Young and Profiting with Hala Taha - Robert Sapolsky: Free Will Doesn’t Exist! Leading Neuroscientist Claims ALL Behavior Is Biologically Determined | Human Behavior E262
Episode Date: December 18, 2023Dr. Robert Sapolsky has accomplished so much in his life and career, including winning the MacArthur “genius” grant and authoring several best-selling books. But as he puts it himself in his most ...recent book: “I’ve been very lucky in my life, something which I certainly did not earn.” This sentiment is consistent with his view that we lack free will entirely, and in today’s episode, Professor Sapolsky is going to make his argument to Hala as to why that is indeed the case. Robert Sapolsky is a professor of biology and neurology at Stanford University, who is an expert in several fields ranging from stress to baboon behavior to human evolution. His work has received many awards including the esteemed MacArthur Fellowship. He is also the best-selling author of several books including Behave, Why Zebras Don't Get Ulcers, and The Trouble with Testosterone. His newest book is called Determined: A Science of Life Without Free Will. In this episode, Hala and Robert will discuss: - Why free will doesn’t exist - The epiphany he had as a 14-year-old - Is meritocracy an illusion? - The neuroscience of decision-making - The myth of grit - What predetermination means for entrepreneurs - Why Jeff Bezos was born to create Amazon - Does spontaneity exist? - How no free will impacts our morality - The science behind moral disgust - Why you can’t reason someone out of an opinion - Why we should overhaul the criminal justice system - And other topics… Robert Sapolsky is a professor of biology and neurology at Stanford University and a research associate with the Institute of Primate Research at the National Museum of Kenya. Over the past thirty years, he has divided his time between the lab, where he studies how stress hormones can damage the brain, and in East Africa, where he studies the impact of chronic stress on the health of baboons. Sapolsky is the author of Behave, Why Zebras Don't Get Ulcers, A Primate's Memoir, and The Trouble with Testosterone, and is a regular contributor to Discover. He has published articles about stress and health in magazines as diverse as Men's Health and The New Yorker. Sapolsky received the MacArthur Foundation's “genius” grant at age 30. Resources Mentioned: Robert’s Website: http://www.robertsapolskyrocks.com/ Robert’s LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/robertsapolsky/ Robert’s Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/people/Robert-Sapolsky/100063871383510/ Robert’s new book Determined: A Science of Life Without Free Will (2023): https://www.amazon.com/Determined-Science-Life-without-Free/dp/B0BVNSX4CQ/ref=sr_1_1?qid=1699016118&refinements=p_27%3ARobert+Sapolsky&s=books&sr=1-1 LinkedIn Secrets Masterclass, Have Job Security For Life: Use code ‘podcast’ for 30% off at yapmedia.io/course. Sponsored By: Shopify - Sign up for a one-dollar-per-month trial period at youngandprofiting.co/shopify Greenlight - Sign up for Greenlight today and get your first month free when you go to greenlight.com/YAP MasterClass - Right now you can get Two Memberships for the Price of One at youngandprofiting.co/masterclass Articulate 360 - Visit articulate.com/360 to start a free 30-day trial of Articulate 360 Help Save Palestinian Lives: Donate money for eSIM cards for the people of Gaza at https://youngandprofiting.co/DonateWHala More About Young and Profiting Download Transcripts - youngandprofiting.com Get Sponsorship Deals - youngandprofiting.com/sponsorships Leave a Review - ratethispodcast.com/yap Watch Videos - youtube.com/c/YoungandProfiting Follow Hala Taha LinkedIn - linkedin.com/in/htaha/ Instagram - instagram.com/yapwithhala/ TikTok - tiktok.com/@yapwithhala Twitter - twitter.com/yapwithhala Learn more about YAP Media Agency Services - yapmedia.io/
Transcript
Discussion (0)
I think there's no free will whatsoever.
When you're choosing Coke over Pepsi, you feel like such an agent of choice.
You feel like you were independent of everything that came before, which we never are for a second.
Why do you feel like your view of free will is controversial?
People initially freak out over the, oh my God, people will just run amok of people stop believing in free will
and we'll have murderers everywhere and we won't hold anyone responsible for anything.
The system makes no sense at all.
If there's no free will, meritocracies don't either.
What people believed forever was that you think your way to a moral decision.
And what all the science now shows is you feel your way to a moral decision.
And then your conscious cognitive self suddenly leaps up and scrambles to try to come up with a rationale
for why it makes perfect sense that you did that.
We don't have free will, but what about free won't?
do we at least have the ability to veto stuff and dancers?
Welcome back to the show, young improfitors,
and today we're talking about free will.
Free will is something that we often don't speak about.
We kind of just take it for granted,
like it's this definite thing that we all have.
We all have agency.
We all have choice.
Well, the guest I have today is going to turn that thought on its head.
Dr. Robert Sapolsky is a professor of biology and neurology at Stanford University.
He's an expert in several fields, ranging from strength.
to baboon behavior to human evolution. His work has received many awards, including the
esteemed MacArthur Fellowship. Robert is also the author of several best-selling books,
including Behave, and his newest book, perhaps his most ambitious yet, is called Determined,
a science of life without free will. Robert, welcome to Young and Profiting Podcast.
Well, thanks for having me on. I am really excited for this conversation. We have not spoken about
free will on the podcast yet, and I think all your material is
is really interesting.
So I just want to cut straight to the chase in a nutshell.
Tell us, what is your outlook on free will,
and how does that outlook differ
from the traditional outlook on free will?
Well, just to start off in a very subtle, nuanced way,
I think there's no free will whatsoever.
And that puts me, well, basically from the overall population,
that puts me in the lunatic fringe,
among neuroscientists,
puts me a little bit more extreme than the average, but it certainly puts me way outside the
pale for 95% of philosophers these days who believe there is free will. So I'm staking out a fairly
extreme stance here. And I'm going to dig into this a lot, but why do you feel like your view
of free will is controversial? Like, what does it turn on its head? Well, my best evidence that is
controversial is the hate emails that I'm getting, is showing some really dramatic misinterpretations
of, well, actually, I have no evidence that any of these people have actually read any of this.
But what it seems to panic people most about, once they get past the, is there no me inside there,
am I not a special separate entity, separate from all my neurons and such?
people initially freak out over the, oh my God, people will just run amok of people stop believing
in free will and we'll have murderers everywhere and we won't hold anyone responsible for anything.
So that's usually the first sort of thing that people bring up. But with an audience like yours,
my guess is the real thing that comes through always takes about an extra 10 minutes or so,
which is, wait, are you also telling me I've got,
no grounds for being proud of my really prestigious MBA or my salary or my corner office or even
my ability to work really hard. In some ways, the notion that if there's no free will, criminal
justice system makes no sense at all. If there's no free will, meritocracies don't either.
It's so interesting. And I've never even thought of the fact that free will could not be real, right?
We're just always taught when we're younger that we have a choice.
We can change our lives.
We have free will to do whatever we want.
But you're basically saying that's not true that everything is sort of predetermined
and based on your biology and your environment.
Yeah, exactly.
And it feels like we have free will because when right in the moment you're choosing
Coke over Pepsi or something.
It's so in the momentness. You're so there. It's so tangible. You feel like such an agent of choice and all of that. That is hard for you to imagine the billions of like little threads that have brought you to that moment and made you who you are. And you feel like you were independent of everything that came before, which we never are for a second.
So I was born Muslim and I know that in Islam, that's what it says, that everything is written, like your life is already predetermined.
So your thoughts actually are more aligned with like major religions out there in terms of what these religious books say.
Would you say that's accurate?
Yeah, with the key distinction in that sort of your version is another version of like the pilgrims running around with buckles on their shirt.
and being Calvinist predeterminists, that everything has already said.
A scientific determinism absolutely deals with the notion that things can change.
And you could change dramatically.
Societies can change dramatically, all that sort of thing, rather than they don't bother.
Because that's bringing us to sort of the next thing that people freak out over,
oh my God, everyone will run amok, oh, my God, when somebody compliments me on having
done a good job, I really can't take credit for it. The next one is, well, if there's no free will,
nothing can change. Why bother? Which is as far from the case as possible. We change really
dramatically at times, but what we think of is that we formed the conscious intent to change.
I decided it was time to change how I feel about something totally fundamental. No.
That's never the case.
Circumstances that have made you, you are such that you will respond to this event in a particular way,
which you will say, I changed afterward, where in reality, you were changed afterward.
Well, those are some really fascinating and unique thoughts.
Can you tell me about when you first started realizing that you think that there's no such thing as free will?
Well, I was not quite a scientist yet, but I think in retrospect, I was thinking scientifically.
I was 14, and I was going through some sort of adolescent tumult that was very intertwined with
all sorts of ways I was being raised and it was terribly conflicting.
And then one night at two in the morning, I woke up spontaneously.
And like this epiphany of, oh, I get it.
There's no God and there's no free will and there's no purpose.
And that's exactly how I've been thinking ever since.
Everything evaporated in one evening, one night.
And then you went on to become a scientist and you further established the fact that there's no free will.
And then now you've come out with this new book called Determined.
So what was your intent with writing Determined if we could call it intent?
Well, I'm glad we could view that as a temporary term. I published this book about five years ago
called Behave, the biology of humans at their best and worst. And it's like 800 pages along and it's
agonizing and nobody in their right mind reads the whole thing. But basically it's going through
you do a behavior and where did that behavior come from? What was the science of what was happening
one second ago, one minute ago, one hour ago, eventually one millennium ago, how do we make sense
of us in the context of neuroscience and hormones and early development and genes and culture and
ecological stuff? And like this huge tour of that where it seemed self-evident to me that after
you go through all of that evidence, there's like no space for free will in there. And I'd hear from
people afterwards saying, wow, just read the book, whatever. It seems to me like this may
like lessen the realms of free will that we could. Lesson. Are you kidding? I think this is like
emphatically showing that there is no free will whatsoever and saying, okay, well, amazingly enough,
800 pages was too subtle. I now need to write a book just explicitly saying when you look at the
science of how we become who we are, it's not just that there's less free will than we
conventionally think. There's none. All we are is the outcome of biology we had no control over
and it's interactions with the environment that we had no control over. Before we get into the
actual science on why you believe there's no such thing as free will, talk to us about your
background, your experiences as a scientist, even your own genetics that make you the perfect
author of this book? One thing that has helped, and a point I try to emphasize, ooh, if you study tons and
tons about neurobiology, you could see there's a lot less free will than people think, but it's not a
slam dunk. And ooh, if you studied genetics, you reach the same conclusion. Oh, if you study
cultural anthropology, whatever. And it happens, I'm somewhat of a sort of generalist. I've spent my
sort of career oscillating between being a laboratory neurobiologist and studying wild baboons
in a national park in East Africa. I've spent 30 years going there annually. So like the lab stuff
gets me talking to molecular people. The field stuff gets me talking bizarrely to like sociologists.
So I think collectively I've got this kind of broad interdisciplinary view, which is to say I'm skating on
very thin ice and a lot of different disciplines at once. But when you have that perspective,
you eventually see they're not different disciplines. They all connect. Like, for example,
if you're talking about the effects of genes on behavior, by definition, you're talking about
the evolution of those genes. And by definition, you're talking about your childhood,
which determined how readily turned on or off those genes are. And by definition, you're talking,
you're talking about the last hour when those genes were specifying what proteins are being
made in your brain. It's not just, ooh, all these different disciplines collectively, they all
turn into one discipline after a while, which is this like seamless arc of stuff we have no
control over. And when you look at it closely, there isn't a crack anywhere in there to shoot
horn in a notion of free will. This is so interesting because I've never,
heard anything like this before. Like I've never heard anybody say that there's, I have self-improvement
people and entrepreneurs all day coming on this podcast talking to us about grit and determination and
purpose and all these things that according to you, we don't have much control over. So your book is really
two parts or has two main points, the science of why we don't have free will. And then what do we do
with that information? How do we live our best life knowing that there's no free will? I want to dig into
the science, but I think let's get some terminology and some foundation on the table. So, first of all,
can you define free will and can you define determinism for us? Okay, free will. Probably the best
place to start is what I don't think defines free will and 99% of people do because it just
feels so right, which is the in the momentnessness. You have an intent to do something you were
consciously aware you have the intent, you understand if you do that, what are the consequences
likely to be? You understand you have alternatives. You don't have to do that. And for most people,
if the answer is yes to all of those, yeah, you understand this is, you got free will. And that's how
our criminal justice system works on. Once they establish, if the guy actually did it, did he intend to?
Did he know there were alternatives? Did you know what the consequence? And if the answer is, yes,
that's it. Culpable, responsible act that as a free agent. And this gives me apoplexy because this is
ignoring virtually everything that's happening. This is like the metaphor I keep thinking is it's like
trying to review a movie based on only seeing the last three minutes of it. Because what you're not
doing is saying, okay, but where did that intent come from in the first place? And it's when you look
at where intent came from, or let's translate that a bit, how you turned out to be the sort of
person you are, that's where you see you had no control at all. And in a sense, in my mind,
the definition of free will then is your brain makes you do something. And if you can show that
it did that something, and it doesn't matter if you had completely different genes,
were raised in a different home, were raised in a different neighborhood, had glands that
secreted dramatically different levels of hormones, and like your eye color were different.
And if all of those things were different, if your brain would have done the same exact thing,
it's acting freely.
And no brains do that because they can't do anything other than the ways in which they're
embedded in what just came before this and what just came before that and before that and all the way
back. So what you're really saying is that we may have choice in the moment, but that choice in the
moment is based on our biology and environment, which we have no control over. Yes. And even more
striking our circumstances where we're making a choice in the moment, where we even think and
makes sense to us why we formed that intent. Like, okay, okay, well, this is the person I turned out
to be, but this person who I am is now very consciously making that choice. And then all you have
to do is look at circumstances where just subtle manipulations of people, and they make different
choices, and they have no idea that you have manipulated them, and they feel as if they are
agentive out the wazoo, and this was entirely, and even being conscious of what you're intending to do
is not getting you some free will, because, you know, independent of how you got that conscious
intent, a lot of the time we're doing stuff where we're not even conscious of it. I mean, one of the,
there's just been this massive shift in sort of people who think about moral decision making. And what people
believed forever was that you think your way to a moral decision. And what all the science now shows
is a whole lot of the time, most of the time, some of the time from the most important things.
You feel your way to a moral decision. And then your conscious cognitive self suddenly leaps up
and scrambles to try to come up with a rationale for why it makes perfect sense that you did that.
Guy at NYU named Jonathan Haidt has done this fantastic neuroimaging stuff showing somebody's
making a moral decision, here's the scenarios, this is the right thing to do, is it wrong, whatever,
and the more emotional parts of the brain activate and commit to an answer before the more
cognitive parts do. And we all know this. We know this when somebody sits there and says,
you know, I can't quite tell you why, I can't put my finger on it, but when those
people do that sort of thing, it's just wrong. It's wrong, wrong, wrong. You've caught them at that
point. Their cortex has not come up with a rationale yet for the gut intuitions they're running on.
And then when two seconds later, they say, oh yeah, that's why, that's why, because those people
tend to be this way, or because those people did this to my ancestors back in 1823. And what we're
seeing as much of the time, some of the most fundamental things we're deciding, like what counts
as okay behavior, what counts as grounds for condemning someone, et cetera, we haven't a clue
where our decisions are coming from. I'm 100% Palestinian. So later in this conversation,
I definitely want to ask you about your thoughts on the conflict and like how people are
thinking and stuff. But first, let's get through some of this material.
So your book is called Determined.
Why did you title the book that?
And can you explain a little bit about what determinism is?
Well, the Determined was meant to be sort of a play on words.
The full thing is determined, a science of life without free will,
determined in the sense of biological determined,
but then going after exactly what you brought up before
and what's probably terribly relevant to your listeners, which is that whole issue of, hey, show some
determination, social grits, show some backbone. And that's speaking to like this incredibly
tempting false dichotomy, which is most people are willing to say, okay, there's stuff we have no
control over. There's biological attributes that we have. I'm not seven foot four, so I'm never playing
in the NBA. I've got perfect pitch. I didn't have to learn to do that. I just, it turns out to be
genetic. I am really good memory for this, but lousy memory for that. Yeah, we can accept that there are
all sorts of traits that we were handed, but where people then go berserkis saying, ah, but the true
measure of a person is what they then do with those traits. Do they show tenacity? Do they show gumption?
or if they've been given all sorts of gifts, do they squander it? Do they throw it away at a self-indulgence?
Ooh, in that totally incorrect view of the world, stuff like your memory span, that's made a biology.
But your grit, your tenacity, that stuff's made out of like fairy dust or something.
That's different. And a key critical thing is when, just as an example,
You have someone who is prone towards alcoholism and they're feeling an urge to drink something.
That's a biological phenomenon.
And when they then either give into it or say, no, actually, I'll have ginger ale instead,
that's just as biological.
The part of your brain that makes you do the harder thing when it's the right thing to do,
something called the frontal cortex, is as sculpted by everything that came before you.
you, and we think of like attributes as being the hardware in your brain, but what you do with it
and do you stick to the tough sort of thing, that that's the you sitting inside there that's
somehow separate of all that biology yuck, and it's made of the exact same biology, so that
if someone has no control over they were handed the biology of a tendency towards alcohol
craving. They also have no control over the biology of whether or not they're good at resisting it.
It's just a very different sort of biology, but it's one that you had no more role in choosing
than choosing your eye color. So do you believe that, let's say somebody else was born and
looked exactly like me, had the same biology as me, had the same environment as me, but they're not
me, that they would be the host of Young and Profiting Podcast eventually. And like,
same things that I did, they would have done?
Well, if they had the same genes were raised by the same parents in the same way
and the same environment, all those other things, including prenatal environment,
which is a major factor in what kind of adults we turn out to be, if it was exactly the same,
everything else would be the same, assuming the rest of the world was the same as well,
because it's the rest of the world that would have been shaping you. But showing random stuff,
Brownian motion, like all of us had to learn what Brownian motion was for about three and a half
hours in chemistry, somewhere in like ninth grade or something. And Brownian motion makes
molecules float around in random indeterministic ways. And a consequence of that is you and your
identical twin are both in the same exact womb and seemingly having the same exact environment for
nine months, but you aren't because somewhat random brownian sort of stuff is going to determine
that your sibling has two and a half percent more capillaries going to them than you have.
Or because of blood flow, you're getting 4% more of this stress hormone from mom circulating
in your brain than your sister is, and you go through all of that and you look at identical twins
at the time of birth, and their gene regulation is already different. Already, not only have you
been sculpted by your prenatal environment, but which corner of the womb and things like that.
So you can't really do that thought experiment of having everything being exactly the same,
but in principle, yeah, you'd still be here saying the same exact thing.
At Yap, we have a super unique company culture.
We're all about obsessive excellence.
We even call ourselves scrappy hustlers.
And I'm really picky when it comes to my employees.
My team is growing every day.
We're 60 people all over the world.
And when it comes to hiring, I no longer feel overwhelmed by finding that perfect candidate,
even though I'm so picky because when it comes to hiring, indeed is all you need.
Stop struggling to get your job.
post noticed. Indeed, sponsored jobs help you stand out and hire fast by boosting your post
to the top relevant candidates. Sponsored jobs on Indeed get 45% more applications than non-sponsored
ones according to Indeed data worldwide. I'm so glad I found Indeed when I did because hiring
is so much easier now. In fact, in the minute we've been talking, 23 hires were made on Indeed
according to Indeed data worldwide. Plus, there's no subscriptions or long-term contracts. You literally
just pay for your results. You pay for the people that you hire. There's no need to wait any longer.
speed up your hiring right now with Indeed, and listeners of this show will get a $75
sponsored job credit to get your jobs more visibility at Indeed.com.com.
Just go to Indeed.com slash profiting right now and support our show by saying you heard about
Indeed on this podcast. Indeed.com slash profiting. Terms and conditions apply. Hiring,
Indeed is all you need.
Hello, Yap Gang. I know my young improfiting listeners want bigger businesses and a better life,
and the New Year is the perfect moment to reset and commit to your growth.
But let's be real. You can't build an empire if your finances are all over the place.
That's why getting into it QuickBooks is one of the best first moves you can make this year.
They've got powerful money management tools built right into their platform.
And they have them for every stage of your business, whether you're a solopreneur or a small business.
And I love that QuickBooks helps you get paid faster, pay bill smarter, and even gives you access to funding when opportunity pops up.
So QuickBooks can help you with bookkeeping, can help you with getting paid, can even help you with
projections and understanding where your business is at financially.
Plus, QuickBooks Money Solutions reduces manual work by half and keeps your money and your
books perfectly synced.
That means less time staring at spreadsheets and more time actually building the vision that you
started with.
That's the upgrade that every profiting entrepreneur needs.
Start the New Year's strong, take control of your cash flow with QuickBooks Money tools.
Learn more at quickbooks.com slash money.
Again, that's quickbooks.com slash money.
Terms apply.
Money movement services are provided by Intuit payments and corporate.
licensed as a money transmitter by the New York State Department of Financial Services.
Hello, young improfitors. Running my own business has been one of the most rewarding things I've
ever done, but I won't lie to you. In those early days of setting it up, I feel like I was
jumping on a cliff with no parachute. I'm not really good at that kind of stuff. I'm really good
at marketing, sales, growing a business, offers, but I had so many questions and zero idea
where to find the answers when it came to starting an official business. I wish I had known
about Northwest Registered Agent back when I was starting YAP Media.
And if you're an entrepreneur, you need to know what Northwest Registered Agent is.
They've been helping small business owners launch and grow businesses for nearly 30 years.
They literally make life easy for entrepreneurs.
They don't just help you form your business.
They give you the free tools you need after you form it, like operating agreements
and thousands of how-to guides that explain the complicated ends and outs of running a business.
And guys, it can get really complicated.
But Northwest Registered Agent just make it.
it all easy and breaks it down for you. So when you want more for your business, more privacy,
more guidance, more free resources, Northwest Registered Agent is where you should go. Don't wait
and protect your privacy, build your brand, and get your complete business identity in just 10 clicks
and 10 minutes. Visit Northwest Registeredagent.com slash Yapfree and start building something amazing.
Get more with Northwest Registered Agent at Northwest Registeredagent.com slash yapfree.
So let's break down the science and the mechanics of why we take action, why we behave a certain way, if there's no free will.
Okay. Well, we look at like you do some behavior and you pull a trigger just to make it really loaded.
And we all know context. That could be like the most appalling thing on earth. That could be totally wonderful, self-sacrificial.
But you do that behavior.
Like, all you've done is flexed your finger.
And as a result, behavior has happened and it's consequential.
So, like, you could say, well, okay, which parts of the brain just activated to do that?
Which parts went silent?
Good.
That's why you did that behavior.
But then you've got to also incorporate, well, what was going on around you in the seconds
to minutes before?
Are you tired?
Are you stressed?
Is somebody threatening you?
Are you overheated? Are you feeling perfectly comfortable? All that stuff makes a difference. A bizarre,
totally amazing literature showing that if people sit in a room that smells a freshly baked chocolate chip
cookies, they become more generous and economic games that they then play. Whoa, that makes a difference
in the minutes before. But then, what were your hormone levels this morning? Because they're going to have been
marinating your brain and making it more or less sensitive to this or that sort of stimulus.
You take somebody of either sex and you raise their testosterone levels and later in the day,
they look at a face whose facial expression, everyone would say, looks neutral, doesn't look friendly,
doesn't look angry, and elevated testosterone will make you view neutral faces as threatening and
angry because of your hormone levels this morning. And what was it going on in previous months?
Did you have trauma? Are you in the middle of PTSD? Have you had a major depression? Have you found
God? Have you fallen in love? All those things change the structure of your brain. And then before you know it,
you're back to adolescence and childhood and fetal life and your genes, which don't determine anything,
but which completely determined what will happen in a particular environment. And then the most
bizarre thing of all is you've got to start thinking about culture, like what sort of
culture did your ancestors come up with 500 years ago, parentheses, what sort of ecosystems
make certain cultures more likely? And you look at that and say, what does that have to do?
Because within minutes of birth, your mother was mothering you differently depending on which
culture she was raised in. And she was raised in the one that came before and came before and went
all the way back. Like here's one example that just in terms of like how you view the world,
I love this one in terms of our shared nomadic pastoralist roots that people, desert cultures
tend to come up with monotheistic religions. Rainforest cultures come up with polytheistic ones.
And you further see that rainforest cultures tend to come from hunter-gatherers with polytheism.
Monotheistic cultures come from the desert or the open grasslands and people who are
pastoralists with their cows and sheeps and camels and goats and stuff. And that's where the
Judeo-Christian Islamic world came from. That's why that's dominating this planet rather than
people from Kwokyudal cultures or Trojan Islanders or something like that. That has something to do
it. Yeah. And you can see centuries later those patterns of who your ancestors were. For example,
explains patterns of violence of the United States, depending on who settled what parts of the country
back. Okay, so you even have to go back to culture. So, geez, everything from what you were
smelling a second ago to whether mom was stressed when you were a fetus, to what your ancestors
were doing, all of those collectively merge into one set of influences, and then you throw an
environment on top of it. And that's how you became who you are. And that's why you did. And that's
why you did the thing you just did.
I'm trying my best to, like, grapple my head around this because it's like, like I was saying
in the beginning, it's something I've never heard before. It seems really outlandish compared
to other things that I've heard before. So help me understand. Like, let's look at like Jeff
Bezos and Amazon. Was Jeff Bezos born to make Amazon what it is today? Was that always going
to happen? Or was that just what happened? I guess I'm just confused about it all.
Well, he certainly wasn't born to make it. By the time he did start Amazon, it's not by chance that he did and somebody else did not. By the time he had to go, how many years was it before Amazon started making money and somehow they kept still going? It is not by chance that he turned out to be that sort of person who could hold on and hold his breath for that long. And not only do that, but convince other people to hold their
breaths also. And it's one of those where, okay, you get three people, each of whom starts the same
sort of business and they're side by side and it's not making money for years. And one of them like
gives up and like steals the investors money and buys a yacht. The other one like collapses into
despair and like goes back to working in a kinkos. And the third one is Jeff Bezos and just keeps
pushing at it. It is not by chance that each one of those wound up being the
sort of person that they are that would respond to it that way. In the same way, like, you go to some
inspirational heartwarming movie, and one person comes out saying, that's it, I'm going to go do a
random act of kindness tomorrow. And the next person comes out and say, oh, my God, that was such
amazing cinematography. And the third person comes out and says, that was the most manipulative,
boring plot I've ever seen. How do they wind up? You just exposed them to the same stimulus, but
a world of influences from one second before to a million years before blah, blah, blah,
turn them into people who were going to be changed by seeing that movie or changed by the news
that they still had not made a profit that quarter, but they were going to be changed in different
ways because of who they were sculpted into being outside their control.
Can you talk to us about Laplace's demon and why it can help us think about what
determinism is and isn't? Well, it's sort of that's 18th century version, but a sort of a logical
precursor, ancestry to all of this. This was his notion that if you could arrange every particle
in the universe as it was at the time that God created the world, this was pre-Big Bang,
but if you could set every single condition exactly the same as it was back when, you'd
have the exact same world right now. It was just spooling out a tape of pre-recorded contingencies
that we're going to produce this outcome. And what we've learned since then is there's randomness
thrown in, there's quantum indeterminacy that has virtually nothing to do with free will, but still
mucks around with things. There's systems, chaotic systems that are by definition unpredictable,
even though they're determinists.
Okay, so we got a 21st century view,
but he's basically still like the poster child
for the notion of saying,
all we are now is the end product of what came before.
And like anyone writing about free will,
somewhere by the second paragraph,
they have to mention him,
and his demon was this supposedly infinitely insightful being,
who, if they knew where every single,
particle in the universe was right now could tell you like that you're going to sneeze three
centuries and 23 minutes from now. So that's sort of the grandfather of the notion that whatever
came before came before that and before that and before that and before that. And all of that
collectively is what made you into the person who's like standing here right now. Yeah. And so
just to further clarify what you're saying, you give a really good example about a
garbage collector and a college graduate and you kind of compare their lives to each other and how
they could basically be swapped had you just swapped the conditions. Can you tell us about that?
Yeah, this was actually at my son's graduation sitting there and it's totally heartwarming and
it's like great and the parents and everyone's tearful and it's totally wonderful and I'm a sucker for
stuff like that and all of this is going on and sort of at the corner out of the
corner of my eye, I saw this guy back there who was the grounds crew guy who was bagging the
garbage from all the nice like box lunches, all the parents had just tossed or consumed
and thinking, wow, so we're sitting here and there's the graduate and there's this guy
collecting the garbage. And you know damn well that if they switched jeans and switched
childhoods and switched which one of them got ice skating lessons from their parents and which one of
them had to move every six months because like visa issues or undocumented, which one of them grew up
in a dangerous neighborhood, which one went to a fancy-ass prep school, etc., switch all of those,
and the guy with the garbage would be the one up on stage now getting the diploma.
And that's what a deterministic world looks like, the fact that we know if all of those
advantages and disadvantages were traded, they would be trading their positions in life at this
point.
But at some point in our lives, we're making decisions, right?
We are making decisions, at least in the moment.
So can you talk to us about where deciding and where intent comes from?
Okay, so tell me about a time of very explicit decision that you made.
chose this instead of that, where you initially thought, eh, I'm probably going to do this,
and you wound up changing your mind and doing that instead? Well, six years ago, I was working in
corporate and I quit my corporate job to start my business and take my podcast full time. So my whole life,
I thought I was just going to be in corporate, or for a long time, I thought I was just going to
be in corporate. And then within a month's time, I just decided I wanted to start my business and I
quit my job. Okay. So that's great. And we know for certain all sorts of people in the exact same
position would now be like heading towards their 45th anniversary of working for the same company,
that sort of thing. Why do you turn out to be the sort of person who would be bored by being
in the same environment? Why do you turn out to be the sort of person who had enough self-confidence
to walk away from that? Why do you have the certain degree of risk taking that you do?
We know all about half a dozen different genes that have an influence on how risk-taking someone is,
how sensation-seeking they are, and it influences who you marry and your voting patterns
and your economic stability. So how do you wind up being that sort of person? How do you wind
up being somebody who, I assume, was extroverted in the right ways to get people to back you?
if your parents thought this was the most like disastrous decision on earth,
where do you turn out to have the ability to respect them, but only so much?
Or if they thought this was wonderful and they had been prompting you to do that,
how do you turn out to be the sort of person who thought that your parents actually had
sensible things to say to you, et cetera, et cetera?
I was once lecturing a bunch of judges.
I do some of these read judges continuing ed things and telling them
how they're in this ridiculous occupation because it makes no sense and they have no free
law and all of that. This judge said, well, that's nonsense. The other day, like the day ended in court
where I figured, okay, I'm going to throw the book at this guy. And I thought about it that night
and realized, you know, actually this and this. And I decided, no, I'm going to go easier on the guy
the next morning. And he said, you're telling me I didn't decide that. And I said, who told you to
turn out to be the sort of person who respects reflecting on your thoughts? Who taught you to value thinking
objectively? Who taught you to be the sort of person who wouldn't be so threatened by the notion
that you're changing your mind? What do you mean? Omnipotent? Had you turned out to be somebody who
could deal with the fact that your first thoughts were wrong? And none of this comes from nowhere.
And you know, I am sure, cadres of people who would have been too freaked out to make the leap that you did.
And that didn't come from nowhere.
And the fact that they're changing, the fact that they're still at the same job didn't come from nowhere.
And the fact that they're still there and are bored out of their minds or that they're still there and this is totally great.
neither of those responses came from nowhere.
That's how we become who we are.
That's why Jeff Bezos stuck it out for all those years
and lots of other people would have given up.
So I have two follow-up questions to this.
Do you feel like there's no such thing as being spontaneous?
And then how about the choice of not doing something?
Do you think we have the freedom of won't?
Yeah.
Being spontaneous, no.
we're never spontaneous. What we think of as spontaneous is when you have absolutely no insights
as to what was going on implicitly underneath the surface. Like every now and then we're capable
of saying, oh, that's why I'm being all irritable. I haven't eaten yet and I should. There we have
some insight into the implicit stuff boiling beneath the surface. But what we call spontaneous
is like we're just not aware of what the pieces were. And we're not aware of most of the pieces.
In terms of, okay, okay, we don't have free will, but what about free won't? Do we at least have
the ability to veto stuff? And the answer is no, because when you look at the nuts and bolts
of how your brain goes about deciding to do something, and you conclude, actually, there's no
free will going into that, all you need to do to figure out is,
the nuts and balls of when you've decided to do something and then your brain says,
nah, don't do it. All you've done is just added a little minus switch to your circuit instead
of a plus there sort of thing. But it's the same exact stuff that it's built on. And if you find
people who at every single juncture in their life, when they have an opportunity to finally
get their act together, and they can't do the free won't, they can't say no,
they do the wrong thing each time, that's the same exact biology playing out there as if they instead
had said time to like reform myself and I'm never going to do X again and now I'm Mother Teresa or
some such thing. All it does is it just has a little like additional glitch in the system there
and you get the opposite unspontaneous decision. That makes me sad kind of because it makes me feel like
if somebody is born in a bad environment and has poor genes or trauma in their genes,
that they're never going to have a good life or be able to change their life to have a better
outcome?
Well, absolutely they can change, but we know it's an uphill battle.
We know despite whatever myths we have in this country, if you're born into poverty,
I don't know what the number is, but there's like an 85% chance, you're still going to
to be in poverty as an adult. And if you're born into a family with three vacation homes and,
you know, an IPO coming up next season sort of thing, you know you are going to get a large
inheritance somewhere to add. You are going to have freedoms in your life that 99% of people on
this planet don't have. You know, every now and then somebody does completely counter all the
expectations, but we're running a planet, or at least a country on the notion that it's okay to
treat some people much better than average because of stuff they had no control over, and to treat
other people much worse than average. And not only do we think that's okay, but we invent all these
myths to explain how the person actually had a role in bringing about those things. I mean,
Here's like a great example in terms of like ongoing biology.
You know, you look at all sorts of implicit bias studies and people are getting less biased
against people from this background and this other background and all of that so that
there might actually be some good news occurring there.
But one area where there's not been a decrease in implicit bias, and in fact there's been
an increase is against people who are obese.
that calls for very negative judgments, both visceral and reasoned, pseudo-reason, that this is someone who has no self-control. So how are they going to do self-control in this job they're applying for, et cetera, et cetera. It's one of the groups where stigma is increasing against them. And then along comes somebody who everyone in their family is morbidly obese and they were by the time they were 11. And this is how they've been incorporating their view into their whole life.
yeah, I keep trying.
I can.
What can I say?
I have no self-discipline, blah, blah.
And then somebody discovered this hormone called leptin.
And leptin sends a signal to your brain telling you to feel less hungry than you were.
And it turns out this person has a mutation in the receptor for leptin so that they don't get a
satiation signal.
It's a goddamn mutation that their family has all had.
And that's what?
No, they're not lacking self-control.
No, they don't hate themselves, rather, or any of the...
This is what it is.
And we run a world where, because of this one stupid feature about their endocrinology,
they're less likely to get jobs than other people.
They're more likely to be convicted by a jury.
They're more likely to spend their life alone and lonely.
I'm like, how screwed is this?
And it's this way in all those domains.
And yeah, it's kind of like horrifying if somebody just because they were born with a silver
spoon, they're going to have a life of privilege and comfort.
But, you know, it's a hundredfold more horrifying.
When you look at all people who spend their lives with less and their needs less
considered and marginalized or mistreated or disenfranchised or whatever, just because of their
just crappy luck, there's something.
very wrong here. As you're explaining this, it gets me thinking that a lot of your work can actually
make the world a better place because we'll have more empathy for people who are overweight or
people who have drug addictions and things like this because we'll realize that in a lot of part
or in your opinion, and 100% it's not their fault. They don't have free will. And likewise,
if we see somebody who's like a master of the universe and has just had like their six successful
startups in a row or whatever, and they kind of have decided they're pretty damn special
and they're entitled to better treatment and they're more deserving of this and their
needs have earned more consideration, they haven't for a second. If all of this has to change
your worldview into not blaming for people for the ways of
in which things didn't turn out well for them,
absolutely the same.
Nobody, including you and me,
are entitled to anything that makes them better than anyone else.
Because the cool, laudable, you know,
impressive things we may or may not have pulled off
had nothing to do with who we are
because we just had good luck with it.
And like meritocracy goes down the tubes
just as surely as blaming people,
born into poverty for still being poor 20 years later.
Happy New Year, Yap, gang.
I just love the unique energy of the new year.
It's all about fresh starts.
And fresh starts not only feel possible,
but also feel encouraged.
And if you've been thinking about starting a business,
this is your sign.
There's no better time than right now.
2026 can be the year that you build something
that is truly yours,
the year where you take control over your career.
And it starts with Shopify.
I've built plenty of my own businesses on Shopify,
including my LinkedIn Secrets Masterclass.
So it's a two-day workshop.
People buy their tickets on Shopify.
And then my mastermind subscription is also on Shopify.
I built my site quickly in just a couple of days,
payments for setup super easily.
And none of the technical stuff slowed me down like it usually does
because Shopify is just so intuitive.
And this choice of using Shopify helped me scale my masterclass
to over $500,000 in revenue in our first year.
And I'm launching some new podcast courses
and can't wait to launch them on Shopify.
Shopify gives you everything you need to sell online and in-person,
just like the millions of entrepreneurs that they power.
You can build your dream story using hundreds of beautiful templates
and set up as fast with built-in AI tools
that help you write product descriptions and edit photos.
Plus, marketing is built in,
so you can create email and social campaigns easily.
And as you grow, Shopify can scale right along with your business.
In 2026, stop waiting and start selling with Shopify.
Sign up for your website.
$1 per month trial and start selling today at Shopify.com slash profiting. Go to Shopify.com
slash profiting. That's Shopify.com slash profiting. Yeah, fam, hear your first. This new year with Shopify
by your side. Hey, young improfitters. As an entrepreneur, I know firsthand that getting a huge expense
off your books is the best possible feeling. It gives you peace of mind and it lets you focus on the
big picture and invest in other things that move your business forward. Now imagine if you, if you
You got free business internet for life.
You never had to pay for business internet again.
How good would that feel?
Well, now you don't even have to imagine because Spectrum business is doing exactly that.
They get it that if you aren't connected, you can't make transactions, you can't move your
business forward.
They support all types of businesses from restaurants to dry cleaners to content creators
like me and everybody in between.
They offer things like internet, advanced Wi-Fi, phone TV, and mobile services.
Now, for my business-owning friends out there, I want you to listen up.
If you want reliable internet connection with no contracts and no added fees,
Spectrum is now offering free business internet advantage forever when you simply add four or more mobile lines.
This isn't just a deal. It's a smart way to cut your monthly overhead and stay connected.
Yeah, bam, you should definitely take advantage of this offer. It's free business internet forever.
Visit Spectrum.com slash free for life to learn how you can get business internet free forever.
Restrictions apply. Services not available in all areas.
What's up, Yap, gang?
If you're a serious entrepreneur like me, you know your website is one of the first touchpoints
every single cold customer has with your brand.
Think about that for a second.
When people are searching on Google, everybody who interacts with your brand first is seeing
your dot-com initially.
But here's a problem.
Too many companies treat their website like a formality instead of the gross tool that
it should be.
At Yap Media, we are guilty of this.
I am really due for an upgrade from my website and I'm planning on doing that with
framework this year.
because small changes can take days with my other platform and simple updates require tickets.
And suddenly we're just leaving so much opportunity on the table.
And that's why so many teams, including mine, are turning to framework.
It's built for teams who refuse to let their website slow them down.
Your designers and marketers get full ownership with real-time collaboration,
everything you need for SEO and analytics with integrated A-B testing.
I love that.
I love testing and making sure that we've got the best performing assets on the page.
You make a change, hit publish, and it's live in seconds.
Whether you're launching a new site, testing landing pages, or migrating your full.com,
Framer makes going from idea to live site fast and simple.
Learn how you can get more out of your dot com from a Framer specialist or get started
building for free today at Framer.com slash profiting for 30% off a Framer pro
annual plan.
That's 30% off in 2026.
Again, that's Framer.com slash profiting for 30% off, Framer.com slash profiting.
rules and restrictions apply.
Yeah.
So let's talk about some of the ways that we create these decisions
and some of the causes of these decisions.
You give a lot of examples in the book.
One of them is between odor and disgust.
Can you talk to us about how odor and disgust
can actually change our decision making in the moment?
Yep.
I love this in terms of, whoa, that's got something to do with it
in the 30 seconds before you make a decision.
This is not a big effect, but it's been replicated. It came from some very good psychologists at Yale and sort of a broader, the sort of version of that has been out there. And it's the flip side of what I mentioned before. Take somebody, sit them down, have them fill out a questionnaire about their political views, social politics, economics, geopolitics, whatever. And then bring them back a month later and put them in the room saying, here's another questionnaire we want you to fill out about your political views.
And it happens, they're sitting at a room that smells of totally rancid garbage.
And you can actually go buy a vial of rancid garbage like odorant and you like take the lid off
it just as you could buy freshly baked chocolate chip cookies, smell vials and open them up.
But you're sitting in that room.
And if somebody is sitting in a room that smells bad, they become more socially conservative.
doesn't change their economic views, doesn't change their political, their geopolitical views,
but what's happening, a part of the brain called the insula cortex, which for the last 150 million
years in every vertebrate on Earth tells you if you've just taken some rancid food into your
mouth and it tastes disgusting and all sorts of like toxin receptors in your tongue,
wake up this part of the brain and it causes you to gag and throw up and spit it out,
all of that. Somewhere in the last 40,000 years, we've evolved the ability. Not only do those neurons
do disgusting taste and smells, they do moral disgust also. How did this happen? Like 40,000 years ago,
that's like a blink of an, that's not enough time to get a new part of the brain. They had like
some big committee meeting and they said, well, insular cortex, it does disgusting tastes.
Okay, it'll do disgusting actions from now on. Like, give me some duct tape. Let's like push that
in there and expand its portfolio. And you've got neurons in there, which literally cannot
distinguish between a disgusting taste and disgusting moral act, which is why when we hear about
them, we feel queasy. It leaves a bad taste in our mouth. We almost want to throw.
It makes us nauseous, that sort of thing.
And once you've got that, you've got people who are then running their moral decision-making
on stuff that just kind of feels disgusting is wrong, wrong, wrong.
And that's letting you then have a 150 million-year-old part of your brain make your decisions
as to whether those people are okay just because they, despite looking different from you
or sounding or praying or eating or loving or whatever it is,
because you're running your brain on one of the most savagely, like, ancient parts of it,
and it's powerful.
And you take that person at that point to say, whoa, that's really interesting.
Because, you know, four weeks ago, you said, that should actually be legal if people want to do that.
And just now you said it shouldn't be legal.
Why do you change?
They're not going to say because the room smells disgusting.
And my insular cortex can tell the difference between metaphor and reality.
they're going to say, oh, I thought about it and I saw this thing in the news and then I reflected.
And they're just making it up because they were running on just an intuitive sense that disgusting sensations make you think of disgusting actions and ideologies and theologies and things like that.
And like, whoa, where'd that come from?
That's fascinating in and of itself.
and what's even more fascinating is when you this ask the person who made that different judgment
and they're going to confabulate something from like freshman year philosophy or something
to explain. And nah, there's other stuff going on underneath the surface. And it's mostly
other stuff going on underneath the surface. So are you saying that we can't have rational,
logical thinking, and we are really just pretending to have logical thinking, masking our reptilian brain or something?
Well, that's very apt that you brought in that part of the brain because that's exactly sort of where that comes into.
We and dinosaurs, we're doing some very similarly impulsive things with some very similar parts of the brain.
But do we ever actually think and reason and come to a rational?
Yeah, we do.
but under some circumstances more readily than others.
If you're tired, you're going to run on instincts and intuition.
If you're in pain, if you're scared, if you're stressed,
if your heart is pounding because of desire and arouse on all of that,
you're going to make completely different sorts of stupid decisions.
Or if you're sitting there and you're deciding,
how are you going to assess this person?
if they count in your brain as a them instead of as an us,
you don't have a chance to get your more emotive reflexive parts of the brain to step down
and let's think about this carefully.
Wonderful example of this research by this guy at Harvard named Josh Green,
who has shown if you're having to make a decision about acting morally or not,
am I going to act in a generous sharing way right now?
if it's concerning a bunch of your friends, people who are uses,
if you have to make a very fast decision about that,
you're going to be generous.
And if you have mortal time to think about it,
that's when you come up with,
well, you know, it's really their fault that they did that
and somebody else is going to take care of it.
It's really not my problem.
And you wanted to do something selfish.
When you're considering a them,
someone who looks totally different from you,
all of that has all those alarms going,
off unconsciously, if you've got to make that decision instantly, you're going to act aggressively
and selfishly and preemptively sort of looking out for your side. It's only when you have more
time to think that you may come to, you know, maybe they're not so different and maybe, you know,
they wound up this way because, you know, their circumstances were real different from mine.
when you're around us's, your reflexes are towards pro-social nice behavior.
When you're around them's, your reflexes are towards just the opposite.
And it's in both cases that when you can sit and think about it, that's where you come up with a
completely different answer.
So in a world in which somebody has to decide in the next three seconds, should this person
get a green card, should this person get this job, should this person be arrested, you
in those cases, that's exactly where you should be on guard, that you're going to be making your
most stupid emotion-driven decisions. Stop and think about it and thinking about again and again and
again. And all of this gets encapsulated in this quote that I think is like incredibly
informative, which is you cannot reason somebody out of an opinion that they weren't reasoned
into in the first place. If they got to that out of emotion and fear and hatred and stress and
love or whatever, and they just made up a rationalization afterward, no amount of reason is going to
change that. And we've seen that, you know, our national political landscape over the last eight
years, showing counter to what every sort of rational social psychologist would have taught you.
There's a whole realm of having extremist views where the more convincing the evidence
is that you give them that their views are wrong, the more they're going to believe in it.
Because, oh, my God, they must really be having to come up with a big lie if they're pulling out
the big guns like that. Like, we know the whole world I'm talking about here. Yeah, reason is not
going to reason someone out of something they were not reasoned into in the first place.
And circumstances where we can actually, like, come to, that's not what I normally would have thought,
but I thought about it and I thought about it again. And I put myself in that person's perspective
because theirs is a whole lot different from mine. And I showed that I'm capable of understanding
somebody else can feel pain about something I have no understanding of. And when you work your way
towards that, that's where we come up with interesting different outcomes. And that's where
it's not by chance that some people do that and some people don't.
One more example that I think really helps illustrate this.
You talk about judges who are hungry,
who end up giving different sentences based on their level of hunger.
Tell us about that.
Yeah.
This is another one of those.
I love this study, and it was done by some really good scientists in a very prestigious
journal, and it's been attacked by all sorts of people since then.
But this was looking at more than a thousand judicial decisions in this parole board system over the course of the year, looking at when did the judge's parole the person, when did they send them back to jail and looking at every variable they could think of. And the strongest predictor was how many hours had it been since the judge had eaten a meal.
Appear before the judge right after they had lunch, you had a 60% chance of being paroled by four hours later a one to two percent chance.
Oh my God, what is this about? What it's about is doing the harder thing, looking at the world from
somebody else's perspective, instead of jumping to immediate gut decision, thinking about again,
all that takes work in a very literal way that's more energetically demanding for your brain.
And if you have low blood glucose levels, because you haven't eaten in four hours, you get the
easier answer every single time. And what's amazing about that is you ask the judge why they
made this decision, and they're going to tell you about, I don't know, Spinoza or Aristotle or something,
and they're not going to tell you because my blood glucose level was below this. Now, that study
has been attacked by all sorts of cranks complaining about how the statistics were done.
The authors have come back and completely put that confound to rest some other things that
people have complained about, which when you look at it closely, makes the case even stronger for that,
and it's been replicated in other realms. Don't go apply for a home loan if the loan officer has gone
a lot of hours since eating a meal. You're less likely to get a loan. If you're an out-group member
and somebody's looking at your job application, the more hours it's been since they've eaten,
the faster they're going to toss your application in the garbage. Whoa, all of those. But then,
then on top of that, where I was talking before about culture even matters, there's one circumstance
where as judges become more hungry, they become more merciful. What's that about? That's in Islamic courts
during Ramadan, because you're hungry and you're reflecting on the nature of justice and goodness
and all of that, if you're in a Sharia court and you're a judge, hunger makes you more merciful
if it's in a religious context. If you're hungry because you didn't have time to get lunch,
you're more likely to throw the book at the guy, just like a judge sitting here in the Bronx
or something. Whoa. So there's a cultural aspect to it as well. Totally cool that it works that
way. So with all this information, knowing that your environment and your circumstances really shape
your decision-making in the moment, if you're hungry, if you're stressed, if you have hormones,
if you're PMSing, if you're a girl, like, there's probably all these different things that we need
to worry about. So how do we take this information and then apply it to the real world, knowing all
these things? How do you suggest that we improve our lives in the real world?
Well, I recognize once again out of the lunatic fringe that if this is really taken to its logical extreme, criminal justice has to be totally completely trashed and replaced with a quarantine model. You protect people from dangerous people. You can strain them, but you don't do it one smidgen more than the minimum needed, and you don't lecture them afterward about how they have a bad soul, and you put a lot of effort into understanding how they turned out that way.
And also from the lunatic fringe, meritocracy makes no sense whatsoever.
That doesn't mean you pick a random person to take out your brain tumor tomorrow morning.
You want the person to be skilled.
You want to protect people from incompetent people in difficult jobs.
But sure, don't make sure you teach that person that they feel more deserving that you,
that they're a better person because they've got a good memory and they've got good spatial,
you know, physical, digital control or whatever, taking out your tumor, that stuff needs to go down the tube.
None of us can feel entitled to anything whatsoever, and thus there's nobody on Earth who is less
entitled to things than you are. And finally, like hating somebody makes his little sense as hating a
virus or hating an earthquake or something. And all that said, that's unbelievably difficult to do. And I've been
thinking this way since I'm 14, and I can pull this off about once every three weeks for a
minute, because most of the time I'm falling back into the time and place I was trained in.
And if it's really, really hard to do this, which it sure is, what you're left with is,
save the energy to do that for when it really matters, for when you're just about to judge
somebody for when you're just about to jump to the front of a literal or metaphorical line,
because you feel as if somehow you've earned better consideration than anybody.
Save it for when it really matters.
If you want to believe it was free will, whether you floss the top of your teeth
before the bottom this morning or the other way around, you know, go for it.
Don't work hard at that point to figure out how you turned out to be an upper-tooth flosser
instead of a lower one, but save it for when it matters. And like all we've learned is for centuries
every time we figure out a new domain where, aha, there actually wasn't responsibility. That person
had no control over what happened. The world becomes better. It's a really good thing that society
figured out that disastrous thunderstorms are not caused by old women with old teeth.
Witches can't cause thunderstorms, and the appropriate societal response isn't to burn them at the
stake. And like kids you aren't learning to read very well, they aren't lazy and motivated.
They've got something screwy with like layer six of this part of their cortex. So they reverse
looped letters and they have dyslexia. It's not their fault. And not only does it become a better
world because you figure out how to teach kids with dyslexia to read and it becomes, you know,
more interventively effective. But it's a much more humane world because you're not burning old
women at the stakes and you're not telling kids who can't keep letters from flipping that they're
lazy and unmotivated and that's who they should grow up thinking of themselves as. And at every one of
these steps, if you save the effort to do this hard work where it really matters, the roof isn't going to cave in.
this is going to happen. Is this going to become like a nicer world to be in? So I mentioned this earlier.
I'm 100% Palestinian and I said I would bring up the Palestine-Israeli conflict and I feel like this
is an appropriate time. So right now, Israel, in my opinion, is committing an ethnic cleansing
and genocide against the people in Gaza. And I can't help but always whenever I do these interviews,
it's November 7th, the day that we're recording today. So this has been going on for about a month.
and I think everybody in the world by now knows about the Hamas attacks on October 7th
and the fact that now Israel has been retaliating carpet bombing Gaza for about 30 days straight now.
So let's talk about this because it seems pretty relevant to what you're talking about in terms of like the Hamas attack.
They even have control over what they were going to do.
There's so many circumstances that obviously led up to that.
And then now with what Israel is doing now, in terms of,
of the bombing, and then even before that, with the apartheid and the entitlement of, you know,
having a state only for, you know, Jewish supremacy.
Well, I am going to, I would guess, get literal death threats rather than just metaphorical
ones in saying what I think here, I was raised as an Orthodox Jew, a very observant one,
until I became an atheist that night at age 14, and I am a vehement strident anti-Zionist.
I think the founding of Israel was one of the last great crimes of European colonialism.
Like Europe finally figured out, after shitting on the Jews for 2,000 years,
Hitler finally pushed it over the top and made that seem a little bit embarrassing.
So for the first time, European Christianity decided it's time to be nice to the Jews
and try to make up for the death camps. And what does Britain do in its last gas of empire? It decides to
make up for those 2,000 years of European brutality by giving away the Palestinians' homeland.
What a cool idea. How just is that? I know. Ridiculous. And what that did, amid that creating the
Palestinian catastrophe of that, what that did is make both sides victims.
of this because the Palestinians have been robbed of their homeland and their rights and their safety
and their security and their dignity and all of that for 75 years now, whatever it is. And all of these
bedraggled survivors of the concentration camps were dumped into the middle of a place where
everyone surrounding them hated their guts because it was much easier to hate them than to hate
the British Colonials who engineered it behind the scenes. And all we've done is spent 75 years
guaranteeing that these people were going to spend this time tearing in each other's throats like
savages. And they're both victims. And they both got screwed in this deal. And Israel, it's there
now. I would not have voted for its founding. But it's, if you do that, take it apart. Now,
there's a lot of other places you're going to have to take apart. It's there now. But
they're sure as hell has to be a viable, supported Palestinian state, and they're sure as hell
has to be equal rights for Arab Israelis in Israel, and they're sure as hell has to be all those
things, and those settlers sure as hell should be labeled as terrorists and pulled out of there,
and, you know, all that stuff. So, you know, those are the obvious solutions, but all of it is
within this mindset that I think is totally an outcome of how I think, which is they're both
victims of circumstance. And somehow, 2,000 years of bedraggled Jews have become ethno-nationalists.
And somehow the Palestinians who have been, like, beaten on for 75 years, have become angry
enough to do things like what Hamas did. And everybody is a victim in this. So that's my two cents.
Yeah, it was a good one. Thank you for sharing. I had no idea where you were going to go with it.
but I do think it's relevant to everything that you're saying that this is the main thing that I wanted
to get out of what you just said. None of this actually happened on October 7th. This is years,
thousands of years in the making. It's not October. It didn't all, everybody was looking at it in a bubble.
And really, there's so much context behind it. Environmental-wise and even biology-wise,
like all the trauma from everyone's ancestors even is at play here. I know that we are running out of time here.
So I end all my interviews with two last questions.
Thank you so much for your time.
Everything was really, really insightful.
The first question is, what is one actionable thing that our young improfitors can do today
to become more profitable tomorrow?
Since I am so ignorant about the world you're coming from, I can't even begin.
I don't know, anything that I can say is to be sound fatuous, stupid.
Like, you're really not such a big deal.
you're really not the Christ child coming again just because you pulled off a successful startup.
You really didn't do it on your own.
You didn't do any of this on your own.
So keep that in mind.
That's one of my biggest takeaways from this is that now I feel like I'm going to look at other people
who might not be as successful as me with a lot more empathy, honestly, and less judgment.
So that was my big takeaway from this conversation.
and what would you say your secret to profiting in life is?
And this can go beyond financial, so profiting in your relationships and everything.
Oh, once again, like useless, like window dressing.
Oh, I don't know, just remember you didn't get here by chance.
And if the outcome of that is you shouldn't beat on yourself as much or hate yourself as much, that's a good thing.
And if the outcome of that is remembering you've got no damn grounds to congratulate yourself,
you know, those have to be good outcomes.
That's got to make things a little bit better.
Awesome.
Well, Robert, thank you so much for joining us on Young Improfiting Podcast.
I love the conversation.
Great.
Likewise.
Thanks for having me on.
Yeah, fam, this was one of those interviews that truly blows your mind.
And I know I personally will be thinking about this for weeks.
Robert Sopolsky's view that we lack free will entirely is a radical one, and he admits that,
but he certainly made his case in a compelling way.
We all like to think that we're agents of choice and the architects of our own fates,
and that we're all leading our lives by making conscious moment-to-moment decisions.
But so many recent findings in neuroscience and psychology suggest that this is far from the truth.
Like Professor Sopolsky put it, there are a billion threads leading to each moment and believing that
is just your conscious intent in any given moment that determines your actions, is a lot like
trying to review a movie based on only seeing the last three minutes of it.
Viewed like this, something like grit, which many of us entrepreneurs take great pride in,
loses a bit of its luster. Your tenacity, like everything else, stems from some combination
of your genes, hormones, environment, ancestral heritage, and more. The implications of having no
free will are even bigger than that. The moral principles that
underlie our criminal justice system, our meritocracy, our ideas of blame and praise start to crumble
without the presence of free will. But that can be a good thing too, says Sapolsky. It can actually
lead us to having more empathy for others who are struggling with things like their weight, drug addiction,
or something else that may not be their fault at all. So whatever your own view on free will,
there's so much to take away from thinking about these issues. And next time you're thinking about
beating yourself up or somebody else for that matter for a mistake, shortcoming or bad outcome,
perhaps try zooming back and taking in the really big picture.
Thanks for listening.
And if some combination of your genes environment and chance brought you to this fascinating
discussion with Robert Sapolsky on Young and Profiting Podcast, then why don't you exercise
whatever counts as your own free will to share this episode with your friends and family?
And maybe it was predetermined that you would also drop us a five-star review on Apple Podcasts.
Perhaps your whole life has been building up to this moment.
We here at Young Improviting would certainly appreciate if you did.
You can find me on Instagram at Yap with Hala or on LinkedIn by searching my name.
It's Hala Taha.
But keep in mind, I am the LinkedIn queen and my DMs get nuts.
So if you want to reach out to me and you want to make sure I see it, try me on Instagram.
Before we wrap up, I do have to shout out my amazing production team at YAP Media.
Thank you for all that you do.
This is your host, Hala Taha.
aka the podcast princess, signing off.
