Ask Dr. Drew - Pfizer Told Scientist To “Deliberately Slow Down” mRNA Testing To Help 2020 Biden Election, Alleges US House Panel w/ Dr. Sabine Hazan & Ian Miller – Ask Dr. Drew – Ep 483
Episode Date: May 23, 2025•• Fresh Pressed Olive Oil, direct from small farms! Try a free $39 bottle for just $1 shipping at https://GetFreshDrDrew.com/ •• The House Judiciary Committee is investigating Pfizer for a...llegedly delaying COVID-19 vaccine testing to influence the 2020 presidential election. A former Pfizer scientist, Philip Dormitzer, reportedly claimed senior officials intentionally slowed clinical trials to avoid impacting the election outcome. Rep. Jim Jordan, committee chair, demanded documents and communications from Pfizer and CEO Albert Bourla, covering interactions with federal agencies like the FDA and CDC from March 2020 onward. Dormitzer later denied the claims, but the probe continues. Dr. Sabine Hazan is a gastroenterologist, researcher, and CEO of Progenabiome. She hosts the podcast Let’s Talk Sh*t and authored Let’s Talk Sh*t: Disease, Digestion and Fecal Transplants. A microbiome expert, she consults and speaks on gut health. More at https://x.com/SabinehazanMD and https://progenabiome.com Ian Miller is a writer for Outkick, focusing on science and sports. He authored Illusion of Control: COVID-19 and the Collapse of Expertise and Unmasked: The Global Failure of COVID Mask Mandates. He runs the Substack UNMASKED, ranked #43 in Health Politics. More at https://x.com/ianmSC 「 SUPPORT OUR SPONSORS 」 Find out more about the brands that make this show possible and get special discounts on Dr. Drew's favorite products at https://drdrew.com/sponsors • ACTIVE SKIN REPAIR - Repair skin faster with more of the molecule your body creates naturally! Hypochlorous (HOCl) is produced by white blood cells to support healing – and no sting. Get 20% off at https://drdrew.com/skinrepair • FATTY15 – The future of essential fatty acids is here! Strengthen your cells against age-related breakdown with Fatty15. Get 15% off a 90-day Starter Kit Subscription at https://drdrew.com/fatty15 • PALEOVALLEY - "Paleovalley has a wide variety of extraordinary products that are both healthful and delicious,” says Dr. Drew. "I am a huge fan of this brand and know you'll love it too!” Get 15% off your first order at https://drdrew.com/paleovalley • THE WELLNESS COMPANY - Counteract harmful spike proteins with TWC's Signature Series Spike Support Formula containing nattokinase and selenium. Learn more about TWC's supplements at https://twc.health/drew 「 MEDICAL NOTE 」 Portions of this program may examine countervailing views on important medical issues. Always consult your physician before making any decisions about your health. 「 ABOUT THE SHOW 」 Ask Dr. Drew is produced by Kaleb Nation (https://kalebnation.com) and Susan Pinsky (https://twitter.com/firstladyoflove). This show is for entertainment and/or informational purposes only, and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Well, great guest today.
By the way, we're back from our vacation.
It was a wonderful trip.
We are jet lagged and almost missed the show today because we don't know what time zone
we're in, but I'm very privileged to have Sabine Hazan here.
She is everything shit.
We're going to talk about, let's talk shit with her book and her podcast.
And we're going to talk about amongst other things,
the fit of bacteria.
And we'll talk a little bit about vaccines and about COVID
and the impact it has had on our microbiome.
Then Ian Miller, writer for OutKick,
focusing on science and sports.
His book is Illusion of Control,
COVID-19 and the Collapse of Expertise and Unmasks,
Unmask the global failure of COVID
mask mandates. We'll get to both of them right after this.
Our laws as it pertains to substances are draconian and bizarre.
A psychopath started this.
He was an alcoholic.
Because of social media and pornography.
PTSD.
Love addiction.
Fentanyl and heroin.
Ridiculous. I'm a doctor for, where the hell you think I learned that?
I'm just saying, you go to treatment
before you kill people.
I am a clinician, I observe things about these chemicals.
Let's just deal with what's real.
We used to get these calls on Loveline all the time.
Educate adolescents and to prevent and to treat.
You have trouble, you can't stop
and you want help stopping, I can help.
I got a lot to say, I got a lot more to say.
I recently learned about a great product line formulated using a novel scientific breakthrough.
It is called Active Skin Repair, and my whole family uses it and loves it, including our
new granddaughter. Actually, her parents were using it for diaper rash and other skin
irritations before we learned about it. It's a baby strength spray made from
naturally occurring molecule called HOCL. The technology was just kind of really
mind-blowing to me on how simple and how effective it was. HOCL is a
non-toxic clinically proven antimicrobial molecule
been used in hospital for a long time.
And it's actually produced by our own immune system.
The applications are numerous.
Wound healing, insect bites, even eczema, rosacea,
other inflammatory skin conditions.
What's really cool about it is, again, no toxic disease.
So you're not using any harsh antiseptics.
It's non-cyto-toxic.
So when you're putting it on, you're killing the bacteria, but you're not hurting any
of those healthy cells that your body's producing to actually help heal itself.
Active skin repair spray also comes in a kid versus an adult version.
Get yours at DrDoo.com slash skin repair for 20% off.
That again is DrDoo.com slash skin repair for a 20% discount.
I'm excited to bring you a new product, a new supplement, fatty.
I take it.
I make Susan take, take my whole family takes it.
This comes out of believe it or not, dolphin research.
The Navy maintains a fleet of dolphins and a brilliant veterinarian recognized that these
dolphins sometimes developed a syndrome identical to our Alzheimer's disease.
Those dolphins were deficient in a particular fatty acid.
She replaced the fatty acid and they didn't get the Alzheimer's.
Humans have the same issue and we are more deficient in this particular fatty acid than
ever before.
In a simple replacement of this fatty acid called C15 will help us prevent these syndromes. It's published
in a recent journal called Metabolites. It's a new nutritional C15, pentadecanoic
acid it's called. The deficiency that we are developing for C15 creates something
called the cellular fragility syndrome. This is the first nutritional deficiency
syndrome to be discovered in 75 years
and may be affecting us in many ways
and as many as one in three of us.
This is an important breakthrough.
Take advantage of it.
Go to fatty15.com slash Dr. Drew to receive 15% off
a 90 day starter kit subscription
or use code Dr. Drew at checkout for that 15% off
or just go to our website, drdew.com slash fatty 15.
All right, Sabine Hazan, somebody I wanted to speak to
on this program for a while.
She's a gastroenterologist, researcher, CEO of Progene,
Progene a Biome, I think that's right.
So let's bring Sabine in here right now.
Sabine, welcome, good to see you again.
Thank you, thank you, thank you for having me.
So I want to get the name of your company, correct,
is Progena Biome?
Progena Biome, because it's from your genes to your biome.
Progena.
So tell us what it does, what the company's about.
So we're a research genetic sequencing lab.
As you know, during the pandemic,
we kind of made our debut by finding COVID in the stools.
And then from there, we isolated a bacteria
that we believe protects you from COVID or viruses.
And then from there discovered kind of the microbiome.
So that's the purpose of the company
is really to research the microbiome and disease.
And we have 61 clinical trials going on research the microbiome and disease. And we have 61 clinical trials going on
on the microbiome and disease right now.
So, well, let me understand this.
So the microbiome followed the company,
you didn't found the company
because you were already interested in that material.
No, I started the company a couple of years prior
because I was interested in the microbiome.
I was seeing something when I was doing fecal transplant, the process of taking stools from
healthy donors and putting it into unhealthy with C. diff.
And what happened was I was really interested in, you know, I had a case of a patient with
Alzheimer's who improved after fecal transplant or intestinal microbiota transplant.
And I said, what happened there?
What microbe causes Alzheimer's or what group of microbes or what signature microbiome is
involved in Alzheimer's?
So rather than just bringing a stool product to market and a pharma product, I was more
interested into the microbe itself, the relationship of microbes
and how does disease occur?
We all know disease begins in the gut,
but I just didn't know how and why
and which microbes are involved.
So I founded Progenobion with that.
Well, but I want to even step back a little bit from that
and say, you know, you may have known
that the microbiome
was instrumental, but it's not something
that is axiomatically accepted by everybody in medicine.
Correct.
I knew because I saw something changed with C. diff, right?
A patient, it was a first,
my first case was a doctor actually that was dying.
And I was the girl that was doing clinical trials for C. diff.
So when the clinical trial didn't work and the pharmaceutical product in trial, first
of all, vancomycin, flat drill didn't work and then I went to clinical trial route.
When the clinical trial route didn't work, I was kind of, I'm not going to let this guy
die.
So let me try fecal transplant.
Everybody's talking about it.
And when I saw the colon completely, you know, with ulcerations and mucus and everything,
and then two weeks later, the colon is, the colonic mucosa is completely normal.
I said, what did that?
How did that happen?
Right?
And so that's basically what got me into asking the question.
How did poop change a colon that has a bunch of ulcers
to a normal colonic mucosa?
And you've been very focused specifically
on the Bifidobacteria.
Well, I wasn't focused on the Bifidobacteria
until COVID really.
Initially, what I saw with C. diff
and what was a progression of the research essentially was,
yeah.
We should probably tell people what C. difficile is
and pseudo members colitis
and step back and tell them that.
So C. diff is a condition that people have
that they come to the doctor with recurring diarrhea,
chronic diarrhea it seems. And if you take the history, they've taken the doctor with recurring diarrhea, chronic diarrhea, it seems.
And if you take the history, they've
taken some antibiotics in the past,
have gone to the dentist, and then all of a sudden
they get diarrhea that nobody can fix.
And so C. diff, essentially, the way that we treat C. diff
is either antibiotics like flagellum, vancomycin.
And when that doesn't happen, we go into clinical trials.
When those didn't work,
we would put stools of a healthy donor in the colon,
precisely in the cecum of a person, to fix the problem.
What we realized is that, especially when we started,
when we opened Progena Biome,
was really that the microbiome was removed.
The diversity, these patients lost their diversity.
That's why they were having recurrent episodes of C. diff.
So what we were doing was we were giving vancomycin, killing diversity around the C. diff,
but we were missing C. diff.
And then we kept killing with another antibiotic
So it's like having a mosquito in your house and you're taking a machete and you're trying to kill it
But you missed a mosquito, but you've destroyed your house. So that's essentially what we were doing
20 years ago and 15 years ago and
What fecal transplant does is it takes all the stools from the healthy donor, puts it back into the colon,
so you're essentially re-giving a diversity to suppress the clostridium difficile.
And that was the big discovery prior to COVID.
When COVID came on, I figured, well, I've done clinical trials for pharma.
I have a genetic sequencing lab that's looking at the microbiome.
We know that, you know, at least I knew
that to fight a virus, you need strong microbes.
And actually I wrote the book,
Let's Talk Shit in there.
There's a mention of bifidobacteria,
but it was kind of a hypothesis.
It was something that I read in different papers,
but it wasn't really concrete until
COVID.
And what happened was when we found COVID in the stools, we decided to look at the microbiome.
And that's when we noticed that every single patient that had severe COVID was lacking
this bacteria, bifidobacteria.
And bifidobacteria is found in newborns and it's absent in old people.
And so does the discovery of Bifidobacteria, the implications of Bifidobacteria, its functions.
And here we are today with my whole, you know, slogan, which is save the BIF,
because I'm realizing we're killing more microbes than we can do, you know, so it's crazy.
realizing we're killing more microbes than we can do, so it's crazy.
So how do you know it's not a secondary phenomenon
that the bifidobacteria is not dropping out
because somebody's sick?
Oh, absolutely.
So you don't, and that's the,
you don't know whether the C. diff, I'm sorry,
you don't know whether the loss of bifidobacteria happened
because they were sick, they took antibiotics, they got COVID, they got a virus, or the virus created the loss of bifidobacteria,
or the person is so stressed about having the virus that the increased acidity in the
stomach and the whole digestive tract is all in disarray, which creates the loss of bifidobacteria. So yeah, there's, you know, it's, you know, in medicine,
it's never a one thing and we're not sure of anything,
really it's all hypothetical.
Right.
Do you have a potential mechanism in mind?
And if you have any evidence for that?
Yeah, so I'm coming out with a case report
and that's really my case report during the pandemic
because I was the guinea pig.
And so I kind of followed myself through the pandemic.
And what I think happens is that you end up with a loss
of bifidobacteria either because you killed it.
So I killed my bifidobacteria during the pandemic.
And what I noticed was a, what I call a bifidobacteria
bacteroides gap, essentially essentially and I feel that the virus
penetrates when that gap, you know, what we call leaky gut is not really defined and it's really
because the microbiome kind of opens up. You've got a loss of bifidobacteria, you've got high
bacteroides which we've come to realize is linked with anxiety. So you know when you
see that and you see the signature microbiome and of course there's other microbes that
are disappearing, the virus penetrates and I'm going to be showing that in my own case
where you know I've seen you know viruses come in and viruses go and being symptomatic, not being symptomatic
and what it all does.
So that's coming, you know, in the future as a case.
So you mentioned the leaky gut syndrome
that's a hot topic in many of the sort of health maintenance
wellness fields.
How do we understand that now?
And I, you know, it's, I always,
you've already alluded to And I, you know, it's, I always,
you've already alluded to this,
that, you know, just so narrative,
just so explanations are never just so in biology,
in human biology.
It's always much more complicated.
So what do you make of all that?
Well, the first thing is when I stepped into the microbiome,
I realized, wow, there's so many discrepancies, right?
So many labs out there, so much non-validation,
so much non-reproducibility, right?
So the first thing I did was analyze my stools with different labs,
and I got different results.
Even the same stool sample, different results.
So I said, well, how can I understand the microbiome
before and after fecal transplant when I improve a disease
if I can't even have the same lab validated,
verified, and reproducible?
And so I created progenobiome really with that interest.
I told my genetic sequencing,
my scientist was behind the bracket gene,
and I said to him, I said,
I want an assay that is valid,
verified and reproducible.
So if I test myself today, tomorrow, and I don't change anything, it's still Sabine-Hazen.
I'm going to be able to recognize my signature microbiome.
So that was the first thing was developing that assay.
Once we developed that assay, it became complex because we started to realize, wait a minute,
there's no normals.
Everybody's different.
So how do you compare?
How do I compare me to you?
For example, you just came back from New York.
I just came back from Austin.
I ate Mexican food.
You ate like whatever.
And so, you know, our microbiomes are probably very different and yet we feel like we're
normal.
Right?
So how is there a normal, how do you capture that microbiome
that you're not really looking at the food that you ate last night, right?
So that was another challenge.
The third challenge was how do you capture all that data in a bioinformatics pipeline?
Because even the bioinformatics pipeline were flawed. And you would send the result, the sequences
to one pipeline and you would get again different results.
So it really is a methodical analysis of the microbiome.
It's really precise.
It's really, you have to normalize these samples
up to a certain level and you have to really do the clinical, right?
So in other words, well, what did I eat?
What did I take?
Did I take antibiotics?
Was I on medications?
And then you compare it to families
and then you say, okay, well,
let me see what the family looks like.
Oh, the family seems to have these microbes
and your kid is lacking these microbes that you all have in the family seems to have these microbes, and your kid is lacking
these microbes that you all have in the family. What happened? Why is the kid autistic and
lacking these microbes, for example, right? So that that was really, you know, the whole
point of progena biome was really to validate to use my experience having done clinical
trials for pharmaceutical companies to now bring
pharmaceutical companies to say, listen, you guys have been, you know, putting one product
after another, but we're never reaching a cure.
Can we be a little bit more precise?
Can we see what these drugs are doing?
Can we see what, you know, the vaccine's doing?
Can we see what antibiotics are doing? Could we see maybe one antibiotic improves
by a few bacteria, maybe another doesn't?
What does Tamiflu do?
What does Repdesivir do to the microbiome?
So this is basically the path that I want to get us into
to develop these markers and to say,
look, this is what autoimmune process looks like.
This is what leaky gut looks like.
So if you look at the data and to get back to your question on leaky gut, it's exactly
we don't you wouldn't know from the literature because unfortunately 90% of the literature
out there and I read it all day long, it's flawed.
I can't reproduce it.
If I can't reproduce it, it's not valid.
So if somebody writes a paper on,
well, this microbe is Parkinson's,
and I'm looking at my 50 patients that I've analyzed
that have Parkinson's, and I don't find this microbe,
we have a problem.
Yes. So what is the average person,
let's back up to sort of a hilltop view,
what does the average person need to understand about this
or perhaps do both in terms of healthy people?
And I know a lot of people are worried about post-vax,
post-COVID, those sorts of syndromes.
Well, the first thing I would say is calm down, de-stress.
We don't have all the data right now.
There's hope in the horizon.
However, beware, and you know, Scott Jackson
at the National Institute of Standard,
who's going to be hopefully working with me in the future,
you know, says a beautiful sentence,
which is customer beware.
And I think the customer needs to beware that these stool samples that they're doing out
there are just not there yet.
And here's the other problem when you see Bacteroides vulgatus, what does that mean?
Don't panic and think you need to kill things.
You know, I see so many things on social media and influencers that are saying, kill the
parasites, kill the parasites.
I'm a gastroenterologist.
I look for parasites all day long.
If I don't see a parasite, I'm not going to give a patient a cleanse because here's the
thing the cleanse will kill the parasite that you may have, but it will kill your microbiome
as well.
And good luck bringing back your microbiome
when you don't even know what it looks like or what it looked like, right? Because it's
like a broken glass that you have no idea what it looked like. You're trying to rebuild
it. So beware. And you know, there is research. We're coming out with a lot of exciting things,
a lot of exciting therapeutics in the microbiome space with autism, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's hopefully.
But in the meantime, calm down, make sure you're taking good vitamins, you're going
into the sun, you're hiking, you're eating real food, you're making sure you know where
your food's coming from, your farm, your beef.
I like regenerative beef myself, et cetera.
If you're vegan and vegan does great for your gut, stick to it.
If you're vegetarian and vegetarian is great for your gut, stick to it.
If you're carnivore, stick to it.
I think the thing that we're noticing about the microbiome is we're all different and
we all have different diet needs.
You know, I'm from, you know, I was born in Morocco, but I have like, you know, Greek ancestry,
Italian. So my diet is more Italian Mediterranean food. The person that's from China probably needs
to like look back at where his ancestors were. Go back to the diet that's comfortable from your
ancestors that you feel
you know doesn't cause you any problems. The moment you start having bloating, gas, you
know that doesn't agree with your gut. So pay attention to that.
Drew, that means you can have chicken soup. That's about it. So, Caleb, why don't you
jump?
Well, you could have probably bagel and lox too, right?
Yes, he could.
It's actually true.
He could.
No chives.
But it's my brush border seems to have difficulty
with alliums now.
It's something's gotten way worse as I've aged,
which is interesting.
So what we're noticing is the loss of microbes
that cause the allergies.
It's the loss of microbes that possibly could,
and I'm going to say possibly because you know,
in medicine you can never say that causes
then everybody's going to shoot at me.
But I think possibly Celiac Spru is a loss of microbes.
Allergies is loss of microbes.
I think all of it really begins in the gut.
And I've seen the Parkinson's data, it's rather impressive.
I don't know if I was reading your studies or something,
I read a couple of papers and they looked really,
really very, it's sort of, and reproducible
because it was more than one study.
But Caleb, you wanted to ask a question
about Crohn's disease because you have
a personal experience with that.
Hi, Dr. Hazan. So I actually, I have Crohn's disease because you have a personal experience with that. Hi, Dr. Hazan.
So I actually, I have Crohn's disease
and it was pretty severe.
I had to go into the hospital.
It was like a whole year long thing
right around the pandemic time where it flared up.
Had to get the surgeries and I'm on Sky Rizzi now,
which is probably like the fourth or fifth medication
I've been on in the past 15 years.
But I've been seeing stuff, especially from you,
that was reposted by a research group
that's looking into something called a MAP vaccine
for Crohn's disease, which I think was Dr. Herman Taylor,
I believe, before he passed away,
his daughter's picking it up.
So are you seeing any sort of signs there
that there might potentially be a cure for Crohn's disease
at some point by researching that bacteria?
And let me pile on, you know, Caleb had a so as abscess.
He had all kinds of horrible complications.
Worst.
Yeah.
He really went through it, but go ahead, Esabe.
So I think because I'm doing, I've done clinical trials
and I've done all these clinical trials for pharma
on biologics and actually I did the study on MAP,
which was a quad therapy, quadruple therapy of antibiotics,
hitting really mycobacteria perituberculosis.
So what we discovered with Crohn's disease was that,
or what I discovered, it's not published yet
because it was a small study
as I was doing the clinical trial,
is that there possibly could be one third of people
that have mycobacteria perituberculosis,
one third of people may have a genetic problem,
and one third of people may have a gut dysbiosis.
My own data actually showed
that it was a loss of bifidobacteria in new,
so if you look at all the new onset,
naive, non-treated Crohn's patients,
you'll notice they have zero bifidobacteria.
So when you go to that route and you fix early the loss of bifidobacteria, you may have a
chance at restoring it.
One of the things that I noticed with bovine immunoglobulins, you know, is that, which
is the blood of the cow that's spun around the clear clear stuff is that it actually increases the bifida bacteria
So if we're lucky in the young people
Those people if you catch them early and you give them bovine you may resolve them
I have one case that I published was a young man who was
Started on numera the mom didn't want him to be on numera
We put him on bovine and right away he went into remission and I've not seen him in five years and you could see his dysbiosis
He had a lot of bacteria zero bifidobacteria as we gave him the bovine the bifidobacteria went up the
Bacterioles went down this kid has not seen me and in fact the father
You know who owned a coffee company, talked about it
on a show one day about that case. But we published that case. You know, the other thing
that we're starting to see is really that correction of bifidobacteria can help these
folks. Now, there's a population that you cannot get them, that even if you change the
diet, you change everything, they need to be on biologics.
And then there's a population that the biologics are not working.
So you know there's no genetic component.
And those are the people that fit very well with MAP because you have to like ask yourself,
did those people have, you know, did they eat beef from a cow that had mycobacteria peritroborulosa?
So mycobacteria peritroborulosa is is very similar
It causes in cows a disease called Yoni's disease
Which is very similar to Crohn's disease and you see these cows they're wasted and they're having diarrhea and basically if you're
Unfortunate to have you know
And basically, if you're unfortunate to have, you know, eaten the meat from that cow, then you may end up having that problem.
So is a vaccine the answer?
Maybe.
But I tend to think that we really need to be more precise.
And I think that's what the microbiome is going to help us.
Because what it seems like you're saying is,
so at the beginning, it seemed like you divided people amongst three different groups.
And so some people that might be in my group,
I may be almost like too far gone in a way where it's like, well, for me to just keep living and just be able to
eat food, then I might need biologics.
But I'm also thinking, I've read that it also might be something that's genetic that I might be passing down to my kids.
And so what should I be doing with the, what is it, bifidobacteria?
What was that you mentioned?
I forgot the name.
So bifidobacteria is the bacteria,
but there is a genetic component to Crohn's disease, right?
That's where the biologics are going after.
One important thing about that clinical talk.
Yeah.
Well, yeah, well, my question is,
is that, so what could I be doing with what you mentioned, and what should I be doing for my children in advance?
They haven't shown signs of it.
You want to protect your kids against developing Crohn's.
Right, exactly.
If it is genetic, what can I do for their gut bacteria so they don't have to go onto
these biologics one day?
So you could test, you could join a clinical trial.
We have a lot of clinical trials where you could join.
We have one on Crohn's disease.
We can test your kids and we can kind of tell you, look, that we're seeing no bifidobacteria
and that could help your kids with that. The second thing you could do is you could do
genetic testing, obviously, to see. But here's the thing, the majority of people with Crohn's
disease that we see in our offices do not necessarily
transfer to their kids.
You know, the majority.
Yes.
So and I'll tell you that clinical trial that I did, you know, they came to me to enter
a trial where they got quadruple therapy, right?
What I realized after the fact was that, you know, one third responded
and that's how it came out that, oh, well, maybe one third has MAP, right? Because it's
very difficult to isolate mycobacterial peritroberculosis. And then what happened is the other one third
went into having biologics and they were fine on biologics. And then one third ended up
developing C. diff. And that's how we discovered because they were fine on biologics. And then one third ended up developing C. diff.
And that's how we, because they were taking antibiotics.
And so they were on quadruple antibiotic for a long time.
So those patients is who we did fecal transplant on.
And out of that population, you know, some resolved
and some didn't resolve.
So then you have to kind of look at why did some resolve?
Was it, did I use the right donor?
It happened that, you know, one, if I recall,
was on a lot, was taking a lot of nutraceuticals
that were the equivalent of antibiotics.
You know, there's so many nutraceuticals out there
that are killing the gut.
And so no matter how much I was giving him a new microbiome of his daughter, he was not
resolving the problem.
But another one I treated with a brother, and those are the two cases that come up in
my mind, did great and resolved Crohn's disease.
So that's how you kind of differentiate.
Right, right. And sorry, Drew, I'm taking over your show right now, but she's an expert literally in and resolved Crohn's disease. So that's how you kind of differentiate.
Right, right.
And sorry, Drew, I'm taking over your show right now,
but she's an expert literally in what I have.
So this is very interesting to me.
I know, I want to put you together with her sooner now.
I don't want to step back.
I'm happy to ask you still.
They're going to get Ian in here in just a second.
I'll do it.
Take my poop.
A phrase that not many people can say that phrase
and mean it.
But before I let you go Sabine, I want to step back a little bit and move away from micro bacteria rather from gut microbiome for a second and talk about what has happened to the
medical literature and the editorial process of medical literature.
I know you were under attack during COVID
and we've seen now things like this guy
from Pfizer Speaker Bureau who pled guilty
to dozens of research studies that were faulty or fraudulent.
This stuff is moving where we're starting to see
and I don't know if you saw the opening video,
those of you who are watching before the show started,
again, it was Joseph Freiman talking about
how inappropriate the way we do medical research
and publication, and particularly FDA approval process,
has been.
What are your thoughts on that before I let you go?
Absolutely true.
I mean, there's so much corruption.
Look, the company, company the scientist and the investors
And investors retracted by hypothesis, you know
so when does when in medicine does a
Investor of a of a product get to have any say in what paper gets to stay or gets retracted
Right never and when does a PhD scientist?
Go to the editor and say we tracked this paper, we found all these problems. Never. It should be my peers. So
when my peers who spent their time and basically said, you know, this paper is great. We've
looked at everything, put it to publication. and then they go over those peers that are not
paid by the way.
None of my colleagues that do peer review are paid.
Then you have to say what's going on?
Who's paying these people to retract?
There's so much corruption.
Listen, I'm going to just tell you one thing.
At the beginning of the pandemic, nobody paid attention, but because I've done clinical
trials, I paid attention. There was an ad from Madonna naked
April 4th 2020. Madonna has donated one million dollars to the Bill Gates Foundation for the
vaccine. That's already telling people branding people with the vaccine and then you have an
article on the Economist with Bill Gates talking about the future of vaccines.
April 26th, that should never happen.
The vaccines were not even in,
never didn't even go through the IRB.
Every ad, everything you do in clinical trials,
you have to get IRB approval.
So the IRB hadn't even looked at the protocol and they're already branding
you and influencing the customer or the consumer or the patient with vaccines.
That should have never happened.
And so yes, what I saw with Pfizer, I mean, listen, Pfizer's had fines,
GSK's had fines, you know, this is how they get caught.
They get caught because they do stupid things like that.
That is trying to push a product to market and they ignored the ICHGCP
guidelines, which clearly states you cannot advertise unless you have IRB
approval, you have to have informed consent.
Informed consent wasn't processed during the pandemic.
Kids were getting vaccinated at CVS.
Still.
Yeah.
But before even, before the clinical trials were for kids,
kids were getting vaccinated at CVS.
I know I saw it in Malibu, the kids were lining up.
So nobody gave informed consent to these kids.
Nobody told these kids, listen,
there's no clinical trials on that.
Yeah.
To anybody.
There's no informed consent to anybody.
It was just, there was no risk or work consideration.
Francis Collins said it himself out loud.
One of my friends had a pulmonary emboli,
she's a photographer,
and had a pulmonary emboli shortly after the vaccine.
And basically, you know, I said to her,
I go, well, what are you taking? She goes, you know, I said to her, I go,
well, what are you taking? She goes, I was on the birth control pill.
I go, didn't anybody tell you that you could have a coagulopathy and the vaccines
could cause coagulopathy? No informed consent, no history.
It's just line up shot. And that was ridiculous.
So there is corruption and I hope this administration is gonna get a handle of that
I hope they bring back science where we can publish again. I'm telling you I'm gun-shy in publishing
You know, I have amazing data on autism. I'm gun-shy. I know I'm gonna get retracted or there's gonna be problems and emails
so
You know there's night now
there's a group of doctors that call themselves the science guardian and they're going after the people
that are retracting and they're looking at all this.
So we've assembled and here's the other thing, Drew,
and I know you know this,
the problem is doctors don't unite.
Doctors need to come together and talk and say,
let's come to the tables.
You have, and we have to, the pandemic taught us that, that we need to come to
the table and look at both sides of the narrative.
I could be right.
I could be wrong, but we need to talk about it and not say, oh, this person is
full of it.
And this person's that, by the way, that's why I wrote the book.
Let's talk shit.
I said, maybe they'll think I'm full of it
or maybe I'll know it, right?
But let's talk about it.
So that's it.
Yeah, I'd rather even avoid the word narrative
and just say evidence, that's all.
What's the evidence?
What's the theory?
What's the hypothesis?
And be very specific about how we talk about
the materials we review.
Samina, I appreciate it.
Go ahead, finish your thought.
Yeah, no, show me the data.
One of my professors used to say, show me the data.
Exactly.
Yeah, that's it.
I used to, and I used to yell at my residents all the time,
just show me the publications too.
Show me the data.
Just give them to me.
Show me the publications.
I'll look at them and I'll tell you whether they're relevant
to the decision you made.
Of course, now I think to myself,
oh, I don't know, maybe there's some alternative opinions
out there that I'm not seeing
because it's being repressed by the editorial process.
But hopefully, as you said, we can get our handle on that.
Sabine, I appreciate you being here.
I look forward to this conversation for a long time.
You can follow Sabine on X.
Sabine, S-A-B-I-N-E, Hazan, H-A-Z-A-N-M-D, Sabine, Hazan, M-Z-M-D,
all strung together.
And Progenobion, P-R-O-G-E-N-A-B-I-O-M-E,
progenobion.com.
Sabine, hope to talk to you again soon.
Appreciate you being here.
Yes, thank you so much.
Thank you for your research and work.
Now, speaking of, one of the reasons I wanted
to have Sabina here first
is my next guest is talking about expertise
and how it has been so severely undermined.
So we're sort of setting you up for that conversation.
It is Ian Miller.
He is a writer for Outkick.
He focuses on science.
He's authored Illusion of Control COVID-19
and the Collapse of Expertise
and Unmasked the Global failure of COVID mask mandates.
He's speaking our language.
You can follow Ian on ianmsc.substack.com
and also i-
Ian, I-A-N-M-S-C on X.
We'll get Ian in here right after this.
Wellness company knows that taking charge of your family's health care is a top priority and being rationally ready, who knows what the future will hold for us.
Now TWC has a service to cover your family's medical needs, including and especially prevention.
For just $100 a month, the One Wellness Elite membership includes two free medical grade
nutraceuticals per month, free prescriptions for over 800 of the most common medications,
access to concierge telemedicine, available at a moment's notice, and a 15% discount on all
supplements and the emergency kits. 15% off the emergency kits. That's quite a saving.
So if you're spending a hundred dollars or more
on supplements and meds every month,
this plan will already save you money.
If you sign up for a year, you'll save $200.
And when you use the link, drdrew.com slash TWC,
you'll get 10% off the first payment
to the One Wellness Elite membership.
Check out One Wellness at drdew.com slash TWC
and get 10% off your first payment.
Drdew.com slash TWC, it's all there.
Well, you've heard me praise
Paleo Valley's grass-fed finished beef bone broth
and the delicious meat sticks.
I now want to turn it over to Paleo Valley founder
and CEO, Autumn Smith,
to tell you about her company's food philosophy.
I'm here to help create the products that make healthy food convenient in our modern
world.
The diet and the food you're consuming is absolutely related to your digestive health,
to your mental health, to every aspect of your health.
The devil's in the details here.
And not only do we have to attend to every single ingredient, we have to support a system
with whole foods. And so when we source a product, it's going to be organic,, we have to support a system with whole foods.
And so when we source a product, it's going to be organic,
it's going to be tested for pesticides,
and then it's going to be grass-fed and finished,
or pasture-raised.
It's going to be raised on regenerative American farms.
The protein sticks that come in eight varieties
are likewise impeccably sourced and prepared.
And the fermentation process came about
because there was an ingredient that I didn't like
in meat sticks that's pretty widespread.
It's called encapsulated citric acid.
And it's derived from GMOs and then hydrogenated oil
and it just melts into the beef stick.
And you don't have to label it.
That's the thing, you can label it citric acid.
Make 20, 25 a year to cut out the chemicals
and feed yourself correctly.
Go to DrDew.com slash Paleo Valley for 15% off your first order, 20% off when you subscribe.
That is DrDrew.com slash Paleo Valley.
That's Dr. Drew.
I have no idea who Dr. Drew is.
He's been watching a lot of Dr. Drew lately.
Dr. Drew.
And before I tell you about our fresh pressed olive oil,
I want to remind you that Susan and I were so happy
to have packed our Paleo Valley trips
for the trip to Europe, especially,
we forgot to bring our chocolate bone broth,
the protein powder that I love so much
and I work with, I eat on a daily basis,
but I have the super food bars
which are made with the Paleo Valley's
grass-fed finished beef bone broth.
That's the core sort of ingredient in the superfood bars which are made with the Paleo Valley's grass-fed finished beef bone broth. That's the core ingredient in the superfood bar.
We love the lemon meringue,
which is dense in multiple, multiple nutrients.
We also had a supply of protein sticks, of course.
We had a dog at the airport.
We almost didn't get through the agricultural check
because the dog noticed our beef sticks through.
It was closed beef stick in a luggage,
and we had to pull it all out.
Yeah, Lucky, the dog named Lucky.
Of course, those are made with non-GMO,
high in protein, also low in calories.
And we love our partners at Paylor Valley.
You can go to dr.com slash Paylor Valley
for 15% off your first order, 20% off when you subscribe.
Now I want to tell you about fresh pressed olive oil.
We've been thinking a lot about olive oil
because we were in Italy and I'm eating healthy, of course.
I love good olive oil, especially Susan.
You see Susan keeps walking past the screen here.
And fresh, of course, olive oil packed to most flavor
and it's the healthiest in nutrients
when it's fresh from the farm.
Then that's the problem with supermarket olive oils,
they get old, they're not fresh,
they can sit on the shelf for many months,
they can literally get stale.
So I get olive oil direct from small award-winning farms
thanks to a fellow named TJ Robinson,
who is also known as the olive oil hunter.
And believe me, it makes a big difference what you get.
When I tasted TJ's farm fresh olive oils,
I fell in love with their products,
their vibrant grassy flavors,
they're incredibly delicious, salad, veggies,
I use a lot of olive oil, bread even,
we're using a lot of that, we're in Italy.
And as an introduction to his Fresh Pressed Olive Oil Club,
TJ will send you a full-size $39 bottle
of one of the world's finest artisan olive oils,
fresh from a new harvest, for just $1,
that is to help him cover the shipping costs.
No commitment to buy anything else then or ever.
You get your free $39 bottle for just $1 shipping
and test the, and you'll get to taste
the difference freshness makes.
Go to GetFreshDrDrew, GetFreshDrDrew.com.
That is GetFreshDrDrew.com for a free bottle.
Just pay that $1 shipping and GetFresh drdrew.com is where you get it.
All right, my next guest is Ian Miller.
Again, he's from Outkick, he's a writer,
and he has been writing about a lot of the things
we've been talking about on this show.
Please welcome Ian to the program.
Ian, appreciate you being here.
Thanks so much for having me,
really appreciate you having me on.
So I'm guessing as you came to this topic,
a lot of what was happening surprised you.
I mean, for those of us that are in medicine and in science,
it was just shocking and devastating,
but I bet to someone who's sort of coming,
I think you sort of came at this for the first time,
it must have been bewildering.
Absolutely.
I think one of the biggest things that I learned
because I came in this really from a data perspective
and got really interested in seeing how the data
was panning out with all the restrictions and mandates
that we were trying with COVID
was how little evidence-based practice there is
in so many of medicine in a lot of these fields
and public health that they were making decisions
seemingly without a lot of evidence or data or facts to back it up.
It was just kind of seem that out of a panic and fear
and wanting to try something to see if it works,
but you can't do that when you're playing with people's lives
as we were during COVID.
And so it really was shocking to see how little backing
they had for decisions they were making.
Yeah, no, there was no evidence.
These were ideas that were made up on the fly,
like six feet distancing and all this bullshit.
It was completely out of the blue.
But it's one thing for them to say,
well, we're going to try these things
and we have some hunch that maybe they're going to work.
But to not contemplate the risk reward of what you're doing.
And as I said to Sabine a few minutes ago, Francis Collins has said this out loud. Do not contemplate the risk reward of what you're doing.
And as I said to Sabine a few minutes ago, Francis Collins has said this out loud.
They made no consideration for the adverse impact
of what they might've done.
And I've said this as long as I've been doing this show now.
When I had residents that would, I'd ask them,
what's their justification
for any particular intervention they did.
And if they say to me, well, I had to do something,
I would crucify them.
Because that's how you harm people.
You only harm when you don't have evidence
or you don't understand what you're doing.
And that is what the entire world did.
Were you astonished as I was
that the whole world followed on our shitty ideas?
Yeah, obviously the one kind of exception to that
was Sweden.
And if you notice initially,
I started talking about Sweden a lot.
And then it became clear that Sweden was doing much better
than the rest of Europe,
much better than we were,
despite not having mask mandates,
despite not doing lockdowns,
keeping schools open on and on.
They just kind of stopped talking about it,
stopped mentioning it because it was showing
how little evidence they had
to support what they were saying.
It was the kind of precautionary principle run wild but in
the wrong direction. As you mentioned like they've never gave consideration to
the trade-offs of what they were doing. That's medicine 101 and there you know
nothing you do, no lever you pull doesn't also have another reaction to it and
ignoring that as we are now seeing an incredible amount of harm.
I understand also Bulgaria I guess had a very low vaccine update and guess what?
All cause mortality is down there
relative to everybody else.
Is that a smoking gun?
I don't know.
We've got to ask the questions.
How about the fact that no one was allowed to ask,
no one was allowed to engage
in the usual back and forth discourse
that is associated with the scientific process?
It's still going on, is it not?
Absolutely, and that's the other part of it too, is that they specifically wanted people
that disagree with them to be censored,
acting as if it was dangerous to say,
there could be another way to do this.
We might not be handling this correctly.
And I mean, we've seen the emails
with Francis Collins and Fauci saying
that we need a swift takedown
of the Great Barrington Declaration.
Devastating takedown of the Great Barrington Declaration.
Which is published by her.
Devastating takedown.
Yeah, devastating.
Yeah, devastating too.
Jay Bhattacharya, who's now the head of the NIH,
which is just poetic.
It's Shakespearean, but okay.
But what do you imagine, as you kind of look at this
and sort of wrote about it
and tried to document what happened,
what is your sort of perception of what happened? If you were going to sort of
tell someone the history of 2020, what happened? That's a great question. I think I would say that
we had a group of very egotistical controlled or minded experts quote unquote and politicians that
panicked, they bought into fear, they did not listen
to evidence that contradicted their viewpoints.
And once it became obvious that what they were trying wasn't working throughout the
early middle part of 2020, instead of learning from that, admitting they were wrong, changing
course, they doubled down and made things 10 times worse.
So it was, I would say it's just a complete waterfall effect of bad ideas leading to bad outcomes
and then having people that were too caught up
in their own egomaniacal controlled paranoia
that they weren't willing to alter course.
Yeah, it was weird that they were so paranoid
and that they were so totalitarian in their instincts.
That was again, shocking.
But when you think about someone like Gavin Newsom
who was locking beaches down and filling,
any outdoor activities were being essentially,
literally constructed over.
They put sand over the skateboarding pits and things.
His panic and fear seemed not to have been that great.
He went out with dozens of friends to the French laundry in a closed space. His panic and fear seemed not to have been that great.
He went out with dozens of friends to the French laundry
in a closed space.
He doesn't wear a mask at the SoFi Stadium
during the Super Bowl.
He didn't actually personally seem frightened.
He seemed, humbly, to be just doing the opposite
of what other President Trump was suggesting at the time.
So was there anything of that going on as well?
Some were panicked, I agree with you.
I think he was also fighting with Florida.
I remember they were saying, you know,
why is everything good in Florida?
But again, if something,
if DeSantis said something, do the opposite.
But was there something weird like that going on as well?
Oh, absolutely.
The hypocrisy, I think, is another really important story that's kind
of just been forgotten. I mean, you brought me some of the great example. There was in
the UK, their health minister was having an affair during lockdown and leaving lockdown
to go see his mistress. And we had, I mean, so many examples, Stacey Abrams, when she
went to go visit that school and she was not wearing a mask and all the kids were forced
into masks and a school little kid. And I mean, Nancy Pelosi getting her hair done.
I mean, there's just a limitless amount of examples of this hypocrisy.
With no kind of acknowledgement and the biggest, one of the biggest problems I had was with
the media is pointing out, well, if they're not that scared, why should we be?
Instead, they were, you know, they would just kind of move on or ignore it because they
have the same party or whatever they believed in the greater good.
But it was really frustrating to see how little
they actually wanted to follow their own mandates
and how they impacted our lives.
And they weren't willing to do it themselves.
They weren't willing to have any impact on their lives.
Right.
The one thing that sort of,
I walked away from all this experience
was this notion that I have now
that when alternative ideas are being actively repressed,
like really people are being harmed for having an opinion,
that's a Psi-op essentially, is it not?
Yeah, I agree.
I think it is one of the,
I mean, among the many, many inexcusable things
that happened during COVID,
I think the movement towards,
well, you can't have an idea because it can make people unsafe. That's a dangerous concept. One of the, I mean, among the many, many inexcusable things that happened during COVID, I think the movement towards,
well, you can't have an idea
because it can make people unsafe.
That's a dangerous concept.
I mean, ideas do not make people unsafe
and conversations about making people unsafe,
especially when you're talking about the harms
that were caused by the policy that they were enacting.
I mean, lockdowns were not harmless policies.
School closures are not harmless policies.
Mass mandates were not harmless policies.
Obviously, vaccine mandates and passports.
So yeah, you have to be able to have this conversation.
So many people with school closures
and mandate harmed so many people.
Do you have a theory in studying what's happened here?
Do you have a theory about what happened
to the whole public health
sort of project of public health. It feels like it's became adulterated
or sort of distorted in some way
that I worry it can't come back from.
I have those exact same concerns
and from speaking to people that worked in there
in public health at a very high level
throughout the pandemic and starting in 2020,
it's a lot of groups think, you know,
they don't really listen to outside opinions.
They get very caught up in what their circle of people think.
And obviously it's a very kind of left-leaning profession
that didn't like Donald Trump and kind of took the position
that whatever Donald Trump said or did or thought
was gonna, they were gonna take the opposite position.
Even when he said things that were obviously right,
like opening schools.
So it's very, I think it's a really disheartening thing
that we can't trust them
because they're not willing to be honest with us.
I don't know.
I just think there's something wrong with,
there's some principle, in principle,
there's something wrong with how they're approaching
their work.
Their work should be about advising physicians
and advising community healthcare providers.
It shouldn't be to be an authority from on high.
Now, Caleb, you keep throwing an out kick article up there.
Is that Ian's article?
Yes.
About, yeah, so Pfizer,
house panel investigating Pfizer for conduct
around COVID vaccine rollout.
Tell me about that.
Yeah, so there is a house investigation currently ongoing
because there was a scientist that worked in Pfizer,
a very high up advisor during the testing
for the COVID vaccine in 2020.
And he said to his employer that he went to after Pfizer
that he had been instructed to delay test results
and take longer conducting the test results
because they were concerned that if they released
positive results before the 2020 election,
that it could influence who people voted for.
And I think it's very clear that Pfizer wanted
to get Joe Biden into office.
They didn't want Donald Trump to be reelected.
And they probably, I mean, it's allegedly,
but it seems like they may have purposely delayed
releasing the results so that they would come out
after the 2020 election had happened,
which is what happened.
That's exactly what happened.
It's just, when I really start looking at this all again,
I just get crestfallen by it.
It's so disappointing.
And to think what was motivating them and their,
and again, these are the same people that then lied
about President Biden's Parkinsonism
and cognitive dysfunctions and as well,
I don't know what they were hiding about the vice president.
We're sort of hearing some of these stories now.
And now we're supposed to look at them as heroes
writing books about these periods.
It really, unless people really have some sort of,
people should be going on apology tours
and really proclaiming what they've learned from this
instead of anointing themselves as now heroic
because they can talk about things that we all knew.
Yeah, and nobody wants to take accountability
or accept that they were wrong about this.
And for politicians, it makes some sense
because politicians don't like to ever admit
that they're wrong about anything.
But when you're talking about public health professionals and
experts the only way that you can ever have trust with with the public is to is
to be honest and to tell the truth because people can tell when you're
lying and they can tell when you don't know what you're doing I mean Anthony
Fauci saying wear anything in front of your face then wear a cloth mask and
wear two cloth masks and wear an N95 mask then wear two N95 masks just on and on.
I want to talk about masking in a second,
but yeah, irrational certitude.
This is something I crazed that Joseph Freiman coined.
The appropriate approach to human biology in particular,
and biology and science generally, is rational uncertainty.
Uncertainty, lack of certainty.
We have lack of certainty about everything.
I like some of the things that Sabine was saying.
She goes, we don't know anything.
It's too complicated,
but let's try to make some sense of this.
And that's rational uncertainty.
If you are certain about anything in science,
you are being irrational.
Einstein wasn't certain.
Einstein was wrong in certain respects.
And he had mathematics to substantiate
what he was theorizing.
And he knew he was uncertain about things.
It was the best he could do.
And yet in biology, it is just like trying to predict
the behavior of clouds, as I've always said.
But I want to talk about masking.
Because your masking book, I think,
if I'm getting this right, is one of the most popular books out there.
So, and I saw a thread on X today
where it was showing stupid shit behavior
by celebrities during COVID,
and it was all this footage of people taking their phone
and doing this while they signed autographs,
whoops, while they signed autographs, whoops, while they signed autographs,
and pictures them with masks below their nose.
Again, the nose is where the virus gets in, everybody.
And also where it comes out and it kind of affects people.
Let's see what that is.
Yeah, oh yeah, and then people with the double bands
around the ear, we knew that the surgical mask didn't work,
we knew the cloth didn't work,
we knew that if it wasn't tightly fitting around here,
you weren't doing anything.
And yet people to this day, when you bring up masking,
they go, but a million people died.
Don't you know that a million people died?
Yeah, I know that.
And therefore, I don't want you to make it worse by hurting people with dumb ass
policies like school closures
Yeah, and if you if you go back and look at what Anthony Vasquez said on 60 minutes in February 2020
That's almost exactly what he said that it could actually make things worse
Because people will be touching their faces so much to adjust the mask to make it more comfortable
make things worse because people will be touching their faces so much to adjust the mask to make it more comfortable. All of a sudden, two months later, he changes his mind. And obviously that
sets off a whole mess of mandates and policies that lasted for years and obviously still
lasting today in some parts of California. So one of my favorite examples briefly is that LA County
did a survey in 2021 and found that 95% of people at businesses were complying with the mask mandate
and said in their press release, that was why cases were low in Los Angeles. Within three or four weeks LA had
one of the highest case rates in the world not just the United States anywhere on earth after 95%
of people were wearing masks and they didn't they had kept the mask mandate for months afterwards
and threatened to bring it back later so it's just ridiculous. No discourse nobody going hmm I wonder
why that is can we talk about it?
Nothing.
It just comes off the radar screen,
moving on, moving on to the next,
frankly, target of misinformation.
We're going to start going,
it's such a disappointing sort of posture
for people to have.
Even I'm confused by it,
as someone who's supposed to understand
human motivation a little bit,
that why people would want so much
to tell other people how to live.
That is an astonishing thing in the United States for me.
Communism.
Well, look, the reality is,
you know what's interesting to me is
I keep hearing from former Russians,
formerly under the Soviet system,
talking about how they are inoculated against all this BS
because they remember what it was like to be honest.
They're not in a Soviet system in Russia anymore.
It's not the totalitarian that way.
And they were inoculated against propaganda because of it.
So they didn't fall for so much of this.
Yeah, and unfortunately,
I was actually very surprised at how many people
did fall for the propaganda that we were sold here.
It really is disappointing.
I kind of expected better.
I thought more people would be standing up for the mask,
saying we're not going to wear masks anymore.
We're not going to have these mandates anymore. saying we're not going to wear masks anymore, we're not going to have these mandates anymore,
and we're not going to have kids out of school
and things like that.
And it didn't really happen to the extent
that I hoped that it would.
It was very disappointing.
So it had never happened.
It's interesting, in states that didn't start it,
it stayed open and free,
but states that went down that path
could not seem to change course,
which is maybe there's a lesson there
about totalitarian instincts and hysterias.
Once they get loose, they can't be reeled back in.
I've said a couple of times on this show,
I was reading some books about early, sort of 1930s Germany, and the word hysteria came up there a couple of times on this show, I was reading some books about early, sort of 1930s Germany,
and the word hysteria came up there a couple of times.
And I thought, oh, they were hysterical also,
and that's why they went so berserk
in the direction they went.
And of course, everybody thinks they would be the one
that would stand up to Hitler,
and they would stand up to the Nazis,
when in fact, you're yelling at your neighbors about not going out and having a barbecue with their family
or wearing a mask out of doors, you are the prison guard.
You would be the prison guard in Germany.
You need to know that about yourself
and you need to check yourself as a result.
Yeah, exactly.
And we did the opposite of that.
And I think we, and not only do we do the opposite,
that we encourage people to tell on their neighbors.
I mean, Tim Walz in Minnesota, as we all learned
during the election, had set up a hotline
for people in Minnesota to rat out their neighbors
for not complying with COVID mandates.
That's right.
That's what we did.
Instead of treating people with honesty
and telling the truth, it was, let's tell on everybody
and, you know, rat on our neighbors.
What kind of feedback are you getting on your books?
Most of it has been very positive.
Obviously you have some people that disagree
but I tried to do a very purposeful job of sticking to data
and bringing up the data and showing just here's what it is.
Here's what happened, making comparisons.
You know, this area that's right next to this area,
one had a mandate, the other didn't and they are without a mass magnitude better
Well, how can that be true if what we're hearing from Fauci and the CDC is accurate?
Obviously can't and you know one example may not be enough
But with the book the goal was to show that there's hundreds of examples over and over again everywhere you look
It's not just us. It was in Europe. It was in other parts of the world and
You know, we never really had those conversations here and because the media wasn't willing to have them
They just promoted whatever they were told and so that was the idea is to kind of go into detail and show
We tried all these things. It didn't work and it didn't work anywhere
It didn't there's not a single example that people can point to that said. Oh, here's our here's our
Masks work and here's and here's why, chart.
I mean, there's hundreds that show the opposite.
So what do we do with people that still cling
to these notions that either they sort of minimize things
by saying, well, we just didn't know we were doing our best
or refuse to acknowledge the data as we now understand it?
That's a really, it's a really tough question.
I think that the only way that you can convince them
is to point out, and I do this in the book as well,
that pre-COVID, all of our research on pandemics
and how to handle them had showed
that masks would not work.
The UK had their pre-pandemic guidance,
the CDC had their pre-pandemic guidance.
They both said masks should not be recommended
in a pandemic, and they did it anyway. They both said masks should not be recommended in a pandemic.
And they did it anyway.
They both said we should have society open with as minimal disruption as possible.
Obviously we didn't do that.
So they kind of took all of the planning ahead of time and threw it out and did
what they wanted anyway, because of panic and fear.
That's right.
So it isn't, well, we didn't, you know, we were doing the best of what
we knew at the time they did this, they planned for 20 plus years
for this to happen.
And when it happened, they took everything they planned
and threw it out because they were too scared.
The only solace maybe, or the only justification I can find
for maybe providing some justification
for how some people behaved
is saying that somebody like Fauci or people in his camp
knew that these were dangerous bioweapons
because they'd been doing this research
and they had fears of perhaps how far this thing would go
or the extent of the damage it would have
given what they knew of the virus thus far.
Now, of course, they all deny all that
and they stand by the natural source you know, of the virus thus far. Now, of course they all deny all that and they stand by the natural source
of the virus, all this nonsense.
But I guess that's a possibility
that they were fearful of what it could potentially do
and maybe it didn't fulfill their worst fears.
And I guess you could say that about anybody
looking at the virus, like they didn't understand it,
so it just became this bogeyman that they were afraid of.
But they should have been able to get that under control
pretty quickly.
Yeah, exactly.
That's one of the biggest issues is, okay,
I can see that for maybe a few weeks or a couple of months,
but almost immediately everybody could see.
Yeah, everybody could see this was only,
this was most severely impacting people who
are extremely elderly, really sick already, you know, young healthy people were not affected by
this children are not affected by this. And they kept it going for years afterwards years and that's
where it really starts to get out of control. And you know, you mentioned it earlier, but it's was
very hard for areas and countries that turn these policies on to turn them off again, because there was no off ramp.
They didn't have a set path of,
this is how we end these policies.
It just kept going forever
and enduring places like Florida
and Sweden that proved them wrong.
So you've written about the failure of expertise
or the lack of sort of,
oh, Caleb has a question for us
about the committee investigating Pfizer
delaying the test results.
What are you asking there, Caleb?
I don't know what that is.
Oh yeah, I just, I wanted to know if there was
any new information, because I had read your article
and it seems like it covered what's going on,
but that seemed quite bizarre that there was
an ex-Pfizer employee that was also a scientist
that's out there saying this, then retracting it
very quickly, but it's out there. It seems very politically motivated. Is that confirmed or
how deep does that go?
Well, from my understanding, the company that the scientist went to work for confirmed to
the House panel that that is what they were told that this this ex-Pfizer employee specifically stated that he was told by Pfizer to delay the test results
to delay releasing you know it's a kind of slow walk everything to avoid
impacting the 2020 election he says it's not an accident that he released it
after the election was over so I mean he's kind of retracting it but he's
retracting it after it became public and there's potential
that it could come back to hurt him a bit.
And he apparently asked for a relocation to Canada with the firm as new company.
So I mean, obviously it's very suspicious and you know, retracting it now almost adds
more weight to it that it seems like that's exactly what happened.
And it doesn't make sense because Pfizer probably didn't want to kind of put their thumb on
the scale of the 2020 election.
And they got what they wanted.
And we had boosters and mandates and vaccine mandates.
I mean, Biden tried to get every private business
in the country to mandate vaccines or almost everyone.
You know, I'm sure Pfizer was very hopeful
that that would be the case under a Biden administration,
not a Trump administration.
And I'm guessing vaccines,
that's what I was gonna ask you
before we got off of the mRNA thing,
was I'm guessing that that is in your crosshairs now,
because you've covered how public health has failed,
how the experts failed,
how they've undermined their own trustworthiness,
then masking, and then you can't avoid the vaccine.
That's gotta be your next hill to climb, no?
Yeah, and I have written about it a lot.
I think it is, we're still learning a lot.
And even though we're obviously several years
kind of out of the pandemic,
there is a lot of research still coming out about it.
We're still finding about long-term effects.
We're not gonna know really for several years more
what the long-term effects thing is from the vaccine.
And, you know, if there are long-term effects, I just wrote a story about how scientists
did it, including Joseph Lottopo from the Florida Surgeon General, in comparison to
Pfizer's vaccine in Moderna and found that there was a significant increase in all-cause
mortality from people that took Pfizer's vaccine in this massive million, multi-million
person sample in Florida.
Why do fintechs like Float choose Visa?
As a more trusted, more secure payments network,
Visa provides scale expertise
and innovative payment solutions.
Learn more at visa.ca slash fintech.
The thing I keep saying is,
we know the spike protein
is the pathogenic component of the virus.
Why in God's name are we not developing vaccines
against other components or other aspects of the virus
or the whole virus or the nuclear capsid?
Why do we continue to push the vaccine
that creates the pathogenic protein?
It's, I understand in an emergency,
it was the target that they wanted to aim at,
it made the most sense, and I get it for,
even for a year, but what the hell?
You're continuing to push this thing
that we know has uncontrolled production
in some situations and some individuals
of the worst part of the virus.
And no consideration to develop something else.
It's just, I can't believe it.
It's one thing to keep it on the market, okay,
but to continue to push it and mandate it
and keep it on the childhood vaccine schedule,
mind boggling.
Absolutely.
I think there's lots and lots of questions
that need answers.
We'll unfortunately probably never get them. It doesn't seem like there's lots and lots of questions that need answers. Well, unfortunately, probably never get them.
It doesn't seem like there's a really, uh,
an appetite to go hard after Pfizer or Moderna for kind of explaining the
answers to those questions that you're asking. And I think it's,
it really was the mandates were inexcusable and there was no justification for
doing it after we knew they couldn't stop transmission,
which was within a couple of months and they kept doing it anyway.
And as I understand the, so as long as you're on the
childhood vaccine schedules, you have very limited
liability if any.
And so we've got to get them off of that schedule.
If there's going to be any, you know, careful examination
of what's going on here.
Well, Ian, have I missed anything?
Is there anything else that you're sort of worried about
these days or are're focused on?
Well, I mean, you know here in California you see the Bay area had several counties last this fall and into this this spring
That still had mass minutes in hospitals
but I think it's it's still really important to have these conversations and continue focusing on it because
there's still a lot of people that refuse to acknowledge what we've learned over the last few years.
And this is impacting millions of people
even now in 2025, I know it's hard to believe,
but it still is.
So I wanna keep talking about it
and having these conversations
because that's the only way we ever get people to change.
All right, so also you can read Ian's Substack.
It's ianmsc.substack.com
and also follow him on X,
enmsc.
What is the, wait a minute,
we've got to find a way to, what's the SC part?
Trying to figure out how to remember your handles.
Yeah, so it's just enm and then I went to USC in Los Angeles.
So, just Southern California, that was the reference.
So we can't erase the Trojan influence upon you.
Got it.
And let's see, where else?
People get people to get the book.
So read Unmasked.
The exact title is the global failure,
Unmasked, the global failure of COVID mask mandates.
If you wanna learn about masks,
I really do wanna look at that book more carefully
because I feel like people should be armed with that
if they're gonna talk about this topic.
And then finally, illusion of control,
COVID-19 and the collapse of expertise,
which there certainly has been.
And unless we,
I don't know how we set things right,
except with sort of a lot of understanding and apologies and people copying
or shifting their point of view to the point where
we can start to speak honestly about these things
and freely about them without any sort of worry
about a backlash which is anathema to everything
that is required for science.
But Ian, I appreciate you being here
and I hope we can talk again soon.
Yeah, thanks so much for having me.
I really appreciate it.
You got it.
Appreciate it, Ian Miller.
Get those books, please.
And we have a very special add-on guest here
that we're gonna get into here.
Even though you see Susan walking past,
you see her diving behind me repeatedly.
Of course, I know that you can see her
walking past the camera.
You see her back and her head.
It's the co-host of Calling Out.
As you pretend to be,
you should just stand up like that.
That looks a little more honest at least.
We have a special guest.
We're going to get a, all right.
We're going to get a report from the P Diddy trial.
His name is now Sean Combs.
Sean Combs, he's not changing his name back to Sean Combs.
Not P Diddy, but Sean Combs.
Because he's being sued by the FADS, the United States.
They're making him go by the name he was born with. I so what have you been down there every day, but they are calling him pee
Did he pee EE did he after?
the recent
Urination now we're going to pee pee diddy I see urine diddy did you see that I did not yet
I tried to stay away from this.
I told you this morning.
Is this pee or can I drink this?
Either way, apparently, according to the trial,
whether it is or is not, you can drink it.
This is good.
Emily, tell us about yourself and work with me.
So I just, I'm Emily.
You might've seen me.
I'm calling out with Susan Pinsky.
I just.
She's in the lower third here.
You got all your information down there.
You see that?
Oh, now it's on.
Thanks, Caleb.
There you are.
So I-
Where can they find you?
You can find me at Instagram and Substack.
Emily knows everything.
With an IE.
Emily.
With an IE.
I'm reporting every day I'm going to the courthouse
in lower Manhattan for the Sean Combs
versus the United States of America.
And I just, I'm out of breath because I was running
to get here on time because there is so much chaos
happening outside the courthouse.
Why?
Because it's like a mental health asylum.
And you know, that's where I thrive.
If you saw the clips I just posted.
UC Mill?
Not me, but I'm part of everyone's like,
why do you keep posting the same?
I'm like, have you ever thought maybe I'm one of them?
I'm asking.
Today was the fourth or the third,
third or fourth day of Cassie Ventura's testimony.
They finally wrapped it up.
And I saw, was it you or somebody put the judge
and retracted something or told them,
she said I was basically a sex slave or something.
Basically a sex worker. something. Or sex.
Basically a sex worker.
Yeah, sex worker.
And he was like, don't ignore that.
Why did he have her ignore that?
Objection.
Yeah.
Jury, please disregard that last statement.
Why?
Hearsay.
She's saying it about herself.
That's what I didn't under, no one understood.
You were in the courtroom for all this?
Yeah.
Okay.
And so if you were to sort of describe
what you've taken away from this experience.
I mean, it's only week one day five
It's supposed to be an eight-week trial
So far
People are very split online and in the courtroom every minute people's ideas change like one minute
They're like, wow did he's cooked the next minute. They're saying Cassie's cook
Why did Cassie get cooked?
She's not on trial.
Well, people are forgetting this.
She's on the prosecution side.
Yeah, they're forgetting that this isn't a trial,
Cassie versus Diddy.
There's like a ton of witnesses.
She's a witness.
Well, she's a victim.
Yeah, I think she's victim one.
And then they have a Jane Doe,
but then a lot of the witnesses have been disappearing.
So we don't really know who,
we don't know how this is going to go on for eight weeks.
I don't get it.
So one of the things that you and I have spoken about
is how it has desensitized,
or we seem to desensitize to these extreme imagery
of depraved sexual acts, right?
Yeah, basically that's what I've taken away from this so far
is I feel like I'm just desensitized
to hear about Hollywood sex orgies.
It's just like a court full of people,
including Diddy's children who are in the,
like all of the kids.
Wait, how old are they?
The twins are 18, the boys are in their 20s.
They're all just sitting there with his mom,
just in a row, unfazed,
and everyone's just sitting there unfazed. And it's your fault. It's my fault. My reason I think it's my fault is I did a show,
started in the early 80s called Love Line,
where our goal was to teach people
about the biological consequences of their sexual choices.
And then ultimately talk about that,
we also started talking about trauma and reenactments
and the consequences of disturbed childhood
and how that affected our relationships
and how so our choices also affected our psychological
and our spiritual wellbeing.
This went off the rails somewhere.
Talking about it freely, I guess, opened the door to this.
Do you think maybe did he watch Love Line?
I hope, why are you?
I think Kanye was on Love Line?
I think Kanye was on Love Line, wasn't he?
No way.
We're just sitting there listening to these stories.
Apparently the freak-offs that went on between Cassie Ventura and Sean Combs. Apparently they would sometimes go on for four days
at a time.
So they were hiring male escorts to come in
and she would have to wear like huge platform heels
and she would have to keep having sex with these escorts
and she said every five minutes he would require her
to lather herself and the escort in baby oil
because he liked them to glisten and to keep shining.
So the baby oil, up until this court case,
they said that it was laced with drugs.
They thought that's how he got victims high.
Cassie Ventura took the stand and said,
there was no drugs.
It was literally just baby oil from the drug store.
Were other people doing drugs?
Or I mean, was this in any,
because it all feels like drug addict behavior.
They are doing drugs.
Everybody's doing drugs.
They said that they're both addicted to opiates.
They were doing cocaine, ketamine, MDMA, everything.
So maybe this is going to be an addiction story.
He's going to get out or get somehow some-
That's what the defense is trying to do.
I remember when he first went into jail,
Suge Knight was talking to somebody on the phone
and saying that he was probably in detox and he was going to be having a really hard time detoxing.
They talked about the detox.
Do you remember that?
Cassie talked about it today.
She said that they went, they both flew to Mexico separately to do some type of detox,
but then they both shortly relapsed after.
Is she sober now?
I believe so.
And she's remarried.
She's pregnant. Eight and a half months pregnant. We think she's going to be having a baby on the stand. She's not sober. She's not sober though. What? She's not. She's not. You want to say that? What? You want to diagnose? No, I'm allowed to say she's not talking like a sober person. What do you mean? She may be not using. She's not in recovery. How do you know you're not at the trial? I'm just hearing all this. Yeah, but she's not in recovery.
No, she seems sober.
She may not be using,
because she's not using it.
Sober two different things.
Okay, can you, I don't know, can you explain that?
When people aren't using a substance, they are abstinent.
When they're in the program of recovery, they are sober.
That's technically the case.
So if they're doing 12 step, they have a sponsor,
they're working or getting treatment,
they're seeing therapists, blah, blah, blah, blah.
They're in recovery and sober.
If they're just abstinent, they're just abstinent.
I didn't know it was so technical.
It's technical because when people,
if they're truly an addict and they're just abstinent,
they will go back.
Is it like when you're calling a recovering alcoholic,
you have to say the recovering?
That's another technical thing, which is,
right, you're never not an alcoholic.
Yeah, I don't know if she, I just know that her husband.
Is she a recovering sex addict?
Or just abstinent?
I think that's what the defense is trying to prove
because they're trying to say that she was a willing
participant in the freak off.
So they're trying to show text messages that would have her
say like, oh, I can't wait till you put your legs behind,
I can't wait.
So the reality is, let's kind of spec,
we respect, I don't know anything about this.
I do have my notebook if you guys want real direct quotes.
Oh, I'm going to say.
But without having any direct knowledge of anybody,
she of course had to be willing on some level,
she of course was in addiction.
He was her manager at, she was signed to his label.
So now there's the power hierarchy they're arguing.
That is the point.
This is why doctors don't have relationship with patients
and teachers don't have relationship with students.
That the power imbalance is traumatizing
and creates problems from the outset.
And the music industry is already,
it's already hard enough to break through that industry.
So dating the head of Bad Boy Records
back in the early 2000s is not fair.
And again, she was just barely an adult, right?
So they met when she was 19,
started dating when she was 21,
and he was 17 years older than her.
That's crazy.
And the question is to, and this is kind of a legitimate
question, to what extent is she responsible
for her own actions in this situation?
That's what a lot of men especially are arguing online
where women are arguing the opposite.
Well, there are, let's discuss it.
I really do feel like it's become a male
and female issue online.
Let's talk about it.
Because, so it is truly the case
there was a power imbalance, right?
And are you saying as a woman,
the power imbalance has more persuasive effect
than a man would know?
Is that the implication?
No, I'm saying that online.
I've noticed seeing a lot of men.
No, no, no, stay with me.
But I get that it's a male-
It's been a long day.
I get it's a male-female thing online.
But I'm saying, do you imagine the women online
that are saying this is, you know,
she needs to be sympathized with,
are sympathized with her because they feel like,
and legitimately, reasonably so,
that the power imbalance and the persuasive effects
he had over her were more than a man would realize.
That and if she didn't participate, he would beat her up.
Well, that's, isn't that enough?
So there's a domestic violence element too.
I haven't heard much about that.
Have you seen the video with the Intercontinental Hotel?
No, I've heard that he beat her up.
I haven't heard them.
One time he stomped on her head.
I haven't heard her say I was afraid. I haven't heard them. When time he stomped on her head. I haven't heard her say I was afraid.
He stomped her head in a van.
I was afraid if I didn't engage
in these bizarre sexual acts, I would get beaten.
I didn't know what to say.
Wait, hold on.
Because she was afraid he wouldn't love her anymore.
Drew, okay, what's up?
Caleb, yeah.
Drew, so wait, are you saying, so you haven't seen.
I can't hear Caleb.
Drew, you haven't seen the video that was leaked.
I have.
You have?
I have. You have? I have.
Okay, okay.
But what I'm saying is I haven't heard her say,
yes, she was a victim of domestic violence, yes,
but I haven't heard her say,
I was fearful that if I didn't do these sexual acts,
that would be unleashed on me again.
That was one of the things she said,
and also she was afraid that you wouldn't love her.
I think it's important to remind the audience,
especially the podcast listeners,
that Drew has been out of the country
for what, the past 12 days?
Yes.
So Drew has actually missed a lot of stuff
that you guys have already heard.
So he will be caught up on this.
Yeah, cause it's, Drew is slightly out of date
on his information here because Cassie has said
some pretty horrific things she's described
just in the snippets that I've seen.
And it's, you know, yeah.
We're the horrific things and that's what I'm saying.
How is it we live in a world where people can just
say these things and the press just report these things.
And we are not, we're not phased.
And then I go and report these things and I go viral.
And then I'm like, oh, the more crazy the things.
And then it is whole, there's this creator economy
at the courthouse now where it's not just press
that's getting in.
We have TikTokers, YouTubers, everyone's fighting
for a spot and they're trying to make this story
more salacious when it's already salacious on its own.
How could it be more salacious?
But somebody says you're going to need an exorcist.
A hundred percent. Yeah.
We have a few on hand waiting for her at home.
Yeah.
Okay, Caleb.
You got a head set on?
Yeah, I just.
Yeah.
My question for Emily is some of the stuff that I've been reading about here is that,
I mean, especially looking at the opening statements from both sides, I noticed that
he did a lot of bad things, but it seems like the prosecution is going after something
they might not ever be able to get him on,
which it seems like they're trying to do a Rico case
when they should have tried to go for domestic violence
and assault and kidnapping and all of these other crimes.
Do you think that that's a bad direction for them to go?
Because it just doesn't seem like they're going to get it.
That's what everyone's been saying.
And there has been whispers in the courtroom
that there were some victims that got cold feet
and dropped out before the trial,
which is making this seem like they don't have a lot.
I know that Diddy's legal team is celebrating
in the courtroom as if-
Sean Combs.
Yeah, I'm dead naming him.
He probably wants to be called Love.
That was his latest name before he was arrested, Love.
So there's guys outside the courthouse being like-
I like Puff.
I liked Puff Daddy.
Free Love.
That was my errand.
Free Love, that's hysterical.
There was a guy that was arrested, a free Diddy,
but he was a free love protester outside yesterday.
But yeah, I think that the legal team on Diddy's side, they're already acting like they're going
to win.
They said they, I mean, they're schmoozing with everybody.
I mean, they've got a strong team.
Garagos, Donaldson, Ryan Steele, they have like a powerhouse and then these prosecutors
are so green.
So the prosecution, they're like little,
it's like, imagine seven of me's up on the stand.
It's like little, it's all white women.
That's why Mark Garagos called them a six pack
of white women because they're all nervous,
like, hey, my name is Meredith.
And then they're up against these like amazing
criminal offenses.
I mean, they're-
Isn't that Garagos' daughter?
Like isn't that Mark Garagos' daughter up there?
Yeah, Tony Garagos is the lead.
I read, so I read both of those opening statements.
But she's very teeny.
Well, I read those opening statements from both sides.
She had a better opening statement.
It was, I was like, oh wow, wait a second.
I know he did all of these horrible and terrible things,
but she's making a lot of sense here
that legally you can't,
like they don't have the evidence so far
to support going after like a criminal enterprise.
It's all of these other lists of crimes
that they should have gone after instead.
And so that's what I'm kind of worried about
is that he may get off.
Well, they say that the witnesses they're about to call up,
they're trying to set the stage right now for the RICO.
And the witnesses they're about to call to the stand, they're going to start showing like how he was using trying to set the stage right now for the Rico.
And the witnesses, they're about to call the stand,
they're going to start showing how he was using employees to conspire and to carry out his crimes.
Right now, I think they purposely put Cassie on the stand first.
People thought she was going to be the strongest testimony. opposite. And then I just, when I left the courthouse today,
this guy came up to me and he goes,
because I left about 20 minutes early to get here.
And he goes, things just got really serious.
Like things are about to get really dark.
They just called a new witness to the stand.
And apparently she just spilled out some crazy new evidence
that I didn't get because I had to get here.
Go on your magic.
We'll see. So your magic. It, go on your magic. Oh, geez, we'll see.
So, and there's your magic.
It's already on TMZ, I'm sure.
TMZ's got three reporters in there.
My disclaimer is I've been producing this show for the past
hour and a half to two hours, so I'm not up to date on the past
two hours, so maybe he has a full-on Rico case against him now.
I don't need both of you getting mentally ill
because you're around this grossness so much.
I'm honestly more mentally ill from the comments section
of people being like,
like okay, I posted a video the other day where I said,
it's so weird that I'm just sitting in court
and I'm listening to this male escort being like,
oh yeah, Cassie said I have the biggest dick
she's ever seen.
Oh really?
Yeah, she loved my dick.
And then someone goes, you sound really biased.
And I thought to what, small dicks?
Because I'm not picking a side.
And they were, two people were trying,
one was trying to say I was biased to Cassie
and one to Diddy.
It's like, I can't say anything without people attacking.
Welcome to social media.
I think that's more damaging to my brain than this trial.
Yeah, yeah, I agree.
Although I got to say that the fact,
we need to really examine ourselves culturally
in this country that this is where public figures end up.
We talk about it as though it's no big deal.
It's a big deal.
It's a big deal as to pravity
and it's not good for our soul.
It really isn't.
And I hope people sort of look at it
and think about it that way.
But my question to you is,
where do you think management is going to end up?
When you're a couple weeks down the line here,
what do you imagine we're going to learn?
People wanted it, wanted it.
People were expecting Epstein 2.0.
People want-
But they want Epstein 2.0.
I don't think it's that.
They want bigger people to be named.
And so far we're not seeing,
we're not seeing Ashton Kutcher,
we're not seeing Leonardo DiCaprio, we're not seeing, we're not seeing Ashton Kutcher, we're not seeing Leonardo DiCaprio,
we're not seeing Kim Kardashian.
Right now all we're seeing is random male escorts
hired on Backgrid or Backpage.
And we're not seeing the Mossad in there,
you know, manipulating him or him using other videos.
Today someone in the lunchroom told me
she thinks the shakes were paying Diddy
so that, because they don't get to have sex
in their country, so they were paying him for the tapes.
So that's just a conspiracy brewing in the cafeteria.
Why would they pay him to,
why would they come over and participate?
I don't know, this is how crazy the cafeteria got
when we were eating chicken fingers.
There was conspiracies lingering.
I think also like the content creators,
it's really dog eat dog, like,
everyone's like trying to like outdo each other
with the content.
Why?
This is apparently a sex trafficking, allegedly,
a sex trafficking trial.
So why has this become a media circus?
Exactly.
What makes people come and be drawn to it like moths to a flame?
Seems unhealthy.
I think it's because we've never seen someone as big as Diddy on a trial.
I don't think anyone really cared that much about. Are you going to go after Kanye? big as Diddy on a trial.
I don't think anyone really cared that much.
It's an OJ.
Are you going to go after Kanye?
It's like an OJ trial.
Is the Kanye thing?
Well, the funny thing is, is Lisa Bloom is in the overflow room every day.
And if you guys aren't aware, Lisa Bloom is representing Lauren Piscota,
who is the first woman to be filing a sexual assault lawsuit against Kanye.
So her and her mother, Gloria Allred,
are in the overflow room every day taking notes.
No one knows why, but they're there.
And so, and Kanye is still in prison, jail, whatever?
Kanye's never been to jail.
You want me to call Lisa?
So what is his-
He's in Spain right now.
So what is his liability?
He's saying free Diddy.
He's saying this is a big conspiracy by Diageo.
And it's like- Diageo, who's that? It's this? He's saying free Diddy. He's saying this is a big conspiracy by Diageo. And it's like-
Diageo, who's that?
It's this company that,
I guess Diddy pissed this company off
and a lot of people believe this theory that they want,
I don't know, Caleb, are you aware?
You know, Kanye, God bless him.
He has, why do I say-
Kanye actually talked to Diddy before the trial.
Kanye called Diddy and they spoke on the phone.
And then after that, he started going after Cassie on X
and was saying that Cassie's extorting Diddy for money
and that Cassie was the one that was running the orgies
and the sex parties and now that she took the stand,
she admitted that.
She said, yeah, I was the one that booked
the orgies under the name, I think it was Jackie Starr,
she would use that name, and she was the one booking
the male escort.
So whatever Diddy told Kanye is exactly what they're saying
at the trial.
Well, God bless Kanye, he is sort of clairvoyant
in his perceptions of things, right?
No, he just talked to Diddy.
No, no, but even when he comes up with ideas
that seem outrageous, they end up being like-
Like three years later.
Yeah, they're like, there's the truth.
If not the truth.
It's like the fly on the wall.
Since when do you like Kanye?
Something happened when you went over there.
No, I've always felt bad for Kanye actually,
because he's bipolar.
I can see it.
They have a lot of trauma in their history.
And I could feel the same way for Diddy.
To me, the whole Diddy thing just looks like
drug addiction to sex addiction,
and eventually those things take you
to legal trouble or health trouble.
Or death.
Or death or jail or something.
Why do you think it's drug addiction?
I mean, they're saying it is, but a lot of people
in the courtroom are saying,
I didn't think Diddy was a drug user.
It's just drug addict behavior.
This is all drug addict behavior.
Because no one has sex for four days in a row
unless you're on drugs.
You're high, yeah.
Correct, and people, as they get into their addictions, This is all dragon. Because no one has sex for four days in a row unless you're on drugs. You're high, yeah. Correct.
Oh, and people, as they get into their addictions,
need more and more and more and more stimulation.
That's just how it works.
And the tanks were getting weirder and weirder and weirder.
I must also, because Emily,
you probably know what I'm referring to,
but again, Dr. Drew has been out of town for about 12 days
and he may not be aware of the latest updates.
Kanye West's new song, which we cannot talk about here.
I will tell you about it later if you're not aware.
I got it.
I'm aware of that.
No, no, we knew about that.
Just because I'm saying he can see things
that other people think may not be true,
I'm not saying he's okay.
You know about the song?
I do know about the song.
Why don't you sing it right now?
No.
It's the song of the summer.
It's the Hitler song, right?
Yeah.
No.
I can't even say that word.
I know the H-word song.
This broadcast is when he sees.
You know it's funny because when I was showing him the video where you were talking about,
where you were talking about Cassie
letting him pee in her mouth.
And he went, I was like, yeah, that's a thing.
He goes, how do you know that?
I said, he was just so confounded by it.
He didn't know.
This is Mr. Loveline.
Yes.
You didn't know about that urination kinks?
The descriptions were so over the top
that I was like, what?
He did what?
She consented to it.
She allowed him to do what?
And why does she do it?
There was so many things.
I didn't want to repeat them.
That why I was just like-
Not only consented.
How is that arousing to anybody?
How is that?
How would somebody consent to that?
And then repeatedly do it?
It's just like, oh my God, it's so disgusting.
The male escort said that she's the one
that directed him and said, hey, hey, not so much at once.
You need to let it out a little at a time.
Like let it trickle out.
Yeah, because I guess the escort was like.
There was weird stuff with semen.
There was all kinds of crazy stuff.
Oh yeah, that was the video that went viral
is when I talked about the semen on the nipples.
Okay, thank you for bringing that back.
I mean, right in front of his mother.
I've heard of many celebrities with urination kinks
and now I'm wondering, are they going to try
to get ahead of the narrative and be like,
okay, me too, before some girl comes out and outs them?
Because I know of two right now.
The whole me too moment is going to kind of convert.
P2. P2. Right. Well done. That's where it has to go. because I know of two right now.
P2.
We're all desensitized.
Is it our business to be knowing about everybody's sex life?
I don't want to know about your guys'. about it. But the world is desensitized, not Drew. But it's interesting because that's
what, I mean, I guess Kanye is going to produce porn and he does weird stuff too. I mean,
he's dragging his wife around naked on a red carpet for the Grammys and wondering why his
kids are being taken away. Like it's all this stuff that they do for shock value.
You know, it's like Howard Stern,
like he would fly through the air with his butt hanging out.
Yeah, but that looks like babies, you know.
Yeah, but now he promotes vaccines.
We've advanced, our brains have advanced.
Everybody's so desensitized to anything.
Well, porn has made everybody desensitized,
but this trial, I think, is waking people up.
I think a lot of people that live
maybe in the middle of nowhere,
they're like, this is crazy,
but I think in Hollywood,
people are used to this kind of behavior.
Well, you're saying something rather profound there.
You're saying we're desensitized, right?
Is that true?
Not all of us.
I think some of us are, though.
Not all of us.
Because when I was sitting there,
I was on phased, and then when I left, people are like, are you okay? And I said, I've heard of us are though.
Because when I was sitting there, I was on phased.
And then when I left, people are like, are you okay?
And I said, I've heard of defecation kinks.
Susan and I have talked about that on her show. from the Abercrombie. And it's also like why if this trial ends up being nothing,
I'm wondering like, do you know anything about like,
how does the government sue somebody?
Like, do they just get all these people together?
How do they sue somebody?
Like, how is it the United States versus Sean Combs?
Whose idea was it for the government to go after him?
I don't know.
That's your, the report.
I know, I never, I need to find that out.
Ask Lisa Bloom.
She'll tell you.
Maybe.
And she's an old friend of mine.
We have her phone number.
You can tell her I sent you to talk to her.
Yeah.
She's there every day with Gloria.
I mean, they're saying they're not going to make any assumptions on the case.
Or you can ask Mark Garagos.
He'll tell you.
Yeah, Mark Garagos.
I mean, he seems like he's...
I saw him the first day of court, but I haven't seen him there any other day.
He was in trouble.
People are talking about porn
being the desensitizing factor.
Do you think that's why we're all so desensitized?
Maybe that's the issue?
Yeah, I think so.
When I was watching it,
I was starting to pick videos that were so weird
that I ended up reversing it.
And then I was watching porn
where not only were they all have clothes on,
but they even had N95 masks on.
So that's a category now. It's like the opposite of nudity. That's a new category.
Pauler A porn.
Edith Yeah, so it's like modest porn.
Edith Fully clothed.
Edith Yeah, they're not even doing it. It's so weird.
Pauler How is it porn?
Edith I don't know, but it's a category. It's really strange.
Pauler I get the mask porn thing.
Edith It's some like messed up leftist brain bullshit there.
That's, wow, like they're just,
they turn into a kink for them.
They're so obsessed with masks.
It was very, well, they were in China.
Yeah.
So like they were wearing N95s before pandemic,
but that's a whole other.
They were wearing surgical masks for colds and things.
I don't know i just think
this trial is weird that there's just all these people just sitting there judging this relationship
that happened years ago yeah that how long ago was it that's kind of a while ago and now and her
husband is is there who is um diddy's trainer so she was cheating on diddy with this guy and now
today cheating given no he was cheating too no he was cheating on Diddy with this guy. And now today-
Was it really cheating given what she was telling her to?
No, he was cheating, but today the defense was trying
to paint her out as a cheater, and they said that,
they were like, do you remember the night
that you were having intercourse with Sean Combs,
and your now husband FaceTimed you?
Did you answer that call?
And she was like, no, I don't think so.
And then they were like, did you tell him
that you were having intercourse with Sean Combs? and I was like, no, I don't think so.
And then they were like, did you tell him
that you were having intercourse with Sean Combs?
And she was like, yeah, I think eventually.
It's just a humiliating trial. showing old emails where they're like, I love you so much, I love you, I love you so much.
Like they're just showing how in love this couple was.
Today they asked.
Which couple, the now husband?
No, Diddy and Cassie, they're like showing
how in love they were.
And then they're like, today she asked,
do you still love him?
And she was like, I have love for what we had.
And it was just like.
What did you have? I mean, you can tell she still has like, I have love for what we had. And it was just like. What did you have?
I mean, you can tell she still has like.
Who asked Casey that?
Even though the sex was freaky,
the way it feels to me is like,
they had a toxic relationship
and like the only time she said she felt close to him
is when they were having sex.
Because when you're dating someone that's unavailable
and they're hooking up with girls
and they're that powerful, the only time you do feel bonded is when you're having sex, because when you're dating someone that's unavailable and they're hooking up with girls and they're that powerful,
the only time you do feel bonded is when you're having sex
because once they come, they forget about you.
So that's what the feeling I'm getting.
And they kept saying that Cassie,
they keep showing like screenshots of Cassie
begging for his attention,
but how he was always on tour.
And like they were caught,
like Eregor said in the opening statement
that both of the victims were desperate for his attention.
They're trying to paint both.
And so far Cassie's admitted that.
She's like, yeah, I wanted more time with him.
But it's co-addiction straight across.
And then today they showed an email
where it said that, Diddy says,
you're supposed to be seducing me all day long.
And then they were like, so did you do that?
And she was like, sometimes.
It's just very weird.
It's gross and sad.
And then everyone in the courtroom or the overflow room
is just discussing their sex life.
And they're all kind of, every single woman in there
is relating to Cassie.
They're remembering the toxic relationship
they had in their 20s.
Talk about yours.
My mom told me I'm not allowed to.
I posted about it yesterday.
She goes, stop comparing yourself to Cassie.
That was really funny though.
People in Attica are going to think
you have weird genes.
We all had a rock star phase, okay?
Let's talk about it, talk about it generally.
So if women are relating to these horrible,
addictive relationship that they had. And abusive ones. So if you if women are relating to these horrible addictive
Relationship that they had and abusive ones which are abusive and they regret
Why in the world wouldn't they show some?
insight into how bad the choices were rather than
Relating to Cassie as someone who's like oh poor thing poor thing, she just made some bad, do you know what I mean?
It seemed to me that they would be much more like,
oh, this is a sickness, this is terrible.
I remember when I was that sick.
That means we're all sick.
Yes.
And also women miss their,
like I still miss the toxic relationships
because that's where the passion is.
Like once you get in a stable one,
you don't get those highs anymore.
That is.
Addict behavior.
Sick.
That is sick.
There are so many girls today talking about that.
They're like, you know, they're like Cassie's a Virgo.
They love chaos.
You can tell like she's now dating a Pisces.
They were like-
That's bullshit.
Looking at our astrology signs.
That is sickness.
Drew's a Virgo too.
He doesn't look like a Virgo.
He's a September 4th.
That's the same birthday as Jay-Z.
You can't trust Drew. That is- And that same birthday as Jay-Z. Can't trust Drew.
That is...
And that, speaking of Jay-Z, he has not been mentioned.
Everyone has been thinking he's going to get mentioned.
I don't think Jay-Z's getting mentioned.
Same with Justin Bieber.
So people have to understand, this is my point though,
that people have to look at that behavior
and those choices they made when they were young
and disturbed in some way to make these sick,
develop these sick relationships.
I think it's human.
All of it's human.
But you have to kind of look at it and go,
well, that is-
When you're young, you don't realize
the situation you're in.
18 year olds are kind of assholes.
I was 21.
But to continue to romanticize it and to look at it-
Look at all the TV shows that do it.
Look at you. I agree. Those women shows that do it. Look at you.
I agree.
Those women are obsessed with Joe.
He's killing all the, and the girls still love him.
Who's this?
The new show is number two trending on Netflix.
You.
On season five, the whole show is about
a sociopath serial killer that makes women
fall in love with him and he just kills everybody.
And the sex is just so crazy and they just love
that he's a sociopath
like most of the shows on TV right now just show about emotionally unavailable
men and then these like toxic relationships they're glamorized in
media and I don't think it's because of the media I think it's a human
experience at the present moment that's the way our personality structures have
moved do you what came first these shows or that's a really our personality structures have moved. What came first, these shows or?
That's a really good question,
but I know I saw it happen in real time
when I was working in psychiatric hospital.
I watched all of the character disorders coalesce
around a couple of syndromes.
We started the 70s and 80s
with all kinds of different pathologies.
By the end of the 80ies, borderline persona disorder.
By the end of the nineties, everybody was sociopath,
narcissist, borderline, everybody.
Someone told me that as we've just kind of moved on in time,
they've just started creating this disorders
just for humans. No, no.
Like the book used to have gay in there as a disorder.
I understand that you can be critical,
but I watched it happen. I was there as a disorder. I understand that you can be critical, but I watched it happen.
I was there when it happened.
Because I would argue that people that are boring
just label someone borderline
because they are so boring.
No.
What's the argument that you would make for that?
That people are borderline or not happy they're borderline.
They have very, very serious.
So maybe people are misdiagnosing people with borderline because now it's like a cool thing.
Yeah, we're over labeling.
The same way with autism.
Same thing with narcissism, same thing with everything.
We're over labeling for sure.
Nobody really knows what a sociopath is.
Correct, although you're describing them pretty accurate.
Do you think Diddy's a sociopath?
I think sex and drug addict,
you got pretty clearly based on what, yeah.
His mother also introduced him to sex early, right?
What does that mean?
Can you say something like that?
There's rumors online.
There's something online about,
did he say something about being in Harlem
when he was 12 and being exposed
to like pornographic material?
Happens a lot.
And the average age of exposure now is age nine, I believe.
Which is interesting,
because Kanye just came out and said
that he was giving oral sex to his cousin
that was six years old
after he found pornographic magazines
in his mother's closet.
Right, and so early exposure to pornography
is one of the causes of sex addiction.
Then it's like, okay, my uncle and aunt
had every single issue of Playboy and-
Playboy does not know, it doesn't have that same-
In their basement, and me and my brother saw it
and we didn't go act out, we were just like, oh-
I know there's no sex in Playboy.
There was like Hustler too, wasn't that a bad one?
I think so.
Wasn't that a little more R-rated?
Yeah, but it's not intercourse, like you're not saying-
Right, but I think that Kanye was talking about a hustler or something.
Yeah.
So I don't know.
I just think it depends on the person.
I think maybe the mental illness was the, I don't know.
Oh no, he might have set it for attention.
Is what?
Is it, can people develop sociopath tendencies
just by basically desensitizing themselves
on drugs and sex
and craziness like he probably did for a decade or two?
People in addictions of any stripe
can function on the level of sociopathy.
So they can look like sociopaths,
and when you treat the addiction,
the sociopathy settles down.
Right, okay.
How do you treat being a sociopath?
It's almost impossible,
unless it's in the setting of addiction.
So with addiction, when I've seen it settle down,
it's either A, they weren't sociopaths to begin with,
they were just functioning like a sociopath
to manage to get through their addiction,
or because in order to survive your addiction,
you have to change, that sometimes that's when people
change their personality structure.
People born a sociopath or can it?
There are genetic features, but it's, you know,
other things that obviously come involved.
Are there benefits of being a sociopath?
Sure, you get to use, you can use other people
and you can become a lot of captains of industry
and things and very successful people,
manipulate and use other people to get what they need
without really concerns about them.
But when it comes to mental disorders generally,
in general, it's about 60% genetics, 40% environment,
almost every single condition.
All right, I'm tired, I'm jet lagged.
I was in Rome 24 hours a year.
Thank you so much for jetting over here. Yeah, I appreciate that. There was people, I have to show you guys after, I'm concerned.
Oh my, anybody concerned?
We, I hope this is-
Can you post that on Instagram?
I actually air dropped her the video
and she said her editor's going to censor out of her notes.
I think you should, you can only put that on X.
I don't think you can-
You can put it on X.
Instagram won't ban you.
Ugh.
Yeah, poor Emily.
This is a lot.
No, this is fun.
It's fun for you.
Oh, here's what's coming up.
Laura Delano, she's written a book called Unshrunk about psychiatric care, about maybe
over all the excesses there.
Mike Wall, Kristi Meyer, Susan's show next Wednesday, Tim Pool.
We're doing a psychic speed dating show on Wednesday.
Naomi Wolf and Coulter, tell them about that.
A lot of maha people.
Yeah, so we have a comedian coming on
and we're going to do a comedian meeting six lovely ladies
on a psychic speed dating show.
Oh yeah, that'll be my friend John Campanelli.
That's going to be very funny.
Is it John, is that it?
Yeah, another Virgo.
Hopefully Emily will be able to see me.
A rational one, acts more like you than me, don't worry.
How dare you.
So we'll be back.
Thank you for being here on the special show on Friday.
A lot of interesting conversation, a good guest.
And Emily, thank you for coming by
and enlightening us about the goings on downtown.
We will be back on Tuesday.
We are going to be at two o'clock all week
from what I can see here.
Wow, Tim Poole on Thursday.
Wow, you have a really packed schedule.
This is the easy, this is an easy week.
She's looking at his calendar.
This is easy week, my dear.
This is my week going.
Yes, Drew did film.
This is by getting back to normal.
Drew filmed Gut Feel today.
It will be on tonight at 10 p.m.
and he's also on Kennedy's podcast as well.
And Kill Mead's One Nation show,
it did three shows.
Oh Jesus.
More today?
All day long.
All right, keep drinking them Celsiuses.
Keep it.
So, I can't love.
We're going to have dinner.
Emily.
I'll let you guys know,
I'll come back when there's like a verdict
Okay, but I worry I want you to take you're always worried about me. I want you to take care of your soul You always worry even if I'm not at Diddy you're like, are you okay mentally? No, I'm not okay mentally
I worry this is gonna
Affect you. What's so I don't even have one. Oh, please. Well, maybe that's why I'm worried about it
You're gonna back. We'll get some Eddie love on her, one of my sidekicks.
He'll make her feel better.
Every time I leave here, I do feel good.
That's why I agreed to it.
I was like, I always leave Drew and Susan's feeling
the normal.
Aw, good.
All right, Caleb, thank you.
And everyone else, we will see you Tuesday at two o'clock.
And see us all next week.
And check out, as I said, Gut Felt Tonight,
a pretty good show.
And we're going to have dinner and I'm going to go to sleep
at 7, 7.30.
It's like two in the morning for us right now.
Literally two in the morning.
All right, thank you very much,
and we'll see you Tuesday.
Ta ta.
Ask Dr. Drew is produced by Caleb Nation and Susan Pinsky.
As a reminder, the discussions here are not a substitute for medical care, diagnosis, or treatment. This show is intended for educational
and informational purposes only. I am a licensed physician, but I am not a replacement for
your personal doctor and I am not practicing medicine here. Always remember that our understanding
of medicine and science is constantly evolving. Though my opinion is based on the information
that is available to me today,
some of the contents of this show could be outdated in the future.
Be sure to check with trusted resources in case any of the information has been updated
since this was published.
If you or someone you know is in immediate danger, don't call me, call 911.
If you're feeling hopeless or suicidal, call the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline
at 800-273-8255.
You can find more of my recommended organizations and helpful resources at DrDoo.com slash
help.