Dan Snow's History Hit - A history of (American) occupation in Greenland

Episode Date: January 8, 2026

This isn't the first or even second time the U.S has made moves to procure Greenland in the last 160 years. President Donald Trump has stepped up his rhetoric, now saying that the use of US military is ‘always an option’ to annexe the autonomous territory. Currently part of the Kingdom of Denmark, an American takeover of Greenland would pose a serious crisis for NATO. But how much authority does Denmark have to protect Greenland? Why does Trump want it, and why are there already American troops already stationed there?In this episode, first released in January 2025, Dan and Professor Robert Rix from the University of Copenhagen trace the occupation of Greenland from the first Vikings to the arrival of the Americans in the mid-20th century, as well as explain its relationship with Denmark and explore previous attempts from American administrations to acquire it.You can discover more about the history of Greenland in Robert's book 'The Vanished Settlers of Greenland: In Search of a Legend and Its Legacy'. Produced by James Hickmann, Mariana Des Forges and edited by Dougal Patmore.Dan Snow's History Hit is now available on Youtube! Check it out at: https://www.youtube.com/@DSHHPodcastYou can also email the podcast directly at [e-mail] up to History Hit for hundreds of hours of original documentaries, with a new release every week and ad-free podcasts. Sign up at https://www.historyhit.com/subscribe. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Hi, Von. Welcome to Dan Snow's history hit. A Republican president has his eyes on Greenland. He assumed that with Alaska secured, if Greenland was brought in, well, then Canada would be surrounded and bow to the inevitable and join the United States of America. And yes, folks, you guessed it. I'm talking about 1868. Donald Trump is not the first. US policymaker to fix his eyes on Greenland. The US tried again in 1910. In 1930, the Danish prime minister had to announce publicly that Greenland was not for sale. It didn't stop the Americans, though. In 1946, they made an offer to buy it again. Greenland matters. It's important for its geography. It's a gigantic island with an absolutely tiny population. It's part of the North American continent geographically. And it reaches far into the Arctic Circle. So now thanks to

global warming, the waters around the coast of Greenland are increasingly ice-free and able to be exploited. Resource extraction and shipping are becoming ever easier. And as we know, the gaze of many Northern Hemisphere nations have been drawn to the Arctic. It's a new zone of opportunity, a new zone of conflict. But as you'll hear in this podcast, many of these modern currents, They're not so modern, they're not new. There are important echoes here. I was lucky enough to talk to Professor Robert William Ricks. He's at the University of Copenhagen.

He's written a brilliant book, The Vanished Settlers of Greenland in search of a legend and its legacy. And he's could explain to me how one of the smallest nations in Europe, Denmark, end up ruling one of the world's largest islands on a completely different continent. We're going to go all the way back

to the original settlement by Inuit people. We're going to talk about its discovery by the Norse. hopefully there'll be those of you listening to this who are enjoying my latest series on our history at TV channel when I visit Iceland and talk about the settlement there and indeed the settlement of Greenland as well. So this part of the story might be familiar to you. The settlement of Greenland was the start of a connection with Norway, which as you're about to hear, morphed into a link with Denmark, which is why today President Trump is addressing his remarks about Greenland to Denmark and why the Danes have received.

responded robustly, and they've changed their royal family's coat of arms to more prominently feature Greenland. They've got a polar bear on that coat of arms now, which is Danish for Bring It On. Now, I first released this interview in 2025. Obviously, Greenland is back in the news now. It's a pretty turbulent time in the Western Hemisphere, so I thought it would be good to re-release this podcast, re-release this conversation. And I guess the big lesson I took from it is that rangles over Greenland are absolutely nothing new. But I also learned perhaps that Donald Trump might be able to might be addressing his remarks the wrong audience. The question is, who does decide the fate of Greenland?

Listen to find out. T-minus 10. The atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima. God save the king. No black white unity till there is first than black unity. Never to go to war with one another again. And lift-off, and the shuttle has cleared the power. Robert, thank you so much for coming on this bizarre podcast.

Well, thank you for having me, Dan. It's an honor to be here. Let's go all the way back. Let's go all the way back. When do humans first set foot on Greenland, any humans, no matter where they're from? First time human foot was set on Greenland is some 4,500 years ago. So these would be Paleo-Arctic people who entered from what is now Canada into Greenland. So they were there on and off. And there was a number of people. that we know about, the Dorset, the Tully people, and some of them would be ancestors of what's now as the Inuit, indigenous population there. Are they always on the move? Are they putting down roots? In what sort of ways are they living? Yeah, these were nomads.

So they would travel, they would have hunting grounds, and they would move from place to place. So depending on whether it was summer or winter, they would go to different places in Greenland. They would be, you know, some places for an extended period of time, but then move on depending on where they could hunt. So that would be the case. Robert, we should talk about that climate.

It's pretty important in the Greenland story. It's a place where historically humans have been only just able to survive, a place right on the margin. So I imagine that every change in our climate, every fraction of a degree warmer or cooler, it really makes its mark on attempts to survive, to thrive in Greenland. Absolutely. I mean, this is very much an interesting.

part of Greenland history. Basically, the only inhabital parts of Greenland are the coastal areas. So these are ecological pockets. And you can do a little bit of farming there, as the Norse people would do. And you could live there sort of rather comfortably. But climate, as you say, was extremely important because when we get to the Middle Ages and the first sort of Norse settlements in Greenland, they would come there because they could farm the land.

They could have, and this was during the medieval warm period, so a warm period between 9.50 and 1250 approximately. So this would be a welcome climate at the time. And part of the reason why the Norse people left Greenland was also because it got increasingly colder in the 13th century. Right. Well, let's get into that now. Let's get into the arrival of the first Europeans.

What's your best guess about why and how people from Europe end up in Greenland? Well, at least according to the sagas, I mean, they are true. We know that the first person to really take an interest in Greenland was a very colorful character called Eric the Red. He was an Icelander, and he was accused of murder. He got into other squabbles, and at one point he was banished from Iceland. And he sought out this place in Greenland, a place to settle as he was banished for three years, and I thought this would be a place where I could establish a new colony. So part of the propaganda exercise, he sold this as the Greenland.

And the sagas are quite clear about this, that this was to attract other settlers to come to Greenland. So this is in 986. This is the year in the sagas given for Eric the Red's settling on Greenland. And this led to quite expansive settlement, north settlement from Iceland in Greenland. These are not sort of officially sanctioned. This is not officially government-led colonization. These are freebooters heading across the ocean by themselves, are they? Absolutely. Absolutely. So there's no official colony of that sort of comes later because the Norwegian king takes an interest in Greenland. And at some point, and we know this to be 1261, King Hawkinson, Hawkinson, establishes Greenland as some kind of protectorate. It's a little unclear from the sources what this meant. But if we take the parallel of Iceland, we know that this was really guaranteeing shipping routes, which would obviously be important for trade.

There may also have been some kind of protection. We know that at least for Iceland, there was a number of English pirates who came there to fish and also to loot the coast of Iceland. And presumably something similar could have happened in Greenland. At least there are stories told about. this. And in some of the records, we know that pirates did came to Greenland's coast and looted and presumably also kidnapped people. You're not going to believe this. But here in Britain, we're raised on stories of Scandinavian pirates. We call them Vikings. Are you trying to tell

me, the Norwegians are raised on stories of English pirates, ravaging the coastline, taking slaves and taking booty away? At least we know in the early 15th century, there is a record of one of the leaders in Iceland was kidnapped. And he was in English prison. And he writes a letter to the English king at this time, arguing that really the English pirates had wreaked havoc in Iceland. And we also know that at least eight Icelandic children were traded as slaves in Norfolk in 1429. So maybe not raced on these stories, but we can find documentation that English pirates did come to Greenland. So yes, kind of reverse Vikings. So we got, as a result of Eric the Red, we have.

have people originally who took their lineage back to Norway. They're now in this place, Greenland. It's not sort of government sanctioned initially. It's around the year 10,000, so around 1,000 years ago, extraordinarily. And how are they surviving? Are they bringing European methods of ways of life with them? They are fishing, they are hunting, certainly. There might have been a little bit of Eurocentric as well.

That might have been something that's accelerated their exit from Greenland as well, when it became a little colder because farming was also part of their trade. And that may have been a little more difficult as the climate got increasingly colder. So, yes, they had sort of Eurocentric ways. We also know a little bit about from archaeological digs. They fashion, they sported at the time, which was a European fashion. So they still kept in contact with mainland Europe throughout the colony's existence. Eventually, the Norwegians establish a kind of crown protectorate over the area.

Yes, they do. And this becomes part of the story of the Danish possession of Greenland. Because what happens in 1397, which is known as a Kelmer Union, is that the Queen Margaret I of Denmark, establishes some kind of countermeau to the Hanseatic League. So these commercial and defensive network of merchant guilds and market towns in central northern Europe, in order to counter that, she establishes a Nordic community. So basically the kingdoms of Sweden, Denmark and Norway are united and then under the Danish succession.

So at that time, the overseas colonies, the Norwegian overseas colonies are transferred to Denmark. And that becomes really the origin story of why Denmark is now in, impossession or why it's a part of it, a part of Denmark today, because of that. The unification of Norway and Denmark, I mean, continues obviously after the Kalmer Union becomes defunct. And until 1814, Norway and Denmark are seen as a united, so they are united kingdom under the Danish crown. And when Denmark has to seat Norway to Sweden in 1814, following a defeat in the Napoleonic Wars. It's quite clear in the Kiel Treaty at the time

that the overseas colonies, Norway, Iceland included, will still belong to Denmark. Let's just finish off the story of those settlers, for whom I'm sure Norway and Denmark were both a long way away. Does the colony sort of ever, does it become lost? Does there's a bit of a faintly romantic or mythological idea about the end of this colony? What happens to those settlers in Greenland?

The communication with the settlers in Greenland discontinues after 1410. The last record we have of the Greenland colony is a ship leaving in 1410 after a wedding in the eastern settlement. And after that, there are no records of any communication with Greenland. We simply don't know what is happening there. And it leads to all kinds of speculations. One speculation is that they're all been killed because at this time, maybe it's important to emphasize that when Eric the Red came to that southern part of Greenland, it was empty

land. So it didn't take the land from anyone. But over the centuries, the ancestors of the Inuit moved down from Canada to reach at least first the hunting grounds in the north and then later to the settlements in the south. And we do have records of skirmishes between the two peoples. So there must, there could have been some violence involved, which have been. made life in more difficult in the Greenland colonies. Pirates, the climate, overfishing is also a possibility.

After 1410, there would have been a colony there, but it probably would have discontinued around 1450, maybe a little later. We don't know how it came to an end, that these are the bombastic visions, dystopian visions, of all the Norse Greenlanders dying from the cold or from starvation. Probably that didn't happen that way. This was a time when the plague was in Europe and lands would have become available in Norway and in Iceland.

So presumably, some of these Norse Greenlanders just thought, well, there's a better option for me back in Iceland, and they might have hitched the rides where they've boats and went back to Iceland. Fascinating. So the European people of European descent disappear from the Greenland story in around 14. Right about that time, yes.

Which is so tantalizing because it's just a one or two, it's a generation before the Europeans will go back to the Americas, this time pursuing a very different route a long way to the south, but extraordinary. So it's almost this brief gap where the Americas are European free. When do Europeans return to Greenland? So there's several attempts to reach Greenland, but because of internal and domestic problems in Scandinavia, it doesn't actually really have to. until the early 1600s. So King Christian IV launched three expeditions to Greenland. And this is basically to reclaim Greenland for Denmark. And it's still with this imagination that there are these rich colonies full of gold,

full of resources. And resources must really be the headline here because as we move on, This will also be a theme or throughline in much of what's sort of Greenland significance for Europeans as resources. But this time, Christian VIII is interested in finding the eastern settlements because of resources, because of trade. But that is to say, presumably fishing would still have taken place in the intervening years. At least we know when Denmark establishes a colony in 1721. There are several boats already trading with the indigenous Greenlanders. So when the Danes come there, they realize that especially boats from the Netherlands have systematized trade along the coast.

And that becomes a real problem. And also a spur for the Danes to re-enter Greenland because they need to get a check on this trade, thinking that this is our land and we need to profit from it. So in 1721 is the recolonization of Greenland. These ships are coming back with their holes full of raw materials, are they? Not at this time. No. I mean, it's quite a disappointment. This fantasy alive, that just beyond the horizon, there's gold. There's something to be found. There's this kind of the forests of Greenland

described in the old texts will still be there. We just need to reach that eastern settlement. You're listening to Dan Snow's history. Talking about Greenland. Not coming up. Is there also a sense, like in the Scramble for Africa later on, is there a scramble for the Americas going on? Is there a need by in European capitals to just start planting flags, even if initially there isn't a strong economic argument for doing so? Absolutely. So go back to Christian IV and his early 17th century expeditions. I mean, this was really brought on by the fact that Martin Frobyshire, the English, the explorer, had reached what is now Canada and brought back what initially was thought to be very precious metal, but turned out just to be completely valueless, or that had no gold content in it.

So it is a competition at this time. It continues to be so. And certainly the Netherlands, also Britain, would sort of buy for possession of Greenlands, especially Greenland waters. whaling, it becomes increasingly important. And we must think of the greenland waters as some kind of almost the parallel of the modern-day oil fields. Because whale blubber is such a commodity that it is something that you really, you'd do anything to gain sort of access to these waters because whale blubber is used for lamps, for oiling machinery. So it becomes an industry at this time to find whale blubber. And this is also what you trade with the indigenous Greenlanders.

But whaling becomes so important at this time. So yes, there is this is European competition. And everything the Danes do is to curtail any kind of other European involvement in Greenland and Greenland waters. Norway is joined to Sweden, but Denmark keeps Greenland. That's right. That's right. In the 19th century, the Americans appeared to have made an attempt to secure Greenland. Who'd have thought it? Tell me about that attempt.

So we're in 1867, and there are numbers of very interesting parallels at this time because the U.S. Secretary of State William H. Stewart, who had just negotiated the purchase of Alaska for the U.S. He also has his eyes on three Danish islands, the West Indies. So that's St. Thomas, St. John and St. Croix. And there's been Danish colonies and been part of the triangular trade, trading sugar and slaves. But we're no longer profitable at this point. So there's this idea that the US could purchase these three islands from Denmark. And in this annexation frenzy, both Greenland and Iceland entered the discussion as a kind of way to guilt the expansionist lily.

And a report is produced at this time for the U.S. government and also published. And this is gushing over resources. So there's fishing, there's coal, and there's a mineral called cryolites, which we can come back to, which becomes very important. But there's another thing that's sort of an echo of history here, because we just look at the recent pronouncements by Donald Trump, that it's not only Greenland. He also wants to make Canada part of the, as a 51st state of the U.S. And this is also a point here in the report because the report says that if Greenland could be bought for the U.S., it would induce what's called a peaceful and cheerful handing over of Canada, what's now Canada, to the U.S., because it would be sandwiched between Alaska, Greenland and the U.S. So this would surely make Canada a state of the US. So this is kind of probably misattributed to Mark Twain, where you say that history is rather fond of briming.

But we certainly see kind of, as Donald Trump in the same breath, mentions Canada and Greenland, this is something that's been mentioned before. Does that come to anything? It doesn't come to anything because the purchase of the three West Indies or the West Indian Islands falls through. At that point, it's seen as that Greenland would probably not happen either. So an offer is never really made. Through the rest of the 19th and early 20th century, what's the Greenland story? Well, there's a growing interest, American interest in throughout the century, the 20th century, early 20th century, an interest in Greenland. And to begin with, again, the theme is resources, but increasingly it becomes security.

And that's also how Trump sort of couches this today. It's for security reasons. So we know that in 1910, at least security takes center stage. There's at this time a fear among the Americans that the Prussian expansion may lead to a takeover of Denmark. And that would also mean the takeover of the three West Indian Islands. And since this is very close to the Panama Canal, it's thought that it would be a good idea to buy the West. Indies. Now, the calculus is that the Danes should be sweetened into selling the West Indies, so it doesn't fall into the hands of Germany. So there's this scheme, which is quite intricate,

which is that Denmark should give over Greenland to the US. In return, Denmark should receive a southern group of the Philippines, or islands in the Philippines. Denmark should then surrender these islands to Germany, because Germany had an interest in becoming a leading power in that part of Asia. In return, Germany should give back Denmark the northern part of Schleswig, which it had lost. So this is the idea. And after that, if the Americans could set this in motion, they thought that that would sweeten the Danes to then sell the West Indian Islands, again, because that would mean that they could keep control of the Panama Canal. They aren't sold at this time in 1910, but they are sold in 1917. And they're sold in 17.

This is, again, a fear during the First World War, that this could be used for German submarines. A submarine station could be constructed there. So, yes, in January 1917, the Danish government, Celsius island to the United States for 25 million krona. And there's an interesting thing here because one of the conditions for selling the West Indies is that the U.S. should acknowledge Denmark's right to Greenland. And U.S. falls short of ever doing that. But this was really part of the original demands, but it's never affected, it's never manifest in what happened at the time. So that's so fascinating. So what we now know is that the US Virgin Islands were, in fact, Danish territory that was sold in 1917. They were sold in 1917. And Greenland, I think, is still very much on the agenda. We had a few records of this, and we know that rumors were still banded about that US would potentially buy Greenland at some point.

point. So in 1930, the Danish Prime Minister, Torquistowning, comes out actually saying very publicly, Greenland is not for sale. So we have been down this road before. So it's a kind of continuing interest from America in buying Greenland for security reasons. You're listening to Danson's history. Talking about Greenland. What coming up? So you mentioned security, obviously very important, but also particularly the 20th century, industrial exploitation of raw materials, looking for new centres of resource, increasingly being seen as an economic asset as well? Certainly in the 20th century, and I just briefly mentioned cryolites, which is Israel

mineral, which has been mined in Greenland and commercially mined until 1987. Criolite is used in the production of aluminium. And this becomes very important in the 20th century and certainly during the Second World War because it's used for manufacturing of fighter planes, for instance. So there's a huge trade with the US. And after Denmark is invaded by Germany in 1940, it becomes very important to protect that production of cryolite.

So what happens here is a source. super interesting story. There's a, the Danish ambassador to the U.S., a guy called Henry Kaufman. He basically goes rogue because he strikes his deal with the U.S. that the U.S. could come in and protect the Danish colonies. This is obviously not what the Danish government wants at this time. They've been occupied by Germany. So they can't agree to this. So they basically accuse Kaufman of high treason. But he doesn't. established this agreement with the U.S. and U.S. servicemen, they do travel to Greenland and protect, especially the Krilyte mine, but also some of the stations there, the airports.

The fix there is that they basically resigned from service and they then sign up as volunteers to create this fiction that the U.S. is not, in fact, invading Greenland. But they do protect the mine there, the production of Krilylights, which should not fall into the hands of the German obviously. They also use the air bases there. So Greenland will be a hub for refueling from at least 10,000 planes during the World War II landed in Greenland. There's also a place from where you could protect the ships going to Europe. So it becomes a very important place, Greenland. And one other a little twist maybe is what's called the Weather War. Basically on the East Coast, there were stations, weather stations

because being able to forecast the weather was extremely important for knowing when to launch a mission as also used for D-Day, obviously, just a few days where the climate was clement enough to launch that mission. But throughout the years of the war, there were Germans established weather stations, so the clandestine weather stations,

then the Danes or U.S. established other weather stations so they could forecast the weather of skirmishes there or shoot at each other, and that's known as the weather war. So for many reasons, tactical reasons, Greenland was extremely important during the Second World War and basically given over as a U.S. protectorate during the time when the Danish government was hamstrung. So that's a hectic few years.

So the Americans who are effectively running Greenland hand it back to Denmark at the end of the war And the Danes like, thank you very much now please leave. And the Americans are like, well, we don't know. We're not going to leave. And until Denmark enters NATO, that's a curious position. It is a curious position. And there's this problem with the US presence. And the US at this time already realizes that Greenland is extremely important. And do they offer to buy it again at the end of the war? Is they chuck in a quick bid then just in case? In 1946, the Secretary of State, James F. Burns, offers Denmark $100 million, this is under the Truman administration. They flirted with the idea of swapping Greenland for some of the Euritzland in Alaska that never came through. And this has been kept as secret, as it were, until recently. Okay, so we've got Greenland then becomes a really essential part of the West. NORAD's anti-ballistic missile posture, there's important bases there, there's monitoring stations

there. I mean, it's fully integrated into North American defence at that point. It is indeed. And what you had in Greenland at the moment is what's the beaded thick space base, which was formerly and perhaps better known as the Tully Air Base on the Northwest Coast, built in 1951. And that still serves, as you say, as an early warning stationed for ballistic missiles. It also tracks satellites, hence the names at Space Base. And it also aims to track, and this becomes increasingly significant as the ice is melting in the Arctic, to monitor Chinese and Russian ships off the coast. So yes, this base is very much part of the, part of American security. I think after Trump held this conference, Denmark has now stepped up its security investment

in the Arctic. So they're now going to increase the Arctic security because if Trump has a point, I mean, this part of the world becomes significant. And I think had he couched this in slightly different terms, so he said that this is what America needs. America needs Greenland because we need to take care of American security interests. Had he said that this would be for the interest of the West's or liberal democracies, this would have been perfectly aligned with the Danish and Greenlandic interests. Meanwhile, what's going on with the relationship between Greenland and Denmark. Yeah, if we go back and to look at the

constitutional arrangement, in 9th, the Greenland is a colony of Denmark until 1953, when Greenland is cooperated into the Danish state. So, this is something that is maintained to this day. There's what's called the unity

of the realm, of the Danish realm, really consists of three entities. So there's Denmark proper, the mainland, Denmark. There's Greenland, and there's the Faroe Islands. And in 1953, basically, Greenland becomes a province. But the unity of the realm, in 1979, Greenland is granted its home rule, and that's expanded in 2009 to become self-rule. That means that Denmark, or the Danish government, has very little, if any, say, in domestic

issues in Greenland. So this is where Trump goes wrong, because he says that Denmark should sell Greenland. And that's simply not for Denmark to sell. Greenland is completely devolved. Greenland Parliament has 31 members. So selling Greenland would first sort of entail a discussion between Greenland and Denmark about whether there should be independence. Then independence should be ratified by some kind of referendum. And then the Greenlanders should decide to sell themselves to America. So it's simply not for, it's a constitutional setup here. It's not for Denmark to sell Greenland. It's simply as impossible as it would be for Westminster to sell Scotland without any involvement

of Holyrood. Well, that's an interesting point. I guess it's the place to leave it, that the Danish position is that the people of Greenland are effectively sovereign. If they choose to pursue independence, for example, there's nothing constitutionally to prevent Denmark from having that conversation. Absolutely. As of 2009, Greenland is given a way to achieve independence.

Denmark also signed the indigenous and tribal people's convention in 1996, which acknowledges the Inuit as a people, and therefore also the inherent right to self-determination. So it's basically in the agreement that if the Greenlanders want independence, they can have it. And I think this is the trajectory. I mean, this is what the Greenland people want. At least four out of five parties, political parties in Greenland, want independence. The problem is it will be a bit of a rocky road, simply because of the economy. So unless Greenland pivots the economy, perhaps with American investments in mining, it will be very difficult. The Greenland economy is propped up by Danish what's called a block grant to the tune of 5.7 billion Danish crown,

which is equivalent of £6.84 million. pounds. So it's quite significant for population of 56, 57,000 people. So it will be difficult to achieve independence straight away. But I think that is the long-term prospect for many Greenlanders. Thank you very much indeed for coming on the podcast and talking all about that. That's absolutely phenomenal. Tell everyone what your book is called, for which you've already been on the Gone Medieval podcast. That's right. That's right. The book is called the Venice settlers of Greenland in search of a legend and its legacy. Well, thank you very much, Robert Ricks, for coming on the podcast.

Well, thank you very much for listening, folks. It does seem like Trump is trying to exploit the pro-independence sentiment in Greenland. It's a game that the US has played before. It reminds me a little bit of Texas in the 19th century. But for now, Denmark still controls Greenland's foreign and defense policy. And in response to Trump's heightened threats, the leaders of Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, the UK, they all released a joint statement on the 6th of January saying, it's for Denmark and Greenland and them only to decide on matters concerning Denmark and Greenland.

But all this does overlook one very key fact here, and those facts on the ground. There are quite a lot of US troops already in Greenland. And as Robert said, it would in principle be pretty easy, I think, for the US to pose legitimately elected. government in the Greenland capital of nuke and just take over, exploit Greenland's natural resources as it sees fit. And this really matters, not just in the North American context, but of course for NATO. Imagine if we see the sending of additional European military forces to nuke to support the existing structures, to reinforce air sea and land defences there. That would be an extraordinary signal. The very country that NATO has relied on to provide

a defensive umbrella for over 75 years would now be the one that Europe is protecting itself from. Absolutely extraordinary. Interestingly, we have a statement from Greenland's Prime Minister, Jens Friedrich Nilsen, and he has said, enough is enough, no more pressure, no more innuendo, no more fantasies about annexation. Well, watch this space, folks. We'll have to wait to see. Thanks so much for listening. I hope this gave you a bit of helpful backstory. Make sure to subscribe for more episodes like this. that help you get the history behind the headlines over the coming weeks.