ZOE Science & Nutrition - Most replayed moment: What your wearable is really telling you | Dr Malcolm Finlay

Episode Date: September 22, 2026

From smartwatches to fitness trackers, more of us than ever are monitoring our health in real time. With just a glance at our wrist, we can check our step count, sleep quality, heart rate and, more re...cently, something called HRV. But what do these numbers actually mean? And more importantly, how can we use them to improve our lives? I’m joined by Dr Malcolm Finlay to break down the data behind the devices. He explains how to turn confusing metrics into meaningful action. helping you adjust your training, manage stress, and make smarter decisions for your health. 🌱 Try our science-backed and tasty wholefood supplement Daily30 🌿Let your gut microbes snack on the ZOE Gut Health Bar Get our brand-new app and Gut Health Test designed by world-leading gut health and nutrition scientists to build healthy eating habits 👉 Join ZOE Follow ZOE on Instagram. 📚Books by our ZOE Scientists The Food For Life Cookbook Every Body Should Know This by Dr Federica Amati The Appetite Reset by Dr Federica Amati Food For Life by Prof. Tim Spector Ferment by Prof. Tim Spector Good Mood Food (preorder) by Prof. Tim Spector Free resources from ZOE The Smart Snacking Guide: How to feed your gut, fuel your day, and snack without guilt The Hormone Harmony Guide: Tuning Your Body’s Internal Orchestra   Eating for Better Brain Health: Your brain-gut blueprint How to eat in 2026 - Discover ZOE’s 8 nutrition principles for long-term health Live Healthier: Top 10 Tips From ZOE Science & Nutrition Gut Guide - For a Healthier Microbiome in Weeks  Better Breakfast Guide Have feedback or a topic you'd like us to cover? Let us know here. Episode transcripts are available here.

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Hello and welcome to Zoe Recap, where each week we find the best bits from one of our podcast episodes to help you improve your health. From smartwatches to fitness trackers, more of us than ever are monitoring our health in real time. With just a glance at our wrist, we can check our step count, sleep quality, heart rate, and more recently, something called HRV. But what do these numbers actually mean? And more importantly, how can we use them to improve our lives? I'm joined by Dr Malcolm Finley to break down the data behind the devices. He explains how to turn confusing metrics into meaningful action, helping you adjust your training, manage stress, and make smarter decisions for your health. What is HRV?
Starting point is 00:00:48 Heart rate variability is something you can measure from the heart rate, like the technical side of things is it measures the subtle changes in the beat-to-beat time differences of each heartbeat. When we talk about heart rate variability with watches and so on, it's not really the big changes that the heart rate will change for doing exercise or when you get excited about something or going to sleep at night. It's more like the subtle wobbles in the heart rate from beat to beat and looking at the course of that over several minutes or even over the whole day. So the measure's quite a mathematically complex measure that was first bought out in the 1970s, I think, as a way of guiding medical treatment and risk prediction. I think in hardcore medicine, it didn't fulfill its promise.
Starting point is 00:01:32 in that people are trying to look for heart rate variability is a good predictor for future disease or future problems. But actually, it's kind of a weak one compared to some other very serious medical testing that we have, for example, CT scans or MRI scans. But as a wearable device, I think wearables have picked up on this measure because you can take that and it gives another insight about your overall physical general health and general health metrics. Am I healthiest if there is no variability? in my heart rate and it's completely steady. It's the other way around. Absolutely the other way around. So the general idea of being healthy would be someone who have both control inputs into their heart,
Starting point is 00:02:13 both the sort of fight and flight response, the sympathetic, that's the adrenaline sort of drive, but also the relaxation drive, the parasympathetic, the works against that. And having both inputs from the nervous system to the heart subtly changes how that beat-to-beat variability happens in the heart. is the HRV. And so the HRV being higher, as measured by a watch, really indicates that you've got those inputs really strongly affecting the heart. Let's take an extreme example. People with a heart transplant, you measure their HRV, it's completely flat. Why is it completely flat? Because does that mean it's zero? It's almost zero. Okay. And that's because they've had the nerves to their new heart essentially severed. And over time, there have been cases where people have developed a heart rate
Starting point is 00:03:02 variability back in their new transplanted heart, probably because they've regrown some nerve innovation to their heart. So in an extreme scenario where you remove those nervous inputs, you get almost zero heart rate variability. Having sort of helped us to understand what these measures are, I'd love to start to talk a bit about actionable advice. Maybe we could start with this question about the metrics that we should be tracking. And maybe let's start with HRV. How should I be thinking about that? Yeah. So first of all, I think, HIV is a useful measure. It's got some scientific basis and it can give a, you know, an indication of one's health status, particularly the changes in an individual. So if I measure
Starting point is 00:03:44 and compare myself to myself yesterday, my numbers last week, then I get an idea. There's no good me comparing mine to yours because our baseline starting point may be different. Malcolm, I was literally going to ask that because you mentioned 55 and mine having seen this over the last A couple of months is about 33, so now I'm really worried that I'm really unhealthy. Really, don't be worried. That's your own number and the changes in one's own number that are going to be the key things to track on an individual basis. How far does it need to change to care? Because that's the other thing I notice is mine fluctuates around a very little bit.
Starting point is 00:04:18 So like if it goes from 37 to 33, is that a real difference? As a one-off, that's probably not a real change. let's say things are changing in a negative way, you'll probably be noticing other things having changed and be able to pinpoint, oh, actually I've been in bed for the last two weeks with a flu, or I've had a minor operation, or it's been a particularly stressful part of my life, and that HRV will kind of be a reflection of those other things happening. It's pretty rare. In fact, I find it hard to think of times where people have spot an HRV change,
Starting point is 00:04:56 and only the HRV change has preceded us being able to say there's something else that needs doing. Those measurements tend to be something that follow feeling unwell or something else changing. I think it's a little different if one's looking at it from a wellness point of view, whereby you may want to say, okay, actually, I've made a change in my life. Is this actually having an effect on my overall body's wellness? It's something to give themselves a second encouragement as a nice feedback to say, okay, I'm on the right path here. But, you know, it will get to a level and it will fluctuate around that level.
Starting point is 00:05:36 I think it's never going to just keep on increasing up to 50, 60, 100. So it might fluctuate between low 30s up to the low 40s and keep fluctuating. If that's where you are, that's fine for you. I think those are quite big variations. But it's a long-term shift from the, say, you're in the low 30s. low 40s, then you shift to the mid-30s to the mid-40s. Weeks are the timeframes where one can really be sure that any measurements is consistently changing.
Starting point is 00:06:09 Most of the time when people have come to me, specifically asking about HRV, it's been pretty easy to pinpoint, oh, hold on a sec, you've just changed your job. Now you're having to get up at 6am, but you're still going to bed at midnight, whereas before you're getting up at 8. And these things can make a big impact and people have to, you know, accept impacts of changing their life and adjust things accordingly to fulfill their health status. How much value is there in looking at the heart rate? How much should I care that in my life I'm trying to get my heart rate up to sort of certain levels during the day or during exercise? What's your? Yeah, so it can be useful, really, really useful to guide training and training.
Starting point is 00:06:53 and training fitness when people are trying to go for that athletic targets, when people are getting their fitness targets. I think it falls down a little bit if we use the same idea, well, that's necessary to make the healthiest you possible, right? So the key benefits probably come from doing not the extreme exercise, not extreme training. It's going to be getting outside of the resting zone, So when you start to significantly increase the heart rate, it's not just the heart that's benefiting, but the whole body, the whole blood vessels, the muscles, the strength, the bones, everything about the body, longevity improves with exercise. When you talk about getting your heart rate up, how do I think about what that means?
Starting point is 00:07:41 So let's say, I now have this device that says to me, you know, when I'm resting my heart rate is 60 or something. 60 or 70, yeah. What does that mean when you're saying you want to get your heart rate up? A standard, most people will find they're doing some brisk exercise, some you'll get into the realms of getting heart rates above 110, 120. That is definitely changing from a normal resting type activity to a formal exercise kind of zone. And in terms of heart health, are you saying that it's sort of getting to that level is the thing that you are most telling your purchase it wants to do rather than trying to get it to 150 or 160 for some. short period of time. Yeah, I think that when you're getting to 150, 160, that is really starting
Starting point is 00:08:28 to be exercise training. I'm not convinced that we've got great data that that improves the cardiac health more than a more subtle exercise. So if people are starting to go on an exercise program and they're finding it hard to stress themselves and they're saying, well, I'm not getting heart rates of 160, 170. Don't feel disappointed by that. If you're managing to boost your heart rate, above 110, 120 beats minute, that's doing good. That's going the right way for people's health. How much time in the week should be trying to get my heart rate above that 110, 120? Yeah. So different people have different lives and things are tricky, right? I think it's clear that the more time, the better within reason. The standard of a bit of advice would be
Starting point is 00:09:17 if you can get your do about half an hour a day. I think that's probably. probably too much. I think there's good evidence that even if you're doing half an hour a week or two hours a week, for example, to half an hour every couple of days, that is going to be hugely beneficial compared to not doing anything. So more is better, but the most important thing is to be doing some. And once you're doing some, you'll notice the benefits remarkably quickly and being able to keep that as part of your schedule. What about sleep consistency? So I've notice that actually on both these devices that are on my wrist. And as I understand, it's sort of of the measure of how much the time you go to bed or wake up vary. So it's not just how many
Starting point is 00:10:01 hours you sleep for, but I'm guilty of this. Like maybe during the week I might go to bed at one time and then maybe at the weekend I'm going to bed, you know, three hours later. Does this matter? Yeah, the body's own day and night cycle rhythms don't really change on a individual day basis. That's why you get these jet lags. If you're traveling a huge amount, you will be going to sleep at hugely different times. And that's really disruptive for not just the time you sleep, but the quality of sleep, and you can end up having the direct feeling of jet lag. Now, the kind of interesting thing is that that quality of sleep does relate to the heart rate variability.
Starting point is 00:10:44 So getting good quality sleep is like the input, and the heart rate variability is like the output. So if you improve your sleep consistency, you'd hope and probably even expect to see your heart rate variability increases. You spend longer in these restful periods and have benefits from that. Is sleep consistency just getting eight hours sleep? Or is it more than that? Although this may be, again, hugely varying between individuals, eight hours is not going to be the right thing for everyone.
Starting point is 00:11:18 many people will feel great on six and a half hours sleep. But it's really making time. So one isn't chisling away at sleep at both ends. And one isn't having things which will stop one getting a deep night's sleep, getting enough REM sleep, for example. And finally, VO2 max. What is it and does it matter? Okay, so VO2 Max is a measure of the real exercise capacity of the body.
Starting point is 00:11:43 It's a great metric, right? It's a great metric for athletes and for training and it has been useful in certain amounts of clinical health and clinical studies. It's been a useful research measure, hard to actually pin things on. And what one gets from the watches and what one gets from the wearable world, the importance of VO2 max outside of being a measure of exercise training is a bit indeterminate. I think it can be super important in the clinical environment, but even in the clinical world, I think it's been only in the last five to ten years. This is really coming into the fore
Starting point is 00:12:23 as a useful thing that we can make actionable decisions on. As far as the accuracy and the usefulness on the wearables, I think the jury's still out on that, other than as a measure of real exercise training. So if one's using that as a training metric, great. I mean, there's a science behind it, but if one's using that as a, like, how's my general health doing metric, I'm not so sure how we can interpret that at the moment. Final question, should I be comparing myself against others with these metrics, or is this only about, like, my own variation? I mean, one of the most important bits of advice I've ever been given was, don't care
Starting point is 00:13:05 what other people think, right? I guess this is about you, right? This is about making oneself better playing the cards you've already got, right? You're not going to be the same as your mate in the cafe or the pub. Things will be different. So these health metrics shouldn't be a competition between you and the person next door. This is about you making yourself better for your own health and your own longevity and your own feeling of well-being. That's all for this week's recap episode.
Starting point is 00:13:38 If you want to learn 10 science-back tips to improve your health for some of this podcast's most popular episodes, you're in luck. You can download it from zoe.com slash free guide. Or if you're looking for another episode to listen to today, why not try a popular episode of Zoe Science and Nutrition, like what to eat to avoid osteoporosis, how to prevent heart disease, or mushrooms as medicine. Search for them on your favorite podcast player.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.