know, because the U.S. has
lots of power and generates a lot of power. It's just that the size of these data centers is so
overwhelming, it can be difficult to connect them in one location and provide that much power
in one spot. Because some of them use, for instance, the power of 1,000 Walmart stores.
So just when you imagine the substations and transformers and things like that that are needed
to deliver that kind of power to a site, it takes a while to build that out.
Jennifer, this is super interesting. Thank you so much for joining us.
Thank you. And that's it for What's News for this Thursday morning.
Today's show is produced by Daniel Bach and Kate Bullivant.
Our supervising producer is Sandra Kilhoff.
And I'm Caitlin McCabe for The Wall Street Journal.
We'll be back tonight with the new show.
Until then, thanks for listening.