WSJ What’s News - Paramount Goes Hostile in Fight for Warner Bros. Discovery

Episode Date: December 8, 2025

P.M. Edition for Dec. 8. Paramount has launched a nearly $78 billion hostile takeover bid for Warner Bros. Discovery, going directly to shareholders just a few days after Warner agreed to a $72 billion Netflix deal. Plus, the Trump administration announces a $12 billion bailout for struggling U.S. farmers grappling with the effects of the president’s tariffs. And pharmaceutical companies are shaking up the drug industry, selling some medicines directly to patients. WSJ reporter Peter Loftus joins to discuss the winners and losers from the shift. Alex Ossola hosts. Sign up for the WSJ's free What's News newsletter. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Canada's Wonderland is bringing the holiday magic this season with Winterfest on select nights now through January 3rd. Step into a winter wonderland filled with millions of dazzling lights, festive shows, rides, and holiday treats. Plus, Coca-Cola is back with Canada's kindness community, celebrating acts of kindness nationwide with a chance at 100,000 donation for the winning community and a 2026 holiday caravan stop. Learn more at canadaswunderland.com. President Trump announces billions of dollars in aid for U.S. farmers. Plus, Paramount launches a hostile takeover bid for Warner Brothers Discovery. And why pharma companies are building websites so patients can buy drugs straight from them. There is a segment of patients that just either doesn't have insurance or doesn't have great insurance.

And so sometimes it's to their advantage for the companies to offer those patients a significant cash discount. because otherwise they might not even get their business at all. It's Monday, December 8th. I'm Alex O'Sillef for the Wall Street Journal. This is the PM edition of What's News, the top headlines and business stories that move the world today. Berkshire Hathaway is losing one of its top stars in Todd Combs, who led the turnaround of the company's GEICO auto insurance arm.

Combs is leaving for J.P. Morgan Chase, as Berkshire prepares for a new. era without CEO Warren Buffett, who's retiring at the end of the year. Berkshire stock has dropped nearly 8% since Buffett said he would step down as CEO. Paramount has launched a nearly $78 billion hostile takeover offer for Warner Brothers Discovery, taking its case directly to shareholders just a few days after Warner agreed to a $72 billion deal with Netflix. Paramount argues that its offer is a better deal for shareholders, and as more likely to win approval from regulators.

Here's Paramount Chairman and CEO David Ellison, speaking about the deal on CNBC this morning. What we're creating by putting these two companies together is a real competitor to Netflix, a real competitor to Amazon, a real competitor to Disney. Not something that is so anti-competitive, there will be no more competition in Hollywood if this deal is allowed to come to pass.

Netflix says Paramount's bid was expected and that Netflix is confident its deal will get done. As for Warner, the company says it'll advise shareholders on what to do within 10 business days and that it's recommending supporting the Netflix deal for now. There's a big shift going on in how people buy medicine.

Drug makers are cutting out middlemen called pharmacy benefit managers, setting up their own websites and selling straight to patients. I'm joined now by Peter Loftus, who covers pharma for the journal. Peter, how do these services work? It often starts with a web,

that the drug manufacturers have set up, patients can go there if they already have a prescription from the doctor or they could actually connect you with certain doctors, which then could eventually lead to ordering that company's drug or maybe another company's drug. The price is often discounted and they could order the drug online like you would go through Amazon to do and then have it delivered to your home. Why are drug makers doing this? What's the advantage for them. There is a segment of patients that just either doesn't have insurance or doesn't have great insurance. And so sometimes it's to their advantage for the companies to offer those patients a significant cash discount because otherwise they might not even get their business

at all. You know, this has become particularly popular for the weight loss drugs. There's sort of intrinsic demand from patients. They want to be on this drug. But also, there's still not great insurance coverage. And so they would, normally, you know, they would have to pay the full list price, which could be like $1,000 a month or more. The manufacturers are saying, we can offer you a discount that brings it down to, you know, as low as $150, $200 a month because it's better than not getting any business from the patient, essentially. Who stands to lose as part of this shift? Pharmacy benefit managers, which are companies that administer drug benefit plans on behalf of of insurers or your employer plan.

They've been this sort of middlemen in the industry that negotiates prices for these drugs. CVS Caremark is one, Express Scripts is one, Optum RX. The drug companies say that that can really distort the pricing. And so by going directly to the patient, that's a way to get around the middlemen and just offer a discounted price that is what it is. The industry trade group for these pharmacy benefit managers, they say that they believe they offer valuable services that also result in lower net pricing for everybody involved. And if patients are dealing with their pharmacy, that's an extra level of protection, making sure that they're taking the right drug and not having drug interactions, that sort of thing. That was WSJ reporter, Peter Loftus.

Thank you, Peter. Thanks for having me. Major U.S. indexes were slightly lower today. The Dow led the losses, falling about half a percent. China said that its trade surplus and goods this year has topped $1 trillion for the first time. It remains a dominant exporting power even after the Trump administration put higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Chinese exports to other parts of the world, like Africa, Southeast Asia, and Latin America have surged. Meanwhile, trade tensions have strained American agriculture, which was struggling even before Trump took office.

Today, the administration announced $12 billion in aid to U.S. farmers. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rawlins said the money will start going out at the end of February. Farmers have said the money would help them pay down debt and finance the cost of planting next year's crop. The tariffs on China earlier this year had slashed Beijing's imports of U.S. soybeans from their usual 29 million metric tons to zero until a deal was reached in October. Coming up, why millions of cars still have defective airbags, and why some California school districts are getting into residential real estate. Those stories and more after the break. The U.S. Supreme Court seems ready to expand the president's power to fire the heads of many regulatory agencies.

As we mentioned on this morning show, the court heard arguments today in a case involving President Trump's firing of Rebecca Slaughter, a Democrat on the Federal Trade Commission. The conservative justices appeared mostly receptive to the administration's argument that the president is entitled to more control over the regulatory boards. A ruling in this case is expected by July. And a Wall Street Journal analysis of federal data has found that many cars recalled for dangerous defects don't get needed repairs. For example, roughly one-fifth of the 12 million vehicles recalled for defective airbags in the 10 years through 2024, haven't been fixed. That's more than two and a half million vehicles. And it's a problem that goes beyond airbags. About one in three cars that have been recalled for any reason don't get

fixed. A spokesman for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said that while the agency can issue recalls, it cannot force car owners to fix the recalled vehicles. The local school district in Monterey, California is becoming a landlord. It's spending $35 million to buy an apartment complex with 64 units that it's renting to staff at lower prices than they'd find elsewhere, like a one-bedroom apartment for $1,500 a month, which, according to Zillow, is 30% lower than the market rate. School systems across the country are investing in housing for their employees, and especially in California. Scott Calvert, who covers National Affairs for the Journal, joins me now to discuss why these schools are embracing the Teacher Village model. Scott, why did the Monterey School District think it was necessary to buy these apartments for teachers? Yeah, well, the school district has been grappling with this problem of high teacher turnover for a long time.

In any given year, about 20% of the teachers walk out the door, and one of the big reasons for that is the high cost of living, and a big reason for that is the incredibly expensive housing in the Monterey area. And so their thought was, well, we'll become a landlord, will provide the housing at a discount in hopes that that will stem the tide. Is this a problem that's isolated to teachers? No, it's really not. You see it in the context of all sorts of like municipal employees and police officers and firefighters who essentially have been priced out of the communities that they serve. I spoke to one teacher, Albert Platt, who talked to me about all the benefits he sees as a result of offering the housing.

Having that workforce housing, it just creates the continuity with teachers because I know there's a lot of turnover. People stay here for a year. People leave. And having that stability helps not just, not just, the people working, but also kids, like learning. Scott, your reporting for this story focuses on California, where school districts have created about 1,000 apartment units in the past few years, and another 1,800 are in the works. Why is this happening so much in California in particular?

Housing is just so expensive there. You had these teachers who are having to live with roommates or commute from an hour, hour and a half, two hours away. And so what they're deciding is, geez, you know, I can have my own place and not have this monster commute if I go work someplace else. Another factor in California is that, you know, these school districts have a lot of land and declining enrollment. And so a lot of them are electing to develop their own apartment complexes, basically on district-owned land. Is there any criticism of this teacher village approach?

One thing that people will say is this is a help, but it's very far from a panacea. Monterey of the Teachers Union said this is great, but really we need to do a lot more in the area of salaries. There also are some concerns because the housing is tied to the job. So if you leave the district, you've got to move out. And, you know, some people don't necessarily like the idea of living amongst their colleagues. It may not be ideal for everybody. How are these districts paying for this? One common approach is to borrow the money.

And so you'll find these districts doing bond issues. So in the case of Monterey, it was part of this broader $340 million facilities bond issue. The $35 million they needed to buy the area. apartment complex was one piece of that. And the interest has been high. In many places, they have waiting lists and lotteries to determine who gets to live there. So it's not as if these units are going wanting. That was WSJ National Affairs reporter, Scott Calvert. Thank you, Scott. Thanks, Alex. Are you a millionaire? A growing number of Americans are, at least where their 401ks are concerned.

More people are saving steadily, plus a third consecutive year of big gains for U.S. stocks have pushed many people's account balances over that $1 million mark. At brokerage Fidelity alone, there were 654,000 401k millionaires as of the third quarter, the highest level in records that go back to the early 2000s. But they're part of a group that UBS Global Wealth Management calls the moderate millionaires. They may have broken through a, quote, psychological wealth threshold, but their income and spending is more like the middle class. And that's what's news for this Monday afternoon. Today's show is produced by Pierre Bienname with supervising producer Tali Arbell. I'm Alex Oscella for the Wall Street Journal. We'll be back with the new show tomorrow morning.

Thanks for listening. Thank you.