WSJ What’s News - Israel’s Lebanon Strikes Threaten Iran Peace Push

Episode Date: April 9, 2026

A.M. Edition for April 9. Global stocks fall and oil prices are climbing as cracks in the fragile U.S.-Iran truce begin to show. Israel’s deadly attacks in Lebanon have emerged as a key sticking point for Tehran, while tanker traffic remains snarled in the Strait of Hormuz. Plus, with businesses and consumers feeling the economic impacts of the war, WSJ editor Alex Frangos says another long-term problem is looming: Americans aren’t having enough babies. And AI companies are trying to avert a public backlash for a distrustful public. Daniel Bach hosts. Sign up for the WSJ’s free What’s News newsletter. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Lebanon emerges as the key sticking point for the ceasefire as Israel continues to hammer Beirut. Plus, we look at the economic fallout of the war with Iran with the full impact yet to come. We went into the home spring selling season with mortgage rates finally dipping down below 6%. People were very optimistic. And as soon as the war started, rates went back up. People have gotten skittish and gotten scared. And how the creators of AI are trying to trying to avert a public backlash. It's Wednesday, April 9th. I'm Daniel Bach for the Wall Street Journal, filling in for Luke Vargas. And here's the AM edition of What's News, the top headlines and

business stories moving your world today. Global markets are selling off and oil prices have shot back up as shipping traffic through the Strait of Hormuz remains choked off amid the tentative ceasefire with Iran. Tehran is limiting the number of ships crossing the street to around a dozen a day and has said it will start charging tolls. But world leaders are pushing back. Here's UK Foreign Minister ofette Cooper speaking to the BBC's Radio 4 Today program. There may be territorial waters there,

but there is also an international shipping route and an international transit route, which means that freedom of navigation principles apply, and that countries cannot simply hijack those kinds of international transit routes and unilaterally apply tolls. They cannot do that as part of. of the laws of the sea and the United Nations arrangements that are in place. In a fresh warning, President Trump said in a social media post that U.S. military personnel

and assets will remain near Iran until the, quote, real agreement reached is fully complied with, end quote, including the full reopening of the waterway. Iran's semi-official Faris news agency said oil tanker traffic was halted after Israel hit Lebanon with fresh airstrikes yesterday, killing more than 250 people. Tehran has said it will only participate in planned peace negotiations in Pakistan this weekend. If there's a pause in Israel's conflict with Hezbollah, something the White House has said isn't part of the ceasefire. At the same time, Israel says its ground operations in Lebanon will continue, even as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu faces criticism for not laying out an endgame. Israel's just demonstrated over the last three years or so just really stunning tactical victories on the battlefield in terms of military operations.

operations, intelligence operations, such as exploding beepers, targeted assassinations, but then when you look sort of at the strategy or long term beyond the military, so more political diplomacy, you don't see it translating into that. That's the journals Annat Palad in Tel Aviv. So I spoke to experts and also former Israeli officials in the government and the military, and they spoke about a weakness in Israel, not just now, but also historically, basically not being very good at planning for the long term. One example of this is really that in Israel, unlike the U.S. or France or the U.K., there's no tradition of publishing official government national security

strategies where countries lay out their biggest threats, how they're going to deal with them. In Israel, it's just historically, it's focused on short kinetic action. It's often been quite short wars. And now we're just seeing a real change and it's just long wars that are dragging out. and it's not really clear what Israel's long game here is. Trump has also been lashing out at NATO allies, writing that, quote, NATO wasn't there when we needed them, and they won't be there if we need them again. This after NATO's Secretary General Mark Rota met with Trump yesterday in Washington in a bid to soothe tensions. We're exclusively reporting that the White House is now considering a plan to punish some members of the alliance

that the president thinks were unhelpful to the U.S. and Israel during the war. Here's White House Press Secretary Caroline Levitt. I have a direct quote from the President of the United States on NATO, and I will share it with all of you. They were tested and they failed. And I would add it's quite sad that NATO turned their backs on the American people over the course of the last six weeks when it's the American people who have been defunding their defense. The proposal would involve moving U.S. troops out of NATO member countries deemed unhelpful to the Iran war effort and stationing them in countries that were more supportive. The proposal would fall short of President Trump's recent threats to fully withdraw the U.S. from the alliance, which by law he can't do without Congress. Meanwhile, the chair of NATO's military committee, Admiral Giuseppe Cabo Dregoni,

is brushing away suggestions that the alliance isn't united. He spoke to our Luke Vargas about how NATO is set up for future conflicts, and Luke began by asking him what's been learned about modern warfare out of the Iran conflict. UAVs, drones, has been the actors of this conflict, and of course we take it very, very serious. Drones, of course, we learned that they are not anymore a nice capability. They are central in modern warfare. They, of course, involve effect surveillance, targeting, logistic, even for protection.

This is an operational reality that directly impact our deterrence and defense. And of course, we are strengthening our layered, integrated air and missile defense. We are increasing vigilance and readiness. And, of course, we are accelerating innovation because we need to speed up the capability to develop and to deploy. Yeah, I mean, how far off is that capability? And even if some of the technology exists, is there not a real concern around cost

and the asymmetry here of expensive defenses for a very cheap and powerful weapon? This is one of the lesson we learn. At the moment, probably a layer and cost-effective approach. is needed. NATO must be able to use the cheapest, but effective response at each level. And we are ranging from electronic warfare to kinetic and direct energy weapons. And we should get higher-end interceptors as the last ditch, only when it is necessary. You need to avoid situation where cheap drones force disproportionate costly countermeasure. This, of course, requires

more abundant, scalable and affordable solution, as well as smarter prioritization. That's basically the key to effectively face this kind of overwhelming threat. Does that goal align with what else the alliance is trying to focus on, namely defending against maybe a more conventional land threat on the eastern front? Or is there some overlap here? Let's say that there is no single solution. As NATO, we are pursuing a layered approach, which includes a detection system like, for example, radar sensor, artificial intelligence, of course, electronic warfare like jamming and spoofing, or also kinetic option, guns, missiles, interceptor drones too. And also, we not to forget, the passive measures, camouflage, arming, increasing, of course, artificial intelligence.

and autonomy are, of course, increasing, improving detection and decision-making. Of course, at the end of the day, the key is an integration across system rather than to rely on a single technology. Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragoni is NATO's most senior military officer serving as the Alliance's chair of its military committee. Admiral Dragroni, thank you so much for being with us on What's News. Thank you very much for giving me this chance. Coming up, a setback for Anthropic in its legal fight with the Pentagon for declaring the company a supply chain risk.

And with AI hype everywhere, more Americans now think it will do more harm than good. Those stories and more after the break. Uh, where are my gloves? Come on, heat. Any day now? Winter is hard, but your groceries don't have to be. This winter, stay warm. Tap the banner to order your groceries online at walla.ca. Enjoy in-store prices without leaving your home. You'll find the same regular prices online as in-store. Many promotions are available both in-store and online, though some may vary.

Now, the fragile sea spire involving the U.S., Israel, and Iran is welcome news for the U.S. economy, but economists are warning not to expect an immediate return to normal. In recent weeks, soaring gas prices and climbing more, mortgage rates have pinched consumers, while rising energy and transportation costs have squeezed businesses. And Journal Economics editor Alex Frango says we haven't yet felt the full effects. We're going to start to get the first readings of it with inflation figures this week for March, which was the month where the war really took off. And, I mean, the main place you're going to see it as gas prices, diesel prices, and then things that are also made of petroleum and natural gas like fertilizer, which then feeds into food. So the concern here is that the damage already done from the war with the Strait of Hormuz closed has yet to feed through

and ships are not streaming through the Strait of Hormuz. So for now, it's not clear that there's going to be a big burst of supply of oil and gas and fertilizer streaming out of the Persian Gulf. Further complicating the long-term economic outlook, and stick with me here because this is quite a pivot, not enough babies. New data shows the U.S. fertility rate is at a record low for the six straight year. We're now below 1.6 average fertility for the average woman in their life to how many children they're going to have. And that's below so-called replacement value, which is around 2.1 in order to keep the population steady. In recent years, you've had the population grow also because of immigration. The Trump administration has all like crack down on immigration quite a bit. So for the economy,

this means eventually you have an issue where you don't have enough labor. And, you know, that can be a constraint on the economy. It can lead to inflation. But as we've seen in other countries that faced this earlier on, it also pushes companies to be more productive to say, well, we don't have the workers. So how are we going to use machines or AI or computers or whatnot to do what we're doing now more efficiently? We are exclusively reporting that Disney plans to lay off as many as a thousand employees in the coming weeks, mainly from its marketing department. It's one of the first moves under new CEO Josh Tomorrow aimed at offsetting lower box office and streaming profits and to fund

digital growth. V-cuts reflect a broader industry trend as rivals like Sony, Paramount, and Warner Brothers Discovery also cut staff. And a federal appeals court has upheld the Defense Department's designation of Anthropic as a supply chain risk, prioritizing national security over the company's financial harm. While Anthropic recently secured an injunction against a broader federal ban, in California, this ruling keeps them excluded from Pentagon contracts and systems. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche called the decision a victory for military readiness, while for its part Anthropic maintains its focus is on providing safe AI. And speaking of safe AI,

more than half of Americans now fear the technology will do more harm than good. To that end, tech reporter Sam Shackner says AI companies have started a charm offensive in earnest. OpenAI this week published a list of policy proposals such as a four-day work week and an AI-invested public wealth fund that would be distributed to citizens. They also bought the podcast TBPN, which is known in part for its tech booster vibe. Anthropic, for its part, has been signing partnerships and building tools for sectors like consulting and software, where share prices have been whacked by fears they'll be replaced by AI. Those efforts have helped push back up the shares of some of these companies. What we're seeing is something of a vibe shift.

You're seeing AI companies trying to shift the narrative away from a sort of anxious backlash against AI towards the more optimistic vision that they would like to articulate. Sam added that tech companies once framed AI risks as far off science fiction. But those dangers are no longer a distant concern as, the technology integrates into daily life. Now, as we're really getting into the rollout of these tools, some of the dangers are much closer to home. We're talking about jobs.

We're talking about the survival of industries. And that's leading the companies to take a different approach to how they talk about the dangers and responses to the potential impacts from AI. And that's it for what's news for this Thursday morning. Additional sound in this episode was from Reuters. Today's show was produced by Hattie Moyer. Our supervising producer is Sondra Kilhoff. And I'm Daniel Bach for The Wall Street Journal. We'll be back tonight with a new show. Until then, thanks for listening.