Classic Audiobook Collection - An Introduction to Yoga by Annie Besant ~ Full Audiobook [philosophy]
Episode Date: June 29, 2023An Introduction to Yoga by Annie Besant audiobook. Genre: philosophy First delivered as four public lectures in Benares in 1907, Annie Besant's An Introduction to Yoga invites the listener into yoga ...not as a set of gymnastic poses, but as a disciplined science of consciousness. Speaking as a leading figure in the Theosophical movement, Besant sets out to make India's spiritual psychology intelligible to Western readers while remaining rooted in the classical tradition of Patanjali's Yoga Sutras. She begins by asking what yoga is really for: the gradual unfolding of awareness and the realization of the deeper Self, explored through familiar and mysterious states of mind, from waking and dreaming to profound inner stillness. From there, she maps the major Indian schools of thought, clarifying how different philosophies explain the soul, the world, and liberation. The heart of the book is practical in the most demanding sense: training attention, mastering distraction, and using concentration and meditation to transform character and perception. As Besant connects ethics, mind control, and spiritual evolution, the central struggle becomes clear: can an ordinary life, with its scattered thoughts and restless desires, be reorganized into a purposeful path toward inner freedom? For ad-free listening try our premium subscription Chapters (Approximate) (00:00:00) Chapter 00 (00:01:38) Chapter 01 (00:06:00) Chapter 02 (00:10:52) Chapter 03 (00:11:48) Chapter 04 (00:15:42) Chapter 05 (00:21:19) Chapter 06 (00:27:03) Chapter 07 (00:31:21) Chapter 08 (00:36:45) Chapter 09 (00:42:28) Chapter 10 (00:47:06) Chapter 11 (00:49:39) Chapter 12 (00:54:51) Chapter 13 (00:56:43) Chapter 14 (01:02:12) Chapter 15 (01:04:44) Chapter 16 (01:08:01) Chapter 17 (01:41:08) Chapter 18 (01:46:10) Chapter 19 (01:51:33) Chapter 20 (01:57:33) Chapter 21 (02:02:34) Chapter 22 (02:09:10) Chapter 23 (02:13:08) Chapter 24 (02:21:22) Chapter 25 (02:29:22) Chapter 26 (02:43:53) Chapter 27 (02:52:55) Chapter 28 (03:02:17) Chapter 29 (03:04:30) Chapter 30 (03:08:18) Chapter 31 (03:10:22) Chapter 32 (03:19:08) Chapter 33 (03:30:04) Chapter 34 (03:35:14) Chapter 35 (03:44:12) Chapter 36 (03:46:18) Chapter 37 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Section 1 of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant.
Lecture 1. The Nature of Yoga.
In this first discourse, we shall concern ourselves with the gaining of a general idea of the subject of yoga,
seeking its place in nature, its own character, its object in human evolution.
1. The meaning of the universe.
Let us first of all ask ourselves, looking at the world,
around us, what it is that the history of the world signifies. When we read history, what does the
history tell us? It seems to be a moving panorama of people and events, but it is really only a
dance of shadows. The people are shadows, not realities. The kings and statesmen, the ministers and
armies, and the events, the battles and revolutions, the rises and falls of states, are the most
shadow-like dance of all. Even if the historian tries to go deeper, if he deals with economic
conditions, with social organizations, with the study of the tendencies of the currents of thought,
even then he is in the midst of shadows, the illusory shadows cast by unseen realities.
This world is full of forms that are illusory, and the values are all wrong. The proportions are
out of focus. The things.
which a man of the world thinks valuable, a spiritual man must cast aside as worthless.
The diamonds of the world, with their glare and glitter in the rays of the outside sun,
are mere fragments of broken glass to the man of knowledge.
The crown of the king, the scepter of the emperor, the triumph of earthly power,
are less than nothing to the man who has had one glimpse of the majesty of the self.
What is then real?
What is truly valuable?
Our answer will be very different from the answer given by the man of the world.
The universe exists for the sake of the self, not for what the outer world can give,
not for control over the objects of desire, not for the sake even of beauty or pleasure,
does the great architect plan and build his worlds.
He has filled them with objects, beautiful and pleasure-giving.
The great arch of the sky above, the mountains with snow-clad peaks, the valleys soft with verdure and fragrant with blossoms, the oceans with their vast depths, their surface now calm as a lake, now tossing in fury they all exist, not for the objects themselves, but for their value to the self. Not for themselves, because they are anything in themselves, but that the purpose of the self may be served and his manifestations made possible.
The world, with all its beauty, its happiness and suffering, its joys and pains,
is planned with the utmost ingenuity in order that the powers of the self may be shown forth
in manifestation.
From the fire mist to the logos.
All exist for the sake of the self.
The lowest grain of dust, the mightiest Deva in his heavenly regions,
the plant that grows out of sight in the Nookhofer mountain,
the star that shines aloft over us all, these exist in order that the fragments of the one-self
embodied in countless forms may realize their own identity and manifest the powers of the
self through the matter that envelops them. There is but one self in the lowliest dust
and the loftiest deva. Mamam Saha, my portion, a portion of myself, says Sri Krishna,
are all these Jivatmas, all these living spirits.
For them the universe exists, for them the sun shines,
and the waves roll, and the winds blow,
and the rain falls that the self may know himself as manifested in matter
as embodied in the universe.
End of Section 1.
Section 2 of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant.
This Libri-Wox recording is in the public don't.
2. The unfolding of consciousness. One of those pregnant and significant ideas which theosophy
scatters so lavishly around is this that the same scale is repeated over and over again.
The same succession of events in larger or smaller cycles. If you understand one cycle, you understand
the whole. The same laws by which a solar system is builted go to the building up of
the system of man. The laws by which the self unfolds.
holds his powers in the universe, from the fire mist up to the logos, are the same laws of consciousness
which repeat themselves in the universe of man. If you understand them in the one, you can
equally understand them in the other. Grasp them in the small and the large is revealed to you.
Grasp them in the large and the small becomes intelligible to you. The great unfolding from
the stone to the god goes on through millions of years, through aeon's
of time. But the long unfolding that takes place in the universe takes place in a shorter time cycle
within the limit of humanity, and this in a cycle so brief that it seems as nothing beside
the longer one. Within a still briefer cycle, a similar unfolding takes place in the individual
rapidly, swiftly, with all the force of its past behind it. These forces that manifest and
unveil themselves in evolution are cumulative in their power. Embodied in the stone, in the mineral world,
they grow and put out a little more of strength and in the mineral world accomplished their unfolding.
Then they become too strong for the mineral and press on into the vegetable world. There they
unfold more and more of their divinity until they become too mighty for the vegetable and become
animal. Expanding within and gaining experiences from the animal, they again overflow the limits of the
animal and appear as the human. In the human being, they still grow and accumulate with ever-increasing
force and exert greater pressure against the barrier and then out of the human they press
into the superhuman. This last process of evolution is called yoga. Coming to the individual,
the man of our own globe has behind him his long-estown.
evolution in other chains than ours, this same evolution through mineral to vegetable, through
vegetable to animal, through animal to man, and then from our last dwelling place in the lunar orb
onto this terrain globe that we call the earth. Our evolution here has all the force
of the last evolution in it, and hence when we come to this shortest cycle of evolution,
which is called yoga, the man has behind him the whole of the forces accumulating.
in his human evolution and it is the accumulation of these forces which enables him to make the passage so rapidly.
We must connect our yoga with the evolution of consciousness everywhere, else we shall not understand it at all.
For the laws of evolution of consciousness in a universe are exactly the same as the laws of yoga,
and the principles whereby consciousness unfolds itself in the great evolution of humanity are the same principles
that we take in yoga and deliberately apply to the more rapid unfolding of our own consciousness.
So that yoga, when it is definitely begun, is not a new thing, as some people imagine.
The whole evolution is one in its essence.
The succession is the same, the sequences identical.
Whether you are thinking of the unfolding of consciousness in the universe,
or in the human race, or in the individual, you can study the laws of the whole,
and in yoga you learn to apply those same laws to your own consciousness rationally and definitely.
All the laws are one, however different in their stage of manifestation.
If you look at yoga in this light, then this yoga, which seemed so alien and so far off,
will begin to wear a familiar face and come to you in a garb not wholly strange,
As you study the unfolding of consciousness and the corresponding evolution of form,
it will not seem so strange that from man you should pass on to Superman,
transcending the barrier of humanity and finding yourself in the region where divinity becomes more manifest.
End of Section 2
Section 3 of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant.
This Libre Walk's recording is in the public domain.
3. The oneness of the self. The self in you is the same as the self-universal.
Whatever powers are manifested throughout the world, those powers exist in germ, in latency,
in you. He, the supreme, does not evolve. In him there are no additions or subtractions.
His portions, the Jivatmas, are as himself, and they only unfold their powers in matter,
as conditions around them draw those powers forth.
If you realize the unity of the self
amid the diversities of the not self,
then yoga will not seem an impossible thing to you.
End of section 3.
Section 4 of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant.
This Libreworks recording is in the public domain.
4. The quickening of the process of self-unfoldment.
educated and thoughtful men and women you already are already you have climbed up that long ladder which separates the present outer form of the deity in you from his form in the dust
the manifest deity sleeps in the mineral and the stone he becomes more and more unfolded in vegetables and animals and lastly in man he has reached what appears as his culmination to ordinary men having done so much shall you not do more
With the consciousness so far unfolded, does it seem impossible that it should unfold in the future into the divine?
As you realize that the laws of the evolution of form and of the unfolding of consciousness in the universe and man are the same,
and that it is through these laws that the yogi brings out his hidden powers,
then you will understand also that it is not necessary to go into the mountain or into the desert,
to hide yourself in a cave or a forest in order that the union with the self may be obtained,
he who is within you and without you.
Sometimes for a special purpose seclusion may be useful.
It may be well at times to retire temporarily from the busy haunts of men.
But in the universe planned by Ishwara,
in order that the powers of the self may be brought out,
there is your best field for yoga, planned with divine wisdom and sagacity.
The world is meant for the unfolding of the self.
Why should you then seek to run away from it?
Look at Sri Krishna himself in that great Upanishad of yoga, the Bhagavad Gita.
He spoke it out on a battlefield and not on a mountain peak.
He spoke it to a kshadriya ready to fight and not to a brahmanah quietly retired from the world.
The Kurukshetra of the world is the field of yoga.
They who cannot face the world have not the strength to face the difficulties of yoga practice.
If the outer world outwearys your powers, how do you expect to conquer the difficulties of the inner life?
If you cannot climb over the little troubles of the world, how can you hope to climb over the difficulties that a yogi has to scale?
Those men blunder who think that running away from the world is the road to victory,
and that peace can be found only in certain localities.
As a matter of fact, you have practiced yoga unconsciously in the past,
even before your self-consciousness had separated itself, was aware of itself.
Sand knew itself to be different, in temporary matter at least,
from all the others that surround it.
And that is the first idea that you should take up and hold firmly.
Yoga is only a quickened process of the ordinary unfolding of
consciousness. Yoga may then be defined as the rational application of the laws of the unfolding of
consciousness in an individual case. That is what is meant by the methods of yoga. You study the
laws of the unfolding of consciousness in the universe, you then apply them to a special case
and that case is your own. You cannot apply them to another. They must be self-applied. That is the
definite principle to grasp. So we must add one more word to our definition.
Yoga is the rational application of the laws of the unfolding of consciousness self-applied
in an individual case. End of Section 4. Section 5 of an introduction to yoga by Annie
Bessent. This Libri-Wox recording is in the public domain.
5. Yoga is a science.
Next, yoga is a science, that is the second thing to grasp.
Yoga is a science and not a vague, dreamy drifting or imagining.
It is an applied science, a systematized collection of laws applied to bring about a definite end.
It takes up the laws of psychology applicable to the unfolding of the whole consciousness of man on every plane in every world
and applies those rationally in a particular case.
This rational application of the laws of unfolding consciousness acts exactly on the same principles
that you see applied around you every day in other departments of science.
You know by looking at the world around you how enormously the intelligence of man
cooperating with nature may quicken natural processes
and the working of intelligence is as natural as anything else.
We make this distinction and practically it is a real one
between rational and natural growth because human intelligence can guide the working of natural laws
and when we come to deal with yoga we are in the same department of applied science as let us say
is the scientific farmer or gardener when he applies the natural laws of selection to breeding
the farmer or gardener cannot transcend the laws of nature nor can he work against them he has no other
laws of nature to work with save universal laws by which nature is evolving forms around us,
and yet he does in a few years what nature takes perhaps hundreds of thousands of years to do.
And how? By applying human intelligence to choose the laws that serve him and to neutralize the
laws that hinder. He brings the divine intelligence in man to utilize the divine powers in nature
that are working for general rather than for particular ends.
Take the breeder of pigeons.
Out of the blue rock pigeon he develops, the powder or the fantail,
he chooses out, generation after generation,
the forms that show most strongly the peculiarity that he wishes to develop.
He mates such birds together, takes every favouring circumstance into consideration,
and selects again and again, and so on and on,
till the peculiarity that he wants to establish has become a well-marked feature.
Remove his controlling intelligence, leave the birds to themselves, and they revert to the
ancestral type.
Or take the case of the gardener, out of the wild rows of the hedge has been evolved
every rose of the garden.
Many petaled roses are but the result of the scientific culture of the five petal
rose of the hedge row, the wild product of nature.
A gardener who chooses the pollen from one plant and places it on the carpers of another
is simply doing deliberately what is done every day by the bee and the fly.
But he chooses his plants and he chooses those that have the qualities he wants intensified
and from those again he chooses those that show the desired qualities still more clearly
until he has produced a flower so different from the original stock
that only by tracing it back can you tell the stock whence it sprang.
So is it in the application of the laws of psychology that we call yoga.
Systematized knowledge of the unfolding of consciousness applied to the individualized self,
that is yoga.
As I have just said, it is by the world that consciousness has been unfolded
and the world is admirably planned by the logos for this unfolding of consciousness,
hence the would-be yogi, choosing out his objects and applying his laws,
finds in the world exactly the things he wants to make his practice of yoga real,
a vital thing, a quickening process for the knowledge of the self.
There are many laws.
You can choose those which you require,
you can evade those you do not require,
you can utilize those you need,
and thus you can bring about the result that nature,
without that application of human intelligence,
cannot so swiftly effect. Take it then that yoga is within your reach, with your powers,
and that even some of the lower practices of yoga, some of the simpler applications of the
laws of the unfolding of consciousness to yourself, will benefit you in this world as well as in all
others. For you are really merely quickening your growth, your unfolding, taking advantage of
the powers nature puts within your hands and deliberately eliminating the conditions which would
not help you in your work, but rather hinder your march forward. If you see it in that light,
it seems to me that yoga will be to you a far more real, practical thing than it is when you
merely read some fragments about it taken from Sanskrit books and often mistranslated into English
and you will begin to feel that to be a yogi is not necessarily a thing.
for a life far off, an incarnation far removed from the present one.
End of Section 5.
Section 6 of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant.
This Libri-Wox recording is in the public domain.
6. Man, a duality.
Some of the terms used in yoga are necessarily to be known.
For yoga takes man for a special purpose and studies him for a special end
and therefore only troubles itself about two great facts regarding man, mind and body.
First, he is a unit, a unit of consciousness.
That is a point to be definitely grasped.
There is only one of him in each set of envelopes,
and sometimes the the theosophist has to revise his ideas about man
when he begins this practical line.
Theosophy, quite usefully and rightly,
for the understanding of the human constitution,
divides man into many parts and pieces.
We talk of physical, astral, mental, etc.
Or we talk about sthoola Sharira, Sukhshma Sharira, Karana Sharira, and so on.
Sometimes we divide man into Anamaya Kosha, Pranamaya Kosha, Manomaya Kosha, etc.
We divide man into so many pieces in order to study him thoroughly
that we can hardly find the man because of the pieces.
This is, so to say, for the study of human anatomy and physiology.
But yoga is practical and psychological.
I am not complaining of the various subdivisions of other systems.
They are necessary for the purpose of those systems.
But yoga, for its practical purposes, considers man simply as a duality,
mind and body, a unit of consciousness in a set of envelopes.
This is not the duality of the self and the not self.
For in yoga, self includes consciousness, plus such matter as it cannot distinguish from itself,
and not self is only the matter it can put aside.
Man is not pure self, pure consciousness, sumvid.
That is an abstraction.
In the concrete universe there are always the self and his sheaths.
However tenuous, the latter may be, so that a unit of consciousness is inseparable from matter
and a Jivatma or monad is invariably consciousness plus matter.
In order that this may come out clearly, two terms are used in yoga as constituting man,
prana and prada, life breath and matter.
Prana is not only the life breath of the body, but the totality of the life forces of the universe,
or in other words, the life side of the universe.
I am prana, says Indra.
Prana here means the totality of the life forces.
They are taken as consciousness, mind.
Pradhana is the term used for matter.
Body or the opposite of mind means for the yogi in practice so much of the appropriated matter of the outer world
as he is able to put away from himself to distinguish from his own consciousness.
This division is very significant and useful if you can catch clearly hold off the root idea.
Of course, looking at the things.
from beginning to end, you will see prana, the great life, the great self, always present in all,
and you will see the envelopes, the bodies, the sheaths, present at the different stages,
taking different forms. But from the standpoint of yogic practice, that is called prana or self,
with which the man identifies himself for the time, including every sheath of matter
from which the man is unable to separate himself in consciousness. That unit to the
is the self so that it is a changing quantity as he drops off one sheath after another and says
that is not myself he is coming nearer and nearer to his highest point to consciousness in a single
film in a single atom of matter a monad for all practical purposes of yoga the man the working
conscious man is so much of him as he cannot separate from the matter enclosing him or with
which he is connected. Only that is body which the man is able to put aside and say,
This is not I, but mine. We find we have a whole series of terms in yoga, which may be
repeated over and over again. All the states of mind exist on every plane, says Vyasa, and this
way of dealing with man enables the same significant words, as we shall see in a moment,
to be used over and over again with an ever subtler connotation. They all
become relative and are equally true at each stage of evolution.
Now it is quite clear that so far as many of us are concerned, the physical body is the only thing of which we can say, it is not myself, so that in the practice of yoga at first for you, all the words that would be used in it to describe the states of consciousness, the states of mind, would deal with the waking consciousness in the body, as the lowest state and rising up from that all the words would be used in it.
be relative terms, implying a distinct and recognizable state of the mind in relation to that
which is the lowest. In order to know how you shall begin to apply to yourselves the various
terms used to describe the states of mind, you must carefully analyze your own consciousness
and find out how much of it is really consciousness and how much is matter so closely appropriated
that you cannot separate it from yourself.
End of Section 6.
Section 7 of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant.
This Libreworks recording is in the public domain.
7.
States of Mind
Let us take it in detail.
Four states of consciousness are spoken of amongst us.
Waking consciousness or Jagrat.
The dream consciousness or Swapna.
The deep sleep consciousness or Sushupti.
and the state beyond that called Turya.
Beginning of footnote number three.
It is impossible to avoid the use of these technical terms even in an introduction to yoga.
There are no exact English equivalents and they are no more troublesome to learn than any other technical psychological terms.
End of footnote number three.
How are those related to the body?
Jagrith is the ordinary waking consciousness that you and I are using
at the present time. If our consciousness works in the subtle or astral body and is able to impress
its experiences upon the brain, it is called Swapna, or in English dream consciousness. It is more
vivid and real than the jagrith state. When working in the subtler form, the mental body,
it is not able to impress its experiences on the brain. It is called suhupti or deep sleep
consciousness. Then the mind is working on its own contents, not on outer objects. But if it has so far
separated itself from connection with the brain that it cannot be readily recalled by outer means,
then it is called Thuria, a lofty state of trance. These four states, when correlated to the
four planes, represent a much unfolded consciousness. Jagrith is related to the physical,
swapna to the astral,
Sushupti to the mental,
and Turia to the Buddik.
When passing from one world to another,
we should use these words
to designate the consciousness
working under the conditions of each world.
But the same words are repeated
in the books of yoga with a different context.
There the difficulty occurs
if we have not learned their relative nature.
Swapna is not the same for all,
nor is Susupti the same for everyone.
Above all, the word samadhi, to be explained in a moment, is used in different ways and in different senses.
How then are we to find our way in this apparent tangle?
By knowing the state which is the starting point and then the sequence will always be the same.
All of you are familiar with the waking consciousness in the physical body.
You can find four states even in that if you analyze it
and a similar sequence of the states of the mind is found on every place.
How to distinguish them then?
Let us take the waking consciousness and try to see the four states in that.
Suppose I take up a book and read it.
I read the words,
My eyes are related to the outer physical consciousness.
That is the Jagrat state.
I go behind the words to the meaning of the words.
I have passed from the waking state of the physical plane
into the Swapna state of waking consciousness
that sees through the outer form, seeking
the inner life. I pass from this to the mind of the writer. Here the mind touches the mind.
It is the waking consciousness in its suhupti state. If I pass from this contact and enter the
very mind of the writer and live in that man's mind, then I have reached the Thuria state
of the waking consciousness. Take another illustration. I look at any watch, I am in Jagrath.
I close my eyes and make an image of the watch. I am in Swapna.
I call together many ideas of many watches and reach the ideal watch.
I am in Susupti.
I pass to the ideal of time in the abstract.
I am in Thuria.
But all these are stages in the physical plane consciousness.
I have not left the body.
In this way, you can make states of mind intelligible and real instead of mere words.
End of Section 7.
Section 8 of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant.
This Libri-Wox recording is in the public domain.
8. Samadhi
Some other important words which recur from time to time in the Yoga Sutras
need to be understood though there are no exact English equivalence.
As they must be used to avoid clumsy circumlocutions, it is necessary to explain them.
It is said yoga is samadhi.
Samadhi is a state in which the consciousness is so dissociated from the body
that the latter remains insensible.
It is a state of trance in which the mind is fully self-conscious,
though the body is insensitive,
and from which the mind returns to the body with the experiences it has had
in the superphysical state, remembering them when again immersed in the physical brain.
Samadhi for any one person is relative to his waking consciousness,
but implies insensitiveness of the body.
If an ordinary person throws himself into trance,
and is active on the astral plane, his samadhi is on the astral.
If his consciousness is functioning in the mental plane, samadhi is there.
The man who can so withdraw from the body as to leave it insensitive,
while his mind is fully self-conscious, can practice samadhi.
The phrase, yoga is samadhi, covers facts of the highest significance and greatest instruction.
Suppose you are only able to reach the astral world when you are a sleep,
Your consciousness there is, as we have seen in the Swapna state.
But as you slowly unfold your powers, the astral forms begin to intrude upon your waking physical consciousness until they appear as distinctly as do physical forms, and thus become objects of your waking consciousness.
The astral world then, for you, no longer belongs to the Swapna consciousness, but to the Jagrith.
You have taken two worlds within the scope of your Jagrith consciousness, the physical and the astral worlds,
and the mental world is in your Swapna consciousness.
Your body is then the physical and the astral bodies taken together.
As you go on, the mental plane begins similarly to intrude itself,
and the physical, astral and mental all come within your waking consciousness.
All these are then your Jagrath world.
These three worlds form but one world to you.
They're three corresponding bodies but one body that perceives and acts.
The three bodies of the ordinary man have become one body for the yogi.
If under these conditions you want to see only one world at a time, you must fix your attention on it and thus focus it.
You can in that state of enlarged waking concentrate your attention on the physical and same.
seat, then the astral and mental will appear hazy.
So you can focus your attention on the astral and seat,
then the physical and the mental being out of focus will appear dim.
You will easily understand this if you remember that in this hall,
I may focus my sight in the middle of the hall when the pillars on both sides will appear indistinctly.
Or I may concentrate my attention on a pillar and see distinctly,
but I then see you only vaguely at the same time.
It is a change of focus, not a change of body.
Remember that all which you can put aside as not yourself is the body of the yogi,
and hence as you go higher, the lower bodies form but a single body
and the consciousness in that sheath of matter which it still cannot throw away that becomes the man.
Yoga is samadhi.
It is the power to withdraw from all that you know as body.
and to concentrate yourself within.
That is samadhi.
No ordinary means will then call you back to the world that you have left.
Beginning of footnote number four.
An Indian yoghine samadhi discovered in a forest by some ignorant and brutal Englishman
was so violently ill-used that he returned to his tortured body
only to leave it again at once by death.
End of footnote number four.
This will also explain to you the phrase in the secret doctrine that the adept begins his samadhi on the Atmic plane.
When a Jivan Mukta enters into Samadhi, he begins it on the Atmic plane.
All planes below the Atmic are one plane for him.
He begins his Samadhi on a plane to which the mere man cannot rise.
He begins it on the Atmic plane and thence rises stage by stage to the higher cosmic planes.
The same word Samadhi is used to describe the states of the consciousness
whether it rises above the physical into the astral
as in self-induced trance of an ordinary man
or as in the case of a Jivan Mukta when the consciousness being already centered in the fifth or Atmic plane
it rises to the higher planes of a larger world.
End of Section 8
Section 9 of an introduction to yoga by Annihemiqa
Bessent. This Libri-Wox recording is in the public domain.
9. The Literature of Yoga
Unfortunately for non-San-Sanxkrit knowing people, the literature of yoga is not largely available
in English. The general teachings of yoga are to be found in the Upanishads and the
Bhagavad Gita. Those in many translations are within your reach, but they are general,
not special. They give you the main principles, but do not tell you about the methods in any
detailed way. Even in the Bhagavad Gita, while you are told to make sacrifices to become
indifferent and so on, it is all of the nature of moral precept. Absolutely necessary indeed,
but still not telling you how to reach the conditions put before you. The special literature
of yoga is, first of all, many of the minor Upanishads, the 100 and 8, as they are called.
Then comes the enormous mass of literature called the tantras. These books have a
an evil significance in the ordinary English ear, but not quite rightly. The tantras are very
useful books, very valuable and instructive. All occult signs is to be found in them, but they are
divisible into three classes, those that deal with white magic, those that deal with black
magic, and those that deal with what we may call grey magic, a mixture of the two.
Now magic is the word which covers the methods of deliberately bringing about supernormal,
states by the action of the will. A high tension of the nerves brought on by anxiety or disease
leads to ordinary hysteria, emotional and foolish. A similarly high tension brought about by the will
renders a man's sensitive to superphysical vibrations going to sleep has no significance, but going
into samadhi is a priceless power. The process is largely the same, but one is due to ordinary
conditions, the other to the action of the trained will.
The yogi is the man who has learned the power of the will
and knows how to use it to bring about foreseen and four determined results.
This knowledge has ever been called magic.
It is the name of the great signs of the past,
the one signs to which only the word great was given in the past.
The tantras contain the whole of that.
The occult side of man and nature,
the means whereby discoveries may be made, the principles whereby the man may recreate himself,
all these are in the tantras.
The difficulty is that without a teacher they are very dangerous.
And again and again, a man trying to practice the tantric methods without a teacher makes himself very ill.
So the tantras have got a bad name both in the West and here in India.
A good many of the American occult books now sold are scraps.
of the tantras which have been translated.
One difficulty is that these tantric works often use the name of a bodily organ to represent
an astral or mental centre.
There is some reason in that because all the centres are connected with each other from body to
body.
But no reliable teacher would set his pupil to work on the bodily organs until he had
some control over the higher centres and had carefully purified the physical body.
Knowing the one helps you to know the other
and the teacher who has been through it all can place his pupil on the right path
but if you take up these words which are all physical
and do not know to what the physical word is applied
then you will only become very confused and may injure yourself
for instance in one of the sutras it is said that if you meditate on a certain
part of the tongue you will obtain astral sight
That means that if you meditate on the pituitary body, just over this part of the tongue, astral sight will be opened.
The particular word used to refer to a centre has a correspondence in the physical body,
and the word is often applied to the physical organs when the other is meant.
This is what is called a blind, and it is intended to keep the people away from dangerous practices in the books that are published.
People may meditate on that part of their tongues all their lives without anything coming of it.
But if they think upon the corresponding centre in the body, a good deal, much harm may come of it.
Meditate on the navel, it is also said.
This means the solar plexes, for there is a close connection between the two.
But to meditate on that is to incur the danger of a serious nervous disorder almost impossible to cure.
All who know how many people in India suffer through these practices, ill understood,
recognize that it is not wise to plunge into them without someone to tell you what they mean
and what may be safely practiced and what not.
The other part of the yoga literature is a small book called the Sutras of Patanjali.
That is available but I am afraid that few are able to make much of it by themselves.
In the first place, to elucidate the sutras which are simply headed,
There is a great deal of commentary in Sanskrit only partially translated.
And even the commentaries have this peculiarity that all the most difficult words are merely repeated, not explained,
so that the student is not much enlightened.
End of Section 9.
Section 10 of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant.
This Libreworks recording is in the public domain.
10.
Some definitions.
There are a few words constant.
recurring which need brief definitions in order to avoid confusion. They are
unfolding, evolution, spirituality, psychism, yoga and mysticism. Unfolding always
refers to consciousness, evolution to forms. Evolution is the homogenous becoming the
heterogeneous, the simple becoming complex but there is no growth and no
perfectioning for spirit for consciousness.
It is all there and always, and all that can happen to it is to turn itself outwards instead of remaining turned inwards.
The God in you cannot evolve, but he may show forth his powers through matter that he has appropriated for the purpose, and the matter evolves to serve him.
He himself only manifests what he is, and on that many a saying of the great mystics may come to your mind.
Become, says St. Ambrose, what you are, a paradoxical phrase, but one that sums up a great truth.
Become in outer manifestation that which you are in inner reality. That is the object of the whole process of yoga.
Spirituality is the realization of the one. Psychism is the manifestation of intelligence through any material vehicle.
beginning of footnote number five see london lectures of 1907 spirituality and psychism end of footnote number five
yoga is the seeking of union by the intellect a science mysticism is the seeking of the same union by emotion
beginning of footnote number six the word yoga may of course be rightly used of all union with the self
whatever the road taken. I am using it here in the narrower sense as peculiarly connected with
the intelligence as a science herein following Patanjali. End of footnote number six. See the mystic.
He fixes his mind on the object of devotion. He loses self-consciousness and passes into a rapture
of love and adoration, leaving all external ideas wrapped in the object of his love.
and a great surge of emotion sweeps him up to God.
He does not know how he has reached that lofty state.
He is conscious only of God and his love for him.
Here is the rapture of the mystic, the triumph of the saint.
The yogi does not work like that.
Step after step he realizes what he is doing.
He works by science and not by emotion,
so that any who do not care for signs, finding it dull and dry,
are not at present unfolding that part of their nature
which will find its best help in the practice of yoga.
The yogi may use devotion as a means.
This comes out very plainly in Patanjali.
He has given many means whereby yoga may be followed
and curiously, devotion to Ishwara is one of several means.
There comes out the spirit of the scientific thinker.
Devotion to Ishwara is not for him an end in itself but means to an end.
the concentration of the mind.
You see there at once the difference of spirit.
Devotion to Ishwara is the path of the mystic.
He attains communion by that.
Devotion to Ishwara as a means of concentrating the mind
is the scientific way in which the yogi regards devotion.
No number of words would have brought out the difference of spirit
between yoga and mysticism as well as this.
The one looks upon devotion to Ishwara as a way of reaching the beloved.
The other looks upon it as a means of reaching concentration.
To the mystic, God in himself is the object of search.
Delight in him is the reason for approaching him.
Union with him in consciousness is his goal.
But to the yogi, fixing the attention on God is merely an effective way of concentrating the mind.
In the one, devotion is used to obtain an end.
In the other, God is seen as the end and is reached directly by rapture.
End of Section 10
Section 11 of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant
This Libri-Wox recording is in the public domain
11
God without and God within
That leads us to the next point
The relation of God without to God within
To the yogi who is the very type of Hindu thought
There is no definite proof of God save the witness of the self within
To his existence
and his idea of finding the proof of God is that you should strip away from your consciousness
all limitations and thus reach the stage where you have pure consciousness save a veil of the thin
nirvanic matter. Then you know that God is. So you read in the Upanishad whose only proof
is the witness of the self. This is very different from Western methods of thought which
try to demonstrate God by a process of argument. The Hindu will tell you that
you cannot demonstrate God by any argument or reasoning.
He is above and beyond reasoning.
And although the reason may guide you on the way,
it will not prove to demonstration that God is.
The only way you can know him is by diving into yourself.
There you will find him and know that he is without as well as within you.
And yoga is a system that enables you to get rid of everything from consciousness
that is not God,
save that one veil of the Nirvanic atom.
and so to know that God is, with an unshakable certainty of conviction.
To the Hindu that inner conviction is the only thing worthy to be called faith,
and this gives you the reason why faith is said to be beyond reason,
and so is often confused with credulity.
Faith is beyond reason, because it is the testimony of the self to himself,
that conviction of existence as self, of which reason is only one of the outer manifestations,
and the only true faith is that inner conviction which no argument can either strengthen or weaken of the innermost self of you,
that of which alone you are entirely sure.
It is the aim of yoga to enable you to reach that self constantly, not by a sudden glimpse of intuition,
but steadily, unshakably and unchangeably, and when that self is reached,
then the question, is there a God, can never again come into the human,
mind. End of Section 11. Section 12 of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant. This
Libri-Wox recording is in the public domain. 12. Changes of consciousness and vibrations
of matter. It is necessary to understand something about that consciousness which is yourself
and about the matter which is the envelope of consciousness but which the self so often identifies
with himself. The great characteristic of consciousness
is change with the foundation of certainty that it is.
The consciousness of existence never changes.
But beyond this all is change,
and only by the changes does consciousness become self-consciousness.
Consciousness is an ever-changing thing,
circling round one idea that never changes, self-existence.
The consciousness itself is not changed by any change of position or place.
It only changes its states within,
itself. In matter, every change of state is brought about by change of place. A change of consciousness
is a change of a state. A change of matter is a change of place. Moreover, every change of state
in consciousness is related to vibrations of matter in its vehicle. When matter is examined,
we find three fundamental qualities, rhythm, mobility, stability, satua, Rajas, tamas. Satwa is
rhythm, vibration. It is more than
rages or mobility. It is a regulated movement, a
swinging from one side to the other over a definite distance,
a length of wave, a vibration. The question is often put,
how can things in such different categories as matter and spirit affect
each other? Can we bridge that great gulf which some say
can never be crossed? Yes, the Indian has crossed it,
or rather has shown that there is no gulf.
To the Indian, matter and spirit are not only the two phases of the one,
but by a subtle analysis of the relation between consciousness and matter,
he sees that in every universe the logos imposes upon matter
a certain definite relation of rhythms,
every vibration of matter corresponding to a change in consciousness.
There is no change in consciousness, however subtle,
that has not appropriated to it a vibration in consciousness.
matter, there is no vibration in matter, however swift or delicate, which is not correlated
to it a certain change in consciousness.
That is the first great work of the logos, which the Hindu scriptures trace out in
the building of the atom, the Tan Matra, the measure of that, the measure of consciousness.
He who is consciousness imposes on his material the answer to every change in consciousness,
and that is an infinite number of vibrations.
so that between the self and his sheets there is this invariable relation, the change in consciousness and the vibration of matter and vice versa.
That makes it possible for the self to know the not self.
These correspondences are utilized in Raja Yoga and Hatha Yoga, the King Lee Yoga and the Yoga of Resolve.
The Raja Yoga seeks to control the changes in consciousness and by this control to rule the material we are.
The Hatha Yoga seeks to control the vibrations of matter, and by this control to evoke the desired changes in consciousness.
The weak point in Hatha yoga is that action on this line cannot reach beyond the astral plane,
and the great strain imposed on the comparatively intractable matter of the physical plane sometimes leads to atrophy of the very organs,
the activity of which is necessary for affecting the changes in consciousness that would be useful.
The Hatha Yogi gains control over the bodily organs with which the waking consciousness no longer concerns itself.
Having relinquished them to its lower part, the subconsciousness, this is often useful as regards the prevention of disease, but serves no higher purpose.
When he begins to work on the brain centers connected with ordinary consciousness, and still more when he touches those connected with the superconsciousness, he enters a dangerous region and is more.
likely to paralyze than to evolve. That relation alone it is which makes matter cognizable.
The change in the thinker is answered by a change outside and his answer to it and the change in
it that he makes by his answer rearrange again the matter of the body which is his envelope.
Hence the rhythmic changes in matter are rightly called its cognizability. Matter may be known
by consciousness because of this unchanging relation between the two sides of the manifest
logos, who is one, and the self becomes aware of changes within himself, and thus of those
of the external words to which those changes are related.
End of section 12.
Section 13 of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant.
This Libri-Wox recording is in the public domain.
13. Mind.
What is mind?
From the yogic standpoint, it is simply the individualized consciousness, the whole
of it, the whole of your consciousness, including your activities, which the Western psychologist
puts outside mind. Only on the basis of Eastern psychology is yoga possible. How shall we
describe this individualized consciousness? First, it is aware of things. Becoming aware of them,
it desires them. Desiring them, it tries to attain them. So we have the three aspects
of consciousness. Intelligence, desire, activity. On the physical plane, activity predominates,
although desire and thought are present. On the astral plane, desire predominates,
and thought and activity are subject to desire. On the mental plane, intelligence is the dominant
note. Desire and activity are subject to it. Go to the buddhik plane and cognition, as pure reason,
predominates, and so on. Each one.
quality is present all the time, but one predominates.
So with the matter that belongs to them.
In your combinations of matter, you get rhythmic, active, or stable ones.
And according to the combinations of matter in your bodies will be the conditions of the
activity of the whole of these in consciousness.
To practice yoga, you must build your bodies of the rhythmic combinations with activity
and inertia less apparent.
The yogi wants to make his body match.
match his mind. End of Section 13. Section 14 of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant.
This Libriworks recording is in the public domain.
14. Stages of Mind
The mind has five stages, Patanjali tells us.
And Vyasa comments that these stages of mind are on every plane.
The first stage is the stage in which the mind is slung about, the Kshipta stage.
It is the butterfly mind, the early stage of humanity, or in man the mind of the child,
darting constantly from one object to another.
It corresponds to activity on the physical plane.
The next is the confused stage, moorha, equivalent to the stage of the youth, swayed by emotions,
bewildered by them.
He begins to feel he is ignorant, a state beyond the fickleness of the child,
A characteristic state
corresponding to activity in the astral world.
Then comes the state of preoccupation or infatuation.
Wixipta, the state of the man possessed by an idea,
love, ambition, or what not.
He is no longer a confused youth,
but a man with a clear aim, and an idea possesses him.
It may be either the fixed idea of the madman
or the fixed idea which makes the hero or the saint.
But in any case, he is possessed by the idea.
The quality of the idea, its truth or falsehood, makes the difference between the maniac and the martyr.
Maniac or martyr, he is under the spell of a fixed idea.
No reasoning avails against it.
If he has assured himself that he is made of glass,
no amount of argument will convince him to the contrary.
He will always regard himself as being as brittle as glass.
That is a fixed idea which is false, but there is a fixed idea which makes the hero and the martyr.
For some great truth dearer than life is everything thrown aside.
He is possessed by it, dominated by it, and he goes to death gladly for it.
That state is said to be approaching yoga, for such a man is becoming concentrated,
even if only possessed by one idea.
This stage corresponds to activity on the lower mental plane,
where the man possesses the idea instead of being possessed by it.
That one-pointed state of the mind called a agagrita in Sanskrit is the fourth stage.
He is a mature man ready for the true life.
When the man has gone through life dominated by one idea,
then he is approaching yoga.
He is getting rid of the grip of the grip of.
of the world and is beyond its allurements. But when he possesses that which before possessed him,
then he has become fit for yoga and begins the training which makes his progress rapid.
This stage corresponds to activity on the higher mental plane. Out of this fourth stage or
aikagrata arises the fifth stage, Nirudhah or self-controlled. When the man not only possesses
one idea, but rising above all ideas, chooses as he wills, takes or does not take according
to the illumined will, then he is self-controlled and can effectively practice yoga.
This stage corresponds to activity on the buddhik plane.
In the third stage, Wixipta, where he is possessed by the idea, he is learning
Viveka, or discrimination between the outer and the inner, the real and the unreal.
When he has learned the lesson of Viveka, then he advances a stage forward,
and in Ekagrata he chooses one idea, the inner life, and as he fixes his mind on that idea,
he learns Vairagya or dispassion.
He rises above the desire to possess objects of enjoyment belonging either to this or any other world.
Then he advances towards the fifth stage, self-controlled.
In order to reach that, he must practice the six endowments, the Shat-Sampati.
These six endowments have to do with the will aspect of consciousness, as the other two,
Viveka and Vairagya have to do with the cognition and activity aspects of it.
By a study of your own mind, you can find out how far you are ready to begin the definite
practice of yoga.
Examine your mind in order to recognize these stages in yourself.
If you are in either of the two early stages, you are not ready for yoga.
The child and the youth are not ready to become yogis, nor is the preoccupied man.
But if you find yourself possessed by a single thought, you are nearly ready for yoga.
It leads to the next stage of one-pointedness, where you can choose your idea and cling to it of your own will.
Short is the step from that to the complete control which can inhibit all motion.
of the mind. Having reached that stage, it is comparatively easy to pass into samadhi.
End of section 14. Section 15 of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant.
This Libri-Wox recording is in the public domain.
15. Inward and outward turned consciousness.
Samadhi is of two kinds. One turned outward, one turned inward.
The outward turned consciousness is always first.
You're in the stage of samadhi belonging to the outward turn waking consciousness
when you can pass beyond the objects to the principles which those objects manifest.
When through the form you catch a glimpse of the life.
Darwin was in this stage when he glimpsed the truth of evolution.
That is the outward turned samadhi of the physical body.
This is technically the Sampragnata Samadhi.
the samadhi with consciousness.
But to be better regarded, I think as with consciousness outward turned,
that is, conscious of objects.
When the object disappears, that is,
when consciousness draws itself away from the sheath by which those objects are seen,
then comes the Asam Pragnata Samadhi,
called the Samadhi without consciousness.
I prefer to call it the inward turned consciousness,
as it is by turning away from the outer that this stage is reached.
These two stages of samadhi follow each other on every plane.
The intense concentration on objects in the first stage
and the piercing thereby through the outer form to the underlying principle
are followed by the turning away of the consciousness
from the sheath which has served its purpose
and its withdrawal into itself, that is, into a sheath
not yet recognized as a sheath.
It is then for a while conscious only of itself
and not of the outer world.
Then comes the cloud.
The dawning sense again of an outer,
a dim sensing of something other than itself,
that again is followed by the functioning of the nigher sheath
and the recognition of the objects of the next higher plane
corresponding to that sheath.
Hence the complete cycle is
Sampragnata Samadhi,
a sampragnaatya samadhi megha cloud and then the sampragnaata samadhi of the next plane and so on end of section 15 section 16 of an introduction to yoga by annie besant this library
work's recording is in the public domain sixteen the cloud this term in full dharma megha cloud of righteousness or of religion is one which is very
scantily explained by the commentators. In fact, the only explanation they give is that all the
man's past karma of good gathers over him and pours down upon him a reign of blessing. Let us see
if we cannot find something more than this meager interpretation. The term cloud is very often
used in mystic literature of the West, the cloud on the mount, the cloud on the sanctuary,
the cloud on the mercy seat, are expressions familiar to the West. Are expressions familiar to the West,
the student and the experience which they indicate is familiar to all mystics in its lower phases
and to some in its fullness. In its lower phases it is the experience just noted where the
withdrawal of the consciousness into a sheath not yet recognized as a sheath is followed by the
beginning of the functioning of that sheath, the first indication of which is the dim sensing
of an outer. You feel as though surrounded by a dense mist,
conscious that you're not alone but unable to see.
Be still. Be patient. Wait.
Let your consciousness be in the attitude of suspense.
Presently the cloud will thin and first in glimpses,
then in its full beauty, the vision of a higher plane will dawn on your entranced sight.
This entrance into a higher plane will repeat itself again and again
until your consciousness
centered on the buddik plane
and its splendous having disappeared
as your consciousness withdraws
even from that exquisite sheath
you find yourself in the true cloud
the cloud on the sanctuary
the cloud that wails the holiest
that hides the vision of the self
then comes what seems to be the draining away
of the very life
the letting go of the last hold on the tangible
the hanging in a void
the horror of great darkness
loneliness,
Unspeakable
Endure, endure
Everything must go
Nothing out of the eternal
can help you
God only shines out in the stillness
As says the Hebrew
Be still and know that I am God
In that silence
A voice shall be heard
The voice of the self
In that stillness
A life shall be felt
The life of the self
In that void a fullness
shall be revealed
the fullness of the self.
In that darkness a light shall be seen,
the glory of the self.
The cloud shall vanish,
and the shining of the self shall be made manifest.
That which was a glimpse of a far-off majesty
shall become a perpetual realization,
and knowing the self and your unity with it,
you shall enter into the peace that belongs to the self alone.
End of Section 16.
Section 17 of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant.
This Libri-Wox recording is in the public domain.
Lecture 2
Schools of Thought
In studying psychology, anyone who is acquainted with the Sanskrit tongue
must know how valuable that language is for precise and scientific dealing with the subject.
The Sanskrit, or the well-made, the constructed, the built-together tongue,
is one that lends itself better than any other to the elucidation of psychological difficulties.
Over and over again, by the mere form of a word, a hint is given, an explanation or relation is suggested.
The language is constructed in a fashion which enables a large number of meanings to be connoted by a single word
so that you may trace all allied ideas or truths or facts by this verbal connection
when you are speaking or using Sanskrit.
It has a limited number of important roots
and then an immense number of words constructed on those roots.
Now the root of the word yoga is a word that means to join,
yuj, and that root appears in many languages,
such as the English, of course, through the Latin,
wherein you get Yugaare, Junjere, to join.
And out of that, a number of English words are derived,
and will at once suggest themselves to you, junction, conjunction, disjunction, and so on.
The English word yoke, again, is derived from this same Sanskrit root
so that all through the various words or thoughts or facts connected with this one root,
you're able to gather the meaning of the word yoga and to see how much that word covers
in the ordinary processes of the mind and how suggestive many of the words connected with it
are acting, so to speak, as signposts to direct you along the road to the meaning.
In other tongues, as in French, we have a word like rapport, used constantly in English,
being on rapport, a French expression, but so anglicised that it is continually heard amongst
ourselves. And that term in some ways is the closest to the meaning of the Sanskrit word
yoga, to be in relation to, to be connected with, to end up, to end up, and to
enter into, to merge in, and so on.
All these ideas are classified together under the one head of yoga.
When you find Sri Krishna saying that yoga is equilibrium in the Sanskrit,
he's saying a perfectly obvious thing because yoga implies balance, yoking,
and the Sanskrit of equilibrium is samwata, togetherness,
so that it is a perfectly simple, straightforward statement,
not connoting anything very deep, but merely expressing one of the fundamental meanings of the word he's using.
And so with another word.
A word used in the commentary on the sutra, I quoted before,
which conveys to the Hindu a perfectly straightforward meaning.
Yoga is samadhi.
To an only English-knowing person that does not convey any very definite idea,
each word needs explanation.
To a Sanskrit-knowing man, the two words are obviously related to,
one another. For the word yoga we have seen means yoked together and samadhi derived from
the root the to place with the preposition sum and ah meaning completely together. Samadhi therefore
literally means fully placing together and its etymological equivalent in English would
be to compose. Come is equal to sum, posita is equal to place. Samadhi therefore
means composing the mind, collecting it together, checking all distractions.
Thus by philological, as well as by practical investigation, the two words yoga and samadhi
are inseparably linked together. And when Vyasa, the commentator, says,
Yoga is the composed mind, he is conveying a clear and significant idea as to what is implied
in yoga. Although Samadhi has come to mean by a natural sequence of ideas, the trans,
state which results from perfect composure. Its original meaning should not be lost sight of.
Thus, in explaining yoga, one is often at a loss for the English equivalent of the manifold
meanings of the Sanskrit tongue. And I earnestly advise those of you who can do so, at least
to acquaint yourselves sufficiently with this admirable language to make the literature
of yoga more intelligible to you than it can be to a person who is complete to.
ignorant of Sanskrit.
1. Its relation to
Indian philosophies.
Let me ask you to think for a while
on the place of yoga in its relation
to two of the great Hindu schools
of philosophical thought, for neither
the Westerner nor the non-Sanskrit
knowing Indian can ever really
understand the translations of the
chief Indian books, now current
here and in the West, and the
force of all the allusions they make
unless they acquaint themselves
in some degree with the outline
of these great schools of philosophy,
they being the very foundation
on which these books are built up.
Take the Bhagavad Gita.
Probably there are many who know that book
fairly well, who use it as
the book to help in the spiritual life,
who are not familiar with most of
its precepts. But you must
always be more or less in a fog
in reading it, unless you realize
the fact that it is founded on
a particular Indian philosophy
and that the meaning of nearly all the
technical words in it is
practically limited by their meaning in philosophy known as the Sankhya. There are certain phrases
belonging rather to the Vedanta, but the great majority are Sankyan, and it is taken for granted
that the people reading or using the book are familiar with the outline of the Sankian philosophy.
I do not want to take you into details, but I must give you the leading ideas of the philosophy.
For if you grasp these, you will not only read your Bhagavad Gita with much more intelligence
than before, but you will be able to use it practically for yogic purposes in a way that,
without this knowledge, is almost impossible.
Alike in the Bhagavad Gita and in the Yoga Sutras of Phatanjali, the terms are Sankhyang,
and historically yoga is based on the Sankhya, so far as its philosophy is concerned.
Sankhya does not concern itself with the existence of deity, but only with the becoming of a universe,
the order of evolution.
Hence it is often called
Nair-eshwara Sankya
the Sankhya without God
but so closely is it
bound up with the yoga system that
the latter is called
Sheshvara Sankhya with God
for its understanding therefore
I must outline part of the Sankhya
philosophy that part which
deals with the relation of spirit
and matter
note the difference from this of the Vedantic
conception of self and not self
and then find the reconciliation in the
the theosophic statement of the facts in nature. The directions which fall from the lips of
the Lord of Yoga in the Gita may sometimes seem to you opposed to each other and contradictory,
because they sometimes are phrased in the Sankyang and sometimes in the Vedantic terms, starting
from different standpoints, one looking at the world from the standpoint of matter, the other
from the standpoint of spirit. If you are a student of theosophy, then the knowledge of the facts
will enable you to translate the different phrases.
That reconciliation and understanding of these apparently contradictory phrases
is the object to which I would ask your attention now.
The Sankyang school starts with the statement that the universe consists of two factors.
The first pair of opposites, spirit and matter, or more accurately, spirits and matter.
The spirit is called Purusha, the man, and each spirit is an individual.
Purusha is a unit, a unit of consciousness.
They are all of the same nature, but distinct everlastingly the one from the other.
Of these units there are many.
Countless purushas are to be found in the world of men.
But while they are countless in number, they are identical in nature.
They are homogeneous.
Every purusha has three characteristics.
And these three are alike in all.
One characteristic is awareness.
It will become cognition.
The second of the characteristics is life or prana.
It will become activity.
The third characteristic is immutability, the essence of eternity.
It will become will.
Eternity is not, as some mistakenly think, everlasting time.
Everlasting time has nothing to do with eternity.
Time and eternity are two altogether different things.
Eternity is changeless, immutable, simultaneous.
succession in time, albeit everlasting. If such could be, could give eternity. The fact that
Purusha has this attribute of immutability tells us that he is eternal, for changelessness
is a mark of the eternal. Such are the three attributes of Purusha, according to the Sankhya. Though these
are not the same in nomenclature as the Vedantic Sat-Chit Ananda, yet they are practically
identical. Awareness or cognition is chit, life or force is sat, and immutability, the essence of eternity,
is ananda. Over against these purushas, homogeneous units, countless in number, stands
prakriti, matter, the second in the sanghung duality. Prakriti is one, purushas are many,
Prakriti is a continuum.
Purushars are discontinuous, being innumerable homogeneous units.
Continuity is the mark of prakriti.
Pause for a moment on the name Prakriti.
Let us investigate its root meaning.
The name indicates its essence.
Pra means fourth and kri is the root make.
Prahrity thus means fourth making.
Matter is that which enables the essence of being,
To become, that which is being is tense, becomes ex is tense, out being by matter,
and to describe matter as forthmaking is to give its essence in a single word.
Only by prakriti can spirit or purusha forth make or manifest himself.
Without the presence of prakriti, Purusha is helpless, a mere abstraction.
Only by the presence of and in prakriti can Purusha make manifest
his powers. Prakriti has also three characteristics, the well-known gunas, attributes or qualities.
These are rhythm, mobility and inertia. Rhythm enables awareness to become cognition, mobility
enables life to become activity, inertia enables immutability to become will. Now the conception
as to the relation of spirit to matter is a very peculiar one and confused ideas about it
give rise to many misconceptions. If you grasp it, the Bhagavad Gita becomes illuminated,
and all the phrases about action and actor, and the mistake of saying,
I act, become easy to understand as implying technical sanghian ideas.
The three qualities of Prakriti, when Prakriti's thought of as away from Purohya,
are in equilibrium, motionless, poised the one against the other,
counterbalancing and neutralizing each other so that matter is called jadha unconscious, dead.
But in the presence of Purusha all is changed.
When Purusha is in propinquity to matter, then there is a change in matter, not outside but in it.
Purusha acts on Prakriti by propinquity, says Vyasa.
It comes near Prakriti and Prakriti begins to live.
The coming near is a figure of speech.
An adaptation to our ideas of time and space, for we cannot posit nearness of that which is timeless and spaceless spirit.
By the word propinquity is indicated and influence exerted by Perusha on Prakriti, and this, where material objects are concerned, would be brought about by their propinquity.
If a magnet be brought near to a piece of soft iron or an electrified body be brought near to a neutral one, certain changes are right.
in the soft iron or in the neutral body by that bringing near.
The propinquity of the magnet makes the soft iron a magnet.
The qualities of the magnet are produced in it.
It manifests poles.
It attracts steel.
It attracts or repels the end of an electric needle.
In the presence of a positively electrified body,
the electricity in a neutral body is rearranged.
And the positive retreats while the negative gathers near the electrified body.
An internal change has occurred in both cases from the propinquity of another object.
So with Purusha and Prakrity.
Purusha does nothing, but from Purusha there comes out an influence,
as in the case of the magnetic influence.
The three gunas, under this influence of Purusha, undergo a marvelous change.
I do not know what words to use in order not to make a mistake in putting it.
You cannot say that Prakrity absorbs the influence,
You can hardly say that it reflects the Purusha, but the presence of Purisha brings about certain internal changes
causes a difference in the equilibrium of the three Gunas in Prakriti.
The three Gunas were in a state of equilibrium.
No guna was manifest.
One guna was balanced against another.
What happens when Purusha influences Prakriti?
The quality of awareness in Purusha is taken up by or reflected in the guna called Satva.
rhythm, and it becomes cognition in Prakriti.
The quality that we call life in Purusha is taken up by or reflected in the guna called Rajas,
mobility, and it becomes force, energy, activity in Prakriti.
The quality that we call immutability in Purucia is taken up by or reflected in the
guna called tamas, inertia, and shows itself out as will or desire in Prakriti, so that
in that balanced equilibrium of Prakriti, a change has taken place by the mere propinquity of
or presence of the Purusha. The Purusha has lost nothing, but at the same time a change has
taken place in matter. Cognition has appeared in it. Activity, force has appeared in it. Will
or desire has appeared in it. With this change in Prakriti, another change occurs. The three
attributes of Purusha cannot be separated from each other, nor can the three attributes of
Prakrithi be separated each from each. Hence, rhythm, while appropriating awareness, is under the
influence of the whole three-in-one Purusha and cannot but also take up subordinately life
and immutability as activity and will, and so with mobility and inertia. In combinations,
one quality or another may predominate, and we may have combinations. And we may have
combinations which show preponderantly awareness rhythm or life mobility or immutability inertia.
The combinations in which awareness rhythm or cognition predominates become mind in nature,
the subject or subjective half of nature. Combinations in which either of the other two
predominates become the object or objective half of nature, the force and matter of the Western
scientist. Beginning of footnote number 7. A friend notes that the first is the Shudhha Satva
of the Ramanujha school and the second and third the prakriti or spirit matter in the lower sense
of the same. End of footnote number 7. We have thus nature divided into two, the subject and the object.
We have now in nature everything that is wanted for the manifestation of activity,
for the production of forms and for the expression of consciousness.
We have mind and we have force and matter.
Purusha has nothing more to do, for he has infused all powers into Prakriti and sits apart,
contemplating their interplay, himself remaining unchanged.
The drama of existence is played out within matter and all that spirit does is to look at it.
Purusha is the spectator before whom the drama is played.
He is not the actor, but only a spectator.
The actor is the subjective part of nature, the mind, which is the reflection of awareness
in rhythmic matter.
That with which it works, objective nature, is the reflection of the other qualities of
Purusha, life and immutability in the Gunas, Rajas, and Thamas.
Thus, we have in nature everything that is wanted for the production of the universe.
The Purusha only looks on when the drama is played.
before him. He is spectator, not actor. This is the predominant note of the Bhagavad Gita.
Nature does everything. The Guna's bring about the universe. The man who says I act is mistaken
and confused. The Guna's act, not he. He is only the spectator and looks on. Most of the Gita
teaching is built upon this conception of the Sankhya. And unless that is clear in our minds,
we can never discriminate the meaning under the phrases of
a particular philosophy. Let us now turn to the Vedantic idea. According to the Vedantic view,
the self is one, omnipresent, all permeating, the one reality. Nothing exists except the self,
that is the starting point in Vedanta. All permeating, all controlling, all inspiring, the self
is everywhere present. As the ether permeates all matter, so does the one self permeate, restrain, support,
vivify all. It is written in the Gita that as the air goes everywhere, so is the self
everywhere in the infinite diversity of objects. As we try to follow the outline of Vedantic
thought, as we try to grasp this idea of the one universal self, who is existence, consciousness,
bliss, such chit, ananda, we find that we are carried into a loftier region of philosophy
than that occupied by the Sankya.
The self is one.
The self is everywhere conscious.
The self is everywhere existent.
The self is everywhere blissful.
There is no division between these qualities of the self.
Everywhere, all embracing, these qualities are found at every point in every place.
There is no spot on which you can put your finger and say,
The self is not here.
Where the self is, and he is everywhere.
there is existence, there is consciousness, and there is bliss.
The self-being consciousness imagines limitation, division.
From that imagination of limitation arises form, diversity, manyness.
From that thought of the self, from that thought of limitation, all diversity of the many is born.
Matter is the limitation imposed upon the self by his own will to limit himself.
A co-ham, Bahu Shiam.
I am one, I will to be many.
Let me be many, is the thought of the one.
And in that thought, the manifold universe comes into existence.
In that limitation, self-created, he exists, he is conscious, he is happy.
In him arises the thought that he is self-existence.
And behold, all existence becomes possible,
because in him is the will to manifest, all manifestation at once comes into existence, because in him is all bliss, therefore is the law of life the seeking for happiness, the essential characteristic of every sentient creature.
The universe appears by the self limitation in thought of the self.
The moment the self ceases to think it, the universe is not.
It vanishes as a dream.
That is the fundamental idea of the Vedanta.
Then it accepts the spirits of the Sankhya, the Purushas, but it says that these spirits are only reflections of the one self, emanated by the activity of the self, and that they all reproduce him in miniature, with the limitations which the universal self has imposed upon them, which are apparently portions of the universe, but are really identical with him.
It is the play of the supreme self that makes the limitations, and thus reproducing.
within limitations the qualities of the self, the consciousness of the self, of the supreme self
becomes in the particularized self, cognition, the power to know, and the existence of the
self becomes activity, the power to manifest, and the bliss of the self becomes will,
the deepest part of all, the longing for happiness, for bliss. The resolve to obtain it
is what we call will.
And so in the limited,
the power to know and the power to
act and the power to will,
these are the reflections in the particular
self of the essential qualities
of the universal self.
Otherwise put,
that which was universal awareness
becomes now cognition in the separated
self. That which in the
universal self was awareness
of itself becomes in the
limited self awareness of others.
The awareness of the whole
becomes the cognition of the individual.
So with the existence of the self,
the self-existence of the universal self
becomes, in the limited self, activity,
preservation of existence.
So does the bliss of the universal self,
in the limited expression of the individual self,
become the will that seeks for happiness,
the self-determination of the self,
the seeking for self-realization,
that deepest a sense of,
human life. The difference comes with limitation, with the narrowing of the universal qualities
into the specific qualities of the limited self. Both are the same in a sense, though seeming
different in manifestation. We have the power to know, the power to will, and the power to act.
These are the three great powers of the self that show themselves in the separated self in
every diversity of forms. From the minutest organism,
to the loftiest logos.
Then just as in the Sankhya,
if the Purusha, the particular self,
should identify himself with the matter in which he is reflected,
then there is delusion and bondage.
So in the Vedantah,
if the self, eternally free,
imagines himself to be bound by matter,
identifying himself with his limitations,
he is deluded,
he is under the domain of Maya.
For Maya is the self-identification of the self,
with his limitations.
The eternally free can never be bound by matter.
The eternally pure can never be tainted by matter.
The eternally knowing can never be deluded by matter.
The eternally self-determined can never be ruled by matter, save by his own ignorance.
His own foolish fancy limits his inherent powers.
He is bound because he imagines himself bound.
He is impure because he imagines himself impure.
He is ignorant because he imagines himself ignorant.
With the vanishing of delusion, he finds that he is eternally pure, eternally wise.
Here is the great difference between the Sankhya and the Vedantah.
According to the Sankya, Purisha is the spectator and never the actor.
According to Vedanta, the self is the only actor.
All else is Maya.
There is no one else who acts but the self.
According to the Vedanta teaching.
As says the Upanishad, the self-willed to see and there were eyes.
The self-willed to hear and there were ears.
The self-willed to think and there was mind.
The eyes, the ears, the mind exist because the self has willed them into existence.
The self-appropriates matter in order that he may manifest his powers through it.
There is the distinction between the Sankhya and the Vedanta
In the Sankhya, the propinquity of the Purusha brings out in matter or prakriti all these characteristics.
The Prakrity acts and not the Purusha.
In the Vedantta, self alone exists and self alone acts.
He imagines limitation and matter appears.
He appropriates that matter in order that he may manifest his own capacity.
The Sankhya is the view of the universe of the scientist.
The Vedanta is the view of the universe of the metal.
a physician. Heichel unconsciously expounded the Sankyang philosophy almost perfectly. So close to the Sankhian is his
exposition that another idea would make it purely Sankyan. He has not yet supplied that propinquity
of consciousness which the Sankhya postulates in its ultimate duality. He has force and matter,
he has mind in matter, but he has no Purusha. His last book, criticized by Sir Oliver Lodge,
is thoroughly intelligible from the Hindu standpoint
as an almost accurate representation of Sankham philosophy.
It is the view of the scientist, indifferent to the why of the facts which he records.
The Vedanta, as I said, is the view of the metaphysician.
He seeks the unity in which all diversities are rooted and into which they are resolved.
Now, what light does Theosophy throw on both these systems?
Theosophy enables every thinker to reconcile the partial statements which are apparently so contradictory.
Theosophy, with the Vedanta, proclaims the universal self.
All that the Vedanta says of the universal self-limitation, Theosophy repeats.
We call these self-limited selves monads, and we say, as the Vedantin says,
that these monads reproduce the nature of the universal self,
whose portions they are.
And hence you find in them the three qualities
which you find in the supreme.
They are units,
and these represent the purushas of the Sankhya,
but with a very great difference,
for they are not passive watchers,
but active agents in the drama of the universe,
although being above the five-fold universe,
they are as spectators who pull the strengths
of the players of the stage.
The Monad takes to himself
from the universe of matter atoms,
which show out the qualities corresponding to his three qualities
and in these he thinks and wills and acts.
He takes to himself rhythmic combinations
and shows his quality of cognition,
he takes to himself combinations that are mobile
through those he shows out his activity.
He takes the combinations that are inert
and shows out his quality of bliss as the will to be happy.
Now notice the difference of phrase and thought.
In the Sankhya, matter changed to reflect the spirit.
In fact, the spirit appropriates portions of matter
and through those expresses his own characteristics
an enormous difference.
He creates an actor for self-expression
and this actor is the spiritual man of the theological teaching,
the spiritual triad, the Atma-Buddhi-Manas,
to whom we shall return in a moment.
The monad remains ever beyond the full,
five-fold universe and in that sense is a spectator. He dwells beyond the five planes of matter,
beyond the Atmik or Akashik, beyond the buddhik plane, the plain of Vayu, beyond the mental plane,
the plane of Agni, beyond the astral plane, the plane of Varuna, beyond the physical plane,
the plane of Kubeira. Beyond all these planes, the monad, the self, stands self-conscious and
self-determined. He reigns in changeless peace and lives in eternity. But as said above, he appropriates
matter. He takes to himself an atom of the Atmic plane and in that he, as it were, incorporates his
will and that becomes Atma. He appropriates an atom of the buddhic plane and reflects in that his
aspect of cognition and that becomes Budhi. He appropriates an atom of the Manasic plane and
embodies as it were his activity in it and it becomes manas. Thus we get Atma plus
buddhi plus manas. That triad is the reflection in the five-fold universe of the monad
beyond the five-fold universe. The terms of theosophy can be easily identified with those
of other schools. The monad of the theosophy is the Jivatma of Indian philosophy, the
purusha of the Sankhya, the particularised self of the Vedanta.
The three-fold manifestation, Atma, Buddi Manas, is the result of the Purusha's propinquity to Prakriti,
the subject of the Sankham philosophy, the self-embodied in the highest sheets, according to the Vedantic teaching.
In the one you have this self and his sheets, and in the other the subject, a reflection in matter of Purusha.
Thus, you can readily see that you are dealing with the same concepts, but they are looked at from different standpoints.
We are nearer to the Vedanta than to the Sankya,
but if you know the principles you can put the statements of the two philosophies
in their own niches and will not be confused.
Learn the principles and you can explain all the theories.
That is the value of the theological teaching.
It gives you the principles and leads you to study the philosophies
and you study them with a torch in your hand instead of in the dark.
Now when we understand the nature of the spiritual man or triad,
what do we find with regard to all the manifestations of consciousness,
that they are duads.
Spirit matter everywhere, on every plane of our five-fold universe.
If you are a scientist, you will call it spiritualized matter.
If you are a metaphysician, you will call it materialized spirit.
Either phrase is equally true, so long as you remember, that both are always present in every
manifestation, that what you see is not the play of matter alone, but the play of spirit matter,
inseparable through the period of manifestation. Then when you come in reading an ancient book
to the statement, mind is material, you will not be confused. You will know that the writer is only
speaking on the Sankham line which speaks of matter everywhere but always implies that the spirit
is looking on and that this presence makes the work of matter possible. You will not, when
reading the constant statement in Indian philosophies that mind is material,
confuse this with the opposite view of the materialist,
which says that mind is the product of matter.
A very different thing.
Although the Sankham may use materialistic terms,
he always posits the vivifying influence of spirit,
while the materialist makes spirit the product of matter.
Really, a gulf divides them,
although the language they use may often be the same.
End of Section 17
Section 18
of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant
This Libri-Wox recording is in the public domain
2. Mind
Yoga is the inhibition of the functions of the mind
says Patanjali
The functions of the mind must be suppressed
and in order that we may be able to follow out really what this means
we must go more closely into what the Indian philosopher means by the word mind.
Mind, in the wide sense of the term, has three great properties or qualities,
cognition, desire or will, activity.
Now, yoga is not immediately concerned with all these three, but only with one, cognition,
the Santhian subject.
But you cannot separate cognition, as we have seen, completely.
from the others because consciousness is a unit and although we are only concerned with that part
of consciousness which we specifically call cognition we cannot get cognition all by itself
hence the Indian psychologist investigating this property cognition divides it up into three
or as the Vedanta says into four with all submission the Vedantin here makes a mistake
If you take up any Vedantic book and read about mind, you will find a particular word used for it which translated means internal organ.
This antah karana is the word always used where in English we use mind.
But it is only used in relation to cognition, not in relation to activity and desire.
It is said to be fourfold being made up of Manas, Buddi, Ahankara,
and chittah.
But this four-fold division
is a very curious division.
We know what Manas is,
what buddhi is,
what ahankara is,
but what is this chittah?
What is chittah?
Outside Manas,
buddhi and ahankara.
Ask anyone you like
and record his answer.
You will find that it is of the vaguest kind.
Let us try to analyze it for ourselves
and see whether light will come upon it
by using the theosophic idea of a triplet summed up in a fourth that is not really a fourth,
but the summation of the three.
Manas, buddhi and ahankara are the three different sides of a triangle,
which triangle is called chittah.
The chita is not a fourth but the sum of the three, Manas, buddhi and ahankara.
This is the old idea of a Trinity in unity.
Over and over again, H.P. Blavaravar.
Watsky uses this summation as a fourth to her triplets, for she follows the old methods.
The fourth, which sums up the three, but is not other than they, makes a unity out of their
apparent diversity. Let us apply that to Antah Karana. Take cognition. Though in cognition
that aspect of the self is predominant, yet it cannot exist absolutely alone. The whole self
is there in every act of cognition.
Similarly, with the other two,
one cannot exist, separate from the others.
Where there is cognition, the other two are present,
though subordinate to it.
The activity is there, the will is there.
Let us think of cognition as pure as it can be,
turned on itself, reflected in itself,
and we have buddhi, the pure reason,
the very essence of cognition.
This in the universe is represented,
by Vishnu, the sustaining wisdom of the universe.
Now let us think of cognition looking outwards and as reflecting itself in activity, its brother quality,
and we have a mixture of cognition and activity which is called Manas, the active mind.
Cognition reflected in activity is Manas in man or Brahma, the creative mind in the universe.
When cognition similarly reflects itself in will, then it becomes ahankara.
The I am I in man, represented by Mahadeva in the universe.
Thus, we have found within the limits of this cognition a triple division,
making up the internal organ or antah karna, manas, plus buddhi, plus ahankara,
and we can find no fort.
What is then chittah?
It is the summation of the three.
The three taken together the totality of the three.
Because of the old way of counting these things, you get this division of Antah Karana into four.
End of section 18.
Section 19 of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant.
This Libreworks recording is in the public domain.
3. The Mental Body
We must now deal with the mental body which is taken
as equivalent to mind for practical purposes.
The first thing for a man to do in practical yoga is to separate himself from the mental body,
to draw away from that into the sheath next above it.
And here, remember what I said previously, that in yoga, the self is always the consciousness
plus the vehicle from which the consciousness is unable to separate itself.
All that is above the body you cannot leave is the self for practical purposes and your first attempt must be to draw away from your mental body.
Under these conditions, Manas must be identified with the self and the spiritual triad, the Atma Budhi Manas, is to be realized as separate from the mental body.
That is the first step.
You must be able to take up and lay down your mind as you do.
a tool before it is of any use to consider the further progress of the self in getting rid of its envelopes.
Hence, the mental body is taken as the starting point.
Suppress, thought, quiet it, still it.
Now, what is the ordinary condition of the mental body?
As you look upon that body from a higher plane, you see constant changes of colors playing in it.
You find that they are sometimes initiated from within it.
then, sometimes from without. Sometimes a vibration from without has caused a change in consciousness
and a corresponding change in the colours in the mental body. If there is a change of consciousness,
that causes vibration in the matter in which that consciousness is functioning. The mental
body is a body of ever-changing hues and colours, never still, changing colour with swift
rapidity throughout the whole of it. Yoga,
is the stopping of all these. The inhibition of vibrations and changes alike. Inhibition of the
change of consciousness stops the vibration of the mental body. The checking of the vibration
of the mental body checks the change in consciousness. In the mental body of a master,
there is no change of color save as initiated from within. No outward stimulus can produce
any answer, any vibration in that perfectly controlled mental body.
The color of the mental body of a master is as moonlight on the rippling ocean.
Within that whiteness of moon-like refulgence lie all possibilities of color,
but nothing in the outer world can make the faintest change of hue sweep over its
steady radiance.
If a change of consciousness occurs within, then the change will send
a wave of delicate hues over the mental body which responds only in color to changes initiated
from within and never to changes stimulated from without. His mental body is never his self,
but only his tool or instrument, which he can take up or lay down at his will. It is only an outer
Sheet that he uses when he needs to communicate with the lower world.
By that idea of the stopping of all changes of color in the mental body, you can realize
what is meant by inhibition. The functions of mind are stopped in yoga. You have to begin
with your mental body. You have to learn how to stop the whole of those vibrations, how to make
the mental body colorless, still and quiet, responsive only to the impact.
pulses that you choose to put upon it. How will you be able to tell when the mind is really
coming under control when it is no longer a part of yourself? You will begin to realize this
when you find that by the action of your will, you can check the current of thought and hold
the mind in perfect stillness. Sheath after sheath has to be transcended and the proof of
transcending is that it can no longer affect you. You can affect it but it cannot
affect you the moment that nothing outside you can harass you can stir the mind the
moment that the mind does not respond to the outer save under your own impulse
then can you say of it this is not myself it has become part of the outer it can no
longer be identified with the self from this you pass on to the conquest of the
causal body in a similar way when the conquering of the causal
body is complete, then you go to the conquering of the buddhig body.
When mastery over the buddhik body is complete, you pass on to the conquest of the
Atmic body. End of section 19.
Section 20 of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant.
This Libri-Works recording is in the public domain.
4. Mind and Self.
You cannot be surprised that under these conditions
of continued disappearance of functions, the unfortunate student asks,
what becomes of the mind itself?
If you suppress all the functions, what is left?
In the Indian way of teaching, when you come to a difficulty,
someone jumps up and asks a question,
and in the commentaries, the question which raises the difficulties always put.
The answer of Patanjali is, then the spectator remains in his own form.
Theosophy answers, the monad remains.
It is the end of the human pilgrimage.
That is the highest point to which humanity may climb,
to suppress all the reflections in the five-fold universe
through which the monad has manifested his powers.
And then for the monad to realize himself,
enriched by the experiences through which his manifested aspects have passed,
but to the Sankhian the difficulty is very great.
for when he has only his spectator left, when spectacle seizes, the spectator himself almost
vanishes. His only function was to look on at the play of mind. When the play of mind is gone,
what is left? He can no longer be a spectator, since there is nothing to see. The only answer is
he remains in his own form. He is now out of manifestation, the duality is transcended,
and so the spirit sinks back into latency, no longer capable of manifestation.
There you come to a very serious difference with the theosophical view of the universe,
for according to that view of the universe, when all these functions have been suppressed,
then the monad is ruler over matter and is prepared for a new cycle of activity,
no longer slave but master.
All analogy shows us that as the self withdraws from sheath after,
he does not lose but gains in self-realization. Self-realization becomes more and more
vivid with each successive withdrawal, so that as the self puts aside one veil of matter
after another, recognizes in regular succession that each body in turn is not himself, by that
process of withdrawal, his sense of self-reality becomes keener, not less keen. It is
important to remember that because often Western readers dealing with Eastern ideas in consequence
of misunderstanding the meaning of the state of liberation or the condition of Nirvana,
identify it with nothingness or unconsciousness, an entirely mistaken idea which is apt
to colour the whole of their thought when dealing with yogic processes.
Imagine the condition of a man who identifies himself completely with the body so that he cannot,
even in thought, separate himself from it.
The state of the early undeveloped man, and compare that with the strength, vigor, and lucidity
of your own mental consciousness.
The consciousness of the early man limited to the physical body, with occasional touches
of dream consciousness, is very restricted in its range.
He has no idea of the sweep of your consciousness, of your abstract thinking.
But is that consciousness of the early man?
man more vivid or less vivid than yours? Certainly you will say it is less vivid. You have
largely transcended his powers of consciousness. Your consciousness is astral rather than physical,
but has thereby increased its vividness. As the self withdraws himself from sheath
after sheath, he realizes himself more and more, not less and less. Self-realization becomes
more intense, as sheath after sheath is cast aside. The center grows more powerful as the
circumference becomes more permeable, and at last a stage is reached when the center knows itself
at every point of the circumference. When that is accomplished, the circumference
vanishes, but not so the center. The center still remains, just as you are more vividly
conscious than the early man, just as your consciousness is more alive, not less, than that of
an undeveloped man, so it is as we climb up the stairway of life and cast away garment after
garment. We become more conscious of existence, more conscious of knowledge, more conscious of
self-determined power. The faculties of the self shine out more strongly as veil after veil
falls away. By analogy then, when we touch the monad, our consciousness should be mightier,
more vivid, and more perfect. As you learn to truly live, your powers and feelings grow in strength.
And remember that all control is exercised over sheets, over portions of the not-self.
You do not control yourself, that is a misconception. You control your not-serve. The self is never
controlled. He is the inner ruler immortal. He is the controller, not the controlled. As
sheath after sheath becomes subject to yourself and body after body becomes the tool of yourself,
then shall you realize the truth of the saying of the Upanishad that you are the self,
the inner ruler, the immortal. End of section 20. Section 21 of an introduction to yoga by
Annie Besant. This Librivox recording is in the public domain. Lecture 3. Yoga as
science. I propose now to deal first with the two great methods of yoga, one related to the self and
the other to the not self. Let me remind you before I begin that we are dealing only with the
science of yoga and not with other means of attaining union with the divine. The scientific method
following the old Indian conception is the one to which I am asking your attention.
I would remind you, however, that though I am only dealing with this,
there remain also the other two great ways of Bhakti and karma.
The yoga we are studying specially concerns the marga of Nianam or knowledge
and within that way, within that marga or path of knowledge,
we find that three subdivisions occur as everywhere in nature.
1. Methods of Yoga
With regard to what I have just called the two great methods in yoga,
we find that by one of these a man treads the path of knowledge by buddhi,
the pure reason, and the other the same path by Manas, the concrete mind.
You may remember that in speaking yesterday of the subdivisions of Antah Karana,
I pointed out to you that there we had a process of reflection of one quality in another,
and within the limits of the cognitional aspect of the self,
you find budi, cognition reflected in cognition,
and ahankara, cognition reflected in will,
and manas, cognition reflected in activity.
Bearing those three subdivisions in mind,
you will very readily be able to see that these two methods of yoga
fall naturally under two of these heads.
But what of the third?
What of the will of which?
which Ankara is the representative in cognition. That certainly has its road, but it can scarcely
be said to be a method. Will breaks its way upwards by sheer, unflinching determination,
keeping its eyes fixed on the end and using either buddhi or manas indifferently as a means
to that end. Metaphysics is used to realize the self. Science is used to understand the
not self, but either is grasped, either is thrown aside as it serves or fails to serve the needs
of the moment. Often the man in whom will is predominant does not know how he gains the object
he is aiming at. It comes to his hands but the how is obscure to him. He willed to have it
and nature gives it to him. This is also seen in yoga in the man of Ankara, the subtype of
will in cognition. Just as in the man of ahankara,
buddhi and manas are subordinate, so in the man of buddhi,
ahankara and manas are not absent, but are subordinate.
And in the man of manas, ahankara and buddhi are present, but play a subsidiary part.
Both the metaphysician and the scientist must be supported by ahankara.
That self-determining faculty, that deliberate setting of oneself, do a
chosen end that is necessary in all forms of yoga, whether a yogi is going to follow the purely
cognitional way of buddhi, or whether he is going to follow the more active path of Manas,
in both cases he needs the self-determining will in order to sustain him in his arduous task.
You remember it is written in the Upanishad that the weak man cannot reach the self,
strength is wanted determination is wanted perseverance is wanted and you must have in every successful
yogi that intense determination which is the very essence of individuality now what are these two
great methods one of them may be described as seeking the self by the self the other may be
described as seeking the self by the not self and if you will think of them in that fashion
I think you will find the idea illuminative.
Those who seek the self by the self, seek him through the faculty of buddhi.
They turn ever inwards and turn away from the outer world.
Those who seek the self by the not self, seek him through the active working manas.
They are outward turned.
And by study of the not self, they learn to realize the self.
The one is the path of the metaphysician, the other is the path.
of the scientist.
End of Section 21.
Section 22 of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant.
This Libri-Wox recording is in the public domain.
2. To the self by the self.
Let us look at this a little more closely with its appropriate methods.
The path on which the faculty of Buddhis used predominantly is, as just said, the path of the metaphysician.
It is the path of the phytophysion.
It is the path of the philosopher.
He turns inwards ever seeking to find the self by diving into the recesses of his own nature.
Knowing that the self is within him, he tries to strip away vesture after vesture, envelope
after envelope, and by a process of rejecting them, he reaches the glory of the unveiled self.
To begin this, he must give up concrete thinking and dwell amidst abstractions.
His method then must be strenuous, long-sustained, patient meditation.
Nothing else will serve his end, strenuous hard thinking,
by which he rises away from the concrete into the abstract regions of the mind.
Strenuous hard thinking further continued by which he reaches from the abstract region of the mind
up to the region of buddhi, where unity is sensed.
Still by strenuous thinking, climbing yet further,
Until buddhi, as it were, opens out into Atma, until the self is seen in his splendour,
with only a film of Atmic matter, the envelope of Atma in the manifested five-fold world.
It is along that difficult and strenuous path that the self must be found by way of the self.
Such a man must utterly disregard the not-self.
He must shut his senses against the outside world.
The world must no longer be able to touch him.
The senses must be closed against all the vibrations that come from without,
and he must turn a deaf ear, a blind eye to all the allurements of matter,
to all the diversity of objects, which make up the universe of the not-self.
Seclusion will help him until he is strong enough to close himself against the outer stimuli or allurements.
The contemplative orders in the Roman Catholic Church
offer a good environment for this path.
They put the outer world away as far away as possible.
It is a snare, a temptation, a hindrance.
Always turning away from the world,
the yogi must fix his thought, his attention, upon the self.
Hence, for those who walk along this road,
what are called the Siddhis, are direct obstacles and not helps.
But that statement that you find so often that the Siddhis are things to be avoided is far more sweeping than some of our modern theosophists are apt to imagine.
They declare that the Siddhis are to be avoided, but forget that the Indian who says this also avoids the use of the physical senses.
He closes physical eyes and ears as hindrances.
But some theosophists urge avoidance of all use of the astral senses and mental senses.
but they do not object to the free use of the physical senses or dream that they are hindrances.
Why not?
If the senses are obstacles in their finer forms,
there are also obstacles in their grosser manifestations.
To the man who would find the self by the self,
every sense is a hindrance and an obstacle,
and there is no logic, no reason, in denouncing the subtler senses only,
while forgetting the temptations of the physical senses,
impediments as much as the other.
No such division exists for the man who tries to understand the universe in which he is.
In the search for the self by the self, all that is not self is an obstacle.
Your eyes, your ears, everything that puts you into contact with the outer world
is just as much an obstacle as the subtler forms of the same senses
which put you into touch with the subtler worlds of matter,
which you call astral and mental.
This exaggerated fear of the Siddhis is only a passing reaction, not based on understanding but on lack of understanding.
And those who denounce the Siddhis should rise to the logical position of the Hindu yogi,
or of the Roman Catholic recluse, who denounces all the senses and all the objects of the senses as obstacles in the way.
Many the theosophists here, and more in the West, think that much is gained by acuteness of the physical senses and of the physical senses,
and of the other faculties in the physical brain.
But the moment the senses are acute enough to be astral,
or the faculties begin to work in astral matter,
they treat them as objects of denunciation.
That is not rational.
It is not logical.
Obstacles then are all the senses,
whether you call them siddhis or not,
in the search for the self by turning away from the not self.
It is necessary for the man who seeks the self by the self
to have the quality which is called faith in the sense in which I defined it before,
the profound, intense conviction that nothing can shake of the reality of the self within you.
That is the one thing that is worthy to be dignified by the name of faith.
Truly it is beyond reason.
For not by reason may the self be known as real.
Truly it is not based on argument.
For not by reasoning may the self be discovered.
It is the witness of the self within you to his own.
supreme reality and that unshakable conviction, which is Shradda, is necessary for the treading
of this path.
It is necessary because without it the human mind would fail, the human courage would be
daunted, the human perseverance would break with the difficulties of the seeking for the
self.
Only that imperious conviction that the self is, only that can cheer the pilgrim in the darkness
that comes down upon him in the void that he must cross before.
the life of the lower being thrown away, the life of the higher is realized.
This imperious faith is to the yogi on this path, what experience and knowledge are to the
yogi on the other.
End of Section 22.
Section 23 of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant.
This Libri-Works recording is in the public domain.
3.
To the self through the not-self.
Turn from him to the seeker for the self
through the not-self. This is the way of the scientist of the man who uses the concrete
active manas in order scientifically to understand the universe. He has to find the real
among the unreal, the eternal among the changing, the self amid the diversity of forms.
How is he to do it? By a close and rigorous study of every changing form in which the self
has wailed himself. By studying the not-self around him and in him, by understanding
his own nature by analyzing in order to understand, by studying nature in others as well as in
himself, by learning to know himself and to gain knowledge of others. Slowly, gradually, step by step,
plane after plane, he has to climb upwards, rejecting one form of matter after another, finding
not in these the self he seeks. As he learns to conquer the physical plane, he uses
the keenest senses in order to understand and finally to reject. He says this is not myself.
This changing panorama, these obscurities, these continual transformations, these are obviously
the antithesis of the eternity, the lucidity, the stability of the self. These cannot be myself
and thus he constantly rejects them. He climbs onto the astral plane and using there the finer astral
senses, he studies the astral world only to find that that also is changing and manifests,
not the changelessness of the self. After the astral world is conquered and rejected,
he climbs on into the mental plane and there still studies the ever-changing forms of that
Manasik world, only once more to reject them, these are not the self. Climbing still higher,
ever following the track of forms, he goes from the mental to the Buddhik plane,
where the self begins to show his radiance and beauty in manifested union.
Thus by studying diversity, he reaches the conception of unity
and is led into the understanding of the one.
To him the realization of the self comes through the study of the not-self,
by the separation of the not-self from the self.
Thus he does by knowledge and experience what the other does by pure thinking and by faith.
In this path of finding the self through the not self, the so-called Siddhis are necessary.
Just as you cannot study the physical world without the physical senses,
so you cannot study the astral world without the astral senses,
nor the mental world without the mental senses.
Therefore, calmly choose your ends and then think out your means,
and you will not be in any difficulty about the method you should employ, the path you should tread.
we see that there are two methods and these must be kept separate in your thought.
Along the line of pure thinking, the metaphysical line, you may reach the self.
So also along the line of scientific observation and experiment,
the physical line, in the widest sense of the term physical, you may reach the self.
Both are ways of yoga.
Both are included in the directions that you may read in the yoga sutras of Patanjali.
Those directions will cease to be self-contradictory,
if you will only separate in your thought the two methods.
Patanjali has given, in the later part of his sutras,
some hints as to the way in which the Siddhis may be developed.
Thus, you may find your way to the supreme.
End of Section 23.
Section 24 of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant.
This Libri-Wox recording is in the public domain.
4. Yoga and Morality.
The next point that I would pause upon and ask you to realize,
is the fact that yoga is a science of psychology.
I want further to point out to you that it is not a science of ethic,
though ethic is certainly the foundation of it.
Psychology and ethic are not the same.
The science of psychology is the result of the study of mind.
The science of ethic is the result of the study of conduct,
so as to bring about the harmonious relation of one to another.
Ethic is a science of life and not an investigation
into the nature of mind and the methods by which the powers of the mind may be developed and evolved.
I pause on this because of the confusion that exists in many people as regards this point.
If you understand the scope of yoga aright, such a confusion ought not to arise.
The confused idea makes people think that in yoga they out to find necessarily what are called precepts of morality, ethic.
Though Patanjali gives the universal precepts,
of morality and right conduct in the first two angas of yoga called yama and niama yet they are
subsidiary to the main topic are the foundation of it as just said no practice of yoga is possible
unless you possess the ordinary moral attributes summed up in yama and niama that goes without saying
but you should not expect to find moral precepts in a scientific textbook of psychology like yoga
A man studying the science of electricity is not shocked if he does not find in it moral precepts.
Why then should one studying yoga as a science of psychology expect to find moral precepts in it?
I do not say that morality is unimportant for the yogi.
On the contrary, it is all important.
It is absolutely necessary in the first stages of yoga for everyone.
But to a yogi who has mastered these, it is not necessary if he wants to follow the left-hand path.
for you must remember that there is a yoga of the left-hand path as well as a yoga of the right-hand path.
Yoga is there also followed, and though asceticism is always found in the early stages
and sometimes in the later, true morality is absent.
The black magician is often as rigid in his morality as any brother of the white lodge.
Beginning of footnote number 8.
Terms white and black as used here have no relation to race or color.
End of footnote number 8
Of the disciples of the black and white magicians
The disciple of the black magician is often the more ascetic
His object is not the purification of life
For the sake of humanity
But the purification of the vehicle
That he may be better able to acquire power
The difference between the white and the black magician
lies in the motive
You might have a white magician
A follower of the right-hand path
Rejecting meat because the way of
obtaining it is against the law of compassion. The follower of the left-hand path may also reject
meat, but for the reason that he would not be able to work so well with his vehicle, if it were
full of the Rajasic elements of meat. The difference is in the motive. The outer action is the same.
Both men may be called moral if judged by the outer action alone. The motive marks the path
while the outer actions are often identical. It is a moral thing to abstain from meat,
because thereby you are lessening the infliction of suffering.
It is not a moral act to abstain from meat from the yogic standpoint,
but only a means to an end.
Some of the greatest yogis in Hindu literature were and are men whom you would rightly call
black magicians.
But still they are yogis.
One of the greatest yogies of all was Ravana,
the Antichrist, the avatar of evil,
who summed up all the evil of the world in his own person,
in order to oppose the avatar of good.
He was a great, a marvelous yogi,
and by yoga he gained his power.
Ravana was a typical yogi of the left-hand path,
a great destroyer,
and he practiced yoga to obtain the power of destruction
in order to force from the hands of the planetary logos
the boon that no man should be able to kill him.
You may say, what a strange thing that a man can force from God such a power.
The laws of nature are the expression of divinity,
and if a man follows a law of nature, he reaps the result which that law inevitably brings.
The question whether he is good or bad to his fellow men does not touch this matter at all.
Whether some other law is or is not obeyed is entirely outside the question.
It is a matter of dry fact that the scientific man may be moral or immoral,
provided that his immorality does not upset his eyesight or nervous system.
It is the same with yoke.
Morality matters profoundly, but it does not affect these particular things, and if you think it does, you're always getting into bogs and changing your moral standpoint, either lowering or making it absurd.
Try to understand, that is what the theosophist should do, and when you understand, you will not fall into the blunders nor suffer the bewilderment many do when you expect laws belonging to one region of the universe to bring about results in another.
The scientific man understands that.
He knows that a discovery in chemistry does not depend upon his morality,
and he would not think of doing an act of charity with a view to finding out a new element.
He will not fail in a well-wrought experiment, however wishes his private life may be.
The things are in different regions, and he does not confuse the laws of the two.
As Ishwara is absolutely just, the man who obeys a law reaps the fruit of that law,
whether his actions in any other fields are beneficial to man or not.
If you sow rice, you will reap rice.
If you sow weeds, you will reap weeds.
Rice for rice and weed for weed.
The harvest is according to the sewing, for this is a universe of law.
By law we conquer, by law we succeed.
Where does morality come in then?
When you are dealing with the magician of the right-hand path, the servant of the
White Lodge, their morality is an all-important factor. In as much as he is learning to be a servant of
humanity, he must observe the highest morality, not merely the morality of the world, for the white
magician has to deal with helping on harmonious relations between man and man. The white magician
must be patient. The black magician may quite well be harsh. The white magician must be
compassionate. Compassion widens out his nature, and he's trying to make his consciousness,
include the whole of humanity.
But not so the black magician, he can afford to ignore compassion.
A white magician may strive for power, but when he is striving for power, he seeks it that he
may serve humanity and become more useful to mankind, a more effective servant in the
helping of the world.
But not so the brother of the dark side.
When he strives for power, he seeks it for himself, so that he may use it against the
whole world.
He may be harsh and cruel.
He wants to be isolated, and harshness and cruelty tend to isolate him.
He wants power, and holding that power for himself,
he can put himself temporarily, as it were, against the divine will in evolution.
The end of the one is Nirvana, where all separation has ceased.
The end of the other is Avichi, the uttermost isolation, the Kaivalya of the black magician.
Both are yogis, both follow the science of yoga, and each gets the result of the law he has followed.
One, the Kaivalya of Nirvana, the other the Kaivalya of Avichi.
End of Section 24.
Section 25 of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant.
This Libri-Works recording is in the public domain.
5. Composition of States of the Mind
Let us pass now to the States of the Mind as they are right.
called. The word which is used for the states of the mind by Patanjali is Vrithi.
This admirably constructed language, Sanskrit, gives you in that very word its own meaning.
Vrithis means the being of the mind, the ways in which mind can exist, the modes of the mind,
the modes of mental existence, the ways of existing. That is the literal meaning of this word.
A subsidiary meaning is a turning around, a moving in a circle.
You have to stop in yoga every mode of existing in which the mind manifests itself.
In order to guide you towards the power of stopping them, for you cannot stop them till you understand them,
you are told that these modes of mind are fivefold in their nature.
They are pentads.
The sutra, as usually translated, says, the vritis are fivefold.
but Pentad is a more accurate rendering of the word Panchatayah in the original than fivefold.
The word pentad at once recalls to you the way in which the chemist speaks of a monad, triad,
heptad when he deals with elements.
The elements with which the chemist is dealing are related to the unit element in different ways.
Some elements are related to it in one way only and are called monads.
Others are related in two ways and are called two ads and so on.
Is this applicable to the states of mind also?
Recall the shloka of the Bhagavad Gita in which it is said that the Jiva goes out into the world,
drawing round him the five senses and mind as sixth.
That may throw a little light on the subject.
You have five senses, the five ways of knowing, the five gna nandria's or organs of knowing.
Only by these five senses can you know the outer world.
Western psychology says that nothing exists in thought that does not exist in sensation.
That is not true universally.
It is not true of the abstract mind, nor wholly of the concrete.
But there is a great deal of truth in it.
Every idea is a pentad.
It is made up of five elements.
Each element making up the idea comes from one of the senses,
and of these there are at present five.
Later on, every idea will be a Heptad made up of seven elements.
For the present, each has five qualities which build up the idea.
The mind unites the whole together into a single thought synthesizes the five sensations.
If you think of an orange and analyze your thought of an orange,
you will find in it color which comes through the eye, fragrance, which comes through the nose,
taste which comes through the tongue roughness or smoothness which comes through the sense of touch and you would hear musical notes made by the vibrations of the molecules coming through the sense of hearing were it keener
if you had a perfect sense of hearing you would hear the sound of the orange also for wherever there is vibration there is sound all this synthesized by the mind into one idea is an orange that is the root reason for the association of ideas
It is not only that a fragrance recalls the scene and the circumstances under which the fragrance was observed,
but because every impression is made through all the five senses and, therefore, when one is stimulated,
the others are recalled.
The mind is like a prism.
If you put a prism in the path of a ray of white light, it will break it up into its seven constituent rays and seven colors will appear.
Put another prism in the path of these seven rays, and as they pass it,
through the prism, the process is reversed and the seven become one white light.
The mind is like the second prism.
It takes in the five sensations that enter through the senses and combines them into a single precept.
As at the present stage of evolution the senses are five only, it unites the five sensations
into one idea.
What the white ray is to the seven colored light, that a thought or idea is to the five-fold
sensation. That is the meaning of the much controverted sutra.
The vritayha panchataeha. The vritis or modes of the mind are pentads.
If you look at it in that way, the later teachings will be more clearly understood.
As I have already said, that sentence that nothing exists in thought which is not in sensation,
is not the whole truth. Manas, the sixth sense, adds to the sensations its own pure,
elemental nature. What is that nature that you find thus added? It is the establishment of a
relation, that is really what the mind adds. All thinking is the establishment of relations,
and the more closely you look into that phrase, the more you will realize how it covers all
the varied processes of the mind. The very first process of the mind is to become aware of an
outside world. However dimly at first, we become aware of a world. We become aware of the mind. We become aware of
of something outside ourselves, a process generally called perception.
I use the more general term establishing a relation because that runs through the whole
of the mental processes, whereas perception is only a single thing.
To use a well-known simile, when a little baby feels a pin pricking it, it is conscious of
pain, but not at first conscious of the pin, nor yet conscious of where exactly the pin is.
It does not recognize the part of the body in which the pin is.
There is no perception, for perception is defined as relating a sensation to the object which causes the sensation.
You only, technically speaking, perceive when you make a relation between the object and yourself.
That is the very first of these mental processes, following on the heels of sensation.
Of course, from the Eastern standpoint, sensation is a mental function also for the
the senses are part of the cognitive faculty, but they are unfortunately classed with feelings
in Western psychology. Now having established that relation between yourself and objects outside,
what is the next process of the mind? Reasoning, that is, the establishing of relations between
different objects as perception is the establishment of your relation with a single object.
When you have perceived many objects, then you begin to reason in order to establish relations
between them. Reasoning is the establishment of a new relation which comes out from the comparison
of the different objects that by perception you have established in relation with yourself
and the result is a concept. This one phrase, establishment of relations, is true all round.
The whole process of thinking is the establishment of relations and it is natural that it
should be so because the supreme thinker by establishing a relation brought matter into existence.
Just as he, by establishing that primary relation between himself and the not-self,
makes a universe possible, so do we reflect his powers in ourselves,
thinking by the same method, establishing relations,
and thus carrying out every intellectual process.
End of Section 25.
Section 26 of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant.
This Libreworks recording is in the public domain.
6. Pleasure and pain. Let us pass again from that to another statement made by this great
teacher of yoga. Pentads are of two kinds. Painful and non-painful. Why did he not say painful
and pleasant? Because he was an accurate thinker, a logical thinker, and he uses the logical
division that includes the whole universe of discourse. A and not A. Painful and not a. Painful and
non-painful. There has been much controversy among psychologists as to a third kind, indifferent.
Some psychologists divide all feelings into three, painful, pleasant, and indifferent.
Feelings cannot be divided merely into pain and pleasure. There is a third class called
indifference, which is neither painful nor pleasant. Other psychologists say that
indifference is merely pain or pleasure that is not marked enough to be called the one or the other.
Now, this controversy and tangle into which psychologists have fallen might be avoided if the primary
division of feelings were a logical division. A and not A, that is the only true and logical
division. Patanjali is absolutely logical and right. In order to avoid the quick sand into which
the modern psychologists have fallen, he divides all Rittis, modes of mind, and
into painful and non-painful.
There is, however, a psychological reason
why we should say pleasure and pain,
although it is not a logical division.
The reason why there should be that classification
is that the word pleasure and the word pain
express two fundamental states of difference,
not in the self, but in the vehicles in which that self dwells.
The self being by nature unlimited is ever-pressing,
so to say, against any boundaries,
which seek to limit him.
When these limitations give way a little before the constant pressure of the self,
we feel pleasure, and when they resist or contract, we feel pain.
They are not states of the self so much as states of the vehicles
and states of certain changes in consciousness.
Pleasure and pain belong to the self as a whole,
and not to any aspect of the self separately taken.
When pleasure and pain are marked off as belonging,
only to the desire nature, the objection arises. Well, but in the exercise of the cognitive
faculty, there is an intense pleasure. When you use the creative faculty of the mind, you're
conscious of a profound joy in its exercise, and yet that creative faculty can by no means
be classed with desire. The answer is, pleasure belongs to the self as a whole, where the
vehicles yield themselves to the self, and permit it to expand as is its own. The answer is,
eternal nature, then what is called pleasure is felt. It has been rightly said,
pleasure is a sense of moreness. Every time you feel pleasure, you will find the word
moreness covers the case. It will cover the lowest condition of pleasure, the pleasure of eating.
You are becoming more by appropriating to yourself a part of the not-self, food. You will find
it true of the highest condition of bliss, union with the supreme. You become more by expanding
yourself to his infinity. When you have a phrase that can be applied to the lowest and highest
with which you are dealing, you may be fairly sure it is all-inclusive, and that, therefore,
pleasure is moreness, is a true statement. Similarly, pain is lessness. If you understand
these things, your philosophy of life will become more practical and you will be able to help
more effectively people who fall into evil ways.
Take drink.
The real attraction of drinking lies in the fact that in the first stages of it,
a more keen and vivid life is felt.
That stage is overstepped in the case of the man who gets drunk,
and then the attraction ceases.
The attraction lies in the first stages,
and many people have experienced that,
who would never dream of becoming drunk.
Watch people who are taking wine
and see how much more lively and talkative they become.
come. There lies the attraction, the danger. The real attraction in most coarse forms of excess
is that they give an added sense of life and you will never be able to redeem a man from his excess
unless you know why he does it. Understanding the attractiveness of the first step, the increase of life,
then you will be able to put your finger on the point of temptation and meet that in your argument
with him. So that this sort of mental analysis is not only interesting, but
practically useful to every helper of mankind. The more you know, the greater is your power to help.
The next question that arises is, why does he not divide all feelings into pleasurable and
not pleasurable, rather than into painful and not painful? A Westerner will not be at a loss
to answer that. Oh, the Hindu is naturally so very pessimistic that he naturally ignores pleasure
and speaks of painful and not painful. The universe is full of pain, but that would not be a true
answer. In the first place, the Hindu is not pessimistic. He is the most optimistic of men.
He has not got one solitary school of philosophy that does not put in its foreground that the
object of all philosophy is to put an end to pain. But he is profoundly reasonable. He knows that
we need not go about seeking happiness. It is already ours, for it is the essence of our own
nature. Do not the Upanishads say, the self is bliss? Happiness exists. Happiness exists.
perennially within you. It is your normal state. You have not to seek it. You will necessarily
be happy if you get rid of the obstacles called pain which are in the modes of mind. Happiness is
not a secondary thing but pain is and these painful things are obstacles to be got rid of. When
they are stopped you must be happy. Therefore Patanjali says the vritis are painful and
non-painful. Pain is an excrescence. It is a transitory thing.
The self who is bliss, being the all-permeating life of the universe, pain has no permanent place in it.
Such is the Hindu position, the most optimistic in the world.
Let us pause for a moment to ask, why should there be pain at all if the self is bliss?
Just because the nature of the self is bliss.
It would be impossible to make the self turn outward, come into manifestation, if only streams of bliss flowed in on him.
He would have remained unconscious of the streams.
To the infinity of bliss, nothing could be added.
If you had a stream of water flowing unimpeded in its cores,
pouring more water into it would cause no ruffling.
The stream would go on heedless of the addition,
but put an obstacle in the way so that the free flow is checked,
and the stream will struggle and fume against the obstacle
and make every endeavor to sweep it away.
That which is contrary to it,
that which will check its current smooth flow,
that alone will cause effort. That is the first function of pain. It is the only thing that can
rouse the self. It is the only thing that can awaken his attention. When that peaceful, happy,
dreaming, interned self finds the surge of pain beating against him, he awakens. What is this
contrary to my nature, antagonistic and repulsive? What is this? It arouses him to the fact of a
surrounding universe, an outer world. Hence, in psychology, in yoga, always basing itself on the
ultimate analysis of the fact of nature, pain is the thing that asserts itself as the most
important factor in self-realization. That which is other than the self, will best spur
the self into activity. Therefore, we find our commentator, when dealing with pain, declares that
the karmic receptacle, the causal body, that in which all the seeds of
karma are gathered up, has for its builder all painful experiences.
And along that line of thought, we come to the great generalization.
The first function of pain in the universe is to arouse the self to turn himself to the
outer world to evoke his aspect of activity.
The next function of pain is the organization of the vehicles.
Pain makes the man exert himself and by that exertion the matter of his vehicles gradually
becomes organized.
If you want to develop and organize your muscles, you make efforts, you exercise them,
and thus more life flows into them and they become strong.
Pain is necessary that the self may force his vehicles into making efforts which develop
and organize them.
Thus, pain not only awakens awareness, it also organizes the vehicles.
It has a third function also.
Pain purifies.
We try to get rid of that which causes us pain.
It is contrary to our nature, and we endeavor to throw it away.
All that is against the blissful nature of the self is shaken by pain out of the vehicles.
Slowly they become purified by suffering, and in that way become ready for the handling of the self.
It has a fourth function.
Pain teaches.
All the best lessons of life come from pain rather than from joy.
When one is becoming old as I am, and I look on the long,
life behind me, a life of storm and stress, of difficulties and efforts, I see something of the
great lessons pain can teach. Out of my life story could efface without regret everything that it has
had of joy and happiness, but not one pain would I let go, for pain is the teacher of wisdom.
It has a fifth function. Pain gives power. Edward Carpenter said, in his splendid poem of
time and Satan, after he had described the wrestlings and the overthrows,
every pain that I suffered in one body became a power which I wielded in the next.
Power is pain transmuted.
Hence the wise man, knowing these things, does not shrink from pain.
It means purification, wisdom, power.
It is true that a man may suffer so much pain that for this incarnation, he may be numbed by it,
rendered wholly or partially useless.
Especially is this the case when the pain has deluged in childhood.
But even then, he shall reap his harvest of good later.
By his past, he may have rendered present pain inevitable,
but nonetheless can he turn it into a golden opportunity by knowing and utilizing its functions.
You may say, what use then of pleasure if pain is so splendid a thing?
From pleasure comes illumination.
Pleasure enables the self to manifest.
In pleasure, all the vehicles of the self are made harmonious.
They all vibrate together.
The vibrations are rhythmical, not jangled as they are in pain.
And those rhythmical vibrations permit that expansion of the self, of which I spoke,
and thus lead up to illumination, the knowledge of the self.
And if that be true as it is true, you will see that pleasure plays an immense part in nature,
being of the nature of the self belonging to him.
When it harmonizes the vehicles of the self from outside,
it enables the self more readily to manifest himself
through the lower selves within us.
Hence, happiness is a condition of illumination.
That is the explanation of the value of the rapture of the mystic.
It is an intense joy.
A tremendous wave of bliss, born of love triumphant,
sweeps over the whole of his being, and when that great wave of bliss sweeps over him,
it harmonizes the whole of his vehicles, subtle and grows alike,
and the glory of the self is made manifest, and he sees the face of his God.
Then comes the wonderful illumination, which for the time makes him unconscious of all the lower worlds.
It is because for a moment the self is realizing himself as divine,
that it is possible for him to see that divinity,
which is cognate to himself.
So you should not fear joy any more than you fear pain,
as some unwise people do,
dwarfed by a mistaken religionism.
That foolish thought which you often find in an ignorant religion,
that pleasure is rather to be dreaded
as though God grudged joy to his children
is one of the nightmares born of ignorance and terror.
The father of life is bliss.
He who is joy cannot grudge himself to his children,
and every reflection of joy in the world.
the world is a reflection of the divine life and a manifestation of the self in the midst of matter.
Hence, pleasure has its function as well as pain and that also is welcome to the wise,
for he understands and utilizes it. You can easily see how along this line pleasure and pain
become equally welcome. Identified with neither, the wise man takes either as it comes,
knowing its purpose. When we understand the places of joy and of pain, then both
lose their power to bind or to upset us.
If pain comes, we take it and utilize it.
If joy comes, we take it and utilize it.
So we may pass through life, welcoming both pleasure and pain, content whichever may come
to us, and not wishing for that which is for the moment absent.
We use both as means to a desired end, and thus we may rise to a higher indifference than
that of the stoic to the true wairagia.
both pleasure and pain are transcended and the self remains who is bliss end of section 26 section 27 of an introduction to yoga by annie
this library works recording is in the public domain lecture four yoga as practice in dealing with the third section of the subject i drew your attention to the states of mind and pointed out to you that according to the summer
word vrithi, those states of mind should be regarded as ways in which the mind exists.
Or, to use the philosophical phrase of the West, they are modes of mind, modes of mental existence.
These are the states which are to be inhibited, put an end to, abolished, reduced into absolute
quiescence. The reason for this inhibition is the production of a state which allows the higher
mind to pour itself into the lower. To put it in another way, the lower mind, unruffled,
waveless, reflects the higher as a waveless lake reflects the stars. You will remember the phrase
used in the Upanishad, which puts it less technically and scientifically, but more beautifully,
and declares that in the quietude of the mind and the tranquility of the senses, a man may
behold the majesty of the self. The method of producing this quiet,
is what we have now to consider.
1. Inhibition of states of mind.
Two ways, and two ways only, there are, of inhibiting these modes,
these ways of existence of the mind.
They were given by Sri Krishna in the Bhagavad Gita,
when Arjuna complained that the mind was impetuous, strong,
difficult to bend, hard to curb as the wind.
His answer was definite.
Without doubt, O Mighty Armed, the mind is hard to curb and restless,
but it may be curbed by constant practice, abhasa, and by dispassion,
Vairagya.
Beginning of footnote number 9
Locks it 6.35-35.
End of footnote number 9.
These are the two methods, the only two methods by which this restless, storm-tossed mind,
can be reduced to peace and quietude.
Vyaragya and Abhyasa, they are the only two methods, but when steadily practiced, they inevitably bring about the result.
Let us consider what these two familiar words imply.
Vairagya, or dispassion, has as its main idea the clearing away of all passion for attraction to, the objects of the senses,
the bonds which are made by desire between man and the objects around him.
Raga is passion, addiction, that which bind to.
a man to thinks. The prefix y, changing to why by a grammatical rule, means without or in opposition to.
Hence, Vairagya is non-passion, absence of passion, not bound, tied or related to any of these outside objects.
Remembering that thinking is the establishing of relations, we see that the getting rid of relations will impose on the mind the stillness that is yoga.
All Raga must be entirely put aside.
We must separate ourselves from it.
We must acquire the opposite condition, where every passion is tilled, where no attraction for the objects of desire remains,
where all the bonds that unite the man to surrounding objects are broken.
When the bonds of the heart are broken, then the man becomes immortal.
How shall this dispassion be brought about?
There is only one right way of doing it.
by slowly and gradually drawing ourselves away from outer objects through the more potent attraction of the self.
The self is ever attracted to the self.
That attraction alone can turn these vehicles away from the alluring and repulsive objects that surround them.
Free from all Raga, no more establishing relations with objects,
the separated self finds himself liberated and free,
and union with the one self becomes the sole object.
of desire. But not instantly by one supreme effort, by one endeavor can this great quality
of dispassion become the characteristic of the man bent on yoga. He must practice dispassion
constantly and steadfastly. That is implied in the word joined with dispassion, abhyasa or practice.
The practice must be constant, continual and unbroken. Practice does not mean only meditation,
though this is the sense in which the word is generally used.
It means the deliberate, unbroken, carrying out of dispassion
in the very midst of the objects that attract.
In order that you may acquire dispassion,
you must practice it in the everyday things of life.
I have said that many confine abhyasa to meditation.
That is why so few people attain to yoga.
Another error is to wait for some big opportunity.
People prepare themselves for some tremendous sacrifice,
and forget the little things of everyday life, in which the mind is knitted to objects by a myriad tiny threads.
These things, by their pettiness, fail to attract attention, and in waiting for the large thing which does not come,
people lose the daily practice of dispassion towards the little things that are around them.
By curbing desire at every moment, we become indifferent to all the objects that surround us.
then when the great opportunity comes, we seize it while scarce aware that it is upon us.
Every day, all day long, practice, that is what is demanded from the aspirant to yoga,
for only on that line can success come.
And it is the wearisomeness of this strenuous, continued endeavour that tires out the majority of aspirants.
I must here warn you of a danger, there is a rough and ready way of quickly bringing about dispassion.
Some say to you, kill out all love and affection, harden your hearts, become cold to all around you,
desert your wife and children, your father and mother, and fly to the desert or the jungle,
put a wall between yourself and all objects of desire, then dispassion will be yours.
It is true that it is comparatively easy to acquire dispassion in that way, but by that you kill more than desire.
You put round the self, who is love, a barrier, through.
which he is unable to pierce. You cramp yourself by encircling yourself with a thick shell
and you cannot break through it. You harden yourself where you out to be softened. You isolate
yourself where you out to be embracing others. You kill love and not only desire, forgetting
that love clings to the self and seeks the self, while desire clings to the sheaths
of the self, the bodies in which the self is clothed. Love is the desire. Love is the desire.
of the separated self for union with all other separated selves.
Dispassion is the non-attraction to matter.
A very different thing.
You must guard love, for it is the very self of the self.
In your anxiety to acquire dispassion, do not kill out love.
Love is the life in every one of us separate itself.
It draws every separated self to the other self.
Each one of us is a part of one mighty whole.
efface desire as regards the vehicles that clothe the self, but do not efface love as regards the self,
that never-dying force which draws self to self.
In this great upclimbing, it is far better to suffer from love rather than to reject it,
and to harden your hearts against all ties and claims of affection.
Suffer for love, even though the suffering be bitter.
Love, even though the love be an avenue of pain.
The pain shall pass away, but the love shall continue to grow,
and in the unity of the self, you shall finally discover that love is the great attracting force
which makes all things one.
Many people, in trying to kill out love, only throw themselves back, becoming less human,
not superhuman, by their mistaken attempts.
It is by and through human ties of love and sympathy that the self unfolds.
It is said of the masters that they love all humanity,
as a mother loves her first-born son. Their love is not love watered down to coolness,
but love for all raised to the heat of the highest particular loves of smaller souls.
Always mistrust the teacher who tells you to kill out love to be indifferent to human
affections. That is the way which leads to the left-hand path.
End of Section 27
Section 28 of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant.
This Librivox recording is in the public domain.
2. Meditation with and without seed.
The next step is our method of meditation.
What do we mean by meditation?
Meditation cannot be the same for every man.
Though the same in principle, namely, the studying of the mind,
the method must vary with the temperament of the practitioner.
Suppose that you are a strong-minded and intelligent man,
fond of reasoning.
suppose that connected links of thought and argument have been to you the only exorcise of the mind.
Utilize that past training.
Do not imagine that you can make your mind still by a single effort.
Follow a logical chain of reasoning, step by step, link after link.
Do not allow the mind to swerve a hair's breadth from it.
Do not allow the mind to go aside to other lines of thought.
Keep it rigidly along a single line and steadiness.
will gradually result.
Then, when you have worked up to your highest point of reasoning
and reached the last link of your chain of argument
and your mind will carry you no further
and beyond that you can see nothing, then stop.
At that highest point of thinking,
cling desperately to the last link of the chain
and there keep the mind poised
in steadiness and strenuous quiet
waiting for what may come.
After a while, you will be
able to maintain this attitude for a considerable time. For one in whom imagination is stronger
than the reasoning faculty, the method by devotion rather than by reasoning is the method. Let him
call imagination to his help. He should picture some scene in which the object of his devotion
forms the central figure, building it up, bit by bit as a painter paints a picture,
putting in it gradually all the elements of the scene. He must work at it as a
a painter works on his canvas, line by line, his brush the brush of imagination. At first,
the work will be very slow, but the picture soon begins to present itself at call. Over and over
he should picture the scene dwelling less and less on the surrounding objects and more and more
on the central figure, which is the object of his heart's devotion. The drawing of the mind to a point
in this way, brings it under control and steadies it, and thus gradually by this use of the
imagination, he brings the mind under command. The object of devotion will be according to the man's
religion. Suppose, as is the case with many of you, that his object of devotion is Sri Krishna,
picture him in any scene of his earthly life as in the Battle of Kurukshetra. Imagine the armies
arrayed for battle on both sides. Imagine Arjuno
on the floor of the chariot, despondent, despairing, then come to Sri Krishna, the chariator,
the friend and teacher, then fixing your mind on the central figure, let your heart go out to
him with one-pointed devotion, resting on him, poise yourself in silence, and as before, wait for
what may come. This is what is called meditation with seed. The central figure, or the last link in reasoning,
that is the seed. You have gradually made the vagrant mind steady by this process of slow and gradual
curbing and at last you are fixed on the central thought or the central figure and there you are
poised. Now let even that go. Drop the central thought, the idea, the seed of meditation. Let everything go.
But keep the mind in the position gained, the highest point reached, vigorous and alert. This is meditation
without a seed.
Remain poised and wait in the silence and the void.
You are in the cloud before described and passed through the condition before sketched.
Suddenly there will be a change, a change unmistakable, stupendous, incredible.
In that silence as said, a voice shall be heard.
In that void, a form shall reveal itself.
In that empty sky, a sun shall rise and in the light.
of that sun, you shall realize your own identity with it, and know that that which is empty to the
eye of sense is full to the eye of spirit, that that which is silence to the ear of sense is full
of music to the ear of spirit. Along such lines, you can learn to bring into control your mind,
to discipline your vagrant thought, and thus to reach illumination. One word of warning,
you cannot do this while you are trying meditation with the seed, until,
you are able to cling to your seat definitely for a considerable time
and maintain throughout an alert attention.
It is the emptiness of alert expectation,
not the emptiness of impending sleep.
If your mind be not in that condition,
its mere emptiness is dangerous.
It leads to mediumship, to possession, to obsession.
You can wisely aim at emptiness
only when you have so disciplined the mind
that it can hold for a considerable time,
to a single point and remain alert when that point is dropped.
The question is sometimes asked,
suppose that I do this and succeed in becoming unconscious of the body,
suppose that I do rise into a higher region,
is it quite sure that I shall come back again to the body?
Having left the body, shall I be certain to return?
The idea of non-return makes a man nervous.
Even if he says that matter is nothing and spirit is everything,
he yet does not like to lose touch with his body,
and losing that touch, by sheer fear,
he drops back to the earth
after having taken so much trouble to leave it.
You should, however, have no such fear.
That which will draw you back again
is the trace of your past,
which remains under all these conditions.
The question is of the same kind as
why should a state of Pralaia ever come to an end
and a new state of Manvantara begin?
and the answer is the same from the Hindu psychological standpoint.
Because although you have dropped the very seed of thought,
you cannot destroy the traces which that thought has left
and that trace is a germ and it tends to draw again to itself matter
that it may express itself once more.
This trace is what is called the privation of matter, samskara.
Far as you may soar beyond the concrete mind,
that trace left in the thinking principle of what you have,
have thought and have known that remains and will inevitably draw you back. You cannot escape your
past and until your life period is over that Smskara will bring you back. It is this also which at the
close of the heavenly life brings a man back to rebirth. It is the expression of the law of rhythm.
In light on the path that wonderful occult treatise, this state is spoken of and the disciple is pictured
as in the silence. The writer goes on to say,
Out of the silence that is peace, a resonant voice shall arise.
And this voice will say, it is not well, thou hast reaped, now thou must so.
And knowing this voice to be the silence itself, thou wilt obey.
What is the meaning of that phrase, thou hast reaped, now thou must so?
It refers to the great law of rhythm which rules even the logos,
the Ishwaras, the law of the mighty breath, the out-breathing and the in-breathing,
which compels every fragment which is separated for a time.
A logos may leave his universe, and it may drop away when he turns his gaze inward,
for it was he who gave reality to it.
He may plunge into the infinite depths of being,
but even then there is the Smskara of the past universe,
the shadowy latent memory, the germ of Maya,
from which he cannot escape.
To escape from it would be to cease to be Ishwara,
and to become Brahma nirguna.
There is no Ishvara without Maya.
There is no Maya without Ishvara.
Even in Praelaia, a time comes when the rest is over
and the inner life again demands manifestation.
Then the outward turning begins and a new universe comes forth.
Such is the law of rest and activity.
Activity followed by rest,
Rest followed again by the desire for activity.
And so the ceaseless wheel of the universe, as well as of human lives, goes on.
For in the eternal, both rest and activity are ever present, and in that which we call time,
they follow each other, although in eternity they be simultaneous and ever existing.
End of Section 28.
Section 29 of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant.
This Libreworks recording.
is in the public domain.
3. The use of mantras.
Let us see how far we can help ourselves in this difficult work.
I will draw your attention to one fact which is of enormous help to the beginner.
Your vehicles are ever restless.
Every vibration in the vehicle produces a corresponding change in consciousness.
Is there any way to check these vibrations to steady the vehicle so that consciousness
may be still? One method is the repeating of a mantra. A mantra is a mechanical way of checking
vibration. Instead of using the powers of the will and of imagination, you save these for other
purposes and use the mechanical resource of a mantra. A mantra is a definite succession of sounds.
Those sounds repeated rhythmically over and over again in succession, synchronize the vibrations
of the vehicles into unity with themselves.
Hence a mantra cannot be translated. Translation alters the sounds. Not only in Hinduism but in Buddhism,
in Roman Catholicism, in Islam and among the Parsis, mantras are found and they are never translated.
For when you have changed the succession and order of the sounds, the mantra ceases to be a mantra.
If you translate the words, you may have a very beautiful prayer but not a mantra. Your translation may be beautiful,
inspired poetry, but it is not a living mantra. It will no longer harmonize the vibrations
of the surrounding sheets and thus enable the consciousness to become still. The poetry, the inspired
prayer, these are mentally translatable. But a mantra is unique and untranslatable. Poetry is a great
thing. It is often an inspirer of the soul. It gives gratification to the ear, and it may be sublime
and beautiful, but it is not a mantra.
End of Section 29.
Section 30 of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant.
This Libri-Wox recording is in the public domain.
4. Attention. Let us consider concentration.
You ask a man if he can concentrate. He at once says,
Oh, it is very difficult. I have often tried and failed.
But put the same question in a different way.
and ask him, can you pay attention to a thing?
He will at once say, yes, I can do that.
Concentration is attention.
The fixed attitude of attention, that is concentration.
If you pay attention to what you do, your mind will be concentrated.
Many sit down for meditation and wonder why they do not succeed.
How can you suppose that half an hour of meditation and 23 and a half hours of scattering
of thought throughout the day and night will enable you to concentrate during the half hour.
You have undone during the day and night what you did in the morning, as Penelope unraveled
the web she wove. To become a yogi, you must be attentive all the time. You must practice
concentration every hour of your active life. Now you scatter your thoughts for many hours
and you wonder that you do not succeed. The wonder would be if you did. You must
You must pay attention every day to everything you do.
That is, no doubt, hard to do, and you may make it easier in the first stages by choosing out of your day's work a portion only, and doing that portion with perfect, unflagging attention.
Do not let your mind wander from the thing before you.
It does not matter what the thing is.
It may be the adding up of a column of figures or the reading of a book.
anything will do.
It is the attitude of the mind that is important
and not the object before it.
This is the only way of learning concentration.
Fix your mind rigidly on the work before you
for the time being and when you have done with it, drop it.
Practice steadily in this way for a few months
and you will be surprised to find how easy it becomes
to concentrate the mind.
Moreover, the body will soon learn to do many things automatically.
If you force it to do a thing regularly, it will begin to do it after a time, of its own accord,
and then you find that you can manage to do two or three things at the same time.
In England, for instance, women are very fond of knitting.
When a girl first learns to knit, she is obliged to be very intent on her fingers.
Her attention must not wander from her fingers for a moment, or she will make a mistake.
She goes on doing that day after day
and presently her fingers have learnt to pay attention to the work
without her supervision and they may be left to do the knitting
while she employs the conscious mind on something else.
It is further possible to train your mind as the girl has trained her fingers.
The mind also, the mental body, can be so trained as to do a little thing automatically.
At last, your highest consciousness can always remain
fixed on the supreme, while the lower consciousness in the body will do the things of the body
and do them perfectly because perfectly trained. These are practical lessons of yoga.
Practice of this sort builds up the qualities you want and you become stronger and better
and fit to go on to the definite study of yoga.
End of Section 30. Section 31 of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant.
Libreworks recording is in the public domain.
5. Obstacles to Yoga
Before considering the capacities needed for this definite practice,
let us run over the obstacles to yoga as laid down by Patanjali.
The obstacles to yoga are very inclusive.
First, disease.
If you are diseased, you cannot practice yoga.
It demands sound health for the physical strain entailed by it is great.
Then, languor of mind.
You must be alert, energetic in your thought.
Then, doubt.
You must have decision of will, must be able to make up your mind.
Then, carelessness.
This is one of the greatest difficulties with beginners.
They read a thing carelessly, they are inaccurate.
Sloth.
A lazy man cannot be a yogi, one who is inert,
who lacks the power and the will to exert him,
how shall he make the desperate exertions wanted along this line?
The next, worldly-mindedness is obviously an obstacle.
Mistaken ideas is another great obstacle, thinking wrongly about things.
One of the great qualifications for yoga is right notion.
Right notion means that the thought shall correspond with the outside truth,
that a man shall be fundamentally true, so that his thought corresponds to
fact, unless there is truth in a man, yoga is for him impossible. Missing the point, illogical,
stupid, making the important, unimportant, and vice versa. Lastly, instability, which makes yoga
impossible, and even a small amount of which makes yoga futile. The unstable man cannot be a
yogi. End of Section 31. Section 32 of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besson.
This Libri-Wox recording is in the public domain.
6. Capacities of yoga.
Can everybody practice yoga?
No.
But every well-educated person can prepare for its future practice.
For rapid progress, you must have special capacities as for anything else.
In any of the sciences, a man may study without being the possessor of very special capacity,
although he cannot attain eminence therein, and so it is with yoga.
Anybody with a fair intelligence may learn something from yoga which he may advantageously practice,
but he cannot hope unless he starts with certain capacities to be a success in yoga in this life.
It is only right to say that, for if any special science needs particular capacities in order to attain eminence therein,
the science of sciences certainly cannot fall behind the ordinary sciences in the demands that it makes on its students.
Suppose I am asked, can I become a great mathematician? What must be my answer? You must have a natural
aptitude and capacity for mathematics to be a great mathematician. If you have not that capacity,
you cannot be a great mathematician in this life. But this does not mean that you cannot learn any
mathematics. To be a great mathematician, you must be born with a special capacity for mathematics.
To be born with such a special capacity means that you have practiced it in very many lives and
now you are born with it ready made. It is the same with yoga. Every man can learn a little of it,
but to be a great yogi means lives of practice. If these are behind you, you will have been born
with the necessary faculties in the present birth.
There are three faculties which one must have to obtain success in yoga.
The first is a strong desire.
Desire ardently.
Such a desire is needed to break the strong links of desire which knit you to the outer world.
Moreover, without that strong desire, you will never go through all the difficulties that
bat your way.
You must have the conviction that you will ultimately succeed.
and the resolution to go on until you do succeed.
It must be a desire so ardent and so firmly rooted
that obstacles only make it more keen.
To such a man, an obstacle is like fuel that you throw on a fire.
It burns, but the more strongly as it catches hold of it
and finds it fuel for the burning.
So difficulties and obstacles are but fuel to feed the fire
of the yogi's resolute desire.
He only becomes the more firmly fixed because he finds the difficulties.
If you have not this strong desire, its absence shows that you are new to the work,
but you can begin to prepare for it in this life.
You can create desire by thought, you cannot create desire by desire.
Out of the desire nature, the training of the desire nature cannot come.
What is it in us that calls out desire?
Look into your own mind and you will find that memory,
and imagination are the two things that evoke desire most strongly. Hence, thought is the means
whereby all the changes in desire can be brought about. Thought, imagination is the only creative
power in you and by imagination your powers are to be unfolded. The more you think of a desirable
object, the stronger becomes the desire for it. Then think of yoga as desirable if you want
to desire yoga. Think about the results of yoga and what it means for the world when you have
become a yogi and you will find your desire becoming stronger and stronger. For it is only by
thought that you can manage desire. You can do nothing with it by itself. You want the thing or you do
not want it. And within the limits of the desire nature you are helpless in its grasp. As just said,
you cannot change desire by desire. You must
go into another region of your being, the region of thought, and by thought you can make yourself
desire or not desire, exactly as you like. If only, you will use the right means, and those
means, after all, are fairly simple. Why is it you desire to possess a thing? Because you think
it will make you happier. But suppose you know by past experience that in the long run,
it does not make you happier, but brings you sorrow, trouble, distress. You have a lot of
have at once ready to your hands the way to get rid of that desire.
Think of the ultimate results.
Let your mind dwell carefully on all the painful things.
Jump over the momentary pleasure and fix your thoughts steadily on the pain which follows
the gratification of that desire.
And when you have done that for a month or so, the very sight of those objects of desire
will repel you.
You will have associated it in your mind with suffering.
and will recoil from it instinctively.
You will not want it.
You have changed the want,
and have changed it by your power of imagination.
There is no more effective way of destroying a vice
than by deliberately picturing the ultimate results of its indulgence.
Persuade a young man who is inclined to be profligate
to keep in his mind the image of an old profligate,
show him the profligate worn out,
desiring without the power to gratify,
and if you can get him to think in that way,
unconsciously he will begin to shrink from that which before attracted him.
The very hideousness of the results frightens away the man from clinging to the object of desire,
and the would-be yogi has to use his thought to mark out the desires he will permit
and the desires that he is determined to slay.
The next thing after a strong desire is a strong will.
Will is desire transmuted, its directing is changed from without to within.
If your will is weak, you must strengthen it.
Deal with it as you do with other weak things.
Strengthen it by practice.
If a boy knows that he has weak arms, he says,
My arms are weak but I shall practice gymnastics, work on the parallel bars.
Thus my arms will grow strong.
It is the same with the will.
practice will make strong the little weak will that you have at present.
Resolve, for example, saying,
I will do such and such thing every morning and do it.
One thing at a time is enough for a feeble will.
Make yourself a promise to do such and such a thing at such a time
and you will soon find that you will be ashamed to break your promise.
When you have kept such a promise to yourself for a day,
make it for a week, then for a fortnight.
Having succeeded, you can choose a harder thing to do and so on.
By this forcing of action, you strengthen the will.
Day after day it grows greater in power and you find your inner strength increases.
First have a strong desire, then transmute it into a strong will.
The third requisite for yoga is a keen and broad intelligence.
You cannot control your mind unless you have a mind to control.
Therefore, you must develop your mind.
You must study.
By study, I do not mean the reading of books.
I mean thinking.
You may read a dozen books and your mind may be as feeble as in the beginning.
But if you have read one serious book properly,
then by slow reading and much thinking,
your intelligence will be nurtured and your mind grows strong.
These are the things you want,
a strong desire, an indomitable will, a keen intelligence.
Those are the capacities that you must unfold in order that the practice of yoga may be possible to you.
If your mind is very unsteady, if it is a butterfly mind like a child's, you must make it steady.
That comes by close study and thinking.
You must unfold the mind by which you are to work.
End of Section 32
Section 33
of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant
This LibriVox's recording is in the public domain
7
4th Going and Returning
It will help you in doing this
and in changing your desire
if you realize that the great evolution of humanity
goes on along two paths
The path of forthgoing and the path of return
On the path, or marga, of Pravrity, forthgoing on which are the vast majority of human beings, desires are necessary and useful.
On that path, the more desire a man has, the better for his evolution.
They are the motives that prompt to activity.
Without these he stagnates, he is inert.
Why should Ishvara have filled the worlds with desirable objects if he did not intend,
that desire should be an ingredient in evolution.
He deals with humanity as a sensible mother deals with her child.
She does not give lectures to the child on the advantages of walking
nor explain to it learnedly the mechanism of the muscles of the leg.
She holds a bright, glittering toy before the child and says,
Come and get it.
Desire awakens and the child begins to crawl, and so it learns to walk.
So Ishvara has put toys around us, but always just out of our reach and he says,
Come, children, take these.
Here are love, money, fame, social consideration, come and get them, walk, make efforts for them.
And we, like children, make great efforts and struggle along to snatch these toys.
When we seize the toy, it breaks into pieces and is of no use.
People fight and struggle and toil for wealth, and when they become multimillionaires,
they ask, how shall we spend this wealth?
I read of a millionaire in America who was walking on foot from city to city in order to distribute
the vast wealth which he accumulated.
He learned his lesson.
Never in another life will that man be induced to put forth efforts for the toy of wealth.
Love of fame, love of power, stimulate men.
to most strenuous effort.
But when they are grasped and held in the hand,
weariness is the result.
The mighty statesman,
the leader of the nation,
the man idolized by millions,
follow him home,
and there you will see the wariness of power,
the satiety that clois passion.
Does then God mock us with all the objects?
No.
The object has been to bring out the power of the self,
to develop the capacity latent in man
and in the development of human faculty
the result of the great Leela may be seen
that is the way in which we learn
to unfold the God within us
that is the result of the play of the divine father
with his children but sometimes
the desire for objects is lost too early
and the lesson is but half learned
that is one of the difficulties in the India of today
You have a mighty spiritual philosophy, which was the natural expression for the souls who were born centuries ago.
They were ready to throw away the fruit of action and to work for the Supreme to carry out his will.
But the lesson for India at the present time is to wake up the desire.
It may look like going back, but it is really a going forward.
The philosophy is true, but it belonged to those older souls who were ready for it,
and the younger souls now being born into the people are not ready for that philosophy.
They repeat it by rote, they are hypnotized by it, and they sink down into inertia,
because there is nothing they desire enough to force them to exertion.
The consequence is that the nation as a whole is going downhill.
The old lesson of putting different objects before souls of different ages is forgotten,
and everyone is now nominally aiming at ideal perfection
which can only be reached when the preliminary steps have been successfully mounted.
It is the same as with the Sermon on the Mount in Christian countries,
but there the practical common sense of the people bows to it and ignores it.
No nation tries to live by the Sermon on the Mount.
It is not meant for ordinary men and women but for the saint.
For all those who are on the path of forthgoing, desire is necessary for progress.
What is the path of nivrithi?
It is the path of return.
Their desire must seize, and the self-determined will must take its place.
The last object of desire in a person commencing the path of return is the desire to work
with the will of the supreme.
He harmonizes his will with the supreme will, renounces all the power of the power,
separate desires and thus works to turn the wheel of life as long as such turning is needed by the
law of life. Desire on the path of forthgoing becomes will on the path of return. The soul,
in harmony with the divine, works with the law. Thought on the path of forthgoing is ever alert
lighty and changing. It becomes reason on the path of return. The yoke of reason is placed on the
neck of the lower mind and reason guides the bull.
Work, activity, on the path of forthgoing is restless action by which the ordinary man is bound.
On the path of return, work becomes sacrifice, and thus its binding force is broken.
These are then the manifestations of three aspects as shown on the paths of forthgoing and
return.
Bliss manifested as desire is changed into will.
Wisdom manifested as thought is changed into reason.
Activity manifested as work is changed into sacrifice.
People very often ask with regard to this,
why is will placed in the human being as the correspondence of bliss in the divine?
The three great divine qualities are
Chit or consciousness, Ananda or bliss, sat or existence.
Now it is quite clear that the consciousness is reflected in intelligence in man,
the same quality only in miniature.
It is equally clear that existence and activity belong to each other.
You can only exist as you act outwards.
The very form of the word shows it.
X out of, it is manifested,
life. That leaves the third bliss to correspond with will and some people are rather puzzled with
that and they ask what is the correspondence between bliss and will. But if you come down to desire
and the objects of desire, you will be able to solve the riddle. The nature of the self is bliss.
Throw that nature down into matter and what will be the expression of the bliss nature. Desire
for happiness, the seeking after day.
desirable objects, which it imagines will give it the happiness which is of its own essential
nature, and which it is continually seeking to realize amid the obstacles of the world.
Its nature being bliss, it seeks for happiness, and that desire for happiness is to be
transmuted into will. All these correspondents have a profound meaning if you will only look
into them and that universal will to live translates itself as the desire for happiness that you
find in every man and woman in every sentient creature. Has it ever struck you how surely
you are justifying that analysis of your own nature by the way you accept happiness as
you're right and resent misery and ask what you have done to deserve it? You do not ask the same
about happiness, which is the natural result of your own nature. The thing that has to be
explained is not happiness but pain, the things that are against the nature of the self that is
bliss. And so, looking into this, we see how desire and will are both the determination to be
happy. But the one is ignorant, drawn out by outer objects, the other is self-conscious,
initiated and ruled from within. Desire is evoked. And so...
and directed from outside, and when the same aspect rules from within, it is will.
There is no difference in their nature.
Hence, desire on the path of forthgoing becomes will on the path of return.
When desire, thought, and work are changed into will, reason and sacrifice,
then the man is turning homewards, then he lives by renunciation.
When a man has really renounced,
a strange change takes place.
On the path of forthgoing, you must fight for everything you want to get.
On the path of return, nature pours her treasures at your feet.
When a man has ceased to desire them, then all treasures pour down upon him,
for he has become a channel through which all good gifts flow to those around him.
Seek the good, give up grasping, and then everything will be yours.
Cease to ask that your own little water tank may be filled and you will become a pipe.
Joined to the living source of all waters, the source which never runs dry,
the waters which spring up unfailingly.
Renunciation means the power of unceasing work for the good of all,
work which cannot fail because wrought by the supreme worker through his servant.
If you are engaged in any true work of charity and your means are limited and the wealth does not flow into your hands, what does it mean?
It means that you have not yet learnt the true renunciation.
You are clinging to the visible, to the fruit of action, and so the wealth does not pour through your hands.
End of Section 33.
Section 34 of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant.
This Librivox recording is in the public domain.
8. Purification of bodies.
The unfolding of powers belongs to the side of consciousness.
Purification of bodies belongs to the side of matter.
You must purify each of your three working bodies, mental, astral and physical.
Without that purification, you had better leave yoga alone.
First of all, how shall you purify the thought body?
By right thinking, then you must use imagination, your great creative tool once more.
Imagine things and imagining them you will form your thought body into the organization that you desire.
Imagine something strongly as the painter imagines when he is going to paint.
Visualize an object if you have the power of visualization at all.
If you have not, try to make it.
It is an artistic faculty, of course, but most people have it more or less.
See how far you can reproduce perfectly a face you see daily.
By such practice, you will be strengthening your imagination, and by strengthening your imagination,
you will be making the great tool with which you have to practice in yoga.
There is another use of the imagination which is very valuable.
If you will imagine in your thought body the presence of the qualities that you desire to have
and the absence of those which you desire not to have,
you're halfway to having and not having them.
Also, many of the troubles of your life might be weakened
if you would imagine them on right lines before you have to go through them.
Why do you wait helplessly until you meet them in the physical world?
If you thought of your coming trouble in the morning
and thought of yourself as acting perfectly in the midst of it,
you should never scruple to imagine yourself perfect.
When the thing turned up in the day, it would have lost its power and you would no longer feel the sting to the same extent.
Now each of you must have in your life something that troubles you.
Think of yourself as facing that trouble and not minding it and when it comes, you will be what you have been thinking.
You might get rid of half your troubles and your faults if you would deal with them through your imagination.
As the thought body becomes purified in this way, you must turn to the astral body.
The astral body is purified by right desire.
Desire nobly, and the astral body will evolve the organs of good desires
instead of the organs of evil ones.
The secret of all progress is to think and desire the highest,
never dwelling on the fault, the weakness, the error,
but always on the perfected power,
and slowly in that way you will be able to build up perfection in yourself.
Think and desire then, in order to purify the thought,
heart body and the astral body. And how shall you purify the physical body? You must regulate it
in all its activities, in sleep, in food, in exercise, in everything. You cannot have a pure
physical body with impure, mental and astral bodies so that the work of imagination helps
also in the purification of the physical. But you must also regulate the physical body in all
its activities. Take, for instance, food. The Indian says truly that every sort of food has a
dominant quality in it, either rhythm or activity or inertia, and that all foods fall under one of
these heads. Now, the man who is to be a yogi must not touch any food which is on the way
to decay. Those things belong to the Tama-sick foods. All foods, for instance, of the nature
of game, of venison, all food which is showing signs of decay,
all alcohol is a product of decay are to be avoided.
Flesh foods come under the quality of activity.
All flesh foods are really stimulants.
All forms in the animal kingdom are built up to express animal desires and animal activities.
The yogi cannot afford to use these in a body meant for the higher processes of thought.
Vitality, yes, they will give that.
Strength, which does not last, they will give that.
A sudden spurs of energy, yes, meat will give that, but those are not the things which the
yogi wants. So he puts aside all those foods is not available for the work he desires
and chooses his food out of the most highly vitalized products.
All the foods which tend to growth, those are the most highly vitalized.
Grain, out of which the new plant will grow, is packed full of the most nutritious substances.
fruits, all those things which have growth as their next stage in the life cycle,
those are the rhythmic foods, full of life,
and building up a body sensitive and strong at the same time.
End of Section 34.
Section 35 of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant.
This Librevox recording is in the public domain.
9. Dwellers on the Threshold.
Of these there are many kinds.
First, elementals.
They try to bar the astral plane against man.
And naturally so, because they are concerned with the building up of the lower kingdoms,
these elementals of form, the Rupa Devas,
and to them man is a really hateful creature because of his destructive properties.
That is why they dislike him so much.
He spoils their work wherever he is.
goes, tramples down vegetable things, and kills animals, so that the whole of that great kingdom
of nature hates the name of man. They band themselves together to stop the one who is just taking
his first conscious steps on the astral plane and try to frighten him for they fear that he is
bringing destructiveness into the new world. They cannot do anything if you do not mind them.
When that rush of elemental force comes against the man entering on the astral plane,
he must remain quiet, indifferent, taking up the position,
I am a higher product of evolution than you are, you can do nothing to me.
I am your friend, not your enemy, peace.
If he be strong enough to take up that position,
the great wave of elemental force will roll aside and let him through.
The seemingly causeless fears which some feel at night are largely due to this hostility.
You are at night more sensitive to the astral plane than during the day
and the dislike of the beings on the plane for man is felt more strongly.
But when the elementals find you are not destructive, not an embodiment of ruin,
they become as friendly to you as they were before hostile.
That is the first form of the dweller on the threshold.
Here again the importance of pure and rhythmic food comes in, because if you use meat and alcohol, you attract the lower elementals of the plane, those that take pleasure in the scent of blood and spirits, and they will inevitably prevent your seeing and understanding things clearly.
They will surge around you, impress their thoughts upon you, force their impressions on your astral body, so that you may have a kind of shell of objectionable hangers on to,
your aura who will much obstruct you in your efforts to see and hear correctly.
That is the chief reason why everyone who is teaching yoga on the right-hand path
absolutely forbids indulgence in meat and alcohol.
The second form of the dweller on the threshold is the thought forms of our own past.
Those forms growing out of the evil of lives that lie behind us,
thought forms of wickedness of all kinds, those faiths,
us when we first come into touch with the astral plane really belonging to us, but appearing as
outside forms, as objects, and they try to scare back their creator. You can only conquer
them by sternly repudiating them, you are no longer mine, you belong to my past and not to my
present, I will give you none of my life. Thus you will gradually exhaust and finally annihilate them.
This is perhaps one of the most painful difficulties that one has to face in treading the astral plane in consciousness for the first time.
Of course, where a person has in any way been mixed up with objectionable thought forms of the stronger kind,
such as those brought about by practicing black magic, there this particular form of the dweller will be much stronger and more dangerous
and often desperate is the struggle between the neophyte and these dwellers from his past
backed up by the masters of the black side.
Now we come to one of the most terrible forms of the dwellers on the threshold.
Suppose a case in which a man during the past has steadily identified himself with the lower
part of his nature and has gone against the higher, paralyzing himself, using higher powers
for lower purposes, degrading his mind to be the mere slave.
of his lower desires.
A curious change takes place in him.
The life which belongs to the ego in him
is taken up by the physical body
and assimilated with the lower lives of which the body is composed.
Instead of serving the purposes of the spirit,
it is dragged away for tile purposes of the lower
and becomes part of the animal life
belonging to the lower bodies
so that the ego and his higher bodies are weakened
and the animal life of the lower is strengthened.
Now, under those conditions, the ego will sometimes become so disgusted with his vehicles
that when death relieves him of the physical body, he will cast the others quite aside.
And even sometimes during physical life, he will leave the desecrated temple.
Now, after death, in these cases, the man generally reincarnates very quickly.
For having torn himself away from his astral and mental bodies,
he has no bodies with which to live in the astral and mental bodies, he has no bodies with which to live in the astral and
mental worlds and he must quickly form new ones and come again to rebirth here.
Under these conditions, the old astral and mental bodies are not disintegrated when the new
mental and astral bodies are formed and born into the world and the affinity between the old
and the new, both having had the same owner, the same tenant, asserts itself and the highly vitalized
old astral and mental bodies will attach themselves to the new astral and mental bodies
and become the most terrible form of the dweller on the threshold.
These are the various forms which the dweller may assume
and all are spoken of in books dealing with these particular subjects,
though I do not know that you will find anywhere in a single book
a definite classification like the above.
In addition to these there are, of course,
the direct attacks of the Dark Brothers,
taking up various forms and aspects,
and the most common form they will take is the form of some virtue,
which is a little bit in excess in the yogi.
The yogi is not attacked through his vices, but through his virtues.
For a virtue in excess becomes a vice.
It is the extremes which are ever the vices.
The golden mean is the virtue, and thus, virtues become temptors
in the difficult regions of the astral and mental worlds
and are utilized by the brothers of the shadow in order to entrap the unwary.
I am not here speaking of the foreordinary.
ordinary ordeals of the astral plane. The ordeals by earth, water, fire and air. Those are mere
trifles, hardly worth considering when speaking of these more serious difficulties. Of course,
you have to learn that you are entirely master of astral matter, that earth cannot crush you,
nor water drown you, etc. Those are, so to speak, very easy lessons. Those who belong to a
masonic body will recognize these ordeals as parts of the language they are familiar with in their
Masonic ritual. There is one other danger also. You may injure yourself by repercussion. If on
the astral plane you are threatened with danger which belongs to the physical, but are
unwise enough to think it can injure you, it will injure your physical body. You may get a wound
or a bruise and so on out of astral experiences. I once made a fool of myself in this way.
I was in a ship going down and as I was busy there, I saw that the mast of the ship was going to fall and in a moment's forgetfulness thought that mast will fall on me.
That momentary thought had its result for when I came back to the body in the morning, I had a large physical bruise where the mast fell.
That is a frequent phenomenon until you have corrected the fault of the mind, which thinks instinctively the things which it is accustomed to think down here.
One protection you can make for yourself as you become more sensitive.
Be rigorously truthful in thought, in word, indeed.
Every thought, every desire takes form in the higher world.
If you are careless of truth here, you are creating a whole host of terrifying and deluding forms.
Think truth, speak truth, live truth, and then you shall be free from the illusions of the astral world.
End of Section 35
Section 36
of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant
This Libri-Work's recording is in the public domain
10
Preparation for Yoga
People say that I put the ideal of discipleship
so very high that nobody can hope to become a disciple
but I have not said that no one can become a disciple
who does not reproduce the description that is given
of the perfect disciple
one may, but we do it at our own peril.
A man may be thoroughly capable along one line,
but have a serious fault along another.
The serious fault will not prevent him from becoming a disciple,
but he must suffer for it.
The initiate pays for his faults ten times the price
he would have had to pay for them as a man of the world.
That is why I have put the ideal so high.
I have never said that a person must come utterly up to the ideal
before becoming a disciple, but I have said that the risks of becoming a disciple without these qualifications
are enormous. It is the duty of those who have seen the results of going through the gateway
with faults in character to point out that it is well to get rid of these faults first.
Every fault you carry through the gateway with you becomes a dagger to stab you on the other side.
Therefore, it is well to purify yourself as much as you can before you are sufficiently
evolved on any line to have the right to say,
I will pass through that gateway.
That is what I intended to be understood
when I spoke of qualifications for discipleship.
I have followed along the ancient road
which lays down these qualifications
which the disciple should bring with him
and if he comes without them
then the word of Jesus is true
that he will be beaten with many stripes.
For a man can afford to do in the outer world
with small result what will bring terrible results
upon him when once he's treading the path.
End of Section 36.
Section 37 of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant.
This Libreworks recording is in the public domain.
11. The end.
What is to be the end of this long struggle?
What is the goal of the upward climbing?
The prize of the great battle.
What does the yogi reach at last?
He reaches unity.
Sometimes I'm not sure.
that large numbers of people, if they realized what unity means, would really desire to reach it.
There are many virtues of your ordinary life which will drop entirely away from you when you reach
unity. Many things you admire will be no longer helps but hindrances when the sense of unity
begins to dawn. All those qualities so useful in ordinary life, such as moral indignation,
repulsion from evil, judgment of others, have no room where unity is realized.
When you feel repulsion from evil, it is a sign that your higher self is beginning to awaken
is seeing the dangers of evil. He drags the body forcibly away from it. That is the beginning
of the conscious moral life. Hatred of evil is better at that stage than indifference to evil.
It is a necessary stage.
But repulsion cannot be felt when a man has realized unity
when he sees God made manifest in man.
A man who knows unity cannot judge another.
I judge no man, said the Christ.
He cannot be repelled by anyone.
The sinner is himself.
And how shall he be repelled from himself?
For him there is no I or thee.
For we are one.
This is not a thing that many honestly wish for.
It is not a thing that many honestly desire.
The man who has realized unity knows no difference between himself and the vilest wretch that
walks the earth.
He sees only the God that walks in the sinner and knows that the sin is not in the God,
but in the sheath.
The difference is only there.
He who has realized the inner greatness of the self never pronounces judgment upon another,
knows that other as himself.
and he himself as that other, that is unity.
We talk brotherhood but how many of us really practice it,
and even that is not the thing the yogi aims at.
Greater than brotherhood are identity and realization of the self as one.
The sixth root race will carry brotherhood to the highest point.
The seventh root race will know identity,
will realize the unity of the human race.
To catch a glimpse of the beauty of that high,
conception, the greatness of the unity in which I and mine, you and yours have vanished,
in which we are all one life, even to do that lifts the whole nature towards divinity,
and those who can even see that unity is fair, they are the nearer to the realization of
the beauty that is God.
End of Section 37.
End of an introduction to yoga by Annie Besant.
