Close All Tabs - My Therapist Is a Chatbot (Reload)

Episode Date: May 6, 2026

What happens when your therapist is… a chatbot? For KQED health reporter Lesley McClurg, it started with a late-night spiral over dating. Instead of texting a friend, she opened ChatGPT and got the kind of calm, reassuring advice she needed. It worked… maybe a little too well. Lesley joins Morgan to dig into the rise of AI therapy, why so many people are turning to chatbots for emotional support, and what they might be risking in the process. These systems promise something traditional mental health care often can’t: instant, affordable, judgment-free access. But there are limits and, sometimes, serious consequences.  Note: This episode includes discussions of suicide and mental health conditions. Listener discretion is advised. This episode first aired on April 23rd, 2025  Guest:  Lesley McClurg, KQED health correspondent Further Reading/Listening: Can AI Replace Your Therapist? The Benefits, Risks and Unsettling Truths - Lesley McClurg, KQED The AI therapist can see you now - Katia Riddle, NPR  Woebot, a Mental-Health Chatbot, Tries Out Generative AI - Casey Sackett, Devin Harper, and Aaron Pavez, IEEE Spectrum AI Prophets and Spiritual Delusions — Close All Tabs  New Studies Reveal Mental Health Blindspots of AI Chatbots — Marlynn Wei, Psychology Today AI in the mental health care workforce is met with fear, pushback — and enthusiasm — Rhitu Chatterjee, NPR  Read the Transcript here Email us at [e-mail] Follow us on⁠ ⁠Instagram⁠⁠ and⁠ ⁠TikTok⁠⁠ Credits: Close All Tabs is hosted by Morgan Sung. Our team includes producer Maya Cueva, editor Chris Hambrick and senior editor Chris Egusa who also composed our theme song and credits music. Additional music from APM. Audio engineering by Brendan Willard. Audience engagement support from Maha Sanad. Jen Chien is our Director of Podcasts. Ethan Toven-Lindsey is our Editor in Chief. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This spring, denim gets a softer, lighter update. Introducing Old Navy's drapey denim wide leg, a new fit that moves with you. It's everything you want denim to feel like for summer. Easy, breathable, and effortlessly cool. With a fit that creates natural movement and a wide leg that feels modern, not overwhelming. Plus, that signature, wait, for this price, moment. Old Navy's drapey denim wide leg. Hey, it's Olivia Allen Price from the Bay Curious podcast.

You've probably heard that federal funding for public media has been cut. That's left KQED with an $8 million budget gap. So now, more than ever, we need your support. Please give whatever is comfortable for your budget and help keep programs that you love going strong. Visit donate.kud.org slash podcasts. From KQED. Hey, you're listening to Close All Taps, and I'm Morgan Sung.

is Mental Health Awareness Month. With the proliferation of AI tools over the last few years, many people have turned to chatbots for companionship, advice, and even therapy. It makes sense. Healthcare in the U.S. can be completely inaccessible, especially when it comes to mental health treatment. But in some cases, AI chatbots can put very vulnerable users in danger. In light of that, mental health has been at the forefront of conversations about AI use.

So today, for Mental Health Awareness Month, we're re-airing an episode that explores that exact topic. A quick heads-up. This episode includes discussion of suicide and mental health conditions, which may be distressing for some listeners. If you or someone you know need support, we'll have links to resources in the episode description. So I was going through a divorce and started dating after my divorce and hadn't dated in many years and came home after a date one night. and was just really anxious and kind of disheveled and needed some advice. This is KQED health reporter Leslie McClurg. I had used chat cheap E.T for other things and found it pretty helpful.

And I thought, what about for this moment of my life? And so I asked chat whether or not I should reach out to this person that I had just dated because I was feeling like the night hadn't gone that well. It was late at night. She didn't want to bug a friend about this. And really, she was feeling pretty vulnerable. She didn't want to be judged. And so Chat GBTGPT was right there, ready to cheerfully answer her questions.

I was surprised that it was so good. I just remember after, you know, a few back and forths, I realized that really I was just nervous. Really, I just needed to take a deep breath. Basically, I had created a big storm in my head. And Chat basically was like, hey, chill, relax. It could have gone well. There's another way this could have played out, not the sort of, uh, devastating reality that you're playing out right now, maybe give it a day or two and then reach out.

And so in that moment, it just sort of helped me take the gas off and come back into myself. It was exactly what she needed to hear at the time. I didn't text the person, which was the right call, and kind of used it as I warmed myself back up into the dating world. And it was really helpful. And so it made me then as a reporter start asking, should I be telling this thing all about my love life? Is this a good idea? privacy-wise, et cetera. And so that's where it sort of ceded my reporting going forward. Leslie isn't the only one turning to chat GPT for therapy.

If you've ever dealt with any health insurance company, you're probably familiar with the hassle of getting care. And mental health care is especially inaccessible. AI chatbots, though, they're convenient, cost little to nothing to use, and in Leslie's case, can actually be pretty helpful. But a lot of people are also wary of turning to AI for therapy. Can you trust it?

What are you risking when you share your most vulnerable thoughts with a chatbot? This is Close All Tabs. I'm Morgan Sung, tech journalist, and your chronically online friend here to open as many browser tabs as it takes to help you understand how the digital world affects our real lives. Let's get into it. Access to actual mental health resources has become so limited. cost and insurance aside, there's a shortage of licensed human mental health professionals across the country.

But can AI therapy really replace actual therapists? Okay, new tab. Does AI therapy work? Over the course of your reporting, did you meet anyone who actually used an AI chatbot for therapy? I actually talked to quite a few people who used AI therapy, and I went online and read a lot of Reddit threads because this is quite the popular. topic. I heard more positive stories than negatives. As a reporter, I wanted to illustrate someone who kind of had a nuanced experience, you know, good and bad. So Leslie found a woman named Lily Payne. She had kind of the ideal story to illustrate that, yes, it helped her, but it, but it wasn't ideal.

And so that was sort of like the character that I ended up, you know, focusing on. In your story, you mentioned that Lily had turned to AI therapy during the COVID lockdowns, which were a terrible time for a lot of us. But Lily wasn't just experiencing, you know, anxiety and depression and loneliness. Her situation was a little more complicated, right? Can you talk about that? Yeah, I mean, in her words, her life basically fell apart. She had graduated from college. She had moved to New York City to pursue an arts career. It was very excited. And if we can remember, New York was sort of the epicenter of the early days of COVID. It was really bad. Lockdown was really scary. And the hospitals were overflowing and it was not a good scene. And so she left her arts career, abandoned her dreams,

and moved back home, which was pretty painful to her parents' home in Kentucky. And she sort of tucked away and it just felt like a big failure. And she was really struggling with like, what's next for my life? Where do I go from here? It was such a lonely time for so many people. This is Lily. I was not at a breaking point, but I wasn't doing awesome. So I was like, the more help, the better. And so in all of that anxiety, she, you know, initially reached out and leaned on a lot of friends, but eventually she felt like she'd kind of warn those supports Finn. And so she read about Wobot, this AI therapy platform in a health newsletter. So I gave it a shot because it was like, why not? Everyone's cooped up in their house. I will talk to this robot.

Initially, it was really helpful. It did help her calm herself. I think she said she, you know, even just having it in her pocket helped her feel more in control in her life. I think she relied on it quite a bit in those early days to kind of find her ground again and be able to focus on reimagining a new life from there while she was back at home with her parents in Kentucky. It's worth noting that Wobot is a therapy-specific AI chatbot, and it doesn't use generative AI to respond to users the way that other tools like chatGBT or Claude or DeepSeek do. This means that its interactions with users are a bit more predictable. It's also engineered to respond to the way that a therapist might.

So instead of immediately jumping into offering advice, Wobot asks specific questions to encourage users to reflect and do the inner work themselves. Well, it was designed by a psychologist. And so from that perspective, it really is designed to focus on your mental health. The goal of Wobot is as a mental health tool, as a well-eastern health tool, as a wellness tool, I think, is how they market themselves. Wobot is designed to use a set of techniques called Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. You know, cognitive behavioral therapy helps you reframe your negative thoughts using specific exercises.

And, you know, I think as any CBT, which is what it's acronym is, it feels a little forced. But she did say it did help her reframe those negative thoughts and that she was able to think more positively. Yeah. Can you talk about Lily's other diagnosis that may be complicated this form of treatment? She has obsessive-compulsive disorder. And sometimes that makes her fixate on worst-case scenarios. Most of the time when people think about OCD, they think of just the very cliche, like, oh, you can't stop washing your hands.

You're afraid of germs. While that is a very real subtype that people experience, typically OCD, like, manifest. in really taboo intrusive thoughts, and then the physical compulsion stem from trying to keep those themes away. And so logically, you can know that, like, this doesn't make sense. It's not actually happening, but it just, it's not just in your head. Like, physically it feels so real. Lily is also diagnosed with anxiety and depression. A symptom of depression is suicide ideation eventually, right? So she fixated on the idea that eventually, because of her depression, that she may think about killing herself.

My brain would be like, oh, you've struggled with depression in the past. There's no saying that one day you won't want to go through with suicide. And so she mentioned that she was worried about suicide in a session with Wobot. And Wobot came back and had a crisis alert and said, hey, you better call the suicide hotline. And she said, no, no, wait a second. I'm not experiencing suicidal inclinations. I'm just terrified that I will. And luckily she knew that.

She understood her disorder enough to know that nuance and to know what was happening in her brain because she had so much previous therapy. But she said, you know, if she hadn't really understood her disease, having that crisis alert come up may have even added more stress. I would have freaked out and been like, oh my gosh, this thing that is supposed to have this mental health knowledge thinks that I am suicidal. I must be suicidal. I must be a danger myself. So, you know, in defense of Wobot, they came back and said, hey, we're not, you know, specifically targeting or for people who have OCD. We really are just a wellness tool. But her story illustrates where AI doesn't necessarily have the nuance, the understanding that a human, like a human therapist would have picked up on that. They would have understood that she had OCD and really understood the nuances of that. whereas in this case, Wobot didn't.

Right. It sounds like Wobot was inadvertently validating this intrusive thought that she was having because she has OCD. And when you're really depressed or anxious, it might be helpful for your feelings to be validated like that. But how does that compare to the recommended treatment for OCD? I mean, the recommended treatment for OCD is generally exposure therapy. So you expose yourself to whatever you're scared of. And so in this case, a therapist would work with her in terms of exposing herself to those ideas, probably walk her through, you know, reality, et cetera, in a way that allows her to lean in to her fears

so that they're not as scary and sort of wound up and keep going and sort of overtake her. Whereas you, like a therapist wouldn't stand up with a red flag and say, oh my God, you really are suicidal. Therefore, you should call her hotline, right? Which is basically what Wolcott did. Yeah. Lily's case is just one example of the limits of AI therapy. responding with a crisis alert wasn't helpful for her specific needs, but it's probably good that Wobot even has those guardrails in place.

But what happens when AI chatbots go off script? How bad can it get? We'll get into that when we come back. Support for KQED podcasts comes from San Francisco International Airport. At SFO, you can shop, dine, and unwind before your flight. Go ahead, treat yourself. Learn more about SFO restaurants and shops. at flysfo.com.

Support for KQED podcasts comes from Star One Credit Union. Give your savings account the love it deserves. When you keep your money with Star One, you keep more of your money. Star One Credit Union in your best interest. New tab. AI Therapy Worst Case Scenarios. So Wobot can't necessarily respond with the nuance of an actual human therapist, But it seems like it wasn't giving Lily bad advice.

But let's talk about examples of AI therapy doing the exact opposite of what it's supposed to do. What happened with the National Eating Disorder Association hotline? Yeah, that didn't play out very well. They created a bot named Tessa. And some of the users found that Tessa was giving them dieting advice. So these are folks who have, you know, anorexia, bulimia, and somehow Tessa's wires got crossed, and people were getting the exact advice

that would be really dangerous for their eating disorders. The recommendations that Tessa gave me was that I could lose one to two pounds per week that I should eat no more than 2,000 calories in a day, that I should have a calorie deficit of 500 to 1,000 calories per day, all of which might sound benign to the general listener, however, to an individual with an eating disorder, the focus of weight loss really fuels the eating disorder.

That was Sharon Maxwell, an eating disorder recovery educator, speaking to NPR about her experience with Tessa. So Nita, the National Eating Disorder Association, pulled Tessa down and said, this isn't working very well. And it sounds like they just didn't have that kind of guardrail in place, like they didn't anticipate that. So even if Lily didn't really need Wobot to immediately jump into crisis mode, at least it had that guardrail to say like, hey, crisis. But in the past, other AI chatbots have gotten into serious trouble for not responding to users' red flags and just validating their responses. And that happened in the case of Character AI, this AI app that lets users personalize an AI companion based on fictional characters, celebrities, historical figures, all that. Until a recent lawsuit,

Character AI did not have any safety measures or disclaimers warning users that they weren't talking to a real person. What led to this lawsuit? Yeah, there was a 14-year-old who grew really attached to his character that he had created. Like you said, character AI lets you create a character and then interact with that character. And not surprisingly, kind of like I did in my first experience with chat GPT, it feels so good that you develop a little bit of an emotional connection. And so this 14-year-old did that over the course of several months. And then he started opening up about some of the distress that he was feeling. and the character, instead of steering, you know, this 14-year-old towards help, unfortunately, the bot allegedly reinforced some suicidal thoughts. And eventually the boy ended up taking his life. And so the lawsuit, exactly, it's really kind of horrific. And it's not the only one like this.

There's only a handful at this point, but it really is raising the red flag that these very empathetic responses are sort of like, you know, parroting back. which is, again, what some AI does, can play out really, really poorly. In January, 26, Character AI agreed to settle multiple lawsuits that alleged that the chatbot contributed to mental health issues among teenagers. Other companies have faced similar lawsuits after several users died by suicide, allegedly at the encouragement of chatbots. So what happened with the eating disorder hotline and character AI, those are pretty extreme cases.

Will most people actually experience those worst case scenarios in your research? Did you find anything about that? Or is it just like, are these just edge cases? I mean, we don't have numbers yet. I think it's really early in the arc of this technology. I think the experts are most worried about platforms that are like character AI, where you are building a relationship with a character, in their defense, they're not built as mental health tools, right? These are not marketing themselves as mental health tools. They are,

you know, marketing themselves as, hey, here, we're going to give you a friend. Yet, you know, like a friend, like you and I probably do with our friends, we lean on our friends, we talk to our friends, we build emotional connections with our friends, we trust our friends for the right advice, right? And these are robots. So that relationship is not, you know, built on human connection. And like we can see, it can go wrong. Another concern that I have, you know, as a tech reporter, is privacy. ChatGPT, for example, isn't HIPAA compliant. Could you explain what HIPAA is and why it's necessary with medical information? Yeah, I mean, HIPA is the regulation that keeps all of our data safe. So when you go to the doctor, a doctor is required to keep all of your medical information

totally private. It's not going to be given anywhere. It's not going to leak away. That is the privacy regulations. Now, some of these platforms, you know, for example, like WoBod, Rosebud is one, which is a platform that's more like a journaling service. You know, they say they're HIPAA compliant, but there's no one regulating them. It's not like the American Medical Association is regulating them. So that data, you don't really know where it's going. You're trusting these companies who are profit-driven. Hopefully, Wobot and Rosebud are following their own promises to their consumers. But there might be other companies that definitely chat cheap E.T is not promising that they're HIPAA compliant.

And that information is being used as being put out there to retrain the model. And so, hopefully they're not going to sell your data to advertisers. Also, I mean, the kind of a worst case scenario, this fortunately hasn't happened yet, but, you know, what if your mental health information gets out there and insurance company gets wind of that and your premiums start going up because they know that you're struggling with something. So, you know, again, that hasn't happened yet. But those are sort of like the worst case scenario. Right. Exactly. Yeah. Obviously the priority of pretty much any for-profit company is to monetize. But do AI companies have any incentive to improve as more people turn to their products for therapy, even if they aren't necessarily mental health-specific chatbots? You know, are there better safety measures, more transparency about data collection, especially given the character AI lawsuit? I think they have that incentive. They also have the

incentive to keep you hooked. So I think that's the sort of like fine line. We've seen that with all social media, right? They're getting a lot better at keeping our attention. AI companies have the same needs and incentives to keep people coming back. And so, you know, I think it's going to be a gray area. And it's going to be, unfortunately, like the social media companies, it's going to be really up to the creators of these products on whether or not they're going to have a really ethical orientation. Despite all of these issues, therapy is so inaccessible that, unfortunately, AI chatbots might feel like the only immediate tool that people have when seeking treatment. How did we get here? Let's open one last tab.

The Mental Health Care Crisis. You had mentioned earlier the state of mental health care. Why is it so hard to see a therapist? Yeah, I mean, the demand for mental health services is really at an all-time high. and it's surged even more, you know, since the pandemic began and continues to do so. I think there's something like one in five Americans have some kind of a mental health issue, and yet they have a significant barrier to getting to a therapist. I mean, I think it's 55% of counties.

People don't have access to a psychotherapist or a social worker or a psychologist. There just aren't any in that area. And so, you know, I think because of this issue that these sort of mental health deserts, AI is a kind of natural fill-in. It's available 24-7. You don't need insurance to get there. You don't have a high deductible. You don't have to prove anyone that you have a mental health condition. You don't have to get accepted. So it's easy and accessible. And I think that it will mean that more and more people are going to use this. And hopefully they'll be well-informed consumers. Yeah. You know, given the shortage of providers and like you mentioned, insurance issues, since the pandemic started, telehealth therapy has become pretty popular. But I've seen a lot of complaints about these kind of quick one-size-fits-all mental health care platforms like BetterHelp, which matches users with licensed therapist or cerebral, which sets users up with a psychiatrist that can prescribe medications like antidepressants or ADHD meds. And both of these services were created to kind of fill this void that you're talking about, but at the same time, they're kind of plagued with their own issues. It seems like making therapy quick and accessible isn't always as easy as it seems. What do you think? I think there's absolutely a role for telehealth. I think there's absolutely a role for AI therapy.

I think anyone would probably say that having a really heartfelt connection with a therapist in an office, live human, feels different than if you are talking to a screen. And the, emotional repair that can happen in that session with a live human, I think is different and potentially more profound than with a robot. That might change over time. I don't know how good these things are going to get. They already feel a little bit too good for my own comfort, but they might get even better. You know, same thing. I think the telehealth model at this point is pretty early. I think they're still refining how well those things work. I think it's similar with AI therapy. And, you know, I think the, the tricky thing here as well with any of these

technological solutions is that we are also living in a pretty isolated way in our lives right now. If you're taking even like your therapy to a computer, that's one less human that you're interacting with. And maybe your, you know, mental health issues are because you're dealing with isolation with estrangement, with disconnection. Those feelings might even become more escalated if you're, you know, using telehealth or using AI therapy. I saw both responses and reflections when I was reading these Reddit threads, you know, from people who were in rural places. I know that they were feeling more isolated using an AI therapy and others who said, you know, it was a godsend because I was so alone. At least someone was listening to me.

For your story on AI therapy, you talked to a bunch of a psychologist and real-life human psychologists and, you know, someone from the American Psychological Association. Are human therapists concerned about being replaced by AI? I don't hear that from them yet. Number one, they're still really in high demand. So I don't think they're feeling that crunch yet. There's still a shortage. They're still a huge shortage. And I think they're fairly confident that what they offer is different than what AI therapy offers. And, you know, they can pick up on subtle cues that AI can't say like body language or, you know, pace of speech. These things can reveal a lot about our mental health state. And AI can't pick up on that stuff. And in the deeper bonds,

the deeper attachment work that you might do in therapy, I think therapists are quite confident that they're still better at that. So in this moment, I would say they're not especially worried. We've talked about the downsides of AI therapy pretty extensively. But you had mentioned that they can kind of be a tool in a bigger treatment plan while also seeing a real therapist. If someone is going to use AI therapy, how should they approach it? Yeah, yeah. I think that's the message I hope comes across in my reporting is that, you know, there are these worst case scenarios. Again, I think that the consumer should be educated on how their data is going to be used and understand how the company operates so that they're not sharing really vulnerable information.

but I think as a sort of, you know, addition to your yoga, your meditation, your, you know, walks in nature, I think AI can really be a self-regulation tool. And I think it can be used quite well. You know, I talked to one company, Rosebud, which is a kind of journaling platform, which it asks you questions to kind of inspire you to express whatever's going on and help you reflect. And it can follow a thread. So if you mentioned something, you know, two weeks ago about your relationship and what was going wrong, it will check in with you about what is happening and help you make sense of that. And I was on it. You know, I'm not a huge pen and paper person. You know, I don't write anything anymore, so my arm hurts really quickly. And so I enjoyed, you know, like, I just would pick up my phone and I would journal just, you know, talking to it. And it would ask me questions. And it felt, you know, fairly similar to a conversation with a friend. And I would always feel quite a bit better afterwards. So, and that sense, I think it can be quite helpful because, you know, maybe I'm in therapy once a week,

but I'm having a panic attack on Monday night and my, you know, appointment's not till Thursday. I think in that sense, you know, it's 4 o'clock in the morning. I can't call a human therapist no matter what, even if I'm, you know, do have one, you know, to sit down and have the opportunity to have something that's engaging me, I think can be really helpful. I'm really curious. Since you started reporting on the story, have you used Chachi BT, not necessarily as a therapist, but, you know, as this kind of mental health tool that you're talking about since? I wish I had the positive spin to be like, yes, I'm relying on it all the time. You know, I didn't and I don't. I felt a little bit like one more thing to do. And I felt similarly, you know, we talked about Lily at the beginning

of the story. And the reason that she stopped using WoVOT was not because it, you know, had the crisis alert or it sort of like poorly dealt with her OCD, she got tired of being on her phone. She was like, I didn't want to be on my phone anymore. I wanted to talk to someone. And I feel that. But, you know, that was kind of my reasoning, you know, because of my job, I'm on a computer, you know, nearly all day long. And I didn't want one more thing on the computer or one more thing on my phone. I can imagine, you know, if I was going through a really tough time again, you know, turning to it. Luckily, I've been a bit of a good moment. So I haven't been using it. Yeah. You can unplug.

know. Exactly. I'm going to enjoy it at this moment and ride the wave of goodness. Thanks again to KQED's Leslie McClurg for talking with us about this story. You can check out more of her reporting on health care, including this story on AI therapy at KQED.org. Again, AI therapy tools work best when they're used in addition to treatment under a licensed professional. But if it's the only option accessible to you right now, there are AI tools. specifically designed for mental health and wellness that might be more useful than the general chatbots like chat chabit or quad. For now, let's close these tabs. Close All Tabs is a production of KQED Studios and is reported and hosted by me, Morgan Sung.

This episode was produced by Maya Cueva and edited by Chris Agusa, who also composed our theme song and credits music. The Close All Tabs team also includes editor Chris Hambrick and audio engineer Brendan Willard. Additional music by APM. Audience engagement support from Mahasanaad. Jen Cheon is our director of podcasts, and Ethan Tovin-Lin-Linsey is our editor-in-chief. Some members of the KQAE podcast team are represented by the Screen Actors Guild,

American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, San Francisco, Northern California, local. Keyboard sounds were recorded on my purple and pink, dust-silver K-84 wired mechanical keyboard with Gator-on-red switches. If you have feedback, or a topic you think we should cover, hit us up at close all tabs at kQED.org. And if you're enjoying the show, give us a rating on Apple Podcasts or whatever platform you use.

Thanks for listening. I am Sasha Koka. I host the California Report Magazine. We bring you in-depth personal stories about your neighbors, your communities, and the issues affecting all of us as Californians. But the future is powered by you. If you've been listening but haven't donated yet, now is the moment. Make your gift today at donate. kweed.org slash podcasts.