Dan Snow's History Hit - How to Survive a Medieval Crusade

Episode Date: January 7, 2025

What would it have been like to go on a medieval crusade? What dangers would you have faced on the gruelling journey to the Holy Land, and what would it have been like once you arrived?Dan and Matt Lewis, host of the 'Gone Medieval' podcast, discuss the logistical nightmares, deadly battles and harsh conditions faced by crusaders, and the brutal realities of these Church-sanctioned religious expeditions.Produced by James Hickmann and edited by Max Carrey.Sign up to History Hit for hundreds of hours of original documentaries, with a new release every week and ad-free podcasts. Sign up at https://www.historyhit.com/subscribe.

On November the 27th, 1095, Pope Urban II delivered a particularly impassioned sermon. Watching him, hanging on his every word, was a large group of French nobles and clergymen in Clermont. In the sermon, he talked about the terrible violence in European society, the necessity of maintaining peace, the peace of God he called it. And then perhaps in order to achieve that he subtly changed tack. He talked about helping the Greeks in the east, i.e. the rulers of Constantinople, from the Muslim superpower that dominated what we now call the Middle East. He pointed out those Greeks had been asking for assistance. He pointed out that in the Middle East, terrible crimes had been committed against Christians. And then he laid out his solution to all of those ills.

A neat solution. A new kind of war. Armed pilgrimage. His nobles in the audience should cease fighting, quarrelling amongst themselves, and instead unite and head east to take on the infidel, the Muslim lords of the Near East. He promised anyone who would die that they would die a pilgrim, their sins would be remitted, they would be rewarded in heaven.

The crowd roared back, Deus Vult, God wills it. And that really was the start of the Crusades, a series of campaigns in which large groups of warriors left Europe, marched or sailed east and tried to re-Christianise the Holy Land. Now, some of these crusades were well-funded. Some of them were led by dukes and counts and kings. Others were organised on a wing and a prayer. But all of them really had one thing in common.

They were absurdly dangerous. Your chances of getting home were not great. It was dangerous getting there. Even the superhuman, the legendary Frederick Barbarossa, he drowned or somehow died in a river in Turkey on the way to the Holy Land, and he was by no means alone. The terrain, the heat, disease, shortage of food cost the lives of thousands of crusaders before they ever even set eyes on the holy sites. It was dangerous being in the Holy Land. It was dangerous being a foot soldier, because it always is, but it was even dangerous being powerful. In 1119, the Battle of the Field of Blood,

Roger of Salerno had three and a half thousand men around him, killed, hacked down, stamped beneath the feet of the Muslims. And he was among the dead. One of the great lords of the Holy Land, Raymond of Poitiers, he was killed in battle. His head presented to the legendary Muslim commander Saladin. It was dangerous even being away from the front lines. Conrad of Montferrat was killed by assassins just after he'd been elected King of Jerusalem on his way back from the baths. It was also dangerous coming home. English King Richard I, Richard the Lionheart, was shipwrecked.

And folks, those are the rich people. Some of the accounts of the normal people that we know about are harrowing. In the very early 1200s, a 12-year-old Stephen of Clois, he managed to attract large gangs of youths. He convinced them he was a miracle worker, he convinced them he was touched by the divine. They ended up leading thousands of young people to Marseille, telling them he'd take them to the Holy Land. They survived by begging for food along the route.

When they arrived in Marseille, two merchants offered them to take them to the Holy Land and promptly sailed them off to Tunisia and sold them into slavery. At the same time, oddly, it must have been a fashion, another spontaneous kind of bottom-up crusade was organised by a shepherd in Germany who led thousands of men across the Alps. Two-thirds of them died on that crossing of the Alps. They arrived in Italy where he promised that God was going to part the waves and allow them to walk to the Holy Land. God did not part the waves. Nicholas died crossing the Alps on his way home. The big question is, how on earth do you survive a crusade? It's a question I think many of them would like to have known. It's sad for their sake they can't have listened to this podcast because we're going

to answer that question. I've got Matt Lewis on the podcast. He is the host of our sibling podcast, Gone Medieval. He is the presenter of our recent programme on Richard III, in which experts recreated the voice of Richard using his skeleton, using what we know about linguistics in medieval England, to come up with what they think is a pretty accurate version of the voice of Richard III. It's an amazing documentary. Please go and check it out on History Hit TV. Please go and subscribe to that.

But in the meantime, folks, here is Matt Lewis telling us how to survive a crusade. Useful stuff. T-minus 10. Atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima. God save the king. No black-white unity till there is first and black unity.

Never to go to war with one another again. And lift off, and the shuttle has cleared the tower. Matt, thanks for coming on the podcast, buddy. Thank you very much for having me, Dan. I suppose, you know, we all think of the Crusades and the battles and the politics, but let's just talk initially. I mean, it's a big old journey at the time. I mean, was that something people remarked upon? Was just the adventure, the

journey of just getting to the Holy Land part of the challenge? It's definitely part of the big logistical challenge. So going on pilgrimage to the Holy Land has always been something that's important. And you're talking thousands of miles of travel. So small groups of pilgrims trying to do this have always had their challenges to face, to even get to the Holy Land. You know, it's a lot of travel through lands that aren't always entirely friendly. We get to kind of the First Crusade happening

and you're now talking about armed forces of thousands and thousands moving like locusts across Europe making for the Holy Land it takes on a whole new dimension I think just even trying to get to the Holy Land the logistics of moving those kinds of numbers of people that kind of distance well okay let's pick up on the locust thing is there a sense that some of the European places in the way were not particularly grateful for these great swarms of people transiting across their territory? Or did they behave themselves and pay for all their food? For the most part in Europe, they are keen to pay for their food. They're travelling across

Christian lands, so they don't really have an interest in upsetting all of these neighbours at this point. But the logistics do become a massive issue. The best estimates that we have say something like 50,000 to 60,000 people are travelling, and that's around about 7,000 knights, and then all of their squires, servants, all of those kinds of things. You can add on to that that each knight will have three horses. He'll have the palfrey that he's riding, the comfortable horse to ride, he'll have the war horse that he wants to ride into battle on,

and he'll have a pack horse that's carrying all of his stuff. So if there's 7,000 knights, there's 21,000 horses probably. And all of those have to be fed and watered. There would be a train of carts behind them. Each of those carts has two oxen pulling it. So each of those two oxen is then going to be fed and watered as well. So you have to imagine that these huge forces would be arriving, hoovering up any spare food and access to water in a local area. There must have been kind of inflationary bubbles following them around as they just landed somewhere, bought up any spare food that was going on. It must have driven prices up through the roof. And then they move on to the next kind of town, the next stopping point. And they do the same thing again. Now, they can't really take food with them that won't perish for more than a fortnight, so they can fill up all of their supplies, but they're going to have to

keep buying more and more stuff along the way as they go. Yeah, and that's a key point, right? Today, we are used to logistics, canned food, frozen food, dried food. You can transport it around the world. You can bring your own food with you somewhere. What we're talking about here really is local sourcing of supplies. Are we realistically? Yeah, absolutely. And I think we tried to do a bit of maths on this a little while ago. And if each person wants about a kilogram of food, and if each horse wants about nine kilograms worth of food, and then you've got to add in some oxen and things like that, you're talking about 14 about nine kilograms worth of food, and then you've got to add in some oxen and things like that, you're talking about 14 articulated wagons worth of food

following this army around all of the time. That's being consumed every day. So you've got to refill that volume of food every day. So if you can, you know, 14 articulated wagons full of bread and grain and all of that kind of thing, it must have caused absolute chaos in the places that they visited. Some crusades famously were better funded, I suppose, better organised, you could say, than others.

There's a few that are sort of terrifying. The Children's Crusade, which we might come on to. But tell me, what was the People's Crusade like? The People's Crusade was utter chaos. So this was, the Pope has preached the First Crusade in kind of 1095. It's taken a little while for the noblemen to gather what they need. There's an issue for the nobility in terms of funding it, but also who's looking after all of your lands while you go? You know, if you've got someone trustworthy who can take care of all that stuff while you're not

going to be there for a long while. So we see people like Robert, the Duke of Normandy, the oldest son of William the Conqueror, will mortgage Normandy to his brother, William II of England, for 10,000 marks to raise money for the Crusades. So there is a long process for these men to organise themselves and their forces. And in the crusading fervour that's been whipped up by the Pope, you get a lot of ordinary people who think, well, we don't have those issues. We could just all go to the Holy Land right now and get the job done. Isn't this brilliant? We don't have to wait. So you get this guy called

Peter the Hermit, who nominates himself as leader of this huge group of people, to tens of thousands of people, who then decide to plough off across Europe. They make it a fair distance, but then they get to Hungary and they realise they don't actually have any food left. They begin pillaging, they begin trying to steal food and all of that kind of stuff. They fall out with the Hungarians, who clearly don't like this. There ends up in a massive battle and most of the people of the People's Crusade are killed by soldiers in Hungary. So they don't even make it out of Europe in their effort to get to the Holy Land and they are torn to shreds. And then this causes another problem for what's called the Prince's Crusade

that follows them, the noblemen that are behind them. Because when they get to Hungary, all of a sudden the Hungarians are like, woo, woo, woo, woo, we've seen this before, you are not welcome. And it takes them weeks to negotiate entry even into Hungary. So just getting out of Europe is problematic and potentially deadly. People die inside the bounds of Europe trying to go on crusade. We should finish off the poor old people's crusade, because then some of them amazingly managed to get out of Hungary, having committed various atrocities and got in trouble with everyone and pogroms against

jewish people and communities they did get to constantinople and then the the ruler of constantinople knew a dodgy thing when he saw it and could have transported them immediately got them into asia minor where the well some of them made it quite a long way really but they didn't last longer no that's it you know i think you can see in Constantinople, the emperor is kind of, you know, seeing what you've done in Hungary, just carry on through, carry on through, carry on through, gets them into Asia Minor.

And for ordinary people, you know, they're now in a completely foreign climate, unfamiliar landscapes and surroundings, don't really have a clue what they're doing, lost a lot of their numbers, really struggling for leadership at this point. And anyone that made it that far probably doesn't make it too much further.

The thought that only a couple of thousand people ever made it back to Europe. So Matt, let's talk about the better funded crusades now. Even getting across Europe, very challenging. Would they have marched all the way on foot or would they have used the Mediterranean and tried to go by ship? So there are lots of potential ways to solve the issue of all of these people moving through the land of Europe. There were different routes that could be taken. So you could split the army up to minimise the

impact that they're having on hoovering up all of that food everywhere that they visit the two main options that you have are the sea route or the land route so on the first crusade lots of people prefer the land route so they do march across europe they can you know diverge and take slightly different routes to to make sure that there's reasonable access to food and things like that you do get a few who make their way so robert duke of normandy will make his way down through Italy and will board a ship there and sail across the Mediterranean. Poor Robert misses out on the Crown of England

when his brother, William II, dies. I think he's making this journey and in that case going back from Crusade. It's not just the dangers of the journey, but the opportunities you might be missing out on back home. Yeah, and that's all the issues that the nobles have with who's taking care of your lands while you're not there. You know, can you trust someone

or are you going to leave a massive dispute and come back? So Robert had made an arrangement with his brother, William II, that if either of them died without heirs, they would succeed. So if William II died without an heir, Robert should be King of England. When William is mysteriously shot

in a hunting accident in the New Forest, Robert is still on his way back from the Crusades, and it's their little brother Henry who's standing there going, well, this looks like an opportunity. And so if Robert had been on the spot, he would most likely have been King Robert I of England. But the fact that he's gone on Crusade has cost him the crown of England, and he will end up fighting his little brother Henry

and eventually spend the rest of his life in prison. He will end up fighting his little brother Henry and eventually spend the rest of his life in prison. He'll spend decades as his brother's prisoner. So going on crusade has cost him an awful lot back at home. And the journey would cost many even more. It cost them their lives. So we got Robert going by boat from Italy. And that was quite a common route, was it? Not so much in the First Crusade. So they preferred the land route in the first crusade but as the crusading goes on so by the second third fourth crusades people are using the sea route an awful lot more so richard the first of england on the third crusade will take ship and go through the mediterranean and it becomes a more preferred method of travel as the crusades go on but in in the First Crusade, it was predominantly

travel by land. And is there a big attrition rate? I mean, do you see, is it like that wonderful map of Napoleon's army entering Russia in 1812? Do you see a huge number of people starting off and quite a small number of people arriving as people drop by the wayside? It's not too bad for the Prince's Crusade in Europe. So they get to Constantinople, you know, they converge on Constantinople, and there you've got the Emperor Alexios, who is the man who has asked for the help. So he's the cause of the Pope preaching the Crusade. Alexios has said, we're struggling, we're about to be overrun, we need some help. So this army arrives, and Alexios has imagined that he's going to have control of a bunch of mercenaries who are there to do his bidding. What he actually gets is an incredibly motivated army

with its own leadership and its own agenda and its own aims who just kind of want to march through Constantinople and get on with the job at hand. So part of what the army was expecting was lots of support from the Byzantine Empire, from Emperor Alexios, but because he's not quite got what he expected, he's less willing than he might have been to help them out. So they're losing a kind of local ally who they were relying on to back them up with lots of knowledge and lots of extra men and all

of that kind of thing. So again, they're marching into different climates, different territories, things that they're not used to. People have been on pilgrimage to the Holy Land, but that's very, very different to going there for a war. Does Western European armour work in a desert, hot environment? Can you fight in those kinds of things? Do Western European military cavalry tactics work in the mountains of the Near East? You're going up against a foe at that point. Once you cross the Bosporus and you get out of Europe, you're fighting a foe who know that landscape, who know how to operate in it, and you very definitely don't. So you see lots of ambushes in the mountains and things like that. So even the journey to try to get anywhere near Jerusalem

becomes incredibly dangerous and people are lost along the way. Again, lots of people don't make it to Jerusalem. Well, you've mentioned the warfare there. Let's get to the battlefield. If we survive the journey, somehow you've managed to get to the Holy Land. We have this sort of vision of the Crusades, don't we? It's a particularly brutal clash of civilizations. I mean, you've come on the podcast and done a wonderful series with me about the Wars of the Roses. Do you think that's true? Was there something particular about the violence? Was no court given? Was it a very dangerous theatre of war? I think it was because it has that religious element to it. You know, you are fighting people who, from the previous year when the Pope has

preached the Crusade, Muslims have been othered. And from the Muslim point of view, you've suddenly got this Christian army invading what you understand to be your lands, your territory. So you do have a kind of really vicious edge to this. There is no need to give quarter. The Pope has told you that if you go and kill Muslims, you will go to heaven. All of your sins will be forgiven and you'll go to heaven. So there is a real motivation for the Christian army to seek out and kill as many Muslims as they possibly can.

They've been told that they're doing God's work. The counter to that, I guess, is that during this period, pitched battles are still not really a thing. So in Western European Christian military training, they will teach you to avoid battles wherever you can because they're way too unpredictable. And if you're moving into territory that you don't know very well, that's kind of doubled. So warfare in Europe in this period will rely an awful lot on sieges, siege warfare. And that's what the Western Christians will take to the Holy Land with them. So the First Crusade in particular is an awful

lot about sieges of cities along the way that they will try to capture. And even that, you know, that brings with it its own difficulties and challenges. The biggest problem for an army of this size on campaign in the medieval period is disease. So if you sit outside the walls of a city for weeks and weeks and weeks with a small camp that you need to be able to defend, with all of the toilets inside it and all of the sweaty men and everything else that's going on inside the camp, it's kind of a breeding ground for disease. So while you're sitting outside this town trying to starve them to death and deprive them of water and cause them to surrender, you're actually facing all of your own problems as well. And we see a big attrition rate

for disease in the camps during the period. So the spiritual leader of the First Crusade will die when there's an outbreak of plague in one of the Crusader camps during a crusade. Obviously, when they dig a hole to bury him, they find a piece of the true cross in the hole that they dig. As you do, you know, you have to find things like that on crusade, don't you? You listen to Dan Snow's history. Don't go anywhere. There's more to come.

I'm Matt Lewis. And I'm Dr. Eleanor Yonaga. And in Gone Medieval, we get into the greatest mysteries. The gobsmacking details and latest groundbreaking research. From the greatest millennium in human history. We're talking Vikings. Normans.

Kings and popes. Who were rarely the best of friends. Murder. Rebellions. And crusades. Find out who we really were. By subscribing to Gone Medieval from History Hit. Wherever you get your podcasts. Find out who we really were by subscribing to Gone Medieval from History Hit,

wherever you get your podcasts. So your guess is that you might die of disease than go down fighting in battle against Muslim forces. Yeah, and once they're in foreign territory and hostile territory as well, the army were then relying on being able to pillage food and things like that. But they find that those supplies are really, really scarce. So what the people in the regions are really good at is hiding their food out of the way. So they simply can't get access to as much food as they thought they would. Water becomes incredibly scarce. They're trying to lay siege to cities

without very good, reliable water supplies of their own. So while they're trying to starve those inside the city, they're finding themselves hitting real, real problems. And I guess ultimately the measure of the attrition rate comes in the fact that when they actually get to Jerusalem and lay siege to it, the reports tell us that of the 50,000 to 60,000 people that left Europe, there were about 12,000 people left. So kind of 80% of the army doesn't make it to Jerusalem. Wow. I suppose some of those would have been left behind to garrison castles that they'd captured,

but that is a pretty big attrition rate, isn't it? Yes. Some will have gone home. Some have been left behind. So there are noblemen who are, Edessa and Tripoli and places like that are being taken, and people are trying to claim those, they will become the crusader states. They're trying to build their own little landed areas there. So they're staying behind with garrisons. Some may have been invalided home and things like that. But the bottom line is that 80% of those who left Europe don't get to Jerusalem to lay siege to it. Crikey.

And then that siege was a bloody affair. There were some battles, weren't there? Like Hattin, I've often thought, if you offered me a time machine, I would specifically not go to the battlefield of Hattin in 1187. An astonishing defeat in horrific conditions for the Crusader army and enormous casualties. Yeah, and somewhere like hattin you know it lays bare the kind of the arrogance of the the christian crusaders in the holy land i guess you know they saladin is well aware that he can lure them away he can mock them

and whatever else lure them away from their water supplies and stuff like that they traipse out into the middle of the hot desert and it takes away all of their advantage you know there's a lot of templars involved in Hattin they're considered the the elite fighting force of the Christian armies at that point but they're not enough to save the Christians at Hattin and what Saladin has done is exploit the weaknesses that he can see in the Christians he takes them away from their water sources away from anything they're familiar with, and then just crushes them completely and utterly. But yeah, I think it probably exposes a little bit of arrogance on the part of the Christians who think,

well, you know, we're here now, we know what we're doing. And they clearly really don't. And all the Templars, I learned from your podcast, Matt, all the Templars at the end of that battle, all of them captured, lined up and executed by the Islamic commander, Saladin. Yeah, and that's kind of as a mark of all of them captured, lined up and executed by the Islamic commander Saladin. Yeah, and that's kind of as a mark of respect for them almost, because they are viewed as the elite fighting force of the Christian army and the ones that Saladin won't allow to go back and take up

arms against him again. But a lot of the time, as you say, microbes do the job for the Muslims. But is it the Seventh Crusade, Louis IX in Egypt, they land in Egypt on the Nile, and they just sit there and are decimated by disease. Terrifying. Yeah, so this is a constant problem for armies in Europe. We see plenty of Western Christian leaders dying of disease in Europe. Henry V will die of dysentery that he contracts on campaign. So disease is kind of a never-ending problem for them. And

the 9th Crusade will suffer. They go with the aim of conquering and crushing Egypt, and essentially just sit there and wither away. Does your social status matter? I'm guessing it helps to be richer. It does, in that you probably have first access to the food and the water and all of that kind of thing so i would say much like being in europe being at home the wealthier will be the first to be better looked after so if food becomes incredibly expensive because it's scarce the wealthier you are the more food you can still afford to buy and it's those further down the the scale the the foot soldiers, the ordinary people,

the hangers-on around the camp, who are going to suffer first and suffer most. And is there, I mean, medical provision? I mean, did doctors do more harm than good? Or do you think there was a bit of wisdom around that would have helped some people take on these diseases and avoid them if they could afford it? Yeah, medical provision was pretty good. Again, if you're rich enough to be able to afford to have a doctor and a physician around. So I think medicine was probably in better shape

in the medieval period than we often give them credit for. They didn't understand germ theory, which is why you get so many issues with illnesses in camps. But they're not sometimes a million miles away. They understand that having so many men crowded together in dirty conditions isn't great. They're aware that bad smells can lead to illnesses, which isn't a million miles away from understanding germ theory.

But you always have to balance that against the practical reality of if you're in a hostile territory, you need to keep your camp as compact as you possibly can, but allow enough room for disease not to spread. It's always a difficult balance, and they very often get that balance wrong. We've talked about fighting there, trying to exist in the Holy Land, but there's all sorts of accounts in the Crusade of the journey back, whether retreating with the tail between the legs or even just getting back. I mean, it's

just as dangerous. It is. So, I mean, after particularly the first crusade, they take Jerusalem. It's pretty horrendous, blood running through the streets of Jerusalem. And then for a lot of people on the Christian side of it, they consider then that their pilgrimage is done. They're viewing this as a pilgrimage. They've been sent by the Pope to recapture Jerusalem, and then all of their sins will be forgiven and they're guaranteed entry into heaven. So having taken Jerusalem, your job is done and you can now go home. Some people remain in the Holy Land, but we're probably talking hundreds of knights out of those 7,000 that left Europe. If they think they can get a nice piece of land, so there'll be the Count of Edessa, there'll be the Prince of

Antioch, who in himself is a really interesting guy, the first Prince of Antioch, Bohemond of Taranto. Then everyone else decides that they want to go home. And you've then got the same problems that you had in getting there in reverse, except that you're now exhausted after a couple of years of fighting and trying to survive and exist in the Holy Land to try and get home. And I mean, the most famous example of problems getting home is Richard the Lionheart of England, who is captured on his way back home and imprisoned and charged kind of two years worth of income

for the English crown as a ransom to release himself. So there are potential issues for everybody just to get home again as well at the end of it. You listen to Dan Snow's history. Don't go anywhere. There's more to come. I'm Matt Lewis. And I'm Dr. Alan Orjanaga.

And in Gone Medieval, we get into the greatest mysteries. The gobsmacking details and latest groundbreaking research. From the greatest millennium in human history. We're talking Vikings, Normans, Kings and Popes, who were rarely the best of friends, murder, rebellions, and crusades. Find out who we really were by subscribing to Gone Medieval from History Hit,

wherever you get your podcasts. We should probably nod to the fact the most famous celebrity couple who went on Crusade and the Crusade was the breaking of them. You know what they say, travel it makes or breaks you. It certainly was the breaking of them, partly because of the reasons that we're describing. Talk to me about the King and Queen of France when they went on crusade together. So this would be the second crusade. We have Louis VII of France and his wife, Eleanor of Aquitaine, which is a name we probably don't need to say any more about. But Louis is quite a funny one in that there's a doubt whether he ever really wanted to go on crusade so much as he just wanted to go on pilgrimage to the Holy Land. He's an incredibly pious and devout man, not much of a soldier. He then thought, well, you know, I'll be

the first king to lead a crusade. But then the King of Germany hops on alongside him. So then I think Louis is a little bit like, oh, I wanted to be the only king. So then you've got problems of leadership going on around it and all of that kind of thing. They travel there together. We will get later stories that Eleanor rode with all of her women bare-breasted

all of the way to the Holy Land, which is just bizarre and weird and definitely never happened. I'd imagine the windburn would have been pretty atrocious if you'd tried anything like that. And then when they get to the Holy Land, we have this famous incident where Eleanor is accused of having an affair with her uncle Raymond,

who is Prince of Antioch, one of the Crusader states there. And this seems to be the result of Louis arriving there, Raymond of Antioch giving him some military advice about good targets, ways to approach this so that they can secure Jerusalem, and Louis ignoring him. And it seems like Eleanor was saying, well, hang on, we've got a guy here on the ground

who knows what he's talking about. We should hear him out and listen to his advice. And Louis utterly refuses to pay any attention to Raymond. And then it seems like because Eleanor took the side of her uncle over her husband, the only possible explanation that medieval chroniclers can come up with for this was that they were having an affair together. So we get this random story that Eleanor was sleeping with her uncle during the Second Crusade.

But then they will go on towards Jerusalem. There is an incident when they're crossing over a mountain. They call it Mount Cadmus. And the army gets a bit too strung out and they're attacked by Seljuk Turks who try to ambush them. Louis is almost killed. A couple of his bodyguards are killed during the fighting. And this is blamed on Eleanor

because one of her vassals is the man at the front of the army who's apparently been moving too far forward, strung the army out too much. So it's Eleanor's one of her vassals is the man at the front of the army who's apparently been moving too far forward, strung the army out too much. So it's Eleanor's fault that Louis almost gets killed on the crusade as well. Just to highlight as well the difference between the higher and the lower fortunes during this, after this incident Louis decides to take ship and sail down the coast with some of his men and sends the rest of the army to march on. And they end up getting ambushed all the way south. They lose vast numbers just on that march south. And then kind of Louis and Eleanor get off ship and go,

oh, that was a lovely journey. How's everybody else? And everybody else is not really very well. And Louis will essentially end up, he gets into Jerusalem, but only as a pilgrimage. So they will spend Easter in Jerusalem Jerusalem but there's no kind of military victory to this after Easter they will turn around and go home you know their marriage is looking pretty shaky by this point there's talk of them splitting up the Pope gives them a bed to

sleep in and blesses it and tells them if they spend the night in that bed they'll have a child and nine months later they do have a child but's a daughter. It's not the son that Louis wants. And that journey seems to have been the real catalyst towards the end of Louis VII and Eleanor of Aquitaine's marriage, which will break up kind of a year or so after they get back to France. So as you say, you know, travel can put a weight on the relationship as well. But happily, Eleanor then chooses the much better husband. She marries Henry II of England,

and that is the period when we see this vast Plantagenet empire stretching from Ireland all the way down to the Pyrenees. And Henry has an interesting crusader connection in that his family, so his granddad has gone off to be king of Jerusalem. And when Jerusalem is beginning to face lots and lots of problems again, later on in Henry's life, so towards the third quarter of the 12th century, the patriarch of Jerusalem comes to England to ask Henry, they bring the keys to the city of Jerusalem and ask Henry to go and be the king. It's the time of Baldwin the leper who's, you know, looking like he's not going to last too long. And essentially this family

connection of Henry to the crown and the fact that he is so devastatingly effective in Europe and such a powerful figure leads the patriarch of Jerusalem to literally go and offer him the crown of Jerusalem. And Henry just kind of says, no, thank you. But then we do see his son and eventual heir, you know, his second son who will eventually succeed him, Richard, kind of really gripped by that crusading fervour that his dad simply didn't seem to have. Well, unfortunately, he may have had a bit of fervour, but Richard and then his useless brother John

went and threw away that wonderful plantagenet patrimony, that wonderful empire. Anyway, we're digressing a little bit here. I should say, by the way, we mentioned Richard Henry II's son. He was captured on the way home and he was ransomed. Speaking of captives, if the Muslims captured crusaders, would they ransom them if they were wealthy enough or enslave them, kill them? What was the fate of those who survived disease, survived battle, but then fell into the enemy's hands? It varied and slightly depended on who you were. So as we've seen, the Battle of Hattin, the Templars are killed after the battle because they're simply too much of a threat to be allowed

to continue. So otherwise, noble prisoners might be treated with a bit more respect, they might be ransomed, there's a fair chance that you might well end up executing. And that was reciprocated. So the Christians were diabolical for slaughtering Muslims. Richard I is considered successful on the Third Crusade. He arrives at the siege of Acre, which has been going on for a couple of years. And the city falls within weeks of his arrival, and he's viewed as driving the victory at Acre. And he then marches south, has all of these military victories, appears almost unstoppable.

But he will end up slaughtering thousands of Muslim prisoners because cities refuse to bow to him, and there's issues around feeding and taking care of that kind of many prisoners. But he will end up slaughtering prisoners of war on a vast scale outside city walls in acts of cruelty. This is diabolical cruelty to people who consider to be othered from yourself. So I think prisoners on both sides could probably not expect too much mercy if they were captured. It does make you wonder whether people would have regretted their religious enthusiasm when they set out. I mean, is it possible to just make any estimates about

the chance of surviving a crusade? I mean, I know every crusade is different and people might want to stay and garrison a fortress, but if something like 20 or 15% of the original number that set out the first crusade actually arrived at Jerusalem, and that was a successful crusade, then can we speculate about some of the others? I mean, from that point onward, the second crusade is a disaster. The third crusade is kind of a score draw.

The Christians don't win, but they reach an arrangement with Saladin and withdraw from the Holy Land. And then the Crusades just start to go more and more wrong after that. So if only 20% of those who left Europe made it to Jerusalem, even if we allow for the fact that some may have been garrisoning towns along the way. So even if we stretch that to say maybe 30 odd percent of the people didn't die by the time the crusade got to Jerusalem and that was a positive successful victory and your odds after that go down I mean what we can say you've got a

one in five chance if you leave Europe of ever coming back that says something about the astonishing optimism of young males that they they think well, most of us will die, but it won't be me. Let's get on with it. Let's go. I say, if one in five is coming back, you better believe I'm going to be that one. Yeah. Astonishing. So more dangerous going on crusade than going over the top at the Battle of the Somme. It might well have been. I mean, it's a scary thought, isn't it? Amazing. Thank you so much, Matt, for coming on the podcast and talking all about it. People can go and listen to more, Matt, alongside his brilliant co-host, Eleanor Jarnager, on the Gone Medieval podcast, where you do a lot of this kind of thing, don't you, Matt?

We do. So we like to give overviews of medieval topics where we can, but we also like to get really deep into the weeds of it all too. So there is day-to-day stuff, there is the big battles and the big personalities. There are also the daily life factors of the medieval world, archaeological finds, new discoveries. We try to cover as much as we can of the greatest millennium in human history. Oh, well, hang on a second. And also your recent show was so great on History Hit, Reconstructing Richard III's Voice. That got a lot of publicity. Yeah. So this was the result. I mean, obviously,

anyone who listens to Gone Medieval will know that I'm obsessed with Richard III. But he's almost the kind of side benefit for me of this project. This was a 10 year long project to look at, if we've got someone's physical human remains, and we've got some material that they wrote during their lifetime, and we've got experts like that they wrote during their lifetime and we've got experts like Professor David Crystal who can talk about the original pronunciation, the way that words were said in the 15th century. Can we bring all of that together and get as close as we possibly can to hearing the tone, the pitch, the pronunciation of someone who would have spoken more than 500 years ago. And the project believe that they've got sort of 90 to 95% accuracy. When we die, the muscles on our face leave marks on our

bones and our skull that will tell you about the strength of facial muscles at the time at which you've died. And they can measure from the jaw and things like that, the space that's inside the mouth, the soft palate and the effect that that would have had on the tone and pitch of your voice. So this has brought together kind of history and science and technology and manuscripts and art. There is a digital facial reconstruction with facial movements and the voice layered over the top of it. It's been an absolutely incredible thing to be involved in

and to see all of those different disciplines coming together to give someone back their voice after centuries of silence. Well done, you, Matt. Such a great project. Thank you. Go and check it out, everyone.

It's on the History Hit TV channel. You go and subscribe. It's the world's greatest history channel. You get wonderful documentaries like that every single week of the year. Thanks so much for coming on the show, buddy. Thank you very much. you