Bulwark Takes - AOC Strikes Back at Trump's Border Czar Tom Homan

Episode Date: February 18, 2025

Andrew Egger and Joe Perticone discuss Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's defiant strikes at Trump Border Czar Tom Homan as he repeatedly goes after her for supporting education of laws and constitutional rights.

Memorial Day deals are here at Lowe's. Get up to 40% off select major appliances, including Samsung. Plus, save an extra $50 on every $500 you spend on select major appliances, $396 or more. Like the Samsung Bespoke AI Laundry Combo. The largest capacity, fastest, all-in-one laundry combo available that washes and dries in one machine. Lowe's. We help, you save. Valid 515 through 618. Selection varies by location. Total savings varies based on purchase amount. See Lowe's.com for details. Hi, welcome to The Bulwark. I'm Andrew Egger, joined here by our congressional reporter, Joe Perticone, to talk a little bit about the Trump administration's latest iteration of its favorite hobby these days,

which is sort of threatening, sort of vaguely to have people that they don't like, critics, people in the way, obstacles, criminally investigated and or imprisoned. And the latest instance of this has been happening the last few days with the Trump administration's, quote unquote, border czar, Tom Homan, the guy who the president has brought in to sort of supervise his mass deportation plans, his plans to reshape the federal immigration, illegal immigration enforcement system in general. He has been sparring in recent days with Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York. AOC has been a fly in the ointment, maybe you could say, of the mass deportation plans, because she has been spending a lot of her time doing things like posting educational resources

for people who come in contact with ICE, basically know your rights type stuff. Just kind of educating people on what you do if ICE comes to your door, what you are obligated by the law to do, what you aren't obligated by the law to do. They need a warrant, for instance, to enter your home, have them slide the warrant under the door, that kind of thing. Tom Homan has been pretty unhappy about all of this. He's been going on Fox News a few times over the last couple of weeks and a couple of times just yesterday, essentially to say, you know, we don't love that she's she's, you know, trying to frustrate our efforts to round up illegal immigrants. And we think, you know, at what point at what point he's kind of just asking questions, at what point does that tip over the line into essentially criminal interference with our work?

And he's essentially said that he has asked the Department of Justice to look into this question, just to basically say, well, you look, I mean, maybe she's breaking the law. We're trying to get to the bottom of that. We're trying to figure it out. She might be in a little bit of trouble is something he said. She wants to go out and say she's teaching people the constitutional rights. Yeah, you can call it that. We all know what she's up to. I'm sure a free speech argument can be made. OK, she has every right to say anything she wants. When does it cross a line into aiding and abetting lawbreaking?

Would it have to have direct involvement by her in helping people to evade ICE? That's exactly the question I posed to the deputy attorney general. I asked him to look into it. I said, I know through my career someone steps in front of you and the person you're arresting, they're repeating, yeah, that's a violation. But at what point do you cross the line on saying you're educating people versus you're teaching them how to evade ICE arrest? So, Joe, let me just start. Let me just ask you, what do you make of this? I mean,

on its face, what's AOC trying to do here? How's she been responding to this stuff? What's going on? So I think there's kind of two components to it. One, Tom Homan is a professional yapper. That's part of the reason why he was hired. He goes on Fox. He used to be a contributor at Fox. And he goes on these networks and he just says whatever comes to mind. And if that's, oh, we're going to investigate this, that's just him being tough, which is what Trump likes out of his officials. Not really their actions, but their words. The other component is that it's very much an intimidation tactic. And while people might think, oh, well, that doesn't work on AOC, and it obviously has not, I know for a fact that this kind of instruction of how to act, how to behave if they do show up,

that's being talked about in local governments. It's being talked about in local businesses, small businesses that maybe employ some of the people who either are undocumented or might be targets of ICE, even if they are documented or are citizens even. And so the intimidation aspect of it spreads far beyond AOC and far beyond any member of Congress. It's not illegal to give broadly legal advice like that. And she's not acting in a lawyer capacity. But people are being briefed on these kinds of things. And if they see someone in the administration saying, well, you could face criminal prosecution or an investigation, because just an investigation can bankrupt someone in legal fees. It's more of an intimidation tactic across the board to the other people who might be tuning in. So I think that's the more serious element of this. In terms

of how ASC is handling it, she's handling it like normal people should by not backing down in any way by saying, actually, I get to say whatever I want because I'm an American. And B, it's not illegal to know what your rights are, know what the laws are. Even if you're not a US citizen, you still have rights. And being informed of that or informing others of that is not a crime, but it's apparently enough to warrant this intimidation effort. Yeah, that's the thing that's been been so striking to me, and especially just because, you know, I sort of remember a time when when there was this sort of broad, like, quote, unquote, conservatarian alliance inside of like, Republican politics,

where there was like a real a real, you know, there's always like a very strong, like respect the police back the blue, you know, sort of respect for authority thing within conservatism, but also like this very kind of strong libertarian streak of like, no, your rights don't let the cops push you around, you know, just because, just because they're, you know, you're, you're in a, in a, you know, just because you are in an interaction with law enforcement doesn't mean that you, you know, need to, uh, you know, listen to every single thing they say, like, like, like you, you have rights in that situation as well. And, and, and, and, you know, educating people on knowing what those are, knowing how to behave and things like that was like kind of broadly

speaking, a thing that you could, you could see in sort of right coded circles. And, and, and that's, that's sort of the astonishing thing to me about all of this as well, is that, is that that's just so absent at this point. I mean, you have Homan basically out there saying like, well, you know, look, like she says she's just educating people, but, you know, we're just going after criminals and, you know, she's making our work and going after criminals harder. And like, isn't that kind of illegal maybe and criminal maybe? Well, no, I mean, like that's every law enforcement agency in the world conceptualizes themselves as going after criminals. And that doesn't mean you have to make that perfectly easy for them in every single way, according to the

law. So that's the striking thing to me. I mean, I found it very interesting every time Tom Homan goes on Fox and badmouths her and suggests that the law might be coming for her. And she reposts the clip. Yesterday, she wrote, go ahead saying daring him essentially to get the DOJ to investigate her on this. Let the people see you for what you are. That really stood out to me because we are always having these conversations, right, about what should Democrats be doing, right? Like what should elected Democrats be doing to kind of respond to this moment? Because they are their their wings are so clipped, right? I mean, they've been thrown out of power everywhere. They don't control the House or the Senate or the presidency or the Supreme Court. I mean, you know, in Washington, D.C., if you're an elected Democrat,

you kind of are a messenger, a messenger. And that's kind of all that you can do except, you know, gum things up procedurally, essentially, and plan for the future. But this interaction was so striking to me because it really does seem like one thing that elected Democrats can do, which is one, stand their ground in the face of the bullies. But also, she's not just standing her ground. I mean, she's kind of poking Homan in the eye, right? I mean, she's basically saying like, hit me with your best shot. And at a time when these guys from Trump on down, like their main mission seems to be, you know, anytime anybody gets mad at them, swinging at them with the full force of government. I mean,

she really is kind of putting a target on her own back, right? I mean, she's kind of setting herself up as a person to potentially get kind of smacked down in an aggressive, you know, over the line way by this administration in a way that then she can kind of take the case to the people and say, look, look at what's going on. You know, I'm just trying to educate people on their rights and the government is, is, you know, coming down on me with full force. And I mean, like, that's, that's a kind of a striking thing and not something that we're seeing necessarily from a lot of, a lot of congressional leaders and kind of a scary thing to do as well. Yeah. She's setting an example. So when I've looked at members of Congress and the way they've

reacted to everything that's happened in the first several weeks of this administration, if you look at the leadership side of things, they're doing things like they'll introduce a bill saying this has to be prohibited. And that sort of comes across as ineffective because it's tacitly admitting, oh, well, this is already okay and we need to make it illegal. With AOC, she's more setting an example saying, this isn't okay, this isn't legal, come pick on me, what are you going to do about it? And I think that's a lot more effective, especially in these areas where it's not as politically advantageous, like talking about egg prices. But when they're talking about weaponized government, it's very effective to set the example for everyone else, as opposed to just being like, we're going to deliver so many floor speeches to stop this. She's taking it right away. She's doing it in real time on social media.

And that's something that's really lacked from Democrats so far in this. And, you know, hats off to her for actually doing it. Yeah. Yeah. And it's striking kind of from a from a just messaging point of view as well. Right. Because, I mean, one of the kind of through lines of a lot of these early kind of really disruptive actions that the Trump administration has been taking is that they are really kind of coming down very hard on a lot of kind of behind the scenes sort of faceless people who have been just kind of quietly doing work on behalf of the country, you know, for their entire careers, you know, people who do foreign aid abroad, people who, you know, work kind of thankless, quiet jobs in the bureaucracy to just kind of keep things running smoothly. And, you

know, these are the people whose lives are being upended. And it's insane and it's cruel and it's, you know, illegal and wrong, but it's also from a messaging point of view, kind of hard to make that case sometimes to people who are only sort of halfway paying attention, a quarter paying attention, who are who are not like predisposed to be like sympathetic to just government bureaucrats. Right. I mean, where that where they basically see Elon Musk slashing and burning and it's kind of in the corner of their eye and they're like, oh, he's over there, you know, cleaning up the bureaucracy a little bit. And I think that from a messaging point of view, somebody like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez stepping forward, somebody who does have this kind of gigantic independent platform, who's very notorious, who is, you know, she's super well known on the left and the right kind of can't help paying attention to her either, because they just all hate her so much. And I just think like, you know, if the question is, can you kind of like shake America out of this lethargy that that a lot, a lot, a lot of people are in at this moment?

These are the kind of battles that that that in theory you could see you could see making a difference. So I think it's I think it's really striking that she's doing it. And I like like like you said, I think it takes a lot of courage and is kind of a laudable thing. So so we'll leave it there. Thanks, Joe, for for coming on to chat about it a little bit. Thank you all for for watching and we'll see you next time.