Bulwark Takes - BREAKING: Congress Subpoenas Maxwell. Now What?
Episode Date: July 22, 2025Sam Stein takes on breaking news about Ghislaine Maxwell: the DOJ suddenly wants to talk, Congress just voted to subpoena her, and MAGA influencers are fed up with Trump’s distractions. Is Maxwell a...bout to flip, or is this all just a pardon play?
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Discover the exciting action of BedMGM Casino.
Check out a wide variety of table games with a live dealer,
or enjoy over 3,000 games to choose from like Cash Eruption, UFC Gold Lifts,
Make Insta-Deposits or Same Day Withdrawals.
Download the BedMGM Ontario app today.
Visit BedMGM.com for terms and conditions.
19 plus to wage your Ontario only.
Please gamble responsibly.
If you have questions or concerns about gambling or someone close to you,
please contact Connex Ontario at 1-866-53126 to speak to an advisor free of charge.
Ben MGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario.
Hey guys, it's me, Sam Stein managing out at the Bulwark.
I am randomly in the MSNBC green room.
Um, found the best backdrop I could get.
I'm commenting because there's some really, um, hot breaking news on
Jelaine Maxwell, uh, who is Jeffrey Epstein's
co-conspirator, uh, she has been incarcerated for some time now and kind
of this like looming figure over this controversy, which as you know, has
been just unspooling across Washington, DC and really, uh, rankling the white
house and congressional Republicans, uh, this morning, uh, fairly This morning, a fairly abrupt tweet or statement, I should say,
from Todd Blanch, who's at the Department of Justice. He's the deputy attorney general.
He put out this, I'm going to read it. This Department of Justice does not shy away from
uncomfortable truths. We can get back to that one. Not from nor from the responsibility to
pursue justice wherever the facts may lead.
The joint statement by the DOJ and FBI of July 6th remains as accurate today as it was when it was
random. I'm going to pause for a second there. What he's referring to is that statement from the DOJ
and FBI that they looked into the Epstein matter, but nothing new. Back to Todd Blinch, namely that
in recent thorough review of the files maintained by the FBI in the Eppsi case, no evidence was uncovered that could predicate an investigation
against uncharged their parties.
President Trump has told us to release all credible evidence.
And here comes the key part.
If Jelaine Maxwell has information about anyone who has committed crimes against
victims, the FBI and the DOJ will hear what she has to say, therefore at the
direction of attorney general Bondi, Pan Bondi, I have communicated with
counsel for Ms. Maxwell to determine whether she would be willing to speak with prosecutors
from the department.
I anticipate meeting with Ms. Maxwell in the coming days.
Until now, no administration on behalf of the department has inquired about her willingness
to meet with the government.
That changes now
Well, let me just say very bold time
Blanche very bold to actually pick up the phone and talk to the attorney and someone who has
Incredible information all this smaller. I'm so glad you did that
It raises the question of why you wouldn't do this action prior to issuing a report that
you had made a comprehensive review of all the evidence and determine there was nothing
more to investigate.
Uh, in theory, I would imagine that talking to Jelaine Maxwell and seeing what she might
have to say would probably be an investigative step, uh, to take, but you know, we don't
know, uh, perhaps that's just not something that you do.
I certainly don't know for, for example, I've never investigated
anything like that in my time.
Um, that said, there's a few more things to get to Maxwell's attorney, David
Oscar Marcus, uh, has responded and saying that they can confirm that they
are in discussions with the government and that Jelaine will always, Jelaine will always
testify truthfully and quote, we are grateful to president Trump for his
commitment to uncovering the truth in this case, and then something else
happened involving Jelaine Maxwell.
And this one was kind of crazy.
Um, the Congress from Tom Bichette Tim Bichette, sorry, decided this morning to offer a Jelaine Maxwell subpoena for when the house oversight committee was
gathering and the subpoena, the idea would be they're going to vote on the
idea to subpoena her, however, come before the committee.
Well, wouldn't you know it?
The hearing began and they passed it on a voice vote.
So that means that they've approved of a motion to subpoena Jelaine Maxwell.
Things are moving so fast here. I'm not entirely sure where that leaves us because in theory it would be up to, I guess, the chair of the oversight committee chairman Comer to schedule that subpoena.
That's subpoena, uh, house is about to go on recess. So it's not going to happen anytime soon, but, um, I guess we could end up
having a situation where Jalaine Maxwell, not only is talking to the
department of, uh, uh, justice, but also going up to the Hill and testifying.
I can't imagine that they would do this in public, but God, that would
be incredible if they did.
Uh, and what she has to say is obviously of immense intrigue for
everybody who's been following this case.
Um, there is some concern I would see, be honest about people who think
she's just part in shopping, uh, and that she's going to dangle out some
information and hopes that Trump gives her a pardon and obviously if you want
to dangle on information in hopes of getting a part of Donald Trump, you're
not going to say anything that would.
Uh, implicate Donald Trump.
So we'll have to see about that.
But a lot of developing stuff happening on the storyline.
All of this I should note is taking place amid what is best described as a real pickle
for House Republicans over what to do about this.
They have been sort of batting back and forth whether or not to allow a
vote to release, uh, any more information on Jeffrey Epstein.
Um, the consensus this morning, uh, from house speaker Mike Johnson was that
they were not going to do this, that they were absolutely going to, you know,
go on break for August, come back
and figure it out.
Um, the basic gist from Johnson was that they wanted to let August recess happen to give
the Trump administration some time to get the docs out.
But the Trump administration has decided it doesn't really care for all the docs.
Obviously president has rejected the idea of getting special counsel.
And then of course he's only requested grand jury testimony.
He has not requested any of their fundamental documents that would happen.
So that's taking place in, in the meantime, house Republicans are just
getting pummeled as we've talked about, uh, over this for, uh, by the
MAGA influencers, by the online community.
I would encourage folks to look one last thing before I let you go.
I would encourage folks to take a look at Will Summer and his latest from
false flag to give you a real sense of what's going on here.
One is he took, he took a low dive into what is clearly an effort to distract
from the main storyline by Donald Trump.
What you see is the stuff like, you know, let's arrest Barack Obama.
Let's deport Rosie O'Donnell, change the name of the Washington
commanders back to the Washington Redskins.
It's all, you know, all distraction.
So Will was kind of looking into is the distraction campaign working.
Uh, and what he determined is that for some shirt, like, you know, Benny Johnson,
Charlie Kirk, et cetera, like they're, they're willing to like throw three siren emojis up on a post
and say, yeah, let's arrest Barack Obama.
And you know, everyone's posting AI images of Obama in jumpsuit and whatever.
But for like the true, you know, Epstein heads for the people who care about
this stuff, like they see through it.
Uh, and a lot of posts on some of the, you know, forums where these people
congregate, they're just like, okay, cool arrest arrest Obama, but can we also like see the EPSTEAM files?
And so that to me is like indicating that the Republicans have a problem and maybe they
know it.
I just don't know.
The second thing that I think will, and this kind of got lost in the mix is, you know,
part of the problem that Trump has here is that there's just this like bifurcated Byzantine, Balkanized conservative media ecosystem where people have different audiences and
forums and channels.
And it's not like centralized top down right wing media echo chamber.
And so Trump gets a little bit more trouble controlling the narrative.
Uh, you can put out, uh, you can demand that people stop covering it and maybe
Foxwell for a beat, but others aren't.
Which brings us back to Julian Maxwell.
The Todd Lynch thing is so clear, an effort to try to make it seem like
they are moving with the tide series.
Why that Trump said we will release grand jury interviews.
It's why, you know, they put out the statement
this morning. They're going to talk to Jelai Maxwell. They wanted to appear like they are
looking for information that they are interested in uncovering more information.
But at the same time, when you have them going on recess for all of August, and when you have Trump
saying, you know what, maybe I don't want a special counsel. And when you have him resisting more than just grand jury interviews, you're going
to have that tension of, wait a second, they're on the one hand saying we're all for transparency,
but the other hand fighting transparency.
And until they resolve that central question, you have a sense that this stuff is going
to stay a problem for them.
Now maybe overtaking by other events that always happens. These things
don't last forever scandals certainly buy down. But we have that central tension. That's
a problem. So especially when you have Julian Maxwell potentially testifying for the house.
The likelihood is that this story stays in the spotlight. And I have to imagine that
these house members when they go home for August recess, they might actually get confrontations
with the rotors over the stuff. All right, I'll wrap it there. That's the latest news from this morning.
Again, more Jeffrey Epstein drama. It never ends. We'll keep covering it. Thank you so much for
paying attention to this stuff and we'll talk shortly.
