Classic Audiobook Collection - Astronomy - The Science of the Heavenly Bodies by David Todd ~ Full Audiobook [science]
Episode Date: September 23, 2023Astronomy - The Science of the Heavenly Bodies by David Todd audiobook. Genre: science The progress of astronomy from age to age has been far from uniform—rather by leaps and bounds: from the earli...est epoch when man's planet earth was the center about which the stupendous cosmos wheeled, for whom it was created, and for whose edification it was maintained—down to the modern age whose discoveries have ascertained that even our stellar universe, the vast region of the solar domain, is but one of the thousands of island universes that tenant the inconceivable immensities of space. So rapid, indeed, has been the progress of astronomy in very recent years that the present is especially favorable for setting forth its salient features; and this book is an attempt to present the wide range of astronomy in readable fashion, as if a story with a definite plot, from its origin with the shepherds of ancient Chaldea down to present-day ascertainment of the actual scale of the universe, and definite measures of the huge volume of supersolar giants among the stars. (Preface) For ad-free listening try our premium subscription Chapters (Approximate) (00:00:00) Chapter 00 (00:04:06) Chapter 01 (00:21:18) Chapter 02 (00:28:00) Chapter 03 (00:36:12) Chapter 04 (00:41:23) Chapter 05 (00:47:12) Chapter 06 (00:54:51) Chapter 07 (01:04:02) Chapter 08 (01:09:51) Chapter 09 (01:16:24) Chapter 10 (01:26:37) Chapter 11 (01:34:46) Chapter 12 (01:42:50) Chapter 13 (01:50:44) Chapter 14 (02:03:05) Chapter 15 (02:21:19) Chapter 16 (02:34:48) Chapter 17 (02:41:30) Chapter 18 (02:58:14) Chapter 19 (03:13:56) Chapter 20 (03:41:14) Chapter 21 (04:04:59) Chapter 22 (04:31:31) Chapter 23 (04:51:35) Chapter 24 (04:57:25) Chapter 25 (05:19:05) Chapter 26 (05:54:34) Chapter 27 (06:01:57) Chapter 28 (06:25:09) Chapter 29 (06:29:57) Chapter 30 (06:50:21) Chapter 31 (07:03:50) Chapter 32 (07:26:37) Chapter 33 (07:38:41) Chapter 34 (08:02:32) Chapter 35 (08:13:54) Chapter 36 (08:21:54) Chapter 37 (08:28:15) Chapter 38 (08:34:45) Chapter 39 (08:39:20) Chapter 40 (08:52:05) Chapter 41 (08:58:41) Chapter 42 (09:12:04) Chapter 43 (09:17:39) Chapter 44 (09:27:23) Chapter 45 (09:34:12) Chapter 46 (09:40:38) Chapter 47 (09:49:16) Chapter 48 (10:03:37) Chapter 49 (10:06:14) Chapter 50 (10:12:28) Chapter 51 (10:24:38) Chapter 52 (10:30:17) Chapter 53 (10:33:08) Chapter 54 (10:42:30) Chapter 55 (10:49:28) Chapter 56 (10:58:15) Chapter 57 (11:15:12) Chapter 58 (11:24:00) Chapter 59 (11:35:05) Chapter 60 (11:57:45) Chapter 61 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
astronomy the science of the heavenly bodies by david todd astronomy a living science like life itself we do not know when astronomy began we cannot conceive a time when it was not
man of the early stone age must have begun to observe sun moon and stars because all the bodies of the cosmos were there then as now with his intellectual birth astronomy was born
Onward through the childhood of the race, he began to think on the things he observed,
to make crude records of times and seasons.
The Chaldeans and Chinese began each their own system of astronomy.
The causes of things and the reasons underlying phenomena began to attract attention,
and astronomy was cultivated not for its own sake,
but because of its practical utility in supplying the data necessary to accurate astrological prediction.
Belief in astrology was universal.
the earth set in the midst of the wonders of the sky was the reason for it all clearly the earth was created for humanity so too the heavens were created for the edification of the race all was subservient to man
naturally all was geocentric or earth-centered from the savage who could count only to five the digits of one hand civilized man very slowly began to evolve he noted the progress of the seasons
The old records of eclipses showed Thales and early Greek how to predict their happenings,
and true science had its birth when man acquired the power to make forecasts that always came true.
Few ancient philosophers were greater than Pythagoras,
and his conceptions of the order of the heavens and the shape and motion of the earth,
were so near the truth that we sometimes wonder how they could have been rejected for 20 centuries.
We must remember, however, that man had not yet learned the art of measuring,
things, and the world could not be brought into subjection to him until he had.
To measure, he must have tools, instruments.
To have instruments, he must learn the art of working in metals, and all this took time.
It was a slow and in large part, imperceptible process.
It is not yet finished.
The earliest really sturdy manifestation of astronomical life came with the birth of Greek
science, culminating with Aristarchus, Hipparchus, and Ptolemy.
the last of these great philosophers realizing that only the art of writing prevents man's knowledge from perishing with him set down all the astronomical knowledge of that day in one of the three greatest books on astronomy ever written the ammogest a name for it derived through the arabic and really meaning the greatest
The system of earth and heaven seemed as if finished, and the authority of Ptolemy and his
Almagest were as wholly writ for the unfortunate centuries that followed him.
With fatal persistence, the fundamental error of his system delayed the evolutionary life of
the science through all that period.
But man had begun to measure.
Geometry had been born, and Eratosthenes had indeed measured the size of the earth.
Tools in bronze and iron were fashioned closely after the models of the earth.
tools of stone. Astrolabes and armillary spheres were first built on geometric spheres and circles,
and science was then laid away for the slumber of the dark ages. Nevertheless, through all this
dreary period, the life of the youthful astronomical giant was maintained. Time went on,
the heavens revolved, sun, moon, and stars kept their appointed places, and Arab and Moore,
and the savage monarchs of the east were there to observe and record,
even if the world mind was lying fallow, and no genius had been born to inspire anew
that direction of human intellect on which the later growth of science and civilization depends.
With the growth of the collective mind of mankind, from generation to generation,
we note that ordered sequence of events, which characterizes the development of astronomy
from earliest peoples down to the age of Newton, Herschel, and the present.
It is the unfolding of a story as if with a definite plot from the beginning.
Leaving to philosophical writers the great fundamental reason underlying the intellectual lethargy of the Dark Ages,
we only note that astronomy and its development suffered with every other department of human activity
that concerned the intellectual progress of the race.
To knowledge of every sort, the medieval spirit was hostile.
But with the founding and growth of universities, a new era began.
The time was ripe for Copernicus and a new system of the heavens.
The discovery of the new world and the revival of learning through the universities
added that stimulus and inspiration which marked the transition from the Middle Ages to our modern era,
and the life of astronomy, long dormant, was quickened to an extraordinary development.
It fell to the lot of Copernicus to write the second great book on astronomy
de revolutionionibus orbium celestium. But the new heliocentric or sun-centered system of Copernicus,
while it was the true system bidding fair to replace the false, could not be firmly established,
except on the basis of accurate observation. How fortunate was the occurrence of the new star of
1572 that turned the keen intellect of Tycho Bray toward the heavens?
Without the observational labors of Tycho's lifetime, what would the mathematical genius
of Kepler have availed in discovery of his laws of motion of the planets. Historians dwell on the
destruction and violent conflicts of certain centuries of the Middle Ages, quite overlooking
the constructive work in progress through the entire era. Much of this was of a nature absolutely
essential to the new life that was to manifest itself in astronomy. The Arabs had made important
improvements in mathematical processes. European artisans had made great advances in the manufacture
of glass, and in the tools for working in metals. Then came Galileo with his telescope,
revealing anew the universe to mankind. It was the north of Italy where the Renaissance was most
potent, recalling the vigorous life of ancient Greece. Copernicus had studied here. It was
the home of Galileo. Columbus was a Genoese, and the compass which guided him to the Western world
was a product of deft Italian artisans, whose skill with that of their successors was now available
to construct the instruments necessary for further progress in the accurate science of astronomical observation.
Even before Copernicus, Johann Mueller, better known as Reggio Montanus, had imbibed the learning of the Greeks while studying in Italy,
and founded an observatory and issued nautical almanacs from Nuremberg,
the basis of those by which Columbus was guided over untraversed seas.
About this time, too, the art of printing was invented, and the interrelation of all the moon,
movements then in progress, led up to a general awakening of the mind of man, and eventually
an outburst in science and learning, which has continued to the present day.
Naturally, it put new life into astronomy, and led directly up from Galileo and his experimental
philosophy to Newton and Principia, the third in the Trinity of great astronomical books
of all time. To get to the bottom of things, one must study intimately the history of the intellectual
development of Europe through the 15th and 16th centuries. Many of the Western countries were
ruled by sovereigns of extraordinary vigor and force of character, and their activities tended strongly
toward that firm basis on which the foundations of modern civilization were securely laid.
Contemporaneously with this era, and following on through the 17th century, came the measurements
of the earth by French geotists, the construction of greater and greater telescopes, and the
wonderful discoveries with them by Heugenz, Cassini, and many others.
Most important of all was the application of telescopes to the instruments with which
angles are measured. Then, for the first time, man had begun to find out that by accurate
measures of the heavenly bodies, their places among the stars, their sizes and distances,
he could attain to complete knowledge of them, and so conquer the universe.
But he soon realized the insufficiency of the mathematical tools with which he were.
how unsuited they were to the solution of the problem of three bodies, sun, earth, and moon,
under the Newtonian law of gravitation, let alone the problem of end bodies, mutually attracting
each other, and every one perturbing the motion of every other one. So the invention of new mathematical
tools was prosecuted by Newton and his rival Leibniz, who, by the way, showed himself as great
a man as mathematician. Taking mathematics, wrote Leibniz, from the beginning of the world
to the times when Newton lived, what he had done was much the better half.
Newton was the greatest of astronomers who, since the revival of learning,
had observed the motions of the heavenly bodies and sought to find out why they moved.
Copernicus, Tycho Bray, Galileo, Kepler, Newton, all are bound together as in a plot.
Not one of them can be dissociated from the greatest of all discoveries.
But Newton, the greatest of them all, revealed his greatness even more by saying,
If I have seen further than other men, it is because I have been standing on the shoulders of giants.
Elsewhere, he says,
All this was in the two plague years of 1665 and 1662,
for in those days I was in the prime of my age for invention
and minded mathematics and philosophy more than at any time since.
At the time, he was then but 24.
All schoolchildren know these as the years of the plague in the fire, but very few, in school or out,
connect these years with two other far-reaching events in the world's history,
the invention of the infinitesimal calculus, and the discovery of the law of gravitation.
We have passed over the name of Descartes, almost contemporary with Galileo,
the founder of modern dynamics, but his initiation of one of the greatest improvements of mathematical method
cannot be overlooked. This era was the beginning of the golden age of mathematics that embraced
the lives of the versatile Euler, equally at home in dynamics and optics, and the lunar theory,
of Lagrange, author of the elegant, Mechanique Analytique, and Laplace of the unparalleled
mechanic celeste. With them and a fully elaborated calculus, Newton's universal law had been
extended to all the motions of the cosmos. Even the tides and procession of the equinoxes and Bradley's
mutation were accounted for and explained. Mathematical or gravitational astronomy had attained
its pinnacle. It seemed to be a finished science. All who were to come after must be but followers.
The culmination of one great period, however, proved to be but the inception of another epoch in the
development of the living science. The greatest observer of all time, with a telescope
built by his own hands, had discovered a great planet far beyond the then confines of the solar
system. Mathematicians would take care of Uranus, and Herschel was left free to build a bigger
telescope still and studied the construction of the stellar universe. Down to his day, astronomy
had dealt almost wholly with the positions and motions of the celestial bodies. Astronomy was
science of where. To inquire what the heavenly bodies are seemed to Herschel worthy of his keenest
attention also. While a knowledge of the construction of the heavens has always been the ultimate
object of my observations, as he said, and his ingenious method of stargaging was the first
practicable attempt to investigate the construction of the sidereal universe, he nevertheless
devoted much time to the description of nebulae in their nature, as well as their distribution in
space. He was the founder of double-star astronomy, and his researches on the light of the stars by the
simple method of sequences were the inception of the vast fields of stellar photometry and variable
stars. The physics of the sun also was by no means neglected, and his life work earned for him
the title of Father of Descriptive Astronomy. While progress and discovery in the earlier fields
of astronomy were going on, the initial discoveries in the vast group of
small planets were made at the beginning of the 19th century. The great Bessel added new life to the
science by revolutionizing the methods and instruments of accurate observation, his work culminating in the
measure of the distance of 61 Cygney, first of all the stars whose distance from the sun became known.
Wonderful as was this achievement, however, a greater marvel still was announced just before the
middle of the century, a new planet far beyond Uranus, whose discovery was a discovery was a new planet far beyond Uranus,
whose discovery was made as a direct result of mathematical researches by Adams and Laverier,
and affording an extraordinary verification of the great Newtonian law.
These were the days of great discoveries, and about this time, the giant of all the astronomical
tools of the century, was erected by Lord Ross, the Leviathan reflector with a speculum six feet in
diameter, which remained for more than half a century the greatest telescope in the world,
and whose ethical discovery of spiral nebulae has greater significance than we yet know,
or perhaps even surmise.
The living science was now at the height of a vigorous development,
when a revolutionary discovery was announced by Kierkov, which had been hanging fire nearly
half a century, the half-century two, which had witnessed the invention of photography,
the steam engine, the railroad, and the telegraph, three simple laws by which the dark
absorption lines of a spectrum are interpreted, and the physical and chemical constitution of
sun and stars ascertained, no matter what their distance from us.
Huggins in England and Seki in Italy were quick to apply the discovery to the stars, and
Draper and Pickering by masterly organization, have photographed and classified the spectra of
many hundred thousand stars of both hemispheres, a research of the highest importance which
has proved of unique service in studies of stellar movements and
the structure of the universe by editing in Shapley, Campbell and Capitaine, with many others
who are still engaged in pushing our knowledge far beyond the former confines of the universe.
Few are the branches of astronomy that have not been modified by photography and the spectroscope.
It has become a measuring tool of the first order of accuracy, measuring the speed of stars and
nebulae toward and from us, measuring the rotational speed of sun and planets,
corona and Saturnian ring.
Measuring the distances of whole classes of stars from the solar system.
Measuring afresh, even the distance of the sun, the yardstick of our immediate universe.
Measuring the drift of the sun with his entire family of planets 12 miles every second in the direction of Alpha Lirae,
and discovering and measuring the speed of binary suns too close together for our telescopes,
and so making real the astronomy of the invisible.
impatient of the handicap of a turbulent atmosphere the living science has sought out mountain tops and there erected telescopes vastly greater than the leviathan of a past century
there the sun in every detail of disc and spectrum is photographed by day and stars with their spectra and the nebulae by night great streams of stars are discovered and the speed and direction of their drift has retained
The marvels of the spiral nebulae are unfolded, their multitudinous forms portrayed and deciphered.
And their distances?
And the distances of the still more wonderful clusters?
Far, inconceivably far beyond the Milky Way.
And are they island universes?
And can man, the measurer, measure the distance of the mainland beyond?
End of Chapter 1.
Read by Verla Vieira, Las Cruces.
New Mexico, USA. November 13th, 2021.
Chapter 2 of Astronomy, the Science of Heavenly Bodies. This is a Libravox recording.
All Libravox recordings are in the public domain. For more information or to volunteer,
please visit Libravox.org.
Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies by David Todd.
The First Astronomers
Who were the first astronomers?
and who wrote the first treatise on astronomy, oldest of the sciences.
Questions are not easy to answer in our day.
With the progress of archaeological research or inquiry into the civilization and monuments of early peoples,
it has become certain that man has lived on this planet Earth for tens of thousands of years in the past
as an intelligent, observing, intellectual being,
and it is impossible to assign any time so remote that he did not observe and
philosophize upon the firmament above.
We can hardly imagine a people so primitive that they would fail to regard the sun as
Lord of the Day, and therefore all important in the scheme of things terrestrial, says Anne Bradstreet
of the Sun in her contemplations. What glories like to thee, soul of this world, this universe's
eye? No wonder some made thee deity.
To the Babylonians belongs the credit of the oldest known work on astronomy.
It was written nearly 6,000 years ago, about BC, 3,800, by their monarch, Sargon I, King of Aged.
Only the merest fragments of this historic treatise have survived, and they indicate the reverence
of the Babylonians for the sun. Another work by Sargon is entitled Olmins, which shows the
intimate relationship of astronomy to mysticism and superstitious worship at this early date,
and which persists even at the present day.
As remotely as BC-3000, the sun god Shamash and his wife Ayah are carved upon the historic
cylinders of hematite and Lavas-Lazalee, and one of the oldest designs on these cylinders
represents the sun god coming out of the door of sunrise,
while a porter is opening the gate of the east.
The Semitic religion has, as its basis, a reverence for the bodies of the sky,
and Samson, Hebrew for sun, was probably the sun god of the Hebrews.
The Phoenician deity Baal was a sun god under differing designations,
and at the epoch of the Shepard kings, about BC,500, during the Hixom.
Dynasty, the sun god was represented by a circle or disc with extending rays ending in hands,
possibly the precursor of the frequently recurring Egyptian design of the winged disc or winged
solar globe. Hittites, Persians, and Assyrians, as well as the Phoenicians, frequently represented
the sun god in similar fashion in their sacred glyphs or carvings. For a long period in
early human history, astronomy and astrology, were pretty much the same. We can trace the history
of astrology back as far as BC-3000 in ancient Babylonia. The motions of the sun, moon, and five
lucid planets of that time indicated the activity of the various gods who influenced human affairs.
So the Babylonian priests devised an elaborate system of interpreting the phenomena of the heavens
and attaching the proper significance in human terms to everything that took place in the sky.
In Babylonia and Assyria, it was the king and his people for whom the prognostications were made out.
It was the same in Egypt. Later, about the 5th century BC, astrology spread through Greece,
where astrologers developed the idea of the influence of planets upon individual concerns.
Biology persisted through the Dark Ages, and the great astronomers, Copernicus, Tycho, Kepler, Gessondi, Hoygens, were all astrologers as well.
Milton makes many references to planetary influence.
Our language has many words with a direct origin in astrology, and in our great cities today are many astrologers who prepare individual horoscopes of more than ordinary interest.
It is difficult to assign the antiquity of the Chinese astronomy with any approach to definiteness.
Their earliest records appear to have been total eclipses of the sun,
going back nearly 2,200 years before the Christian era,
and nearly a thousand years earlier, the Hindu astronomy sets down a conjunction of all the planets,
concerning which, however, there is doubt whether it was actually observed or merely calculated,
backward. Owing to a colossal misfortune, the burning of all native scientific books by order
of the emperor Xinxai Huangti in BC 21, accepting only the volumes related to agriculture,
medicine, and astrology, the Chinese lost a precious mass of astronomical learning accumulated
through the ages. No less an authority than Wells Williams credits them with a
observing 600 solar eclipses between BC-2159 and AD 1223,
and there must have been some centuries of eclipses observed and recorded anterior to BC-2159,
as this is the date assigned to the eclipse which came unheralded by the Astronomers Royal,
high and ho, who had become intoxicated and forgot to warn the court in accord with their duty.
China was thereby exposed to the anger of the gods, and High and Ho were executed by His Majesty's command.
It is doubtful if there is an earlier record of any celestial phenomenon.
End of Chapter 2. Chapter 3 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Libravox recording. All Libravox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit Libravox.org
Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies by David Todd.
Pyramid, Tomb, and Temple
Inquiry into the beginnings of astronomy in ancient Egypt
reveals most interesting relations of the origins of the science
to life and work and worship of the people.
Their astronomers were called the Mystery Teachers of Heaven,
Their monuments indicate a civilization more or less advanced, and their temples were built on astronomical principles and dedicated to the purpose of worship.
The Egyptian records carry us back many thousands of years, and we find that in Egypt, as in other early civilizations, observation of the heavenly bodies may be embraced in three pretty distinct stages.
awe, fear, wonder and worship were the first. Then came utility. A calendar was necessary to tell men,
when, to plow and sow, to reap and mow. And a calendar necessitated astronomical observations of some sort.
Following this, the third direction required observations of celestial positions and phenomena also,
because astrology in which the potentates of every ancient realm believed
could only thrive as it was based on astronomy.
Sun worship was preeminent in early Egypt, as in India,
where the primal antithesis between night and day struck terror
in the unformed mind of man.
In one of the Vedas occurs this significant song to the god of the day.
Will the sun rise again?
Will our old friend the dawn come back again?
Will the power of darkness be conquered by the God of light?
Quite different from India, however, is Egypt in matters of record.
In India, records in papyrus, but no monuments of very great antiquity.
In Egypt, no papyrus, but monuments of exceeding antiquity in abundance.
Herodotus and Pliny have told us of the great antiquity of these monuments,
even in their own day, and research by archaeologist and astronomer has made it certain
that the pyramids were built by a race possessing great knowledge of astronomy.
Their temples, too, were constructed in strict relation to stars.
Not only are the temples, as Edfu and Dendera of exceeding interest in themselves,
but associated with them are often huge monoliths of cyanite,
obelisks of many hundred tons in weight, which the astronomer recognizes as having served as observation pillars or nomans.
Specimens of these have wandered as far from home as Central Park and the Bank of the Thames.
But there is an even more remarkable wealth of temple inscriptions, zodiacs especially.
Next to the sun himself was the worship of the dawn and sunrise, the great revelations of nature.
There were numerous hymns to the still more numerous sun gods and the powers of sunlight.
Ra was the sun god in his noontide strength.
Osiris, the dying sun of sunset.
Only two gods were associated with the moon, and for the stars, a special goddess, Seishada.
Sacrifices were made at daybreak, and the stars that heralded the dawn were the subjects of careful observation by the sacrificial priest.
who must therefore have possessed a good knowledge of star places and names, doubtless in belts of stars
extending clear around the heavens. These Deccans, as they were called, are the exact counterparts
of the moon stations devised by the Arabians, Indians, and other peoples for a like purpose.
The plain or circle of observation, both in Egypt and India, was always the horizon, whether the sun was
observed or moon or stars. So the sun was often worshipped by the ancient Egyptians as the
Lord of the Two Horizons. It is sometimes difficult to keep in mind the fact in regard to all
temples of the ancients, whether in Egypt or elsewhere, that in studying them we must deal with
the risings or settings of the heavenly bodies in quite different fashion from that of the
astronomer of today, who is mainly concerned only with observing them on the meridian.
The axis of the temple shows by its direction the place of rising or setting. If the temple faces
directly east or west, its amplitude is zero. Now, the sun, moon, and planets are,
as everyone knows, very erratic as to their amplitudes, i.e. horizon points of rising,
and setting, so it must have been the stars that engrossed the attention of the earliest
builders of temples. After that, temples were directed to the rising sun at the equinox or solstices.
Then came the necessity of finding out about the inclination or obliquity of the elliptic,
and this is where the nomen was employed.
At Karnak are many temples of the solstitial order.
The wonderful temple of Amun Ra is so oriented that its axis stands in amplitude 26 degrees north of west,
which is the exact amplitude of the sun at Thebes at sunset of the summer solstice.
The axis of a lesser temple adjacent points to 26 degrees south of east,
which is the exact amplitude of the sunrise at the winter solstice.
At Giza, we find the temples oriented, not solstitially, but by the equinoxes.
That is, they face due east and west.
Peoples who worshipped the sun at the solstice must have begun their year at the solstice.
And Sir Norman Lockyer shows how the rise of the Nile, which took place at the summer solstice,
dominated not only the industry but the astronomy and religion of Egypt.
Looking into the question of temple orientation in other countries, as China, for example,
Lockyer finds that the most important temple of that country, the Temple of the Sun at Peking,
is oriented to the winter solstice, and Stonehenge, as has long been known,
is oriented to sunrise at the summer solstice.
In like fashion, the rising and the sunsuits.
setting of many stars were utilized by the Egyptians in both temple and pyramid, and no astronomer
who has ever seen these ancient structures and studied their orientations can doubt that they
were built by astronomers for use by astronomers of that day. The priests were the astronomers,
and the temples had a deep religious significance, with a ceremony of exceeding magnificence
wherever observations of heavenly bodies were undertaken, whether of sun or stars.
Hindu and Persian astronomy must be passed over very briefly, interesting as their systems are
historically, there are few, if any, original contributions of importance, and the Indian treatises
bear strong evidence of Greek origin.
End of Chapter 3.
Chapter 4 of Astronomies.
The Science of the Heavenly
Bodies. This is a Libravox recording.
All Libravox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit
Libravox.org
Astronomy, the Science of Heavenly Bodies
by David Todd.
Origin of Greek Astronomy
While the Greeks laid the foundations of modern
scientific astronomy, they were not
as a whole observers,
rather philosophers, we should say.
The later representatives of the Greek school, however, saw the necessity of observation as a basis of true induction,
and they discovered that real progress was not possible unless their speculative ideas were sufficiently developed and made definite by the aid of geometry,
so that they became capable of detailed comparison with observation.
This was the necessary and ultimate test with them, and the same is true today.
The early Greek philosophers were, however, mainly interested, not in observations, but in guessing
the causes of phenomena.
Baylis of Miletus, founder of the Ionian School, introduced the system of Egyptian astronomy
into Greece about the end of the 7th century BC.
He is universally known as the first astronomer who ever predicted a total eclipse of the sun
that happened when he said it would.
the eclipse of BC 585.
This he did by means of the Chandelion eclipse cycle of 18 years, known as the Saras.
Aristarchus of Seamus was the first and most eminent of the Alexandrian astronomers,
and his treatise on the magnitudes and distances of the sun and moon is still extant.
This method of ascertaining how many times farther the sun is than the moon is very simple,
and geometrically exact.
Unfortunately, it is impossible even today
to observe with accuracy
the precise time when the moon quarters,
an observation essential to his method,
because the moon's terminal or line
between day and night is not a straight line,
as required by theory, but a jagged one.
By his observation, the sun was only 20 times farther away
than the moon,
a distance which we know to be nearly 20 times too small.
His views regarding other astronomical questions were right,
although they found little favor among contemporaries.
Not only was the Earth spherical, he said,
but it rotated on its axis and also traveled round the sun.
Aristarchus was indeed the true originator of the modern doctrine of motions in the solar system,
and not Copernicus, 17.5.5.
centuries later. But Seleucus appears to have been his only follower in these very advanced
conceptions. Eristarchus made out the apparent diameters of sun and moon as practically
equal to one another, and inferred correctly that their real diameters are in proportion to
their distances from the Earth. Also, he estimated from observations during an eclipse of the moon
that the moon's diameter is about one-third that of the Earth.
Aristarchus appears to have been one of the clearest and most accurate thinkers
among the ancient astronomers.
Even his views concerning the distances of the stars were in accord with the fact
that they are immeasurably distant as compared with the distances of the sun, moon, and planets.
Practically contemporary with Aristarchus were Tamachorus, and Eustachius, and,
Aristolus, who were excellent observers and left records of position of sun and planets which were
exceedingly useful to their successors. Haparchus and Ptolemy in particular, indeed their observations
of star positions were such that, in a way, they deserve the fame of having made the first
catalog rather than Hipparchus to whom is universally accorded that honor.
spherical astronomy had its origin with the Alexandrian school, many famous geometers, and in particular Euclid, pointing the way.
Spherics, or the doctrine of the sphere, was the subject of numerous treatises, and the foundations were securely laid for that department of astronomical research, which was absolutely essential to further advance.
The artisans of that day began to build rude mechanical adaptations of the geometric
conceptions as concrete constructions in wood and metal, and it became the epoch of the origin
of astrolabes and armillary spheres.
End of Chapter 4.
Chapter 5 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Libravox recording.
All Libravox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit Libravox.org.
Astronomy, the science of the heavenly bodies by David Todd.
Measuring the Earth, Aristophanines
All told, the Greek philosophers were probably the keenest minds that ever inhabited the planet,
and we cannot suppose them so stupid as to reject the doctrine of a spherical Earth.
In fact, so certain were they that the Earth's true figure
is a sphere that Aristotthenes in the 3rd century BC made the first measure of the dimensions
of the terrestrial sphere by a method geometrically exact. At Saein in Upper Egypt, the sun at the summer
solstice was known to pass through the zenith at noon, whereas at Alexandria, Aristottenines
estimated its distance as 7 degrees from the zenith at the same time. This difference being about
150th of the entire circumference of a meridian. Aristotthenes correctly inferred that the distance
between Alexandria and Cyan must be 150th of the Earth's circumference. So he measured the
distance between the two and found it 5,000 stadia. This figured out the size of the Earth with a
percentage of error surprisingly small when we consider the rough means with which Aristotthenes
measured the sun's zenith distance and the distance between the two stations.
Greatest of all the Greek astronomers and one of the greatest in the history of the science
was Haparchus, who had an observatory at Rhodes in the middle of the second century BC.
His activities covered every department of astronomy. He made extensive series of observations
which he diligently compared with those handed down to him by the early
astronomers, especially Aristolus and Tamacarus. This enabled him to ascertain the motion of the
equinoxal points, and his value of the constant of procession of the equinoxes is exceedingly accurate
for a first determination. In 134 BC, a new star blazed out in the constellation Scorpio,
and this set Hipparchus at work on a catalog of the brighter stars of the firmament, a monumental work of
true scientific conception because it would enable the astronomers of future generations to ascertain
what changes, if any, were taking place in the stellar universe. There were 1,080 stars in his
catalog, and he referred their positions to the ecliptic and the equinoxes. Also, he originated
the present system of stellar magnitudes or orders of brightness, and his catalog was in use
as a standard for many centuries.
Teparchus was a great mathematician as well,
and he devoted himself to the improvement
of the method of applying numerical calculations
to geometrical figures, trigonometry,
both plain and spherical, that is,
and by some authorities he is regarded
as the inventor of the original methods in trigonometry.
The system of spheres of Udoxas did not satisfy him,
so he devised a method of representing the paths of the heavenly bodies by perfectly uniform motion in circles.
There is slight evidence that Apollonius of Perga may have been the originator of the system,
but it was reserved for Hipparchus to work it out in its final form.
This enabled him to ascertain the varying length of the seasons,
and he fixed the true length of the year as 365 and one-quarter days.
He had almost equal success in dealing with the irregularities of the moon's motion,
although the problem is much more complicated.
The distance and size of the moon by the method of Aristichus were improved by him,
and he worked out for the distance of the sun 1,200 radii of the earth,
a classic for many centuries.
Papparchus devoted much attention to the eclipses of both the sun and moon,
and we owe to him the first elucidation of the subject of parallax,
or the effect of difference of position of an observer on the Earth service
as affecting the apparent projection of the moon against the sun
when a solar eclipse takes place.
Whereas an eclipse of the moon is unaffected by parallax
and can be seen at the same time by observers everywhere,
no matter what, their location on the earth.
Indeed, with all that Hipparchus achieved,
we need not be surprised that astronomy was regarded as a finished science
and made practically no progress whatever for centuries after his time.
Then came Claudius Ptolemaeus, generally known as Ptolemy,
the last great name in Greek astronomy.
He lived in Alexandria, about the middle of the second century AD,
and wrote many minor astronomical and astrological treatises,
also works on geography and optics,
in the last of which the atmospheric refraction of rays of light from heavenly bodies,
apparently elevating them toward the zenith,
is first dealt with in true form.
End of Chapter 5.
Chapter 6 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Libravox recording.
All Libravox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit you.
it's Libravox.org.
Astronomy, the science
of the heavenly bodies by David Todd.
Ptolemy and his great book.
Calamay was an observer of the heavens,
though not of the highest order,
but he had all the work of his predecessors,
best of all,
Haparchus to build upon.
Palome's greatest work was the Magale Syntaxis,
generally known as the Almagest.
It forms a nearly complete compendium of the ancient astronomy.
And although it embodies much error, because built on a wrong theory,
the Almagest nevertheless is competent to follow the motions of all the bodies in the sky
with a close approach to accuracy, even at the present day.
This marvelous work written at this critical epoch became as authoritative as the philosophy of Aristotle,
and for many centuries it was the last word in the science.
The old astrology held full sway, and the Ptolemaic theory of the universe supplied everything necessary.
Further progress, indeed, was deemed impossible.
The Almegast comprises in all 13 books, the first two of which deal with the simpler observations of the celestial sphere,
its own motion, and the apparent motions of the sun, moon, and planets upon it.
He discusses, too, the postulates of his system and exhibits great skill as an original
geometer and mathematician.
In the third book, he takes up the length of the year, and in the fourth book, similarly,
The Moon and the Length of the Month.
Here, his mathematical powers are at their best, and he made a discovery of an inequality
in the Moon's motion known as the Evection.
Book 5 describes the construction and use of the use of the discovery of the world.
the astrolabe, a combination of graduated circles with which Ptolemy made most of his observations.
In the sixth book, he follows mainly Hipparchus in dealing with eclipses of sun and moon.
In the seventh and eighth books, he discusses the motion of the equinox and embodies a catalog
of 1,028 stars, substantially, as in Hipparchus.
The five remaining books of the Almagest deal with the planetary motions,
and are the most important of all of Ptolemy's original contributions to astronomy.
Ptolema's fundamental doctrines were that the heavens are spherical in form,
all the heavenly motions being in circles.
In his view, the Earth, too, is spherical and is located at the center of the universe,
being only a point, as it were, in comparison.
All was founded on mere appearance combined with the philosophical notion,
that the circle being the only perfect curve, all motions of heavenly bodies must take place
in earth-centered circles. For 14 or 15 centuries, this false theory persisted on the authority
of Ptolemy and the Almagest, rendering progress toward the development of the true theory
impossible. Tolemy correctly argued that the earth itself is a sphere that is curved from east to west
and from north to south as well,
clinching his argument, as we do today,
by the visibility of objects at sea,
the lower portions of which are at first concealed from our view
by the curved surface of the water which intervenes.
To Ptolemy also, the earth is at the center of the celestial sphere,
and it has no motion of translation from that point.
But his argument fails to prove this.
Truth and error indeed are.
so deftly intermingled that one is led to wonder why the keen intelligence of this great philosopher
permitted him to reject the simple doctrine of the Earth's rotation on its axis. But if we reflect that
there was then no science of natural philosophy or physics proper and that the age was wholly
undeveloped along the lines of practical mechanics, we shall see why the astronomers of Ptolemy's time
and subsequent centuries were content to accept the doctrines of the heavens as formulated by
him. When it came to explaining the movements of the wandering stars or planets, as we termed them,
the Ptolemaic theory was very happy insofar as accuracy was concerned, but very unhappy when it
had to account for the actual mechanics of the cosmos in space. Sun and Moon were the only bodies.
that went steadily onward, easterly. Whereas all others, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn,
although they moved easterly most of the time, nevertheless would at intervals slow down to
stationary points, where for a time they did not move at all, and then actually go backward to the
west or retrograde, then become stationary again, finally resuming their regular onward motion to
the east.
To help out of this difficulty, the worst possible mechanical scheme was invented, that known as the epicycle.
Each of the five planets was supposed to have a fictitious double, which traveled eastward with uniformity,
attached to the end of a huge but mechanically impossible bar.
The earth-centered circle in which this traveled round was called the deferent.
what this bar was made of, what stresses it would be subjected to, or what its size would have to be in order to keep from breaking,
none of these questions seem to have agitated the ancient and medieval astronomers, any more than the flat-earth astronomy of the Hindu is troubled by the necessity of something to hold up the tortoise that holds up the elephant that holds up the earth.
But at the end of this bar is jointed or swiveled another shorter bar
to the revolving end of which is attached the actual planet itself.
And the second bar swinging once round the end of the primary advancing bar
would account for the backward or retrograde motion of the planet as seen in the sky.
For every new irregularity that was found in the motion of Mars, for instance,
a new and additional bar was requisitioned
until interplanetary space
was hopelessly filled with revolving bars
each producing one of the epicycles,
some large, some small,
that were needed to take up the vagaries
of the several planets.
The Arabic astronomers who kept the science alive
through the Middle Ages added epicycle to epicycle
until there was every justification
for Milton's verses descriptive of the sphere,
with centric and eccentric
scribbled ore, cycle and epicycle,
orb in orb.
End of
Chapter 6
Chapter 7 of Astronomy,
The Science of the Heavenly
Bodies. This is a Libravox recording.
All Libravox recordings are in the
public domain. For more information
or to volunteer, please visit
Libravox.org.
Astronomy, the science of the heavenly
bodies.
David Todd.
Astronomy of the Middle Ages
With the fall of Alexandria and the victory of
Muhammad throughout the West, and a
consequent decline in learning, supremacy, and science
passed to the east and centered
around the Kailiffs of Baghdad in the
7th and 8th centuries.
They were interested in astronomy only as a
practical and to them useful science
in adjusting the complicated
lunar calendar of the Mohammedans in
ascertaining the true direction of Mecca which every Mohammedan must know, and in the revival
of astrology to which the Greeks had not attached any particular significance.
Harun al-Rashid ordered the Almagest and many other Greek works translated, of which
the modern world would otherwise no doubt never have heard, as the Greek originals are not
extant. Splendid observatories were built at Damascus and Baghdad, and
fine instruments patterned after Greek models were continuously used in observing.
The Arab astronomers, although they had no clocks, were nevertheless so fully impressed
by the importance of time that they added extreme value to their observation of eclipses,
for example, by setting down the altitudes of sun or stars at the same time.
On very important occasions, the records were certified on oath by a body of barrens,
and astronomers conjointly, a precedent which fortunately has never been followed.
About the middle of the 9th century, the Kailiff al-Mamun directed his astronomers to revise the Greek
measures of the Earth's dimensions, and they had less reverence for the Almagast than existed
in later centuries. Indeed, Tabit Ben-Cora invented and applied to the tables of the
Almagest, a theoretical fluctuation in the position of the ecliptic, which he called trepidation,
which brought sad confusion into astronomical tables for many succeeding centuries.
Albatagnus was another Arab prince whose record in astronomy in the 9th and 10th centuries was
perhaps the best. The Ptolemaic values of the procession of the equinoxes and of the obliquity
of the ecliptic were improved by new observations.
and his excellence as mathematician enabled him to make permanent improvements in the astronomical application of trigonometry.
Abolwifa was the last of the Baghdad astronomers in the latter half of the 10th century,
and his great treatise on astronomy known as the Almagest is sometimes confused with Ptolemy's work.
Following him was Ibn Yunus of Cairo, whose labors culminated in the famous Hachamite tables,
which became the standard in mathematical and astronomical computations for several centuries.
Mohamedan astronomy thrived too in Spain and northern Africa.
Osricel of Toledo published the Toledo Win Tables,
and his pupils made improvements in instruments and the methods of calculation.
The Goralda was built by the Moors in Seville in 1196,
the first astronomical observatory on the continent of Europe,
But within the next half-century, both Seville and Cordova became Christian again, and Arab astronomy was at an end.
Through many centuries, however, the science had been kept alive, even if no great original advances had been achieved,
and Arab activities have modified our language very materially, adding many such words as
almanac, zenith, and radii, and a wealth of star names as Aldebaran,
Rigel, Beetlejuice, Vega, and so on.
Meanwhile, other schools of astronomy had developed in the east, one at Maraga, near the modern
Persia, where Nassir Eden, the astronomer of Huluga Khan, grandson of the Mongol Emperor
Genghis Khan, built and used large and carefully constructed instruments,
translated all the Greek treatises on astronomy, and published a laborious work,
known as the Ilkhanate tables based on the Hakamite tables of Ibn Yunos.
More important still was the Tartar School of Astronomy under Ullug Beg,
a grandson of Tamerlane, who built an observatory at Samarkand in 1420,
published new tables of the planets, and made with his excellent instruments
the observations for a new catalog of stars, the first since Haparkas, the star places being
recorded with great precision. The European astronomy of the Middle Ages amounted to very
little besides translations from the Arabic authors into Latin, with commentaries. Astronomers under
the patronage of Alfonso the 10th of Lyon and Castile published in 1252 the Alphanzine tables,
which superseded the Toledin tables
and were accepted everywhere throughout Europe.
Alfonso published also
the Libros del Sabre,
perhaps the first of all astronomical cyclopedias
in which is said to occur the earliest diagram
representing a planetary orbit as an ellipse,
Mercury's supposed path around the Earth as a center.
Herbach of Vienna,
about the middle of the 15th century,
began his epitome of astronomy
based on the Almagast of Ptolemy,
which was finished by his collaborator,
Regio Montanus,
who was an expert in mathematics
and published a treatise on trigonometry
with the first table of signs,
calculated for every minute
from zero degrees to 90 degrees,
a most helpful contribution
to theoretical astronomy.
Regiomontanus had a very picturesque career,
finally taking up his residence in Nuremberg, where a wealthy citizen named Valthur became his patron, pupil, and collaborator.
The artisans of the city were set at work on astronomical instruments of the greatest accuracy,
and the comment of 1472 was the first to be observed and studied in true scientific fashion.
Reggio Montanus was very progressive, and the invention of the new art of printing gave you,
him an opportunity to publish
Herbach's treatise, which went
through several editions and doubtless
had much to do in promoting
dissatisfaction with the
ancient Ptolemaic system
and was thus most significant
in preparing a background
for the coming of the new
Copernican order.
The Nuremberg Press's
popularized astronomy in other
important ways, issuing
almanacs the first precursors
of our astronomical effemoration.
Reggio Montanus was practical as well, and invented a new method of getting a ship's position at sea,
with tables so accurate that they superseded all others in the great voyages of discovery,
and it is probable that they were employed by Columbus in his discovery of the American continent.
Regio Montanus had died several years earlier in 1475 at Rome,
where he had gone by invitation of the Pope to effect,
a reformation in the calendar.
He was only 40, and his patron, Volther, kept on with excellent observations, the first
probably to be corrected for the effect of atmospheric refraction, although its influence
had been known since Ptolemy.
The Nuremberg School lasted for nearly two centuries.
Nearly contemporary with Regio Montanus were Frankistoro and Peter Apion, whose original
observations on comets are worthy of mention because they first noticed that the tales of these
bodies always point away from the sun. Leonardo da Vinci was the first to give the true
explanation of earth shine on the moon, and similarly the moon illumination of the earth, and this
no doubt had great weight in disposing of the popular notion of an essential difference
of nature between the earth and celestial bodies, all of which helped to prepare the way for
Copernicus and the Great Revolution in Astronomical Thought.
End of Chapter 7.
Chapter 8 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Libri-Vox recording.
All Libby-Vox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information on to volunteer, please visit LibbyVox.org.
Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies by David Todd.
Chapter 8
Copernicus and the New Era
Throughout the Middle Ages, the progress of astronomy was held back by a combination of untoward circumstances.
A prolonged reaction from the heights attained by the Greek philosophers was to be expected.
The uprising of the Mohammedan world and the savage conquerors in the east did not produce conditions favourable to the origin and development of great ideas.
At the birth of Copernicus, however, in 1473, the time was ripening for fundamental changes from the ancient system,
the error of which had helped to hold back the development of the science for centuries.
the fifteenth century was most fruitful in a general quickening of intelligence the invention of printing had much to do with this as it spread a knowledge of the greek writers and led to conflict of authorities
even aristotle and ptolemy were not entirely in harmony yet each was held in violet it was the age of the reformation too and near the end of the century the discovery of america
America exerted a powerful stimulus in the advance of thought.
Copernicus searched the works of the ancient writers and philosophers,
and embodied in this new order such of their ideas as commended themselves in the elaboration of his own system.
Pythagoras alone and his philosophy looked in the true direction.
Many believe that he taught that the sun, not the earth, is the center of our solar system,
system. But his views were mingled with the speculative philosophy of the Greeks, and none of his
writings, barring a few meager fragments, have come down to our modern age. To many philosophers,
through all these long centuries, the true theory of the celestial motions must have been
obvious, but their views were not formulated, nor have they been preserved in writing. So the fact
remains that Copernicus alone first proved the truth of the system which is recognized today.
This he did in his great treaties entitled De Revolutionibus Orbium Colestium, the first printed
copy of which was dramatically delivered to him on his deathbed in May 1543. The 70 years of his
life were largely devoted to the preparation of this work, which necessitated many observations
as well as intricate calculations based upon them. Being a canon in the church, he naturally
hesitated about publishing his revolutionary views, his friend Reticus first doing this for him
in outline in 1540. So simple are the great principles that they may be embodied in very
few words. What appears to us as the daily revolution of the heavens is not a real motion. It is
only an apparent one. That is, the heavens are at rest, while the earth itself is in motion,
turning around an axis which passes through its centre, and the second proposition is that
the earth is simply one of six known planets, and they all revolve around the sun as the
true center. The solar system, therefore, is heliocentric or sun-centered, not geocentric, or
Earth-centered, as taught by the Ptolemaic theory. Copernicus demonstrates clearly how his system
explains the retrograde motion of the planets and their stationary points, no matter whether
they are within the orbit of the Earth, as Mercury and Venus, or outside of it, as
Mars, Jupiter and Saturn. His system provides also the means of ascertaining, with accuracy,
the proportions of the solar system, or the relative distances of the planets from the sun
and from each other. In this respect also, his system possessed a vast advantage over that of
Ptolemy, and the planetary distances which Copernicus computed are very close approximations
to the measures of the present day.
Reinhold revised the calculations of Copernicus,
and prepared the tabulae puttenike,
based on the De Revolutionebus,
which proved far superior to the Alphonsein tables,
and were only supplanted by the Rudolfine tables of Kepler.
On the whole, we may regard the lifework of Copernicus
as fundamentally the most significant in the history
and progress of astronomy.
End of chapter 8.
Recording by Alan Mapstone.
Chapter 9 of astronomy,
The Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Libravox recording.
All Libravox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer,
please visit Libravox.org.
Astronomy, the science of the heavenly bodies by David Todd.
Tycho, the Great
observer. Clear as Copernicus had made the demonstration of the truth of his new system,
it nevertheless failed of immediate and universal acceptance. The Ptolemaic system was too strongly
entrenched, and the motions of all the bodies in the sky were too well represented by it.
Accurate observations were greatly needed, and the landgrave William IV of Hesse built the
castle observatory, which made a new catalogue of stars and introduced the use of clocks.
to carry on the time as measured by the uniform motion of the celestial sphere.
Three years after the death of Copernicus, Tycho Brahe was born,
and when he was 30, the king of Denmark built for him the famous observatory of Uraniburg,
where the great astronomer passed nearly a quarter of a century
in critically observing the positions of the stars and planets.
Tycho was celebrated as a designer and constructor of new types of astronomical instruments,
and he printed a large volume of these designs, which formed the basis of many in use at the present day.
Unfortunately for the genius of Tycho and the significance of his work, the invention of the telescope had not yet been made,
so that his observations had not the modern degree of accuracy.
Nevertheless, they were destined to play a most important part in the progress of astronomy.
Tycho was sadly an error in his rejection of the Copernican system,
although his reasons in his day seemed unanswerable.
If the outer planets were displaced among the stars by the annual motion of the Earth round the sun, he argued,
then the fixed stars must be similarly displaced,
unless indeed they be at such vast distances that their motions would be too slight to be visible.
Of course we know now that this is really true,
and that no instruments that Tycho was able to build could possibly have detected the motions,
the effects of which we now recognize in the case of the nearer fixed stars in their annual or paralactic orbits.
The remarkably accurate instruments devised by Taicobrahe and employed by him in improving the observations of the positions of the heavenly bodies
were no doubt built after descriptions of astrolabs such as Hipparchus used, as described by Ptolemy.
In his Astronomier, Instoratae Mechanica, we find illustrations and descriptions of many of them.
One is a polar astrolab, mounted somewhat as a modern equatorial telescope is, and the meridian circle is
adjustable so that it can be used in any place, no matter what its latitude might be. There is a graduated
equatorial ring at right angles to the polar axis, so that the astrolab could be used for making
observations outside the meridian, as well as on it. This equatorial circle slides through grooves
and is furnished with movable sights, and a plum line from the zenith or highest point of the meridian circle
makes it possible to give the necessary adjustment in the vertical.
Screws for adjustment at the bottom are provided, just as in our modern instruments,
and two observers were necessary taking their sights simultaneously,
unless, as in one type of the instrument, a clock or some sort of measure of time was employed.
Another early type of instrument is called by Tycho the Ecliptic Astrolab, Armalet Zodiacalis, or the Zodiacal rings.
It resembles the equatorial astrolab somewhat, but has a second ring inclined to the equatorial one at an angle equal to the obliquity of the ecliptic.
In observing the equatorial ring was revolved round till the ecliptic ring came into coincidence with the plane of the ecliptic in the sky.
Then the observation of a star's longitude and latitude, as referred to the ecliptic plane,
could be made, quite as well as that of right ascension and declination on the equatorial plane.
But it was necessary to work quickly as the adjustment on the ecliptic would soon disappear and have to be renewed.
Tycho was often called the father of the science of astronomical observation
because of the improvements in design and construction of the instruments he used.
His largest instrument was a mural quadrant, a quarter circle of copper turning parallel to the north and south face of a wall,
its axis turning on a bearing fixed in the wall.
The radius of this quadrant was nine feet, and it was graduated or divided so as to read the very small angle of ten seconds of arc,
an extraordinary degree of precision for his day.
Tycho built also a very large alt-asimuth quadrant of six feet radius.
Its operation was very much as if his mural quadrant could be swung round in azimuth.
At several of the great observatories of the present day, as Greenwich and Washington,
there are instruments of a similar type, but much more accurate,
because the mechanical work in brass and steel is executed by tools that are essentially perfect,
and besides this, the power of the telescope is super-added to give absolute direction,
or pointing on the object under observation.
excellent clocks are necessary for precise observation with such an instrument,
but neither Tycho Brahe nor Havilius was provided with such accessories.
Havilius did not avail himself of the telescope as an aid to precision of observation,
claiming that pinhole sights gave him more accurate results.
It was a dispute concerning this question that Hally was sent over from London to Dantzig to arbitrate.
There could be but one way to decide.
The telescope with its added power magnifies any displacement of the instrument
and thereby enables the observer to point his instrument more exactly,
so he can detect smaller errors and differences of direction than he can without it.
And what is of great importance in more modern astronomy,
the telescope makes it possible to observe accurately the position of objects so faint
that they are wholly invisible to the naked eye.
End of Chapter 9. Read by Sonia Sherman.
Chapter 10 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Libravox recording.
All Libravox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit Libravox.org.
Recording by Rick Vena
Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly
bodies by David Todd.
Chapter 10
Kepler, the Great Calculator
Most fortunate it was, for the later development of astronomical theory,
that Tycho Bray not only was a practical or observational astronomer
of the highest order, but that he can find himself studiously for years,
to observations of the places of the planets.
Of Mars, he accumulated an especially long and accurate series,
and among those who assisted him in his work
was a young and brilliant pupil named Johann Kepler.
Strongly impressed with the truth of the Copernican system,
Kepler was free to reject the erroneous
compromise system, devised by Tycho Bray.
And soon after Tycho's death, Kepler addressed himself seriously to the great problem that no one
had ever attempted to solve, namely, to find out what the laws of motion of the planets
round the sun really are. Of course, he took the fullest advantage,
of all that Ptolemy and Copernicus had done before him,
and he had, in addition, the splendid observations of Tycho Bray as a basis to work upon.
Copernicus, while he had affected the tremendous advance of substituting the sun for the earth
as the center of motion,
nevertheless clung to the erroneous notion of Ptolemy,
that all the bodies of the sky must perforce move at uniform speeds
and in circular curves,
the circle being the only perfect curve.
Kepler was not long in finding out that this could not be so,
and he found it out because Tycho Bray's observations were much more accurate than any that Copernicus had employed.
Naturally, he attempted the nearest planet first, and that was Mars, the planet that Tycho had assigned to him for research.
How fortunate that the orbit of Mars was the one of all the planets
to show practically the greatest divergence
from the ancient conditions of uniform motion
in a perfectly circular orbit.
Had the orbit of Mars chanced to be as nearly circular
as is that of Venus,
Kepler might well have been driven
to abandon his search for the true curve of planetary motion.
However, the facts of the cosmos were on his side,
but the calculations essential in testing his various hypotheses
were of the most tedious nature,
because logarithms were not yet known in his day.
His first discovery was that the orbit of Mars,
is certainly not a circle, but oval or elliptic in figure.
And the sun, he soon found, could not be in the center of the ellipse.
So he made a series of trial calculations with the sun located in one of the foci of the ellipse instead.
Then he found he could make his calculated places of Mars agree quite perfectly with Tycho Bray's observed positions.
If only he gave up the other ancient requisite of perfectly uniform motion.
On doing this, it soon appeared that Mars, when in Perihelian or nearest the sun,
sun always moved swiftest, while at its greatest distance from the sun, or Aphelian, its orbital
velocity was slowest. Kepler did not busy himself to inquire why these revolutionary
discoveries of his were as they were. He simply went on making enough trials on Mars,
and then on the other planets in turn,
to satisfy himself that all the planetary orbits are elliptical,
not circular in form,
and are so located in space that the center of the sun
is at one of the two foci of each orbit.
This is known as Kepler's first law of planetary motion.
The second one did not come quite so easy.
It concerned the variable speed with which the planet moves at every point of the orbit.
We must remember how handicapped he was in solving this problem,
only the geometry of Euclid to work with,
and none of the refinements of the higher mathematics of a later day.
But he finally found a very simple relation,
which represented the velocity of the planet everywhere in its orbit.
It was this.
If we calculate the area swept or passed over by the planet's radius vector,
that is, the line joining its center to the sun's center,
during a week's time near Perihelian,
and then calculate the similar area
for a week near Aphelian,
or indeed for a week when Mars is in any intermediate part of its orbit,
we shall find that these areas are all equal to each other.
So, Kepler formulated
his second great law of planetary motion very simply.
The radius vector of any planet describes or sweeps over equal areas in equal times,
and he found this was true for all the planets.
But the real genius of the great mathematician was shown in the description, was shown in the
of his third law, which is more complex and even more significant than the other two.
A law connecting the distances of the planets from the sun with their periods of revolution
about the sun.
This cost Kepler many additional years of close calculation, and the resulting law, his
third law of planetary motion is this. The cubes of the mean or average distances of the planets
from the sun are proportional to the squares of their times of revolution around him. So, Kepler
had not only disposed of the sacred theories of motion of the planets,
held by the ancients as inviolable,
but he had demonstrated the truth of a great law
which bound all the bodies of the solar system together.
So accurately and completely
did these three laws account for all the motions
that the science of astronomy seemed as if finished,
and no matter how far in the future a time might be assigned,
Kepler's laws provided the means of calculating the planet's position for that epic
as accurately as it would be possible to observe it.
Kepler paused here, and he died in 1630.
End of Chapter 10.
Chapter 11 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Libri-Vox recording. All Libby-Vox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit Libri-Box.org.
Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies by David Todd.
Chapter 11. Galileo, the Great Experimenter.
and 16th centuries, containing the lives and work of Copernicus, Tisho, Galileo, Kepler,
Hoygens, Halley, and Newton, were a veritable golden age of astronomy. All these men were truly
great and original investigators. None had a career more picturesque and popular than did Galileo.
Born a few years earlier and dying a few years later than Kepler, the work of each of these two great astronomers was wholly independent of the other and in entirely different fields.
Kepler was discovering the laws of planetary motion, while Galileo was laying the secure foundations of the new science of dynamics.
In particular the laws of falling bodies that was necessary before Kepler's laws could be fully understood.
When only 18, Galileo's keen power of observation led to his discovery of the laws of pendulum motion,
suggested by the oscillation to and fro of a lamp in the Cathedral of Pisa.
The world-famous leaning tower of this place, where he was brought.
born, served as a physical laboratory, from the top of which he dropped various objects,
and thus was led to formulate the laws of falling bodies. He proved that Aristotle was all wrong
in saying that a heavy body must fall swifter in proportion to its weight than a lighter one.
These and other discoveries rendered him unpopular with his associates, who christened him the
Wrangler. The new system of Copernicus appealed to him, and when he, first of all men,
turned a telescope on the heavenly bodies, there was Venus with phases like those of the
moon, and Jupiter with satellites travelling about it, a Copernican system in miniature.
Nothing could have happened that would have proved a better demonstration of the truth of the new
system and the falsity of the old. His marvelous discoveries caused the greatest excitement,
consternation even among the anti-Capernicans. Galileo published the Sidereus Nuncius,
with many observations and drawings of the moon, which he showed to be a body not wholly
dissimilar to the earth. This too was obviously a great moment in corroboration.
of the Copernican order, and in contradiction to the Ptolemaic, which maintains sharp lines of demarcation between things terrestrial and things celestial.
His telescopes, small as they were, revealed to him anomalous appearances on both sides of the planet Saturn, which he called and say or handles.
but their subsequent disappearance was unaccountable to him, and later observers, who kept on guessing
ineffectively, till Hoygens, nearly half a century after, showed that the true nature of the
appendage was a ring. Spots on the sun were frequently observed by Galileo and led to bitter
controversies. He proved, however, that they were objects on the sun itself, not outside it,
and by noticing their repeated transits across the sun's disc, he showed that the sun turned round
on its axis in a little less than a month, another analogy to the like motion of the earth
on the Copernicum plan. Galileo's appointment in 1610, as first philosopher and mathematics,
to the Grand Duke of Tuscany, gave him abundant time for the pursuit of original investigations
and the preparation of books and pamphlets. His first visit to Rome the year following was the
occasion of a reception with great honour by many cardinals and others of high rank. His lack of sympathy
with others whose views differed from him and his naturally controversial spirit, have begun
to lead him headlong into controversies with the Jesuits and the Church, which culminated in his censure by the authorities of the church and persecution by the Inquisition.
In 1618, three comets appeared, and Galileo was again in controversial hot water with the Jesuits,
But it led to the publication five years later of Il Sagittore, the assessor, of no great scientific value, but only a brilliant bit of controversial literature dedicated to the newly elevated Pope, Urban the Eighth.
Later he wrote through several years a great treatise, more or less controversial in character, entitled a dialogue of the two chief systems.
of the world between three speakers and extending through four successive days. Simplicio argues for
the Aristotelians, Salviati for the Copernicans, while Sagredo does his best to be neutral.
It will always be a very readable book, and we are fortunate to have a recent translation by
Professor Crewe of Evanston. Here we find the first suggestion on the first suggestion of the
of the modern method of getting stellar parallaxes, a relative parallax that is, of two stars
in the same field, a method not put into service until Bessel's time two centuries later.
But the most important chapters of the dialogue deal with Galileo's investigations of the laws
of motion of bodies in general, which he applied to the problem of the earth's motion.
this he really anticipated Newton in the first of his three laws of motion, and in a subsequent
work, dealing with the theory of projectiles, he reaches substantially the results of
Newton's second law of motion, although he gave no general statement of the principle.
Nevertheless, in the epoch where his life was lived and his work done, his telescopic discoveries,
combined with his dynamic researches in untrodden fields, resulted in the complete and final overthrow
of the ancient system of error and the secure establishment of the Copernican system beyond further
question and discussion. Only then could the science of astronomy proceed unhampered to the
fullest development by the masterminds of succeeding centuries.
End of Chapter 11. Recording by Alan Matstone.
Chapter 12 of Astronomy, The Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Libravox recording. All Libravox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit Libravox.org.
Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies by David Todd.
After the Great Masters.
Following Kepler and Galileo was a half-century of great astronomical progress along many lines
laid out by the work of the great masters. The telescope seemed only a toy, but its improvement
in size and quality showed almost inconceivable possibilities of celestial discoveries.
Havaleus of Danzig took up the study of the moon, and his selenographia was finally illustrated
by plates which he not only drew, but engraved himself. Lunar names.
of mountains, plains, and craters we owe very largely to him. Also he published, among other works
two on comets, the second of which was published in 1668 and called the cometographia,
the first detailed account of all the comets observed and recorded to date. Many were the telescopes
turned on the planet Saturn, and every variety of guess was made as to the actual shape and
physical nature of the weird appendages discovered by Galileo.
The true solution was finally reached by Hauchens, whose mechanical genius had enabled him to
grind and polish larger and better lenses than his contemporaries.
In 1659, he published the Systema Saturnium, interpreting the ring and the cause of its
various configurations, and the first discovery of a Saturnian satellite is due to him.
Gascoigne in England, about 1640, was the first to make the important application of the micrometer
to enhance the accuracy of measurement of small angles in the telescopic field.
An invention made and applied independently many years later by Hauchens in Holland and Azou
and Picard in France, where the instrument was first regularly employed as an accessory in the work of an observatory.
Another Englishman, Jeremiah Horx, was the first observer of a transatlore.
of Venus over the disc of the sun in 1639. Horrocks was possessed of great ability and
calculational astronomy also. This was about the time of the invention of the pendulum clock by
Hauchens, which in conjunction with the later invention of the transit instrument by Romer,
wrought a revolution in the exacting art of practical astronomy. This was because it enabled
the time to be carried along continuously, and the revolution of the Earth could be utilized in
making precise measures of the position of sun, moon, and stars.
Louis XIV had just founded the new observatory at Paris in 1668,
and Picard was the first to establish regular time observations there.
Hauchens followed up the motion of the pendulum in theory as well as practice
in his horologium oscillatorium, 1673, showing the way to measure the force of gravity,
and his study of circular motion showed the fundamental necessity
of some force directed toward the center in planetary motions.
The doctrine of the sphericity of the earth being no longer in doubt,
the great advance in accuracy of astronomical observation indicated to Villabrode-Schnell
in Holland the best way to measure an arc of meridian by triangulation.
Picard repeated the measurements near Paris with even greater accuracy,
and his results were of the utmost significance to Newton in establishing his law of
gravitation.
Domenico Cassini, an industrious observer, voluminous writer, and a strong personality,
devised telescopes of great size, discovered four Saturnian satellites, and the main division
in the ring of Saturn, determined the rotation periods of Mars and Jupiter, and prepared
tables of the eclipses of Jupiter's satellites.
At his suggestion, Richet undertook an expedition to Cayenne, in latitude five degrees north, where it
was found that the intensity of gravity was less than at Paris, and his clock therefore lost time,
thus indicating that the Earth was not a perfect sphere as had been thought, but a spheroid instead.
The planet Mars passed a near opposition, and Richet's observations of it from Cayenne, when combined
with those of Cassini and others in France, gave a new value of the sun's parallax and distance.
really the first actual measurement worth the name in the history of astronomy.
To close this era of signal advance in astronomy, we may cite a discovery by Romer of the first order,
no less than that of the velocity of transmission of light through space.
At the instigation of Picard, Romer, in studying the motions of Jupiter's satellites,
found that the intervals between eclipses grew less and less as Jupiter and the Earth approached each other,
and greater and greater than the average, as the two planets separated farther and farther.
Romer correctly attributed this difference to the progressive motion of light, and a rough value of its velocity was calculated,
though not accepted by astronomers generally for more than a century.
Why the laws of Kepler should be true, Kepler himself was unable to say,
nor could anyone else in that day answer these questions.
1. The planets move in orbits that are elliptical, not circular. Why should they move in an imperfect curve
rather than the perfect one in which it had always been taught that they moved?
2. Why should our planet vary its velocity at all, and travel now fast, now slow?
Especially why should the speed so vary that the line of varying length joining the planet to the
sun always passes over areas proportional to the time of describing them?
And three, why should there be any definite relation of the distances of planets from the sun to their times of revolution about him?
Why should it be exactly as the cube of one to the square of the other?
We must remember that the Copernican system itself was not yet in the beginning of the 17th century, accepted universally,
and the great minds of that period were most concerned in overturning the erroneous theory of Ptolemy.
The next step in logical order was to find a basic explanation of the planetary motions,
and Descartes and his theory of vortices are worthy of mention, among many unsuccessful attempts in this direction.
Descartes was a brilliant French philosopher and mathematician,
but his hypothesis of a multitude of whirlpools in the ether, while ingenious in theory,
was too vague and indefinite to account for the planetary motions with any approach to the precision,
with which the laws of Kepler represented them.
Another great astronomer whose labors helped immensely in preparing the way for the signal discoveries
that were soon to come was Hauchens, a man of versatility as natural philosopher,
mechanician, and astronomical observer.
Hauchens was born 13 years before the death of Galileo,
and to the discovery of the laws of motion by the latter Hauchens added researches on the laws
of action of centrifugal forces. Neither of them, however, appeared to see the immediate bearing
on the great general problem of celestial motions in its true light, and it was reserved for another
generation and an astronomer of another country to make the one fundamental discovery that should
explain the whole by a single, simple law. End of Chapter 12, read by Sonia Sherman.
Chapter 13 of astronomy, the science of the heavenly bodies.
This is a Libri-Box recording.
All Libri-Box recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit Libri-box.org.
Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies by David Todd.
Chapter 13, Newton and Motion
How is it that you are able to make these great discoveries?
Was once asked of Sir Isaac Newton,
Facil precepts of all philosophers,
and the discoverer of the great law of universal gravitation.
By perpetually thinking about them,
was Newton's terse and illuminating reply,
he had set for himself the definite problem of Kepler's laws,
Why is it that they are true, and is there not some single general law that will embody all the circumstances of the planetary motions?
Newton was born in 1643, the year after the death of Galileo.
He had a thorough training in the mathematics of his day, and addressed himself first to an investigation and definite formulation of the general laws of motion,
which he found to be three in number, and which he was able to put in very simple terms.
The first one is, any body, once it is set in motion, will continue to move forward in a straight line
with a uniform velocity forever, provided it is acted upon by no force whatever.
In other words, a state of motion is as natural as a state of rest.
in relation to things everywhere adjacent, in which we find all things in general.
Here on Earth, where gravity itself pulls all objects downward towards the Earth,
and where resistance of the air tends to hold a moving body back and bring it to rest,
and where friction from contact with whatever material substance may be in its path
is perpetually tending to neutralise all motion.
With all three of these forces, always at work, to stop a moving body,
the truth of this first and fundamental law of motion was not apparent on the surface.
Till Galileo's time, everyone had made the mistake of supposing that some force or other
must be acting continually on every moving body to keep it in motion.
Ptolemy, Copernicus, Kepler, Leonardo da Vinci, all failed to see the truth of this law which Newton developed in the immortal Principia.
and at the present day it is not always easy to accept at first,
although the progress of mechanical science,
by reducing friction and resistance,
has produced machines in which motion of large masses may be kept up
indefinitely with the application of only the merest minimum of force.
Once a planet is set in motion round the sun,
it would go on forever through frictionless, non-resistant,
space. But there must be a central force, as Huygens saw clearly, to hold it in its orbit.
Otherwise, it would at any moment take the direction of a tangent to the orbit.
Here is where Newton's second law of motion comes in, and he formulated it with great
definiteness. When any force acts on a moving body, its deviation from a straight line
will be in the direction of the force applied and proportional to that force.
In accord with this law, Newton first began to inquire
whether the force of attraction here on Earth,
which everyone commonly recognises as gravity,
drawing all things down towards the centre of the Earth,
might not extend upward indefinitely.
It is found in operation on the summits of mountain peaks
and the clouds above them, and the rain falling from them,
are obviously drawn downward by the same force.
May it not extend outward into space, even as far as the moon?
This was an audacious question,
but Newton not only asked, but tried to answer it,
in the year 1665, when he was only 23.
On the surface of the earth, this attraction is strong enough
to draw a falling body downward through a vertical space of 16 feet in a second of time.
What ought it to be at the distance of the moon?
The distance of the moon in Newton's time was better known in terms of the Earth's size
than was the size of the Earth itself.
The Earth's radius was known to be one-sixtieth of the Moon's distance,
but the Earth's diameter was thought to be something under 7,000 miles,
so that Newton's first calculations were most disappointing, and he laid them aside for nearly 20 years.
Meanwhile, the French astronomers, led by Picar, had measured the Earth anew, and showed it to be nearly 8,000 miles in diameter.
As soon as Newton learned of this, he revised his calculations and found that by the law of the inverse square, the moon, in one second, should fall away from a tangent to its orbit 1.3,600th of 16 feet.
This accorded exactly with his original supposition that the Earth's attraction extended to the moon.
so he concluded that the force which makes a stone fall or an apple as the story goes is the same force that holds the moon in its orbit and that this force diminishes in the exact proportion that the square of the distance from the earth's centre increases
the moon indeed becomes a falling body only as kingdom cliford put it she is going so fast and is so far off
that she falls quite around to the other side of the earth
instead of hitting it, and so goes on forever.
Newton goes on in the Principia
to explain the extension of gravitation
to the other bodies of the solar system
beyond the Earth and Moon.
Clearly the same gravitation that holds the Moon in its orbit
round the Earth must extend outward from the Sun also
and hold all the planets in their orbits centered about him.
Newton demonstrates by calculation,
based on Kepler's third law, that,
1, the forces drawing the planets towards the sun
are inversely as the squares of their mean distance from him.
And 2, if the force be constantly directed towards the sun,
the radius vector in an elliptic orbit must pass over each,
areas in equal times.
End of Chapter 13.
Recording by Alan Mapstone.
Chapter 14 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Libravox recording.
All Libravox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit Libravox.org.
Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies by David Todd.
Newton and gravitation.
So all of Kepler's laws could be embodied in a single law of gravitation toward a central body,
whose force of attraction decreases outward in exact proportion as the square of the distance increases.
Only one farther step had to be taken, and this the most complicated of all.
He must make all the bodies of the sky conform to his third law of motion.
This is, action and reaction are equal, or the mutual.
actions of any two bodies are always equal and oppositely directed.
There must be mutual attractions everywhere.
Earth for sun as well as sun for Earth.
Moon for sun and sun for moon.
Earth for Venus and Venus for Earth.
Jupiter for Saturn and Saturn for Jupiter and so on.
The motions of the planets in the untisturbed ellipses of Kepler must be impossible.
As observations of the planets became more accurate,
It was found that they really did fail to move in exact accord with Kepler's laws unmodified.
Newton was unable, with the imperfect processes of the mathematics of his day,
to ascertain whether the deviations then known could be accounted for by his law of gravitation.
But he nevertheless formulated the law with entire precision, as follows.
Every particle of matter in the universe attracts every other particle,
were the force exactly proportioned to the product of their masses, and inversely as the square of the distance between their centres.
The centuries of astronomical research, since Newton's day, however, have verified the great law with the utmost exactness.
Practically every irregularity of lunarity of lunar and planetary motion is accounted for.
Indeed, the intricacies of the problems involved and the nicety of their solution have led to the invention of new mathematical processes adequate to the,
the difficulties encountered. And about the middle of the last century, when Uranus departed from the
path laid out for it by the mathematical astronomers, its orbital deviations were made the basis of an
investigation which soon led to the assignment of the position where a great planet could be found
that would account for the unexplained irregularities of the motion of Uranus. And the immediate
discovery of this planet, Neptune, became the most striking verification of the Newtonian law
that the solar system could possibly afford.
The astronomers of still later days,
investigating the stately emotions of stellar systems,
find the Newtonian law regnant everywhere among the stars,
where our most powerful telescopes have as yet reached.
So that Newton's law is known as the law of universal gravitation,
and its author is everywhere held as the greatest scientist of the ages.
Newton's Principia may be regarded as the culminating research
of the inductive method, and further outline of its contents is desirable.
It is divided into three books, following certain introductory sections.
The first book treats of the problems of moving bodies,
the solutions being worked out generally and not with special reference to astronomy.
The second book deals with the motion of bodies through resistant media, as fluids,
and has very little significance in astronomy.
The third book is the all-important one, and applies his general principles to the case of the actual solar system,
providing a full explanation of the motions of all the bodies of the system known in his day.
Anyone who critically reads the Principia of Newton will be forced to conclude that its author was a genius in the highest sense of the word.
The elegance and thoroughness of the demonstrations and the completeness of application of the law of gravitation are especially,
impressive. The universality of his new law was the feature to which he gave particular attention.
It was clear to him that the gravitation of a planet, although it acted as if wholly concentrated at the
centre, was nevertheless resident in every one of the particles of which the planet is composed.
Indeed, his universal law was so formulated as to make every particle attract every other particle,
and an investigation known as the Cavendish experiment, a really,
research of great delicacy of manipulation. Not only proves this, but leads also to a measurement
of the Earth's mean density, from which we can calculate approximately how much the Earth
actually weighs. Another way to attack the same problem is by measuring the attraction of mountains,
as masculine Astronomer Royal of Scotland did on Mount Chehalion in Scotland, which was selected
because of its sheer isolation. The attraction of the mountain deflects, deflected.
the plum lines by measurable amounts. The volume of the mountain was carefully ascertained by
surveys, and geologists found out what rocks composed it. So the weight of the entire mountain
became pretty well known, and combining this with the observed deflection, an independent value
of the earth's weight was found. Still, other methods have been applied to this question,
and as an average it is found that the materials composing the earth are about five and a half times as
as water, and the total weight of the earth is something like six sextillions of
tons. What is the true shape of the earth? And does the earth's turning round on its
axis affect this shape? Newton saw the answer to these questions in his law of
gravitation. A spherical figure followed as a matter of course from the mutual
attraction of all materials composing the earth, providing it was at rest or did not
turn round on its axis. But rotation
bulges it at the equator and draws it in at the poles by an amount which calculation shows to be
in exact agreement with the amount ascertained by actual measurement of the earth itself.
Another curious effect, not at first apparent, was that all bodies carried from high latitudes
toward the equator would get lighter and lighter, in consequence of the centrifugal force of
rotation. This was unexpectedly demonstrated by Ritcher,
when the French Academy sent himself to observe Mars in 1672.
His clock had been regulated exactly in Paris,
and he soon found that it lost time when set up at KN.
The amount of loss was found by observation,
and it was exactly equal to the calculated effect
that the reduction of gravity by centrifugal action should produce.
Also, Newton saw that his law of gravitation
would afford an explanation of the rise and fall of the tides.
the water on the side of the earth toward the moon, being nearer to the moon, would be more strongly attracted toward it, and therefore raised in a tide.
And the water on the farther side of the earth away from the moon, being at a greater distance than the earth itself,
the moon would attract the earth more strongly than this mass of water, tending therefore to draw the earth away from the water,
and so raising at the same time a high tide on the side of the earth away from the moon.
As the Earth turns round on its axis, therefore, two tidal waves continually follow each other at intervals of about 12 hours.
The sun, too, joins its gravitating force with that of the moon, raising tides nearly half as high as those which the moon produces,
because the sun's vast mass makes up, in large part, for its much greater distance.
At first and third quarters of the moon, the sun acts against the moon, and the difference of their tide produced,
producing forces gives us neap tides, while at new moon and full, sun and moon act together
and produce the maximum effect known as spring tides. Newton passed on to explain by the action
of gravitation also, the procession of the equinoxes, a phenomenon of the sky discovered by
Hipparchus, who pretty well ascertained its amount, although no reason for it had ever been
assigned. The plane of the Earth's equator extended to the celestial
sphere marks out the celestial equator and the two opposite points where it intersects the plane of
the ecliptic or the earth's path around the sun are called the equinoctial points or simply the
equinoxes and procession of the equinoxes is the motion of these points westward or backward about
50 seconds each year so that a complete revolution around the ecliptic would take place in about
26,000 years. Newton saw clearly how to explain this. It is simply due to the attraction of the
sun's gravitation upon the protuberant bulge around the Earth's equator, acting in conjunction
with the Earth's rotation on its axis, the effect being very similar to that, often seen in a
spinning top or in a gyroscope. The moon moving near the ecliptic produces a processional effect,
as also do the planets to a very slight degree, and the observed
value of procession is the same as that calculated from gravitation to a high degree of precision.
Newton died in 1727, too early to have witnessed that complete and triumphant verification of his
law, which ultimately has accounted for practically every inequality in the planetary motions
caused by their mutual attractions. The problems involved are far beyond the complexity of those
which the mathematical astronomer has to deal with, and the mathematician,
of France deserve the highest credit for improving the processes of their science, so the
obstacles which appeared insuperable were one after another overcome. Newton's method of dealing
with these problems was mainly geometric, and the insufficiency of this method was apparent.
Only when the French mathematicians began to apply the higher methods of algebra was
progressed toward the ultimate goal assured. Dallember and Clare, for a time,
foremost in these researchers. But their places were soon taken by La Grange, who wrote the Mechanique
Analytique, and Laplace, whose Mechanique Celeste is the most celebrated work of all. In large part,
these works are the basis of the researchers of subsequent mathematical astronomers, who,
strictly speaking, cannot as yet be said to have arrived at a complete and rigorous solution
of all the problems which the mutual attractions of all the bodies of the solar system have
originated. It may well be that even the mathematics of the present day are incompetent to this
purpose. When the brilliant genius of Sir William Hamilton invented Quaternian analysis and showed the
marvellous facility with which it solves the intricate problems of physics, there was the
expectation that its application to the higher problems of mathematical astronomy might affect
still greater advances. But nothing in that direction has so far eventuated. Some astronomers look
for the invention of new functions with numerical tables,
bearing perhaps somewhat the relation to present tables of logarithms,
signs, tangents, and so on,
that these tables do to the simple multiplication table of Pythagoras.
End of Chapter 14.
Read by Sadia Bindir,
Abuja, January 2022.
Chapter 15 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a leap of volume of.
recording. All Libravox recordings are in the public domain. For more information or to volunteer, please visit Libravox.org.
Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies by David Todd. After Newton.
We have said that practically all the motions in the solar system have been accounted for by the Newtonian law of gravitation.
It will be of interest to inquire into the instances that led to qualification.
of this absolute statement. One relates to the planet Mercury, whose orbital path round the sun
is the most elliptical of all the planetary orbits. This will be explained a little later.
The moon has given the mathematical astronomers more trouble than any other of the celestial bodies,
for one reason because it is nearest to us, and very minute deviations in its motion are
therefore detectable. Haley was who ascertained two centuries ago that the moon was
The moon's motion round the Earth was not uniform, but subject to a slight acceleration which
greatly puzzled Lagrange and Laplace, because they had proved exactly this sort of thing to be
impossible, unless indeed the body in question should be acted on by some other force than
gravitation. But Laplace finally traced the cause to the secular, or very slow reduction,
in the eccentricity of the Earth's own orbit. The sun's action on the moon was
indeed progressively changing from century to century in such manner as to accelerate the moon's
own motion in its orbit round the earth. Adams, the eminent English astronomer, revised the
calculations of Laplus and found the effect in question only half as great as Laplice had done.
And for years, a great mathematical battle was on between the greatest of astronomical experts in
this field of research.
Adams, in conjunction with Delonne, the greatest of the French mathematicians a half-century ago,
won the battle insofar as the mathematical calculations were concerned.
But the moon continues to the present day her slight and perplexing deviation,
as if perhaps our standard timekeeper, the Earth, by its rotation round its axis,
were itself subject to variation.
Although many investigations have been made of the uniformity of the Earth's rotation,
No such irregularity has been detected, and this unexplained variation of the moon's motion is one of the unsolved problems of the gravitational astronomer of today.
But we are passing over the most impressive of all the earlier researchers of Lagrange and Laplace,
which concern the exceedingly slow changes, technically called the secular variations of the elements of the planetary orbits.
These elements are geometrical relations which indicate the form of the orbit,
of the orbit and its position in space and it was found that none of these relations or
quantities are constant in amount or direction but that all with but one exception are subject to
very slow or secular change or oscillation this question assumed an alarming
significance at an early day particularly as it affected the eccentricity of the earth's orbit round
the sun should it be possible for this element to go on increasing for indom
definite ages, clearly the Earth's orbit would become more and more elliptical, and the
sun would come nearer and nearer at perihelian, and the Earth would drift farther and farther from
the sun, at Apheelian, until the extremes of temperature would bring all forms of life on
the Earth to an end. The refined and powerful analysis of Lagrange, however, soon allayed
the fears of humanity by accounting for these slow progressive changes, as merely part of the
regular system of mere oscillations, in entire accord with the operation of the law of
gravitation, and extending throughout the entire planetary system. Indeed, the periods of these
oscillations were so vast that none of them were shorter than 50,000 years, while they ranged
up to 2 million years in length, great clocks of eternity which beat ages as hours beat
seconds. About a century ago, an eminent lecturer on astronomy told his audience that the problem
of weighing the planets might readily be one that would seem wholly impossible to solve.
To measure their sizes and distances might well be done, but actually to ascertain how many
tons they weigh, never. Yet, if a planet is fortunate enough to have one satellite or more,
the astronomer's method of weighing the planet is exceedingly simple, and all the
All the major planets have satellites except the two interior ones, Mercury and Venus.
As the satellite travels round its primary, just as the moon does around the Earth, two elements
of its orbit need to be ascertained, and only two.
First, the mean distance of the satellite from its primary, and second, the time of revolution
around it.
Now it is simply a case of applying Kepler's third law.
First take the cube of the satellite's distance and divide it by the square of the square,
of the time of revolution. Similarly, take the cube of the planet's distance from the sun and divide
by the square of the planet's time of revolution round him. The proportion, then, of the first quotient
to the second, shows the relation of the mass, that is the weight, of the planet to that of the sun.
In the case of Jupiter, we should find it to be 150, in that of Saturn, 3,500, and so on. The
The range of planetary masses, in fact, is very curious and is doubtless of much significance in the cosmogany with which we deal later.
If we consider the Sun and his eight planets, the mass or weight of each of the nine bodies far exceeds the combined mass of all the others which are lighter than itself.
To illustrate, suppose we take as our unit of weight the one billionth part of the Sun's weight.
Then the planets in the order of their masses will be Mercury, Mars, Venus, Earth, Uranus, Neptune, Saturn and Jupiter.
According to their relative masses then, Mercury being a five millionth part the weight of the Sun, will be represented by 200.
Similarly, Venus, a 425,000th part, by 2,350, and so on.
Curious and interesting it is that Saturn is nearly three times as heavy as the six lighter planets taken together.
Jupiter, between two and three times heavier than all the other planets combined, while the Sun's mass is 750 times that of all the great planets of his system rolled into one.
All the foregoing masses, except those of Mercury and Venus, are pretty accurately known because they were found by the satellite method just indicated.
Mercury's mass is found by its disturbing effects on Enkies' comet, whenever it approaches very near.
The mass of Venus is ascertained by the perturbations in the orbital motion of the Earth.
In such cases, the Newtonian law of gravitation forms the basis of the intricate and tedious calculations necessary
to find out the mass by this indirect method.
Its inferiority to the satellite method was strikingly shown at the observatory in Washington,
soon after the satellites of Mars were discovered in 1877.
The inaccurate mass of that planet, as previously known by months of computation,
based upon years and years of observation,
was immediately discarded in favour of the new mass derived from the distance and period of the outer satellite
by only a few minutes' calculation.
In weighing the planets, astronomers always use the Sun as the unit.
What then is the Sun's own weight?
Obviously, the law of gravitation answers this question.
If we compare the Sun's attraction with the Earth's at equal distances.
First, we conceive of the Sun's mass, as if all compress into a globe the size of the Earth,
and calculate how far a body at the surface of this globe would fall in one second.
The relation of this number to 16.1 feet.
The distance the body falls in one second on the actual earth is about 330,000,
which is therefore the number of times the sun's weight exceeds that of the earth.
A word may be added regarding the force of gravitation and what it really is.
As a matter of fact, Newton did not concern himself in the least with this inquiry,
and says so very definitely.
What he did was to discover the law according to which gravitation acts everywhere throughout the solar system.
And although many physicists have endeavored to find out what gravitation really is, its cause is not yet known.
In some manner as yet mysterious, it acts instantaneously over distances great and small alike,
and no substance has been found which, if we interpose it between two bodies,
has in any degree the effect of interrupting their gravitation.
tendency toward each other.
While the Newtonian law of gravitation has been accepted as true,
because it explained and accounted for all the motions of the heavenly bodies,
even including such motions of the stars as have been subjected to observation,
astronomers have for a long time recognized that quite possibly
the law might not be absolutely exact in a mathematical sense,
and that deviations from it would surely make their appearance in time.
A crude instance of this was suggested about a century ago when the planet Uranus was found to be deviating from the path marked out for it by Bouvaas tables based on the Newtonian law.
And the theory was advocated by many astronomers that this law, while operant at the medium distances from the sun where the planets within Jupiter and Saturn travel,
could not be expected to hold absolutely true at the vast distance of Uranus and beyond.
The discovery of Neptune in 1846, however, put an end to all such speculation
and has universally been regarded as an extraordinary verification of the law, as indeed it is.
When, however, Leverrier investigated the orbit of Mercury,
he found an excess of motion in the perihelian point of the planet's orbit,
which neither he nor subsequent investigators have been able to account for by Newtonian gravitation,
pure and simple. If Newton's theory is absolutely true, the excess motions of Mercury's perihelion
remains a mystery. Only one theory has been advanced to account for this discrepancy,
and that is the Einstein theory of gravitation. This ingenious speculation was first
propounded in comprehensive form nearly 15 years ago, and its author has
has developed from it mathematical formulae which appear to yield results even more precise than those
based on the Newtonian theory. In expressing the difference between the law of gravitation and his
own conception, Einstein says, begin quote, imagine the earth removed and in its place suspended a box
as big as a moon or a whole house and inside a man naturally floating in the centre, there being no
force whatever pulling him. Imagine further.
this box being, by a rope or other contrivance, suddenly jerked to one side,
which is scientifically termed deform motion, as opposed to uniform motion.
The person would then naturally reach bottom on the opposite side.
The result would consequently be the same as if he obeyed Newton's law of gravitation,
while in fact there is no gravitation exerted whatever,
which proves that deform motion will in every case,
produce the same effects as gravitation. The term relativity refers to time and space.
According to Galileo and Newton, time and space were absolute entities, and the moving systems
of the universe were dependent on this absolute time and space. On this conception was built the science
of mechanics. The resulting formulas sufficed for all motions of a slow nature. It was found, however,
that they would not conform to the rapid motions apparent in electrodynamics.
Briefly, the theory of special relativity
discards absolute time and space
and makes them in every instance relative to moving systems.
By this theory, all phenomena in electrodynamics, as well as mechanics,
hitherto irreducible by the old formulae,
were satisfactorily explained.
End quote.
Natural phenomena then, involving gravitation,
and inertia, as in the planetary motions and electromagnetic phenomena, including the motion of light,
are to be regarded as interrelated and not independent of one another. And the Einstein theory would
appear to have received a striking verification in both these fields. On this theory,
the Newtonian dynamics fails when the velocities concerned are a near approach to that of light.
The Newtonian theory then is not to be considered as wrong, but in the light of a first approximation.
Applying the new theory to the case of the motion of Mercury's perihelion, it is found to account for the excess quite exactly.
On the electromagnetic side, including also the motion of light, a total eclipse of the sun affords an especially favourable occasion for applying the critical test,
whether a huge mass like the sun would or would not deflect toward itself the rays of light from stars passing close to the edge of its disc or limb.
A total eclipse of exceptional duration occurred on May 29, 1919, and the two eclipse parties sent out by the Royal Society of London and the Royal Astronomical Society were equipped especially with apparatus for making this test.
Their stations were one on the east coast of Brazil
and the other on the west coast of Africa.
Accurate calculation beforehand
showed just where the sun would be among the stars at the time of the eclipse,
so that star plates of this region were taken in England
before the expeditions went out.
Then, during the total eclipse,
the same regions were photographed with the eclipsed sun
and the corona projected against them.
To make doubly sure the stars
were a third time photographed some weeks after the eclipse, when the sun had moved away from that
particular region. Measuring up the three sets of plates, it was found that an appreciable deflection
of the light of the stars nearest alongside the sun actually exists, and the amount of it is such
as to afford a fair, though not absolutely exact, verification of the theory. The observed deflection
may of course be due to other causes, but the English
astronomers generally regard the near verification as a triumph for the Einstein theory.
Astronomers are already beginning preparations for a repetition of the eclipse program with all
possible refinement of observation when the next total eclipse of the sun occurs, September 20, 1922,
visible in Australia and the islands of the Indian Ocean. A third test of the theory is perhaps
more critical than either of the others, and this necessitates a displacement of spectral lines
in a gravitational field toward the red end of the spectrum.
But the experts who have so far made measures for detecting such displacement
disagree as to its actual existence.
The work of St. John at Mount Wilson is unfavourable to the theory,
as is that of Evershed of Kraykanal,
who has made repeated tests on the spectrum of Venus,
as well as in the cyanogen bands of the sun.
The enthusiastic advocates of the Einstein's theory,
theory hold that, as Newton proved the three laws of Kepler to be special cases of his general
law, so the universal relativity theory will enable eventually the Newtonian law to be deduced
from the Einstein theory.
Start quote, this is the way we go on in science, as in everything else.
End quote, wrote Sir George Erie, Astronomer Royal.
Start quote, we have to make out that something is true.
Then we find out under certain circumstances that it is not quite true, and then we have to consider and find out how the departure can be explained.
Meanwhile, the prudent person keeps the open mind.
End of Chapter 15. Read by Sadiabindir, Abuja, December 2021.
Chapter 16 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
Libravox recording. All Libravox recordings are in the public domain. For more information or to
volunteer, please visit Libravox.org. Astronomy, the science of the heavenly bodies by David
Todd. Haley and his comet. Haley is one of the most picturesque characters in all astronomical history.
Next to Newton himself, he was most intimately concerned in giving the Newtonian law to the world.
Edmund Haley was born, in brackets 1656, in stirring times.
Charles I had just been executed, and it was the era of Cromwell's Lord Protectorate and the wars with Spain and Holland.
Then followed, in bracket 1660, the promising but profligate Charles II.
Open bracket, who nevertheless founded at Greenwich, the greatest of all observatories when Haley was 19, close bracket.
the frightful ravages of the Black Plague, the tyrannies of James II, and the Revolution of 1688,
all in the early manhood of Haley, whose scientific life and works marched with much of the vigor of the contending personalities of state.
The telescope had been invented a half-century earlier, and Galileo's discoveries of Jupiter's moons and the phases of Venus had firmly established the sun-centered theory of Copernicus.
The sun's distance, though, was known but crudely,
and why the stars seemed to have no yearly orbits of their own
corresponding to that of the Earth was a puzzle.
Newton was well advanced toward his supreme discovery
of the law of universal gravitation,
and the authority of Kepler taught that comets
travel helter-skelter through space in straight lines past the Earth,
a perpetual menace to humanity.
Ugly monsters.
that comets always were to the ancient world,
the medieval church perpetuated this misconception so vigorously
that even now these harmless, gauzy visitors from interstellar space
possess a certain wizard-hold upon our imagination.
This entertaining phase of the subject is excellently treated
in President Andrew D. White's history of the doctrine of comets
in the papers of the American Historical Association.
Haley's brilliant comet at its earlier apparitions had been no exception.
Haley's father was a wealthy London soap maker who took great pride in the growing intellectuality of his son.
Graduating at Queen's College, Oxford, the latter began his astronomical labours at 20 by publishing a work on planetary orbits.
And the next year he voyaged to St. Helena to catalogue the stars of the southern firmament, to measure the force of terrestrial gravity,
and observe a transit of Mercury over the disk of the sun.
While clouds seriously interfered with his observations on that lonely isle,
what he saw of the transit led to his invention of Haley's method,
which, as applied to the transit of Venus,
though not till long after his death,
helped greatly in the accurate determination of the sun's distance from the earth.
Haley's researches on the proper motions of the stars of both hemispheres
soon made him famous, and it was said of him,
if any star gets displaced on the globe,
Haley will presently find it out.
His return to London and election to the Royal Society,
open bracket, of which he was many years secretary,
close bracket, added much to his fame,
and he was commissioned by the society to visit Nansich
and arbitrate an astronomical controversy between Hook and Havilius,
both his seniors by a generation.
On the continent he associated with other great astronomers, especially Cassini, who had already found three Saturnian moons,
and it was then he observed the great comet of 1680, which led up to the famous event of Haley's life.
The sea-like Seneca may almost be said to have predicted the advent of Haley when he wrote,
open bracket, questions natarares, seven, close bracket, someday there will be
arise a man who will demonstrate in what region of the heavens comets pursue their way, why they
travel apart from the planets, and what their sizes and constitution are. Then posterity will be
amazed that simple things of this sort were not explained before. To Newton, it appeared probable
that cometry voyages through space might have orbits of their own, and he proved that the comet of
1680 never swerved from such a path. As it could nowhere approach within the moon's orbit,
clearly threats of its wrecking the Earth and punishing its inhabitants ought to frighten no more.
Haley then became intensely interested in comets and gathered whatever data concerning the paths
of all these bodies he could find. His first great discovery was that the comet seen in
1531 by Apien and in 1607 by Kepler travelled round the sun in identical paths with one he had
himself observed in 1682. A still earlier appearance of Haley's comet, in brackets 1456,
seems to have given rise to a popular and long-reiterated myth of a papal bull,
excommunicating the devil, the Turk and the comet.
No longer room for doubt, so certain was Haley that all three were one on the same comet,
completing the round of its orbit in about 76 years,
that he fearlessly predicted that it would be seen again in 1758 or 1759,
and with equal confidence he might have foretold its return in 1835 and 1910,
for all three predictions have come true to the letter.
Hayley's span of existence did not permit his living to see even the first of these now historic verifications,
but we in our day may emphatically term the epoch of the third verified return,
Anus Helianus.
Says Turner, Hayley's successor in the civilian chair at Oxford today,
there can be no more complete or more sensational proof of a scientific law than,
to predict events by means of it. Haley was deservedly the first to perform this great service
for Newton's Law of Gravitation, and he would have rejoiced to think how conspicuous a part of
England was to play in the subsequent prediction of the existence of Neptune. Haley rose rapidly
among the chief astronomical figures of his day, but he had little veneration for mere authority
and the significant veering of his religious views toward heterodoxy was for years an obstacle to his advance.
Still, Haley, the astronomer, was great enough to question any contemporary dicta that seemed to rest on authority alone.
Everyone called the star's fixed stars, but Haley doubting this made the first discovery of a star's individual motion, proper motion as astronomers say.
Today, 200 years after, every star is considered to be in motion, and astronomers are ascertaining their real motions in the celestial spaces to a nicety undreamt of by even the exacting Haley.
The moon of priceless service to the early navigator was regarded by all astronomers as endowed with an average rate of motion round the earth that did not vary from age to age.
But Haley questioned this too, and on comparing with the ancient value from Chaldean eclipses,
he made another discovery, the secular acceleration of the moon's mean motion, as it is technically termed.
This was a colossal discovery in celestial dynamics, and the reason underlying it lay hidden in Newton's law for yet another century,
till the keener mathematics of Laplace detected its true origin.
With Newton, Haley laid down the firm foundations of celestial mechanics, and they pushed the science as far as the mathematics of their day would permit.
Haley, however, was not content with elucidating the motion of bodies nearest the earth, and pressed to the utmost confines of the solar system known to him.
Here, too, he made a signal discovery of that mutual disturbance of the planets in their motion round the sun, called the great inequality of Jupiter and Saturn.
Hayley's versatile genius attacked all the great problems of the day.
His observation of the sun's total eclipse in 1715 is the earliest reliable account of such a phenomenon by a trained astronomer.
He described the corona minutely and was the first to see that other interesting phenomenon,
which only an alert observer can detect, which a great astronomer of a later day compared to the ignition of a fine train of gumpowder,
and which has ever since borne the name of Bailey's Beads.
Besides being a great astronomer, Haley was a man of affairs as well,
which Newton, although the greater mathematician, was not.
Without Haley, Newton's superb discovery might easily have been lost to the age and nation,
for the latter was bent merely on making discoveries,
and on speculative contemplation of them,
with never a thought of publishing to the world.
Haley, more practical and business-like, insisted on careful writing out and publication.
Newton was then only 42, and Haley, fully 14 years his junior.
But the philosophers of that day were keenly alive to the mystery of Kepler's laws,
and Haley was fully conscious of the grandeur and far-reaching significance of Newton's great generalisation,
which embodied all three of Kepler's laws in one.
Newton at last yielded, though reluctantly, and the Principia was given to the world,
though wholly at Haley's private charges.
But Haley was far from being completely engrossed, with the absorbing problems of the sky.
Things terrestrial held for years his undivided attention.
Imagine present-day lords commissioners of the Admiralty entrusting a ship of the British Navy to civilian command.
Yet such was their confidence in Haley that he was commissioned as captain of His Majesty's Pink Paramour in 1698,
with instructions to proceed to southern seas for geographical discoveries,
and for improving knowledge of the longitude problem and of the variations of the compass.
Trade winds and monsoons, charts of magnetic variation, tides and surveys of the Channel Coast,
and experiments with diving bells were practical activities that occupied his attention.
Haley, in 1720, became Astronomer Royal.
He was the second incumbent of this great office,
but the first to supply the Royal Observatory with instruments of its own,
some of which adorn its walls even today.
His long series of lunar observations and his magnetic researchers
were of immense practical value in navigation.
Haley lived to a ripe old age and left the world vastly better than he found it.
His rise from humblest obscurity was most remarkable, and he lived to gratify all the ambitions
of his early manhood.
Of attractive appearance, pleasing manners and ready wit, says one of his biographers,
loyal, generous and free from self-seeking, he was one of the most personally engaging
men who ever held the office of Astronomer Royal.
He died in office at Greenwich in 1742.
Haley was buried, says Chambers, in the churchyard of St. Margaret's, Lee, not far from Greenwich,
and it has lately been announced that the Admiralty have decided to repair his tomb at the public expense.
No descendants of his being known.
There is no suitable monument in England to the memory of one of her greatest scientific men.
In any event, the collection and republication of his epoch-making papers would be welcomed by astronomers of every nation.
End of Chapter 16. Read by Sadiabindir, Abouja, January 2022.
Chapter 17 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Libravox recording. All Libravox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit Librivox.org.
Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies by David Todd.
Chapter 17 Bradley and Aberation
Living at Q in London early in the 18th century was an enthusiastic young astronomer
James Bradley.
He is famous chiefly for his accurate observations of star places
which have been invaluable to astronomers of later epochs in ascertaining the proper motion of stars.
The latitude of Bradley's house in Q was very nearly the same as the declination of the bright star,
gamma draconis, so that it passed through his zenith once every day.
Bradley had a zenith sector, and with this he observed with the greatest care
the zenith distance of gamma draconis at every possible opportunity.
This he did by pointing the telescope on the star
and then recording the small angle of its inclination to a fine plum line.
So accurate were his measures that he was probably certain of the star's position
to the nearest second of arc.
What he hoped to find was the star's motion
round a very slight orbit once each year
and due to the Earth's motion in its orbit around the sun.
In other words, he sought to find the star's parallax if it turned out to be a measurable quantity.
It is just as well now that his method of observation proved insufficiently delicate to reveal the parallax of gamma-draconis,
but his aciduity in observations led him to an unexpected discovery of greater moment at that time.
What he really found was that the star had a regular annual orbit, but wholly different from what he expected,
and very much larger in a mount.
This result was most puzzling to Bradley.
The law of relative motion would require
that the star's motion in its expected orbit
should be opposite to that of the Earth in its annual orbit,
instead of which the star was all the time
at right angles to the Earth's motion.
Bradley was a frequent traveler by boat on the Thames
and the apparent change in the direction of the wind
when the boat was in motion, is said to have suggested to him what caused the displacement of gamma draconis.
The progressive motion of light had been roughly ascertained by Rima.
Let that be the velocity of the wind.
And the Earth's motion in its orbit around the sun, let that be the speed of the boat.
Then, as the wind, to an observer on the moving boat, always seems to come from a point in advance,
of the point it actually proceeds from, to an observer at rest, so the star should be constantly
thrown forward by an angle given by the relation of the velocity of light to the speed of the
earth in its orbital revolution around the sun. The apparent places of all stars are affected
in this manner and this displacement is called the aberration of light. Astronomers since Bradley's
discovery of aberration in 1726 have devoted a great deal of attention to this astronomical constant,
as it is called, and the arc value of it is very nearly 20.5 seconds. This means that light travels more
than 10,000 times as fast as the Earth in its orbit, 186, 330 miles per second as against the Earth's 18.5
miles per second. And we can ascertain the sun's distance by aberration also because the exact values of the
velocity of light and of the constant of aberration when properly combined give the exact orbital speed of
the earth and this furnishes directly by geometry the radius of the earth's orbit. That is the distance of the
sun. In fact, this is one of the more accurate modern methods of ascertaining the distance of the
sun. As early as 1880, it enabled the writer to calculate the sun's parallax equal to 8.8 seconds,
a value absolutely identical with that adopted by the Paris Conference of 1896 and now universally
accepted as the standard. In whatever part of the sky we observe,
every star is affected by aberration. At the poles of the ecliptic, 23 and a half degrees from the Earth's poles,
the annual aberration orbits of the stars are very small circles, 41 seconds in diameter.
Toward the ecliptic, the aberration orbits become more and more oval,
ellipses, in fact, of greater and greater eccentricity, but with their major axes all of the same length,
until we reach the ecliptic itself, and then the ellipse is flattened into a straight line,
41 seconds, in length, in which the star travels forth and back once a year.
Exact correspondence of the aberration ellipses of the stars with the annual motion of the earth
round the sun affords indisputable proof of this motion, and as every star partakes of the movement,
this proof of our motion round the sun becomes many million-fold. Indeed, if we were to push a little farther
the refinement of our analysis of the effect of aberration on stellar positions, we could prove also
the rotation of the earth on its axis, because that motion is swift enough to bear an appreciable
ratio to the velocity of light. Diornal aberration is the term applied to this slight effect,
and, as every star partakes of it, demonstration of the Earth's turning round on its axis
becomes many million-fold also.
End of Chapter 17.
Chapter 18 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Libravox recording.
All Libravox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit Librevox.org.
Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies by David Todd
Chapter 18
The Telescope
Had anyone told Ptolemy that his Earth-centered system
of sun, moon, and stars, would ultimately be overthrown,
not by philosophy, but by the overwhelming evidence
furnished by a little optical instrument, which so aided the human eye
that it could actually see systems of bodies in revolution
around each other in the sky, he would no doubt have vehemently denied that any such thing was
possible. To be sure, it took 14 centuries to bring this about, and the discovery, even then,
was, without much doubt, due to accident. Through all this long period, when astronomy may be
said have merely existed, practically without any forward step or development, its devotees
were unequipped with the sort of instruments, which were requisite to make the advance
possible. There were astrolabes and armillary spheres with crudely divided circles,
and the excellent work done with them only shows the genius of many of the early astronomers
who had nothing better to work with. Regarding star places made with instruments fixed in the meridian,
Bezal, often called the father of practical astronomy, used to say that, even if you provided
a bad observer with the best of instruments, a genius could surpass him with a gun-barrel and a
Part wheel. Before the days of telescopes, that is, prior to the 17th century, it was not known
whether any of the planets, except the Earth, had a moon or not. Consequently, the masses
of these planets were but very imperfectly ascertained. The phases of Mercury and Venus were
merely conjectured. What were the actual dimensions of the planets could only be guessed at?
The approximate distances of sun, moon, and planets were little better than guesses.
The distances of the stars were wildly inaccurate, and the positions of the stars on the celestial sphere,
and of sun, moon, and planets among them, were far removed from modern standards of precision,
all because the telescope had not yet become available, as an optical adjunct,
to increase the power of the human eye and enable it to see, as if distances were, in considerable measure, annihilated.
Galileo, almost universally, is said to have been the inventor of the telescope,
but intimate research into the question would appear to give the honor of that original invention
to another in another country. What Galileo deserves the highest praise for, however, is the
re-invention independently of an optic tube, by which he could bring distant objects apparently
much nearer to him. And being an astronomer, he was, by universal acknowledgement,
first of all men to turn a telescope on the heavenly bodies. This was in the year 16th,
and his first discovery was the phase of Venus. His second, the four Medecian moons or satellites of Jupiter,
discoveries which at that epoch were of the highest significance in establishing the truth of the
Copernican system beyond the shadow of doubt. But the first telescopes of which we have record
were made so far as can now be ascertained in Holland very early in the 17th century.
Matthias, a professor of mathematics, and Jansen, and Lipperhe, who were opticians in Middleburg,
all three are entitled to consideration as claimants of the original invention of the telescope.
But that such an instrument was pretty well known would appear to be shown by his government's refusal
of a patent to Lippurhe in 1608, while the officials, recognizing the value of such an instrument
for purposes of war, got him to construct several telescopes, and ordered him to keep the invention
a secret. Within a year, Galileo heard that an instrument was in use in Holland, by which it was
possible to see distant objects as if near at hand. Skilled in optics as he was, the reinvention
was a task neither long nor difficult for him. One of his first instruments, magnified but three
times. Still, it made a great sensation in Venice where he exhibited the little tube to the authorities
of that city in which he first invented it. Galileo's telescope was of the simplest type, with but two
lenses, the one, a double convex lens, with which an image of the distant object is formed,
the other, a double concave lens, much smaller, which was the eye lens for examining the image.
It is this simple form of Galilean telescope that is still used in opera glasses and field glasses
because of the shorter tube necessary.
Galileo carried on the construction of telescopes all the time improving their quality
and enlarging their power until he built one that magnified 30 times.
What the diameter of the object glass was, we do not know, perhaps two inches or possibly a little more.
glass of a quality good enough to make a telescope of
cannot have been abundant or even obtainable
except with great difficulty in those days.
Other discoveries by this first of celestial observers
were the spots on the sun,
the larger mountains of the moon,
the separate stars of which the Milky Way is composed,
and, greatest wonder of all,
the anomalous handles,
Anse, he called them, of Saturn,
which we now know as the planet's ring,
the most wonderful of all the bodies in the sky.
Since Galileo's time, only three centuries passed,
the progress in size and improvement in quality of the telescope
have been marvelous,
and this advance would not have been possible,
except for, first,
the discoveries still kept, in large part, secret,
by the makers of optical glass,
which have enabled them to make disks of the largest size,
second, the consummate skill of modern opticians
in fashioning these discs into perfect lenses,
and third, the progress in the mechanical arts and engineering,
by which telescope tubes of many tons weight
are mounted or poised so delicately
that the thrust of a finger readily swerves them
from one point of the heavens to another.
As the telescope is the most important of all astronomical instruments,
it is necessary to understand its construction and adjustment
and how the astronomer uses it.
Telescopes are optical instruments, and nothing but optical parts would be requisite in making them,
if only the optical conditions of their perfect working, could be obtained without other mechanical accessories.
In original principle, all telescopes are as simple as Galileo's.
First, an object glass to form the image of the distant object.
Second, the eyepiece, usually made of two lenses, but really a microscope, to magnify that image,
and working in the same way that any microscope magnifies an object close at hand.
And third, a tube to hold all the necessary lenses in the true relative positions.
The focal lengths of object glass and eyepiece
will determine just what distance apart the lenses must be
in order to give perfect vision.
But it is quite as important that the axes of all the lenses
be adjusted into one and the same straight line
and then held there rigidly and permanently.
Otherwise, vision with a telescope will be very imperfect and wholly unsatisfactory.
The distance from the objective, or object glass, to its focal point, is called its focal length,
and if we divide this by the focal length of the eyepiece, we shall have the magnifying power of the telescope.
The eye piece will usually be made of two lenses or more, and we use its focal length,
considered as a single lens, in getting the magnifying power.
A telescope will generally have many eye pieces of different focal lengths, so that it will have a corresponding range of magnifying powers.
The lowest magnifying power will be not less than four or five diameters for each inch of aperture of the objective.
Otherwise, the eye will fail to receive all the light which falls upon the glass.
A four-inch telescope will, therefore, have no eyepiece with a lower magnifying power than about 20 diameters.
The highest magnifying power advantageous for a glass of this size will be about 250 to 300,
the working rule being about 70 diameters to each inch of aperture, although the theoretical limit
is regarded as 100.
The reason for a variety of eye pieces with different magnifying powers soon becomes apparent
on using the telescope.
Comets and nebulae call for very low powers, while double stars and the planetary surfaces
require the higher powers, provided the state of the atmosphere at the moment will allow it.
If there is much quivering and unsteadiness, nothing is gained by trying the higher powers,
because all the waves of unsteadiness are magnified also in the same proportion,
and sharpness of vision, or fine definition, or good seeing, as it is called, becomes impossible.
The vibrations and tremors of the atmosphere are the greatest of all obstacles to astronomical
observation, and the search is always, in order for regions of the world, in deserts or on high
mountains, where the quietest atmosphere is to be found. Quite another power of the telescope
is dependent on its objective solely. Its light-gathering power. Light by which we see a star or planet
is admitted to the retina of the eye through an adjustable aperture called the pupil. In the dark or at night,
the pupil expands to an average diameter of one-fourth of an inch.
But the object glass of a telescope, by focusing the rays from a star,
pours into the eye, almost as a funnel acts with water,
all the light, which falls on its larger surface,
and as geometry has settled it for us that areas of surfaces are proportioned
to the squares of their diameters,
a two-inch object glass focuses upon the retina of the eye
64 times as much light as the unassisted eye would receive.
And the great 40-inch objective of the Yerkes Telescope would, theoretically,
yield 25,600 times as much light as the eye alone.
But there would be a noticeable percentage of this lost
through absorption by the glasses of the telescope
and scattering by their surfaces.
The first makers of telescopes soon encountered a most discouraging difficulty
because it seemed to them absolutely insuperable.
This is known as chromatic aberration,
or the scattering of light in a telescope,
due simply to its color or wavelength.
When light passes through a prism,
red is refracted the least and violet the most.
Through a lens it is the same,
because a lens may be regarded as an indefinite system of prisms.
The image of a star or planet then,
formed by a single lens,
cannot be optically perfect.
Instead, it will be a confused intermingling of images of various colors.
With low powers, this will not be very troublesome.
But great indistinctness results from the use of high magnifying powers.
The early makers and users of telescopes in the latter part of the 17th century
found that the troublesome effects of chromatic aberration
could be much reduced by increasing the focal length of the objective.
This led to what we term engineering difficulties of a very serious nature,
because the tubes of great length were very awkward in pointing towards celestial objects,
especially near the zenith, where the air is quietest,
and it was next to impossible to hold an object steadily in the field,
even after all the troubles of getting it there, had been successfully overcome.
Biancini and Cassini, Havilius and Huygens, were among the active observers of the
that epoch, who built telescopes of extraordinary length, a hundred feet and upward.
One tube is said to have been built 600 feet in length, but quite certainly it could never have
been used. So-called aerial telescopes were also constructed, in which the objective was mounted
on top of a tower or a pole, and the eyepiece moved along near the ground. But it is difficult
to see how anything but fleeting glimpses of the heavenly bodies could have been obtained with
such contrivances, even if the lenses had been perfect. Newton, indeed, who was an expert in
optics, gave up the problem of improving the refracting telescope, and turned his energies
toward the reflector. In 1733, half a century after Newton, and a century and a quarter after
Galileo, Chester Moore Hall, an Englishman, found by experiment that chromatic aberration
could be nearly eliminated by making the objective of two lenses instead of one.
And the same invention was made independently by Dalland, an English optician,
who took out letters patent about 1760.
So the size of telescopes seemed to be limited only by the skill of the glassmaker
and the size of discs that he might find it practicable to produce.
What Hull and Dalland did was to make the outer, or crown, lens,
of the objective as before,
and place it behind a Plano-concave lens
of dense flint glass.
This had the effect of neutralizing
the chromatic effect, or color aberration,
while at the same time,
only part of the refractive effect
of the crown lens was destroyed.
This ingenious but costly combination
prepared the way for the great refracting
telescopes of the present day,
because it solved, or seemed to solve,
the important problem
of getting the necessary refraction of light rays without harmful dispersion or decomposition of them.
Through the 18th century and the first years of the 19th, many telescopes of a size very great for that day were built,
and their success seemed complete. With large increase in the size of the disks, however,
a new trouble arose, quite inherent in the glass itself. The two kinds of glass, flint and crown,
do not decompose white light with uniformity,
so that when the so-called acromatic objective
was composed of flint and crown,
there was an effect known as irrationality of dispersion
or secondary spectrum,
which produced a very troublesome residuum of blue light
surrounding the images of bright objects.
This is the most serious defect of all the great refractors of the day,
and, effectively, it limits their size
to about 60 inches of aperture.
with present types of flint and crown.
It is expected by present experimenters, however,
that further improvements in optical glass
will do much to extend this limit
so that a refracting telescope
of much greater size than any now in existence
will be practicable.
Improvements in mounting telescopes, too, are still possible.
Within recent years,
Hartness of Springfield, Vermont,
has erected a new and ingenious type of turret telescope,
which protects the observer from wind and cold,
while his instrument is outside.
It affords exceptional facilities for rapid and convenient observing,
as for visible stars,
and is adaptable to both refractors and reflectors.
The captivating study of the heavens can, of course,
be begun with the naked eye alone,
but very moderate optical assistance is a great help and stimulates.
An opera glass affords such assistance,
a field glass does still better, and best of all, for certain purposes, is a modern prism binocular.
End of Chapter 18. Chapter 19 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Librevox recording. All Libravox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit Librevox.org.
Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies, by David Todd.
Chapter 19
Reflectors
Mirror Telescopes
Cherished with the utmost care
in the rooms of the Royal Society of London
is a world-famous telescope,
a diminutive reflector made by the hands of Sir Isaac Newton.
We've already mentioned his connection with the refractor
and how he abandoned that type of telescope
in favor of the reflecting mirror or reflector
in which the obstacles to great size
appeared to be purely mechanical. By many, indeed, Newton is regarded as the inventor of the reflector.
By the principles of optics, all the rays from a star that strike a concave mirror will be
reflected to the geometric focal point, provided a section of that mirror is a parabola.
Such a mirror is called a speculum and is an alloy of tin, copper, and bismuth. Its surface takes
a very high polish, reflecting when newly polished, nearly 90% of the amount of the same thing
of the light that falls upon it.
But the focus where the eyepiece must be used
is in front of the mirror.
And if the eye were placed there,
the observer's head would intercept all, or much,
of the light that would otherwise reach the mirror.
Gregory, probably the real inventor of the reflector,
was the first to dodge this difficulty
by perforating the mirror at the center
and applying the eye piece there at the back of the speculum.
But it was necessary to first send the rays
to that point by the reflection,
from a second or smaller mirror in the optical axis of the speculum.
This reflects the rays backward down the tube to the eyepiece or spectroscope or camera.
Another English optician, Casagrain, improved on this design somewhat
by placing the secondary mirror inside the focus of the speculum, or nearer to it,
so that the tube is shorter.
This form is preferable for many kinds of astronomical work, especially photography.
Herschel sought to do away with the secondary reflector entirely and save the loss of light by tilting the
speculum slightly so as to throw the image at one side of the tube. But this modification introduces
bad definition of the image and has never been much used. A better plan is that of Newton,
who placed a small plain speculum at an angle of 45 degrees in the optical axis, where the secondary
mirror of the Gregory Casagranian type is placed. The razor then received by the eyepiece at
the side of the upper end of the tube, the observer looking in at right angles to the axis.
And a modern improvement, first used by Draper, is a small rectangular prism in place of the
little plain speculum, affecting a saving of 5 to 10% of the light. It is not easy to say which
type of telescope, the refractor or the reflector, is the more famous, nor which is the better
or more useful, or the more likely to lead in the astronomy of the future. When the successors of
Dahlund had carried the acromatic refractor to the limit enforced by the size of the glass
disks they were able to secure, they found these instruments not so great an improvement after
all. The single-lens telescopes of great focal length were nearly as good optically, though much
more awkward to handle. But the quality of the glass, obtainable in that day, appeared to set an
arbitrary limit to that great amplification of size and power which progress in observational
astronomy demanded. Then came the elder Herschel, best known and perhaps the greatest of all astronomers.
At Bath, England, music was his profession, especially the organ. But he was dissatisfied with his
little Gregorian reflector, and, being a very clever mechanician, he set out to build a reflector
for himself. It is said that he cast and polished nearly 200 mirrors in the course of experiments
on the most highly reflective type of alloys, and the sort of mechanism that would enable him
to give them the highest polish. In his work, he was ably and enthusiastically aided by his
sister, Caroline Herschel, most famous of all women astronomers. Upward in size of his mirrors,
he advanced, till he had a speculum of two feet diameter, with a tube 20 feet long. 12 to 15 years
had elapsed when, in 1781, while testing one of these reflectors on stars in the constellation
and Gemini, he made the first discovery of a planet since the invention of the telescope,
the great planet now known as Uranus. Under the patronage of King George, he advanced to telescopes
of still greater size, his largest being no less than 40 feet in length, with a speculum of
four feet in diameter. Two new satellites of Saturn were discovered with this giant reflector,
which was dismantled by Sir John Herschel
with appropriate ceremonies,
including the singing of an ode
by the Herschel family,
assembled inside of the tube
on New Year's Eve, 1839 to 40.
We have record of but few attempts
to improve the size and definition
of great reflectors
by the continental astronomers during this era.
In England and Ireland, however,
great progress was made.
About 1860,
LaSalle,
built a two-foot reflector with which he discovered two new satellites of Uranus
and which he subsequently set up in the island of Malta.
Ten years later, Thomas Grub and Son of Dublin
constructed a four-foot reflector now at the observatory in Melbourne, Australia.
Calver, in conjunction with Common of Ealing, London,
about 1880 to 95, built several large reflectors,
the largest of five feet diameter,
now owned by Harvard College Observatory,
and rather earlier, Martin of Paris,
completed a four-foot reflector.
The mirrors of these latter instruments
were not made of specula metal,
but of solid glass,
which must be very thick,
one-seventh their diameter,
in order to prevent flexure
or bending by their own weight.
So sensitive is the optical surface to distortion
that unless a complicated series of levers
and counterpoises is supposed,
applied to support the under surface of the mirror, the perfection of its optical figure disappears
when the telescope is directed to objects at different altitudes in the sky. The upper or outer
surface of the glass is the one which receives the optical polish on a heavy coat of silver
chemically deposited on the polished glass after its figure has been tested and found satisfactory.
But far and away, the most famous reflecting telescope of all, is the Leviathan of Lord
Ross, built at Burr Castle, Parson Town, Ireland, about the middle of the last century.
His lordship made many ingenious improvements in grinding the mirror, which was of speculum metal,
six feet in diameter, and weighed seven tons. It was ground to a focal length of 54 feet and
mounted between heavy walls of masonry, so that the motion of the great tube was restricted
to a few degrees on both sides of the meridian. The huge mechanism was very cumbersome in operation,
and photography was not available in those days. Nevertheless, Lord Ross's telescope
made the epicical discovery of the spiral nebulae, which no other telescope of that day could
have done. In America, the reflector has always kept at least even pace with the refractor.
As early as 1830, Mason and Smith, two students at Yale,
college, enthused by Denison Olemstead, built a 12-inch speculum, with which they made unsurpassed
observations of the nebulae. Dr. Henry Draper, returning from a visit to Lord Ross, began about 1865,
the construction of two silver-on-glass reflectors, one of 15 inches diameter, the other of 28-inches,
with which he did important work for many years in photography and spectroscopy, and his mirrors
are now the property of Harvard College Observatory.
Alvin Clark and Sons have, in later years,
built a 40-inch mirror for the Lowell Observatory in Arizona,
and very recently, a six-foot, silver-on-glass mirror,
has been set up in the Dominion of Canada Astrophysical Observatory
at Victoria, British Columbia,
where it is doing excellent work in the hands of Plaskett, its designer.
The huge glass disc for the reflector weighs two tons, and it must be cast so that there are no internal strains.
Otherwise, it is liable to burst in fragments in the process of grinding.
It should be free from air bubbles, too, so that the glass is cast in one melting, if possible.
This disc was made by the St. Gobain Plate Glass Company, whose works have been ruthlessly destroyed by the enemy during the war.
But fortunately, the Great Disc had been shipped from Antwerp only a week before the declaration of hostilities.
Brashear of Allegheny was entrusted with the optical parts, which occupied many months of critical work.
The finished mirror is 73 inches in diameter, its focal length is 30 feet, and its thickness 12 inches.
A central hole, 10 inches in diameter, makes possible its use as a Gregorian or a Casagranian type.
as well as Newtonian.
The mechanical parts of this great telescope
are by Warner and Swayze of Cleveland
after the well-known equatorial mounting
of the Melbourne reflector by Grub of Dublin.
Friction of the polar and declination axes
is reduced by ball bearings.
The 66-foot dome has an opening 15 feet wide
and extending six feet beyond the zenith.
All motions of the telescope,
dome shutters, and observing platform
are under complete control by electric motors.
Spectroscopic binaries form one of the special fields of research
with this powerful instrument,
and many new binaries have already been detected.
The great reflectors designed and constructed by Richie,
formerly of Chicago, and now of Pasadena,
deserve special mention.
While connected with the Yerkes Observatory,
he constructed a two-foot reflector for that institution,
with which he had exceptional success in photography,
of the stars and nebulae.
Later, he built a five-foot reflector,
now at Carnegie Observatory,
on Mount Wilson, California,
with which the spiral nebulae
and many other celestial objects
have been especially well photographed.
Ritchie's later years
have been spent on the construction
of an even greater mirror,
no less than a hundred inches in diameter,
which was completed in 1919
and has already yielded
photographic results
dealt with farther on, and far surpassing anything previously obtained.
Theoretically, this huge mirror, if its surface were perfectly reflective,
so that it would transmit all the rays falling upon it,
would gather 160,000 times as much light as the unaided eye alone.
Whether a 72-inch refractor, should it ever be constructed,
would surpass the 100-inch reflector as an all-round engine for astronomical
research is a question that can only be fully answered by building it and trying the two
instruments alongside. Probably three-quarters of all the really great astronomical work in the past
has been done by refractors. They are always ready and convenient for use, and the optical surfaces
rarely require cleaning and readjustment. With the increase of size, however, the secondary
spectrum becomes very bothersome in the great lenses, and the larger they are,
the more light is lost by absorption,
on account of the increasing thickness of the lenses.
With reflector, on the other hand,
while there is clearly a greater range of size,
the reflective surface retains its high polish only a brief period,
so that mere tarnish effectively reduces the aperture,
and the great mirror is more or less ineffective,
in consequence of flexure uncompensated by the lever system
that supports the back of the mirror.
Both types of telescopes still have their enthusiastic devotees, and the next great reflector would doubtless be a gratifying success, if mounted in some elevated region of the world, like the Andes of Northern Chile, where the air is exceptionally steady, and the sky very clear, a large part of the year.
The highest magnifying powers suitable for work with such a telescope could then be employed, and new discoveries added, as well as important work done in extension of lines,
already begun on the universe of stars. On the authority of Clark, even a six-foot objective
would not necessitate a combined thickness of its glasses in excess of six inches. Present discs
are vastly superior to the early ones in transparency, and there is reason to expect still greater
improvement. The engineering troubles incident to execution of the mechanical side of the scheme
need not stand in the way. They never have. Indeed, the astronomer has but just
begun to invoke the fertile resources of the modern engineer. Not long before his death,
the younger Clark, who had just finished the great lenses of the 40-inch Yorks telescope, ventured
this provision already in part come true. Quote, the new astronomy, as well as the old,
demands more power. Problems wait for their solution and theories to be substantiated or disproved.
The horizon of science has been greatly broadened within the last few years,
But out upon the borderland, I see the glimmer of new lights that await for their interpretation,
and the great telescopes of the future must be their interpreters."
Practically all the great telescopes of the world have, in turn,
signalized the new accession of power by some significant astronomical discovery.
To specify, one of Herschel's reflectorses first revealed the planet Uranus,
Lord Ross's Leviathan, the spiral nebulae, the 15-inch Cambridge lens, the crape or dusky ring of Saturn,
the 18-5-inch Chicago reflector, the companion of Sirius, the Washington, 26-inch telescope,
the satellites of Mars, the 30-inch polkoa-glass, the nebulosities of the Pleiades,
and the 36-inch Lick telescope brought to light a fifth satellite of Jupiter.
At the time these discoveries were made,
each of these great telescopes was the only instrument then in existence
with power enough to have made the discovery possible.
So we may advance to still farther accessions of power
with the expectation that greater discoveries will continue to gratify our confidence.
End of Chapter 19.
Chapter 20 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Librevox recording.
Libravox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit Libravox.org.
Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies by David Todd.
Chapter 20
The Story of the Spectroscope
Sir Isaac Newton really ought to have been the inventor of the spectroscope,
because he began by analyzing light in the rough with prisms,
was very expert in optics,
and was certainly enough of a philosopher to have laid the foundations of the science.
What Newton did was to admit sunlight into a darkened room through a small round aperture,
then passed the rays through a glass prism, and received the band of color on a screen.
He noticed the succession of colors correctly, violet, indigo, blue, green, yellow, orange, red,
also that they were not pure colors, but overlapping bands of color.
Apparently neither he nor any other experimenter, for more than a century, went any further when the next essential step was taken by Walliston about 1802 in England.
He saw that by receiving the light through a narrow slit instead of a round hole, he got a purer spectrum.
Spectrum being the name given to the succession of colors into which the prism splits up, or decomposes the original beam of white sunlight.
This seemingly insignificant change, a narrow slit replacing the round hole,
made Wollaston and Not Newton the discoverer of the dark lines crossing the spectrum at various
irregular intervals, and these singularly neglected lines meant the basis of a new and most
important science. Even Wallastone, however, passed them by, and it was Fronhofer,
who, in 1814 through 15, first made a chart of them. Consequently, the
They are known as Fraunhofer lines, or dark absorption lines.
Sending the beam of light through a succession of prisms gives greater dispersion
and increases the power of the spectroscope.
The greater the dispersion, the greater the number of absorption lines.
And it is the number and intensity of these lines, with their accurate position throughout
the range of the spectrum, which becomes the basis of spectrum analysis.
The half-century that saw the invention of the steam engine, photography, the railroad, and the telegraph
elapsed without any farther developments than mere mapping of the fundamental lines,
A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H of the solar spectrum.
The moon, too, was examined, and its spectrum found the same, as was to be expected, from sunlight simply reflected.
Sir John Herschel and other experimenters
came near guessing the significance of the dark lines,
but the problem of unraveling their mystery
was finally solved by Bunsen and Kirchhoff,
who ascertained that an incandescent gas
emits rays of exactly the same degree of refrangibility
which it absorbs when white light is passed through it.
This great discovery was at once received
as the secure basis of spectrum analysis,
and Kirchhoff, in 1858, put,
in compact and comprehensive form,
the three following principles underlying the theory of the science.
One, solid and liquid bodies,
also gases under high pressure,
give, when incandescent, a continuous spectrum,
that is, one with a mere succession of colors,
and neither bright nor dark lines.
Two, gases under low pressure give a discontinuous
spectrum crossed by bright lines whose number and position in the spectrum differ according to the
substances vaporized.
3. When white light passes through a gas, this medium absorbs, or quenches, rays of identical
wavelength with those composing its own bright line spectrum. Clearly then, it makes no difference
where the light originates, whether it comes from sun or star. Only it must be bright enough
so that we can analyze it with the spectroscope.
But our analysis of sun and star
could not proceed until the chemist had vaporized
in the laboratory all the elements
and charted their spectra with accuracy.
When this had been done,
every substance became at once recognizable
by the number and position of its lines
with practical certainty.
How then can we be sure
of the chemical and physical composition
of sun and stars?
Only by detailed and critical,
comparison of their spectra, with the laboratory spectra of elements which chemical and physical
research have supplied. As in the sun, so in the stars, each of which is encircled by a gaseous
absorptive layer or atmosphere, the light rays from the self-luminous inner sphere must pass
through this reversing layer, which absorbs light of exactly the same wavelength, as the lines
which make up its own bright-line spectrum. Whatever substances are here found in gaseousy,
condition, the same will be evident by dark lines in the spectrum of sun or star, and the
position of these dark lines will show, by coincidence with the position of the laboratory
bright lines, all the substances that are vaporized in the atmosphere of the self-luminous
bodies of the sky. Here then originated the science of the new astronomy. The old astronomy had
concerned itself mainly with positions of the heavenly bodies, where they are. The new
astronomy deals with their chemical composition and physical constitution and what they are.
Between 1865 and 1875, the fundamental application of the basic principles was well advanced
by the researchers of Sir William Huggins in England, of Father Angelo Secky in Rome, of Jules
Jensen in Paris, and of Dr. Henry Draper in New York. In analyzing the spectrum of the sun,
many thousands of dark absorption lines are found,
and their coincidences with the bright lines of terrestrial elements
show that iron, for instance, is most prominently identified,
with rather more than 2,000 coincidences of bright and dark lines.
Calcium 2 is indicated by peculiar intensity of its lines,
as well as their great number.
Next in order are hydrogen, nickel, and sodium.
By prolonged in minute comparison of the solar spectrum,
with spectra of terrestrial elements, something like 40 elemental substances are now known to exist in the sun.
Rowland's splendid photographs of the solar system have contributed most effectively.
About half of these elements, though not in order of certainty, are aluminum, cadmium, calcium, carbon, chromium, cobalt, copper, hydrogen, iron, magnesium,
magnesium, magnus, nickel, scandium, silicon, silver, sodium, titanium, vanandium, etrium,
zinc, and zirconium. Oxygen too is pretty surely indicated, but certain elements abundant
on earth, as nitrogen and chlorine, together with gold, mercury, phosphorus, and sulfur,
are not found in the sun. The two brilliant red stars, Aldabaran in Taras, and Beetlejuice in Orion,
were the first two stars whose chemical constitution was revealed to the eye of man,
and Sir William Huggins of London was the astronomer who achieved this epoch-making result.
Father Secki, of the Vatican Observatory, proceeded at once with the visual examination of the
spectra of hundreds of the brighter stars, and he was the first to provide a classification of
stellar spectra. These were the four types. Secky's type one is characterized chiefly by the breadth
and intensity of dark hydrogen lines, together with a faintness or entire absence of metallic
lines. These are bluish or white stars, and they are very abundant, nearly half of all the stars.
Vega, Altair, and numerous other bright stars belong to this type, and especially Sirius,
which gives to the type the name Syrians.
Type 2 is characterized by a multitude of fine, dark, metallic lines,
closely resembling the lines of the solar spectrum.
These stars are somewhat yellowish in tinge like the sun,
and from this similarity of spectra, they are called Solars.
Arcturus and Capella are Solars,
and on the whole, the solars are rather less numerous than the Syrians.
Stars nearest to the solar system are mostly of this type,
and according to Cap-Tain of Gronogen,
the absolute luminous power of the first-type stars
exceeds that of the second-type stars seven-fold.
Seki's Type 3 is characterized by many dark bands,
well-defined on the side towards the blue end of the spectrum,
but shading off toward the red.
colonated spectrum, as Ms. Clerk aptly terms it.
Alpha Hercules, Antares, and Mira, together with orange and reddish stars, and most of the
variable stars, belong in type 3.
Type 4 is also characterized by dark bands, often called flutings, similar to those of
type 3, but reversed as to shading, that is, well defined on the side toward the red, but
fading out toward the blue.
Their atmospheres contain carbon.
but they are not abundant, besides being faint, and nearly all blood-red in tint.
Following up the brilliant researches of Draper, who, in 1872, obtained the first successful
photograph of a star spectrum, that of Vega, Pickering of Harvard, supplemented Secky's classification
by Type 5, a spectrum characterized by bright lines. They, too, are not abundant, and are all found
near the middle of the galaxy. These are usually known as Wolfram's,
Rayette stars from the two Paris astronomers who first investigated their spectra.
Type 5 stars are a class of objects, seemingly apart from the rest of the stellar universe,
and many of the planetary nebulae yield the same sort of a spectrum.
The late Mrs. Anna Palmer Draper, widow of Dr. Henry Draper, established the Henry Draper Memorial
at Harvard, and investigation of the photographic spectra of all the brighter stars of the
entire heavens, has been prosecuted on a comprehensive scale, those of the Northern Hemisphere
at Cambridge, and of the Southern at Arquipa, Peru. These researchers have led to a broad
reclassification of the stars into eight distinct groups, a work of exceptional magnitude, begun by
the late Mrs. Fleming, and recently completed by Miss Annie Cannon, who classified the photographic
spectra of more than 230,000 stars on the new system as follows. The letters O, B, A, F, G, K, M, N represent a continuous gradation
in the supposed order of stellar evolution, and farther subdivision is indicated by
tenths, G5K, meaning a type halfway between G and K, and usually written
G5, simply. B2 would indicate a type between B and A, but nearer to B than A, and so on.
On this system, the spectrum of a star in the earliest stages of its evolution is made up of
diffuse bright bands on a faint continuous background. As these bands become fewer and narrower,
very faint absorption lines begin to appear. First, the helium lines, followed by several
series of hydrogen lines. On the disappearance of the bright bands, the spectrum becomes wholly
absorbative bands and lines. Then comes a very great increase in intensity of the true hydrogen
spectrum, with wide and much diffused lines, and few, if any other, lines. Then H&K calcium lines,
and other lines peculiar to the sun, become more and more intense. Then the hydrogen lines go
through their long decline. The calcium spectrum becomes intense. The calcium spectrum becomes intense.
and later the spectrum becomes quite like that of the sun,
with a great wealth of lines.
Following this stage, the spectrum shortens from the ultraviolet,
the hydrogen lines fade out still farther,
and bands, due to metallic compounds, make their appearance,
the entire spectrum finally resembling that of sunspots.
To designate these types rather more categorically,
type O, bright bands on a faint continuous background,
with five subdivisions.
O-A, O-B, O-C, O-D, O-E, according to the varying width and intensity of the bands.
Type B, the Orion type, or helium type, with additional lines of origin unknown as yet, but without any of the bright bands of type O.
Type A, the Syrian type, the regular balmer series of hydrogen lines being very intense, with a few other lines.
not conspicuously marked.
Type F, the calcium type.
Hydrogen lines less strongly marked,
but with the narrow calcium lines H and K,
very intense.
Type G, the solar type,
with multitudes of metallic lines.
Type K.
In some respects, similar to G,
but with the hydrogen lines fading out,
and the metallic lines relatively more prominent.
Type M.
Spectrum with peculiar flutis,
due to titanium oxide, with subdivisions MA and MB, and the variable stars of long period,
with a few bright hydrogen lines additional, in a separate class, MD.
Type N, similar to M, in that both are pronouncedly reddish, but with characteristic flutings
probably indicating carbon compounds.
The Draper classification being based on photographic spectra, and the original Secky classification,
being visual, the relation of the two systems is approximately as follows. Secky type 1 includes draper B
and A. Secky type 2 includes Draper F, G, and K. Secky type 3 includes Draper M. Secky type 4 includes Draper
N. Pickering's mark success in organization and execution of this great program was due to his
option of the slitless spectroscope, which made it possible to photograph stellar spectra in vast
numbers on a single plate. The first observers of stellar spectra placed the spectroscope
beyond the focus of the telescope with which it was used, thereby limiting the examination to but
one star at a time. In the slitless spectroscope, a large prism is mounted in front of the
objective of short focus, so that the stars rays pass through it first, and then are brought to
the same focus on the photographic plate for all the stars within the field of view, sometimes
many thousand in number. This arrangement provides great advantages in the comparison and
classification of stellar spectra. When spectroscopic methods were first introduced into
astronomy, there was no expectation that the field of the old or so-called exact astronomy
would be invaded. Physicists were sometimes jocularly greeted among astronomers as
ribbon men, and no one even dreamed that their researchers were one day to advance to equal
recognition with results derived from micrometer, meridian circle, and heliometer.
The first step in this direction was taken in 1868 by Sir William Huggins of London,
who noticed small displacements in the lines of spectra of very bright stars.
fact, the whole spectrum appeared to be shifted. In the case of Sirius, it was shifted toward the
red, while the whole spectrum of Acturus was shifted by three times this amount toward the violet
end of the spectrum. The reason was not difficult to assign. As early as 1842, Doppler had
enunciated the principle that, when we are approaching, or are approached by, a body which is
emitting regular vibrations, then the number of waves we receive in a second is increased,
and their wavelength correspondingly diminished, just as the reverse of this occurs when the distance
of the vibrating body is increasing. It is the same with light as with sound, and everyone has
noticed how the pitch of a locomotive whistle suddenly rises as it passes, and falls as suddenly
on retreating from us. So Huggins drew the immediate inference that the distance
between the Earth and Sirius was increasing at the rate of nearly 20 miles per second,
while Arcturus was nearing us with a velocity of 60 miles per second.
These pioneer observations of motions in the line of sight, or radial velocities, as they are now called,
led directly to the acceptance of the high value of spectroscopic work as an adjunct of exact
astronomy in stellar research, nor has it been found wanting in application.
to a great variety of exact problems in the solar system,
which would have been wholly impossible to solve without it.
Foremost is the sun, of course, because of the overplus of light.
Young early measured the displacement of lines in the spectra of the prominences
and found velocities sometimes exceeding 250 miles per second.
Many astronomers, Dunei, among them,
investigated the rotation of the sun by the spectroscopic method.
The sun's east limb is coming toward us, while the west is going from us, and by measuring the sum of displacements, the rate of rotation has been calculated, not only at the sun's equator, but at many solar latitudes also, both north and south.
As was to be expected, these results agree well with the sun's rotation, as found by the transits of sunspots in the lower latitudes where they make their appearance.
Belipolsky has applied the same method to the rotation of the planet Venus and Keeler
by measuring the displacement of lines in the spectrum of Saturn on opposite sides of the ring
provided a brilliant observational proof of the physical constitution of the rings
because he showed that the inner ring traveled round more swiftly than the outer one
thus demonstrating that the ring could not be solid but must be composed of multitudes of small
particles traveling around the ball of Saturn, much as if they were satellites. Indeed, Keeler
ascertained the velocity of their orbital motion and found that in each case it agreed exactly
with that required by Kepleran law. Even the filmy corona of the sun was investigated in similar
fashion by De Slandres at the total eclipse of 1893, and he found that it rotates bodily
with the sun. But the complete vindication of the spectroscopic method as an adjunct of the old astronomy
came with its application to measurement of the distance of the sun. The method is very interesting
and was first suggested by Campbell in 1892. Spectrum line measurements have become very accurate
with the introduction of dry plate photography and ecliptic stars were spectrographed toward
and from which the earth is traveling by its orbital motion around the sun. By accurate,
measurement of these displacements, the orbital velocity of the Earth is calculated,
and as we know the exact length of the year, or a complete period, the length of the orbit
itself in miles becomes known, and thus by simple menstruation, the length of the radius of the
orbit, which is the distance of the sun. If we pass from sun to star, the triumph of the spectroscope
has been everywhere complete and significant. As the spectroscopic survey of the stars grew
toward completeness, it became evident that the swarming hosts of the stellar universe are in constant
motion through space. Not only athwart the line of vision, as their proper motions had long
disclosed, but some stars are swiftly moving toward our solar system and others as swiftly from it.
Fixed stars, strictly speaking, there are no such. All are in relative motion.
Exact astronomy, by discussion of the proper motions, had assigned a region of the sky,
toward which the sun and planets are moving.
Spectrography soon verified this direction not only,
but gave a determination of the velocity of our motion
of 12 miles per second in a direction approximately that
of the constellation Lira.
From corresponding radial velocities,
we draw the ready conclusion that certain groups or clusters of stars
are actually connected in space and moving as related systems,
as in the Pleiades and Ursa Major.
Rather more than a quarter century ago, the spectroscope came to the assistance of the telescope
in helping to solve the intricate problem of stellar distribution.
Cap-Tain, by combining the proper motions of certain stars with their classification in the Draper
catalog of Stellar Spectra, drew the conclusion that, as stars having very small proper motions
show a condensation towards the galaxy, the stars composing this girdle are mostly of the Syrian type
and are at vast distances from the solar system.
The proper motion of a star near to us will ordinarily be large,
and in the case of solar stars,
the larger their proper motion, the greater their number.
So it would appear that the solar stars are aggregated round the sun himself,
and this conclusion is greatly strengthened
by the fact that, of those stars whose distances and spectral type
are both ascertained,
seven of the eight nearest to us are solar stars.
In 1889, the spectroscope achieved an unexpected triumph
by enabling the late Professor Pickering
to make the first discovery of a spectroscopic double, or binary star,
a type of object now quite abundant.
Unlike the visual binary systems,
whose periods are years in length,
the spectroscopic binaries have short periods,
reckoned in some cases in days or hours even.
If the orbit of a very close binary is seen edge on,
the light of the two stars will coalesce twice in every revolution.
Halfway between these points,
there are two times when the two stars will be moving,
one toward the earth and the other from it.
At all times, the light of the star,
insofar as the telescope shows it,
proceeds from a single object.
Now the photograph of the star's spectrum at each of the four critical points above indicated,
in the first pair the lines are sharply defined and single,
because at conjunction the stars are simply moving athwart the line of sight,
while at the intermediate points, the lines are double.
Doppler's principle completely accounts for this.
The light from the receding companion is giving lines displaced toward the red,
while the approaching companion yields lines displaced toward the violet.
Mazar, the double star at the bend of the handle of the Great Dipper, was the first star to yield this peculiar type of spectrum, and the period of its invisible companion is about 52 days.
The relative velocity of the components is 100 miles a second, and, applying Newton's law, we find its mass exceeds that of the sun 40-fold.
Capella has been found to be a spectroscopic binary, also the pole star.
spectroscopic binaries have relatively short periods,
one of the shortest known, being only 35 hours in length.
It is in the constellation Scorpio.
Beta Aragi is another whose lines double on alternate nights,
giving a period of four days,
and the combined mass of both stars is more than twice that of the sun.
The catalog of spectroscopic binaries is constantly enlarging,
but thousands doubtless exist.
that can never be discovered by this method, as is evident if their orbits are perpendicular
to the line of sight, or nearly so.
The history of spectroscopic binaries is one of the most interesting chapters in astronomy,
and affords a marvelous confirmation of the prediction of Bessel, who first wrote of the
astronomy of the invisible. Find a star's distance by the spectroscope? Impossible, everyone
would have said, even a very few years ago. Now, however, the third
is done, and with increasing accuracy. Adams of Mount Wilson has found, after protracted
investigation, that the relative intensity of certain spectral lines varies according to the absolute
brightness of the star. Indeed, so close is the correspondence that the spectroscopic
observations are employed to provide, in certain cases, a good determination of the absolute
magnitude, and therefore of the distance. To test this relation,
the spectroscopic parallaxes have been compared with the measured parallaxes in numerous instances,
and an excellent agreement is shown.
The new method is adding extensively to our knowledge of stellar luminosities and distances,
and even the vast distances of globular clusters and spiral nebulae are becoming known.
In fact, but few departments of the old astronomy are left,
which the new astronomy has not invaded, and this latest triumph,
of the spectroscope in determining accurately the distances of even the remotest stars is
enthusiastically welcomed by advocates of the old and new astronomy alike.
End of Chapter 20. Recording by Olivia.
Chapter 21 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies. This is a Librebox recording.
All Librebox recordings are in the public domain. For more information, or to
volunteer, please visit libervox.org.
Read by Piotr Natter.
Astronomy, the science of the heavenly bodies by David Todd, the story of astronomical
photography.
The most powerful ally of both telescope and spectroscope is photography.
Without it, the marvelous researches carried on with both these types of instrument
would have been essentially impossible.
Even the great telescopes of Herschel and Lord Ross, notwithstanding their
splendid record as optical instruments might have achieved vastly more, had photography been developed
in their time to the point where the astronomer could have employed its wonderful capabilities
as he does today. And with the spectroscope, it is hardly too much to say that no investigator
ever observes visually with that instrument anymore. Practically every spectrum is made a matter
of photographic record first. The observing, or nowadays the measuring, is all done afterward.
telescopes and cameras are alike, in that each must form, or have formed within it an image
by means of a lens or mirror. In the telescope, the eye sees the fleeting image. In the camera,
the process of registering the image on a plate or film is known as photography. DeGere first
invented the process, silver film on a copper plate, in 1839. The year following, it was first
employed on the moon. In 1850, the first star was photographed.
in 1851 the first total eclipse of the sun all by the primitive daguerreotype process which notwithstanding its awkwardness and the great length of exposure required was found to possess many advantages for astronomical work
about the middle of the last century the wet-plate process so-called because the sensitized collodion film must be kept moist during exposure came into general use and the astronomers of that period were not slow to avail themselves of the advantage of
of a more sensitive process, which, in 1872, in the skillful hands of Henry Draper, produced
the first spectrum of a star. In 180, a nebula was first photographed, and in 1881, a comet.
Before this time, however, a new dried-plate process had been developed to the point where astronomers
began to avail of its greater convenience and increased sensitiveness, even in spite of the
coarseness of grain of the film. Forty years of dry-plate service,
have brought a wealth of advantages scarcely dreamed of in the beginning, and nearly every
department of astronomical research has been enhanced thereby, while many entirely new
photographic methods of investigation have been worked out. Continued improvement in photographic
processes has provided the possibility of pictures of fainter and fainter celestial objects,
and all the larger telescopes have photographed stars and nebulae of such exceeding faintness that the
human eye, even if applied to the same instrument, would never be able to see them.
This is because the eye, in ten or twelve seconds of keen watching, becomes fatigued and must
be rested, whereas the action of a very faint light-race is cumulative on the highly sensitive
film, so that a continuous exposure of many hours duration becomes readily visible to
the eye on development.
So a super-sensitive dry plate will often record many thousand stars in a region where the
naked eye can see but one. Perhaps the greatest amplification of photography has taken place at
the Harvard University under Pickering, where a library of many hundred thousand plates has accumulated,
and at Groningen, Holland, where Captain has established an astronomical laboratory without
instruments except such as are necessary to measure photographic plates, whenever and wherever
taken. So it is possible to select the clearest of skies all over the world for exposure
of the plates and bring back the photographs for expert discussion. Of course the sun was the celestial
body first photographed, and its surpassing brilliance necessitates reduction of exposure to a minimum.
In moments of exceptional steadiness of the atmosphere, a very high degree of magnification
of the solar surface on the photographic plate is permitted, and the details in formation,
development, and ending of sunspots are faithfully registered. Nevertheless, it cannot be
said that photography has yet entirely replaced the eye in this work, and careful drawings of
sunspots at critical stages of their life are capable of registering fine detail which the plate
has so far been unable to record. Jansen of Paris took photographs of the solar photosphere so
highly magnified that the granulation of willow-leed structure of the surface was clearly visible,
and its variations traceable from hour to hour. The advantages of
sunspots photography on ascertaining the sun's rotation, keeping count of the spots and in a
permanent record for measurement of position of the sun's axis and the spot zones are obvious.
In direct portrayal of the sun's corona during total eclipses, photography has offered superior
advantages of their visual sketching, in the form and exact location of the coronal streamers,
but the extraordinary differences of intensity between the inner coroner and its outlying extensions
are such that halation renders a complete picture on a single plate practically impossible.
The filamentous detail of the inner coroner and the faintest outlying extension of streamers,
the eye must still reveal directly.
In solar spectrum photography, research has been especially benefited.
Indeed, exact registry of the multitudinous lines was quite impossible without it.
Photographic maps of the spectrum by Tholon, McLean, and Rowland are so complete
and accurate that no visual charts can approach them.
Rowland's great photographic map of the solar spectrum spread out into a band about 40 feet in length,
and in the infrared, Langley's spectrobolometer extended the invisible heat spectrum photographically
to many times that length. At the other end of the spectrum, special photographic processes
have extended the ultraviolet spectrum far beyond the ocular limit, to a point where it is abruptly
cut off by absorption of the Earth's atmosphere. On the same plate, with certain regions of the
sun's spectrum, the spectra of terrestrial metals are photographed side by side, and exact
coincidences of lines show that about 40 elemental substances, known to terrestrial chemistry,
are vaporized in the sun. Young was the first to photograph a solar prominence in 1870,
and 20 years later the Slaundre of Paris and Hale of Chicago independently invented.
the spectro-heliograph, by which the chronosphere and prominences of the sun, as well as the
disc of the sun itself, are all photographed by monochromatic light on a single plate. Hale has
developed this instrument almost to the limit, first at the Yerkes Observatory of the University
of Chicago, and more recently at the Mount Wilson Observatory of the Carnegie Institution,
where spectro-heliograms of marvelous perfection are daily taken. It was with this instrument that
Hale discovered the effect of an electromagnetic field in sunspots which has revolutionized solar theories,
a research impossible to conceive of without the aid of photography. When we apply Doppler's principle,
photography becomes doubly advantageous. Whether we determine, as Duner did, and more recently
Adams, the sun's own rotation, and find it to vary in different solar latitudes, the equator going
fastest, or apply the method to the sun's corona at the east and west limbs of the sun,
which the slough in 1893 proved to be rotating bodily with the sun, because of the measured
displacement of spectral lines of the corona in juxtaposition on the photographic plate.
In the solar astronomy of measurement, too, photography has been helpfully utilized, as in
registering the transits of Mercury over the sun's disk, for correcting the tables of the
planet's orbital motion, and most prominently in the action taken by the principal governments of
the world in sending out expeditions to observe the transits of Venus in 1874 and 1882,
for the purpose of determining the parallax of Venus and so the distance of the Earth from the
sun. In our studies of the moon, photography has almost completely superseded ocular work
during the past 60 years. Rutherford and the Draper of New York, about 1865, obtained very
excellent lunar photographs with wet plates, which were unexcelled for nearly half a century.
The Harvard, Lick and Paris Observatories have published pretty complete photographic atlases
of the moon, and the best negatives of these series show nearly everything that the eye can discern,
except under unusual circumstances. Later lunar photography was taken up at the Yerke's Observatory,
and exceptionally fine photographs on a large scale were obtained with the 40-inch refractor
using a color screen.
More recently, the 60-inch and 100-inch mirrors of the Mount Wilson Observatory have taken
a series of photographs of the Moon far surpassing everything previously done,
as was to be expected from the unique combination of a tranquil mountain atmosphere
with the extraordinary optical power of the instruments,
and a special adaptation of photographic methods.
During lunar eclipses, Pickering has made a photographic search for a possible satellite of the moon,
occultations of stars by the moon have been recorded by photography,
and Russell of Princeton has shown how the position of the moon among the stars
can be determined by the aid of photography with a high order of precision.
The story of planetary photography is on the whole disappointing.
Much has been done, but there is much that is.
is within reach, or ought to be, that remains undone. From Mercury, nothing ought perhaps to be
expected. On many of the photographs of the transit of Venus, especially those taken under the
writer's direction at the Lick Observatory in 1882, we have unmistakable evidence of the planet's
atmosphere. Here again the wet-plate process, although more clumsy, demonstrated its
superiority over the dry process used by other expeditions. In spectroscopy, Belopolski,
has sought to determine the period of rotation of Venus on her axis.
At the Lowell Observatory, Douglas succeeded in photographing the faint zodiacal light,
and very successful photographs of Mars were taken at this institution as early as 1905 by Slyfer.
Two years later, these were much improved upon by the writer's expedition to the Andes of Chile,
when 12,000 exposures of Mars were made, many of them showing the principal Canali and other prominent.
and features of the planet's disk, at subsequent opposition of the planet, Barnard at the
Erke's Observatory, and the Mount Wilson observers, have far surpassed all these photographs.
For future oppositions, a more sensitive film is highly desired, in connection with instruments
possessing greater light-gathering power, so permitting a briefer exposure that will be less
influenced by irregularities and defects of the atmosphere. The spectrum of Mars is of course
that of sunlight, very much reduced and modified to a slight extent by its passing twice
through the atmosphere of Mars. What amount of equious vapor that atmosphere may contain is a
question that can be answered only by critical comparison of the Martian spectrum with the
spectrum of the moon, and photography affords the only method by which this can be done.
Many are the ways in which photography has aided research on the asteroid group. Since 1891, more
and 600 of them have been discovered by photography, and it is many times easier to find the new object on the photographic plate than to detect it in the sky, as was formerly done by means of star charts.
The planet, by its motion, during the exposure of the plate, produces a trail, whereas the surrounding stars are all-round dots or images.
Or by moving the plate slightly during exposure, as in Medkal's ingenious method, we may catch the planet at that point where it will give a nearer.
circular image and thus be quite as easy to detect because all the stars on the same plate will
then be trails. Photographic photometry of the asteroids has revealed marked variations in their
light due perhaps to irregularities of figure. On account of their faint light, the asteroids are
especially suited, as Mars is not, to exact photography for ascertaining their parallax,
and from this the sun's distance when the asteroid's distance has been found.
Many asteroids have been utilized in this way, in particular, Eros, 4333.
In 1931, it approaches the Earth within 13 million miles,
when the photographic method will doubtless give the sun's distance with the utmost accuracy.
Photographs of Jupiter have been very successfully taken at the Yerkes and Lowell Observatories and elsewhere,
but the great depth of the planet's atmosphere is highly absorptive,
so that the impression is very weak in the discerptive.
neighborhood of the limb if the exposure is correctly timed for the center of the disc.
The striking detail of the belts, however, is excellently shown. Wood of Baltimore has obtained
excellent results by monochromatic photography of Jupiter and Saturn with the 60-inch reflector
on Mount Wilson. Jupiter's satellites have not been neglected photographically, and Pickering
has observed hundreds of the eclipses of the satellites by a sword of cinematographic method
of repeated exposures around the time of disappearance and reappearance by eclipse.
The newest outer satellites of Jupiter were all discovered by photography,
and it is extremely doubtful if they would have been found otherwise.
Saturn has long been a favorite object with the astronomical photographer,
and there are many fine pictures, in spite of its yellowish light, relatively weak photographically,
the marvelous ring system with the Cassini division, the oblateness of the ball,
the occasional markings on it, all are well shown in the best photographs, but the call is for
more light and a more sensitive photographic process. Pickering's ninth satellite, Phoebe,
was discovered by photography, one of the faintest moons in the solar system. Like the faint outer
moons of Jupiter, few existing telescopes are powerful enough to show it. Its orbit has been found
from photographic observations, and its position is checked up from time to time.
by photography. But the crowning achievement of spectrum photography in the Saturnian system
is Keeler's application of Doppler's principle in determining the rate of orbital motion of
particles in different zones of the rings, thereby establishing the Maxwellian theory of
the constitution of the rings beyond the possibility of doubt. For Uranus and Neptune,
photography has availed but little, except to negative the existence of additional satellites
of these planets, which doubtless would have been discovered by the thorough photographic search
which has been made for them by the W.H. Pickering without results. As with the asteroids,
so with comets. Several of these bodies have been discovered by photography, none more spectacular
than the Egyptian comet of May 17, 1882, which impressed itself on the plates of the coroner of
that date. Withdrawal of the sun's light by total eclipse made the comet visible,
and it had never been seen before, nor is it known whether it will ever return.
In cometary photography, much the same difficulties are present as in photographing the corona.
If the plate is exposed long enough to get the faint extensions of the tail,
the fine filaments of the coma or head are obliterated by halation and overexposure.
No one has had greater success in this work than Barnard,
whose photographs of comets, particularly at the Lick Observatory,
are numerous and unexcelled.
His photographs of the Brooks Comet of 1893
revealed rapid and violent changes in the tail,
as if shattered by encounter with meteors.
And the tale of Halley's Comet in 1910
showed the rapid propagation of luminous waves down the tail,
similar to phenomena sometimes seen in streamers of the aurora.
Draper obtained the first photograph of a comet's spectrum in 1881,
disclosing an identity with hydrocarbons burning in a bansom flame, also bands in the violet
due to carbon compounds. The photographic spectra of subsequent comets have shown bright lights
due to sodium and the vapour of iron and magnesium. Even the elusive meteor has been caught by
photography, first by Wolf in 1891, who was exposing a plate on stars in the Milky Way.
On developing it, he found a fine, dark, nearly uniform line crossing it
due to the accidental flight across the field of a meteor of varying brightness.
Since then, meteor trails have been repeatedly photographed,
and even the trail spectra of meteors have been registered on the Harvard plates.
At Yale, in 1894, Elkin employed a unique apparatus for securing photographic trails of meteors.
Six photographic cameras mounted at different.
angles on a long polar axis driven by clockwork, the whole arranged so as to cover a large area
of the sky where meteors were expected. When we pass from the solar system to the stellar
universe, the advantages of photography and the amplification of research due to its employment
as accessory in nearly every line of investigation are enormous. So extensively has photography
been introduced, that plates, and to a slight extent, films are now almost exclusively
used in securing original records. Regrettably so in case of the nebulae, because the numerous
photographs of the brighter nebulae taken since 1880, when Draper got the first photograph of
the nebulae of Orion, are as a rule not comparable with each other. Differences of instruments,
of plates, of exposure and development all have occasioned differences in portraying.
of a nebula which do not exist. When we consider faithful accuracy of portrayal of the nebulae
for purposes of critical comparison from age to age, many of our nebular photographs of the past
40 years, fine as they are and marvelous as they are, must fail to serve the purpose of
revealing progressive changes in nebular features in the future. Roberts and Common in England
were among the first to obtain nebular photographs with extraordinary details,
also the brothers Henri of Paris.
As early as 1888, Roberts revealed the true nature of the great nebulae in Andromeda,
which had never been suspected of being spiral.
And Killer and Perrin at the Lick Observatory
pushed the photographic discovery of spiral nebulae so far
that their estimates fill the sky with many hundred thousands of these objects.
In the southern hemisphere, the 24-inch Bruce Telescope of Harvard College Observatory has obtained many very remarkable photographs of nebulae, particularly in the vicinity of Etta Carine, but the great reflectors of the Mount Wilson Observatory, on account of their exceptional location and extraordinary power, have surpassed all others in the photographic portrayal of these objects, especially of the spiral nebulae, which appear to show all stages in transition from nebula to star.
No less remarkable are the photographs of such wonderful clusters as Omega Centauri,
a perfect visual representation of which is wholly impossible.
In their comparison of the photographs of clusters has afforded Bailey of Harvard,
shapely of Mount Wilson, and others the opportunity of discovery that hundreds of the components
of stars are variable.
What is the longest photographic exposure ever made?
At the Cape of Good Hope, under the direction of the late Sir David Gavitt,
Gil, exposures of nebulae were made, utilizing the best part of several nights, and
totaling as high as 17 or even 23 hours. But the Mount Wilson observers have far surpassed
this duration. To study the rotation and radial velocity of the central part of the nebulae
of Andromeda, an exposure of no less than 79 hours total duration was made on the exceedingly
faint spectrum, and even that record has since been exceeded.
The eye cannot be removed from the guiding star for a moment while the exposure is in progress,
and this tedious piece of work was rewarded by determining the velocity of the center of the nucleus
as a motion of approach at the rate of 316 kilometers per second.
But when the stars, their magnitudes and their special peculiarities are to be investigated en masse,
photography provides the facile means for researchers that would scarcely have been dreamed of without it.
The International Photographic Chart of the Entire Heavens, in Progress at 20 Observatories
since 1887, the photographic charts of the Northern Heavens at Harvard and of the Southern
Sky at Cape Town, the manifold investigations that have led up to the Harvard Photometry,
and the unparalleled photographic researchers of the Henry Draper Memorial,
enabling the spectra of many hundred thousand stars to be examined and classified.
All this is but a part of the astronomical work in studies.
fields that photography has rendered possible. Then there are the stellar parallaxes, now observed
for many stars at once photographically, when formerly only one star's parallax could be measured
at a time, and with the eye at the telescope, and photoelectric photometry, measuring smaller
differences of light than any other method, and providing more accurate light curves of the
variable stars, and perhaps most remarkable of all, the radial velocity work on both stars
and nebulae, giving us the distance of the whole classes of stars, discovering large numbers of
spectroscopic binaries, and checking up the motion of the solar systems toward Lyra, within a fraction
of a mile per second. All told, photography has been the most potent adjunct in astronomical
research, and it is impossible to predict the future with more powerful apparatus and
photographic processes of higher sensitiveness. The field of research is almost boundless,
and the possibilities practically without limit. What would Herschel have done with 100,000 pounds
and photography? End of Chapter 21. Chapter 22 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly
Bodies. This is a Librevox recording. All Librevox recordings are in the public domain. For more
information or to volunteer, please visit librivox.org.
Astronomy, the science of the heavenly bodies by David Todd.
Chapter 22. Mountain Observatories
The century that has elapsed since the time of Sir William Herschel, known as the father
of the new or descriptive astronomy, has witnessed all the advances of science that have
been made possible by adopting the photographic method of making the record,
instead of depending upon the human eye.
Only one eye can be looking at the eyepiece at a time.
The photograph can be studied by a thousand eyes.
At mountain elevation, telescopes are now extensively employed,
and there the camera is of especial and additional value
because the photograph taken on the mountain
can be brought down for the expert to study at ease
and in the comfort of a lower elevation.
We shall next trace the movement that has led the astronomer to seek the summits of mountains
for his observatories and the photographer to follow him.
Not only did the genius of Newton discover the law of universal gravitation
and make the first experiments in optics essential to the invention of the spectroscope,
but he was the real originator also of the modern movement for the occupation of mountain elevations
for astronomical observatories.
His keen mind followed a ray of light all the way
from its celestial source to the eye of the observer
and analyzed the causes of indistinct and imperfect vision.
Endeavouring to improve on the telescope
as Galileo and his followers had left it,
he found such inherent difficulties in glass itself
that he abandoned the refracting type of telescope
for the reflector.
to the construction of which he devoted many years.
But he soon found out what every astronomer and optician knew to their keen regret,
that a telescope, no matter how perfectly the skill of the optician's hand may make it,
cannot perform perfectly unless it has an optically perfect atmosphere to look through.
So Newton conceived the idea of a mountain observatory,
on the summit of which, as he thought, the air would not only be cloudless, but so steady and
equable that the rays of light from the heavenly bodies might reach the eye undisturbed
by atmospheric tremors and quiverings, which are almost always present in the lower strata
of the great ocean of air that surrounds our planet.
This is the way Newton puts the question in his treatise on optics.
He says,
The air through which we look upon the stars is in perpetual tremor,
as may be seen by the tremulous motion of shadows cast from high towers,
and by the twinkling of the fixed stars.
The only remedy is a most serene and quiet air,
such as may perhaps be found on the tops of the highest mountains above the grosser clouds.
Newton's suggestion is that the highest mountains may afford the best conditions for tranquillers.
and it is an interesting coincidence that the summits of the highest mountains, about 30,000 feet in elevation, are at about the same level where the turbulence of the atmosphere most likely ceases, according to the indications of recent meteorological research.
These heights are far above any elevations permanently occupied as yet, but a good beginning has been made and results of great value have already been
reached. Curiously, investigation of mountain peaks and their suitability for this purpose was not
undertaken till nearly two centuries after Newton. When Piazzi-Smife in 1856 organized his expedition
to the summit of a mountain of quite moderate elevation and published his Tenerife and Astronomers
Experiment. Tenerife is an accessible peak of about 10,000 feet on an island of the Canaries.
off the African coast, where Smyth fancied that the conditions of equability would exist,
and on reaching the summit with his apparatus and spending a few days and nights there,
he was not disappointed. Could he have reached an elevation of 13,000 feet,
he would have had fully one-third of all the atmosphere in weight below him,
and that the most turbulent portion of all. Nevertheless, the gain in steadiness,
of the atmosphere providing better seeing, as the astronomer's expression is, even at 10,000 feet,
was most encouraging and led to attempts on other peaks by other astronomers, a few of whom we shall
mention. Davidson, an observer of the United States Coast Survey, with a broad experience of many
years in mountain observing, investigated the summit of the Sierra Nevada Mountains as early as
1872 at an elevation of 7,200 feet. His especial object was to make an accurate comparison between
elevated stations at different heights. He found the seeing excellent, especially on the sun,
but the excessive snowfall at his station, 45 feet annually, was a condition very adverse to permanent
occupation. In the summer of 1872, Young spent several weeks at Sherman, Wyoming, at an elevation
exceeding 8,300 feet. He carried with him the 9.4-inch telescope of Dartmouth College, where he was
then professor, and this was the first expedition on which a large glass was used by a very
skillful observer at great elevation. He found the number of good days and nights small,
but the sky was exceedingly favorable when clear. Many seventh magnitude stars could be detected
with the naked eye. Young's observations at Sherman were mainly spectroscopic, however,
and they demonstrated the immense advantage of a high-level station far above the dust and
haze of the lower atmosphere. He pronounced the 9.4 inch glass at 8,000 feet, the full equivalent of
a 12 inch at sea level. Montblanc of 15,000 feet elevation was another summit where the veteran
Jansen of Paris maintained a station for many years, but the continental conditions of atmospheric
moisture and circulation were not favorable on the whole. Jansen was mainly interested in the sun,
and the daylight seeing is rarely benefited owing to the strong upward currents of warm air set in motion by the sun itself.
Mountains in the beautiful climate of California were among the earliest investigated,
and when, in 1874, the trustees of Mr. James Lix Estate were charged with equipping an observatory with the most powerful telescope in existence,
they wisely located on the summit of Mount Hamilton.
it is forty three hundred feet above sea level and burnham and other astronomers made critical tests of the steadiness of vision there by observing double stars which afford perhaps the best means of comparing the optical quality of the atmosphere of one region with another
the writer was fortunate in having charge of the observations of the transit of venus in eighteen eighty two on the mountain when the observatory was in
process of construction and the quality of the photographs obtained on that occasion demonstrated anew
the excellence of the site. Particularly at night, for about nine months of the year, the seeing is
exceptionally good, especially when fog banks rolling in from the Pacific cover the valleys below like a
blanket, preventing harmful radiation from the soil below. The great telescope mounted in 1888, a 138, a
36-inch refractor by Alvin Clark has fulfilled every expectation of its projectors and justified
the selection of the site in every particular. The elevation, although moderate, is still high
enough to secure very marked advantage in clearness and steadiness of the air, and at the same time,
not so high that the health and activities of the observers are appreciably affected by the thinner
air of the summit. This telescope is known the world over for the monumental contributions to science
made by the able astronomers who have worked with it, among them Barnard, who discovered the fifth
satellite of Jupiter in 1892, Burnham, Hussie, and Aiken, who have discovered and measured
thousands of close double stars. Keeler, who spent many faithful years on the summit, and Campbell,
the present director, whose spectroscopic researchers on stellar movements have added greatly
to our knowledge of the structure of the universe. Among the many lines of research now in progress
at the Lick Observatory and in the D. O. Mills Observatory at Santiago, Chile, are the discoveries
of stars whose velocities in space are not constant, but variable with the spectral type of the star.
Mr Lick's bequest for the observatory was about $700,000.
So ably has this scientific trust been administered
that he might have well endowed it with his entire estate,
exceeding $4 million.
Another California mountain that was early investigated is Mount Whitney.
Its summit elevation is nearly 15,000 feet,
and in 1881 Langley made its assent for the purpose of measuring
the solar constant. He found conditions much more favourable than on Mount Etna, Sicily,
elevation about 10,000 feet, which he had visited the year before. But the height of Mount Whitney
was such as to occasion him much inconvenience from mountain sickness, an ailment which is most
distressing and due partly to lack of oxygen and partly to mere diminution of mechanical pressure.
Mount Whitney was also visited many years after by Campbell for investigating the spectrum of Mars in comparison with that of the moon.
Langley found on Mount Whitney an excellent station lower down at about 12,000 feet elevation,
and by equipping the two stations with like apparatus for measuring the solar heat,
he obtained very important data on the selective absorption of the atmosphere.
Returning from the transit of Venus in 1882, Copeland of Edinburgh visited several sites in the Andes of Peru, ascending on the railway from Molendo.
Vincocaya was one of the highest, something over 14,000 feet elevation.
His report was most enthusiastic, not only as to clearness and transparency of the atmosphere,
but also as to its steadiness, which, for planetary and double star,
observations is almost as important. Copeland's investigation of this region of the Andes has led
many other astronomers to make critical tests in the same general region. Climatic conditions are
particularly favorable and the sites for high-level research are among the best known, the atmosphere
being not only clear a large part of the year but in certain favoured spots exceedingly steady.
In 1887, the writer ascended the summit of Fujiyama, Japan, 12,400 feet elevation.
The early September conditions as to steadiness of atmosphere were extraordinarily fine,
but the mountain is covered by cloud many months in each year.
There is a saddle on the inside of the crater that would form an ideal location for a high-level observatory.
This expedition was undertaken at the request of the late Professor P.
Pickering, Director of Harvard College Observatory, which had recently received a bequest from
Uriah A. Boyden, amounting to nearly a quarter of a million dollars to establish and maintain
in conjunction with others an astronomical observatory on some mountain peak.
Great elevations were systematically investigated in Colorado and California, the Chilean
desert of Atacama was visited, and a temporary station established at Shuris.
Pauzeca, Peru, elevation, about 5,000 feet.
Atmospheric conditions becoming unfavorable.
A permanent station was established in 1891 at Arequipa, Peru, elevation, 8,000 feet,
which has been maintained as an annex to the Harvard Observatory ever since.
The cloud conditions have been, on the whole, less favorable than was expected,
but the steadiness of the air has been very satisfactory.
In addition to planetary researchers conducted there in the earlier years by W.H. Pickering,
many large programs of stellar research have been executed,
especially relating to the magnitudes and spectra of the stars.
In conjunction with the home observatory in the Northern Hemisphere,
this afforded a vast advantage in embracing all the stars of the entire heavens
on a scale not attempted elsewhere.
The Bruce Photographic Telescope of 24-inch aperture has been employed for many years at Arequipa,
and with it the plates were taken which enabled Pickering to discover the ninth satellite of Saturn, Phoebe,
and the splendid photographs of southern globular clusters in which Bailey has found numerous variable stars of very short periods,
very faint objects, but nonetheless interesting and of much significance in modern study of the evolution
and structure of the stellar universe. The crowning research of the observatory is the Henry
Draper catalogue of stellar spectra now in process of publication, which is of the first
order of importance in statistical studies of stellar distribution with reference to spectral type,
and in studying the relation of parallax and distance, proper motion, radio velocity,
and its variation to the spectral characteristics of the stars.
Perrine of Cordova is now establishing on Sierra Chica,
about 25 miles southwest of Cordova,
a great reflecting telescope comparable in size with the instruments of the northern hemisphere
for investigation of the southern nebulae and clusters and motions of the
the stars. The elevation of this new Argentine observatory will be 4,000 feet above sea level.
Another observatory at mountain elevation and in a highly favorable climate is the Lowell Observatory
located at about 7,000 feet elevation at Flagstaff, Arizona. Many localities were visited and
the atmosphere tested especially for steadiness, an optical quality very essential for research
on the planetary surfaces.
Mexico was one of these stations,
but local air currents and changes of temperature there
were such that good seeing was far from prevalent,
as had been expected.
At Flagstaff, on the other hand,
conditions have been pretty uniformly good
and an enormous amount of work on the planet Mars
has been accumulated and published.
The first successful photographs of this planet
were taken there in 1905,
and Jupiter,
Saturn, the zodiacal light and many other test objects have been photographed,
which demonstrates the excellence of the site for astronomical research.
Within recent years, spectrum research by Sliffer, especially on the nebulae, has been added
to the program, and the rotation and radial velocities of many nebulae have been determined.
On Mount Wilson near Pasadena, California, at an elevation of nearly 6,000 feet,
is the Carnegie Solar Observatory founded and equipped under the direction of Professor George E. Hale as a department of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, of which Dr. John Campbell Merriam is president.
The climatology of the region was carefully investigated and tests of the seeing made by Hussie and others.
Although equipped primarily for study of the sun, the program of the observatory has been widely amplified to,
include the stars and nebulae. The instrumental equipment is unique in many respects. To avoid
the harmful effect of unsteadiness of air strata close to the ground, a tower 150 feet high was erected,
with a dome surmounting it and covering a shellastat with mirror for reflecting the sun's rays
vertically downward. Underneath the tower, a dry well was excavated to a depth equal to one
half the height of the tower above it. In the subterranean chamber is the spectro-heliograph of
exceptional size and power. The sun's original image is nearly 17 inches in diameter on the plate,
and the solar chromosphere and prominences together with the photosphere and faculay are all
recorded by monochromatic light. Connected with the observatory on Mount Wilson are the
the laboratories, offices and instrument shops in Pasadena, 16 miles distant, where the remarkable
apparatus for use on the mountain is constructed. A reflecting telescope with silver on glass mirror
60 inches in diameter was first built by Ritchie and thoroughly tested by stellar photographs.
Also, the northern spiral nebulae were photographed, exhibiting an extraordinary wealth of detail
in apparent star formation.
The success of this instrument paved the way for one similar in design,
but with a mirror 100 inches in diameter,
provided by gift of the late John D. Hooker of Los Angeles.
The telescope was completed in 1919.
Notwithstanding its huge size and enormous weight,
the mounting is very successful as well as the mirror.
Mercurial bearings counterbalance the weight of the power,
polar axis in large part. This great telescope, by far the largest and most powerful ever
constructed, is now employed on a program of research in which its vast, light-gathering power
will be utilized to the full. Under the skillful management of Hale and his enthusiastic and
capable colleagues, the confines of the stellar heavens will be enormously extended
and secrets of evolution of the universe and of its structure, no doubt, revealed.
In all the mountain stations hitherto established as the Lick Observatory at 4,000 feet,
the Mount Wilson Observatory at 6,000 feet,
the Lowell Observatory at 7,000 feet,
the Harvard Observatory at 8,000 feet,
and Tenerife and Etna at 10,000, Fugiaima at 12,000,
Pike's Peak at 14,000, Mount Black and Mount Whitney at 15,000. The researchers that have been
carried on have fully demonstrated the vast advantage of increased elevation in localities where
climatological conditions as well as elevation are favorable. Nevertheless, only one half of the
extreme altitude contemplated by Sir Isaac Newton has yet been attained. Can the Great
heights be reached and permanently occupied? Geographically and astronomically the most
favourable located mountain for a great observatory is Mount Chimborazo in Ecuador.
Its elevation is 22,000 feet, and it was ascended by Edward Wimper in 1880.
Situated very nearly on the Earth's equator, almost the entire sidereal heavens are
visible from this single station, and all the planets are favored by circumsumsearche
zenith conditions when passing the meridian. No other mountain in the world approaches
Chimbarazzo in this respect, but the summit is perpetually snow-capped, exceedingly inaccessible,
and the defect of barometric pressure would make life impossible up there in the open.
Only one method of occupation appears to be feasible. The permanent snowline is at about 16,000 feet,
where excellent water power is available.
By tunneling into the mountain at this point and diagonally upwards to the summit,
permanent occupation could be accomplished at a cost not to exceed $1 million.
The rooms of the summit observatory would need to be built as steel caissons
and supplied with a compressed air at sea level tension.
The practicability of this plan was demonstrated by the writer in September 1910.
at Chero de Pascar, Peru. A steel casin was carried up to an elevation exceeding 14,000 feet.
Patients suffering acutely with mountain sickness were placed inside this casin, and on restoring
the atmospheric pressure within it artificially, all unfavorable symptoms, headache, high
respiration, and accelerated pulse disappeared. There was every indication that if persons liable to this
uncomfortable complaint were brought up to this elevation, or indeed any attainable elevation,
under unreduced pressure, the symptoms of mountain sickness would be unknown.
Comfortable occupation of the highest mountain summits was thereby assured.
The working of astronomical instruments from within airtight compartments does not present
any insurmountable difficulties, either mechanical or physical. Since the time these experiments,
were made, the Guayaquil Kito Railway has been constructed over a saddle of Chimborazo
at an elevation of 12,000 feet, and only six miles of railway would need to be built from
this station to the point where the tunnel would enter the mountain. Only by the execution of some
such plan as this can astronomers hope to overcome the baleful effects of an ever-mobile
atmosphere and secure the advantages contemplated by Sir Isaac Newton in that tranquility of atmosphere
which he conceived as perpetually surrounding the summits of the highest mountains.
In Russell's theory of the progressive development of the stars, from the giant class to the dwarf,
an element of verification from observation is lacking because hitherto no certain method
of measuring the very minute angular diameters of the stars has been successfully applied.
The apparent surface brightness corresponding to each spectral type is pretty well known and by
dividing it into the total apparent brightness, we have the angular area subtended by the star quite
independent of the star's distance. This makes it easy to estimate the angular diameter
of a star. And Betelgoose is the one which has the greatest angular diameter of a star. And Betelgoose is the one which
has the greatest angular diameter of all whose distances we know, Antares is next in order of
angular diameter, 0.043 seconds. Aldebaran, 0.022 seconds, Arcturus 0.020, Pollux, 0.013,
and Sirius only 0.007 seconds. Can these things?
theoretical estimates be verified by observation. Clearly, it is of the utmost importance and the
exceedingly difficult inquiry has been undertaken with the 100-inch reflector on Mount Wilson,
employing the method of the interferometer developed by Mickelson and described later on.
An instrument undoubtedly capable of measuring much smaller angles than can be measured by any
other known method. Unquestionably, the interference of atmospheric
waves, or in other words, what astronomers call poor seeing, will ultimately set the limit to what
can be accomplished. But even if, says Eddington, we have to send special expeditions to the top
of one of the highest mountains in the world, the attack on this far-reaching problem must not
be allowed to languish. End of Chapter 22.
Chapter 23 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies. This
This is a Libravox recording. All Libravox recordings are in the public domain. For more information or to volunteer, please visit Libravox.org.
Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies by David Todd. The Program of a Great Observatory.
The Mount Wilson Observatory has now been in operation about 15 years. The novelty in construction of its instruments, the investigations undertaken with
them and the discoveries made, the interpretation of celestial phenomena by laboratory experiment,
and the recent addition to its equipment of a telescope 100 inches in diameter, surpassing all
others in power, directs a special attention to the extensive activities of this institution,
whose budget now exceeds a million dollars annually.
Results are only achieved by a carefully elaborated program, such as the following,
for which the reader is mainly indebted to Dr. Hale, the director of the observatory,
who gives a very clear idea of the trend of present-day research on the magnetic nature of the sun
and the structure and evolution of the sidereal universe.
The purpose of the observatory, as defined at its inception,
was to undertake a general study of stellar evolution,
laying a special emphasis upon the study of the sun,
considered as a typical star, physical researches on stars and nebulae, and the interpretation of
solar and stellar phenomena by laboratory experiments. Recognizing that the development of new
instruments and methods afforded the most promising means of progress, well-equipped machine shops
and optical shops were provided with this end in view. The original program of the observatory
has been much modified and extended by the independent and striking discovery by Campbell and
Capitaine of an important relationship between stellar speed and spectral type.
The demonstration by Hertzsprung and Russell of the existence of giant and dwarf stars.
The successful application of the 60-inch reflector by Van Manin
to the measurement of minute parallaxes of stars and nebulae,
the important developments of Shapley's investigation of globular star clusters,
the possibilities of research resulting from seers' studies in stellar photometry,
and the remarkable means of attack developed by atoms through the method of spectroscopic parallaxes.
By this method, the absolute magnitude, and hence the distance of a star,
is accurately determined from estimates of the relative intensities,
of certain lines in stellar spectra.
Attention was first directed toward lines of this character in 1906,
when it was inferred that the weakening of some lines in the spectra of sunspots
and the strengthening of others was the result of reduced temperature of the spot vapors.
On testing this hypothesis by laboratory experiments, it was fully verified.
Subsequently, atoms, who had thus become familiar with these lines and their variability,
studied them extensively in the spectra of other stars.
In this way was discovered the dependence of their relative intensities on the star's absolute magnitude,
so providing the powerful method of spectroscopic parallaxes.
This method, giving the absolute magnitude as well as the distance of every star,
excepting those of the earliest type, whose spectrum is photographed,
is no less important from the evolution,
than from the structural point of view.
Investigations in solar physics,
which formerly held chief place in the research program,
have developed along unexpected lines.
It could not be foreseen at the outset
that solar magnetic phenomenon might become a subject of inquiry,
demanding special instrumental facilities,
and throwing light on the complex question
of the nature of the sunspots
and other solar problems of long-standing.
It is obvious that these researchers, together with those on the solar rotation and the motions of the solar atmosphere developed by atoms in St. John, must be carried to their logical conclusion if they are to be utilized to the fullest in interpreting stellar and nebular phenomena.
The discovery of solar magnetism, like many other Mount Wilson results, was the direct outcome of a long series of instrumental developments.
The progressive improvement and advance in size of the tools of research was absolutely necessary.
Hale's first spectro-heliograph at Kenwood in 1890 was attached to a 12-inch refractor, and the solar image was but 2 inches in diameter.
It was soon found that a larger solar image was essential, and a spectrograph of much greater linear dispersion.
In fact, the spectrograph must be made the prime element in the combination, and the telescope so designed as to serve as a necessary auxiliary.
Accordingly, successive steps have led through spectrographs of 18 and 30 feet dimension to a vertical spectrograph 75 feet in focal length.
The telescope is the 150-feet tower telescope, giving a solar image of 16.5 inches in diameter.
Its spectrograph is massive in construction, and by extending deep into the Earth, it enjoys
the stability and constancy of temperature required for the most exacting work.
Another direct outgrowth of the work of Sunspot Spectra is a study of the spectra of red stars.
where the chemistry of these coolest regions of the sun is partially duplicated.
The combination of titanium and oxygen,
and the significant changes of line intensity already observed in both instances,
and also in the electric furnace at reduced temperatures,
give indication of what may be expected to result from an attack
on the spectra of the red stars with more powerful instrumental means,
which is now provided by the 100-inch telescope and its
large stellar spectrograph. Other elements in the design of the 100-inch hooker telescope have the
same general object in view. That of developing and applying in astronomical practice,
the effective research methods suggested by recent advances in physics. Fresh possibilities of
progress are constantly arising, and these are utilized as rapidly as circumstances permit.
The policy of undertaking the interpretations of celestial phenomena by laboratory experiments,
an important element in the initial organization of Mount Wilson, has certainly been justified
by its results. Indeed, the development of many of the chief solar investigations would have
been impossible without the aid of special laboratory studies, going hand in hand with the
astronomical observations. So indispensable are such researches,
and so great is the promise of their extension that the time has now come for advancing the laboratory work
from an accessory feature to full equality with the major factors in the work of the observatory.
Accordingly, a new instrument now under installation is an extremely powerful electromagnet
designed by Anderson for the extension of researchers on the Zeman effect and for other related investigations.
within the large and uniform field of this magnet,
which is built in the form of a solenoid,
a special electric furnace, designed for this purpose by King,
is used for the study of the inverse zeman effect
at various angles with the lines of force.
This will provide the means of interpreting certain remarkable anomalies
in the magnetic phenomena of sunspots.
The 100-inch telescope is now in regular use.
All the tests so far applied show that it greatly surpasses the 60-inch telescope in every class of work.
For many months, most of the observations and photographs have been made with the Casa-grained combination of mirrors,
giving an equivalent focal length of 134 feet and involving three reflections of light.
The 100-inch telescope is found to give nearly 2.8 times as much light as the 60-inch telescope,
and therefore extends the scope of the instrument to all the stars, an entire magnitude fainter.
This is a very important gain for research on the faint globular clusters,
as well as the small and faint spiral and planetary nebulae,
providing a much larger scale for these objects, and sufficient light at the same time.
Photographs of the moon and many other less critical tests have been made with very
satisfactory results. Those of the moon appear to be decidedly superior in definition to any
previously taken with other instruments. Another investigation is of great importance in the light of
recent advances in theoretical dynamics. Darwin, in his fundamental researches on the dynamics
of rotating masses, dealt with incompressible matter, which assumes the well-known pear-shaped figure,
and may ultimately separate into two bodies.
Roche, on the other hand, discussed the evolution of a highly compressible mass,
which finally acquires a lens-shaped form and ejects matter at its periphery.
Both of these are extreme cases.
Genes has recently dealt with intermediate cases, such as are actually encountered in stars and nebulae.
He finds that when the density is less than about one-fourth that
water, a lens-shaped figure will be produced with sharp edges, as depicted by Roche. Matter thrown
off at opposite points in the periphery, under the influence of small tidal forces from neighboring
masses, may take the form of two symmetric filaments, though it is not yet entirely clear how
these may attain the characteristic configuration of spiral nebulae. The preliminary results of Van Manen
indicate motion outward along the arms in harmony with the genes views.
Genes further discusses the evolution of the arms, which will break up into nuclei of the order of mass of the sun,
if they are sufficiently massive, but will diffuse a way if their gravitational attraction is small.
The mass of our solar system is apparently not great enough, according to genes,
to account for its formation in this way.
As is apparent, these investigations lead to conclusions
very different from those derived by Chamberlain and Moulton,
from the planetissimal hypothesis.
This is a critical study of spiral nebulae,
for which the 100-inch telescope is of all instruments in existence
the best suited.
The spectra of the spirals must be studied,
as well as the motions of the matter
composing the arms. Their parallaxes, too, must be ascertained. A photographic campaign,
including spiral nebulae of various types, will settle the question of internal motions.
The large scale of the spiral nebulae at the principal focus of the Hooker telescope,
and the experience gained in the measurement of nebular nuclei for parallax determination,
will help greatly in this research.
A multiple slit spectrograph, already applied at Mount Wilson, will be employed, not only on spiral nebulae, whose plane
is directed toward us, but also on those whose plane lies at an angle sufficient to permit both
components of motion to be measured by the two methods. In dealing with problems of structure
and motion in the galactic system, the 100-inch telescope offers special advantages because of its
vast light-gathering power. Studies of radial velocities of the stars have hitherto been
necessarily confined to the brighter stars, for the most part even to those visible to the naked eye.
While some of these are very distant, most of the stars whose radial velocities are known
belong to a very limited group, perhaps constituting a distinct cluster of which the sun is a member.
but in any event of insignificant proportions when contrasted with the galaxy.
Current spectrographic work with the 60-inch telescope includes stars of the 8th magnitude and some even fainter.
But while the 60-inch has enabled atoms to measure the distance of many remote stars by his new spectroscopic method,
and to double the known extent, so far as spectroscopic evidence is concerned, of the star
streams of Cap-Tane, a much greater advance into space is necessary to find out the
community of motion among the stars comprising the galactic system. The Hooker
telescope will enable us to determine accurate radial velocities to stars of the
11th magnitude, which doubtless truly represent the galaxy. In order to secure a
maximum return within a reasonable period of time, the stars in the selected areas of
captain will be given the preference because of the vast amount of work already done, relating to
their positions, proper motions, and visual and photographic magnitudes.
Such consideration as spectral type, the known directions of star streaming, and the position
of the chosen regions with reference to the plane of the galaxy, are given adequate weight,
and it is of fundamental importance that the method of spectroscopic parallaxes will permit
dwarf stars to be distinguished from stars that are in the giant class, but rendered faint by their
much greater distance. In addition to these problems, the stellar spectrograms will provide
rich material for study of the relationship between stellar mass and speed, and the nature of
giant stars and dwarf stars. Shappley's recent studies of globular clusters have indicated the significance
of these objects in both evolutionary and structural problems,
and the possibility of determining their parallaxes by a number of independent methods
is of prime importance, both in its bearing on the structure of the universe,
and because it permits a host of apparent magnitudes to be at once transformed into absolute
magnitudes. Here, the advantage of the Hooker telescope is twofold. At its 134-foot focus,
the increased scale of the crowded clusters makes it possible to select separate stars for spectrum photography,
which could not be done with the 60-inch where the images were commingled.
And the great gain in light is such that the spectra of stars to the 14th magnitude
have been photographed in less than an hour.
Faint globular clusters, then, will comprise a large part of the early program with a 100-inch telescope.
The faintest possible stars in them must be detected.
and their magnitudes and colors measured.
Spectral types must be determined.
And the radial velocities of individual stars and of clusters as a whole.
Spectroscopic evidence of possible axial rotation of globular clusters must be searched for.
And the method of spectroscopic parallaxes, as well as other methods,
must be applied to ascertaining the distances of these clusters.
The possibility of dealing with many problems relating to the distribution
and evolution of the faintest stars, depends on the establishment of photographic and photovisual
magnitude scales. Below the 12th magnitude, the only existing scale of standard visual or photovisual
magnitudes is the Mount Wilson sequence, already extended by Sears to magnitude 17.5 with the 60-inch
telescope. Extension of this scale to even fainter magnitudes, and its application to the
the faintest stars within its range is an important task for this great telescope, as it will
doubtless bring within range hundreds of millions of stars that are beyond the reach of the 60-inch.
The giants among them will form for us the outer boundary of the galactic system, while the dwarfs
will be of almost equal interest from the evolutionary standpoint.
The photometric program of the 100-inch, then, will deal with such
questions as the condensation of the fainter stars toward the galactic plane, the collar of the
most distant stars, and the final settlement of the long inquiry regarding the possible
absorption of light in space. Another research of exceptional promise will be undertaken,
which is of great importance in a general study of stellar evolution, and that is the
determination of the spectral energy curves of stars of various classes for the purpose of measuring
their surface temperatures. A very few of the nebulae are found to be variable, and their peculiarities
need investigation. Also, special problems of variable stars and temporary stars, and the spectra
of the components of close double stars which are beyond the power of all other instruments to photograph.
Such a program of research confase an excellent idea of many of the great problems that are
under investigation by astronomers today, and give some notion of the instrumental means requisite
in executing comprehensive plans of this character. It will not escape notice that the climax of
instrumental development attained at Mount Wilson has only been made possible by an unbroken
chain of progress, link by link, each antecedent link being necessary to the successful
forging of its following one. In very large part, and certainly in
indispensable to these instrumental advances, has the art of working in glass and metals
been the mainstay of research? As we review the history of astronomical progress,
from Galileo's time to our own, the consummate genius of the artisan and his deft handiwork
compel our admiration almost equally with the keen intelligence of the astronomer
who uses these powerful engines of his own devising to restive.
the secrets of nature from the heavens.
End of chapter 23.
Chapter 24 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Libravox recording.
All Libravox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit Libravox.org.
Astronomy, the science of the heavenly bodies by David Todd.
Our Solar System
Now let us go upward in imagination
Far, far beyond the tops of the highest mountains,
Beyond the Moon and Sun,
and outward in space until we reach a point
in the northern heavens millions and millions of miles away,
directly above and equally distant from all points in the ecliptic
or path in which our Earth travels yearly round the sun.
then we should have that sort of comprehensive view of the solar system,
which is necessary if we are to visualize as a whole the working of the vast machine
and the motions, sizes, and distances of all the bodies that comprise it.
Of such stupendous mechanism our earth is part.
Or in lieu of this, let us attempt to get in mind a picture of the solar system
by means of Sir William Herschel's apt illustration.
Choose any well-leveled field. On it place a globe 2 feet in diameter. This will represent the sun.
Mercury will be represented by a grain of mustard seed on the circumference of a circle 164 feet in diameter for its orbit.
Venus, a P on a circle of 284 feet in diameter. The Earth, also a P, on a circle of 430 feet.
Mars, a rather larger pinshead on a circle of 654 feet.
The asteroids, grains of sand in orbits of 1,000 to 1,200 feet.
Jupiter, a moderate-sized orange in a circle of nearly half a mile across.
Saturn, a small orange on a circle of four-fifths of a mile.
Uranus, a full-sized cherry or small plum upon the circumference of a starvation of a
circle more than a mile into half, and finally Neptune, a good-sized plum on a circle about two
miles and a half in diameter. To imitate the motions of the planets in the above-mentioned orbits,
Mercury must describe its own diameter in 41 seconds, Venus in 4 minutes 14 seconds, the Earth in 7
minutes, Mars in 4 minutes 48 seconds, Jupiter in 2 minutes 56 seconds, Saturn in 3 minutes 13 seconds,
Uranus in 2 minutes 16 seconds, and Neptune in 3 minutes 30 seconds.
Now, let us look earthward from our imaginary station near the North Pole of the ecliptic.
All these planetary bodies would be seen to be traveling eastward round the sun,
that is, in a counterclockwise direction, or contrary to the motions of the hands of a timepiece.
Their orbits or paths of motion are very nearly circular, and the sun is practically at the center of all of them, except Mercury and Mars,
a Venus and Neptune, almost at the absolute center.
The planes of all their orbits are very nearly the same as that of the ecliptic, or plane in which the Earth moves.
These and many other resemblances and characteristics suggest a uniformity of origin which comports with the idea of a family,
and so the whole is spoken of as the solar system, or the sun and his family of planets.
In addition to the nine bodies already specified, the solar system comprises a great variety of other and lesser bodies.
No less than 26 moons or satellites tributary to the planets, and traveling round them in various periods as the moon does round our Earth.
Then between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter are many thousands of asteroids, so-called, or minor planets.
About 1,000 of them have actually been discovered, and their paths accurately calculated.
And at all sorts of angles with the planetary orbits are the past.
has of hundreds of comets, delicate, filmy bodies of a wholly different constitution from the
planets, and which now and then blaze forth in the sky, their tails appearing much like
the beam of a searchlight, and compelling for the time the attention of everybody. Connected with
the comets, and doubtless, originally parts of them, are uncounted millions of millions of
meteors, which for the time become a part of the solar system.
Their minute masses being attracted to the planets upon which they fall,
those hitting the Earth being visible to us as familiar shooting stars.
We next follow the story of astronomy through the solar system,
beginning with the sun itself and proceeding outward through his family of planets,
now much more numerous and vastly more extensive,
than it was to the ancient world, or indeed to within a century and a half of our own day.
End of Chapter 24, read by Andrea Kotzer.
Chapter 25 of Astronomy
The Science of the Heavenly Bodies
This is a Librivox recording.
All Librivox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit Librivox.org.
Read by Prajacta.
Astronomy, the science of the heavenly bodies by David Todd.
The sun and observing it.
As Lord of Day, king of the heavens, mankind in the ancient world, adored the sun.
By their researches into the epoch of the Assyrians, Ittides, Phoenicians and other early people.
Now passed from earth, archaeologists have unearthed.
Many monuments that evidenced the veneration in which the early peoples who inhabited Egypt and Asia Minor many thousand years ago held the sun.
A striking example is found in the architecture of early Egyptian temples, on the lentils of which are carved representations of the winged globe or the winged solar disk, is a bare possibility.
that the winds of the globe were suggested by a type of solar corona as glimpsed by the ancients.
Little knew they about the distance and size of the sun,
but the effects of his light and heat upon all vegetable and animal life were obvious to them.
Doubtless, this formed the basis for their worship of the sun.
Occasionally huge spots must have been visible to the naked.
eye and the sun's corona was seen at rare intervals.
Tutarch and Philostratus describe it very much as we see it today.
How completely dependent mankind is upon the sun and its powerful radiations,
only the science of the present day can tell us.
By means of the sun's heat, the forests of early geologic ages were enabled
to rest carbon from the atmosphere and store it in forms later converted by nature's chemistry into peat and coal.
Through processes but imperfectly understood, the varying forms of vegetable life are empowered to conserve from air and soil,
nitrogen and other substances suitable for and essential to the life maintenance of animal creatures.
Breezes that bring rain and purify the air, the energy of water held under storage in stream and dam and fall,
trade winds facilitating commerce between the continents, oceanic currents, modifying coastal climates,
the violence of tornado, typhoon and water spout, together with other manifestations of natural forces.
all can be traced back to their origin in the tremendous heating power of the solar rays.
In everything material, the sun is our constant and bountiful benefactor.
If his light and heat were withdrawn, practically every form of human activity on this planet would come to an early end.
How far away is the sun?
What is the size of the sun?
These are questions that astronomers of the present day can answer with accuracy.
So closely do they know the sun's distance that it is employed as their yardstick of the sky
or unit of celestial measurement.
Many methods have been utilized in ascertaining the distance of the sun and the remarkable
agreement among them all is very extraordinary.
Some of them depend upon pure geometry and the basic measure which we make from the Earth is not the distance of the Sun directly, but we find out how far away Venus is during a transit of Venus, for example, or how far away Mars is, or some of the asteroids are at their closer oppositions.
Then it is possible to calculate how far away the sun is because one measurement of distance in the solar system affords us the scale on which the whole structure is built.
But perhaps the simplest method of getting the sun's distance is by the velocity of light 186,300 miles a second.
From eclipses of Jupiter's moons, we know that light takes 8 minutes 20 seconds to pass from sun to Earth,
so that the sun's distance is the simple product of the two, or 93 million miles.
Once this fundamental unit is established, we have a firm basis on which to build up our knowledge of the distances.
the sizes and motions of the heavenly bodies, especially those that comprise the solar system.
We can advance a certain the size of the sun, which we do by measuring the angle which it feels,
that is, the sun's apparent diameter.
Finding this to be something over a half a degree in arc, the processes of elementary trigonometry tell us
that the sun's globe is 865,000 miles in diameter.
For nearly a century, this has been accurately measured with the greatest care
and diameters taken in every direction are found to be equal and invariably the same.
So, we conclude that the sun is a perfect sphere and so far as our instruments can inform us,
its actual diameter is not subject to appreciable change.
The vastness of the sun's volume commands our attention,
as his diameter is 110 times that of the earth,
his mere size or volume is 110 into 110 into 110 or 1,300,000 times that of the earth,
because the volumes of spheres are in proportion as the cube of their diameters.
If the materials that compose the sun were as heavy as those that make up the earth,
it would take 1,300,000 earths to weigh as much as the sun does.
But by a method which we need not detail here,
the sun's actual weight or mass is found to be only only.
only 300,000, more nearly 3,300,000 times greater than the Earth's.
So, we must infer that bulk for bulk, the component materials of the sun are about
one-fourth lighter than those of the Earth, that is, about one and one-half times as dense as water.
To look at this in another way, it is known that a body falling free,
clearly toward the Earth from outer space would acquire a speed of 7 miles a second, whereas if it were to fall toward the Sun instead, the velocity would be 383 miles a second on reaching its surface.
If all the other bodies of the solar system, that is the Earth and Moon, all the planets and their satellites, the comets and all, were to be,
to be fused together in a single globe, it would weigh only one 750th as much as the sun does.
At the surface, however, the disproportion of gravity is not so great because of the sun's vast
size. It is only about 28 times greater on the sun than on the earth, and instead of a body
falling 16 feet the first second as here, it would fall 444 feet there. Pendulums of clocks on the sun
would swing five times for every tick here and an athlete's running a high jump would be scaled down to
3 inches. Let us next inquire into the amount of sun's light and heat and the enormously high
temperature of a body whose heat is so intense even at the vast distance at which we are from it.
The intensity of its brightness is such that we have no artificial source of light that we can
readily compare it with. In the sky, the next object in brightness is the full moon,
but that gives less than the half-millionth part as much as much as.
light as the sun. The standard candle used in physics gives so little light in comparison
that we have to use an enormous number to express the quantity of light that the sun gives.
A spom candle burning 120 grains hourly is the standard and if we compare this with the sun
when overhead and allow for the light absorbed by the atmosphere, we get the number
1,575 with 24 ciphers following it to express the candle power of the sun's light.
If we interpose the intense calcium light or an electric arc light between the eye and the sun,
those artificial sources will look like black spots on the disk.
Indeed, the sun is nearly four times brighter than the crater or brightest part of the electric arc.
The late Professor Langley at a steelworks in Pennsylvania once compared direct sunlight with the dazzling stream of molten metal from the Bessemer converter, but bright as it,
was, sunlight was found to be 5,000 times brighter. Equally enormous is the heat of the sun. Our
intensest sources of artificial heat do not exceed 4,000 degrees Fahrenheit, but the temperature
at the sun's surface is probably not less than 16,000 degrees Fahrenheit. One square
meter of heat surface radiates enough heat to generate 100,000 horsepower continuously. At our vast
distance of 93 million miles, the sun's heat received by the earth is still powerful
enough to melt annually a layer of ice on the earth more than 100 feet in thickness. If the
solar heat that strikes the deck of a tropical steamship could be fully utilized in propelling it,
the speed would reach at least 10 knots. Many attempts have been made in tropical and subtropical
climates to utilize the sun's heat directly for power. And Erickson in Sweden, Moucott in France
and Schumann in Egypt have built successful and efficient solar in Germany.
Necessary intermission of their power at night as well as on cloudy days will preclude their industrial introduction until present fuels have advanced very greatly in cost.
All regions of the sun's disk radiate heat uniformly.
Oan atmosphere absorbs so much that we should receive 1.7 times more heat if it was.
removed. So far as is known, solar light and heat are radiated equally in all directions,
so that only a very minute fraction of the total amount ever reaches the Earth. It is one
twenty-two hundred millionth part of the whole. Indeed, all the planets and other bodies
of the solar system together receive only one, one hundred million-th million-th,
part, the vast remainder is, so far as we know, effectively wasted. It is transformed,
but what becomes of it and whether it ever reappears in any other form, we cannot see.
How is this inconceivably vast output of energy maintained practically invariable throughout the
centuries? Many theories have been advanced.
but only one has received nearly universal assent,
that of secular contraction of the sun's huge mass upon itself.
Shrinkage means evolution of heat,
and it is found by calculation that if the sun were to contract its diameter
by shrinking only 250 feet per year,
the entire output of solar heat might thus be accounted for.
So distant is the sun and so slow this rate of contraction that centuries must elapse before we could verify the theory by actual measurements.
Meanwhile, the progress of physical research on the structure and elemental properties of matter has brought to light the existence of highly active internal forces which are doubtless,
intimately concerned in the enormous output of radiant energy, though the mechanism of its maintenance
is as yet known only in part.
I have bought from many years' observations of the solar constant at Washington on Mount Wilson
and in Algeria finds certain evidence of fluctuation in the solar heat received by the Earth.
It cannot be a local phenomenon due to the disturbances in our atmosphere,
but must originate in causes entirely extraneous to the earth.
Interposition of meteoric dust might conceivably account for it,
but there is sufficient evidence to show that the changes must be attributed to the sun itself.
The sun then is a variable star and it has not only a period connected with the periodicity of the sun spots,
but also an irregular non-periodic variation during a cycle of a week or 10 days, though sometimes longer and occasioning irregular fluctuations of 2 to 10% of the total radiation.
Radiation is found to increase with the spottedness.
Attempts have been made on the basis of the contraction theory to find out the past history of the sun and to predict its future.
Probably 20 to 50 millions of years in the past represents the life of the sun much as it is at present and if solar radiation in the future is maintained substantially as now, the sun will have shrunk to the sun.
to one half its present diameter in the next 5 million years.
So far then as heat and light from the sun are concerned,
the sun may continue to support life on the earth
not to exceed 10 million years in the future.
But the sun's own existence independently of the orbs of the system
dependent upon it
might continue for indefinite millions of eons before it would ever become a cold dead globe.
Indeed, in the present state of science, we cannot be sure that it is destined to reach that condition within calculable time.
A few words on observing the sun, an object much neglected by amateurs.
On account of the intense light, a very slight degree of optical power is sufficient.
Indeed, a piece of window glass smoked in a candle flame with uniform graduation from
end to end will be found worth while in a beginner's daily observation of the sun.
The glass should be smoked densely enough at one end so that the sunlight as seen through it
will not dazzle the eye on the clearest dates. At the other end of the glass, the degree of
smoke film should not be quite so dense so that the sun can be examined on hazy, foggy or
partly cloudy dates. An occasional naked eye spot will reward the patient observer.
If a small spy glass, opera glass or filled glass is at hand, excellent view
of the sun may be had by mounting the glass so that it can be held steadily pointed on the sun and then viewing the disc by projection on a white card or sheet of paper.
Care must be taken to get a good focus on the projected image and then the faculty or whitish spots or moteling nearer the sun's age will usually be well seen.
By moving the card farther away from the eye piece, a larger disc may be obtained,
in effect a higher degree of magnification.
But care must be used not to increase it too much.
Keep direct sunlight outside the tube from falling on the card where the image is being examined.
This is conveniently done by cutting a large hole, the size of the brass,
cell of the object glass through a sheet of corrugated straw board and slipping this on over the
cell. In this way the spots on the sun can be examined with ease and safety to the eye.
For large instruments a special type of eye piece is provided known as helioscope which
disposes of the intense heat rays that are harmful to the eye. Frequent examining,
of the IPs should be made and the IPs cooled if necessary.
That part of the sun's surface under observation is known as the photosphere, that is, the part
which radiates light. If the atmosphere admits the use of high magnifying powers,
the structure of the photosphere will be found more and more interesting, the higher the power
employed. It is an irregularly motored surface showing a species of rice grain structure under fairly
high magnification. These grains are grouped irregularly and are about 500 miles across. Under fine
conditions of vision, they may be subdivided into granules. The faecule or white spots are sometimes
elevations above the general solar level, they have occasionally been seen projecting outside the limb
or age of the disc. End of Chapter 26 of Astronomy. The Science of the Heavenly
Bodies This is a Librivox recording. All Librivox recordings are in the public domain. For more
information or to volunteer, please visit Librivox.org.
Read by Prajcata. Astronomy. The Science of the Heavenly Bodies by David Todd.
Sun spots and prominences
Dark spots of a deep bluish black will often be seen on the photosphere of the sun.
Sometimes single, though generally in groups, the larger ones,
will have a dark center called the umbra, surrounded by the very irregular panumbra,
which is darker near its outer age and much brighter, apparently, on its inner age,
where it joins on the umbrella.
The panumbra often shows a species of thatchwork structure and systematic sketches of sunspots
by observers skilled in drawing are greatly to be desired because photography has not yet reached
the stage where it is possible to compete with visual observation in the matter of fine detail.
The spots themselves nearly always appear like depressions in the photosphere and on repeated occasions
they have been seen as actual notches when on the age of the sun.
Many spots, however, are not depressions.
Some appear to be actual elevations with the umbra perhaps a central depression,
like the crater in the general elevation of a volcano.
Spots are sometimes of enormous size.
The largest on record was seen in 18.
It was nearly 150,000 miles in breadth and covered a considerable proportion of the whole visible hemisphere of the sun.
A spot must be nearly 30,000 miles across in order to be seen with the naked eye.
In their beginning, development and end, each spot or group of spots appears to be a law into itself.
Sometimes in a few hours they will form, though generally it is a question of days and even weeks.
Very soon after their formation is complete, tongue-like encroachments of the penumbra appear to force their way across the umbra and this splitting up of the central spot usually goes on quite rapidly.
Sun spots in violent disturbance are rarely observed. As the sun turns round on his axis, the spots will often be carried across the disc from the centre to the age when they become very much foreshortened. The sun's period of rotation is 28 days so that if a spot lasts more than two weeks without breaking up, it may reappear on the east.
eastern limb of the sun after having disappeared at the western age.
2 or 3 months is an average duration for a spot.
The longest on record lasted through 18 months in 1840-41.
The position of the sun's axis is well known.
Its equator being tilted about 7 degrees to the ecliptic
and the spots are distributed in zones north and south of the equator, extending as far as 30 degrees of solar latitude.
In very high latitudes, spots are never seen. They are most abundant in about latitude 15 degrees both north and south and rather more numerous in the northern than in the southern hemisphere of the sun.
Recent research at Mount Wilson makes the sun a great magnet and its magnetic axis is inclined at an angle of 6 degrees to the axis of rotation around which it revolves in 32 days.
There is a most interesting periodicity of the spots on the sun for months will sometimes elapse with spots in abundance and visible every day while at other periods.
days and even weeks will elapse without a single spot being seen.
There is a well-recognized period of 11th and 1-10th years,
the reason underlying which is not, however, known.
After passing through the minimum of spottedness,
they begin to break out again first in latitudes of 25 degrees to 30 degrees,
rather suddenly and on both sides of the equator, and they move toward the equator as their number and individual size decrees.
The last observed epoch of maximum spot activity on the sun was passed in 1917.
Many attempts have been made to ascertain the cause of the periodicity of sun spots, but the real cause is not yet known.
If the spots are eruptional in character, the forces held in check during seasons of few spots may well break out in period.
The brighter streaks and motelings known as faculty are probably elevations above the general photosphere and seem to be crusts of luminous matter, often incandescent calcium protruding through from the lower levels.
Generally, the Faculi are numerous around the dark spots and absorption of the sun's light by his own atmosphere affords a darker background for them, with better visibility nearer the rim of the solar disk.
The spectro-heliograph reveals vast zones of faculi otherwise invisible related to the sunspot zones proper on both sides of the equator.
In some intimate way, the magnetism of sun and earth are so related that outbreaks of solar spots are accompanied with disturbances of electrical and other instruments on the earth.
Also, the aurora borealis is seen with greater frequency during periods when many spots are visible.
Within very recent years, the discovery of a magnetic field in sunspots has been made by Halley, with powerful instruments of his own design.
Sunspots had never been investigated before with adequate instrumental means.
He recognized the necessity of having a spectroscope that would record the widened lines of sunspot spectra
and strenant and weakened lines on a large scale.
Certain changes in relative intensity were traced to a reduced temperature of the spot vapors
by comparison with photographs of the spectrum of iron and other metallic vapors in an electric arc at different temperatures.
Here the work of the laboratory was essential.
Sunspots were thus found to be regions of reduced temperature in the solar atmosphere.
Chemical unions were thus possible and thousands of faint lines in spot spectra.
were measured and identified as bandlines due to chemical compounds.
Thus, the chemical changes at work in sunspot vapors were recognized.
Then followed the highly significant investigations of solar vertices and magnetic fields.
Improvements in photographic methods had revealed immense vortices surrounding sunspots
in the higher part of the hydrogen atmosphere.
And this led to the hypothesis that a sun spot is a solar storm,
resembling a terrestrial tornado and in which the hot vapors whirling at high velocity
are cooled by expansion.
This would account for the observed intensity changes of the spectrum lines
and the presence of chemical compounds.
The vortex hypothesis suggested an explanation of the widening of many spotlines and the doubling or trebling of some of them.
As it is known that electrons are emitted by hot bodies, they must be present in the vast numbers in the sun.
And positive or negative electrons, if caught and whirled in a vortex, would produce a magnetic field.
Zeman in 1896 had discovered that the lines in the spectrum of a luminous vapor in a magnetic field are widened,
or even split into several components if the field is strong enough.
Characteristic effects of polarization appear also.
The new apparatus of the observatory in conjunction with experiments in the laboratory in the laboratory,
immediately provided evidence that proved the existence of magnetic fields in sun spots and stendon the view that the spots are caused by electric vortices.
Extended investigations have led Halley to the conclusion that the sun itself is a magnet, with its poles situated at or near the poles of rotation.
In this respect, the sun resembles the earth, which has long been known to be a magnet.
The sun's axial rotation permits investigation of the magnetic phenomena of all parts of its surface,
so that ultimately the exact position of the sun's magnetic poles and the intensity of the field
at different levels in the solar atmosphere will be ascertained.
Schuster is of the opinion that not only the sun and earth, but every star and perhaps every rotating body, becomes a magnet by virtue of its rotation.
Halley is confident that the 100-inch reflector will permit the test for magnetism to be applied to a few of the stars.
The sun can be observed at Mount Wilson on at least 9 tenths of all the days in the year
and a daily record of the polarities of all spots with the 150 foot tower telescope is a part of the routine.
A method has been devised for classifying sun spots on the basis of their magnetic properties
and more than a thousand spots have already been so classified.
About 60% of all sun spots are found to be binary groups,
the single or multiple members of which are of opposite magnetic polarity.
Unipolar spots are very seldom observed without some indication of the characteristics of bipolar groups.
These are usually exhibited in the form of flocule following the spot.
The bipolar spot seems to be the dominant type and the unipolar type a variant of it.
Although devised for quite another purpose, that of photographing the hydrogen prominences
on the limb of the sun, the spectro-haliograph has contributed very effectively to many departments
of solar research. The prominences are dull reddish cloudlets that were first seen during
total eclipses of the sun. Probably Vassinous, a Swedish astronomer during the total eclipse
of 1733, made the earliest record of them as pinkish clouds quite detached from the age of the moon
and in that day when it had not yet been proved that the moon was without atmosphere,
he naturally thought they belonged to the moon, not the sun.
Undoubtedly, Ulloa, a Spanish admiral, also saw the prominences in observing the total eclipse
of 1778, but they seemed to have attracted little attention till 1842 when a
Very important total eclipse was central throughout Europe and observed with great care by many of the eminent astronomers of all countries.
So different did the prominences appear to different eyes and so many were the theories as to what they were that no general consensus of opinion was reached.
and some thought them no part of either sun or moon but a mere mirage or optical illusion.
But at the return of the eclipse in 1860, photography was employed so as to demonstrate beyond a shadow of doubt the real existence and true solar character of the prominences.
By the slow progress of the moon across the sun and the prominences on the age,
a unique series of photographs by De La Rue showed the moon's age gradually cutting off the prominences
piecemeal on one side of the sun and equally gradually uncovering them on the opposite side.
The prominences then were known to be real phenomena of the sun.
Some of them discontentedly floating in his atmosphere as if clouds.
Their forms did not vary rapidly.
They were very abundant and their light was so rich in rays of great photographic intensity
that many were caught on the plate which the eye fell to see.
They appeared at every part of the sun's limb and their height above it indicated that
they must be many thousand miles in actual dimension. What they were, however, remained an
entire mystery and no one even thought it possible to find out what their chemical constitution
might be or to measure the speed with which they moved. A few years later came the Great
Indian Eclipse August 28, 1868. At that date, the long time, the long time. The long time,
longest total eclipse ever observed.
Jansin of France and many others went out to India to witness it.
Fortunately, the prominences were very brilliant and this led Jensin to believe it would be
possible for him to see them the day after the eclipse was over.
By modifying the adjustment of his apparatus, suitably and changing its results,
relation to the sun's age, he found that hydrogen is the main constituent in the light of the
prominences. In addition to this, he was able to trace out the shapes of the prominences
and even major their dimensions. His station in India was at Guntur many weeks by post from home
so that his account of this important discovery reached the Paris Academy of Sciences
for communication with another from the late Sir Norman Lockyer of England,
announcing a like discovery wholly independently.
The principle is simply this and admirably stated by Young.
Under ordinary circumstances, the prominences are invisible,
for the same reason as the stars in the daytime.
They are hidden by the intense light reflected from the part of the,
particles of our own atmosphere near the sun's place in the sky. And if we could only sufficiently
weaken this aerial illumination without at the same time awakening their light, the end would
begin. And the spectroscope accomplishes this very thing. Since the air light is reflected
sunshine, it of course presents the same spectrum at sunlight, a continuous band of color
crossed by dark lines. Now, this sort of spectrum is greatly weakened by every increase of
dispersive power because the light is sprayed out into a longer ribbon and made to cover a more
extended area. On the other hand, a spectrum of bright lines undergoes, no more. The other hand, a spectrum of bright
lines undergoes no such awakening by an increase in the dispersive power of the spectroscopes.
The bright lines are only more widely separated, not in the least diffused or shown of their brightness.
Stimulineous announcement of this great discovery by astronomers of different nations
working in widely separate regions of the earth led to the striking of a gold medal.
by the French government in honor of both astronomers and bearing their united effigies.
Ever since the famous Indian eclipse of 1868, it has not been necessary to wait for a total eclipse
in order to observe the solar prominences. But every observer provided with suitable
apparatus has been able to observe them in full sunlight whenever desired,
and the charting of them is part of the daily routine at several observatories in different parts of the world.
So vast has been the accumulation of data about them that we know their numbers to fluctuate with the spots on the sun
and their distribution over the sun's surface resembles in a way that of the spots.
While the spots and protuberances are most numerous around solar latitude 20 degrees both north and south,
the prominences do not disappear above latitude 35 to 40 degrees as the spots do.
But from latitude 60 degrees, they increase in number to about 75 degrees and are occasionally observed even at the sun's poles.
Faculi and prominences are more closely related than the sunspots and prominences.
There are wide variations in both magnitude and type of the prominences.
Heights above the sun's limp of a few thousand miles are very common and they rarely
reach elevations as great as 100,000 miles, though a very occasional one reaches even greater heights.
Classification of the prominences divides them into two broad types, the quescent and the eruptive.
The former are for the most part hydrogen and the latter metallic.
The quescent prominences resemble closely the status and cyrus type of terrestrial clouds
and are frequently of enormous extent along the sun's age.
They are relatively long-lived, persisting sometimes for days without much change.
The eruptive prominences are more brilliant, changing their form and brightness rapidly.
Often they appear as brilliant spikes or jets, reaching altitudes that average about 25,000 miles.
Rarely see near the sun's poles, they are much more numerous nearer the suns,
spots. Speed of motion of their filaments sometimes exceeds 100 miles a second and the changing
variety of shapes of the eruptive prominences is most interesting. Oftentimes they change so rapidly
that only photography can do them justice. Prominence photography began with young a half
century ago, who obtained the first successful impression on a microscope slide with a sensitized
film of collodian as was necessary in the earlier wet plate process of photography, which required
exposures so long that little progress was effected for about 20 years. Then it was taken up by
Deslandres of Paris and Halle of Chicago independently.
both of whom succeeded in devising a complex type of apparatus known as spectro heliograph by which all the prominences surrounding the entire limb of the sun can be photographed at any time by light of a single wavelength together with the disk of the sun on the same negative.
The prominences appear to be intimately connected with a gaseous envelope surrounding the solar photosphere in which sodium and magnesium are present as well as hydrogen.
The depth of the chromosphere is usually between 5,000 and 10,000 miles and its existence was first made out during the total solar eclipse of 1605 and 1750,000.
when it appeared as an irregular rose-tinted fringe, though not at the time recognized as belonging to the sun.
The constitution of the sun and its envelopes are still under discussion and no complete theory of the sun has yet been advanced which commands the widest acceptance.
Of the interior of the sun, we can only surmise that it is composed of gases.
which, because of intense heat and compression, are in a state unfamiliar on earth and impossible
to reproduce in our laboratory needs. Their consistency may be that of melted peach
or tar. Surrounding the main body of the sun are a series of layers, shells or atmospheres.
Outside of all and very irregular in structure, indeed probably not a solar atmosphere at all, is the solar corona, parts of which behave much as if it were an atmosphere.
But it appears to be bound up in some way with the sun's radiation.
It has streamers that vary with the sun's spot period and its constitution and function are very imperfect.
known because it has never been seen or photographed except at rare intervals on occasion of total
eclipses of the sun. Beneath the corona we meet the projecting prominences to which parts of the
corona are certainly related and beneath them the first true layer or atmosphere of the sun
known as the chromosphere. Its average depth being about 100th part of the sun's diameter.
Beneath the chromosphere is the layer of the sun from which emanates of light by which we see it
called the photosphere. It appears to be composed of filaments due to the condensation of metallic
vapors and it is the outer extremities of these filaments which are seen as.
as the granular structure everywhere covering the disc of the sun.
Their light shines through the chromosphere and the spots are ruptures in this envelope.
Between photosphere and chromosphere is a very thin envelope, probably not over 700 miles in thickness, called the reversing layer.
It is this relatively thin shell that is responsible for the absorption which produces
the dark lines in the spectrum of the sun. Under normal conditions, the filaments of the
photosphere are radial, that is vertical on the sun. But whenever eruptions take place,
as during the occurrence of spots, the adjacent filaments are violently swept out of their normal
vertical lines and these displaced columns then form what we view as a little vertical lines. And these displaced columns
then form what we view as the spots penumbra.
From the outer surface of the sun's chromosphere rise in the eruptive columns, vapors of hydrogen
and the various metals of which the sun is composed.
These and the spots would naturally occur in periods just as we see them.
We have said that the sun is composed of a mass of highly heated,
or incandescent vapors or gases, whose compression on account of gravity must render their
physical condition quite different from any gaseous forms known on the earth or which we can reproduce
here, as the result of more than half a century of studious observation of the sun and
mapping of its spectrum in every part and diligent comparison.
with the spectra of all known chemical elements on the earth, we find that the sun contains
no elements not already found here, but that a great preponderance of elements known to earth
are found in the sun. The intensity of their spectral lines is one prominent indication of the
presence of elements in the sun and the number of coincidences of spectral lines.
is another. Iron, nickel, calcium, manganese, sodium, cobalt and carbon are among the elements
most strongly identified. A few of the rarer terrestrial elements are of doubtful existence
in the sun and a very few as gold, bismuth, antimony and sulphur are not found there
and the existence of oxygen in the sun is regarded by some experts as doubtful.
But if the whole earth were vaporized by heat, probably its spectrum would resemble that of the sun very closely.
What are the effects of the sun and the sun spots in particular on our weather?
Is the influence of their periodicity potent or negligible?
If we investigate conditions pertaining to terrestrial magnetism as fluctuations of the magnetic needle and the frequency of aurorae, there is no occasion for doubt of the sun's direct influence, although we are not able to see just how that influence becomes potent.
If, however, we look into questions of temperature, barometric pressure, rainfall, cyclones, crops,
and consequent financial conditions, we find fully as much evidence against solar influence
as for it. The slight variations of the sun's light and heat due to the presence or absence
of sunspots can scarcely be sensible and much longer periods of closer observation are necessary
before such questions can be finally decided. The slighter such influences are if they actually
exist and the more veiled they are by other influences more or less powerful, the more
difficult it is to discover their effects with certainty. The importance of solar radiation
in the prediction of terrestrial weather has long been recognized, but until very recently,
no practical application has been made. The Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory at Washington
under the direction of Dr. Abbott has for many years carried on at a number of stations a series,
of determinations of the constant of solar radiation by the spectro-bolometric method originated
by Langley. A new station in Kalama, Chile has recently been inaugurated at which the solar
constant is worked out each day and telegraphed to the Argentine weather service where
it is employed in forecasting for the day. Abbot's new method of solar constant determination
is based on the fact that atmospheric transparency varies oppositely to the variations of brightness
of the sky. Increase of haziness presents more reflecting surface to scatter the solar rays
indirectly to the earth. Of course, it presents also additional surface to all. It also additional surface to
obstruct the direct rays from the sun. By measuring the brightness of the sky near the sun,
it becomes possible to infer the coefficients of atmospheric transmission at all wavelengths.
The direct observations and the complete deduction of the solar constant for the day can all
be completed within two or three hours. Clayton of Bunoz science has now employed these results
in the Argentine weather predictions for two years and the introduction of this new element
in forecasting has brought about a pronounced gain in the value of the predictions.
Its adoption by the weather bureaus of other nations will doubtless come in due time
and the new method take a firmly established rank in practical meteorology.
Abbot's observations many years ago first called attention to the variability of the solar
constant through a range of several percent both from year to year and in irregular short periods
of weeks or even days.
Abott considers this the more likely explanation than that atmospheric changes should
take place simultaneously all over the earth.
The sun is but a star. The stars that are irregularly variable in light and heat are numerous
and the sun itself appears to be one of these. Especially important to the agricultural
and vineyard interests of Argentina is the question of precipitation and Clayton finds this
very dependent on solar radiation. At epochs of practically stationed,
solar intensity, there is little or no precipitation, but quite generally he finds that
great decrease of solar radiation is followed in from three to five days by heavy
precipitation. Direct temperature effects are also traced in Buenos Aires and other South American
cities lagging from two to three days behind observed solar fluctuations. The station at
Kalama yields about 250 determinations of the solar constant each year and the Mount
Wilson station about half that number. They are the only stations of this character
at present in existence and others should be established in widely separated and cloudless
regions as Egypt, Southern California and Australia. Uniformity in the methods of observing
would be highly desirable and the Smithsonian Institution has perfected the details of common control of such stations
which it is expected may be established at an early day.
End of Chapter 26
Chapter 27 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Librevox recording.
All Librevox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit Librevox.org, read by Pieternater.
Astronomy, the science of the heavenly bodies by David Todd, the inner planets.
Vulcan
About the middle of the last century, Le Verre, a great French astronomer, having added
the planet Neptune beyond the outside confines of the solar system, saw the evidence of a lesser planet,
traveling round the sun within the orbit of Mercury.
For many years, close watch was kept on the sun in the hope of discovering such a body in the act of passing across the disk, or in transit, as it is technically termed.
Lescarboe, a French physician, announced that he had actually seen such a planet, Volcan, it was called, passing over the sun in 1859.
Total eclipses of the sun would afford the best opportunity for seeing such a body, and on several such occasions astronomers thought they had found it,
but the signal advantages of photography have been applied so often to this search, and always unsuccessfully, that the existence of Vulcan, or the intramercurial planet, is now regarded as mythical.
Mercury
This planet is an elusive body that very few, even astronomers, have ever seen.
It is not very bright, has a rapid motion, and never retreats far from the sun, so that it was a puzzle to the ancients who saw it, sometimes in the twilight after sunset,
and again in the twilight of dawn.
When following the sun down in the west,
in March or April,
Mercury is likely to be best seen,
twinkling rather violently,
and nearly as bright as a star of the first magnitude.
Very little is to be seen on the minute disk of this planet,
except that it goes through all the phases of the moon,
crescent, gibus, full, gibus, crescent.
Whether Mercury turns round on its axis or not
cannot be said to be known,
because the markings that are suspected on its surface are too indefinite to permit the exact observation.
More than likely the planet presents always the same sight or face to the sun,
so that it turns round on its axis once while travelling once around the sun in its orbit.
Mercury's day and year would therefore be equal in length,
nor have we much evidence on the question of an atmosphere a surrounding Mercury.
Probably it is very thin, if indeed there is any at all.
Mercury comes directly between us and the Sun, crossing in transit, the edge of the planet,
as projected against the Sun, is very sharply defined, and this would indicate an absence of
atmosphere on Mercury. Transits of Mercury can occur in May and November only. There was one
on November 7, 1914, and there will be one on May 7, 1924. The latter will be nearly eight hours
in length, which is almost the limit.
Mercury's distance from the sun averages 36 million miles, the diameter of the planet is 3,000 miles,
and his orbital speed is 30 miles per second, the swiftest of all the planets.
No moon of Mercury is known to exist, although many times diligently searched for, especially during
transits of the planet.
Venus
Brightest of all the planets, and the most beautiful of all is Venus.
Its path is next outside.
the orbit of Mercury, but within that of the Earth, so that it partakes of all the phases of the
moon. Like Mercury, it sometimes passes exactly between us and the sun, a rare phenomenon
which is known as a transit of Venus. Being without telescopes, the ancients knew nothing
about these occurrences, but they were puzzled for centuries over the appearance of the planet
in the west after sunset, when they call it Hesperus, and in early dawn in the east when they
gave it the name phosphorus. Venus is known to be girdled with an atmosphere denser than hours,
and it seems to be always filled with dense clouds. It is the reflection of sunlight from this
perpetually cloudy exterior which gives Venus her singular radiance. So brilliant is she,
that even full daylight is not strong enough to overpower her rays, and she may often be seen
glistening in the clear blue daytime sky, if one knows pretty nearly, in what direction to look for
her. Venus is 67 million miles from the sun, and as our own distance is 93 million miles,
this planet can come within 26 million miles of the Earth. It is therefore at times our nearest
known neighbor in space, excepting only the moon and Eros, one of the erratic little planets
that travel round the sun between Mars and Jupiter. Also, possible.
a comet might come much nearer. Astronomers always take advantage of this nearness of Venus
to us if a transit across the Sun takes place, because it affords an excellent method of finding out
what the distance of the Sun is from the Earth. A pair of these transits happens about once a century.
There were transits in 1874 and 1882, and the next pair occur in 2004 and 2012.
In actual size, Venus is almost as large a planet as our own, being,
being 7,700 miles in diameter, as compared with 7,920 for the Earth.
Her velocity in her orbit is 22 miles per second, and she travels all the way round the sun
in 7 and 1 half months, or 225 days. Venus, from her striking brilliancy, always
leads the novice to expect to see great things on applying the telescope. But aside from
a brilliant disc, now a slender crescent, now half-full like a moon at quarter, and
Again, Gibus, as the moon is, between quarter and full, the telescope reveals but little.
There is pretty good evidence that the markings thought to have been seen on the planet's surface
are illusory, and so it is wholly uncertain in what direction the planet axis lies.
Also, there is great uncertainty about the length of the day on Venus, or the period of
turning round on its axis.
Probably it is the same in length as the planet's year.
Once, when Venus passed very close to the sun, just barely escaping and, and the moon,
transit, Lyman of Yale University caught sight of it by hiding the sun behind the tall building
or church spire. The dark side of Venus was turned toward us and he could not, of course, see that,
but the planet was clearly there, completely encircled by a narrow delicate luminous ring,
which was due to sunlight shining through the atmosphere that surrounds the planet. Similar ring
effects were seen by observers of the transits of Venus in 1874 and 1882, and from all
all their observations it is concluded that venus has an atmosphere probably at least twice as dense and extensive as that which encircles the earth spurious satellites of venus are many but no real moon is known to attend this planet
and of chapter twenty seven chapter twenty eight of astronomy the science of the heavenly bodies this is a librivox recording all librivox recordings are in the public domain for more information or
to volunteer, please visit Librebox.org.
Read by Piotr Natter.
Astronomy, the science of the heavenly bodies, by David Todd.
The moon and her surface.
As the sun has always reigned as king of day, so is the moon queen of night.
Observation of her phases, now waxing, now waning, with her stately motion always eastward
among the stars, began with the earliest ages.
Often when near the fool, she must have been seen herself a clear,
and much more rarely the occurrence of total eclipses of the sun are certain to have suggested the moon's intervention between earth and sun, shutting off the sunlight completely, because these eclipses never took place except when the moon was in the same part of the sky with the sun.
If we watch the nightly march of the moon, we shall find that she travels over her own breadth in about an hour's time.
By using a telescope on the stars just eastward or to the left of her, she will now and then be seen
to pass between us and a star, on very rare occasion a planet, extinguishing its light with
great suddenness, the most nearly instantaneous of all phenomena in nature.
Draw a line connecting the cusps or horns of the lunar crescent, and then align eastward at right
angles to this, and it will show the direction of the moon's own motion in its orbit round
the earth quite accurately. As the phase advances, note the inside edge of the advancing crescent,
this will be quite rough and jagged compared to the outside edge which is the moon's real contour and relatively very smooth the position of the inside curve will change from night to night and it marks the line of sunrise on the moon during the fortnight elapsing between new moon and full
while from full through last quarter and back to new moon this advancing line marks the region of sunset on the moon the general shape of this line is never a circle but always elliptical
and astronomers call it the terminator all along the terminator sunlight strikes the lunar surface at a small angle whether near sunrise or sunset so that owing to the mountains and other high masses of the moon's surface the terminator is always a more or less jagged and irregular line
onward from new moon toward full the horns of the crescent are always turned upward or eastward when the general line of the terminator becomes a straight line from two
Cusp to Casp, the moon is said to have reached first quarter or quadrature. Onward toward
full, the terminator will be seen to bend the other way, and in about a week's time it will
have merged itself with the moon's limb. The moon is then said to be full. Afterward,
the phase phenomena recur in the reverse order, with third quarter midway between full
and new moon again. The face of the moon, called gibus, take all way from first quarter to third
quarter, except when exactly full. As we know that the moon is, like the earth,
and non-luminous body, and shines only by virtue of the sunlight falling upon it,
clearly an entire half of the moon's globe must be perpetually illuminated by sunlight.
The varying phases then are due simply to the part of the illuminated hemisphere which is
turned toward us. New moon is entirely invisible because the southward hemisphere is
turned wholly away from us, while at full moon we see the lunar disk complete, because we
are on the same side of the moon that the sun is, and practically in line with both sun and moon.
If we could visit the moon, we should see the earth in exactly complementary phase. At new moon here,
we should be enjoying full earth there, and full moon here would be coincident with new or dark
earth there. The narrow crescent of new moon here would be the period of gibus earth there,
and it is the reflection of sunlight from this Gibus Earth, which illuminates the part of the moon,
but faintly seen at this time, popularly known as the old moon in the new moon's arms.
Its greater visibility at some times than at others is due to greater prevalence of clouded area
in the reflecting regions of the earth turned towards the moon,
and the higher reflective power of clouds than that possessed by mere land and water.
as the moon goes all the way round the sky every month, the same as the sun does in a year,
and travels in nearly the same path, clearly it must also go north and south every month as the sun does.
So in mid-summer, when the sun runs high upon the meridian, we expect to find full moon's running glow.
And likewise in midwinter, the full moon always runs high, as almost everyone has sometimes or other noticed.
This eastward, or true orbital motion of the moon, is responsible for another relation which soon comes to light when we begin to observe the moon, and that is the later hour of rising or setting each night.
Our clock time is regulated by the sun, which also is moving eastward about one degree daily, or twice its own breadth.
So the moon's eastward gain on the sun amounts to about 12 degrees daily, and one degree being equal to four minutes,
The retarded time of moonrise or moonset each day amounts to very nearly fifty minutes on the average,
though sometimes the delay will be less than half an hour, or at other times it will exceed an hour and a quarter.
The season of least retardation of rising of the full moon is in the autumn,
and so the moon that falls in late September and October is known as the harvest moon,
and the next succeeding full moon is called the Hunter's Moon.
Lunation is a term sometimes given to the moon's period from any definite phase round to the same phase again.
Its length is the true period of the moon's revolution once round the earth, from the sun all the way round till it overtakes the sun again.
The synodic period is another name for lunation, and its true length is 29th and one-half days, or very accurately, 29 days, 12 hours, 44 minutes, 2.7 seconds.
calculated by astronomers with great exactness from many thousands revolutions of the Moon.
But if we want the true period of the Moon round the Earth as referred to a star, it is much
shorter than this, amounting to only 27 days and nearly one-third.
This is called the Moon's sidereal period, or revolution, because it is the time elapsed
while she is travelling eastward from a given star around to coincide with the same star again.
If we study the moon's path in the sky more critically, we shall find that it does not quite
follow the ecliptic, or the sun's path, but that twice each month she deviates from the
ecliptic, once to the north and once to the south of it, by roughly ten times her own
breadth.
More accurately, this angle is five degrees, eight minutes and forty seconds, an almost invariable
quantity, and it is therefore known as an astronomical constant, or the inclination of the
moon's orbit to the ecliptic. So the moon's orbit must intersect the ecliptic, and as both
are great circles in the sky, the points of intersection are known as the moon's nodes,
one ascending and the other descending, and the nodes are 180 degrees apart. The figure of the
moon's orbit is not circular, although it deviates only slightly from that form. But like the
paths of all other satellites round their primary planets, and of the planets themselves,
around the sun, the moon's orbit is also an eclipse. The distance of the moon's center from the
Earth's center is therefore perpetually changing. The point of nearest approach is called
perigee, and that of farthest recession, apogee. The moon's distance from the earth is easier
and simpler to be ascertained than that of any other heavenly body, because it is the nearest.
An outline of the method of finding this distance is not difficult to present, and it
resembles in every particular the method a surveyor uses to find the distance of some inaccessible
point which he cannot measure directly. Up and down a stream, for example, he measures the length
of a line, and from each end of it he measures the angle between the other end of the line
and the object on the opposite side of the stream whose distance he wishes to find out. Then he
applies the science of trigonometry to these three measures, two of angles, and one the length of
the site or base included between them, and a few minutes' calculation gives the distance of
the inaccessible object from either end of the baseline. Now in like manner, to transfer the
process to the sky, let the two ends of the base be represented by two astronomical observatories,
for example Greenwich in the northern hemisphere and Cape Town in the southern. The baseline is
the cord or straight line through the earth connecting the two observatories, and we know the
length of this line pretty accurately, because we know the size of the Earth. The angles measured
are somewhat different from those in the terrestrial example, but the process amounts to the same
thing, because the astronomers and the two observatories measure the angular distance of the
center of the moon from the zenith, each using his own zenith at the same time, and the same
science of trigonometry enables them to figure out the length of any side of the triangles involved.
The site which belongs to both triangles is the distance from the center of the earth to the center of the moon,
and the average of many hundred measures of this gives 238,800 miles,
or about ten times the distance round the equator of the earth.
We have said that the orbit in which the moon travels round the earth is practically a circle,
but the earth's center is found not at the center of this orbit, but set to one side or eccentricly,
so that the distance spanning the centers of the two bodies is sometimes as small as 221,610 miles at Perigee,
and 252,000 and 970 miles at apogee.
The moon's speed in this orbit averages rather more than half a mile every second of time.
More accurately, 3,350 feet a second, or 2,290 miles per hour.
Once the moon's distance is known, its size or diameter is easy to ascertain.
An angular measure is necessary, of course, that of an angle which the disk of the moon fills
as seen from the earth.
There are many types of astronomical instruments with which this angle can be measured,
and its value is something more than half a degree, 31 degrees and 7 seconds.
The moon's actual diameter figures out from this 2,133 miles,
and it would therefore require nearly 50 moons merged in one to make a bowl the size of the Earth.
Still, no other planet has a satellite as large in proportion to its primary as the Moon is in relation to the Earth,
but the materials that compose the Moon have less than two-thirds the average density of those that make up the Earth,
so that 81 moons fused together would be necessary to equal the mass or weight of the Earth.
If we figure out the force of attraction of the moon for bodies on its surface,
we find it equals about one-sixth that of the earth.
Athletes could perform some astounding feats there,
miracles of high jump and hammer-throw.
Our interest in the moon's physical characteristics never wanes.
Her nearness to us has always fascinated astronomer and laymen alike.
Early users of the telescope were readily led into error regarding the general characteristics.
of the lunar surface. And it is easy to see why they thought the smooth-level planes must
be seas, and gave them names to that effect which persist today, such as Marecrisium,
Mare serenitatus, and so on. We may be sure that no water exists on the moon's surface,
although some astronomers think that solid water, as ice or snow, may still exist there
at a temperature too low for appreciable evaporation. Perhaps water, seas, and ocean,
were once there, but their secular dissemination and loss as vapor have gone on, through
the millions of millions of years, till even the moon's atmosphere appears to have vanished completely.
At least there is much better evidence of absence of atmosphere on the moon than of its presence.
Not enough, at any rate, to equal a thousandth part of the barometric pressure that we have at the
Earth's surface.
observations of stars passing behind the moon in occultations have satisfied astronomers on this point.
We often say of the brilliant full moon, it is as bright as day. The photometer, or instrument
for accurate comparison of lights, their amount and intensity, tells a different story. Indeed,
if the entire dome of the sky were filled with full moons, we should be receiving only one-eighth
of the light the sun gives us, and it would require more than 600,000 average full moons to
equal the light radiation of the sun. Heat from the moon, however, is quite different. Early
attempts to measure it detected none at all, but with modern instruments there is little
trouble in detecting heat from the moon, though measurement of it is not easy. Much of the moon's
heat is sun heat, directly reflected from the moon, as sunlight is, but most of it is due to
to radiation of solar heat previously absorbed by the materials of the lunar surface.
The actual temperature of the moon's surface suffers great variation.
A fortnight's perpetual shining of the sun upon the lunar rocks would certainly heat
them above the temperature of boiling water if the moon had an atmosphere to conserve and
store this heat. But the entire absence of such an air blanket probably permits the sun's heat
to be radiated away nearly as fast as it is received,
the temperature at the surface always very low.
What physical influences the Moon really has upon the Earth must be very slight, barring
the tides.
But there is little hope of getting people generally to take that view, because the Moon appears
to be the planet of the people.
And opinion that the Moon controls the weather, for instance, amounts with them to practical
certainty.
More than likely all these notions are but legitimate survivals of superstition and astrology.
In addition to the tides, our magnetic observatories reveal slight disturbances with the swinging
of the moon from apogee to perigy and back.
But long series of weather observations have been faithfully interrogated with negative or contradictory
results.
If one believes that the moon's changes affect the weather, it is easy to remember coincidences
and pass over the many times when no changes has taken place.
The moon changes pretty frequently anyhow.
As young, well puts it,
a change of the moon necessarily occurs about once a week.
All changes of the weather, for instance, must therefore occur within three or four days of a change of the moon,
and 50% of them ought to occur within 46 hours of a change,
even if there were no causal connection whatever.
When we turn to the strongly diversified surface of the moon itself,
we find much to rivet the attention, even with slender optical aid.
Everyone wants to know how near the telescope, the biggest possible telescope, brings the moon to us.
That will depend on many things, first of all, on the magnifying power of the eyepiece employed on the telescope,
and eyepieces are changed on telescope just as they are on the microscopes, though not for the same reasons.
The theoretical limit of the power of a telescope is usually considered as one hundred hundred,
for each inch of diameter or aperture of the object glass.
A 40-inch telescope, such as that of the Yerkes Observatory,
the largest refracting telescope in existence,
should bear a magnifying power not to exceed 4,000.
But this limit is practically never reached,
one-half of it, or 50 to the inch of aperture,
being a good working limit of power,
even under exceptional conditions of steadiness of atmosphere.
If we reduce the effective distance of the moon,
from 240,000 miles to 100 miles, that is about the utmost that can be expected.
But even at that distance we can make out only landscape details,
nothing whatever like buildings or the works of intelligence.
The larger relations of light and shade, so obvious to the naked eye on the moon,
vanish on looking at it with the telescope,
but we are at once captivated by the novel character of the surface
and the seemingly great variety of detail that is clearly
visible. As soon as the new moon comes out in the west, one may begin to gaze with interest
and watch the Terminator, or sunrise line, gradually steal over the roughened surface,
bringing new and striking craters into view each night. Around the time of quarter moon,
or a little past it, is one of the best times for telescopic views of the moon, because the
huge craters, Tycho and Copernicus, are then in fine illumination. Close to the face of full
Moon is never a good time because there are no shadows of the rough surface then, and its entire
structure seems to be quite flat and uninteresting, except for the streaks or rills which
radiate from Tycho in every direction, and are the only lunar features that are best seen
near full. In a broad general way, the moon's surface, if compared with the Earth's, differs
in having no water. Our extensive oceans are replaced there by smooth, level,
plains, which were at first thought to be seized and so named. There are ten or twelve of them
in all. Then we find mountain ranges, so numerous on the earth, relatively few on the moon. Those that
exist are named, in part, four terrestrial mountain ranges, as the Alps, Caucasus, and the
Apennines. But the nearly circular crater, a relatively rare formation on the earth, is seen dotted
all over the moon in every size, from a fraction of a mile in the air. From a fraction of a mile in
diameter up to 60, 70, and in extreme cases a hundred miles. No mere description of
plains or mountains and craters affords an adequate idea of the moon's surface as it actually
is. A telescopic view is necessary, or some of the modern photographs, which give an even
better notion of the moon than any telescopic view. Many of the lunar craters are, without
doubt, volcanic in origin. Others seem to be ruins of molten lakes. Many thousands of the smaller
ones appear as if formed by a violent pelting of the surface when semi-plastic, perhaps by enormous
showers of meteoric matter. More than 30,000 craters cover the half of the lunar surface visible
from the earth, and hundreds of them are named for philosophers and astronomers. Measurement of
the height of lunar mountains have been made in numerous instances, especially when their shadows
fall on planes or surfaces that are nearly level, so that the length of the shadow can be
measured. In general, the height of lunar peaks is greater than that of terrestrial peaks,
owing probably to the lesser surface gravity of the moon. About 40 lunar peaks are higher than
Montblanc. Most astronomers regard it as certain that no changes ever take place on the moon. Probably
no very conspicuous changes ever do. Some, however, have made out a fair case for comparatively
recent changes in surface detail. Extreme caution is necessary in drawing conclusions, because
the varying changes of illumination from one phase to another are themselves sufficient to cause
the appearance of change. At intervals of a double lunation equal to 59 days, one and one-half
hours, the Terminator goes very nearly through the same objects, so that the circumstances
of illumination are comparable. In Mare Serenitatus, the little crater named Linne,
was announced to have disappeared about a half century ago subsequently it became visible again and other minor changes were reported perhaps due to falling in of the walls of the crater
if one were to visit the moon he must needs take air and water along with him as well as other sustenance no atmosphere means no diffused light we could see nothing unless the sun's direct rays were shining upon it any one stepping into the shadow of a lunar crag would be
would become wholly invisible. No sound, however loud, could be heard. Sound, in fact, would
become impossible. A rock might roll down the wall of a lunar crater, but there would be no noise,
though we should know what had happened by the tremor produced. So slight is gravity there,
that a good ball-player might bat a baseball half a mile or more. Looking upward, all the stars
would be appreciably brighter than here, and visible perpetually in the daytime, as well as at night.
if one were to go to the opposite side of the moon he would lose sight of the earth until he came back to the sight which is always turned towards the earth even then the earth would never rise and set at any given place as the moon does to us
but would remain all the time at about the same height above the lunar horizon the earth would go through all the phases that the moon shows to us here full earth occurring there when it is new moon here our globe would appear to be nearly four times broader than the moon seems to us
its white polar caps of ice and snow its dark oceans and the vast cloud areas would be very conspicuous faint stars the zodiacal light and the filmy solar coroner
would be visible, probably even close up to the sun's edge, but although his rays might shine
upon the lunar rocks without intermission for a fortnight, probably they would still be too cold
to touch with safety. On the side of the moon turned away from the sun, the temperature of the
moon's surface would fall to that of space, or many hundred degrees below zero.
End of Chapter 28.
Chapter 29 of Astronomy.
of heavenly bodies. This is a Libravox recording. All Libravox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit Libravox.org.
Astronomy, the Science of Heavenly Bodies by David Todd.
Chapter 29. The Eclipses of the Moon
Of all the weird happenings of the nighttime sky, eclipses of the moon are the most impressive.
Rarely is there a year without one.
What is the cause?
Simply, the Earth getting in between sun and moon,
and thereby shutting off the sunlight,
which, at all other times, enables us to see the moon.
As the Earth is a dark body,
it must cast a black shadow on the side away from the sun,
and it is the moon's passing into this shadow,
or some part of it, that causes a lunar eclipse.
Sun and Earth, being so different in size, the Earth's shadow must stretch away from it into space,
growing smaller and smaller until at length it comes to an end, the apex of a cone,
857,000 miles long.
If we cut off this shadow at the moon's distance from the Earth, we find it about 6,000 miles in diameter at that point,
And this accounts for the fact that the curvature on the side of the moon, when the eclipse is coming on and where it is dropping into the shadow, is always much less rapid than the curvature of the moon's own disk is.
When an eclipse is approaching, the eastern limb will be duskily darkened for half an hour or more because the moon must first pass through the outer penumbra, or half-shadow, which everywhere surrounds the true shadow itself.
If the moon hits only the upper or lower part of the shadow, the eclipse will be only partial.
And during the progress of the eclipse, it will seem as if the uneclipsed part had swung
or twisted around in the sky, from the western limb of the moon to the eastern.
But when the moon passes through the middle regions of the shadow, the eclipse is always total,
and direct sunlight is wholly cut off from every part of the moon's face for a greater or less
length of time, according to the part of the shadow through which it passes.
When passing centrally through the shadow, the total eclipse will last about two hours,
as the moon's diameter is about one-third of the breadth of the shadow, and the eclipse will be
partial about two hours longer, an hour at beginning and an hour at the end, because the
moon moves over her own breath in about an hour. While the moon is wholly immersed in the
shadow, her body is nevertheless visible, as a dull tarnished copper disk, and this is caused
by the reddish sunlight which grazes the earth all around and is refracted or bent by our
atmosphere into the shadow itself. If this belt or ring of terrestrial atmosphere happens to be
everywhere filled with dense clouds, as was the case in 1886, even the familiar copper moon
of a total lunar eclipse disappears completely in the black sky.
Quite different from a solar eclipse, all the phases of a lunar eclipse are visible at the same time on the Earth whenever the Moon is above the horizon.
Eclipses of the Moon are therefore seen with great frequency at any given place as compared with solar eclipses,
which are restricted to relatively narrow areas of the Earth's surface.
Nor are lunar eclipses are very much significance to the astronomer, mainly because of the slowness and indefiniteness of the phenomena.
It is a good time to observe occultations of faint stars at the moon's edge or limb,
and several such programs have been carried out by cooperation of observatories
in widely separated regions of the world,
the object being improvement in our knowledge of the distance of the moon
and in the accuracy of the mathematical tables of her motion.
Search by photography for a possible satellite, or moon of the moon,
has been made on several occasions, though without success.
A lunar eclipse was first observed and photographed from an aeroplane, May 2nd, 1920.
At the request of the writer, two aviators of the United States Navy ascended to a height
of 15,000 feet above Rockaway, and secured many advantages accruing from a great elevation
in viewing a celestial phenomenon of this character.
End of Section 29.
Chapter 30 of Astronomy, The Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Libravox recording. All Libravox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit Libravox.org.
Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies, by David Todd.
Total Eclipses of the Sun.
Primitive peoples indulged in every variety of explanation of mysterious happenings in the sky.
To the Chinese, and all through India, a total eclipse of the sun is caused by a certain dragon
with very black claws, who, except for their frightening him away by every conceivable sort of hideous
noise, would most certainly eat up the sun. The eclipse also goes off. The sun has never been
eaten yet. Can you convince a Chinaman that Rahoo, the dragon, would have eaten up the sun if his
unearthly din hadn't frightened him away? In Japan,
The eclipse drops poison from the sky into wells, so the Japanese cover them up.
Fontenelle relates that, in the middle of the 17th century,
a multitude of people shut themselves up in cellars in Paris during the total eclipse.
In the Shu King, an ancient Chinese work, occurs the earliest record of a total eclipse of the sun
in the year BC 2158.
The Nineveh eclipse of BC-763 is perhaps the first of the ancient eclipses, of which we possess a really clear description of the Assyrian eponym tablets in the British Museum.
It is the eclipse possibly referred to in the book of Amos, Chapter 4.
But of all the ancient eclipses, none perhaps succeeds in interest the famous eclipse of Thales, B.C. 585, May 28th.
It is the first eclipse to have been predicted, probably by means of the Saros, or 18-year period
of eclipses, which is useful as an approximate method even at the present day.
But the accident of a war between the Lydians and the Medes is added greatly to the historic
interest because the combatants were so terrified by the sudden turning of day into night
that they at once concluded a peace cemented by two marriages.
Very many of the ancient eclipses have been of great use to the historian and verifying dates,
and mathematical astronomers have employed them in correcting the lunar tables,
or intricate mathematical data by which the motion of the moon is predicted.
Coming down to the middle of the 6th century,
we find the first eclipse recorded in England, in the Saxon Chronicle, AD 538.
During the epic of the Arabian nights, several eclipses were,
witnessed at Baghdad, AD 829 to 928, and many a century later by Ibu Yunis,
court astronomer of Hakim, the Caliph of Egypt. Nothing is more interesting than to search
the quaint records of these ancient eclipses. One, occurring in 1650, when Ticobrahi was but
14, had much to do with turning his permanent interest towards mathematics and astronomy.
The eclipse of 1612 was the first seen through a tube, the telescope having been invented only a few years before.
Paradise Lost was completed about 1665, and the censorship was still in existence, and it is a matter of record that the oft-coded passage,
as when the sun, new risen, looks through the horizontal misty air, shorn of his beams or from behind the moon,
in dim eclipse, disastrous twilight sheds, on half the nations, and with fear of change, perplexes monarchs,
was strongly urged as sufficient reason for suppressing the entire epic.
London was favored with the outflashing corona, May 3, 1715, and a pamphlet was issued in
prediction entitled The Black Day, or A Prospect of Doomsday.
The first American Eclipse expedition was on occasion of the totality of October 27, 1780,
sent out by Harvard College and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences under Professor Samuel Williams,
to Pnobscot.
There was a fine total eclipse from Albany to Boston on June 16th of 1806,
and many important observations of it were made in this country.
But it was not till the European Acclux.
clips of 1842, their research got fully underway because the germ of the new astronomy,
particularly as applied to the sun, had begun its development, and the significance of the
corona was obvious, if it could be proved a true appendage of the sun. Photography had not
long been discovered, and the corona of 1851 was the first to be automatically registered
on a daguerre type. In 1860, it was proved that prominences and
corona both belong to the sun and not to the moon.
The great Indian eclipse of 1868 brought the important discovery that the prominences
can be observed at any time without an eclipse by means of the spectroscope.
In 1869, bright lines were found in the spectrum of the corona, one line in the green
indicating the presence of an element not then known on the earth, and hence called
coronium. In 1870, the reversing glare or stratum of the sun was discovered. In 1878, a vast
ecliptic extension of the streams of the corona, many millions of miles, both east and west of the sun,
was first seen. This is now known to be the type of corona characteristic of minimum spots on the
sun. In 1882, the spectrum of the corona was first photographed, and in 1889, excellent
detailed photographs of the corona were taken. In 1893, it was shown that the corona
quite certainly rotates bodily with the sun. In 1896, actual spectrum photographs of the
reversing layer established its existence beyond doubt, flash spectrum it's often called. In 1898,
the long ecliptic streamers of the corona were successfully photographed for the first time. In
In 1900, the depth of the reversing layer was found to average 500 miles.
The heat of the corona was first measured by the bolometer, and many observations showed that
the coronal streamers, in part at least, partake of the nature of electric discharges.
All subsequent total eclipses have been carefully observed in whatever part of the world
they may happen, and each has added new results of significance to our theory.
of the corona and its relation to the radiant energy of the sun.
In very recent eclipses, this cinematograph has been brought into action as an efficient
adjunct of observation. In 1914, the first successful movie of the eclipse was secured in
Sweden, and in 1918, Frost of the Urquise Observatory first applied the cinematograph
to Registry of the Flash Spectrum, and Stebbins tested out his photo-election.
cell on the corona, making the brightness 0.5 that of the full moon.
In 1914, in Russia, and again in 1919, on the Atlantic,
the obvious advantages of the aeroplane in ecliptic observation and photography
were sought by the writer, though unsuccessfully.
The photographic tests, however, conducted in preparation for these expeditions,
proved the entire practicability of securing eclipse' results of much value,
independently of clouds below.
Eclipses in the near future will be total in Australia,
about six minutes on September 21st, 1922.
In California and Mexico, about four minutes on September 10th, 1923,
and along a line from Toronto to Nantucket,
about two minutes on the morning of January 24th, 1925.
To all spectators, savage or civilized,
scientist or layman, a total eclipse, is wonderful and impressive. Langley said,
the spectacle is one of which, though the man of science may prosaically state the facts,
perhaps only the poet could render the impression. Very gradually, the moon steals its
way across the face of the sun. The lessened light is hardly noticed. If one is near a tree,
through whose foliage the sunlight filters, an extraordinary sight is seen.
The ground all about is covered with luminous crescents,
instead of the overlapping disks to which were there before the eclipse came on.
In both cases, they are images of the disk of the sun at the time,
and the narrowing crescents will be watched with interest as totality approaches.
Then the shadow bands may be seen flitting across the long,
landscape, like visible wind. They are probably related to our atmosphere, and the very slender
crescent from which true sunlight still comes. Then, for a few seconds, the moon's actual shadow
may be caught in its approach. Very suddenly, the darkness steals over the landscape,
and totality is on. How lucky if there are no clouds. Every eye is riveted on the incomparable
corona, a silvery, soft, unearthly light, with radiant streamers, stretching at times millions
of uncomprehended miles into space, while the rosy flaming protuberances skirt the black
rim of the moon in ethereal splendor. Then, it is now or never with the observer and
photographer, months of diligent preparations at home, followed by weeks of tedious journey abroad,
with days of strenuous preparation and rehearsals at the station,
all go for naught,
unless the whole is tuned up to perfect operation,
the instant totality begins.
It may last but a minute, or even less.
In 1937, however, the total eclipse will last seven minutes, 20 seconds,
the longest ever observed,
and within half a minute of the longest possible.
All is over as suddenly as it came on.
The first thing is to complete records, develop plates, and see if everything worked perfectly.
There is great utility back of all Eclipse research, on account of its wide bearing on meteorology and terrestrial physics, and possibly the direct use of solar energy for industrial purposes.
With this purpose in view, the astronomer devotes himself unsparingly to the actual.
acquisition of every possible fact about the sun and his corona.
Considering the earth as a whole, the number of total eclipses will average nearly 70 to the century.
But at any given place, one may count himself very fortunate if he sees a single total eclipse,
although he may see several partial ones without going from home.
Then, too, there are annular or ring eclipses, averaging seven and eight years.
But had one been born in Boston or New York in the latter part of the 18th century,
he might have lived through the entire 19th century and a long way into the 20th
without seeing more than one total eclipse of the sun.
In London, in 1715, no total eclipse had been visible for six centuries.
However, taking general averages and recalling the comparatively narrow belt of total eclipse,
every part of the Earth is likely to come within range of the moon's shadow once in about three
and a half centuries. The longest total eclipses always occur near the equator. This is because
an observer on the equator is carried eastward by the Earth's rotation at a velocity of about
a thousand miles per hour, so that he remains longer in the moon's shadow, which is passing
over him in the same direction with a velocity about twice as great.
The general circumstances of total eclipses are readily foretold by means of the ancient
Chaldean period of eclipses known as the Saros.
It is 18 years and 10 or 11 days in length, according to the number of leap years intervening.
In one complete Saros, 41 solar eclipses will generally happen, but only about one-fourth of
them will be total.
The Saros is a period at the end of which the centers of ferales of the center of
Sun and Moon return very nearly to their relative positions at the beginning of the cycle.
So, in general, the eclipse of any year will be a repetition of one which took place 18 years
before, and another, very similar in circumstances, will happen 18 years in the future.
Three periods of the Saros, or 54 years and one month, will usually bring about a return
of any given eclipse to a particular part of the earth, so far as longitude is concerned,
though the returning track will lie about 600 miles to the north or south of the 154 years earlier.
Paths of total eclipses frequently intersect if large areas like an entire country are considered.
Spain, for instance, where total eclipses have occurred in 1842, 1860, 1870, 1900,
and 1905. Besides crossing Spain, the tracks of totality on May 28th, 1900, and August 30,
1905, were unique in intersecting exactly over a large city, Tripoli and Barbary,
on both of which occasions, the writer's expeditions to that city were rewarded with perfect
observing conditions in that now Italian province on the edge of the Great Desert.
Kepler was the first astronomer to calculate eclipses with some approach to scientific form,
as exemplified in his Rudolfine tables.
His method was, of course, geometrical, but LaGrange, who applied the methods of more refined analysis to the problem,
was the first to develop a method by which, in eclipse and all its circumstances,
could be accurately predicted for any part of the earth.
To many minds, the prediction of an eclipse affords the best illustration of the superior knowledge of the astronomer.
It seems little short of the marvelous.
But recalling that the motion of the moon follows the law of gravitation,
and that its position in the sky is predictable for years in advance with a high degree of precision,
it will readily be seen how the arrival of the moon's shadow,
and hence the total eclipses of the sun can be foretold for any place over which the shadow passes.
All these data, derived by the mathematician, are known as the elements of the eclipse,
and they are prepared many years in advance and published in the nautical almanacs and astronomical
ephemorides issued by the leading nations.
Buchanan's Treatise on Eclipsees will supply all the technical information regarding the
prediction of eclipses that anyone desirous of inquiring into this phase of the problem may desire.
So important are total eclipses in the scheme of modern solar research, and so necessary are
clear skies in order that expeditions may be favored with success, that every effort is now
made to ascertain the weather chances at particular stations along the line of eclipse many
years in advance. This method of securing preliminary cloud observations for a series of years
has proved especially useful for the eclipses of 1893, 1896, 1900, and 1918. And had it been
employed in Russia for totality of 1914, many well-equipped expeditions might have been spare
disaster. The California and Mexico totality of 1923 does not require the
forethought, as the regions visited, are quite likely to be free from cloud. But observations are now
in process of accumulation for the total eclipse of 1925. The outlook for clear skies on that occasion,
the total eclipse nearest New York for more than a century, is not very promising. The path of
totality passes over Marquette, Michigan, Rochester and Poughkeepsie, New York, Newport, Rhode Island,
and Nantucket, about nine in the morning.
Everyone who saw it will remember the last total eclipse of this part of the world,
on June 8, 1918, visible from Oregon to Florida.
Many will recall the last total eclipse that was visible before that in the eastern part of the United States,
on May 28, 1900, visible in the narrow path from New Orleans to Norfolk.
One's father or grandfather will perhaps remember the total.
eclipse of July 29, 1878, which passed over the United States from Pikes Peak to Texas.
It was the writer's maiden eclipse, and another on August 7, 1869, which passed
southeasterly over Iowa and Kentucky. On all these occasions, the paths of total eclipse
were dotted with numerous observing parties, many of them equipped with elaborate apparatus
for studying and photographing the sole corona and prominences,
together with a multitude of other phenomena,
which are seen only when total eclipses take place.
Looking forward, rather than backward,
a striking series, or family of eclipses, happen in the future.
It is the series of May 2001 and 1919,
reoccurring again on June 8, 1937 over the Pacific Ocean,
June 20, 1955, through India, Siam and Luzon, and June 30th,
1973, visible in Sahara, Abyssinia, and Somali.
Already in 1919, this totality was six minutes, 50 seconds in duration.
In 1937, as already mentioned, it will be seven minutes, 20 seconds.
And at the subsequent returns even longer yet,
approaching the estimated maximum of seven minutes, 58 seconds, which has never been observed.
This remarkable series of total eclipses is longer in duration than any others during a thousand years.
Its next subsequent return is in 1991, occurring with the eclipsed sun, practically at noon
in the zenith of Mount Popokatapetal, in Mexico.
Whether may be the progress of solar research during the intervening years,
it is impossible to imagine the alert astronomer of that remote day
without incentive for further investigation of the sun's corona,
in which are concealed, no doubt, many secrets of the sun's evolution,
from nebula to star.
End of Section 30.
Chapter 31 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Libravox recording.
All Libravox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit Libravox.org.
Read by Jason Humphreys.
Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies by David Todd.
The Solar Corona
And what is the sun's corona?
Mildly asked a college professor of a student who might better have answered,
Not Prepared.
I did know, Professor.
But I have forgotten, was his reply.
What an incalculable loss to science, returned the professor with a twinkle.
The only man, whoever knew what the sun's corona is, and he is forgotten.
Only in part has the mystery of the corona been cleared by the research of the present day.
Our knowledge proceeds but slowly, because the corona has never been seen except during total eclipses of the sun,
and astronomers, as a matter of fact, have never had a fair chance at it.
Two total eclipses happen on the average of every three years.
Their average duration is only two or three minutes.
Totality can be seen only in a narrow path about 100 miles wide,
though it may be several thousand miles long.
There is usually about equal chance of cloud with clear skies,
in fully three-fourths of the totality areas of the globe
are unavailable because covered by water,
so that even if we imagine the tracks of eclipses,
quite thickly populated with astronomers and telescopes, at least one every hundred miles.
How much solid watching of the corona would this permit?
Only a little more than one week's time in a whole century.
The true corona is at least a triple phenomenon and a very complex one.
The photographs reveal it much as the eye sees it,
with all its complexity of interlacing streamers projected into a flat or plane
surrounding the disk of the dark moon, which hides the true sun completely.
But we must keep in mind the fact that the sun is a globe, not a disk,
and that the streamers of the corona radiate more or less from all parts of the surface of the solar sphere,
much as quills from a porcupine.
From the sun's magnetic poles branch out the polar rays,
nearly straight throughout their visible extent.
Gradually as the coronal rays originate at points around the solar disk
farther and farther removed from the poles, they are more and more curved.
Very probably they extend into the equatorial regions,
but it is not easy to trace them there because they are projected upon
and confused with the filaments having their origin remote from the poles.
Then there is the inner equatorial corona,
apparently connected intimately with truly solar phenomena,
quite as the polar rays are.
The third element in the composite is the outer ecliptic corona,
for the most part made up of long streamers.
This is most fully developed at the time of the few spots on the sun.
It is traceable much farther against the black sky with the naked eye than by photography.
Without any doubt, it is a solar appendage and possibly it may merge into the zodiacal light.
Naturally this superb spectacle must have been an amazing sight of the beholders of antiquity,
who were fortunate enough to see it.
Historical references are rare.
Perhaps the earliest was by Plutarch, about AD 100, who wrote of it,
A radiance shone round the rim, and would not suffer darkness to become deep and intense.
Philostratus, a century later, mentions the death of the Emperor Domitian at Ephesus,
as announced by a total eclipse.
Kepler thought that Corona was evidence of a lunar atmosphere.
Indeed, it was not until the middle of the 19th century that its lack of relation to the
moon was finally demonstrated. Later observers, Wybird in 1652 and Uyowa, got the impression that
the corona turned round the disc Catherine wheel fashion, like an ignited wheel and fireworks, turning
on its center. But no later observer has reported anything of the sort. Quite the contrary,
there it stands against a black sky in motionless magnificence, a colorless, pearly mass of
whips and streamers, for the most part, nebulous and ill-defined,
fading out very irregularly into the black sky beyond,
but with the complex interlacing of filaments,
sometimes very sharply defined near the solar poles.
It defies the skill of artist and draughtsmen to sketch it before it is gone.
Photograph it? Yes, but there are troubles.
Of course, the camera work is superior to sketches by hand.
As Langley used to say, the camera has no nerves and what it sets down,
we may rely on. Foremost among the photographic difficulties is the wide variation in intensity
of the coronal light in different regions of the corona. If a plate is exposed long enough to get
the outer corona, the exceeding brightness of the inner corona overexposes and burns out that part
of the plate or film. If the exposure is short, we get certain regions of the inner corona
excellently, but the outer regions are a blank because they can be caught only by a long exposure.
So the only way is to take a series of pictures with a wide range of exposures, and then by careful
and artistic candy work combine them all into a single drawing. Wesley of London has succeeded
eminently in work of this character, and his drawings of the sun's corona, visible at total
eclipses from 1871 onward in possession of the Royal Astronomical Society are the finest in existence.
They give a vastly better idea of the corona as the eye sees it than any single photograph possibly can.
The early observers apparently never thought of the corona as being connected with the sun.
It was a halo merely and so drawn.
Its real structure was neither known, depicted, or investigated.
Sketches were structuralless, as any of the sun.
aureola formed by stray sun like grazing the moon might naturally be, that the rays are curved
and far from radial around the sun was shown for the first time in the sketches of 1842,
and in 1860 Sir Francis Galton observed that the long arms or streamers do not radiate strictly
from the center. The inner corona had first been recorded photographically on a daguerre-type
plate during the eclipse of 1851, but the lens belonged to a heliometer.
and was, of course, uncorrected for the photographic rays.
The wet collodium plates of the eclipse of 1860 by De LaRue
Proved that not only the prominences but the corona were truly solar,
because his series of technically perfect pictures revealed the steady and unchanged character
of these phenomena while the moon's disc was passing over them as totality progressed.
And at the eclipse of 1869, Young put the solar theory of the corona beyond the shadow of any further doubt,
by examination of its light with the spectroscope,
and discovering a green line in the spectrum
due to incandescent vapor of a substance not then identified with anything terrestrial,
and therefore called coronium.
The total brilliance of the corona was very differently estimated by the earlier observers,
though pretty carefully measured at later eclipses.
The standard full moon is used for reference,
and at one eclipse the corona fall short of,
while at another it will exceed the full moon and brightness.
Variations and brilliancy are quite marked.
At one eclipse it was nearly four times as bright as the full moon.
Much evidence has already accumulated on this question.
But whether the observed variations are real,
or due mainly to the varying relative sizes of sun at moon
at different eclipses is not yet known.
The coronal light is largely bluish intent,
and this is the region of the spectrum most powerful,
absorbed by our atmosphere.
Eclipse are observed by different expeditions, located at stations where the Eclipse Sun stands at very different altitudes above the horizon.
Besides this, the localities of observation are at varied elevations above sea level,
so that the varying amount of absorption of the coronal light renders the problem one of much difficulty.
The long-eclipt extremers of the corona were first seen by Newcomb and Langley during the totality of 1878.
On one side of the sun there was a stupendous extension of at least 12 solar diameters,
or nearly 11 millions of miles. Langley observed from the summit of Pike's peak, over 14,000 feet
high, and was sure that he was witnessing a real phenomenon here too for undescribed.
The vast advantage of elevation was apparent also from the fact that he held the corona for more
than four minutes after true totality had ended.
These streamers are characteristic of the epic of minimum spots on the sun, as Ranyard first suggested.
It was found that this type of corona had been recorded also in 1867, and it has reappeared in 1889, 1900, and 1911, and will doubtless be visible again in 1920.
How rapidly the streamers of the corona vary is not known.
Occasionally an observer reports having seen the filaments vibrate rapidly as in the Aurora Borealis,
but this is not verified by others who saw the same corona perfectly unmoving.
Comparisons of photographs taken at widely separate stations during the same eclipse
have shown that at least the corona remains stationary for hours at a time.
Whether it may be unchanged at the end of a day, or a week, or a month is not known,
because no two total eclipses can ever happen near each other than within an interval of 173 days,
or one half of the eclipse year.
And usually the interval between total eclipses is twice, or three times this period.
There is what the solar corona may be are very numerous.
The extreme inner corona is perhaps in part a sort of gaseous atmosphere of the sun,
due to matter ejected from the sun and kept in motion by forces of ejection,
gravity, and repulsion of some sort.
Meteoric matter is likely concerned in it,
and Huggins suggested the debris of disintegrating comets.
Schuster was an agreement with Huggins that the brighter filaments of the corona
might be due to electric discharges,
but it seems very unlikely that any single hypothesis
can completely account for the intricate tracery of so complex a phenomenon.
Elaborate spectroscopic programs have been carried out of recent eclipses,
affording evidence that certain regions are due to incandescent matter of lower temperature than the sun's surface.
A small part of the light of the corona is sunlight reflected from dark particles, possibly meteoric,
but more likely dust particles or fog of some sort.
This accounts for the weak in solar spectrum with Fronhofer absorption lines,
and this part of the light is polarized.
Many have been the attempts to see or photograph the corona without an eclipse.
None of them has, however, succeeded as yet.
Huggins got very promising results nearly 40 years ago,
and success was thought to have been reached,
but subsequent experiments on the Riffelberg in 1884 and later
convinced him that his results related only to a spurious corona.
In 1887, the writer made an unsuccessful attempt to visualize the corona from the summit of Fujiamma,
and Hale tried both optical and photographic methods on Pike's Peak,
in 1893 without success. He devised later a promising method by which the heat of the corona
in different regions can be measured by the bolometer, and an outline corona afterwards
sketched from these results. Still another method of attacking the problem occurred to the writer
in 1919, which has not yet been carried out. It would take advantage of recent advances in
aeronautics, and contemplates an artificial eclipse in the upper air by means of a black
spherical balloon. This would be sent up to an altitude of perhaps 40,000 feet,
where it would partake of the motion of the air current in which it came to equilibrium.
Then a snapshot camera would be mounted on an aeroplane in which the aviator would ascend to such
a height that the balloon just covered the sun, as the moon does in a total eclipse.
With the center of the balloon in line with the sun's center,
he would photograph the regions of the sky immediately surrounding the sun,
against which the corona is projected.
As the entire apparatus would be above more than an entire half of the Earth's atmosphere,
the experiment would be well worth the attempt,
as pretty much everything else has been tried and found wanting.
Needless to say, the importance of seeing the corona at regular intervals whenever desired,
without waiting for eclipses of the sun, remains as insistent as ever.
End of Chapter 31
Chapter 32 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Libravox recording.
All Libravox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit Libravox.org.
Read by Rick Vina
Astronomy
The Science of the Heavenly Bodies
By David Todd
The Ruddy Planet
Mars is a planet
next in order beyond the earth
and its distance from the sun
averages 141.4 million miles
It has a relatively rapid motion among the stars.
Its color is reddish, and, when nearest to us, it is perhaps the most conspicuous object in the sky.
Mars appeared to the ancients, just as it does to us today.
Aristotle recorded an observation of Mars, 3,000.
when the moon passed over the planet, or occulted it, as our expression is.
Galileo made the first observations of Mars with a telescope in 1610,
and his little instrument was powerful enough to enable him to discover that the planet had phases,
though it did not pass through all the phases that Mercury and Venus do.
This was obvious from the fact that Mars is always at a greater distance from the sun than we are,
and the phase can only be gibbis, or about like the moon,
when midway between full and quarter.
Many observers in the 17th century followed up the planet with such feeble optical power as the telescopes of that epic provided.
Fontana, who made the first sketch, Richioli and Biancini in Italy, Cassini in France, Huigans in Holland,
and later Sir William Herschel in England.
It was Cassini who first made out the whitish spots, or polar caps of Mars, in 1666, but not until after Wegan's had noted the fact that Mars turned around on an axis in a period but little longer than the Earth's.
Cassini followed it up later with a more accurate value, and observations in our own day,
when combined with these early ones, enable us to say that the Martian Day is equal to
24 hours, 37 minutes, 22.67 seconds, accurate probably to the hundredth part of a
When we know that a planet turns round on an axis, we know that it has a day.
When we know the direction of the axis in space, or in relation to the plane of its path round
the sun, we know that it has seasons.
We can tell their length and when they begin and end.
It did not take many years of observation to prove that the axis round which Mars turns
is tilted to the plane of its path round the sun by an angle practically the same as that at which
the Earth's axis is tilted.
So, there is the immediate inference that on Mars, the order, the order,
and perhaps the character of the seasons
is much the same as here on the earth.
At least two things, however, tend to modify them.
First, the year of Mars is not 365 days like ours,
but 687 days.
Each of the four seasons on Earth,
Mars, therefore, is proportionally longer than our seasons are.
Then comes the question of atmosphere.
How much of an atmosphere does Mars really possess in proportion to ours,
and how would its lesser amount modify the blending of the seasons into one another?
All discussion of Mars and the problems of existence of life upon that planet
hinge upon the character and extent of Martian atmosphere.
The planet seems never to be covered, as the Earth usually is,
with extensive areas of cloud, which, to an observer in space,
would completely mask its oceans and ocean.
and continents. Nearly all the time, Mars, in his equatorial and temperate zones, is quite
clear of clouds. A few whitish spots are occasionally seen to change their form and position
in both northern and southern latitudes, and they vary with the progress of the day on Mars,
as clouds naturally would.
But Chapparelli, perhaps the best of all observers,
thought them to be not low-lying clouds of the nimbus type
that would produce rains, but rather a veil of fog,
or perhaps a temporary condensation of vapor,
as dew or hoar frost.
But the strongest argument for an atmosphere is based on the temporary darkening or obscuration of well-known and permanent markings on the surface of Mars.
These are more or less frequently observed, and clouds afford the best explanation of their occurrence.
So much for evidence supplied by the telescope alone.
When, however, we employ the spectroscope, in conjunction with the telescope,
another sort of evidence is at hand.
Several astronomers have reached a conclusion that watery vapor exists
in the atmosphere of Mars, while other astronomers,
equipped with equal or superior apparatus,
and under equally favorable or even better conditions,
have reached the remarkable conclusion
that the spectra of Mars and the Moon
are identical in every particular.
From this, we should be led to infer
that Mars has perhaps no more atmosphere than the Moon has.
That is to say, none whatever, that present instruments and methods of investigation have enabled us to detect.
What then shall we conclude?
Simply that the atmosphere of Mars is neither very dense nor extensive.
Probably, its lower strata close to the planet's surface are about as dense.
as the Earth's atmosphere is at the summits of our highest mountains.
This conclusion is not unwelcome if we keep a few fundamental facts in clear and constant view.
Mars is a planet of intermediate size between the Earth and the Moon.
Twice the Moon's diameter,
2,160 miles, very nearly equals the diameter of Mars, 4,200 miles, and twice the diameter of Mars,
does not greatly exceed the Earth's diameter, 7,920 miles.
As to the weights or masses of these bodies, Mars, Mars, Mars,
is about one-ninth, and the moon one-eightheth of the Earth.
The atmospheric envelope of the Earth is abundant.
The moon has none, as far as we can ascertain.
So, it seems safe to infer that Mars has an atmosphere of slight density,
not dense enough to be detected by spectroscopic methods,
but yet dense enough to enable us to explain
the varying telescopic phenomena of the planet's disk,
which we should not know how to account for
if there were no atmosphere whatever.
One astronomer has indeed gone so far as to calculate,
that in comparison with our planet,
Mars is entitled to one-twentieth as much atmosphere as we have,
and that the Mercurial barometer at sea level
would run about five and a half inches,
as against 30 inches on the Earth.
In general, then, the climate of Mars is probably very much like that
of a clear season on a very high terrestrial table land or mountain,
a climate of wide extremes, with great changes of temperature from day to night.
The inequality of Martian seasons is such that in his northern hemisphere,
the winter lasts 381 days, and the summer only,
306 days.
Now, the polar caps of Mars,
which are reasonably assumed
to be due to snow or hoar frost,
attain their maximum
three or four months
after the winter solstice,
and their minimum,
about the same length of time
after the summer solstice.
This lagging
should be interpreted as an argument for a Martian atmosphere with heat-storing qualities,
similar to that possessed by the Earth.
Upon this characteristic indeed depends the climate at the surface of Mars,
whether it is at all similar to our own,
and whether fluid water is a possibility on Mars or not.
While the cosmic relations of the planet in its orbit are quite the same as ours,
nevertheless the greater distance of Mars diminishes his supply of direct solar heat to about
half what we receive. On the other hand, his distance from the sun during his year of motion
around it varies much more widely than ours, so that he receives when nearest the sun,
about one half more of solar heat than he does when farthest away.
Southern summers on Mars, therefore, must be much hotter, and southern winters colder
than the corresponding seasons of his northern hemisphere.
Indeed, the length of the southern summer,
nearly twice that of the terrestrial season,
sometimes amply suffices to melt all the polar ice and snow,
as in October 1894,
when the southern polar cap of Mars dwindled rapidly,
and finally vanished completely.
Very interesting in this connection are the researches of Stony
on the general conditions affecting planetary atmospheres and their composition.
According to the kinetic theory,
if the molecules of gases which are continually in motion
travel outward from the center of a planet, as they frequently must,
and with velocities surpassing the limit that a planet's gravity is capable of controlling,
these molecules will affect a permanent escape from the planet,
and travel through space in orbits of their own.
So the moon is wholly without action.
atmosphere, because the moon's gravity is not powerful enough to retain the molecules of its
component gases. So also, the Earth's atmosphere contains no helium or free hydrogen. So, too,
Mars is possessed of insufficient force of gravity to retain water vapor, and the Marshall
atmosphere may therefore consist mainly of nitrogen, argon, and carbon dioxide.
As everyone knows, the axis of the earth, if extended to the northern heavens, would pass very near
the north polar star, which on that account is known as Polaris. In a similar manner,
The axis of Mars pierces the northern heavens about midway between the two bright stars,
Alpha Cephe and Alpha Signe, Deneb.
The direction of this axis is pretty accurately known,
because the measurement of the polar caps of the planet,
as they turn round from night to night, year in,
and year out, has enabled astronomers to assign the inclination of the axis with great precision.
These caps are a brilliant white, and they are generally supposed to be snow and ice.
They wax and wane alternately with the seasons on Mars,
being largest at the end of the Martian winter and smallest near the end of summer.
The existence of the polar caps, together with their seasonal fluctuations,
afford a most convincing argument for the reality of a Martian atmosphere,
sufficiently dense to be capable of diffusing and transporting vapor.
The northern cap is centered on the pole,
almost with geometric exactness,
and as far as the 85th parallel of latitude.
On the other hand, the south polar cap is centered about 200 miles from the true pole,
and this distance has been observed to vary from one season to another.
No suggestion has been made to account for this singular variation.
On one occasion, it stretched down to Martian latitude 70 degrees
and was over 1,200 miles in diameter.
Pickering watched the changing conditions of shrinking of the South Polar cap
in 1892, with a large telescope located in the Andes of Peru.
Mars was faithfully followed on every night but one, from July 13 to September 9,
and the apparent alterations in this cap were very marked, even from night to night.
As the snows began to decrease, a long, dark line made its appearance near the middle of the cap,
and gradually grew until it cut the cap in two.
This white polar area, and probably also the northern one, in similar fashion,
becomes notched on the edge with the progress of its summer season.
Dark interior spots and fissures form.
Isolated patches separate from the principal mass
and later seem to dissolve and disappear.
Possibly, if one were located on Mars
and viewing our Earth with a big telescope,
the seasonal variation of our north and south polar caps
might present somewhat similar phenomena.
All the recent oppositions of Mars
have been critically observed by Pickering
from an excellent station in Jamaica.
Quite obviously, the fluctuctions of Mars,
of the polar caps are the key to the physiographic situation on Mars,
and they are made the subject of the closest scrutiny at every recurring opposition of the planet.
Several observers, Lowell in particular, record a bluish line,
or a sort of retreating polar sea,
following up the diminishing polar cap
as it shrinks with the advance of summer.
It is said that no such line is visible
during the formation of the polar cap
with the approach of winter.
All such results of critical observation,
just on the limit of visibility,
have to be repeated over and over again
before they become part of the body of accepted scientific fact.
And in many instances, the only sure way is to fall back on the photographic record,
which all astronomers, whether prejudiced or not,
may have the opportunity to examine and draw their individual,
conclusions.
Already, the approaching opposition of 1924, the most favorable since the invention of the telescope,
is beginning to attract attention, and preparations are in progress of new and more powerful
instruments, with new and more sensitive photographic processes by means of
which many of the present riddles of Mars may be solved.
End of Chapter 32.
Chapter 33 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Librevox recording. All Librevox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information, or to volunteer, please visit Librevox.org.
Read by Piotr Natter, The Astronomy, The Science of the Heavenly Bodies, by David
Todd, the Canals of Mars.
Then there are the so-called canals of Mars, about which so much is written and relatively
little known.
Faint markings which resemble them in character were first drawn in 1840 and later in 1864,
but Skiaparelli, the famous Italian astronomer, is probably their original discoverer,
when Mars was at its least distance from the Earth in 1877.
He made the first accurate detailed map of Mars.
at this time, and most of the important or more conspicuous canals, canali, he called them in
Italian, that is, channels merely, without any reference whatever to there being watercourses,
were accurately charted by him. At all the subsequent close approaches of Mars, the canals have
been critically studied by a wide range of astronomical observers, and their conclusions as to
the nature and visibility of the canals have been equally wide and varied. The most favorable
oppositions have occurred in 1892 and 1894, also in 1907 and 1909. On these occasions a close minimum
distance of Mars was reached, that is, about 35 millions of miles. But in 1924, the planet makes the closest
approach in a period of nearly a thousand years. Its distance will not much exceed 34 millions
of miles. But although this is a minimum distance for Mars, it must not be forgotten that it is a really
vast distance, absolutely speaking, it is something like 150 times greater than the distance of the
moon. We have no telescopic power at our command. Could we possibly see anything on the moon
of the size of the largest buildings, or other works of human intelligence, so that we seem
forever barred from detecting anything of the sort on Mars? Nevertheless, the closest scrutiny
of the ruddy planet by observers of great enthusiasm and intelligence, coupled with imagination
and persistence have built up a system of canals on Mars, covering the surface of the planet like
spider webs over a printed page, crossing each other at intersecting spots known as lakes,
and embodying a wealth of detail which challenges criticism and explanation.
To see the canals at all requires a favorable presentation of Mars, a steady atmosphere and a
perfect telescope, with a trained eye behind it. Not even then are they sure to be visible.
training of the eye has no doubt much to do with it, so photography has been called in,
and very excellent pictures of marks have already been taken, some nearly half as large as a dime,
showing plainly the lights and shades of the grander divisions of the Martian surface,
but only in a few instances revealing the actual canals more unmistakably than they are seen
at the eyepiece. The appearance and degree of visibility of the canals are variable,
possible clouds temporarily obscure them, but there is a certain capriciousness about their
visibility that is little understood. In consequence of the changing physical aspects as to season
on Mars and his orbital position with reference to the Earth, some of the canals remain for a long
time invisible, adding to the intricacy of the puzzle. For the most part, the canals are straight
in their course, and do not swerve much from a great circle on the planet, but their length
are very different, some as short as 250 miles, some as long as 4,000 miles, and they often
join one another like spokes in a hub of a wheel, though at various angles.
As depicted by Lowell and his core of observers at Flagstaff, Arizona, the canal system
is a truly marvelous network of fine darkish stripes.
Their color is represented as a bluish-green.
Each marking maintains its own breadth throughout its entire length, but the breadth of all
the canals is by no means the same. The narrowest are perhaps fifteen to twenty miles
wide, and the broadest probably ten times that. At least that must be the breadth of the
Nylosertes, which is generally regarded as the most conspicuous of all the canals. The lower
observatory has outstripped all others in the number of canals seen and charted, now about
500. What may be the true significance of this remarkable system of markings, it is
impossible to conclude at present. Skiaparelli, from his long and critical study of them,
their changes of width and color, was led to think that they may be a veritable hydrographic
system for distributing the liquid from the melting polar snows. In this case, it would be
difficult to escape the conviction that the canals have, at least in part, been designed and executed
with a definite end in view. Lowell went even farther and built upon their behavior
an elaborate theory of life on the planet, with intelligent beings constructing and opening
new canals on Mars at the present epoch. Picking propounded the theory that the canals are not
water-bearing channels at all, but that they are due to vegetation, starting in the spring when
first seen, and vitalized by the progress of the season-pollward, the intensity of color of
the vegetation coinciding with the progress of the season as we observe it. Extensive irrigation
schemes for conducting agricultural operations on a large scale seem a very plausible explanation of
the canals, especially if we regard Mars as a world farther advanced in its world history
than our own. Erosion may have worn the continents down to their minimum elevation,
rendering artificial waterways not difficult to build. While with the vanishing Martian
atmosphere and absence of rains, the necessity of water for the support of animal and vegetable
life could only be made by conducting it in artificial channels from one region of the planet to another.
Interesting as this speculative interpretation is, however, we cannot pass by the fact that many
competent astronomers, with excellent instruments finally located, have been unable to see the
canals and therefore think the astronomers who do see them are deceived in some way.
Also, many other astronomers, perhaps on insufficient grounds, deny their existence
in total. Many patient years of labor would be required to consult all the literature of
investigation of the planet Mars, but much of the detail has been critically embodied in maps
at different epochs by Kaiser, Proctor, Green and Dreyer. And Flamarian, in two classic volumes
on Mars, has presented all the observations from the earliest time, together with his own
interpretation of them. Aerography is a term sometimes applied to a description of the surface of Mars,
and it is scarcely an exaggeration to say that aerography is now better known than the geography of
immense tracts of the Earth. For some reason well-recognized, though not at all well understood,
Mars, although the nearest of all the planets, Venus alone accepted, is an object by no means
easy to observe with the telescope. Possibly its unusual tint has.
something to do with it. With an ordinary opera glass examined the moon very closely and try to
settle precise markings, colors, and the nature of objects on her surface. Mars, under the best
conditions, scrutinized with our largest and best telescope, presents a problem of about
the same order of difficulty. There are delicate and changing local colors that add much
uncertainty. Nevertheless, the planet's leading features are well made out, and their
stability since the time of the earliest observers leaves no room to doubt their reality as parts of the permanent planetary crust.
The border of the Martian disk is brighter than the interior, but this brightness is far from uniform.
Variations in the color of the markings often depend on the planet's turning ground on its axis,
and the relation of the surface to our angle of vision. If we keep in mind these obstacles to perfect vision in our own day,
It is easy to see why the early users of the very imperfect telescopes failed to see very much,
and were misled by much that they thought they saw.
Then, too, they had to contend, as we do, with unsteadiness of atmosphere,
which is least troublesome near the zenith.
As their telescopes were all located in the northern hemisphere,
the northern hemisphere of Mars is the one best circumstanced for their investigation,
because at the remote oppositions of Mars, which always happen in our northern winter,
with the planet in high north declination, it is always the north pole of Mars, which is presented
to our view, whereas the close oppositions of the planet always come in our northern midsummer,
with Mars in south declination, and therefore passing through the zenith of places in corresponding
south latitude. With Mars near opposition, high up from the horizon, a fairly steady atmosphere,
and a magnifying power of at least 200 diameters, even the most casual observer could not fail
to notice the striking difference in brightness of the two hemispheres, the northern chiefly bright
and the southern markedly dark. Formerly this was thought to indicate that the southern
hemisphere of Mars was chiefly water, and the northern land, much as is the case on the earth.
With this difference, however, that water and land on the earth are proportioned about as 11 to 4.
But Mars, in its general topography, presents no analogy with the present relation of land and water on the earth.
There seems no reason to doubt that the northern regions, with their prevailing orange tints,
in some places a dark red, and in others fading to yellow and white, are really continental in character.
Other vast regions of the Martian surface are possibly marshy, the varying depth of water,
causing the diversity of color.
If we could ever catch a reflection of sunlight from any part of the surface of Mars,
we might conclude that deep water exists on the planet.
But the farther research progresses, the more complete becomes the evidence
that permanent water areas on Mars, if they exist at all, are extremely limited.
Since 1877, Mars has been known to possess two satellites,
which were discovered in August of that year by Hall at Washington.
moons of this planet had long been suspected to exist, and on one or two previous occasions
critically looked for, though without success. In the writings of Dean Swift, there is a fanciful
allusion to the two moons of Mars, and if astronomers had chanced to give serious attention
to this, Phobos and Damos, as Hall named them, might have been discovered long before.
They are very small bodies, not only faint in the telescope, but actually of only 10 or 20 miles
diameter. And from the strange relation that Phobos, the inner moon, moves round Mars three times,
while the planet itself is turning round only once on its axis, some astronomers inclined to the
hypothesis that this moon at least was never part of Mars itself, but that it was originally
an inner or very eccentric member of the asteroid group, which ventured within the sphere of
gravitation of Mars, was captured by that planet, and has ever since been tributary to it
as a secondary body or satellite.
End of chapter 33.
Chapter 34 of Astronomy,
The Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Librevox recording.
All Libravox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer,
please visit Libravox.org.
Read by Light Crystal.
Astronomy, the science of the heavenly bodies.
By David Todd.
Life in other worlds.
Popular interest in astronomy is exceedingly wide,
but it is very largely confined to the idea of resemblances and differences between our
Earth and the bodies of the sky.
The question most frequently asked the astronomer is,
have any of the stars got people on them?
Or more specifically, is Mars inhabited?
The average questioner will not readily be turned off with yes or no for an answer.
he may or may not know that it is quite impossible for astronomers to ascertain anything definite in this matter.
Most interesting as it is, what he wants to find out is the view of the individual astronomer
on this absorbing and ever-recurring inquiry.
We ought first to understand what is meant by the manifestation here on the earth called life
and agree concerning the conditions that render it possible.
Apparently they are very simple. We may or may not agree that a counterpart of life or life of a wholly different type from ours may exist on other planets under conditions wholly diverse from those recognized as essential to its existence here. The problem of the origin of life is, in the present state of knowledge, highly speculative and hardly within the domain of science. Here on Earth, life is intimately,
associated with certain chemical compounds, in which carbon is the most common element without which
life would not exist. Also hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen are present with iron, sulphur, phosphorus,
magnesium, and a few less important elements besides. But carbon is the only substance,
absolutely essential. Protoplasm cannot be built without it, and protoplasm makes up the most
of the living cell. Closely related to carbon is silica also. As a substitution in certain organic
compounds, protoplasm is able to stand very low temperatures, but its properties as a living
cell cease when the temperature reaches 150 Fahrenheit. Animal life, as it exists on the earth
today, appears to have been here many million years. The paleontologists agree that all life
originated in the waters of the earth. It has passed through evolutionary stages, from the lowest
to the highest. Throughout this vast period, the astronomer is able to say that the conditions of
the earth, which appear to be essential to the maintenance of life, have been pretty constantly
what they are today. The higher, the type of life, the narrower the range of conditions
under which it thrives. Man can exist at the frigid poles, even if the temperature is 75 degrees below
Fahrenheit zero, and in the deserts, and the tropics. He swelters under temperatures of 115 degrees,
but he still lives. At these extremes, however, he can scarcely be said to thrive.
We have then a relatively narrow range of temperatures, which seems to be essential to his comfortable
existence and development. We may call it 150 degrees in extent. Had not the surface temperature of the
earth be maintained within this range for indefinite ages, in the regions where the human race has
developed, quite certainly man would not be here. How this equability of temperature has been
maintained does not now matter. Clearly the earth must have existed through indefinite ages in the
process of cooling down from temperatures of at least 6,000 degrees. During this stage, the temperature
of the surface was Earth controlled. Then this period merged very gradually into the stage
where life became possible, and the temperature of the surface became, as it now is,
sun-controlled. How many years are embraced in this span of periods or ages? We have no means of knowing,
but of the sequence of periods and the secular diminution of temperature. We may be certain.
Then there is the equally important consideration of water necessary for the origination,
support and development of life. We cannot conceive of life existing without it.
On the earth, water is super abundant and has been for indefinite ages in the past.
There is little evidence that the oceans are drying up,
although the commonly accepted view is that the waters of the earth will very gradually disappear.
Water can exist in the fluid state, which is essential to life,
at all temperatures between 32 degrees and 680 degrees Fahrenheit.
Air to breathe is essential to life also.
The atmosphere which envelopes the Earth is at least 100 miles in depth, and its own weight
compresses it to a tension of nearly 15 pounds to the square inch at sea level.
This atmosphere and its physical properties have had everything to do with the development
of animal life on the planet. Without it and its remarkable property of selective absorption,
which imprisons and diffuses the solar heat,
it is inconceivable that the necessary equability of surface temperature
could be maintained.
This appears to be quite independent
of the chemical constituents of the atmosphere
and is perhaps the most important single consideration
affecting the existence of life on a planet.
If the surface of a planet is partly covered with water,
it will possess also an atmosphere,
containing aqueous vapor.
Heat, water and air.
These three essentials determine whether there is life on a planet or not.
Of course, there must be nutrition suitable to the organism.
Mineral for the vegetal and vegetal for the animal.
But the narrow range of variation appears to be the striking thing,
relatively but a few degrees of temperature and a narrow margin of atmospheric pressure.
this pressure is doubled or trebled, as in submarine cassons, life becomes insupportable.
If, on the other hand, it is reduced even one-third, as on mountains even 13,000 feet high,
the human mechanism fails to function, partly from lack of oxygen necessary in vitalizing the blood,
but mainly because of simple reduction of mechanical pressure.
If, then, we conceive of life.
in other worlds, and it is agreed that life there must manifest itself much as it does here.
Our answer to the question of habitability of the planets must follow upon an investigation
of what we know, or can reasonably surmise about the surface temperatures of these bodies,
whether they have water, and what are the probable physical characteristics of their atmospheres?
We may inquire about each planet then concerning each of these details.
The case of Mercury is not difficult.
At an average distance of only 36 million miles from the sun,
and with a large eccentricity of orbit, which brings it a fifth part era,
conditions of temperature alone must be such as to forbid the existence of life.
The solar heat received is seven times greater than that at the Earth,
and this is perhaps sufficient reason for a minimum of atmosphere, as indicated by observation.
If no air, then quite certainly no water, as evaporation would supply a slight atmosphere.
But according to the kinetic theory of gases, the mass of mercury, only a very small fraction
of that of the sun, is inadequate to retain an atmospheric envelope. If, however, the planet's day
and year are equal, so that it turns a constant face to the sun. Surface conditions would be
greatly complicated, so that we cannot regard the planet as absolutely uninhabitable on the hemisphere
that is always turned away from the sun. Venus, at 67 millions of miles from the sun,
presents conditions that are quite different. She receives double the solar heat that we do,
but possessing an atmosphere perhaps threefold denser than ours,
as reliably indicated by observations of transits of Venus,
the intensity of the heat and its diffusion may be greatly modified.
What the selective absorption of the atmosphere of Venus may be,
we do not know, nor is the rotation time of the planet definitely ascertained,
if equal to her year as many observations show,
and as indicated by the theory of tidal evolution,
there may well be certain regions on the hemisphere
perpetually turned away from the sun,
where temperature conditions are identical with those on the tropical earth,
and where every condition the origin and development of life
is more fully met than anywhere else in the solar system.
Whether Venus has water distributed as on the earth, we do not know,
as her surface is never seen,
to dense clouds under which she is always enshrouded. Her cloudy condition possibly indicates
an overplus of water. Is the moon inhabited? Quite certainly not. No appreciable air,
no water, and a surface temperature unmodified by atmosphere, rising perhaps to 100 degrees Fahrenheit
during the day, which is a fortnight in length and falling at night to 300 degrees below zero,
not lower. Is Mars inhabited? The probable surface temperature is much lower than the Earth's,
because Mars receives only half as much solar heat as we do, and more important still,
the atmosphere of Mars is neither so dense nor so extensive as our own. Seasons on Mars are
established, much the same as here, except that they are nearly twice as long as ours,
and alternate shrinking and enlarging of the polar caps keeps even pace with the seasons,
thereby indicating a certainty of atmosphere whose equatorial and polar circulation
transports the moisture poleward to form the snow and ice of which the polar caps no doubt consist.
There is a variety of evidence pointing to an atmosphere on Mars of one-third to one-half the density of our own.
an atmosphere in which free hydrogen could not exist.
Although other gases might,
the spectroscopic evidence of water vapour in the Martian atmosphere
is not very strong.
It is very doubtful whether water exists on Mars in large bodies,
quite certainly not as oceans,
though the evidence of many small lakes is pretty well made out.
With very little water, a thin atmosphere and a zero temperature,
is Mars likely to be inhabited.
At the present time, the chances are rather against it.
If, however, the past development of the planet has progressed in the way usually considered
as probable, we may be practically certain that Mars has been inhabited in the past, when
water was more abundant and the atmosphere more dense, so as to retain and diffuse the solar heat.
Biologists tell me that they hardly know enough regarding the extent.
extreme adaptability of organisms to environment to enable them to say whether life on such a plant as Mars would
or would not keep on functioning with secular changes of moisture and temperature. The survival of a race
might be ensured against extremely low temperatures by dwelling in sub-marsian caves, and sufficient
water might be preserved by conceivable engineering and mechanical schemes, but the secular
reduction of the quantity and pressure of atmosphere. It is not easy to see how a race even more
advanced than ourselves could maintain itself alive and a serious lack of an element so vital
to existence. Both Wallace, the great biologist, and Arrhenius, the eminent chemist, but
biologist, astronomer and physicist as well. Both reject the habitation theory of Mars regarding
the so-called canals as quite like the luminous streaks on the moon, that is, cracks in the volcanic
crust caused by internal strains due to the heated interior. Wallace, indeed, argues that the planet
is absolutely uninhabitable. The asteroids? Or minor planets? We may dismiss them with,
the simple consideration that their individual masses are so insignificant and their gravity so slight
that no atmosphere can possibly surround them. Their temperatures must be exceedingly low,
and water, if present at all, can only exist in the form of ice.
Jupiter, the giant planet, presents the opposite extreme. His mass is nearly a thousandth
part of the suns, and is sufficient to retain a very high temperature, probably approximating to the
condition we call red-hot. This precludes the possibility of life at the outset, although the
indications of a very dense atmosphere many thousand miles in depth are unmistakable.
Of Saturn, one thirty-five hundredth the mass of the sun, practically the same may be said.
Proctor thought it quite likely that Saturn might be habitable for living creatures of some sort,
but he regarded the planet as on many accounts unsuitable as a habitation for beings constituted like ourselves.
Mere consideration of surface temperature precludes the possibility of life in the present stage of Saturn's development.
But the consensus of opinion is to the effect that life may make its appearance on these great planets at some
inconceivably remote epoch in the future, when the surface temperature is sufficiently reduced
for life processes to begin. Discoveries of algae, flourishing in hot springs, approaching 200 degrees
Fahrenheit, make it possible that these beginnings may take place earlier and at much higher
temperatures than have thirtu been thought possible. A century ago when the ring of Saturn was
believed to be a continuous plane. This was a favorite corner of the solar system for speculation
as to habitability. But now that we know, the true constitution of the rings, no one would for a moment
consider any such possibility. Conditions may, however, be quite different with Saturn's huge satellite
Titan, the giant moon of the solar system. Its diameter makes it approximately the size of the planet Mars,
and although it is much further removed from the sun, its relative nearness to the highly heated globe of Saturn
may provide the equability of temperature which is essential to life processes.
Also the three inner Galilean moons of Jupiter, especially three, which is about the size of Titan,
are excellently placed for life possibilities as far as probable temperature is concerned,
but we have of course no basis for surmising what their conditions may be as to air and water,
except that their small mass would indicate a probable deficiency of those elements.
Uranus and Neptune are planets so remote,
and their apparent disks are so small that very little is known about their physical condition.
They are each about one-third the diameter of Jupiter,
and the spectrum of Uranus shows broad diffused bands,
indicating strong absorption by a dense atmosphere very different from that of the Earth.
Indications are that Neptune has a similar atmosphere.
It is possible that the denser atmospheres of these remote planets
may be so conditioned as to selective absorption that the relatively slender supply of solar heat may be conserved
and thus ensure a relatively high surface temperature when the sun comes into control.
if our theories of origin of the planets are to be trusted,
we may rather suppose that Uranus and Neptune are still in a highly heated condition.
That life has not yet made its appearance on them,
but that it will begin its development ages before Saturn and Jupiter
have cooled to the requisite temperature.
Comets?
In his Latras Cosmoticus 1765,
Lambert considers the question of habitability of the comets,
naturally enough in his day,
because he thought them solid body surrounded by atmosphere
and related to the planets,
the extremes of temperature at perihelia and aphealia
to which the comets were subjected did not bother him particularly.
After calculating that the comet of 1680,
being 160 times nearer to the sun than we are ourselves
must have been subjected to a degree of heat
25,600 times as great as we are.
Lambert goes on to say
whether this comet was of a more compact substance than our globe
or was protected in some other way
it made its perihelium passage in safety
and we may suppose all its inhabitants also pass safely. No doubt they would have to be of a more
vigorous temperament and of a constitution very different from our own, but why should all living
beings necessarily be constituted like ourselves? Is it not more infinitely probable that amongst
the different globes of the universe a variety of organisations exist, adapted to the wants of the
people who inhabit them, and fitting them for the places in which they dwell, and the temperatures
to which they will be subjected. Is man the only inhabitant of the earth itself? And if we had
never seen an either bird or fish, should we not believe that the air and water were
uninhabitable? Are we sure that fire has not its invisible inhabitants, whose bodies made of
asbestos, are impenetrable to flame? Let us admit,
that the nature of the beings who inhabit comets is unknown to us but let us not deny their existence and still less the possibility of it
little enough is really known about the physical nature of comets even now but what we do know indicates incessant transformation and instability of conditions that would render life of any type exceedingly difficult of maintenance
a word about Sir William Herschel's theory of the sun and its habitability.
He thought the core of the sun a dark solid body quite cold and surrounded by a double layer,
the inner one of which he conceived to act as a sort of fire screen
to shield the sun proper against the intense heat of the outer layer,
or photospere by which we see it.
Viewed in this light the sun, he says,
appears to be nothing else than a very eminent, large and lucid planet, evidently the first,
or, in strictness of speaking, the only primary one of our system. It is most probably also
inhabited, like the rest of the planets, by beings whose organs are adapted to the peculiar
circumstance of that vast globe. But physics and biology were undeveloped sciences in Herschel's days.
Herschel knew, however, that the stars are all suns, so that he must have conceived that they are inhabited also quite independently of the question whether they possess retinues of planets after the manner of our solar system.
This again is a question to which the astronomer of the present day can give no certain answer.
so immensely distant are even the nearest of these multitudinous bodies
that no telescope can ever be built large enough or powerful enough
to reveal a dark planet as large as Jupiter
alongside even the nearest fixed star
whatever may be the process of stellar evolution
their doubtless is an era of many hundreds of millions of years
in the life of the star when it is passing through a planet
a planet-maintaining stage. This would likely depend upon spectral type, or to be indicated by it,
and as about half of the stars are of the solar type, it would be a reasonable inference
that at least half of the stars may have planets tributary to them. In such a case,
the chances must be overwhelmingly in favour of vast numbers of the planets of other stealth systems,
being favourably circumstance as to heat and moisture for the maintenance of life at the present time.
That is, they are habitable, and if habitable, then thousands of them are no doubt inhabited now.
But astronomers know absolutely nothing about this question, nor are they able to conceive at present any way that may lead them to any definite knowledge of it.
There is indeed one piece of quasi-evidence which might reasonably be interpreted as implying that it is more likely that the stars are not attended by families of planets than that they are.
End of Chapter 35 of Astronomy. The Science of the Heavenly Bodies
This is a Librevox recording. All Librevox recordings are in the public domain. For more information.
or to volunteer, please visit Libravox.org.
Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies, by David Todd.
The Little Planets
Along toward the end of the 18th century and the beginning of the 19th,
astronomers were leading a quiet, unexcited life.
Sir William Herschel had been knighted by King George
for his discovery of the outer planet Uranus,
and practically everything seemed to be known and discovered
in the solar system with a single exception. Between Mars and Jupiter, there existed an obvious gap
in the planetary brotherhood. Could it be possible that some time in the remote cosmic past,
a planet actually existed there, and that some celestial cataclysm had blown it to fragments?
If so, would they still be traveling round the sun as individual small planets? And might it not be
possible to discover some of them among the faint stars that make up the belt of the zodiac
in which all the other planets travel? So interesting was this question that the first
international association of astronomers banded themselves together to carry on a systematic search
around the entire zodiacal heavens in the faint hope of detecting possible fragments of the
original planet of mere hypothesis. The astronomers of that day placed
much reliance on what is known as Bode's Law,
not a law at all,
but a mere arithmetical succession of numbers
which represented very well
the relative distances of all the planets from the Sun.
And the distance of a newly found Uranus
fitted in so well with this law
that the utter absence of a planet in the gap
between Mars and Jupiter
became very strongly marked.
Quite by accident,
A discovery of one of the guestat small planetary bodies was made on January 1st, 1801,
at Palermo Sicily by Piazzi, who was regularly occupied in making an extensive catalog of the stars.
His observations soon showed that the new object he had seen could not be a fixed star,
because it moved from night to night among the stars.
He concluded that it was a planet and named it series,
for the tutelary goddess of Sicily.
Other astronomers kept up the search,
and another companion planet,
Palace, was found in the following year.
Juno was found in 1804,
and Vesta, the largest and brightest of all the minor planets,
in 1807.
Vesta is sometimes bright enough
when nearest the Earth to be seen with the naked eye,
but it was the last of the brighter stars
and no more discoveries of the kind were made till the fifth was found in 1845.
Since then, discoveries have been made in great abundance, more and more with every year,
till the number of little planets at present known is very near 1,000.
The early asteroid hunters found the search rather tedious,
and the labor increased as it became necessary to examine the increasing thousands of fainter
and fainter stars that must be observed in order to detect the undiscovered planets,
which naturally grow fainter and fainter as the chase is prolonged.
First, a chart of the ecliptic sky had to be prepared,
containing all the stars that the telescope employed in the search would show.
Some of the most detailed charts of the sky in existence were prepared in connection with
this work, particularly by the late Dr. Peters of Hamilton College.
Once such charts are complete, they are compared with the sky, night after night, when the moon is absent.
Thousands upon thousands of tedious hours are spent in this comparison, with no result whatever,
except that chart and sky are found to correspond exactly.
But now and then the planet Hunter is rewarded by finding a new object in the sky that does not appear on his chart.
Almost certainly this is a small planet, and only a few nights' observation will be necessary
to enable the discoverer to find out approximately the orbit it is traveling in,
and whether it is out and out a new planet, or only one that had been previously recognized
and then lost track of.
Nearly all the minor planets so far found have had names assigned to them,
principally legendary and mythological.
and a nearly complete catalog of them, containing the elements of their orbits,
that is, all the mathematical data that tells us about their distance from the sun
and the circumstances of their motion around him,
is published each year in the Ennouad Dubiro de Lunditudes at Paris.
But these little planets require a great deal of care and attention,
for some astronomers must accurately observe them every few years,
and other astronomers must conduct intricate mathematical computations based on these observations.
Otherwise, they get lost and have to be discovered all over again.
Professor Watson of the University of Michigan and later of the University of Wisconsin
endowed the 22 asteroids of his own discovery, leaving the National Academy of Sciences
a fund for prosecuting this work perpetually, and Loisner is now able to
conducting it. While the number of the asteroids is gratifyingly large, their individual size is so
small, and their total mass so slight, that even if there are a hundred thousand of them, as is
wholly possible, they would not be comparable in magnitude with any one of the great planets.
Vesta, the largest, is perhaps 400 miles in diameter, and if composed of substances similar to
those which make up the Earth, its mass may be perhaps one 20,000th of the Earth's mass.
If we calculate the surface gravity on such a body, we find it about one-thteenth of what it is here,
so that a rifle ball, if fired on Vesta with a muzzle velocity of only 2,000 feet a second,
might overmaster the gravity of the little planet entirely and be projected in space never to return.
if, as is likely, some of the smallest asteroids are not more than ten miles in diameter,
their gravity must be so feeble of force that it might be overcome by a stone throw from the hand.
There is no reliable evidence that any of the asteroids are surrounded by atmospheric gases of any sort.
Probably they are, for the most part, spherical in form,
although there is very reliable evidence that a few of the asteroids, being variable in the
amount of sunlight that they reflect, are irregular in form, merely angular masses, perhaps.
The network of orbits of the asteroids is inconceivably complicated. Nevertheless, there is a wide
variation in their average distance from the sun, as their periods of traveling around him
vary in a similar manner, the shortest being
only about three years, but the longest is nearly nine years in duration. The average of all
their periods is a little over four years. The gap in the zone of asteroids, at a distance from the
sun, equal to about five-eighths, that of Jupiter, is due to the excessive disturbing action of
Jupiter, whose periodic time is just twice as long as that of a theoretical planet at this
distance. The average inclination of their orbits to the plane of the ecliptic is not far from
eight degrees, but the orbit of Pallas, for example, is inclined 35 degrees, and the eccentricities
of the asteroid orbits are equally erratic and excessive. Both eccentricity and inclination
of orbit, at times suggest a possible relation to cometary orbits, but nothing ever has been
definitely made out connecting asteroids and comets in a related origin. No comprehensive theory of the
origin of the asteroid group has yet been propounded that has met with universal acceptance.
According to the nebular hypothesis, the original gaseous material, which should have been so
concentrated as to form a planet of ordinary type, has in the case of the asteroids,
collected into a multitude of small masses instead of simply one. That there is a sound physical reason
for this can hardly be denied. According to Laplacean hypothesis, the nearness of the huge
planetary mass of Jupiter just beyond their orbits produced violent perturbations which
caused the original ring of gaseous material to collect interfragmentary masses instead of one
considerable planet. The theory of a century ago that an original great planet was shattered
by internal explosive forces is no longer regarded as tenable. To astronomers engaged upon
investigation of distances in the solar system, the asteroid group has proved very useful. The late Sir David
Gill employed a number of them in a geometrical research for finding the sun's distance,
and more recently, the discovery of Eros has made it possible to apply a similar method
for a like purpose when it approaches nearest to the Earth in 1924 and 1931.
Then, the distance of Eros will be less than half that of Mars, or even Venus, at their nearest.
When the total number of asteroids discovered has reached a thousand, with accurate determination
of all their orbits, we shall have sufficient material for a statistical investigation of the
group which ought to elucidate the question of its origin, and bear on other problems of the
cosmogony yet unsolved. Present methods of discovery of the asteroids by photography
replace entirely the old method by visual observation alone,
with the result that discoveries are made with relatively great ease and rapidity.
End of Section 35.
Chapter 36.
Of astronomy, the science of heavenly bodies.
This is a Libravox recording.
All Libravox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit Libravox.org.
Astronomy.
The science of the heavenly bodies.
by David Todd,
The Giant Planet.
I can never forget as a young boy my first glimpse of the planet Jupiter and his moons.
It was through a bit of a telescope that I had put together with my own hands,
a tube of pasteboard and a pair of old spectacle lenses
the chance to be lying about the house.
In the field of view, I saw five objects,
four of them looking quite alike,
and is that they were stars merely.
they were Jupiter's moons, while the fifth was vastly larger and brighter. It was circular in shape,
and I thought I could see a faint darkish line across the middle of it. This experience encouraged me
immensely, and I availed myself, eagerly, of the first chance to see Jupiter through a bigger
and better glass. Then I saw at once that I had observed nothing wrongly, but that I had seen
only the merest fraction of what there was to see.
In the first place, the planet's disk was not perfectly circular, but slightly oval.
Inquiring into the cause of this, we must remember that Jupiter is actually not a flat disk,
but a huge ball or globe more than ten times the diameter of the Earth,
which turns swiftly round on its axis once every ten hours,
as against the Earth's turning around in 24 hours.
Then it is easy to see how the centrifugal forest bulges outward the equatorial regions of Jupiter,
so that the polar regions are correspondingly drawn inward,
thereby making the polar diameter shorter than the equator one,
which is in line with the moons or satellites.
The difference between the two diameters is very marked, as much as one part in 15.
All the planets are slightly flattened in this way,
But Jupiter is the most so of all, except Saturn.
The little darkish line across the planet's middle region or equator
was found to be replaced by several such lines or irregular belts and spots,
often seen highly colored, especially with reflecting telescopes,
and they are perpetually changing their mutual relation and shapes
because they are not solid territory, or land on Jupiter,
but merely the outer shapes of atmospheric,
blown and torn and twisted by atmospheric circulation on this planet.
Quite the same as clouds in the atmosphere on the Earth are.
Besides this, the axial turning of Jupiter brings an entirely different part of the planet into view every two or three hours,
so that in making a map or chart of the planet, an arbitrary meridian must be selected.
Even then, the process is not an easy one, and it is found
that spots on Jupiter's equator turn around in nine hours and 50 minutes, while other regions
take a few minutes longer, the nearer the poles are approached. The Great Red Spot,
about 30,000 miles long and a quarter as much in breadth, has been visible for about half a century.
Bolton, an English observer, had made interesting studies of it very recently. The four moons,
or satellites, which a small telescope reveals, are exceedingly interesting on many accounts.
They were the first heavenly body seen by the aid of the telescope, Galileo having discovered them
in 1610. They traveled round Jupiter much the same as the moon does round the earth,
but faster. The innermost moon about four times per week. The second moon, about twice a week.
the third or largest moon, larger than the planet Mercury, once a week, and the outermost in about
16 days. The innermost is about 260,000 miles from Jupiter, and the outermost more than a million
miles. From their nearness to the huge and excessively hot globe of Jupiter, some astronomers,
Proctor especially, have inclined to view that these little bodies may be
inhabited. Jupiter has other moons, a very small one, close to the planet, which goes round
in less than 12 hours, discovered by Barnard in 1892. Four others are known, very small and faint
and remote from the planet, which travel slowly round it in orbits of great magnitude. The ninth,
or outermost, is at a distance of 15 and 1 half million miles from Jupiter, and requires nearly
three years in going round the planet. It was discovered by Nicholson at the Lick Observatory in
1914. The 8th was discovered by Milot at Greenwich in 1908 and is peculiar in the great angle of 28
degrees, at which its orbit is inclined to the equator of Jupiter. The 6th and 7th satellites
revolve round Jupiter inside the 8th satellite, but outside the orbit of 4.
and they were discovered by photography at the Lick Observatory in 1905 by Perrine,
now director of the Argentine National Observatory at Cordoba.
The ever-changing positions of the Medician moons,
as Galileo called the four satellites that he discovered,
their passing into the shadow and eclipse,
their transit in front of the disk,
and their occupation behind it,
form a succession of phenomena,
which the telescopeist always views with delight.
The times when all these events take place
are predicted in the nautical almanac,
many thousand of them each year,
and the predictions cover two or three years in advance.
Jupiter, as the naked eye sees him high up in the midnight sky,
is the brightest of all the planets except Venus.
Indeed, he is five times brighter than Sirius,
the brightest of all the fixed stars.
His stately motion among the planets,
the stars will usually be visible by close observation from day to day, and his distance from
the Earth at times when he is best seen, is usually about 400 million miles. Jupiter travels
all the way around the sun in 12 years. His motion in orbit is about 8 miles a second. The
eclipses of Jupiter's moons, caused by passing into the shadow of the planet, would take place
at almost perfectly regular intervals if our distance from Jupiter were invariable.
but it was early found out that while the Earth is approaching Jupiter, the eclipses take place
earlier and earlier, but later and later when the Earth is moving away.
The acceleration of the earliest eclipse added to the retardation of the latest makes 1,000 seconds,
which is the time that light takes in crossing the diameter of the Earth's slope around the sun.
Now the velocity of light is well known to be 186,300 miles,
per second. So we calculate it once, and very simply, that the sun's distance from the Earth,
which is half the diameter of the orbit, equals 500 times 186, 300,000, or 93 million miles.
End of Section 36.
Chapter 37 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Libravox recording. All Libravox
recordings are in the public domain. For more information or to volunteer, please visit
Librevox.org. Astronomy, the science of the heavenly bodies by David Todd. The Ringed Planet
Saturn is the most remote of all the planets that the ancient peoples knew anything about.
These anciently known planets are sometimes called the lucid or naked eye planets,
5 in number, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn. Saturn shines as a first magnitude
star with a steady straw-colored light and is at a distance of about 800 million miles from
the Earth when best seen. Saturn travels completely round the sun in a little short of 30 years,
and the telescope, when turned to Saturn, reveals a unique,
and astonishing object.
A vast globe
somewhat similar to Jupiter,
but surrounded by a system
of rings wholly unlike
anything else in the universe,
as far as at present known.
The whole encircled
by a family of ten moons or satellites.
The Saturnian system, therefore,
is regarded by many
as the most wonderful and
most interesting of all the
objects that the telescope reveals.
At first, the flattening of the disk of Saturn is not easily made out, but every 15 years, as 1921 and 1936, the Earth comes into a position where we look directly at the thin edge of the rings, causing them to completely disappear.
Then the remarkable flattening of the poles of Saturn is strikingly visible, amounting to as much as one-tenth of the entire diameter.
The atmospheric belt system is also best seen at these times.
But the rings of Saturn are easily the most fascinating features of the system.
They can never be seen as if we were directly above or beneath the planet,
so they never appear circular, as they really are in space,
but always oval or elliptical in shape.
The minor axis or greatest breath is about one half the main one half the main one half the main area,
one-half the major access or length.
The latter is the outer ring's actual diameter,
and it amounts to 170,000 miles,
or two and one-half times the diameter of Saturn's globe.
There are, in fact, no less than four rings.
An outer ring sometimes seemed to be divided near its middle,
an inner, broader, and brighter ring,
and an innermost dusky or crape ring, as it is often called.
This comes within about 10,000 miles of the planet itself.
After the form and size of the rings were well made out,
their thickness, or rather lack of thickness, was a great puzzle.
If a model about a foot in diameter were cut out of tissue paper,
the relative proportion of size and thickness would be about right.
In space, the thickness is very nearly 100 miles, so that, when we look at the ring system edge on,
it becomes all but invisible except in very large telescopes.
Clearly a ring so thin cannot be a continuous solid object,
and recent observations have proved beyond a doubt that Saturn's rings are made up of millions of separate particles moving around the planet,
each as if it were an individual satellite.
Ever since 1857, the true theory of the constitution of the Saturnian ring has been recognized on
theoretic grounds, because Clerk Maxwell founded the dynamical demonstration that the rings
could be neither fluid nor solid, so that they must be made up of a vast multitude of particles
traveling around the planet independently.
But the physical demonstration that absolutely verified this conclusion did not come until 1895,
when, as we have said in the preceding chapter, Keeler, by radio velocity measures on different
regions of the ring by means of the spectroscope, proved that the inner parts of the ring
travel more swiftly around the planet than the outer regions do.
And he further showed that the rates of revolution in different parts of the ring
exactly correspond to the periods of revolution which satellites of Saturn would have,
if at the same distance from the center of the planet.
The innermost particles of the dusky ring, for example, travel around Saturn in about five hours,
while the outermost particles of the outer bright ring take 137 hours to make their revolution.
For many years, it was thought that the Saturnian ring system was a new satellite in process of formation,
but this view is no longer entertained, and the system is regarded as a permanent feature of the planet,
although astronomers are not in entire agreement as to the evolutionary process by which it came into existence,
whether by some cosmic cataclysm or by gradual development throughout indefinite eons,
as the rest of the solar system is thought to have come to its present state of existence.
Possibly the planetesimal hypothesis of Chamberlain and Moulton affords the true explanation
as the result of a rupture due to excessive tidal strain.
End of Chapter 37, read by Andrea Kotzer.
Chapter 38 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Libre Works recording.
Librivox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit Libriworks.org.
Read by Cosmic T.
Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies by David Todd.
The Farthest Planets
On the 13th of March 1781, between 10 and 11 p.m.
As Sir William Herschel was sweeping the constellation Gemini with one of his great
reflecting telescopes, one star among all that passed through the field of view attracted his attention.
Removing the eyepiece and applying another with a higher magnifying power, he found that,
unlike all the other stars, this one had a small disc and was not a mere point of light,
as all the fixed stars seemed to be.
A few nights' observation showed that the stranger was moving among the stars.
So, he thought it must be a comet.
But a week's observation following showed that he had discovered a new member of the planetary system far out beyond Saturn, which from time immemorial had been assumed to be the outermost planet of all.
This then was the first real discovery of a planet, as the finding of the satellites of Jupiter had been assumed to be the outermost planet.
been the first of all astronomical discoveries, Herschel's discovery occasioned great excitement.
And he named the new planet Georgian Sidus, or the Georgian, after his king.
The king created him a knight and gave him a pension, besides providing the means for building
a huge telescope 40 feet long, with which he subsequently made many other astronomical discoveries.
The planet that Herschel discovered is now called Uranus.
Uranus is an object not wholly impossible to see with the naked eye if the sky background is clear and black and one knows exactly where to look for it.
Its brightness is about that of a sixth magnitude star or a little fainter.
Its average distance from the sun is about 1,800 million miles and it takes 84 years to complete
its journey round the Sun, traveling only a little more than four miles a second.
When we examine Uranus closely with a large telescope, we find a small disk, slightly greenish
intent, very slightly flattened and at times faint bands or belts are apparently seen.
Uranus is about 30,000 miles in diameter and is probably surrounded by a dense atmosphere.
rotation time is 10 hours and 50 minutes. Uranus is attended by four
moons or satellites named Ariel, Uriol, Titania and Oberon. The last being the
most remote from the planet. This system of satellite has a remarkable
peculiarity. The plane of the orbit in which they travel around Uranus is inclined
about 80 degrees to the plane of the ecliptic. So, the
that the satellite traveled backward or in a retrograde direction or we might regard their motion as forward or direct if we consider the planes of the orbit inclined at a hundred degrees.
For many years after the discovery of Uranus, it was thought that all the great bodies of solar system had surely been found.
Least of all was any planet suspected beyond Uranus until the mathematical tables of the motion of Uranus, although built up,
and revised with the greatest care and thoroughness began to show that some outside
influence was disturbing it in accordance with Newton's law of gravitation.
The attraction of a still more distant planet would account for the disturbance,
and since no such planet was visible anywhere, a mathematical search for it was begun.
Neptune, wholly independently of each other, two young astronomers
Adams of England and Leveria of France undertook to solve the unique problem of finding out the position in the sky where a planet might be found that would exactly account for the irregular motion of Uranus.
Both reached practically identical results. Adams was first in point of time and his announcement led to the earliest observation without recognition of the new planet, July 30, 1846.
although it was a lavarese work that led directly to the new planets being first seen and recognized as such September 23, 1846.
Figuring backward, it was found that the planet had been accidentally observed in Paris in 1795, but its planetary character had been overlooked.
Neptune is the name finally assigned to this historical planet.
It is 30 times farther from the sun than the Earth, or two times.
thousand eight hundred million miles its velocity in orbit is a little over three
miles per second and it consumes 164 years in going once completely round the Sun so faint
is it that a telescope of large size is necessary to show it plainly the brightness
equals that of a star of the eighth magnitude and with the telescope of sufficient
magnifying power the tiny disc can be seen
seen and measured. The planet is about 30,000 miles in diameter and is not known to possess more
than one moon or satellite. If there are others, they are probably too faint to be seen by any
telescope at present in existence. End of chapter 38. Chapter 39 of Astronomy, the Science
of the Heavenly Bodies. This is the Libre Works recording. All Libre Works recordings are in the
public domain. For more information or to volunteer, please visit Librivox.org, read by Cosmic
T. Astronomy. The Science of the Heavenly Bodies by David Todd. The Trans-Neptunian Planet
Investigation of the question of a possible trans-Neptunian planet was undertaken by the writer
in 1877, as Neptune requires 164 years to travel completely around the same.
and the period during which it has been carefully observed embraces only half that interval,
clearly its orbit cannot be regarded as very well known.
Any possible deviations from the mathematical orbit could not therefore be traced to the action
of a possible unknown planet outside.
But the case was different with Uranus, which showed very slight disturbances,
and these were assumed to be due to a possible planet exterior.
to both Uranus and Neptune.
As a position for this body in the heavens was indicated by the writer's investigation,
that region of the sky was searched by him with great care in 1877, 1878,
with the 26-inch telescope at Washington,
and photographs of the same region were afterward taken by others,
though only with negative results.
In 1880, Forbes of Edenburg published his investigation
of the problem from an entirely independent angle.
Families of comets have long been recognized
whose abhalian distances correspond so nearly
with the distances of the planets
that these comet families are now recognized
as having been created by the several planets
which have reduced the high original velocities
possessed by the comets on first entering the solar system.
Their orbits have ever since been illiberal
with their Apalya in groups corresponding to the distances of the planets concerned.
Jupiter has a large group of such comets, also Saturn.
Uranus and Neptune likewise have their families of comets,
and Popes found two groups with average distances far outside of Neptune,
from which he drew the inference that there are two transneptunean planets.
The position he assigned to the inner one
agreed fairly well with the writer's planet as indicated by unexplained deviations of Uranus.
The theoretical problem of Transnptune planet has since been taken up by Galliard and Lau of Paris,
the late Percival Lowell and W.H. Pickering of Harvard.
The photographic method of search will, it is expected, ultimately lead to its discovery.
On account of the probable faintness of the planet, at least the 12th or 13th magnitude,
Medkov's method of search is well adapted to this practical problem.
When near its opposition, the motion of Neptune retrograding among the stars
amounts to 5 seconds of arc in an hour, while the trans-neptunian planet would move by 3 seconds.
By shifting the plate this amount hourly during exposure, the suspected
object would readily be detected on the photographic plate as a minute and nearly circular
disk, all the adjacent stars being represented by short trails. Interest in a possible planet
of planets outside the orbit of Neptune is likely to increase rather than diminish.
To the ancients, seven was the perfect number. There were seven heavenly bodies already known,
so there could be no use whatever in looking for an eighth. The discovery
of Uranus in 1781 proved the futility of such logic and Neptune followed in 1846
with further demonstration if need be. The cosmogany of the present days sets no outer
limits to the solar system and some astronomers advocate the existence of many transneptunean
planets. End of chapter 39. Chapter 40 of astronomy, the science of the heavenly bodies.
All Libervox recordings are in the public domain. For more information or to volunteer, please visit Libervox.org.
Read by Swan in Love. Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies by David Todd. Comets, the hairy stars. Comets, hairy stars, as the origin of the name would indicate, are the freaks of the heavens.
of great variety in shape, some with heads and some without, some with tails and some without,
moving very slowly at one time and with exceedingly high velocity at another,
in orbits at all possible angles of inclination to the general plane of the planetary paths round the sun.
Their antics and irregularities were the wonder and terror of the ancient world,
and they are keenly dreaded by superstitious people even to the present day.
Down through the Middle Ages, the advent of a comet was regarded as
threatening the world of famine, plague and war, to princes' death, to kingdoms many curses,
to all estates' inevitable losses, to herdsmen wrought, to plowmen hapless seasons,
to sailors, storms, to cities' civil treasons. Comets appear to be marvelous objects, as well as sinister,
chiefly because they bid apparent defiance to all law. Kepler had shown that the moon and the planets
travel in regular paths, slightly elliptical to be sure, but nevertheless unvarying.
None of the comets were known to follow regular paths till the time of Halley, late in the 17th century,
when, as we have before told, a fine comet made its appearance, and Halley calculated its orbit with much precision,
comparing this with the orbits of comets that had previously been seen.
He found its path about the sun practically identical with that of at least two comets,
previously observed in 1531 and 1607.
So Halley ventured to think that all these comets were one in the same body,
and that it traveled round the sun in a long ellipse in a period of about 75 or 76 years.
We have seen how his prediction of its return in 1758 was verified in every particular.
On the comet's return in 1910, Crowell and Cromelon of Greenwich made a thorough mathematical investigation of the orbit, indicating that the year 1986 will witness its next return to the sun.
There is a class of astronomers known as comet hunters, and they pass hours upon hours of clear, sparkling, moonless nights in search for comets.
They are equipped with a peculiar sort of telescope called a comet seeker, which has an object glass, usually four or five inches in diameter, and a relatively short length of focus, so that a larger field of view may be included.
Regions near the poles of the heavens are perhaps the most fruitful fields for search, and thence toward the sun, till its light renders the sky too bright for the finding of such a faint object,
as a new comet usually is at the time of discovery.
Generally, when first seen, it resembles a small circular patch of faint luminous cloud.
When a suspect is found, the first thing to do is to observe its position accurately with
relation to the surrounding stars. Then, if on the next occasion, when it is seen, the object
has moved, the chances are that it is a comet, and a few days'
observation will provide material from which the path of the comet in space can be calculated.
By comparing this with the complete lists of comets, now about 700 in number, it is possible to tell
whether the comet is a new one or an old one returning. The total number of comets in the heavens
must be very great, and thousands are doubtless passing continually undetected, because their
light is wholly overpowered by that of the sun. Of those that are known, perhaps one in 12
develops into a naked eye comet, and in some years six or seven will be discovered. With
sufficiently powerful telescopes, there are, as of rule, not many weeks in the year when no
comet is visible. Brilliant naked eye comets are, however, infrequent. Comets, except Halleys,
generally bear the name of their discoverer as Donati, 1858, and Poulns Brooks in 1893.
Poulns was a very active discoverer of comets in France early in the 19th century.
He was a doorkeeper at the Observatory of Merseilles, and his name is now more famous in astronomy
than that of Thulis, then the director of the observatory, who taught and encouraged him.
Messier was another very successful discoverer of comets in France, and in America we have had many,
Swift, Brooks, and Barnard, the most successful.
How bright a comet will be, and how long it will be visible, depends on many conditions.
So the comets vary much in these respects.
The first comet of 1811 was under observation for nearly a year and a half,
the longest on record till Halle is in 1910.
In case the comet eludes discovery and observation
until it has passed its perihelian
or nearest point to the sun,
its period of visibility may be reduced
to a few weeks only.
The brightest comets on record
were visible in 1843 and 1882.
So brilliant were they
that even the effulgence of full daylight
did not overpower them. In particular, the comet of 1843 was not only excessively bright,
but at its nearest approach to the earth, its tail swept all the way across the sky from one horizon
to the other. It must have looked very much like the straight beam of an enormous searchlight,
though very much brighter. The tales of comets are to the naked eye the most compelling thing about them,
and to the ancient peoples they were naturally most terrifying.
Their tails are not only curved,
but sometimes curved with varying degrees of curvature,
and this circumstance adds to their weirdness of appearance.
If we examine the tail of a comet with a telescope,
it vanishes as if there were nothing to it,
as indeed one may almost say there is not.
Ordinarily, only the head of the comet is of much interest,
in the telescope. When first seen, there is usually nothing but the head visible, and that is
made up of portions which develop more or less rapidly, presenting a succession of phenomena
quite different in different comets. When first discovered, a comet is usually at a great distance
from the sun, about the distance of Jupiter, and we see it not as we do the planets, by
sunlight reflected from them, but by the comet's own light. This is at the
time, very faint, and nearly all comets at such distance look alike. Small, roundish, hazy
patches of faint cloud-like light, with very often a concentration towards the center called
the nucleus, on the average, about 4,000 miles in diameter. Approach towards the sun brightens up
the comet more and more, and the nucleus usually becomes very much brighter and more star-like. Then on the
sunward side of the nucleus, jet-like streamers or envelopes appear to be thrown off,
often as if in parallel curved strata or concentrically. As they expand and move outward from the
nucleus, these envelopes grow fainter and are finally merged in the general nebulosity,
known as the comet's head, which is anywhere from 30,000 to 100,000 miles in diameter.
As a rule, this is an orderly development.
which can be watched in the telescope from hour to hour and from night to night.
But occasionally, a cometary visitor is quite a law to itself in development,
presenting a fascinating succession of unpredictable surprises.
Then follows the development of the comet's tale,
perhaps more striking than anything that has preceded it.
Here, a genuine repulsion from the sun appears to come into play.
It may be an electrical repulsion. Much of the material projected from the comet's nucleus
seems to be driven backward or repelled by the sun, and it is this that goes to form the tail.
The particles which form the tail then travel in modified paths, which nevertheless can be calculated.
The tail is made up of these luminous particles and expands in space, much in the form of a hollow,
horn-shaped cone, the nucleus being near the tip of the horn. Some comets possess multiple tails
with different degrees of curvatures, Donates, for example. Usually, there is a nearly straight
central dark space marking the axis of the comet and following the nucleus. But occasionally,
this is replaced by a thin light streak, very much less in breadth than the diameter of the head.
Cometary tails are sometimes 100 million miles in length.
Three different types of cometary tales are recognized.
First, the long straight ones, apparently made up of matter repelled by the sun,
12 to 15 times more powerfully than gravitation attracts it.
Such particles must be brushed away from the comet's head
with a velocity of perhaps 5 miles a second,
and their speed is continually increasing.
Probably these straight tails are due to hydrogen.
The second type tails are somewhat curved or plume-like,
and they form the most common type of cometary tail.
In them, the sun's repulsion is perhaps twice its gravitational attraction,
and hydrocarbons in some form appear to be responsible for tails of this character.
Then, there is a third type, much less often seen, short and quickly curving,
probably due to heavier vapors, as of chlorine or iron or sodium,
in which a repulsive force is only a small fraction of that of gravitation.
Many features of this theory of cometary tales are born out of investigation of their light with the spectroscope.
Although the investigation is as yet fragmentary,
it is evident that the tail of a comet is formed at the expense of the substance of the nucleus and head,
so that the matter of Pelt is forever dissipated through the regions of space, which the comet has traveled.
Comets must lose much of their original substance every time they return to perihelian.
Comets actually age, therefore, and grow less and less in magnitude of material, as well as brightness,
until they are at last opaque, non-luminous bodies, which it becomes impossible to follow with the telescope.
of chapter 40 chapter 41 of astronomy the science of the heavenly bodies this is a Librivox
recording all Librivox recordings are in the public domain for more information or to
volunteer please visit Librivox.org read by Cosmic tea astronomy the science of the
heavenly bodies by David Todd where do comets come from
Where do comets come from?
The answer to this question is not yet fully made out.
Most likely they have not all had a similar origin and theories are abundant.
Apparently they come into the solar system from outer space from any direction whatsoever.
The depths of the interstellar space seem to be responsible for most, if not all, of the new ones.
Whether they have come from other stars or stellar systems, we cannot say.
While comets are tremendous in size or volume, their mass or the amount of real substance
in them is relatively very slight.
We know this by the effect they produce on planets that they pass near, or rather by the effect
that they fail to produce.
The Earth's atmosphere weighs about 1,250,000 as much as the Earth itself.
a comet's entire mass must be vastly less than this.
Even if a comet were to collide with the Earth head on, there is little reason to believe that
dire catastrophe would ensure.
At least twice the Earth is known to have passed through the tail of a comet and the only
effect noticed was upon the comet itself. Its orbit had been moved somewhat by the attraction
of the Earth. If the comet were a small one, collision with any of the planets would result
and absorption and dissipation of the comet into vapor.
The whole of a large comet has perhaps as much mass or weight as a spear of iron a hundred
miles in diameter.
Even this could not wreck the Earth, but the effect would depend upon what part of the Earth
was hit.
A comet is very thin and tenuous because its relatively small mass is distributed through a volume
so enormous. So it is probable that the Earth's atmosphere could scatter and burn up the
invading comet and we should have only a shower of meteors on an unprecedented scale.
Diffusion of noxious gases through the atmosphere might vitiate it to some extent, though
probably not enough to cause the extinction of animal life. Every comet has an interesting
history of its own, almost indeed unique, one of the smallest
comets and the briefest in its period around the Sun is known as Enkies Comet.
It is a telescopic comet with a very short tail.
Its time of revolution is about 3.5 years and it exhibits a remarkable contraction of volume
on approach to the Sun.
Bela's comet has a period about twice as long.
At one time it passes within about 15 million miles of the Earth and somewhere about the year
1840 this comet devoid.
divided into two distinct comets which traveled for months side by side, but later separated
and both have since completely disappeared.
Perhaps the most beautiful of all comets is that discovered by Donati of Florence in 1858.
Its coma presented the development of jets and envelopes in remarkable perfection, and
its tail was of the secondary or hydrocarbon type, but accompanied
by two faint streamer tails nearly tangential to the main tail and of the hydrogen type.
Donati's comet moves in an ellipse of extraordinary length and it will not return to the sun
for nearly 2,000 years. The most brilliant comet of the last half century is known as the
Great Comet of 1882. In a clear sky, it could readily be seen at midday. On September 17, it
passed across the disk of the sun and was practically as bright as the surface of the
sun itself.
The comet had a multiple nucleus and a hydrocarbon tail of the second type, nearly a hundred
million miles in length.
Doubtless this great comet is a member of what is known as a cometary group, which consists
of comets having the same orbit and traveling tandem round the sun.
The comet of 1668, 1843, 1880, 1882, and 1887 belong to this particular group.
And they all pass within 300,000 miles of the sun's surface, at a maximum velocity exceeding 300 miles a second.
They must therefore invade the region of the solar corona, the inference being that the corona, as well as the comet, is composed of exceedingly rare matter.
Photography of comets has developed remarkably within recent years, especially under the
deft manipulation of Barnard, whose plates, in particular during his residence at the Lick Observatory
on Mount Hamilton, California, show the feature of cometary heads and tails in excellent
definition.
Halley's comet at the 1910 apparition was particularly well photographed at many observatories.
The question is often asked.
When will the next comet come? If a large bright comet is meant, astronomers cannot tell.
At almost any time one may blaze into prominence within only a few days. During the latter half of
the last century, bright comets appeared at perihelian at intervals of eight years on the average.
Several of the lesser and fainter periodic comets return nearly every year, but they are mostly
telescopic and are rarely seen except by astronomers who are particularly interested in observing them.
End of Chapter 42 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies. This is a Libravox recording.
All Libravox recordings are in the public domain. For more information or to volunteer, please visit
Libravox.org. Astronomy, the science of the heavenly bodies,
by David Todd. Meteors and Shooting Stars
Falling stars or shooting stars have been familiar sights in all ages of the world,
but the ancient philosophers thought them scarcely worthy of notice.
According to Aristotle, they were mere nothings of the upper atmosphere,
of no more account than the general happenings of the weather.
But about the end of the 18th century and the beginning of the 19th,
the insufficiency of this view began to be fully recognized,
an interplanetary space was conceived as tenanted by shoals of moving bodies exceedingly small in mass
and dimension as compared with the planets. Millions of these bodies are all the time in collision
with the outlying regions of our atmosphere, and by their impact upon it and their friction
in passing swiftly through it, they become heated to incandescence, thus creating the luminous
appearances commonly known as shooting stars. For the most part, they are consumed or disableness,
in vapor before reaching the solid surface of the earth, but occasionally a luminous cloud or
streak is left glowing in the wake of a large meteor, which sometimes remains visible for half
an hour after the passage of the meteor itself. These mist-like clouds projected upon the dark sky
have been especially studied by Trowbridge of Columbia University. Many more meteors are seen
during the morning hours, say from four to six, than at any other nightly period.
of equal length, because the visible sky is at that time nearly centered around the general direction
toward which the earth is moving in its orbit round the sun, so that the number of meteors that
would fall upon the earth if at rest is increased by those which the earth overtakes by its own motion.
Also from January to July, while the earth is traveling from perihelian to aphelian. Fewer meteors
are seen than in the last half of the year, but this is chiefly because of the rich shower.
encountered in August and November. Although the descent of meteoric bodies from the sky was pretty
generally discredited until early in the 19th century, such falls had nevertheless been recorded
from very early times. They were usually regarded as prodigies or miracles, and such stones
were commonly objects of worship among ancient peoples. For example, the Phrygian stone, known as the
quote, Diana of the Ephesians, which fell down from Jupiter, unquote, was a very important.
a famous stone built into the Kaaba at Mecca, and even today it is revered by Mohammedans as a holy relic.
Perhaps the earliest known meteoric fall is that historically recorded in the Parian Chronicle
as having occurred in the island of Crete, B.C. 1478. Also in the Imperial Museum of Petrograd
is the Palace, or Krosnyarsk Iron, perhaps three-quarters of a ton in weight, found in 1772 by
Palace, the famous traveler at Krasnyarsk, Siberia. But a fall of meteoric stones that chanced upon the
Department of Orne, France, in 1805, led to a critical investigation by Biot, the distinguished physicist
and academician. According to his report, a violent explosion in the neighborhood of Legla had been
heard for a distance of 75 miles around, and lasting 5 or 6 minutes, about 1 p.m. on Tuesday, April 26.
From several adjoining towns, a rapidly moving fireball had been seen in a sky generally clear,
and there was absolutely no room for doubt that on the same day, many stones fell in the neighborhood
of Legla. Bio estimated their number between 2 and 3,000, and they were scattered over an elliptical
area more than 6 miles long and 2.5 miles broad. Thence forward, the descent of meteoric matter
from outer space upon the earth, has been recognized as an unquestioned fact.
The origin of these bodies being cosmic, meteors may be expected to fall upon the earth
without reference to latitude or season or day and night or weather. On entering our upper
atmosphere, their temperature must be that of space, many hundred degrees below zero, and their
velocities range from 10 miles per second upward. But atmospheric resistance to their flight
is so great that their velocity is quickly reduced. At ground impact, it does not exceed a few
hundred feet per second. On January 1, 1869, several meteoric stones fell on ice only a few inches
thick in Sweden, rebounding without either breaking through the ice or being themselves fractured.
Naturally, the flight of a meteor through the atmosphere will be only a few seconds in duration,
and owing to the sudden reduction of velocity, it will continue to be luminous throughout only the
upper part of its course. Visibility generally begins at an elevation of a about,
70 miles and ends at perhaps half that altitude. What is the origin of meteors?
Theories there are in great abundance, that they come from the sun, that they come from the moon,
that they come from the earth in past ages as a result of volcanic action, and so on.
But there are many difficulties in the way of acceptance of these and several other theories,
that all meteors were originally parts of cometary masses is, however, a theory that may be
accepted without much hesitation. Comets have been known to disintegrate. Bila's comet even disappeared
entirely so that during a shower of Bila meteors in November 1885, an actual fragment of the lost
comet fell upon the Earth at Mazapil, Mexico. As the Bileid meteors encounter the Earth with a relatively
low velocity of 10 miles a second, we may expect to capture other fragments in the future. Numerous observers saw the
weird disintegration of the nucleus of the Great Comet of 1882, well-recognized as a member of
the family of the Comet of 1843. As these comets are fellow voyagers through space along the same orbit,
probably all five members of the family, with perhaps others, were originally a single comet
of unparalleled magnitude. The Brooks Comet of 1890 affords another instance of fragmentary nucleus,
The oft-repeated action of solar forces, tending to disrupt the mass of a comet more and more,
and scatter its material throughout space, the secular dismemberment of all comets becomes an obvious
conclusion. During the hundreds of millions of years that these forces are known to have been
operant, the original comets have been broken up in great numbers, so that elliptical rings of
opaque, meteoric bodies now travel round the sun in place of the comets. These bodies and vast
numbers are everywhere through space, each too small to reflect an appreciable amount of sunlight
and becoming visible only when they come into collision with our outer atmosphere.
The practical identity of several such meteor streams and cometary orbits has already been
established, and there is every reason for assigning a similar origin to all meteoric bodies.
Meteors, then, were originally parts of comets, which have trailed themselves out to such
extent that particles of the primal masses are liable to be picked up anywhere along the original
cometary paths. The historical records of all countries contain trustworthy accounts of meteoric showers.
Making due allowances for the flowery imagery of the Oriental, it is evident that all have at one
time or another seen much the same thing. In AD 472, for instance, the Constantinople sky was
reported alive with flying stars. In October 1202, quote, stars appeared like waves upon the sky,
and they flew about like grasshoppers, unquote. During the reign of King William II,
occurred a very remarkable shower in which, quote, stars seemed to fall like rain from heaven,
unquote. But the showers of November 1799 and 1833 are easily the most striking of all. The sky was
filled with innumerable fiery trails, and there was not a space in the heavens, a few times
the size of the moon, that was not ablaze with celestial fireworks.
Frequently, huge meteors blended their dazzling brilliancy with the long and seemingly
phosphorescent trails of the shooting stars.
The interval of 34 years between 1799 and 1833 appeared to indicate the possibility of a return
of the shower in November of 1866, or 1836.
And all the people of that day were aroused on this subject and made every preparation to witness the
spectacle. Extemporized observatories were established, watchmen were everywhere on the lookout,
and bells were to be rung the minute the shower began. The newspapers of the day did little to allay
the fears of the multitude, but the critical days of November 1866 passed with disappointment in
America. In Europe, however, a fine shower was seen, though it was not equal to that of 1833.
The astronomers at Greenwich counted many thousand meteors. In November of 1867, however, American
astronomers were gratified by a grand display, which, although failing to match the general
expectation, nevertheless was a most striking spectacle, and the careful preparation for
observing it afforded data of observation, which were of the greatest scientific
value. The actual orbits of these bodies in space became known with great exactitude, and it was found that
their general path was identical with that of the first comet of 1866, which travels outward, somewhat
beyond the planet Uranus. When the visible paths of these meteors are traced backward, all appear as if
they originated from the constellation Leo, so they are known as the Leonids, and a return of the shower
was confidently predicted for November 1901, which, for unknown reasons, failed to appear.
During the last half-century, meteors have been pretty systematically observed,
especially by the astronomers of Italy and Denning of England,
so that several hundred distinct showers are now known.
Their radiant points fall in every part of the heavens,
and there is scarcely a clear, moonless night,
when careful watching for meteors will be unrewarded.
Besides November, the months of August, Perseids, April, Lyridz, and December, Geminids, are favorable.
Following in tabular form is a fairly comprehensive list of the meteoric showers of the year, and the epics of the showers, according to Denning.
Name of shower, date of shower. Quadrantids, January 2nd through the 4th. Zeta Cepheid's, January 25th, Alpha Leonids, February 19th through March 4th.
Tau Leonids March 1st through the 4th, Beta Ercids March 13th through the 24th,
Lyrid's April 20th to the 22nd, Gam Aquarids, May 1st through the 6th, Zeta Herculids, May 18th
through the 26th, Ada Pegasids, May 30th to June 4th, Theta Bootids, June 27th through the 28th,
Alpha Capricornids, July 15th through the 28th, Delta Aquarids, July 25th through the 30th,
Perseids, August 10th through the 12th, Omicron Draconids, August 15th through the 25th, Zeta Draconids, August 21st
through September 2nd, Pysids, September 4th through the 14th, Alpha Andromedids, September 27th,
Epsilon Eritids, October 11th through the 24th, Oryonids, October 17th through the 24th,
Epsilon Perseids, November 5th, Leonids, November 13th through the 15th,
Epsilon Taurids, November 14th through the 25th,
Andromedids, November 17th through the 23rd, Beta Geminids, December 1st through the 12th,
Geminids, December 1st through the 14th, Alpha Ersi Majorids,
December 18 through the 21st, Kappa Draconids, December 18th through the 28th.
The year 1916 was exceptional in providing an abundant and previously unknown shower on June 28,
and its stream has nearly the same orbit as that of the Pons-Veneka Periodic Comet.
Useful observations of meteors are not difficult to make,
and they are of service to professional astronomers
investigating the orbits of these bodies, among whom are Mitchell and
Olivier of the University of Virginia.
End of Chapter 42.
Chapter 43 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly
Bodies. This is a Libravox recording. All Libravox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit Libravox.org.
Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies by David Todd.
Meteorites. Meteorites, the name for meteors which have
actually gone all the way through our atmosphere are never regular in form or spherical. As a rule,
the iron meteorites are covered with pittings or thumb marks due probably to the resistance and impact
of the little columns of air which impede its progress, together with the unequal condition and
fusibility of their surface material. The work done by the atmosphere in suddenly checking the meteor's
velocity appears in considerable part as heat, fusing the exterior to incandescence. This thin,
liquid shell is quickly brushed off, making oftentimes a luminous train. But notwithstanding the
exceedingly high temperature of the exterior, enforced upon it for the brief time of transit through
the atmosphere, it is probable that all large meteorites, if they could be reached at once on striking
the earth, would be found to be cold, because the smooth black, varnish-like crust, which always
encases them as a result of intense heat, is never thick. On one occasion, a meteor which was seen
to fall in India, was dug out of the ground as quickly as possible, and found to be, not hot as
was expected, but coated thickly over with ice frozen on it from the moisture in the surrounding
soil. As to the composition of shooting stars and their probable mass, and its effect upon the
earth, our data are quite insufficient. The lines of sodium and magnesium have been hurriedly caught
in the spectroscope, and estimating on the basis of the light emitted by them, the largest meteors
must weigh ounces rather than pounds. Nevertheless, it is interesting to inquire what addition
the continual fall of many millions daily upon the earth makes to its weight. Somewhere between
30 and 50,000 tons annually is perhaps a conservative estimate, but even this would not accumulate
a layer one inch in thickness over the entire surface of the earth in less than a thousand million
years. Many hundreds of the meteors actually seem to fall, together with those
picked up accidentally, are recovered and prized as specimens of great value in our collections,
the richest of which are now in New York, Paris, and London. The detailed investigation of them
are rather the province of the chemist, the crystallographer, and the mineralogist, than of the
astronomer, whose interest is more keen in their life history before they reach the earth. To distinguish
a stony meteorite from terrestrial rock substances is not always easy, but there is usually little
difficulty in pronouncing upon an iron meteorite. These are most frequently found in deserts,
because the dryness of the climate renders their oxidation and gradual disappearance very slow.
The surface of a suspected iron meteorite is polished to a high luster, and nitric acid is poured upon it.
If it quickly becomes etched with a characteristic series of lines, or a sort of crosshatching,
it is almost certain to be a meteorite. Occasionally, carbon has been found in meteorites,
existence of diamond has been suspected. The minerals composing meteorites are not unlike terrestrial
materials of volcanic origin, though many of them are peculiar to meteorites only. More than one-third
of all the known chemical elements have been found by analysis in meteorites, but not any new ones.
Meteoric iron is a rich alloy containing about 10% of nickel, also cobalt, tin, and copper
in much smaller amount. Calcium, chlorine, sodium, and sulfur.
sulfur likewise are found in meteoric irons. At very high temperatures, iron will absorb gases
and retain them until again heated to red heat. Carbonic oxide, helium, hydrogen, and nitrogen
are thus imprisoned, or occluded in meteoric irons in very small quantities. And in 1867, during a London
lecture by Graham, a room in the Royal Institution was for a brief space illuminated by gas brought
to Earth in a meteorite from interplanetary space.
meteorites too have been most critically investigated by the biologist, but no trace of germs of organic
life of any type has so far been found. Farrington of Chicago has published a full descriptive
catalog of all the North American meteorites. Recent investigations of radioactivity of
meteorites show that the average stone meteorite is much less radioactive than the average rock,
and probably less than one-fourth as radioactive as an average granite. The material, the
metallic meteorites examined were found about wholly free from radioactivity.
From shooting stars, perhaps the chips of the celestial workshop, or more possibly related to the
planetesimals, which the processes of the growth of the universe, have swept up into the vastly
greater bodies of the universe, transition is natural to the stars themselves, the most numerous
of the heavenly bodies, all shining by their own light, and all conceivably remote from the
solar system, which nevertheless appears to be not far removed from the center of the stellar universe.
End of Chapter 43
Chapter 44 of Astronomy, The Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Libravox recording. All Libravox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit Libravox.org.
Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies by David Todd.
The Universe of Stars
Our consideration of the solar system hitherto has kept us quite at home in the universe.
The outer known planets, Uranus, and Neptune, are indeed far removed from the sun,
and a few of the comets that belong to our family travel to even greater distances
before they begin to retrace their steps sunward.
When we come to consider the vast majority of the glistening points on the celestial sphere,
all in fact except the five great planets,
Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn, we are dealing with bodies that are self-luminous
like the Sun, but that vary in size quite as the bodies of the Solar System do. Some stars being
smaller than the Sun, and others many hundredfold larger than he is, some being giants and
others dwarfs. But the overwhelming remoteness of all these bodies arrests our attention,
and even taxes are credulity regarding the methods that astronomers have depended on to
ascertain their distances from us. Their seeming countlessness, too, is as bewildering as are the
distances, though if we make actual counts of those visible to the naked eye within a certain area,
in the body of the Great Bear, for example, the great surprise will be that there are so few,
and if the entire dome of the sky is counted at any one time, a clear, moonless sky would reveal
perhaps 2,500, so that in the entire sky, northern and southern, we might expect to find a full.
find 5,000 to 6,000 lucid stars, or stars visible to the naked eye. But when the telescope is
applied, every accession of power increases the myriads of fainter and fainter stars, until the number
with an optical reach of present instruments is somewhere between 400 and 500 millions. But if we were
to push the 100-inch reflector on Mount Wilson to its limit by photography, with plates of the highest
sensitiveness, millions upon millions of excessively faint stars would be plainly visible on the plates,
which the human eye can never hope to see directly with any telescope present or future,
and which would doubtless swell the total number of stars to a thousand millions.
Recent counts of stars by Chapman and Melot of Greenwich tend to substantiate this estimate.
What have astronomers done to classify or cataloged this vast array of bodies in the sky,
even before making any attempt to estimate their number, there is a system of classification
simply by the amount of light they send us or by their apparent stellar magnitudes,
not their actual magnitudes, for of those we know as yet very little.
We speak of stars of the first magnitude, of which there are about 20,
serious being the brightest and regulus the faintest.
Then there are about 65 of the second or next fainter magnitude, stars like Polaris, for
example, which give an amount of light two and a half times less than the average first magnitude star.
Stars of the third magnitude are fainter than those of the second in the same ratio, but their number
increases to 200, fourth magnitude 500, fifth magnitude 1400, 6th magnitude 5,000, and these
are so faint that they are just visible on the best nights without telescopic aid. Decimals express all
intermediate graduations of magnitude. Astronomers carry the telescopic magnitudes much farther
till a magnitude beyond the 20th is reached, preserving in every case the ratio of two and one-half
for each magnitude in relation to that numerically next to it. Even Jupiter and Venus and the sun
and moon are sometimes calculated on this scale of stellar magnitude, numerically negative, of course,
Venus sometimes being as bright as magnitude minus 4.3 and the sun minus 26.7.
Knowing thus the relation of sun, moon, and stars, and the number of stars of different magnitudes,
it is possible to estimate the total light from the stars. This interesting relation comes out this way,
that the stars we cannot see with the naked eye give a greater total of light than those we can
because of their vastly greater numbers. And if we calculate the total light of all the brighter stars
down to magnitude 9 and 1.5, we find it equal to 180th of the light of the average full moon.
Many stars show marked differences in color, and, strictly speaking, the stars are now classified
by their colors. The atmosphere affects star colors very considerably, low altitudes or greater
thickness of air, absorbing the bluish rays more strongly, and making the stars appear redder.
than they really are. Aldebaron, Beetlejuice, and Antares are well-known red stars,
Capella and Alphacete, yellowish, vega in serious blue, and procyon and Polaris white.
Among the telescopic stars are many of a deep blood-red tint, variable stars being numerous among them.
Double stars, too, are often complementary in color. There is evidence indicating change of color
of a very few stars in long periods of time.
Sirius, for example,
2,000 years ago, was a red star,
now it is blue or bluish-white.
But the meaning of color or change of color in a star
is as yet only incompletely ascertained.
It may be connected with the radiative intensity of the star,
or its age, or both.
The late professor Edward C. Pickering was famous
for his lifelong study and determination of the magnitudes of the star.
standards of comparison have been many and have led to much unnecessary work. Pickering chose Polaris as a standard
and devised the meridian photometer, an ingenious instrument of high accuracy in which the light of a star is
compared directly with that of the pole star by reflection. All the bright stars of both the northern and
the southern skies are worked into a standard system of magnitudes known as HP or the Harvard Photometry.
Astronomers make use of several different kinds of magnitude for the stars. The apparent magnitude, as the eye sees it, often called the visual magnitude, the photographic magnitude, as the photographic plate records it, and these are now determined with the highest accuracy. The photovisual magnitude, quite the same as the visual, but determined photographically on an isochromatic plate with a yellow screen or filter, so that the intensity is nearly the same as it appears to the
eye. The difference between the star's visual or photovisual magnitude and its photographic magnitude
is called its color index and is often used as a measure of the star's color. Light of shorter wavelengths
as blue and violet affects the photographic plate more rapidly than the reds and yellows of
longer wavelengths, by which the eye mainly sees, so that red stars will appear much fainter
and blue stars much brighter on the ordinary photographic plate than the eye sees them.
So great are the differences of color in the stars that well-known asterisms, with which the eye is
perfectly familiar, are sometimes quite unrecognizable on the photographic plate, except by
relative positions of the stars, composing them. White stars affect the eye and the plate about
equally so that their visual or photovisual and photographic magnitudes are about equal.
The studies of the colors of the stars, the different methods of determining them, and the
relations of color to constitution have been made the subject of a special investigation
by seers of Mount Wilson and many other astronomers.
Centuries of work of astronomers have been faithfully devoted to mapping or charting the stars
and cataloging them. Just as we have geographical maps of countries, so the heavens are
parceled out in sections and the stars set down in their true relative positions, just as cities
are on the map. Recent years have added photographic charts, especially of detailed regions of the
sky, but owing to spectral differences of the stars, their photographic magnitudes are often quite
different from their visual magnitudes. From these maps and charts, the positions of the stars can be
found with much precision. But if we want the utmost accuracy, we must go to the star catalogs,
huge volumes, oftentimes, with stellar positions set down therein, with the last,
degree of precision. First there will be the star's name, and in the next column, its magnitude,
and in the third, the star's right ascension. This is its angular distance eastward around the celestial
sphere, starting from the vernal equinox, and it corresponds quite closely to the longitude of a place
which we should get from a gazetteer if we wished to locate it on the earth. Then another column of
the catalog will give the star's declination, north or south of the equator, just as the
gazetteer will locate a city by its north or south latitude.
End of Chapter 44
Chapter 45 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Buddies.
This is the Librivox recording. All Librivox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit Liprivox.org.
recording by Abayi in December 2021.
Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Buddies, by David Todd.
Chapter 45. Star charts and catalogs.
Who made the first star chart or catalogue?
There is little doubt that Eudoxus, BC 200, was the first to set down the positions of all the brighter stars on a celestial globe,
and he did this from observations with a Gnormon and an armillary sphere.
Later, Hipparchus, BC 130,
constructed the first known catalogue of stars,
so that astronomers of a later day might discover what changes are in progress among the stars,
either in their relative positions,
or caused by old stars disappearing or new stars appearing at times in the heavens.
Hipparchus was an accurate observer, and he discovered an apparent and perpetual shifting of the vernal equinox westward, by which the right ascensions of the stars are all the time increasing.
He determined the amount of it pretty accurately, too.
His catalogue contained 1,080 stars, and is printed in the Almagest of Ptolemy.
Centuries elapsed before a second star catalogue was made.
by Yuluk Beg, an Arabian astronomer, AD 1420,
who was a son of Tamerlane, the Tartar monarch of Samarkand,
where the observations for the catalogue were made.
The stars were mainly those of Ptolemy,
and much the same stars were re-observed by Ticho Brahe,
AD 1580, with his greatly improved instruments,
thus forming the third and last star catalogue of importance
before the invention of the telescope.
From the end of the 17th century onward,
the application of the telescope
to all the types of instruments
for making observations of star places
has increased the accuracy many-fold.
The entire heavens has been covered
by Argelander in the northern hemisphere
and gold in the southern,
over 700,000 stars in all.
Many government observatories are still
work cataloging the stars. The Carnegie Institution of Washington maintains a
department of astrometry under Boss of Albany which has already issued a preliminary
catalog of more than 6,000 stars and has a great general catalog in progress,
together with investigations of stellar motions and parallaxes. This
catalogue of star positions will include proper motions of stars to the seventh magnitude.
In 1887, on proposal of the late Sir David Gill, an international congress of astronomers met at Paris
and arranged for the construction of a photographic chart of the entire heavens, allotting the work to 18 observatories,
equipped with photographic telescopes essentially alike.
The total number of plate succeeds 25,000.
stars of the 14th magnitude are recorded, but only those including the 11th magnitude will be cataloged, perhaps 2 million in all.
The expense of this comprehensive map of the stars has already exceeded $2 million, and the work is now nearly complete.
Turner of Oxford has conducted many special investigations that have greatly enhanced the progress of this international enterprise.
Other great photographic star charts have been carried through by the Harvard Observatory,
with the annex at Arequipa, Peru, employing the Bruce Photographic Telescope, a doublet with 24-inch lenses.
Also, Captain of Hohnen has catalogued about 300,000 stars on plates taken at Cape Town.
Charting and cataloging the stars, both visually and photographically, is a work that will never be entirely finished.
Improvements in processes will be such that it can be better done in the future than it is now,
and the detection of changes in the fainter stars and investigation of their motions
will necessitate repetition of the entire work from century to century.
The origin of the names of individual stars is a question of much interest.
The constellation figures form the basis of the method,
and the earliest names were given according to location in the especial figure,
as, for instance, core scorpion, the heart of the scorpion,
later known as Antares or Alpha Scorpi.
The Arabians adopted many star names from the Greeks,
and gave about a hundred special names to other stars.
Some of these are in common use today by navigators, observers of meteors,
and of variable stars.
Sirius, Vega, Arcturus, and a few other first magnitude stars are instances.
But this method is quite insufficient for the fainter stars whose numbers increase so rapidly.
Bayer, a contemporary of Galileo, originated our present system,
which also employs the names of the constellations, the Latin genitive in each case,
prefixed by the small letters of the Greek alphabet, from alpha to alpha to our.
omega in order of decreasing brightness, and followed by the Roman letters when the Greek alphabet
is exhausted. If there were still stars left in a constellation unnamed, numbers were used,
first by Flamsteed, Astronomer Royal, and numbers in the order of right ascension in various
catalogues are used to designate hundreds of other stars. The vast bulk of the stars are, however,
nameless, but about
one million are identifiable
by their positions, right
ascension and declination
on the celestial sphere.
End of
Chapter 45.
Chapter 46 of
Astronomy, the Science of
the Heavenly Buddies.
This is a Librivox recording.
All Librevox recordings are in the public
domain. For more information or to
volunteer, please visit Librevox.org.
by Hawaii in December 2021.
Astronomy, the science of the heavenly bodies by David Todd.
Chapter 46. The Sun's motion toward Lyra.
If Hipparchus or Galileo should return to Earth tonight and look at the stars and constellations
as we see them, there would be no change whatever discernible in either the brightness of the stars
or in their relative positions.
So the name fixed stars would appear to have been well chosen.
Hallie, in the 17th century, was the first to detect
that slow relative change of position of a few stars,
which is known as proper motion,
and all the modern catalogs give the proper motions
in both right ascension and declination.
These are simply the small annual changes in position
athwart the line of vision, and, as a whole, the proper motions of the brighter stars exceed
the corresponding motions of the fainter ones, because they are nearer to us.
The average proper motion of the brightest stars is 0.25 seconds, and of stars of the sixth magnitude,
only one-sixth as great.
A few extreme cases of proper motion have been detected, one as large as nine seconds,
of an orange-yellow star of the eighth magnitude in the southern constellation Pictor,
and Barnard has recently discovered a star with a proper motion exceeding ten seconds.
Several determinations of its parallax give 0.52 seconds,
corresponding to a distance of 6.27 light years.
Nevertheless, two centuries would elapse before these stars would be displaced
as much as the breadth of the moon among their neighbors in the sky.
The proper motions of stars are along perfectly straight lines,
so far as yet observed.
Ultimately, we may find a few moving in curved paths or orbits,
but this is hardly likely.
As for a central sun hypothesis,
that pointing out Alcyon in particular,
there is no reliable evidence whatever.
Analysis of the proper motion,
of stars in considerable numbers, first by Sir William Herschel, showed that they were moving
radially from the constellation Hercules, and in great numbers also towards the opposite side
of the stellar sphere. Later investigation places this point, called the Sun's goal, or
apex of the Sun's way, over in the adjacent constellation Lyra, and the opposite point,
or the sun's quit, is about halfway between Sirius and Canopus.
By means of the radial velocities of stars in these antipodal regions of the sky,
it is found that the sun's motion toward Lyra, carrying all his planetary family along with him,
is taking place at the rate of about 12 miles in every second.
While the right ascensions of the solar apex is given by the different investigations,
have been pretty uniform, the declination of this point has shown a rather wide variation
not yet explained. For example, there is a difference of nearly 10 degrees between the declination
34.3 degrees of the apex, as determined by boss, from the proper motions of more than 6,000 stars,
and the declination 25.3 degrees, found by Campbell from the radial velocities of the
of nearly 1,200 stars.
Several investigations tend to show
that the fainter the stars are,
the greater is the declination of the solar apex.
More remarkable is the evidence
that this declination varies with the spectral type of the stars,
the later types, especially G and K,
giving much more northerly values.
On the whole, the great amount of research
that has been devoted to the solar motion,
relative to the system of the stars for the past hundred years
may be said to indicate a point in right ascension 18 hours,
270 degrees, and declination 34 degrees north,
as the direction toward which the sun is moving.
This is not very far from the bright star alpha lyray,
and the antipodal point from which the sun is traveling
is quite near to beta-columbae.
so swift is this motion, nearly 20 kilometers per second,
that it has provided a baseline of exceptional length
and very great service in determining the average distance of stars in groups or classes.
After thousands of years, the sun's own motion combined with the proper motions of the stars
will displace many stars appreciably from their familiar places.
The constellations, as we know them, will suffer slight,
distortions, particularly Orion, Cassiopeia, and Ursa Major.
Identity or otherwise of Spectra often indicates what stars are associated together in groups,
and their community of motion is known as Star Drift.
Recent investigation of vast numbers of stars by both these methods have led to the epochal
discovery of star streaming, which indicates that the stars of our system
are drifting by, or rather through each other, in two stately and interpenetrating streams.
The grand primary cause underlying this motion is as yet only surmised.
End of Chapter 46
Chapter 47 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Librevox recording. All Librevox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer,
please visit Librivox.org.
Recording by
Hawaii in December 2021.
Astronomy, the science of the heavenly bodies
by David Todd.
Chapter 47.
Stars and their spectral type.
When in 1872, Dr. Henry Draper
placed a very small wet plate in the camera of his spectroscope
and, by careful following, on account of the necessary,
long exposure secured the first photographic spectrum of a star ever taken, he could hardly have anticipated the wealth of the new field of research which he was opening.
His wife, Anna Palmer Draper, was his enthusiastic assistant in both laboratory and observatory, and on his death in 1882, she began to devote her resources very considerably to the amplification of stellar spectrum photography.
At first, with the cooperation of Professor Young of Princeton,
and later through extension of the facilities of Harvard College Observatory,
whose director, the late Professor Edward C. Pickering,
devoted his energies in very large part to this matter,
all the preliminaries of the Great Enterprise were worked out,
and a comprehensive program was embarked upon,
which culminated in the Henry Draper Memorial,
a catalog and classification of the spectra of all the stars brighter than the ninth magnitude
in both the northern and southern hemispheres.
One very remarkable result from the investigation of large numbers of stars, according to their type,
is the close correlation between a star's luminosity and its spectral type.
But even more remarkable is the connection between spectral type and speed of motion.
As early as 1892, Monkhoff Dublin, later Capthain, and still later Dyson, directed attention to the fact that stars of the SETI type 2 had on the average larger proper motions than those of type 1.
In 1903, Frost and Adams brought out the exceptional character of the Orion stars, the radial velocities of 20 of which averaged only 7 kilometers per second.
Soon after, with the introduction of the two-stream hypothesis, a wider generalization was reached by Campbell and Cap-Tain, whose radial velocities showed that the average linear velocity increases continually through the entire series, B, A, F, G, K, M, from the earliest types of evolution to the latest.
The younger stars of early type have velocities of perhaps five or six kilometers per second,
while the older stars of later type have velocities nearly fourfold greater.
The great question that occurs at once is,
how do the individual stars get their motions?
The farther back we go in a star's life history,
the smaller we find its velocity to be.
When a star reaches the Orion stage of development,
its velocity is only one-third of what it may be expected to have finally.
Apparently then, the stars at birth have no motion,
but gradually acquire it in passing through their several types or stages of development.
More striking still is the motion of the planetary nebulae
in excess of 25 kilometers per second,
while type A stars move 11 kilometers,
type G, 15 kilometers, and type M, 17 kilometers per second.
Can the law connecting speed of motion and spectral type be so general
that the planetary nebula is to be regarded as the final evolutionary stage?
Stars have been seen to become nebulae,
and one astronomer at least is strongly of the opinion
that a single such instance ought to outweigh all speculation to the contrary,
as that stars originate from nebulae.
In his discussion of stellar proper motions,
Boss has reached a striking confirmation of the relation of speed to type,
finding for the cross-linear motion of the different types
a series of velocities closely paralleling those of Capthine and Campbell.
Concerning the market relation of the luminosities of the stars
to their spectral types,
There is a pronounced tendency toward equality of brightness among stars of a given type.
Also, the brightness diminishes very markedly with advance in the stage of evolution.
There has been much discussion as to the order of evolution as related to the type of spectrum,
and Russell of Princeton has put forward the hypothesis of giant stars and dwarf stars,
each spectral type having these two divisions, though not closely related.
One class embraces intensely luminous stars, the other stars only feebly luminous.
When a star is in process of contraction from a diffused gaseous mass, its temperature rises,
according to Lane's law, until that density is reached where the loss of heat by radiation
exceeds the rise in temperature due to conversion of gravitational energy into heat.
then the star begins to cool again.
So that if the spectrum of a star depends mainly on the effective temperature of the body,
clearly the classification of the Draper catalog would group stars together
which are nearly alike in temperature,
taking no note as to whether their present temperature is rising or falling.
Another classification of stars by Lockyer divides them according to ascending and descending
temperatures. Russell's theory would assign a succession of evolutionary types in the order
M1, K1, G1, F1, A1, B, A2, F2, G2, K2, M2, the subscript one referring to the giants, and two
to the dwarf stars. In large part, the weight of evidence would appear to favor the order of the
classification, independently confirmed as it is by studies of stellar velocities,
galactic distribution, and periods of binary stars, both spectroscopic and visual,
where Campbell and Aiken find a marked increase in length of period with advance in spectral type.
At the same time, a vast amount of evidence is accumulating in support of Russell's theory.
Investigations in progress will doubtless reveal the ground
on which both may be harmonized.
The publication of the new Henry Draper
Catalogue of Stella Spectra is in progress,
a work of vast magnitude.
The Great Catalogue of 30 years ago
embraced the spectra of more than 10,000 stars
and was a huge work for that day.
But the new catalogue utterly dwarves it,
with a classification much more detailed
than in the earlier work,
and with the number of stars increased more than 20,
This work, projected by the late director of the Harvard Observatory, has been brought to a conclusion by the energy and enthusiasm of Miss N.J. Cannon through six years of close application, aided by many assistants.
The catalogue ranges over the stars of both hemispheres and is a monument to master the organization and completed execution, which will be of the highest importance and usefulness in all future recent.
searches on the body of the stella universe.
End of Chapter 47.
Chapter 48 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Libervox recording.
All Lipervox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visitlibervox.org.
Read by Krista Zaleski.
Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies by David Todd.
Chapter 48 Star Distances
So vast are the distances of the stars that all attempts of the early astronomers to ascertain them necessarily proved futile.
This led many astronomers after Copernicus to reject his doctrine of the Earth's motion around the Sun,
so that they clung rather to the Ptolemaic view that the Earth was without motion and was the center about which all the celestial motions took place.
The geometry of stellar distances was perfectly understood, and many were the attempts made to find the parallaxes and distances of the stars.
But the art of instrument-making had not yet advanced to a stage, where astronomers had the mechanisms that were absolutely necessary to measure very small angles.
About 1835, Bessel undertook the work of determining stellar parallax in earnest.
His instrument was the heliometer, originally designed for measuring the sun's diameter.
But as modified for parallax work, it is the most accurate of all angle measuring instruments
that the astronomers employ.
The star that he selected was 61 signy, not a bright star of the sixth magnitude only, but
its large proper motion suggested that it might be one of those nearest to us.
He measured with the heliometer, at opposite seasons of the year, the distance of 61 signy
from another and very small star in the same field of view, and thus determined the relative
parallax of the two stars. The assumption was made that the very faint star was very much
more distant than the bright one, and this assumption will usually turn out to be sound.
Bessel got zero seconds, point 35, for his parallax of 61 Cygney.
and Struve, by applying the same method to Alpha Leary, about the same time, got 0.25 for the parallax of that star.
These classic researches of Bessel and Struve are the most important in the history of star distances,
because they were the first to prove that stellar parallax, although minute, could nevertheless be actually measured.
About the same time success was achieved in another quarter,
and Henderson, the British astronomer at the Cape of Good Hope,
found a parallax of nearly a whole second for the bright star Alpha Centuary.
Although the parallaxes of many hundreds of stars have been measured since,
and the parallaxes of other thousands of stars estimated,
the measured parallax of Alpha Centurri,
as later investigated by Elkinenser David Gill,
and found to be 0.75,
is the largest known parallax,
and therefore Alpha Centurie is our number.
nearest neighbor among the stars so far as we yet know. This star is a binary system,
and the light of the two components together is about the same as that of capilla, alpha
orige, but it is never visible from this part of the world, being in 60 degrees of south
declination. One might just glimpse it near the southern horizon from Key West. How the distances
of the stars are found is not difficult to explain, although the method of doing it involves a good
deal of complication, interesting to the practical astronomer only. Recall the method of getting
the moon's distance from the Earth. It was done by measuring her displacement among the stars,
as seen from two widely separated observatories, as near the ends of a diameter of the Earth as
convenient. This is the baseline, and the angle which a radius of the Earth as seen from the
center of the moon fills, or subtends, is the moon's parallax. So near is the moon that this angle is
almost an entire degree, and therefore not at all difficult to measure. But if we go to the distance of
even Alpha Centauri, the nearest of the stars, our Earth shrinks to invisibility, so that we must
seek a longer baseline. Fortunately, there is one, but although its length is 25,000 times the Earth's
diameter, it is only just long enough to make the star distance as measurable. We found that the
Sun's distance from the Earth was 93 million miles. The diameter of the Earth's orbit is therefore
double that amount. Now conceive the diameter of the Earth, replaced by the diameter of the Earth's
orbit. By our motion round the Sun, we are transported from one extremity of this diameter to the
opposite one in six months' time, so we may measure the displacement of a star from these two
extremities, and half this displacement will be the star's parallax, often called the annual parallax,
because a year is consumed in traversing its period. And it is this very minute angle which Bessalens
drew for the first to measure with certainty, and which Henderson found to be in the case of
Alva Centauri, the largest yet known. Evidently, the earth by its motion around the sun makes
every star describe a little paralactic ellipse. The nearer the star is,
the larger this ellipse will be, and the farther the star the smaller. If the star were at an
infinite distance, its ellipse would become a point. That is, if we imagine ourselves occupying
the position of the star, even the vast orbit of the Earth, 186 million miles across, would shrink
to invisibility or become a mathematical point. Measurement of stellar parallax is one of many
problems of exceeding difficulty that confront the practical astronomer. But the actual
research nowadays is greatly simplified by photography, which enables the astronomer to select times
when the air is not only clear, but very steady for making the exposures. Development and measurement
of the plates can then be done at any time. Pritchard of Oxford, England was among the earliest
to appreciate the advantages of photography and parallax work, and Schlesinger, Mitchell, Miller,
Slocum, and Van Mann, with many others in this country, have zealously prosecuted it.
How shall we intelligently express the vast distances at which the stars are removed from us?
Of course we can use miles, and pile up the millions upon millions by adding on ciphers,
but that fails to give much notion of the star's distance. Let us try with Alpha Centauri.
Its parallax of 0.75, means that it is 275,000 times farther from the sun than the Earth is.
multiplying this out we get 25 trillion miles, that is 25 millions of million miles.
An inconceivable number and an unthinkable distance.
Suppose the entire solar system to shrink so that the orbit of Neptune,
60 times 93 million miles in diameter,
would be a circle the size of the dot over this letter I.
On the same scale, the sun itself, although nearly a million miles in diameter,
could not be seen with the most powerful microscope in existence, and on the same scale also,
we should have to have a circle 10 feet in diameter, if the solar system were imagined at its
center and alpha centauri in its circumference. So astronomers do not often use the mile as the
yardstick of stellar distance any more than we state the distance from London to San Francisco
in feet or inches. By convention of astronomers, the average distance between the centers of sun
and Earth, or 93 million miles, is the accepted unit of measure in the solar system.
So, the adopted unit of stellar distance is the distance traveled by a wave of light in a year's
time, and this unit is technically called the light year. This unit of distance, or stellar yardstick,
as we may call it, is nearly six millions of million miles in length. Alpha Chantari, then,
is four and one-third light-years distant, and 61 Cygne, 7 and 1-5.
light years away. For convenience in their calculations, most astronomers now use a longer unit called
the parsec, first suggested by Turner. Its length is equal to the distance of a star whose parallax
is one second of arc. That is, one parsec is equal to about three and a quarter light years.
Or the light year is equal to 0.31 parsec. Also, the parsec is equal to 206,000 astronomical
units, or about 19 millions of million miles. We have then four distinct methods of stating distance of a star.
Sirius, for example, has a parallax of 0.38, or its distance is 2 and 2 thirds parsecs, or 8.5 light years,
or 50 millions of million miles. It is the angle of parallax which is always found first by actual
measurement, and from this the other three estimates of distance are calculated.
So difficult and delicate is the determination of a stellar distance that only a few hundred parallaxes have been ascertained in the past century.
The distance of the same star has been many times measured by different astronomers, with much seeming duplication of effort.
Comprehensive campaigns for determining star parallaxes in large numbers have been undertaken in a few instances,
particularly at the suggestion of Kaptian, an eminent astronomer of Grunigan-Hollin.
his catalog of star parallaxes is the most complete and accurate yet published,
and is the standard in all statistical investigations of the stars.
That we find relatively large parallaxes for some of the fainter stars,
and almost no measurable parallax for some of the very bright stars,
is one of the riddles of the stellar universe.
We may instance Arcturus in the northern hemisphere and Kenopas in the southern,
the latter almost as bright as serious. Dr. Elkin and the late Sir David Gill
determined exhaustively the parallax of Canopus, and found it very minute, only zero seconds
0.03, making its distance in excess of a hundred light years. The stupendous brilliancy of this
star is apparent, if we remember that the intensity of its light must vary inversely as the
square of the distance, so that if canopus were to be brought as near us as even 61 Cygney is,
it would be a hundredfold brighter than serious, the brightest of all the stars of the firmament.
In researches upon the distribution of the more distant stars,
the method of measuring parallaxes of individual stars fails completely,
and the secular parallax, or paralactic motion of the stars, is employed instead.
By paralytic motion is meant the apparent displacement in consequence of the solar motion,
which is now known with great accuracy,
and amounts to 19.5 kilometers per second.
Even in a single year then,
the sun's motion is twice the diameter of the Earth's orbit,
so that in a hundred or more years,
a much longer baseline is available
than in the usual types of observations for stellar parallax.
If we ascertain the parallactic motion of a group of stars,
then we can find their average distance.
It is found, for example,
that the mean parallax of stars of the sixth magnitude
in 0.0.014. Also, the mean distances of stars thrown into classes, according to their spectral
type, have been investigated by Boss, Caphtian, Campbell, and others. The complete intermingling of
the two great star streams has been proved, too, by using the magnitude of the proper motions to
measure the average distances of both streams. These come out essentially the same,
so that the streaming cannot be due to mere chance relation in line of sight.
Most unexpected and highly important is the discovery that the peculiar behavior of certain lines in the spectrum
leads to a fixed relation between a star's spectrum and its absolute magnitude,
which provides a new and very effective method of ascertaining stellar distances.
By absolute magnitudes are meant the magnitudes the stars would appear to have
if they were all at the same standard distance from Earth.
Very satisfactory estimates of the distance of the distance
of exceedingly remote objects have been made within recent years by this indirect method,
which is especially applicable to spiral nebulae and globular clusters.
The absolute magnitude of a star is inferred from the relative intensities of certain lines
in its spectrum, so that the observed apparent magnitude at once enables us to calculate the distance
of the star.
Adams and Joy have recently determined the luminosities and parallaxes of 500 stars by this spectroscopic method.
Of these stars, 360 have had their parallaxes previously measured,
and the average difference between the spectroscopic and the trigonometric values of the parallax
is only the very small angle 0.0037, a highly satisfactory verification.
An indirect method, but a very simple one, and of the greatest value,
because it provides the key to stellar distances with the least possible calculation.
And we can ascertain also the distances.
of whole classes of stars, too remote to be ascertained in any other way at present known.
The problem of spectroscopic determinations of luminosity and parallax has been
investigated at Mount Wilson with great thoroughness from all sides, the separate investigations
checking each other. A definitive scale for the spectroscopic determination of absolute
magnitudes has now been established, and the parallaxes and absolute magnitudes have already been
arrived for about 1800 stars.
End of chapter 48.
Chapter 49 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly
Bodies. This is a Libri-Wox recording. All Libre-Wox recordings are in the public
domain. For more information or to volunteer, please visit LibriWox.org.
Read by CosmicT.
Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies by David Todd.
The nearest stars.
Of a special interest of the few stars that we know are the nearest to us, and a given table includes all those whose parallax is 0.20 second of an arc or greater.
There are 19 in all and nearly half of them are binary systems.
The radial motions given are relative to the sun.
The transverse velocities are formed by using the measured parallaxes to transform proper motion into low.
linear measures. They are given by Eddington in his stellar moments. These stars are distant
less than 5 parsecs, about 16 light years from the sun. So they make up the closest
fringe of the stellar universe immediately surrounding our system. The large number of binary
systems is quite remarkable. Why some stars are single and others double is not yet known.
By the spectroscopic method, the proportion is not so large.
Campbell, finding that about one quarter of 1,600 stars examined are spectroscopic binaries,
and crossed two-fifth to a half.
The exceptional number of large velocities is very remarkable.
The average transverse motion of the 19 stars is 50 kilometers per second, whereas 30 is
about what would have been expected.
As to star streams to which these nearest star belong, 11 are in stream 1 and 8 in stream 2,
enclosed accord with the 3 is to 2 ratio given by the 6,000 stars of Boss's catalog.
We are not able, says Eddington, to detect any significant difference between the luminosities,
spectra or speed of the stars constituting the two streams.
The thorough interpretation of the two-star streams is well illustrated since we find even in this small volume of space that members of both streams are mingled together in just about the average proportion.
End of Chapter 49
Chapter 50 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Librivox recording.
All Librivox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit
Libriwox.org.
Read by Cosmic T.
Astronomy.
The Science of the Heavenly
Bodies by David Todd.
Actual Dimensions of the Stars
We have seen that the distances
of the stars from the solar system
are immense beyond conception
and millions upon millions of them
are probably forever beyond our power
of ascertaining by direct measurement
what their distance really is.
After we had found the sun's distance and measured the angle filled by his disc, it was easy to calculate his actual size.
This direct method, however, fails when we try to apply it to the stars.
Because their distance are so vast that no star's disc fills an angle of any appreciable size.
And even if we try to apply it to the stars,
Even if we try to get a disk with the highest magnifying powers of great telescope, our efforts end only in failure.
There is indeed no instrumentally appreciable angle to measure.
How then shall we ascertain the actual dimensions of the vast spheres which we know the stars actually are,
as they exist in the remotest regions of space?
clearly by indirect methods only, and it must be said that astronomers have as yet no general method
that yields very satisfactory results for stellar dimensions.
The actual magnitude of the variable system of Algol, Beta-Percy, is among the best known
of all the stars, because the spectroscope measures the rate of approach and recession
of Algol when its invisible satellite is in opposite parts of the orbit.
The law of gravitation gives the mass of the star and the size of its orbit, and so the length
of the eclipse gives the actual size of the dark eclipsing body.
This figures out to be practically the same size as that of our sun, while Algo's own
diameter is rather larger, exceeding a million miles.
try to estimate sizes of the stars by their brightness merely be as soon as tree.
Differences of brightness are due to difference of dimensions of course or of light-giving
area.
But differences of distance also affect the brightness, inversely as the squares of the distance,
while differences of temperature and constitution affect in very marked degree the
intrinsic brilliance of the light emitting surface of the star.
There are big stars and little stars, stars relatively near to us and stars exceedingly remote,
and stars highly incandescent as well as others feebly glowing.
We have already shown how the angular diameters, subtended by many of the stars, have been estimated
through the relation of surface brightness and spectral type.
Antyrus and Betelgees appear to be the most inviting for investigation, because the
estimated angular diameters are about 120th of a second of arc. This is the way in
which their direct measurement is being attempted. As early as 1890, Michelson of Chicago
suggested the application of interference methods to the accurate measurement of very small
angles, such as the diameters of the minor planets and the satellites of Jupiter and Saturn,
as well as the arc distance between the components of double stars.
Two portions of the object glass are used,
as far apart as possible on the same diameter
and the interference fringes reduced at the focus of the objective
are then the subject of observation.
These fringes form a series of equidistant interference bands
and are most distinct when the light comes from a source
subtending an infinitesimal angle.
If the object presents an appreciable angle,
the visibility is less and may even become zero.
Michelson tested this method on the satellites of Jupiter at the Lick Observatory in 1891
ensured its accuracy and practicability.
Nevertheless, the method has not been taken up by astronomers until very recently at the Mount Wilson Observatory
where Anderson has applied it to the measurement of close double stars.
It is found that, contrary to general expectation, the method gives excellent results.
Even if the seeing is not the best, two on a scale of 10, for instance.
To simplify the manipulation of the interferometer, a small plate with two apertures in it is placed in the converging beam of light coming from the telescope objective or mirror.
The interference fringes formed in the focal plane are then viewed with an eye piece of very large,
high power, many thousand diameters. The resolving power of the interferometer is
found to be somewhat more than double that of a telescope of the same aperture. By
applying the interferometer method to Capella, arc distances of much less than
one 20th of a second of arc were measured. More recently the method has been
applied to the great star Betelgeus in Orion whose angular diameter was
was found to be 0.46 arc second, corresponding to an actual diameter of 260 million miles.
If the star's parallax is as small as it appears to be.
End of Chapter 50.
Chapter number 51 of astronomy, the science of the heavenly bodies.
This is the Librivox recording.
All Librivox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit
Librivox.org
Astronomy
The Science of the Heavenly
Bodies by David Todd
The Variable Stars
Spectacular as they are to the
layman, novee, or temporary
stars, are to the astronomers
simply a class among many thousands
of stars which they call variables
or variable stars.
There are a few objects
classified as irregular variables,
one of which is very remarkable.
We refer to
Eta Argus, an erratic variable in the southern constellation Argo, and surrounded by a well-known nebula.
There is a pretty complete record of the star.
Haley, in 1677, when observing at St. Helena, recorded Eta Argus as of the fourth magnitude.
During the 18th century, it fluctuated between the fourth magnitude and the second.
Early in the 19th, it rapidly waxed in brightness, fluctuating between the first and the
second magnitudes from 1822 to 1836. But two years later, its light tripled, rivaling all the
fixed stars except cannabis and serious. In 1843, it was even brighter for a few months, but since
then, it has declined fairly steadily, reaching a minimum at magnitude seven and a half in 1886,
with a slight increase in brightness more recently. A period of half a century has been suggested,
but it is very doubtful if Eta Argus has any regular period of variation.
Another very interesting class of variables is known as the Omicron-Setti type.
Nearly all the time, they are very faint,
but quite suddenly they brighten through several magnitudes
and then fade away, more or less slowly,
to their normal condition of faintness.
But the extraordinary thing is that most of these variables
go through their fluctuations in regular periods.
From six months to two years in length.
The type star, Omicron Setti,
or Mira is the oldest non-variable, having been discovered by Fabricius in 1596.
Most of the time, it is a relatively faint star of the 12th magnitude,
but once and rather less than a year, its brightness runs up to the fourth, third,
and sometimes even the second magnitude, where it remains for a week or 10 days,
and afterwards it recedes more slowly to its usual faintness,
the entire rise and decline in brightness usually requiring about 100 days.
The spectrum of Omicroncetti contains many very bright lines
and a large proportion of the variable stars are of this type.
Another class of variables is designated as the Beta Lyra type.
Their periods are quite regular,
but there are two or more maxima and minima of light in each period,
as if the variation were caused by superposed relations in some way.
Their spectra show a complexity of helium and hydrogen bands,
no wholly satisfactory explanation
has yet been offered. Probably they are double stars revolving in very small orbits compared with
their dimensions, their plane of motion passing nearly through the earth. But the most interesting
of all the variables are those of the Al-Gol type, their light curves being just the reverse of the
Omicron-Setti type. That is, they are at their maximum brightness most of the time, and then
suffer a partial eclipse for a relatively brief interval. Al-Gol goes through a
its variation so frequently that its period is very accurately known. It is two days,
20 hours, 48 minutes, 55.4 seconds. For most of this period, Al-Gol is an easy second magnitude star.
Then, in about four and a half hours, it loses nearly five-sixth of its light,
receding to the fourth magnitude. Here at minimum it remains for 15 or 20 minutes,
and then in the next three and a half hours, it regained its full normal brilliancy of
of the second magnitude.
During these fluctuations, the star spectrum
undergoes no mark changes.
The spectra of all the algal variables
are of the first or Syrian type.
To explain the variation of the algal type of variables is easy.
A dark eclipsing body, somewhat smaller than the primary,
is supposed to be traveling rounded in an orbit
lying nearly edgewise to our line of sight.
The gravitation of this dark companion
displaces algal itself alternately toward and from the Earth,
because the two bodies revolve around their common center of gravity.
With the spectroscope, this alternate motion of algal,
now advancing and now receding at the rate of 26 miles per second,
has been demonstrated,
and the period of this motion synchronizes exactly with the period of the star's variability.
Russell and Shapley have made extended studies of the eclipsing binaries
and developed the formulae by which investigations of their orbits are conducted,
Here tofore, visual binaries and spectroscopic binaries afforded the only means of deriving data regarding double systems,
but it is now possible to obtain from the orbits of eclipsing variables fully as much information relating to binary systems in general,
and their bearing on stellar evolution.
After an orbit has been determined from the photometric data of the light curve,
The addition of spectroscopic data often permits the calculation of the masses, dimensions, and densities in terms of the sun.
Shapley's original investigation included the orbits of 90 eclipsing variables, and with the aid of hypothetical parallaxes,
he computed the approximate position of each system in space.
The relation to the Milky Way is interesting, the condensation into the galactic plane being very marked,
only 13 of the 90 systems being found at galactic latitudes exceeding 30 degrees.
If we can suppose the variable stars covered with vast areas of spots,
perhaps similar to the spots on the sun,
and then combine the variation of these spots areas with rotation of the star on its axis,
there is a possibility of explanation of many of the observed phenomena,
especially where the range of variation is small.
But for the Omicron set a type,
No better explanation offers than that afforded by Sir Norman Lockyer's collision theory.
First, he assumes that these stars are not condensed bodies, but still in the condition of meteoric swarms,
and the revolution of lesser swarms around larger aggregations.
In elliptic corbits of greater or less eccentricity must produce vast multitudes of collisions.
And these collisions taking place at pretty regular periods, produced a variable maximum light
by raising host of meteoric particles to a state of incandescent simultaneously.
The catalogs of variable stars now contain many thousands of these objects.
They are often designated by the letters R, S, T, and so on,
followed by the genitive form of the name of the constellation, wherein they are found.
Most of the recently found variables have a range of less than one magnitude.
They are so distributed as to be most numerous in a zone inclined about 18 degrees to the celestial,
equator and split in two near where the cleft in the galaxy is located.
Nearly all the temporary stars are in this duplex region.
Bailey of Harvard, a quarter century ago, began the investigation of variables in closed star clusters,
where they are very abundant, with marked changes of magnitude within only a few hours.
Many amateur astronomers afford very great assistance to the professional investigator of
variable stars by their cooperation in observing these interesting bodies, in particular
particular, the American Association of Observers of Variable Stars, organized and directed by William
Tyler Olcott. For a high degree of accuracy in determining stellar magnitudes, the photoelectric
cell is unsurpassed. Stebbins of Urbana has been very successful in its application, and he
discovered the secondary minimum of algal with the selenium cell. His most recent work was done
with a potassium cell with walls of fused quartz, perfected after many trial attempts.
The stars he has recently investigated are Lambda Tori and Pi 5 Orionis.
Combining results with those reached by the spectroscope,
the masses of the two component stars of the former are 2.5 and 1.1 that of the sun,
and the radii are 4.8 and 3.6 times the suns.
Russell of Princeton thinks it probable that similar causes are at work in all these variables.
In the case of the typical nobe, there is evidence that when the out of the outside,
outburst takes place, a shell of incandescent gas is actually ejected by the star at a very high
velocity. What may be the forces that cause such an explosion can only be gassed. Repeated outbursts
have not, in the case of T. Pikesides, destroyed the star because it has gone through this process
three times in the past 30 years. Russell inclines to regard it as a standard process occurring
somewhere in the stellar universe probably as often as once a year. Nove then cannot be due to
collisions between two stars. For even if we suppose the stars to be a thousand millions of number,
no two should collide except that average intervals of many million years. The idea is gaining
ground that the stars are vast storehouses of energy, which they are gradually transforming
into heat and radiating into space. Quote, under ordinary circumstances, it is probable
that the rate of generation of heat is automatically regulated to balance the loss by radiation. But it
It is quite conceivable that some sudden disturbance in the substance of the star near the surface
might cause an abrupt liberation of a great amount of energy, sufficient to heat the surface
excessively, and drive the hot material off into infinite space.
In much the form of a shell of gas, it seems to have been observed in the case of
Nove Acule.
With the rapid advance of our knowledge of the properties of the stars on one hand and of
the very nuclei of atoms on the other, we may, perhaps, before many years have passed,
find ourselves near a solution of the problem."
End quote.
The Cepheid variables increase very rapidly in brightness from their least light to their maximum,
and then fade out much more slowly with certain irregularities or roughness of their light curves when declining.
Their spectral lines also shift in period with their variations of light.
In the case of these variables whose regular fluctuation of light cannot be due to eclipse
and is as a rule embraced within a few days, there is a fluctuation in color
also between maximum and minimum, as if there were a periodic change in the star's physical condition.
Edenton and Shapely advocate the theory of a mechanical pulsation of the star as most plausible.
Knowledge of the internal conditions of the stars make it possible to predict the period of pulsation within narrow limits.
And for Delta Cephii, this theoretical period is between four and ten days.
Its observed period is five and one-third days, and corresponding agreement is found in all the Cephades so far testing.
Shapley of Mount Wilson finds that the Sepade variables,
with periods exceeding a day in length, all lie close to the galactic lane.
So greatly have the studies of these objects progress that,
as before remark, when we know the star's period,
we can get its absolute magnitude, and from this the star's distance.
On all sides of the sun, the distances of the cephades range up to 4,000 parsecs,
so they indicate the existence of a galactic system far greater next to the sun,
far greater an extent than any previously dealt with.
End of Chapter 51.
Read by Susie Vera in the city of Los Angeles, February 1st, 2022.
Chapter 52 of astronomy, the science of the heavenly bodies.
This is a Librevox recording.
All Libravox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visitlibrovox.org.
Read by Krista Zaleski.
Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies by David Todd.
Chapter 52. The Novi, or New Stars
New Stars or Temporary Stars, we have already mentioned in connection with variables.
They are next to Comets the most dramatic objects in the heavens.
They may be variable stars, which, in a brief period, increase enormously in brightness,
and then slowly wane and disappear entirely, or remain of a very faint, steller magnitude.
in the ancient historical records are found accounts of several such stars.
For instance, in the Chinese annals, there is an allusion to such a stellar outburst in the constellation of Scorpio, BC-134.
This was observed also by Hipparchus, and no doubt it was the immediate incentive which led to his construction of the first known catalogue of stars,
so that similar happenings might be detected in the future.
In November 1572, Tycho Brahe observed the most famous of all new stars, which blazed out in the
constellation Cassiopeia. In something over a year, it had completely disappeared. In 1604 to 1605, a new star of
equal brightness was seen in Ophiuchus by Kepler. It also faded out to invisibility in 1606.
Kepler and Tycho printed very complete records of these remarkable objects. The 18th,
passed without any new stars being seen or recorded. There was one of the fifth magnitude in
1848, and another of the seventh magnitude in 1860, and in May, 1866, a star of the second
magnitude suddenly made us appearance in Corona Borealis, and one of the third magnitude in Cygnus
in November 1876. The latter was fully observed by Schmidt of Athens, and became a faint
telescopic star within a few weeks. It is now of the 15th,
magnitude. In 1885, astronomers were surprised to find suddenly a new star of the sixth magnitude,
very close to the brightest part of the great nebula in Andromeda. It ran its course in about
six months, fading with many fluctuations in brightness, and no star is now visible in its position,
even with the telescope. Stars of this class are known to astronomers as Novi, usually with
the genitive of the constellation name, as Nova Andromedae.
In 1891 to 1892, Nova AriGay made its spectacular appearance and yielded a distinctly double and complex spectrum for more than a month.
Many pairs of lines indicated a community of origin as to substance, and accurate measurement showed a large displacement with a relative velocity of more than 500 miles per second.
For each bright hydrogen line displaced toward the red, there was a dark companion line, or band about
equally displaced toward the violet, much as if the weird light of Nova Arrigae originated in a solid
globe, moving swiftly away from us and plunging into an irregular nebulous mass as swiftly approaching
us. Parallax observations of Nova Arrigae made it immensely remote, perhaps within the galaxy,
and it still exists as a faint nebulous star. In February, 1901, in the constellation Perseus
appeared the most brilliant Nova of recent years. It was first discovered by Dr. Anderson,
an amateur of Glasgow, and at maximum on February 23rd, it outshone Capella. There were many
unusual fluctuations in its waning brightness. Its spectrum closely resembled that of
Nova Origay, with calcium, helium, and hydrogen lines. In August, 1901, an enveloping nebula was
discovered, and a month later, certain wisps of this nebulosity appeared to have moved bodily,
at a speed 70-fold greater than ever previously observed in the stellar universe.
According to Sir Norman Lockyer's meteoritic hypothesis, a vast nebulous region was invaded,
not by one but by many meteor swarms, under conditions such that the effects of collision
varied greatly in intensity. The most violent of these collisions gave birth
to Nova Percy itself, and the least violent occurred subsequently in other parts of the disturbed
nebula, perhaps immeasurably removed. This explanation would avoid the necessity of supposing actual
motion of matter through space at velocities heretofore unobserved and inconceivably high.
A recent photograph of Nova Percy, by Ritchie, reveals a nebulous ring of regular structure
surrounding the star. The great power of the sixty inch has made it possible to photograph
even this spectra of many of the novae of years ago, which are now very faint. After the lapse of
of years, the characteristic lines of the nebulae generally vanish, as if the star had passed out of the
nebula, a plunge into which is generally thought to be the cause of the great and sudden outburst of
light. Many novi have recently been found in the spiral nebulae, especially in the great nebula of
Andromeda. End of Chapter 52.
Chapter 53 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Libri-Wox recording. All Libre-Wox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit LibriWorks.org.
Read by Cosmic T.
Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies by David Todd.
The Double Stars
Examining individual stars of the heavens, more in detail,
thousands of them are found to be double, not the stars that appear double to the naked eye,
as Theta Tori, Mizer, Ipsilon Lidri, and others.
But pairs of stars much closer together and requiring the power of the telescope to divide or separate them.
Only a very few seconds apart they are, or in many cases only the merest fraction of a second of hour.
Some of them, called binaries, are found to be revolving around a common center
sometimes in only a few years, sometimes in stately period of hundreds of years.
Many such binary systems are now known and the number is constantly increasing.
Castor is one, Gamma Virgin is another, Sirius is also one of these binaries.
And a most interesting one, having a period of revolution of about 52 years.
Aiken of the Lake Observatory in his work on binary stars directs special attention to the
correlation between the elements of known binary orbits and the stars spectral type and presents
a statistical study of the distribution of 54,000 visual double stars, of which the spectra
of 3,919 are known.
That the masses of binary systems average about twice that of the sun's mass has long been
known, and this fact can be employed with confidence in estimates of the probable parallax
of these systems.
It can apply the test to 14 visual systems for which the necessary data are available and
deduces for them a mean mass of 1.76 times that of the Sun.
For the spectroscopic binaries, the masses are much greater.
Triple, quadruple and multiple stars are less frequent but many exceedingly interesting
objects of this class exist.
Ipsylon Liry is one, a double double, of four stars as seen with slender telescopic power,
and six or seven stars with larger instruments.
Sigma Orionis and 12 Lincis, also Theta, Cancry and Mew Borders are good examples of triple stars.
End of Chapter 53
Chapter 54 of Astronomy, The Science of Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Libravox recording.
All Laborvox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit Libravox.org.
Astronomy, the Science of Heavenly Bodies by David Todd.
The Star Clusters
From multiple stars, the transition is natural to star clusters,
although the gap between these types of stellar objects is very broad.
The familiar group of the winter sky, known as the Pleiades, is a loose cluster, showing relatively very few stars even in telescopes or on photographic plates.
The B-hive, or cluster known as Presby, in cancer, and a double group in the sword handle of Perseus, both just visible to the naked eye, are excellent examples of star clusters of the average type.
When the moon is absent, they are easily recognized without a telescope as little patches of nebulous light,
but every increase of optical power adds to their magnificence.
Then we come in regular succession to the truly marvelous globular clusters, that, for instance, in Hercules.
Messierre 13, a recent photograph of which taken by Richie with the 60-inch reflector on Mount Wilson,
reveals an aggregation of more than 50,000 stars.
But the finest specimens are in the Southern Hemisphere.
Sir John Herschel spent much time investigating them nearly a century ago at the Cape of Good Hope.
His description of the cluster in the constellation of Centaurus is as follows.
The noble globular cluster Omega Centauri is beyond all comparison,
the richest and largest object of the kind in the heavens.
The stars are literally innumerable, and as their total light when received by the naked eye affects it hardly more than a star of the fifth or fourth to fifth magnitude, the minuteness of each star may be imagined.
Others of these clusters are so remote that the separate stars are not distinguishable, especially at the center, and their distances are entirely beyond our present powers of direct measurement, although methods of estimating them are in process of development.
If gravitation is regnant among these uncounted components of stellar clusters, as doubtless it is,
these stars must be in rapid motion, although our photographs of measurements have been made too recently
for us to detect even the slightest motion in any of the component stars of a cluster.
The only variations are changes of apparent magnitude, of a first type detected in a large number
of stars in Omega Centauri by Bailey of Harvard.
who, by comparison of photographs of the globular clusters, was the first to find variable stars quite numerous in the objects.
Their unexplained variations of magnitude take place with great rapidity, and within a few hours.
There are about a hundred of these globular clusters, and the radial velocities of ten of them have been measured by Slyfer,
and found to range from a recession of 410 to an approach of 225,
kilometers per second. These excessive velocities are comparable with those found for the spiral
nebulae. Shapely has estimated the distances of many of these bodies, which contain a large
number of variable stars of the sepheid type. By assuming their absolute magnitudes equal to those
of similar sephiades at known distances, he finds their distance represented by the inconceivably
minute parallel acts of 0.000.12, corresponding to 30,000 light years. This research also places the
globular clusters far outside and independent of our galactic system of stars. The distribution of
globular clusters has also been investigated, and these interesting objects are found almost
exclusively in but one hemisphere of the sky. It's center lies,
in the rich star clouds of Scorpio and Sagittarius.
Success in finding the distances of these objects
has made it possible to form a general idea
of their distribution in three-dimensional space.
The numerous variable stars in any one cluster
are remarkable for their uniformity.
Accepting variables of this type
as a constant standard of absolute brightness
and assuming that the differences of average magnitude
of the variables in different clusters
are entirely due to differences of distance,
the relative distances of many clusters
were ascertained with considerable accuracy.
Then it was found that the average absolute magnitude
of the 25 brightest stars in a cluster
is also a uniform standard,
or about 1.3 magnitudes brighter
than the mean magnitude of the variables.
This new standard was employed
in ascertaining the distances
of other clusters, not containing many variables.
Shaping further shows that the linear dimensions of the clusters are nearly uniform,
and the proper relative positions in space are charted for 69 of these objects.
We can determine the scale of the charts if we know the absolute brightness of our primary standard,
the variable stars, and this is deduced from a knowledge of the distance of variables
of the same type in our immediate stellar system.
The most striking of all the globular clusters, Omega Centauri, comes out the nearest.
Nevertheless, it is a distant 6.5 kiloparsecs.
A kiloparsec is a thousand parsecs, and is the equivalent of 3,256 light years.
At the inconceivable distance of 67 kiloparsecs, or more than 200,000 light years, is the most
most remote of the globular clusters, known to astronomers as NGC-706, from its number in the
catalog which records its position in the sky, the new general catalog of Nebulae by Dreyer
of Armagh. The clusters are widely scattered, and their center of diffusion is about 20
khaloparsex on the galactic plane toward the region of Scorpio Sagittarius.
Marked symmetry with reference to this plane makes it evident that the entire system of globular
clusters is associated with the galaxy itself. But to conceive of this, it is necessary to extend our
ideas of the actual dimensions of the galactic system. Almost on the circumference of the great
system of globular clusters, our local stellar system is found, and it contains probably all the
naked eye stars, with millions of fainter ones. Its size seems almost diminutive, only about one
kylaparsec in diameter. The relative location of our local stellar system shows why the
globular clusters appear to be crowded into one hemisphere only. Shapley suggests that globular
clusters can exist only an empty space, and that when they enter regions of space tenanted by
other stars, they dissolve into the well-known loose clusters and the star clouds of the Milky Way.
Strangely, the radial velocities of the clusters already observed show that most of them are
traveling toward this region, and that some will enter the stellar regions within a period
of the order of a hundred million years. The actual dimensions of globular clusters are not
easy to determine, because the outer stars are much scattered. To a typical cluster, Messier 3,
shapely assigns a diameter of 150 parsecs, which makes it comparable with the size of the stellar
cluster to which the sun belongs. Also on certain likely assumptions, he finds that the diameter
of the great cluster in Hercules, the finest one in our northern sky, is about 350 parsecs,
and its distance no less than 30,000 parsecs.
In other words, the staggering distance that light would require 9,750,000 years to travel over.
While these distances can never be verified by direct measurement, it lends great weight to the three methods of indirect measurement, or estimation.
1. From the diameter of the image of the clusters.
2. From the mean magnitude of the 25 brightest stars.
And 3. From the mean magnitude of the short period variables.
That they are in excellent agreement.
End of Chapter 54.
Chapter 55 of Astronomy.
The Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a LibriVox recording.
Livebox recordings are in the public domain. For more information or to volunteer, please visit
liverbox.org. Read by Track. Astronomy, the science of the heavenly bodies by David Todd.
Moving Clusters
Recent researchers on the proper emotions of stars have brought to light many groups of stars
whose individual members have equal and parallel velocities. Adington calls these movements,
clusters. The component stars are not exceptionally near to each other, and it often happens
that other stars not belonging to the group are actually interspersed among them. They may
be likened to double stars which are permanent neighbors with some orbital motion, though
exceedingly slow. The connection is rather one of origin, occurring in the same reason of space
perhaps from a single nebula. They set out with the same motion and have shared all the
accidents of the journey together. Their equality of motion is intact because any possible
deflections by the gravitational pull of the stellar system is the same for both. Mutual
attraction may tend to keep the stars together, but their community of motion persists chiefly
because no forces tend to interfere with it. In this way, physically connected pairs may be separated
by very great distances. So, with the moving clusters, their component stars may be widely separate,
on the celestial sphere.
But equality of their motion
affords a clue to their association
in grubs.
The Hyades, a loose cluster in thoris,
is a group of 39 stars
within an area of about 15 degrees square,
which has been pretty fully investigated,
especially by the late Professor Louis Boss,
and no doubt many fainter stars
in the same reason will ultimately be found
to belong to the same grub.
If we draw arrows on a chart
representing the amount and direction
of the proper motions of these stars, these arrows must all converge to a point.
This shows that their motions are parallel in space.
It is a relatively compact group and the close convergence shows that their individual velocities
must agree within a small fraction of a kilometer per second.
Radial velocity measures of six of the competent stars are in very satisfactory accord,
giving 45.6 km per second for the entire group.
We can get the transverse velocity and therefrom the distances of the stars which are among the best known in the heavens,
because the proper motions are very accurately known.
The mean parallax of the group by this indirect method comes out to be 0.25 arc seconds,
agreeing almost exactly with the direct determination by photography as 0.23.
arcsecates by Captain DeSitter and others.
Eddington concludes that this Torres group is a globular cluster with a slight central condensation.
Its entire diameter is 10 parsecs and its known motion enables us to trace its past and future history.
It was nearest the sun 8 lakhs years ago when it was about half its present distance.
POS calculated that in 65 million years if the first,
present motion is maintained, this group will have receded so far as to appear like an
ordinary globular cluster, 20 feet in diameter, its stars ranging from the ninth to the
12th upper in magnitude.
We may infer that the motion will likely continue undisturbed, because there are interspersed
among the groups many stars not belonging to it, and these have neither scattered its members,
not sensibly interfered with the parallelism of their motion.
Another moving cluster, the similarity of proper motion of whose component stars, was first
pointed out by Proctor, is known as the Ursa Major System, which embraces primarily
beta, gamma, delta, epsilon, and Jita Ursa Majorus, of five of the seven stars that
mark the familiar dipper.
But as many as eight other stars widely scattered are thought to belong to the same system,
including Sears and Alpha Coronet, Borealis.
The absolute motion amounts to 28.8 kilometers per second and is approximately parallel
to the galaxy.
Turner has made a model of the cluster which has the form of a flat desk.
Among stars of the Orient type of a spectrum are several examples of moving clusters.
The Pleiaries, together with many fainter stars from another moving cluster, as also do the brighter
stars of Orion, together with the faint cloud-like extensions of the great nebula in Orion,
whose radial velocity agrees with that of the stars in the constellation, still another
very remarkable moving cluster is in Perseus.
First detected by Eddington and embracing 18 stars, the brightest of which is Alpha per se.
The further discovery of moving clusters is most important in the future development of sterile estonomy.
Because with their aid we can find out the relative distribution, luminosity and distance of very remote stars.
So far, the stars found associated in groups are of early types of spectrum.
But the thoris clusters embraces several members equally advanced in evolution with the sun.
And in the more scattered system of Ursei Major, there are three stars of type F.
Some of these systems Eddington concludes would thus appear to have existed for a time comparable
with the lifetime of an average star.
They are wandering through a part of space in which are scattered stars not belonging to their
system interlopers penetrating right among the cluster stars.
Nevertheless, the quality of motion has not been seriously disturbed.
It is scarcely possible to avoid the conclusion that the chance attractions of stars passing
in the vicinity have no appreciable effect on stellar motion, and that if the motions change
in course of time as it appears they must do, this change is due not to the passage of individual
stars but to the central attraction of the whole stellar universe, which is sensibly constant
over the volume of space occupied by a moving cluster.
End of Section 55
Chapter 56 of Astronomy, the Science of Heavenly
Bodies
This is a Libravox recording
All LibraVox recordings are in the public domain
For more information or to volunteer,
please visit Libravox.org
Astronomy, the Science of Heavenly
Bodies by David Todd
The Two Star Streams
Consider the ships
on the Atlantic voyaging between Europe and America.
At any one time, there may be a hundred or more,
all bound either east or west,
some moving in interpenetrating groups,
individuals frequently passing each other,
but rarely or never colliding.
We might say there are two great streams of ships,
one moving east and the other west.
Now, in place of each ship,
imagine a hundred ships,
and magnify their distances from each other to the vast distances that the stars are from each other,
and all in motion in two great streams as before.
This will convey some idea of the relatively recent discovery called by astronomers Star Streaming.
Early in this century, the investigation of moving clusters began to reveal the fact that the motions of the stars were not at random throughout the universe,
and about 1904 captain was the first to show that the stellar motions considered in great groups are very far from being haphazard,
but that the stars tend to travel in two great streams or favored directions.
This was ascertained by analyzing the proper motions of stars in the sky, many thousands of them,
and correcting all for the effect which the known motion of the sun would have upon them.
The corrected motion, or part that is left over, is known as the star's own motion, or modus peculiaris.
This important investigation was greatly facilitated by the general catalog of 6,188 stars well distributed over the entire sky,
the work of the late Professor Boss.
It was published by the Carnegie Institution of Washington and includes all stars down to the sixth magnitude.
Boss was very critical in the matter of stellar positions and proper motions, and his work is the most accurate at present available.
Excluding stars of the Orion type and the known members of moving clusters,
Captain's investigation was based on 5,322 stars, which he divided into 17 regions of the sky,
each northern region having an antipodal one in the southern hemisphere.
Mathematical analysis of these regions showed them all,
in substantial agreement, with one exception, and enabled Captain to draw the conclusion
that the stars of one stream, called Drift 1, move with a speed of 32 kilometers per second,
while those of the other, Drift 2, travel with the speed of 18 kilometers per second.
Their directions are not, like those of the east and westbound ships, 180 degrees
from each other, but are inclined at an angle of 100 degrees.
The mathematical analysis of these regions showed them all in substantial agreement, with one exception,
and enabled Captain to draw the conclusion that the stars of one stream, called Drift 1,
moved with a speed of 32 kilometers per second, while those of the other, Drift 2, travel with the speed of 18 kilometers per second.
Their directions are not, like those of east and westbound ships, 180 degrees from each other,
but are inclined at an angle of 100 degrees.
Drift 1 embraces about three-fifths of the stars and drift to the remaining two-fifths.
Quite as remarkable as the drift themselves is the fact that the relative motion of the two is very closely parallel to the plain of the Milky Way.
This apical research has very great significance in all investigations of stellar motions,
and it has been verified in various ways, particularly by the astronomer Royal, Sir Frank Dyson,
who limited the stars under consideration to 1,924 in number, but all having very large proper motions.
In this way, the two streams are even more characteristically marked.
But radial velocity determinations afford the ultimate and most satisfactory test,
and Campbell has this investigation in hand,
classifying the stars in their streaming according to this type.
Type A stars are so far found to be confirmatory.
Turning to the question of physical differences between the stars of the two streams,
Eddington inquires into the average magnitude of the stars in both drifts and their spectral type.
Also, whether they are distributed at the same distance from the sun and in the same proportion
in all parts of the sky.
His conclusion is that there is no important difference in the magnitudes of the stars constituting the two drifts.
Regarding their spectra, stars of early and late types are found in both streams, and a somewhat higher proportion of late types among the stars of Drift 2 than those of Drift 1.
Campbell and Moore of the Lick Observatory have investigated 73 planetary nebulae which exhibit the phenomena of star streaming, and have motions which are characteristic of the stars.
Dealing with the very important question whether the two streams are actually intermingled in space,
Eddington finds them nearly at the same mean distance and thoroughly intermingled,
and there is no possible hypothesis of drifts one and two passing one behind the other in the same line of sight.
A third drift, to which all the Orion stars belong, is under investigation,
together with comprehensive analysis of the drifts according to their spectral type of all the stars included.
The farther research on star streaming is pushed, the more it becomes evident that a third stream called Drift O is necessary,
especially to include B-type stars.
The farther we recede from the sun, the more this drift is in evidence.
At the average distances of B-type stars, the observed motions are almost complete,
represented by Drift O alone.
Halm of Cape Town concludes from recent investigations that the double drift phenomena,
drifts one and two, is of a distinctly local character, and concerns chiefly the stars in the
vicinity of the solar system, while stars in the greatest distances from the sun belong preeminently
to Drift O.
The 60-inch reflector on Mount Wilson gathers sufficient light so that the spectra of very faint stars
can be photographed, and a discussion of velocities derived in this manner has shown that
captain's two-star streams extend into space much farther than it was possible to trace them
with the nearer stars. Star streaming then may be a phenomenon in the widest significance
in reference to the entire universe. As to the fundamental cause for the two opposite and nearly
equal star streams, it is early perhaps to even theorize upon the subject. Eddington has
however, finds a possible explanation in the spiral nebulae, which are so numerous as to indicate
the certainty of an almost universal law compelling matter to flow in these forms. Why it does so we cannot
be said to know, but obviously matter is either flowing into the nucleus from the branches of the
spiral, or it is flowing out from the nucleus into the branches. Which of the two directions does not
matter, because in either case there would be currents of matter in opposite directions at the
points where the arms merge in the central aggregation. The currents continue through the center,
because the stars do not interfere with one another's paths. As Eddington concludes,
There then, we have an explanation of the prevalence of motions to and fro in a particular straight line.
It is the line from which the spiral branches start out. The two-star streams and the double-branched
spirals arise from the same cause.
End of Chapter 56.
Chapter 57 of Astronomy.
The Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a LibriVox recording.
All LibriVox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit LibriVox.orgi.
Read by Prajcata.
Astronomy.
The Science of the Heavenly Bodies by David Todd
The Galaxy or Milky Way
Grandest of all the problems that have occupied the mind of man
is the distribution of the stars throughout space
to the earliest astronomers who knew nothing about the distances of the stars
it was not much of a problem because they thought
all the fixed stars were attached to a revolving sphere and therefore all at essentially the same distance.
A very moderate distance too.
Even Kepler held the idea that the distances of individual stars from each other are much less than their distances from our sun.
Thomas Wright of Durham, England seems to have been the first to suggest the most to suggest the most
the modern theory of the structure of the stellar universe about the middle of the 18th century.
His idea was taken up by Kant, who elaborated it more fully. It is founded on the galaxy,
the basal plane of the stellar distribution, just as the ecliptic is the fundamental circle
of the reference in the solar system. What is the galaxy or Milky Way?
Here is the great poet's view of the most poetic object in all nature.
A broad and ample road with dust is gold and pavement stars as stars to thee appear.
Seen in the galaxy that Milky Way, which nightly as a circling zone, dowsest, powdered with stars.
Milton PL 7 580
Were the earth transparent as crystal
So that we could see downward through it
And outward in all directions to the celestial sphere
The galaxy or Milky Way would appear as a belt
or zone of cloud-like luminosity
extending all the way around the heavens
As the horizon cuts the celestial sphere in two, we see at any one time only one half of the Milky Way,
spanning the dome of the sky as a cloud-like arc.
As the general plane of the galaxy makes a large angle with our equator,
the Milky Way is continually changing its angle with the horizon,
so that it rises at different elevation.
One half of the Milky Way will always be below our horizon and a small region of it lies so near the south pole of the heavens that it can never be seen from medium northern latitudes.
Galileo was the first to explain the fundamental mystery of this belt.
When he turned his telescope upon it and found that it was not a continuous sheet of face,
light as it seemed to be, but was made up of countless numbers of stars individually
too faint to be visible to the naked eye, but whose vast number taken in the aggregate gave
the well-known effect which we see in the sky.
In some regions as per seous, the stars are more numerous than in others and they
are gathered in close clusters.
The larger the telescope we employ, the greater the number of stars that are seen as we approach
the galaxy on either side, and the farther we recede from the galaxy and approach either
of its poles, fewer and fewer stars are found.
Indeed, if all the stars visible in a 12-inch telescope could be conceived as a more of
As blotted out, nearly all the stars that are left would be found in the galaxy itself.
The naked eye readily notes the variations in breadth and brightness of the galactic zone.
Nearly a third of it, from Scorpio to Cygnus, it split into two divisions nearly parallel.
In many regions, its light is interrupted, especially in Centaurus, where a dark,
dark starless region exists known as the coal sack. Sir John Herschel, who followed up the stellar
researchers of his father, Sir William, in great detail, places the north pole of the galactic
plain in the declination of 37 degrees north and right ascension 12 hour 47 minute. This makes
the plane of the Milky Way lie at an angle of about 60 degrees north.
with the ecliptic, which it intersects not far from the solstices.
Now, Kant, in view of the two great facts about the galaxy known in his time,
one, that it wholly encircles the heavens, and two, that it is composed of countless stars
too faint to be individually visible to the naked eye, drew the safe conclusions that the
system of the stars must extend much farther in the direction of Milky Wave than in other directions.
This theory of Kant was next investigated from an observational standpoint by Sir William Harshal,
the ultimate goal of whose researches was always a knowledge of the construction of the heavens.
The present conclusion is that we may regard the stellar bodies of the sidereal universe as scattered without much regard to uniformity throughout a vast space having in general the shape of a thick watch, its thickness being perhaps one-tenth its diameter.
On both sides of this disk of stars and clustered about the poles of the sea,
Sidereal system are the regions occupied by vast numbers of nebulae.
The entire visible universe then would be spheroidal in general shape.
The plane of the Milky Way passes through the middle of the aggregation of stars and nebulae
and the solar system is near the center of the Milky Way.
Throughout the watchform space the stars are clustered irregularly in very much.
varied and sometimes fantastic forms, but without approach to order or system.
If we accept some of the star groups and star clusters and consider only the naked eye stars,
we find them scattered with fair approach to uniformity.
The watch-shaped disk is not to be understood as representing the actual form of the staler system,
but only in general the limits within which it is for the most part contained.
A vigorous attack on the problem of the evolution and structure of the stellar universe
as a whole is now being conducted by cooperation of many observatories in both hemispheres.
It is known as the captain plan of selected areas embracing 266.000.
regions which are distributed regularly over the entire sky.
Besides this, a special plan includes 46 additional regions, either very rich or extremely poor
in stars or to which other interest attaches.
Of all investigators, Captain has gone into the question of our precise location in
the Milky Way most thoroughly, concluding that the solar system,
stim lies not at the center in the exact plane, but somewhat to the north of the galaxy.
Discussing the Syrian stars, he finds that if stars of equal brightness are compared, the
Syrians average nearly three times more distance from the sun than those of the solar type.
So probably the Syrians far exceed the solars in intrinsic brightness.
Further, Captain concludes that the galaxy has no connection with our solar system and is composed of a vast encircling annulus or ring of stars, far exceeding in number of stars of the great central solar cluster and everywhere exceedingly remote from these stars as well as differing from them in physical type and constitution.
So it would be mainly the mere element of distance that makes them appear so faint and crowded
thickly together into that gauzy girdle which we call the galaxy.
Milky Way reveals irregularities of stellar density and star clustering on a large scale
with deep rifts between great clouds of stars.
Modern photographs, particularly those of Bernard in Sagittles.
Make this very apparent. Within the Milky Way, nearly in its plain and almost central is what Eddington terms the inner stellar system, near the center of which is the sun.
Surrounding it and near its plane are the masses of star clouds which make up the Milky Way, whether these star clouds are isolated from the inner system or continuous field.
with it is not yet ascertain. The vast masses of the Milky Way stars are very faint and we know nothing yet as to their proper motions, their radial motions or their spectra.
Probably a few stars as bright as the sixth magnitude are actually located in the midst of the Milky Way clusters.
the fainter 9th magnitude stars certainly begin the Milky Way proper, while the stars of the 12th or 13th magnitude carry us into the very depths of the galaxy.
It is now pretty generally believed that many of the dark regions of the Milky Way are due not to actual absence of stars so much as to the absorption of light by intervening tracts of the Milky Way.
nebulous matter on the heather side of the galactic aggregations and, probably in fact, within the oblate inner stellar system itself.
E. Stone has made many hundred counts of stars in galactic regions of Cygnus and Aquila, where the range of intensity of light is very marked.
In fact, the star density of the bright patches of the galaxy is so much.
far in excess of the density adjacent and just outside the Milky Way, that the conclusion
is inevitable that this excess is due to the star clouds. Of the distance of the Milky Way, we
have very little knowledge. It is certainly not less than 1000 parsecs and more likely
5,000 parsecs, a distance over which light would travel in about 16,000 persecs, and more likely 5,000
thousand years. Quite certainly, all parts of the galaxy are not at the same distance,
and probably there are branches in some regions that lie behind one another. While the general
regions of the nebulae are remote from the galactic plane, the large irregular nebulae as the
triffid, the keyhole and the omega nebulae are found chiefly in the milky way.
In addition to the irregular nebulae, many types of stellar objects appear to be strongly condensed toward the Milky Way.
But this may be due to the inner stellar system rather than a real relation to the galactic formation.
Quite different are the Magellanic clouds which contain many gaseous nebulae and are unique objects of the sky,
having no resemblance to the true spiral nebulae, which, as a rule, avoid the galactic regions.
Worthy of note also is the theory of Eastern that the Milky Way has itself the form of a double-branched spiral,
which explains the visible features quite well, but is incapable of either disproof or verification.
The central nucleus he locates in the rich galactic region of Cygnus with the sun well outside the nucleus itself.
By combining the available photographs of the galaxy, he has produced a chart which indicates in a general way how the stellar aggregations might all be arrayed,
so as to give the effect of the galaxy as we see it.
Sheppley at Mount Wilson had studied the structure of the galactic system in which he has been aided by Mrs. Sheppley.
An interesting part of this work relates to the distribution of the spiral nebulae and to certain properties of their systematic recessional motion,
suggesting that the entire galactic system may be rapidly moving through space.
Apparently, the spiral nebulae are not distant stellar organizations or island universes,
but truly nebula structures of vast volume which in general are actively repelled from the stellar system.
A tentative cosmogonic hypothesis has been formulated to account for the motions,
distribution and observed structure of clusters and spiral nebula.
An additional great problem of the galaxy is a purely dynamical one.
Doubtless it is in some sort of equilibrium according to Eddington,
that is to say the individual stars do not oscillate to and fro across the stellar system
in a period of 300 million years.
but remain concentrated in clusters as at present.
Pointe care has considered the entire Milky Way as in stately rotation
and on the assumption that the total mass of the inner stellar system is 1,000 million times the sun's mass
and that the distance of the Milky Way is 2,000 parsecs, the angular velocity for the
for equilibrium comes out 0.5 radiance per century.
That is to say, a complete revolution would take place in about 250 million years.
End of Chapter 57
Chapter 58 of Astronomy, The Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Libravox recording.
All Libravox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer,
Please visit Libravox.org.
Read by Raven Green.
Astronomy, the science of the heavenly bodies by David Todd.
Star clouds and nebulae.
From star clusters to nebulae, only a century ago, the transition was thought to be easy and immediate.
Accuracy, in determining the distances of stars, was just beginning to be reached.
The clusters were obviously of all degrees of closeness, following to the verge of irresolvability.
And it was but natural to jump to the conclusion that the mystery of the nebulae consisted in nothing but their vaster distance than that of clusters.
And it was believed that all nebulae would prove resolvable into stars whenever telescopes of sufficiently great power could be constructed.
But the development of the spectroscope soon showed.
the error of this hypothesis by revealing bright lines in the nebular spectra, showing that many nebulae emit light
that comes from glowing incandescent gas, not from an infinitude of small stars. In pre-telloscope days,
nothing was known about the nebulae. The great nebula in Andromeda, and possibly the great
nebula in Orion are alone visible to the naked eye. But as thus seen, they are the merest wisps of
light, the same as the larger clusters are. Galileo, Hougens, and other early users of the telescope
made observations of nebulae, but long-focused telescopes were not well adapted to this work.
Simon Meyer has left us the first drawing of a nebula. The Orion Nebula.
as he saw it in 1612.
The vast light-gathering power of the reflectors built by Sir William Herschel
first afforded glimpses of the structure of the nebulae,
and if his drawings are critically compared with modern ones,
no case of motion, with reference to the stars,
or of change in the filaments of the nebulae themselves,
has been satisfactorily made out.
Only very recently has the distance of a nebula been to do with a nebulae been to do with,
determined, and the few that have been measured seem to indicate that the nebulae are at great
distances comparable with the stars. Of all celestial objects, the nebulae fill the greatest
angles, so that we are forced to conclude with regard to the actual size of the greater nebulae
as they exist in space, that they far surpass all other objects in bulk.
Photography invaded the realm of the nebulae in 1880 when Dr. Henry Draper secured the first photograph of the nebula of Orion.
Theoretically, photography ought to help greatly in the study of the nebula and enable us in the lapse of centuries to ascertain the exact nature of the changes which must be going on.
The differences of photographic processes of plates, of exposure, and of events,
produce in the finished photograph vastly greater differences than any actual changes that might be going on,
so that we must rely rather on optical drawings made with the telescope,
or on drawings made by expert artists from photographs with many lengths of exposure on the same object.
The great work on neboli and star clusters,
recently concluded by Biggordon of the Paris Observatory,
and published in five volumes received the award of the gold medal of the Royal Astronomical Society.
While Daudest measured about 2,000 nebulae and Sir John Herschel about double that number in both hemispheres,
Bigorda has measured about 7,000.
His work forms an invaluable lexicon of information concerning the nebulae.
Classification of the nebulae is not very satisfactory.
if made by their shapes alone. There are perhaps 15,000 nebulae in all that have been catalogued,
described, and photographed. Dreyer's new general catalog, NGC, is the best and most useful.
Many of the nebulae, especially the large ones, can only be classified as irregular nebulae.
The Orion Nebulae is the principal one of this class.
class, revealing an enormous amount of complicated detail, with exceptional brilliancy of many
regions and filaments. An extraordinary multiple star, Theta Orionis, occupies a very prominent
position in the nebula, and photographs by Pickering have brought to light the curved filaments,
very faint and optically invisible, in the outlying regions which give the Orion Nebula,
in part, a spiral character.
But the delicate optical wisps of this nebula are well seen, even in very small telescopes.
Its spectrum yields hydrogen, helium, and nitrogen.
The Orion Nebula is receding from the Earth about 11 miles in every second.
Kieler and Campbell have shown that nearly every line of the nebulae spectrum is a counterpart of a prominent dark line
in the spectrum of the brighter stars of the constellation of Orion.
A recent investigator of the distribution of luminosity in the great nebula of Orion
finds that radiations from nebulium are confined, chiefly to the Hugenian region of the nebula
and its immediate neighborhood.
Photography has revealed another extraordinary nebula or group of nebulae,
surrounding the stars in the Pleiades, which the deft manipulation of,
of Bernard has brought to light.
All the stars and the nebula are so interrelated that they are obviously bound together physically,
as the common proper motion of the stars also appears to show.
Also in the constellation Cygnus, Bernard has discovered very extensive nebulosities of
a delicate, filmy, cloud-like nature, which are wholly invisible with telescopes, but very obvious
on highly sensitive plates with long exposures.
Another class of these objects are the annular and elliptic nebulae, which are not very abundant.
The southern constellation Grus, the crane, contains a fine one, but by far the best example
is in the constellation Lyra.
It is a near-perfect ring, elliptic in figure, exceedingly faint in small telescopes, but
large instruments reveal many stars within the annulus.
one near the center which, although very faint to the eye, is always an easy object on the photographic plate
because it is rich in blue and violet rays. The parallax of the ring nebula in Lyra comes out only
one-sixth of that of the planetary nebulae, and the least greatest diameters of this huge continuous
ring are 250 and 330 times the orbit of Neptune.
planetary nebulae and nebulous stars are yet another class of nebulae, for the most part faint and small,
resembling in some measure a planetary disk or a star with a nebulous outline.
Practically all are gaseous in composition and have large radial velocities.
Probably they are located within our own stellar system.
The parallaxes of several of them have been measured by Van Monen,
One of the very small angle, 0.023 inches, which enables us to calculate the diameter of this faint but interesting object as equal to 19 times the orbit of Neptune.
End of Chapter 58
Chapter 59 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a library box recording.
All library box recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit
Labelvox.org, read by Trek. Astronomy, the science of the heavenly bodies by David Todd.
The spiral nebulae. Last and most important of all the spiral nebulae. The finest example is in the constellation
Cain's Venatacy, and its spiral configuration was first noted by Lord Ross, an epoch-making discovery.
The convolutions of its spiral are filled with numerous star-like condensations themselves engirved in nebulosity.
Photography possesses a vast advantage over the eye in revealing the marvelous character of this object,
an inconceivably vast celestial whirl.
Naturally, the central reasons of the world would revolve most swiftly, but no comparison of drawing.
and photographs, separated by intervals of many years, has yet revealed even a trace of any such motion.
The number of large spiral nebulae is not very great. The largest of all is the great nebula of
Andromeda, whose length stretches over an arc of seven times the breadth of the moon,
and its width about half as great. This nebula is a naked eye object near Ita Endromeda
day, and it is often mistaken for a comet.
Optically, it was always a puzzle, but photographs by Roberts of England first revealed
the true spiral, with ring-like formations partially distinct and knots of condensing nebulosity
as of companion stars in the making.
While its spectrum shows the non-gaseous constitution of this nebula, no telescope has yet
resolved it into component stars.
Systematic search for a spiral nebulae by Keeler and later continued by Perrine at the
Leck Observatory with the 36-inch cross-lay reflector disclosed the existence of vast
numbers of these objects, in fact many hundreds of thousands by estimation, so that next
to the stars the spiral nebulae are by far the most abyssabular.
abundant of all the objects in the sky.
They present every face according to the angle of their plane with the line of sight, and
the convolutions of the open ones are very perfectly marked.
Many are filled with stars in all degrees of condensation, and the appearance is strongly
as if stars are here caught in every step of the process of making.
The vast multitude of the spiral nebulae indicates clearly their importance in the theory
of the cosmogony or science of the development of the material universe.
Curtis of the Lick Observatory has lately extended the estimated number of these objects
to 700,000.
He has also photographed with the cross-lay reflector many nebulae with lanes or dark streaks
crossing them longitudinally through or near the center.
These remarkable streaks appear as if due to opaque matter between us and the luminous matter
of the nebula beyond.
Perhaps a dark ring of absorptive or occulting matter encircles the nebula in nearly the same
plane with the luminous worlds.
Duncan has employed the 60-inch Mount Wilson reflector in photographing
bright nebulae and star clusters in the very interesting regions of sagittarius one of these shows unmistakable dark rifts or lanes in all parts of the nebula resembling the dark reasons of the neighboring milky way
Peace of Mount Wilson has recently employed the 60-inch and the 100-inch reflectors of the Mount Wilson Observatory to good advantage in photographing several hundred of the fainter nebulae.
Many of these are spirals and others present very intricate and irregular forms.
A search was made for additional spirals among the smaller nebulae along the galaxy, but without success,
Several of the supposedly variable nebulae are found to be unchanging.
Many nights in each month when the moon is absent are devoted to a systematic survey of the
smaller nebulae and their spectra by photography.
The visible spiral figure of all these objects is a double-branched curve, its two arms
joining on the nucleus in opposing points and coiling round in the same geometrical
direction. The spiral nebulae, as to their distribution, are remote from the galaxy, and the
North Galactic Polar region contains a greater aggregation than the south. The distances of
the spiral nebulae are exceedingly great. They lie far beyond the planetary and irregular
gases nebulae, like that of Orion, which are closely related to the stars forming part of
our own system. Possibly, the spiral nebulae are exterior or separate island universes.
If so, they must be inconceivably vast in size and would develop not into solar systems,
but into stellar clusters. The enormous radial velocities of the spiral nebulae averaging
300 to 400 km per second or 20-fold that of the stars tend to sustain the view that
they may be island universes, each comparable in extent with the universe of stars to which
our sun belongs. Recent spectroscopic observations of the nebulae applying the principle
of Doppler have revealed high velocities of rotation. Sliffer of the Lowell Observatory
made the first discovery of this sort and Van Manen of Mount Wilson has detected in the great
Ursa Meijer spiral. Number 101 in Messier's catalogue, a speed of rotation at 5 minutes
of arc from the center that would correspond to a complete period in 85,000 years. As was to be
expected, the nebula does not rotate as a rigid body, but the nearer the center, the greater
the angular velocity. And Van Manon finds evidence of motion along the arms and away from
the center. These great velocities appear to belong to the spiral nebulae as a class and not
to other nebulae. 13 nebulae investigated by Keeler are as a whole almost at rest relatively
to our system, as are the large irregular objects in Orion and the Trifford nebula. This would
seem to indicate that the spiral nebulae form systems outside our own and independent
of it.
Quiet different from their spirals in their distribution through space are the planetary nebula.
The spirals follow the early general law of nebula arrangement.
That is, they are concentrated toward the poles of the galaxy, but the planetary nebulae,
on the other hand, are very few near the poles and show a marked frequency toward the
galactic plane.
Campable and Mooray have found in spectroscopic evidence of internal rotatory motion in a large
proportion of the planetary nebula.
The distribution of the nebulae throughout space like that of the stars is still under critical
investigation.
But the location of vast numbers of the more compact nebulae on the celestial sphere is
very extraordinary.
The Milky Way appears to be the determining plane in both cases.
The nearer we approach it, the more numerous the stars become, whereas this is the general
region of fewest nebulae, and they increase in number outward in both directions from the
galaxy and toward both poles of the galactic circle.
Obviously, this relation or contrarelation of stars and nebulae on such a vast scale is not
accidental, and it also must be duly accounted for in the true theory of the cosmogany.
The nebulae which are found principally in and near the Milky Way are the large irregular nebulae,
and vast nebulous backgrounds like those photographed by Bernard in Scorpio, Thoris and Ellsphere,
as well as the keyhole, omega, and triffid nebulae.
A light to these backgrounds are doubtless,
some of the dark galactic spaces, radiating little or no intrinsic light, and absorbing
the light of the fainted stars beyond them. A peculiar veiled or tinted appearance has been
remarked in some cases visually, and examination of the photographs strongly confirms the existence
of absorbing nebulosity. The spiral nebulae are so abundant and so much attention of the
is now being given to them, both by observers and mathematicians, that their precise relation
to the stellar systems must soon be known, that is, whether they are comparatively small
objects belonging to the stellar system or independent systems on the borders of the
stellar system, or as seems more likely.
Vast and exceedingly remote galaxies comparable with that of the Milky Way itself.
Our knowledge of the motions of the spirals both radial and angular is increasing rapidly and
must soon permit accurate general conclusions to be drawn.
End of Chapter 59.
Chapter 60 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Libre Vox recording.
All Libre Vox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information or to volunteer, please visit LibriVox.org.
The Science of the Heavenly Bodies by David Todd.
Cosmogany
Down to the middle of the last century and later,
it was commonly believed that in the beginning the cosmos came into being by divine fiat substantially as it is.
Previously the earth had been without form and void, as in the scripture.
Had it not been for the growth and gradual acceptance of the doctrine of evolution,
in its reactionary effect upon human thought,
it is conceivable that the early view might have persisted to the present day.
But now it is universally held that everything in the heavens above and the earth beneath is subject more or less to secular change and is the result of an orderly development throughout indefinite past ages, a progressive evolution which will continue through indefinite eons of the future.
In the writings of the Greek philosophers and down through the Middle Ages, we find the idea of an original chaos prevailing, with no indication whatever of the modern view of the process, by which the cosmos came to be what they saw it and as it is today.
If we go still farther back, there is no glimmer of any ideas that will bear investigation by scientific method, however interesting they may be as purely philosophical conceptions.
Many ancient philosophers, among them Anaxagoras, Democritus, and Anaximinis, regard the earth is the product of diffused manner and a state of the original chaos having fallen together haphazard, and they even presume to predict its future career and ultimate destiny.
In Anaximander and Anaximini's alone, do we find any conception of possible progress?
Their thought was that as the world had taken time to become what it is, so in time it would pass,
and as the entire universe had undergone alternate renewal and destruction in the past,
that would be its history in the future.
Aristotle, Ptolemy, and others appear to have held the curious notion that although everything terrestrial is evanescent,
nevertheless the cosmos beyond the orbit of the moon is imperishable and eternal.
by tracing the history of the intellectual development of europe we may find why it was that scientific speculation on the cosmogony was delayed until the eighteenth century and then undertaken quite independently by three philosophers in three different countries swedenborg the the theologian
set down in due form many of the principles that underlie the modern nebular hypothesis.
Thomas Wright of Durham, whose early theory of the arrangement of stars in the galaxy we have already mentioned,
speculated also on the origin and development of the universe, and his writings were known to Kant,
who was now regarded as the author of the modern nebular hypothesis.
This presents a definite mechanical explanation of the development and formation of the heavenly bodies,
and in particular those composing the solar system.
Kant was illustrious as a metaphysician,
but he was a great physicist or natural philosopher as well,
and he set down his ideas regarding the cosmogony with precision.
Learned in the philosophy of the ancients,
he did not follow their speculative conceptions,
but merely assumed that all the materials from which the bodies of the solar system
have been fashioned were resolved into their original elements of the beginning,
and filled all that part of space in which they now move.
true this is pretty near the chaos of the greeks but can't do of the operation of the newtonian law of gravitation which the greeks did not as a natural result of gravitative processes
Kant inferred that the denser portions of the original mass would draw upon themselves the less dense portions.
Whirling motions would be everywhere set up, and the process would continue until many spherical bodies,
each with a gaseous exterior and process of condensation, had taken the place of the original elements which filled space.
In this manner, Kant would explain the sameness and direction of motion, both orbital and axial, of all the planets and satellites of our system.
But many philosophers are of the opinion that Kant's hypothesis would result, not in the formation
of such a collection of bodies as the solar system is, but rather in a single central sun
formed by common gravitation toward a single center.
From quite another viewpoint, the work of the elder Herschel is important here.
No one knew the nebulae from actual observation better than he did, but while his ideas about
their composition were wrong, he nevertheless conceived of them as gradually condensing into stars
or clusters of stars.
And it was this speculative aspect of the nebulae, known as a possible means of accounting
for the birth and development of the solar system, which constitutes Herschel's chief contribution
to the nebular hypothesis.
Classifying the nebulae, which he had carefully studied with his great telescopes, it seemed
obvious to him that they were actually in all the different stages of condensation, and subsequent
research has strongly tended to substantiate the Herschelian view.
Then came Laplace, who took up the great hypothesis where Kant and Herschel had left it,
added new and important conceptions in the light of his mature labors as mathematician and astronomer,
and put the theory in definitive form such that has ever since been known under the name of Laplacean nebular hypothesis.
For reasons like those that prevailed with Kant, he began the evolution of the solar system with the sun already formed as the center,
but surrounded by a vast incandescent atmosphere that filled all the space which the sun's family of planets now occupied.
This entire mass, sun, atmosphere, and all, he conceived to have a stately rotation about its axis.
With rotation of the mass and slow reduction of temperature in its outer regions,
there would be contraction toward the solar center and an increase in velocity of rotation
until the whole mass had been much reduced in diameter in its poles and proportionately expanded at its equator.
When the centrifugal force of the outer equatorial masses finally became equal to the gravitational
forces of the central mass, then these conjoined outer portions would be left behind as a ring,
still revolving at the velocity it had acquired when detached.
The revolution of the entire inner mass goes on, its velocity accelerating until a similar
equilibrium of forces is again reached, when a second rotating ping is left behind.
While place conceived the process is repeated until as many rings had been detached as the
there are individual planets, all central about the Sun, or nearly so.
In all, then, we should have non-gaseous rings, the other ones preceding the inner
formation, but not all existing as rings at the same time.
Radiation from the ring on all sides would lead to rapid contraction of its mass,
so that many nuclei of condensation would form of various sizes, all revolving around the central
sun in practically the same period.
a place conceived of the evolution of the ring to proceed still farther to the largest aggregation
in it had drawn to itself, all the other separate nuclei in the ring.
This, then, was the planet an embryo, an effected diminutive sum, a secondary incandescent mass,
endowed with axial rotation in the same direction as the parent nebula.
With reduction of temperature by radiation, polar contraction and equatorial expansion
go on, and planetary rings are detached from this secondary mass in exactly the same ways
from the original Sun Nebula.
And these planetary rings are, in the Laplacean hypothesis, the embryo, moons, or planetary satellites,
all revolving around their several planets in the same direction that the planets revolve about
the sun.
In the case of one of the planetary rings, its formation was so nearly homogeneous throughout
that no aggregation into a single satellite was possible, all portions of the ring being
of equal density, there was no denser region to attract the less dense regions, and in this
The various manner of the rings of Saturn were formed in lieu of condensation into a separate
satellite.
Similarly in the case of the primal solar ring that was detached next after the Jovian
ring, there was such a nice balancing of masses and densities that, instead of a single
major planet, we have the well-known asteroidal ring composed of innumerable discrete minor
planets.
This, then, in bare outline, is the Laplacean nebular hypothesis, and it accounted very well
for the solar system as known in his day.
fairly regular progression of planetary distances, their orbits around the sun all nearly
circular and approximately in a single plane, the planetary satellite revolutions in orbit
all in the same direction, the axial rotations of planets in the same direction as their
orbital revolutions, and the plane of orbital revolution of the satellites practically
coinciding with the plane of the planet's axial rotation.
But the principle of conservation of energy was, of course, unknown to the little place,
more had the mechanical equivalence of heat with other forms of energy been a state.
established in his day.
In 1870, Lane of Washington first demonstrated the remarkable law the gaseous sphere, in process
of losing heat by radiation and contraction because of its own gravity, actually grows
hotter instead of cooler, as long as it continues to be gaseous and not liquid or solid.
So there is no need of postulating with the place an excessively high temperature of the original
The chief objection to the Places hypothesis by modern theorists is that the detachment
of rings, though possible, would likely be a rare occurrence.
Protuberances or lumps on the equatorial exterior of a swiftly revolving mass would be more
likely, and it is much easier to see how such masses would ultimately become planets than
it is to follow the disruption of a possible ring in the necessary steps of the process
by which it would condense into a final planet.
The continued progress of research in many departments of astronomy has had an important
bearing on the nebular hypothesis, and we may rest assured that this hypothesis in somewhat modified
form can hardly fail of ultimate acceptance, though not in every essential as its great originator
left it.
Lord Rossi's discovery of spiral nebulae, followed up by Keeler's photographic search for these
bodies, revealing their actual existence in the heavens by the hundreds of thousands,
has led to another criticism of the Laplacean theory.
Could Lopace have known of the existence of these objects in such vast numbers, his hypothesis would no doubt have been suitably modified to account for their formation and development?
It is generally considered that the Ring of Saturn suggested till a place.
The ring feature in his scheme of origin of planets and satellites, so far as we know, the Saturnian ring is unique, the only object of its kind in the heavens.
Whereas, next to the star itself, the spiral nebula is the type object, which occurs most frequently.
A theory, therefore, which will satisfactorily account for the origin and development of spiral nebulae must command recognition as of great importance in the cosmogony.
Such a theory has been sent forth by Chamberlain and Moulton in their planetesable hypothesis,
according to which the genesis of spiral nebulae happens when two giant suns approach each other so closely that tide-producing effects take place on a vast scale.
These suns need not be luminous.
They may perhaps belong to the class of darker extinguished suns.
The evidences of the existence of such and vast numbers throughout the universe is thought to be well established.
Now, on close approach, what happens?
There will be huge tides, and the nearer the bodies come to each other, the vaster the scale on which tides will be formed.
If the bodies are liquid or gaseous, they will be distorted by the force of gravitation,
and the figure of both bodies will become ellipsoidal.
And it lasts under greater stress, the restraining shell of both bodies will burst asunder on,
opposite sides and streams of matter from the interior, in this manner the arms of the spiral are formed.
As Chamberlain puts it, if, with these potent forces thus nearly balanced, the sun closely approaches
another sun, or body of like magnitude, the gravity which restrains this enormous elastic power
will be reduced along the line of mutual attraction. At the same time the pressure transverse to this line
relief will be increased. Such localized relief and intensified pressure must bring into action
corresponding portions of the sun's elastic potency, resulting in protuberances of corresponding mass
in high velocity. Only a fraction of 1% of the sun's mass ejected in this fashion would be
sufficient to generate the entire planetary system. Nuclei or knots in the arms of the spiral
gradually grew by accretion, the four interior knots forming Mercury, Venus, the Earth, and Mars.
not was a double one, which developed into the Earth-moon system. The absence of a
dominating nucleus beyond Mars accounts for the zone of the asteroids, remaining in some
sense in the original planetesimal condition. The vaster nuclei beyond Mars gradually condensed
into Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune, and lesser nuclei related to the larger ones
form the systems of moons or satellites. The orbits of the planetesimals and the planetarian
satellite nuclei would be very eccentric, forming a confusion of ellipsis, and the
with frequently causing paths. Collisions would occur, and the nuclei would inevitably grow by accretion.
Each planet then will clear out the planetesimals of its own, and molten shows that this process would give rise to axial revolution of the planet in the same direction as its orbital revolution.
The eccentricities would finally disappear, and the entire mass would revolve in a nearly circular orbit.
Rotation twists the streams into the spiral form, and the huge amounts of wreckage from the near collision,
are thrown into eddies. The fragments are particles, planetesimals, which have given the names of the theory,
begin their motion round their central sun and elliptical paths as required by gravitation. The form of the spiral is preserved by the orbital motion of its particles.
There is a gradual gathering together of the planetesimals that points or nodes of intersection,
and these become aggregations of matter, nuclei that will perhaps become planets, though more likely other stars.
The opulsor near approach is but one of the methods by which the spiral nebulae may have,
have come into existence.
The planet-attestable hypothesis would seem to account for the formation of many of these objects
as we see them in the sky, though perhaps it is hardly competent to replace entirely the
Laplacean hypothesis of the formation of the solar system, which would appear to be a special
case by itself.
It will be observed that while the Laplacean hypothesis is concerned in the main with the progressive
development of the solar system and systems of a light order surrounding other stellar
centers, whose existence is highly probable.
the origin and development of the stellar universe is a vaster problem which can only be undertaken and completed in its broadest bearings when the structure of the stellar universe has been ascertained.
Darwin's important investigations in 1877 to 1878 on tidal friction may be here related.
Before his day, acceptance of the ring theory of development of the moon from the earth had scarcely been questioned,
but his recondite mathematical research is on the tidal reaction between a central yielding mass and a body revolving round it brought to light the under the undercuting.
unsuspected effect of tides raised upon both bodies by their mutual attraction.
The types of tides here meant is not the usual rise and fall of the waters of the ocean,
but primeval tides in the plastic material of which the earth in its early history was composed.
The Newtonian law of gravitation afforded a complete explanation of the rise and fall of the
waters of the oceans, but as applied to the motions of planets and satellites by the
Lagrangian formulae, it presupposed that all these bodies are rigid and unyielding.
However, mutual tides of phenomenal height in their early plastic substances must have been a necessary consequence of the action of the Newtonian law, and they gradually drew upon the Earth's rotational moment of momentum.
In its very early history, before there was any mood to produce tides, the Earth rotated much more rapidly, that is, the day was very much shorter than now, probably about five or six hours long, and with the rapid whirling, it was not a Laplacean ring that was detached,
but a huge globular mass was separated from the plastic earth's equator.
Darwin shows that the gravitative interaction of the two bodies immediately began to raise tides of extraordinary height in both,
therefore tending to slow down the rotational periods of both bodies.
Action and reaction being equal, the reaction at once began driving the moon away from the earth and thereby lengthening its period of revolution.
So small was the mass of the moon and so near was it to the,
the earth, that its relative rotational energy was in time completely used up, and the moon has
ever since turned her constant face toward us. Tides of sun and moon in the plastic earth, acting
through the ages, slowed down the earth's rotation to its present period, or the length of
the day. Moulton, however, has investigated the tidal theory of the origin of the moon in the light
of the planetesimal hypothesis, concluding that the moon was never part of the earth and separated
therefrom by too rapid rotation of the Earth, but that the distance of the two bodies has always been the same as now.
The more massive Earth has in its development throughout time robbed of the less massive moon in the gradual process of accretion.
So the moon has never acquired either an ocean or atmosphere, and this view is acceptable to geologists,
who have studied the sheer lunar surface, Shaler of Harvard among the first,
inlaid the foundations for a separate science of selenology.
Tidal friction has also been operant in producing sun-raised tides upon the early plastic substances which compose the planets.
More powerfully in the case of planets nearer the sun.
Less rapidly if the planet's mass is large.
Also less completely if the planet has solidified earlier on accounts of its small dimensions.
So Darwin would account for the present rotation periods of all the planets.
Both Mercury and Venus powerfully acted on by the sun on accounts of their nearness to him.
and their rotational energy completely exhausted, so that they now, and for all time, turn a constant face toward him, as the moon does to the Earth.
Earth and possibly Mars, even yet undergoing a very slight lengthening of their day.
Jupiter and Saturn, also Uranus and probably Neptune, still exhibiting relatively swift axial rotation,
because of their great mass and great original moments of momentum,
and also by reason of their vast distances from the central Tirezen body, the sun.
by applying to stellar systems principles developed by darwin c accounted for the fact to which he was the first to direct attention that the great eccentricity of the binary orbits is a necessary result of the secular action of tidal friction
the double stars then were double nebulae originally single but separated by a process allied to that known as fission and protozoans indeed poinca ray proved mathematically that a swiftly revolving nebulae
in consequence of contraction first undergoes distortion into a pear-shaped or hour-glass figure the two masses ultimately separating entirely and the observations of the herschels lord rossi and others with the recent photographic plates at the lick and mount wilson observatories
afford immediate confirmation in a multitude of double nebulae widely scattered throughout the nebulae regions of the heavens genes of cambridge england
Among the most recent of mathematical investigators of the cosmogony
balances the advantages and disadvantages of the differing cosmogonic systems as follows
in his problems of cosmogony and stellar dynamics.
Some hundreds of millions of years ago, all the stars within our galactic universe formed a
single mass of excessively tenuous gas in slow rotation.
As imagined by Laplace, this mass contracted, owing to loss of energy by radiation,
and so increased its angular velocity until it assumed a lenticular shape.
After this, further contraction was a sheer mathematical impossibility and the system had to expand.
The mechanism of expansion was provided by matter being thrown off from the sharp edge of the lenticular figure,
the lenticular center now forming the nucleus, and the thrown off matter forming the arms of a spiral nebula of the normal type.
The long filaments of matter which constituted the arms, being gravitationally unstable, first formed into chains of condensation,
about nuclei, and ultimately formed detached masses of gas.
With continued shrinkage, the temperature of these masses increased until they attained to incandescence
and shown as luminous stars. At the same time, their velocity of rotation increased until a large
proportion of them broke up by fission into binary systems. The majority of the stars broke away
from their neighbors and so formed a cluster of irregularly moving stars, our present galactic universe,
in which the flattened shape of the original nebula may still be traced in the concentration about the galactic plane,
while the original motion along the nebular arms still persists in the form of star-streaming.
In some cases, a pair or small group of stars failed to get clear of one another's gravitational attractions
and remain describing orbits about one another as wide binaries or multiple stars.
The stars which were formed last, the present B-type stars,
have been unusually immune from disturbance by their neighbors,
partly because they were born when adjacent stars had almost ceased to interfere with one another,
partly because their exceptionally large mass minimized the effect of such interferences may have occurred.
Consequently, they remained moving in the plane in which they were formed,
many of them still constituting closely associated groups of stars, the moving star clusters.
At intervals it must have happened that two stars passed relatively near to one another
in their motion through the universe.
We conjecture that something like 300 million years ago,
our sun experienced an encounter of this kind, a large star passing within a distance of about
the sun's diameter from its surface. The effect of this, as we have seen, would be the ejection
of a stream of gas toward the passing star. At this epoch the sun is supposed to have been dark and cold,
its density being so low, and its radius was perhaps comparable with the present radius of
Neptune's orbit. The ejected stream of matter, becoming still colder by radiation, may have condensed
into liquid near its ends, and perhaps partially also near its middle.
Such a jet of matter would be longitudinally unstable, and would condense into detached nuclei,
which would ultimately form planets.
End of Chapter 60
Chapter 61 of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
This is a Libravox recording.
All Libravox recordings are in the public domain.
For more information, or to volunteer, please visit,
Librevox.org.
Read by Andy Glover.
Astronomy.
The Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
By David Todd.
Cosmogeny in Transition.
We have seen how Wright in 1750 initiated a theory of evolution,
not only of the solar system,
but of all the stars and nebulae as well.
How Kant, in 1752, by elaborating this theory,
sought to develop the details of evolution.
evolution of the solar system on the basis of the Newtonian law, though weakened, as we know,
by serious errors in applying physical laws. How Laplace in 1796 put forward his nebular hypothesis
of origin and development of the solar system, by contraction from an original gaseous nebula,
in accord with the Newtonian law. How Sir William Herschel in 1810 saw an all nebulae
merely the stuff that stars are made of.
How Lord Rossi in 1845 discovered spiral nebulae.
How Helmholtz in 1854 put forward his contraction theory of maintenance of the solar heat,
seemingly reinforcing the Laplation theory.
How Lane in 1870 proved that a contracting gaseous star might rise in temperature.
How Roche in 1873 in attempting to modify the Laplation hypothesis.
pointed out the conditions under which a satellite would be broken up by tidal strains.
How Darwin in 1879 showed that the theory of tidal evolution of non-rigid bodies
might account for the formation of the moon and binary stars might originate by fission.
How Keeler in 1900 discovered the vast numbers of spiral nebulae.
How Chamberlain and Moulton in 2003 put forward the planetesimal hypothesis of formation
of the spiral nebulae, showing also how that hypothesis might account for the evolution of the solar
system, and how genes in 1916 advocated the median ground in evolution of the arms of the spiral
nebulae, showing that they will break up into nuclei if sufficiently massive.
In all these theories, truth and error or lack of complete knowledge appear to be intermingled
in varying proportions. Is it not early yet to say,
either that any one of them must be abandoned as totally wrong or on the other hand that any one of them or indeed any single hypothesis can explain all the evolutionary processes of the universe
clearly the great problems cannot all be solved by the kinetic theory of gases and the law of gravitation alone recent physical researches into subatomic energy and the structure and properties of matter appear to point in the direction where we must next look from what
light on such questions, as the origin and maintenance of the sun's heat, the complex
phenomena of variable stars, and the progressive evolution of the myriad bodies of the
stellar universe.
Because we have actually seen one star turn into a nebula, we should not jump to the
conclusion that all nebulae are formed from stars, even if this might seem a direct inference
from the high radial velocities of planetary nebulae.
Quite as obviously many of the spiral nebulae are in a stage of transition into local universes
of stars.
Even more obvious from the marvelous photographs in our day than the evolution of stars from
nebulae of all types was to Herschel in his day.
The physicist must further investigate such questions as the building up of heavy atomic
elements by gravitative condensation of such lighter ones as composed the nebulae.
laboratory investigation must elucidate further the process of development of energy from atomic
disintegration under very high pressures. This leads to a reclassification of the stars on a temperature
basis. Equally important is the inquiry into the mechanism of radiative equilibrium in sun
and stars. Not impossibly the process of the Earth's upper atmosphere in maintaining a terrestrial
equilibrium may afford some clue. What this physical mechanism may be is very
incompletely known, but it is now open to further research through recent progress of
aeronautics, which will afford the investigator a ceiling of 50,000 feet and probably more.
Beneath this level, perhaps even below 40,000 feet, lie all the strata, including the inversion
layer, where the sun's heat is conserved and an equilibrium maintained.
Even ten years ago, had an astronomer been asked about the physical condition of the interior of the stars,
he would have replied that information of this character could only be had on visiting the stars themselves,
and perhaps not even then.
But at the Cardiff meeting of the British Association in 1920, Eddington, the president of Section A,
delivered an address on the internal constitution of the stars.
He cites the recent investigations of Russell and other,
on truly gaseous stars, like Aldabarin, Arcturus, Antares, and Canopus, which are in a diffuse
state and are the most powerful lightgivers, and thus are to be distinguished from the denser stars
like our sun. The term giants is applied to the former, and dwarfs to the latter, in accord with
Russell's theory. As density increases through contraction, these terms represent the progressive
of stages from earlier to later in the star's history.
A red or M-type star begins its history as a giant of comparatively low temperature.
Contracting, according to Lane's law, its temperature must rise until its density becomes such
that it no longer behaves as a perfect gas.
Much depends on the star's mass, but after its maximum temperature is attained, the star,
which has shrunk to the proportions of a dwarf, goes on cooling and heat.
contracts still further. Each temperature level is reached and passed twice, once during the
ascending stage and once again in descending, once as a giant and once as a dwarf. Thus there
are vast differences in luminosity, the huge giant, having a far larger surface than the shrunken
dwarf, radiates an amount of light correspondingly greater. The physicist recognizes heat in
two forms, the energy of motion of material atoms and the energy of ether waves. In hot bodies
with which we are familiar, the second form is quite insignificant, but in the giant stars,
the two forms are present in about equal proportions. The superheated conditions of the interior
of the stars can only be estimated in millions of degrees, and the problem is not one of convection
currents, as formerly thought, bringing hot masses to the surface for the surface for the
from the highly heated interior.
But how can the heat of the interior be barred against leakage
and reduce to the relatively small radiation emitted
by the stars?
Smaller stars have to manufacture the radiant heat
which they emit, living from hand to mouth.
The giant stars merely leak radiant heat from their store.
So a radioactive type of equilibrium must be established
rather than a convective one.
Laboratory investigations of the very short way
are now in progress, bearing on the transparency of stellar material to the radiation traversing
it, and the penetrating power of the star's radiation is much like that of x-rays. The
opacity is remarkably high, explaining why the star is so nearly heat-tight. Opacity being
constant, the total radiation of a giant star depends on its mass only, and is quite
independent of its temperature or state of diffuseness, so that the total radiation of a star which
is measured roughly by its luminosity may readily remain constant during the entire giant stage
of its history. As Russell originally pointed out, giant stars of every spectral type have
nearly the same luminosity. From the range of luminosity of the giant stars, then, we may infer their range
of masses. They come out much alike, agreeing well with results obtained by double-star investigation.
These studies of radiation and internal condition of the stars again bring up the question
of the original source of that supply of radiant energy, continually squandered by all self-luminous
bodies. The giant stars are especially prodigal, and radiate at least a hundredfold faster
than the sun. A star is drawing on some vast reservoir of energy, says Eddington, by means unknown to us.
This reservoir can scarcely be other than the subatomic energy, which it is known, exists abundantly
in all matter. We sometimes dream that man will one day learn how to release it and use it for
his service. The store is well-nigh and exhaustible. If only it could be tapped. There is sufficient
in the sun to maintain its output of heat for 15 billion years.
End of Chapter 61.
End of Astronomy, the Science of the Heavenly Bodies.
By David Todd.
